Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - October 4, 2005~' ~ ° i'' r ; a~~ .~i.< ~ _r.~i r.. ~_{~l if _`. ~~~W ~'~ e~t_- ~ i' ~~~~ ~Jext G'l~ar~~r7in~} ~;or~~r~r7ir~<>ior~ I~~~~~oirs~~«rr f~c.~, E~~~ C~or~nie IVlocryc~~r°r~r~a ,L~~sndy {=ish, !:)c~r`rti~~rt 1c3i~ari, iVl~c~~< I._cawiC~, ~>c1o;~ IV1~r~c9olc~, C"r}uc:~c ~~il~n%i, ar~r.~ U1~i~yr1~ f~~i~c~~, Ifl. r> ~~C~3~s ~ ~ !r 11l. ~_~~~~~~ fa. f~ehi~~~,~ ~r~ci ar~~~rov~l of ~~c~~t~~r~~~~or t7iJ~ '~ ,: ;r~ir-rg ~ornrr~i~~,ior~ R~~ir~~riu ~i~blic: ~~~rir~~ io ~o~~si~~f- ~ :~onir~g M~~~ ~'~m~:r~~~~r~~nt` ~~plic;~fic~r~ ~~ ~~~ ~-z~ ~hango ~h~ lor~inc~ from ~~al~-E"C; A.~rr~~loyi~~~~t ~orr~r~~r~i~l ~o -~C~l~- (_,I~~F~, (_.o~~r i1/1ix ~2esi~or~~i~l for ~.o'c ~~ of Cra~~~ac~~ [Vl~~c~ov~~s 1yi11~ao„ Pl~r~r~~r~ t1~"~ii Dovolopr~~~r~t, ~. Go~~~id~r~tior~ o~` fir-rdit~~~ fior c~er~~i~l of ~ ~h~r~t~five C='I~n ~r°~d ~ ~'i~r~n~c~ Ur~if ~Jevelop~~non~ ors h_oi 9~ o~ ~~~t~~ac~e ~1~~c~ow~ Vii~~~e. ;~~; ~,-~h Tho ~~cldro~~ i~ ~ 69 ~1~~ Line. ~,~~~~-~s C. ~ ~~«~~~~ mee~ir~g fo r~vie~ a ~~in~f L7evelo~a~nen~c 'I~r- for ~eee VVoo~°i~, ~~~~~e~ I(I & ~~, ~ ~'i~r~ne~ ~~r,i~ E~e~~eiopnlen~. L3. /~ ~a~ak'~lic he~ri~~~g fo co~~~i~er ~ I en~~~ive ~l~rr ~~plic~~~iort fc~r fih~ ~Ear~o~e: of cr~e~~inc,~. ~ re~ider~ii~l la~~ loc~~~d in ~ ~t~L~~LP~~, Lo~v ~~ss~-ss ~,~ix F~e:~i~fer~'ti~l coning di~~ricf, ,J~~~son ~o~~r~ty llsse~~or~ n~~p ~s 37`~ ~`~ 'l O~,I~, .I_r~~ Lot.1~bt}. .I~I~r~ ~c~~r~~-,~~ i~, 'C J~l~ "l~r~~~Cor I=Zo~c~. pc~o~aos E. A public hearing to consider a Minor Partition application, to create ~~~. s~-~a two individual tax lots. Jackson County Assessors map as 37 2W 128, Tax Lot 202. F, A public hearing to consider Conditional Use Permit and Bite Plan applications for the purpose of allowing the construction and operation of an Umpqua Dairy Facility located within the M-1, Industrial District. Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W ~~~. 7s-~z 128, Tax Lot 202. The address is 3213 Hamrick Road. G. A public hearing to review a Minor Par#ition application to create two individual tax lots. Jackson County Assessors map as 37 2tN ~~5, ~~-~~~ 928, Tax Lot 203. H, A public hearing to review a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan applications for the purpose of allowing the construction and operation of a Trucking & Distribution Facility, within the M-9, ~~s. ~ ~°-IZ~ Industrial District. Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 128, Tax Lot 203 vi. lvl~scEL~ANEavs vll. ,ao,~ouRrvnnEtvT ~c~~a~as Planning Canrrrrissian Minutes September 6, 2t1QS Page I City of Central Pain Planning Commission ~1~inutes September G, 2005 I. MEETING CALLED Td ORDER AT 7:00 P,M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairperson Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Mack Lewis, Chuck Piland and Wayne Riggs were present. Scott Mangold was absent. Also in attendance were; Dave Alvord, Community Planner; Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; Don Burt, Interim Planning Manager; Chris Clayton, Deputy Fublic Works Director and Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was correspondence distributed related to Items "D" & "E",and revised plans for Item "C'° IV, MINUTES Commissioner Riggs made a motion to approve the minutes from August 2, 2005. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. Rt7LL CALL; Fish, yes; Idiart, Abstain; Lewis, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. Commissioner Piland made a motion to approve the minutes from August ~.b, 2005. Commissioner Riggs secondedthe motion. RC}LL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Lewis, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the minutes from .August ~.6, 2005, Citizens Advisory Committee ~ Planning Commission Joint Meeting. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL; Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Lewis, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion. passed. ~'. PUBLIC APPF~~ztANCES There were no public appearances. vz. BuszNESs Plarsning Corrtrnissiox Minutes S`eptetrt6er 5, 20tJS Page Z A. C(71~i'TINUANCE of a Public Hearing to consider a Tentative Plan application and a Planned Unit Development application. The purpose of these applications is to create 6 single family residential lots. Tlxe property is located within an R ~.-6, Residential Single Family zoning district. It is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map at 37 2W x©DC, Tax Lot xoo. David Alvord, Community Planner presented the revised staff repart for Creekside'Village PtJ`D. The revised plan reduced the number of lots from 6 to ~, and realigned road. ~tVhen the property to the north develops, the road would open up and the road turn around footage would revert back to the property owners. Paul Grout, Applicant said this revised plan is the best blend with the surrounding neighborhood and is the best use of tt-x-6 caning. He will build singly family homes compatible with the area. They will be upscale 2. story homes. There will be a 6' perimeter fence. He explained that due to the irregular shape of the lot, and being adjacent to Griffin Creek that a Planned Unit Development was the best way to proceed. Mr. Grout stated he will maintain the privacy of adjacent property owners by elevating the windows on the Ana story. hTa one came forward to speak in favor of or against the application. The public portion of the muting was closed. Commissioner Piland made a motion to adopt Resolution 6brl., approving Tentative Plan and Planned Unit Development applications, based on tlxe standards, :findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports, in addition to the following condition: ~. Placement of windows and landscaping installed to maintain privacy of adjacent property owners. Commissioner Idiart seconded the motion RC}LL CALL; Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Lewis, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion passed. fi. Public hearing to consider Tentative Plan and Planned Unit Development applications known as Phase 11I of a previously approved Master Plan known as Cascade Meadows Village. The purpose of these applications is to create 4 single family x•esidential lots. The property is currently located in a TflD-EC, Employment Commercial. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as S7 2W ~.~CC, Tax Lot ~a.o©. APFR(1VAL OF THESE Plattruttg Cattrrtrission Mittufes .S`eptember 6, 2~Jt15 .Rage 3 APFLICATIQNS WC}ULD I3E COl~t"I`~NGENT UPC}N APPRt)VAL OF PENDING ZONE MAP' & CCIMPREHENSNE PL~?-N AMENDMENTS TO CI3ANGE THE ZtJNING FRC?M TtlD-EC, ENIPL4~t'MEN'T CQMMERCL!~.LTU T(}D-LMR, LOW MIS RESIDEN'TZAL. Commissioner Riggs made a site visit. David Alvord, Community Planner, presented the staff report and read through the criteria. There were discussions regarding the marketability of the lot as presently zoned, background of the Master Plan, parks and open space. Craig Stone of Stone & Associates, agent far the applicant spoke. Mr. Stone explained that when they first asked for this lot to have an Employment Commercial designation the plan was to have Haskell Street extend the length of the existing city limits, which he feels may not be the case anymore. The markets have changed. They could have proposed 3 lots rather than q. lots, however that would only make the lots more expensive, Further discussions with Commissioner's indicated that they prefer to see the big plan for the future, they would like to see mare Snowy Butte Station developed out before compromising any more commercial zoning, Terry Marks, a property owner on Alta Lane stated that he was told it was going to be a convenience store. Though he doesn't object to the change in zoning, he does object to the proposed number of lots. No off street parking is a problem. Mary Beebe, property owner on Alta Lane expressed concerns for parking. She wouldlike to see enough room to park on the individual lots rather than the street. She does preferthe residential zoning over commercial. David Painter, resident of Central Point, stated that the design of the lots could be improved. He doesn't feel like this plan offers enough space to maneuver vehicles. Mr. Stone spoke again, confirming what he had said before. He added that they have tried to sell the property as zoned, and that it was originally zoned Employment Commercial to accommodate a potential business along with the cell tower site. That deal was not completed. No one else came forward to speak in favor of or against the application, The public portion of the hearing was closed. Planning Commission Mintetes September 6, 2(705 Pcxge 4 There were further discussions regarding how the land could be developed as presently zoned. Planning Commissioners directed staff to present findings to deny tl~e application at the next meeting. Commissioner Idiart made a motion directing staff to present findings denying Texitative Plan applicatioxx. and Planned Unit Development applications based on the standards, findings, conclusions and requirements as outlined in CPMC ~768.04.o subsections (a), (b}, (c) and (e). Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion R£?LL CALL: Tislx, yes; Idxart, yes; Lewis, yes; Piland, yes; and Riggs, yes. lYlafiian passed. Commissioner Lewis was excused for the remainder of the meeting. C. Public meeting to consider a Site Plan application for the purpose of constructing a Holiday Inn Txpress motel. The property its located within a C- 4, Tourist and C?ffice-Professional zoning district and is idenfiified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W o2D, Tax Lots xgoq. $r. xSoo, The project site is located south of East Pine Street and east of Interstate ~. Ken. Gersehler, Community Planner distributed revised site and sign plans for Holiday Inn Express. Mr. Gerschler presented the staff report and criteria. There were discussions regarding the private drive off of Peninger Lane and the allowable length for a cul-de-sac, and if there would be future development to the south. Tirn Hovet, Vice President of Sycan Development, agent far the applicant camplimentedthe staff. He stated that they are presently working an an agreement for non-exclusive ingress/egress easement with the property to the south. Mr. Hovet explained he did not have any knowledge of plans for development to the south. No one came forward to speak. im favor of or against the development. The public portion o£ the meeting was closed. Commissioner Piland made a motion to adopt Resolution GSA, approving a Site Plan application, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Fish seconded fihe motion ROLL CALL: Tish, yes; Idiart, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion passed. Plannitzg Commission Minutes Sejttemher 6, 2~tJ5 Page S Commissioner Fish made a motion to continue the meeting past ~©:aopm. Commissioner Idiart seconded. All said "Aye". Motion carried. D. A Public hearing to consider a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating ~~~ lots (i5a residential lots) located witlxin the Twin Creeks Master Plan area. This area of the Master Plan is known as North village ~ Twin Creeks, Fhases I & II, The zoning consists of TUT--C7-S, Open Space and TUD-LMR, Low Mix Residential and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as ~7S zW a38, Tax Lots i6aa, xGaz, ~.Go2, xGo3, i$ao and ~~ 2W a3C, Tax Lots ~.aa & ~.oz. The property is located soutlx of Scenic Avenue, north of Taylor Road, east of Grant Road and west of US Highway 99~ Ken Gerschler, Community Planner read the correspondence submitted by the Daley's regarding this application and the next on the agenda, Mr. Gerschler went through each of the items mentioned in the letter, answering each concern. Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician presented the sta££ report. Ms. Morgan went through the minor deviations that have occurred since the Master Plan. These items were elimination o£ traffic circles, intention for Haskell Street to Grant Road, an association recreation area, and parking. There were discussions regarding the irrigation system £rorn the correspondence submitted. The Planning Commission recommended adding a condition that the developer works with R RVID to ensure that surrounding property owners would maintain their irrigation. Herb Farber of Farber Surveying, agent £ar the developer handed out a preliminary site plan for the association recreation area illustrating the parking around the proposed lot. The actual name of the subdivision is The .IVartlt Village ~ Twin Creeks. Mr. Farber explained that enhanced pedestrian cross walks would be installed in lieu a£tra£fic circles. Mr. Farber stated that he would like to have the Planning Commission added conditis~n o£ working with the RRVID removed. He explained that they have worked with them all slang and that wasn't necessary £or a condition. They have and will continue to install new irrigation lines as Twin Creeks develops for property owners to maintain the use o£ irrigation. Mr. Farber explained their process of working with engineers £ar managing storm water, 'Twin Creeks has bio swales that will filter the storm water and allow it to percolate back into the water table. The developer will probably install one more traffic circle in 'T'w'in Creeks that would be located at Rustler Peak and Stone Paint Drive. C}ther traffic calming measures they intend to use would be landscaped medians. Na one came forward to comment in favor of or against this application. Plartrtirtg Corrtrnission Minutes S'epterrtt~er 6, 24f15 Page G The public portion of the meeting was closed. Commissioner Idiart made a motion to adopt Resolution Gb7, approving a Tentative Plan application, based on the standards, fiindings, conclusions az~d recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion ROLL CALL. Fislx, yes; Idiart, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes, Motion passed. Resolution No. bb6, was intentionally skipped and will not be used. E. A Public hearing to consider a Tentative Plan application fox the purpose of creating 67 residential Tots within the Twin Creeks Master Plan area, known as T~vvi~n Creeks Crossing, Ph. II. The zoning consists of TOD-OS, Open Space and TOT.t-MMR, Medium Mix Residential It is identified on the Jackson CountyA ssessor's map as 37S 2W 3C, portions of Tax Lot ~.©2 and portions of Tax Lot 1U©, The property is located south of Scenic Avenue, north of Taylor Road, east of Grant Road, and west of US Highway g9. Ken Gerschler presented the staff report. Chris Clayton, Deputy Public Works Director gave a railroad crossing update. Mr. Farber stated that the rail order permit should be received in late October or November. It should be completed within the year. Mr. Gerschler explained that all the other considerations were discussed with the previous application. No one came forward to comment in favor of or against this application. The public portion of the meeting was closed, Commissioner Riggs made a motion to adopt Resolution 6b8, approving a Tentative Plan application, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion ROLL CALL: Fish, yes, Idiart, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion passed. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Don Burt, Interim Planning Manager stated that the City will be undertaking a full blown periodic review for the Transportation System Plan. We may have a 2~d meeting in September. Planning Conrrnissiorr Minutes ,SePternber 6, zpCt$ Page 7 VIiL .A.DJQU~:NMENT Comrnissivner Fish made a motion to adjourn the meeting, Commissioner Piland seconded the motion, R.{]LL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at xo:2o P.M. City Qf central Point, Oregon ] 40 So. Third St., Central Point, Or 97502 S4].6&4.332] Fax 54].b54.6384 ~vww.ci.centraf-point.or.us f ~~~ STAFF REPC.3RT Planning Commission Meeting October 4, 2005 Planning Department Tam Humphrey,AICP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Adrr~inistrator ITEM NO. 05074 ZC Consideration of a Resolution No. 669 approving a request for an Amendment to the Zoning Map from TOD-EC to TOD-LMR on .4$ acres (37 2W }, Cascade Meadows Planned Unit Development Phase III, Thomas and Anna Sunday applicant (05074 ZC}. STAFF SC7URCE Don Burt, AICP, EDFP BACKGRf7UND The original approval of Cascade Meadows Village Planned Unit Development (02(}62} in March of 2002 designated the zoning for the subject property as TOD-EC Employment Commercial}. The intent was to provide to the residents of Cascade Meadows Village PUD approximately 4,000 sq. ft. commercial employment opportunities in a two story building. Since 2002 the owners ofthe subject property have been. unsuccessful in developing the property for its intended commercial use and are now requesting that the property be rezoned to TOD-LMR {Low Mix Residential} similar to the abutting properties. The original designation of the subject property for commercial use was discretionary and at the applicant's request. As a PUD it was the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate that corntnerciai development in the PUD is needed at that the proposed location adequate in size to accommodate the commercial facilities of the type proposed [Section 17.68.060~F}~. Presently the applicant is contending that market conditions will not support commercial development of the property, as evidenced by their inability to develop the property for commercial use. FINDINGS There are no definitive criteria for the evaluation ofthe requested zone change. The TOD Corridor designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map does not distinguish between residential, commercial, and industrial uses. As a planned unit development Section 17.65.060~F}, there are provisions for permitting commercial property within a residential PUD provided the applicant satisfactorily demonstrates need and site planning requirements. At the time of approval of the Cascade Meadows Village PUD the applicant demonstrated that there was a need for commercial property and designated the subject property for commercial use. ISSUES 1. The Zoning C7rdinance does not contain any specific criteria on which to judge the applicant's rezoning request. 