HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 98 - Dale CUP in C-5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 808
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REZONING OF LOT 33,TWIN CREEKS
CROSSING, PHASE I FROM HIGH MIX RESIDENTIAL (HMR) TO LOW MIX
RESIDENTIAL (LMR)
FILE NO. 14017
Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, LLC;
WHEREAS, the Twin Creeks Master Plan designates Lot 33, Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase I
as Low Mixed Residential; and
WHEREAS, the Twin Creeks Master Plan, as amended on October 7,2014 has be
determined to comply with the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed change of zone from HMR to LMR has been determined to be
consistent with the Twin Creeks Master Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. 808, does approve the change of zone on Lot 33, Twin
Creeks Crossing, Phase I from HMR to LMR. This decision is based on the Staff Report dated
October 7, 2014 attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
711]day of October, 2014.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
tA/1/1, d-T9
City epresentative
Approved by me this 7th day of October, 2014.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 808 (10/07/2014)
City of Central Point, Oregon CENTRAL Community Develop_ ment
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 POINT Tom Humphrey,AICP
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 Community Development Director
www.centralpointoregon.gov
STAFF REPORT
October 7, 2014
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 14017
Consideration of a Zone Change application from HMR, High Mix Residential to LMR,Low Mix
residential for a 1.81 acre site located within the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development (TOD).The
Project Site is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 S 2W 03CA, Tax Lot 1200.
Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, LLC Agent: Herb Farber,Farber Surveying.
STAFF SOURCE:
Stephanie Holtey, Community Planner II
BACKGROUND:
Twin Creeks Retirement Center("Retirement Center"), an assisted living facility, was developed on
lands designated HMR in 2009. At this time there are plans to expand the Retirement Center by
adding 19 attached row houses("Addition")on an adjacent 1.81 acre lot that is currently planned and
zoned HMR(Lot 33, Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase I ). As a pre-requisite to the zone change it is
necessary that the Twin Creeks TOD Master Plan be amended re-designating Lot 33 from HMR to
LMR.
On October 7, 2014 an amendment (File No. 14013)to the Twin Creeks Master Plan was considered,
including a change in land use for Lot 33 from HMR to LMR. Pending approval of the Master Plan
amendment the proposed zone change will be consistent with the amended Master Plan.
ISSUES & NOTES:
There are 4 issues/Notes relative to this application as follows:
1. Comprehensive Plan Compliance. Approval of the proposed zone change must be found
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan Map. The Comprehensive
Plan designates Lot 33 as Transit Oriented Development (TOD). The proposal does not
change the TOD land use designation, and therefor remains consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Twin Creeks Master Plan Compliance. The proposed zone change must be found to be
consistent with the Twin Creeks Master Plan. A Major Modification application(File No.
14013)has been submitted to amend the Twin Creeks Master Plan, including adjusting the
land use designation on Lot 33 from HMR to LMR. Pending approval of the Major
Modification application,the proposed zone change will be consistent with the approved
Twin Creeks Master Plan.
3. Senior Housing. The immediate question before the Planning Commission is limited to the
rezoning of Lot 33 from HMR to LMR, with the understanding that the ultimate use and
development of Lot 33 must comply with all applicable sections of CPMC 17.65 and 17.67.
However, for disclosure purposes it needs to be noted that the intended use of Lot 33 is for
senior housing within 19 single-story multiplex units.
e4
The LMR district does not allow senior housing as a housing type,but multiplexes and all
other housing types are permitted. The term"senior housing"is not defined in CPMC
17.08.410. Consequently, given the LMR development standards imposed by CPMC 17.65
and 17.69 and the general design standards included in the Master Plan it is determined that
as a housing type the multiplex development of Lot 33 has adequate architectural controls to
assure neighborhood compatibility, and is permitted in the LMR district. The subsequent
residential use of those 19 multiplex units is consistent with the intent and purpose of the
LMR district.
4. Flood Impacts. Lot 33 is currently located in the SFHA and subject to CPMC 8.24. The
proposed change of zone does not aggravate Lot 33's development within the SFHA. The
developer of Twin Creeks TOD has prepared a SFHA mitigation plan reducing the(File No.
