Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 4, 2004CITY C}F CENTRAL Pt7INT PLANNING C4MMISSIC3N AGENDA May 4, 200,,~~4~~,,- 7:0{1 p,ni. L~ Next Planning Coznznission Resolution No. 615 I. MEETING CALLED T4 ORDER 11. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland ,Christopher Brown, Candy Fish, Don Faster, Paul Lunte, Connie Moczygeznba, and Wayne Riggs III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. A'I[NUTES A. Review and approval of April 6, 2fl04, Planning Cozxzission Minutes VI. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS A. A public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for tine purpose of creating 58 pad lots within a Planned Unit Development. The subject parcels are in the R-3, Residential Multiple Family zone and are identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 1{~AB, Tax Lot 65U{l, Map 37 2W lOAD, Tax Lot 1fl00 and Map 37 2W lOAD, Tax Lat $00. The properties are located south of West Pine Street, north of Beall Lane and west of US Highway 99. Page 1-28 VII= MISCELLANEdUS t~ITi. ADJCJURNMENT n~aso4zoo~ City of ~enfral Point Planning ~on~xxission Minutes April fi, 200 I. MEETING CALLED T4 ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairman Chuck. Piland, Christopher Brown, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Cozanie Moczygemba, and Wayne Riggs were present. Paul Lunte was absent. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; David Alvord, Community Plaruaer; K.en Gerschler, Community Planner; Chris Clayton, Deputy Public Works Director; and Zisa Morgan, Planning Secretary. III. CCJRRESP4NDENCE There was correspondence distributed at the meeting received up to the close of the business day regarding Business Item `A'. There wcre also elevations distributed regarding Item `B' and a letter of concern from an adjoining property owner. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Brown made a motion to approve the minutes from March 30, 2003, vcrith corrections, relating to the recommended conditions of approval for the Pear Blossom Center (SVaI-Mart Super Center), and Cor~~n~issioner Moczygemba wanted the record to reflect that she had not abstained from all motions made. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. RQLL CALL: Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Moczygemba, ycs; and Riggs, yes, Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VL BUSINESS A. Final review of Planning Commission's decision of March 30, 2004 tentatively approving a Site Plan application under Planning Commission Resolution GIO for the proposed Retail Pear Blossom Plaza (V4'al~Mart Super Center}. The subject parcel is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 3'T 2W 02D, TaxLot l00 in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district and is located at the north`vest corner of East Fine Street and Hamrick Road. The corrections made to the Planning Department's recommended conditions of approval from March 30, 2004, occurred during the approval of the minutes. The commissioners were then asked to make a motion reaffirming the two motions made on March 30, 2004. Those motions were 1 To determine that the Wal-Mart super center is a community shopping center and therefore a `permitted use' in the C-4 zoning district and 2 to determine that the uses being proposed with the Wal-Mart site plan, not specifically listed in the C-4 zoning district meet findings of `similarity' and compatibility' as outlined in CPMC 17.60.140. The Commission also determined that the Wal-Mart application does not exhibit potentially adverse or hazardous characteristics not normally found in uses ofsimilar type and size and therefore they determined that it is a permitted use and not a conditional use. Commissioner Fish made a motion to reaffirm the two motions as listed above on March 30, 2004. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. Tom Plumphrey, Community Development Director, asked the commissioners to reaffirm their decision to pass Resolution No, 610, approving the site plan from the meeting on March 30, 2004. The corrected Planning Department conditions) were already discussed through the approval of the March 30, 2004 minutes, and are listed as follows: 1. Approved as presented with no amendments or corrections. 2. Approved as presented with no amendments or corrections. 3. Approved as presented with no amendments or corrections. 4. Approved as presented with no amendments or corrections. 5. It was determined that this condition was not to be removed in it's entirety, by the Planning Commission. The only segment of this condition that was removed concerned the re-vegetation of the Bear Creek flood plain that was destroyed by fire. The landscape plan shall specify mature trees with 1 ,12,t - 2" minimum caliper trunks. Lelandi cypress trees shall be planted along the Hamrick Road frontage. Magnolia trees shall be planted along East Pine Street. 6. Approved as presented with an amendment that the applicant shall submit light design standard plans using decorative lighting similar to that used in the Transit Oriented Development, 7. The commission had some language modifications as follows: the applicant shall be responsible to implement and/or bond for their fair share of transportation itnpravements that are being recommended or may be recommended in the future in the East Pine Street Corridor Plan, including, but not limited to: 1). Participating in the construction of a new traffic signal at Beebe and 1-lamrick Roads.. 8. Approved as presented with no amendments or correctioa~s. 9. Removed by commissioners. This condition related to limiting parking on site to the minianum number of spaces required by CPMC 17.64.020, in order to create stone detention. 10. Removed by commissioners. Applicant already submitted revised elevations presented at the March 30, 2004 meeting, and the re-orientation of the building was not judged to be necessary. 1.1. Approved with recommended striking of"unless special accommodations are made to designate and manage that parking so as not to create unsafe or unsightly conditions". The applicant has already stated for the record that they will not allow any overnight R.~. parking. The applicant is solely responsible for the enforcement of this condition. 12. Approved as originally recommended in the March 30, 2{104 Conditions of Approval. The portion of the condition, stating that the applicant sha11 submit plans to the City for approval prior to construction of the wall and before building permits are issued for new buildings should not have been removed. The following was added: the block wall should resemble the wa11 built in Pheasant Creek Estates. The materials and design will be the same as the materials used at Pheasant Creek Estates, using colors that wi11 be complimentary to the colors used in the Wal-Mart Super Center building, 13, Has been and remains removed by the commissioners. 