Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution 757 - Twin Creeks Modification to Master Plan
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~ s ~ A RE5OLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TD THE TWIN CREEK5 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN DESIGNATION OF THE 2.03 ACRE SITE FROM MEDIUM MIX RESIDENTIAL (MMR} TO HIGH MIX RESIDENTIAL (HMR} FILE NO, 09008. Applicant: Twin Creeks Development Company, LLC; Agent: Herb Farber, Farber Surveying [414 Richardson Drive, 37S 2W d3 DC, Tax Lot 341 d, APN 14980155}. WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application to change the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan designation of the 2.U3 acre site from Medium Mix Residential (MMR} to High Mix Residential (HMR} [File Na. 09008}. Central Paint Retirement Community, is located at 410 Richardson Drive and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03 DC, Tax Lat 3410, APN 1x980155 in the City of Central Paint, Oregon; WHEREAS, on November 4, 200$, the City of Central Paint Planning Commission conducted adult'-noticed public hearing an the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based an the standards and criteria applicable to Major Modifications in accordance with Section 17.fl9.30d of the Central Point Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, after duly considering Applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application does comply with applicable standards, criteria and subject tv compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A"} dated October 7, 200$; NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RE5C}EYED, that the City of Central Paint Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. ~ 57 ,does hereby approve the application based vn the findings and conditions of approval as set forth an Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated October 7, 244$, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Commission Resolution Nv. ~ $7 {11~4~2d08) PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4`~ day of November, 2008. Planning Co issi C ATTEST: ck ~~ City Representative Approved by me this 4`" day of November, 20x8. Planning Ca 'ssi C Planning Commission Resvlutian No. 1 ~1 ~7.~~4~20()$) STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: FILE NO. U98U8 CENTRAL POINT STAFF REPORT October 7, 240$ Planning Department Tom Humphrey,AICP, Community Derre€opment Direttorl Assistant City Adm€nistrator Consideration of a major modification application to the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan designation of the 2.43 acre site from Medium Mix Residential (MMR} to High Mix Residential (HMR}. The project site is the current location of the Central Point Retirement Community, located at 410 Richardson Drive and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 43 DC, Tax Lot 3414, APN 10984155. Applicant: Twin Creeks Development Company, LLC Agent: Herb Farber, Farber Surveyjr~g. 5TAFF SOUR Connie Clune, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: It is the intent of Pacific Retirement Services to add an additional 41 dwelling units to the current 62 unit retirement facility located an the project site Figure 1). The MMR district allows a maximum of 32 units per acre. Tv accommodate the additional density proposed by the additiona141 units requires modification of the Master Plan re-designating the project site from MMR to HMR. The HMR district does not have a maximum density limitation; however, most HMR projects are in the vicinity of 50 units per acre. With the existing and proposed units, the density would be 51 units per acre. BACKGROUND: In January 2001, by Ord. Nv. 1$17, the City approved the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan (the "Master Plan"}. The approved Master Plan allowed for a maximum of -- 1,650residential units and 240,00(] sq. ft. of commercial floor _ _ area. The Master Plan is shown in Figure 2. Approval of the Master Plan included provisions for adequate and timely ~ improvements determined accessary to accommodate the maximum allowable densities as noted in the Master Plan. i Figure € In 2005 the project site was developed as the Central Point Retirement Community, a b2 unit, three (3} story, retirement facility on 2.03 acres of land planned and zoned MMR. Approximately 50% of the project site was left in open space in anticipation of a future second phase expansioa. Page 1 of 3 FINDING5: See Attachment "C". ISS[TES: I. L'amprehensire Play Compliance: Approval of the proposed modification must be found to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The City's Land Use Plan designates the project site as a Transit Oriented De~elapment (TOO} District. The proposed modification does not change the TDD land use designation. On the City's Comprehensive Land [Ise Plan the project site will remain designated far TOD use. Z. Master Plae Compliance: It is the Applicant's request to modify the Master Plan, The proposed modification has been compared against the approved Master Plan design and maximum allowable densities. 