HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 758 - Twin Creeks Zone ChangePLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.~,S
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE
APPLICATION FROM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
MEDIUM MIX RESIDENTL4L(MMR} TO HIGH MIX RESIDENTIAL (HMR} FOR
2.U3 ACRE SITE
FILE NO.08179
Applicants: Pacific Retirement Services) RVM Central Paint Housing Corporation;
Agent: Rena Smith, Pacific Retirement Services.
(410 Richardson Drive, 37S 2W 03 DC, Tax Lat 3410, APN 10980155}.
WHEREAS, the applicants have submitted a zone change application to Transit Oriented
De~eloprnent (TDD} pistrict zoning of the 2.03 acre site from Medium Mix Residential
{MMR) to High Mix Residential {HMR} (File No. 0$174). Central Point Retirement
Community, is located at 410 Richardson Drive and is identified on the Jackson County
Assessor's map as 37S 2W 43 DC, Tax Lot 3410, APN 10984155 in the City of Central Paint,
Oregon;
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2008, the City of Central Paint Planning Commission
conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City
staff report and heard testimony and comments an the application; and
WHEREA5, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the
standards and criteria applicable to Toning Map and Text Amendments in accordance with
Section 17.10.300 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and
WHEREA5, after duly considering Applicants' request, it is the Planning Commission's
deternunation that the application does comply with applicable standards, criteria and subject
to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit
"A"} dated October 7, 2008;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE5DLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. ~~ ~S ,does hereby forward a favorable
recommendation to the Central Paint City Council to approve the application based vn the
findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department
Staff Report dated October 7, 200$, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference
and incorporated herein.
Planning Cvrnmission Resolution No. `~ $ g (11~4~20t]S)
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
4~' day of November, 2~a8.
Planning Co iss' n
ATTEST:
~ dom. ~~
City Representative
Approved by me this 4~' day of November, ~Q48.
Planning Ca i on
Planning Cvnamissivn Resolution No, 1S8 [11/4/ZIXlB}
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM: FILE NO. 0$I79
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPQRT
October 7, 2008
Planning Department
Tom Humphrey,AFCi?
Community ~e~elopment Dire~tarl
Assistant City Administrator
Cvasiderativn of a zone change application from Transit Orieated Development {TOO} District Medium
Mix Residential (MMR}, to High Mix Residential (HMR}, fora 2A3 acre site in accordance with CPMC
Section 17.14.300. The project site is located at 410 Richardson 1]ri~e and is identified vn the Jackson
County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03 DC, Tax Lat 3410, API+i 10980155. Applicants: Pacific
Retirement Services) RVM Ceatral Paint Housing Corporation; Agent: Dena Smith, Pacific Retirement
Services.
STAFF SOiJI
Connie Clune,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
It Is the applicants' intent to add an additiona141 dwelling
units tv the current b2 unit retirement facility located on
the 2.03 acre project site. Tv do sa requires a change of
zoning from MMR to HMR. The proposed zone change
would increase the current NiMR maximum density of 32
units per net acre to the HMR density range, which has a
minimum density of 30 units per acre and no maximum.
Most HMR projects have an approximate density of 50
units per acre.
BACI~GROLTND:
As a pre-requisi#e to this application, it is necessary that the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented De~elvpment
Master Plan {Master Plan} that the pmject site he changed from its current M1V[R designation to 1-1MR.
The applicants have requested a modification to the Master Plan {File Na. 0900$), which will be
considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the zone change request.
FINDINGS:
See Attachment "C".
IS5LTE5:
1. Comprelzensrve Pisa Compliance: Approval of the proposed zone change must be found to be
consistent with the City's Cvmprehensi~e Land Use Plan. The City's Land Use Plan designates
the project site as a Transit Oriented De~elvpment (TOO} District. The proposed zvae chaage
Page 1 of 3
Figure l: Zoning
does not change the TDD land use designation. ~n the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan the
project site will remain designated for TDD use.
2. Master Plan Compliance: The proposed zone change has been compared against the approved
(pending File No. 09008} Master Plan and determined to be consistent with the uses and
densities of the approved Master Plan.
