Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 759 - Transportation System Plan (TSP)PLANNING COMMI55IDN RESOLUTION NO. 'T S ~1 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATING THE TRAN5PORTATION SYSTEM PLAN WHEREA5, on August 5, 2008 the City of Central Paint Planning Commission, in accordance with Section 17.45.540 of the City of Central Paint Municipal Code, initiated a Type IV Legislative change to the City's Comprehensive Plan to update the City's Transportation System Plan; and WHEREA5, the amendment has been prepared in compliance with DAR fi64-12, the Oregon state adapted rules governing preparation and coordination of transportation system plans which are collectively referred to as the Transportation Planning Rule and with Gregon Statewide Planning Gval #12 -Transportation; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2408, the Central Paint Planning Cvrnmission conducted aduly- noticed public hearing at which time it reriiewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the Transportation System Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE50LVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by the Resolution No. "15 does hereby accept, and forward to the City Council, the Transportation System Plan as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" far final consideration and adoption. PASSED by the Piannin Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ~ day of _ h1oYv,~, 2448 Planni C i hair ATTEST: ~` t City Representative Approved by me this ~~ day of ~1oy¢L~~2008. Pl Co is 'r Planning Commission Resolution No. 1 s~ (1110412448) STAFF REPORT CENTRAL POINT STAFF REPORT actober 7, 2(Hl8 Tom Humphrey, AICP, Community ^e~elopment Directarl Assistant City Aeiministrator AGENDA ITEM: File No. 4816U(~3) Consideration of a Resolution Recommending Approval of an Amendment to the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Updating the Transportation System Plan. AppGcsnt: City of Central Point STAFF SOURCE Dan Burt, Planning Manager BACKGROUND The City of Central Point recognizes the importance in having and maintaining a coordinated network of transportation facilities that serves current and future state, regional and local transportation needs. In response to #his objective, the City has prepared this Transportation System Plan (TSP} to assure that not only are the transportation needs of its citizens met in a timely and efficient manner, but that in doing so, the transportation system will continue to be improved in a manner that supports projected growth and enhances the quality of life of those living and visiting the City of Central Point. This TSP has been prepared within the context of an urban area consisting of 2,88U acres, the state's Transportation Planning Rule (TPR}, the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP}, and other local transportation plans. The TSP will serve as the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan meeting the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 12 -Transportation. The following represents the principles that have guided the preparation and future implementation of this TSP: To strike a balance between accessibility and connectivity of people and goads, while keeping the system safe, attractive and well-maintained. 2. To advocate lead use patterns, such as transit-oriented development and in-fill strategies, tha# support the continued enhancement of multi-modal transportation. 3. To increase street system safety and function through the adoption and implementation of access management standards for the purpose of maintaining and preserving the existing investment in transportation facilities. Planning Department Page 1 of 2 4. To design streets in a manner that maximizes the utility of public right-vf--way; is appropriate to their functional role; and provides for multiple travel modes, Whsle minimizing their impact vn the character and livability of surrounding neighborhoods, business districts and the environment. IS5UES At the September 2, 2Q08, Planning Commission meeting, David Pyle, Dregan Department of Transportation (ODOT}, subnvtted a letter to the Planning Commission requesting that the "public hearing written record remain apes to a date and time certain far a minimum of seven (7} days to a maximum of 30 days, per city code Section 17.05.500(F} to provide far additional time to assess the completed draft TSP in total." The Planning Commission agreed to this request and continued the public hearing by motion until October 7, 2008. Dn September 26, 2008, planning department staff received a memorandum containing DDOT's final review conuneats on the TSP and made the suggested revisions except for fvm~atting changes to several tables which will completed prior to submitting the document for final approval. Amendments, including those suggested by Plaruiiag Commission during study sessions and by representatives of the technical advisory committee, have been made to the draft TSP which was distributed #a Planning Commissioners an August S, 2008. A revised draft of the TSP will be available for additional review and comment prior to submission to the City Council for final approval. The Resolution is worded to include all agreed upon modifications tv the TSP. CDNDTI`IUN5 OF APPROVAL NIA EXHIBITSIATTACHMENTS Attachment "A" -Resolution Attachment "B" - DDOT Correspondence dated September 2, 2008 requesting an extension of public comment period Attachment "C~ - DDOT memorandum dated September 26, 2008 -Final DDDT Review Comments Attachment "D" -Jackson County memorandum dated September 4, 200$ - City of Central TSP Cvnunents ACTION Consideration of a Resolution No, forwarding a favorable recommendation to approve the Transportation System Plan. RECUMMENDATIQN Approve Resolution No. forwarding a favorable recommendation to approve the Transportation System Plaa Dated October 7, 2008. Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT "~" PLANNING COMMISSION RE5DLUTION NU. A RE5OL[ITION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL DF AN AMENDMENT TD THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IFPDATING THE TRAN5PDRTATION 5Y5TEM PLAN WHEREAS, on August 5, 2408 the City of Central Point Planning Commission, in accordance with Section 17.45.544 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code, initiated a Type iV Legislative change to the City's Cvmpreheasive Plan to update the City's Transportation System Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment has been prepared in compliance with OAR 550-12, the Oregon state adapted rules governing preparation and coordination of transportation system plans which are collectively referred tv as the Transpvrtatinn Planning Rule and with Gregva Statewide Planning Goal # 12 -- Transportation; and WHEREAS, an October 7, 2008, the Central Paint Planning Conunission conducted aduly- noticed public hearing at which time i# reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the Transportation System Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Paint Planning Commission by the Resolution Na. does hereby accept, and forward to the City Council, the Transpartativa System Plan as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" for final consideration and adoption. PA55ED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 2448 Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of _ , 240$. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. {1010712448} ATTAGHMFI~T ~ ~ ^ .Jr~ on 7'twodore R. Kulongaski, Gn~err-ar Department of Tr~-rQapvrtstian Region 3, District B R.ague Valley Area Office iii Auii;loy~ Rwiu White City, OR 97503 Telephone (541) 774-5399 FAX (541 j 774-5349 Da-+id.PYLES[rr~odot.state. or. us September 2, 2008 Connie Moczygemba, Planning Commission Chair City of Central Point i 4D 5. Third St. Central Point, OR 975D2 Ra: Oi]OT commanta: City file nv. 8180{03} -Planning Commission Resolution recommending approval of sn amendment to tt~e city's Transportation System Plan {TSPy Dear Ms. Maczygemba: The Oregon Department of Transportation appreciates the opportunity tv provide comments es#abiishing legal standing at the first eviden#iary hearing for the Central Point Planning Commission's consideration of a Resolution recommending approval to amend the Centro! Point Comprehensive Plan by updating the city's Transportation System Ptan. Our interest in this project is as an affected agency and service provider of state transpartativn facilities within the Urban Growth Boundary of Central Point. Please enter this letter into the TSP project 8760(03} Erie. The ODOT received notice of the proposed TSP Resolution vn August 1 S, 2D08, via a letter from Planning Manager Dan Burt, dated August 75, 2DDg. We understand the TSP amendment process tv be oonsis#ent with a legislative Type iV procedure, outlined in the Cen#r>gl Poinf Municipal Cade, Se~ctivn 17. D5.5D0. Section 17. D5.5D0 (2}{a} of the city's code, requires notice "At leas# twenty days, but not more than forty days, before the date of the first hearing..." Mr. hurt's cover letter with attached complete draft TSP invites the Department ta, "Please send any additional revisions andlor corrections to us by Friday, September 5, 2008 and we will add them tv the final document draft." Our review of the complete final draft TSP dated July 2DD8 is in-progress and ongoing. A# this time, we are requesting the public hearing written record remain open #o a date and time certain far a minimum of seven {7} days to a maximum of 30 days, per city code Section 17.D5.5D0 {F}, for us to assess the completed draft TSP in total. We anticipate comments in support of the final draft TSP, with possible recommendations for miner revisions prior to consideration by the City Council and adoption of the proposed TSP amendment by city ordinance. The city's proposed revisions to the TSP have been generaAy coordinated with the ODOT per the n~quiroernents of Statewide Planning Goals 1 {Citizen Involvement}, 2 {Land Use Planning} and 12 {Transporta#ion}, and the Transportation Planning Rule {Oregon Administrative Rule BBD-012}. I have represented HOOT staff vn the city's Technical Advisory Committee {TAG} since approximately the fall of 2~D1. We appreciate the Planning Commission's consideration to allow final review and coordination of the proposed TSP amendments. City staffs welt organised and effective work on this project to date will be reflected ul5matefy in a plan to guide transportation system facility decisions for Central Point for the next 2a years. We acknowledge the fine work of city staff and Planning Department an this project. We appreciate this opportunity to provide technical transportation and land use planning service tv the City of Central Point. Please enter this letter into the project's public hearing record; copy me vn the Planning Commission's TSP Resolution hearing ou#oome; and, notice DDQT (to my attention} on upcoming Planning Commission andlor City Council public hearings for this TSP amendment project. Please contact me a# {541 } 7?4-B399, if you have questions yr require additional information regarding this letter, and our interests as an affected agency. Thank you. 5incer ly, aar-id J. les Development Review Planner 111 Cc: Dave Jacob, Community Planner Dan Burt, Planning Manager Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director John Rent, DLCD Regional Representative CDQT Region 3 Central Palm TSP: 816Q(d3) 2 0170T oommer~ts: Q~-4~-08 ATTACHMEh1T "~" sTA~ vF vRECON Department of Tranaportatlan Region 3 Planning dot Programmting Section 1 t)l} Antelope Road White City, OR 97503 (541} 774fi394 FAX (541) 774-6349 TO: I}a~e ,laoob, City Planner, Cenh al Paint, pR FROM: Da-~d Pyles, Development Review Planner ,r~ytP. MEMU Date: September 26, 200a SLT9.