Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 738 - Conger-Morris Site PlanPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~~ A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR AN EXPANSION OF EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATED AT 800 SOUTH FRONT 5TREET (HIGHWAY 99) Applicant: S & B, LLC dba: Conger-Morris Central Point Chapel (37S 2W 11CB, Tax Lot 100) File No. 08145 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for a Site Plan approval for expansion of existing facilities located at SOO South Front Street (Highway 99), and is identified on the ~'ackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11CB, Tax Lot I00, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, on November b, 2007, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the Application Review Process - Section 17,05, Permitted Uses and Development Standards 17.65.050, and Site Design Standards 17.67 of the Central Point Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Site Plan application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated November b, 2007, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the Site Plan is consistent with the intent of the TOD -Transit Oriented District; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Paint Plaiuiing Commission, by this Resolution No. ~1 ~ ~ does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff Report dated November 6, 2007, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Co~miGsion Resolution No. ~ 'J ~ (11062007) ~~ ~~pr~~~~~.~~~i~ ,.,.: ~~ ~.~~ ~'~~~~~ ~'~~~e ~i~~ "gym. ~~~ s s:::<as~f~rrtz:ra'r;~r €.?.~v~t>~c:~tr~~r~3':#: €)a~f>~:tr~r:~ F~tt$f 1Ti~r'~~ ~.{i'~ ,~~d3`~tr?1~~~?'ii ~Crr' ;~~~sid~~~t~~~.~ c~#'~ ~~.tca ~~:~~ ~~°r=~:v~r ~~r ~x~~~~ic~~~ c~i ~~ie ~~i~t~~ ~:'esr~~~r~~rr~ ~~~:~~it~~:~. `l"~~ ;~a.~~~~~~;~ ~~~•~~~~~t.~~ i~ ~c~r~~c~ ~~~-~~. ~~~~r~l ~`c~znzncrc;~~l, ~rte~ ~:~ ~~.~.~ti~:~~ ~~i [~~r<:.~~3~k~cstt ~~~s~~r~l~~ ~'~s~~;~~c~~':5 n~~~ ~~ ~7 ~~~,; ~, ~~'~~. ~..~t I ~3~< ~,9 ~~ ~t~~~~~ ~~ t)t) ~. ~sresr~t ~t~~€~t, .. f• `. . \ ~ .\ .\ ~ ;,~ ~,. f. i.°r3? }? s ._. ~~~ ~;~' ~ =' -:. -, .7 :, '~ '~. ~~~r~r"1 •~ri~h s~ c~~°~~~~~y ~n~ ~3~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ t~~~ ~~~~~z~F ~~~~~e~ t~~~ ~izs~.~•~:ti.c3~~ c~~ ~.~~~i~l~ x~~~~~ ~~~sta•i~t crit~~aa try ~~~~ti. ~~~ this ~~~~. ale ~~~~l~~ar~t ~:~~~~ iu ~~c~c~s~ €~ ~•~q~i~~~~ne~itsr ]~~an~~~~:~ ~p~•i~~~~~t ~~~c~~ds d~ nit ~~~r~i~.~te t~~~t a CY? ~~ dad ~~~~~ b~~~~ z~su~ ~:csr ~:~r~e~ _.. ~~~~ ~t•~~z t~ ~+~• ~.ft~~• 1~~~ ~ e~~~ ~~~~ sits ~~€~ p~~~pccti~re, ~~ d~~'t~r~~z~~ ~~~:~~~~~ the t-i~;~a ~~niz~~ ~sir~t~; l . 'I'~~.~ (~NyA ~:~n~~~~z~~ T~~c~r~~~~~~~~ r~c~~.~ir~~ a Goa~c~iti~~~~l t~~~ ~~~~•~a~~t ~~~• a ~ctc~rtu~•y. ~- .` _ . ti 2. The C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare requires a mortuary to have one (1j parking space per SO square feet of gross floor area. In this case, the required parking would be 107 spaces. 3. The TOD- GC, General Commercial zone would designate this existing business as a "Personal Service" and as such, is a permitted uses. 4. The required number of parking spaces in the TOD-GC is one { I) parking space per 500 square feet of floor area for a total of eleven (11) required parking spaces. Tax Lot 100 has a lot dimension of 150' x 290' deep, for a total of 43,500 square feet. (Figurel}. To the north, south, and west the surrounding properties are zoned TOD-GC, General Commercial To the east (rear) the adjacent property is zoned R-3, Residential Multiple Family. General Project Description: The existing and proposed use is classifed by defnition as Personal Services3, which is a permitted use within the TOD-GC zoning district. The project as proposed is for an expansion of their existing facility to include a receiving area, additional indoor temperature controlled storage, and a crematorium. The construction and use of a crematorium is regulated by the State of Oregon. The existing first floor (3,147 square feet) and second floor area (949 square feet) is approximately 4,096 square feet, and was constructed in 1976. The proposed addition is for a single story consisting of 1,257 square feet to be situated behind the existing building. if approved, the structure's adjusted total gross floor area will be 5,353 square feet, fora 31 % expansion. The applicant is proposing to enclose the existing covered drive {carport) by adding garage doors at the west and east ends. There will not be any changes to the original footprint of the carport. Density, Lot Area and Coverage: The maximum allowed lot coverage for TOD -General Commercial zoning is 100% (all impervious surfaces count toward lot coverage), with a minimum requirement of 15% landscaping. The total proposed lot coverage (building and impervious area) is approximately 76% or 33,060 square feet. The landscaping is approximately 24 % or 10,355 square feet, which is in compliance with CPMC. There is additional landscaping (approximately 1,820 square feet) located within the public right of