'The preciously approved Master Plan limited the maximum number of dwelling units to 1,55U {Maximum Density} and the maximum commercial floor area to 20,040 sq. ft. Currently, the design of the Twin Creeks TOD pra~ides for 1,475 dwelling units and 2(f0,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area. The proposed modification would add an additional 41 dwelling units, far a total of 1,515. This figure remains within the allowed Maximum Density. The proposed modification does not add any additional commercial floor area. Aside from the increase in dwelling units, the proposed modification does not otherwise alter the Master Plan. The approved Master Plan included a phasing schedule for bath residential and commercial development that was conditioned as compietian of certain street improvements. The proposed Master Plan modification does not alter the phasing, or completion timing of the required public improvements. CUNDITIDN5 OF APPRUVAL: There are no conditions of approval. ATTACI-IIVIENT5IEXHIBITS: Attachment "A"- Applicant Findings Attachment "B"- Rogue Valley Sewer Service Attachment "C"- Findings of Fact Attachment "D"- Resolution Page 2 of 3 ACTroN: Consideration of Resolution No. ~, approving the major modification application to the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan designation of the 2.43 acre site from Medium Mix Residential {MMR} to High Mix Residential {HMR} [File Na. D9008). RECUMMENDATIUN: Approval of Resolution No. ,granting approval of the major modification application to the Twin Creeks Transit oriented Development Master Plan designation of the 2.03 acre site fmm Medium Mix Residential {MMR) to High Mix Residential (HMR} (File No. 09008}. Page 3 of 3 BER SURVEY 1 N G ATTACHMENT ~~..." • FARBER & SONS, 1NC. a PAST dFF1CE BOX 586 + CENTRAL PAINT, QR 975D2 # + OFFICE ~ 43'1 DAIC STREET + CEAfTRAL POINT • Ffndings Minor Plan Amendment for Pacffic Retirement Service. Central Point a.ad 7~vin Creeks Devebpment Co., LLC August 18, 2(1a$ These findings arc to address the proposed master plan amendment and none change of the property located at 4l0 Richardson l3rive, Central Point, Cregvn, and identified as Assessors Map No 372Wfl3DC-341fl and as Lat 9 of Pine Street Station, Phase 1 as recorded is Volume 3l, Page 4 of the Plat Records of Jackson County, Oregon. Back ground: The Pre-Annexation Development Agreement recorded as Instrument No. ~ 1- 43646 of the official mcards of Jackson County provided the framework far establishing a Transit Orieeted Development {TDD} in January 2i?O 1 and was followed by the approval of the master plan for Twin Creeks development shortly thereafter. The implementation of the master plan has been in progress since the adoption of the development agreement and master plan. This property was master planned as Medium Mix Residential (N11NIR}. The request for consideration is to amend the plan to allow for a zone change from MMR to High Mix Residential [HMR}. Elements for consideration are the intent of the master plan community design features page 25 through 27 of the master plan book, triggers far public street improvements to accommodate tn~ic generated by the project and future plans for the site dependent on the results of the zone change application. 1. Cn page 27 the "PINE STREET STAT`IDN, A neighborhood with active retail, employment and high density residential uses. Senior assisted living housing is envisioned. Formal open spa~oes and landscaping. Closest neighborhood to Mae Richardson SchvoI and downtown Central Point " Finding: A master plan is not intended to be a precise template. The master plan was developed with the inclusion of the Rogue Bu- and Quality Fence properties. Since these properties are not under the control of Twin Creeks Development Co., LLC, the implementation of the plea does not reflect framework of the plan exactly. The senior housing development is the existing use and the proposed use is an expansion of that use is compatible with the vision statement in the master plan. The open space elements have been developed and are in the final stages of landscape planting. + HERBERT A. FARBER PRESIDENT/SURVEYOR +SUSAN M. FARBER BUSINESS MANAGER+ PHO-vE: 54 ~-664-5599 • FAx.' 54 ~-fiB4-563 Page 1 of 2 2. The Pre Annexation Development Agreement established a plan and time line fur required public sheet improvementldevelopment based on traffic