14. Approved as presented with no amendments or corrections, Commissioner Brown made a motion reaffirming Resolution No. 610, conditionally approving a site plan far the development of a Wal-Mart super center, with the recommended, corrected, andlor modified conditions of approval. Conunissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. There were questions about the JRH analysis, and ifit is completed or not. Mr. Humphrey, stated that we have received the preliminary analysis that was distributed at the last meeting. ©nce this has been incorporated into the Transportation System Plan, the SDC fees collected can be used, and eminent domain can be exercised for recommended improvements. There were questions regarding the time frame involved, should this application go to LLTBA. Mr. Plumphrey, stated that it could take up to 3 months for LUBA to review and make a decision. PacLand will not be able to start any development until a decision is reached by LCJBA. Mr. Humphrey, asked for a resolution approving the minor land partition required for this application. Commissioner Fish made a motion adopting Resolution No. 61.1., granting approval far a Minor Land partition for the subject parcel identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 3'7 2W 02D, Tax Lot 1.00. Commissioner Brawn seconded the motion. Rt~LL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. Chairman Piland called a 5 minute break. Meeting was called back to order at 8:32 P.M. B. Public hearing to review an application for a Funned Unit Development that could allow the construction of 4 duplexes, and 4 multiplexes in the R-3, Residential Multiple Family zone. The subject parcels are identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 11BD, Tax Lots 1.1.400 & 1.1.600 and are located east of Freeman Road and north of Hopkins Road. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the planning staff report. Mr. Gerschler, stated that there is a small pause with a garage that has already been moved. He explained that the little portion of land. located south of the subject property, was sold to the City for a water vault. Mr. Gerschler explained the background of road widening and sidewalk improvements for this area. Frontage improvement along Freeman Road were postponed due to an elderly resident in the area. He also gave a briefhistory ofdevelopment in the surrounding areas, which is also zoned R-3, but was not developed to it's highest density. Mr. Gerschier said that an application to develop apartments could have been submitted, and if it met the requirements could have been approved. Ryan Csaftis intends to build smaller multi-family dwellings, with this application, which should sell easier. Mr. Gerschler went over the criteria for a Planned Unit Development, and stated that the application meets the criteria. Concerns discussed with surrounding neighbors, were the height of the development. After Mr, Gerschler spoke with the applicant, they do intend to build two-story buildings. The Fire Marshal said that the road within the development had to be at least 20' wide, with a 25' radius. The applicants modified their plans to meet this requirement, and opted to build only duplexes, rather than multiplexes. There were concerns about the appearance and staff advocated a "boxy" look. Mr. Gerschler referred to revised. architectural illustrations submitted by the applicant. Staff found these to be nice looking and complimentary to the existing neighborhood. Lots 8, 9, and 10 adjoining Freeman and Hopkins Road should re-anent the units to face the intersection with off street parking in the rear. There was na illustration provided showing the garages. Public Works is requesting safe ingresslegress lanes for this development. Chris Clayton, Deputy Public Works Director, stated that Public Works has completed the preliminary improvement design from Hopkins Road, north along Freeman Road. Freeman Road has an arterial classification with a bU' right of way. The design has been modified to match the existing sidewalk. The applicant can either construct these improvements with their development or pay the City and the improvements can be made by the City at the same time the City does their improvements. The puns submitted by the applicant measured the right ofway 40' from center line, and only 30` from the center line is required. Staff recommends shining cots 8, ~, and 10 a few feet towards Freeman Road, and placing a tot lot in an area that would not disturb residents from the Meadows. This development must be built to FEMA standards. It was also recommended that the applicants be sensitive to neighbors by placing windows on the 2na story, so as not to compromise their privacy. Staff recommends an internal pedestrian sidewalk Cael Neathamer, agent for the applicant addressed the previous items discussed. Mr. Neathamer wanted clarification on the tot lot, regarding the size and fencing. The applicant's are fine with re- orienting the units on lots 8, 9, and 1(}. Mr. Neathamer doesn't think it is necessary to adjust the 10' setbacks, but rather adjust it by moving the property lines 5' into the common area. There are mature trees on lots 2, 3, 4 and S which will help maintain privacy for the residents of the Meadows. Qn lots 1, 6 and 7, the applicants agreed to limiting the windows on the 2'~~ story. Mr. Neatharner's clients agreed to a fence and hedge along the northern property boundary. The applicants wanted to have as little impervious surface as possible within the development, which is why they didn°t incorporate an internal sidewalk for this development. Chris Clayton, Deputy Public Works Director, added that Public Works does not have any standards for an internal sidewalk, however it would have to be ADA accessible. Commissioner Riggs made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 512, conditionally approving a preliminary development plan and Tentative Plan for Ryan Csaftis. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Fish made a motion to continue the meeting past 10:00 P.M. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. R{~LL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. C, Public hearing to review a Site Plan application for the purpose of developing a two story office building. The subject parcels are in the lYI-2, Industrial General district and are identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 1C, Tax Lot 3600. The property is located south of East Pine Street, west of Hamrick Read and east of Interstate 5. David Alvard, Carnmunity Planner, presented the planning staffreport and read through the Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law. Gary Caperna, representing LTM, stated that they are not opposed to any of the conditions. 