Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 739 - Gray Court Final Development Plan ApprovalPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS GRAY COURT LOCATED AT 737 AND 745 HOPKINS ROAD Applicant: Jon S. Gray (37S 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1400 &1.500) File No. 06060 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for Final Development Plan approval for a Planned Unit Development and subdivision known as Gray Court located at 737 and 745 Hopkins Road Street, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's snap as 37S 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1400 & 1500, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 2008, the City o£ Central Point Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the Application Review Process -- Section 17.05, Residential Multiple Family -Section 17.28, and Planned Unit Developments 17.65 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Final Development Plan application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated January 15, 200$, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the Final Development Plan is consistent with the intent of the CPMC; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. ~ 3 does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated January 15, 2008, which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Commission Resolution No. ~ 3 ~ (1/15/2008) ~'.~~~,~~ Syr ~h~ ~~~~~~z~~~; ~c~~~~i~~ie~.~~ r~.~~.c~ ;~~~~~.~}~.f ?;~ ~~~.~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~z~~ ~~~ i~~ City :t~~~~~~~nt~~~~~ A:~~~~°c~zY~~ ~v ~~~ ~.~ 1~~~~. ~-~a~r ~~ ~a~z~ar~.Y, ~~~~. ~~~.~a~ar~~ C;~~is~i~z~. R~~e~~u~~c~~. hrs. #..., (~/ ~~~'~1~~ -#n~-z ~#~say~#7rE~y, r~f~:E i ~c~~~~r~a:r~€3y I:~t:u¢a#,~~irt~f~t (~€t'~Ci~:iP ,ass#st~fat Katy ~a~#~#n€w€e~ic~~ ~~~:~`~' ~~' '~ ~> .... Cry ~~~~~~~ :~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~sa~~i€~~r~~ aa~ ~ ~n ~~~Felcap~~z~r~~ :~~~ ~~a~alic~.~~s~.t~ :~€~~° ~~s•~~t C;~~~•~ ~~~.J-13. '~'~~~ ~~l~j~c~ ~~r~~e~~' ~~ ~sa~~t~d i~~ ~~ :1~.~3, :~:~~~~~.r~t~~~ €~~~~~sl~ ~~~~~x ~~~ t~~~.r€~i; is ~~~~~t~~~~~. ~n ~h~~ ~~~~s~~ar~ ~~~~~y ~~s~~sarp~~ as a~ ~7~ ~~ ~ 1;~., T~~ T.c~ts ~~~~ ~.~~ t~f3!~. 'T'he ~s~~~~~~1 ~c~c~~•i~~~s ~~~ 7~~ ~ ~~ -------- --------- ---------- -----~.W_~.~..r.~------_~..~~.~W.~-.~.._ .....~...v........... -----~-------J.......................». _ ---------- .:~~L'> '~'~~ saa~a;~~~~ r~?j~~,~ ~s~~~ ~y ~ca~ ~~ ~s ~sa~~e~atisa~a~~t~r ~~a~zsa~r~~ Cdr ~~.~~~l~.~aa~a Asa. d~a ~~ t•wi~~~°~ ~ ~'~~ ~aui~s~~~g~, ~.~ ~.~~ ~ati~~ti~~~ k~~.:~ ~'~~ ~ t.~~~~ c~~: ~.5 s~~ifs. fln ~~a~~~x , ~t~(3~, the ~1~~~~i~3 ~s~n~.~~i~~.it~s~ ~s•t~~ ~ sip ~~1 ~~€~~. ~~~~~g~sa~..r~.~~ca.~z• ~~ (~~ gnsa~~~ ~~t~~~s~ra ~~~ ~;~~~~~ ~~~ ~,~~;a~~t '~, ~' ~~ €~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~i~~~san. T~:~ ~~~ s~~~~r~~~~sa~a~ ~a1~xa ~~r~~ ~~~tt~it~~~ ire ~. #~~1~ n~~~~r r~csr ~~ ~h~ ~~~~ ~~t~a~a~~~saz~ ~t~ ~f J~~u•d; ~, 2~3~~. '~~~~ ~'l~~~n sarn~x~~;~~~s~~'~ sar~~.i ~p~Sra~Y~l ~~l~c~~~~ s~~s~~~a~r~Y ~~~~~€~~~ ~~ ~'sallca~~; 1. ~~~c~ €~sa~ic~~°z~~sa€z sa~~c ~~~~~z~a~~at ~fr~~.t• cl~~~~isaza ~~~~r~sa~~~ ~c~ a~ raca~ fisa ~saxs~.~~roz~se ~.~ ~~s~sr~~J~ ~ s~~,r~z~l ~.~~~~~~~ ~~~1~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~s~r~~ Ica b~°~~c Epp ~~ ~~~~~~~, c~a~°t~~~ ~auili€~s. `~~ a~~z~~ ~s ~.dc~.r~~~~c~ ar~~ rat ~~~ ~sara~tis~xa~, :~~~r ~€~ ~;~~~~~~" i~ ~~ ~t~'r~~asa~~> '~'~3e ~p~ii~~at ~~ ~~.sa~~ ~u~~~~ ~`~~~ ~~~r~~ca~.~~c ~~~a~~~~~i~n Tsar ~ransis~~x~.~~~, ~~~~~ ~r,=:it~ ~~.