Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet - October 5, 2004
CITY dF CENTRAL POIN`I' PLANNING COMMISSIdN AGENDA October 5, 2004 -'7:00 p.m. ~~ Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 625 I. MEETING CALLED Td dRDER II. RtJLL CALL Chuck Piland ,Christopher Brown, Candy Fish, Don Faster, Paul Lunte, Connie Moczygemba, and Wayne Riggs III. Cdl7;RESPdNDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of September '7, 2004, Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review Planned Unit Development, Tentative Plan and Conditional Use applications that would amend the previously approved Beebe Woods Planned Unit Development by including a 4`~' phase near the northwest corner of the project. This proposed 4'~' phase would add five additional lots to an adjacent tax lot and would not change any other elements of the original P.U.D. approval. The subject parcel is in the R-2, Residential Two Family District and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W flICB, Tax 20fl. The properties are located on the east side of Hamrick Road (4460 Hamrick Road), north of East Pine Street and south of Packwood Village Lane. NdTE: This item was continued at the request of the applicant's agent to this meeting. The Planning Department has not received any further information and therefore the Planning Department recommends that this item be continued until the next meeting. The agent has stated that he would waive the 120 day rule but the Cify has not had a letter formally requesting same. If a letter is not submitted, the City will need to make a final decision na later than November 24, 2004. B. Public hearing to consider a tentative plan far a 21 lot subdivision. named Jackson dales, Phase V located north of Taylor Raad east of Grant Raad in the TdD-LMR, Law Mix Pis. ~-12 Residential zoning district on Map 37 2W 03C, Tax Lat 208 and Map 37 2W 03CB, Tax Lat 100. VI. MISCELLANEdUS VIII. AD.IdURNMENT z~~iQOSZOO~ S~te,~,~ 7, 2004 M i~~~ City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes September 7, 2QQ4 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7;00 P.M. ll, ROLL CALL: Chairman Ghuck Piland, Ghristopher Brown, Gandy Fish, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, Connie Moczygernba, and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; David Alvord, Community Planner, im.isa Morgan, Planning Secretary, and Dave Arkens, GlS Technician, Ill, CC}RRESPC3NDENCE There was no correspondence. lV". MINUTES Candy Fish made a motion to approve the minutes from August 3, X004. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. After the motion to approve the minutes was made and seconded, David Painter from the audience spoke up asking to have the affiliation of Central Point First removed from their comments. Mr. Painter stated that Becca Croft, Joe Thomas and himself made comments as citizens, not Gentral Point First representatives. Discussions between commissioners indicated that they were under the impression that comments made by them were as representatives of Central Paint First, and that the tapes would have to be reviewed. RC7lrL CALL: Brown, yes; Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Lunte, yes; Moczygemba, yes; and Riggs, Yes, Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. Vl. BUSINESS A. A public hearing to review an application for a tentative subdivision to create 19 lots with one designated as open space) within a Planned Unit Development. The subject parcels are in the R-'1-6 and R-'1-8, Residential Single Family zones and are Identified in the records of the Plc~ntring ComnrissiQn Mirarates September 7, 20Q9 Page 2 Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W '10DC, Tax Lot 200 & Map 37 ZW 10DB, Tax Lots{s) 9'100, 9200 & 9400. The properties are located west of Snowy Butte Lane, north of Beall Lane and adjacent to Griffin Greek. Chairman Piland asked if there were any ex-parts communications or conflicts of interestto declare. Commissioner Fish asked to be dismissed from this portion of the meeting. Mr. Humphrey, Community Development Director, provided some City background information regarding the passing of a resolution several years ago regulating development of subdivisions near Snowy Butte Road until road improvements have been made. an August 28, 2C}03, the City Council passed Resolution # 991, rescinding the regulation of subdivisions. The thought behind rescinding the resolution was that if subdivisions were allowed, that the road improvements would happen with the development of the subdivisions. Mr, Humphrey referred to an aerial