Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 6, 2003CITY OF CENTRAL, POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 6, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. ~ Q Q Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 569 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Candy Fish, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, Connie Moczygemba, Rick Perry and Wayne Riggs III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of April 1, 2003, Planning Conunission Minutes B. Review and approval of April 15, 2003, Plarming Conmussion Study Session Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS A. The Planning Department will address the Commission concerning a land partition for the Pgs. 1 - 3 proposed skate park near the intersection of Fourth and Bush Streets. The property is identified by the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 11BA, Tax Lot 2200 acrd Map 37 2W 11BB, Tax Lot 8300. B. The Planning Department will address the Commission concerning a development Pgs. 4 - 5 phasing plan for the previously approved Pheasant Creek Estates Subdivision. "I'hc property is identified as Map 37 2W l OCB, Tax Lots 1900 and 2200. C. Public meeting to review a preliminary development plan fora 6 lot subdivision near the Pgs. 6 - 32 intersection of North Tenth Street and Crest Drive. The proposed Planned Unit Development is located in a R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district on Map 37 2W 03AD. Tax Lot 9300. D. Public meeting to review a site plan application that would allow the construction.of a Pgs . 33 - 49 commercial building at 431 South Front Street. The subject parcel is in a TOD-GC, General Commercial Zoning District and is identified on Map 37 2W 11BC, Tax Lot 4100. E. Public meeting to review a site plan application that would allow the construction of a Pgs. 50 - duplex behind the house at 833 Laurel Street. 'fhe parcel is located in the R-3, Residential 63 Multiple Family District on Map 37 2W 02CB,1"ax Lot 5000. F. Public Hearing to review applications for Conditional tJse Permit and Planned Unit Pgs. 64 - Development for the proposed 102 lot Beebe Wood Subdivision. The project is located 111 near the intersection of Hamrick and Biddle Roads iu a R-2, Residential Two Family zoning district on Map 37 2W O1C, Tax Lots 1400 and 1500. VII. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes April 1, 2003 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT APPROXIMATELY 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairman Chuck Piland, Rick Pery, Candy Fish, Paul Lunte, Don Foster, Wayne Riggs and Connie Moczygemba were present. Also in attendance were Matt Samitore, Community Plamier; and Ken Gerschler, Community Planner III. CORRESPONDENCE There was correspondence received relating to Item C. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve theminutes from theMarch 11, 2003 meeting. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Perry; yes, Fish, yes; Lunte, yes; Foster, yes; Riggs, yes; Moczygemba, abstain. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Public meeting to review a site plan application that woald allow the construction of two four-plex structures near the intersection of Manzanita and Third Street in the HMR, High Mix Residential District. The parcel has been identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7800. Planning Coniutissron Minuses ifpril 1. 2003 Page 2 Matt Samitore, Community Planner; presented the Planning Department Staff report. This area has been re-zoned as HMR, High Mix Residential. The proposed town home style fi~ur plexes meet the bare minimum density requirements. Each individual unit will range from 800- 1,000 square feet. With a zero lot line approval, it would require the applicant to purchase an easement. The Building Department has recommended that the building be moved in one foot on the Westerly property line, so that the entire over-hang of the building is only on the subject property. Every other aspect meets all the requirements for the T.O.D. zoning district. The parking and landscaping is above and beyond what is required. There was discussion about the position and accessibility for pick up of the trash receptacle. It was suggested that they look into moving it to where the receptacle can be emptied from the alley. The City will give the Sanitary Authority an opportunity to comment on the location. There were no public comments Commissioner Foster made a motion to adopt Resolution 567, approving the Site Plan application for two four plex structures located at 323 Manzanita Street, subject to meeting possible requirements from the Sanitary Authority ,and staff recommended conditions of approval (Attachments D and E). Commissioner Peary seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. B. Public meeting to review a fence variance application for properties located within the Brookfield Estates Subdivision, to construct fences within a special stream setback area that has been established adjacent to creeks within the City. The subject parcels are located in a R-1, Residential Single Family Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 37 2W lOBB.. There were handouts distributed to the Planning Commission, showing the fence code inconsistencies currently in place. Mr. Samitore began by stating that there are conflicting sections in the CPMC to amend for fences. Since a fence is not a structure by definition unless it is a block wall, it should be moved from the Building Codes section to the Planning Codes section. Fence variances would still go through the Planning Commission, however with the draft fence ordinance, it should reduce the number of future fence variance applications. Mr. Samitore explained that the draft fence ordinance was designed in a comprehensive matrix format (similar to that of the T.O.D. Design Standards). If the Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council, it is the intention with this draft, to set precedence, and to combine requirements/restrictions into one section, rather than 3 different conflicting sections. In the future, the City is going to probably require that developers would dedicate open space and walkways along creek beds, rather than having property owners back yards %nnnrng Cnnrn~iss'ion Minutes Apri! 1, 2003 Page 3 extend to the creek beds. There are currently 3 properties in Lindsey Meadows that conflict with current ordinances. Commissioner Piland opened the public portion of the meeting. Duane McCoy of 327 Donna Way, addressed the Commission. Mr. McCoy said he has 25 feet he can't utilize at this time. He would like to be able to use it He is in favor of the proposed new fence ordinance, however would like to see chainlink fences, it would be easier to remove than wood fences. Tod Mariman of 916 Mendolia Way, lives in a DeCarlow home by a detention pond. He lost a portion of his yard during the hard rains earlier this year. He is in favor of the new proposed fence ordinance, and in support ofbeing able to move the fence back. Mr. Mariman likes the vinyl fencing as opposed to wood fences. They are lighter than wood, if sections need to be removed, especially if the wood gets wet. There was discussion that the area of responsibility for homeowners to maintain extend to the edge of the water in creeks. Also, about whether people could putrip-rap or something similar in to help stabilize the creek banks. It was explained that this would require a DSL permit, and the process takes months. There are some types of trees and shrubs that do well by the creeks, to help protect the creek banks. We as a City are working on the types of trees and shrubs that work best for this. Marvin Evans of 321 Donna Way, stated that during the heavy rains, he observed the culvert on Grant Road, across from the Mornan Temple, where some flooding occurred, and feels that the existing culvert is not big enough to handle the water flow. Mr. Evans is in favor of the fence variance. Joanna Sousa of 353 Silver Creek Drive, said her being in favor of the fence variance would depend on whether or not the homes on the other side would be single story or two story. Ms. Sousa feels that if two story homes were built, it would eliminate the amount of privacy with the approval of this fence variance. In addition, Ms. Sousa would like to see that fencing materials used in the development are consistent. Theresa Kolpoc of 347 Silver Creek Drive, stated that she is in favor of the fence variance, because with some of those homes you walk out the back door and you are in the easement. Ms. Kolpoc said she wanted to install vinyl fencing and was denied, even though in Phase II she has seen three different types of fencing materials: cedar, vinyl and chainlink. She also would like to see consistency in the materials used. In further discussions about single story and two story homes, it was explained that as long as a two story home is under 35 feet it can be approved, and is irrelevant to this fence variance application. Plmvring Cmrunicciar Minu~ec Apri! 1, 200_i Page 4 Charles MaHar, of Mahar Brothers Construction explained that it is his understanding that the CC & R's for Phase II are under review and will be amended, and that he filed application for fence variance in support of the residents interests in Brookfield Estates. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 568, approving application for a fence variance, for properties located within the Brookfield Estates Subdivision, Phases I and II and to inch~de Lindsey Meadows in the Resolution to construct fences within a special stream setback area to coincide with the draft fence ordinance. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion pass unanimously. Chairman Piland called a five minute break at 8:30 p.m. Commissioner Foster, was excused for the remainder of the meeting. Meeting called to order at 8:35 p.m. C. Public hearing to review comments and recommendations concerning the urban rese-roe areas identified as "CP-2 and CP-3". Ken Gerschler, Community Planner began this portion of the meeting with explaining the purpose of Regional Problem Solving. There will need to be future scientific studies conducted for the exclusion of agricultural land along the northern fringe for area CP-3. There are other preservation issues in this area. There is Whetstone Creek, which serves as a home for amoeba's (tiny single celled protozoans that occur especially in water and soil). There would not be much impact to include this area in the UGB. If included in the UGB, there will still have to be application hearings prior to any development happening. Also, that there is existing underdeveloped land within the City, and many older homes that can be bulldozed if land value is right, to redevelop that land. In correspondence received, residents are expressing a preference for the inclusion of the CP-2 area. Chairman Piland opened the public portion of the meeting. Sam Inkley, Sr. of 5055 Gebhard Road, spoke and explained that there isn't a lot of water, and doesn't use his land for farn~ing. Leon Callahan of 5278 Gebhard Road, stated that he has the existing Urban Growth Boundary at his property line. He owns 5.74 acres zoned as SR2.5, with a seasonal creek through his property. There isn't the irrigation or run off that there used to be, and would be in favor of this area to be included. Tim Hasp of 589 Wilson Road, spoke ofhis interest to save faun land, however this area is not good Plmmiiig Cmnmisriou Minutes Aprrl /, 2003 Page S farm land. He explained that he can see many houses being developed fiom his back fence. He wondered how long before he could start to develop. ]t was explained that it could be as little as 1-2 years or even more depending on growth factors. Eric Beiter of 271 Gibbon Road, explained that he is watching very viable agricultural land being developed by W.L. Moore. However, on his land they are farming nothing more than rocks. Mr. Beiter feels that we can make a difference, and we can enlist some organizations to help us do what we know is right, not what the State or County says we should <lo. John Hilkey of 27 Orr Drive, asked about existing businesses and if they came into the City would they be grand fathered in. He would like to see the pro's and con's, how much it would cost him for this and how much he can make. There were more discussions regarding clarification of this process, and if any master planning has been done yet, and whether or not there has been any move to have hydrology a factor in determining good quality agricultural land. Chairman Piland closed the public portion of the meeting. Commissioner Fish made a motion to make RPS recommendations to the City Council after the Planning Commission Study Session scheduled for April 15, 2003. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Samitore explained that the May agenda is already full. We will still be having the Planning Commission Study Session on April 15, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. to discuss RPS and make recommendations to the City Council. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. City of Central Point Planning Commission Study Session Minutes April 15, 2003 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.NI. II. ROLL CALL: Chairman Chuck Piland, Rick Perry, Candy Fish, Paul Lunte, Don Foster, Wayne Riggs and Connie Moczygemba were present. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Planning Director; Dave Arkens, Planning Technician and Jeff Eikin from RRVID. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. BUSINESS A. Regional Problem Solving (RPS) Urban Reserve Area review and recommendation to the City Council for CP-I, CP-2, CP-3 and CP-5. Tom Humphrey stated the goals and a brief history of the urban reserve process and briefly covered the four areas (CP-1, CP-2, CP-3, CP-5) being discussed at this meeting. Copies of letters received by residents living in these areas and previous meeting minutes were included in the packet. Mr. Humphrey also stated that this is just the beginning of a process to include these areas into the City of Central Point's Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB). CP-5 Commission members discussed the school district property and its future uses. They also discussed Jackson Creek and the fact that it would probably be in better environmental shape if it were included in the UGB in the future because the city would manage it better. Commissioner Lunte made a motion to recommend CP-5 to the City Council as amended with Planning Commission Study Session April 15, 2003 the western boundary being aligned to Grant Road (5l to 33 acres). Rick I'eny seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed wranimously. CP-3 Mr. Humphrey explained that this area was originally not included, but because of its location along Bear Creek and the Jackson County Expo the City Council decided to include the area and expand it northward for final consideration. Jeff Eikin said that there is no water rights to this area. This area is not being used for fanning. Commissioner Perry made a motion to recommend CP-3 to the City Council as is, no changes. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. CP-2 Mr. Humphrey explained the history of this area. The owners of the Castor property along Upton Road would like their property considered for a future school site. Mr. Eikin said that there are properties in CP-2 that have irrigation rights. Commissioner Fish suggested that the boundary be moved to West Gregory Road but no motion was made. There was discussion on many of the bowling alley shaped lots and it was understood that if this area ever enters into the UGB and city limits that these lots will be difficult to develop unless adjoining property owners work together to develop these lots. Commissioner Lunte made a motion to recommend CP-2 to the City Council as is, no changes. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. CP-1 Mr. Humphrey briefly described some of the history behind the interchange and the agreement the city has with the county. Commissioner Fish pointed out that the area between the interchange and the city already has many small pazcels in it plus many acres of prime farm land. She stated that we could include this area and designate the faun land with a zoning description which will keep the land as farm use for may generations. Mr. Humphrey stated that this area is in the area of mutual concern and if it is ever included in the city it would be better managed by the city. Mr. Humphrey also quoted Mr. Bradshaw, owner ofthe Seven Oaks Farm, stating that "We (the Bradshaw's) have no desire to discontinue fanning ,but feel the City of Central Point would be more willing to allow us the flexibility that would let our business continue." The Bradshaw's would like to include some commercial use on their property to help supplement their farm use but the county does not allow for commercial uses in the current zone. We also received a letter from the 1000 Friends of Oregon which oppose CP-1 because of the cherry-stem approach and it puts the faun land in this area at risk for future urbanization. The Commission members agreed that this prime farm land has already been damaged because of the construction of I-5 and the parcelization of larger lots by the county. Mr. Planning Commission Study Session April 15, 2003 Humphrey stated that this interchange is important not only to Central Point but also regionally. The interchange may be a future hub of east-west traffic from Highway 140 and that there is already infrashucture in place. Mr. Humphrey stated that the RPS committee is being allowed to think outside the box when it comes to planning practices. Commissioner Lunte said that if we include the area between the city and the interchange and call it open space/faun use this would seem to fit into the concept of mixcd- use. Commissioner Lunte also stated "that at the state level when you look at communities like ours which have historical and cultural background that has agriculture to it and we start urbanizing through that area we have to maintain that culture to some degree as well as the mixed land use. To say that we can't include it (farm use) in our UGB, the process seems to negate part of our heritage and culture for towns like ours. To put us in one box with some of the other towns that may not have that connection still to their past doesn't seem to fit for us and several other cities." The Commissioners discussed including the cherry-stem area between I-5 and the railroad. As the discussion continued, more time was spent deciding where the boundaries of CP-1 would be expanded too. The stated goal that the Commission members would like to achieve is having the farm land managed and protected by the City instead of the county. The boundary change for CP-1 is as follows; Beginning at Scenic Ave. and Hwy. 99, west to Seven Oaks Rd., north to the intersection of Seven Oaks Rd. and the railroad tracks, northwest on the east side of the railroad tracks to the intersection of the railroad tracks and Willow Springs Rd., west and following Willow Springs Rd. to Tolo Rd., north on Tolo Rd. to the south side of I-5, I-5 east to the Tolo Rd. bridge, north on Tolo Rd. to Blackwell Rd., following Blackwel I Rd./Hwy. 99 southeast to the southeast corner of the Seven Oaks interchange, southeast along the west side of I-5 to the current UGB, following the UGB south to Scenic Rd., and west to Scenic Ave. and Hwy. 99. Commissioner Lunte made a motion to recommend CP-I to the City Council as amended on the map (as stated above, 930 to 1275 Acres). Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. V. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Humphrey stated that the Planning Commission will have full agendas in May and have two meetings in June. Commission members requested that meeting packets be delivered to them earlier than Friday afternoon to allow them more time to review items on the agenda. VI. ADJOURNMENT Planning Commission Study Session April 15, 2003 Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adjourn the mectin~. Commissioner Rigs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. MecYing was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. Planning Commission Study Session April 15, 2003 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NIGNIOI2ANDUM MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Expedited Land Partition for Skate Park Aaulicant/ City of Central Point-Public Works Department Property I55 South Second Street Owner Central Point, Oregon 97502 Property Description/ 37 2W 1 I BA, Tax Lot 2200 and Map 37 2W 11 BB, Tax Lot 8300- 2.12 acres total. Zoning: R-I, Residential Single Family Discussion: During the past two years, the City has been working to create a skate park and purchased land near the Central Point Elementary School. The Public Works Department and the Parks Division have been in contact with various agencies that will issue grants in favor of the park once there is a dedicated paz~cel for the park facility. The Planning Department has arranged for a plat to be drawn up that describes a separate lot. Oregon law permits Staff to review the partition application and send notices to neighboring property owners without a public meeting. Once the comment period ends, the Planning Commission will send out a notice of decision to the neighbors. This application was originally noticed for a review by the Planning Commission. Staff has decided to process the partition administratively to reduce the application load on the Planning Commission. Attachments: A. Tentative Plat B. Notice ~, ~s.~ .,,, . ... .........., ..,...., ___..__.. \ FOUND BRASS DISC 2" DEEP For: ~ ~ AS SHOWN ON 5M 13035 I The Cit of Central f ti„~ ~ m.m5' NORTH AND 5SI' WEST FOUNp 5/8" IRON PIN \ S, (3 ,~. WITH METAL GAP FLUSH y 6 \ ~ !0.02' NORTH AND 5.49' WEST STAMPED "G/L MON LS 2615" i ~ S5 S. Second Stre ~ 9, PER SM 13035) yam, / ~ ~ PER SM 16865 ~ ~ FOUND BRASS DISC /*------------ _----- Central Point, OR 97 IN MONUMENT CASE / 111--- \ 0 ------ \ /~ .I STREET 0 N89 >6'52"E 125.18' ~ I / ~ ~ ~ \ / 151 _ ~ _' 204.86' ~ ~- SI4.13' `~ --~ ~ T / i~0'12'30"W ---- 7 T \ r , ~~ I ~ X00, 8 8 (514b9' PER SM 16865) ~ ~q i~'i'~j~ yd~ \ /~ 0, /k°j ~li_ N89'56'52'E -~ _I\ 1 ~M 0 ~j~~~M1~P \\ tS>' \ ~ ~ / y~~`'0, 'hM1 r~l `~ ~~_ n9.9m' '- ~ FOUND 2" BRASS CAP ~~ ~ ~ \ ~ \b ~ j !229.89' PER SM 13035) '~ I 3" DEEP, NO MAPoGINGS / ~ ~~k / ^ ~ \ 'P~ ~I 1 % 229.90' AS SHOLLN ON SM 16865 I 1 ~ \ 1 ~ \\'~/ 25' 125' I =/8"IRON PIN // 161 ~/ \ ~~~~ ~g~ N !8" DEEP) / °~ \ ~ i a SM 3541 / e~~~'Ch/ ^pM1//\ \ ~ ~I ~Q i 3755 ALAMEDA STORE ET,HSURI // ke~~°`~ ~/ \\ Pp~N~~ n iaxLOinmm alt-I ~) (sat) / j L ~ t31 zw uBA) ,~ w w\ ~ lM1 / / N~(~Q \ ~ P AREA = 159 ACRES, vS I W \O\v BY: DOUGLAS C. McMAI / k ~ ~ G'G v r~ M1~. e / j ~F \\ \~ ~ MORE OR LESS ~ "C I SCALE: 7" = 60' / / ~ sI ~ D~~ I BASIS OE BEARING: i / i i / ~0, / / / \~ \ 0 .9 01 J~ \ ~v y I ~IITH METAL GAP &iAMPED // '~SCl, , ~ ~ 0) w~ Iw g `~ TAX LOi 830 ~ ~ 0 ~w \~ ~ N I ~ ~ ,[ 110 0 ~\ 9 A A= 2.12 ACRES, MORE R LESS i~ ~O~/~ p ~ i ll m =SUL"~ ING AREA = 1.41 A S s l \ 9m \ ~~ / / 93.ffi' v I I ~ I m \ T6i`9\ ~d // \ C12~ ~ ~ LL W \~ \ / I I 0 (SP y \ / ARC _ ~ I 7 m \\~y ~, // EoS~gy~,P ~ e) I e \ ~, 0e\ d / / OPpS A " 30~ B ~ FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN I ~ \~~ 0`\ / / p~ IAA ill ~ 23030' 25' 125' I "C/L MON LS 2615" I Z \~~fi ~~`9SA 1 II'ii t~Il I ~ __ (23 82m63mPER SM 13035) I PER SM 16865 1 ~~ \ S\9 n - I I FOUND I!2" IRON PIN ~ ~ B 8 - ~O CAP !12" DEEP) __ _ \ \ 6~yS. ~~9S. k2 v 192.13' _ ~ 515.5_9'~/~\/~ A SM 16865 N \\ \ \'~~~ $ ~ ~ 889'50'81"W 10832' (889"50'45"W PER SM 16865) ~ '~ \ .\~m ~ ° STREET -- ~------ ~ \ 9~ \ M1kb i ~---------.---- ~ .\~m~~g\a / = \ \ / ° \`~ . / ~ n~ ~. ~ ffq / o ~j"r~~ <y~1,y o/' Cc~~1, °~11 1'oiill. -,y I'l„91VNING l)J;'I',UL'l7b1/s'NT ,~, y~ / r ~ ~,ae9 OREGON I'oin Iluinl>I,ret. rU('P I'lannint~ Diroctor K<;n Ccrschlcr ~4~rl.l. ~nmiLore ('onrrnunily I'lannr~r Dave Arlen 1'lannin~!'I'eclu~icieur NOTICE OF EXPEDITED LAND DIVISION Date of Notice: April 22, 2003 The City of Central Point is in review of an application for and Expedited Land Division pursuant to ORS 197.360 et al.on two City-owned lots located near the intersection of South Fourth and Bush Streets (37 2W 12 BC, Tax Lot 1239). If approved, the property will be partitioned to create an additional tax lot for the proposed skate park. Copies of this application are available for public review at the Central Point City Hall, Monday through Friday during normal business hours. Citizens or interested parties have 14 days from the date of this notice to comment on the proposed Expedited Land Division, either orally or in writing. Any issue that may form the basis for an appeal of the decision rendered in this case must be raised in writing during the continent period with sufficient specificity to enable the City to respond to the issue. Any person interested in commenting on the proposed expedited land division in advance of the decision may do so by submitting written comments to Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502, or by calling 664-3321 (Extension 293), no later than close of business on May 8'~' 2003. Following the comment period, a written decision to approve or deny the application will be rendered based on it's compliance with applicable land use regulations. Notice of this decision will be provided to the applicant and to all owners e~~ PLANNING DEPARTMEN`C MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Request to Phase the Pheasant Creek Estates Subdivision Applicant/ Duncan Development L.L.C. Pro er P.O. Box 5656 Owner Central Point, Oregon 97502 Pro er Description/ 37 2W l OCB, Tax Lots 1900 and 2200. Zoning: R-1-8, Residential Single Family Discussion: Earlier this year, the Planning Commission approved the tentative subdivision plan for Pheasant Creek Estates. Since the approval, property owners Michael and Cheri Williams have decided to postpone development on their portion ofthe subdivision which is located along the northerly portion of the development. In light of the change, the applicant Mike Duncan would like to ask the Commission to allow the project to be phased so that he may proceed. A phase map has been included for consideration by the Commission. The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Commission allow the phasing with the understanding that the Williams or other successor owners of the subject property be subject to the conditions ofthe original subdivision approval. This requirement shall be in effect since the area was master planned prior to annexation by the City Council. Attachments: A. Phasing Map t `Z r& Q ~df a°+ ` ~ r !