Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - March 2, 2004CI"PY OE CEN'CRAL POINT i'I_.~IVPlING COMMISSION AGENDA Marchr2, 20~0}4 - 7:00 p.m. `+'}I Next Planning Conunission Resolution No. 606 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland ,Christopher Brown, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, Connie Moczygemba, and Wayne Riggs III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of February 3, 2004, Planning Commission Minutes VI. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS A. Continuation of a public hearing to review a site plan application. The applicant is requesting approval to add a duplex on his lot, identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37S 2W 2, Tax Lot 900, also known as 400 N. 10`h Street. This lot is zoned as R-3, Residential Multiple Family District. Page 1-13 B. Public hearing to review an application for a conditional use permit for the purpose of operating a day care facility at Independent Baptist Church located at 316 W. Pine Street. The subject parcel is in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family Zone and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W l OAB, Tax Lot 5300. Pages l4-24 C. Public hearing to consider a Tentative Plan fora 9 lot subdivision known as Pine Street Station, Phase I located north of Taylor Road in the TOD-MMR zoning district (Map 2W 03DC, Tax Lot 3400). Pages 25-41 Pc03022004 D. Public hearing to consider a Planned Unit Development for the construction of eight duplexes known as Hazel Creek PUD. The subject parcel is itt the R-3, Residential Multiple Family zone and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 02BC, Tax Lot 602. The property is located east of North 10'x' Street between Hazel & Cherry Streets. Pages 42-67 VII. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Pc03022004 City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 200 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairman Chuck Piland, Christopher Brown, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, and Wayne Riggs were present. Connie Moczygemba was absent. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; David Alvord, Community Planner; Dave Arkens, GIS Technician; Lisa Morgan, Planning Secretary. Commissioners went around and introduced themselves and welcomed Christopher Brown, who has replaced Rick Perry on the Planning Commission. III. CORRESPONDENCE Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, distributed copies of CPMC 1.24, Public Hearings Procedures; and CPMC 2.16, Planning Commission, which explains the establishment, membership, terms of office, vacancies, and powers and duties of the Planning Commissioners. Copies of the Wal-mart proposal were also distributed to commissioners. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the minutes from January 6, 2004. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Brown, abstain; Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Lunte, yes; and Riggs, yes, Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Introduction to Oregon's Statewide Land Use Planning Program, Organizational Structure and LCDC Policy Focus for the 2003-OS Biennium. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, introduced planning material from the DLCD website. Mr. Humphrey discussed the CPMC handouts. He stated Planrving Comnvission Alinutes Febr«ar~~ 3, 2004 Page 2 it is the intent of the Planning Department to stream-line existing documents and make them easier to understand and interpret. He also said that the Department will work to improve report findings and planning procedures. Mr. Humphrey talked about the States goals and began with citizen involvement. In Central Point the Citizens Advisory Committee, is the local sounding board which makes recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. The Planning Commission has the responsibility to make a land use decision on behalf of the City Council unless it involves amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or zoning. Mr. Humphrey, then went through appeal process. Mr. Humphrey defined various acronyms such as LCDC, DLCD, LUBA and the purpose and/or role of each. Other areas of discussion included definitions of Urban Growth Boundaries, Urban Reserve, and the remaining Statewide Planning Goals. Some of the goals talked about in greater depth were: Goal # 9: Economic Development - as explained is being given more importance. Natural resource protection is working hand in hand with economic growth. Mr. Humpluey gave an example of Governor Kulongoski's pursuit in identifying industrial `shovel ready'sites throughout the state, with one of the best sites being here in Central Point. Goal # 10: Housing - To provide buildable lands inventory that provides a variety of homes commensurating with the economy. Goal # 12: Transportation -The Transportation System Plan (TSP) ties in with this goal. The TSP helps prioritize certain road improvements. Goal # 14: Urbanization -Expanding the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), forces growth where infrastmcture already exists, rather than promoting urban sprawl. The Planning Commission can expect to see more on the UGB in the late summer or fall sometime. Additional topics considered at length were from League of Oregon Cities -Planning Commissioner Training. Discussions included: Introduction to Land Use Planning in Oregon; City Land Use Procedures which consist of Quasi-judicial vs. Legislative hearings, burden of proof, relevant vs. irrelevant testimony, evidence and common procedural issues. Planning Convnaissior: Minutes February 3, 2004 Page 3 B. Distribution of Proposed Retail Site Plan Application for Pear Blossom Plaza (Wal-Mart) Mr. Humphrey explained that he has distributed copies of the Wal-Mart application now to give Commissioners enough time to review. There were questions as to the status of the application and whether the application was complete or not. Mr. Humphrey explained that there were additional items that he had asked for such as an Economic analysis, and the effect of displaced traffic with the Highway 62 store once it closes. He then read the letters from Kittleson & Associates representing Wal-Mart for their traffic analysis. The application was deemed complete on January 16, 2004, and a tentative time frame for upcoming meetings was discussed, provided PacLand agreed to waive the 120 day rule by approximately two weeks. There were questions from the commissioners about whether or not they could attend other meetings held by other committees regarding the application, and if it is acceptable to have a study session with the City Council. Mr. Humphrey said he would contact the attorney to see if this could be done and would call commissioners back at a later date with direction. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Tom Humphrey passed around booklets from this years Council Retreat. He explained the theme this year and how each Department Head had to map where they wanted their departments to go within the next 5 years. Mr. Humphrey encouraged the Planning Commissioners to take the Council Retreat's walking tour and comment on their observations. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fish made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P.M. Owens Site ~1an -Continuation Stem A -1- PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March 2, 2004 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT; Public Hearing-Site Plan Application of 37 2W 02BC, Tax Lot 900-Additional Dwelling Units on R-3, Residential Multiple Family zoned lot. Owner! Applicant: John Owens 39 Glen Oak Court Medford, Oregon 97504 Pro er Description/ 37 2W 02BC, Tax Lot 900 - 0.28 acres Zoning: R-3, Residential Multiple Family District Summary A property owner is requesting site plan approval to construct a duplex beside the existing residence at 400 North Tenth Street. Multiple-family and dwelling groups are permitted uses in the R-3 zoning district. This item has been continued for the past two months due to difficulties the applicant has had designing around a PP&L power pole. The item should be resolved at this meeting or be denied if a waiver of the 120 day processing rule is not granted. Authority CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a site plan. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment A). Applicable Law CPMC 17.28.010 et seq.- Residential Multiple Family Zoning District CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan Review Discussion The applicant, John Owens is requesting that the Planning Comrission review and approve a site plan that would allow him to construct a new duplex beside the existing house at 400 North Tenth Street. -2- Both structures would share the 0.28 acre pared with the duplex being located between the existing house and the east property boundary. The East Cherry Estates pad lot development lies immediately east of this project site. The site plan and elevations (Attachment B) depict each of the duplex units as having 979 square feet with two bedrooms and two bathrooms. Each dwelling unit will be equipped with a single car garage and single car carport. The existing house has a carport. Building setbacks in the ft-3 district are 20 feet for the front lot, 10 feet for the rear and five feet for the side lot lines. Unfortunately, the proposed duplex is too large to meet the rear, side and front tot lines and the Planning Commission cannot approve the site plan review application as submitted since the zoning criteria have not been met. Earlier in the year, the applicant had applied to partition the lot into two separate lots (Attachment C )one of which would have the existing house with the other containing the new duplex. That map showed a duplex "footprint" that met all of the required setbacks but the proposed lots could not meet the minimum lot size requirements. The map was returned to