2. The purpose of the TOD DistrictlCorridor is to promote efficient and sustainable land development and the increased use of transit. Is the present TC}D-EC designation an efficient use of land, and is it sustainable? EXHIBI'li'S. Exhibit "A" -Applicant's Bindings Exhibit "B" -Resolution No. 669 A~CTIQN: Consideration of a request for an Amendment to the Zoning Map froze T4D-EC to TDD-LMR on .48 acres (37 2W ), Cascade Meadows Planned T.~nit Development Phase III, Thomas and Anna Sunday applicant {05074 ZC), RECQMMEI'~DATI4N: Discuss and provide staff with direction to either approve or deny. BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATIONS FOR ZONE CHANGE FROM TOD CORRIDOR EMPLOYMENT COMMERCIAL TO TOD CORRIDOR LOW MIX RESIDENTIAL, LAND DIVISION AND AMENDMENT T4 A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON LAND WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF CENTRAL POINT, JACKSON COUNTY OREGON Thomas and Anna Sunday: Applicanl~s PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Appiicanfs' Exhibif ~ NATURE, SCOPE AND INTENT OF APPLICATION Thomas and Anna Sunday ("Applicant"~ seek a zone change and land partition on property within the Cascade Meadows Planned Unit Development and for which they have an option to purchase contingent upon approval of these applications. Under a previous application the subject property was rezoned from TOD Corridor -Medium Mix Residential (overlay) to TOD Corridor -Employment Commercial to allow the development of the subject 0.48-acre parcel with commercial uses. Applicant now wishes to amend the previous Planned Unit Development ("PUD") approval and rezone the 0.48-acre parcel from Employment Commercial to Low Mix Residential to allow the parcel to be subdivided into four {4~ single- family lots. The proposed development will be similar to and compatible with the adjacent residential uses within the Cascade Meadows Planned Unit Development which are also zoned Low Mix Residential. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION Applicant herewith submits the following evidence in support of the applications: Exhibit L The proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (this document) which demonstrates how the applications comply with the applicable substantive approval criteria as set forth in the Central Point Zoning Ordinance (ZO) Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Gapita3 Development 2062, LLC. Applioant Jane 24, 2005 Page 1 Craig A. Stone & Associates, ~tti. Exhibit 2. Site Plan ^ 2.1 Proposed Land Use Plan ^ 2.2 Existing Land Use Plan ^ 2,3 Water and Sewer Plan 2,4 Street Tree Plan Exhibit 3. Tentative Plan Exhibit 4. Construction Plans Exhibit 5. Zoning 1VIap Exhibit 6. A completed application form accompanied by limited powers of attorney duly executed by the record owner which authorizes Craig A. Stone ~, Associates, Ltd. to perform acts procedurally required in connection with the subject applications. RELEVANT SUBSTANTIVE APPRC}VAL. CRITERIA The criteria, under which zone change, planned unit development amendment and land division applications must be considered, are in the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC}. The criteria are recited verbatim below and in Section V hereinbelow; 2oning Map Amendment The criteria governing zoning map amendments are set forth in Chapter 17.88 (CPMC}, which provides in pertinent part: 17<8f3.t}40{Dj: If from the facts presented and the findings and reporf and recammenda#ians of the planning commission as required in Section 17.88.p4f3, the cify council determines that the public health, safe#y, welfare and convenience will best be served by a proposed ahange of zone, Planned Unit C3evetapmentAmendment The criteria governing Planned Unit Development amendments are set forth in Chapter 17.68 ~CPMC}, which provides in pertinent part: 97.68.E?40 Criteria to grar~fr or deny a PUI~; A PkJD shall be perrni#ted, altered or denied in aacarcfance with the standards and procedures of this chapter. In the case of a use existing prior #o the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter and classified in this chapter as a PUD, a change in the use or in fat area, ar an alferation of structure shall confomt wi#h the requirements of PtJD use. To approve or deny a PfJ©, the planning commission shall find whether or not the standards of this chapter, including the following criteria are eifher me#, ar can be met by observance of conditions, ar are not applicable. A. What the development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions #o the normal requirements of this title; Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Capital C?evelopmenf 2002, LLC. Appliean# 3une 24, 2005 .__.. _._ Page 2 ~- Craig A. Stone & Associates, C.td. B. The proposal will be consistent with the comprehensive p#an, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other app#icab#e polices of the city; C, The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the PUD wil# have minimal adverse impact on the Livability, va#ue or appropriate development of the surrounding area; D, That the proponents of the PUD have demonstrated that they are financially able to carry out the proposed project, that they Intend to complete said construction within a reasonable time as determined by the commission, ~. That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development ar will be obviated by demonstrable provisions in the plan of proper entrances, exits, Internal traffic cercu#atian and parking; F. That commercial development in a PUD is needed at the proposed #ocation to provide adequate commercial facilities of the type proposed; G. That proposed industrial development wil# be efficient and well organized with adequate provisions for railroad and truck access and necessary storage; H. The PUD preserves natura# features such as streams and share##nes, wooded saver and rough terrain, if these are present; I. The PUD will be compatible with the surrounding area; J. The PUD will reduce need for public facilities and services relative fo other permitted uses far fhe land. T©!~ Corridor Site Plan and Landscaping The criteria governing the T{~l~ Corridor master plan, site plan., landscaping are set forth iri Chapter 1'7.66 {CPMC}, and which provides as follows: 17.~66.Q~U Application and review A. Application Types. There are faun types of app#icatians which are subject to review within fhe Central Point Tt)D district and corridor. 1. TOD district or Corridor Master Plan. Master plan approval shall be required for: a. Development ar Land division applica#ians which involve more than five acres of land or forty dwelling units; ar b. Modifications to a va#id master plan approva#, which involve one or mare of the foi#av+ring: i. An increase in dwel#ing unit density which exceeds five percent; ii. An increase in commercial gross floor area of ten percenf or two thousand square feet, whichever is greater; iii. An increase in building height by more than twenty percenf; iv. A change in the type and location of streets, accessways, and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; ar v. A modification of a candifion imposed as part of the master plan approval. 2. Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. The provisions of Chapfer 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Ganstnaction Plan Approva#, shall apply to permitted and limited uses within the T£7D district and corridor. Far deve#opment ar #and division applications involving more than five acres of land or forty dwel#ing units, a master plan approva#, as provided in this chapter, sha#I be approved prior to, ar concurrently with, a site plan, landscaping and construction plan application. 3. Land Division. Partitions and subdivisions shal# be reviewed as provided in Title 16, Subdivisions Fr'ndings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Capital bevelopment 2002, LLC. Applicant June 24, 2005 ___._ ~.....~__ Page 3 Craig A. Sf4ne & Ass+~ciates, Ltd. 4. Candi#ianal Use. Conditiana# uses shall be reviewed as provided in Chapter 17,76, Condit#anal Use Permits. B. Submittal Requirements. Applications sha#I be submitted as required in Chapter 1,24, of this Cade. 17,66,050 Application Approval Criteria A. TC7D District ar Corridor Master Plan * "'' 8. Site Plan, Landscaping and Ganstruatian Plan Approva# A site p#an, landscaping and construction plan app#iaatian sha## be appraved when the apprava# authority finds that the fal#awing criteria are satisfied ar can be spawn to be inapp##cable: The provisions of Chapter '17.72 Site l~#an, Landscaping and Ganstructian Plan Approva# shal# be satisfied; and 2. The proposed improvements camp#y with the appraved TOD District or Corrtdar Master P#an far the property; and 3. Chapter 17.67, Design Standards - TCJD District and TOD Gorridar C. Land Division A Land Division app#ication shall be appraved when the apprava# authority Ends that the fal#av~fng criteria are satisfied oC can be shown to be inapplicable: 1. The provisions of Section 16 -Subdivision Ordinance, and 2. The proposed Land Division complies with the appraved TOD District ar Corridor Master Plan for the property. ~. Chapter 17.67, Design Standards - TDD Cistrict ar Corridor D, Conditional Use * * * * 17.68.080 Irxseptians to Zoning and Subdivision Titles. The Planning Commission may al#ow exceptions within a PUD far dimensions, site coverage, yard spaces, structure heights, distances between structures, stree# widths ar off-stree# parking and loading facilities differ`sng from the specific standards far the zoning district in which the PUD is located. l xceptians shall be based upon the applicant's demonstration that the objectives of the zoning and subdivision titles of this code w### be achieved. C7REGON TRANSPC3RTATlC3N PLANNING RULE 660-412-0064 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments SECTION 680-092-0060 {1} {1~ Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, ar a #and use regulation wau#d significantly affect an existing or p#anned #ransportatian fac##ity, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section {2) of this ru#e to assure that a#lawed #and uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards {e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. A p#an ar land use regu#ation amendment s'sgnificant#y affects a #ranspartation facility if it wau#d: {a) Change the functona# classification of an existing or panned transportation facility {exclusive of correction of map errors in an adapted plan); {b) Change standards imp#ementing a functional classi5cation system; ar Findings of Fact and ConcCrxsions of Law Capital Development 20tI2, L.L.C. Applicant June ~4, ~Q05 -- Page 4 l~ Craig A. Stone & Associates, ~t8. {c} As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adop#ed transportation system plan: {A} Allow land uses ar levels of development that would result in types or levels of travel or access {whichl that are inconsistent with the functianat classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; {B} Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transpartatian facility below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 2 comprehensive plan; ar {G} Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP ar comprehensive plan. IV FIN©INGS OF FAGT The City Council, "Council" reaches the following facts and finds them to be true with respect to this matter. The below Findings of Fact in Section lV support the Conclusions of Law Section V. 1. Property Location. The subject property is described as Lot 92 of Phase ~ of Cascade Meadows Village Planned Community which is located north off Beall Lane at the southeast corner of Haskell Street and Alta Lane. The subject property is within the corporate limits of the City of Central Point and described as in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Tax Lot 514U on assessor map 37-2W-1 ICC, The property is part of the Cascade Meadows Planned Unit Development. ~. Subject Prt~ject Area Acreage anal Glwrzership: The property is (1.48 acres and owned by Capital Development 2(30, LLC, 3. Existing and Proposed Plan Map and Zoning Designations: The subject property is covered by a TOD Corridor comprehensive plan map designation and is zoned TCJD--EC (Employment Commercial. Applicant here proposes a zone change to TOD LMR (Law Mix Residential), The base zoning designation ofR-1-8 will remain the same. 4. Previous Land Use Applications and Existing Land Use: The subject property is presently vacant. Under previous applications the subject property, as part of the Cascade Meadows PUD, was approved for the following: Annexation to the City of Central Point ^ Zoning Map amendment ~ Conditional Use permit Planned Unit Development (PUD} ~ TOD Master Plan ^ Site Plan, Landscape ^ Subdivision Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Capita! C?eveloprnent 2002, €.LC. Applicant lone 24, 2005 ._.._... __.._.._._..~.~._ Page ~ Craig A, Stone 8 Associates, Ltd. Upon approval crf these previous applications the sub~}ect €x.48-acre parcel was approved for commercial development under the Tt~O-EC coning designation. 5. Existing Land Development: Cascade Meadows Village was approved to be developed in two phases with 134 single-family dwellings, 22 attached Row Houses and 61 mini storage units. The subject property was approved for commercial uses. This application would have the effect of eliminating the potential commercial uses and putting in its place the approval for 4 additional single family dwellings and the same will increase the housing density by 3 percent. 6. T4D Corridor District, Permitted Residential Uses: The below Table 1 sets forth the permitted and conditional uses within the TOD-LMR zoning district: Table ~ T;JD Corridor Land Uses Source: TOD Disfricis and Corridors Chapter 17.66 (CPMC3 Ta6ie 4 tise Categories Zone Distric#s ~ L.MR RESf[JENTIAL Large and Standard Laf P 0 Lot Line, F}etached P Attached Flow Houses P Accessory Uni#s P1 'table Notes: P-Permitted Ilse P'1-Permitted use, 1 unit per lot 7. Lot Characteristics: The proposed lots have the following characteristics: Lot V~Tidth. Lot 92A has a lot width of 48.2 feet, Lots 928, 92C and 92D have lot widths of 42 feet. An exception to the requirement has been requested herein below in Table 3. ^ Lot Depth, Each lot has a lot depth of 14{3 feet, ^ Lot Area. The lot area for Lot 92A is approximately 4,62 square feet. Lots 92B, 92C and 92D have approximately 4,2(}7 square feet. ^ Average Lot Area. The average lot area in the overall development is more than Findings of Fact and Cranc/usions of t.al+v Capital Development 2002, LLC. Applicant June 24, 2005 _._~__. __,..._.M_...~...____._ Page 6 GraEg A. S#one & Associates, Ltd. 4,9f1~ square feet; the city standard is 4,5{}€l square feet. Lot Coverage. The lot coverage for Lot 92A is l~(3 percent. Lot coverage for Lets 928, 92C and 92D is 6'7 percent.' 8, Zo>aing Standards: The fallowing Tahl~ 2 represents the design requirements and guidelines for the Low Mix Residential and Employment Commercial zoning designations within the TC~LLL7 Corridor and provides a comparison between the existing Employment Commercial and Low Mix Residential requirements. Table 2 TO© Corridor Zoning Standards Saurce: Zoning Ordinance Chapter 17.65 TOD Distrlcf Zoning Standards 'Table 5 Standard zone Districts €~MR ~ EC ---------__..__..._._____.___._W_._._.._.~._~_.~_ DENSITY-» UNITS PER NET ACRE {F) __...___~~ ~~______ . W__. Maximum 12 NA Minimum 6 NA DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS Minimum Lot Area Large Lot Single Family 5,004 NA Standard Single Family 3,fl00 NA 0' Lot Line Detached 2,700 NA Attached Rowhouses 2,000 NA Multi-Family and Senior 2,000 NA Average Minimum Lot Area Large Lot Single Family ?,500 NA Standard Single Family 4,500 NA 0' Lot Line Detached 3,OOD NA Attached Rowhouses 2,800 NA Mull-Famil and Senior 2,000 1,000 Minimum Lot Width Large Lot Single Family 50` NA Standard Single Family 50' NA 0' Lot Line Detached 30' NA Attached Rowhouses 24' NA Mulfi-Farm and Senior NA t,O00 Minimum Lot Depth 50' NA BUILDING SETBACKS Front {min. /max.} 10'It 8' 4' ~ i.ct coverage is aii impervious surfaces inciudirzg buiidings and paved surfacing. Findings of Facf and Conclusions of Law Capital Development 2002, LLC. Applicant .Pone 24, 2005 -----~-------~---- -- Page 7 Craig A. Stone ~ Associates, Ltd. Side {between buildings} 5' de#ached 0` {detachedlattached} 0' attached {a}{c} t 0' {b} Comer min.tmax, 5'114' S'It 0' Rear 15' ~ 10' b Garage Entrance {d} {e} MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35' 60' MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE (G} 80°!0 100°l0 MINIMUM LANDSCAPED AREA {I} 20°!fl of site area 0°la of site area HOUSING MIX Required Housing Types as Listed {16 units in Under Residential in Table 3 development 1 housing ~e NA 16-40 un'fts in development 2 housing types >40 units in development Table Notes: NA -- Not Applicable a} The 5-fao# minimum also applies to the perimeter of the attached unit development. b} Setback required when adjacent to a residential zone. c} Setback requirement is 10 feet minimum between uni#s when using zero fat line configurations. d} Ten {10} fee# behind front building fagade facing street. e} Garage erdrance shall not prc#rude beyond the face of the building. f} Ne# Acre =Area remaining a#ter deduc#Ing environmental lands, exclusive employment areas, exclusive civic areas and right-of--way. g} Lot coverage refers to all impervious surfaces, including buildings and paved surfacing. h} Parking lot landscaping and screening requirements s61E apply. i} Landscaped area shall inc{ude ]wing ground cover, shrubs, trees, and decorative iandsoaping material such as bark mulch or gravel. Na pavemen# ar other impervieus surfaces are permitted except for pedestrian pa#hways and sealing areas. j} Roofkop gardens can be used #o help meet #his requirement. 