~ z~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ran fsar ~a~~ ~~r~v~, a~ ~r~j~~t ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~r~rs~ist~~~~ tt~ ~h~ ,s~~~~i~n~P ~1. ~~ ~~ ~~~i~rz~ ~x~~~a~~s: ~ . ~~~.~ ~t has b~~~ ~~a~~d t~ $~c~~~s~d~~~ t~~I~t ~sa~~t~+~za~ isa ~~~ ~~~~r~ d~~~~sa~arn~~# ~~~~.~~ ~:~ ac~~~~~i~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~sa~~ :~~ ~~~a~ ~ ~~~~ ~a~c~~a~~~ ~i~a~ sa~t~azs prs~j~~~e `I'~~s Ea~~ r~~s~~~s~ ire ~. r~~~ct~sa~ s~£°~ ~c~a~~cr ca~'~.~~i~~ ~~i~h ~asa~~ c~~~~~~ ~~" ~~~~~d ~~~~e ~~z~il~ d~rel~~s~;~, s~n~ s:~nl~ ~~~:~~,. ~~~~~:~ ~~re~li:~~ sa~~~ ~~ sa~~~ ~gr~y ~,~~r~ I~ira~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~1~~ ~'~~~ 1 sad I~TNDINGS: Refer to Attachment "E" ISSUES: Banding Elevations: The elevations submitted with the final development plan do not reflect the Planning Commission's condition for special consideration for the placement of the windows on the rear elevation. The applicant's narrative (Attachment "B"}, addresses this condition by stating that the windows facing adjacent properties have been removed. Removing all windows on the rear elevation would further contribute to the look of solid massive buildings without additional features to break up a monolithic appearance. After meeting with staff, the agent submitted revised elevations relocating the windows on the 2"d floor to the sides of the units, reducing the size of the window on the ~Ea floor and repositioning them from the tap plate (ceiling), rather than completely removing the windows. (Refer to Attachment "B") Architecture: During the original approval for this development, it was further conditioned by the Planning Commission that the applicantlagent work with staff to make the units more aesthetic. Again, after meeting with staff, the agent agreed to redesign the rear elevation by adding architectural columns between the attached units, and paint the belt bands and individual units a different color to further break up the mass. The agent has submitted revised elevations incorporating the Planning Commissions concerns, and also added covered rear entries/dormers. CC & R's: The applicant has submitted dra$ CC & R's that address the maintenance of individual. properties as well as the continued maintenance of common areas. The tot lot 1 playground is identified as common area and is ensured the continued maintenance by the Home Owner's Association. Reduction in Dwelling Units: In order to accommodate utility connections to the development, it has been necessary to eliminate one unit. This will leave a single detached single family dwelling unit at the northern portion of the project. This detached home will have the largest lot with the PUE located within the side yard far this unit. However, this unit must be consistent with the architectural elevations of the attached single family units. (Refer to Conditions of Approval}. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL l . All building plans submitted shall comply with the architectural elevations as submitted in Attachment "B" 2. The tat lot shall be bonded for with the Public Works Department to ensure its completion as identified in Attachment "C" prior to the signing of the final plat for recording. 3. A copy of the recorded CC & R's shall be submitted to the City prior to signing the final plat for recording. 