~ O V f~ W • =6 ; ~ ~ \; ;ter i7'-.__ • • ~'~° op r. ~mw' ; TENTATIVE PI-AT _ ~ '~ ~- `""~- ~ ~y PHEASANT CREEK ESTATES _ Cry" ~,:. .~ ~ LOCATiD IN: T375, RZW, WM.. (" THE SW TYCOIO CENTRAL POINT O C H N/ ~ '' °. ~ ~ ~ I T E I JACKSON GOUNTY, OREGON ~ ~ ~a z ,. ero Y" w... et Wot.,,2T . .j ( • ~ ~ ~ ~ DEVEIOP~AENTS, l.LC i DUNCAN . 1 . ~ ^" 25 SOUTH FROf1T STREET e iwt za ~ ~ i ~ P.0. BOX 5656 9T502 ~ CENTRA ~ 8 nr .++' Q 7 1 . ~ 5263 541 665 Y~3 , e n ew~ ~~ ~~ 92 Lit ~ rr wi ~~~.. I~ ~.-_.w~a°oc°"o {-_...~ ~~: ( I 1-^^^ I ~'''ro`a f ~~~, ( ~.v.__._......_.__._. HOFFBUHR & ASSOC 315 (5A1~779-4641~ X201 By; DOUGLAS ~McMAHpAN~ ATES, INC. MEDFDRD, OREOt 97504 PLS No. 15 FEBRUARY 12. 2C N07E: YTHA7 WAS PR VIDED TDULHOFFHUHR 1ANDR.ASS4C BY DUNCAN DEVELOPMENTS, LLC. ~~ www; iYn/u (0302: PLANNING DEPARTMEN"I' STAFF REPOR"[' HEARING DATE November 5, 2002 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Matt Samitore, Community Planner SUBJECT: Tentative Plan, and Planned Unit Development Expansion for Dawn Hope Estates. Applicant/ Owner: Mike Lisk 2941 Barclay Medford, OR 9 Agent: Same as above Property Description/ 37 2W03AD Tax Lot 9300 - 1.37 Acres Zoning: R-1-6, Residential Single Family Summary: The applicant has submitted a preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision for Dawn Hope Estates, a Planned Unit Development consisting of six lots (Exhibit A) with access from North 10"' Street. Authority: CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a preliminary development plan for Planned Unit Developments. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Exhibit B). Applicable Law• City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Housing Element CPMC 16.10.010 et seq.- Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20.010 et seq.- R-1, Single Family District CPMC 17.60.130 et seq.- General Provisions, Access CPMC 17.68.010 et seq.- Planned Unit Development Discussion: City Staff has been working with the applicant Mike Lisk to develop this odd shaped property for a couple of years. Several subdivisions were developed around the property in the 1960's and 1970's . According to old city documents the owners at the time did not want to have anything to do with development, thus the lot was left with the original house for the past 20 years. A planned unit development (PUD) may be permitted in the R-1 zoning district subject to t(re approval of a preliminary development plan. If the preliminary development plan is approved, an application for final development plan must be submitted within six months of such approval. CPMC 17.68.010 states that "the purpose of planned trrtit developrnern (PUD) is to gain more effective use of open space, realize the advantages o/large-scale site plaruting and the ntiritag of building t)~pes or land uses, improved aesthetics and ertvironntental preservation. 'I'bis is achieved by allowing a variety of building and structures, types of open space, variable building heights artd setbacks, artd shared services mtd facilities. " This project is being processed as a PUD because the project area is in-fill development and because of the odd shape of the parent parcel. In the past, similar areas have been developed as "flag lots" which reduce urban density since most of the useable space is dedicated to private access driveways. Flaglot requirements also dictate that the minimum lot area be twice the area minimum for the applicable zoning district, excluding the square footage within the access road. Flaglot creation wastes land which ultimately results in an expansion of the city limits and Urban Growth Boundary away fi•om the City's core areas. As a Planned Unit Development, Dawn Hope Estates will allow approximately 1.37 acres to be developed into 6 residential lots instead of the traditional flaglot configuration that would have permitted only two lots. If developed as a standard subdivision the majority of the lot would be developed as a roadway or not developed at all. The Planned Unit Development will be served by a twenty-two foot (22') wide private roadway with no on-street parking allowed. The road width may have to be increased depending on water meter placement. The Public Works Department will work the applicants engineer for an acceptable road configuration. The Roadway will be no less than twenty-one (21'), which is the standard for a private drive in the Public Works new Standards and Specifications. The applicants have proposed the road to be a public right-of--way. Unfortunately that size of a road is unacceptable. The City's minimum public road width, for a tninor residential lane, vary from a minimum of twenty-seven feet (2T) to forty feet (40') depending on sidewalks and parking requirements. The applicants are proposing smaller lot widths than the standard for the zoning district. The standard for the R-1-6 Zoning District is 60' and the applicants width varies from fifty-seven to fifty-eight feet. A ten foot (10') area bordering North Tenth Street will need to be dedicated to the City for the future expansion of the road. The applicant will be responsible for curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the frontage of their property. The applicants have also proposed a small park area which sits at the entrance into the subdivision. The park will be a private park facility and meets the open space component for the PUD. The applicant will need to form a home owners association for the maintenance of the park and private street. Fire District No. 3, BCVSA, and Jackson County Roads and Parks have been notified. The Public Works Department has reviewed the preliminary development plan for compliance with the City's water, storm drain and transportation standards (Attachment E). The Public Works DeparCment is requiring a looped water line system to be installed from North 10"'streets to . - ~ tG either Vista, Hermosa, or Terra Linda. The stone drain facility will need to be designed for on site detention because the current ditch on North l0"' Street is over capacity. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Size of PUD site A PUD shalt be on a tract of land five acres or larger, except that a PUD may be on a tract of land more than one acre but less than five acres if the planning commission finds, upon a showing by the applicant, that a PUD is in the public interest because one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An unusual physical feature of importance to the people of the area or the community as a whole exists on the site, which can be conserved and still leave the landowner equivalent use of the land by the use of a planned unit development; ^ The site of the expanded PUD is 1.37 acres. The site is a very umisual shape and has severe development constrictions if developed as a standard subdivision. The PUD will leave the land owner with five new buildable lots, preserve the existing home, and reduce impervious area by reducing the amount of asphalt. B. The property or its neighborhood has historical character or distinctive features that are important to the community and that could be protected or enhanced through use of a PUD; ^ The applicants are constructing residential homes within an existing residential neighborhood. The homes will be similar in design and architecture to the existing homes. The PUD will allow for single family dwellings to be constructed that would preserve the neighborhood character. C. The property is adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of a planned unit development of similar design as that proposed and developments would complement each other without significant adverse impact on surrounding areas; ^ The project is like other in-fill Planned Unit Developments in Central Point and will have similar lot size, house size, and architecture. The development will match the character of the existing neighborhoods. D. The property is of irregular shape, with limited access, or has unusual dimensions or characteristics which would make conventional development unreasonably difficult and expensive ^ The parcel has a very irregular shape and has only one point of access onto North 10`h Street. If developed as a subdivision the developer would not limited to 2 to 4 (~ ~' homes and would have to desh•oy the existing home, trees, and create impervious area that is not needed. Criteria to Grantor Den~~ a PUD In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from section I ZC>8.040: A. That the development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions to the normal requirements of this title; ^ The applicant's preliminary development plan proposes 6 single family dwellings. The housing types will be similar to the existing neighborhood and will have the similar architecture and size. B. The proposal will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the City; ^ This proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Housing Goals as follows: it ensures adequate housing fvill be provided; contributes to the variety of housing offered and promotes higher density zoning. The project promotes alternative housing designs that will potentially minimize the need to expand the urban growth boundary by encouraging a higher density project near the downtown. Zoning code objectives can be met if recommended planning and public works conditions are satisfied. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the PUD will have minimal adverse impact on the livability, value or appropriate development of the surrounding area; ^ The preliminary development plan is consistent with the zoning in the surrounding area. Each of the lots is in the same price range as the adjacent subdivision and the homes will be of similar size and design. D. That the proponents of the PUD have demonstrated that they are financially able to carry out the proposed project, that they intend to start construction within six months of the final approval of the project and any necessary district changes, and intend to complete said construction with a reasonable time as determined by the Commission; ^ Though the applicant is new to Central Point, he has demonstrated to City Staff that he has the resources to complete the project. He has also hired a surveyor and engineer that have a long history with the City of Central Point. E. That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development or will be obviated by demonstrable provisions in the plan for proper entrances, exits, internal traffic circulation and parking; Q ^ All of the units will access onto North lU°i Street which is deemed a Mina• Arterial in the City's Transportation System Plan. F. The commercial development in a PUD is needed at the proposed location to provide adequate commercial facilities of the type proposed; ^ There is no commercial development proposed within this development. G. That proposed industrial development will be efficient and well-organized with adequate provisions for railroad and buck access and necessary storage; ^ There is no industrial development proposed within this development. H. The PUD preserves natural features such as streams and shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain, if these are present; ^ A landscape plan showing alt of the existing trees will need to be submitted prior to final PUD approval. Any historic or prominent trees will need to be preserved. No other natural features exist on the site. I. The PUD will be compatible with the surrounding area; ^ Dawn Hope Estates will be compatible with the surrounding area. J. The PUD will reduce need for public facilities and services relative to other permitted uses for the land; ^ The development will result in a more efficient use of public services and will eventually encourage the use of mass transit along North 10`h Streets. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission may take one of the following actions in regard to the preliminary development plan for Dawn Hope Estates. 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving conditional use permit, preliminary development plan and PUD boundary expansion for Dawn Hope Estates, based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval as set fort in the staff reports; or 2. Recommend denial of the conditional use pei7nit, preliminary development plan and PUD boundary expansion for the Dawn Hope Estates based on findings of fact articulated by the Commission; or 3. Continue the review of the conditional use permit and preliminary development plan at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Site Plan and Elevations B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Copies of the Plats for the surrounding subdivisions. D. Correspondence E. Public Works Staff Report F. Planning Department Recommended Conditions or Approval G:\Planning\03016strcport.wpd ~.E~ A'f FOR ^pAVJry NO4E ESTA?ES" A P111iJNEp UPSIY DEVELOPMENT THE N.£. i/d OF °ECTIONO 3N~T.3T5. R,2Vl.. 'Yl.ll. CIN OF CFtlTRAL PDINS~lA3 ~2W 030.0!/ OREGON I~ // I / f 1~ /' / / \ ./ / \ +~ :, / / \ 1 / `C lU ~ / / / I 111 / r~f `\\\` cE0.LLM 3DV.NE r / \ 1 WI ~ \ ~\ \ \ xD ( \ncusL g 1 C/ \\ ~~d UI l 9 SW OSM R 1000 \ 0. a wcxiuE ;~ r \ Awxwatl~a l0 moo. ~\ \ ]1 tW 03AA it 1909 0 °Of ' l \` wnr eext9mn A.a9vou~Y , / 1 l \ so+'nN UnE ~\ TA% lOT 9 TE{1TM STREET 1030 NORTH i/fl \ \ ~~Pi Y' ' ~i24S~ ..rmwNFR: ) C I / MICHAEL D. 11EK ANO +EANETTE E. LI51( /~ ~ / y941 9AACtAY CDUPT ,( / ME0FOR0. OREGON 9350b f/ \ / \ / (Sbl) 110-.915 / 7` \ / / ~4 \ \ DOU&C' lIC1.IAHPN IIlC. ' 140FF0UNR p~55(fl[EfE SUITE 201 3> masAA UlKixsD \ // ~ IZ`'O _155 AW+E c3AA n 1+Da ~ ~ pCOFOAD. ORCGON 9]304 DDYWnC ~' I 31 ApinVft viITCK \ (565) gg9"d6d1 \\\ ~ ~=DOOe ///n mDSADhtLam[6\~ ° UILS,3fl y 0 `o , ~ ` LINK[ '~ \ n / _ / P~) tpTl3 .~ I ~ In 4 0,631 "A.Ft..oD xAB'D 990'C " ^ ~. -_. ~ \1 C Y It $ ~0\n 1. 93W l9RM~ y (~. ~ e LOT 0 3) w IDNiAY~[ ~1<f~ Pohpf 1 OSED 9.'iip° \ h'F ., aOPryp ~ 1 \ o° o s. \ 1 , '' ~ o IT. yd'`, ~ !(\ . ~g LOT 5 n ' f \ \ ~/f-tr . 4P`/ / b ).e)D. SO.fY. F~~V / _q~ ~\` ~6 \// \ / a •~W\. F,yS t'. i $ _ 3Y ALCT ANAWN OB \ \ I LOT 1 d %// . ~ svz b n 4\ )oat =_o.st., ~ / ed . /,y n zx e3AO m, ixNE -a eL 3 ~% ¢ 9mINA z \ ANN N ~ / i4 BANJO yA ON% CIEO ~.\ PS11 tWt HCL I' )IJ oA V / 1A ~ 3f iW OSADfAX1611£ / N ~' 0 ' q ~ . 0 \/ 4 \ ` \ ` ` I '~ 3) 3W OJAA N 2~ °° f O%/ % 51CE (AA G / 2L 913 / }A StILpOY h 9CBVMN / v \ \ ~ .V . ! f 1 GOOx ~r "P 4r ~' i i - _ _ PPION ~ , zw oaD t( 9u3 \ \ ~ _ ._ , _. W~ ~~~p~I- (" jy/ QISIIN9 -D Q\ , ~1VQ Os:~Et" .l' /WNNN£ • 3t 3W OSA- i(. 9219 n ~ PELffl ll AAS%Y l\ SWSN[H \ \ L<P \ \C/ J \ \ , ^Oy lb /AA \~ '~! e N ~. )pl $CIbO554R 4 51fAWN Ofl11LN 1 \ C/ ` \ 6 1Y f \ y \`t. t ~,'LM1 ~ / PYANI{9tL ~ E?ISTNO 8 f yANIiAPY SCKEA ~ ~+. ! qM1' \//p \ \\ \ \ \ O \ w 5' ' / 3x9 r le :tLYfll h SNEHIIY \ ~/ f~, \~ / r xv uftul Sr 2 a'a~ \ \/ \ C Wa l /\\ \ h \`~( Jam. ` / f _-\ sutEwnsnl / /S\ a. \ \ I \Fr / / STRUGTE0 N iE5' / ~.v \~(~~ ° I / 0 6E LON I 22' PUBLIC STREET T DNS (T0 REPLACE I f ~ ~ aW 03pq a S90R / \o~ f \ ~ i ` "Pe scDN es9nAAY \G / a / nea 1 , EXIS N FONVEVlA ) VAl i5 5' (FROM CWNiY / ~ fa \ M\ ~ \ \\/ \ @ - pryppE5510NA ND Sl'RVBYO0. E) CONTOUR {NT6R VIDE AEPiAt PHOTO). OE 35 ONIAiPROVED. \ ~ . ~ \ \ / LP ff(s Jl~v--~ ~~ ],) f4. 10TH 5fREET fRONTA ~ / +a^lax I~Ce nN n~. ~ ~ s oooav. oc.l r RtlaEtti9 1' xm m Scut /~,, _`L)a ~! ~.~^~h m~ ~ENrRq City of Central ~ oint ~~~' o~ -~ < - - , ~,~z~ z PX,fINNXNG ,DEPARTMENT ",chi;'/~ ~"y.,= yc `a>s'`~~C~ \~ om° Tom I3umphrey, AICP pRE GIN Planning Director Ken Gerschler Cotrununity Planner Matt Samitore Community Planner Dave Arkens Planning Technician Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: April 15, 2003 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING May 6, 2003 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning atthe above time and place, the Central Point Plamung Commission will review an application for a Planned Unit Development on a parcel ofproperty located near the intersection ofNortlr Tenth Street and Crest Drive The subject parcel islocated in aR-1-6, Residential Single Family Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372W03AD, Tax Lot 9300. The Central Point Planning Commission will initially review the tentative plazr for the Planned Unit Development to determine i£the proposed subdivision meets the requirements of law. If approved, the subdivision would create a residential development with 6 parcels and a small park. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Planned UnitDevelopments are set forth in Chapters 16 and 17 ofthe Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in eonunenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 6, 2003 2. Written comments may besentinadvanceofthemeetingtoCentralPointCit5~Ha11,155South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. . _ Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration ofthe comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to he related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, I55 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies ofthe same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staffreports, heartestimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the tentative plan for the Plamied Unit Development. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~. 155 South Second Street ®Central Point, OR 97502 ®(541) 664-3321 ®Fax: (541) E>64-6384 ;; 1 1_ ~~~~~~~ ~ `~( «Gu ~ i ~.- g KNOW ALL MEN BY Germonn, ¢.e Poe Oxn sneai.mea ene s : size o+ +ne lou one n1e y ec+ represen*oron o Dnolic o ou svc<+z sr Mm0y OrOnt +o m0 pp o+ Ploo. By ns ptorwo: of m¢ \ os vro+a Drive, :+ will eeea PwEGPEGT SU2DNISIC L l.O/ ff STATE OF OREGON \ COUNTY OF JgCK90 NJ ` p¢rgpn Ily oDpeon "~-' ocMnowl¢agetl +M1¢ forego ~ l (ogx¢ Suzy. •oo ~ My tt \~ ~ r ~ x ou. o.c ops ~ x J DIJ3'O.: riH \ \ ~ 4 ' Zy= bD W V~ 14 " ~/ E.ominea ona appro.ee /`~ ~KKiw session +ms !n¢_ ..¢.oo.o /i e 9' ' • Po ¢.r¢. .m _> o .,_ auesl. Eaammea one aDOro.e~ j ~~ o Sel 5/d'ix 2di iron pln IWSn A11 lopes PO:E In Toll k( 9e+ 5/9"% 30"iron Din IIOSM1 /,U Y -~'^~ 9osig of Beorln9s: Pe<orC¢C 9urv0y No. 2191 ~~ ~ ~ v 1 .~ :. \ ~ ` +,~,~ ~~lA ~ enact e.. _- _ ~--- - - ---''~--- ~ INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. n °JZ .'Pi o a~'t o •x~ ~a~ - '° n °_ N.W. COR. G.LC. N0.35 W 20' EA6EMENT 11/2°9.1. PIPE n 70-10301, 72-06333 22.13 N 45°00'S0'W 87.00- INITIAL POINL _70.00 _7531'_' I ~ GON MON.~88A88 CAP -74.8!_ - - - 120.00- - - _ , - - N $ o J II~O~_P. U. E. S~P.U.E. m n m IydeuE \o PJE ~°•~ 22N~ay w 23 - e 24 a o 25 I M - _ ~ W 21 ~ ~ AO 2JN N O M O p n ° .I ~ O N q p O N Y e N N O d eW LUINF 3: ~" ~~_80. Z b P m ° A Z O { Y Z N I Iso ~ 2e.O\~ 8g °•1 z i `~_~ m r Ln14.61 ° 7 e0' ~ O O ~ I I o a Q 841 59'E 'O H29o i2', a0' a'4 ~~ aw °~ S31 9.32 ~ ; I lpO.t3g'W-i HQ ~r9 56.961 I L.58.! NP" R`vE p0 ,1 N nb i T~ ~ ~ ° N63 ~~ L-6 1 o ° - L. _ I a43°so' ~z"S a~ HERMO_SA x.44., ~ N~*- 4. In y of N 41°59'W 119.99 ~33N .yp Lp f ° ( W n 20 ~, Z `r'+~i, c O 1 2 v U NI o\e ~O (et 0 W 99.25 On O"3/J~ ~" m H ~' I a1• ~~e eo iae R`~1 n p!+y. t-e 3 Oka z - -e 19 P~ i 18 • ^ I ~18.91______r_ _n a V q I W $ t o 10 P.U.€.-- _ - t+h • m ~ ° 342~00'E 193.48 0 ~ 92.61 n ~ _ _93.26 _ ~ _ '° N41°39W p O y5'PU. ri I N Z 'n^. 17 u H o 2 a O ° ~ N a ~ _ ° o . rn I ~ W I 93.25 ° ~ Y I 93.35 W _ _ -- O N 42°00~ W 180.48 ~" I ", ~3;?8t5TPU.E n Q -- - S~P.U. E~'r n 0] ~ 11 db _149.23 _ _ _ _ .3 34.23_ _o ^ ~ 0 1 v ~ ~ °a Ro 16 o a ~ "' ~z N n 154 a ~P m x' W° o of O ti A n ti tip A 2s"' o_ et o e ~ '` ~`~'~54.49 ~ vP 7 .4 I N 32°20'26" - y'14 '><W ~~~ N41°59'W 153,60 °1 1 _ ° I ~Q o TIERRA LINDA DRIVEN 1 N4e.os W {~yr ~ ~ 14 Nyo~ ~ ~ O 72.80 I I 72.8D 72.80 yy211 W ~ P ~i o~ ~ty_~~O i 5'P.U.E.-{ __ U' N ~ °~O ~/ \~~ ~ L=50 N 'ii O W ° I ° Of 1" `oi ~ ~M1O Ne a°~ o ^ r~g'oo II °I 10 ° 9 ~O N i "5 M C' i° q Y- n - O ~ W ~~„ .'4i- D 13 c ~ F 12 Jq - d W ~ ~ N __ ri n ~ _~ J! ILL-P.U.E. J Z `r n i t l oY _-__128.94__-__ ___91.48___ ____11______ ______~ } = n ~' ~ -- ^72.80-- -72.80-- ~~7280-- --72.80-- --72.80--~ - K ~ I I W o i j Z q o °~ p o O o O o K ®'- °- I o°nv 2 ~ 3 ° 4 ° 5 °- 6 °- a w _ _ _ - - i i ~ I ~ Q~`` \ I Z3.1z 7zso 7z.eo 7z so 7z.9o 7z.eo _ o~y `~O~ 3 41°59 E 43 T. IL O P5y ~ 14 0Q- NORTH TENTN STREET ~ SURVEYORI S CERTIFICATE )REGON) ockson ~ SS ~~ SCALE 1~~= • Set 5/8x24"Iron F j Set 3/4 z30"Iron } p Found Monument os e Str9lt Monument BASIS OE BEARING Pinecrl RfiCitST PROFES', LAND SUI 04!28/2003 12:43 15417746295 .J~1C!<SON COUNTY RPS PAGE 01 Roads JACKSON COUNTY aoud> Apri! 28, 2003 Attention: Tom Humphrey City of Central Point Planning 115 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 Eric Niemcycr, PE 21'~c & pevefopmert Engineer 200 Mtelopo Road White City, Oft 97503 Phone: (541)774-8230 Fac (541) 774-6295 niemeyel(~jacksonCOUMy,ofg NMW.;adcsanCaunfy'.wg RE: Dawn Hope Estates off N. Tenth Street - acounty-maintained road. A 6-lot residential PUD. Dear Mr. Humphrey: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application for the tentative plan for Dawn Hope Estates PUD, a 6-lot residential subdivision located on the east side of North Tenth Street, south of Crest Drive. Roads and Parks has the following comments: 1. The applicant shad submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and Parks and obtain county permits if reauired. 2. The applicant shall obtain a road approach permits from Roads and Parks for the new public street road approach to North Tenth Street. The paved approach shall have 30' approach radii and a 30' minimum width. 3. We recommend no direct parcel access to North Tenth Street. 4. Jackson County Roads and Parks Services would like to review and comment on the hydraulic repork including the calculations and drainage plan. Capacity improvements or on site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. Sincerely, Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer I.\Engineering\Development\CITIES\CNTRLPT\03-Dawn Hope Estates.wpd 04/30/2003 15:56 5415355278 RCUSA FACE 01/02 BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY 3915 SOUTH PAgiIG NWY. • MB~FORe, pplOON H>607.9090 • lsA~) S~S.S1 e3 • (Qdt) »B-41 qq FAX le+t) ess-es>e • W Ww.heV~~.etp April 30, 2003 Ken Gerschler PAX 664-6384 City of Central Point Planning Departtnent 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 $e: Dawu hope Estates Dear I~en, The tentative plat indicates that a new sewer main would be constructed along the access road to serve the proposed development. This is consistent with BCVSA standards and my conversations with the developer. All new construction roust be done in accordance with BCVSA standards. If you need additional information, gIease call me at 779-4144. /Since~rely~, Cam"' ~ / ~~ ~-'`~'.,.. District Engineer IC:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SUBDIVISION\DAWNI IOPEESTATES.DOC a969/ a~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 4/30/2003 1 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT sMile Lisk' 2941 Barclay- Metlford, Oregon; 97502- :t: Dawn Hope Es#ates' on: North Tenth Street, Central Point;;Oregon g: R-1-6, Residential Single'fiamily,; 37 2W 43 AD Tax Lot 9300 -1.37 Acres.: Dawn Hope Tentative Plat- Hoffburr & Associates 3155 Alameda Street Suite 201 °- Medford Oregon 97504 PURPOSE Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. The "General" section of this staff report is a broad representation of the City of Central Points Standards & Specifications for construction. For specific criteria relating to individual projects/development the City's Standard & Specifications should be consulted. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS The following items are specific Public Works infrastructure recommendations identified while reviewing the Tentative Plat for Dawn Hope Estates. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 4/30/2003 2 Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets, water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems, natural drainage systems, etc.) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of current infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner involved. Street Lavout/Section: It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the Developer of Dawn Hope Estates intends to construct a Public Street, including a "hammerhead" turn around with a connection to North Tenth Street. The Developer's engineer should consult the City of Central Point Standards & Specifications for construction regarding the requirements for street sections, street geometry, right-of-way width, curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscaping rows, wheel chair ramps and all other necessary street design guidelines. The Tentative Plat for Dawn Hope Estates shows a 22-foot wide Public Street. The minimum street right-of-way width allowed for a public street in the City of Central Point Standards & Specifications is 42 feet. Included in the 42 foot right-of-way would be (2) 10- foot travel lanes, (1) 8-foot parking lane, (2) five-foot sidewalks, and (2) 2-foot areas of clear space behind the sidewalk for water meter placement. An alternative to a public street would be a private street. The Public Works Department recommends Dawn Hope Estates be approved with a private street, which includes a 25 foot wide right-of-way width. Attached: Cify of Central Point standard drawing for a Private Street (A-9DJ City of Central Point standard drawing for a Minor Local Residenfial Sfreet (A-7C) North Tenth Sfreet Improvements: Dawn Hope Estates Accesses North Tenth Street, which is currently classified as an unimproved Minor Arterial. The required right-of-way for a Minor Arterial is 79-feet. The existing right-of-way of North Tenth Street is 60-feet. The Applicant's for Dawn Hope Estates will be required to dedicate 10 feet of right-of way along their property boundary which boarders North Tenth Street for future roadway improvements. The improvements include, but are not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, an irrigated landscape buffer, street lighting, storm drainage and traffic delineation. No immediate plans to improve either North Tenth Street exist. However, the Developer will be responsible to construct their required improvements to accommodate future improvements, compensate the City of Central Point for the cost of the required improvements, or establish a bond for the estimated construction cost related to the required improvements. Public Utility Easements: The Tentative Plat for Dawn Hope Estates does not identify a Public Utility Easement. The Public Works Department Staff recommends coordination between the Developer's engineer and surveyor to create the necessary public utility CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 4/30/2003 3 easements for Dawn Hope Estates. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development, any future development on adjacent properties, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to tie-into the proposed development's storm water collection and conveyance system. If Dawn Hope Estates storm drain system will be a public system, operated and maintained by the City. Suitable easements for storm drainage infrastructure will need to be dedicated to the City for alignment, construction, and maintenance of the necessary storm drainage infrastructure. An appropriate system will need to be designed to the City of Central Point Public Works Department's Standards & Specifications for construction. Water System: The minimum size for distribution lateral water mains in residential areas shall be 8-inches. The minimum size in multiple-dwelling, commercial and industrial areas shall be 12-inches except that in the sole discretion of the Public Works Department, 8-inch lateral lines may be allowed if flows meet domestic and fire protection needs in the area. Where fire demands or line losses might demand larger sized pipe, the engineer will be required to submit hydraulic computations to support the use of 8-inch pipe, or to establish the size required. The City of Central Point Public Works Department typically requires a developer's water distribution to be of a "looped design". The Developer's engineer will be required to explore all potential connection locations. If the Developer's engineer is unable achieve a "looped system" design the City may allow a water distribution system, which provides a single connection to the existing water distribution system. The City of Central Point Public Works Department recommends a connection to the existing City water distribution system at the following location: ^ A connection to the existing 12-inch ductile iron water line located on the south side of North Tenth Street. GENERAL All construction shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City Municipal Code, City of Central Point Standards & Specifications, Oregon Department of Transportation /American Public Works Associations 2002 Standards & Specifications for construction, and all conditions mandated by the City of Central Point Planning Commission. Any changes to the above-described standards, specifications, and conditions must be submitted to the City in writing for approval prior to implementing any and all requested changes. 2. All public improvements shall be designed as a logical part of the development of the CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 4/30/2003 4 surrounding area. Storm sewers and sanitary sewers all are sized to accommodate the entire drainage basin, which they will ultimately serve. Utilities and street improvements will be extended to the boundaries of the development for future extensions to the adjoining areas. The Public Works Director may require over sizing of utility lines to accommodate future growth of the City. 3. Where existing City utility lines do not adjoin the proposed development, the developer will be required to extend the Tines to the development as necessary. Where existing roadway improvements do not extend to the proposed development, the developer may be required to improve the roadway to the development. 4. The Developer's engineer shall field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. A minimum of six inches of clear vertical separation between infrastructure facilities is required. The City's Standards and Specifications should be consulted for further information on or regarding utility separation. 6. Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads and Parks. Following review, the plans will be returned "approved" or with comments. In order to be entitled to further review, the applicant's engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a bona fide attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's engineer shall submit 4 copies of the plans to the Public Works Department. (See the City of Central Point standards & specifications section (100) for general design guidelines). A digital copy of the approved construction drawing will be required before the Public Works Permit will be issued. 7. The Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEO), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and ODOT 8. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: ^ A copy of written approval from Fire District #3 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system `'~ 4 ~ V ~ ~ CITY OF CENTRAL P©!NT PUBG.IC WQRKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 413d12dd3 5 improvement plans for the proposed development. ^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by E3CVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should bs completed on the plans. © A copy of written approval from Jackson County Roads department regarding highway/county road improvements {as applicable}, 9. if applicable, the Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights {on a City approved form), far any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Water Master the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result ofi the proposed development. 1 g. Applicants shall submit a Construction Site Management Plan {CSMP} fior approval to the Pudic Works Department in conjunction with any commercial or private development plans prior to issuance of a Public Works department construction permit. The Construction Site Management Plan shall contain sufficient information to describe the sits development and the system{s} intended to control erosion and prevent off-site damage from erosion and sedimentation. See the City of Central Point Standards & Specifications Section 80g for complete details regarding Construction Sits Management Plans & erosion Control. 11. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar°} and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD ~ 2. °`As~built"drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations {as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations, spot elevations identified on drawings, road alignment, water lines, valves, and fire hydrants, water and sewer lateral stationing, modifications to street section, manhole and curb inlet locations, street light locations, other bebw grads utility line locations and depths, etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy {on Mylar`~} or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 'l 3. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the ~~ CITY CF CENTRAL POfNT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 4/3{7/2tJ03 6 permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. 14. Easements for City infrastructure {i.e. sanitary sewer, water and storm drain} should be a minimum of 1 ~-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements far public utilities should be designated as Public Utility Easements {P.U.E.}. City maintained or owned facilities such as storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water line easements should be dedicated to the City. Privately maintained or owned facilities over adjacent private property also require easements. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {5} feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 2Q-foot width shall be required. basement dedications in final deeds or in CC&R's need a statement, which clearly states that easements must be maintained for suitable, drivable access, as determined and approved by the City PWD. 15. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, Qwest, and Charter Communications, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 16. In addition to the Public Works Department standards, all of the "Utility{s}" requirements shall be followed in the installation of utility lines and appurtenances. As set forth in Section 70.0.0 of the City's Standards & Specifications. The designs for layout from each of the Utility Companies along with existing utility locations shall be presented on a single utility plan. The utility plan shall also include the existing and planned water and sewer locations along with street and driveway details sufficient to resolve conflicting locations. 17. The utility plan shall contain the signed approvals of each "Utility". All underground utilities shall be located within Public Utility Easements {PUE} or a separate utility righfi of way. 18. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed {both horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans and "as-built" drawings. 19. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat rnap reproduced on Mylar®and in an acceptable M C/TY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ~tI3{//2CttJ3 7 electronic form in AutaCAD° format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either ref#ect or be #ater modified to reflect any applicable "red-line" changes naffed in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. 20. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year flood zone, the Developer's engineer will be required to explain and provide detail as to what affect the placement of these structures will have on the flood zone; what affect it will have on the floodplain elevation and flood zone boundary; and what affects the modification of the floodplain elevation and flood zone boundary will have on the exiting and proposed facilities, and properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer shall determine the existing Base Flood elevation contours and illustrate the existing boundaries of the floodplain and floodway fora 100-year storm event on the construction plans submitted for the proposed development. STREETS=LIGHTING=TRAFFIC Section 300 & 700 of the City's Standards & Specification should be consulted for complete details regarding streets, lighting, and traffic guidelines. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to beate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface fee of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. A!I designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act {ADAM or as adopted by the ©regon Department of Transportation {C~DC}T), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. 2. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully development. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, T41 design guidelines, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. 3. The minimum geometric & structural requirements for all street classifications are defined in Section 300 of the City of Central Point Standards & Specifications. 4. The City of Central Point standards & Specifications Section 700 should be consulted for the location and design of required street lighting. The City has a contract with Pacific Power and Light under which PP&~ supplies and installs all streetlights, CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLlC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 4I3t112t?{?3 including supply of the anchor bolts and bolt template{s}. The ground rods, required conduit, and other fittings shall meet PP&~. design requirements. 5. Where special lighting fixtures are required such as in the Transit C7riented Development areas, the completed lighting shall provide the same amount of illumination at the street level as would the standard lighting fixture, spacing and pole heights specified in the City's Standards & Specifications Section 700. STORM C~7RA11VAGE Section 400 of the City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for complete details regarding storm drain guidelines. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project. If a contiguous annexed drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage are at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and 4DFW and United Sates COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase Il requirements. 2. Local drainage areas not included in a" Designated Flood Zone" as a result of a Federal Emergency Management Agency {FEMA} Study, shall have storm drains of sufficient capacity to carry runoff for a typical 10-year storm, unless the main discharge pipe or stream will have greater than 100 cubic foot per second discharge "Q" during a 10-year storm. When the discharge "Q" of storm drains exceeds 100 CFS, but is less than 200 CFS, that storm drain shall be designed to carry the runoff expected fora 50-year storm. When the main storm drain will have a discharge "Q" in excess of 200 CFS during a 50-year storm, that storm drain shall be designed to carry the runoff expected fora 100-year storm. A rainfall intensity duration Curve is supplied in Section 400 of the City's Standards & Specifications for construction. 3. Unless the engineer can otherwise demonstrate through hydraulic design that the existing facilities such as culverts, bridges or pipe, including any planned future development, will carry the computed discharge, the engineer will be required to design and dedicate detention basins or other facilities for the purpose of reducing the discharge until the downstream facilities have been improved or enlarge, or until ofiher solution have been found. 2~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPpRT 4/301211(13 9 4. The Public Works Department will require both; apre-condition analysis and a pe~st- canditian analysis of the project area that considers all planned or estimated build-out of future facilities in arder to substantiate the project design. 5, The Public Works Department requires that any storm sewer system to be dedicated to the City shall be designed as a "closed system" in arder to minimize the effect of graund water infiltration, silt and other undesirable substances. Weep hales and grade rings above the street sub-grade level ar hydraulic grade line in non-street installations, are exempted from the watertight requirement. The system shall also be designed to be "self cleaning" to extent possible. The minimum requirements are as follows; a. A minimum cleaning velocity of ~-fps will be maintained throughout all segments of pipe between catch basins or manholes regardless of the type of pipe used. In no case shall the pipe gradient be less than 8.885-ft per foot {8.5°Jo}. b. Cleaning velocity shall also be maintained through catch basins and manholes except at specially designed sediment cleaning structures as discussed in {section 428.10.04} of the City's Standards & Specifications. Street curb gutters shall be designed to maintain cleaning velocities between curb inlets including the corner radii. c, Many areas in the City of Central Paint have a high water table that fluctuates greatly with rainfall amounts as well as surrounding use. The applicant's engineer should consult section 428.'18.02 far requirements related to graund water control. SANITARY SEWER Section 588 of the City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted far complete details regarding sanitary sewer guidelines. The sanitary sewer system including all sewer mains, lateral piping, manholes and pumping stations are owned and administered by the Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA}. generally, all technical aspects of design, construction, approvals, inspections and testing of sanitary sewers shall be conducted by BCVSA. 2. It shall be the responsibility of the engineer to coordinate the design of the sanitary sewer with any existing ar proposed water system facilities, storm water sysfiems, and streets including any appurtenances, The engineer andJor applicant shall be responsible to investigate the area of the project and obtain all required approvals and permits from BCVSA, Public Works Department, Jackson County and the State of Oregon with respect to construction of sanitary sewer systems. The engineer may use ~~ ., ~ CITY pF CENTRAL PC71NT PUBLIC WpRKS ©EPARTMENT STAFF REPQRT 4t3(112tJ03 10 information that has formerly been established by the City and is can file, including previous Constructions. The sanitary sewer system design shall be in conformance with BCVSA requirements and specifications, including any applicable provisions of the Oregon Plumbing Code, Oregon DEQ and Oregon OHD. 3. Although BCVSA mandates requirements for the sanitary sewer design the City of Central Point Public Works Department Standards & Specifications includes a sanitary sewer Section 500 for requirements that are coincidental to construction of the sanitary sewer facilities within a City of Central Point right-af-way or City easement. WATER SYSTEM Section 600 of the City's Standards & Specifications should be Consulted for Complete details regarding water system guidelines. Designs shall Consider the existing water system, master plans; neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The applicant, engineer and contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. ~. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 3. Water lines shall normally be located 10 feet south or 10 feet west of centerline of streets. The longitudinal placement of water limes and valves within the intended vehicle wheel path shat! be avoided. 4. Exceptions to these requirements may be made in order to avoid Cutting and replacing pavement, to avoid Conflicts with other existing underground facilities and to permit sanitary sewers to be installed on the low sides of streets. As nearly as practical, mains shall be installed in the same relative location on a particular street with the distance from the Centerline of the street being varied as little as possible. 5. Water mains shall not e installed in alleys and the installation of mains within easements across privately owned property is to be done only when absolutely necessary such as the avoidance of dead-end Conditions. Such easements when required, shall be a minimum of 16-feet in width except that the Public Works Department may require additional widths far major trunk lines and multiple utility easement locations. Easements where required, shall be located adjacent to property lines of a single property and shall not straddle property lines. Conditions of the easement shall include provisions that the property included in the easement shall not be used for any purpose which would interfere with the unrestricted use for water ~~ CJ7`Y ©F CEN7"RAL P©1N7' PUBLIC WORKS CtEP,4t?TMENT S7"RFF REP©R7' 4/3(}12003 '# '[ system purposes including the maintenance, repair, construction or re-construction of such. Under no circumstances will the City grant permission for the construction of any building or structure of any type excluding fences within the easement. 6. A copy of standard City of Central Point easement forms is Included in Appendix A of these Standards & Specifications. 7. Separation of water mains, including service lines and sanitary sewers shall be in accordance with current Oregon State Health Division Rules C}AR 333-001-000(10}, figure 1, and / or as modified in these Standards except in all cases where running parallel with each other, there shall be a minimum 10-foot separation unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 8. Excepting sanitary sewers as noted above, the minimum horizontal spacing between water mains and storm sewers, gas lines, electrical utilities, shall be five (5} feet horizontally and twelve {12} inches vertically as measured from the outside of the pipe or conduit. Separation between other public utilities such as Gas, TV or Telephone and similar utilities shall be as determined by the individual utility company or franchisee. 9. In all cases where utilities cross in close proximity to one another, a cement sand slurry shall be required for separation between any city lines and any utility. In some cases, depending on size and type of facility, concrete bridging piers or supports will be required to span the water facility. The vertical spacing at sewer crossings shall be designed and constructed in accordance with CHAR Chapter 333, Division 61 {10}. 10. The minimum size far distribution lateral water mains in residential areas shall be 8 inches. The minimum size in multiple-dwelling, commercial and industrial areas shall be 12-inches except that in the sole discretion of the Public Works Department, 8-inch lateral lines may be allowed if flows meet domestic and fire protection needs in the area. Where fire demands or line losses might demand larger sized pipe, the engineer will be required to submit hydraulic computations to support the use of 8-inch pipe, or to establish the size required. 11. In certain cases, such as cul-de-sacs, where water lines will not be extended, where not more than ten {10} dwelling units are to be served and no fire hydrants are to be served by the line, a 6-inch diameter water line may be approved. 12. Where no fire hydrants are served and no more than five {~} dwelling units are served, a 4-inch diameter water line may be approved where the line length will be less than 200-feet. 13. Each dwelling and commercial building shall be served by a separate water service connection. .- ~ ctrr~ m ~ r Q 'a` -row 2 ,b ~" .cNti~a M ? ..j Ch' `~+~Je 4 ~ "~`11 {\{\~~\\ ~ ~o' Puy 42 RfW t7.~'* C1.5'* ~1 gx 1O' ~" „~ ~ SfD£WRt,K SIDEWALK PARKING 3z TRAV'ct LM"E TRAVEL' GWE JY ~~ C C~ a n "G r-+ ~ ~ ~ ~._,~ ~~~ ~ '~ i° ~" a r--+ 7 ~~" 3 N'D>~? R~SID~NT1. O' ~~ 3 ~~'AL. ST~?E~E~T wlrx PARx~nrc ~N c~N~ sr©~ NOT TO SCALE -~ r~ E~ NOTES *7. WNERE APPROVEQ tN RE51C7ENTiAL AREAS 3-FOOT ROLLED CURB AND GUTTER SECTION ~T7'PE ~ CURB ANC? GUTTERS MA ~ B~ CES ~ NE ASPN ~ T CONCRETE PA FitIfENT WIDTNR REQUtRE•D FROM 33 ~~O AND GUTTER SECTION 2. SEE TABLE' .3OC1_,3 FOR MtNtMUM STREET SECTJON REQUIREMENTS. 3. SEE' TABLE 3OC3-~ 1 D f OR NJDTNS AND RJGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS 4. TRANSVERSE' GRADE ARE .3~'. /~tt~1C~tItICt1t ~~~''} RECOMMENDED PLANNING I)EI'ARTNIEN'I' CC}NDITIC}NS QF AI'PR4~'AL l . A final development plan, containing in final form the itzfoz'~natiolz recluirecl i~z the preliminary plan shad be subznittecl to the City witl~iiz six months of approval or by l~oveinber 4, 2{03. A six month extension niay be granted by the City upon the applicant's request and for good cause. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulatioizs including, but not limited to, the Qregon Uniform 1~ire Code and Striictural Specialty Code. 3. The applicant shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the City for approval as part ofthe final development plan. A suitable landscape plan. shall show the types, shapes, and sizes of tree's on the site. 4, The applicant shall submit a copy of the Covenazzts, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R's} and I-Iome {Jwners Association and any comparable agreement governing the use, maintenance and continued protection of the 1'UD as part of the final developzxzent plan. G:'~E~lan~ti~~~1{J3tl l C7stre.~ac7rt.~vpcd e ~'"~ ., ,. 6~ FLANNiNG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPUR'T HEARING DA`I'S: May 6, 2003 TC): Central Point Planning Comtrtission FRfJ1Vl: Matt Samitore, Community Planner SI~BJECT: Public 1-Ieaz-ing- Site Plan Review for 37 2~V 1 1 BC, Tax Lot 4100 - Coznmercial Garage Applicant Scott Narraznore 43I South Front Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent David Kenyon 557 Eastwood Drive Medford, 4R 97504 Pro er Same as Applicant 4~~vner Pro cr Descriptionl 37 2~V 118C, Tax Lot 4100 - 0.12 acres total. Zo..~, nines C-5, Cozrzz~zercial Thoroughfare, with a TC3D GC Corridor Qverlay ~tl-..