9. Proposed Exceptir~ns: Exceptions proposed for this project are enumerated in the following Table 3: Findings of Fact and Conciusians of Law Capital Development 2002, LLC. Applicant June 24, 2005 - -- --- Page 8 ~~ Craig A. Stuns & Associates, t.td. Table 3 Proposed exceptions Saurce: Craig A. Stone & Associates, Ltd. ,- . ' • i i f •. + s t t i • e • ~ ~ Minimum Lot Applican# requests a minimum !ot width of All zC317.68.080 17.65.070 Table 5 Width 48.20 feet and 42.00. An exception from the requirement of 50 feet for standard single family in the TC7D Corridor LMR zoning district. Minimum Rear Applicant requests a 10 foot minimum rear All ZO 1"7.68.080 17.65.07(3 Table 5 Yard Building yard building setback for detached garages. setback An exception from the requirement of 15 feet. 10. Proposed Development Standards: Uther than the exceptions requested in the above Table 3, the proposed development will comply with the zoning regulations found in Chapter I ?.65.{~'~(? at Tables 4 and 5. 1L Surrounding Land Development Pattern: Land adjacent and to the north, east and west of the subject property are developed under the previous Cascade Meadow Subdivision/PUD, Phase 1, as family residential. Land adjacent and to the south and south off Beall Lane is within the county jurisdiction and zoned General Industrial. The property is in the owned by Boise Building Solutions Manufacturing LLC and is presently vacant. 1.2. Public Facilities: The subject property is served by the following public facilities and services: A. Sanitairy Sewer Facilities and Services: The sewer lines are owned and operated by Rogue Valley Sewer Systems {"RVSS"}. The subject property presently has one connection to the 8-inch line within the Alta Lane right-of way. The existing 8-inch line continues east within the Alta Lane right-of--way to the intersection with Silver Fox Drive, continuing south to Beall Lane where it connects to a l~-inch line. Sewerage wastes are treated at the Medford Regional W a#er Reclamation Plant, which is owned and operated by the City of Medford. According to ~irn Hill of the Medford Engineering Department, sewage wastewater collected and transported by the Bear Creek Interceptor is treated at the Medford Regional Water Reclamation Plant. Mr. Kill serves as the principal staff person in Findings of Facf and Cr~nclusions of Law Capital Development 2002, LLC. Applicant June 24,2005 - - Page 9 ~1 Craig A. Stuns & Associates, Lfd. charge 4f aperatic~ns at the regional plant which is located near Bybee Bridge where Table Rock Road crosses the Rogue River. The punt serves the Rogue Valley Sewer Service {RVSS} and the cities of Central Point, Jacksonville, Medford, Phoenix and Bogle Paint. A portion of the service charges levied on customers are allocated to treatment casts. The Regional Rate Con~rnittee as established in the September 23, 1985 Regional Sewer Agreement is authorized to set treatment charges and rates for the regional system. The charges and rate structures are reviewed annually by the Regional Rate Committee, and rate adjustments are made as necessary. Systems development charges are allocated to plant expansion. Monthly service charges levied on customers are allocated to treatment costs, equipment repair and replacement, and plant upgrades to meet changing regulations, The regional treatment plant was constructed in 1969-1970. The present average dry weather plant capacity is 20.0 million gallons per day {MGD}. The peak hydraulic capacity is 60 MGZ7. Plant capacity was doubled between years 198(}-1990 through several incremental expansions. A treatment plant facilities plan, developed in 1992, established a capital improvement program to meet growth need to Year 201.0. Average dzy weather flow into the treatment plant was 13.2 MGD in 1988, increasing to 14.1 MGD in 1994. Existing 1997 flows are anticipated to be approximately 18.0 MGi~. The population receiving sewer service in 1988 was 77,475. Sewer connections since 19$8 have increased the residential population served by sewers to approximately 94,00{}. The regional plant has a capacity for a population equivalent of approximately 115,{100, including commercial and industrial flows. The population forecasts by consulting engineers Brown and Caldwell, including analysis of rural as well as urban population densities, estimate the ultimate population that the plant would serve at 190,800. B. Water Supply: According to Medford Water Commission's System operations Report for 2044, the MWC water system supplies a population of ±117,000. Peak demands reach 50 million gallons per day (MGI~} during the summer months. The present source and distribution system has an existing capacity of 71.4 MGI7. There is an additional water source capability of 15 MGi~ available. In 2002 the City of Central Point replaced the Elk City Water District line that was within the right-of way of Beall Lane with a 16•inch municipal water main. A 12- inch line was extended north within the right-of--way of Haskell Street and an 8-inch line was extended east within the right-of way ofAlta Lane. The subject property has frontage along both Haskell Street and Alta Lane. Both Haskell Street and Alta Lane were constructed in June of 2003. C, Storm Drainage: At the time of development of the Cascade Meadows Subdivision the storm drainage line within the right-of way of Beall Lane was replaced with an 18-inch line. There is an existing 6-inch stub out from the subject property to a 12- Findings of Fact acrd Conclusions of Law Capital Development 2002, LLC. Applicant ,bane 24, 2005 ____.~ Page 10 1~„ Craig A. S#one & Associa#es, Ltd. inch storm drain Tine within the right-of way of Alta Lane. Individual lets will be connected to the existing storm drainage system. D. Streets: Access. The subject property has frontage along both I~laskell Street and Alta Lane. The south property boundary fronts along Beall Zane. There is an existing concrete block decorative wail between the south property boundary and Beall Lane. No access is proposed directly from the subject property onto Beall Lane. Access to individual lots will be from either Haskell Street or Alta Lane, Street t~wnership and Classificatit~n: Beall Lane is a county owned and maintained read classified by the City of Central Paint as a Minor Arterial Street. Uregon Highway 99 is awned and under the jurisdiction of the Qregon Department of Transportation (()I~C?T} and is classified by the City of Central Point as a Major Arterial Street. Haskell Street and Alta Lane are under the jurisdiction of the City of Central Point. Haskell Street is constructed to business collector standards and Alta Lane has been constructed to minor residential street standards. Street Constructia-n: Beall Lane is constructed with a minimum right-of way width of 60-feet from the railroad right-4f way to Snowy Butte Read. At the time of development of Cascade Meadows PUD Beall Lane was improved to a right- of--way width of 65 feet along the frontage of the PUD. Beall Lane has two travel lanes with a paved width of 3€7-feet from Highway 99 to Malibar. Curbs, gutter and sidewalk have been constructed along the north side of Beall Lane at the south boundary of the Cascade Meadows Subdivision. Haskell Street and Alta Lane are both city owned and maintained residential streets. Haskell Street has a right-of way width of ?6 feet and is improved with two paved travel lanes, curb, gutter, and sidewalks on both sides of the street. Alta Lane is constructed with a right-of--way width of approximately SCl to 52 feet and is improved with two paved travel lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalks on both sides of the street. Sidewalks along the north property boundary of the subject property will be constructed at the time of developed. Ea~isting Traffic f.,aading: Traffic counts conducted by the City of Medford engineering department for year 2tlOtl indicate that existing traffic on Highway ~9 (south of its intersection with Beall Lane} is 18,80C} vehicles per day. Traffic counts conducted by Jackson County Roads and Parks in July ~40t} indicate that traffic loading on Beall Lane (west of its intersection with Highway 99} is 5,53 vehicles per day, Under the approved Cascade Meadows PLTL7, the subject (}.48-acre subject property was to be developed for service and retail commercial uses. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Cap'~#al C3eveloprnent 24(12, LLC. Applican# Jct~e 24, 2005 _~f.._ ._...~. Page 11 ~~ Craig A. Stone & Associates, t.td. previously approved PUD plan for Cascade Meadows anticipated that the commercial development would include 6,644 square feet of office space on the first floor and 2,544 square feet of office space on the second floor, a total of 9,144 square feet. According to the standard reference, Trip Generation i;Institute of Transportation Engineers} 6~' Edition, ifthe property were developed as offices (i.e. as a "General Office Building"} it would produce approximately 11 average daily vehicle trips ~ADT} per each 1444 square feet of gross floor area, a total of approximately 144 ADT. As proposed, the 4.48-acre subject property would be occupied with four single family dwellings. Based upon Trip Generation {6f3' Edition) single family dwelling produce roughly 14 ADT per unit on an average weekday, a total of 44 ADT and decrease of 64 ADT from the previously approved office building. When combined, the existing 5,583 ADT on Beall Lane, the 1,174 ADT for the previously approved residential build out and mini storage units, and the proposed additional 40 ADT, the total is 6,797 ADT and represents a net traffic reduction of approximately 64 ADT. Existing Roadway Capacity and Level of Service: Under the previous approval, agents for the applicant had been advised by representatives of the Jackson County Roads and Parrs Department, that Beall Lane has a threshold traffic capacity of 10,044 vehicle trips per day at level of service "D." A Traffic Impact Study dated May 5, 1998 by Harley Engineering and Associates, Inc. was incorporated into the record of a 1998 legislative plan map amendment proceeding in Central Point. According to the Harley Traffic Impact Study, at full build out of the subject property (with R-1-6 coning) the intersection at Highway 99 and Beall Lane would operate at Level of Service `°B" Applicants agent testified that even with the proposed commercial uses ----- retail and service uses, mini-storage and cellular telephone facilities, that the level of service at the Highway 99IBeall Lane intersection would be below a Level of Service "D" These applications will produce a net decrease of approximately 64 average daily vehicle trips. 12. Public Transit: Public transportation in the region (and area surrounding the subject property) is supplied by the Rogue galley Transportation District ~R~TD}. 13. Bicycle Routes: Beall Lane and Haskell Street are designated bicycle routes, Frontage improvements to Beall Lane included striping for bicycles. 14. Electricity; Natural Gas; Telephone; CATV; Cellular Telephone: The subject property is served in adequate capacity by Pacific Corporation (electricity}, Avista Utilities, Inc. natural gash, LT.S. West {telephone} and CATV, Findings o€ Fact and Conclusions o€ Law Capital development 2002, IrLG AppEicant June 24, 2005 - Page 12 l~' Craig A. Stone & Assoe9ates, Ltd. 15. Solid Waste Disposal; Recycling: Solid waste collection, storage and recycling are provided by franchise through Rogue Disposal and Recycling, Inc. 16, Topography: The subject territory is nearly level with a slight grade which drains the property from south to north. 1.7. Public Health, Safety, Welfare and Convenience: Statewide Planning Goals 9 and 10 recognize that public health, safety, welfare and convenience are served through the provision of both housing opportunities and employment lands in urban areas. Strong demand is expected for the contemplated residential development. The small commercial area in this PUD does not constitute a substantial component of the City of Central Paint's commercial land base. As the residential component of the PUD is over 8(} percent built- out, the demand for the planned commercial space has not materialized. There are na substantial development projects anticipated for this immediate area in the near future that would further spur demand for commercial employment land. As such, continued designation for commercial uses levies an opparEunity cost against the potential to serve Goal 10 by providing additional housing. Applicant herewith testifies that homeowners in the area have expressed their concerns over use of the subject property for commercial purposes and have expressed a strong preference for detached single family housing similar to that which exists throughout Cascade Meadows. Applicant believes and expects the requested zone change and accompanying development plan will address homeowner concerns. V CC}NCLUSiC7NS t3~ LAW The following conclusions of law and ultimate conclusions are based on the findings of fact contained in Section N above and the evidence enumerated in Section II. The below conclusions of law of the City Council are preceded by the approval criteria to which they relate: Criterion ~ Zoning Map Amendment The criteria governing zoning map amendments are set forth in Chapter 1'x.88 {CPMC), which provides in pertinent part: 17.88.440(0}: !f from the facts presented and the findings and report and recommendations of the planning commission as required in Section 17,8$.x40, the city counait determines that the public health, safety, welfare and convenience will best be served by a prc`'posed change of zone, `~ Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact in Section IV {#l~}, the City Council concludes exchanging the Goal 9 employment land opportunity for a Goal 10 housing Findings of Facf and Conclusions of Law capital r}evelapment 2002, t.LC. Applicant .tune 24, 2005 Page 13 ~~ Craig A. Stone & Associates, Ltd. opportunity will best serve the public health, safety, welfare and convenience, consistent with Criterion 1. Criterion 2 Planned Unit Deveiapment Amendment The criteria governing Planned Unit Development amendments are set forth in Chapter 17.58 (CPMC), which provides in pertinent part: 17.68,OA0 Criteria to grant or deny a PllD: A t'f!D shalt be permitted, attered ar denied in accordance with ttte standards and procedures of this chapter. to the case a# a use existing prior to the effective date a# the ordinance codified in this chapter and ctassi#ied in this chapter as a PUC}, a change in the use or in tot area, ar an aiferatian of structure shall can#orm with the requirements of F'U© use. To approve or deny a PtJ4~, the ptanning commission shaft find whether or not the standards of this chapter, inctuding the #atlovving criteria are either met, ar can be met by observance of conditions, or are not applicable. A. That the development of a harmonious, integrafed plan justifies exceptions to the normat requirements a# this title; Conclusions of Law: The Council finds, based on the Findings of Fact in Section N and the evidence enumerated in Section II, that the proposed amendment is of the same design, character and use as the existing whale Cascade Meadows PUD Phases 1 and II. Therefore, the Council concludes that the proposed development has justified the contemplated exceptions to the normal requirements of this title {Title 17) to remain harmonious and integrated with the surrounding area. Criterion 3 B. The proposal will be cansisfent with the comprehensive plan, the objectives a# the zoning ordinance and other applicable polices of the city; Conclusions of Law: The fact that Criterion 3 requires consistency with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan does not make all goals and policies decisional criteria. ,See, Bennett v. City of Dallas, 17 4r LUBA 45t}, afi'd 95 Qr App 545 X1989). In that and subsequent cases, the courts have held that approval criteria requiring compliance with a comprehensive plan does not automatically transform all plan goals and policies into decisional criteria. A determination of whether particular plan goals and policies are approval criteria must be based on the language used in the goals and policies and the context in which they appear. Plan goals and policies that are permissive rather than mandatory, or that merely encourage or suggest a course of action, are also not approval criteria. Based upon the foregoing, the Council concludes that the following comprehensive plan goals and policies are appropriately construed and apply in this instance as approval criteria under 1~ennett v. City of .Dallas and those which are not cited and addressed below, are not, in this instance, approval criteria: Findings of Fact and Conciusians of Law Capifal Cleve€opment 2(}42, LLC. App€icant June 24, 2445 -._~.