3. Zane Change: When considering a zoning map amendment it is necessary that the Planning
Commission address five (S} criteria as set forth in CPMC Section 17.10.300(B}. Each of these
five criteria has been reviewed and favorably addressed in Attachment "C -Planning
Department Findings".
The Master Plan and supporting documentsl, provide the necessary documentation needed #o
address the applicable statewide planning goals, public facilities, services, transportation
network, and established the TDD District Comprehensive Plan map designation. The requested
change from TDD-MMR to HMR is consistent with the City's criteria far a zone change.
4. Tranapartativn Planning Rule (TPR} compliance: CPMC Section 17.10.500 states that when
a development application includes a proposed zoning district change, the proposal shall be
reviewed to determine whether it significantly ai~'ects a transportation facility, and if it is
determined that the change of zoning may impact the City's transpartarinn system, then a traffic
impact study may be required.
The Master Plan approval was originally based on a traffic study2 that established design and
development limitations based upon the phased completion of defined street improvements. The
proposed zone change is consistent with the land uses and maximum allowed number of
dwelling units approved in the original Master Plan. The TPR has been reviewed and favorably
addressed in Attachment "C -Planning Department Findings".
CUND][TIUN5 OF APPRQVAL:
There are ao identified conditions of approval.
ATTACIEiMENTSIE7~IIiIBITS
Attachment "A"- Applicant Findings
Attachment "A-1"- Applican# Future Site Plan
Attachment "B"- Rogue Valley Sewer Service
Attachment "C"- Planning Department Findings
Attachment "D"- Resolution
ACTIUN:
Cvnsideratioa of Resolution No. , a recommendation tv the City Council for approval of the woe
change application from Transit Oriented Development (TDD} District Medium Mix Residential
(IVaVfR) to High Mix Residential (HMR} [File No. 08179).
~ Central Point 1'OD Design Requirements and Guidelines, Ord. 1815 and Pre-Annexarion Agreement, Ord, No, 1817
~ Central Paint Transit Oriented Devclopmeert Traffic Impact Study August 2400, JRH Engineers, Planners & Project
Managers
Page 2 of 3
RECUMMENDATI4N:
Approval of Resolution No. ,forward recommendation to the City Council for appm~al.
Pagc 3 of 3
~mmunit Hous~n ~4`T~ACHMENT s~.~>:
BY
PpCI~XC /~w !
RlTxR!#f!!I7 R~dv ~ }~~~
clrr ^~ c~i~ ;-~~,~ I~°^In~r
SIRYIClS
~aY ~ ~ zaps
May $, ~Q(]$ PU9L1C 1'hf{iFti[;;; ~~.r7~•.
Connie Clune, Community Planner
Attn: Planning Department
City of Central Point
144 South Third Street
Central Paint, CR 97502
RE: Tuning Application
Dear Ms. Clune,
Please find enclosed the following items for the proposed zoning change for 41 Q
Richardson Drive:
1. Zoning Change Application
2. Check nv. x3225 made payable to the City of Central Point for $2,77Q.DQ for the
application review.
3. Criterion narrative stating that the zone change meets the requirements for an
amendment.
4. Mail Labels.
Thank you in advance far your review of application. Please contact me via email
den 'rement.ar ar 857-7454 if any additional items are needed,
Sincerely,
Dena Sntith
Vice President of Hauling
cc: Central Point Retirement Carnrnunity
E] McManus, PRS
File
1200 Mira Mar Avenue • Medford, ^R 97504
~54i 1857-7$87 • (840) 7149177 • TDD: [800J 735-2900 or dial 711 ^ Fax: (541) 857-7$$9
wwwseniaraffordabfehousing.org
All facilities comply with Federal Fair Housing regulations, accepting age-qualified residenrs witheut regard to national origin or gender, race, color, religion, disability, or famillaE status.
We do not discriminate on tfie basis of disability status in the admission or ac[ess to, or treatment or employment ln, its federally assisted programs and activities.
Criterion Narrative
17.1.340 Quasi judicial amendments
H. 1. By approving the zoning increase of the current zoning MMR to HMR, will allow
for forty-vne units of affordable housing for vcry low-income seniors. This directly meets
the goal of the 2Uii5-2U10, State of Oregon's Cansalidated plan, as referenced in Table ~,
listing the unmet need of 4,87b elderly housing households within the poverty level.