-_.I3it11al~ The applicant leas requested a Site Plan Review for the construction of a comzrzercial garage. Aathority~ CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Site Plan Review. Notice of the Public ~-Iearing was givcz~ in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment "A"}. Applicable Law: CPMC 17.46.010 et seq. - C-5, Cozrzzrzercial Thoroughfare CPMC 17,65.010 et seq. - Exhibit B TC}D Districts and Cozxidors - GC -General Commercial CPMC 17.64.010 et.seq. - C7ff Street Parking and Loading CPMC 17,72.010 ct seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval a DISC11SS1021' The applicants have requested that the Planning Commission review a site p]azz aplalication that would allow the coz~stz-uction of a coznzncrcial gaz•age within the C-5, Commercial Thoz-oughfare District with a TC7D General Commercial {GC) overlay. The coznzx~ercial garage would be uscti foz• auto detailing and cleaning of the vehicles. Tile building is proposed to be ten feet { l (}') froze the side property line. The normal setback for corner lots in the TtJD-GC zoning is a zeiniznuzn oflifteen feet {15'}. The setback creates a large area ofnon-useable space anti is a zz3ajor deviation from the rest of the T(~D Zoning Code and the zest of the Municipal Code which encourages buildings to be set nearer the street. Staff has recoznzeended the building be moved to the ten foot { l 0') setback izz order for the applicant to get the building they desired. This setback. is one of many that will be reviewed for modifzcation when the entire 1'QT~ L1~sigrt Regrrit°erarenfs crud Grridelin~s is reviewed latez• this year. The Site Plan meets most of the T(~l~ 1:7esigrz Requir•~rarerrts arrd Crrid~lirzes foz• architecture, landscaping, and parking requirements . The Architecture ofthe building features separated garage doors, differing siding types, and a pitched roof The property must have a landscape and irrigation plan that indicates approximately ~7~ square feet of landscaped area. The current site plan indicates approximately 820 square feet of landscape space on the tax lot which will be irrigated by a drip irrigation system. An omission was wade by the applicants in that they did not show the sidewalk and landscaping along Cedar Street. Cedar Street is a sixty foot {60'} Right-of--way, which is paved at a width of forty feet {40'}. There is an additional 10' of Right-of~Way along Cedar Street that is currently being used by the applicants for vehicular parking. This area will now be required to have a five foot sidewalk and 5 feet of landscape row. The applicant has shown a five foot sidewalk along Front Street. The amount of vehicles and off-street parking for the business leas been a concern frozz~z the neighbors. Currently, the applicant is using the maximum amount of area, including public right-of way, for their vehicular sales. With the addition ofa garage the applicant must upgrade the facility to current city standards. These include the landscaping that was previously discussed as well as customer parking and amount of vehicles on site. The building currently has an apartment, which is agrand-fathered use, and a commercial office. The apartment is required to have 1.5 designated spaces and the commercial office must have at least 1 designated spaces. The proposed building will also require 1.5 additional spaces, for a total of four designated spaces. The new garage and landscaping areas will also take away from the amount ofparking area allowed for vehicular sales. The planning department has prepared a small znap showing the current location of buildings, the proposed building, landscaped areas, and designated parking spaces {Attachment C}. The Site Map included by the applicant is not accurate. Using this map as a site plan for the entire property the applicant is allowed to have a maximum of 14 vehicles for sale at any given tune. The effected agencies have been notified. Fire District No. 3 and BCVSA have submitted letters of correspondence {Attachment D}. The Department of Public Works has submitted a staff report {Attachment E}. The Public Works Department is concerned about the new building and the requirements for such buildings with tl~e Department ofEnvironmental Quality. A permit froze DEQ d~ is required prior to the building being issued. The applicant nay Have to lzigl~er an engineer to clcsig~~ the drainage for the new ca~n~nercial bui lcling in artier to ~x~eet DEQ's requirements. A ten-foot { 1 {~`~ Public Utility Easement is required around the exterior of tl~e property. Aclditianal i~nprave~~~ents include sidewalks and landscaping. Findings of Fact 8z Concl~rsions of L~~v: In approving, canditianally approving ar denying the; plans subn~ittcel, the City bases it's clccisian an the fallowing standards from Section 17.2.{140: A. Landscaping and fencing and the eanstructian afwalls an the site in such a manner as to cause the sa~r~e to not substantially interfere with the landscaping sclzezne of the neighborhood, and in such a rr~anner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterageneaus to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the ~xaaintenance of existing plants ar the installation of new apes for purposes of screening adjoining property, ^ The site plan shows landscaped areas along the hack and side of fhe project area that satisfy the requirements of the T47D Corrido~• zoning dist~•icts. l~. Design, number and location of ingress and egress paints sa as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets, ^ Primary access is shown to betaken from Front Street. Pedes#~•ian access is proposed from sidewalks on Cedar and Fron# St~•ee#s. C. Ta provide off street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a ~r~anner as is compatible with the use far which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a r~aanner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flaw on public streets; ^ Four designated parking spaces must be identified by the applican# prior to building final, The TQD Corridor requires 1.5 spaces per each. agar#ment {1.5 spaces ~•egeiired), 1 space per 400 square feet of floor area for professional office {1 space required}, phis 1 space per 1000 square fee# of floor area for Vehicle sales, Ren#al, and repair {1.5 spaces required). For a Total of four {4} spaces. L~. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with ar deter fro~r~ traffic control signs ar devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings ar uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance ar visibility of nearby signs; ^ There are no signs associated with this project. The appIican#s have changed #heir signs in the las# ,year #o meet the TC}D requirements. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety oflife, limb and property, including, but not limited ta, suitable gates, access roads ,. and fire lanes so that all buildings on the pre~x~ises are accessible to fi~•e apparatus; ^ An approval of this project ~voi~tct be subject to the recomn~enclations of Jacksol~ County Fire District N~xmber 3, BCVSA, and DEQ. F. Compliance with all city ordinances antl regulations; ^ The proposed constriction meets the minimum setback requirements fox• the C~S, Commercial Thoroughfare district, but do not meet the co~•ne~• tot p~•ovisions of the TUD Corridor Generat Commercial District. Staff is recommenclini; the ten foot (10'} setback proposed be approved. CS. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ The architecture of the building. meets the TfJD Design. Guidelines and Requirements minimum standards. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions. l .Adopt Resolution No., approving the Site flan Review subject to the recommended conditions of approval, or 2. Deny the Site flan Review, or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan Review at the discretion of the Coznz~ission. Attachments A, Notice of Public Hearing B. Applicant's Application Packet and Exhibits C. Planning Department Site Map D. Recommendations for affected agencies. E. Public Works Staff Report F. Planning Department Reco~n~r~ended Conditions of Approval ~. ~~~ ~~~ of "~"`` . ~~ .-r ~4C ~~~~~~~~ TE~~~ I'1,11 NIVTNC~y 1.~~'1?11 T''11~~1T;°N'l' '1'c~rTT lllllrll}I~T-a}~, t11C~i' E'i~lnnirl{; 1)irecl.f7T' lien tFc:l~sch]t~T. [;f7TT]II71T[711.V I}IikI7T1C'.T' ~•~ai.# ~faTrTil.f7r't~ ~.`t1TT71T71.11"11~.}1 ~'Ieli1T']t',i' Dave Arkens Planning Technician Notice of ~'ublic Meeting Date of Notice; Apr~~ 15, 203 Meeting bate: Time: Place: I~iATURE 4F MEETI~iG May 6, 2003 7:00 p.m. (Approximate Central Point City Hail 155 South Second Street Central Point, C}regon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an application for a site plan that will allow the construction of a 1,575 square foot shop building for a car sales business at 431 South Front Street. The subject parcel is in an TCID-GC, General Commercial zoning district and is identified in the records of the .Iaclcson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 1 IBC, Tax Lot 4100. The Central Point Planning Commission will review the site plan application to determine if all of the requirements ofthe Central Point Municipal Code can be:<net. Ifthe Commission determines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued . CRITERIA FC~R DECISIt~N The requirements for site plans are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General information and conditions on the project approval. PUBLIC CC?MMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land. use decision may submit written comments up until the close ofthe meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 6, 2{}03. ~a 2. Written comments may be sent in aciva~~ce of tlic meeting to Central Paint City 1-loll, 155 South Second Street, Ce~~tral Point, OR 975{12. 3. Issues which may provide the basis far an appeal an the matters shall be raised prior tt> tl~e expiration of the comment period notccl above. Any testimony and written caznlnents about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and sl~auld be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of ail evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, I55 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon.. Copies ofthe same are available at I5 cents per page. 5. Far additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at {541} 664- 332I ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PRC}CEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staffreports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments an the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set Earth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the site plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Paint City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. 155 South Second Street O Central Point, OR 975G2 !F {541} 664-3321 1~! Fax: {54I} 664-6384 ~~, ho?~: Aroposec( 5'-Ct^ buitHkng @Xi@f1Sf6n y >~.. South 35 23' 0" East Gt3' D" a S :~ rs O O 2.1 u7 N a w Q M ~{ C Note: Aropased 5'-0"building extension --y4~~ f ~,.-^~„_.,..y f„~-' 1 i~ •~\ ~ / ~,,g~~ry; // ,<b ~~ ~~ ~~ h +4 W P M ~S b ,~-.1'~C Dc~~2t ProPeF! Descrtptioa~ Lot3 in 61ock #3 of the City of CB»tral Point. Ora9on Address; A31 S. Front Zoning: GC {70D Disttic;J f3uitding Square Faotage~ 3575 Sq. Ft. Mazimurn k,ot Coverage {$5"to}; ProviBed = 86°k lv3irritnum E,andscape Area; Required {t5°fo} S 960 Sq. Ft. Aravided = 820 Sq. Ft. Pref iminarv Site Desogn for Below Wholesale Auto ~,.,~.<<.r,, r..~ ~ west nu~ u~~ F#"Di"~1~ ~~Ce2'~ Cf~ ~ a o -- C to t,...,,t} ~2. ~~ CQ .--.. t7d C CD W ~0 O ~r 0 C3 tl) W ~" ~" ~~ ~_ ~~. 4€~ CJverall Building Height 2~'-p" {apprax} f ~~ ~.~ ~ J __ ..: __ _ { ~" ~ ~~ ~„ tiS _._~-.?~1,:~~...__~.~' __ !'til. ~r~3t..~r°~~__.~.t~t~£X~' _ ~.~~.t`~.__.... ~__ ~~-- - _ -_ ~_~ .~. L ""Y~ ._~. __ ._.~ ___. ......_...~~~~~~~ __. ~ ~_.a~...~...... _ _. _. __: , ___. ._. _ _` ,r~, r i ~4ll~i 2H~~ l6. ~~ 826456 ~7C~ Il3 ~~1~ CI~C WAGE 03 ~~~' ~ c~. ~z~~ ~~T~ ,~ACKSC~N CC3U~~'Y' WH1T~ czt~' o~~~o~ 975U3-~a75 ,.~.~-~~~~~ ~~ 83 ~ 3 AGA"!1~ RQAC), , .`cf'd ~o,rn ac-~ April 22, 2aC?3 City of Central Point Attn: Ken Gersehler Fire Districfi #3 comme»ts: Below Wholesale Auto Shop 1, The Uniform Fire Code applies in this application, ~. We will need to have a set of plans construction type# square feet, and occupancy class issued by the building official before we can crake additional comments. 3, Describe the intended use of the building, Mark E+~oran Deputy Fire Marshal ~34/:~:~;'~~L~ :~~::;~, ~i41~:3~`~2!'"~ ~C;VU#~ SAGE ~121E12 ~~A~ t~r~~~~ VAL.~.~~t'` ~A11~~TARY AllTN~C3F~ITY .~~ts aaurt~ ~nct~~e ~twv. ~ M~t~rsxaa, ctst~r~aH ~7sat.$a$$ . {sat} asa_~,ga • (sat} Tr$~atao rax {a4t}'S3lS.tt27e • www.aevte.orp .Apr~i 23, 20{3 City of Central Point Plaz~zxi.x~g Depa~e~t ~ ~5 Srsutlz Secaxzd Street Central Paint, (~xegc~rz 975f~~ ~2.e: Sel+~rv ''4~'holesate Auto Shvla, Ijile # 03-O.ZX Dear den, `t'here is a sanitary sewer znain located adjacent to the subject prr~pt~rty Utz bath Cedar Stmt acid P'xont Sheet. Either ofthese Ic~cations nay be used tc~ prr~vide sewci' sez~vice, Conx},ection to the sewer tivill require ~. permit ar~d payrxaertt cif dcvelc~pa~exlt fees. The appli~t should contact k3CVS.A, so that the fees can be ca2curated and pazd prior to tae start of constnzction. Zf yr~u need additioz~ai infcrmatiox}, please call me at 779-4144: Sincerely, Carl Tappez~t, P.E. T~istrict l~n~ineer ~.:1A.A`I`~.I~.GEI~CIES~CEI~'Tl'T~F'I.~,~1~CxlSl'1`EPLA~I~VTE~J1(~~ ~- 021 ~3Fl..Q"~trW~C}~ESALEAU'~`C~.~tJC 4~ ~~ C ~'I"~ {~ F C:F DT'I' R.AL ~' (~ ~ ~T 1''zxblie Forks Ilepaxt~r~~nt .. . ~F.1-,~1:C)I~:I~I~V~~ To: ~>~,;~~~;rli~c:3 cc~~ln~llsszc~ FROM: PL"Z~I.~IC ~~'C~1Zl~S I71~1~I~'I'~Il:<,~1'C' SUBJECT; ~~l:~z.a~~ ~~-~c~~.l_11~~.~~~, ~~~L'~•c~sl~~c~~~ ~~~~ ~~~l~c~l~'~~ srl~l~~r~~ DATE; ~--3C)-2Cl(}3 Cozxxzxxissioners: 't`he applicant has requested the re~-ie~v of a site plaza tlxat ~vi11 allow the eozxstt~~ctiazx of a duplex on a lot ~vitlx and ezistizxg clwellizxg located at 431 Z~rant Street. The falloivizxg axe special requiremezxts znandatc.d b~- the Cite of Central 17aizxt l'ulalic Worl~s Z~elxartmczxt. "1'he l'ul~lic Worl~s Z~epartzxxent recozxazxxends the Z~c~>elaper cc~zxsult the Citt~'s Stazxdards c~: Specificatiozxs or C;ztt' Staff fax further izxfc>rzxxatiazx. 1. lNach can-site coznzxxcrcial buildizxg zxxust he sez~c-ed ley azx individual metered water ser~-ice connectiazx 2. The Z~evelapez: will. be z:equired to sulxznit a grading 8~ drainage plan fox- the proposed development. Cit-t' Staff must z:eview & approve the grading ~ drainage desizjzx pxzoz to issuing ant= permits relative tc~ tlxe lxraposed de~-clopinent. 3. ~xi~~ezx the nature of tlxe praposed conxmercial developzuent the Public ~'orl~s Departzxzent tivill require written authorization far the de~~eIoprrzezxt frozxx tlxc Z~epartnxent c>f llzxviranzxxezxtal C}ualitt- {l~L;~?} pz:ior to issuing and= permits far the proposed dex-elapzx-tent. '' ~. `I'l~e Citr~ of C:c:rltr~al 1'c~irlt 1'ul~lic ~~'jc>z~ks 17el~ar-€r~~rczzt will cxar~-rinc tllc e~istin€; cvnditivz~r of czu(~, l;u€:€er: and sicle~valk l~v~~der:ir~g €I~c 1-rrol~ert~ fr~cxztal;e vn Cedar and I=rvnt Streets. After r•c~-ietvinl; the cvr~clitiora cif €l-rc e~istin~; infrastrtirctzzze tl-re C:it~, Yvill z~rxake ~ dcterzzxirlativrz z•ctt;arclin~; €~lae need tc> cc>nst.ruct oz: irazl~r:cac-e tlzc elements of curb, Matter, and side~valls. '1'he cost of in-rl~rc}~-ink curl, l;utter and sidewalk shall be the svle resl~c~nsibilit}~ of tl•ae l~evclvl~e;r. Sir~cezcl~', I]nblic ~~'vr~ks I~elaartznent 4 ~s ATTACIIMEN'I' F RECOMIVIENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CC3NDIT14NS 4F APPROVAL 1. The approval ofthe Site Pla~z shah expire in one year ocz May (~, 2(}44 unless an application for a building permit or a~a application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall subzx~it a revised si#e flan depicting any changes eliscussecl and approved a# the public hearing wi#l~iz7 GO clays of Planning Co~nn~ission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, s#a#e and federal regula#ions . 3. The applicant shall eonstrue# a five foot {S'} sidewalk along #l~e exterior of#l~e property. 4. The Appliean# shall construct all landscaping proposed before the building finale. 5. The applicant shall designate four spaces for off street parking. Three of those spaces are required for customer parking and one for the exis#ing apart~~en#. 6. The appliean# is limited to 14 vehicles for sell at any given time. PLANNING DEPAR`I'1bIENT S'I"AFT REP+OR"C MEETING DATE: May C, 20{?3 T(7: Central Point Planning Co~z~tmission FROM: K.en Gerscl~ler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Site Plan Review for 37 2W ~2CB, Tax l.,ot SQ{l0 - Duplex Applicant/ Roy and Shannon Shaw Pra per 216 Meadowbrook Drive O•+vncr Central Point, Oregon 9'7SC}2 Pro er Description) 37 2W ~2CB, Tax Lot SO{~0 - O.18 acres total. Zoning_ R-3, Residential Multiple Family District Sumnaarv: The applicant has requested a review of a site plan that will allow the construction of a duplex on a lot with an existing dwelling at 833 Laurel Street. Authority: CPMC 1.24.OS(} vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a site plan, Notice of the public meeting was given in accordance with CPMC l .24,06 {Attachment "B"). Applicable Law• CPMC l'7.28.O10 et seq. - R-3, Residential Multiple Family District CPMC 17.64.010 et seq. -Off Street Parking and Loading CPMC 1 x.72.0 l 0 et seq. -Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Discussiou- The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission allow the construction of a duplex behind tl~e house at 833 Laurel Street. The duplex would be attached to the existing house. Under normal circumstances, the Pla~aning Department Staff would be able to review the plan without a public meeting however, the code requires a Commission approval when there is an existing structure on the parcel. The site plan and elevations {Attachment "A"} show that the applicant has found plans on the Internet for the two story duplex. Each"Duplex" unit will contain 1200 square feet and have three L~ bedrooms, one and a l~alfbathraams. 'I'he Plan~zi~z Departznetxt has examined the plan al~tions and observed that the climensians shown ocz the site plan do eat n~zatch those shown on pla~z nczzz~ber Sd0309. The applicant will need to revise the flans to tz~atclz what is proposed an the site pla~z izzcluding the architectzzral features shown on the elevatiaFZS. An accurate landseal}e and iz•rigation plan will also need to be subn-zitted prior to aecel~tance afbuilding plans. Miniznuzn setback requirements for this parcel are 5 feet per story an side yards anti I ~ feet for the rear lot line. All setbacks zneasureznents have been znet tagetlzcz• with tl~ze density requirements for the R-3 zoning district. A copy ofthe site plan has been. distributed to the Building L7cpartznent which has been reviewing the project. There znay be issues concerning hre/life/safety since the structure is to be attached to the existing residence. Ifthe Plazaniz3g Commission should approve this project, the applicant would need to meet the requirements outlined by the Building Depaz~tzxzent. CPMC 17.b~1.0~0 {A-2) requires "rxot less tl2an t~~o spaces per cl~velli~ag ut2it, at bast raze ref zvlaiclz shall be a garage at° caryaort ". The existing residence will continue to use Laurel Street exclusively for access to the single car garage with additional area for a second uncovered space. The duplex will be served by an alley at the rear of the parcel. Two single car garages have been shown together with dedicated uncovered areas with enough space for two vehicles. The site plan. demonstrates that there is adequate maneuvering area faz• vehicles. The applicant is aware that he will need to make impravezxzents since the duplex will create additional demand on the alley. The Public Works Staff report will elaborate and is attached as Exhibit "D" Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority azzd Jackson County Fire District Number Three have submitted correspondence for consideration by the Planning Caznzrzission. An S inch sewer main has been identified in Laurel Street. The applicant should contact BCVSA for details and applicable fees. The Fire District will require that the applicant submit detailed plans for review, Notices to suz-rounding property owners were sent out by mail anal no comments have been received. Findings of Fact & Conch~sions of Law: In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision. on the following standards froze Section 17.72.t34(l: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to eat substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission znay require the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property. ~ The applicant has incizzded landscaping on the site plan that he submitted howeve~•, the plan is not specific as to plant type or irrigation method. The Planning Department has recommended a condition that an accurate landscape plan be submitted prior to the 5~ acceptance of bzzildizzg permits. B. Design, number anti location of izzgz-ess and egress points so as to in~lx•ove anti to avoid interference wit}~ the traffic flow on public streets; ~ The existing Izozzse will continzze to take access from Lauz•el Street. The dzzplex will zzse an alley at the rear of the lot. The Pzzblic Works Department r~vill likely regzzire fzzll alley improvements aiozzg the portiozz of the property that adjoins the project area. C. To provide off street paz•kin and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used az~d capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ Off street parking requirements have been met for this project per CPMC 17.64.040(A}{2}. D. Signs and other outdoor advez'tising structures to ezzsure that they do not conflict with or deter froze traffzc control signs or devices and that they are cozrzpatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract froze the, appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ There are no signs associated with this project. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety oflife, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the prez'nises are accessible to fire apparatus; ^ An approval of this project would be subject to the recotnznendations of .lacksozz County Fire District l'~Sumber 3. l". Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction meets the minimum setback requirements for the R-3, Residential Multiple Family District. All applicable requirements of the municipal code can be met by the applicant, G. Compliance with such architecture and design. standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ Multiple family dwelling groups are a permitted use in the R-3 district and the applicant has provided an adequate site plan that meets the intent of the code. Recommendation Staff recoznzxzends that the Planning Cozrzzxzission take one of the following actions: ~ ~. ~ ~~ ~ 1. Adopt Resolution No.~, approving tl~e site plan subject to tl~e reco~~~mendecl conclitio~~s of approval; or 2. Deny the site plan based upon a~`ticulated findings of fact; or 3. Continue the review of the site plan at the discretion of the Co~n~nission. Attachments A. Site Plan and Elevations B. Notice of Public Meeting C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions ofApproval D. Public Works Staff Report E. Correspondence i F 3 1 S .._ t7h! - ..._.._ .,.....,........ I _._._ _ ... ., . ~ ~ ~n ~ i Q37r~s33 F.,2fO,.L.{J ~ Cd~71~n©'~ . _.__. { C=~rc~~t, Ct~fi~ v2 x ~1 4 "'~~a..i~,.4.:~ t LJ ~J _S..t~t W.:~?~.._71,OQ^l.~t ~ "f ~.tirutb5,. ..2f~,~. . v, _ ~ -~»5 CIS- ....... ............~_.~-b. ~ z t~1 .. 'ate 7!7 r^t.4~ h.,,~.asx~.~ }O! ..__ ~ ..... [ ; ..._ _ . ,. ~ ~ ~~,.~ r ;; _.__..._..... f ~~'Zt.1S' ~ v ~, ~~. r~ ~'.~ ~. rw .i House Plans and Duplex Hc~rtt~ ~'3~ Designs ~ Plan #54309 www. Fl©meP(a nFi rider. com duplex Page 1 csf 5 Ifl the floor plan shown, the layout of the main floor units is shown to the left and the layout of the upper floor units is shown to the right. Living area{sq ft} Rooms Foundations C?rdering info Main: 6oojfio0 Bedrooms: 3 basement Plan can be customised Upper: 6ooj6oo Full baths: 1 VYidth:~s~'v" Prices Total: 120oJI20o Half baths: 1 C-epth:3o'6" Order Code:GHG55 Car stalls: 0 Order ~~" The "living area" square footage is for the finished space of the home. For mint's family plans, sgssas~e footage and other specifications are shown per unit. For more information about multi family homes, click here. Construction spec cations Roof frame Truss t+yati thickness 2xt} Maximum roof height ~$, `t~! Roof pitch fprimary_} 61t~ Roa# pitch {secondary} 8tt 2 ~a411~d (~4ive} 4o Ibs Rcof load fDead~ 20 tbs Main t2oor ceiling height g` 13pper floor ceiling height ~, E}a5@me l ~ feet ~~ Sf Plant Package(s) Prices in USA dollars Amount 8 set . {Recommerxted} .~ 4 set . (Min. construction pl~q} $6't 5.t~3 1 set . {Study Package} 5515.OC} f7e~ro, master {v_eiium} S72a•W Autocad.DWG ~'! 025.tk7 L.i~t Readino Reverse 560.4t~ Additional sets ~-~ Material list ~~.~ http:l/c~~ww.homeplanfinder.cam/factsheet.asp?pl~.n-543o9&ordercode=--CaHG55 4/212003 ,.~e Plans and 1~uple~ Hom,, Haan Resigns J Plan ##543(}9 www. HomePlanFinder.ccm ~G Page 3 cif 5 llttp:/J~v~u~.hr~>€~leplanf nder.comlfa~slleet.asp'?plan=54309&ordercc~de=GHG55 4/2/2003 To order plan #54349 order code: GHG55, call 80~-345-4663 or 303-6?1-6844 www.HomePlanFznder.com ~ 1994-2003 Ablrisaft Hause Plans, Inc. 2. written comments may be sent iz1 advance of the meeting to Centz•al 1'oizzt City I-Fa11, F S ~ South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for az~ appeal on the znattcrs shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available far public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at X541} 664- 3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY C3F FR©CEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staffreports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, anti hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the site plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~~ 155 South Secozzd Street +~- Central Point, C~I2 97502 +~ (541} 664-3321 1~ Fax: (541} 664-6384 ATTAC~IMrN"~' c RECOMMENDED PLANNING t7EPAR'I'MLNT CONDI'1'inNS {)F APPR(3VAL I . The approval of the site plan shall expire in o~~e year on May Ci, 2004 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by #lle City. The applicant shall submit a z-evisecl si#e plan depicting any changes discussed a~~cl approved a# the public hearing within ~0 days of Planning Coznn~zission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations or staff assigned conditions. 