photograph on the wall of Snowy Butte Road illustrating the proposed road improvement designs for Snowy Butte Road. Improvements to Snowy Butte Lane were lower on the priority list due to other arterial or collector streets within the city that needed improvement. The applicant Dale Clark will make road improvements on Snowy Butte Road along his development. There will be two boundary line adjustments to bring a couple of the lots into compliance. Mr. Humphrey referred to page 19 showing the lot line adjustments. Public Works recommends that Virginia Drive is to be a local access road, and that it will not belong to either the City or the County. Mr. Glark is willing to make the road improvements on Snowy Butte Road, with the cooperation and share of financial responsibility for the road improvements with the residents along Snowy Butte Road Once the road improvements have been made and the road is brought up to Gity standards, the City will take over maintenance of the road. Mr. Humphrey stated that with the new road design for Snowy Butte Road, it will not encourage cut through traffic, and will add the needed safety and a few off road parking spaces. Mr. Humphrey began the presentation of the Punning Department Staff report. He stated that the Gity does not disagree with the applicants findings of fact and conclusions of law. The applicant has met the overall targeted density and does not exceed the maximum density, There were discussions among City staff as to whether Virginia Road should be a separate tax lot or an easement. The City would prefer to see it as an easement and built to Public Plartrrirag Corrrn2issiorr Minartes Septern6er 7, 2t?04 Page 3 Works Standards for a private lane, Some difficulties in the past with private roads being recorded as an individual tax lot caused problems with the County far lack of financial responsibility for taxes, which could lead to foreclosure of that lot or an orphan lot. Mr. Humphrey explained that a Planned Unit Development allows the City to vary from some requirements and allow cluster homes, etc. Noweverthe City will need to hold firmly on the setback requirements. The setbacks will be measured from the edge of pavement or sidewalks, to ensure that cars will not extend into the sidewalk area. The property is partially in a 100 year floodplain. Those lots that fail within the 100 year floodplain would have to be built to FEMA standards. Lot 19 is designated as open space. The City is hoping that sometime in the future we could contact adjacent property owners to extend a pedestrian pathway over the bridge to Flanagan Park. Even if this cannot be agreed on with adjacent property owners, it will still provide a nice open space area within the development. Staff's conclusion is that with the irregular shape of the cots, the development being larger than 1 acre and smaller than ~ acres, and the overall density does not exceed the targeted density, this proposal meets the criteria of a Planned Unit Development. There were no special concerns noted by any other agencies. Chairman Plland asked about the road improvements on Snowy Butte Road and if the residents are ready to proceed or not. Mr. Humphrey did not know the position of all the residents. Ne added that he had previously recommended the formation of a Limited Liability Corporation by the residents for this joint effort. There are approximately 10 affected residents per Dave Arkens, GIS Technician. The City has met with residents in the past regarding the improvements. Chairman Piland asked Dale Clark to speak on behalf of his proposal. Mr. Clark stated that he is here to help facilitate the improvements of Snowy Butte Road. He concurs with the staff report. He added that there will be a double tree lined boulevard and it would be very nice. He stated that he would like to say it would add to the area, however it was a pretty nice area before he came along. Mr. Clark has met with Fire District # 3 and the plans before the commissioners reflected their recommendations. For example, the requirement that the home on Lot #1 have a sprinkler system. Mr. Thomas, a resident across from the Snowy Butte IV~eadows proposal, stated that he is in favor of the development. It will provide l1llr. Thomas an opportunity to extend the road Ptnnrring Cvnrrrrissiorr Minutes September 7, 2p04 Page 4 improvements to in front of his house. Mr. Bartholomew, a resident on Snowy Butte Road, is concerned about the additions[ traffic and if it will increase his taxes. He is also concerned with filling every nook and cranny with development, Chairman Piland