2. The approval of the request is Consistent with the City of Central Point's
comprehensive plan as this is part of the TQD which is currently oat maximized in the
number of units it is allotted.
3. All utilities are currently tv the site and do not adversely impact services or
traUSpartation.
4. The surrounding residential neighbors have been notified and a meeting will be
conducted an Tuesday, May 13m at Central Point Retirement Community. We anticipate
that they will continue to be supportive of elderly housing fvr this area since i# truly is a
public benefit and has not adversely impacted their residence. We will notify you with
comments after the meeting.
17.14.640 Transportation planning rule compliance
There is no significant change tv the transpartativn planning rule as this zoning change is
well within the allowable unit count fvr the TOO. Therefarc is does nvt adversely affect
the traffic impact of the TQD; especially with the population being served.
,~,~*~ a~
~t ur-a-*°Tx
May 25, zQU1:
~~
~c l of 1
+4T~'ACHMENT " ~ "
Connie Cluns
From: Carl Tappart [dappert~rvss.u:1
Sant: Friday. September 12, 2008 8:313 AM
Ta: Connie China
8u6jact: 09008-PacHic Retiretrisrrt 5ervciss.dac
Attachments: imaae0011P9
D
September ~ Z, ~$
R~GLJE VALLEY 5E1NER SERVICES
1Locatian: 138 West Vilas Road, Genera! Pairs aR -Mailing Addrras: P.O. Box 3 i 30, Central Paint, UR 75~Z-0Of
Tei. [541 y 6/4-b30~, Fax {541 ]564-7171 www.RVS5.ug
Connie Clone
City of Central Point Planning Departrneut
155 South Second Street
Cenh~al Point, dragon 97502
liter PaclHe Retiremeet Servkea IHaater Plan lHodiflcatba and Zolne Cbange, File #09008, 08179
>7ear Connie,
The gmposed development is currently served by a connection to the sewer main on Haskell Street. The proposed
additional units will require a permit from RVS only if there is new sewer pipe built outside of the buildings.
Regardless of whether yr not a permit is required, there will be additional development fees awed to Rogue Valley
Sewer Services.
Compliance with stormwater quality regulations has already been established for this site. The utility fee for
smrmwa~ quality is based on the amourrt of impervious area which will change with the proposed developmenrt.
We request that the approval of this application be subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior m the start of oonstivction, the applicant must provide RVS with a site plan showing the location of
existing and proposed ~ and sewer laterals, with a calculation of the total lot area and total
impervious surface area.
Z. Prior to the start of construction, tiro applicant must pay all related sewer development fees and obtain a
permit if needed. The need far a permit will be determined by RVS based upon the site plan.
Feel fi~ee to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project,.
Sincerely,
Carl Tappert, P.E.
District Engineer
911512flU$
Attachment "C"
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
File No: Q817~
INTRODUCTION
Consideration of the zone change application from Transit Oriented Development {TOD}
District Medium Mix Residential MMR, to High Mix Residential HMR, fora 2.Q3 acre site.
The project site is located at 414 Richardson Drive and identified on the Jackson County
Assessor's map as 37S 2W ~3 DC, Tax Lat 341, APN 1Q98Q155. Applicants: Pacific
Retirement Serviced RVM Central Point Housing Corporation; Agent: Dena Smith, Pacific
Retirement Services.
17.1U.30Q Qaasi-judicial ~mendment~.
A. Applicability of Quasi,Iudicial Amendments. Quasi judicial amendments are those
that involve the application of adapted policy to a speck development application or code
revision, and not the adoption o, f'new policy ~i. e., through legislative decisions}. Quasi-
judicial zoning map amendments shall fallow the Type 1'11 procedure, as governed by Section
17. d5. X00, using standards of approval in subsection B of this section. The approval
authority shall be as follows:
1. The planning commission shall review and recommend land use district map
changes that do not involve comprehensive plan map amendments;
2. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city council on an
application for a comprehensive plan map amendment. The city council shall decide
such applications; and
3. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city council on a
land use district change application that also involves a comprehensive plan map
amendment application. The city council shall decide both applications.