FP 14001),which is currently under review by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA). Once approved by FEMA, the developer of Twin Creeks TOD must complete
construction of the SFHA mitigation plan and apply for a Letter of Map Revision which will
remove the Lot 33 from the SFHA.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
The Twin Creeks TOD Master Plan amendment (File No. 14013), Exhibit 18 changing the
land use on Lot 33 from HMR to LMR must be approved. If Exhibit 18 is not modified to re-
designate Lot 33 from HMR to LMR then this zone change(File No. 14017) then the
approval of the zone change from HMR to LMR is denied.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A"—Site Plan
Attachment"B"—Applicant's Findings
Attachment"C"—Planning Department's Supplemental Findings
Attachment"D"—Resolution No. 808
ACTION:
Consideration of zone change on Lot 33 of Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase I from HMR, High
Mix Residential to LMR, Low Mix Residential.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution No. 808. Per the Staff Report dated October 7, 2014 and subject to
approval of major modification to the Twin Creeks Master Plan amendment.
ATTACHMENT ". A "
F U
J RqY
o
z 1111 L811 .
D E t S ,, 9
;iinu !:H
luel
NI
it
el
c e-- 'Th
an d 4' Yl 1
II C
OJO� / 4 S.... ' \ iti Z f i
m h /
4 j S
\
GJ r14
''°,7 43 a / .
0N 0' '♦ oy`
\
� m
i
• 4�i ♦ i
dr-\..,, lit. \
\ .
\s',, .
(73.
0 OC o
4 of./•\': 1°V "c1- \ G
1 ri 1 — \
\ . \
. 1.! IA i
4
W '- O O K.Pi
I "� C
U .4 n h C I
O dw U I'
p j C-U G
,u, .Ef'=3 a �i�
O r Or
o hEN o CI .id
h O
d F-_ E -5 N 0
O" U,Z j
J E }
d II y U 1 i
in I re tO
I
Il
il
!
1331415 NV3d Na-usnN E
V
1
ATTACHMENT
Findings Minor Plan Amendment and Zone Change
for
Twin Creeks Retirement, LLC
and
Twin Creeks Development Co., LLC
August 25, 2014, Edited September 29, 2014
The primary purpose of these findings is to address the proposed master plan amendments and
zone change of the property located on the corner of Twin Creeks Crossing and North Haskell
Street, Central Point, Oregon, and identified as Assessors Map No 372W03CA-1200 and as Lot
33 of Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase 1 as recorded in Volume 33, Page 1 of the Plat Records of
Jackson County, Oregon, other minor elements in the Twin Creeks Development plan.
Back ground: The Pre-Annexation Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 01-
03646 of the official records of Jackson County provided the framework for establishing a
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) in January 2001 and was followed by the approval of the
master plan for Twin Creeks Development shortly thereafter. The last amendment to the master
plan was approved by the City, on November 4, 2008 by Planning Commission by Resolution
No 575. City File No 09008.
On June 3, 2014 a Pre-Application Conference application was submitted and on June 4. 2014
a Pre-Application conference was held to discuss proposed changes to the previously approved
master plan for Twin Creeks TOD. The meeting was attended by Tom Humphrey, Community
Development Director; Don Burt, Planning Manager; Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works
Director; Bret Moore, Applicant; Herb Farber, Agent; and William Hoag and Ron Grimes,
Interested Parties. Staff has determined that the Master Plan Amendment is a Major
Modification and will be processed as such under Chapter 17.09 and the Zone Change is a
Minor Amendment under Chapter 17.10.
Project Description:
The applicant proposes to modify the Twin Creeks Master Plan's land use and zoning
designation for Lot 33, Twin Creeks Crossing Phase I. from HMR to LMR. The purpose of the
amendment is to accommodate expansion of the Twin Creeks Retirement Center allowing the
addition of 19 cottage units adjacent to the Twin Creeks Retirement Center. There have been
some minor changes to the master plan over the last 14 years that have not been formally
approved. These will be discussed in these finding for approval. They include traffic circles,
impacts from the FEMA remapping adopted on May 3, 2011. There are also findings for an
application for the zone change minor map amendment included in this document. This request
for consideration is to amend the plan to allow for a zone change from High Mix Residential
(HMR)to Low Mix Residential (LMR)as a minor map amendment.