way for Highway 99, which is discussed in greater detail under issues of this staff report. Setbacks: The existing structure is not subject to review far setback requirements. The proposed expansion must meet the following current setback requirements: The rear yard setback is 0' (unless adjacent to a residential zone, the minimum setback is 15'). The portion of South First Street that was vacated cannot have any structures located within those 40 feet. However, it is used in calculating the required distance from a residential zone, overall landscaping requirements and maximum lot coverage. Parking: The parking requirements for personal services located within the TOD District /Corridor are one (1) space per 500 square feet of gross floor area4, far a total of 11 spaces required. The existing parking provides 49 spaces. The proposed addition will consume an area equivalent to seven {7) of the existing parking spaces leaving a total of 42 parking spaces, which, as proposed, meets and exceeds the minimum number of parking spaces required. 2 CPMC 17.08.410 (D) {b) -Definitions of Personal Services s CPMC 17.65.OS0 -Table 1 a 17.65.050 -Table 3 - TOD Districts and Corridor Parking Standards Page 2 of 5 Architectural Design: The Site Plan application. includes elevations, parking and landscaping plans (Attachment A). The building elevations of the existing building and proposed expansion are architecturally consistent with the design criteria for the TOD District & Corridors. Landscaping and Buffering: The subject property includes 12,175 square feet afan-site landscaped area accounting for 24% of the total property area. The minimum landscape requirement is 1 S%6 . The landscaping is situated along the entire perimeter of the property, as well as raised brick wall planters on the northwest corner of the property and within the existing parking lot. The landscaped area located to the rear of the property consists of approximately 6,000 square feet and will provide additional buffering to the R-3, Multiple Family residential area located to the east. The minimum buffering required is 15'. The applicant has met and exceeded the minimum landscaping and buffering requirements. Access: There are three (3) existing access points to the subject property, one {1) from Highway 99, and the other two (2) from Cupp Drive. The applicant will not be making any changes to existing access points. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "G" ISSUES: 1. Highway 99 Right of Way: Based on the Jackson County Assessment map, field measurements and with other information available to staff, the right of way for Highway 99 in front of Conger -Morris is approximately 112 feet in width. The paved area of Highway 99 is approximately 67 feet from curb to curb. Measuring from the center line of Highway 99 towards Conger-Morris the right of way is approximately 55 feet with approximately 33 feet paved to front of curb. This leaves a remaining right of way beyond the existing curb of approximately 23 feet. The site plan is inconsistent with the measurements taken by staff, and would place the applicant's monument sign, the trees recommended for removal and their parking lot lighting all within the public right of way. Prior is issuance of any construction permit, the applicant will be required to provide a corrected site plan. 2. Nan Conforming Screening: There is existing nonconforming fencing that consists of: • A forty-two (42"} inch chain link fence along the property line adjacent to Cupp Drive, and, • East of the second driveway from Highway 99 there is an existing seventy-two (72"} inch chain link fence. Chain link fencing with or without slats for screening is prohibited in the TOD District/Corridor~. The applicant is conditioned to replace the chain link fencing with a fence constructed of acceptable materials. The fence/screen will be a s 17.67 -~ Design Standards - TOD District and Corridor 6 CPMC Section 17.65.050 Table 2 7 CPMC 17.67.OS0 {4) Page 3 of 5 minimum of six (6) feet in height around the service areasR, and shall not obstruct adequate sight distance for vehicles entering and exiting the parking lot or service areas. Sidewalks and Landscaping Strips: Currently there are no sidewalks along the project's frontage adjacent io Highway 99. The applicant must provide sidewalks and a landscape strip consistent with Public Works Standards along the frontage of the property. There are three (3} mature trees along Highway 93 which are currently causing the asphalt in the parking lot to raise and break apart. These trees are also located within the area proposed for the sidewalk. Public Works Specifications for improvements along a five (5) lane arterial (Drawing No. ST-32), requires a six (6) foot sidewalk and seven and a half foot (7.S) landscape strip. The three (3) trees along Highway 99 presently causing damage shall be removed and replaced with trees chosen from the City of Central Point approved street tree list9 . 