1Vir. Caperna added that mast afthe alder existing structures will be destroyed. The newer existing structures will be re-oriented, bringing the new two story office building up towards the front of the property. The buildings will serve as LTM's corporate headquarters. Chairman Piland closed the public portion of the meeting. Commission Foster made a motion to adopt Resolution 613 granting approval to develop a two story office building located south of East Pine Street, west of Hamrick Road and east of Interstate 5. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. RtJLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. D, Public meeting to review a Final Development Plan known as Dawn Hope Estates, The subject property is located in an R~-1-6, Residential Single Family Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat as 3'7 2W 03Ad, Tax Lot 9300, and is located east of N, 10~~' Street, south of Crest Drive and north of Terra Linda Drive. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner presented the staff report. Mr. Gerschler, recommends final approval, with the City to work with the applicant regarding the landscape plan. There were questions about the number of stories and hydrants. Michael Lisk, applicant addressed the canunissian. Mr. Lisk explained that he was probably going to build two stories at 101.3 and 1025 {located in the front of the development}, and in the back at least one two story, maybe even all two stories. Mr. Lisk stated that he was aware that he had to come up with a more detailed landscape plan, and that he certainly wants the development to look as nice as possible. Chairman Piland closed the public portion of the meeting. Commission Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 614 granting final plat approval for Dawn Hope Estates, A Planned Unit I7-evelopment. Applicant must work with staff on final landscape plan. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. RC3LL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. VII. MISCELLANEOUS There were discussions regarding items coming before the i'lanning Commission at the meeting in May. VIII. ' ADJCI-URNMENT Commissioner Fish made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. RQLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting vas adjourned at 10:32 P.M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFr REPORT HE[NG DATE: May 4, 2004 TfJ: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Community Development Director SUB.IECT: Public Hearing - To consider a preliminary development plan and a tentative subdivision for the 58 lot L?aisy Creek village PtTU. The properties are located south of West Pine Street between Glenn Way and Plaskell Street. AppIicanf: Owner ~_ Property Descri tiojn/ Zoning: Summary. Eric Axtnar Construction, Inc. P.C~. Box 609 Jacksonville, Oregon 97530 Investors Il, LLC 1758 Siskiyou Blvd. Ashland, {~regon 97520 Carl E. Neathamer dba: Neathamer Surveying, Inc. P.tJ. Box 1584 Medford, Oregon 97501 37 2W10AB Tax Lot 65{}0; 37 2W 10AD, Tax Lots 800 & 1000 - 3.83 acres total R-3, Multiple Family Residential & T4D-MMR The applicant has submitted a preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision consisting of 58 lots to facilitate single-family townhouses. Daisy Creek Village is a planned community that proposes private streets with primary access from Haskell and Ash Streets and secondary or emergency {gated) access from Glenn Way through an existing development. Common open space, parking and a tot lot are also proposed. The plan also allows for future expansion pending the possible acquisition of adj acent property. {refer to Attachment A} Aufhority• CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for tentative subdivision and a preliminary development plan for a PUD. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Attachment B). A~atalicable Law: CPMC 1.6.1(}.410 et seq CPMC 1'7.28.01.0 et seq CPMC 17.65.01.0 et seq CPMC 17.68.01{} et seq Sackgrouz~d; Tentative Plans -- R-3, Multiple Family Residential - T4D Districts and Corridors -Planned Unit Development {PUD} The applicant initially submitted plans to develop two `land-locked' parcels just east ofDaisy Creek and south of an existing apartment complex. The combined geometry of Glenn ~Vay and the creek made it too difficult to access the Artner property from the west so allowances were made during the tentative approval of Snowy Butte Station {see Attachment C} to take access from Haskell Street. Mr. Artner has since entered. into an agreement with the Snowy Butte developers to acquire more property and has expanded his master plan {PtJD} to include the original two parcels and a third tax lot which fronts 1-Iaskell and Asiz Streets. Although the zoning differs on two of the three parcels, both zones allow similar residential densities and the PUD provisions will facilitate compatible master planning. Discussion The housing design of two, three and four unit "attached" single family homes, private streets, interior side walks, common areas and parks and open space is becoming more common among developments in the City. The applicant is prepared to discuss the demand for this type of housing at the Planning Commission meeting and. has been asked to provide an economic analysis at that time, Infrastructure improvements in the area include a water line that is stubbed-out on Tax Lot 6540; a water line that runs adjacent to both Tax Lots 65{}(3 & 1040; a fire hydrant on Tax Lot 5540; and a storm pipe that bisects both Tax Lots 6500 & 1040, with an outfall on Tax Lot 100. According to Rogue Valley Sewer Services {RVS}, sewer service to the project area will be difficult to obtain but can be extended to the site from an 8 inch main line on I-Iaskell Street or the 8 inch main line on Glenn Way. Ali design and construction ofthe sewer extension must be done in accordance with RVS standards {Attachment E}. The Building Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the City's storm drain, street lighting and geo-technical standards along with compliance with applicable sections of the Unifoxzz-~ Building Code; particularly those requirements of tl~e UBC that are based on IRC and interpretive ruling #40-14 for `row house construction'. Building Department staff has summarized department requirements in the staff report included as Attachment E. Daisy Creek Village will need to form a Home {}wners Association to manage private streets, parks and common areas. This is one of t~vo options permitted under the City's municipal code {Section 17.68.114.8} and, since the City will not assume the streets and open spaces, this is the option of chaise. ~~ E The Association will need to be formed dose to the time the City considers a Final Development Plan. A copy of this agreement must be submitted to the City of Central Point prior to Final Plat approval. The Public Works Department has submitted a staff report