Master Plan Amendment:
Page 1 of 6
6 7
Chapter 17.09.300 B. Major Modification Applications; Approval Criteria. An applicant may
request a major modification using a Type Il or Type III review procedure, as follows:
1. Upon the community development director determining that the proposed
modification is a major modification,the applicant shall submit an application form, filing fee
and narrative, and a site plan using the same plan format as in the original approval. The
community development director may require other relevant information, as necessary, to
evaluate the request.
Finding: The application and fees are a part of these findings.
2. The application shall be subject to the same review procedure(Type 11 or III),
decision-making body, and approval criteria used for the initial project approval, except that
adding a conditional use to an approved project shall be reviewed using a Type Ill procedure.
Finding: It has been determined that this is a Type III procedure to be brought before the
Planning Commission.
3. The scope of review shall be limited to the modification request. For example, a
request to modify a parking lot shall require site design review only for the proposed parking lot
and any changes to associated access, circulation, pathways, lighting,trees, and landscaping.
Notice shall be provided in accordance with the applicable notice requirements for Type II or
Type III procedures.
Finding: The scope of this review is for a plan amendment from HMR to LMR,address
the floodplain issues,elimination of The North Village neighborhood commercial area and
traffic circles.
4. The decision-making body shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions an
application for major modification based on written findings on the criteria. (Ord. 1874 §2(part),
2006).
Review items Master Plan Amendment Application per Pre-Application meeting staff
report:
a. A large area of the current Master Plan is within the designated floodway. A
brief history of the 2011 floodway designation shall be included in the findings
along with a comprehensive mitigation plan, i.e. procedural requirements,
timing, CLOMR/LOMR, DSL/Army Corp permitting, etc.
Finding: Twin Creeks began to initiate a study as a result of
reconstruction/relocation of Griffin Creek. This effort was taken over by the
City and then Jackson County as a regional amendment to the County FIS
Page 2 of 6
68
was made. The mitigation process began shortly after the Flood Insurance
Study(FIS) became effective on May 3,2011. Twin Creeks was significantly
impacted by the new FIS. We knew that it would impact the project but did
not protest or request further revision due to the changes within the project
site that had occurred while the study was underway. These changes are the
result of following the master plan and various approvals for constructing
subdivisions as they were approved by the City per the FIS and City Code in
effect at the time of construction and approval. Following the adoption of the
new FIS and amendment of the City Code, there was a court ruling in
Washington that changed how FEMA did business and required all LOMR's
to demonstrate compliance with the Environmental Species Act(ESA). This
took a relatively straight forward process and added agencies to the processes
that have a difficult time talking to each other. This has delayed the
mitigation project by years. The Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR)application is being delivery to FEMA with an ESA approval in
hand at the time of this application. The area being revised is from Griffin
Creek north to the north end of the North Village neighborhood (Northern
Oaks neighborhood in the master plan). A copy of the mitigation plan
approved by the City File No FP 14001 is attached for your review. Upon the
approval by FEMA of the planned revision construction will be completed to
mitigate the flood hazard area allowing the original master plan to be
implemented as it was originally planned.
b. It needs to be noted in the findings that other than the proposed changes to Lot
33 that the uses. site plan, and development standards as initially approved do
not change. However. if there are other changes to the land use and site plan.
i.e. the park land at the northern end of Phase I, they should be noted in the
findings and exhibits.
Finding: The applicants are only interested it changing the zoning on Lot 33.
All of the uses,site plan and development standards in the master plan and
other previous approvals will remain in effect. The park and other elements are
addressed later in these findings.
c. Included in the proposed Amendment the following Master Plan
exhibits need to be amended:
i. Exhibit 18. Land Use Plan —note/illustrate change in land use for
Lot 33 and any other locations.
Finding: The Land Use Plan has been updated to reflect all of
the changes to the master plan over the last 14 years and the
resulting change that would occur with approval of this request.
The new exhibit is attached to these findings.
Page 3 of 6
ii. Exhibit 20, Recreation and Open Space Plan—note/illustrate
SFHA mitigation adjustments if necessary, i.e. park designation at
northern end of Phase I.
Finding: There are no expected changes to this plan. As with
all master plans there may be some design changes to what
was original presented in the master plan.
iii. Exhibit 30, Storm Water Management Plan—update per CLOMR if
applicable.