volumes generated by the project. There are three primary triggers identified it the agreement. The first was 1000 Vehicle Trips per Day (VTD} which did not include the first 241vts of Crriffin Qaks subdivision as it was approved and under development prior to the agreemen# allowed l 00 units without any improvements. The second trigger was a choice between Pine Street, Haskell and Taylor road and railroad impravemeats for 5750 VTD ar the new railroad crossing far 400U VTD. The third trigger is the remaining option in trigger two to be completed prior to full development. Finding: The accepted Trip Generative Rate from the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication are 10 VTD for single family residential and 6 VTD for retirement community and 7 VTD for multiple family units or apartments all rounded figures. Based on these accepted numbers vve have built or have final platted single family lots numbering about 349 units for 3490 VTD and 185 senior waits for 1110 VTD far a total of 4600 VTD. The tentative plan for The North Village is pending final plat has 1 SO single family units for a potential of 1 S00 VTD. Existing H1V1It, MMR and EC lots require a site plan approval prior to development and until a specific plan is submitted and approved and the use is determined are not being taunted as able to generate VTD. Using these assumptions there is a potential of 6100 VTD from present development approved or pending final plat. The improvements far Pine, Haskell and Taylor Rvad have been completed and per the development agreement there are 675[] VTD available for development. This leaves 650 VTT] available far any site plan approval for use within the development area prior to the railroad crossing being constructed. The proposed use for the property is 41 additional retirement units that would generate 246 VTD and is within the available VTD, 3. Future Plans Finding: Comments received for the proposal have addressed the height of the proposed building. While this is oat criteria for the zone change and plan amendment, Pacific Retirement Services stipulates to keeping the proposed building under the 45 foot height requirement of the MMR. Canclusiva: This project will enhance the overall goals of the TDD by increasing the density of the project while conforming tv the vision of the master plan as stated in item 1 of this report. This action will provide for mare housing without urban sprawl in a livable setting. The proposed minor plea amendment and zone change is in conformance with the vision of the TDD master plan as it was approved and hes been developed to the present time. We respectfully request approval of Ibis request. Respectfiilly Submitted, Herbert A Farber Page 2 of x May 2S, 240I Cibnnla Cluny Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT ".~" From: Carl Tappert [ctelppert~rvaa.ue] Bent: Friday SepEsm6ar 12.7008 8:317 AAA Tv: Connie Ctuna SubJact: 09008-Pacific RetlremeM Ser-idss.doc Attachmrnt:: image00f jpp ,0 SEptCmber 1 ~, Z008 ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES L.ocatian: i38 West Vilas Read, Central Peirit, OR -Mailing Address: P.O. Hox 3130, Central Paint, QR 7502-00{ Tel. [54l } 664300, Fax {541 } C64-7I7 T www.RV55.us Connie Clime City of Central Point Planning Depamnent 1S5 South Second Street Central Paint, t7rcgon 97502 life: Paeldc Redremeat Services 1Vlfast{er PLra 1Hodi~ratlo>n slsAd Zane ChsAnge, lirile #04008, 08179 Dear Connie, The proposed development is currently served by a eormoction to the sewer main on I-Iaskekl Street, The Proposed additional units will require a permit from RVS only if there is new sewer pipe built outside of the buildings. Regardless of whether ar not a permit is required, there will be additional development fees awl to Rogge Valley Sewer Services. Compliance with stormwater quality regulations has already been established far this site. The utility fee for starmwater quality is based art the amount of impervious arcs which will change with the proposed development. We request that the approval of this application be subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the start of oonswc>bian, the applicant must provide RVS with a site plan showing the location of existing and proposed stxuctln~es and sewer laterals, with a calculadan of the toW lot area and total impervious surface area. 7. Prior m the start of construction, the applicant must pay all related sewer development fees and obtain a permit if needed. The need for a permit will be deterlmined by RVS based upon the site plan. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service far this project. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, P.E. District P.ngineer 91I51~OQ8 Attachment "C" FINDINGS DF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File Na: 090x8 INTRODUCTION Consideration of a major modification application to the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan designation of the 2.03 acre site firm Medium Mix Residential (11~[MR} to High Mix Residential (I-IlVIR}. The project site is the current location of the Central Point Retirement Community, located at 410 Richardson Drive and identified on the .lackson County Assessor's map as 37S ZW 03 DC, Tax Lot 3410, APN 1D9$D155 {"Project Site"}. Applicant: Twin Creeks Development Company, LLC, Agent: Herb Farber, Farber Surveying. CPMC 17.09.300 Major modifications. A. Major Modifrcat7an Defined The community development director shall determine that cr major mad~cation~s} is required if one ar rnore of the changes listed beIaw are proposed• 2. An increase in density by more than ten percent, provided the resulting density does not exceed thQt Allowed by the land use district; Finding: The Project Site is located within an area identified on the Land Ilse Plan Map as Transit Oriented Ievelopment {TOD}, a land use designation that provides far master planned Waxed use transit oriented development. In January 2041, by Drd. No. 1817, the City approved the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan {"Master Plan"} which identifies the use of the Project Site as Medium Mix Residential {MMR}. Consistent with the Master Plan designation of MMR the Project Site is currently zoned Medium Mix Residential {MMR}. The MMR zoning designation allows far a maximum density of 32 units per net acre. Finding: To accommodate the additional pmpased units it is necessary that the Master Plan be modified to allow far higher densities on the Project Site. This would necessitate a change from MMR to HMR. The HMR land use designation does not have a maximum density limit, and as such does constitute an increase in allowable density an the Project Site in excess of 10%. Conclusion: It has been determined that a major modification application is required for the application to modify the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan designation of the 2.03 acre site from Medium Mix Residential {MMR} to High Mix Residential {HMR} as provided in CPMC 17.09.3U0 {A}. CPMC 17.09.300 B. Major Modification Applications; Approval Criteria. An applicant may request a mQjnr modif cation using a Type II or Type III review procedure, as follows: Page 1 of b I. Upon the community development director determining that the proposed rriodijicatinn is a major modification, the applicant shall submit an application farm, filing fee acrd narrative, and a site plan using the same plan format as in the original approval The community development director may require other relevant information, as necessmy, to evaluate the request. Finding, Criteria 1: After a preliminary review of the applicant's proposed modification it was the Community Development Director's determination that the modification does constitute a major modification. The Applicant submitted an application far a Major Plan Modification. Conclusion, Criteria 1: The proposed project is a Major Modification and the appropriate submittals have been included in the application. 2. The application shall be subject to the same review procedure (Type II or III}, decision-making body, and approval criteria used for the initial project apprvvaI, except that adding a canditinnal use to an approved project shall lie reviewed using a Type III procedure. Finding, Criteria 2: The initial review and approval of the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan was conducted by the Planning Commission using a process, which under today's regulations is equivalent to a Type III application process. The Applicant submitted as application far review by the Planning Commission as a Type III major modification of the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan in compliance with section 17.09.300 (B}. Cvnclusivn, Criteria 2: Consideration of the proposed modification has been scheduled far review by the Planning Commission at their October 7, 2008 meeting. 3. The scope of review shall be limited to the mod cation request. Far example, a request to modem a parking lot shall require site design review anlyfor the proposed parking lot and any changes to associated access, circulation, pathways, lighting, trees, and landscaping. Notice shall be provided in accordance with the applicable notice requirements for Type II ar Type III procedures. Finding, Criteria 3: The proposed modification is restricted to the 2.03 acre project 51te. Cvneluaivn, Criteria 3: Consideration of the proposed modification has been limited to the 2.03 acre project area and consistency of the modification to the development conditions of the Master Plan as further discussed in these Findings. 