4. The detached single family unit must be consistent with the architectural elevations submitted for the attached single family units. Gray Court Final Development Plan Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS: Attachment "A" -Final Development Plan Attachment "B" -Revised Elevations Attachment "C" - Tot Lot Design Attachment "D" -- Applicant's Narrative Attachment "E" -Findings Attachment "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consider approval for a Final Development Plan application to create twenty-two (22) attached single family units, one (1) detached single family unit and one existing home for a total of 24 single family dwellings. RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve the Final Development Plan application per Staff Report dated Januazy 1 S, 2008 including all attachments and exhibits to create twenty-two (22) attached single family lots, one detached single family lot and an existing single family residence known as Gray Covert. Subdivision, A Planned Unit Development. Gray Court Final Development Plan Page 3 of 3 R~ ~~a••7 yt.>~~ ~1~~. CPNflI:nN AGG~' St•ccriAS;uh.s 2'~[xa~F~ ~e~ _~ Nll•G1-lOi-IA ~c ~.~asI.,ANCeIANA ~~ ~p 6~t ~~,FS '~,~~' to3.FSj 5 _- ~it+.IC.L4C. NIA61l.lOL~h 3 W 3L7gN GA{+{'E'~ .l'JNi f`~L. i filly- } ~--~ "~ ` ti r ' ~ ( 7..• ~ (~ ~ - 1 d Rk11~'NP_Gt..~PF ih ~5P€::,NG I~Pt'7s~[~' r7 GAL I .`_'~.1`s~rrl. ~ F~.s~~li.•ivh. Jt+~. C~ac.D~J ~ fitAL ~ --- +~'~~' ~ ,7-{i7h~1!/•• C,UONYMCra GIOL.OC~{ fF~P•gR6EN~ ~9 rz Pw-'>`lu~ ~I~:Ja 2"car.rr~ ~i a o ~. - - -- f r" f'` ~A G 4. _ ~ '~ V€~:J(iy.l iJM t7AVr57ii '~ lgAL, ~ ,1,s_~I~ r- ~-3 `I~`'I~ ~ ~K llm"~ 1 ~ ~ LW.1rD`h vI Eufw u ~.t . E 1 I D v~~, ~' y~~ ~ S fit{. - ' ra :rn.a sol. c - -- --° ..Cdi.E4Rt;-t, - ~- d ~~ ; ..15 ::J °IG~h G:.h:.s~P 2 Ch:.._'aF.,~ `_ a~ I '° c € ~:'~ tol ~F~ICe 8 FJI. 1 5Q ~'htfd. LNG ~ ~ .y .~ t~ ~ ~ ~ : u~~. Cu.l-:..:~r*~j) u I - ~. , grv,l c, ~, - I ~Q r~ - --f~'P#G LAN D~iG A~ . f~~~ Lf'~N ~ . .~wri.R..,~.:w,sar,~E~~.R.,,er.uo..w>ISa. scr.~fl.~snax ~-~ swr rw r ~ i vm , „ , _ ~ ~ , ~.. /:.~ -, tied ram ~ - PRoPGRTY i.~n+e 5'~q,ol e'wrreeserw~.ar~x- o ~ i 32' az "`may'-~,n=fir _.. . ~ ~ C } Iz a 4 ' 3 16 ~ la 9 410 4 t I '~ c ~ - ' t I ~ + °- ' o ~ ' 9y. 4 .. ~l•~ .I ! ~ ~ I I I m2to'I ~ f5'•o' {.~4.°. _ ~ ~4 \ f ~ ~~ ~ P I I I t / ~ \ .. ~/ e r .. o e f `~~~--_c o u €~ 'f ,„ _ ti~ueT eENYSR ~~NE~__-, -~^.gtrtp..ie.`. n~ Ir o PPOP<¢1'{ LwlB E~{hT_Nfil„gpFyv.WJCO - ~ _ ' _.~__ o If !t + t3 1A I 1K f0 1'f is 14 (7q y€ ~ y It4[ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ t.,]~ v :z~ F ' I I I I I a ! I ~ iy ~ ~ ' I/ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~~ ~ t~ . ~z' 3a' ...1.. 3z` yrz' ~ o___~_..._~i` _,~ 3z' ° ma ...+. FINAL DEVELQPMENT °~- PLAN h„~,_u~ ,,,..,....._. i r~ f.. ,~i~•~Yilr'ti ~ ~ ,;i :~ ~ ' fy4 u~tTti REAR ELEVATION srs-~ i,-n^ .:mow r r.~a:.„ ?cam _ ~ -. i2 4 r._ FRONT ELEVATIpN 11I^•~ ~'-p^ .~~~~a +~~ ~' '~ ~~ ~ 10~~~- i ~ ~ -- I ~ ~ - -i i :~.: --! C") rn Z V SIDE ELEVATIC3N d~ Gp~L„ ~~~~.~ `3~2K. OJT '~(-1G \~~ ~~ H ~~€~NG~ ~F-1' .. -S, ~ r• - ~G~ ~~ A t Lit= ~`i..:,'s+~' ~I~`GJ'P~F h~4 i- ~~. }L.. • b. ~ ~ti ~ ,, r~. `O ~~~.. Gay! ATTACHMENT "~!~ L Cal vin Martin, Developer's Agent 3901 Bridgeport Drive, Medford, Oregon, 97504 (541) 857-4374 Offce, (541) 210-1063 Ceti, (541) 282-9535 Fag calmartinl MSN.COM Design, Construdion Management, Construction Cost Estimates, Contract Negotiations Feasibility Studies, Quantity Surveys, Contract Management, Contract Dispute Resolutions City and Regional Planning, Land Development, Lr obbying, Wastewater Technologies l a ~ 06 ~ zoos NARRATIVE To: City of Central Point Oregon Planning Department Re: Final Plat Submission for Gray Court PUD Via Hand Delivery This narrative is to give an overview of the above project located at north side of the intersection of Hopkins