Finding: An application far a zone change from Transit Oriented Development
{TQD} District Medium Mix Residential MMR, to High Mix Residential HMR, for
approximately 2.p3 acres has been submitted for review as a quasi judicial, Type III
procedure before the Planning Commission.
Finding: The City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation
of the subject site is Transit Oriented Development {TOD} District, therefore a
comprehensive plan amendment is not required far review with this application.
Canclusivn: A zone change, Type III application has been submitted for review by
the City of Central Povat Planning Commission.
Page 1 of 9
B. Criteria far Quasi Judicial Amendments. 14 recommendation or a decision to approve,
approve with conditions or to deny an application fnr a quasi judicial amendment shall be
based on all of the following criteria:
1..4pproval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals;
Finding: The proposed zone change has been reviewed for compliance with the
nineteen (19} Statewide Planning Goals. Based an the following findings it is
concluded that the proposed zone change is consistent with the State Wide Planning
Goals.
GnAL I. CITIZENINYGL iTEMENT - To develop a citizen involvement program
that insures the opportunity far citizens to be involved in all phases of the
planning process.
Finding, Gna11: The proposed zone change does not enhance, or detract, from
citizen participation in the City's planning process. A duly noticed public hearing is
scheduled far October 7, 2d~8 to review the proposed zone change.
Conclusion, Goal 1: Consistent.
GDAL 2. LAND USE PLANNING - 2'a establish a land use planning process and
policy framework as a basis far all decision and actions related to use of
land and to assure an adequate factual base far such decisions and actions.
Finding Goa12: The proposed zone change in accordance with CPMC Section
17.1~.3D~ and therefore does not modify, or otherwise affect the City's planning
process as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusion Gaal Z: Not applicable.
Gaa13. AGRICULTURAL LANDS - To preserve and maintain agricultural lands.
Finding Gaa13: The proposed zone change does not involve, ar otherwise affect
lands designated for agricultural use.
Conclusion Goal 3: Not applicable.
Gaol 4. FOREST LANDS - To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land
base and to protect the state's forest economy by making passible
economically efficient forest practices that assure the continuous gnawing
and harvesting afforest tree species as the leading use on forest land
consistent with sound management of soil, air, water, and fish and wildlife
resources and to provide far recreational opportunities and agriculture.
Finding, Goal 4: The proposed zone change does not involve, yr otherwise affect
lands designated for forest use.
Page 2 of 9
Conclusion, Goa14: Not applicable.
GOAL S. DPENSPACE, SCENICAIND HISTDRICAREAS, AND NATURAL
RESDURCES - 7'o protect natural resources and conserve scenic and
historic areas and open spaces.
Finding Gva15: The proposed zone change does not involve, or otherwise affect
lands designated as natural, scenic, or historic resources.
Conclusion Gval S: Nat applicable.
GDAL b AIR, WATER, AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY- Ta maintain and
improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state.
Finding Goal b: The proposed zone change does not involve, ar otherwise affect
regulations managing the quality of air, water and land resources.
Cvaclusioa Gva16: Not applicable.
GOAL 7. AREAS SUBJECT TD NATURAL HAZARDS AND DISASTERS - To
protect people and property from natural hazards.
Finding Gva17: The proposed zone change does not involve, or otherwise affect
regulations protecting the citizens of Central Point from natural hazards. Stephanie
Waolett, CFM, City of Central Point Floodplainl Stormwater Specialist review of the
subject site found, according to the FIRM, the site is located in a Flood Zone S, which
is a low to moderate risk flood hazard and is not subject to the requirements
established by CPMC $.24. The subject site is not located in a regulatory floodplain
area.
Conclusion Gva17: Consistent.
GDAL 8 RECREATIDNNEEDS - To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of
the state and visitors and, here appropriate, to provide far the siting of
necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts.
Finding Goal S: The proposed none change does not involve, or otherwise affect
the City's provision ofnecessary recreational facilities.
Conclusion Gva18: Not applicable.