Finding: There are no expected changes to this plan. As with
all master plans there may be some design changes to what
was original presented in the master plan. Most of the storm
water system has been constructed or is approved for
construction by the City.
iv. Exhibit 35, Housing Plan — for Lot 33 remove reference to `Mixed-Use
Apartments' and replace with `Single-Family Attached' and update
`Housing Types' table.
Finding: The Housing Plan has been updated relative to the
senior living component and attached to these findings. The
components relative to the other housing types are unknown
to me.
v. Exhibit 36, Mixed-Use Plan—remove mixed-use reference from Lot 33
(Orange and Blue designations).
Finding: The Mixed Use Plan is similar in nature to Exhibit
37 with the changes to the master plan adequately reflected in
Exhibit 37. Exhibit 36 is incorporated into Exhibit 37.
vi. Exhibit 37, Civic and Commercial Plan - remove mixed-use reference
from Lot 33 (Yellow and Blue designations).
Finding: The Civic and Commercial Plan has been updated
and attached to these findings.
d. In the findings for the Master Plan amendment note that: "All master plan
submittal requirements per Chapters 17.66 and design standards per chapter
17.67, as noted in the original master plan, will remain in effect and
applicable to development of the amended Master Plan." If there are changes
to the standards previously approved in the master plan,then they should be
noted in the findings, including demonstration of compliance with the
standards in Section 17.67.
Page 4 of 6
70
Findings: All design standards previously stated in the Master Plan
relating to Chapter 17.66 and 17.67 will remain effect from the original
plan to this amended plan.
Additional minor changes to the master plan over the years include the
following minor changes;
A small amount of open space area was changed by the addition of 3 lots
to the Jackson Oaks Neighborhood with Phase VI. A minor amount of
open space was added with additional area required for the Griffin Oaks
storm water treatment facility.
As the project was being constructed it was mutually agreed by the City
Engineer and Public Works Department and the project Engineers to
eliminate the traffic circles which were deemed unnecessary and have
not been constructed.
The Commercial and Civic Exhibit 37 has a neighborhood commercial
area that has been determined to be unviable with the size and scope of
The North Village neighborhood. This can be seen throughout the City
where these centers have struggled to exist in areas that have much more
traffic than this area will have. This area is now The North Village,
Phase I, tentatively approved for lots by the Planning Commission on
July 1,2014, City File No 05076.
e. In the findings address the reduction in density vs. the minimum (1403
total and 594 for HMR)approved in the original Master Plan.
Findings: As shown on Exhibit 18, Land Use Plan, the original total for
minimum housing units was 1403 units and with this approval the
number will be 1393. The HMR area remains about the same size
despite the reduction requested with this application due to the
conversion of the MMR zone to HMR with the first amendment in
2008. I went through the entire master plan area and compiled all of
the changes that are known to me. The total change still reflects the
diversity of development and housing type that were set forth in the
original master plan.
f. As part of the findings include a section on extending the Master Plan. A
suggested date would be 2035.
Findings: The applicants agree to extend the Master Plan to the year
2030.
Zone Change 17.10.400 Approval criteria.
Page 5 of 6
71
A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application
for a text or map amendment shall be based on written findings and conclusions that address the
following criteria:
A. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals (major
amendments only);
Findings: This application remains consistent with the statewide planning goals with the
maximum change of 2 % in the overall density with the most significant change occurring
to the MMR which was done under the 2008 approval. Note the changes to the overall
zones in the attached Exhibit 18.
B. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan (major and
minor amendments);
Findings: This request is only slightly different than the original TOD master plan
approved in 2001 and amended in 2008 and in compliance with the comprehensive plan.
C. If a zoning map amendment, findings demonstrating that adequate public services and
transportation networks to serve the property are either available, or identified for construction in
the city's public facilities master plans (major and minor amendments); and
D. The amendment complies with OAR 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule.
(Ord. 1989 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1874 §3(part), 2006. Formerly 17.10.300(B)).
Findings: This request is only slightly different than the original Twin Creeks Master
Plan, all of the findings from that plan are adopted and adequately supply all of the public
services and transportation networks to serve this property. The services to the proposed
zone change are constructed and in place. The proposed railroad crossing and final trigger
in the development agreement has been funded and is expected to be constructed in 2016.