~ECT: Ceatral Point TSP Upda#e [file no. 8160(A3)]: Final QDUT Review Camraents The fallowing comments neflcct (?DOT's review and final comments on the draft Central Fvint TSP (dated ]uly 20x8). We roquest the city's incorparatian of the recommended changes into the final TSP dvcurnent far adoption by the city. Please enter this memo iota the public hearing rersrd far the city's TSP update praj ed. P Comment Clot ter 4 - Exl rtatian Conditaona Chapter fasting Chapter 4 indicates "Chapter 5 -Transportation System Elements" in the fasting. Recommend revision to appropriate "Chapter 4 -Existing T rtatian Conditions" footin throu out entire cha ter. Figure 4.I Recommend additional ~otstian in the figure legend, indicating interstate 5 as an Interstate Hi wa within the ci limits![IGB. 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5. Existing Qperntianal Analysis: iracvrrectly indicates the OLK]T (page 26 of rrvlume-to-capacity ratio {vlc) performance standard of "0.94" The correct 149) ODDT perfsnnance standard is 4.85 vlc far Interchange 33 ramp ternunals; and, 0.90 vlc for the north and south remaining CR-99 segments (portions of the intersections at Scenic Road and Beall Lane) under state jttrisdictisn. Please revise to correetl indicate state osriance standards. Table 4.4 -- Table 4.4 incorrectly indicates the aDDT vlc performance standard of "0.90" LOS 8t VIC far the I-5 NB 8t SB ramp terminals at East Pine St. The correct vlc for (page 27 of Interchange 33 ramp terminals is 0.$5 vlc [see first paragraph, last sea#ence sf 149) page 79 of the 1999 Oregon HighwYry Plan, as amended thru January 2006]. Please r~c-+ise Table 4.4, and all applicable citations within the entire document to reflect correct state performance measures. Cho ter 7 - Stmt S to 20D$-Z03+~ Figure 7,1 Recommend additional natation in the ftgttt+e legend, indicating Interstate 5 as an Interstate Hi wa within the ci limitslUGB. Table 7.3, Year Incorrectly indicator the CDT vvltune-to-capacity ratio (vie) perfstrnance 2420. PM Peak standard of "090" for the I-5 NB & SB ramp terminals at East Pine St. {Exit Hour LGS 33]. Tito correct 4DOT perfa*~++A++rp standard it 0.85 vie far Interchange 33 ramp teraninals. [See text of the Error paragraph on page 79 of the 1995 CHP {a~ amended).] Table 7.4, Year Same comment as immediately abo~. Please rtvise correct vlc at l-5 ramps 2434 PM Peak to 0.85 vlc perfonmance standard, Hour L(}S 7.2.2,3 - #3 Please revise discussion of improvamants to Interchangt 33 to discuss the [page 73 of needs and necessity for future analysis. The TSP should instead call for wore 149} derailed analysis of the interchange. No planned or programmed improvement is currently approved far Exit 33. Discussion of the "loop ramps" should be resno~ed and revised, consistea~t with city's September 8, 2008 response to DDC]T. Tables: 7.51 Recommend publication of tables on pages 77-79 in a format with larger font 7.fi 17.7 s' for 'er 1 'bill Cht tar 12 - T rtatYotii S ~ Fintncin Pro m DDDT requests "Inclusion of an improvement in the TSP does oat represent a commitment by addition of the DDOT to fund, allow, or construct the proj ect. Projects an the Stara Highway following System that arc contained in the TSP are oat cansidarod "planned" projects carreat text to until they are programmed into the Statewide Transportation Improvement the funding Program (STIP}. As sucb, projects proposed in the TSP that are located an a chapter. State Highway cannot be considered mitigation for future development ar land Recommctrd use actions urnil they arc programmed into an adopted S'T1P. Highway projects addition as a that are programmed to be constructed may have to be altered ar cancelled at a concluding later time to meet changing budgets or unanticipated conditions such as paragraph to environmental constraints." 5ectian 12.4.2, State Reuenue Sources ATTACH MENT ~ ~ " N Jr~rer ~Ilp, re. P,~ea ~gAiaer ~ Y I NTEAw~~FtCE ~~n+~ ~~ ~~-nom Roads ~~ Ta: Don Bart >FY~om: ]amen Philp, P.E. Subject: City of Central Point TSP Date: September 4, 20Q8 Listed below are some comments on the daft dated 71~f}08: ~~~r;: -Page 33, Section 4.4.2, Bear Creek C3reenway Plan - This paragraph should be revised since the [3reenway is now one section fmm Pine Street to Nevada Street. ~. • Page 73, Section 7.3, Recommended Street System l'mprovements - In these paragraphs it references Table 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3. The table's on page 77, 78, and 79 do not have the same table numbers. Page 77, Table 7.5 or 7.1 not sure which one it is -Project rcf # 2I7 and. 218 are at least I~ years out, not 4. .. Page 89, Section 8.8, Bear Ct~ek C3roenway -This paragraph should tae revised since the Greenway is now one section from Pine Street to Nevada Street. F ~`~ ' Page 11 ~, Figcre 11.1- Not sure what the black dashed circles represent.