GDAL 9. ECDNDHY DF THE STATE - To provide adequate opportunities
throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health,
welfare, and prosperity of Oregon's citizens.
Finding Gva19: The proposed zone change does not alter the City's provision of
adequate economic opportunities. The proposed zone change serves to increase
density on a Z. D3 acre parcel zone for mixed-use residential. The property is
currently planned for TOl] District oa the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Page 3 of 9
Map. The Land Use Plan designation will remain TOD District. The site
development standards far both districts are similar.
Conclusion Goal 9: Consistent.
GGAL I4. HOUSING - Tv provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state.
Finding Goa11U: Central Point Retirement Center, an affordable senior housing
facility, is located on the subject site. CPMC 17.65.50 prescribes the density
standards of the MMR zone at a maximum of 32 units per net acre. The project site
of x.03 acres is allowed 62 units at this current density. The HMR minimum density
is 30 units per net acre and thus would allow the proposed 41 additional unit.
Finding: The 20U5-010, State of Qregon's Consolidated Plan' as referenced in
Table 7, listing the unmet housing need of 4,876 elderly household within the
poverty level. The proposed zone change will increase allowed density thus the
future addition of units to the facility will contribute to the identified need far
affordable senior housing.
Conclusion Goal 10: Consistent.
GUAL II. P~TBLIC FACILITIES AND SER DICES - Tv plan and devel op a timely,
orderly and efficient arrangement vfpublic facilities and services tv serve
as a framework for urban and rural development.
Finding Goal I1: The proposed zone change does not involve, yr otherwise affect
the City's provision of timely, orderly and efficient public facilities and services.
The proposed zone change does not cause an increase in the demand far public
facilities and services not already available within the TDD MMR and TDD HMR
distracts. The project site has existing public facilities available to serve the existing
and future senior housing units2.
Conclusion Goal 11: Consistent.
GGAL I1. TRANSPURTATIUN- To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and
economic transportation system.
Finding Goal I2: Twin Creeks TOD Master Plan design is in conformance with
QAR 660-012-005(29} "Transit-Oriented Development ~TOD}".
Finding: The Master Plan includes a circulation street} system and a maximum
allowable traffic generation measured as average daily trips (ADT}. The proposed
modification does not alter the approved street system.
' State Consolidated Plan 20Dfr2010, page 39
~ Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines CPAIZC page 18
Page 4 of g
Finding Goal 12: The Central Point Transit Oriented Devclapment Traffic Impact
Study August 2(}Qa prepared by JRH Engineers, Planners & Proj ect Managers
analyzead the TDD project and provided uifrastracture improvement
recommendations. These recommendead system improvements have been
incorporated in the Pre-Annexation Development Agreement, did. No. 1817.
Finding Go$112: The approved Twin Creeks Transit-oriented Master Plan {Master
Plan) provides an overall design density of 165 dwelling units and 204,x04 sq. ft. of
commercial floor area as stipulated in the Pre-Annexation Development Agreement.
These triggers and associated infrastructure improvements were incorporated in the
adapted plan. The approved Master Plan provides far the City's provision of safe,
convenient, and economic transportation.
Conclusion Goa112: Consistent.
GDAL 13 ENERGY- To conserve energy.
Finding Goa113: The proposed zone change does not involve, or otherwise affect
and development standards or regulations that address conservation of energy.
Conclusion Goa113: Not applicable.
GOAL Y~, URBANIT.ATI41V - 2'o provide far an orderly and efficient transition from
rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban
errtployment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of
land, and to provide for Livable communities.
Finding Goa114: The proposed zone change does not involve, ar otherwise affect
regulations addressing and regulating the transition from rural to urban lands.
Conclusion Goal 14: Not applicable.
GGAL 15. WILLAMETTE GREENWAY- To protect, conserve, enhance and
maintain the natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and
recreational qualities of lairds along the Willamette River as the Willamette
River Greenway.
Finding Goal 15: The proposed zone change does not involve, or otherwise affect
the Willamette River or Willameite River Greenway.
Conclusion Goal 1S: Not applicable.