4. Existing Monument Sign: The existing monument sign is located almost entirely within the public right of way and will need to be relocated. if the applicant wishes to replace the sign, they will be required to obtain a sign permit. The new sign shall be compliant with the sign regulations for the TOD - GC District/Corridor. 5. Rogue Valley Sewer Services: RVSS is requiring the applicant to locate the existing sewer service lateral and replace or relocate the pipe as needed in coordination with RVSS. (Refer to Attachment "E"). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Applicant shall comply with alI requirements of outside agencies. 2. Applicant shall relocate or remove the existing monument sign to allow for a new sidewalk and landscaping strip within the public right of way once verified by a surveyor. 3. Applicant shall replace existing chain link fencing with a material acceptable for the TOD District and Corridor. 4. Applicant shall screen the compressor for the temperature controlled storage area, using materials similar or complimentary to the existing screening of the HVAC unit on the east side of the building. 5. Applicant shall install a sidewalk and landscaping strip along the frontage adjacent to Front Street {Highway 99} that is compliant with the Public Works Specifications (Drawing No. ST-32} (Refer to "Sidewalks" under issues for full condition of approval). This shall be done prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to construction of the sidewalks, applicant shall provide a landscaping and irrigation plan for the frontage landscape strip. The landscape plan shall be based on the landscape plan proposed for the Providence facility south of this project. 6. Applicant shall provide a revised site plan drawn by a licensed surveyor reflecting actual property ba~uldaries, and measurements prior to issuance of a building permit. a CPMC 17.67050 {4) (~) 9 CPMC 17.67.050 {S) Page 4 of S NOTES: Approval of this Site Plan shall be valid for a period of one year and shall expire on Thursday, November 6, 2008. EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" -Building Elevations & Landscaping Plans Attachment "B" -Applicant Project Narrative Attachment "C" -Public Works Correspondence Attachment "D" -Building Department Staff Report Attachment "E" - RVSS Correspondence Attachment "F" -Department of Environmental Quality Correspondence Attachment "G" ~-Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Attachment "H" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of approval for the Site Plan Application. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution Number granting Site Plan approval, based on the Staff Report dated November 6, 2007 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Page S of S ~1~~~~aH~~~~ c,; .~ 9~ £~~ ~ m ~~ ~ ~ ~© ~ ~ti~e ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ x K gas ~ r i -~t c ~~~~ ~ •"{ ~ ~ C ~ ~ Y~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ Y rv q u u yyy Y`S ~ L ~ p w g p O - - - - - - - PACTF~C HWY 99- _-... .... . .~._-.. -.. ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ c~, ~ ~ Z N ~ ~. ~ ~~ A Q {p Hs 1! N O x ~~~ ~/ ~_ • ro v rn ~ " g ~ ~ ~ ,~ PROPO&ED REMODEI.6 AllDLTION for CHARLES L. BALKEN CHARLES A. BECK ARCfiITEGT,aIA ~ ~ ~ CONGER-MORRIS CONSI`i2U TtON ^s~.~0,~r=N^SS°°^n~~,K s N a - c~Nraa~. PazNrc~-rAp~~: C TED F. ELETSCHER CA. ARCHITECT ~ aou~xr•aarnE~,~..ai..wgec CELL:601-9079 A4ESS~AGE:776-4060 ~.~,~,~~=,~.~ro~~w~~.,ti~.~:~« ~ $s)0 So. FRONT ST. CENTRAL. POINT, OR 3639 RO55 CANE, CENTRAL POINT, GR- 2366 7ACK50NVTEI.E HWY- #171 !VIED ORD OR 9750t 54!•857.9033 EXISTING MORTUARY 3 p A v Z ~ f A ~ ~ ~ iV z r u W -r--- --....._..,_ _ ________r . _---- - _ _ _ _ -- --------- ---------- - E .. _ _ ... .. 1 I »„~„~ I E I 3 f I i 1 4 ~; 3 Y - _ e I I I I k _____.__.....I _ 1 E~ I 1 I I; I ~1 F E I I i I 1 I ~ I ~~ I f I 1 r I 1 ~ 5r ~~ I r I f y f f I E • I '~~ I ~~ ~'g~ 1 ~ 1 t 1 ' ~g~ Ea~ ~ ~: I ~ Il x y E I if I 3 _ iS ~ 49 E 1 ~8 i ~ ` I ~ 11 ~.W ! ~. ~~ ~ g ~ '~ I 1 I E I tP~ I _. q, J ~ I -~ M I ` -- ~ i t I i I 1 I 1 E,Y M1~ f ~ ~ i E \ 1 1 I } [ 1 ~1 c E ~ kw ~/ i 4 1 I b gg I 3 i ie r sq I 1 __-_"" II ~^L ~ I I T II wr •@@k ?T____y--.__e_ _ ___ _¢! .s jl \,~ n~ I[rf I I~ ~d 4E1?i . ¢ 1~ e 0 .. I f . I .~, . II I 4I~ )I ~ ~ I 1 I ~ 11~ _w_ , . _. a ~;>.~.~ -: °. ,. ~ - - -- -~ ° s --~ _ ~,i. ~a ggn, E 1 Y ~ y r 9 € r ~ ~ ~~ I I I r I 1 •°~ I I -- -- I I !~ i ~• 8qg I g l I - ACQQ 1 u...e ~ ~~yyf ~f E 5 1 1 a I ~~il I~E ~1 1 5~ 1i' I ~1 i =~ 3 ~ ~ 3 ! I I ~ i 1 d I ~ I 1 d ~ w ' I .. .r _. I G I 1 wo.r, ?! 4 v 5 r ~} $ ry/ E f I I ~.:~. i~~ ' _ .... _ _ _ _ _ _ I >< I q M1 ~ I ~ I I I i ~~ I I { 4~~ 77 E t ~ r ! ~ ! 1 B~~ I I 3 ..-.-...._.___ I _J~ ~ I ~ 1. ~..4«__________. i a Z V v s ~ a ~ ~ ~ rRaaOS::B REMObEL a ADDIT[OIV fa' CHARLES L BALKEIV CHA~2LE5 A. SECIC ARCNI7EC1`, arA ~ $ CONGER-MORRIS . A70FF1r M07ERINA~SI CGTION W[TH ' ~ fV ~ CEN'f'RA I T' P C~NST{2UClZON aRCttlTECr TED ~ ~LETSCHER cA P $ L O N CHAPEL aoeeur •soo•Ifrp,a.w~i,.we.. eEL4: 601-9679 NiE55A6E: 776.4060 . . <a>wwy.