closed the public portion of the meeting There were discussions about lots 12 & ~ 4 being surrounded on three sides by streets. Mr. Humphrey asked the commissioners to look at the loop as mare of an alley, and explained that with unusual shaped properties we have to make the most of various access drives. There were questions if Lot 12 is actually a buildable lot due to the size. Mr. Clark explained that with the square footage of the house they have planned for that lot, he has no problem meeting the setback requirements. The County Surveyor will want to have the "private drive 1 alleyway„ Warned. Virginia Drive will have sidewalks. Mr. Clark had originally proposed sidewalks in the alleyway, and the Fire District discouraged that. Mr. Humphrey said that there are other ways of designating a pedestrian walkway by stamping it differently, etc. Commissioner Lunte made a motion adopting Resolution No. 623, conditionally granting approval for a Planned Unit Development known as Snowy Butte Meadows, subject to the recommended conditions of approval In addition to 1 }. Garages have set backs of 20'; 2}. Virgiinia Street be recorded as an easement rather than an Individual tax lot and 3}. There should be pedestrian designations along the private drive. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. RQLL CALL {excluding Commissioner Fish}: The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Fish returned to the Commissioner table. B. Public meeting to review an application for a minor land partition application that would create a total of 3 parcels. The subject parcel is in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family District and Is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as being Map 37 2W 1 ~ BA, Tax Lot 1400. The property is located an the west side of Freeman Road {460 Freeman Road}, north of Cedar and south of Ash Street. Plat»sing Corrrrnission Minartes SeplemGer 7, 2t1t14 Page S David Alvord, Community Planner presented the Planning Department Staff Report. Ne explained that with the upcoming improvements for Freeman Road, that there wilt be a setback of 6U' for Lot #3. Mr. Alvord, went through the correspondence received from outside agencies. Fire District # 3 would Tike a hammerhead on parse[ #1, or a sprinkler system installed in the home to be built. Rogue Valley Sewer Service stated that because there is not a sewer connection on Freeman Road, connections would need to be made to the existing line on Cedar, as well as upsizing the sewer line to the parcel. The existing sewer line is not adequate to serve two additional dwellings. The applicant Dan Castellano, said that he has been granted permission to cut across a parcel to the north Evelyn Null's property} to access the sewer line on Ash Street. Mr. Castellano prefers the Fire District's option of a sprinkler system on Lot 'I instead of the hammerhead. Mr. Currier, a resident on Cedar Street, stated that he doesn't object to development of the Castellano property, however he doesn't want to see two start' homes. They do not want to lose the privacy in their backyard. Also, all of the homes in the area are single story homes. Mr. Castellano stated that he will be selling the lots and more than likely will be building two story homes. Chairman Piland called a five minute break for Mr. Castellano to speak with the Carrier's. The meeting was called back to order at 8:27 p.m. The public portion of the meeting was closed. Commissioner Fish stated that she would prefer to see a hammerhead on Trot'[ . Chairman Piland explained that with the cost of home sprinkler systems becoming more affordable that we will probably see more requirements for the home sprinkler systems because it reduces the amount of damage until emergency services can respond. Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 624, approving an application for a minor land partition located at 460 Freeman Road, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, Commissioner IVloc~ygemba seconded the motion. RC7LL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. Plcznnirrg Cornrnission Miruates Seprern6er 7, 2t1t14 Pnge 6 C. Public hearing to review a Planned Unit Development, Tentative Plan and Conditional Use applications that would amend the previously approved Beebe Woods Planned Unit Development by including a 4` phase near the northwest corner of the project. This proposed 4#~' phase would add five additional lots to an adjacent tax lot and would not change any other elements of the original P.U.D, approval. The subject parcel is in the R-2, Residential Two Family