with specific requirements concerning the development in Attachment F. The Planning Department recommended conditions of approval are enclosed at Attachment "G°' Planned Unit Develo ment A planned unit development (PUD} may be permitted in an R-3 and TC}D-N1MR zoning districts subject to the approval of a preliminary development Plan. If the preliminary development plan is approved, an application for frnai development plan must be submitted within six months of such approval. CPMC 1'7.68.010 states that the purpose of planned unit development {PUD} is to gain more effective use of open space, realize the advantages of large-scale site planning and the mixing of building types or land uses, improved aesthetics and environmental preservation, This is achieved by allowing a variety of building and structures, types of open space, variable building heights and setbacks, and shared services and facilities. The proposed PUD is a single family residential development. It consists of fifty eight {58} lots ranging in size from 1,324 to 2,661 square feet. Each lot will be constructed with a single family attached residence. Each dwelling will provide adequate parking. There will be limited but sufficient on-street parking within the development. Strict Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions ACC&R's} will be written and enforced for the development by a Home fJwner's Association who will maintain common areas, private streets and the park. The Public Works Department has reviewed the preliminary development plan for compliance with the City's water, storm drain and transportation standards, The Public Works staff report is attached as Attachment F. Findings of Fact & Conclusiozrs of Law Size of P~.1Z7 site A PUD shall be on a tract of land five acres or larger, except that a PUD may be on a tract of land more than ane acre but less than five acres if the planning commission f nds, upon a showing by the applicant, that a PUD is in the public interest because one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The property is adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of a planned unit development of similar design as that proposed and the developments would complement each other with significant adverse impact on surrounding areas. ^ The site is adjacent to the Snowy Butte Station planned commrrnity which is also shares similar zoning and includes attached single family, owrrer occrrpied homes on smaller tax lots. ~~ B. The property or its neigl~borizood has historical character or tlistinctivc features that are important to the community and that could be protected or enhanced through use of a PCTD; ^ The applicants are constructing residential homes within an existing residential neighborhood. The homes will be similar in design and architecture to the surrounding homes. The PUD will allow for single family dwellings to be constructed that would help to preserve the neighborhood character, C. The property is adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of a planned unit development of similar design as that proposed and developments would complement each other without significant adverse impact on surrounding areas; ^ The project is adjacent to the Snowy Butte Station planned community and will have similar lot size, house size, and architecture. The residential densities are comparable with others in the immediate area. D. The property is of irregular shape, with limited access, or has unusual dimensions or characteristics which would make conventional development unreasonably difficult and expensive ^ The lots are part of an unusual configuration and an in-fill redevelopment area. The lots are located between a business collector street and Daisy Creek including two parcels that were previously `land-locked'. Criteria tc~ Grant czr L>efzy a PUI.~ n approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards froze section 17.68.040: A. That the development of a hazonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions to the normal requirements of this title; ^ The applicant's preliminary development plan proposes 58 single family townhouse dwellings at densities that are consistent with both the R 3 and T4D-MMR zoning districts in which the property is located. The housing types will be consistent with the zoning district and developments to the north and south but will differ slightly from the single family dwellings to the west. B. The proposal will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the City; ^ This proposal is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Housing Goals to the degree it ensures adequate housing r~vill be provided; contributes to the variety of housing offered and promotes higher density zoning. The project promotes alternative housing designs that will potentially minimize the need to e~;pand the urban growth boundary by encouraging a higher density project near the downtown, J w ..- Zoning code objectives can be met if recommended planning and public works conditions are satisfied. C. The location, sire, design and operating characteristics of the PI.JD will have minimal adverse impact on the livability, value or appropriate development of the surrounding area; ^ The preliminary development plan is consistent with the zoning in the surrounding area. The proponents have stated that the development will provide a quality living experience for Central Point residents that are presently underserved, D. That the proponents of the PUD have demonstrated that they are financially able to carry out the proposed project, that they intend to start construction within six months of the final approval of the project and any necessary district changes, and intend to complete said construction with a reasonable time as determined by the Commission; ^ The applicants have a successful history of building homes in the valley and intend to start construction as soon as possible. E. That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development or will be obviated by demonstrable provisions in the plan for proper entrances, exits, infiemal trafhc circulation and parking; ^ Alt of the units will eventually access onto Haskell Street, a collector, or onto Ash Street, a local street. Both streets can accommodate the proposed increase in vehicle trips particularly with planned irnprovetnents. Frivate streets {ranging in width from 20 to 3U feet} will allow for limited parking, internal walk ways and the safe maneuvering of emergency vehicles on site. F, The commercial development in a PU.D is needed at the proposed location to provide adequate commercial facilities of the type proposed; ^ There is no commercial development proposed within this development. C. That proposed industrial development will be efficient and well-organized with adequate provisions for railroad and truck access and necessary storage; ^ There