•aaxn;n <wdl.<ela.eaews.r w. e.~,.,ann 9Q0 30. FRONT ST. CENTRAL POINT, OR 3619 RO55 LANE, CENTRAL POINT, OR, 2366 SACKSONVILLE-HN/1e. ~k[71 MEDFORD OR 97501 541-857- 33 it 'n II SI ~~ 11 it 4 _ II Yil ~'~~•~ lr______1 ........~.~~ _...J i m 0 C fT1 iV s m rn 7C7 rn a m r~ A 7v H m n C '-v C rn x1 m s m ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°~°~" ~~'"°°°• A A°1LTTON f~ CHARLES !. BALKEN CHARLES A. BECK ARCFRTECT,AIA CONGER-MORRIS . C N ~~~~~~~~n~~~ W CENTRAL POINT CHAPEL O STRUCTION TE© F. FLETSCHER CA, hRCWI7ECT S aoeeaT•eon•r~rr.o.n. i,...q.. CELL: 601-9079 MESSAGE: 77b-4060 w~iwy o~aimciin ~xr .vM a~..t~w,w~,o-~M., 800 $v. FRONT ST. GElVTRAL POINT, OR 3619 R055 LANE, CENTRAL POINT, OR. 2366 JhCKSONVTLLE FEWy, tf171 MEpFORp OR 97501 541.857-9033 ~:'zt~t~i`~:<e~z~ra1 Pc~it~.t k'~~.~~in~ ~e~a~~~t~~-~t ~~J~ ~t~.:~~~•~~z~ ~tre~t ~'~°a~~t~~~€~ :~'t~je~~: ~~a~'~~~,~~tt~~~~~~ :~~~a~ilc~i~x~? ~nc~ C~xt?rr~~~tt~~•~ ~'k~e site fc~r i~~~, ra~~~~~~e ~rt~~e~t is ~•th_~~~. ~}~e ~~~ti~~~ ~~~ ia~es, ~. 'Thy ~€~ditioz~ ~ril~ have at~e~~~a~e ~~cce~s ~i•c~~n ~~is~i:~3~ ~t~-~et5, ~t~~'t:h ~z•G~s~t ~t~~~e~ ~~ the ~~r~~t a~~~ C`°~~~~~ T~ri~re ~ the ~~t~r~h. ~~ at~t~i~ic~r~ai i~~af fit: ~fz3.1 ~~ ~erier•azec~ ~~-s~~r~ tY~~~ rtajec.i, ~;. 'I'he~•e aril k~e ~~ ac~v~r~e ~~:~~s~ fi~t~z~~ t~-~e ~~r~je~~ t~ #~h~ ~~.trr~~~z~t~z~.~ ~~r~~~tJr~ie~. `~`~~~~ ~~i~i ~~ s~~f~i~ient i~~re~~ c~ e~r~:s~ t~ tl~e ~'ac~lit:~~. t>t h~~~s, levees, a~~t~' la.~dsca~z~~ Yvili ~~ ~~~.~•~~ t~ ~~r ~l~e ~~..€-s~~e~:.t. ~3, The safety ~z~ ~~~e~f~.z~e ~ltl~e s~~~t~~~~~~ ~~ei~h~at~z~~ ~~rz~~. axei~her he de~zzne~~ta.l €~~~• }~a~artiat~s tt~ ~?~cir ~~.ea.~~h. ~Jerat~Q~ Q.t'tk~e t~re~~aic~~'y sswc~~re~x~ct~. ~~r.~t~ ~iee~~~~ h~ bt~th tk~e ~3re~t~~~ Mate ~e~~~etc.~•~,> ~.'~~t~z-t~a~~Y ~~~rc~. {~nrl a~sc~ the etaart~~e~~t tit: ~~t~~zro~rz-~e~tal C,~~a~ity. ~'~~:er~ are r~~ 5tr~zc,f~.~res G~,~t~~i~~ ~ 1 ~}~~ .(~ ~~- t~Ze ~,rt~pc~~tci ~~rt~}eet, Sa.~,~~z•~t •, ~t~~ert ~~ Jeff ~~ C~~.~z~e ~TTA~HMENT " ~ g' r lz,.. ,.,-,~. Public Works Department ` CENTRAL P~tNT P UB~IC WORKS ST.~FF REPORT Oct©ber 25, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Manager Commercial Addition Applicant: S&B Western, LLC. Zoning: TOD-GC, General Commercial T raff c: Na traffic study is warranted for this development. Existin Infrastructure: All utilities are present. Issues: There are no sidewalks existing at this site. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of t13e City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Speciftcations and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notiftcations and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the fnal plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements {as determined by the Public Works Director). 940 Soufh 3~ Street .- Central Point, OR 97502 ®541.664.3329 ~ Fax 549.664.6384 Conditi©ns of Approval: l . Sidewalks and Landsca e Stri :Subject to Municipal Code Section 12.44 six foot side sidewalks shall be required as part of the proposed additioE~, along the frontage of property within the right of way for Highway 99. Additionally, a seven and a half (7.5) foot landscape strip shall be required to be installed concurrently. The configuration of the landscape strip and sidewalk will be in compliance with Public Works Standards and Specifications drawing CP-ST- 32. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final building occupancy, the applicant shad submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape strips. Landscape strips for the proposed development shall be placed immediately behind the proposed sidewalk location. Street trees shall be panted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details, specifications and species of the trees selected from the City's approved street tree list and are to be planted within the landscape strips. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 %z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be the responsibility of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape strip. 940 South 3'~ Street • Central Point, OR 97502 •549.6fi4.3329 • Fax 549.664.6384 City of Central Point, Oregon 14t? 5 Third Street, Central Pain, OR 97502 541.b64.332 i I;ax 541.664.161 1 www.ci.central-point.or us ~ir,~r~ CENTwR~ AL POINT ATTACHMENT" ~ Building Department Todd Meador, Building Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATB:10/20/07 TO: Planning Department Planning file: 08144/08145 FROM: Building Department SUBTECT: Conger-Morris Addition/Remodel APPLICANT: S&B LLC Property Description: T37S R2W 11 100 PURPOSE; CUP/Site Plan Review The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is n©t a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 99 940 S Thiri~ Street Central Point, oR s 7502 ~ 54 9. fifi4.3329 ~ Fax 54 9. fifi4.9 fi 9 9 BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. Tf a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 1 S of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. S. Grading excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private storm drain work must be permitted and inspected by City Building Department (prior to backfill}. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official, shall be submitted prior to f nal of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavationperrmt is fznaled. Exception: 1. The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 940 S Third Street Central Point, 4R 97502 ~ 549.664.3329 ~ Fax 549.664.9691 Building Department Staff Report, page 3 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. S. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. A comprehensive erosion control plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Department prior to start of work. 10. Application for building permits will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code (2007}, The International Fire Code (with the State of Oregon Amendments--2007), NFPA 13, Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code (2007},.Uniform Plumbing Code (with Oregon Blue Pages-amendments). Plan check may take from 3 to S weeks, depending on completeness when submitted.....if requested, plan check my be initiated simultaneously with Planning Dept. evaluation (Plan Check Fee must be paid prior to start of plan check). A complete code analysis should be a part of the submitted plans. 11. Fire District 3 will determine f re hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. 12. Crematorium unit must be Listed and Labeled and installed to Manufactures Instructions. 13. Room containing Crematorium must be 2 Hour. (Fire Protection} Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. If questions, please tali Todd Meador.....664--6325, ext. 228. 3 140 S Third Street Cenfrai Poinf, OR 97502 ~ 541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.161 ~ ~~ s~w~~, ~~ ~ ~ October 12, 2007 RQGUE VALLEY SEINER SERVICES L.ocatinn: 138 West Vi[as Road, Central Poinr, OR - Mai[in8 Address: P.O. Bnx 3130, Central Point, flR 7502-00#15 Tel. {S41) 6fi4-670Q I~ax {541 } 664-717 € www.R VSS.us Lisa Morgan City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: S&B Western, LLC, File # 08144-CUP, 08145 -Site Plan The existing building is served by a connection to an 8 inch sewer main on 1St Street. The exact location of this service is unknown but it is possible that the proposed building addition will cover the sewer service lateral. If this is the case, the service lateral will need to be either re-located or replaced using a material that is approved far use under the building. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this project be subjected to the following condition, 1. Applicant must locate the existing sewer service lateral and replace or relocate the pipe as needed in coordination with Rogue Valley Sewer Services. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ,sT .-~------~. Carl Tapper, PE District Engineer 95 K:IDATAIAGENCTESICENTPTIPLANNGICUP12008108 X ~-CONBERMORR)LS CHAPEL.DOC ~ : . ~: z T859 ATTACHMENT " ~ 'g ~re~on Theodorn R. Kulangoski, Governox October 15, 2007 Ms. Lisa Morgan City of Central Point 140 So. Third St. Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Chanee to comment on S & B Western, LLC Dear Ms. Morgan; Department of Environrnental Qualify Western Region 221 Stewart Ave, Suite 201 Medford, OR 97501 541-77b-601Q FAX 541-77{-6262 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on S&B Western's application for an expansion of the Conger Morris Central Point Chapel, located at S00 So. Front Street, Central Point. According to OAR 340-216-0020, a facility planning on operating a crematorium, is required to obtain an Air Contaminant Discharge Permit from the Department of Environmental Quality prior to the operation of the crematorium. The applicant can contact me at 776-6010 ext. 237 for an application packet. Thank you. Sin ely, a Kemmerer Environmental Specialist nEq~wrt~t oa`~V,~ ad COX ~.R~'AC~~~~v d7~avs....\~~ ~e~~~~ ~`~~~~~~a~a~~ ~~ :~~~~~ .~ 7 ~ ~`. d~~~ ,~'~aFaa~a~,3 r~'~Y~.€1ta~rrF~a ~~~w:~i~l~ r~s.~~`~~~t ~~..~~ r'Fa?rteac.~' ~~s•~'s'. ,t~"~arFFtF~'t€~tf a?,j~:i ~Fa ~cr~it~ ~ tzs'F} s~af~~s~~? as~~t~a €~ "1'.''` a~'~af>s~~ ~r4~f>s ldF~€~ c?1~f~}~>c~e~` if't7?~,~~ .~{rrr~r.Fl~~ sf~ti.,~ ah ~?~J~'1I'dGfi~3b~G: ~"13"fl}%IS'T€)D?;S' t3~ ~`i°~?e':i a7,'1E?:',~7#?~~ €.Fl't''..i'iT-t:~3J~f?C'f f43 F~G? S't7FTit#,' ~i',~'),(1{`iCCT€JfTT? tf~Ff.~YF.'311f?t~'~3?'f3C:f.'~S',5 i7S' C1J~?f?1'~1f?3"FFT13'~${a~ Li':Sf':S t€~€~Fat;;~t`~~~~ it ~hi~ tz~l~3. 3~grts~as~~~: ~t~~' 1}as cte~~r~Y~~~°~d ti}~ e~~s~i~~~ ~tse ~~~~~ ~rc~~~~s~c$ ~~wu ~~ ~.~a;~sz~ef~ ~s ~'c:?'sc~na~ ~er~~~,c~s. ~Y~~a~~~~~~~p ~'~rsc~~~~ ~er~~ic~s are ~~ ~~~~t~~~€~c~ aa;~e. i~} ~~~e'~'~3~~^CH~", C7~`~a~~~'~1 ~:c~fn~~~e~~~.ic~t L`~i~tf•~~,t ~ t~r'~`~~e~e:~s~~~~~~~. { %.s ~ ~ i'ert~ ~aF~rr~.c v~~1~'iFi~-, =5r'Fr~Y~e~~l~'~arndt'9> __________W .l:L?D`€,r€.' G?F?f:~ S`~t:?f?f:~t1T'Ci ~€1?~ r~L?T'CJ ~f.~f ~df'IL!. C?~F~e~G7C'~?£'CI~ ,~ 1'j .tY? ~ - ----- ~~ ~{ --------------- ~~ i'~' ....... ---------------- ,~r ~' 1----r ------ .'