3. The applicant shall submit elevations that generally z~~zatch #hose given #o the Planning Coznzrzission at the meeting on May 6, 2(703. The, City will not accept building plans until this condition is znet. 4. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan that identifies plant species, size ofplants, and irrigation system. ~. lrir~i~ `~' . _. __ .Pr~blte Works Depa~trner~ t _ . _. . ~~1=J~tC)l~<°1i~I~t~~I To: PZaz~~vltiliriCl ~:c)~-~~~Z~s~c) FRdM: PL~I3Z.ZC ~UC)RI~.S Z~l:1P~1R'1'1~I1=~~"Z" SUBJECT: I'RC~PC?SI:11~ Z~L PI,}:s5: (I.C~C1i1"Z'EZ~ ~l`I" X33 I.~1LIZI~aZ, S`"Z'R3:i:'Z~ DATE: 4-3C}-20113 Cozrzznissioncrs: "1 he applicant has requested the re~-ie~v of a site flan that will allow the construction of a duplex oza a lot with an existing dwelling located at S33 Z.,aurcl Street. 'I'lae following are special requirezxzents mandated ht- the City= of Central Point Z'ublic ~~'orlcs Z~epartmcnt, `Z'hc Z7ublic ~'orl~s Z~epartx;tent recozaaz~zxends the Z)e~-cloper consult tlae Cit~~'s Standaxds 8c Specifications or City Staff for further inforz~zaation. 1. The proposed duplex must be sert-ed b~- a zxzctered tvatcr sez~rice conzaection other than the existzng dwelling. 2. "I'l~e Developer ~cvill Z7e required to subzxa.it a grading ~: drainage plan for the proposed development. Citt~ Staff must review ~ approve the grading ~ drainage design prior ro issuing and- permits relatitre to the proposed de~-eloprnent. 3. The Developer will be responsible for "f~Ialf ~llc}-" izxzprovements along the subject properties northtvcstcrl~F property boundax-~=. This includes a structural section and asphalt overla~~ section for the entire length of the Developer's property. The CittT of Central Paint intends to fuIIS- irrzprot-c the subject act, in tl~e next budget c}-cle. "I'hercfore, a construction cost estizxaate will be completed b~, the Public Worl~s Department for the Developer's portion. of the alley izxzprovements. ~`he Developer will be required to paC- the City- in full for the costs associated with their development prior to the issuing of an~r permits relati~-e to tlac proposed development. ~. "J:'he Cite- of Central Point i'ublic ~Y~orl~s Department ~viZl examine the existing a~zadition of curb, gutter and sidezvall~ bordering the property> frontage on T.,aurel 6~ St~:eet. After re~-ie~uiz~~; the cc7taciitiat~ z~f tl~c c~istiza~; it~fz:~stz:tzet~.~zc: t-l~e Cit~t' ~~~ii1 tnal.e: a cleterta~.izaatic~z~ re~arcbz~~; tbe; necc3 t:t~ cc~t~struct c>r itt~~~t-c>~>c t:hc e1et~-zez~ts cif curb, gutter azac~ sic~etvalls. Sinccrel~,', Pub~€c ~~loz:lis ~e~artza-zcnt a ~~A~ CR~E~ VA~~.~''1~ ANT`ARY A1,1~'Nt3R7°Y 3915 80UTH PAC[FEC HWY. + MEDFOftD, ORBGtJN 97501-9099 • (541} 535.5193 • {541} 779-4144 FAX {541} 535-5278 • vrww.bcvsf-,org .. April 23, 2U4}3 Ken Gerschler FAQ 664-6384 City of Central Point Planning Depa~~ment 1 SS South Second Street Central Point, C}regon X7502 Re: Laurel Street Duplex, File ## 03-026 Dear Ken, City ~of Cen#x~l Foix~.t ~~~~I~~T ~~~ ~t l~lannin~ Departrnen't The existing house is connected to the 8" sanitary sewer main in Laurel Street. The proposed new duplex will require a new service connection to the main line. Connection will require a permit and payment of development charges to BCVSA. The applicant should contact BCVSA so that the charges can be calculated and paid before the start of construction. If you need additional information, please call me at x'79-4144. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:IDATAIAGENCIESICENTPTIPLANNGISITEPLANREV1EW103- 026_LALTR.ELSTREETD~.JPLEX.DOC ~~ H4/22~'2~83 16:31 8264566 J~FD3 ~I~; O~G 6'66 E~4 E 3 ~~~.~ t~~~~~~~~ ~o. ,AC~csc~N cauN~r~r 83,33 AGATE RflAp, WHi C~ CI'T'Y, C3t2~Gi3N 97503-7.075 (~41) 82,fi-71.00 ~~( ~54J.? Sz6-4566 www;~,„cfd~,cam April 22, 2U03 Citjr of Central P©int Attn, ~ Ken Gerschler Fire District ~3 Comments: S33 Laurel Street Duplex 1. We will need to see a set of plans that describes the street access be-~er. (see the attached plat I was given. ~~~ is difficult to determine measurements, Mark Moran Deputy Fire Marshal ~ 3"~ ~~ PLANI~III~'G DEPARTMENT STAFF REP4R"1" ~~EARING DATE May 6, 2003 Tfl: Central Point Planning Com~Y~ission FROM: Tozn Humphrey ATCP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Conditional Use, Tentative Plan, and Planned Unit Dc;vclopmcnt for Beebe Wood Village. Applicantt fl~vne~~: Naomi F. and Cartee Wood, LT.~C Wood l?a~nily, LLC 4582 C)ld Stage Road Central Point, OR 97502 Galpin, LLC P.C?. Box 8271 Medford, c~R 97501 Anent: Craig A Stone & Associates, Ltd. 708 Cardley Avenue Medford, {~R 97504 Pr©perty Description/ 37 2W l C Tax Lots l 400 & l 500 - 8.78 Acres Zoning: R-2, Residential Two-Family District Summaxy~ The applicant has submitted a preliminary development plan far a residential planned community and subdivision consisting of l02 attached single family dwellings, public greenways and a private parr and streets {Attachment A}. The applicant is also requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop this Planned Unit Development {PUD} in the R-2 zoning district. Authority CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a preliminary development plan for PUD, a tentative subdivision plan and a conditional use permit application. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC I.24.O~a0. {Attach~xaent B}. Applicable La~~v• CPMC 16.10.0I0 ct seq.- Tentative Plans CPMC 17.24.0 l0 et seq.- R-2, Residential Two-Family District CPMC 17.68.0T0 et seq.- Planned Unit Development CPMC 17.76.010 et seq.- Conditional Use Permit L}iSCtlSSion; The City Council approved an annexation for this property in July 20(}2 at the request of the property owners and based upon a sub-az°ea zrrastez- plern fihat was developed fcaz• tine site by thezrz and by City planning staff The Caznzaaission p~zay recall reviewitzg the two options for this pz•aperty. The options involved a zxzodest increase in izousirag density but it still remained closer to the R- i value of 6 units per acre than to the R-2 value of up to 12 units per acre. Participants in the planning process a~n-eed to a nuz~~ber of conclusions and guiding pz-iz~eiples that were spelled out in a letter which is Attacl•rment C. The proposal under consideration is consistent with the conclusions and guiding; principles stated in the letter but is a departure froze-r tl~e sub-area plaster plan. The housing densities proposed in Beebe Waod Village are closer to tine R-2 zoning densities whiciz wez-e conceived lay the 1986 Comprehensive Plan. The housing design oftwo and three "attached" single fazxzily homes, fihc private streets, interior side walks, camzrzan areas and parks and open space is different froze the majority ofdevelapments in the City. Because this is a pop-traditional developmez~zt, the plan may be resisted lay peighboring property owners or by Haase who will argue that there is no za~zarket for this kind ofhousing. The applicant has submitted an economic analysis {Attachment D} of tlae azvnet~-ttectdpi~d housing provided and states thafi the development is pt~opas~d to pt°ovide a qualitJ= liz>itzg ~xper•ietzc~ fi~r° Centt-al Pr~irzt t•~sidetzts that at°e ptA~serTtly utzders~r-v~d. Access to the proposed development will be froze the stub street of (Jakview Avenue on the east and from tine proposed extension of Broakdale Drive on the south. Sixty-eight lots will comprise Phase l which will use {~akview until the second access is provided. Phase 2 consists afthe remaining 34 lots. The internal streets at the boundary of Beebe Wood will be pz-ivate but constructed to City street standards. The design of the zaads will give a more rural appearance and traditional side walks will be replaced with internal walking paths. The street widths are appraxizxzately 25 feet with railed curbs. Fire District Na. 3 has reviewed the application and is in suppoz~t of the proposal. BCVSA has also reviewed the application. Sewer service is available far the devclopznent. Beebe Wood Village will need to form a I-lamc (Jwners Assaciafiian to mazaage private streets, parks azzd common areas. This is one of two options perzrzitted under the City's municipal code {Section l'7.68. i l (}.$} and, since the City will pot assume the streets and parks, is the option of choice. The Association will need to be formed close to the time the City considers a Final Development Plan. A copy of this agreement must be submitted to the City of Central Point prior to Final Plat approval. The Public Works Department has submitted a staff report with specifzc requirements concerning the develapznent {Attachment F}. The Planning Department recommended conditions of approval are enclosed at Attacizz~nent "G°'. The applicant's agent has prepared proposed conclusions of law found in Atfiachzxzent E. These conclusions are consistent with those arrived at by planning staff and are offered for the Coz~zznissian's cansidez~ation. Conditional Use Permit CPiviC 17.28.t~3~ lists Planned Ltnit Devclapznents as a conditional use in the R-2, Residential Two-Family Zoning District. ~M r Required Findings for a Corlditior~a] Use Per~z~t# C`otzditiazzal uses regr~iz•e special cotzsider•rrtivtr so tlzclt. tlre~}r razcx}J I~e~at°~~et•l~- le~ccrled z~-itlr rc.s~aect to ... the zorzirr~ title arzd tTzeit° effect trrz srrz•r•oz.crzditzg~ar•o~aez•ties. The Pla~~ning Con~~mission in gran#ing a Conditional Use Pez-~x~it n-~ust lied as follows: A. That the site for the proposed use; is adequate in size and shalae to accozmmodate the use and to meet all other develolarment anti lot requirements of the subject zoning distric# and all other provisions of this code. .~ The parcel far this proposed development has an area of 5.78 acres. The proposal is consistent with the Central Point R-2, Residential Two-Family zoning district req~~irements. and the Comprehensive Plan ho~tsil~g density for this area. The applicant is c~•eating 1OZ tax lots. The residential deiasity for tl~e R-2 zoning district is a maximum of IZ units an acre. In this case the applicants could b~iild up to 105 snits. The proposal is targeting an owner occupied market. B. Tha# the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and tha# the street or highway is adequate in size and eoncli#ion to effectively accozmzmoda#e the traffic #ha# is expected #o be generated by the proposed use. ~- Initially, 65 lots will take their access from 4akview Avenge. tJnce the second access point is completed from Brookdale Drive it is anticipated that vehicle trips onto C}akview Avenue will diminish and that trips will disperse evenly between the two access points. C. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abu##ing property or the permitted use #hereof .~- The proposed development if approved would provide a less or equally intense development to adjoining properties on the north and south. Single story, attached single family homes will border single family detached homes along the eastern boundary. L}. Tha# the conditions required for approval of the permi# are deezmed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare, .~s 8ear Creek "trolley Sanita~•y Authority confzrtns that sewer service can be provided to the site. The private street system is acceptable to Fire District #3. Planned Unit 1~tevelopzment A planned uni# development {PUD} smay lac perm#ted in an R-2 zoning district subject to the approval of a Condi#ional 1Jse Permit and a prelizminazy developzmen# Plan. if the prclizminary developzmen# plan is approved, an application for final development plan zmust be submi##ed Zvi#hin six months of such approval. 6~ CPIv1C 17.68.010 states that the ptzz-pose ol`planned unit dcve;lop~ne~~t (PUD} is to gain more effective use of open space, realize the advantages oflarge-scale site ~}fanning and the naixi~~g of building types or land uses, iz~z-zprovecl aesthetics and environzrze~7tal preservation. This is achieved by allowing a variety afbuileling anti stz-uctuz-es, types ofopezz space, variable: btzilciing heights and setbacks, and shared sez-vices anti facilities. The proposed Pt.]D is a single family residential devclopz~~zent. It consists of one hundred acid two {102} lots ranging in size froze 1,32(} to 3,350 square feet. Each lot will be constructed with a single family attached residence. Each dwelling will provide adequate parking. There will be limited but sufficient on-street barking oz~ within the development. Strict Convents, Codes, and Restzxctions {CC&R's} will bey written and enforced for the development by a 1-lome Owner's Association who will maintain common areas, private streets and the park. The Public Works l~epaz~#ment leas reviewed the prelizninazy development plan for cozrzpliancc with the City's water, storm drain az~d transportation standards. The Public Works staff report is attached as Exhibit 1". Findings of Fact & Conclusions of La~v Size of PUD site A PUD shall be on a tract of land five acres or larger, except that a PUD may be on a tract of land more than one acre but less than f ve acres if the planning coznznission finds, upon a showing by the applicant, that a PL1D is in tl~e public interest because one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The property is adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity ofa planned unit development of similar design as that proposed and the developments would cozxzple;znent each other with significant adverse impact on surrounding areas. ~ The site is adjacent to the Parkwood ~iillage PUD which is also zoned R-2 and includes attached single family, owner occupied homes on smaller tax lots. B. The property or its neighborhood has historical character or distinctive features that are important to the comzxzunity and that could be protected or enhanced through use of a PUD; .~- The applicants are constructing residential homes within an existing residential neighborhood. The homes will be similar in design and architecture to the surrounding homes, The PUD will allow for single family dwellings to be constructed that would preserve the neighborhood character. C. The property is adjacent to or iz~ the immediate vicinity of a planned unit development of similar design as that proposed and developments would caznpleznent each othez- without significant advez-se izrzpact on surrounding areas; ~a l- The project is adjacent to the Par•krvoad Village arad 13raaktiale Gar•clerrs PITDs and will have similar lot size, house sire, and ar•clritecture. L}. The property is of irregular shape, with Ii~z~ite:d access, or has unusual dimensions or characteristics which would ~ttc~ke co~~ventional develop~z~ent unreasonably difficult and expensive The lots are part of an rrnusrral configrrr•ation and a1r in-lilt redevelopment area. The lots are surrounded by a secondary arterial, an existing collector street and a proposed local street. Ctr°ite~°ia to CTr•cx~rt c~f-L?eriy a PLTL) In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from section 17.68.(340: A. That the development of a harmonious, inte~a•ated plan justifies exceptions to the normal requirements of this title; The applicant's preliminary development plan proposes 102 single family dwellings. The housing types will be consistent with the zoning district and developments to the north and south but will differ from the single family, large lot dwellings to the east. B. The proposal will be consistent with the Comprehensive flan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the City, This proposal is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Housing Goals to the degree it ensures adequate housing will be provided; contributes to the variety of housing offered and promotes higher density zoning. The project promotes alternative housing designs that ~vilI potentially minimize the need to expand the urban growth boundary by encouraging a higher density project near the downtown. Zoning code objectives can be met if recommended planning and public works conditions are satisfied. This type of development only a tentative plan review in newer T{JD sections of the Central Point Municipal Code. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics ofthe 1'UD will have zminimal adverse impact on the livability, value or appropriate develap~ment of the surrounding area; .~ The preliminary development plan is consistent with the zoning in the surrounding area. The proponents have stated that the development will pr•uvide a quulr'ty Iruing experience for Central Pc~irit t•esrdents tlr~rt at•e pr•esefctly urtde]•sef•ved, L}. Tlrat the proponents of the PUD have demonstrated that they are financially able to carry out the proposed project, that they intend to start construction within six rrionths ofthe final approval of the project and any necessary district changes, and intend to cazrzplete said construction with a reasonable time as determined by the Co~nrnission; b £~ ~' The applicanfs have a s€€ccessf€Il t€ist€~ry of b€€ilclit€~; ha~nes ir€ fhe valley at€c1 it€fe€td fo scarf consfrucfion as soo€€ as possible. E. That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development or will be obviated by demonstrable provisions in the pla~~ for proper entrances, exits, internal traffic circulation. and parking; ~:' A11 of fhe units wi11 event€za11y access o€€fo 13rookdale Ave€€€€e and 1-lamrick Road, a secondary arfe€-ial, or onfo C-akview Aven€€e and Meadowbrook Drive w1€ich can handle fl€e exisfing and proposed vehicle tz•ips. F. The commercial development in a PLJI~ is needed at the proposed location to provide adequate commercial facilities of tl~c type proposed; There is no commercial developmenf proposed within this development. G. That proposed industrial development will be efficient and well-organized with adequate provisions for railroad and truck access and necessary storage; There is no industrial development proposed wifhin fhis development. H. The PLTD preserves natural features such as strea~r~s and shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain, if these are present; .~ The preliminary development plan depicts private, 25 foot streets which allow for Larger Breen areas, street frees, and infernal walk ways. The PL1D will be compatible with the surrounding area; $eebe Wood Village will be compatible wifih fhe surrounding area to fhe degree if is innovative, oriented fo~vard an owner-occupied market and provides a qualify living experience. The development is similar in design, archifecture, and Iof size fo Pa€•kwood Village. The PUD will reduce need for public facilities and services relative to other permitted uses for the land; .F- The development wi11 result in a more efficient use of public services and will evenfuaIly encourage fhe use of walking paths and other alfiernative forms of franspo€•tafiion. Planning Commission ,Action The Planning Commission may take one ofthe following actions in regard to the preliminary development plan for Beebe Wood Village. l . Adopt Resolution No..i_, apiaz-aving caneiitianal izse: lae~-taait, larcliz7~Iin~zry tievelaia~~lent pla~~z and PI..TZ~ boundary expansion for Beebe Wcxaci Village;, laaseci on tlze: findings of fact afati conclusions of law contained in the record anti sulaject to the recan~zziendeci conciitians of approrTal as set fort in the staff reports, or 2. Recaznzrzend denial of the con{litianal use hermit, prelizrzinary cievelopzrzent plan cznd PUD boundary expansion far the Beebe Waad Village based on findings of fact articulated lay the Camzaaissian; or 3. Continue the review of the conditional use laec•fa~it and prelizzainary development plan at the discretiaza of the Caznznission. AttaGlxrnenfs: A. Site Plan and Elevations B. Nofiice of Public Hearing C, Letter to Gordan & Erma Layton with attachments, elated October l 7, 20E71 D. Economic Analysis E. Applicant's Proposed Conclusions of Law F, Public Wanks Staff Report G. Planning Departzrzent Recamzrzended Conditions ar Approval ti. Correspondence 1'~CPF'IaI'raC't.~I`PY 1~III3EiPI,ANNI~~G~.{)3{) ] 7.IaCaC ! [ ---- _ .... £'t Ate GOMh#I?tITY f7EVf-S.GY~'MG TtT I UNIT A - C7NE EEDfsQOM - 9 UH{T 6 - TNk? BEDROD;-t - !L7 ~ Gi5 ~ E UNiT 6l5M>Y » Tt'i'? 8E£'rF'1X7M - 45 !RJ{T G - T£~ 6FJJRfX7M - 4 IM3T GlSTUDY -'[I~ 8~(~£ - 28 I UNiT D - 7Hk'~ I3~["IF?OG>t~4 - 6 TL7TAL = !02 UNITS I ~ EGYlA45 £I.bb U471"ES PSZ AGRE r- ..... - .. TOTAL S£TE - 382,559 5P. ~SJA! ~r 0,78 +0.GRF~ UNITS h!/ PAT#O E S7hN'S - I58k{a8 5.i=. PAVE£7 AGG~a C20AR -75964 5 F . ~ c?a~ TOTAL IMPcRVEt~ - 234kt32 S.F, i ~rrj GIS $ E315 , . ' 615 A $t5 6!5 A GIS GIS B/5 GR77~lFlAY E YAf2Da - I4792"t 5.i". Ef~£1AL5 39% GR 3.4 AGRES ~ \ C,~ ~ ~ 3I ~~_ kf ~ G p ~ t`~~'}t S15 { Gl5 $~ GIa ~~ BIS A 615 B~ Gtv f'~t sf ~~ £;~ 1 ~~ F''~ ME5TLETe~ GOUS2T' jf 6 ~ ° S rr ~ F~t ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M~ ~ ~ f i ~ j GIS 6t5 1 G15 61`5 SIS 615 8t5 A Gt3 ..~ /~~ ~ ~ G ~ f r' 6t~ 6t5 tl GI5 ~' G15 6~r~~ ~ A g~ GI5 ~ t ~'~' ~, -=- ~ a~ I ~ b 6 ~ _~ ~ Lr~ oax £~ n+S~RAY NTA ~~ 1~ --~5 -; ~ ~ ~ ~~E o ~ ~`-- Gt5 8i5 ~ GIS 815 ~4- Gf5 A SI5 ~ 615 ~ g ; B!S G15 °~~ _.. _ io V23tw= / ;^} GGFUAL 5I7"E PLsAN pax bwrs fj~. scfaE. r.ao~-cr `ty~T (.L. G15 G 6t5 _....._ /OAKKV7U4'{ Av8i7E D f ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~D I ~: G ~ ~~ ~ 3 F p GJy - p ~ ~~ A 615 ~G1=?~ ~ LiGhT Pa3~ a WA.Y LIG-}fS ~' 6c"~H 6 i~ ~~ '` 3 a r z ~~ ~~~ ~~Q a ~ ~ ~ . ~~~ =~~~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ U s ~ ~ ~ 2 d ec.W.6 ea nsaN ~.IlIl / 1 i dm r« z ~' OT -~ z U~ ~ ~~ BABE WOQ[3 t~+naP w. SGHWiMiAER`e~>, i «~~~ fPLANNEp 17EVELOPM~NTCOMMUNETY n~cwirECrsj ataraN~s ~ ~', CENTRAL POINT, OREGON JAOKSON44~LE, OREGON {543)-899-7728 aftAVM 8Y: CLO ~n1 ~z~ ~ ~ ~ lfNFRlUC. PDN7 ~ ~ ~' y ~~ :. µ r ~ ~ ~ 77 ~~~. ~1tw t~5'S ~ ~ ~ ~' '~M1ti ~ E ~ ~ ru ~"~ _ `~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ :~; ~ ~ t s _ ~~"~ m ~ '+~~ ~'~ b ca ((: ~. [ ~, D ~ IE ~ ' Ctl x"< ,~ ~~ ~ ~~\\ ~] ~ k~ -r ~7// ~:~F'v (p t~ ~; ~.. ~ ~; ~y . ~~~ s ~ •".~s& ~. :. ~'. ~. Yi,. a ern Z -t ~'~ { ~ 1 4 7C y.. r. y~r ~vun~*wrea v~yrg'a~sF:a,~+y,n x~.otiw.aa'~.tiww nµ n.n*.. cvn ~~,rwF ~~~,~.i v.r.sats.~pw~en.vnnihyn ahwm. x °" SE~S~WClQ[} ____. ~V, tuzu2V.SY57xrr PLANNEC7 DEVELOPII~?ENT Ct~tth#VIUNETY~ ~~ ~ ~ 13+:. a ~ CENTRFlL ~CIINT, OR~GC7N M~ORD,t7Rt~5Gtt CSf1J^7'tq^2ibE t7RhF'N BY. ?~ t Gif L~vE O,~ GrJOP +~~~10~f`~`~~z~:~c~Z .~"a~~~ Tozxx I-[zrzx-pltrey, ,f1.tC;P r'laz-niztg Director ICez~ Gersclller Coznxntxnity Ptarlner Matt Saxrzitore Coznznunzty t'Ianner Dave Arkens Planning Technician l~Totrce of ~1~Ieet~ng Date of Notice: April 15, 203 Meeting bate: Time: Place: NATURE C7~F MEETING May 6, 20{}3 7:00 p.m. {Approximate) Central Paint City I-Iall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Begi~~ning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Con~nission will review an application for a Planned. Unit Development on a parcel of property located near the intersection of~Iamrick and Biddle Roads. The subj ectparcel islocated in a R-2, Residentzal Two Family Zoning District on Jackson. County Assessment Plat 372WO1C, Tax Lots 1100 and 1500. The Central Point Planning Commission will initially review the tentative plan for the Planned Unit Development to determine ifthe proposed subdivision meets the requirements oflaw. If approved, the subdivision would create a residential development with 102 single family homes with several parr and open space areas. CRITERIA FC}R DECISION The requirements for Planned Unit Developments are set forth in Chapters 16 and 17 ofthe Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC CQMMENTS Anyperson interested in commenti~lg on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit v~~-itten comments up until the close of the trteeting scheduled far `T'uesday, May 6, 2003 2. Written con~mcnts tna}= be se~~t i~~ advance ofthe meeting to Central Point City hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, C)1~ 97502. ~~ 3. Issues which may provide the basis fox az~ appeal on tl~e n~attcrs shall be raised prior to the expiration ofthe comment period noted above. Any testimony azzd written caznmcnts about the decisions described above will need to Ire related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. ~, Copies afall evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City I~al1,155 South Second Street, Cezxtral Paint, C}regon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page, 5 . For additional irzfam~ation, the public znay contact the Plaz~rzing Department at {541 } 664-3321 ext. 2~2. SUMMARY C3F PROCEDUT~F, At the xneetixzg, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff'xepoxts, bear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and bear arguments an the application. Any testimony ox written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above, At the conclusion ofthe review the Planning Comrrzission may approve or deny the tentative plan for the Planned 1Jnit Development. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions, z~ s~ ea 155 South Sccozxd Street ~ Central I'aiz~t, C}l~ x'7502 ~ (541} 664-,321 ~' Fax: (541} 664-63&4 ._..~~~ ~ ~ City of Central Point ~'~annin De artment Torn ~Ium~frrey, rtICP Ptarrrring~irectvr Gordon ~ Erma Layton 4460 Hanu~ck Read Geri#ral ~'o~nt, £)iZ 95(}2 bear Mr. & IVSrs. Layton: Ken Gersehter C'ornrnuntty Planner Matt samitore +Gorrtmunity Ptarrner t.