Road and Bursell Road and also known as Township 37, Range 2W, Section 1 lA and Tax Lots 1400 and 1500. The zoning district of the City of Central Point is R-3 and this project has a file number with the city of 6060. The project preliminary plat and site plan was approved by the City Council of Central Point and the applicant is now submitting for a final plat approval. Virtually all of the work on the infrastructure has been completed and inspected by the city during the process. Sewer, Water, Storm Drain, Power, Cable, Telephone, Curbs, Paving, Perimeter Fencing have been completed according to the approved drawings. Some items remain to be completed and they include a railing at the west side of the entry onto Hopkins road where a small retaining wall creates adrop-off. Reflectors have been ordered for the fence at the north end of the cul-de-sac to warn vehicles that they have come to the end of the street. The sidewalk is completed up to the first home sites on both sides of the street and per an arrangement with the city the sidewalks will be completed as the homes are built and their driveways are poured. It was suggested that in doing so we could prevent damage to the sidewalks during construction of the homes. Lighting has been ordered through PP&L and should be installed and illuminated as transformers are installed to Page 2 of 3, Gary PUD, Narrative serve the individual homes. Should the city require a bond for the lights the applicant is willing to da so. Some changes to the original plan were necessary to complete the site work and the following is a list: l . The curbs for the street were changed to mountable curbs throughout to alert those backing out that they are about to enter the roadway and to slow down those entering their driveways. 2. The entry road at Hopkins was moved to the east slightly to preserve about six large trees that add much to the beauty of the area. 3. The 24th dwelling unit was deleted to allow the looping of the water system to the east into Briarwood Drive. This now means that all of the sewer and water connections go through the property of Dr.Marlan Morse to Briarwood Dr. The looping of the water system could not be extended as originally intended due to the unwillingness of the members of the mobile home subdivision to the north to allow such a connection. The storm drain system continued through the property about one half the distance to the north and now includes a separator for trash, debris and oil. 4. Several lengths of fencing have been repaired and or totally replaced during the construction and now is complete. 5. The designs of the residences have now removed all of the windows that face outward from the property to neighboring properties. 6. The electrical plans for the residences have lighting on the entry columns that are activated by light sensors so that street lighting is supplemented. These lights are only 10' from the edge of the sidewalk and should be very effective at lighting the walking areas near the residences. The original concept of this development has not changed and that is to give buyers the opportunity to own a comfortably sized home with upscale amenities that they can afford. Considering the current condition of the housing market these homes should be at a very attractive price and give owners excellent value for their investment. It should be recalled that the reason that this project is a PUD is due to the relatively narrow width of the existing properties. The design only deviates from "normal" standards in the area of front yard setbacks. In the design