District and is identified in the retards of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W tl1 CB, Tax 200. The properties are located on the east side of Hamrick Road X4460 Hamrick Road), north of East Pine Street and south of Parkwood Village Lane. The agent for the applicant, Craig Stone requested a continuance to the October 5, 2004 meeting. This will enable his client Chris Galpin and the Layton's to resolve a few issues. Nir. Stone stated that they are willing to waive the 120 day rule because ofi this continuance. Chairman Piiand asked if there was anyone in the audience to offer testimony either in favor of or against these applications. There were none, Commissionor Riggs made a motion to continue this item to the fJctober 5, 2004 meeting. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. Vll. MISCELL.ANEC?US Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director passed a brochure around to the Commissioners for the American Planners Association joint conference October 4 - 6t~, 2004. Mr. Humphrey said that we still have not been able to schedule a local training session for the Land Use P/anr~irtg: Beyond Basics. We need to coordinate a time between the Citizen Advisory Committee, the Planning Commission and City Council. Flyers will be mailed once the date has been determined. Mr. Humphrey asked if the Commissioners objected to a Saturday class or if necessary we could schedule an weekday evening class. No one objected to a Saturday class. Mr. Humphrey explained that OTAC and TKS will be conducting a Highway 99 study during the October -November time frame. There will be walking tours scheduled with property and business owners to discuss what they like or dislike about Highway 99. The group conducting this study is the same one that worked on Ashland Boulevard. Planning Commission MGrutes September 7, 20174 Page 7 Mr. Humphrey introduced the new City logo approved by the Council, Ne explained the whole concept in going with this design and how it will also serve as a design for issuing blue ribbons for special City recognition to developments or businesses. Viii. ADJQURNNiENT Commissioner ~unte made a motion to adjourn the meeting, Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. R©.~. CALi~.: Motion passed unanimously, Meeting was adjourned at 8:5v P.M. 3eel~eiWoocLa; i'ha~PilV Co-vlt'~~uecL Jackaow oa,k~ t~ha~e v g ~ ~ ®, .~:: ..~ +Ct,nir~!1 1't;irli !'!Irn~il) (;~rri,ili' <i{~?;i ,' ~Esll ~`at'S"`~+;il~s'i , t ~t1LY11i1U.Itll~'' ~~!{i;11IC!" I": P~ `~ ,, . .,.. 1~)~}!: 1'~~;ill-!il¢7 TO f~'O1iS1(!Ci` 21 1 Cll~al'li~'C ~~(lil 1C1T" 'c? ,,~} ~O: `';lE~}(~ft'!.`;1("?Il / ~ ,, \1]t)~4'1) '~ ,I:a! h`1 i~1'; `)till '1 ~`>l~.l )(11VPii{?11., ~ ,ili' ti t!llll)iJ i'J ~!i.7f'1.ltt.;l~ !iC'11~!Cl 4? lavlc)r 1~t,tlti irl thc~ l)I)-l ...\~11~ ~c?111i1<;c'?:~;ti4; {~~1.41~,a ~'~~ f)a+r., l~x~~t `'()4~ Lncl \1a1~ , ?,L~ (i:t::'t>, 1 <:tx 1 .ili l (1()), ~~~~gy~~,<~.~~~1 _. ~(~~'r11 { tl.;C'h; I_)CVCIOI~?7]l)lli. ~+.~...~, f"`'crtit'ai 1'clil r'1 , s1t)n {)",'.`if7`? ~11~: [1i;1~1? i ,'i"l~(:f, l <i;'~"St;l' `~111Vi'~ l:l!! ~~„ , ~;'Iccl(orci. %)1"i;ttc>n t)' ,}l e~_~;r~~tr t `1"~1~: ~1~~~~iic~ltlt h,l~ =>tll~rrlittt~cl i1 ci{~~ ~;'t~~)1j;c;Ili l>I't?l?os~ll c, si?l7<~i~cl~ `~.? t!!,I>,'` (l,~ i~ill(i IIIt(I .~() Ii;~ltll':`1'L1,ll 1{)l'~, I }l1S C'r?t~?ll~;'t' !71c111 Iti ~t): (!tt~(l yl'ii;~1122 t;~~ T~.'~~itt C`'r{,c;lcs'T`r~ltlsi.~ Qt~i~,llCetj Ucvc.ii)~~Irll,rlt ~ [~4:)1:)1 1~~~?~t~r~~lal~, ~taEi~~~~°i!~.~a C:['~.~11; }.~~''_tl5C~ ~~..~,i~, t1~c P~It11~~lirat~; Cc~rl~rt~i~~~i<1T~ ~.vtt~l tilt; ~~ltht.~r°ifiy ~t~~ h{~~ci _ .. _- a~)tll)llf,', ~lt;(Ir"1'l ? t31?Cl 1"Utl(~i:;i' i (~t;CiblO11 {f71 i ll`;' i l)O~lt lltlt?Il It?1" (1 I {'11('cliil'k' Plall. ti{~ti{:z~ !~?ft'~!; f'I.lblit:, 1 ~~~~,Cill; !~'~t~ !>_ivc~rl ill ,lc~c,{1tc1<1:~,,c'V~,~it~~ C1'V1 ,~~~Q~aat~<~~~i~ ~,a'!~~..° (`I'~,~C 7f~.1~.t~1(1 t`t ~c;c;.-T'ert:<l~iv~Flans ~..:1'~~C; l-_(~;5 ei :;cc]. -`1TC)I~ I)i~f,:ictS and Ct~z~it7rs . . ,~~t~.'k,!)1? (:?~t,;~, l.nlt ~~~Lnlt~o;. ,:+ as a ln~xholl c)l`<1 17~u1tzplc ~11<lst~d ~;oll~trllcr{;Ilt~ (llu! rc:lrlcllila. d~vcic)f~1;1,;t1t ~)I()})u~cci llt~rfll c~1 I°a~r~lari~c?Lld and t;~l~t c?1 trlrt. IZ()tlci ill :~,c l l~~~tl~il()ritllit'ci ~t,t%('li'(7illc;i2~ (1 ~~~~ ~..)ltili'i~:f. ~~li_' 1'1~1rlilll4 ~~:~?(1i"~1711;]il~ ~lrt`iis:Vl!,C,ti;tl l~lt' `Ll'I"?~2t~`1~'i_' ~~(lll ~.~tLi1_i~~?Tll;tlf ~~~'~~~ f()f' ~-t?llll)11~1t1C' ~Aill}; ~,liC ,: t~l~ tJ~51;?rl !~CC~L1ii~Cr71f',llt~>, ~7idlCli'.jll?(;S rll(~ C~t)11'~~1~~'17CI15t~iC, i~ittil. ~-7lL rll~~~(1 .9 (~{;Sit?all~('.(1 `l01" lt?t,,; 11.71,'•; Ct'Si{i~'11fi'cl~ tlCtie;i(?