~._._.. Page 14 /lr~ Craig A. Stone & Associates, CtB. Noise Policy 3. The City shall require property owners to master plan land use and design of new developments tq control and minimize noise through stack requirements as site orientation, bu##ering, distance separation, insulation, or other design features. Conclusions of Law: Cascade lvleadows, of which the subject development is a part of, has been master planned and noise mitigation was a part of that approved plan. The proposed project will not cause a significant increase in noise over what now occurs in the surrounding residential uses and will in fact decrease noise caused by traffic which would have occurred under a commercial zoning designation. Therefore, the Council concludes that the land use applications are consistent with Noise Policy 3. Parks and Recrea#ion Policy 2: To provide an equitable distribu#ion of recreation facilities throughout the Community to ensure the easiest possible access by all local residents. Parks and Fiecrea#ion Policy 3: To enhance neighborhood and Community quality by providing for development of attractive, functional, and accessible parks and open space areas throughout the City. Conclusions of Law: The Council finds that the creation of parkland and recreational facilities was previously provided for under the Cascade Meadows Master Plan and that the existing parkland is or will be attractive, functional and accessible by the local residents and by the residents of the dwellings herewith proposed. Therefore, the Council concludes that the land use applications are consistent with Parks and Recreation Policy 2 and 3. Si#e Development Policy 1: Ensure that all new development is in canforrnance with City codes, as well as applicable state and federal requirements. and Site Development Policy 4: Ensure through the plan review process that all proposed deuelapments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and are of the highest possible quality. Conclusions of Law: Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Council concludes that the application is consistent with bite Development Policies 1 and 4 because the proposed development is in conformance with City codes and applicable state and federal requirements and are oftlte highest passible quality. Site DeveEop;»en# Policy S: Ensure that proposed develaprraent plans will not create obstacles to the future development of adjacent parcels. Conclusions of Law: Applicants' proposal merely further partitions land within the existing subdivision. Adjacent parcels to the north, west and east of the subject parcels are already developed in a manner that is consistent with this proposed development. Based upon the foregoing, the Council concludes that the subject proposed development plans would not create obstacles to the future development of adjacent parcels. Circula#iantTransporta#ion Policy 2: Whenever feasible, the City will utilize existing streets, highways, and other transportation facilities to the fullest extent possible #o maximize the return on past public investments. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Capital Development 2002, ~l_C. Applicant June 24, 2005 ------------ Page 15 l~"' Craig A. S#one & Associates, #_#d. Conclusions of Law: Existing streets that serve the subject property are Beall Lane {a county read}, Haskell Street and Alta Lane {city streets}. The proposed project utilizes these existing streets and in this way has utilized existing streets and transportation facilities to the fullest extent possible to maximize the return on past public investments. Summary Conclusions of Law: Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Council concludes that the application is consistent with the requirements of Criterion 3 because the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the city. Criterion 4 C. The Location, size, design and operating charactetistics of the L'11D will have minimal adverse impact on the livability, value or appropriate development of the surrounding area; Conclusions of Law: The proposal will develop existing vacant land within an already approved and built PUD. The proposed development will be residential in nature and developed in a manner that is similar to and consistent with existing development that js adjacent and in the surrounding PUI~ area. The Council concludes that this criterion is met. ~~~~~x>x~~~~~~~~ Criterion 5 D. That the proponents of the PtJQ have demons#rated #hat they are financially able to carry out the proposed project, that they intend to complete said construction within a reasonalale time as de#ermined by the commission; Conclusions of Law: Based upon applicant's stipulation in Section V, the Council concludes that applicant has demonstrated that construction will begin within six months of the final approval of the project {final plat} and that construction will be completed within a reasonable time. As to financial capability, Applicants financial capability is known and determined to be adequate based upon their performance in earlier phases of this PUI~. Therefore, the Council concludes that the PLJI) is consistent with Criterion S. ~~~~~~~~:~~~>k~~ Criterion 6 E. That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development or will be obviated by demonstrable provisions in the plan of proper entrances, exits, intemaL traffic circulation and parking; Co>clusions of Law: Previously, this land was approved for commercial development; applicant now proposes a zone change to allow for residential development, a change which will have the affect of decreasing the Average Daily Trips {AST} over commercial use, The proposed residential development will place driveway access along Alta Lane, an approved and constructed City Street and will provide for adequate off street parking within an Findings of Fact acrd Conclusions of Lour Capital Deveioptnent 2002, Lt.C. Applicant June 24, 2005 --.--..--.~--- Page 16 Its ~.,YS[i„~ ~. u'tptif3 ~ ~135pC1&t@S, L1{{. enclosed garage and will have additional off"street spaces an the driveway aprons. The Council concludes Criterion 6 has been met. Criterion 7 F, That commercial development in a Pt~D is needed at the proposed locafian to provide adequate commercial #acilities of fhe type proposed, G. That proposed industrial development wilt be efficient and well-organized with adequate provisions for railroad and truck access and necessary storage; Conclusions of Law: The proposed development consists of single-family residential dwellings and does not propose any commercial or industrial development. The Council concludes that Criterion 7 does not apply. Criterion 8 H, The PUp preserves natural features such as streams and shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain, i# these are present; Conclusions of Law: The proposed PUD amendment does not affect any land which has existing natural features such as streams, shorelines, wooded cover or rough terrain. The Council concludes that Criterion 8 does not apply. Criterion 9 I. The PUl3 wilt be compatibte with the surrounding area; Conclusions of Law: The P~TD amendment proposes residential development that is compatible in density and design with the residential uses already approved and now completed. The Council concludes that Criterion 9 is met. Criterion 9(1 J. The Pt1D rviit reduce need far public facilities and services relative to other permitted uses for the land. Conclusions of Law: In accordance with the public facility findings provided herein above, the Council concludes the overall difference in demand for public facilities is negligible and to the extent facilities were determined to be available for commercial uses the demands created by single family uses should be na mare and in most instances less. x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Findings of Fact and Conclusions of C.aw CapitaE Development 2002, t_LC. Applicant June 24, 2005 Page tT I9 Craig A. Stone & Associates, Lttf. Griterian 17 17.6$.{780 Exceptions to xoning and subdivision titles. The Planning Commission may allow exceptions within a PUD for dimensions, site coverage, yard spaces, structure heights, distances between stn~ctures, street widths ar off-street parking and loading facilities ditferirlg Pram the specifrc standards for the xoning distric# in which the PUD is located Exceptions shall be based upon the applicant's demonstration that the objectives of the zoning and subdivision titles of this code Will be achieved. C©nclusi€tns of Law: Exceptions are requested to the rear yard setbacl~ for detached garages to be ~ (~ feet from the rear property line and for lot widths to be reduced to 42 feet for interior lots and 4$ feet for the corner lot. The Council concludes neither the zoning title nor subdivision title of the code contains a section entitled objectives and thus construes this criterion to invoke demonstration of compliance with Zoning Title Section 1'I.C14.020 (Purposes} and Subdivision Title Sections 16.(}4.41€1 and 16.C14.C}~0 {Scope of regulations & Design standards and principles of acceptability}~. The Council concludes the proposed code exceptions are not inconsistent with these code sections in any substantive way that would significantly impair application of the City's zoning and subdivision regulations and the same is slaffzcient to establish consistency with Criterion 11. Grlferlon T 2 TaD Garridor Master Plan Amendrrrent A. TflD district or corridor mas#er plan. A master plan shall be approved when the approval authority finds that the following criteria are satisfied or can be spawn to be inapplicable: Discussion; Conclusions of Law: The fallowing criteria constitutes when a master plan is required: 1. TOC3 district or Carridor Master Plan. Master plan approval shall be required for: a. Development or land division applica#ians Which involve more than five acres of land ar forl}r dwelling units; or b, Modifications #n a valid master plan approval which Involve one or more of the #ollawing: i, An increase in dwelling unit density which exceeds five percent; ii, An increase in commercial gross floor area of ten percent or two thousand square feet, Whichever IS greater; iii. An increase in building height by mare than twenty percen#; iv. A change in the Type and location of Streets, accessWays, and parking areas where off-site traffic would be a#fected; or v. A modiflcafion of a condition imposed as part of the master plan approval. a The Council acknowledges the context al~d Language of these code previsions are not appropriately considered specific decisional criteria pursuant to Bennett vs City of Dallas. Correspondingly, demonstration of general consistency is sufficient as a matter of law. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of ~.aw Capita! Development 2(302, LLC. Appl'scant .Lune 24, 200t} Paget 8 f.~~ Craig A. Stone & Associates, Ltd. Continued Tl~iscussion; Conclusions of Law: The Council makes the following GonGlusions with respect to Criterion 3: 1. The proposal is for the construction of 4single-family dwellings on a total of 0.48 acres of land. 2. The addition of 4 dwellings will increase the dwelling unit density by ~ percent. 3. The proposal does not include an increase in commercial floor area and in fact will decrease the Commercial floor area. 4. As demonstrated by Exhibit 4 Construction Plans, the building height will not increase by more than 20 percent from the existing residential development in Phases 1 and II. S. The proposal will not change the parking areas where of£~site traf~G would be affected and will not change the type or location of streets aGGessway. f>. The proposal will not cause any modification of a condition imposed as part of the previous master plan approval, Ultimate Conclusions of Law: The Council concludes that the proposed development does not require an amendment to or revision of the previously approved master plan. Therefore, Criterion 12 does not apply. Criferion 93 B. Site P#an, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approva# A Site P#an, Landscaping and Construct#on P#an app#ication sha## be approved when the approval authority finds that the fo##owing criteria are satisfied or can be shown to be inapplicable: 1 'The provisions of Chapter 17.72 Site P#an, Landscaping and construction Plan Approval sha#1 be satisfed; and 2. The proposed improvements camp#y wi#h the approved T{)D Dis#rict or Corridor Master Pian for the property; and 3. Chap#er 17.67, Design Standards - TOD District and TC?D corridor Conclusions of Law: The Council makes the following conclusions with regards to Criterion 13: 1. Based upon Exhibits 2, 3 and 4, the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Chapter 1'7.72 relevant to site plan, landscaping and construction. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Capital ~}8VC~4pRiE11t ~{}{~~, j..~~. /~}p~tCant June 24, 20€35 _.~...~..__....~ ___._ __.~....__ Page i9 ~J Craig A. Stone & Associates, Gtd. 2. Based upon evidence submitted in Section Il and the Findings of Fact in Section IV the proposed improvements comply with Tt~7D Corridor Master Plan. 3. Based upon Exhibits 2, 3 and 4 and the Findings of Fact in Section 1V the proposed Land division is found to be consistent with Chapter 17.67, Design Standards for TQD Corridor Lands. The Council concludes the proposal is consistent with Criterion 13, ~~~~~>x~~~~>k~~~ Criterion ~4 C. Land Division A Land Division application shalt be approved when the approval authority finds that the fallowing criteria are satisfied ar can be shown to be inappticable: 9. The provisions of Section 16 -Subdivision t~rdinance; and 2. The proposed Land Division complies with the approved TC7D District ar Corridor Master flan for the property. 3. Chapter 97.67, C3esign Standards - TDD District or Corridor Cvz~cl>asions of Law: The Council makes the following conclusions with regards to Criterion 14: L Based upon Exhibit 3 Tentative Plan, the proposed land division is consistent the provisions of Section 16, Subdivision Ordinance. 2. The proposed Land division is similar in design and character as the previously approved subdivision plat. 3. Based upon Exhibits 2, 3 and ~ and the Findings of Fact in Section IV the proposed land division is found to be consistent with Chapter 17.6'7, Design Standards for TOD Corridor lands. Criterion 15 QREGC}N TRAIVSPtJRTATiC7N PLANIVfNG RULE 660.012-006[1 Plan and Land Use Regulatlor~ Amendrr~ents SEwCTItJN 660-0192-171)611 {9} (9} Where an amendment #o a functional plan, art acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a Land use regulation wautd signihrantEy affect an existing ar ptanned transportation facility, the tacal government shall pu# in place measures as provided in section {2} of #his rule to assure that atlawed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and perFormance standards {e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, Findings cif Fact and Conclusions of Law CapitaC Development 2002, t.t_C. Applicant June 24, 2045 --.- Page 20 Gralg A. Stone ~ Associates, Lid. etc.} of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly af#ects a transportation facility if it would: {a} Change the functional classification of an existing ar planned transparkation facility {exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan}; {b} Change standards implementing a functional classifcation system; ar {c} As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adapted transporfatian system plan: {A} Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent vrith the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; {~} Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transpartatian facility below the minimum acceptable performance standard Identified in the TSP ar 2 comprehensive plan; or {C} Worsen the performance of an axis#ing ar planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable perfom~rance standard Identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. Conclusions of Laver: The Council ct~ncludes the proposed zone change and PUD ~revisi~n gill have minimal effect, and during typical peak hour conditions a reduction effect on trip generation within the site and on nearby transportation facilities. As such, the Council concludes the requested land use approval will not create an inconsistency with the existing functional classif xcation system or facility performance standards in any material respects. VI APPLICANT STIPUL.ATIC3N$ Stipulation 1. Timetable for Develtrpment: Applicant herewith agrees to stipulate that construction will commence within six months of the final approval of the project (including final subdivision plat approval} and that construction will lae completed within 1 year or such reasonable time as the city may determine. Findings Qf Facf and Conclusions of Law Capital Development 2002, Gl_C. Applicant June 24, 2005 ---......---~...-- Page 21 ~~ Craig A. atone & Associates, Ltci. Vii ULTIMATE CC}NCLEIE[QNS Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and conclusions of law, the City council ultimately concludes that, the case for annexation and zone change has been shown to conform with all of the relevant substantive criteria. Respectfully submitted on behalf of applicant Mr. anal Mrs. Robert Sunday c~~.~€~- A. sTO~E ~ Assc~e~ATES, zT~. Findings o€Fact and Conclusions o€Larv Capital Development 2f}02, LLC. Applicant ,tune 24, 2{}05 _..._ _._..._. Page 22 Z~f ~a~~~; J~~~ z~, zoos City of Central Point, dregon 140 5o.