the applicant along with a letter to explaining why the proposal would not meet code. if the same duplex "footprint" (without partition)were used on this application, the site plan could have been approved with minor architectural amendments. The Planning Commission has several options to present to the applicant. The Commission could give the applicant an opportunity to present a duplex plan that complies with the setback requirements and review the plan at a subsequent meeting. The applicant could also request a variance from the setbacks based upon extenuating circumstances but the valiance application would require a separate application, public notice and meeting. Ifthe applicant chooses to submit a revised site plan, the Plamiing Department recommends thatthe structure be modified architecturally. While the duplex is shown as single story structure with lap siding and tab shingle siding in the gables, the Planning Department feels that the architecture should be modified to match the motif of the new padlot units that were constructed on Cherry Street. The existing carport is not in good condition and should be improved as a condition to approval. The proposed garages and carports can be architecturally improved to place more emphasis on landscaping. The existing duplex plan presents only five feet of separation between the existing carport /storage room and the proposed duplex. In most situations, the zoning code requires a ten foot separation between primacy and accessory structures however the existing house and proposed duplex would both be classified as primary structures whereas the ten foot separation would not apply. In discussing the building separation with the Building Department, the applicant could either:(1) build a two hour firewall between the two structures or; (2) reduce the width of the existing carport one foot in order to meet a six foot separation that is required by building code. Access to the duplex would be taken from Cherry Street, a roadway that was significantly improved in 1998 when the East Cherry Estates Subdivision was built. Presently there is curb, gutter and sidewalk installed along most of Cherry Street. The applicant will need to install curb cuts and sidewalk sections as required by the Public Works Department. -3- Landscaping is limited on the site plan. The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Commission assign a condition that the applicant provide a urore detailed landscape plan that includes sluub and tree species together with an irrigation plan. f1 backflow prevention assembly wil I be required. New fencing has been proposed along the rear and side lot lines of the project area. Any fencing would need to be designed to allow access to emergency service in areas where the fence is too close to the structures. Firefighters for example, need adequate space to positions ladders in case of fire. The Public Works Department, Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS) and Fire District Number 3 have been notified of this application. Public Works will require that the developer install the applicable curb cuts to Public Works Standards. Public Works will also assess the applicable System Development Fees when the building permits are processed. The Fire District will require that the developer provide the agency with a set of improvement plans that shows hydrant locations. RVSS has facilities in the area that can serve the project, however there are fees that will need to be paid. Findings of i~ act & Conclusions of Law Site Plan Review In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from Section 17.72.040: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property. ^ The applicant has given a minimal landscape plan. Amore in-depth landscape and irrigation plan will be required when the building plans for the duplex are submitted. An irrigation system with backflow prevention assembly will be required. 13. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ The existing house and the proposed duplex will take access from Cherry Street. New curb cuts will need to be installed to Public Works standards. C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ® The off-street parl~ing requirements for the existing house and for the new duplex are -4- two covered spaces per dwelling unit. The application shows a two vehicle carport for the existing house. The duplex will have a single car garage and single car carport for each unit. The off-street parking requirements have been met. D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ No signs have been proposed at this time. Jackson County Fire District Number 3 wi{I require that the address be prominently displayed on each dwelling unit. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction fails to meet the minimum setback requirements for the R-3, Residential Multiple Family District. The applicant will need to provide a duplex plan that meets the setbacks or obtain a variance from the setback standards. The applicant will also need to meet the requirements of the Building Department in relation to the building separation between the existing carport and the proposed duplex. G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ The proposed duplex and on-site improvements comply with the intent of the district but would be more aesthetically acceptable to the residential activities in the area if a few changes were made to the architecture and landscaping in the front. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Continue the review of the site plan at the discretion of the Commission to allow the applicant to provide a site plan that meets the code; or 2. Deny the proposed site plan Attachments A. Notice of Meeting B. Site PJan, Floor Plan and Building Elevations C. Original Partition and Letter to Applicant D. Planning Department Conditions -5- ~'~ Ly o ~' ~ ~~ C ra l I~oln_ ~ PLANNING DE'PARTME'NT Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Arkens Planning Technician Lisa Morgan Planning Secretary Notice of Public Meeting Date of Noticee November 10, 2003 Meeting Date: December 2, 2003 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time andplace, theCentral PointPlanningCommissionwillreview asiteplan application. Theapplicantisrequestingapprovaltoaddaduplexonhislot,identifiedintherecordsofthe Jackson County Assessor as Map 37S 2W 2, Tax Lot 900, also known as 400 N. l Os` Street. This lot is zoned as R-3, Residential Multiple Family District. The Central PonatPlanning Commissionwill reviewthe siteplan application to detemune if all ofthe requirements ofthe CentralPointMunicipalCode canbemet.Ifthe Commissiondeterminesthatthe application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued. CRTI'ERIA FOR DECISION Therequirements for site plan review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions on the project approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS Anypersoninterested ur corrunenthrgontheabove-mentioned land use decision may submit written cornments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 2, 2003. 2. Written commentsmaybesentinadvanceoftherneetingtoCentralPointCityHal1,155South -6- Second Street, Cei 'Point, OR 97502. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the ehpirationofthecommentpcriodnotedabove. Anytestimonyandwrittencorrunentsaboutthe decisions described above will need to berelated to theproposal and shouldbe stated clearlyto the Planning Commission. Copies of all evidencerelied uponbyihe applicant areavailable forpublicreviewat CityHall,155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at I S cents per page. 5. For additionalinformation,thepublicmaycontactthePlanningDepartmentat(541)664-3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staffreports. The Comuussionattheirdiscretion, maydecidetoheartestimonyfromthe applicant,proponents,opponents, andheazazgumentsontheapplication. Ifallowed, anytestimonyorwrittencomments mustberelatedto. thecriteria set forth above. Atthe conclusionofthereviewthePlanningComrnissionmayapproveordeny thesiteplanas submitted. Cityregulationspmvidethatthe CentralPointCityCouncilbeinformedabout all Planning Commission decisions. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point OI~,97502 ®(541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 -~ . ~_..: rrt ..,~~ Je "~.--^Y rJ~.__ .... __.... HLtli ?33»15 . ~ r '> ! ~ w t+ ~~ ~ `i, i ..tt~ ~ ` 1 Y _RN~' ' - `off i' ;; `+ F ., byil :~ ~4 ~~ ~~ 4 , ~~; T nA~;- ~ ~.: ~~ ~ ~_ h:~, > ~ ~ i ~~;. ~:_ ~~" _ _..~ t ,'.;~; ~ _'"t t ` 4 1 j ~ ~- .....: : ~ rx.. ~ ~ i_.: ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ 't-t$ "` ~~;~ ~ c~ M ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ , ~~ - ~t ,,. ~ ~ c~ 'tip ~ g ~ ~~ j ~ ~~ ,, .~ ~ x ~~ P ~. M~ .r, y 'S y to C~~ b6' 0" ,~ 9-599' ]C 76%=153" W/36" MiN 6WP yZy~ -9- 979 SQ. FT_-LIVlN~ MODfI 1002 FRONT t 0 RIGiiT SIDE TENTATIVE PAftTITfON P.~AT Located in the N.W. 1/4 of Sec. ~ T.375., R.2Pl., PT.M. City of Central Paint Jac&soa County, Oregon ]0 Z tJ A -Bt~ VI o o {1 Y1 II F'• I~ I" ~~ I~ ~ 1 _ ~_ 5, II ~ -_ - w ~~~i _ _ r-- i - i it 1t0 .~~ ,{D f ~"1~"~-- 4i {7 f ,D --~ OUPt£X PFMOSED PARCEL 2 6]2D 54 Fi 5 f ~_ f0 ~-X GARAGE PAppNG ~ PFNKFYL LFRAiE ~ I 3 5 ~ { _ ~ __ _ 1 1 59 ~_ .-/. -_^~ CHERRY STREET _ - - -~ ins 7ENiA7 RECIi iERED .,~rcros. PRDfE55tONAl 3]2YA: LAND SURVEYOR ~~ 9y 7)J NDiE: oR[cw u 1) LOLnTg15 CF CbSIING MVO PROPOSED SIAUCNRES ~yEx Ei eDS iRON0E0 BY OINEAS NOT f1M LWFlEO' Z) NOT £lOO DEMRFAE AP-flOA1MAlE BA59 GY FELMO MIA. RENEWAL DALE 6-YJ-D1 Q Ya a.aoanrtz D~~ ~D FAR 7IP,DN PLAT f iL90L DVF_N9 JJ DAH LCURi RO. OR 9]300 ?FO u nwe ~ n.5scc+rts ac Z c .