the second floor overhangs 10' to allow for a bedroom on the third floor and a covered deck an the second floor. The resultant l~' of cover at the driveway parking area is a plus for the homeowner. It is felt by the developer that there are no negatives to this design caused by the deviation of the PUD. The applicant feels strongly that the deviations from the original plan are minor and advantageous to the neighbors and the eventual owners of the residences. The location of the street entering Hopkins Road now in use has seemly presented no problems in that Page 3 of 3, Gray PUD, Narrative visibility is good in all directions and far enough separated from the stop sign on Hopkins to aIiow all to maneuver without difficulty. All changes were reviewed with the city staff before implementation and they agreed that they were reasonable and app opriate. L. Calvin Martin, Agent for applicant ATTACHMENT " ~ Findings of Fact And Conclusions of Law Final Development Plan Findings City File No. 06060 Applicant: Jan S. Gray Agent: L. Calvin Martin T 7.68.060 Final development plan. A. within six months following the approval of the preliminary development plan, the applicant shall~le a jrnal development plan with the city, containing in frnal form the information required in the preliminary plan. The same shall be reviewed by the planning commission and decided by the city Council as set forth in Chapter 17.05 of this codes The council may, in its discretion and for a good cause, extend for six months the period for the filing of the final development plan. B. The permit for a PUD shall expire and become void one year from the date on which it was issued unless an application far extension is fried and approved by the planning commission. The one year shall commence with approval of the final development plan. Finding: The applicant successfully received extensions to keep this project from expiring, and has submitted the f nal development plan in a timely manner. Conclusion: The applicant has met the criterion. ATTACHMENT "~" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDNISION KNOWN AS GRAY COURT LOCATED AT 737 AND 745 HOPKINS ROAD Applicant: Jon S. Gray (375 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1400 & 1500) File No. 060G0 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for Final Development Plan approval for a Planned Unit Development and subdivision known as Gray Court located at 737 and 745 Hopkins Road Street, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1400 & 1500, in the City of Central Point, C-regon; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 2008, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a public hearing an the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the Application Review Process - Section 17.05, Residential Multiple Family -Section 17.28, and Planned Unit Developments 17.68 of the Central Paint Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Final Development Plan application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated January 15, 2008, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the Final Development Plan is consistent with the intent of the CPMC; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated January 15, 2008, which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Commission Resolution No. {1/15/2008) PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th day of January, 2008. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 15th day of January, 2008. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (1/15/2008)