Conclusion: This project will enhance the overall goals of the TOD by maintaining the density
and diversity of the project while conforming to the vision of the master plan. This action will
provide for more housing without urban sprawl in a livable setting.
The proposed major plan amendment and zone change is in conformance with the vision of the
TOD master plan as it was approved and has been developed to the present time. We
respectfully request approval of this request.
Respectfully Submitted,
Herbert A Farber
Page 6 of 6
t tir
ATTACHMENT ",..C,..,,"
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
File No.: 14017
Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission
Consideration of a Zone Change Application on a 1.81 acre site in the Twin Creeks Transit
Oriented Development Master Plan Area
Applicant: ) Findings of Fact
Twin Creeks Retirement, LLC ) and
888 Twin Creeks Crossing ) Conclusion of Law
Central Point, OR 97502 )
PART 1
INTRODUCTION
It is requested that Lot 33, Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase I ("Lot 33")be rezoned from High Mix
Residential (HMR) to Low Mix Residential (LMR). At this time Lot 33 is designated in the Twin Creeks
TOD Master Plan ("Master Plan") as HMR. Prior to approval of the zone change it is necessary the
Master Plan be amended to re-designate Lot 33 as LMR. A concurrent proposal (File No. 14013) has
been submitted to amend the Master Plan, including the designation of Lot 33 as LMR. These findings
have been prepared with the understanding that the Master Plan amendment re-designating Lot 33 from
HMR to LMR will be approved prior to action on the zone change.
The zone change request is a quasi-judicial map amendment, which is processed using Type III
application procedures. Type III procedures set forth in Section 17.05.400 provide the basis for
decisions upon standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan, when
appropriate.
Applicable development code criteria for this Application include:
1. Statewide Planning Goals
2. Comprehensive Plan
3. Twin Creeks Master Plan
4. State Transportation Rule
5. CPMC 17.10
Findings will be presented in four(4)parts addressing the requirements of Section 17.05.300 as follows:
1. Introduction
2. Statewide Planning Goals
3. Comprehensive Plan
4. Twin Creeks Master Plan
5. Summary Conclusion
7 F
')
r
•
PART 2
STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
At the time the Master Plan was initially adopted in 2001 it was found that the Master Plan was
consistent with the acknowledged Comprehensive Plan, previously determined to be consistent with the
Statewide Planning Goals. The General Land Use Plan in the Comprehensive Plan designates the Master
Plan area as Transit Oriented Development(TOD). Development within a TOD is regulated by
individual master plans and compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in CPMC 17.65 through
17.67. The proposed zone change does not alter the TOD designation, but is subject to compliance with
the Twin Creeks Master Plan (See Part 3 for further discussion).
Finding: The proposed zone change does not alter the current TOD designation on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan, which has previously been determined to be consistent with
the Statewide Planning Goals.
Conclusion: Consistent with Statewide Planning Goals.
PART 3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the Twin Creeks Master Plan area as Transit
Oriented Development ("TOD"). The TOD land use designation allows for mixed-use transit oriented
development. Development within this land use classification is subject to the approved Twin Creeks
Master Plan.
Finding: The project site is located on Lot 33 of Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase I within the Twin
Creeks Master Plan area, a 230 acre master planned development approved by Ordinance No.
1817 in January 2001. The zone change from HMR to LMR on the project site does not change
the Project Site's TOD land use designation on the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusion: Consistent.
PART 4
STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION RULE
Section 660-012-0060(1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility,
the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to assure that
allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards (e.g.
level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the,facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment
significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility;
b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
c)As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation system
plan:
7 4
(A)Allow types or levels of land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that are
inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility;
(B)Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility below the
minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(a): The proposed zone change does not modify any existing land use
regulations. The proposed zone change serves to decrease the density standard of the property,
as shown in Table 1, within the mixed residential designated area and is consistent with the
Master Plan' and Comprehensive Plan Map. The proposed zone change will not cause any
changes to the functional classification of any existing or planned transportation facilities.