<o. µu !AF Oi1IN S~au. ~~ ~f~~~llmlmftlm~ ~Dt~ p~l~°ftllmi ~mi ~ _ ~. Tom Humpl+rey,AICP PlmutLr<g fJirector John N.flwens 34 Glen (talc Court Medford, Oregon 97504 ,e ii. :. •~.uo. Ken Gerschler~ Commwtity P[mu¢er Uave Arhens Pfanning Technician Lisa Morgan Planning Secretary Last week we spoke on the telephone conceming the tentative Land division that you submitted for your property at 400 North Tenth Street in Central Point. ht your application, you requested that the Central Point Piamring Commission grant approval fox the partition. z ~.ili:cugh the proposal may have financial merit by enabling you to sell the existing house and construct a duplex unit on the newly created lot, the zoning ordinance has established minimum lot sizes as 7,000 square feet for corner lots and 6,000 square feet for interior lots within the R-3, Residential Multiple Family District. Unfortunately, your application depicts lots that are well below the minimum area requirements for the R-3 zone. Your proposed I,ot 1 would be 6,480 square feet and proposed Lot 2 would be 4,720 square feet. Since the proposed lots fail to meet the minimum lot size requirements, the municipal code compels the Planning Commission to deny the application as submitted. You have the option of filing an application to vary &'om the minimum lot sizes in order to partition the lots as proposed, however there is no guazantee that the Punning Commission or City Council would approve them unless you were able to convince the members that there are special circumstances present. Please observe that I have enclosed an application for a zone variance with this letter if you should decide to proceed with this option. Currently, you could build the duplex on the existing lot with the house at 400 North Tenth Street since the code permits the outright construction of "dwelling groups" in the R-3 district. To facilitate this, please complete the enclosed an application for site plan review and return it to City Hall and we will schedule it for a Planning Commission meeting as soon as possible. I have enclosed your tentative land use partition documents. You will need some of the enclosures for the zone variance and site plan review should you decide to pursue either option. I will request that the Finance Department return your application fee, If you should have any questions concerning this matter or would prefer to meet with City staff, please feel free to contact the Planning Department by telephone at (541) 664-3321, Extension 292. Sincerely, ICen Gersehler -.:.,. ~ + ~~< v x:502 v t 541 664-3321 ext. 231 ? Far. (541 664~63b4 11u;,u~t 25, 2003 ATTACHMENT ll RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall provide a revised site plan or an application for variance from the required setbacks. If the applicant fails to provide a suitable duplex site plan, the Commission will deny the site plan application. If the applicant files a vaziance application, the Commission may or may not approve the variance at their discretion. 2. If a revised Site Plan is submitted and approved by the Planning Commnission, it must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 3. If the site plan shows the duplex any closer than six (6) feet from the existing carport structure, the applicant shall either:(1) build a two hour firewall between the existing carport and the proposed duplex or; (2}reduce the width of the existing carport one foot in order to meet a six foot separation between structures that is required by building code. 4. TheapplicantshallmeetalloftherequirementsestablishedbythePublicWorksDepartment, Fire District Number 3 and the Rogue Valley Sewer Services. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. -13- Weathers Conditional Use ~'ermit Item ~ -14- PLANNING DEPAR`T'MENT STAI~I~ REPOK`C RATE: March 2, 2004 TO: Central Point Planning Commission &'ROM: David Alvord, Community Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for 320 West Pine Street to establish a day care center at the Independent Baptist Church. APPLICANT: Kym Weathers 2590 Savannah Drive Central Point, OR, 97502 OWNER: Independent Baptist Church 316 W. Pine St. Central Point, OR, 97502 Property DescriptionJZoning: 37 2W l OAB, Tax Lot 5300 - 0.54 acres. R-1-8, Residential Single- Family. Summary: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit that will allow her to operate a day care center at Independent Baptist Church, 316 W. Pine Street. The project area is zoned R-1-8. A day care center is an allowable use in an R-1-8 zone, provided a Conditional Use Permit has been granted by the city. Authority: CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a conditional use permit. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Attachment B) Applicable Law: CPMC 1.24.010 et. seq. -Public Hearing Procedure CPMC 17.20.010 et. seq. -Residential Single-Family District CPMC 17.76.010 et. seq. -Conditional Use Permits Back rg ound: The proposed day care center has operated on Sundays as a nursery during church services. The applicant wishes to change the existing use from Sunday-use-only when church services are going on to a five day a week business near Mae Richardson Elementary school. The property is for sale and will no longer be used on Sundays. -15- Discussion: The proposed day care center, which would be located at Independent Baptist Church, is bordered by Griffin Creek and a designated open space area to the West, Mae Richardson Elementary School to the iVorth and West Pine Street to the South. There is a residence on the adjacent lot to the East. Existing improvements include two fully functional self contained buildings with ample parking which includes handicap parking spaces. The building is wheelchair accessible having a ramp located in the front of the building facing West Pine Street. The applicant wishes to use a portable fence which would be used during operating hours and would be located behind the facility. The fencing would be used primarily as a safety measure because of the traffic on West Pine Street and to create a play area for the children that would be at the day care facility. The State of Oregon mandates that all day care centers licensed through the state provide a play area. The play area must provide a minimum of 75 square feet per child; the play surface, if not grass, must be covered with a minimum thickness of six inches of wood chips; the play area must be well drained; any and all play equipment such as swings and climbing equipment must be in good working order and stimulate the development of fine motor skills. The play area must be enclosed by a barrier that is a minimum of three feet in height. The fence the applicant wishes to use is portable, made ofchain -link material and will be six feet in height. The proposed day care center was being used on Sundays as a nursery during church services. The applicants wish to change the current use from a one day a week child care facility to a five day a week business. The property that the church owns is for sale. The church building and home that are situated on the property are being leased to Ms. Weathers. The property owner and the applicant have entered into a lease agreement which includes an option to purchase the entire site. Both buildings located at the site will be used in connection with the day care center. Hours of operation would be Monday through Friday, 6a.m. to 6p.m. The center would close early on Wednesdays and would not be open for business on Saturday or Sunday. Access to the center would be taken fiom West Pine Street. There are two driveways, one on the east end of the church building and the other on the west end of the church building that are used to enter and exit the church property. Access has been established at this location for many years because of the church situated there. The applicant is cun•ently licensed to operate a day care by the State of Oregon. The applicant is licensed for a maximum of 12 children. The number of children present at the day care facility at any one time will not exceed 12 children. -16- Findings and Conditions: Per section 17,76.040 - Finrlines and Conditions, the planning commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows: A. That the site, for• the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use arzd to meet all other rlevelopnter:t and lot requirements of the subject znr:ing districtanrl all other provisions of this code. The proposed location sits on 0.54 acres. There is a building at the proposed day care center location that has been used for a children's nursery during church services. The building has restroom facilities and a kitchen and is equipped to handle more than the 12 children and 2 -4 adults limited by the state. B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the .street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively acconzrnodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by t{:e proposed use. The site has two existing points of ingress and egress that were established at the time the Baptist Church was constructed. The site is accessible from West Pine Street. C. That the proposed use will lzave no .signifrcant adverse effect or: abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposedlocation of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures; walls and fences; Zandscaping; outdoor lighting and signs. All improvements are in place. There will be no additional outdoor lighting but the applicant would like to install new signs to advertise her business. D. That the establishment, maintenance or• operation of the use applied for will can:ply with local, state and federal health and .safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and inzprovenzents in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the catnrnunity based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section. The proposed day care center will fall under state zules and regulations. The site itself is bounded by a school to the north, a creek and open space to the west and West Pine Street to the south. There is a residence to the east of the proposed day care site. The applicant has spoken with the people that live there and they have no objection to a day care being operated near them. -17- E. That any conditiora required for approval of the permit ur•e deemed necessary to protect the public heap{:, safety ar:rl getzeral welfare and n:ay include: Genera] property improvements arc in place. The proposed use will require alteration to the following: Creation of an outdoor play area with a securely fenced perimeter; separation of parking from play area; and identification of a `child chop off area'. The project will not require the posting of a bond for cost of improvements. Action: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution No. _, approving the conditional use permit subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Attachment A); or 2. Deny the conditional use permit; or 3. Continue the review of the conditional use permit at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Site Plan B. Public Notice C. Letter of Intent D. Planning Department Conditions of Approval -18- a ~£"rRA<A City of Central Point ~ 0 155 South Second Street - ° - - z Central Point, OR 975Q2 V '~ PHONE {541) 664-3321 h. ~ d .f FAX (541) 664-6384 QREI',~ ~; ~, Project -" ey _`_ Date )oh Number - -- sheet ____ of ~~E~It~C1~,IC~ ebb C 1--j o 135 ~ 0 r- r m~ ~o~~ tv rT fi"a ..4_.