~' ,~` --------------- ~` ~~l~tl€'+~IEt~I'f)13'!~?€3ZdS'L,S ..H..... ~"' ~-~ ~~ ~: t~' s~` :'fir' ~~t°C'~~lF7~fx.:'`s~`F#i~l`tr~`f7TF~~r'}r ?~~~1.{~t'dt),'~€~'.Y, ft~7t1F'F't1?f.'t7i' ~~ ,~ l"~ L.~ .~~ 1~4' .%~;~ ~~L'G'f.5S,4CF);}l ~1~1?L?5 _.__._. ~~.f ~?i ~1' ~; 1~'~ :~1'` E 9 1~; ~t1L7Yfir?I?~r,,~.~i€3fJ:Pf?dl?tf; .t~~fJl#.,5~:'' i~' --°-----°--------- ~' [.' ,~+ ~ ~ - A~ ~'C7FfE,tI}' ~yfd3`F' _ ~ u } G?)7?l1'"6~ C?'fd}' ~,CdF•~s '_ i~ ~ .e~ ~r i~F !~' t'!Y ____..______ ~~g ,{ ~ F.1?7??L 3 f '? VCS? d~7! L71'xt3F1 1~ t~ {~ . .[ i~'~ i~'F 1~r ~ , } y - ,: i~`~,~ $i~tE~. f?~f ~~d 1. ~4"S ~~~~ j ~ d __.... ~ ' ~_____°°•.__ •f p y __ i Y~ r .t ,t ~ - ~ ~~ _ ~E'S7Ci~f'7??€~~ ~~UFFIG' p 1.> n ! ~ ?~' a tY` 7 sY? ~r t~.tTl~f-'F'~t~ltlTr~?€!~°t"3` ~ =~lr t~1r ~• .~' p .~'~~ ~~e iaZdiat~s e~f F':€c€ ^ I'a~e 1 ~t ~l Professional Office C L3 L3, L4 P P P N Retail Sales and Service Sales-oriented C' L3 L3 P P N N Personal service-oriented C C C P P N N Repair-oriented N N N P P N N Drive-through facilities N N N P P N N Quick vehicle service N N N P P N N Vehicle sales, rental and repair N N N P P N N Tourist Accommodations Motel/hotel N N C P P N N Bed and breakfast inn C C P P P N N Industrial Manufacturing N N N N P N N Industrial Sez•vice Light N N N N P N N Heavy N N N N C N N Wholesale Sales N N N N P N N C1V 1C Corzznzuzzity Services C C C N N P C Hospital C C C C N C N Public facilities C C C C C C N Religious assezizbly C C C C N P N Schools C C C N N P L2 Utilities C C C C C C C Open Space Parks azzd Open Space P P P P P P P N--Not permitted. P--Permitted use. PI--Permitted use, one unit per lot. C--Conditional use. LI--Only permitted as residential units above ground floor commercial uses. L2--School athletic azzd play fields only. School building and parking lots are not permitted. L.3--Ground floor business within a multifamily building. Maximum floor area of ten thousand square feet per tenant. L4--Second story offices may be permitted in areas adjacent to EC zones as a conditional use. LS--Only permitted as a transition between lower density zones and/or when adjacent to an environnzerttally sensitive area. Findings of Fact - Paga 2 of 4 Table Z TOD District Zoning Standards Standard Zoning Districts LMR MMR HMR EC GC C OS Density--Units Per Net Acre (~ Maximum 12 32 NA NA NA NA NA Minimum b 14 30 NA NA NA NA Dimensional Standards Minimum Lot or Land Area/Unit Large single family S, 000 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA Standard single family 3, 000 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA Zero lot line detached 2, 700 SF 2, 700 ~5'F NA NA NA NA NA Attached row houses 2, 000 SF 1,500 SF 1,200 SF NA NA NA NA Multifamily and senior housing 2, 000 SF 1,500 SF 1, 000 SF 1, 000 SF NA NA NA Average Minimum Lot or Land Area/Unit Large single family 7,500 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA Standard single family 4,500 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA Zero lot l ine detached 3, 000 SF 3, 000 SF NA NA NA NA NA Attached row houses 2,500 SF 2,000 SF 1,500 SF NA NA NA NA Multifamily and senior housing 2, 500 SF 2, 000 SF 1, 500 SF 1, 500 SF NA NA NA Minimum Lot Width Large single family SO' NA NA NA NA NA NA Standard single family SO' NA NA NA NA NA NA Zera lot line detached 30' 30' NA NA NA NA NA Attached row houses 24' 22' 18' NA NA NA NA Multifamily and senior housing NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Minimum Lot Depth 50' S0' S0' NA NA NA NA Building Setbacks Findings of Fact -Page 3 of 9 Front {min./max.) 10'/IS' 10'/1S' 0'/.l5' 0' 15' S' 15' Side (between bldgs.) {detached/attached) S' detached 0' attached (a){c) 5' detached 0' attached (a) (c) S' detached 0' attached {a) 0' 10' (b) 0' 15' (b) 0' 20' {b) S' Corner {min./max.) S'/10' S %10' 0'/10' S'/10' IS'/30' S'/10' 15 %NA Rear IS' IS' 10' 0' 10 ' {b) IS' (li) 0' 0' 20' (b) S' Garage Entrance (d) (d) (d) {e) (e) {e) NA Maximum Building Height 3S' 4S' 60' 60' 6~' 45' 3S' Maximum .Got Coverage (g~ 80% 80% $5% 100°°/n 100% 85°/n 25% Minimum Landscaped Area (i) 20% of site area 20% of site area 1 S% of site area (j) 0% of site area (h) LSf of site area 15% of site area NA PincEings of Pact -Page 4 of 9 Finding: The building was constructed in 1976 and is considered an existing use. No portion of the existing structure with the exception of the proposed expansion is subject to the setback requirements of the TOD District/Corridor. Finding: The proposed expansion is set back approximately 50 feet from the rear property tine. A rnitaitnum of 15 feet is required if adjacent to a residential zoning district. Conclusion: The applicant has met and exceeded the minimum rear yard set back requirement. Notes: NA--Not applicable. (b) Setback required when adjacent to a residential zone. (g) Lot coverage refers to a71 impervious surfaces including buildings artd paved surfacing. (h) Parking lot landscaping and screening requirements still apply. (i) Landscaped area shall include living ground cover, shrubs, trees, and