~713?s'.Ilt <Lil{~ 15 7UIl~f_~ ~ t`}~) l ~~lli. 111c.; 31'I.A (?~~}1(hJSll~l4? I~'a)C.`i rfllil{;l;)~li-L;il. ll(IV{: i;lJili!'i'i)Llti ]tl `l~i;j i111(~ Ct?Il ll?,lli'(itl()11~. 1 il(` ,~f~ l{?lti t}111 ('Ol]ll~l l ;!' 1 lli ~? ()t Lilts ,<u(:l4`1(tl1 ~1t11`.z ,~ :~Ll~){jLt`151O,l i~;7TkS?C 11~ 1i1~i; h`(73I1 .`+~<~;71_~ Stll.EtLIC 1.{;i~j t(_? ,~O ~trll'', ~~t~)('ill~l i~. l'llls I)i'()IJ(1`;i;(~ `lll?(ll~ lti;t)(1 1~.; t}TI~ O~sG"V~21 ~i'illili 4 j1i;'14?I1(,()Y~"IC}(ltls lc~catecl \7s'1~1"1111 11it',, ~'Wln Creels 1 Development which has been master planned with stringent standards designed to ensure project quality and to create a form of community that lessens reliance upon the automobile by emphasizing public transportation, bicycle and pedestrian activities. Jackson {yaks, Unit Number S is in compliance with the Twin Creeks Transit t~riented Master Plan which includes pedestrian and bicycle paths, traffic calming measures, open space, landscaping and street light standards. This development represents the beginning of the next phase in W.L.. Moore's agreement with the City. The Commission may recall that the applicants entered into apre-annexation development agreement with the City which established public improvement "triggers" tied to vehicle trips associated with the number of housing units. As of now, the developer has improved Haskell Street between Taylor Road and West Pine Street together with a new signal and architectural lighting standards. Crews are working to extend Haskell Street north into the TCC:~D through property recently acquired from Rogue Valley Sin. The traffic circle at Taylor Road and Silver Creek Drive is now complete and the Central Oregon and Pacific Railroad is nearing completion of an improved rail crossing on West Pine Street. When the crossing is finished, the developer and City will work together to construct a second rail crossing near the Oregon State Police headquarters. Park and open space has been accommodated in the vicinity of the proposed neighborhood where a 3,'79 acre "open space" area lies along the west subdivision boundary and east of Jackson Creek, There is an existing house on Tax Lot 208 will be served by an access drive to Suck Point Street between lots 10S and 106. The Rogue, River Valley Irrigation District, Jackson County Fire District Number 3 and the Rogue Valley Sewer Services have been notibed of this tentative subdivision. Rogue Valley Sewer Services will continue to work with the applicant in the design of infrastructure. Water service is in the area with details outlined. in the Public Works Staff Report (Attachment "C"), Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following Endings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. 1. The project site is located in the T+D~-1L.MR {Low Mix R.esidentiai) zan3ing district and increases residential and mixed use land use efficiency in this area. The proposed tentative plan for low mix residential development is a permitted use in the Tt~D zoning district. The zoning in turn is consistent with the TC}D Comprehensive Plan map designation. The Comprehensive Plan encourages innovative residential planning and development techniques that would help to increase land use efficiency and reduce costs of utilities and services {Comprehensive Plan, page III-I2}. Z. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdiv~ion to subdivide approximately fl.~~ acres for the purpose of developing TJnit ~ of the .fackson ~6alcs Subdivision. The fatal number of lots proposed for what the applicants have identified as the Lnit ~ of their subdivision is 20< one of these lots is the open space area> 2 The proposed mixed use subdivision meets the density z•e:quiremcnt for the T{~D-I.,MIt {l..aw Mix Residential Zoning District which is a maximum of 12 units per acre. Each lot vvitl~in tl~c subdivision meets the requirements of the 'I'lJD Design Requirements and Guidelines. "l`he tentative plan includes all information required by CPMC l G. l (},i} l {l et. seq. ~. '.The Planning and Public '~4a•ks l~epart.e~~ts have reviewed bath the tentative plan far the proposed s;~bdivision and the findings oi' fief and deteranincd that the prc~jeet meets ali City standards and re~{uirexnents s~ebjeet to the reeoxnmended eonditions found in t~ttachrments ~ and TTY. 'The timing for the design and construction of Pine street improvements is compatible with this phase of the 'Twin Greeks Beveioptnent Recommendation: staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: l .Adopt Resolution No.