~ rt ~ o. ~~ „.. N v.r~j' ~5 n Q n~ n ~~ ~~ ~ ~` , ~. ~~ ~, 3 ~. .~~ ~L~~ ! ! 8 I v ,. i 0 ozr ~. A cg!lTgq< y A ti O U- _ _ ti 4 d F aREC'~ City of Central Point Pro;ed - S55 South Second Street gY __ Central Point, OR 97502 PHONE (541) 664-3321 Job Number FAX (541)664-6384 Date Sheet ~ of _._. __ __ __ __ ~-z-- ~. ~) J z ~~ U -ZO- CI ty of Central Pole t PLANNING D.L'PAI~TMI'N7' Tom }Iurnphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner David Alvord Community Planner Dave Arkens G1S 'Pechnician Lisa Morgan Planning Secretary Notice of Public Meeting Date of Notice: February 10, 2004 Meeting Date: March 2, 2004 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING .~ Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Conditional Use Permit application for the purpose of operating a day care facility at Independent Baptist Church, 316 W. Pine Street. The subject parcel is in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family zone and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W l OAB, Tax Lot 5300. The Central Point Planning Commission will review the Conditional Use Permit application to determine if all of the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. If the Commission determines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, or failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. -21- To whom it may Concern: We are wanting to turn the church and Sunday school into a daycare having the Daycare open Monday-Friday 6AM-6PM. And closing it on Saturday and Sunday and Wednesday night. Which the Church daycare is located by one house and the school is right behind so really No other houses up to at least 200 or more ft. Also it has many pazking places and 2 driveways and handicap parking, and ramps. We want to add a removable fence in The back area away from cars by school playground, where it is safe for children. We are currently licensed by the state of Oregon. This should not affect anyone do To it is already a Sunday school and Mae Richazdson school is located 1 house up and behind the church. Do to the increase and need for loving and safe quality Daycare for our children. Questions Please contact Kym Weathers 541-665-0795 ~' %~"~ ~1~J -23- ATTACHMENT "D" -Conditions of Approval The City of Central Point Planning Department has made the following conditions of approval associated with the proposed project. If the following criteria are not met by the applicant, the commission, on its own motion, at a public hearing, may revoke any conditional use permit for noncompliance with the conditions set forth in granting said permit. CPMC 17.76.070 - Revocatior:. No more than 12 children at any one time per the provisions set forth in the child care facility license issued to Kym Weathers by the State of Oregon. 2. The day care center will not be operational on Saturdays and Sundays. Hours and days of operation shall be Monday through Friday; 6a.m. to 6p.m. 4. The applicant shall notify the City of Central Point of any desired changes to conditions associated with the conditional use permit. 5. Fencing guidelines will be detei7nined per State of Oregon child day care center requirements. The applicant shall affix the fence for the play area to the ground in the area shown on the site plan. 6. The proposed day care center will be subject to all applicable city, county and state laws that address child care facilities. The applicant is limited to three signs as defined in CPMC 15.24. A sign permit shall be obtained by the applicant and approved by city staff prior to installation. -24- Fine Street Station Tentative ~'1an Item C -25- PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAI'F REPORT MEETING DATE: March 2, 2004 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing - To consider a Tentative Plan fora 9 lot subdivision known as Pine Street Station, Phase 1 located north of Taylor Road in the TOD-MMR zoning district (Map 37 2W 03DC, Tax Lot 3400). Ap licant/ Owner: Twin Creeks Development L.L.C. P.O. Box 3577 Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent: Herb Farber/Farber Surveying 431 Oak Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 7.36 acres of land into 9 residential lots. This tentative plan is located within the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development (TOD) master plan. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060(Attachment "D"). A~ulicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.65 et seq. -TOD Districts and Con~idors Discussion: Pine Street Station, Phase 1 is a portion of amulti-phased commercial and residential development known as Twin Creeks in the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District. This proposed subdivision (Attachment "A") is one of seven distinct neighborhoods located within the Twin Creeks Development which has been master planned with stringent standards designed to ensure project quality and to create a form of community. The TOD lessens reliance upon the automobile by emphasizing public transportation, bicycle and pedestrian activities. This development is in compliance with the Twin Creeks Transit-Oriented Master Plan which includes pedestrian and bicycle paths, traffic calming measures, open space, landscaping and street light standards. -26- Pine Street Station has been aptly named since the development is located near Wcst Pule Street where a fiiture transit stop will be integrated This phase of the TOD has required significant collaboration between the City, the developer and a neighboring property owner since there is a realignment of "faylor Road and planned extension of Haskell Street through property owned by Rogue Valley Bin. The transfer of land needed for the extension of the Haskell Street right of way will be completed soon. These roadway improvements are part of the second deve]opment "trigger" where the area is being prepared to accommodate the additional traffic anticipated with the development of the TOD. The Commission is aware that other "trigger" improvements are presently underway including the Pine Street rail crossing upgrade and the widening of Taylor Road from Haskell Sheet to Silver Creek Drive. The re-alignment of Taylor Road will affect the access for the properties at 1909 and 1927 Taylor Road and the new road configuration will shift Taylor Road north and east away from these parcels. Farber Surveying has submitted a map showing how a street vacation could be implemented in this area (Attachment "B"). The .Plamling Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the TOD Design Requirements, Guidelines and Comprehensive Plan. The area is designated for medium mix residential development and is zoned TOD-MMR. The mix of housing types anticipated have numerous lot sizes and configurations. The 91ots that comprise Phase 1 of the Pine Street Station range in size fi'om 4,551 to 88,580 square feet with the largest lots being designated for a retirement center and park land (Attachment A). This phase of the subdivision contains 7.36 acres of the existing 11.54 acre parcel now identified by the County as being TL 3400 Lot }has been tentatively discussed by the developer as a potential child day care facility. This is a suitable location since the parcel is adjacent to the Mae Richardson Elementary School, the primary educational facility for this neighborhood. A retirement center has been proposed on Lot 9, the largest lot in this subdivision phase where there will be approximately 89,000 square feet (2 acres) to accommodate this activity. The developers have not stated how many residents would live at the facility but this is a permitted use in the zone. The retirement center will meet a need in this area where there is a mix of housing types and social diversity. Lots 6 and 7 are located in the 100 year floodplain. Structures within the floodplain will require a flood elevation certificate and stringent construction measures designed to reduce property damage during flood events. Lot 8 contains approxirately 27,500 square feet designated as park area and is a portion of the total 48 acres of park and open space within the TOD. Griffin Creek will be realigned in this area and a pedestrian path has been shown to connect this park into the core of the TOD. Setbacks in the TOD-MMR zone vary dependent upon whether the structure is a detached or attached residence but under no circumstances can buildings be any closer than 10 feet from the front tot hne, 5 feet from the side lot lines and 15 feet from tyre rear lot line. The garage is required to be offset at least ten feet from the front of the house. -27- The Rogue River Valley Ireigation District, Jackson County Fire District number 3 and the Rogue Valley Sewer Scivices have been notified of the this tentative subdivision. RVSS will continue to work with the applicant iu the design of infrastructure. Water service is in the area with details outlined in the Public Works Staff Report (Attachment "E"). Fire Officials will require that the applicant provide a copy of maps with hydrant locations for review by the district. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. 1. The project site is located in the TOD-MMR (Medium Mix Residential) zoning district and increases residential and mixed use land use efficiency in this area. The proposed tentative plan for medium mix residential development is a permitted use in the TOD zoning district. The zoning in turn is consistent with the TOD Comprehensive Plan map designation. The Comprehensive Plan encourages innovative residential planning and development techniques that would help to increase land use efficiency and reduce costs of utilities and services (Comprehensive Plan, page XII-12). 2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision to subdivide approximately 7.36 acres for the purpose of developing Phase 1 of the Pine Street Station Subdivision. The total number of lots proposed for what the applicants have identified as the Unit f of their subdivision is 9. The proposed mixed use subdivision meets the density requirement for the TOD-MMR (Medium Mix Residential) Zoning District which is a maximum of 32 units per acre. Each lot within the subdivision meets the requirements of the TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. The tentative plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et. seq. 3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed both the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements. The proposal meets the Planning and Public Works requirements subject to the recommended conditions found in Attachments E and F. The timing for the design and construction of Pine Street improvements is compatible with this phase of the Twin Creeks Development C\Plmming\04001 wpd -28- Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the tentativc subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Road Vacation Map provided by Farher Surveying C. TOD Land Use Plan Map D. Notice of Public Hearing E. Public Works Staff Report F. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval I ~.\Planning\0400 ~ .wpd -29- '~ / / /Y ~~ ~~- //~ j~~ i ~./f II{ `x `{tI ~ i 3. ih \ \~ Y/\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\~ LOO Yin?iLWJ,PUNE \\ \~~\ \\~\\ PE COMUUnIYVLPwnANiiYNO AP \ \~ \~\- \ »99-dObB1 \\ \\\\\\\\~. { I \\ \ ' ryV ~\;~~\ ~\ \\\ `I o ao /^,\\+ ~~\ ~\\ Loren asao \ ~\\ ~ ~ ~f~\\\,\\` ;,~ „~~;~ /~ v`\\-~\ v \ "~ ~,~~\~ ~Rw \ \ZV; /I ~~~\\\ \s41. I ~~n \~ ~ o ~~- ~~\\ \ e .~ G\\ \ /v\\~ r ~\'~\ \ \ j /.\\ \\ W\~//S.A~i-~ ~ ~, ~~ -. 9TW$ Sq. s F , PAflK AflF~ // }0 \ / 6 \ \\~ ~ v \ 4' ? ti\ \I ` y0 00 \ ~ ~ / ~ ti l yj~ .~„ obi 10_ ~ft\ m ~•\ LDT 6 ~~a ` \ p59 Sq.R PT ° ~ ` ~ `]0\ \\r \~ \Yia1 toY 5 Y- 0.939 Sq.FI. //;ArVV. /%~\, ~y ~\ ~ n\\\Y~u+EnE u Entoc \` / n-Tw-o3oc a xao \\~ zn.c, LInR \~ +ZaA O yy--.. iQ -~~~w se F\,\+8' O9 Y \ 3]0>!0 SPM1 ry \~p"tp J\ \\o s l` `\ >.x we. 3\~~ ~\ Wig 0 9g}W 5¢.It. PfllPo5E0 flETPFNE3LT CEHiFR j0 \ //~\ / ~ mil, ~ Y9 f' ""_ \o i i0i1~ f a sass 5¢FL O~rrEL x :ESSiCA \ cuss:son SOnE L a t01 9 saw 5¢.Pe. o v. v { 5~g93_ 1M94A+OxtX i+M1Oa 9 1)ACw.E~ kiNUiE C CR 1{3T-2 tp[aLIH tIOP w s-m'-+aw a +eco a aoEC v zm- .vR { vniP o«a `~+P .u(I. 3~ 2w OJOC 2 J~OQ \0 /QJ2 1q / 0Y ~ //~~ /1 i A4~ROr.rE ~ ! rnE 3 ,gnv50N f ~ I ~€ ~~ { { PPCN'E R M ELAME C ~t tw-+Ond YL tV0 { RCNARO l R?NAlll c ARnvp zoxE tuS JY-2w-IOPd A IIW' { JT_2W ~OT ~~'~ > ~ YJNE EKR { ~ ~ { 41 { { ~~~ t Sheer? '' tpi 1 3mel.ez s¢.PI. + L55 ON iL PROV LAND 3URYEYOA ORE60N ,tyr )6. 19e3 "'~`°`x yps`rvaR REU:W?L OPI[ 13-3+-C9 RosERi L Koreans oa nEO R REYNaos ]~-RU-039C It SGCN 2CFE: nNAMkH TENTATIVE SUBQIVISfON MAP PfNE PHASETONE TfON located +N the NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OE SECTION D3, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH. RANGE 2 µ`SOREGON WILLAhdET7E ldER141AN, JACKSON GOUN TY, tol TNRN CREEKS D~EVE40PIAENT CD.. LI.O CENTRAL POINT. O.PECON 9>50-?-_ TA% lQT 3T-2W-0394 TL 3400 ~ ?ys z (~~\~~1 pRGJECT APP #1 II\\\~ AFEA XX `f1 J} 4E~Al 00:0-NG_ l - ` - ~ ND SC::L -PROJECT ZONING: FOdR PARCEL TO NOR"'~ 2v `ED ~14g - TA% lOT 39-2w-C3DC Tt33vO O+~TIER: Twt91 CREEKS Df`~LOPFIENY CC. 'LLC - AVERAGE .O? AREA 1T.53x SCUARE f£iT _ CURRENT LINO USc t'JLE Y'EEN D.5% AND S.GS AND W6,t _ 5'IR<E5 CRAOES W:LL 0E Bq" aE DETAILED 9N THE ENGfNEERMG DP.AYANOS. _ fuE = Ruauc unlnv eASE~+EIar )T~-JSwVO] CY 1Et 35~ ~ $CNC' nvx \ \ ~ \~ Y~~ \A Yew ~_. {~- = FIRE HYDRANT J5 V/A'ER VA.`iE p G cas vAC/E 9-° iELE?HONE POLE o IRRICABOM 80% y ~ INYERT E!EVATION -_'~_~- \:~a~ - < < TT" ~ ~ .\, \ ~ @`y Ci(Y O( LCNIRAL >aNl i4 IYJO \ \~ ~ \ C ~ 5' S9-]W-1018 :p4c CINC C \ - _. SaiLE: 1 50' 400a a,~'.r ,gg~.vp.: 0549'9612 .Q.. nG•I2e RocE tz=a:i s NAiER ;!E-E _w- _ 'NA'E.R .INE ~c- a Gas LM'E .may-- = iEI: RHiNC :il: _ iEiE>IIONE y1AarOLi .n p Survo/etl tlY FAR9ER & SONS. INC. tl6a: (54S )8fi6455599YiNG p. 0, gOx 5266 a3+ OA/ 6FRGON 99502 CENTRA! a01M1'T, 0 pRpp.SSIONn4 LA)I9 Sli P•V+Y9P. a_r.aarn D.r° a->r_m via I ' '7 - ~ `~- .._ ~ ,. _ ~ ' n,zoz ~... I ~ 1 ~ OvnCt k ES Cn ' 1.r:C1R `U E'CJ. GJS'ix[$U~ 3)_)'x~Da}, `, IiDD 'I ~ 3)-]x.JT]L i;. IaDt ~ ZJxE:.YF v JG/,f WR w ~~ ,~ \ TEN 7A THE CIRCULATION MAP ~ PINE STREET STATION ~ TAYLOR - HA SKELL INTERSECTION ~ ~ wcaE<e ,° Ine ~ \V N0,4TN.We 57 ONE OUARTLR OF SEC7IDN D3, ~ RANGE 2 wE57. \ ' TO'NNSwP 37 iOUTH, / ~ /~ ~ x9L6AMEi7£ fAERI DIAal, JA~XSON GOVNTY, GREG PI / ~ ~\ ~ ca., u.c ~ , \ ~ 7V,yN CREEKS DEVELOPMENT / /~ ~ \ p.o eo.* J / ~ ~ `~ X CENTRAL POINT. CftEGON 3?502 ~ 11 ^ \\ Q \ ~ \ \ \ e~f~M1+9J /~ ~~ \ A pox \ ~ \ ' / / ~ \ ~ NSF ~ \ / , ~ \ 1 ~ ` 1 v O s9as se n, \ ~ ; 9c/ c\ 96 j~ y. /v` \ F~ \ O /~ yOC\ xb\ ~~Q ~9~/~Q I \ \ \ \ /\~ ~ t01 t \ \ 59E)SG.51. M1I \\ /Q!G ~ r399r.H'S SASI. ,I \ / y / \ o~Gj ~ y, °~ * Lc"s / ~eac~DSfo e9°r.R3r'.+~ES \ /_i '~ 0895 _ ~ nJ`ECx _ ennMED °i`D4LwAY `e+iD D° fl. ~tZq 1+ 899 i I uvan& a ;crtxsa+ raCW[ ? re CtA;vE i i-CN.:On9 R r500 ~ MCnlf C M Eln'IlE C 4C nflM'JP g $JNf LV.R wa++s -a;`xon D uc nremuP n-pw-ro•a n Eaon ~ 1 W'xtER P-R~P-10ae P t]OC ZCV( .V? (._7y,_tOna iL rBCO :O.4E tuR I R W ZCNC .MR R a PNO[0 V°nDEED RCCO0.D ~°Ir, DY;K/:^r i'J`d+iCUS xtRE 'YIiPUVr:CU FeOw ir. ;J. iGUr:o!ar a°Simx x[FE DE4RUrvED u Sneer '. of ' 1. ~___ -- -, PICXMD l AAPR%x s]-xw-tona a vw imc (uR ''~~ OF TAYLOR ROAD EX'SrING ALIGn'Mc NT ~I ~~Itir 1 ~t I Ill ~~ crr w upR~[ vu r 3]-1'6-+4u1 It 1bC ror, owc L \ ~y n C\ Ft I m \ „ ~ ~~ ~~ ,r ~ t~ ~ I, ~1 II s "+eved °r SONS. ry'C. iAR3ER 3c >UR,.FS,r:n,G dbo FAR3°` (~41) pot-5595 P O. 30X i28fi 6S OA,GOS RciT vREGQ"1 a] ,L ?OINT, OREGLN 97502 CEPlT.RAL PDiN7, ~! LTtE: -~ xJ fCCn ^f pniE JASVAR' tR. .D9 u0. JSi-96 s..... u,.,~,;,,...m..e.a ..,.. vy lowsl trDO,r+DD. r50DJdaDJ~CO)tlpo ;f a9 - .. r~ eJ U 'll' 4.P '> 1. iDi i ., t3 :11 ; y !!? !f, ~D ~I~ R!t FS I:! A-~'Thc~~ie ~T~ ('~. M'ELOVUEUi Sl1uuARV: -~\ r ' CmD OI Ym n1/COmmmcrol (EC)' <.R o..res (I.Bf.) x\ ~ 19 M ft '~/C (Mfl). 198 (8.6].) 9 1 ]0 / um (G50 hxn) ~ \ /( \\ \{ i ~ ~ L ~ <~ r `~] , () i i ~,O ) J~ O ~ ~ M Q L' R '1 I ( R)~ 2/.6 t (12.09.) M1tl un:s O I6 u/a um (5 m) 11 L ix ResNenla (111R) 61 A acre' (t6 )9.) ~J J6B oils O 6 u/o min man (JLp SXOxn) [ ~ uo sDa (os7 ae> (v.oz) I `\I C \ ~'} ~, C~. \ / C t~ L {7 \ eL ilr. C+~ ~~ ~ q [~i.. ~s S) ~q ~ S~ 1 1~ ~:~ ~ c s~ R'°~ ~~ P (G): 169 ().J ) ~ 9 f of Y' S1 a (22.09.) iota) 5\e Araa. 2J0 Bares (1009.) uoa uml~ m.a~m~~m (la>s cno.a7 ~:, ~ it ' ' p ~p~ O~ . - co < c; ~ 1 4~'. I~ - 0 ~] C]C 1 .I. ~-.: ~ ~l S~ rl0 tl {.~ ^ fl ~~ Ufa : ,..t u { t J _tlu ~~ - cti 060 d1 d t769 CS ~ _ C~( ~' r~ o . cl n n r3 ., ~. ' ~ '€~ ~Cr i'. V ~Ct . M1I/ p off ( , S~ 1 i' ~ U P IS tl n D U - Lt_ : t ~,2 ~ r9~ t1 t ~ ~ ~ t' ~ U t~ C] S - - 7- ~ - - - - - -_ _ --,rte- ~ .~. Y fdiiLir 13. Iwmri Use Plmr -32- „RSI~~~„RA„PI,~,I~~R 24 CI ty of Cen ~-rat Posn t. PLANNING DTs'I'Ah'TML'N'I' Torn Ilurnphrery, AICP Planning Director Ken Gersctller CornmuniLy Planner David Alvord Community Planner Dave Arkens GIS Technician Lisa Morgan Planning Secretary Notice of Public 1VIeeting Date of Notice: February 10, 2004 Meeting Date: March 2, 2004 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a tentative plan application for an 8 lot subdivision known as Pine Street Station, Phase I. It consists of 6 single family residences and one multiplex The subject parcel is in the MMR, TOD- Medium Mix Residential District and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 03DC, Tax Lot 3400. It is located North of Taylor Road, east of Griffin Creek and west of U.S. Highway 99. The Central Point Planning Commission will review the tentative plan application to determine if all of the requirements of the Centrat Point Municipal Code can be met. If the Commission determines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, or failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST I3E PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO T]EIE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 toot radius of subject property. -33- CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for tentative plan review are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Centra] Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions on the project approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 2, 2004. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, I55 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at I S cents per page. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, at their discretion, may decide to hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the tentative plan as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about ail Planning Commission decisions. 