is no industrial development proposed within this development. K. The PZ.TD preserves natural features such as streams and shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain, if these are present; ^ The preliminary development plan depicts some open space and landscaped areas along Daisy Creek. There are also a limited number of parking stalls being proposed along the creek which are needed to serve the new homes in the immediate vicinity and cannot be avoided. The applicant has exgressed a willingness to implement new storm drainage runoff techniques in order to preserve water quality in Daisy Creek. €~- ~x 1. The PUD will be compatible with the surrounding area; ^ Daisy Creek Village will be compatible with the surrounding area to the degree it is innovative, oriented toward an owner_occupied market and provides a duality living experience. The development is similar in design, architecture, and lot size to t3eebe Woods Village on the east side of town. J. The PUD will reduce need for public facilities and services relative to other permitted uses for the land; ^ The development will result iu a more efficient use of public services and wilt eventually encourage the use of walking paths anal other alternative forms of transportation. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission may take one of the following actions in regard to the preliminary development plan for Daisy Creek Village. 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision for the Daisy Creek Village PUD, based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record and subject to the recommended coz~zdztions of approval as set fort in the staff reports; or 2. Recommend denial of the preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision for the Daisy Creek Village PLTD based on findings of fact articulated by the Commission.; or 3. Continue the review of the preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Tentative Flat and PUD Plan and Elevations B. Notice of Public bearing C. Snowy Butte Station Zoning and Tentative Plan L>. 1=}aisy Creek Village Schedule, Phasing and .Fencing Plan E. Correspondence F. Public Works Staff Report G. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval Daisy Cree( 1~iClage tentative Plan, P'UD Plan, Elevations & ~loorplans .~ttacfiment :~' x cm~as ~ ~ ?~ '~ y}r~./'/J T'ENTATI'VE !'I.rtT ~IlYD PZt.O Pi:.4.h' t''C7R: ~~ ~ ,. ~ ' o'o~ sr ne tpGS ~ as xw tpu, G TwR lOT aloe t..X lot Txt,p { { ''` `` b `~- fr DAISY ~;RIaEI~ ~ILIfAGI: \} ~ ~ R'1°o1 dr'' w.m attt^nttS kt. w:tcd x svn f ~.:^~.`,;; , „u ~~ `°i ~ }'i' 37 xw <0.n ` ~'1 // , ` A .~'LA.IVNESI CC7MMLIJVITY t i'., `'~, , i ' iA. ~ ~ ~ Tnx c0r 1700 i ~,h ; r;; ~:. 1 '1 ~ ~iM* `~ c',. arnrtt«'c;xw m, nc :: ;`' ~ ,.;; t.aolnd hr:hn tot 'A' or n,e cookoay.cderlren to evnlror Foh:, ~{ ~. ` - ~ \ t r •" ~ r r r ~ .i ! p P,Nt rufx of rCCa'd, k>~kr3 txotcd n.thh lSaaa:kn Lrnd GtaFn ' ~ ~ ".. \ ~'~ „+'' ,.+° 31 3N' taM r y_ ~ // Ji?. 59 n ttr5 tJta^lhatrx! Qm-nNaYCr of xclkn lab 7<wtY~pr "'111 f/y,% ,'+ `b ^ ru t0: 7)W ,..1 ,, 44 ~ 97 "e+.vth u0~c ] iSC>t of th. h5t?~1tG 1^trrieL'erx A nc~ Gi:y ~ ~' ~,~ ~'`: \~ .nG' .j 4r, `' F^'"` ; „3 r -,. , .: s' or ~e»:ror tson:~ .>aec.7a~s cac.,ly. cxoga. V `~;. VV ,~ ... r t\\` ~1Z-~4~' ~` {~'`!~~`2 'pvF ~r y ~ r.z iot yas~ao r .r~..'rr;'si', ,~.,, ~ ,~~1 t\\,. ~~i. ~.,~,f~.~~'.,~ Z`~~; 9~'G„~ ,p c'•„i~. ~ y~. x~r Rx .:rrac.r.,> .;,.~"``~',',., X~s,',;~.i ..~....,,... Y'~``~.,~ ' Y ~'~t\\ E'RtGA!?7NERCONSTR(7C170N.INC `~/ ¢J~~ ~.':,~ f a+7 '1 ~ riJ~.^''d ^~1' ~.f.-lei': \ P.O. BCiX eSl7V ' ~,,~ ~ a~ `b. '" rr ; ~ ,,,r : '\` G~4, . ~R ~ ~~ JocfaorTVAJa. C3R. ,~'' ~ yr "~ ux ar arao ~ ! `Y;% ..~ ~'r T,3x1z iot taz~au /' ~., ' C{ ti, \\ 97u3U~U.Yh t y~ t „~ ~. ,r' rvw<rc.w,m t t t / /f ~ ~ ~ t JC ~ r `:~ y ~, `S~~ it ,F $ ~. f ' ~ N 1 t r ~J I ~ ~ ~~ ~ t 7 1 °~ ~rr `b. t t. t. t , a - / f AX lCT TDOp t'" ,•, i~ tt ~ tt 1 t t ~~( of ~ .......,. 3T 2W lOAA ,.n ,.,„ . ~. ~, ~ t •, ~ t ~ T+S Lpi 7ioo t 1`Q t '` 1 rax ~n 0.~ x,.>~ >~y^ri «`~`~ ~w.e ~`~ ,;/+ "'( 'a tit tt \` ........~::~f ~~ ~ ° tr.%MCU+:rywM~ir , +9ttyer ~a ~~C \~~ r„r'`f ^t`Z-~2 `4At .Y,- ~~d ~ 1":7 '~'~ ~ ,~~a `"a{ ;, 1 l 1\ ar a a E., '1 ,~r ~~ df, \ py { 8 , f '.` ,.... ~ Y d ~ \ ?1t7TE3: f l +f ... ly* • t 4` /GZ &~+. t ~, R'*ww'tlxwm.,ga3 auvr. l'' `. ,~? pt % '~.~~` 4 T4 \ / ~`';, ~`b. ~ r~uKt«ai aar r U.ro. as z'tsern,r xunar t`svy cwrn t t 1 ~ .Tt' pc r ~ r~ ' x.Y.' ro, ' \ \ r.+ w+,Kmx ~~ ., ~ F ~; Kati ~~.~ ~~~" ~~ ps~~'A t~ ~t9- t~\\ .rf s~~x~.a yra<a.~,..A m,«~y ~w,ry. Tt a,MV«.t~ry: tgC39t40200 ,.4 ,9~ ~ J ryJ° ,yp w r3. r~ 1~ u ~H~WNrvb ei~arG Sa ~+Na^7eQt4rvw s' ~, rU °x i.F:GBMt) :xnu [Rtn4 Y'i.. ~ , 4`fr \, ~SS'~~ 'S " ~ `4.w ~ res49 .Y a++.env NwseA laf +4 aw.y+sa. Yt4Ty yYt"renw w ...z«no .«..a a.... t'rt\ ~. ~ ` S ptj a sR.F+ r '~~ ; ~.r 4t~a iy' °r'o«r°°tecrnt°'<«a...n«i-<.'«wU .. rw,«., a,..t.«3m„«.x. V`r \\ ~- ,' ~~ '- 1,~f• ~" "~,/' r.. ~' a,i +` `£'' a<~*a.,~kor~a.,.-....a«~.,.x w~,y.«.»x.,,~., .h t - ,~ 8 ''~•{a,~ .~ 'P `g, rw ar<. a n. mua.ea.~a, :..,,ey-. taeat..axxy .o-.,ay w.wew.a+aR ~h ` , y(Jty.J ,ya'~ ~,t Y. F t~r\ '~ +f5 ~ ~> ~;y q~mM tr•+.A+'a}Y.~~ra ra.ea. wx as c5~p. m+[Ndm+r ++.roe^ nk«..xx..y...w .wsry.w.x m. 44~`..} } .~^""'~ a l~ S ar+ "F' G «m~a orwu~mvs~ en ,"~atka Weum ar ,txumcway w.<«r, a,«,rro+~*m «.......r.,M.. Y `\ ,\ ~ s ~.ay'~~''F 4x~~ ~ .( .`!~ xZ, 'fir q .ftb er,~<a, ^' oa..oryau.. pas,. *.a~aug ~w .. ..P=<.,~r.~.y..y,d.. M...,..+,„. ~~tT ~~ \ \ .yyy '~ ~a" .. f ! ~~ ,~{ Ltltpa 4"'~~ tit ryw..y.r,r«w:...<,.W~t.a rw.m..:<a awta+...+,r~.w. 3T ?w ]OAC •r•.. J(Y ~t~i r`..lu ~ r 19~ y,r~ ~ ~~ ~apnw~Ad„^~rrott ~~,gGMi"nCa.R~p >w w~i,~~Mt~w.~8h4Gk90~1. a ~.«., «.,.u«arn„. w» «.. xn ~.w,+. .I.C vx cot soa ~ Y ,~ °d ~ 3 t , t :. ',~~f y 'C ~ , t !~ x«m "~» d'°eoh.u«r, ar ~ .r io<r~ 7 ra., a w «n>w ws«a -:.., .a,««axuy.,o-w~ww,r7 vx ,,.. t~ rvrs' ` ~ ~ j + "' ` t ,~- ~a ~ EM1i"{ids.. ~, -r ~~i'S w.tn:'cnyw c.~wo°r`ei r~,+.`rw~%`~ o.~v~«.: r*a.+,~+„+ ....,.» wsr.,Q .x,.y ua+«~~.,.aw,xa. .. ~ ~fi R. ~~ ,4ti cj'S~ Ew.`,xr`~sr`.t~°°~`~c~..~~k~,.~u~~a,'w"°uw ~a«~t°,w.yF.ww'a ~v .--.-'"" C-'t ~V .r r*` ~ t ate.<,c<~wvrarwoa w~^ws. os,*~,,.,,:~n .......w.. „«..a,..,rk,w -....--' " 1. ~', ~.., ypt ~ ~t+' PL~ ~~ rw .^'a *_,y^<t too, o t( w u acct a a, ua at+ean eaw*` n rrra acm ... w....++^7.aw..x.,. ,,..--""~ SI ~..a:. .: ~.,:`p!d ,s°'!rr ~CQ. ~3 ~avt~'`aaxu-,Xa'wmaia a<~«~«,.~.w« a c"'gr. ,~ e. ~..~.0.~ak ,.rK. Y" ~~ .2tk _'}n?t La .~.~~ ~ e y'~~ ra v..caaw.a.a:+.w+ a. c ., a,.,>x,~.., ar,~,t. ..... ., 111 s i ,~'Y Q, t".~ y .,rs .....x., rw, r~ 3> u ~s.c 5y C)€. a.w.« ~., ~«~ r.x cox as st '`,~y y~ ,~ ~' unsis or sza>zvtt~-: brro a«ueoe ' ..~~IXN ,d.,....~er,.s Mii.., a~ ~S}La. ~ '~; ~ ~f N,w~~~:~~ e Mia*+.rt Wn..U .a,....y, t . t, 'i >~j; :1.~"~~ ~r `r%<«.k:,.or b':.':r~ :v~"".°vu,. ue..va.+.am ~ec,w.ara~++»wmf„c^: xwy xe.ean. l~ .~~""'., ,. 1 .:u~. ~~ nw+a:~ .i~i~i.H~Meu.