`Fhird 5t., Central Point, t7r 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.eentral-point.or.us STAFF REPCC:}RT Planning Commission Meeting October 4, 2005 Planning Departr~nen~ `tom Hurnphrey,AiCP, Community C}evelopment D'€rectorl Assistant City Administrator ITEM NUJ: 05074 T/P Consideration of a Resoiution Na. 670 denying a requesfi for a four lot Lanci l~ivision/Preliminary Development Plan and Planned Unit Development amendment on .48 acres, Assessor's Tax Lot 37 2W 11 CC 5100 {Lot 92}, Cascade Meadows Planned Unit Development Phase III, Thomas and Anna Sunday applicant {05074 T1PUD}. STAFF SC)LTRCE Don Burt, AICP, EDFP l3ACKGR4UND At the September 6, 2005 Planning Commission meeting a public hearing was held to consider the modification of the Cascade Meadows Village PUD for Lot 92, and the subdivision of Lot 92 {.48 acres) into four {4} single-family residential detached fats. The land division application was accompanied by a preliminary site development plan for each of the four {4} lets. The initial intent for the Cascade Meadows Village PUD was to develop Lot 92 as commercial. The property is currently designated for employment commercial use {EC}. The applicant has a pending application to amend the zoning map from TOD-EC {Employment Commercial} to T©D-LMR {Low Mix Residential}. In addressing the PUD amendment and Land DivisionlPreliminary Site Plan it was acknowledged that the application was being reviewed on its merits as if it were designated T4D-LMR and that the issue of whether or not the application to amend the zoning map would be addressed separately on its own merits. After conclusion of the public hearing, and subsequent discussion, the Planning Commission voted to deny the proposed PUD amendment and Land Division and dzrected staff to prepare findings for denial based on the following considerations: l , The proposed Tots did not meet the minimum rear yard requirement; 2. The proposed lots did not meet the minimum lot width requirements {50 ft.}; and 3. V~ith the exception of Lot 12 the proposed lots are smaller in area and width than other standard residential lots in Cascade Meadows Village. 25 4. The site plans, with the use of shared driveways are not similar to or compatible with adjacent residential uses. FINDINGS Denial is based on the following findings as relates to the pending T(~D-Llv1R land use re-classification: Section 1.7.65.0'70 Zoning Regulations - TtJD Corridor{E) Dimensional Standards. The dimensional standards for lot size, lat dimensions, building setbacks, and building height are specified in Table S, Finding 1 ~ 65.1174 {E}; Section 17.65. (J7d (E} sets forth dimensional standards for the TC?~- LMR and references Table .5 TC?:D, Corridor Zoning Standards. Table 5 requires a minimum lot width of St1 feet. The applicant proposes lot widths less than Sll feet, Conclusion I7:65.1174(E}; The proposed Land T~ivision daes not comply with the minimum standards for lot width as set forth in Table 5, Section .27.65.4711. .Finding 17 65.474 {E}; Section .17.65. ~7f1{E} sets forth dimensional standards for the TC?.l)- LMR and references Table 5, Corridor Zoning Standards. Table 5 requires a rear yard setback of I5 feet. The applicant proposes a minimum rear yard set back of 10 feet. CvncltssiQn 17.65.(17(1{E}; The proposed Land.Division does not comply with the minimum standards for rear yard setbacks as set forth in Table 5, Section 17.65, 11711. Section 1'7.68,040 Criteria to Grant or Deny a PUD {C). That the location, size, design and operating characteristics of the PUT} will have minimal adverse impact an the livability, value; or appropriate development of the surrounding area. Findi~rg 17, 68.114(1{C}: ,In reviewing the proposed P~T.D amendment and Land .Divisionll'reliminary .Development Plan against the surrounding land use pattern it is determined that the lots as proposed do not meet the width, and area standards of all standard single family lots within Cascade Meadows Trillage (excepting Lot 12}. It was further determined that the existence of extenuating circumstances warranting any reduction in setbacks or lot width were revealed. Cvnclusrrrn 1 ~ 68.114(1{C}; The proposed lots and lot design is not consistent with the character of the previously approved and developed standard single family lots. Section 17.68.040 (I). The 1'UD will be compatible with the surrounding area. p'inditrg 17, 68.1141?{~}: See Finding 17.68. t14(l{C}. Carrclusion 17, 68: See Finding 17.68. {?4D(C}. u ISSUES There are no issues relative to the Planzxing Co~r~mission's decision. It is the apl~lica~~t's responsibility to deznonstratc compliance with the n~inimun~ requirements of the approved planned unit development and the standards oftl~e underlying zoning district (proposed LMR). Under the circumstances the applicant did zaot demonstrate that the proposed Preliminary Development Plan and Land Division complied with the standards ofthe TCUD-LMR as proposed, nor with the general residential character of the adjacent residential properties. 2. The PUD amendment denial is based on the applicant's submitted Preliminary Development Plan for Lot 92. EXHIBITS Exhibit "A" _ Tentative Plan Exhibit "B" --Applicant's Findings ACTIaIv Consideration of l~.esolution No. 670 REC4MMENAATIt)N Approval of Resolution No. 670 .G.~ / PLANNING C4MMZSS~ON RESQLUT~f)N NGt. G'10 A RESCILUT~ClN denying a preliminary Development Plan and Land Division for Assessor's Tax Lot 37 2W l ICC 5100 (Lot 92}, Cascade Meadows Village, Thomas and Anna Sunday applicant. WHEREAS; on September 6, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for an amendment to the Cascade Meadows Village PUD and Land Division! Preliminary Development Plana {the "Application"} submitted by Thomas and Anna Sunday Applicant}; and WI~EREAS; the property is currently zoned as TOD - EC with a pending application. to consider a change in zoning to TOD -LMR; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission's consideration of the Application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to lands designated TC}D -LMR; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicant's request it is the Planning Commission's determination that the Application does not comply with the applicable standards and criteria as set forth in the Staff Report dated C}etober 4, 20fl5; now therefore BE ~T RESCJLVED; that the Planning Commission of the City ofCentral Point, by this Resolution No. 669 hereby denies the Application based on the findings stated in the StaffReport dated October 4, 2005. PASSED by the Planning Commission in open session and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4~' day of dctober 2005. Planning Commission Chairman AT'T'EST: City Representative PLANNING COMMISSIt~i~t RES4LI.7TI4N N©. 670 {I0042005} City of Central Point, C3regon 140 So.TF~ird St., Central Point, t7r 975(72 541.664.3321 Fax 541.6b4,6384 www.ci.centraf-point.or.us CENTRAL POINT STAFF REPC.~RT October 4, 2005 Planning Department Tam Humphrey,AICP, Community Development Directart Assistant Gty Administrator AGENDA ITEM: Public Meeting to review a Final Development Plan for remaining phases of a Planned Unit Development known as Beebe Woods. STAFF SOURCE. Zisa Morgan, Planning Technician BACKGROUND: ^ May 6, 2003, the Planning Commission conditionally approved a Planned Unit Development known as Beebe Woods, consisting of 3 phases. July 6, 20(14, the Planning Commission approved a final development plan for a portion of Beebe Woods, with the following additional conditions added for the approval under Resolution No. 620. The additional conditions are as follows: / Submit a park design. for the "tot-lot" park. {Refer to Attachment ~~ ~-+rr ~" Provide the City with the applicant's choice in materials and design for the internal pedestrian pathway. {Refer to Attachment "_"}. /~ Advise the City of the plans for the proposed pond. Discussion: The dex~eloper has decided against a pond, and wilt provide landscaping in Lieu of the pond. September ~, 2004, the Planning Col~~rrussion approved an additional phase {Phase N} to include .$7 acres, which consisted of an existing home to remain and 5 additional residential lots. ~\ ierverzilla1p1~2Q05 l.,and Use Files~Beebe t~Voods staff Report Final Development.dacT'age 1 of 2 ~~ FINDINGS: The final development plan is consistent with the preliminary plan with the number of lots, lot sizes, lot configurations, and open space. Civil plans for all phases have been approved. The applicant has met all requirements for final development approval with the following exceptions. These exceptions can be monitored and enforced administratively prior to signing the final plat for recording with the Carnnussion`s conditional approval. Any deviations of the submittals from the approved preliminary plan will require reconsideration by the Planning Commission. EXCEPTIC)NS: 1. CC & R`s -The City has received proposed CC & R`s during the previous application approval stages. A recorded copy must be submitted to the City. . Final Landscape Plan -~ The City has received a conceptual landscape design during the master plan approval. A final landscape plan for all phases {including where the pond was going to be} must be submitted and must be consistent with the approved conceptual plan. {Please refer to Attachment "B"}, 3. internal Pedestrian Pathwav - A condition of previous approval was to have a materials and design plan for the pathway. _ This must be submitted to the City prior to signing the Final flat for recording. ~. Pocket ParkJTot-Lot Desi,~m -- A condition of previous approval was to have a design plan for this park. The plan submitted was a rough landscape drawing and did not include any other features. A final design plan must be submitted to the City prior to signing the Final Plat for recording. The above exceptions must be submitted and approved by the City prior to final plat signing. Final plat must be approved and recorded prior to November 4, 2005. EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" -- Final Development Plan Phases III & I~ Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "C" -.Public Works Memorandum Exhibit "D" -Planning Resolution No. 671 ACTItJN: Consideration of Resolution No. 671 RECC?MMENDATItJN: Conditional approval of Resolution No, b71 ~,`5erverzillalp1~2G05 Land Use Files\Beebe Woads ~#aff T{eport Final Develapent.docPage 2 of 2 ~~ 9 ~0~~ 1 ~~'~ p 3 i? 2 udSiRr ec PP~~ ~t~-~~~ ~ G•~ ~Prrr~~ar~ P~~~~~ VI s~~~ ~ ~p,.P~ .) ~'~Pss ~ ~2 P~ocx~r .sr PA~~~~o ~tG~'G~ {Pp'~ } ~~P~E. ~~~K~~n xa ~roNUar~-xr Q[RRS 27 P PoCK£r &" PR~f~.~rt' PfiRx ¢,9 48 _97 ~S ~~ 5 t}D'atl25 cv o,rz ` S7 SFr 5&' {(N89'36'14"5 7Q3.81} .S7C7RhI 17R9rN t' H'lrNESS GORN£RS RR~r CkLCUGSt£R PRSrrfR _ P,4RX DETAIL "8=..,~r - N83°3S'48~~E jN89'36`53" ~ 7R3.7f £aS£nr NT 4d3.8t - = = ~~ ~ '"' ' 49 _m 20 w 37.95:. 24.951 3$.Qt1 _~r,. 3~49_~ 24.49 ~~_ 37.S~R.. .~_w 3.$4.4. _.. .__~ 35. v u; l 16f.79 r. =- m---'"'-' ''29'49-; c.?'" e~ ~^^ ~ #,1 ~.-;5.00' °' 0~.. ~ ~' - uS ro m t .........._.._____~. 7 t ~ utbz ~ , ~ ~ ."n , I~ ur"i ,nn ~ "' 1 ~i ~n Q u°y +n in u> ~ i ss ~ f3! qt i.Sf +Tp+ ~ ~ a51 Cn iS~']'' -O ~''~ ~ ~ `pper O O d f b -n A0~ ~ O O O O O Q O 6 2.50=-I ~ I"^.i!JrU~ P ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ::~ n bG ,,, 38.44 ~' 24.44 ~ 38.04 ~ en q va vi cn cn 7 ~ 36. 3&. ~' 3fi.a4 0.40 ;37.96 4' M ~ ~'~ ~ 589`5 16'1y 2 3.6 / 589'S0'Fb"W 238.3 jr: 27 GOMhI4N PROPERTX. ~ ~ ~ ~~SroRr~ oRnrn+ I.E, & P.U.E. ~/ ~ COMMON PROPERTY, I.E. & P~ ~fl//~~~ Nr,~ q ~t ~~~ ,~ ~ ~._ sas'SO'F6'w f1a.6f __ "' 4 ~ /~, b G f9.0 31~.~5 ~g0. } / ~ 589'Sa'f6"W 3fi01 'c, v; ~"' ~ cs c4i, o ~~'` X96 Yr t .y`'' . ,6 SI';E ojf~r 58554'16"W 60.00 a RETAIL "A" ~-., ate, ~ ~~` k5~, ar, °o ~5 ~`'^~, ;. ~8 103 8 ;g 5`fc. ~2P-" ~ o o + ~ o . ~ ~ ~ ° 24 .+ 23 C ;~ 22 ~ + 21 :~ 20 :~ 1 ~ G 18 I7 '.^' 16 ~ 5 14 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ d.0a d O ~ 36.40 ~ O 36.04 ~ 4.60 ~ 4 o "' 36AD 6Aa .00 O S "' 37.40 7. L ..~ 1jw aelk~'l~'3S' . F N LL --~-•-•-- ... -... _~7~ 46`50 $ ps##'~'ei'~E' t•: ~ 18.9 66.06 k~d16 • °. ap ~°p29~' S89'S416"W311.8 ~ryg•O~i~"7 ,,, ~ `f- 37 - 7$ r "' -` 6k I ~° ~~ _ x/t///J1//// t -- N23't72'37"E ~ " N ~ ~, . ~ N$3'50'78"E ~ S$3'S3`52"E ~ I ~ ~$ ~ o gd ~ 5 °5~'dk~ ~5~ _ PROPERTY, LE. 8c P.TJ.E.i COMD(O I / i9.4~' f / ° ~ ___._ NBS°50 f$ E 42 " ° ' I u '( '~ ~t`a VITIAL POINT S2 ~S E 273.RD 50 iB N$9 ~ N N8 3$ 34 F, &5°27 29°E w ~ ' t~ 5228 68~R ~......_ ....~.. ._ 27.$0 ~ 27.08 ~ i3 ~ ~ Mi.„ ~~ M 1..t ~ .. ~ . ~ 63 ~ ~ ~ N ~ 29 N79'3$' 1 f "E ~ 3 59 EE II ~ ' I i ~ I I ~ 0.r 47 ~ ~ ~ N ~ o T ' ~' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 31 32 ~ ~ ~ ~ I EE 33 ~ 39 ~ 35 I ,3& ~ 37 ~ 38 ~ 38 ~ ~ I i ! I I i i i ~ ~ ~ V ~ I ~~ ! ~ ~~ I ' ~ ~~ 1 ~ I ~~ `` -~ ~~ ~ ~ _ _.-.- - 8~'EBE WL~DG~S, PHASE 2 `"" -.- ~ ~ _ _. ~. ~ s~ ~ '~ MIS~'~ETL3E ~`t7URT ~ ~ ~,~~ ~ ~ ~1 66 ~ ~9 ~ 58 ~ 57 ~ ~ I ,56 ~ 55 ~ .54 ~ 53' ~ 52 (51 T 5tI 49 32 ~ ! E 1 1 1 I ( I I i t ~ 4 ~ , : ti r ~~' r ~a ~ O 103 f t ~; J INITIAL POINT ~ '"J ----_ --78.$7 DETAIL "A" xor m Scut' 4.34 ' 33 108 1 ~'~ ~1?4` DETAIL "8" xar ra snu£ I,EG~NO ~ j : t '&oA rBC 7sG rac rBC r8c j r 32?Yfl£fC_34D0 '" 2C=00 2500 2940 23DA 2200 ~~~~ !8G !8C }F3C !BC 18G tF3C !BC tBD F8n 78D ... o ! ~ E t~,, :a......-....._,..,.sa.......-....~..c. -..._...._.-.,_._...ss ~ 2700 20AD 1900 180D t7D0 18D0 1500 5603 5602 5001 E ...Y-_._._. -~...... _._ _.-" i ~~ ~ i _ m w m n -~ .... ._. - t m t"' m .. i ~ n ~ aY ~ lK h h C~ h ~ m Cf Cl ~ n 4- PRDtF;O'f I i ~ 3T2Yr78C-J600 .,..,t o °o ~ `~ o ti ~ m n n a '~++ ~. sy a > t zaos w sa.l< ~` ~~ S81' .i",r.. ~a.°a ~}t d ~ ~~ '~ 1085 #d7 6108 i 2 5 S ~' i ~54't I ! 10u ~ ..; cxA u 3 4 7 8 8 8 E8 S 1 12 13 y; ocwts ru. ry ( f .~ I.I !f ~te'r^w3 ~~... r T W [ I xl '• ~ i ep' I~ ` ~ ---- ''S N~ ~ Viezixity Map ~. _ ~ i ~i...._...... t ~PFiASE 4 '~ TTASE 3 ~' ~"G ~ ~ ~ _ ~-~-^--_ ~'1, ~, a t \ ~ ~4o Le end GURkENi ZONING: SR-25 n 1 ~ '. i x`~;. .... 24 23€ 22 . 21 0 S9 7 i sa+oa pi5r; 5' (CEN1RAt. PaN}) t ~ ~ a 1 [3' ~ ~- . 2 ~ 3 15 fd IRRiO. OiST: R U 11~t.1 Ep37 ,3p} 5 f( (~----5:------..._;z.-'-.----~'=-"'" OGJE VAttEY tftRIGAriGN (NST, E t ] 1 1. 044.'.` 28 J I ~aM Q~,~('~1J1'a~ia'~~ AR0.cG7 AREI.: 9.47 At tf- (COURVIE4} "' ~ i ~' "` ~-'"' +r-.. N' w ?~{` 1 ~' 7x ~X7~')'T~'t/L' « R tiaD.150gtGDD A.DS Ar t/- (AS'S$SSOR~S AkEA} w~' --.. Iq+kxtX~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,' \ 421 i«»4~` " '.~. ARARO%. >rOCnT10N OF ~+$ l~r--y , • x.~ >! 1 ¢ ! ~ ExisttNC wnT£R urvE i '~ ~. ~ 83'"n'%t ~ 28 } ] C . -ss -. ,wPfiou acxTlUV OF 1 . ,~ 1 4s EA11 zap ~ E%1571NC ~ANitARY Y54ER FINE f r._, r.. ~ ..~ ........................ : ~ :'$f 32 33 34 5 38 37 38 8 3 41 «t "~ `'i -m-C-. AAAROx. tocAnpN or 1 -.- ....4.4 ;?':. 3D .: ~ `e ~, ~, ExtS7tNC STORSA aaAtu 5 .............. .._.... r. 'P v W ~ Ntl7E: AR fai orsas shown wt .n spawn )wet. 1 " 8 - S°F~ ~ y au« ~~ d dd ~ `~O~ Po u1 creas aaa fot etmanslm. ara eparaznsratc. 7 f c5 ~ j111 Sll t ~----~ a+~ i }~~' ~m ! "=6D' +.~enae c4Nma. eASEn oN b ~ ~ i H t v,1 b SF7ie?iUMR FI.EVARCk4 AER £ i ~ CSTY OF CENiR/!.. PA1NF tIAT{tAt q ~ ~ 66 59 ! 8 f 45 ( BRASS CM BENONIxARK sltktVAtEN7 I ~ ix ~ « s~ J ¢ ~ tOCAlEO AT THE Sw CORNER h 3 tJ fl {~ 58 'u7 58 ~ 1 1 ~ 372W7GA_JSIIO ~COMSOtfROINTERRt.[.+ 2 YGEf~ . ^-. 7# " 60 55 54 53 51 v0 ( ~ ~M'"., [, ~` __`»^_ 28 48 ~ aa ;;yy~~ ee~a pa T,ot Areas 'G` 88 83 ~ 3-~OJA 5~ Flt p3a0wt¢gg7pp,F ggq FL 5T-2180 S9 Ft 82-1972 SG f4 i A F 24+880 S9 Ft ,5,ff6.py20 5a Ft 83-3 4r 4«2064 Ft t-2097 9 F; J8-2224 22204 S4 Ft ~; ,y G wu5( 7 $C ~ 21 DO 54 £i 83.2844 Sq fi f cg zz ~s~ SyGq 5 $t4D S .w I ~ ~ ~ .-,.i rr ~ -."z.-w..~ 5-t'79 Sq Ft J{3+.2226 gSp fl 64 el(4$ Sq ~t 87 4z6S5q ~St 3 89 K ~ 3'7,?}Y1Ck-3400 '7.$f$g f't Sa.2t6O 5q Ft 5t«?.YAB Sq Ft 88w2168 54 FS E . f 7x $4 BM2091 $C FS 35-2Id0 $p F; G2«3220 S4 ft SBwS?.OS $G FS A t L.._. ~ Sq F[ 3s..120o Sq Ft 5y«2+44 S4 Ft 9tl»25t3 59 f: i ( 73 74 ~ 75 78 77 78 78 80 8F~ 3 ~ 14«2048 S9 Ft 37.2164 Sq Ft S+«2tn0 59 Fi 91.?238 54 Ft tt-2102 Sq FS 38-2164 Sq Ft 55..2280 S4 Ft 92-2122 5p Ft t2-Et7d S9 Ft 34+2720 Fi 56-1+a0 F ~ ~'- ...7D...¢!• •I ? 71 ~ t5»2226 Sq Ft t0-1896 SQ F4 67+2104 Sq FS 91.».521& S~f[ 1 3' ••...••••. •••... -...__.: ' $ 14+.1272 Ft af.i7U68a S Ft 8 . 59 t 992 q1 G ft 5+2 20 ~ Ft a w7 59 Fl 4.1i< f! 9 ~22~r S~~a„Q Ft ~ 4r "a, ~ }CQ 85 -' 372lt'rCp-330tl fi ~g7.-.gx~ 24 `~~ F~ s~y?S- y~~t 9 ~P~` fpb: 2fo~ `t fi ~~-~i~5ar Sq }O4' ,,,.r' 94 f9.?5 Sq r~i a¢j.~3 4p f ~S.`,'[7~a §a Pt 4nOw$$es 54 Ft ac . ~,p pj; 1 C~ ~ pppp z 0p q F: i 1 a t 7i-21 a s9 et tatw2t¢7 59 ft r~'~ 0 2i..2~84 S Ft 8.4736 S Ft j pC~' !- t'p }} 22+2160 9 FS 49»19AS 4 FC 75-2241 Sa Ft YO2-2246 5q Ft ? ~ ~ J 25-ti+0 Sq FS 50-2224 S Ft 7b.2232 S9 Ft 1W-2220 FC j 2a«2igp 9 T?.2252 Sq Ft t0+-24&D SG4G ft 1 Sq Ft St«1200 Sp F1 Tg+.i 2+0 $+t Ft 145-17,3:1 sq F! 1 25-2175 54 Fl 52w218D 5q Ft 74-2170 $q Ft 106.25+8 59 Ft 26..sas0 54 Ft 53-2160 Sq Ft 0.. i S t a~9 98 37- +tA Ft S+- t 4 11 r 142 f01 SOD 97 „ 88 $ j ~ 3 2 sq 2 64 s4 Ft ~Iw2,~o sa tFt ins-iois sa Fi ~, ~ - 85 84 83 82 8f 0 88 88 87 88 h' J72Y/1Ck-32170 ~,'S. F ~77'~v 7'~ ~'r'[~~TrpA ry't~F~7~+ pT ~{'~7 1 _ $ I $ `I ~,~"~,~ ~~YJ,s.~~JJ 11:+1Y i{^?I.AY L' CLti1,7 ~ ' ' ~---- ~~; --,~-- _ .~,_ _ .~__ .~ ~ BEEBE ~t©C}~ VILLAGE ~. -•: 372K'1C-1344 I j t ~ I 283' I I _.iL1e t ¢. _J7T`' _ _'""'#_ ...~.',.... ..33_ t~ ~ ~.r J( t 1 a i t I t i + ~„ ;.__."• t l 1 11 'A PLANNEI? COMMUNITY i R ~r r~ i IJr j T"~ F j,,j~ j I i I ! j t : ~/'Y2W1CA-i i0 LACAT£D ih: i i ! + i3 A J c ' 72 i 1 7 1 i t L7 i 9 i 8 t 7 ~& ? ~ i '~ ~ 3 ~ xx i /4 aF 'Tx£ srr i f4 DF s£cnoN i _--- i BRf'JDKI)A~E GAi~'DENS 1 t I t . I t ~ ~ To1eNS1ti1~ 37 souTa, xnNSS 2 ~£sT, lfiiJ.1METTE Sd£StSD1AN _._.,F.-_.,___..___,.1.______>._____,1,._,,._,_-~ r i r" ~ 7 t ~ i i ~ CI 4F CENTRIL F4Si~T. 3ACKSON £OUN'['Y, OREGON r t--..___-E_..,___.1___-- - ~ ~ 37 2W iC - TL t4D0, 1546 & 1600 t BR(tt?KIJ.4LE -.,__ , ! ~ p~k --_____ 1,7 . (PRLSPOSEp XIENStDN) ~~~ „, RICRRRD TEhfPLXN LAND SURYBYIN& aEClsrcRea 1 ---~y --.______.