~ave Arkens Planning Technician This le#ter is in#ended to serve as a sununazy for several meetings we've had at City Hall #o discuss a subarea master plan involving your family's property. A# the direction of the City Council, Planning staf~'has created some options for a neighborhood plan that would logically lay out roads and land uses for property located north oflw~st Pine Street between Hamrick Road and Meadowbrook Drive. We also hired a traffic consultant whose recommendations we incorpora#ed iz~zto our options and d iscussed with you and your family. The City is processing a planned unit development {PtJD~ application for Brookdale Gardens and would like #o proceed pending your concurrence and that of other afE'ccted property owners.l have attached copies of the options we discussed that had the most promise anal will now emphasize the camponen#s of these options #ha# your family prefexred. Plcase con#ac# me shzauld my conclusions differ from yours o#herwise 1 will proceed with the understanding that you and your family support these conclusions. ~ All parties agreed that Brookdale Avenue should be extended west from Meadowbrook Drive, intersect with Hamrick Road and have aright-inlrigh#-out access only. t t7akview Avenue should be extended west from its existizig street stub and connect with Brookdale Avenue via Constant Drive in the vicinity of the alignment shown in each option. + if a full access {right-inlright-out; left-izztleft-out) is proposed from t~akview Avenue to Hamrick Road, it should line up with the Pear Blossom north entrance. However, it is preferable that there be no other access between Beebe Road and Brookdale Avenue. f A portion ofthe `t1'an Der Star property should be rezoned for eomrnercial use and a secondary access to this and ad,~acent commercial laud should come from Brookdale Avenue. ~ A half acre park site should be developed internal to the master plan site. • Alley ways are not supported by the property owners because is uses more land for roads. • A variety ofhousing types ranging from single family detached to clusters and townhouses should be considered. Some small lots are okay too in an effort to increase housing density to approach the R-2 ,12.esidential, Two-Family zoning which allows up to 12 units per acre. 155 Sou#h Second Street ~ Central Paint, fJR 97502 ~ {541 b54-3321 ext. 231 ~ Fax {541 ~b64-5384 76 C3ctober 17, 2001 # The Laytan's lion~e site should be retained as well as same of the more signif icaixt trees on site. The above bulleted items were things we discussed during our meetings and should reflect the opinions expressed by the property owners and by City staff: I leave included this letter in a report to the City Council who will consrder the two options that are attached. The Council will meet an Thursday night, October 25"~ at '7;00 p.m, The meeting will beheld. in City Hall if you would like to attend. If the Gauncil chooses to pursue either of these options or a combination of the two, they will direct staff to begin a mare farnxal public hearing process that you will be invited to attend. "You are welcome to contact me at 664-3321 extension 230 if you have any additional questions ar if this letter has neglected to cover something we discussed. Thank you far your cooperation and enthusiastic support of this planning exercise. 1 am certain that product resulting; from our callaboratian will guide you in the development of your property and set a precedent far other successful community planning efforts. Sincerely, ~~ Thomas F. H mphrey, AICF l nclosure C. Central Point City Council 155 South Second Street ~ Central Foint, OR 975(}2 !~ (541} 664-3321 ext. 231 ~ Fax X541}664-6384 Density for Eac~l Gption .~ j~_ .__~._____.__.__...._.___._______.___..______.__..._ __ __ 12,'T8 AGres Total _ - 2.55 Acres for Right of Way ~ef'.~~ ROad ~~~~ 19.22 AcFes For Residential I}evelopment -__._ ~ I (~~ ~NT~~"-- "`~ f""""---- 4ptian 5 # .79 Acre Park 62 [Traits Proposed 6.16 tTnits per acres ~,,..._..._. Packwood vi age one" IVebring Property ~~~`"~`-"""-°-- 2.58 AcFes12.0'J Available foFdevelopment. { 6,044 SF Lots - 16 7.T Uncis per aGFe ori~ a~ +" ~« ~, 'Van .Der Star I.41 Acresll.53 Available for development * (~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~, <6,449 SF hots = 9 - r 5.88 l3nits per acre, plus ComrnerGial square footage to be deFermined, ,,,*, ~'-`} ('"~ *,,, LaytanlWood 4~ x ~..JJ L1 G~ ~> wr 9.35 AcFes/7.48 Available far development ___. ~ >?,544 SF I,rrLS - l0 p '}"'y., *'**" xa s .~. , Lam'' Q nsY x,500--6,49051" Lots - 23 r •~ <6,440 SF lots - S ~ ~ '^' ,,„ Total 38 ~ .99 Acre park ~ ~-*~ ~ ..n. 5.6 (Traits per AcFe, once the park is subtracted from the total. R3 Commercial ,,,,, ~. There is also 4.3~f aorGS of Commercial E3evGlapment Proposed. All the land is Zoned R-2 which allows up to l2 units per acre. *' *°* * *>» ~..... ~ ` x ~. r .~. .~. > .,,. _.....,.,..`_..~.._."-1 I I =~ ~-~ ~3~ookdale Avenue OHN~++O OHHO BzddXe Road ~-.~. casts, develapable land restrictial~s and disl~asablc il~can~c clcgradrttian catlseci by the current recessian cantinue to exacerbate factars material to tl-lis unclesir~tblc trcl~d. able 1. - Jacksan ~aull~t Eeatiainic Ir><dicatar e~~n csuuty t)rean 1 ~39~ 2000 1 ~9~ 2000 2001 P+~t~latian I7~,0 181,26 x,3,0 ,421,E ~~~t71,'7#9 L a b c~ r ~ rc e o $ ~ 0 2 0 ~ 1 4 0 5 1 , 1,7~i 0 0 0 i,802,93 l,"7~ 3 , 7 73 ry ~ y '{ ~ s +.~ y p 1 pn¢ $v4G&k ,C:v++ilv M,ca4 [ k ~ p p g } '~ ~'Y~,.ayRP ^ ~/ y `j "g ~$J, /',A+r',.34F ' ( y p ~Q t ~, ~~Y~yUyiR,i2b~, { i'j~~y~w~ y ~ $y ( '~ ( A,~v7~,v"A',R ""A~~~~' I.,~neIYlptC1}PI7l~ti~ 5,960 ~,~~~ 100,360 87,485 ~ 13,89 Vn~+ l~arr~eat ~t~% ~ 6»7~~u «3~/rn 5,7~i~cr~„ .9~'~~ ~ ~, ~.3~P'~ Ave, Annual Pa~'rUll Per Elnyee $25,668 X26,567 $30,867 X32,776 1~T(A . sources: aregvn I:rnlsloymcnt I)cpartnxcrrt; Ceetter f"e>r Population Itcs4arc}a d'z C"ensus, 1'S1J, U.S. t+ ensscs Bureau; Bureau of Ecconomic Aatalysis; C7retnot Tourism C'oanmission; aregon I~epartrncnt of ltcvcnuca arc~;on fMcanomic and Community .~~.~ . r?cvelopment Ucpa~°tment. Jackson County play ct and Job rends ZQIlQ The year 2000, finished an a very positive Hate far employment in Jacl~san County. Although these numbers are still subject to miner revision, overall jab growth has been Strang, and unemployment was lower than in the previous year. Despite a number of announced layoffs in the retail trade and weed products manufacturing sectors, overall employment grawth in Jackson County greatly outpaced the state average. The rate of nonfarm employment grawth far 2000 was 3.5 percent, compared to 1.8 percent average grawth rate far {~r•egan {Graph 1 }, Maratero cPc Assocrat~s LLC ._ 2 Manufacturing Jackson County's manufacturing sectors had an increase of 240 jobs over the past year. Within manufacturing, lumber and wood products employment fell by ten. There were a number of temporary layoffs, but few pennanent closures, Sawmills and planing mills lost about 40 jobs. The County did experience some job growth in other areas of manufacturing. Employment in the electronics, electrical equipment manufacturing, instruments and related products sectors rose in aggregate by almost 15fl, a gain of 11 percent. "other" durable goods added 130 jobs. Utller manufacturing sectors showing growth include concrete and glass products, fabricated metal products, and machinery. Even though we have added jobs in the "high tech" industry, most jobs in this county tend to be in the law-tech end of the high tech industry. We do not have any silicon chip fabrication plants in the Rogue ~aliey, these tend have a much higher average wage than the high tech industry in Jackson County. The Portland Metro area has benefited from industrial clustering in the high tech arena. Nc~nmanufacturing The vast majority of the increase in Jackson County's employment came from the nonmanufacturing sectors. This is a trend that has been occurring at the national, state, and local level for quite some time. In Jackson County, non-manufacturing employment grew by 2,250 jobs, nearly ten times the increase as compared to manufacturing employment. Job growth in nonmanufacturing was nearly evenly distributed between the trade and services industries, adding 740 and 870 jobs, respectively. Employment increases in the trade sector were nearly all in retail trade. Wholesale trade actually fell by ten. Within the retail industry, food stores added 9fl jobs. Also gaining employment were auto dealers and service stations {~50}, eating and drinking places {210}, and "other" retail {~3d0}. The nondescript category of other retail includes apparel, furniture and furnishings, and mail order retailers. Employment for these individual sectors is not published due to confidentiality restrictions, the sectors either being too srr~ali or having an insufficient sample to produce estimates. Sezvices sector employment gains, at 87fl jobs, were the largest of any broad industry category in Jackson County. Business services gained 2f fl, including help supply and data processing services. Health services, which include hospitals and nursing homes, gained 194 jobs, for a growth rate of almost five percent in 2000. Social Service employment grew by 2fl0, or eight percent over the year. The aggregate category of „other services," including amusement and recreation, legal and professional services, and membership organizations, among others, added 220 last year. Employment in the transportation sector increased by about 80 jobs. Employment in the communications industry increased by 140 over the year, with help of a major call center locating in Jackson County. Construction employment last year increased by seven hfvrrler~a tPc .4sspCictt2s I,LC Fevri~n~y r~, zv~~ 3 percent, adding about 240 jobs. Specialty trades contractors accounted for most of this total. Government jobs increased by 210, with 100 of that increase occurring in local education. Federal government employment spiked briefly during the 240(} Census, but the year-over-year change was only an increase of 14. State government employment increased by 40. Finance, insurance, az~nd real estate lost 40 jobs last year. This was the only major non- manufacturing sector reporting a loss of ennployznent last year. Employment fell in banking and insurance, but rose in real estate. Qverall, it was a very good year for n~zost industries in the Medford-Ashland MSA, which includes all of Jackson County. fJutiook The outlook for 2001 does not look as positive, with many large companies announcing store closures and layoffs. Some of those closures and layoffs are affecting workers in Jackson County. Consumer confidence, one of the nation's leading economic indicators, recently hit afoot-year low. This is a predictor of future consumer spending, which accounts for the majority of total U.S. gross domestic product {GDP}. GDP growth for the last quarter of 2000 was a minuscule 1.4 percent, slow indeed, but at least not negative growth. If these trends, coupled with rising natural gas and electricity prices, continue, we may see slower job growth and higher unemployzrnent in 2001. Vijhen families have to spend more on heating and lighting, there is less disposable income available for other consumer spending. Falling stock prices have also played a part in the drop in consumer confidence. The wealth effect, with the strong price gains in the value of the stock market, benefited more in this economic expansion than in the past. tiVith the ease of buying stocks on the Internet, and aggressive marketing by security and exchange brokerage firrrzs, many people, who would have avoided the market a generation ago, are now heavily invested in the market. According to data reported in the publication .~ncredilaly Creative Z7estruction by James Davidson, the number of individuals who own stock, as a percentage of the population, is nine times greater than it was during the 1950's. Manny pension plans are also heavily invested in the stock market. As stock prices have undergone the latest correction, many people who have invested in the stock market have seen their worth on paper fall, Investors accustomed to annual returns approaching fifteen or twenty percent during late 1990s were given a dose of reality last year, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling by about six percent in 2000, vy Cnn- "!'rrrrer. Y1'orkforce Analyst, (aregorr 1}epar-nrrenr of Errr~7oyntettt Marrtera c$ Associates LLC Felrr7eary I9, 24113 4 ~:s9E~(:)~1 i ~~°~~5~ ~~.(?DG r.~,, I ~ ~ ~ ~, ~~ t i t~~~. "~ 'u ~. ~. r,, i ~ ~ r r" ~,~~~ ~. .~.. F~ ..4 .... ~ _._ , ~~ ~- ____ , "~~ ..:~ ~~ ~ ~ I_ F I ~~ ~~zrx~r~da~°~' _ ~~'llil-~; Qregt~r"s ~ul"r~alt eeenc-mi~ c1.a1'.,,~1`c~s >+~ i11 cor~til:zle fir the neap _. ( tL'il., SoU1~1c;I~t~ q)i"C~_!;O?. 1igiS E~l;l'Jl ~~)<iit{1 t~1e'<7I'11Tii t)~l~i:.' C10~~'ii1i.!?11. 1•~l'O)t;CteC~~Q~)UI<lr1{)il 1111111 'ia:il;ll l0 i.~1~i~t'.rr1C)ll 1'v'l1 C'Olli?IillC. fOrthe IC)I'~St;t;aU~t: ~ilitil'L, i~.a?"<l~`,','-: ~;~. ~'}1~1 S)il~, <;l!I,'t17f lilill'~a~'1 i0!'Ct> 1t il~ L{?I111?li!v 10 lla~~t;Il~?'e ll,~ CO[?i111t11111V l~) 111t;~~ 1tS O:', t?(i'-l)t;(:ti}>I~l~ Iii~'(1s. ~':.;i,:' ~~'t,'OC~ ~~~aliIlcii 1)i:) i;i1~1111.1It ~`Oill[]iLlIIC',' I5 ~)i'O~)lISC{~ ~Cl pl~ovici~ a c,u~llil}= Pvin~, ex~)tl"ictlce l)1" C`~;~Ilt!~al i'{~ilt lt;siil~nls that s,rc pry:~cllt.l{~ Lllu1_i:r served ~~f~ralU~i _ -i.? ~: E~c~~:E~~> e~uc{ ~'%t~l~~ar~c>c~ [.1r1i,. 1"`"st:~~tr:~ic~g:p~ ~ ~; ~ Ci:.y cr .'.:entry,; Pont, ~'jre~r,n C]eal(~ift, LLC lil-~pix:ent ' ~ ~ 11 .C)}}Otip 1F~, CC)11C ~ISJr)1T); O~'1~W ~T~ l~a~t'Cl ll~iO?1 l;>:' 1ill(}Ili ' {)~ lut:l 11? ~t (;(ii?il ~ ~ I,11d ~}lt' (;l !L~ii~t' ~1ill';lli~!IIL;'t~ 1.13 `"iCL'?it)11 f~~, illl(~ }liil:. }]t;l~i7 ~ll'~~?ct't'i} :>() i}1<l1 ~}ll'~' 1111'.',~1~ ~)L' I.li~i)~)lt'(.~ ~7~ ih~ C;iti~ 1'1an11i;~;~ C'i)n~llllistii%)rl i11 ~;l';}Iport «1• tl,c ~~;;;?c'in~,~, a~7}3}i~'Iliitul,`;l ~rit~~~ie:3~~ I rr '° ~ _~__, _ .nt in ~n 1~-" :' ` . set Earth ` '17.24 ar~d ~ t , _. ;trlct: 17.~i8.C}~ ~ ' i 1 ~ ~' - ~ ~I' ~ es ;~ the ' erg c - 7.7~a: G. 1~I1'~t°ied 1~lr { ter 17.~i Cd1lld'daLl~IQ)51V ()~ ~~1~~': ~ '1~ 1'~lll?lilit`! ~t?1111111~`Il(?Il (:t)]i(:}tL}L:~ l}i~li 1}lam })I`i?}7()~i'C; l`~~1'i;}}IIIF.>,`,a ~'}111L' ll~lil;~'ICC~ 'tt) t?Ilt' ;113{?t~1C1 Ii1 ~}i1~f;`I''7 l1j lGl"() llll} tll't:C' U%11~`. ll?'C' S1Ii!'}: 1i:lt)?I}~' l}~,~'L}I117`?ti Viz.'?"t'}1 cl't' }~41'illlilLC} ?15C'~ lli 1~1i; }t_'> Ll)l11.1~_' lil`~ji''.t i. i }?~ }~Jil1ll]~1i1>_ ~,OI1li7115~1OI1 cl}30 COIICltti ~. ~'~':"!~ l[14 }11'i)})i)5ti_'.C} }lil~'C)iC'. ~)~11'}~ 1~ Cli] l1C~C;5~()I'~ l1L iIl 1}7 t; }~-~ L1±1'.u \''f~.1411 })i~)~1C}t; C} C1S }11iI; C)1`;t. i li?l.'C} t_.'illt })L:~'C'}O}?111 C;11j lS li 1~ lIl 1}'.I~ 11 ~~liiC%u. 1'1.~°l;.l~1~', 111e ~.~} I'I~li?l! ~~0111111,~ti1()11 •. C)li~ 1lC}l;~ 1}1tll i~}t1liil~.ClJill[ 1~i;~u}U}7I1?~111ti ul'l' C ~)tii{Ii.0i11} ti$('$ 1T1 c~11 [~-~ %l)il'. } 11% }'lI1C}111~~ C?~i"1 C:1 ~111C} ~~O11L'}LiS10114 c)( },Ilt1" }l_'l'i:lll Dui)})lt 1}3i' <l(1})1't)~'t1} i)L Ci l'(.~i]C~llil)11~1} Ll`I~ 1)i'1'illll IC)1' ,~ ~.}1C })11I'11l)tii; t)j cl}1}l]~OVI11`„ 1.1 }~}<l]1i1~'ll i.'Ili ~C'RS:O}1II1t;'lll. }~c1~c,C} il()O11 I}il' IC)I't_'`,?()Ill`t, Ilili}1Iil?S QL ~lc1. IiIC} ;i)lltlli5l()li~ l)I }cl\t, 1}1 L' }~}111711111 {~t)ll1i7115S1tf11 ~l)i141L1C}L~ 1F1IiL th'~; ~1C121}IC£it1()11 15 L()I1~~~lil? l~"lt}i 1;1L' ll;C}i111't;,tll.:;lt5 t)~T"1t1`1L?11 ~ E~<)C<ll;~<'Ci},} l)1 1}l~' l;C)Illa:lli})11111'C} 1151'S lit ~}115 ~1'l)Il tt AI'L` t)i I'Illltli=C} l3 ,' L;l)IIC}lil)Ilu.} LTSC'S W}11C~1 ~lt`1VC C?:;l:li C.j)}11't)})1 ~<i:~-}~' lll'1}1l)1'l1.;C} }~Ui'~l;<411t ~~} t}1C 1C+~~Vr~.114 5i.1~?~l.lil~it ~. 1'll'i'111 ~',~1T1~c9.111~(} 111 ~~1~' ~.,t%1;"ti'al .~4)]11t ~i?lilllt$ (.,)1'L}II?ul]1;~,; ~~~}~, I akakakak~ a~~a#~~ak~?k~ak#ak~~~ak~akakak~~akakak~akakakakak* _ ~ p r r` ,; 1....,,. , W +.,.......,~ .,. ~~...~.,. ~.. ~ , w .'tJC7. ~"f i~f'%AI7 ~~~~~e~ 1i~/oc)~~ 6'i:~~it~ ~;~ I.Bry~i :.,!~c),~tlre'ttr City of Cc:.. .,~ s=:~_r t, c ~ ~.... _~4D~7~' E1~14,'~~f°~ (Dl ~.la~~~'1 ~~1L'. ~~'11I111IT1'_r ? ~?Il1L`>>1(?;1 Co17CllICI ~ l}12Lt III(' 7CO ;oSl'C7 ~ r ~ ` } ) ~ ~ : } ~ 16 ~1] Ilxt~~'~lllcd hitrrlloiliotl~; Mall ti~'+~hlc}: i_.~ l)rO}x)ti~cl :Ilc 1Oll~ ~ e~i,:~°I)tloll~ tC~ the nvrlnl.: 1tt1111IL:111CI1t5 t)}~lae 10111111' O1'CIlllllllCl': 13ii;~C'(} Li})i)?) lIIC }lllt.lill`.'~ {>~ 1`11C.t 111 ~CCtI(>Il `'}, t}h' C'dI(IC'!1(;C ell llllli'I'It1C(.~ 11: ~t'C(i(?£i TV [7G~ ~1~)1j1 ~ ,:11's st;}lilllltioll~ i,l Secti(]Il \%, tllc }'lol;!lillsz (~~)rnll:ission 1~lu~tllt•r c.onclu(lc~; til~~t 'k}1e J'l.,l) }7:1111 I «ti )L~l.Iii'(i C'>;(:e})lioll5 ~() (}iC' 11oI'f1111) i'l'Cj,lii. illt.'i':i,`; t)) !}l~' /t)Illl?;' UI'(}II:<Ii1t;C`-~1tW}f~ ~~ Oft11e ~81?It'll} }01111, ~11alliClj7,1} (.~t)QC: Il? Co11?}7I1<U1C.C 1l"11}1 {'I'ItCI'lUtl .~. ~~ yk ~ >k ~ rte Sk >14 ~ ~ ~ >k # :, s{e 5k >l<'k # ~ ~k , :::: f {i~"f"(Oi7 ,~ (r'ci~~~tl~ia~ns ~ L~~~~': "ihe facf that C.a~iiel ioll a`vyuir.:V CUn~i~telli'}' ~ti'i:h Ill(; ~~tl}~ <ln ~OILtiCS oh 1}1~ Ct)I'lll)l~e}li'I1Sil't,', plan (}C7L'S Ilot Iilcl}iJ :li} „?of13ti ;rlllCl }lU}ICILS (}('t;l`iloll<1} CI'L1~]'li . a'S'c~~, }3e11ll~tt ~'. ~;i1~ of I)t}ices. 1°7 C7r L,C 13:'~ ~} Ali, iIC''(I ()i~ {)I' ,~~}'I~ ()~}~ ~ 1 ~)~9. }il (}liti <;;lc~ stlt?seC)llent ~1;si:•s. ;..Ile i;olll'l~, 1111~'e Il~l~t tho.1 a}]})r()~i,': criicrilt 1'e(,tlirin;_~: l;oln}~Iirlllci; ~vitll sl l`X)Ilil31'e};t'IIti1V) 7}fall Clot'ti Ilol 11a1C)Clllltli~ll}~' il'aL1Soi'lll li}} }?.111? f~O11}ti 111iC1 I?OilC1C5 lilt(.? C~l'~1510i1i;} ll'ile:'L<1. i~~ C}irtt.l'I1lL;llltloll of L~'}li't}.CC }7rI1~oCl!}Iii' }71u;1 ~?olli5 iil"Ill })ol1C1C~ il]'C, 11}~~7I~C)b'll} Ci1Ll~1'I:I illll:li I?e 171i~:'tl oI"i lit(; } jtl~'.;ii~I`~e llas'CI )l 1 ~ '~li)~ti5 (;Iit} lxi}1(:Ii'S tlilCa 1t~~ e()iliC'`:1 i:l ~i'iilC',1 hilt ~' 11})l7.'1ii'. }~i1111 4r,o<li~> 1111(1 }7oiii;li;~ tll4lt zlt'(', }'el'I111~51\'i' I",lt}li;i" ti?~lli I111111Q1to1'ti', (?;' 1}]111 Iill'I'(:l~" E;IICC)llills._~' ()I' Sll`~c,_'t5t ii (:C)l1l'tiC' t:)~ li,'~1021~ 1''l' 1?I:il) li(>l 1!}?I)I'()','~1} l;l~?lll~ltl, }~llti('i} L';}?(ill t}1~ ~C)f'e~~0111`.?, t}1(; ,~I~:11I1IIi`? ~ ollillll~Siol1 C'C71'1l'}llCltry t}1111 t}1C; }C>1}ol~,liL? CoCI?I7Te}1e11tilVi; Ili ill. r?.o11}`` %11101 1)l)}ILIe' 111'' iil7}71~i)}71~lllt'} Ci?11~i'tI'l:l'C} 11'.10} it})1)}\ 11 t};I~ II?5t11?(l, it~~ it}7}?I'oV<:l} i:l~ltel'lil 1.1110}l't~ >~'1?i1('ll 1'. { !! i' (JJ !)Cl!lti:S' 11!10} 1I0~1' ~,~'111i;1 ilt't~ IlC)t• l;llt:(l £lill} 1}C'il'e5fi~(l ~7C~(?l~,'$ ICJ T1Q~, 1]I ~IIIS II1~111I1e1°, <!l?}?I'(?V<I} CI'11C'I'!1i„ C I }tl, C".ct~a(~1>a~ic;'faw off' l,;la~ : 111(: ;)lox?s4ci l7roject 11s1s Ewen Illasicr i7}111111e~1. .[ he ~raj~ct 11;1,5,. as ~k1 C1li}~' I7ol:iltl:li SOUI'::t: ()} lil)1Ce (()t}iel~ tiilll l}lc' (I~li.l}lll`'.S Llll'1i15~}ti'e~) till; }71'1 `,11t1' })iii}i }t)t"lilC:i}d}r file south~'ticst corllir'r of~ thtr pI'ol7Lt't~ . ~~t this lot;~i~,;iyi)I1, t}?L 171u~}~ is a(}jilee,li to iilm~i(:l: I:oad <li1Cl ;.{) ~'ilC-11i1?. 11111 C? }t)(;.11,t'C? t.o l~ tiotllil. 1lUl'e0`'~i', <ll7(7}1(;clilt i]1lS i?1'ol)o?('Cl ~il!til<lIltll} }ii11C15C;i}7l: :iCI'("l1IIl`r 11llcl }CiiG1I1 ~Q ~~}7<llcl?~. itI1C1 t'.U11(.'I~ Iii(; }7I'I~'lite 1)lil'ti 1`1'i)I1i t11(; <IlIji14fT1~ 1tl];C'lS }il('<li(_'Cl otlt~Il!e l}1(', 17I'OjeCi ~i1111,111:i1'li:~. :~'t'i'. }",~}lll)it .'. ~1iC)('1 l_. } . .} Iit' l7I~U}?OSCCI ~1X f)t7t 1;:111 soli(} 1'lly} lance l~~.i11 l7rociucc SI~IIi?icllnt soull(l 1,ue-I?llatic>11. i-l~le Pi<:rlllil,~~ {:.'onlllli«si~>!~ COI1C11;C1(`S t}i11t L}It'tii; fill,l~,ritloll }e111111'L'~ 5('t;1? lit (:(:)Ilt]'o1 11I7Ci I771I11n117(' 1101ti!;; L}11Y111t',I1 lltie (7t~1}1k.' 1'a]('.1~U1"LS e;ll.illll'I,til.C} Ll iV{~1«(:.~~()}iCV ,j, l}li',"tli)C'':'-, 1}1(' ~~}liI.1111t: ~:i?I11I"t11.~,'S1i.111 (;tJi;Cll:(li;s 1i11}w ~11i,' 1~lilCl li.`>u i:11)17i1(;c1t14)ll~t1I'f.° Cull5l.~te;1~ ~~'1t}1 ~JoISe }~()}1i~~T ). i m ` 1, .. ~. i',. , , ..... ,. .. .h2 C ' ll f d _ w Grae~ a. at~rn~ 8~ Asscaciates, Ltcl. 1° Pages 14 Marct7 2~~3 ~- ~~ c~ ~ l~ t tIt/c> c) I~l~~ r-] r-l es E-l 13 r l i E` ,_~ ~ , i ~ ~ ~ l lr) 4 > r~ c (.; ity a Ceritr~'+I 1'~.-)irl'C, J, 6C,JC7Cl CpEl'~7i~:. ~_~5:: f\pplic:ant (ld$br'll~:til~gl.'4 O~ ~iE~VV~. The hI12111'lli4?. ~(?111111iS.`i;l)Il C(~n =LiLlt'ti thin t}lt' 11-111t`I 11tiL; i11)1?13(~atit)I'15 ~n'c>}~~?se the cr~~atiOn t)f~ hriti'al(" 1ru'1<lalll-I ilrui l~~(;rc<iiiOllal l~a(iliti(:~. ~I 11G:I't;i(;l~i~, illy f'lallrlin~ . j {)i11I1115S1OCi COnclllc}eS tt111t ll1S 1)I-1),((;~. ~~111 h1~C)y'IC1C. U;' 1111 C(Itill<ll)1(' (11 I.;t']i)lftli)11 U; I'l',Cl't~:(ttlt~ll ~i-aciliti~, i?1 this i;~riio?2 of illy c(>l~~~n~~llliiti~. ~lhc~ 1'I<;1~~1~;1~ C`1)nLltli~~siall <llsO ct?;,cluc3c~,, b<1eu 1II?Oil t1G hia11S 111 1'.XiIII)It ~, t}lilt ~~'1")11S' '•.lll'. h1,ai1i]ClI hl~l\1,iC hall'?~ Iil(;Illtti' l~lll t)t' 1T11111?t;111?l'.(i h1' th(' i)~,1'ill~:'~ O! t};G h1~Uj~e1, it 11'll~ l)(' <l~'1'llahlc lt)~ iiSe 1111(1 eil)i)VI?iC71j 1)V tilt I'(_'llt:'1"<il i>tl)hC. .~ti 511011- its lUl;atlOn sat the ~(>111%1~~~CSi C't)1~11C°,I' O1 tiiC h;~{?ht'I'ib', ~tiall Il,i<1~C: ih~ i)til~1< IIIi)1'i'11(.i CSSiI?1(', fit) peopic ~~n(:) litie out5i(le tllc 1)ri)jcct l?~)rln(1ari,°:>. I~t)l' tllt'Si' r~•11~>r)i15, tht: I'11111r1in` (~O;11n115~1OT1 {;t)liC'L1CIUti th;lt tilll; ]llt?le(:t 1)I'l)l-1(11"1 li)1' 1111 L:~1i11111i)ll' (13.`iil'1.t)rtilt)I1 t)1 1'l;(:i'l'i11iQ11 ., facilities t11rOt1~>_Jlt)ut The C_'oll?lllurlity ~)n(i ~~ ll l ~r?SIII't th;:~ tia~ic~>t h(n~ihle ;i c(~<; l)y tri' i~~<:ul T'es'1c1~'rl- ~ .:oni1?,~r.,::r ~:.h I' ~,;~~ : ,~~n(1 1Zecrez111O,1 I'c)licti~ ~. c E~) ' ~f)KlE'~l,~~ll7~fl!i UfLatia'; T<ls((l ili)C)Il Tile I?1t11"3~ 111 1;..`;llC?It that the 1)lalln,,~, park l~'~11iiities y~ ithill 131 pr~)h~);e(~ i!(.'t;i.'titill)1(', t!I'.~ 1T'f„'i,~ Y~ttl.i`i i) -' 1';'iilin'i'i21eT1ts Cal i';ii',~ d! . i c°~ns IT ', the 1lnrlin~ C'()nllltis~,ic)11 colle'tl(les hrC~,je at`~ ctir~lctil t', 1~ullctioll~t1 <lll(1 al"li~ 1•'.C,.`:~eatiEan ~~()1!L~ >. "~+ ail prrapE~~d dev~lcrprrrents are Y ,~ ;, (3 T3C:iL141Q)fl~ E3F ~~'efl~'4': Pa:~('t~ llhOli l,h(; 1()l~t'4?l)Ill4! llI1±i1Tl,~S offa(;I <1i1i1 C()ilUlltSlOllti ()~~~1V~', 1110 ~~1ciilllln~?. ~U117i1115'~lO1i ('Qlii:~tltii;ti illilt ill t_' `<11)I)11ti111OC1 IS Cw"C}~1~15t1,'llt \'1111 ~li(' I~C\'(;il)])]lll'Ili. ~'Olieies I arl(1 a bcc~litse the. hr()h()se(i de~el()p111en1 is in cOnlornlallcc ~',iti: ('i?~ ct)(les an(1 ~~rl)1't,:lhl't tililtin :131(1 1ci1e1'~ii r~'ilulrel,"1e111~ an(I 11re of !)lc 1114=)lesi ho>:tb1e:1.11x.1?lt~'. Ir.~ ]nstllll;;e lt,'I](°?'l' tli::2'i' 211'1: C~(:`.I)tit)llti tl) til(' ~lt~la't i'[;~~illutl)I1~ ()f till; ~~.~~ lli;r Scrllkd llc"lVt' t)CGi.:ll `~~}1;~llli;~ill~ 1:1111.11+.)f'll.i'.(1 <1S 1}f1I't OI~ 11115 I>ic "tlli:(I ~flllt ~5,'Vell)1?Ill t;;lt. - .~`~C7l7tYl~:~ ~. '.ICy ri _ ~ ~ ... S - `~ ,116 Ct31~~11~1~i()~~~ Eel' ~,Ei~,~'i I'rC>pert~ north <1n~ east r,~f the sul)~eet ,;-~~perty, at'(' ~"111.1~ urban. ». . `vi;1c:>he(l a~ sin`.~1u fam~Iy rE;~ulelltial suhcliti~isions. L d tt> t}-, ..' ;, 1-. 1I~a ;ck Rt)tic~, ~"e c)lllti (Ieveli)htli)le land adjacent ic) tide stlbjeet property, is '~ :;~_I tt) tllt: si~utYl, t',lli~ll is Pl"el()1lnllill;tl~~ ~rent.~' 111e 1;.1,1.(1 t() tf1G south. a,s punned to be (icvel()l~ed X11 cOnccrt (or CCx)l~(iin~lteC1 «1111} t~lu d~:~~'c:It)hn?erlt ~)I ill(; ~~~treel to its souti?. °:l he :le~el()hrn~nt c~I~ these ilvo parec;ls a it hr.~ ~~t ti~ ay t)1~ ext(,ntlitl~~ 13r(x>kdltle Drive west tt> ci)rlllcci ~'<'ith I lalxsrick I:()acl. In this way, thy; two al.jOillin~> ~~al'cel~ tE~ th;~ ,(lutt>s can be approprilltelJ hartiti«ried ire a ~~,a;, that ~ T"l~is I_?3-ttCr;; parcel is vUcuhied b~ one i~~ ~~~_ ian)ily ;~,~~llir~ and "~; ~~ ~ ,~ of substantial I1u<litiollal develop~~l ~ lit, r~ic~ A.. S1or,e & fi:~scscl~tes, Ltd. Page 1 M~ rch '?433 - C~~~~C~,,; ;1Lf~rac~ C~ar'~~i ;' ~_trlit: 1'~E~lrc.Cc:~g~r~'ir~lli: :It~,f o~f ~ ~ ~ ~#aI PpiiT~, C}rc>J err ti5'i,ll ~11t1'U ~il~ 1'eSliltillt', ~{)i> 11'(?iT~lllj~'. L11?{>+] ull` i31~{)UiCI211`~ C}1'il'(,' i '~'~li)11. 11T 1111s Ol`;ll'~ 1114 1)i'C)}j{;1(\" di] ~ti'c'I1L tl) i}TC' `;!!l)j'i;1 1)Ii>1")i:lly :;<ll] 1)t'. iii'\'{'I()1)l'i.i 111 I}ice: (11ji!i'C'. /~:i Sllt;[i, t]li: 1)1'~11)(J~i.CI 1}~:,1'{']Ol)17?t'ill [)~<1i1~ ll'111 llt)j C: 1'lIt`t~ OI `tiilli ll'~ i() 11?t.' U1111"~ C~~:l'i'1C)1)1TTC'llt 01 llCl.}d(:t:l?': I"11!li:l'.1`., IIl C;Ui1T1)11~1?1Ci: llilll `°>llt; 1.)~.l~i'}()1)illl'lil ]~l)1!l'\ r, ! ', i d11 r1 .. , I I i, ~~)>i~~~tas~t~~~~ «~"L~€~~`: r111 ~)121;'1taC'a 1~ril~It~: strcci~ v,itl];n tll~ 1'~Jl. 211'c .%llii~llclccl i{) 1)~, im})rc)vci ~O 111C° C]lb'~S l~~l~ 511llTCl~li'C[~ iltl.' it C:OLlI'il'u7~C} 1<1lIC". ~_ 131117i7t)1] ill'C{? i1I'C:1;I]l1'<ll'S ll%1[! ill'C: l~]<~11T1;CC1 ll'ilfi i/C?71C;it.'IL; j)ill}1ll'11'~ lt~i' 11~,(~,l'.~111t1t1 litiv., 1'l:']~L'~i)1'C', I,lli.'. 1~1111)I)Illt..', l`i)IT?llil:ltili,)I"I i;{)IIC1!lC1iS ~lltll 1,110 l:.(~11[titllli)Il l~ i:C)11.S:Sl{;lll l'~Lli. tIli; :'t'Cll;lll'1?ltlll'> t)1 t~iil .'`"iit{.'i't 1)i;l''1;~01)l7IC'1?t. l~l)[1~~ ~%, ~I15I1I~1ieI'~' ~~f1il~'~ll~!(Sil~ d1~ ~.1£d'C'; ii115CC1 111)Oi1 1110 li)1'l,~?{)1114?, llliCll?~~'S t); [£1Ct ?1f~]CE Ci)1TCllllii(?IIS OI 1<1bi. >}'C ]~~i~lzill~i~; (,t)i11111ISS11?iT CO11i;111C}CS ~}1cll tlh_' ;t[?[l[li'C1111)I1 Iti CL`IlSi~1i'lil W1111 1[11' ]~C"~llll'C'1T1Cllt5 U~'~.T1C'1'It)IT .' E?ililitl~i' il]C' }li'{?}?C)ti11; 1~ C.l±il`>Iti?tlil ~Illli tITC' (:t)Illj)1'l'[i~'11y1V1„: i)l:tll.* the c))jectve5 ofthL ~C,ITi1T~; c)riiirl<ulc:i; ~tlcl tit};~r iif)1,lic ti??C~ ;~t~Ji{:ics cli tli~~ C~i?y. ~~.;:I~~k~ak3k~m ie:::;~::kakok~~~ ~k>. .:;;*ok~Y~~Y}k~~k#~?k~~~v.%rvm%~+k ~Yl~~f"lC1i'1~'- G. `Chf C ,~ t'"t~~~cl:~vad~r~~ ~~1;'~,~~~~': lll~ [Ui:iltlUli e)}~1}1t' ['l I) i~ s}1t)ltin ilT 1:1,}Til)it a, The sir.:; t)l~the 1'tl) ~~ stab}i>17~c1 in 11Tt; 1~i1T{lin~~s ol~ l aci ifl ~~ctii>11 V[ ~?s 1);::i{1~ i~.~;; ,zcl~~s. `1ITi; cl~~i`,?.1 i)l~i}7c 1'1C) is ShC)l-l1T ill tl~ pl~l:l at 1~„~11ihi1 ~'. l lli; n11C~ratill~, t`11<Irzl.,i:{'r?stlcs t)?'tITC 1'l:l) <tlc, ~;'i li)1'tll ii] t}1c .,., f'incill7~s {~1~~1~<lct 117 ~C',CI1017 VI. _~s tc) llvi;111~)11111. lrl l'1~tL~.'i)?' 1'..I,?~;;~ C:_`orrr,t,, ~i t~l' 1.1 I3'~ 2~)~x atJl-;~U~' {l`)57), cr~f'c:~'')t) Ur;1p}> 2?I (1`)Y8), it ll1s }1°1C1 th;tt a si117i1<lr 5ta17cla1'll ~~C[tlir~c] tll~a ~2'l1;1 11{1CIC'1' It) iCl{,litli`~%' T}1C Cltl~llltl;;5 iiiTCi i;l.