Page 5 of ~
GUAL ~6, ESTUARINERES4URCES - Ta recognize and protect the unique
environmental, economic, and social values of each estuary and associated
wetlands; and Tv protect, maintain, where appropriate develop, and where
appropriate restore the long-term environmental, economic, and social
values, diversity and benefits of Oregon's estuaries.
Finding Goal iG: The proposed zone change does not involve, or otherwise affect
estuaries and associated wetlands.
Conclusion Gaal i6: Not applicable.
GOAL 17. CUASTAL SHURELANDS - Ta conserve, protect, where appropriate,
develop and where appropriate restore the resources and benefits of all
coastal sharelands, recognizing their value for protection and maintenance
of water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, water-dependent uses, economic
resources and recreation and aesthetics. The management of these
shoreland areas shall be compatible with the characteristics of the adjacent
coastal waters; and Ta reduce the hazard tv human life and property, and
the adverse e,,~`ects upon water quality and fish and wildlife habitat,
resulting from the use and enjoyment of Oregon's coastal shorelands.
Finding Goa117: The proposed zone change does not involve, or otherwise affect
coastal shorelands.
Conclusion Goa117: Nvt applicable.
GGAL 18. REACHES AND DUNES - To conserve, protect, where appropriate
develop, and where appropriate restore the resources and benef is of
coastal beach and dune areas; and To reduce the hazard to human Life and
property from natural or man-induced actions associated with these areas.
Finding Goal 18: The proposed zone change does not involve, or otherwise affect
coastal beach ar dune areas.
Conclusion Goa118: Not applicable.
GUAL ~9 DCEANRESDURCES - To conserve marine resources and ecvlagicaI
functions for the purpose of providing long-term ecological economic, and
social value and benef is to future generations.
Finding Goa119: The City of Central Point is not adjacent to, or near the ocean.
The proposed Zane change does not involve, or otherwise affect marine resources
and marine ecological functions.
Conclusion Goal 19: Not applicable.
17.14.344 {B} {2}, Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point
comprehensive plan;
Page 5 of 9
Finding: The property is currently planned far TOD District on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The Land Use Plan designation will remain
TAD District.
Cvnclusiaa: Consistent
3. The property and affected area is presently provided with adequate public, facil ities,
services and transportation networks to support the use, ar such facilities, services and
transportation networks are planned to be provided in the planning period,' and
Finding: Public facilities, services and transportation network are in place and are
sufficient to serve the praj ect site.
Conclusion: Consistent
4. The change is in the public interest with regard to neighborhood or community
conditions, or corrects a mistake ar inconsistency in the comprehensive plan ar land use
district map regarding the property which is the subject of the application; and
Finding: The zone change is in the public interest with regard to the community
need for affordable senior housing units as evidenced by the 2006-2014, State of
nregan's Consolidated plan as referenced in Table ]', listing the unmet housing need
of 4,875 elderly household within the poverty level. Central Point Retirement
Center, an affordable senior housing facility, is located on the subject site. The
proposed zone change will increase allowed density thus the future addition of units
to the facility will meet the identified need for affordable senior housing.
Conclusion: Consistent
17.14.G44 Transportation planning rule compliance.
Section 66a-4I~-460{1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged
comprehensive plan, ar a laird use regulation would significantly a~`ect an existing or
planned transportation facility, the local government shall put in place measures as
provided in section (2} of this rule to assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the
ident~ed function, capacity, and performance standards (e.g. level of service, volume to
capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. A plan ar land use regulation amendment significantly
affects a transportation facility if it would:
a} Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility;
b} Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
c} .4s measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted
transportation system plan:
Page 7 a€ 9
~A} Allow types or levels of land uses that would result in levels of travel or
access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or
planned trarisportatian facility;
{B} Reduce the performance of an existing ar planned transportation facility
below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP nr
comprehensive plan; or
{C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility
that is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable
performance standard ident f ed in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Finding bG0-01~-446Q(1)(a); The proposed zone change does not modify any
existing land use regulations. The proposed zone change serves to increase the
density standard of the property within the mixed residential designated area and is
consistent with the Master Plana and Comprehensive Plan Map. The proposed zone
change will not cause any changes to the functional classification of any existing or
planned transportation facilities.