„ __Y - ^_y-_L^ s. 7 P. p. 8dX i3ad &49»?d72 JAGK3QY4tttlr a4£CPV RROFfSSIa4Ai, LAND YOR 1 ~ ~ r 37,'l. W7C-12At1 -.-„'-,,,~ ._.-.•- SURVE __-_.._-..- --___.,_______~ REV. DATE: SEk'TEMBER 26, x{7{74 I' I ad FiiB: "cn ta„e sop26.4wi` 1117 } tan ~ j ~J t R~CNiJiO G IEFRPCIN (t) 3f ~ ~ FtlR: Gi.AYiN Lf,C wr mmflcxtE Macs F.O. BOX 8871 ..w[ So. zg4e j ? ~ MEDFOHD, OR. 87501 I __ ~ [ PAGE 2 4P 2 ~~~ 2,_.~ , o . ~~ ;, ~ ~ t~~,~=- ~ ~;'~ ~ .. :~ i `t ~': ' 1:~:~: `~k f: ~: ~5,'~~ Y .,~ C:` E;. ~: o C ~ ~~ ~ ~ S ~~.~,«wPar._ _ `"~ "~-°' ~,~.EB~ W(~(~t~ -,cry. . ~ $ ~, Pi.ANN~D DE~~LC7Pttt~tlT G4t+~tMiYCi1'lY ~~ A # ~~N'fRAI pOltll', ORE~C7N w 4 a .'~ ~ .j: ~;~: `:, ~~ °; ~~. ~n . ` ~,SL .~ a p~xts gY_ sd3+ ~; Public Works depar~menf r~,.,~ ~~~T~-a1~1~. -- __ PC~-1h~T ~~~ Bob Pierce, f~irec! 1Vlaff 5amifore, Development Servic~ I'~blic U~o.~ks .L~epaxtt~xe~xt ~~rrE~.a~T~c~, M~~oRA~r~V~ TC1: PLANNING DF,PARTMENT FR©M: MATT" SAMITORI SLTBJEGT: LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR BEEBE WOODS FtA'I`E: SI~,P'I`IrMI3LR 2G, 2005 Planning: I have reviewed the Landscape and Irrigation Plans for Beebe Woods and have the following comments. 1. Irrigation Plans are incomplete. The statement of "six different zones" is not equivalent to an actual irrigation plan. 2. The Landscaping Plans do not match the preliminary plans presented as part of the preliminary PUD. They need to explain the differences. Additionally the plans only show one small portion of the open space instead of all areas of all the phases. 3, The walking path which was part of the landscapinglirrigation plan is not addressed. Lisa has already mentioned this one. 4~. Sidewalks adjacent to I-lamriek Road are required and have not been addressed. There was supposed to be some sort. of pedestrian connection via fine park. 5. The design of the private pocket parr should include a `tot-lot'. This is a condition of approval, which Lisa has already pointed out. 955 South Second Streef ~ Cenfral Point, OR 975CJ2 ~ 54 9. fi64.33.2 9 Fax 5~ 9.664.6384 PLANNING CfJMMISSItJN RESC?LUTION N{~. 671 A RESC}LUTIIJN conditionally approving a final development plan fox the remain phases for a Planned Unit Development known as Beebe Woods located on Hamrick Road, north of E. fine Street. Beebe Woods, LLC applicant. '~ti'HEREAS; the property is currently zoned as R-2, Residential Two Family and the application is consistent with the permitted uses set forth in Title 17, Section 17.68 Planned Unit Developments; and '~YHEREAS; The Planning Coinznission`s consideration of the Application is based on the standards, criteria and applicable to Planned Unit Developments and Final Development Plans as set forth in Title 17 and applicable requirement for lands within a Planned Unit Developments; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applzcant`s request it is the Planning Comxxussion`s determination that the Application conditionally complies with the applicable standards, criteria and conditions of approval as set forth in the Staff Report {Exhibit "A"} dated C7ctober ~, 2005; now therefore BE IT RESt7LVED; that the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point, by this Resolution No. 671 hereby approves the Application based on the finds and conditions of approval as stated in the Staff Report {Exhibit "A"} dated October 4, 2005. PASSED! by the Planning Commission in open session and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4~ day of October 2005. Planning Conrrnission Chairperson A'I~]~ST: City Representative PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.6~2 {1002005} 35 pity v~ Central Pont, Uregan 140 So.Third St„Central Point, Os 975(}2 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 wvrw.c i. ce nt ra l -poi n t. o r. u s `. Planning Department T ~ /~ Tim Hur~phr~y AiCP, ~~~~ ii1 '~J"1~ Community DevelopmenE Director! ~~ 1 ~~ Assistant City Administrator STAFF T-EPORT Planning Commission Meeting October ~, 2005 STEM N(): 06U02 LD Consideration of a Resolution No. 672 approving a request for an eight lot land division on .78 acres within the TOD-LMR zoning district, Assessor's Tax Lot 37 2W 1 OAB 1400, Janscourtcp, LLC applicant {(}6002 LD}. STAFF SOURCE T3on Burt, AICP, EDFP BACKGROUND The proposed land division is within the TOD-LMR zol~ing district and is being processed per Section 1'7.66.030{3} as a Land Division. It is the applicant's proposal to subdivide the property in to eight {8} lots for eventual development as owner-occupied zero lot line single-family dwelling units {Exhibit "B>'}. Zero lot line homes arc permitted in the TOD-LMR district {Section 17.65.050, Table 1}. The property has several buildings on site, which will be demolished. Each proposed lot complies with the minimum lot area and Iot dimension requirements of Section 17.65.050{F}, Table 2. Under this application consideration is not being given to the site plan, landscaping, and constnlction requirements of Section 17.72. It will be the applicant's responsibility to acquire site plan, landscaping, and construction prior to final approval. It is proposed that the subdivision be accessed via a TOD Courtyard Lane. Each dwelling will be designed to face Mae Richardson Park, with garage access off the proposed lane. The tentative plan also includes provision for a possible future street extension to service the property to the west. The applicant proposes to improve a pedestrian path along the easterly border of the property on city park land. This pedestrian pathway is in lieu of a sidewalk system along the TOD Courtyard Lane. The proposed pedestrian pathway will be included as part of the project's public improvement plans. F~ND~NGS The proposed tentativc plan complies with all applicable provisions of Title 16 and 17 as pertains to the subdivision of property within the TOD-LMR district, 3~l0 ISSUES 1. 'The design of this subdivision is dependent on vacation of Taylor Raad. The timing of file vacation is rat specific. Another factor that needs to be addressed is the allocation of the vacated right-af way. The law requires that each half of the right-of--way (treasured from centerlines will return to the abutting property. Under those circumstances the property will be without legal frontage, unless the area designated as proposed lot line adjustment is acquired lay the applicant. Vacation related issues are addressed in conditions of approval. 2. The project as proposed does rat provide sufficient site development infonratian for Site Development approval. Conditions of approval require that prior to final plat approval the applicant obtain Site Development plan approval for all eight lots. E~HISITS Exhibit "A" -Tentative Plan Exhibit "B" -Applicant's Findings Exhibit `°C" - Public `harks Staff Report dated September 21, 2005 Exhibit "D" -Building Department Staff Report dated July 28, 2005 Exhibit "E" -~ Fire District No. 3 Report dated August 3, 2005 Exhibit "F" -Rogue Valley Sewer Service Report dated July 27, 2005 ACTIfJN Consideration of Resolution No. 672 REC4MMENUATIfJN Approval afResolution No. 6`72 subject to the following conditions: l . Comply with the conditions set Earth in the Pulalic Vdorks Staff Report dated September 21, 2005. 2. Comply with the conditions set Earth in the Building Department Staff Report dated July 28, 2005. 3. Comply with the conditions set Earth in the Hire District No. 3 report dated August 3, 2005. 4. Comply with the conditions set forth in the Rogue Valley Sewer Services letter dated July 27, 2005. 5, Prior to final plat appravai the vacation of Taylor Street must be completed and the lot line adjustment as illustrated in Exhibit "A" recorded. ~. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall receive Site flan, Landscaping and Construction Plan approval far the entire property consistent with the proposed general design objectives set forth in Exhibit "B" 7. Friar to final plat appravai the applicant shall include, as part of the engineered plans, plans for the landscaping, irrigation, and construction of the area designated an Exhibit "A" as the .~~ pedestrian pathway. Applicant shall also be responsible fir co~~str~ction of tie pedstria~~ pathway improvements as approved by the City. ~~ xap's9'ztse ~-r.v .. a.~.-r~,r. ta4r,41 ... l `, .~ f USI~NII CtJRU ., ,,, ,~ `~~ eX,snnr efXtgtCT£ M[i ~3 - ~+ .--" . r5roaa4'xa"W xas4.es g -w-'--w----W----w ---~w R S$R`A4'?,~'w~7i2520 (ri09'a3'C 2ix3.20 D.R.j _..,. ....._...__.~....._..._ JO rpp7 k.u. SET iNt A:vRhT;ltt ~ eiair-#.wt,Y at' r~r,ca Kaw dosT; -~ IsAPR0YE1FE71T N}IM{N E.10511T7(i TAtit7R Rpf.U RIpiT-#-WAY YAi,i, t1f pJUPCLiL UPfin VACATSON Cf RM4WAY, .. J1L EkJSTk7G iuPRaU`iH{F3T5 3NCCV014iC, A 3K1{Y A NW!i: tsNJ .W WT (3ugiNNC Nre SatETNSILb roR s>~+a,ncx+. slmmrcwam psos•~sstaxnz, .^~«9nr~ p ~s~usFttvry~xaia ~~ s~ ROiCwFC OhTF: 12-31-93 ,<ssessarss utn >rtxc Na. s7 2w soAp rc rsau ~`~ 6M;;rtfc Ct3R8 r. C9T~ 4 iy x~na :w.tt fi .~ .~ -i.w,..~w_z,~.a i ~ G ~~I....._ k3°t ~ ?.s ror ..._ - ~'~ ~ 1;~ zOF 3 ~~ iraus~ .n. t C_..... ., 6.5.9 f rR.o .._... a .. ~ ~.._ _.___ -____ _ ~~.~ toi s ~~ 1~ t3 77tl55+}H. r% f_.1 !1 i~ •-.) A ~ .....-''4.37 .».. :M .y C31Y5 ', W ... %.~c I [~.' 27aL a0.tt. j E%18TINC RIGfiT 6F WAY S 7AYLDR RQAD R t"C E3E V! CA3LtJ _ r..Y i... ' ao Tctsr w.sa. s:r a: cuRxzNr R1CNF-#-whY OF rATCgR R4r.4 ~ FXtS>?NC GCgAR TREE; ,70 F047 AMG:rER gRtY F.tNE, WILL Rf.MAtN. ~+ .14.2' t~ .~~ i { LaY 7 . I Y I x x7os 5q.t6 E5 z 1 , ~ t7,58 j~ fj ?a.0 ~ ~!' ..... ' h .tJ~T ~t~ W s; i ~ ,{ 1i ' ~ ~~F ! y ~ # $ ,? a, .., l0T 8 x i v7 3 ~ >~ F" 6 Sq.R. 5 q J` .~ CP \ "~. ~\ r Y { tt f - YGSR,. ,.- .. ~ t+ yaT a ~ j:J z at yo.tr. ~ ~k- BGt 65.9 ..! r ~,~T~4.4 j%" .. j tr,. ,ate.--?- ~{ +-. 0 D to T G1 z c a TOP i7K 84Jtt: «... .--"- j { t ~~ ~~ .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~rss' w.u- to LE#iTkR # ~Kl R~~o ~r zytfl scr av rNC san cf anrtK 4"ra '~+un, Un r ~~7a ~ J ~ `, r -~ s;4C. 3yf QYfl3 ~ !~ .. ' , . ,.l , ARJ -- -' w.sb. Ta C£NTER # cRm: ShocE Y of t =~ cm rr+c roP »E EJFN« ~"~ . J ~~~~~ ~~ T~'NTATlvE St1~f}1V1~iL7N AF'PL1~~tT![?N focdtad to kha r~oRrxv~ESr orvt~ ouAYtrcrz of sECriot~ s~, roxr.rsr~rrp .~~ sotJrrk, RANGE^ a »~sz, YJtf.LktfEr7E' i4FE"rRtt7fAlJ, J!,C:K::gN COCtN'tY Gh'EG'OA+ far .~Arvscvu~ rc~, r_~..c 36~ 1-IARGAtIlNE' ASNCkNq, gRCGO1P 9T,S2q - ma .~.- FgUN4 2-Yj2"" 8ltRSS CAF -~ ?ja. GORNER-~~_^ `~ >v fgfiF70 2-lj2' GRASS CAP ~~~ SECTlpN GgRNER 8g K' FatiN4 s' EiRASS GRa - x.»: GgRroER q.t~i. ss p _ 5ET 5j& lkGH fRgM FINE N;1N Yrl.[gW F't,ASI7C GAR FARBER PtS 2rBg" " ~' SPgY' E3fVATFgN =•^ PRgPgSfq t,ANg5CArirNC R3 < WkTfR TdE'TER -r_r~ ~ PgwER POEE {PP.ti,) __X_x...w FENCE .-ba_--'~ 23~RNEAD E?gWE'R LiA'L' (Fpdd.} --ss- a SANtFAFtY SEWER clraC ®~' pOSStaLE' fFl RlR£ 57REET EXT£NS1gN ~G~f~ - FROF4SLb FRgF£R iY trt1E A.D tf5?idENT ^--~,-..-:: HgfYE S7Tf. ......» FLgOq PtANe- Pert rEraA rlt2~t FANEC 410092 040} C, fJATE'U JANtiARY ;9, x962 ' - ^~ ^ ~= FT.g4U MAZARJ3 RREA- F£R FEfdA FtR1d PANEL. 4YOg5Z 4047 G, OATFq JANUARY ?9, 796? 73r"f: r t3ASC ftOOiT fiLVA t:ta} ff:~. '^ ritrtMSS M0IXJNCTIJ' b./x. ~ Ctt37 RIC'.A48 AS RfCCRAFIt fN Wa`IRUSrfJ77 t/UJt$EIt tl3-r?7233 Cf 7HE A<170AL RFLTYt0.$ # .uUfSYrV fYYlNtY, Gr'itCCF1 -rfasJS rx sEnmas rs rxuc sotrnr, wur es/ns orJVx, ns ra~rsfl sr r,~nvu rasrntwwa srs>Fer os~trnzaars -'rCNT~a4! acTtW hGi4 1824jSG °n't - rtrauc unurr E.ssexcur sae W,erFx. Swrt.~Rr st»tx, sratN tJR.VN, tTffXJF; CAS AND auu.c rY. V1CElVfTY MA~_.,_,___.__.r._ .._.- ~srm. ;~ 3 r x b ~~` TaKa Roatl ~ sp fl~uyct '.bfr /~V w4 -~ prr ..-..~.... ._, Surveyed by FARBEl2 & SCFtVS, ilJC. dba FAFtBi=R SiJftVEY11VC (sir} ssa-hiss ptl BUX 52t3S 43f qAK 57fiEe.7 ~.. .-~. G2=N7RAC t'g7NT; gREGtlN 97502 ~~.~ SGCE: t• „ Jp' .H1' O^ W' d9" Can 1'E' ,WNE 77. %t7a+ JU3 Na.: r34i-. au CRn%WO fkG ~1~Ci1.'7kA4 ik]Ni1~JRNxCVIriC ~tAYR1i5VNYYL `APYjK~t rlSrl 9fi: uAA.Yx: APLICATION POR TENTTI'IVE PLATT 1909 Taylor Rd Central Point 3uly I3, 2005 NOTES 1) We intend to face the houses towards the park with the garage entry in the rear. 2) There will be 20' set backs for the driveways in the rear. 10' setbacks in the front. 3) We request to combir~ our front path with the proposed path through the park - We are very interested to work with the City of Central Point to ensure this meets the city's plans for tbe parks pa#hs and that it improves the overall frontage of the 8 homes. 4) We intend to use Dan Norton's services as our architect, however this application includes. sample drawings from Maroord as examples of style. We will obviously provide full documentation as necessary going forward but the style and layout will be similar to the Marcord drawings. 5) Lots 2 and 3 wili end up as zero lot line units. We will ensure these attached houses wiil meet all code requirements including frrewall and will be consistent with the style of the other homes. ~ Lots 7 and 8, while stayu-g constant with the style of the other homes will be designed specially for these lots. 7} There is a PG&E work order for the power, confirming that it will be burled down Taylor Rd in front of lot 1. The work order is #2677851. We will update the relevant city departments as we Iearn more from PG&E. 8) The printed measurements for the footprint of Iot 7 are incorrect however the drawing is to scale abe the actual measvreanem for the narrow width is 23 feet. It is our intent to place the garage in this narrow portion of the home. 9) It is our intent to provide cost effective housing in the TOD with many luxury upgrades to young families. We will leverage our location (near a quality grade school and park system) to target families with young children. As such each home will have at least 3 bedrooms and 2 baths and should include approximately 1200 square feet of living area. There will also be outdoor living areas for bbq's, relaxation, entertaining and watching young families grow. Thank you Shawn McFadden 541-3247771 Ren Koler 541-3248648 '~® ® 2000 Nan Mazcord Design Associates, Inc. NI rights reserved. ® ALA N ^1~~/~ ~, D E S I G N A S S O C I A T F. S, INC. UPPer Floor ~-' 661 Sq. Ft. Main E9oor 624 Sq. Ft. Total Area Each Side 1285 Sq. Ft. Plan designed for stopirtg lots. mascord.com 1305 N.W. 18th Ave. 503 / 225-9161 Portland, OR 97209 800 / 411-0231 "// I I I 1 i I _ .____a.--_f k---~______J O e U ~~~~~~~~Z`~ STUDY ~~ V/ULTED X ~ ~` { ~ . tV0 X R/0 ~ o ~ MASTER I vo GARAGE ,VB X t]/0 LIN 11/6 X I2/6 _ _ --- yy~y H~ O1999 Alan Mascord ' _- ~~ 46' ~ flEF. ~ Design Associates, Ine. ~Ipulpl-->= _ NI rights reserved . I DINING I VRVITED 1 „/6 X ,,,o --- ~ 24' ~ ALA N Upper Floor Main Floor Total Area E S I G N A S S O C I A T E 5. INC. 787 Sq. Ft. 761 Sq. Ft. 7305 N.W. 18th Ave. 503 / 225-9161 1548 Sq. Ft. portland, OR 97209 800 / 411-0231 4Z L~VII"/~ 1 ~] Public Works Department CENTR POIN Orc~~.~n Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT September 21, 2005 TO: Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Tentative Subdivision for 37 2W lOAB, Tax Lot 1400 Janscourt Subdivision Applicant Janscourtcp, LLC 364 Hargadine Ashland, OR 97520 PropertX Description/ TOD-LMR Zoning Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Public Works Review The developer is proposing a public street designed to the TOD courtyard lane configuration. The Developer shall put in a wider than normal asphalt paving width. When the property owner to the West develops their property the additional improvements will be required. Until that time no parking will be allowed along the street. The developer shall install head-in parking spaces along the current portion of Taylor Road, once that portion of the street is deeded back to the property owner(s). The developer shall also be available for the construction and development of a portion of Taylor Road (Attachment A). This section of Taylor Road will be the connector piece for the newly aligned Taylor/Haskell 955 South Second Street ^ Central Point, OR 97502 •549.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 43 Street intersection. The developer will need to coordinate development of this intersection with the City of Central Point in order to ensure that the City's project connecting Haskell Street is complete in order to preserve adequate traffic flow within the area. In discussions with the Applicant the City has agreed to a front yard pathway plan, in lieu of the standard curbside sidewalk design. The applicant is proposing a meandering path between the fence separating the Mae Richardson Park and the subject property. The developer shall also plant trees every 30 feet along the path. Transportation Currently Taylor Road is a city road that is paved to twenty four feet iu width. In the City of Central Point's Transportation System Plan Taylor Road is classified as a Collector Street. When improved, Minor Arterials are designed to handle up to 5,000 vehicle trips a day or 500 P.M. Peak Hour Trips. When the Twin Creeks Master Plan was approved in 2000 the city and the developer agreed to a set of development triggers for street infrastructure improvements. The Developer and City have been collaborating since the annexation and have improved all of the triggers except for two. The first is the improvement of Taylor Road from Twin Creeks Crossing Haskell Street. The City is planning on implementing this improvement this fall/winter. The last improvement to be completed is a new rail crossing. The rail order has been submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division and is in process of getting approval. This land use application affects the triggers by adding 74 Average Daily Trips (ADT) to Taylor Road. The total TOD Area is allowed an additional 1900 ADT of use prior to the construction of the new rail crossing. Existing Lfrastructure Streets: The City has taken over jurisdiction of Taylor Road from Jackson County. The City will be improving Taylor Road from the Griffin Creek Bridge to Haskell Street in the fall/winter of 2005/2006. 