Table 1. Proposed Zone Change Impact to Average Daily Trips
Zoning Site Acreage Min Density Min Units Min ADT Max Density Min Units Max ADT
HMR I 1.81 30 54.3 361.10 40
L 72.4 481.46
MR 1.81
6 10.86 37.36 12 21.72 74.72
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(a): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(b): The proposed zone change serves to significantly reduce the
Project Site's maximum density(Table 1), consistent with the Master Plan and CPMC
17.65.050, Table 2. The proposed zone change will not cause a change to standards
implementing the City's transportation system.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(b): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A): The proposed zone change will not cause an increase in land
uses that would result in levels of travel or access that would be inconsistent with the City's
functional street classification system for existing and planned transportation facilities. As
shown in Table 1, the proposed zone change will decrease the intensity of daily travel.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B): The proposed zone change will result in significant density
reduction and subsequently fewer average daily trips as demonstrated in Table 1. The proposed
zone change will not reduce the performance of any existing or planned transportation facilities
below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the Master Plan, or in the
City's Transportation System Plan.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C): The proposed zone change decreases the travel intensity
serving the project site as shown in Table 1 and will not cause the worsening of an existing or
Twin Creeks Transit-Oriented Development,Part III,Community Design Features
planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum
acceptable performance standard identified in the Master Plan or Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C): No significant affect.
PART 5
ZONING ORDINANCE
17.10.300 Quasi-judicial amendments.
A. Applicability of Quasi-Judicial Amendments. Quasi-judicial amendments are those that involve
the application of adopted policy to a specific development application or code revision, and not the
adoption of new policy(i.e., through legislative decisions). Quasi-judicial zoning map amendments
shall follow the Type III procedure, as governed by Section 17.05.400 using standards of approval in
subsection B of this section. The approval authority shall be as follows:
1. The planning commission shall review and recommend land use district map changes that do
not involve comprehensive plan map amendments;
2. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city council on an application
for a comprehensive plan map amendment. The city council shall decide such applications; and
3. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city council on a land use
district change application that also involves a comprehensive plan map amendment
application. The city council shall decide both applications.
Finding 17.10.300(A): A zone change application has been submitted to rezone a 1.81 acre site
from HMR, High Mix Residential to LMR, Low Mix Residential. The proposed zone change
does not require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, but must demonstrate compliance
with the Master Plan.
Conclusion 17.10.300(A): Consistent.
B. Criteria,for Quasi-Judicial Amendments. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve
with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the
following criteria:
I. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals;
Finding 17.10.300(B)(1): See Part 2, Statewide Planning Goals findings and conclusions.
Conclusion 17.10.300(8)(1): Consistent
2. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan;
Finding 17.10.300(B)(2): See Part 3, Comprehensive Plan findings and conditions.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(2): Consistent.
.76
3. The property and affected area is presently provided with adequate public facilities, services and
transportation networks to support the use, or such facilities, services and transportation
networks are planned to be provided in the planning period; and
Finding 17.10.300(B)(3): Public facilities, services and transportation networks have been
established pursuant to the Twin Creeks Master Plan and are sufficient to serve the proposed use.
The proposed zone change reduces maximum densities from 50+units per acre to 12 units per
acre significantly reducing the use of public facilities.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(3): Consistent.
4. The change is in the public interest with regard to neighborhood or community conditions, or
corrects a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or land use district map regarding
the property which is the subject of the application.
Finding 17.10.300(B)(4): The proposed zone change is consistent with the Twin Creeks Master
Plan as amended (File No. 14013), which determined that the LMR designation is consistent
with objectives of the Master Plan.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(4): Consistent.
17.10.600 Transportation planning rule compliance.
Section 660-012-0060(1) Where an amendment to a.functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation,facility,
the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to assure that
allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards (e.g.
level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment
significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation,facility;
b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
c)As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation system
plan:
(A)Allow types or levels of land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that are
inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility;
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility below the
minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Finding 17.10.600(1): See Part 4, Statewide Transportation Planning Rule findings and
conclusions.
r«rn
I
Conclusion: Consistent.
Summary Conclusion: As evidenced in findings and conclusions, the proposed zone change is
consistent with applicable standards and criteria in the Central Point Municipal Code, including the
Statewide Planning Goals, Comprehensive Plan , the Twin Creeks TOD Master Plan and Statewide
Transportation Planning Rule.