Conclusion bb0-D1~-410b0[1)(a): No significant affect.
Finding bbQ-0i2-QObQ(1)(h]: The proposed zone change does not modify any
existing land use regulations. The proposed zone change serves to increase the
density standard of the mixed residential property consistent with the Master Plan
and Comprehensive Plan Map. The proposed zone change will not cause a change to
standards implementing the City's transportation system.
Conclusion bbd-0I~-DUbD{1){I~): No significant affect.
Finding bbQ-01Z-0Ob4(1}[c){A}: The proposed zone change will not cause an
increase in land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that would be
inconsistent with the City's functional street classification system far existing and
planned transportation facilities.
Conclusion 6b0-012-OQbO(1){c)(A): No significant a.fFect.
Finding bbQ-01Z-UQb4(1)[c){B]: The proposed zone change will not cause a
reduction in the performance of any existing or planned transportation facilities
below the -ninirnum acceptable performance standard identified in the Master Plan or
Comprehensive Plaa.
Conclusion bbU-0lZ-0UbU(1){c)(B): No significant affect.
Finding bb0-01~-04b4(lxc}(C}: The proposed zone change will not cause the
worsening of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected
a Twin Crocks Transit-Orientaed De~eiopment, Part III, Community Design Features
Page S of 9
to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the
Master Plan or Comprehensive Plan,
Conclusion GbU-012-0(f6D(1)(c}(C): No significant affect.
Summary Conclusion: As proposed, the zone change is in canfonrnance with the approved
Master Plan and the modification to the Master Plan. In addition, the proposed zoned
change is in conformance with the Master Plan maximum allowable density of 1,C5~
dwelling units and 24Q,OUQ sq. ft. of commercial floor area and the maximum allowable
traffic generation measures as established in the Master Plan.
Page 9 of 9
PLANNING CON1~lI53ION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APFROVAL OF A TANE CHANGE
APPLICATION FRONT TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
MEl]IRTM MIX RESIDE ) 'I'O HIGH MILL RESIDENTIAL {H1HR) FOR
2.113 ACRE SITE
FILE NO.08179.
Applicants: Pacific Retirement 5ervicesl RVM Central Paint Housing Corporation;
Agent: Dena Smith, Pacific Retirement Services.
{410 R.ichatxl.gon Derive, 37S 2W 03170, Tax Lot 3410, APN 109$0155},
WHEREA5, the applicalrts have subautted a zone change application to Transit Oriented
Development {TOD} District zoning of the 2.03 acre site firm Medium Mix Residential
{MMR} to High Mix Residential {HMR} (File No. 08179}. Central Point Retirement
Community, is locatcd ax 4 t 0 Richardson Drive and is identified on the Jackson County
Assessor's map as 37S ZW 031]G, Tax Lot 3410, APN 1(1880155 in the City of Central Point,
Ot~egon;
WHEREAS, on October 7, 200$, the City of Central Paint Planning Commission conducted
a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff
report and heard testimony sad comments on the application; and
WHEREAS, the Plaiuiiag Commission's consideration of the application is based an the
standards and criteria applicable to Zoning Map and Text Amendments in accordance with
Section 17.10.300 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after duly cvnsidezing Applicants' request, it is the Planning Canzmission's
detetymination that the application does comply with applicable standards, criteria and subject
to compliance with conditions as set forth is the Planning Department Staff Report {Exhibit
"A'~ dated October 7, 200$;
NOW, THER.EPQRE, BB Tf Rl&SOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this lesolution No. ,dues hereby forward a favorable
recommendation to the Centrnl Point City Council to approve the application based an the
Endings and conditions of approval as set Earth vn Exhibit "A", the Planning ~pA*~~!?t
Staff Report dated October 7, 200$, wtuch includes gttarl+~„~•,.ts, attached berets by reference
and incorporated herein.
Planning Commission Resolution No. {10~7~2005)
PAS3~D by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
7a' day of actober 24U8.
r
Planning Ca ssi C
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this '7'b day of Qctober, 2U08.
Plaruuag C io
Planning ~'~+~+**~t~ion Resolu#ion No. (10/7J2QU8)