2. Water: There is an existing twelve inch water line in Taylor Road. 3. Storm Drain: There are existing curbside ditches that flow to the west into Griffin Creek. Janscourt Subdivision Conditions of Approval 1. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 2. Public Utility Easement: Aten-foot wide public utility easement paralleling the newly created street is required. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 -- Fax 541.664.6384 `~"f 3. Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 ''/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. 4. Taylor Road Improvements: Developer is responsible for paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks and landscape row along a portion of Taylor Road. The section required of the developer is shown in Attachment A. 5. Court-yard Lane Design: The developer shall design the proposed street to the TOD Courtyard-lane design with coordination on design with the City of Central Point Public Works Department. 6. Sidewalks and Landscaping in the Park: Developer shall install the proposed pathway as shown in the tentative plat with trees planted 30' feet on center on either side of the path. 7. Street Name: Developer shall submit a street name to the City of Central Point. 8. Fiber Outic Network -Applicant shall install a minimum conduit for the future fiber optic network throughout Central Point. Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. 155 South Second Street s Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 > Fax 541.664.6384 Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin snap, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Jauscourt Subdivision -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Jauscourt Subdivision -Protection of Existing Facilities 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 -> Fax 541.664.6384 4~ The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or' private utilities involved. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Janscourt Subdivision -Water Connectiozz Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Jazzscourt Subdivisioz -Streets The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall confonn to the cun~ent American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. 155 South Second Street ~- Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 -Fax 541.664.6384 47 The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Cotprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Janscottrt Subdivision -Storm Drain I. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Janscourt Subdivision -Required Subrrtittais All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as maybe required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE), affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority (RVSS), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ALOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 155 South Second Sfreet § Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 4g During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 > Fax 541.664.6384 Y/ BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: 7/28/05 CENTRAL POINT ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Department Planning file no. 06002 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Tentative Subdivision App. For 8 Lots (Residential) Name: JANSCOURTCP. LLC Address: 364 Hargadine City: Ashland State: Or. Zip code: 97520 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Northwest one~uarter of Section 37,Township 37South. Range 2 West....off Taylor rd. PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. -1- 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 a 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BUILDING DEPARTMENT' COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. -G- 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the ODSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fi11s to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shat{ be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. -2- I55 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 ^ 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 . ~I BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with the 2005 Oregon Residential Specialty Code should be submitted for each residence upon approval of this application. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. -3- ~~ 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 ° 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 .~~ 08(0312005 06:56 8264566 JCFD3 EUS OFC 1 PAGE 01/02 ~xl~~~ i r '~ ~ °~ ,~ackson County ~;rc D;s~Er;ct No. 3 q5 8333 ate }load kS ~rz `IY `~~~ Wh;tc C.;ty OR 97503-, X75 "`' (5-rt) 826-7100 (voice) (541) 826566 (~ax~ August 3, 2005 City of Central Point Planning Department Ile: JazrsconrtCP, LLC f~ a ka(pBp~s Fpax N Q ~ °~ 2~' Fgxk From _ Pnwrex • Verify location of Fire Hydrant to the entrance of this development. Plat map provided did not clearly show the Hydrant. • Dedicated turn around shall be signed and curbs painted red and annually maintained. • Contact Deputy Fire Marshal for an site feral site review. Deputy Fire Marshal Mark Mo 53 07/27!2005 14:07 vQ~~EV SEWF~s a`~~I 7uly 27, 2005 541664717171 ROGU1 Location: 138 Wcst~ Tel. Ken Crerschler City of Central Point Planning 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 ;l2e: JausCourt Subdivlsiou, Fiie Dear Ken, Sewer service to the proposed deg sewer main on 'Taylor 12oad, The 12VS standards, The proposed development must cc 1VPD)JS permit which are currently We request that the following RVS ~ PAGE 01101 `` ,~ VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Road, Central Point -Mailing A.ddresa: PO. Bos 3130, Central Poiut,OR 97502-0005 t) 664-63Q0 ar (541) 779~t144 PAX (541) 664-7171 tvww.RVSS.us 1. Acceptance of the sanitar} Z. Concurrence by RVS that permit have been met: Feel free to call me if you have aray Sincerely, Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:~17ATA FAQ 664-6384 will requixe a main line extension from the existing must be designed and constructed in accordance with with the water quality requirements of the Phase 2 developed. be met prior to fuial plat approval: by ItVS, pater quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDI;5 regarding sewer service for this project. .DOC PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 672 A RESOLUTION approving an eight (8) lot subdivision on a .78 acre parcel (37 2W I OAB 1400), Janscourtpc, LLC applicant. WHEREAS; on September 6, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for an eight (8) lot subdivision (the "Application") submitted by Thomas and Anna Sunday (the "Applicant"); and WIiEREAS; the property is currently zoned as TOD - LMR and the Application is consistent with the permitted uses set forth in Title 17, Section 17. 65.050(A), Table I; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission's consideration of the Application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to land divisions as set forth in Title 16 and applicable lot area and size standards for lands within the TOD-LMR district as set forth in Title 17, Section 17.65.050(F), Table 1 designated TOD -LMR; and WHEREAS; after duly considering the Applicant's request it is the Planning Commission's determination that the Application complies with the applicable standards and criteria as set forth in the Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated October 4, 2005; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED; that the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point, by this Resolution No. 672 hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conditions of approval as stated in the Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated October 4, 2005. PASSED by the Planning Commission in open session and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4u` day of October 2005. Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: City Representative PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _672 (10042005) Planning Department STAFF REPORT Tom Humphrey,AICP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator STAFF REPORT October 6, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of a tentative land partition to create two parcels in the Industrial (M-I) Zoning District on Property Identified as Tax Lot 37 2W 12B, 202; Umpqua Dairy, Applicant (Richard L. Kiehn, A.I.A., Agent). STAFF SOURCE: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing to partition an existing 4.64 acre pazcel into two lots of 2.09 acres and 2.55 acres respectively in preparation for a dairy distribution facility that will be addressed in a subsequent land use application. FINDINGS: The applicant's findings of fact (Exhibit "A") adequately address all approval criteria as set forth in Section 17.48.060 which states that "there are no minimum site area requirements in the M-1 district, except as necessary to provide for required parking, loading and yard spaces". As a supplement to the findings staff has included by reference, as a condition of approval agency correspondence Exhibits "C" "D" and "E". ISSUES: In considering an approval of this tentative partition application, the Planning Department identifies that there is s single issue worthy of consideration: 1. Jackson County Fire District Number 3 typically comments on applications such as this but as of this time no correspondence has been received by the City. Since the Fire District generally responds in writing to this type of land use application, the Planning Commission should consider a conditional of approval that would include any requirements outlined by the district. EXFIIBITS: Exhibit "A" -Applicant's Findings Exhibit "B" -Tentative Partition Map Exhibit "C" -Public Works Staff Report, Exhibit "D" -Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "E" - RVSS Comments Exhibit "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. 673, approving the tentative partition. \\Serverzilla\PL\2006 Land Use Files\06010 Umpqua Minor Partition\06010.doc Page 1 of 2 .Sb RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. 67't Umpqua Dairy Tenative Land Partition 06010.doc Page 2 of 2 S~ Umpqua Dairy Applicants Findings of Fact for Conditional Use Permit I . That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of the code; Finding: 7Tre size of our parcel for develop»tent is approximately 2.6 acres, which exceeds the minimum Zot size required by CPMC 17.48.060. Our layout provides for 30 general parking spaces and 2 handicapped spaces. There are 18 loading areas. The warehouse is set back from the property Zirres 132' from the north, 71' from the east, 59' from the west, and 238' from the south. The maintenance facility is located 120' south of the warehouse, 20' from the west property line, 104' from the east and 58' from the south property lines. 2. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Finding: As part of the development requirements for Zots 1 & 2 of Phase I of the MODOC Subdivision, Hammrick Road will be improved as per the City of Central Point's spec cations to the eastern end of lot 2. The City of Cenb•al Point's public works department and the owners of lots 1 and 2 have developed a plan to bring a reeve road from Hammrick south to service the development. It has been recommended that this would be a public road and provide adequate width for use by our facility. 3. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; Finding: North of the property is Reddaway's largest truclying terminal, west of the property is LTM's main concrete plant and office, south of the property is a large pond owned by LTM once used to irrigate the orchards, east of the property is a proposed distribution warehouse facility. As outlined in Paragraph 1, our facility will have adequate room for maneuvering with good ingress and egress on Ice Crean: Drive (public road). The ridge height of our warehouse will be 20' 10 "and ridge height of our maintenance facility will be 22 ' 6 ". Our entire development will be fenced arJd landscaped in accordance with discussions held with Matt Sanitore, Development Service Coordinator. A monument sign will be located at the entrance to the complex. Outdoor lighting will be used to illuminate the truck staging areas and maintenance building. 7~ 4. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community. Finding: The operation of this facility will be consistent with our operations in Grants Pass, Coos Bay, Klamath Falls, Eugene, Portland, and Roseburg. The warehousing and wholesaling of dairy products will be conducted under state and federal regulations and is relatively a quite operation. This• operation is located far enough away from any residential areas that disturbance would be r:on-existing. 5. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare. Finding: Umpqua Dairy has met several times with the City of Central Point staff including the public works department, development services, planning department and the Jackson County Tire District to be sure that all safety and health r•equir•ements have been addressed. The improvement to this property will be done with adequate frre facilities and connections to public and private facilities will be conducted per city standards. Constr•ueiion Engineering Cons7rltants have been retair:ed to engineer the public road as discussed during the pre- application meeting held on July 26, 2005. Page 2 -Applicants Findings of Fact for Conditional Use Permit ~/ PREPARED FOR: UMPQUA DAIRY PRODUCTS 333 Sf Sykes Roseburg, OR 97470 3J 2w 020 IAF COT 2COJ I LTM IVCOP.POFdTEO PARCEU 90,940.51 SF 2.09 ACRES _.~I~ i ~~.,a, MODGGa t r r1 f[ ~.. ~ 4 \ PARCEL 2 110, 922.11 SF ~Nw ~\ vy; 2.55 ACRES m \ A \ ~~ ~~I JJ IW 118 !AX LOT JDO Lill 1,cLORP09ATED m~Mim.n,...m / i A Ra-plak of Lot I of Modoc Subdlvislon Phases I, Located In tha Northwest One-ovarker of Section 12 and the Soulhwast One-gvarker of Sectlon i, TownsMp 37 South, itange 2 West, Wlllpmette Marldlan, Uty of Gentrat Point, .lackson Govnty, Oregon. TENTAT[VE PAizTIT[ON PLAT Jl 2W IC TAX LDi 900 USF RfDDAWAY INC ~^ w,='~`~, „^,"+° »>„~ au~j NOTES: -I- I-r«e ta... urtero .y_ _ _ _ __ _ 1 o-[aoiwex eol[to.. nbrval. _~ ____ _ _____ ______ ~ Alt exl>! NN'rgand Nllltb>,O MpKtad ltlreon. Yp - __________ _ ____ Y•r~~rWee-.-y - - ~~ - - - - - ' Mre I«aEaG nl!!, remaYLb «c[tKµ w m.'+knq on W p.M by OlfeGteq O[~Orc.b> od v III eertpmb>. r 453 oNl>bn I t R ! G t g ( i , nbva ve u >a Kg e pOCC ~~ Mn pelCMtKn>, 4s-abl-tplo n9, otom>, *eceo[mb \ FUTURE am I«atbn nltNn 34 ncFe> of tb ,te a gmemlo[~ ar wtn elge> or <>, otrt>Iqe ~ m I A ~ LOT 3 . wergap r«nny. I o Property Area. A.9j acres>. Noperty ZonY.a De>K)plbn~ M-I ~J UWmI N' CI O O ~ Ftocd Zap 'A-t2' gepKteC Fxecn ae !For ICO-Yerr FIaM Lvc, rlos xaleq han Ne cenlerllre o! 2acr A ///~~~ J2~ A a I Ueek per rvIM)tb MpKIOtl m PIWN Cc+mnlW Fapl ll t 1981 415xA949e3 B ll c[Ne 'A mlW MODOC , . y N^KVr , O e t zs.oo' Lora SUBDIVISION 313,`x. _ R... °~ f \ N~ \ry PARCEL 2 P•60.2004 UM INLDRPORATED 37 2W /2B, TAX L 075 202 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL `°T` L~A~N~D S~U~yR~(,/V/>~EYOR - - . _ . OREGON JULY 79, 1994 PrIASe1 ROBERT V. NEATHAMER Lora 2675 Renewal Date /2/3//06 -~ PNASE2 1.F.GF.ND: --c- reborn o,nnlq ma..a 9n In. a m >pKan a, exbtrg go>>g< -ss- >pbdn o wary ro-req amney wne. Iro. m bal<olo•mexberg >mrtay.w,.e. i,n+nb. m bbala> M exbtYg gl[af eery eleawl. -,o- wm<ae> a wlNy.wme>to.>~ x..r rw. p Yxlbotea m eeblvg>1mn ee.+x mnteb. l ...ty rgbatn o. exnv.y paw pob w oy acl... -alu- raca.s mexbtrg ow,A.w clnlty lbn. -E- MKVtasa NllM1y mmkea Wbe nbc4K l>q. ~,- rca;catn a µIINY'^"~'•ea aleyav Irv. p FEKOte• T exbt Wj bigiria pacea[al. -._ w>KOle•o.rtnlty morwq.aer Iro. . wa>et„ a„xb~~9 rob. ~,br. • YdICMSS O+sxbtYg wlw Valve. G MKC.e. m exblrq rbe ryran. xabdee a rotor epgot. Q~ elaroter a'on b scale.a .nn cvq-I•v .~ ba•• o ~m~e.cle,o-» vee nnn dp m I aw..ete- o-oM w xale. .,„gyp {"°.b~K %~" ~a,N. .ab.M •, n' ~• I o-.<[w[. eoruorny o ` ~w « ~ 'P t-.>bry n<.