decorative landscaping material such as bark, mulch or• gravel. No pavement or other impervious surfaces are permitted except for pedestrian pathways and seating areas. Table 3 TOD District and Corridor Parking Standards Use Categories Minimum Required Parking Residential Dwelling, Single-Family 2 spaces per unit. Large and standard lot Zero lot line, detached Attached row houses Dwelling, Multifamily 1.5 spaces per unit. Plexes Apartments and condominiums Dwelling, Accessory Unit 1 space per unit. Boarding/Rooming House 1 space per accommodation, plus 7 space for every 2 employees. Family Gaye 7 space for every 5 children or clients (minimum 7 space); plus 7 space for Family day care every 2 employees. Day care group home Adult day care Home Occupation Shall meet the parking requirement far the residence. Residential Facility 7 space per unit. Residential Home 1 space per unit. Senior Housing 1 space per unit. Commercial Entertainment 1 space per 250 square feet of floor area, except for theaters which steal! pravide 7 space per 9 seats. Professional Office 1 space per 400 square feet of floor area. Retail Sales and Service Findings of Fact -Page 5 of 9 Sales-oriented Personal servltre- orrenteal Repair-oriented Drive-through facilities Quick vehicle service Vehicle sales, rental and repair 7 space per 500 square feet of floor area. is space per 30l1 square fit of #1dUr area. 7 space per 500 square feet of floor area. Parking as required by the primary use. 7 space per 750 square feet of floor area. 7 space per 7, 000 square feet of floor area. 3. Parking Standards. The off-street parking and loading requirements in Chapter 17.64 shall apply to the TOD district and TOD corridor, except as modified by the standards in this section. Finding: As specified in Table 3 -Parking Standards; the applicant is required to have a total of 11 spaces as a personal service oriented business with an adjusted floor area of 5,353 square feet. Finding: The site currently has a total of 49 spaces. The proposed expansion of the existing facility will result in a loss of seven {7) spaces, leaving a total of 42 parking spaces. Conclusion: The applicant meets and exceeds the minimum number of required parking spaces. 17.67.OS0 Site design standards. A. Respect for Existing Facilities and Ora-Site Features. I. Adjustments should be made during land division and site design to improve the overall relationship of a development or an individual building to the surrounding context. Finding: The existing building and proposed expansion are consistent with tl~e design criteria of the TOD District / Corridor. Finding: The applicant will be replacing and/or painting some of the existing exterior siding, and is compliant with design criteria of the TOD District /Corridor. Finding: There are no existing sidewalks along the frontage of the property adjacent to Highway 99. The development to the south includes an existing Dutch Brotlser's coffee stand with a commercial rental building, which has a sidewalk along the frontage abutting the curb. Further south the Providence Medical center approved for construction includes installing a sidewalk and landscaping strip as part of their approval. Finding: A condition of approval for this application is to install sidewalks and a landscaping strip along the frontage of Highway 99. The three {3) existing trees along the frontage are presently located within the area proposed for sidewalks will require removal and replacement with trees from the City's approved street tree list. Finding: The public right of way extends approximately 23 feet to the east beyond the existing curb. The existing trees recommended for removal and replacement, the monument sign, and the parking Iot light pole are all located within the public right of way. Findings of Facf -Page 6 of 9 Conclusion: Tl~e applicant meets or will meet this criterion with conditions of approval which will improve the overall relationship to the development of the surrounding area by providing pedestrian eom~ectivity. 4. Service Areas. Service areas, loading zones, waste disposal or storage areas must be fully screened from public view. Prohibited screening includes chain linkfencing with or without slats. a. Acceptable screening includes: i. A six foot masonry enclosure, decorative metal fence enclosure, a wood enclosure; ar other approved materials complementary to adjacent buildings; or ii. A six foot solid hedge or other plant material screening as approved. Finding: There is an existing forty-two inch chain liE~k fence along Cupp Drive, with an existing seventy-two inch chain link fence along the rear property line. Finding. Chain link fencing is a prohibited screening material in the TOD Distriet/Corridor. Finding: The applicant will be replacing the chain link fencing with fencing made of decorative metal or vinyl. Conclusion: This is a condition of approval for the site plan to bring the applicant's screeni~zg into compliance with this criterion. 