4. The decision-making body shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions an application far major mod~catian based an written findings on the criteria. Page 2 0# b Finding, Criteria 4: The following findings address compliance with the initial requirements imposed on the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development Master Plan. Conclusion, Criteria 4: The following findings address compliance with the Master Plan. COMPREHEN5IVE LAND USE PLAN Finding: The project site is located within the Twin Creeks Transit oriented Development ("Twin Creeks Master Plan"}, a 230 acre master planned development approved by Ordinance No.1817. On the City's Comprehensive Land Lase Plan Map, Twin Creeks Master Plan area is designated as Transit Oriented Development ("TOO"), a land use designation that allows for mixed-use transit oriented development. Development within this land use classification is subject to the approved Twin Creeks Master Plan. The pz~oposed modification of the Twin Creeks Master Plan will not change the Comprehensive Plan's TOD designation on the Area covered by the Twin Creeks Master Plan. Conclusion; The proposed amendment tv the Twin Creeks Master Plan does oat change the Comprehensive Plan TCD designation, and is therefore considered to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. TWIN CREEKS TRAN5IT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN Finding: The Twin Creeks Transit oriented Development Master Plan ("Twin Creeks Master Plan"} contains three (3) basic design components: 1. Framework: a. Infrastructure, Tmnspartation -The Master Plan is designed with transportation options tv include a circulation system, of streets, bike paths and pedestrian pathways that maximize connectivity. Finding, Infrashvcture, Transportation: The proposed modification will not alter the approved ' plan as presented in the Twin Creeks Master Plan. Conclu~ian, Infrastructure: The proposed modification has no effect an the approved ' plan. b. Utilities -The Twin Creeks Master Plan includes utility plans far storm drainage, sanitary sewers, and water. Finding, Utilities: All utilities have been designed to accommodate the maximum allowable density of 1,650 dwelling units and 200,OOU sq. ft, of commercial floor area. Conclusion, Utilities: The proposed modification does oat cause as increase in the demand far public utilities and services. Page 3 of 6 c. Lsnd Uae Finding, Land Use: The Twin Creeks Master Plan provides for a density range between a minimum of 1,400 and a maximum 1,650 ("Maximum Density"}dwelling units, and a maximum gross commercial floor area of 200,000 sq. ft. The density illustrated in the Master Plan is 1,475 dwelling units {"Resign Density"}. The Twin Creeks Master Plan identifies the Project Site for development as Medium Mix Residential (MMR}. The proposed modification tv HMR will increase the overall density yield by 41 dwelling units. When added tv the Design Density the fatal density would be 1,516 dwelling units; which rvemains below the Maximum Density. Conclusion, Land Use: The proposed modification does not exceed the Maximum Density. ~. Community Design Features: s. Neighborhoods Finding, Neighborhoods: The Master Plan describes seven (7} specific areas to include attributes of each. The Master Plan referred to the general project area of this application as Pine Street Station, a seven acre neighborhood with high density residential uses, senior assisted living and active retaillemplayment uses. The proposed modification does not alter, or otherwise change the approved Pine Street Station Neighborhood. Conclusion, Neighborhoods: The proposed modification does not alter the neighborhood features of Pine Street Station. b. Recreation and open Space Finding, Recreation and Upen Space: The Twin Crocks Master Plan includes an Open Space plan. In conformance with the Master Plan, the Pine Street 5#atian, Phase I approved subdivision {flied plat 31-04} established Lot 8 as a park and open space. Naw known as Pine Street Station Pocket Park, Lot $ is an established park. The proposed modification does not alter, or otherwise change the approved Recreation and Qpen Space Plan. Conclusion, Recreation and Upen Space: The proposed modification does rat alter the Recreation and Open Space Plan. c. 5treetscapes Finding, 5treetscapes: The Master Plan incorporates traffic calming devices plan, street tree planting plan, a parking summary, and. street lighting design plan. The proposed modification does not alter, or otherwise change the approved Streetscape Plan. Page 4 of 5 Conelusion, Streetscapea: The proposed modification does not alter the Streetscape