~, approving the tentative subdivision subject tea the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the; review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Notice of Public Hearing B. Copy of Tentative Plat C. Public Works staff Report D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval tiCPCt-ISI~CITY WIDE~~C~I~NNIN~1050£~1.DfJC f; ~~~ ~~~~~ .~~~~~~~~~1, rx~~ ~~~~~hr~y, nrc~~ I'lazxning Director den Gerschier Cornrx~unif;y t'Zanner David ~llverd Cozxzzxzunity Planner Dave ~rkens GlS `l'echniciarz Lisa i~iorgan Planning Secretary ~~~i~e ®f I~Ie~~~n~ ~t~te ~f Notice: Septeml~b~r 1.d, 2QQ4 Meeting Date: C7ttaber 5, 2444 Time: '7:44 p.m. {Approximate) Place: Central Paint City Hall 15S South ~etand street Central Paint, CJregan NATURE C)F MEETING Beginning at the above tune and place, the Central Paint Planning Camznission will review a Tentative Plan application fax the purpose of developing a 19 single family residence subdivision. The subject parcels are in the TUD-LMR, Law Mix Residential district and are identified in the retards of the Jatksc~n County Assessor as Map 3~ 2W 43C, Tax Lot 208 and 102, 37 2W 03CB, Tax. Lat 142, and 37 2W 03CC, Tax 141. The properties are located north ofTaylar Raad, east of Grant Raad and west of Highway 99 The Central Point Planning Commission will review the Tentative Plan application to determine if all of the requirements of the Central Paint Municipal Cade tan be met. If the Commission determines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued. Pursuant to CC:}RS 197.'763 {3) {e}, failure to raise an issue during this hearing, zn person ar in writing, az' failure to raise an issue with suffibent specificity to afford the derision,.makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. .1gV1~~*~~^yfl~.{L't..~~.^#{L^~~ 1@'.~~i.~~7~0.~'.t"~g~~^(x~5 y~~~}~l~i~.~-.r9~v~y~~glr~it.d~~r~r~~gx 7~tA'.rAIT~/~'S.F~~~e.9~ ~8/~~g~~.~.rrlk~?rJLy~p..~s~+d~~{~4-~k-1~.['r91~PT^~T~R '&pr~+A.7g-~~~g~H:~~~~RryJ.&~~tx7r~TA..AyT~'-yks~ ~$t~~p ill H~A~~Brg.,~?rA Y ~ 3L H.H~il l~F `l.Y~~~k'r ~T li'A 6.t ~ ~1 9FA,t ~~4,~~~ A. ~ H. ll'®%~. V'"I AA~...4.A~~ A~ ~.fl.&A'.F ~it.7 ~9.~~1-X.s9 ~.`.~r~e This notice is being mailed to property owners Within a 240 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for tentative plan review are set forth in Chapters 16 & l 7 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions on the project approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person. interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up unfit the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 5, 2004. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City I-Tall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 9`7502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File No. is 05001. Copies ofthe same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541 } 664-3321 ext, 292. SUMM.A.R.'i' QF PR~C]~D~,TC~ At the meeting, the Planning Cozramission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony froze the applicant, proponents, opponents, anal hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 9750? {541) 664-3321 Fax: {541) 664-6384 t1 1d -- ~t`~~I~~~N ~~}~a~ {~~'~l~a~'~ U ~. . . /~~ ~ +'"i ~ l"I 7~ ~ 1~ i _?~ PREI.lA.l7NARY St19[}1V7S10N PLAN }ocored to :n Ehe sourrr~vESr CINE ouARrER a~ sECrraN .~ rav,<NSr~tc~ ,37 Sat1rN, RANGE .2 FYEST i+~iLLAMETTE MER1tJ)AN, C)TY OF CENTRAL POINT JAClfSON COtlNTY, ©REGON or f l 6;( p} r~.~ry ~ -F~e~(pgt r~~s ~+ Fy tA I PPtiV ti/"C~~~..7 iJ~V~R.,~ir~tYt~itl~ l,iV.i ~..~.t.' P.O. BOX .7577 CEN7F7/tL F't}7NT, (?Rf.GGN £77502 Na r~s ~`~r ' ' yy ~ PMAS~ ~ ~ I ~E~' - " MAn TSa. 37~-2w-{J3C 7c 2{F8 . 3]-ZtY-03C8 TOt} ASSf55+JRS ] ~ ". fitTOPERTY !$ 26xED TC717-CMR OS 3]-~-WC tt ttlt f t CAEErcS O~.v. Co, l.LL _ TOFAL AR[h +- $, 82 ACAFS LDT 53 ~ LOY St - Cthv7pUR tA+7£RVAL .+ T' T -- SAlhLC£,57 F,OT =. 212Ei Sq. F(.: AV[RAGE /.t7T .- ;~75g 5R. Ft. ^. ,~,y~ ~ 2r LoF s2 _ ,~ '` _... ~ a - zo co7s v g~3 } ~~..a ~ I 10.744 Sgft. ~,~5! ~~ PR0.11=CF a # ~~ . ~ S+TE q lbF f(1fi 1~'~ ` j 2 p ~` a' 1.79 A!}iE". ! ~ REUNi;r7E4 4 1 ~ O 7554 5q.1t LOt 33 f y~ fi ° w 26 2 ~ ~) °~'0-a 2s' 26' a ~ ~ r ~ ~~~ ~~ vx ~ ~ IAT Sf ~ LO7 32 }..; d ~ I( r ~ Y $ ~ fl 1 d % ~ ~ ¢ 7290 Sq.it i ~ -2$.8 ~ °wS.ZCf ~ 8L a { ~ ~ TAY4DR A AO ~ id FPT ib? ~` o LO ~ ..i I.OY 3i € w ~S ic, i0.84D Sq.R 11013 S¢tc F N 4} ~ £ 5SA 4 ~ . t$$.4 "~` +2E.4 gtty ' 'TS P ~ loTe3 (07 ao tGAOOT~ I$g~sa~ 3 S4ii ~ VtClN1TY MA < (NO SCALE) 'sr,~ l Li t~ 2626' ~ F`~ " ~ 45.81 0 ~ . _ x ~ T7 t44$ ~: ~ .. Pv£ = PvBLfC VTl;1TY £A5£NE+JT epA wAT[R, SAhY7ARY 5£t4£R, STCf1M o ~ .L oRAtx, aitDNE. GA5, kNA CAB(f tY TS 9? AttD 95 T ' R ~ t r t-~ w a o ~ YxrCti tb -T£URDRARY Att£Y TO 8£ R£1+Oa2 0 +i ~1, tAT s0# ~' - Gbx7at{.45 FRD's 1997 A£AiAL Rub70 SURVEY °1181 Sq,it a -LOPS g4-9? Ynt( BE PAD LOTS T 180 0 ~ '~'}"'£Y N ~-£Y = ° THE TAX 1075 7.0&-iQ$ ARE PFR FExO1NG t't.6P£R7Y [1x£ A6.