+,-n+.v+h+an->. s7 3w SNO ~"b. RLT}rtiC.T~,p ...~--"'~ t, ~., va car tao ~.,~,., Ftt(lFCSSrowL YCtf:PAttEEJ HY: Nrxthamer Sun~Yink, 7»e. 0a~ `" rn ar,. a.M ..x..«°u `..~x.N~. L~- E, .t+c<rrr[x tr. +1~, tAND 54tt'2"tOR J00 ,East Main 5t,. Surtc N +o, ~ .w.r.o.«:Hw'`~", e,x, sx E~'t 3T zw taaa .. „1, J P.Q. Box lu'Gd ~, e r~ ec~s0a °% -. ~ ~ , ~ M ~dforJ. Orcgou 8750! M~ t i'"w`~1 © ~y ~`~, ~`+}^. /~ ~~ Yl one (SdtJ 732-29G0 rrww«m.~wc~xo. l ``v .~~~J f't~i../~V~~ ~3Vf'1~~ xcr au. mos PAX l5d!) ~4%-J3&: ~' ~}Xy; PRpt£t7 hUYUSR: OiPB~ pAT6: I.nurry 50, .'aAd h*...n r ..v+ar"'S`ro.wa+wEax ta.ia erx. ww rv4cr: ear aoe. w..«ywx<n.vy.t.vcm..r~exw..txv ~v+uxa,w.~-n+sa,avm ny,rw,xw+nrya-a-a .ai+.sv+Gw'a eTl3uan Us'DA1F:tF: Mnl r.. ~^Lwa Sw:attoF2 Qet. r~rrzArrv~ ~r~r rt,vn ~~rn nr.~r~ ~nr~.• ~AI~Y CI~T~;K VILLIa.G~ A I'L~Nf~^'I'D CC7Mh1~.J~VX7'k' LaLO:cv.•+t+:~ tat !+' Fd 71>3 Gapnacy nsSS.^.H.1gt la GRrrrct AOnt, Q jJ13: rKU+ of rcaexd lxru~ loca;cd wrttJes Der~a'+a^+ Gar! Gtp:Y+ tb, 53. h the Na^lhea.t c~,c-qus-tcr aF 5eetkar id, H Tarcxr..hn HY :wwtJt y ;N ~ +'1fz1 of ttn rxtid.~nitq Nq~tytpy t~ ilr> rrgV ~ r -u~ ^a.X, .x:uk.cr+ <:acrd~ G'cr~,an, Emc aerneu cr~rr~mucnort. ~HC. P.C7. 8cxy 6U9 Jac3sonvAl©, C?R 47::3p~ik5(7p ~~~' ~~ 1, +A5 A \ \~,i ! ,~ ~~ F 57 3*' iCAC ~ \ tnx cat sa3 m ~:~v'ne+exa x 1 ~- - ry `\\ l . .. ~ ` 1} ZyI 1A~ }1 t t1 1 SN(~Ot Rpi ' ~ t I' ~ ~^ '~- r ~- . 37 YH t0+.t YAK tOT 5a~ j ~. t € .~~~ :€~ t, € 1~ € s~ I 1 G . a . .+'... 1 rR c. ~ ~~,+.'~~.. ~~ ....~ :~sc;: ~~ ~ '\ J" \ 'f2~~ _ i ` \\~ 4 '~ ~l \ ~ \ 't \ \ ,.+ \ \ \ \ ~`ti \ \ \ \ ''~ l J,+ •\ \ \\ y/' f , a\\ ~\ \ •~ 1 ~" ~ lw, • ~l \ l \\ / px 5Y x~ wAO ...~.~.. ~ c YA%ldi~taa ~~(•4y .V[I. ~ a ~ ~;.~ ' 1. •^ " ~ ~"..~} } '+~~' cy ~~ ; ~ ~ ~ !" y ~. x..., t'^yn....r.+a a ,>*a+rxa ro.r«e-.,cw. +,u,. .ueon.w+uny ~.~ .. _-- .. I 3 l'. i 1 /~ r,~ ' , .{f`~.PO~{ J P'~S - / r +wCShxY s u ,r' / .~ ~~ ,-' ~,. r" ~, a ` J~ F3n81S AI' ::tl itVF~1'~ +a"'w.+.r°f t: w`..~,~.x"`.v"+ia,.., x ewta s... mc« a aau,~nlYF i+}e<wYrv.in<..rcamuu<u4 Wawa t~CN~~F.i.Ur.-n YVx/.Y<xarw Jwa .4 ~A~~ .. ~,, ~` ,,•,, \ '.: \ \\ 41 4 v,1~ \ \ ' \ \ \1 \ ~ \1\ 4 \; ': ~ :` `^ `', .1'< '`~ X441°k ~. 1 \ ~\., ' •\M1y 1 \ 144 y~~ ~ ``k' \ ` ,4~ `_ I ~ ~ ' _ .,.. f4t. _~ ;.._ REDUCED SGAL.~ 2~~J~ ~~ PREPARED HZ': NeoUenx»er Samr}'fnx, Inc. 7-0Q Sest Mafn SY., Sailc N P.O. IIox 7560 Mrdlord. Or+:~an 87SOT `----Y^~ Phonc f5f1) 7a2-St3G8 A.tr aA mt PA,Y (,,41j 73»-13!12 CA'1 Lpy~y{~yk~ Pk07ECt NU>I-ER: aJWt I)nTS: Annul Sa, 2tltlf 1 ~s.+FUb [Y/k%'J4 W'UtTf.U. AN+J 1L, :DOS :++ccl 2IN 2 (~ u.n t .p: ~i~il 7 N, f~..~ ~. E, ~~ ~~~~~~ yf i t i f i i 3 t f i t I f .,~ ~, Daisy Creek ~VilCage Notice of Public 3-fearing .attachment `B' City of Central Pozn t .P~LANNIN~ .D~'PA.I~T~IL'NT ~~~-~ H,~r~.pnrEy, ~lc~ Planning Director Ken Gerschler ~arz-~munity Planner David Alvord Cornzraunity Planner Dave Arlsens GIS Technician Lisa Morgan Planning Secretary ~otxce of Pubic ~1~eeting Date of Notice: Apri114, 2444 Meeting Date. Time: Place: NATURE C3F MEETING May ~, 2004 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, CJregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating 58 pad lots within a Planned. Unit Development. The subject parcels are in the R-3, Residential Multiple Family zone and are identified in the records of the Jackson. County Assessor as Map 37 2W 14AB, Tax Lot 6500; Map 37 2VtT 14AD, Tax Lot 1004 and Map 37 2W 10AD, Tax Lot 804. The properties are located south of West Pine Street, north of Beall Lane and west of US Highway 99. The Central Point Planning Commission will review the Tentative Plan application to determine if all of the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. If the Commission determines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued. Pursuant to ~JRS 197.763 ~3} (e}, failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, or failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue, NOTICE To MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 2I5 REQI.iIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE TI~HS NOTICE IT MUST BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED To TILE PL7RCIiASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. -~ r~a ~- _ ~., k ;~_ii Subiect Pry Su Daisy CreekVillage DeveCopment & Zoning .lttacf ment `C "~, ~ ~, 'y44 r' l r w '- ,,y ~ "~ :~-'' > t' _.•° ~~~e~.. ~, r`a^%r ~~r ., ..~ i E f~~ _- ~"iN1U~=+° _ ..~... _,~.~_, ....- .__._,-_.-_r.._a-~_ ~~ ~ ~9n ~~°~ o .~C1~ ~ ~~~ ...__ ._.._,.....,..,.. ._~,.... _.._ _ . _ ., .,., ., ..n._.. .....d-_ .. _ ._. ~, w* `~ ~ y, <~ r' 1 ~,Y',.,~` T r r ~ /" j~- ~ ~,~ ~ F y~~ ,,. ~- l-~j~ ~ ^ ,.. ~~~ ,~~ ~" ~'. ~µsµ~:, ^~~ . ~~~~ ~~ G> z~~r~~ ~" a~ over, s>=acG ® 1 z~ z=to ~._._ ~. __w.__I ~ ~ „ R 3 -~~ rata-ac fot)-LtA32 'i !:;s rn;s{~ es ~des,yrieU fc,r P;lt3nrv3x~ {n;ryx,ses only U^;tA 63 9~7o;=r;mt;nr 2003 ~~r ,, ,,~ ~. ,, , ,~~ ~, { ..____. .__... w_ _._.. _.__._____ r Daisy Creek ~VilCage Development Phasing Schedule & Fencing PCan .attachment `D' Date: 4-~6-21}04 To: Central Paint Planning Commission Attention: T©m Hurnphy Cantering: Daisy Creek Village Schedule & Phasing From: brit Artner Phase ane will include units 1-22, water line from Glenn Way to Haskell, Ail storm drain and sewer services far all three phases, the main entry road from Haskell and the road along palsy Creek. Phase two will include units 23-45, turps, gutter sidewalk, 8 faot widening of street for parking lane an Haskell St. and curb, gutter, sidewalk an Ash St. and entry raad from Ash St. Phase three includes units 40-58, and private raad that services them. Nate: The half street improvement an Ash St. is to be done in tonjunttion with the improvements an the south side of Ash St. .~ ,~., .._ h rR cce #~t~.c~sa po ar~x 6079 CA CCB #463241 Jn.cKSRNVtt„L~, C7R 97537 PH 5~E 1 -215-94413 F'ax 547-245-6~E39 .A 1"'X.r5:V~4Ja7J C`O:i1`~r~Tl~=s"7'}'" FRtG At?TNFR CONS377UC77QN, lNC. p, p, Li4,%r5fJ4x ttxo:cv rJ,:n» +.v: %4 • ar 71.~G :avxrxy Yu~~r:lan ra Centtar ra:.r,. JOCkSdnV11IH. {7R. ~. a ptor .k:w or roccra, tn»j +aca:rar„atten ;: evK.:ron t.xrr+Crain 4T~3(7-i~C79 ncr :..s.:n lrc rta-:nca.! ~ .or~f:rr of :heron !c? e, r..,,rsrzpa 3? vY:A, P ~ J Yw~S: CI :hG %t:iltYr=±::G N•ctKYi^.-2 ~ lht. G,1~ ~ 1 c! Z:nn:tor Pn:n:...~cr.c ca~:ry firm ~ . Q r !.. ' .. ... f. .... -:. . "'..: ..'.. -:-. 1 `. ~ .. ..._ _. .. .. _____~ - '... - .L. r..ct ., I .. . n a a ' . ~ I ~~' • : "~'~ " t Pf + %Ae` bY1 tbA' b.57 R9°rr )9'-A' ~n9a [D.w~ w5a icm ~ .. -•_•-• C I ,,' ~ # s ~"" x ~"' "'" S xor~ aarar loran zorVr xrn.ra~ ~xor.r u~r+x en +a se x»r~ ~ ,+;; W 4 { , Q a 9•r~o3 1 ~i. hra& ~ Ra ~. ~~ ~ W x 1 ~ ~- j $ ~ $tx ~ .>F;S >t.~ r ~ t n ° ~' :r*c?F r; ~-[ .h* ~ ypl s (i-~ L -E. t F, ~ ,~+y~ rr c^"` ,~ F ~ .,.,.,,.,.t~J J ~' r~7a~ w*n ~aao' xxza• ;exa lax aazo- ~ ,. . "`'~^^"^"-'~"~"'".-, j ._ .IA80N AVENUE {PRtVATEJ ~ ~ ;~_ r . a,»:aaa.,,,.