155 South Second Street Central Point, OI 502 ®(541) 664-3321 Fax: (541) 664-6384 U O~ ,Cit of central Point Public Works Department PULBIC WORKS STAFF REPORT February 25, 2004 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Applicant A ent Property Description/ Zoning Purpose Planning Commission Public Works Department Public Hearing -Site Plan Review for 37 2 W 03DC Tax Lot 3400 Pine Street Station, Phase I Twin Creeks Development Co., LLC P.O. Box 3577 Central Point, Oregon 97502-0021 Herb Farber 37 2W 03DC Tax Lots 3400. TOD-HMR Robert Pieree Director Rick Bartlett Suyw•visnr Chris Clayton Deputy Director Mike Otto Technician Greg Graves Technician Xaren Rneber Secretary II Margarita Murtoz Secretory I Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to forni a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. -35- 2/25/2004 Pine Street Station, Phase T Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Departnent is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, arrd storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City o f Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Developn:et:t Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, stone drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Per•zzzit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be -36- 2/25/2004 calculated and attached to the public works permit. All Fees are required to be paid in fill] at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works hrspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Pine Street Stretion, Phase 7- Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Pine Street Statiote, Phase I- Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable constniction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of conshuction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Pine Street Station, Phase I- Water Connection Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. -37- zizsizooa All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State >=lealth Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Piste Street Station, Pl:ase I- Streets 1. The Developer's engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Con-idor might apply to the design and construction of streets in specific areas of the City. These alternate standards are fully described in the Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of-way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical. analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements ofthe Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. 2. Pine Street Station, Phase I includes two street types, both, which are described in the City of Central Point TOD design guidelines. The proposed streets (Taylor Road & Haskell Street,) are classified as TOD Business Collector streets and include the following: A. 76-feet of ROW B. (2) 10-foot travel lanes C. (Z) 5-foot bike lanes D. (z) 8-foot parking lanes E. (2) 6-inch curbs F. (2) 6-foot planter strips G. (z) 8-foot sidewalks The 6-foot planter strip and sidewalk inchiding tree wells. 8-foot sidewalk maybe substituted for with a 12-foot -38- 2/25/2004 3. The proposed street (Richardson Ridge) is classified as a TOD Narrow Residential Local street and includes the following: A. 52-feet of ROW B. (2) 10-foot travel lanes C. (1) 8-foot parking lane D. (2) 6-inch curbs E. (2) 6-foot planter ships F. (2) 5-foot sidewalks 4. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of street related components. Pine Sb•eet Station, Phase I- Stoz•zn Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous annexed drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under cun•ent zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Stonn Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Pine Street Station, Pl:ase I- Required Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Depar-Cment of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for stoi7n drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ACOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). -39- 2/25/2004 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. -40- A'I"I'ACHMEN'I' F PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONllITIONS OF APPROVAL PINE STREET STATION, PHASE 1, FILE 04001 CHECK NUMBER DF,SCRIPTION OF CONDITION BOX I Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) for Phase 1 of the Pine Street Station Subdivision 2 The applicant shall comply with al] requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of Phase 1 of the Pine Sheet Station Subdivision. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3 The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and construction of Phase 1 of the Pine Street Station Subdivision. 4 FRONT SETBACK IS MINIMUM 10 FEET, MAXIMUM 15 FEET AS MEASURED FROM FOUNDATION 5 GARAGE MUST BE OFFSET MIIQIMUM 10 FEET FROM FRONT PROTRUSION OF HOUSE. 6 SIDE YARD SETBACKS ARE 5 FEET AS MEASURED FROM FOUNDATION 7 REAR YARD SETBACK IS MINIMUM 15 FEET AS MEASURED FROM FOUNDATION $ MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED IS 45 FEET 9 The application shall provide a MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA 4VHICFT IS 20 PERCENT OF AREA (Check with Planning to see if landscape plan has been approved) 10 The application shall provide the minimum number of OFF-STREET PARKING REQiJIREMENTS as described by LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. (Check with Planning for required number of spaces) 1 I Jackson County Fire District 3 Conditions have been met. 12 Rogue Valley Sewer Services Conditions have been met. 13 Public Works Department Conditions have been met. 14 I:APlanningAQ4QQ L4vpd -~1- Hazel Creek ~'lanned Unit Development Item D -42- PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5'1'AFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March 2, 2004 TO: Central Point Plamiing Commission FKOM: David Alvord, Community Planner SUBJECT: Tentative Subdivision Plan and Preliminary Development Plan for Hazel Creek Plamied Unit Development (PUD). Applicant: KB Rentals, LLC 3094 Wells Fargo Rd. Central Point, OR., 97501 Owner: Anent: Pro er Descrintion( Zoninn• Summary: Victor Kozmatka and Dan Kozmatka (Co-Owners) 33 Bel Air Court Medford, OR, 97504. Victor Kozmatka 3094 Wells Fargo Rd. Central Point, OR, 97501 37 2W02BC Tax Lot 602 - 1.58 Acres R-3, Multiple Family Residential KB Rentals has submitted a preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision for Hazel Creek, a Planned Unit Development consisting of eight pad lots with access from Hazel Street and an existing private street connecting to Cherry Street (see Attaclunent A). Authority: CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and c•ender a decision on any application for a preliminary development plan for a PUD. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Attachment B). Applicable Law: City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Housing Element CPMC 16.10.010 et seq.- Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20.010 et seq.- R-3, Multiple Family Residential CPMC 17.60.130 et seq.- General Provisions, Access CPMC 17.68.010 et seq.- Plaimed Unit Development -43- Discussion: City staff has worked with the applicant, KB Rentals, since September to plan an 8 lot PUD east of North 10`h Street between Hazel and Cheny Streets in an R-3, Multiple Family Residential District. PUDs and padlots may be permitted in the R-3 zoning district subject to the approval of a preliminary development plan. If the preliminary development plan is approved, an application for final development plan must be submitted within six months of such approval. CPMC 17.68.010 states that "the purpose ofplanned unit development (PUD) is to gain more effective use of open space, realize the advantages of Inge-scale site planning and the mixing of building types or land uses, improved aesthetics and environmental preservation. This is achieved by allowing a variety of building and structures, types of open space, variable building heights and setbacks, and shared services and facilities. " This application is being processed as a PUD because the project area is in-fill development, is unusually shaped and has topographic limitations. In the past, similar areas have been developed as "flag lots" which reduce urban density since most of the useable space is dedicated to private access driveways. Flaglot requirements also dictate that the minimum lot area be twice the area minimum for' the applicable zoning district, excluding the square footage within the access road. As a PUD, Hazel Creek will promote the more efficient use of an infill property and allow approximately 1.58 acres to be developed into 8 residential lots and a total 16 attached single family units. The PUD is proposed to be served by a 20 foot wide private roadway with no on-street parking. A three (3) foot wide landscaped buffer will be located between the drives and a 4 foot sidewalk. The applicant wiU also provide 8off-street parking spaces and driveways that are wide and deep enough to allow for 4 cars to be parked in each one. The applicant has also made provisions in the plan for water meters to be situated so that road width will not have to be increased. Access to the private drive is proposed from an existing private street (in Willow Glen) and from a portion of Hazel Street that is unimproved. The Public Works Department is recommending that the applicant build a `private drive' to adopted city standards shown in Attachment E. They are also proposing the applicant share in the cost of improvements to 650 feet of Hazel Street. The subdivision design attached to this report has been reviewed for completeness by City staff and is the one the applicant would like the Commission to consider as the most desirable plan. The planning department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning code. The area is designated for high density residential developrent and is zoned R-3 which allows up to 24 units per acre. The overall