78
ATTACHMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 808
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REZONING OF LOT 33,TWIN CREEKS
CROSSING, PHASE I FROM HIGH MIX RESIDENTIAL (HMR) TO LOW MIX
RESIDENTIAL (LMR)
FILE NO. 14017
Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, LLC;
WHEREAS, the Twin Creeks Master Plan designates Lot 33, Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase I
as Low Mixed Residential; and
WHEREAS, the Twin Creeks Master Plan, as amended on October 7, 2014 has be
determined to comply with the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed change of zone from HMR to LMR has been determined to be
consistent with the Twin Creeks Master Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. 808, does approve the change of zone on Lot 33, Twin
Creeks Crossing, Phase I from HMR to LMR. This decision is based on the Staff Report dated
October 7, 2014 attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
7th day of October, 2014.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this 7th day of October, 2014.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 808 (10/07/2014)
79
/ F ., r;..
~'T ~1N~vXNC~ COi~MT.,~~S~ON
RF~SOI,U`~ TON N0. 98
A RESOIlUTI01Q APPROVING ~{~O~DTTI.ONAI~ US~: I'r;~2MrT 'I'0 AT,I,O~+~
REM.A.~1C7~'AC'~'URING OI~ PLY~~T00~ INT~ S~'R~.~G rLO~}R5 AND F012 ON-~'IZEMT.S1sS
ANA TELEPHQNE RE~A~Ta S/~I~TS CvI`I'I~I~N ~~3~I~T,~7NG T:N l~ G-5 IONTJ
WHEREAS, Joe Da~e ~zled an app:I.ic~atzon f.or a cozaditio~~.a:L use perm~.t ~o
a~1n~r ~.he remanufactuxir~g o~ p~ywooc~ a.n.to s~~rz~~~ ~.loors fo~ on~~~remzscs ~nd
telep~one retail sales ~aiChiiz a building loca~etl in a C-5 zon.e a~ 680 Soueh
Front Stree~, Cen~ral. Po~.nr, Oregon, ~urther described as Jackson Gounty
Assessor's Map Page 37 2W ~1BC, T~x Lat 590p; and
W~SEREAS, ~otice of a Pciblic F~earing he1cl A~ri]_ ?_, 1.985 was pu~~.lished in
the Medford Ma~l Tribune on March 24 a.nd 31, 1385; ar~c~
t~F~EREAS, at said pubJ~a.c hear~.ng testz~nony fror~ pxoponents and appon~nts
wa.s h.eard or given oppartuiii~q ~o be l~ea~d; now, ~herefore,
~~ TT RESOLVED ~IZa~ ~I1e P7~ann~ng Cnmm~.ssion o~ the City of Cen~ral Paint,
Oregon, adop~s the fandzngs ot f~ct as presented by th~ appJ~zcant and ~pproves
a conditional ~se permit to a11ow remanufacturing of pl~ood into sprin~; floors
and for on-~remises anc~ te]_ephone retail sa3es ~aith~.n a building locat~d zn a
C-5 zone at 68(3 So~th ~~ant St~eet, Central. Point, Oxegon, ~ur~~er descr~.bed as
Jackson Caunty xax Assessor`s Map Pag;~ 37 2[~J J~.IBC, Ta~ ~ot 5900, wath the
foI]_a~vin~ conditions a~tachecl:
l. A permanent affice Ue 1oca~ed witttin or a~~ached to the exist~ng
bui~.ding conforming to a11 applicable codes and ordinarzces; said
cans~zuctian permits to be obtain~d so construction i~ay be com-
pleted wi~.hin six manths.
2. The use of the pr~s~nt ma~~ile off~ce is to d3.scontinu~ for on-
si~e use after a ma~3_mum pe~a.ad of. six mont~.s.
3. Avaa.~able o~z-sic:~ parizin~; sha11 comply with City ordinance.
Pas~ed hy th~ P~an~~ing Commissinz~ on the seventh day a~ May, ]985, at~.d
s~.~n~d by me in au~hentica~ion of i~s passage tha.s 22nd day of May, 1985.
RESOLUTTON N0. 9$ - Page I
_ _~ ,~_
P1~~nt~ing C;ommis~sio~i Chair.ma~.z
ATTEST:
~'~?-, ____.7 : _, f~
~ ..
/ / ~.. ~ ~ l
1'lannin~; Commi ~zoxz S~cr~~
. .~;~..
~t~SO~U'~~~N N0. 98 - ~'a~e 2