<ltllt;`ti:l~l~[iGS l'+'ITIC[T i;C)l1St11111(; ~~11V21i)1}lil•, C1I1C~ C~t_'lGl'ITllill' tll1C'.t]]l' I}1C 1)1'()1:~i)~C'Cl 11~C' l1'1}1 121tl~C' 1?101'i 1}T<1] 1 11111111]1~il 1ICll'CI'`;t° I1111)£it;.1 ta17{)fl ~11f)5', 1~(1tiCC1 ill)O11 i1il: C`.'1Clvilc, llle l~lllIlliTf ~,Oi1117113~11)11 (;C)IIL;}UCIt.S 1}lc i illy: ail!<11t1C'ti <111C~ 3 C~i271dC1C'1'1S11CS tl'i7lC}7 C:C)I1>1llltiC; ~ jll'll)111L\.~'` 1.11 Ii]Iti i]lSitlI1CC, il1C:}UCii it 1'l;}t!llli;ll' C1t11~1 ~'li1'il'OIlIl1C;i11 111<lt 1> :11'~E' 11011.1 i:~l-l'~SIIL 11';;11`}ll: 111101 tl]IS211C: CC)11C1311t)Il~. } ]ll; 1~11117I71I?i ~'OT111111SS1U11 C:{)ilC;ltltiC; S. 1)d~:;-C] 111J0ii Ills' `~:l'iC1:;I1~L' f111Ci il1l: 1C){;iitil)11, ~1L.t;, CaC-51',?I7 <illil O})l;l'Clllil~`? a '- c11a1~1c.Ir7-1511cs c)i t[;ls I'[D {"CIS ITerc117 ctal,lisl7~Cli, t.~lt {i 1~11i 1)roclucC~ lll) ~1'~~1t~~I' th~lll T111I11illlti 21C1V~I'til; IIIT17Ili t~ 1.11?OI] lll~ 1'i'c2t1~''}\ Cllllc'I ~I11'll'Ul?I11C%111, 1,1lli;l7 ~C)l'J 1101 ;7F$Ve qt~~(~~+ r* 1w'~CC,~Si1''t~ 11'2T~~1C OI' llIlS2il]C' CC?I:C1iI1C~11_S, lUl th~i 1(~llt)llll~ 1'<;t1S?IT`i; ~. ~ lTl'. SL'l`~e{1, 17i'{)1)l'Cil' E111C1 Sill'l'(iitllClli:`; Cl2'c'll !~ 1)}tiI111~C~ Gll]Cl It)I1c:C1 ll} d1,„lw(7T771Ti1)llitC' Lli'{)1111 1't.'11{l'i]i1I11 t1C'Vi'.lt)1?I,T(:l'i. l~l 115 I1ilLltt', ~i)lTli; 110iJt, i:~ _)1'i)Cliiti;<'tl 17 t~TUC121 Ti:S1C1~11I121~ 11~eS ll'lllt:l, ~11i' I~11lI1?]111;?, ~.1)iT11111SS1{)11 Cl)ITI:-1L1Cll:ti, ]~ I]uil}ii',1' L~~~S~Iti~ OI" Olll'li~ll'i',. ~lf1e 1; )1C1;?I]i11 ~iJ,1T111T1S2>ll>[1 C1.}SO COill:ltlCll; 111t1t 3l'l't15 01 i101*it t~'lllclll ()i 1111 11i'1)cll; 1'i/S1C1CiTt,t<II ilt'a,:l, £1Te TIOt ul~'V„I :~ 1I11172tC;I~ ~\ lil Cll 11(Ji~i:: 1}7.2111 211ii1ii11tl.~ll' c Ill; ;}, 1110; ~i~"a,)ill~llal~,}" (3>l 4d1e :11.1 C'1'QLiTlC~111~ 'Te`d.. Craig A. ~t~ras ,~ Asscsciates, Ltd. gage 16 March HOC? €3~~'C~'~'~E~ ~~L~4~C~ ~..~~ : i, , 'F".z ~~ttl'i f ~. `~!~'d~ ii se Cl~ City of C;ertta4 Pc,int, ~. ~ ~,) ~~~ztpiYl, LC_C: A;,},!rocan-; s=kak~k#k9k~~~kYkSk#~?k~k~l«yk~xk~krk~k~~k~##~k~k~ r~ ~,' ~"e~~~.l€a~zc~~~~ t~> ~.It~~: T1?,, ~'jarlll'll~ ~"~)1,11]]i`~;it)z~ ~:t)nclllc.ii: tIl<;t itil?i~t' lhi~; 1?rt)~c;t ~~il ~`~;'(1(l~l~[~' aC~Cliti(?13~i1 il'~1~ ~lC 1i17t)f1 11C'ill'1)V ~tl'CC15. 11IC tl~~l~ 11C ~<;~{;1`> i11'<' l)C'111iC.'.l' L711111~iilliC)L~ la)l~ i1f) t114;V C.t7llStlilitt' 11'iitllC tOil4?,CtittO1) I11 t~IC i.:Ollli:~t U1 ~.iil]~1~11' ~~{)IIlI .`i LII'1:);i)? t'11V1I't)Illl"li.'.l"li. ~~ 1lC>`-' d1`1711Ca [It)i1S CIO Ili)l 111Vt)1VC C11a11~',i'~ I,l C.i)CI11)IC;1: 11>l~'i; 7)i~i[] l?I<1j) 1.1C til{_'.i1a1iOi15 Ul 7U1"1Cti. IIi)1' t}1~~' iU111t:I111?1i11t Lii1171ci1]iiGCl 1il)11~I11f, ~~~ll~ltlf:~i. ~ }lC 1~11f]1)lllz? (~pilll?lt~,i1011rl~'~{) Ct)IIG1Ui1~-' . ,` 9~ ~il5i;i1 ~Ij~t)11 cl(~1)111;~i1?t ` 1?1;.1i1~ 11] 1'„~!]1171~ ~. 1111 I~IL a:ll',^>I~I.1? l)1 1{]t.' ()1'l)~i;t ). illLllilll).`i L1 C; 1.11()1i111'<il)lt, }~)'UV'IS11~17S 1C)1~ 1)1~O1~c31' ~ ~~'_Y~lili:C~. C`!:Ilti. ii]:C'l~il<ll lta~~i_~1~; ir'.li'ClllailC)i1 11JIC1 17~1~11I17~',. I ~iCi~ClOi'C, the J'1~]ll:llIl~; ~..'{)Ci11?i5~11111 C;:)lli„illt3~-~ 1?]<11 111; ~~~~ 15 C~~I1S1St'uilt lull] ('~I'11(:l lt)11 t.>, - ' wikh ac for Ct)t;;t~~t~~it~~~~ 4~~~ ~:~a~ti: II ~ ('l?Il;] ;_ l_„r;?t11iS~ii)It c)ll~iucl~<] .it)n1 'i114 evi~ez~ce t11at this ~71't)]~t)SGCI hC'V(:.101?I11t3111 Ct 1',l. 1'.~ 17L'lliif;l' t;O111221f,Ltilcl~ 1101 111illlsli'la1 tauti`(;~(?~JTl~lla~~. I~~Iia'C~O,CeS cc~111p1iall~ e wii11 C'~it~3 i)a ~ 7 i , . ~ta~ali~hcd l?~~ reason c~flla~~l)litat?iiilJ . 9 ~ :: ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ H. e ,.._ ~tur,~° s . _ 1 . - ..- _ ~ _ ~ci shr~relin~s, r~ocrded caner and rour~h terrain, if ,__ -'r- - C't>'~»1R~~i<~~~s t~~ I_:<~ti~; ; Pase~i up<:)1~ tt1~ Iin~iilzs taf ~ ~c t and the ~."Vii1~:;1Ce, t~1e ~tll~jt~~t ~~rc)pcrl~' t~()'..'S TIOt T71C~ilUt. ttilti' 111tL11'a~ lt',Ii1ll1'L'~ (`iilCi7 ~s '1'_,li"~~ al"1Ci 51ii~1'l:llll;~. li"Ut)i~cC1 Lt)\t;i' a11t I'U11~,?] lt'1'1'~llll). 112~'I't: elli;, ~?15i) I?<)l~ll]'I;iCilClli117<1~. ~~ia~iia~~> ~ P~~t".`Y:l OI: 111 t' ~;I'U~~~'1'l\' u(;t)(.)x~~ll]t„ ?CI ili4 :~'<1tit:)I]al ~'ti'etlatt~ I]IV~,11,c)r~. IllcrclUl'c, i,]?~ 1'lal?1]i~]~~ t~"t)1ntt1i5sc~z: ct)]ai;ll.lcii:~ that il~c ~'lill i~ cc>115is1t~n(: with Crit~l;c~;t l~~' 1;tiisC.?t1 of ina,~l~lii;al~ilit~'. Craig A. Stone & Associates, Ltd. Cage "1 ~ Marci~$ 2C>C73 ~~~~f~~ ~/~t~r~~ t"=~d~~lr~f>~;P (.~1'ti"~ €>lle~Ic's)7~'ti'1+k~it't ~:iy Qf ~@nr ~ i'oi: t ~J t~JaE't uses}» Ti"11; 1j 113t71i1I?`! {)(1'!I?llssltlll c1Csl1 4'i?I11:111Ci,", ti3~lC ;>tl1)il+;' )t,i:llltl<'~ :lllil sl'1'1'1C:es C'{)17si`>1 () Sii~]it~l~~ ~e)l'eT'S, j)ll~)11C l$il~ _'1, slOfIT; C]1'tllliil'1.i:, ~il'Ci."tS i111Ci ti~llt]5~)t)I~lil1_IOII i;IlCl Litl~ltli'-S, t11Cli' t ]11Sit21ii11)C)17. I"l1d111tCiliLleC <117C1 ;!i)~~t_'C]). ~ 111', lei:-]j lti tO i)C' .`ii;Tl'eCl 1)V ~)?'i~'itte `;tl~€;Cis. !ls ~ll~ll'lti; S~PI'l {~, iliel'e ~l'l11 be 11U 1'C'tEUi7C117eI1) lUl ~17tt11:' I1'zi111tC111fi1~e £illil l.1~)ill;i:l? 111 Ci]C ~)1i1111C C'\~:)C°E15C, .~1S ~UCil, t171s l~i,'1) 11.111 I'C'C1t1C1: llel'Cl lO1~ lllitll'~' ]~Ui7111: ~_il'~"l't )21C1)1'U€`i Ill<illltC'111111C:~c111C1 ill'1<i;Cl' set`~~lt:es. 'luercf~ol~c, t;lc I'laln??l~t ('i)n~lll~~:,{)11 ct>Ili~ltl~lc; il,;lt []lt~ ~~rt)~)t)seCi I'Cll) ~,~~ill ~~~ ltl~c :. ,. .... 1"1{'4; L1 ii)1' ]It.t~])1C i11C1)llii°.5 ~:-lhl .~'.'1'~~ICI,S I~t'~tltlt~C (t_) Qi11ei' ~)1°1']tiltl~C] ti4:;s ~~{)t' 11~ ia11Ci itl GC)i11t?ii<tfl;ty ,'~'ltl. {.,!-ltei It)11 ~{}. ~t'e$erit}a~ d '! ,. ) .. G ;r ~ ~,(3C~1~',~i9bat)Cl~ Q}~ ~,ei~'4'; 1 11C' I'I1111.1171f; ~~<)]1]l.l;~tii£)I7 Cl)iiC;lliCii;ti t}1{lt illy 1)1-i)~t'C'l7 11; 4?.l:t]C;i':117 S~~~fS k,'.4'v' ~:XC;e])ilOl7s :C) t}1C' Ill)I'llllll 1':ClUl]ell':e71is t)I thl' C1'l ;; I.t)Illll;? i.tilCl s111;Ci1Vlslt Il, i1t1S, 1518 arias ~~,'YIe-I-i; c;XGi'}?tll)lls uI'.' ~C~t;~_'111, llli:.1~~Kii111121 ~~i11111titii()il C'i)lii lllCli:ti 1> 1Uili?l~:"): 1, the ~~1'op~Sec~ cill~eilill;~~~.n.~ ]lerlllissif~ly ~Itt~lclled sil;~lt~ 1't1711i1~~ Cl~>vellin~s. `l'1?~r~ is i~llrtllcr Cillilli_)I'lt~' ~()~1ti1l'il t11C' ill'~'l:lllll`_T.s liy i)C;1-t t}~ '~ ~t:Clic)t Cil'1 eli)1)lilt'17t, ltil]IL11 t171s ls, e~l)C'l;lilsJcl};i~ pacl)c}t Ciel'tll)[?i71e111 __ 1711I'sU<il7t 4V ~, ~,'»t)t)..}]) IS l~C'1'l111i)1.'Cl 111 t11C'. ll- 'O=7e. ni]t1 eX~lrt'ssil' t'ellrill'~s 1171' C}llC'}:.117.,1;~ t0 ~3(' ~tti1C)ICII, ~'li)]'i'1)l%C'1`, i„;s ;1 ~)<lCll{)i Liel~el~}~lmellt. the Cl€:l~elo17r17crlt is exL;117ht (l~ol?~ t~~c+ I{>t ~ll~e~l, width, t.lel:r~til, yard, s~tla~h, all~l lilt {;1)ve1 1~-~ 1~eLluilernents ?hilt cltllcl~~,~,isc tt]71)1~; ~'~it17i1 il,e I-Z dislrist, ~.~llt ()1-C1i1111i'} t)1'i:ll';sll)11s i) ~17e ~~ ?"f'C(?i11C c.lii;f? Ci11'l'lilili? t() }113'(' tll<) C)11-siI`C'Ct ~'3nT°]tiii1 :+])ai:i':i 117cl )! 31.1.1`;-~'~ OI' (:Ill'i'l)i't. }17. tllti ])]-C)jC-i:j... C'21C:), UI11.1',. E1~1J ! t1'~'CI--L1tI ~~Ii?'i3.~'l' S~']tl.. ~ •_ (iI-]l'1'\l'<t}' illl:'l)ll `Sr)t S:l; i{)7' f~.~ {) il~lt)l`til)1111.( l'e)711i1C'~, L\C'ej7t t11L' tJil~-}li;ilill()I77 11111is ~%llli~: Ial~<.);vCi »`,`~' c)n I;~hlblt :~ (~lieet ;"11 ). [ }le enc-t)eclruolll UTi1t ]latie i)I71y a Slllr;ii; C:! f_'iiT'll`.,e t111i s])dCe l)il 1174 l11'I~'el'al' i{)1- t)Ilc <111ci:t:U11111 l'tiilli;lt", ti~~~ille 1111;1"i 1S 1111"lilllt', 1<)i rw 1`1.'~il(;1Cs i01' tiliC}1 t)ill''-l~;l)7t)l)ll1 Lllilt, t)T1C' (.)?\ i174', II .;;i ~'_'_,l;s IS t)eltl7el' tl t?~lll`,?t', 17Qr' c~ll'}~ol-t. "lle 1?1<lllllill~ C`1>1171.11isSiC'rl coi7cluLies that su!~Iici;;ni p lrl`i17~~ is prc)vicieLi ic> lrlt~et the o}~jectiles {)f tl;u city's ~ol7in <t11C1 ~ub~t;visii)17 ()1'ciltl«nces» -~~taeref~~l'c, tl7e Ylallllin~w ~t)Ii117llssi011 ep~7cltlcles iilat t~125 ~RCP.~1t1C}al is 17 i;.1`Illlss3l)le. 3. 'Ti7e ]lrl)1~)se{1 streets lll]ic11 interllt?1ly s~rv the lots llitllir t?~s 1~}rl~~~^t ~lre ~+ri.r°ate ~t~el:ts tl''illi:ll ]IC1'1~i71.~sit7ll' Lll'l'iCiti; 1'€)111 I}li' t~`~"J1Ca~ Stc~.l)C'}c~l`:-ii 1)i file C11.`'. ~17 c~C~Clil.li)li~l~i ('~Cl'i~ilUi; is i)1' Zl'~ll` ()( 1}1C i()l'liil(.?Il O1 slcii.lll)Cti, lt1t~125~f11))i'~t, il7e S1Cil;ltii111`sq 1'il'lllel' Ii1C111 ~)1'i}llCie ~!Ci~it:ellt ).t) tiA:: stI'et'ts, 117.1: 177'1)1 ICieii betllcell till..' 1](1111114? lulls, l ll.e }~iCi[1I73i1~~ ~`0711TIllssl{)I; ~ `" col?l:ltlcies that the 171~1nrlecl slci;;l~~llls 7r1>vld~ loI 7I7pr1)1)7-iate pe~iesit'tall i;I7'Ltllat%o17 v~'hlcl: 1S Gi?71s1s1CI1t 11`]117 1111; 1)1~,li;Cill'~s O1~ 1111' Llll!5$ ~i)llllit? i7tld ~illi)113V1s11?Cl C.~rdlal~cl~5, The7'c1~)1'{~, th;; I?larillil7`~ Ct>l~lr~ission c~l,~cltl~es that this ex~etit~n j , 1:,7i~i1~1~. C ,: ~ ~1, ~l~n~^ & Associates. Ltd, C'~ge ,~C3 iv;,;~'c,Pi 2J0.,~ C. Cenr >i r.:-~,~ c- ~ ~ pirr, L1.C i`.c;l>I~ctant 4, Based uo~7 t}7i,' ?ur~~i t~ir1~; iin(I1) >~.~ t)1 L.1c:i <1i1t1 c:(>~7t_lll:,ic>)1:; i)', 1iw, !7C' 1'1~1)7)tirt ~C}231T21i5`~,IC)Ti COt1C11iC1~ti (111Tt 1170 tiI)1)liC(111C317 L`; Cc))ltiltitC171 G4~,t17 tlll' )'CCjlil)'t'lll~:t71; O1 ~.1'll(,'I'1{71,3 11 b~t_ ~.~;~::_ ~,',~I.el'c nc)t <)illc!~~~isc 1)(~a~uliitcci h~~ i17c 1)~l(?1t)~ }~rtivi~;ic)n~ t>i• t11c %t?, tl7c ex~'e1~liOrls 1~ t~1t; %(7:7i11~i uTl~l `~~11?{livisic)1~titi(~s t)f~tl7c (`cTltr~il I'~.)iill ,'V'iilni_,.,},i11 f~;~)(lc 1?avc 1?et;:il i,il'T?;OllSii'l~.t'it 1{) i1C 111('x, (' tliC't)}?J(~ I'tit;'.`; t?1 111' 1;11)il ('ti ):I t` { ltli'ti. ~~&~k~k>kak~~~>k~#~~}k~~ksk>k~~~k#~ is !; 17 w Fir _. _ f - A. ~"}~ r77A jig C"Y! ~'E'. f"1 to r] "~.~ ~~~ ~}N~Y1i'tllis, '~ Gt:7 le ~Je!'t7"tI~ ~1~~1 ~ 5 ~~, r COIt€:'~L~149Q)1I~ ~~I' [:Ft~,~': Thy I'1a1117ir,~~ t.: c))7~r*~iss~rl (;t)z7clt~d.e that; c)lhc_•)• th~~?17 cxcLl~tic~~.n ~r(~rn t1"le t}'})1c11 t1117c111iC1~ 4~ thi' ~'i'1"ltr(11 I'1)117 ~(lt3l'17~?; ()rC1i11<'tnC; ~1T?ti ~'111~C(i~'151U17 ~)1'C(11711...:i; tl3at plc' 17c)~,77issii~l~ alai ~~hich 17a~~ );:~)1 <lppr<~1~~( ~lti 17~1ii c>t'~t17~ 1'1111117~c1 1'1?it 1)G~c.ic)l.)ln~~l?t, ti3i:~ 1?2'C?,ji;Cl i;7;;i;1S 1111 l)tlll:f' i1t~'~:1t)1")i7iCilt X11711 lt)i I'l'~1:i,1'i'1lii'I71ti C)1 h(; ~;1117ji:i't ~~ ~ /,()I:i11`~~ C11S11'1C1 aril <zll other 171~c)vi5it)T7s (>t• tflU G(.). 'hltc 1'}arllir,~~ ('ur171llissit:)17 al~c) ~~t)17c11ui~~~, b~1_sc({ 111)C)17 lx17i17it ?, t17e I i17c1i17`~5 c)f 1~~1~t in `fie: tic7n ~~'1 a11t1 ~i1)p1it:117t'S sti,)~1~iiic);75 i{1 `~t•ttion V, i17at il7e filte i111~ 111 t.' I)1C)~31)`t'(~ 11`:x; 1S ii(1'(111s11e 117 51/ti_' ~l)7~i ~17i1i7e t:(} accn3rllc)~1<1tc' 17C' l1Si;.. 117L.I'1;11?1'c~ the 1'l~u7ning Cor717;i~siol3 ec>1,c111(?~~ th~1t t17is 1117~711(:cliul7 is cc~nsistl~lli «ith C°T'it~ric>n 1. ~'~it`~,~ic~r~ ~3 ~. Tk~r _ ~ ~ ~~ ,ivy mi"; ~ tr I > ('utlella~ic)~~~ t~t't~~t~~;:>> ~~1 iol'i}7 i.7 the I'i17di774~~5 O--Fact in ectic>~, `.'T,Pl3ase 1 ~) the s11)jcct I)1't){)C1~1~' lle\'clo>17te17t, l)llti 21i}l'C(U~iIC, ~1511i1~~ C1C'CC°SS tt) ~)£11~Y;4',`. ;17?le, a ~~`l't1 Clty Stl'Ct'1 v~ltll ('lll't?5, ~111t1'1'S, Ct~?,7C;1''t~ S1C{eti'ti111{~~~llld ~11~'et 11~.?111~. .`'~S C11tiC) t;~t<1171i~11eF,~ ;~ ~L;C:lll71l ~~, I'hz15e ~ Ol 11715 1)1'C)]eGt ti'~'711 I;CiVC' CiCi;'Sti lC3 the la1a1117ei1 G\ti;ll`;1.~351 t)! [33'uodale l~l'1Vt' (,li) 1he sc)~;th t?i' t11.e r~perty) ~~'hich. ~tilr~n extended, will tic cc)17str11ctecl to fiz1l amity ta17(1<1r<l~. {.~1il~b'1(_'~~;' COl"t21eCt~ iC1 '~1~«(1~+\~'t?1'OC)l~ D1~11~c3~(i 1i1'L7i~~iC1C':1i'. ~~~1i1 Gt)T1Ttf:{w~ 1C} ,'1~~ti;f1C(0~~;~1'OOIC U>i~w ~7t7<i II~?.n~ric;: Ro{lci, bt)ti7 titre.~t~'hi~` :i-e fi11J~ ilnl;rc)~i;~i l() llrl)~l)7 stalltiarci~ ti-iit17 a~>l?1?a1i pavil7~,~. cuc1~.~ X11711 ~.~utters. I17 t17~ c<1~;, nrc1~ I~t)atl. it <11~:c) 1715 11 t~e~i`~rl~itctl ~?iirvclc 1a17cs -' l;':7 l)ath S;.lii'.J ()1 t11t: S'tl'i.'.l,'-t. 1 Ilt~ 1'1i1i7i711i'.' ).. UlI7lTllti~1()i7 t;{)i7t;1.111:1C;5 t17(lt tl7i:~~' Sli'~i:t~, L71S1'<1 lli)O11 t17C11' X1%4 ~llid C017C1itt)tl, 17f()~'1Cle 21C11'C~tl~',L._ 1it~t;e5~ it) i'tl~'i;t1V('{~' 11ui;t)I11:77t)(1t11(' illa: ?,1'T7I`1le t}l%11 e4p(;cted tc~ 1) 4~~17e1'atUtl b/ th; l~r(>I~,~'cc1 usc; Gvh;ch ~s ;'?-1 ti'~lli(;1c tl•l~:~ t~17 at7 ~1ti'. n_~,~,~ ~r,.~ir~ A. Stcr~e ax As: ci , '_td. Page '~1 I`vttirci; 1?UO ~~e~~~+: _: `,•~_',:~c-~~ ~~le3f1i^iE?d Un°r~` f'~c3~+c~tt~ t1t Cii~; ~~F ~ 'oir vicga;: . Wf~t'~CCi~', ].hel'ui;~re~ the ~'~c`~T122111~ ~O11i,7~,i~tilC?I? ]a)tl~ ~~ }"- tllsit J}l15 ii}~}i}IC'lliii>I7 7`i Gt)I1`:7St1=11~ rti'Itll ~1'ltei'lt)il ~. ~`-I^i#t?1'1~"'f? art ] C ~' t _ M a Cf?i1d.~lt~i~()aE~ t13 lia<@~~': Itl 1tS 1~')11,`ilCie7'I`llil's1 t)~ 11C' £t)1}~}~Cl:t:()11 tlii_' J~iltlll II'' ~t~111Ii11~,`il()1] h(i k: ~;s).111I11e.CI tilt;. ))i)t:;lltll~ for ~C1VC1Si' 1.1.11})7.11.;15 LI}?i?11 <il)L1i.1113~', I]I~t);)C'1'lll;ti I111C~ I iViic`~ ~~le "I't)li.lJ1~'I1]r; e~7r1CiilSlt?l'1ti (?}\'tC111: 1. Lti'~agaitlrl c>~' {~t~~)~-€~~,~ta~x-t~~~~~: 'l~l?~ laeatiell c>I'tll~: h?~11.zlcc} illlllrO~,t~lneltt`~lr~ s}~~,~~1i1 oI~ ll]~ p~tlrls ill i°;xhl't?ii ~~'. 17;.::, rlc)tlll+l` intlle 3c)c(tit>n c)~t}l~° ii?lpl(>~ell,t;71t~ ~'t}lich serve:; t}1';; ~~ro~iuce imp~lets (tvl:ita: ~ ~ to vlle level Of ~.i~~tlilic~?llt) t°};011 ~17i~,~ ~lhuttili~ ~lrt~hct'ty ar the her111i_llecl use thert;t~l: ~t'}llt'€11i~~' ~IISt„f,$"~`Is~i it7C~ ~~.,3'~'~iti: ~'lle Ic~e~ltlol] i~f I]1~i11eCl }?C)111i5 i)I»~I1~sreS`~'t~ +I'etiti ~(ICC'eSti} aI'e silo~'tia1 tall tale palls 7r, I';xhihi# ?. T?7e ,Irc1I1( I°~'`r ';1_l~ tic) pointy ol~ <i(.t'etiti: 1) l~rotl (~sl}CVlt,',}'ti ~l'elllle (~`»'}ili:il 1l'ii.`; `i111}~I)~'i~ i111C? t}ilk pi'()I)ei'lt' lU (il;C%C?l,)nlti?C}(!ti' ]tai }?llllllCCl ~~tezlsicln) br' ~~av oI~ 1'1C;ac?c,ti'v t]rc>c)}: I)ri~ e, a:1il :' j 1)~ the }?1lllllcc{ e\teI]sit)t] ~)1~ 13ro(11:C}ulc I7iIVC west tc) eollnet:t ~'~'7t11 lI1711rIC1: l~t)~zcl. ~?tl~<\le'v~ ~.~-i1~?c ~',li? ~(°!'~'e I'11tt~ J ()1 the ]11C?Ji;C;I. ~rtJC}ICC}~11e I)1'll~ 1v 11} ~)1'(J~1C}e i,lC1C'l'ti~ 1(11' lie ~~;1(1~:;-). } }:::1'l' lti lii)t}11114.` 1~1 ~~G }174i1i1C)li Ul lii ':'e5S itl?cl t~?I't'j> ~'t.~1" t121S pr~~eCt ~V~llt }'i 1L1}} l:;l'()Ch.tt;e, 1111171i1,tS (t}1C?1 2'l~e t(3 the IC;~'t'1 i)i S1v~Ili11C:<illl) LlI)()n illy abuttln~ property UI' !IIC I]Url7littC;~ t?Se 111e1't:(1{, 3. ~ta~~t-~~i~I ~.'i~°`tal<tiic>~a: "l he pl~llltel Alterlla~ c~rctl~~txurl ~ti sienl fs ~,11~'tvn ()n ilte I,1~n iii l~x}il})il ~'. ,l )1i: I~}c illlln`?: ~~C)I7i'lll~si()Il C(?l;l lili:}e> 11'Olil t}ll; ell~el?c.e t[1Cit t}ll: LIiG,1.l~%tli`I"'. i`\':;lelll i,`~ tlC1<;l]llilll'. Ilil} tl)pl'ili.)1']cltt' ll) tl~lilsl)t)I'l. ~elllele~ E?IC~'el(;~ (11?C} J)'(Ietitl']clli~. lii~:,: 1~ II()1111I1~ I11 1.}le 1i11t:1'll~ii i'li'i:L1111LiC)I:i li?1' 1i:1.` 1)lU,jeCl tti'II1C11 1lylil ])I'CaC1ti;C I1l1I~C14~~ 1}'.?it I'l;a~' ~tC? llle, level iJi J1~11':h(, i1i11) 'I,ll7t7iltlXl'~, sl}. U:117)t~'} ~?1'l:)Ii~'i'tti' C)1 tli~^, ~]S;i'II11tt4C1 L1 Si 1171;1'+ ,_'!, ~. `fit'.! i)id~~t;~: I IlU ~Oelltl(?1'~ ~?J~ lI1(~ ~~IAl1i7eC1. illll~l'C?~;':llle„tS Cii"(' wlll)l'~ 11 ()dl t}li' I~llI1S 111 L,;:hlk?lt » ~,~'hlle .llc)t I'e~lu7reci o{'padl(1t (,e~'clc)l~nlellts. the pltir?111'<1 cl~le};ill~~s L'Onel'~li1y os(~1'~;e t~.e l)Ihl'1'l~'ISe 1'etllilT'eC~ ti1:il)i11;1~J OI tllc; }t-~ !t)11111E Cll~trlt;t <tl?C1 itt'C: c i?I~1'Uj)1'I,~te, I liel'e is laU }Iliia~' li] t~,e plill'1I1~(~ 5t.'11~1t11~ U t1t111Celtl`.~5 1~'}ll,}1 ~<I'VUS t11G' l~Tl)i1tTGl' llll[)11~'t5 ~1'~'i11C71 'Ie tv t11'~ }evel c)fsinificli~ ~1pCln ~Iny tU~t lt:llt~ Ilr~perty t~l• tll~~ permitted.. ils~ iilere~t~~. . ,. , j. ~CIl~[!(Il;~ ~~GS±~~It T}Ti/ ~Ql:Cl`ti(11i <!1~ the 111(11?iieC} 1i211)?'C)tii=ilii'1115 Ire ~}1U1i11 C)11 $~le pl(Irl~ 1t't . ., l:~x}7.1~)I[ ;'. 1)~~;'elllll~?s Ioc~liecl aci~accn to e~lstul~~ re~lclc~ntltll c}el'elopl~ltrtt t(~ il~le 11O1-tl]o t~l'c: ~lZd t~f Sil]~1e ~t~)r'ti c~~nstl-uetioll~. ~I~}lere i~ 11(ltilin~ ill the. t~Iallned s.;ti:)acl< ~f bti}3di11~ tv;hie}1 sel't~e5 the I~rl>(itlce il1ll>41cts +'~lhic'~ ri r to the ie~e1 o!~„~iullilit~ult} uptan any t1~71Itti114'. pl°Opcr~y t)r t~+e perrlittccl use tllc:;-eo}~. t~~~ig /-~.:~tor~~ & Associates. Ltd. tae 2 f~'erc}~ 2C)O:3 r !'- '[_3C° ~*' ~ 6.1RJ~4.~ nt-t."~t"S€-'-'~~ ~i"1i €: ~_~~`~ ~/ti)fC)~bEt i['i i i_ r"en~:ra! Pcsir~, 3 ~cri Coal;yin, ELC: ,AppfiC~nt t). ~~~61.Ld.3 Si ~~~..~ ~~~'I'; Q,. ~<~A~.. ~llel ~r r ~~7 elll `T ~i(}I iiE k1~~)(~ll ~L:11{.ili ~.~ [114)11, ~. L311~ ~~l.,~l ~i()I t~] tlill_I t..tl ~~t 1ll'O1)i:iiG' 1_)()Lil1C1Ct1'le`i. 1 ilk' i~lltitlll!' 1C'!'C'llil.) 5i:1)i:l;iit'ti Illi' till})~~(:t 1)1()E)l;li~` ~I()li1 !}it: l;\15~111;_> 111.1)LI1;iLCilii)11 b~hlctl is Ct)tlllt?t,O(1~; LU tliC ;tll)~CCE ~)1t)1):a'll'. i 1)1:3[' l;; ;li)t111I1!, li) i}1C 1'r~i3~` C)~ lench)~ (.{)r 1~~alls) ~,:°hicll ;erve~~ [h(~ ~)r{uiuc~: ilrll)llct`~ (w}llch 1 is~: t~ tilt 1{~~'c1 {)f" sit 1~J<1ic;~lllij t117C)11 ~ll,ti «ht:tlila~ 1)ec)~x~i tti~ ul' ill;: 1)cl'llliite,i ati{, tllti~rt~Oi". 7. L,;~r~~l~~a~f~~rt,~: ~;.~:,~,1 1117{)11 tlli~ 1;ahihu :' (`Ili°<;i 1,) i.~lnclleap ~;w 1'1an, tlll E)OI'[i(;.1;~ OCti~~ f)1"Ol?CI't~' I101 OCGI?i)11 C1 hy: C1liC.'1113i~:,ti, Sil':;CIS, Cll'l~'C~'va~'s 111 K1 (?C'l1t :iti'lilil ])<LlilS, 15 11?tC'1?CECC1 iC} la.'. 1i111t' 111i1tl~C'.1):;C1. ~ 1~C'I 1~ 11{)iillll! 11i till: E7lilliillCl liiIlCl:iC:~11)11':~~ ~1'111L11 )ii'I'Vl'S t1lt. ro~l~lce 11Ti1)~iC;tS {1~`1111,;iI 1'l:~l,', to t~'1C ll'VE'~ fJ~;;l~t111E1t;<1111J tiE~{)11 illl` c:?ldtllll; ~?1'{?~);Ct~' ~1 lE;l' pe~-1~itte{1 LISC tEl~re{)I: . ~~~iclc)a~~• l..i~~;hdi~~;~; Tll lc){raticn~ i)"pc~1e 3i~>_Ilt3na~. x~lld 1)t_C'csi]-ian 1i,;;liill~ ~lc~«11 c)l~ t1?C: 1';:~:hiLit `? (5ht;ci :~i) hitC~ flan. ~1)})liC~ltlt ~l<I5 a~,l'~°{~ci t() tilil)tllat~ tillli t~~:t~~I'ii)1' Esc>li: li`~lltill ~ ~tiiil be 5i11-i141Cji.'ci stii•litientl~' sc:) ill~li it Clc)~~s ]lc)t ct:st clh'e~t li~~lli ul)i)11 z~CEj<>i.lin~,~. ~1.~})4.1'11C'~. 1{ illy, et.e-zlU[ l~l)lt; llt?htlil`' I~ shl'ULIt1eC1 1).11'tillfllll il) Il?1)11C11111'ti ~tll)tlllitl()Cl} the~~_ is 1?othil7 in thy' plarlnetl e~tel~ic)r lis~hl;IIL inlpri,~tit;1n~;Ills ~~hic:l~ sLr~rs file l~rc)citli:e im~~acls (~~11icll rise to the Ii'vcl of si`~lliiic<11:;j l.1,))n a} ~huiLill~1)roperty ~1'thc 1)elnliitccl use ?hC'1'eUf. ~. ~1~[14: 1 he )a1~13]111I~~T ?~(3rnr1~1sS2p]l C;017C;1tlCIeS 1il<l1 I]C? tii`',17ti ire ~l]-t)1)()se{,J 21i 11115 tulle. :~1~1)licallf has a~]'ee{~ io 11)1)ly sel)ztlzltcl~ 1{.)1- ~ `~.n 1>{Amts ~?cl i{) cc)lnl)ly ~'~it11 file 1{.~~tllatiC:)il~ C>i~ the i iii'. Tf t3?t city`' ~i~~I; rC;~ tll~iii{)11S sire {~h~~r~cd, iller~ is Ilvtlli;z ~ 71~ the t•ti'<l~' t). S1 `?115 tiV111i;i1 l~"11.1. j)1'Ot1tlCC: 1I111)CiLtti (1\ 111C:1? 1'iuL' to the lel el i ?' ; ll~ li;;llll) tl~{Jn ~! <lbuitill>> prc)J)ei~1}' (11- the 1:~eI'nlitle{1 Ilse lhi:t:i>f. l~J, l~tlseCl tI}){)Il t1~e 1'ore`~{)ill, 1inClin`s c>f feet allil. co11~1usi;)rl> of ?{l~ti=. iile 1'111nnn~_' (.,t.)1111illlsll)1) (;C)17,~Ut1e~ lll~lt file <z~()11C:c111C?I] J5 c:U11~1~1e11 ~1'1tEl ills; 1'<'t(;llt'C'llll:l?t5 Ol`~. Iltel'I{)n l>~ hl=(.llltiC', ~.hC: ,~!'t)~)Otie{1 1~1'C)Jeet ~~'lll 11t1Vi' ilia 5tZ!illilu~llit ~3Cll'C'E's:' C',1\3Ci.:l C)n Cii)lilllll`,_> p,, a i)I'Cl)el-C~; l`)I" t7: 1)el-I1lliteCl l7Sw' 1i1C1'i'{)1, 1)Cl~{Cl 111)1)11 t~le it)1C11`;Illll~.~ ~~C)i]i1111StiiC)[?'s CO11sIClel'~ltli)11 i)i 1)1UL~USC;Cs lOl~lllull O1` Il11Eli'C>~.el?leilis i)ll djle ;alt~> 1'l'11iC111C1i- 111`,!,1-es5, l;r?1'C;ss 113C 11111,'I.11C11 elI-CLIlC1t1()]l, se1h~lCl:s, 11C1~?ill Oi ~t1;1C~11a4?Sci17t~ `11I'lliyitlt'i:S, l'~I;I~S C11:1C1 lt'.11Ct,~, I~rldsc~,i)in~, (~uicl{)or li`~iliin~. allcl si~~n. ~f7Z'G'i'IC~C7 '~J~ x~. _ __~ (3t r ( I t (I t Ccl~l~f l~~~t1'~zs a1f' I.~t~E : C'i~lllti yor thy; f)rc)1)osed 1)r(),j~;et ~lre shown in Exhibit . 'Il1e "{~1~eI'atoal c1l~lra~.~~-1'isios" c)!' lllis use - ~ planneCl p~t~loi ~le~,~I{)p;lletat/Planne+~ t,~nit De>+el)plllerli - ,: - ~t'~IC„~ ~. .`7'lOflC'. ~S! ~.'~SJCIi31i.S1 ~..."~~. ~g`}$,~,"~ ~Jlarci~ ;ZC)C);3 ~`iG':,i9~-' 4!'~t?C~~~ ~~^aP"~i'lt?~ t.~~lt~ ~~V+~ICJ~Ck~~ ~~; ..,Ii) ~ ~ ".. ~ Ppin;, ~~r~~Otl C=r~l; t.L(: p; ~ .:~~is ~l,'~ st°t~ ~u~r'tl1 i~~ ,la~° ii~lc3il~~,<.~s c,~~ 1'r ~,t iri `;~a~1vi~ VJ. I3t s~~~1 >i~3oi1 il~c ct~i~lci~cc, tl;c I'l,ii~rlill~, ~C111iI1115S71)Ii C;r~t~C1LlC1';:~ (1i~It t11C. C~l~ll)1lS11111C11,, I71ili11tC)lLlilCi; IlilC1 C)1)4";'~1tlt)11 Ol 4hC 1J11iilli,'~.; I~2'C>_;c4:1 :~~i11 cot~~ply ~~~ltl ;L,ca1, ti1<tlt~ 1,1141 1ei14;rttl liti<t111i ~tll4i ~~,(~~~~ r~.;.~.ulalil~il~s. I I~~cI'ci~lrc t}li pI'O~t',GI 1h 211 i1t~t hc. C1 Ch'iTlli;lllal C) t111' 11CL,1ll., ?~;<li~'1\ U ,',~:l1C;l'Il1 l'Y~1i131'C U1 1~Ci~Zit),1S I~CilL111]I UI' l'~'A)1"~111~,? .ll i~lt', Sttl'~U1111~1i?~1~~. 'i;t11~~>l;l'Il(l~>i~S ~litC1 4'~.i~~ ]xUl ~~C Cii;lil?iii:!1tll~ O1' IllJtll'1Otl~ iU t~](~ ITC>i~t;l";V £11111 11111?1'C)VCl1l~'t11S 111 1}1C Ilclt'h1)Ul'11i)1)C1 t)!' Ii) Ii~t' ~',Clii.'1'tl1 :1't:'11iU'1' t>1 1111' Ct)Il"1I]11lliil~', IIt. CL<1C111:7~ lh,S C(?I14,]USit)Il, ~lhf' 111~1111)li]i' t._~(1111ti1;tiSiOl1 11It?i i)IISCi1 1lS C'(?i1C1iISl{1)1 t)I1 ~1'1C pt"01~C?SCC! 1(14; 1IlOI1 {)~ ]i11hCt)1'C1Zlti[1lS 1711 ;.11t„ 51t1', VCIlICt11<l1' ll~~slCSti~ l ~ l~i'~;~; I117C1 7i]1Ci'11111 (;lIY~111u110i1, 5C:1h;1C1~Sa i"lC~~]t Q1 1)~11~1C1i11~"i illll~ ~'tl"llC'~117~1;.`iy ~~`2i11ti ilili~ ICIICCS; ~i17~t15Cc21)11~1I7.. oUt`7001' 1i4?1111It,?, c1114~ ~i~ri1S. ~'p'1~`Gi'Bt?P7 i3 E. 1 ~ ; `_ ~~ 2. street signs or traffic ~, _ ~ t ,!~ _ . ~. ' ~n 1 t 7. - i r r ~ ~ '7t ' n >d within which the subject land us 1 RF .,f ~ t,.,r,.a ~r ~,as~~,r ~,ta,„ ., .~~Md~ :~. ~ ..r,:"Yte w 12. I 1 _; C N. 1 t_ 1~ 1).t Ct~nc~~~~ic>gl~ of L~a~~: 1?~e I']~nt;irl`~ Cuis5ii>t1. ~::ot~c;llad~s that th~~t pro~'i~;ot1~, listed among t11e approval cl~rtera, do il~>t operate ~~ testy prireI~lisite t~~ <lpprc~virt an a~~pliGation. C;rac A. S:~rc, & Assaci~tes, l.td. gage 24 ru~~~r~z moo F3~:c~f~~ l.~l,~r~c~c~ F~lrt~lc~c~ 4.Irx"rt- "' . ~>'Evz€caa:~r~rn City :~! CE3rttrgl Point. '.~;rrx;on ,~Ipi>>. LLC: A~13iic~artt ,I l1ti1C'C1C'j ill ]>?-Ot'1y1.{')~'lfi Sll,1OI~ i'11h:11Ci"iliC' iil(; ~,'iil li)ll`i (ill)]C.`~ Il>i ~1 ilii.'€] illi' I~i<lilllll)~~ ~_,'('!~ 1T1.1ySii)1] l~ C;i1111(i:Cl 1C) 1]]]1'O~C CC)i1C1111Oil~. ! i"li'ii.'1Orl.'- illy I~itUlllili;' ( t)I1;i71:S51OI] (;Ul1ClltCl{;ti 7 p ~ ,a ~~1~.~'G~1~ t`l~~~lkGsitli)11.15 ~i?Tlsl~l.:111 \-~"11(1 ~ l~tit'I']i)il 1 ~) ~)~' 1:'l-.`iUll O€ ll+<l~l€)iiC~i,~l.ill~`, ~~ "Ii]h C`<;r:ir~t.l ('{)int C~ii~ ~'1<i~tain~~. C~{)n]l::isiOl] !lltil~]tti~•1ti C:Oncl,aClc~ i!aat tit(; hrc~,~t-~,r.c~i ?~II?CI r~s tppltc~lti()rl~ «J:tcl] :;ci~~ lpl~r<);~tl ()1-: 1 j ~. I'iill]lt~~Cl 1'I]it I)~~'uf()€,t]t{~n€ (I'll)}- <'j it C'i)tulii;()lea? ~, ~.;~ 1'crt]tit_ a.>_c! .~ t ,I ct,tati~c 1'lal] I~~r <t 1'<ualOl `~ub~i~'~ii)il 1)~~~cli;h,~,cnt al~° cOn]i~liant ~', it11<111 llr t}]t` I'i;lt'b'C111i ~lt~:)~ti iltl~'i; Jlill]C4CUtiti llliCi i:i liCi'll1 CQ~?t{Iil1C(~ li] ll1t: ~Cl.il.17 I't)1Cti ~,~':tlil;ii~{ll ~t~C:i::il1C{ {)1iI~1 SlCttlCliil'Ci`~ 111 Soil; 1I11U li'Cii l'~l~ I;l1', R~~pectful;~• ~lli)i?~i~~t~t~l c)]~ l~c?~~lll`ct~ ul~~~;?, ~ . C~-~ ~; ~: CC~_. iti:t~;r~~_'t-I~Iit~l'lr`12111T r C~~~ig ,~. 5*vne & A ~soci t~td. P ftilv)rGlt tJC?3 ~~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 4I30l2003 1 cITY of c~nrTRAL Po/nrr PUBLIC WQRKS C?E'PARTMENT STAFF REPORT -- D~te:..:: 4-2-2~~3 Applicant; Calpin L:I.G" P,CI. Pox 8271 l~lledford, .pregon 97502 Project; Beebe Wood Village 1_ocati©n. 1arr~ricE~ Ro~~, ~`}avkiew Avenue ~©ning:. SR = 2.5 .ega1. 37 ~ItV 1 C Tl: 1400, '# 500 & ~ ~i00 t~nifs; 1q2 Plans;. Beebe Word Village Tenatve Plan Richard Templin l~:and Surveying P:C~: ~iox 1940 Jacksr~nvi#le, ©regon 9580 . Repr~rt By: Public Works Department _~ PURPOSE Provide information to the P#anning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department {PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineerregardmg the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. The "General" section of Phis staff report is a broad representation of the City of Central Point's Standards & Specifications for construction. For specific criteria re#ating to individual projectsldevelopment the City's Standard & Specifications should be consulted. SPECIAL RE(,?U1RENlENTS The following items are specific Public Works infrastructure recommendations identified while reviewing the Tentative Plat for Beebe Wood Village. s~ cirr a~ cEnrTR,aL Potn~T PUBLIC WORKS C?EPARTMBNT STAFP REPaRT 4I3t11217a3 2 Existing lnfrastrueture_ The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i~.e. streets, water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems, natural drainage systems, etc.