17.72.040 Site Plan -Standards. In approving, conditionally approving, or denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their decision on the following standards: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a rnanner• as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The planning commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screening purposes and for sound and sight insulation f-om existing neighborhood use; Finding: There is existing landscaping that accounts for approximately 24% of the subject property. The proposed expansion will not interfere with the existing landscaping scheme. Finding: Approximately 1,$20 square feet of the existing (not calculated in onsite landscaping percentages) exist within the public right of way. Finding: The landscaping within the public right of way, will be replaced with a 7.5 foot landscaping strip with trees selected from the City's approved street tree list. Conclusion: The applicant meets this criterion. B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow an public streets; Conclusion: There are no changes proposed. Findings of Faei -Page 7 of 9 C. Ta provide off-street parking and Ioading.facilities and pedestrian and vehicle.flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use far which the site is pr•aposed to he used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traf~c,flow on public streets; Finding: The expansion is located at the rear of the existing building and will not have an impact to existing vehicle flow. Conclusion: The vehicle flow will not change. D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffzc control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or• visibility of nearby signs; Finding: The existing monument sign is Iocated within the public right of way for Highway 99. This sign will have to be relocated to the east or removed out of the public right of way. Public Works Specifications require a six (6} foot sidewalk and 7.5 foot landscaping strip on a five (5} lane arterial street. Finding: Conger -Morris is willing to relocate or remove the monument sign. Conclusion: if Conger -Morris replaces the existing monument sign, applicant shall apply for a sign permit and shall be designed in accordance with the TOD District 1 Corridor design standards for signs and will not be located within the public right of way. E. Accessibility and sufficiency offrre fzghtingfacilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to frre apparatus; Finding: The applicant is not proposing any changes that would affect the existing accessibility. Conclusion: Not applicable. F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section .16..20.080 pertaining to the maximum number of single family dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding: Not applicable. Conclusi©n: Not applicable. G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and its environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the planning commission if found to be incompatible with the existing architectural or design Findings of Fact - Page S of 9 characteristics of adjacent properties or uses. In addition, the planning commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, of• other development requirements that may be necessary to ensure land use compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point residents. Finding: Conger Morris is not changing or altering the existing characteristics of the property. Caneinsion: Not applicable. Findings of Fact -Page 9 of 9 -----.,._.._...e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR AN EXPANSION OF EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATED AT 800 SOUTH FRONT STREET {HIGHWAY 99) Applicant: S & B, LLC dba: Conger-Morris Central Point Chapel (37S 2W 11CB, Tax Lot 100) File No. 08145 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for a Site Plan approval for expansion of existing facilities located at $00 South Front Street (Highway 99), and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2V1T 11CB, Tax Lat 100, in the City of Central Paint, Oregon; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2007, the Central Paint Planning Commission conducted adult'-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the Application Review Process Section 17.05, Permitted Uses and Development Standards 17.65.050, and Site Design Standards 17.67 of the Central Point Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Site Plan application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated November 6, 2007, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the Site Plan is consistent with the intent of the TOD -Transit Oriented District; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff Report dated November 6, 2007, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Commission Resolution No. (T1062007) PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6th day of November, 2007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 6th day of November, 2007. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (11062007)