unit density proposed with Hazel Creek is 10 units per acre. Given the topography of the site and the existing concentration of high density housing, this is not an unreasonable proposal. The development will result in a more efficient use of residentially zoned land and improve the overall appearance of this property and neighborhood. The proposal consists of eight lots, each of which will be a `pad lot'. The applicants have successfully completed similar developments with the completion the East Cheny Street Estates on property nearby. Under CPMC 17.60.210, `parent lots' in a pact lot subdivision must comply with standard requirements, which iu the R-3 zone call for an area of 6,000 square feet. -44- Additionally, CPMC 174.60.130 requires a minimum frontage for lots of nat less than 40 feet upon a public street; 30 feet for padlot developments and 20 feet upon a private street. Each of the lots in this development meet the minimum frontage and lot area requirements. This application for a planned unit development is proposed for property that is currently vacant and situated east of two similar developments. The majority of infi•astiucture improvements were originally installed on East Cherry Street as part of the Bluebird Heights development and then extended by the East Cherry Street Estates padlot development. Findines of Fact & Conclusions of Law Size of PUD site A PUD shall be on a tract of land five acres or larger, except that a PUD maybe on a tract of land more than one acre but less than five acres if the planning commission finds, upon a showing by the applicant, that a PUD is in the public interest because one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An unusual physical feature of importance to the people of the area or the community as a whole exists on the site, which can be conserved and still leave the landowner equivalent use of the land by the use of a planned unit development; ^ The area of the PUD proposal is 1.58 acres. The site is of an unusual shape and topography and has access limitations that make high density (R-3) development more problematic. The PUD will allow the land owner to develop eight new buildable lots consisting of 16 attached single family units. The PUD would Lessen the overall percentage of impervious surface area and creates common areas and open space that lends itself well to the site characteristics. B. The property or its neighborhood has historical character or distinctive features that are important to the community and that could be protected or enhanced through use of a PUD; ^ The applicants are constructing residential homes that are similar to two other existing residential developments. The property is adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of a planned unit development of similar design as that proposed and developments would complement each other without significant adverse impact on sun'ounding areas; r The homes will be similar in design and architecture and the PUD introduces more single family attached dwellings at slightly higher density that would to more to preserve the neighborhood character. D. The properrty is of in-egular shape, with limited access, or has unusual dimensions or characteristics which would make conventional development um'easonably difficult and expensive -45- ^ The parcel is irregularly shaped and will require access fz•om a private street in Willow Glen and from an unimproved section of I3aze1 Street. The developer wishes to use a padlot development-type approach because this design allows for greater density, along with a better use of open space and common areas. Criteria to Grartt or Deny a PUD In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards fi•om section 17.68.040: A. That the development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions to the noz-mal requirements of this title; ^ The applicant's preliminary development plan proposes S lots and 16 single family- attached dwellings. The housing types will be similar to the existing neighboz•hood and will have the similar architecture and size. B. The proposal will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the City; ^ This proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Housing Goals as follows: it ensures adequate housing will be provided; contributes to the variety of housing offered and promotes higher density zoning. Zoning code objectives can be met if recommended planning and public works conditions are satisfied. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the PUD will have minimal adverse impact on the livability, value or appropziate development of the surrounding area; ^ The preliminary development plan is consistent with the zoning in the surrounding area. Each of the lots is in the same square footage range as the adjacent East Chez•ry Street Estates subdivision and the homes will be of similar size and design. D. That the proponents of the PUD have demonstrated that they are financially able to carry out the proposed project, that they intend to start construction within six months of the final approval of the project and any necessary district changes, and intend to complete said constzction with a reasonable time as determined by the Commission; The applicant has developed land throughout Central Point. In the past he has demonstrated to City Staff that he has the resouz•ces to complete his projects. He has also hired a sut•veyor and engineer that have a long history with the City of Central Point. E. That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development or will be obviated by demonstrable provisions in the plan for proper entrances, exits, internal traffic circulation and parking; -46- ^ All of the writs will access either onto Hazel Street or East Cherry Street which are local residential streets in the City's Transportation System Plan. Improvements that are made to the Ilazcl Street right of way will mitigate the potential for traffic congestion in this area. F. The commercial development in a PUD is needed at the proposed location to provide adequate commercial facilities of the type proposed; ^ There is no commercial development proposed within this development. G. That proposed industrial development will be efficient and well-organized with adequate provisions for railroad and truck access and necessary storage; ^ There is no industrial development proposed within this development. H. The PUD preserves natural features such as streams and shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain, if these are present; ^ The development proposal has been designed to work around the unusual topographic characteristics of the site. A landscape plan showing all of the existing trees as well as proposed plantings of trees and shrubbery has been submitted to the Planning Department. Any historic or prominent trees will need to be preserved. No other natural Features exist on the site. The PUD will be compatible with the surrounding area; ^ Hazel Creek will be compatible with the surrounding area. The PUD will reduce need for public facilities and services relative to other permitted uses for the land; ^ The development will result in a more efficient design and use of infrastructure and utilities in the area. Improvements may eventually encourage an increase in public transit along North Tenth Street. -47- PLanninE Commission Action The Planning Commission may take one of the following actions in regard to the preliminary development plan for Hazen Creek PUD and tentative subdivision. 1. Adopt Resolution No.,, approving the preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision for the Hazel Creek development, based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval as set fort in the staff reports; or 2. Recommend denial of the preliminary development plan for the Hazel Creek PUD based on findings of fact articulated by the Commission; or 3. Continue the review of the preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Site Plan and Elevations B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Copies of the Plats for the surrounding subdivisions. D. Correspondence E. Public Works Staff Report F. Planning Department Recommended Conditions or Approval -48- x ~, ~~ 7 n -49- Yom' ~ ' ~ fi Y 7' S ~~,2- Czty off' Central Poln t ~~~ ~ PLANNINGY DI;PARTryl7~;NT Tom I3umphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner David Alvord Community Planner Dave Arkens GIS Technician Lisa Morgan Planning Secretary Notice of Public Meeting Date of Notice: February 10, 2004 Meeting Date: March 2, 2004 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Planned Unit Development application for eight duplexes. The subject parcel is in the R-3, Residential Multiple Family zone and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 02BC, Tax Lot 602. The property is located east of North 10's Street between Hazel & Cherry Street. The Central Point Planning Commission will review the Plam~ed Unit Development application to determine if all of the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. If the Commission detezmines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, or failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. -53- CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for tentative plan review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions on the project approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 2, 2004. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 1 SS South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written continents about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, ISS South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 1S cents per page. S. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, at their discretion, may decide to hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Planned Unit Development as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. 