„..,ww,.,.!«K. a..:a,a.a „ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ a vFt - {r ~i _.~5.._. ~a a ~' a t ~ ,~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ SQ ~.. J.3,:. - $? ~, R ~ ~ ~ Q 7 '~-~ / 4 ,_ ~~ F g Y t 3.i o ga t~ x jw / ~y^4a~° 3 ~ it`s ~u s-. ~a ' , t.°: t ! ~ ~ , .~~r t? _.~ •,1~`a~ ~ , tt4 fix ~ U ~ s ~ §i - ~ R ~ m i :_t ~a i ~ ~ ~~'~ '':,P fibh~~. ~ ~_L.. ~~' a ~~t a u.. a M. S u :._ R ~ Z ~L'3 t~ ~'• [; s > ~ i ~'~ ' ; vC£' v d~~ty+ i ~ ~ ~ I.... 1 '. $ ~ 1117 k _ ~ ._~ ~ h ~ ~Y, i.! ~ .l ~ , a~.'~~r" n~oif ? %t~;`` r s ~ SS ~ ~ ~ ` xa ~ I ~ ~ I V; ~i ~~ ~ ' 9' ~` _~ r } ti 9 a+o 3 4or >-1 t t`' ~Aa oo S~ '.r~,c< c`'y ... ,.i t: ~ ~~ ~ •: ~3 t .. -- by F ~..n..s~- Aa I g 's S ~., ~p ~ ~~ r ~ ~ ~ tf , 'r F.1,:..,^x r.:;,c;: ! .: ~. ~~ a '~ .h ~ -i~ ~fi F1 .,:,t n' / r j 1 ~ I. I: C ..:~. ~. ~ . n... ' -~ ...... S2D iR -~ IY.S{y -~ t D<y,• i ; 7` J ... i. ~ ... ~V•'--~ !A4 .u ]84C wxxr ~bAd A-Ff ]f_A' D1M' Ddv' 9S, ^.q' IDJJ' 4b.Ap >,:4' worr .AX t~S ~1.G IDIXI aJ.kY ~ VkY 119T bLG' iPAeb e3lNY f" - 3AD .. _..... ; ~ ..... i jJ I .~a ~..__.._ .... - ; r ~ ,- s, i r ^a nx ^z ea nR da ^x a i sa -asao `n ~a sx Sa ~ g~ sx ea a j T~a Ra ra ~Ra~ ~ ~ v , X f ~{ a, k>. $t ~~ S3 ~3 9' ~s 63 x Ss 5~ ~3 ~. Sg o, ~`~ ; ~~ ~g $~ X ~3 r+. rf` .: ` t.. „ , .,: ... „~ ... m _. s ~.. >.+ S r ~ ~..r- __ w t Z..i ~ti is ~~~ ~i~-- ~ ~/ _ } , ....... 4 ~ :I ....~ S~ ___ _ l{ ._ _ . c ~.: __.~~ mao~ IDm• a+sa. m DOO' ;oao^ s,ra+ mca aar a:o• woo roar a..u a.aa .teoa ~bM~ ~ai.w ~t9o~ ;acv ;c.vv w!?~ ~ !'S1~Q o v9$ Q' ` `h"-,_-~_-~.:. _ . r ~ ~ ~'~' o: a t1CVi~I~f1G Ei~ .... ~~ ,. `.,~ " ,°rxc` a _ _,¢~ .~ ~.° PRO~ESSIONA}f f ' A.r 1 bi4' +r~ a ~ dRSEY &TREE7 {PRIVATE): ; > k nA't~ ~.,_,_ ~__$,_._,, ,Y ^+~+F•' k~ +'~~ 4 ~>"tIVL StJ~VC EtIfS S3.t:.I:~ t]F~ '3F'ki'1'1': ...........».... n~ e~n v ft~ny p ~....; ~.... ......... .,.~.. ........ ~ ........................ t ~ ~mrwm, w .rw w,ra, .:.wm.xaao [aw ,yy r n f .. ~Y ~9}-.~,w tN• ..... ... _.__ .. ...-_ „~j - .' 446.__._. ....:.... ..... _. ~ t, . . \ ..-._ _, 1 Nn rknn roar. tt.tsn ). wa~& nr 4 a....,.~aa.,.....e, ,.wNr.., 1 ^f a a 1 .. 1........ ,f ~' :; . 7 ~ ,.. , r ....~..--.... Q~ {~~ YREPnB$a R)'; NcrciHamer Svrrrvir fi. R,r=. 1 JULY 9 2001 toa Enn~:.dn,n s'e.. Su; to v GLENN! eti c° t i_= .-_... wnv ' ~ ~ ~ f CALL ~EATHAMER a.a. uez lsrla `il h3o}e' [ i ~ .Nedfnrd, OreXan 97bOt >a~' ~J4J FiXo- /Sdif ~?32?1.4U„a9 A CRAIF.C~ ~vJkUEB~ M00: tln"G' hyYit :!.:PP1 „~...o r. M w..,.. nprr,f>.rr cut re,x«+wa..-.*.+a. r,..:nr;. rco.,=.;vr,. c.x..ynvr.:r-.p,..,~....~.~v...~r,«..a,..rvr:w.va,,... rwx~+,..:. u«.,,vAT^mai.. v..+.rvn ~•l:~v?WL'71 ~Y.JLE' {~~Jl~f~+`r lli VA7Eb: FPrA ::. 20ux rte. n Daisy Cree( `Village Correspondence .attachment `E' ~~~,~~ s~w~,~ f a .4 `~',~ ~ .. March 24, 2009 ~~tibb64.C 1i. r':t €~kl:i PAGE ~2J~3 ~t~CUE VAL~.~Y ~~W~~ ~~RV~~G~~ Lorca#ion. 138 w~s# Ydaa 1Z,oac~, Cet~c#'al ~'QS#kt - Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3130, ~.vtral Pain#,Clkt 97502.0(3t?5 ' Tel. {541} 664*6300 or (S41} 779-4144 1`~ {541} 664-171 wpvw_RVS5.u5 men Cxexschlex FAQ 664-6384 City o£ Cerztz~al Poizat Plaz~z~an~ bepa:zxze~zt i.55 South Secozad Stxeet Ce~tt'a1 i"oi~t, ©xego~, }7502 Re. Arttzer Subdivision, File #~4Ci06 I:}eax Ken, Sewer service to the subject ~Sro~erty ~wi.l.l be di£~ZCUit tc~ obt~iz~, The 6 itch sewer which extends £~raz~ ~aslcell Sheet is in service but does z~c~t meet public sewer standards and aanryat be extended to serve the proposed developrxrent. Likewise, there is a 6 inch sewer on ~e bast side a£ the caxzal which serves the property immediately to the North o£the subject ~~a~ezty which cannot be extended to serve the pxaposed devela~rment, ThE closest available public sewer is the 8 inch main line on Haskell Street ar the 8 inch xnain line on Glerr~. Way. Sexviee to the praiaosed development will re~uixe an exterrsiorr £rorxr orre ax both. o£these locations. ~.ll design and construction o£the sewex e~teztsiozt rx~,ust be done ixz aecordar~ce with RVS standards. If yc~u need additiorxal itl£orxxratic~r~, please call me at 664-6300. Sirrce~eeiy, Caxl Tappers, P_E. ~3istxict Err~iraeer K.IDATA1AGl~iti1"Ci.ESIC~NTPT~'LAt`~G1SUF3A~TVISION103060-TP SP~,UI~,,L.Dt~C ~~ ~. ~. Daisy Creek 1~illage Pu6Cic 1Norks & BuiCding Department Staff Reports .~ttacG~ment F' CITY OF CENTRAL POINT B~TILDING DEI'ART~VIEN`T STAFF t~.EPC?Ii,T APPLICANT: Name: ERIC ARTNER Address: P,fl, BOX 609 CitylStatelZip: JACKSONVII,i~E, OREGON 97530 AGENT: Name: Address: CityJStatel2ip: ~11tVNER OF RECORD: Name: Address: CitylState/Zip: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PAD i_C3T SUBDIVISION 4Gi,EN WAY} LflT 1 - 24, 6 SEPARATE BUIhDINGS, 4 UNITS EACH - "TOWNNOUSES'° BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Private storm drain system must be reviewed and approved by plumbing dept, ~. Street lighting cif any} must be reviewed by electrical dept. 3, Geo-tech report must be provided to verify compliance with 1RC R40~ .4 must be lot specific} 4. Building code requirements based on 1RC and interpretive ruling #00-10 ~rowhouse construction}. 5. When plans are submitted, plan check time cart be estimated. CENTRAL POINT BUDDING DEPARTMENT B Date: ~~~~/ ~~~ ~~~{ ~~ ~~- . ~ 1~ ~f ~n~ra~ Pant "~~' ~:+;fi _:.~ _ ~ Pub~~c •Warks I)e artm~nt '{ r h0 ~~~~ _ ~ ~~ .PUBLI ~' T~C1.~'KS iS'T~FF ~`PQRT May, 4t~' 2004 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Public Dearing -Site Plan Review for 37 2W 10AB, Tax Lot 6500, 372W10AD Tax Lot 1000; 37~WIOAD Tax Lot 800 X58 -Units Total} Applicant Eric Artner Construction, Inc. P.Q. Box 609 Jacksonville, Oregon 9753(1 Agent Cael E. Neathamer Neathamer Surveying, Inc. 100 East Main Street Spite N, P.O Box 1584 Medford, Oregon 97501 Property 37 2W 10A8, Tax Lot 650fl; Description! 372W1flAD, Tax Lot 1000 Zoning R-3 Purpose Robert Pierce Pubtic Works Director Rick :&'arttett Supervisor Chris Cla}=torr Deputy Director Mike C1no T'echttician Greg Grapes T'echrtician Karen Raeber Secretary II Margarita Mrtrtoz Secretary I Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Departrnent {PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design. and development ofthe proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed development, A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Speeif~cations. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public tiVorks Staff Report. r~~ ~ r~ ~.;. May, 4`~ 2404 Daisy Creek Subdivisiaz7 14rtrter~ Llevelvprrzerzt ,Standard S,Pecifreatians and Goats The Central Paint Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, anal storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern. how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to attain the latest version of these specifications from. the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power APP&L}, Cos ~Avista}, Communications ~Qwest}, and Sanitary Sewer {RVSS}. In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development, The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a prof table development and will not sacrif ce quality for the sole purpose ofreducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. .Ueveloprrzent Plans-Required Irzformation Review ofpublic improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of3 sets of plans that are at least 95°lo complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads Department, Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled. to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit {4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public ~'ot•Irs Perrtzit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Dzrector approves the fznal construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be v ~,,,, ,~:~, May, 4`'' 2004 daisy Creek Subdivision calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements {as determined by fihe Public Works Director}, A~tnet~ Uevelvptssent-Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95°lo complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department 2. Qnee approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Artner~ Ilevelopfree~t -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction ofpublic works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose ofprotecting or relocating existing facilities. ~4rtner.Uevelopnrent- Watet~ Connection l . Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension ofthe City water system. .... ~, May, ~`~` 2004 Daisy Creek subdivision All requirerr~ents of the Oregon Mate Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards ~ Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Artner l~evelvptnent-Streets 1. The Developer's engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Corridor might apply to the design and construction of streets in specific areas of the City. These alternate standards are fully described in the Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps anal cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act tADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation {ODOT~, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The detezmination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure, ~. The following improvements are recommended as conditions of approval for Daisy Creek Village: Haskell Street -Street Classification {TOD Collector - Approximately 340 linear feet of curb, gutter, sidewalk & landscaping strip (see attachment for City of Central Point Transient Oriented Collector Street Section). Ash StreetlSnowy Butte Road-Street Classification {TOD Standard Local Street S- Approximately 285 linear feet of "half street improvements°' including but not limited to: curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping strip, (1) parking lane, ~1) travel lane including street sub section.). See attachment for City of Central Point Transient O~~iented Standard Residential Local Street Section}. ~~, r~ ~. May, 4''' 2004 Daisy Creels Subdivision 3. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of street related components. At~tner Ueveloprnent-- Star~n ~li•ain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas ofthe channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. if a contiguous annexed drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. 2. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase ll requirements. 3. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards 8~ Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Artne~ ~7evelvprnent --Required Subrxitlals Ali design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as maybe required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department ofFish and Wildlife {DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ}, Oregon Division of State Lands {DSL}, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT} approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE}, affected irrigation districts, Rogue Valley Sanitary Service {RVSS}, and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department ~JC Roads}, DSL and ACOE, as applicable {wetland mitigation}. 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to f nal review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prier to installation. ~~ ~:> ~~ T W I N C R~ E K~ TT~AN~IT-©RICNTLI) DL VLLC?PMENT 'Sidewafkz P(ortter Parking ~ Traver Lane a Travel t_ane '~ Parking P1a~Sidawalk Strip 38' ~nA Curb to Curb ~_~_ ExhiBlt 7, Standard Residential Street Section ;rxhi8it 8, Narrow Residential Street Section G ~ ~-"~ €~ ~a ~.--5'.. l_. s' s' Ia is' !. to` I. s• [I s' I 5` 11 5' 6` 8' tt?' t{?' 1 6` 5' Sldewofk Planter Parking !raver Lops trove! Lane Planter Sidewat Strip 2&` Strip 0.5' ~tYP.) Curb to Curh ~ C,S, t 52` ~YP~) Right-of-Way Exhibit 6, Business GaItectarll2esidentiat Caltectiatt Street Section ~ ~~ ~~ Daisy Creek ~°ViCCage PCanning Department Recommended Conditions of .approval .attachment `C' ATTACI-IMENT G RECCiMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CCJNDITIf~I~IS C-F APPRQVAL 1. A final development plan, containing in fznal form the information required in the preliminary plan shall be submitted to the City within six months of approval or by November 4, 20Q4. A six month extension may be granted by the City upon the applicant's request and for good cause. 2, The project must comply ~,vith all applicable local, state, and federal regulations including, but not lirrzited to, the Qregon Uniform Fire Cede and Structural Specialty Code. 3. The applicant shall submit final landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the City for approval. as part of the final development plan. A suitable landscape and irrigation plan shall show the types of tree's, shrubs, and ground cover that will be planted and the irrigation for the development and maintenance of public greenways and the tat lotl private parks}. ~. The applicant shall submit. a copy of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R's) or any comparable agreement governing the use, maintenance and continued protection of the PUD as part of the final development plan. 5. The applicant is required to form a homeowner's association, in accordance with ©regon state law, in order to manage and maintain private streets, con~zmon areas and open space in the Daisy Creek Village PUD. 6. The approval of the tentative plan shall expire one year on May 4, 2005 unless arz application for final plat or an extension has been received by the City. '7. The applicant shall comply with the fencing plan adopted by the Planning Commission. Revisions to the plan may be made by the applicant and subject to the Commission's approval at the time of the Final Development Plan reviev~T. 11CPCI~SliCI1"Y wID~1T'LAItiiNZ~1C3104(1t~6 r~RThEFt ~'L3I3.DOC k"~ ~ ~°