Plan. d. Architecture Finding, Architecture: The Master Plan provides architectural design concepts far each of the three [3}main housing types within the plan. Multi-family includes senior assisted living. The plan prescribes that the assisted living building is located in the High Mix Residential zone and is typically three [3}stories in height. The proposed modification does not alter, or otherwise change the approved Architecture Plan. Conclusion, Architecture: The proposed modification does not alter the Architecture Plan. 3. Implementation -The Master Plan includes a circulation (street} system and specific street improvement requirements. Phasing and development triggers are used to implement the Master Plan infrastructure improvements, particularly those improvements that will assure maintenance of adequate street capacity. The proposed modification does not alter the approved Implementation measures of the Master Plan. s. Pre-Annexation De-~elvpme©t Agreement Finding, Pre-Annexation Development Agreement: The development triggers established by the Pre-Annexation De~elvpment Agreement, Ord. No. 1$17 and supported by the TIS, August 2t14~, z are as illustrated by the Rate of Development chart of the Master Plan. These triggers and associated infrastructure improvements were incorporated in the adopted plan. The proposed modification does not alter the Implementation measures of the Master Plan. Conclusion, Pre-Annexation Development Agreement: The proposed modification does not alter the Fre-Annexation Development Agreement. b. Phasing and Development Triggers Finding, Phasing and Development Triggers: Development within Twin Creeks is conducted in four phases to insure that adequate ' capacity is provided concurrent with the development of each phase. Conclusion, Phasing and De-~elvpmeat Triggers -The proposed modification does not modify, or otherwise adversely affect the Phasing and Development Triggers set forth in the Master Plan. Summary Conclusion: As proposed, the major modification application will not cause a modification to the Comprehensive Plan's TAD land use designation. Further, the proposed modification will not alter the Twin Creeks Master Pian, yr exceed the overall plan density of ' Central Point Transit Oriented Development Traffic Impact Study August 2QD4, ]"RH Engineers, P3anners 8c Pra~ect Managers Page 5 of 6 1,65a units and the maximum rvmmercial floor area to 2~4,UUU sq. ft., nor will the proposed modification alter the Phase and Der+elopment Triggers of the Master Plan. Page 6 of b AT~A~ H Nf E NT " ~ " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO THE TWIN CREEK',S TRANSIT ORIIENTED DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN DESIGNATION OF THE Z.D3 ACRE SITE FROM MEDIUM MIX RESIDENTIAL (NIlVIR} TO ffiGH MIX RESIDENTIAL (HMR} FILE N0.09DD8. Applicant: Twin Creeks De~-elopment Company, LLC; Agent: Herb Farber, Farber Surveying (410 Richardson l]ri~e, 375 2W 03 DC, Tax Lot 3418, APN 189$0155). WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application to change the Twin Creeks Transit oriented Dcwelopmerrt Master Plea desiguatioa of the 2.43 acre site from Medium Mix Residential {1NMR) to High Mix Residential (HMR} {File Na. 89008}. Central Point Retirement Community, is located at 4l0 Richardson Drive and is identified on the 7acksaa County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03 DC, Tex Lot 3414, APN 18988155 is the City of Central Point, Uregoa; WHEREAS, an October 7, 2888, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing an the application, at which time it re~+iewed the City staff report and heard testimony end comments oa the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to Major Modifications in accordance with Section 17.49,30{1 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, after duly considering Applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application does comply with applicable stan~A*~Q, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set faith in the Planning Deparr:uent Staff Report (Exhibit "A'~ dated Qctober 7, 2808; NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESaLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolutiva No. ,does hereby appm-re the application based an the findings and conditions of aPPro~ as set forth oa Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated October 7, 2088, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Plarming Co~*+~+t~~ion Resolution No. ~18/7/200~B) PASSED by the Piaaning Commission and signed by me in authentieatiion of its passarge this 7m day of October 200$. Plenniag Co ' sioa ATTEST: City Represeatati~e Approved by me this '7~ day of October, 2408. Planning Cu 'Siva Planning Commission Resolution No. {10/7/2U0B}