1SS South Second Street ~ Central Point ORc;9~S02 ~ (S41) 664-3321 1 Fax: (S41) 664-6384 /P `l^I' C //^\\ V 1 ~~ . ~ _ --_ - \ ~~ P~f~ f ~ ~ ~t V1 tx] 'tl / ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ vy`'Lj Y ~ ~~ ~~~, V a~ ~ Fx~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ / r ~'x/ /:,~~ i / ~ 1 ~d / ~p s! ~l ,~"~r- /t W~ P J ~ / / \ ~ fi~ \\~~~ \ ~ \ 4 y ~ \ ,~ /~ ~~. ` ~i099~ ~~, kFiE ~ ~ 9~~`Y`"~ ! ~g ~~ a,~ ~ ~s ~ ~ ~~ kl 4 `{t {\ •ayVF~ / ~\ ~'~ t`~ \ ~J r ~ FE6a ~x ~~ `a ~ ~~~ x~ P~ ~ ~~ < / f~ / / 1 j~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ / ~~'1 ~~- ~~. t ~= w`"~ -~~` 1 h `s _--~''~ -~ /~ ~ / /~ 7 _ x ~/. .- ~ h,~ a+6 ~v ~ ~ $~$ ~~a9 N~ t ti \~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,O-i{ ~t r-1 ^t`.) ~ ~ Q W } ~Y Bp 8 Y/S ~X~ ~ Fb'A ~ ~,.a~ A ~ d ~' F Pl C ~ ' g ~ r ~y ~ ~ ~}E~~ s~ ~ ~~ ~yS ' t ~ b ~ ~~ ~pA ~~ 4 S ~ ~~ _ ~.. ~ n~u°-, e ga~~ igra ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ a ~~ ~ crroN CONS'rRU~ r0_._.._ ~..'~ ..._, t~ r.u eox ~ ~, orsor ~~j J j5c i~~~.12sa ~' 1 r.~+~ ~/ ~ ,q~ g~~- x~ .-. ,a,.~w ~-' m.~ 4 ~AZ~+ 1_, CREU+ l~ P~7D KS Rentals l:.LC Once the I~azel Creek Planned Unit Development has been approved, work will begin within two -three weeks. Underground utilities will begin to be installed and streets cut in. All underground and above ground street improvements will take approximately six to twelve weeks to complete. While streets are under construction we intend to cut in and prepare all eight building pads. We intend to follow the instructions of our soils engineer for site preparations. We believe all eight can be prepared for construction in about one week. Once the foundation pads are ready, we will start foundation construction on the lots five, six and seven, these lots can be reached from existing paved area without interfering with street development. These will take about four to five weeks. The next foundations to be built, will be lots four and eight lastly three, two, and one. These last five foundations should take about seven -eight weeks to complete. When we start on the fifth foundation (lot eight) we will begin the framing on lot five. This should coincide, within a week or two of the completion of the street improvements. The framing of each duplex will follow the same as the foundations going to lots six, seven, four, eight, three, two, and one. -57- All utility lines, for each duplex will be in, and all backfill in place before framing begins. After each duplex is painted and all concrete flat work is completed, we will follow with landscaping until each duplex is 100% complete. The first duplex to be completed will be lot five, seven months after project begins. The next duplex (lot six) will be complete one month later. Each successive duplex will be completed at one month intervals. All eight duplexes including landscaping should be completed in about fourteen to sixteen months. The common open space will be developed and landscaped at the time each adjacent lot is landscaped, primarily lots six, seven and eight. -58- o ~~,.w cuw i[.: nG ~Zb4bbb JC;FD3 SUS f-hc: Jackson County i ire District Noa 3 8333 A~a~te Road White City ®R 97503-1075 (541) 526-7100 (voice) (541) 826-~F566 (fax) September 18, 2003 City Planner -Ken Gersch{er T was issued a plan for a project called Haze{ Creek. The gentleman is Victor Kosmatka at 6b4-4596. L advised him to request a pre application meeting. The project plan will need to be re-submitted with some kind of engineered concepts included. He is proposing the development of what he claims wi{{ be duplexes. In reviewing the drawing he gave me `it appears these are 2 and 3 family unit developments. He will need to submit drawings with hydrant locations and street widths, etc. Z thought l would give you a heads up before he comes in to see you. Thanks Mark Moran Deputy Fire Marshal -59-' ~~~ ~. ~° ~~-~~~~~` -~ Cit of Central Point • . ~~~ ~__ ~ ~;,-~ - ~ rw~=~ z Public Works De artment ~ ~ `s C ~`~=1 ~ Robert Pierce r ; .~e ARE ~oN Director Rick Bartlett PZILBIC WORKS STAFF REPORT Supervisor c~:ris claym,l Deputy Director February 26, 2004 Mike Ono TCCIin[C[al1 TO: Planning Commission Greg Graves Tecknicia,: FROM: Public Works De artment p Karel Roeber Secretary 77 SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Site Plan Review for 37 2W 02BC Tax Lots 602. Margar•ita Munoz Sec,•erary I Hazel Creek Planned Unit Development Apnlicant KB Rentals, LLC 3094 Wells Fargo Road Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent Victor Kosmatka Property 37 2W 02BC Tax Lots 602. Description/ Multiple Family R-3 Zonin Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer")regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. -60- 2/26/2004 Hazel Creek Planned Unit Develop»zent Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profrtable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Deparhnent and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Developrrzent Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVS5 or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffrc control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final consrivction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be -61- 2/26/2004 calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in fiill at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Hazel Creek Planned Unit Development- Platts 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Hazel Creek Planned Unit Develop»ent- Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Hazel Creek Planned Unit Development- 6i'ater Connection Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. -62- 2/26/2004 All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and conshuction of water system related components. Hazel Creek Planned Unit Develop»zent-Streets 1. The Developer's engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Corridor might apply to the design and construction of streets in specific areas of the City. These alternate standards are fully described in the Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastzucture. 2. Hazel Creek Planned Unit Development proposes a network of Private Streets which are described in the City of Central Point standards and specifications. The proposed streets are classified as City of Central Point privately owned and maintained streets and include the following design warrants: A. 21-feet of drivable surface Option #l, 18-feet of paving and (2) 1.5-foot rolled curbs Option #2, 20-feet of paving and (2) 6-inch straight curbs B. (2) 2-foot water meter easements * No on-street parking will be allowed. Hazel Creek Planned Unit Development proposes a street connection to the unimproved poz*ion of Hazel Street which begins at North Tenth Street and continues 650-feet in a northeasterly direction. This 650-feet of Hazel Street is classified as a standard local -63- 2/26/2004 sheet and when improved will meet the following standards: A. 52-feet of ROW B. (2) 10-foot travel lanes C. (2) 8-foot parking lanes D. (2) 6-inch curbs E. (2) 5-foot sidewalks 4. As a condition of approval the Public Works Department is recommending that the above-described 650-Foot portion of Hazel Street be brought to current City standards. However, the developer of Hazel Creek Planned Unit Development will be responsible for an amount equal to 650-feet of private street improvements as described in the City's standards and specifications for construction. The City of Central Point will fund the balance necessary to upgrade this section of Hazel Street to a standard local street. 5. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should he consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of street related components. Hazel Creek Planned Unit Development-Storm Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous annexed drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design, The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Hazel Creek Planned Unit Development-Required Submittals Alt design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands -64- 2/26/2004 (DSL), Oregon Department of'Cransportation (ODOT) approval for stone drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ACOE), affected irrigation districts, Bcar Creak Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ALOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. -65- ~ GAT}` .~ ~a y ~ iN1Gd ~ ~ i ~~ r~ ~~ °~~ ~~ .y .. n C+ p O m ~~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 z ~ ~. E s 0 1 ,. Z' WATER FASEMEM 10' P.U.E. 1.5' 18" 3" OF CLASS B" A.O. 6" OF 3/4' -0 CRUSHED ROCK (M1Nj COMPACTED TO 95.5 AiSHTO Tf8O-D 8" Of 4 =0 CRUSHED ROCK WELL f.3' ROLLED CURB 2' WATER EASEMENT LlNQ INDUSTRIAL FABR/CS INC. CTR-200 WOVEN REINFORCING FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO A MlN. OF 95R AASHTO T-99-86(Dj PRl VA TE DRl VE NOT TO SCALE Attachment "I'" RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. A final development plan, containing in final foi7n the information required in the preliminary plan shall be submitted to the City within six months of approval or by September 2, 2004. A six month extension maybe granted by the City upon the applicant's request and for good cause. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations including, but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Fire Code and Structural Specialty Code. 3. The applicant shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the City for approval as part of the final development plan. A suitable landscape plan shall show the types, shapes, and sizes of trees on the site. 4. The applicant shall submit a copy of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R's) and documentation creating a Home Owner's Association and any comparable agreement governing the use, maintenance and continued protection of the PUD as part of the final development plan. \\CPCHSt\CITY WIDE\PLANNING\04002 STAFF REPOR9EFIIA~EL CREEK PUD.DOC