~USR~LRT _ tZ8 4 " . 6 26 fG A}' + ~ 14821 5 . °'~ ~~" ° rv ~ q. ° 1 O~ { ioi-,` e . o o c ... 128_5 4t`sz~o ss t. . ~ ~ ~} ° is s4lFt 1 c 30.0 o y'FEAM6t7R7 L7t2lVE ~ BOO A3t.00' I°' ~5' Pll£ i ~ f ~ rr 90.0 y+ 0 9 0 .~ ` ~ o` g ~N ~ a ' ~ ~ 11 i 1Ia o „~ ; ~ ~ €1 !! ;~ ~ 44.E ~ 99 r p T t ~ k4T 2 LOY S G °~ ~ q LO i s~ - ~ ~ P~-SA5 I 64 4 ga.4 C 7UI.ANE AVE. f T f \ O2 ( \ ~, pLc'" ~'~ AEGt153ER£,T1 ', FRIIFBSSIC7NRL GA21U SUFtVEYOtZ OR£bbH .LtY 26, k585 >YY:IRx q t/.~Ek lass R[xESxAL BATE T2-as-OS 'v'i5 C'.l°.t a Of ~ ASSESSORS h(AF Frt£ ht0. 17 21r p3C 7L 248, 3? 2v7 D1C6 iCt) SUFVey4d by. FARBER Ps SONS, INC. dtSU l~ARBER St1RYEYtNG {s4TJ 864-5599 F'.6. BOX 5.28& 437 Qok SEreet C'ENTf2AL AOiNT pREGdN g75L>2 SCA(fi: i" m 1tlD' DAYL: AUGU57 16. 2D44 J~OS NP: b6~9-g6~ r x-n rcr: amw ~ run are„s exeurams +.wa v.+swrnrm,,xltt.asarre a s r,.wc r1:. 4~ ~"+• ~~ \City of Central Point ...w ~ pubic ~V©rks De~ar~men~ ~.- . ~.. . ~~, ~:;.. :~ ~ ~~~ ~ Robert Pierce ~~ ~ ~~~ I~tYG'Ctt?Y Rick I3nrtlett PU.~3.~.1C ~~.~,.~ ~~f~ ~'~ REP(~R~' Supervisor Cfsris Claytass l7eRuty Ltirectar .Mike {?tsa Se tember 29 200 ~ Techniciats Tf~: Planning Commission Techrsicint:~ FRC}M: Public Works De artment ~ Kttrets Raeber ,Secretary XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Site Plan Review for 37 2W 03C, Tax Lot 208 .Mttr tsrita 1l~unaz ~ecretnsy I Jackson CC:}aks Phasc V A~p~licant Twin Creeks Development Co., LLC P.O. Box 3577 Central Point, Oregon 97502-0021 Agent Herb Farber Property Description/ TC1D-L1~~R. Z4-.-.-..-Tll~, .Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department {PWD} standards, requirements, and. conditions to be included in the design and development ofthe proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards c4~ Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Jackson ©aks V Jaeksau Oaks Phase V Special ~equirernents 1. Access for Lot 102: Access for Zot 102 shah betaken froze the private access drive that is shown on the tentative plat. Access is limited for this lot because of the curvature of Buck Point Road and potential accident problems associated by having multiple access points an such a curvature and because the driveways would not meet the minimum spacing standards for driveways. Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Paint Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructuxe, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern haw public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by publz'c facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power {PP&L}, Gas {Avista}, Communications {Qwest}, and Sanitary Sewer {RVSS}. In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are eat, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs aftlze development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose ofreducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and. the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are eat adversely impacted by the development. Development .Plans --Required Iiaf©rmatiotz Review of public improvement pions is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95°lo complete. The plans shah include those ofother agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff: hz order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit {4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitazy sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm. drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and appz-ovals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traff°zc control plan. 8 Jackson ©aks V Public YTjorks Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the 17epartmcnt Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection tune to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncorr~pleted improvements (as determined by the Public 'Works Director}. Jackson Claks Phase V-Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95°lo complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public 'Works Department. 