} will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of current infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows andlor demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by has applicable}, the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner involved. Street Gayout/Sectian: It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the Developer intends to construct a Private Street, including a connection to 4akview Avenue located near the easterly property boundary, and a future connection to Brookdaie Drive located near the southerly property boundary. The Developer's engineer should consult the City of Central Point Standards ~ Specifications for construction regarding the requirements for street secfiions, street geometry, right-of-way width, curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscaping rows, wheel chair ramps, and all other necessary street design guidelines. Historically Fire District #3 has required a minimum of two points of access to local developments. Although a second point of access will be provided with the future construction of Brookdale Drive, the Public Works Department is recommending a temporary alternate point of access for emergency services. The Developer's engineer should coordinate with Fire District #3 to develop a suitable secondary access. Written approval from Fire District #3 will be required before final construction drawing approval. Attached. City of Central Point standard drawing for a Private Street (A-1D} Public Utility Easements: The Public Works Department recommends coordination between the Developer's engineer and surveyor to create the necessary public utility easements for Beebe Wood Village and utility provisions relative to future development located to the south of Beebe Wood Village. Storm L?rainape Infrastructure: Astorm drain connection for the proposed development exists in close proximity to the northern property boundary. This connection was stubbed-out far future development and is recommended by the Public Works Department as the point of connection to the existing City of Central Point storm drain system. The Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system which provides far run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development, any future development on adjacent properties, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to tie- infio the proposed development's storm water collection and conveyance system. Acknowledging Beebe Wood Village storm drain system will be a public system, operated and maintained by the City. Suitable easements for storm drainage infrastructure will need to be dedicated to the City for alignment, construction, and maintenance of the necessary 9~ crrr ©F cENrRAL Pt31N7' PUBLIC WQRKS pEPART'MFNT STRF'F REP4R7' 4I3012Git13 3 storm drainage infrastructure. An appropriate system wilt need to be designed to the City of Central Point Public Works Department's Standards & Specifications for construction. Wa#er System. The minimum size for distribution lateral water mains in residential areas shall be 8-inches. The minimum size in multiple-dwelling, commercial and industrial areas shall be '12-inches except that in the sole discretion of the Public Works Department, 8-inch lateral Tines may be allowed if flows meet domestic and fire protection needs in the area. Where fire demands or line losses might demand larger sized pipe, the Engineer will be required to submit hydraulic computations to support the use of 8-inch pipe, or to establish the size required. The City of Central Point Public Works Department is recommending two connections to the existing City of Central Point water distribution system. ^ A connection to the existing 8-inch ductile iron water line located in a City of Central Point utility easement near the northerly property boundary. © A connection to the existing 8-inch ductile iron waterline located in Oakview Avenue near the easterly property boundary. GENERAL All construction shall be perFormed in accordance with the requirements of the City Municipal Code, City of Central Point Standards & Specifications, C7regon Department of Transportation /American Public Works Associations 2002 Standards & Specifications for construction, and all conditions mandated by the City of Central Point Planning Commission. Any changes to the above-described standards, specifications, and conditions must be submitted to the City in writing far approval prior to implementing any and all requested changes. 2. All public improvements shall be designed as a logical part of the development of the surrounding area. Storm sewers and sanitary sewers all are sized to accommodate the entire drainage basin, which they will ultimately serve. Utilities and street improvements will be extended to the boundaries of the development for future extensions to the adjoining areas. The Public Works Director may require over sizing of utility lines to accommodate future growth of the City, 3. Where existing City utility lines do not adjoin the proposed development, the developer will be required to extend the lines fio the development as necessary. Where existing roadway improvements do not extend to the proposed development, the developer may be required to improve the roadway to the development. 4. The Developer's engineer shall field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditchlchannel inverts, street l0a crTr aF CENTRAL ParNT PUBLIC W©RKS C7EPARTMENT STAFF REPC7RT 413t?l21?Q3 4 elevations, etc,}, to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. 5. A minimum of six inches of clear vertical separation between infrastructure facilities is required, The City's Standards and Specifications should be consulted for further information on or regarding utility separation, ~i. Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95°lo complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads and Parks. Following review, the plans will be returned "approved" or with comments. In order to be entitled to further review, the applicant's engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review, All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a bona fide attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's engineer shall submit 4 copies of the plans to the Public Works Department. {See the City of Central Point standards & specifications section {'1(30} for general design guidelines}. A digital copy of the approved construction drawing will be required before the Public Works Permit will be issued. 7. The Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Uregon Department of Fish and Wildlife {DFW}, C3regon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ}, CJregon Division of State Lands {DSL}, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACME}, affected irrigation districts, and UDUT 8. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: Ct A copy of written approval from Fire District #0 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. © The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. © A copy of written approval from Jackson County Roads Department regarding highwaylcounty road improvements {as applicable}. 9. if applicable, the Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights {on a City approved form}, for any affected properties, For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Water Master the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed iQ~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAI=F REPC?RT 413012dt73 development. ~ 0. Applicants shah submit a Construction Site Management Plan {CSMP} far approval to the Public Works Department in conjunction with any commercial or private development plans prior to issuance of a Public Works Department construction permit. The Construction Site Management Plan shall contain sufficient infiormation to describe the site development and the system{s} intended to control erosion and prevent off-site damage from erosion and sedimentation. See the City of Central Point Standards & Specifications Section 800 for complete details regarding Construction Site Management Plans & Erosion Control. 11. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer ar surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. if feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form {produced on Mylar°) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD°, or other form as approved by the City PWD 12. "As-built" drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations {as appropriate} of actual installed items, including, but nat limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations, spot elevatians identified on drawings, road alignment, water lines, valves, and fire hydrants, water and sewer lateral stationing, modifications to street section, manhole and curb inlet locations, street light lacations, other below grade utility line locations and depths, etc. Provide a "red-line'F hard copy {on Mylar°} ar an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD° compatible drawing electronic Elie to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance ofi public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. '13. All elevatians used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and an the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so Hated on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided far the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer, 14. Easements far City infrastructure {i.e. sanitary sewer, water and storm drain} should be a minimum of ~ 5-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements far public utilities should be designated as Public Utility Easements {P.U.E.}. City maintained ar awned facilities such as storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water line easements should be dedicated to the City. Privately maintained or awned facilities over adjacent private property also require easements. Centerline ofi buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {5} feet from the edge of the easement. if two ar mare City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width shall ~. {~ ~ GrrY o~ CENTRAL POrrur PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STA1='fi REPQR7' 4/30/2C1~3 6 be required. Easement dedications in Final deeds or in CC&R's need a statement, which clearly states that easements must be maintained for suitable, drivable access, as determined and approved by the City PWD. 15. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, Qwest, and Charter Communications, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 10. In addition to the Public Works Department standards, all of the "Utility{s}" requirements steal] be followed in the installation of utility lines and appurtenances. As set forth in Section 720.0.0 of the City's Standards & Specifications. The designs for layout from each of the Utility Companies along with existing utility locations shall be presented on a single utility plan. The utility plan shall also include the existing and planned water and sewer locations along with street and driveway details sufficient to resolve conflicting locations. 17. The utility plan shall contain the signed approvals of each "Utility,'. All underground utilities shall be located within Public Utility Easements {PUE} or a separate utility right of way. 18. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans and "as-built" drawings. 19. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar®and in are acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD° format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflector be later modified to reflect any applicable "red-line" changes noted in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. 20. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year flood zone, the Developer's engineer will be required to explain and provide detail as to what affect the placement of these structures will have on the flood zone; what affect it will have on the floodplain elevation and flood zone boundary; and what afFects the modification of the floodplain elevation and flood zone boundary will have on the exiting and proposed facilities, and properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and illustrate the existing boundaries of the floodplain and floodway i~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 4/3t1/Zt1 t?3 7 fora 100Tyear storm event an the construction plans submitted for the proposed development. STREETS-LIGHTING-TRAFF/~ Section 300 & 700 of the City's Standards & Specification should be consulted far complete details regarding streets, lighting, and traffic guidelines. 1. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface fee of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act {ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation ~ODOT~, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. 2. The determination of the pavement width and total right~of way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully development. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD design guidelines, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. 3, The minimum geometric & structural requirements for all street classifications are defined in Section 304 of the City of Central Point Standards & Specifications. 4. The City of Central Point standards & Specifications Section 740 should be consulted for the location and design of required street lighting. The City has a contract with Pacific Power and iw.ight under which PP&L supplies and installs all streetlights, including supply of the anchor bolts and bolt templates). The ground rods, required conduit, and other fittings shall meet PP&L design requirements. 5. Where special lighting fixtures are required such as in the Transit Oriented development areas, the completed lighting shall provide the same amount of illumination at the street level as would the standard lighting fixture, spacing and pole heights specified in the City's Standards & Specifications Section 744. STURM DRAINAGE Section 400 of the City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted far complete details regarding storm drain guidelines. CtTY C}F CENTRAL Pt71NT PUBLIC W©RKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPbRT 413t?12t1Q3 8 3 . It shall be the responsibility of the Developer`s engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project. If a contiguous annexed drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage are at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations. if the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of C?regon DEQ, DSL and QDFW and United Sates Ct~E and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase 11 requirements, 2. I~ocai drainage areas not included in a" Designated Flood Zone" as a result of a Federal Emergency Management Agency {FEMA} Study, shall have storm drains of sufficient capacity to carry runoff for a typical ~ 0-year storm, unless the main discharge pipe or stream will have greater than 300 cubic foot per second discharge "Q" during a 30-year storm. When the discharge "Q" of storm drains exceeds 300 CPS, but is less than 200 CPS, that storm drain shall be designed to carry the runoff expected fora 50-year storm. When the main storm drain wild have a discharge "Q" in excess of 200 CFS during a 00-year storm, that storm drain shall be designed to carry the runoff expected fora 300-year storm. A rainfall intensity duration Curve is supplied in Section 400 of the City's Standards & Specifications for construction. 3. Unless the engineer can otherwise demonstrate through hydraulic design that the existing facilities such as culverts, bridges or pipe, including any planned future development, will carry the computed discharge, the engineer will be required to design and dedicate detention basins or other facilities for the purpose of reducing the discharge until the downstream facilities have beers improved or enlarge, or until other solution have been found. 4. The Public Works Department will require both, a precondition analysis and apost- condition analysis of the project area that considers all planned or estimated build-out of future facilities in order to substantiate the project design. 5. The Public Works Department requires that any storm sewer system to be dedicated to the City shall be designed as a "closed system" in order to minimize the effect of ground water infiltration, silt and other undesirable substances. Weep holes and grade rings above the street sub-grade lave[ or hydraulic grade line in non-street installations, are exempted from the watertight requirement. The system shall also be designed to be "self cleaning„ to extent possible. The minimum requirements are as follows: A, A minimum cleaning velocity of 2-fps will be maintained throughout all CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS t7EPARTMENT STAFI= REPORT 4/3012Qt33 9 segments of pipe between catch basins ar manholes regardless of the type of pipe used. In na case shall the pipe gradient be less than 0.005-ft per foot {0.5%). B. CCeaning velocity shall also be maintained through catch basins and manholes except at specially designed sediment cleaning structures as discussed in {section 420.10.04} of the City's Standards & Specifications. Street curb gutters shall be designed to maintain cleaning velocities between curb inlets including the corner radii. C. Many areas in the City of Central Point have a high water table that fluctuates greatly with rainfall amounts as well as surrounding use. The applicant's engineer should consult section 420.10.02 for requirements related to ground water control. SANITARY SEWER Section 500 of the City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for complete details regarding sanitary sewer guidelines. The sanitary sewer system including all sewer mains, lateral piping, manholes and pumping stations are owned and administered by the dear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA}, Generally, all technical aspects of design, construction, approvals, inspections and testing of sanitary sewers shall be conducted by BCVSA. 2. It shall be the responsibility of the engineer to coordinate the design of the sanitary sewer with any existing or proposed water system facilities, storm water systems, and streets including any appurtenances. The engineer andJor applicant shall be responsible to investigate the area of the project and obtain all required approvals and permits from BCVSA, Public Works Department, Jackson County and the State of Qregan with respect to construction of sanitary sewer systems. The engineer may use information that has formerly been established by the City and is on file, including previous constructions. The sanitary sewer system design shall be in conformance with BCVSA requirements and specifications, including any applicable provisions of the ©regon Plumbing Code, dregon Q~Q and ©regon C7ND. 3. Although BCVSA mandates requirements for the sanitary sewer design the City of Central Point Public Works Department Standards & Specifications includes a sanitary sewer Section 500 for requirements that are coincidental to construction of the sanitary sewer facilities within a City of Central Point right-of-way or City easement. WATER SYSTEM Section 600 of the City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for complete CITY C7F CENTRAL PQ1NT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT q'130I2tJ03 10 details regarding water system guidelines. Designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The applicant, engineer and contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. 2. All requirements of the Oregon Mate Plumbing Specialty Code and the C}regon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 3. Water lines shall normally be located 10 feet south or 10 feet west of centerline of streets. The longitudinal placement of water lines and valves within the intended vehicle wheel path shall be avoided. 4. Exceptions to these requirements may be made in order to avoid cutting and replacing pavement, to avoid conflicts with other existing underground facilities and to permit sanitary sewers to be installed on the low sides of streets. As nearly as practical, mains shall be installed in the same relative location on a particular street with the distance from the centerline of the street being varied as little as possible. 5. Water mains shall not be installed in alleys and the installation of mains within easements across privately owned property is to be done only when absolutely necessary such as the avoidance of dead-end conditions. Such easements when required, shall be a minimum of 15-feet in width except that the Public Works Department may require additional widths for major trunk lines and multiple utility easement locations. Easements where required, shall be located adjacent to property lines of a single property and shall not straddle property lines. Conditions of the easement shall include provisions that the property included in the easement shall not be used for any purpose which would interfere with the unrestricted use for water system purposes including the maintenance, repair, construction or re-construction of such. Under no circumstances will the City grant permission for the construction of any building or structure of any type excluding fences within the easement. ~. A copy of standard City of Central Point easement forms is included in Appendix A of these Standards & Specifications. 7. Separation of water mains, including service lines and sanitary sewers shall be in accordance with current Qregon State Health Division Rules C}AR 333-061-006010}, figure 1, and / or as modified in these Standards except in all cases where running parallel with each other, there shall be a minimum 10-foot separation unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. G1TY OF` CENTRAL PoIIVT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPQRT 4130/~t11?3 11 8. Excepting sanitary sewers as noted above, the minimum horizontal spacing between water mains and storm sewers, gas lines, electrical utilities, shall be five {5} feet horizontally and twelve {12} inches vertically as measured from the outside of the pipe or conduit. Separation between other public utilities such as Cas, TV or Telephone and similar utilities shall be as determined by the individual utility company or franchisee. 9. In all cases where utilities cross in close proximity to one another, a cement sand slurry shall be required for separation between any city lines and any utility. In some cases, depending on size and type of facility, concrete bridging piers or supports will be required to span the water facility. The vertical spacing at sewer crossings shall be designed and constructed in accordance with C7AR Chapter 333, Division 61 {10}. 'I0. The minimum size for distribution lateral water mains in residential areas shall be 8 inches, The minimum size in multiple-dwelling, commercial and industrial areas shall be '12-Inches except that in the sole discretion of the Public Works Department, 8-inch lateral lines may be allowed if flows meet domestic and fire protection needs in the area. Where fire demands or line losses might demand larger sized pipe, the engineer will be required to submit hydraulic computations to support the use of 8-inch pipe, or to establish the size required. 'I 1. In certain cases, such as cul-de-sacs, where water lines will not be extended, where not more than ten {'I0} dwelling units are to be served and no fire hydrants are to be served by the line, a 6-inch diameter water line may be approved. 12. Where no fire hydrants are served and no more than five {~} dwelling units are served, a 4-inch diameter water line may be approved where the line length will be less than 20g--feet. 13. Each dwelling and commercial building shall be served by a separate water service Connection. ~ o~rrA ~° ~~ ~yy`~' ~ b f J~ HtOd ~ ~ . ~ ~ y ,~ ~' ~ ' j# C ~ y o ~~~ ~ bC`'o '~ ~ ~ "'' ~ .2 ° l~YATER EASEM~'NT 2' }PATER ~r~..,``f -r ~ to` f? U.~: 7.5' EASE'hf~'NT f8" 1D' P.U.E': L , ~"~ " " OF GLASS 8 3' A.C. f.5` ROLLED GURti ~ _...~ ~ I f -~ 6" OF 3f4" -O CRUSHED ROCK ('MtN,J i . ~ ~ LtNQ tNDUSTRtAL FA8RIGS tNG. GTR-2L10 ~ ~ COMPACTED TO 959: AASHTO Tf80-D WOYEN REINFORCING FABRIC OR APPROVED Et1UAL (...i 8" OF 4"-O GRUSHEL3 ROGK WL"LL Gdh~PAGTED SUBCRApE GOMPAGTEt7 TQ A MtN. C?F 95:~ AA5NTQ T-39-»88('DJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ } ~"~"'` ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ J ~ rvOr rc~ sG,ace ~r 9 ~ -~ p I ~ ~ ~ ~ o t ~ ~ ti tlttach~ne~~t "G" RECOMMENDED PLANNICNG DEPARTIYIENT CONlllTI4N~ OF APP~2QV~L 1. A final devclapn~-ent plan, containing in final farm the infarrnation requir•ecl in tl~e prelirxrinazy plan shall be submitted to tl~e City within six ~-nantl~s afappraval ar by Navernber 6, 2003. A six rnanth extension nay be granted by the City ulaan tl~e applicant's request and far goad cause. 2. Tlse project ~2aust carnply with all applicable heal, state, and federal regulations including, but root limited to, the Oregon Uniform Fire Code and Structural ~laeeialty Code. 3. The applicant shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the City for approval as part oftlle final develaprnent plan. A suitable landscape and irrigation plan shall shave the types of tree's, shrubs, and ground cover- that will lac planted and the irrigation far the dcvelaprxrent and maintenance ofpublic green~vays and the private park. 4. The applicant shall submit a copy of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R's} or any carnparable agreement governing the use, maintenance and continued protection of the PUD as part afthe final development plan. 5. The attached single family harnes depicted along the east boundary of the preliminary development plan and stipulated as single scary residences by the applicants shall not lac madifred ar constructed as two scary homes unless subsequently noticed, reviewed and approved by the Planning Carxrrxrissian. 11CPPDPIaCiCi`1'Y 1~vlDE1Pi_t~:VNl~Gti03017.raOC ~4f 30f 2033 15: 56 5415355218 BCVSA i'A~E E~2f£~2 ~ ~ } ~p~ ~~~ ~~A~ ~~t~~~ VAL~,~Y ~AN~TARY Al1T C~RTY ~~~~~ ~ ~~ a~~~ aourtt pacir~~ Hw-r. • r~~a~aao, oa~r-oN QTSUt-~a~s ~ {said sxs-sa~3 • tsa~~ rrv-a~aa }'!V( {731? l1~tS-d17~ ~ SMWfK,tlcViR~l.brp Aprzl ~V} F~1lV~ ~,en. ~exsc~le~ FAX 6f~4~b384 Czty of Central Point Planning Department 155 youthSecond Street Central Paint, dregoza 9~50~ Re; Beebe Wood Subdivision Dear Red, There is az~. 8 teach sewer znaixz along Haaxuiclc Road with service connections to each of the three existing parcels. `Where is also aza 8 inch zxaazn line stubbed to the end of C7akviewAveuue. The existing service caz~nections rz~.ay be used to serve proposed lots along l-Tamrick Road bane lot per connectioz~~. lfthey are not used they must tae ,properly abandoned within ~ feet of the property line. All other new lots must be served by extending the sewer-main either from ~at~aricl~ Read or {~altdale. Avenue, or both. All new con.~tx~uctiom 7Ct),uSt be doze izz s.ccordai~,ce with }3CVSA standards. if you need additional inf"orzz~ation, please call me at 77941.44. Sir~cexely, Carl a e` rt P~~E~~~~ ~ .. lip District Ex~gixaeet K:11~.A.'~`~1.1ACr~~C~ES1CE;t~T'~1'~'1p`~,,AI.~TGlSU~3~~VZ~1C~~1t131~~131~'t7tj0C,~3~~.DC3C ~~