2. lJnce approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets ofplans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy ofthe final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Jackson Daks Phase V-~- ,Protection of Existing Facilities The locations ofexisting facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations ofunderground facilities shall be verified in advance ofany public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. .All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. ~. suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose ofprotecting or relocating existing facilities. Jackson Oaks Plisse Y-- T~Yater ~'ottneetion 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide 9 Jackson ©aks v the accessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water systerrz facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, ar azz extension of the City water system. AlL requirements ofthe pregon State Phtmbing Specialty Cade and the Oregon Mate Keatth Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shalt be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Paint Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted far specific inforrrzatian regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Jackson C?aks .Phase V -- Streets 1. The Developer's engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Corridor might apply to the design and construction of streets in specific areas of the City. These alternate standards are fatty described in the Central Paint TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to Locate street hardware away .from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required, All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA} or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT}, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-a~ way has been addressed through the Twin Creeps Master Plan process and was based an the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis determined use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestz-tans, bicyclists, parl~ed vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Additional technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments and any deviations from the approved Twin Creeks Master Plan. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design ofother new or existing infi-astructure. Jackson (.?aks ~'iiase V - Str~rm L~rai~a 1. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas ofthe channels or storm sewers entering and Leaving the project area. lfa contiguous annexed drainage area ofgiven size exists, the cngineermay use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria far the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. Ifthe City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm. sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology aad hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to 10 Jackson dales V substantiate the storm sewer design. The storzrz water sewez- system. clcsign shall be in conformance with applicable provisions offJregon :I~EQ,175L and C~DFW and Uzaited States CC.7E and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase 11 z-equirements. 2. The City of Central Point. Public Works Standards & Speeihcations should be consulted for specific information regarding the design anti construction. of storm drain related components, Jackson dales Phase ~- Regrcired Submittals 1. All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as txzay be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife {DFW}, ©regon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ}, C3regon Dzvision ofState Lands {DSL}, Qregon Department of Transportation {DDDT} approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ACME), affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA}, and Jackson County Road and Parr Services Departrr~ent {~C Roads}, DSL and ACQE, as applicable {wetland mitigation}. 2. Fire District No. 3 must review all streets and improve the water irnproveznent plans in writing prior to f nal review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed bythe Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public ViTOrks Department for approval prior to installation, 11 A'lC"~'~C~I~~I~'~' ~ I'1C.,~l~I~~l~t~ T.~II~PA~'l~`IV~lCI~'~" 1~~Ct:~N~l~Fl~l~~~ ~d~l~l[~I`lC`li~l+l~ ~}' A~'P~~V~IC~ Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy oftlze proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&l;s} for Units fthe Jackson Caaks Subdivision. 2, The applicant shall comply with ail requirezxzcnts of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of Unit Sof the Jackson. Oaks Subdivision. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and reciuirements applicable to the development and construction of Unit 5 of the Jackson [yaks Subdivision. ~~c~c~szlcrTV w~~~~~t.A~~z~~loso~l.r~oc ~2