~e. t r t .Y xr to w,bxn. a prcpw°e paa bNNy earamw v wKmn ae e..b•r or >qwe ree[ n:ab o cwpq a"o „xn m 4lot. s" war°Keatlp Y~`r'..o4aOC°ox~y sue.. b. vol. pq. ~wwl ~ ~ cmn. ~ cxm o yp r k aa. a v ILC. fb. k K w Gatel F wA W a ~ e . c y e \ ' - . _ _ _ - - - BASIS OF BEARINGS: \ sown u4. I oonmt>4 Lo4a emlm eemeo ss. p.r sba•y x~me.. \/#~ \ ~ IS' We r~{r uAm. m tn.a In b. orn<r or tn. aace>a< eouetr sunwar. \ tore . \, PREPARED $y: Neathamer Surveying, Inc. 3126 State St. Suite 200 P.O. Box 1584 Medford, Oregon 97501 -0120 Phone (541) 732-2869 FAX (541) 732-1382 REDUCED SCALE DATE: August 16 2005 PROJECT NUMBER: 05067 Sheet 1 of I ©LTM ~ ~_~ tel. Public Works Department CENTRAL POINT Oi ~>.,>n r, ~l ~-I ~fiu9/v~eniT L Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT September 19, 2005 TO: Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Minor Land Partition for 372W12, Tax Lot 202 Anplicant Umpqua Dairy Products 333 SE Sykes Roseburg, OR 97470 Agent Neathamer Surveying 3126 State Street, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1584 Medford, OR 97504 Property Description/ M-1 Zonine Purpose Provide infonnation to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Hanu•ick Road br:proventents The proposed partition is part of the Modoc Orchards Phase 1. The applicants have decided to bond for the improvements along Hamrick Road in lieu of constructing the improvements in order to Final Plat Phase 1. In previous conversations with the applicant they have indicated that they plan on installing the improvements 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 lv/ with the construction of the proposed Ice Cream Drive. Since out last conversation the City has been informed that we have been awarded a Transportation Grant for Hamrick Road. Instead of making the applicants improve their portion of Hamrick Road at this time the applicant's shall pay the City for the amount bonded for. The City shall keep the money in an escrow account to be used for the improvement project. The project is being designed by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) with construction scheduled for Summer/Fall of 2006. An area of benefit shall be set-up for the improvement area and property owners within the area shall contribute for the improvement. The subject parcel will be excluded from the area of benefit because of their existing contribution. Application Review The applicant is proposing afifty-foot wide street with a paved with of forty feet, with curb side sidewalks. No parking shall be allowed along the proposed street. A waterline of the appropriate size shall be extended from Hamrick Road to the end of the proposed cul-de-sac. The size of the line shall be a minimum of eight inches and may have to be larger depending on the building and fire code requirements. Stonn drain facilities shall be designed into the proposed street. Existing Izzfrastructure 1. Streets: Hamrick Road is a paved two-lane road. No curb, gutter, or sidewalks exist. Table Rock Road is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County, it is currently a two lane road without curb, gutter or sidewalks. 2. Water: There is a twelve-inch water line that was constructed as part of the USF Reddaway development. 3. Storm Drain: A thirty inch storm drain facility is located at the bend of Hamrick Road. Umpqua Dairy Partition Conditions of Approval Public Utility Easement (PUE): The developer shall dedicate on the Final Plat a ten feet wide public utility easement (PUE) along the property frontage. 2. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows along Hamrick Road. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 ''/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~• Fax 541.664.6384 ~z Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. 155 South Second Street w Central Point, OR 97502 .541.664.3321 =Fax 541.664.6384 !03 Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Umpqua Dairy Pm•tition -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Umpqua Dairy Partition -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Umpqua Dairy Partition -Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 == Fax 541.664.6384 1O't approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Umpqua Dairy Partition -Streets The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Umpqua Dairy Partition -Storm Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and 155 South Second Street R Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 his consistent with APWA Stonn Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Umpqua Dairy Partition -Required Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Enviromnental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE), affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority (RVSS), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ACOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 155 South Second Street ;Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 COO BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE:8/24!05 " k~=.. i's~s'^"•~ CENTRAL _ POINT -(T/~-C.i-ft~ i/ N f ~~ ~ ~ Lois DeE3enedetti, Building Offidal BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Department Planning file No. 06010 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Umpqua Dairy Minor Partition Name: Umpqua Dairy Products Address: 333 S.E. Sykes City: Roseburg State: Or. Zip code: 97470 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: A Re-flat of Lott of Modoc Subdivision Phase 1 Located in th Northwest One-quarter of Section 12 and the_ Southwest One-quarter of Section 1 Township 37 South Ranae2 West. Willamette Meridian City of Central Point Jackson County Or, .Off Hamrick Rd.l PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be inciuded in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely I55 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 e 541.664.3321 <~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~v BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. -2- BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm. drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the ORSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 • 54L664.3321 =Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~QyEE`t SEWfRJF~' C !a~~ // .,,V~ ~-T~.q ardv~~,~7- ~ ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Poin[ -Mailing Address: E0. I3ox 3130, Cenral Point,OR )7502-OWS 1'el. (541) 6C>4-6300 or (541) 779-4144 FAX (541) (64-7171 www.RVSS.us September 9, 2005 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Umpqua Dairy, File #06009 Dear Ken, FAX 664-6384 REG~~~ ~f~ SEP 1 2 2005 ptANNING ^ gt1t~01NG ^ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, t] Sewer service to the proposed development will require a main line extension on the proposed Ice Cream Drive. We have received plans for a sewer extension on Hamrick Road in support of the Modoc Commercial Subdivision which will need to be completed before the sewer on Ice Cream Drive can be built. No work has begun on the Modoc project. The new sewer main must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standazds, , The proposed development must comply with the water quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES permit which aze currently being developed. We request that.the following conditions be met prior to final approval of this development: 1. Sewer main on Ice Cream Drive must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards and accepted as a public sewer main by RVS prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Stormwater plans must be designed and constructed to meet Phase 2 NPDES stormwater quality requirements and approved by RVS. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, ~~~-~~- Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG4SITEPLANREV IEW\2006\06021-GAZELLE INVESTMENTS.DOC 70 q ~l f~l'f ~Cff'VN~`X1( F' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 673 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FORA "SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" FOR A DAIRY DISTRIBUTION FACILITY (Applicant (s) :Umpqua Dairy) (37 2W 12B Tax Lot 202) Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted applications for site plan and conditional use permit on a 4.64 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, October 4, 2005, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.48, M-1, Industrial District B. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval C. Chapter 17.76, Conditional Use Permits Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.48, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.72, relating to Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval C. Chapter 17.76, relating to site development, structure and landscape location, traffic access, fencing and landscaping. Planning Commission Resolution No. 673 (010/4/2005) ~~ Section 3. Conditional Approval. The applications for site plan and conditional use permit herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4~' day of October, 2005. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 4~' day of October, 2005. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. 673 (010/4/2005) 7Z- Planning Department STAFF REPORT Tom Humphrey,AICP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator STAFF REPORT October 6, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of a tentative land partition to create two parcels in the Industrial (M-1) Zoning District on Property Identified as Tax Lot 37 2W 12B, 202; Umpqua Dairy, Applicant (Richard L. Kiehn, A.I.A., Agent). STAFF SOURCE: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing to partition an existing 4.64 acre parcel into two lots of 2.09 acres and 2.55 acres respectively in preparation for a dairy distribution facility that will be addressed in a subsequent land use application. FINDINGS: The applicant's findings of fact (Exhibit "A") adequately address all approval criteria as set forth in Section 17.48.060 which states that "there are no minimum site area reguirements in the M-1 district, except as necessary to provide for required parking, loading and yard spaces". As a supplement to the findings staff has included by reference, as a condition of approval agency correspondence Exhibits "C" "D" and "E". ISSUES: In considering an approval of this tentative partition application, the Planning Department identifies that there is s single issue worthy of consideration: 1. Jackson County Fire District Number 3 typically comments on applications such as this but as of this time no correspondence has been received by the City. Since the Fire District generally responds in writing to this type of land use application, the Planning Commission should consider a conditional of approval that would include any requirements outlined by the district. EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" -Applicant's Findings Exhibit "B" -Tentative Partition Map Exhibit "C" -Public Works Staff Report, Exhibit "D" -Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "E" - RVSS Comments Exhibit "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. 673, approving the tentative partition. \\Serverzilla\PL\2006 Land Use Files\06010 Umpqua Minor Partition\06010.doc Page 1 of 2 JF~ RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. 67't Umpqua Dairy Tenative Land Partition 06010.doc Page 2 of 2 57 Umpqua Dairy Applicants Findings of Fact for Conditional Use Permit 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of the code; Finding: The size of our parcel for development is approximately 2.6 acres, which exceeds the minimum lot siae required by CPMC 17.48.060. Our layout provides for 30 general parking spaces and 2 handicapped spaces. There are 18 loading areas. The warehouse is set back from the property lines 132' from the north, 71 'from the east, 59' iron: the west, and 238' from the south. The maintenance facility is located 120' south of the warehouse, 20' from the west property line, 104' from the east and 58' from the south property lines. 2. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Finding: As part of the development requirements for lots 1 & 2 of Phase 1 of the MODOC Subdivision, Hammrick Road will be improved as per the City of Central Point's specifications to the eastern end of Zot 2. The City of Central Point's public works department and the owners of lots 1 and 2 have developed a plan to bring a new road frorn Hammrick south to service the development. It has been recommended that this would be a public road and provide adequate width for use by our facility. 3. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; Finding: North of the property is Reddaway's largest tr•uclFing terminal, west of the property is LTM's main concrete plant and office, south of the property is a large pond owned by LTM once used to irrigate the orchards, east of the property is a proposed distribution warehouse facility. As outlined in Paragraph 1, our facility will have adequate room for maneuvering with good ingress and egress on Ice Cream Drive (public road). The ridge height of our warehouse will be 20' 10"and ridge height of our maintenance facility will be 22' 6". Our entire development will be fenced and landscaped in accordance with discussions held with Matt Santtore, Development Service Coordinator. A monument sign will be located at the entrance to the complex. Outdoor lighting will be used to illuminate the ir•uck staging areas and maintenance building. S~ 4. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community. Finding: The operation of this facility will be consistent with onr operations in Grants Pass, Coos Bay, Klamath Falls, Eugene, Portland, and Roseburg. The warehousing and wholesaling of dairy products will be conducted under state and federal regulations and is relatively a quite operation. This operation is located far enough away from any residential areas that disturbance would be non-existing. 5. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare. Finding: Umpqua Dairy has met several times with the City of Central Point staff including the pufilic works department, development services, planning department and the Jackson County Fire District to be sure that all safety and health requirements have been addressed. The improvement to this property will be done with adequate fire facilities and connections to public and private facilities will be conducted per city standards. Construction Engineering Consultants have been retained to engineer the public road as discussed during the pre- application meeting held on July 2G, 2005. Page 2 -Applicants Findings of Fact for Conditional Use Permit r' 4...'...C .~: Public Works Deparfinent ~~ ~~" _-- ------- ____--CENTRAL POINT ;r e_ n:, i 1} jTflu9V~ ~~17 ~~ ~ `~ Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT September 19, 2005 TO: Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Minor Land Partition for 372W 12, Tax Lot 202 Annlicant Umpqua Dairy Products 333 SE Sykes Roseburg, OR 97470 Agent Neathamer Surveying 3126 State Street, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1584 Medford, OR 97504 Property Description/ M-1 Zoning Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Ilazzu~ick Road Lz:provemezzts The proposed partition is part of the Modoc Orchards Phase 1. The applicants have decided to bond for the improvements along Hamrick Road in lieu of constructing the improvements iu order to Final Plat Phase 1. In previous conversations with the applicant they have indicated that they plan on installing the improvements 155 South Second Street ^ Central Point, OR 97502 •549.664.3329 ,Fax 541.664.6384 lo/ with the construction of the proposed Ice Cream Drive. Since out last conversation the City has been informed that we have been awarded a Transportation Grant for Hamrick Road. Instead of making the applicants improve their portion of Hamrick Road at this time the applicant's shall pay the City for the amount bonded for. The City shall keep the money in an escrow account to be used for the improvement project. The project is being designed by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) with construction scheduled for Summer/Fall of 2006. An area of benefit shall be set-up for the improvement area and property owners within the area shall contribute for the improvement. The subject parcel will be excluded from the area of benefit because of their existing contribution. Application Review The applicant is proposing afifty-foot wide street with a paved with of forty feet, with curb side sidewalks. No parking shall be allowed along the proposed street. A waterline of the appropriate size shall be extended from Hamrick Road to the end of the proposed cul-de-sac. The size of the line shall be a minimum of eight inches and may have to be larger depending on the building and fire code requirements. Storm drain facilities shall be designed into the proposed street. Existing Infrastructure Streets: Hamrick Road is a paved two-lane road. No curb, gutter, or sidewalks exist. Table Rock Road is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County, it is currently a two lane road without curb, gutter or sidewalks. 2. Water: There is a twelve-inch water line that was constructed as part of the USF Reddaway development. 3. Storm Drain: A thirty inch storm drain facility is located at the bend of Hamrick Road. Umpqua Dairy Partition Conditions of Approval 1. Public Utility Easement (PUE): The developer shall dedicate on the Final Plat a ten feet wide public utility easement (PUE) along the property frontage. 2. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows along Hamrick Road. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 1/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. 155 Soufh Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 ~Z Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 .541.664.3321 • Fax 541.664.6384 !03 approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Umpqua Dairy Partition -Streets The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Umpqua Dairy Partition -Storer: Dz•ain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and 155 South Second Street ~~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 =< Fax 541.664.6384 lo.~ consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Umpqua Dairy Partition -Required Subfnittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority (RVSS), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ALOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 155 South Second Street .„ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 COO BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE:8/24/05 p~, A CENTRAL _ -----_____ .__ __ POINT ___ __ ~} ~AJ~-i-rWt ~ rv ( `~ ~~~ Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Department Planning file No. 06010 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Umpqua Dairy Minor Partition Name: Umpqua Dairy Products Address: 333 S.E. Sykes City: Roseburg State: Or. Zip code: 97470 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: A Re-plat of Lott of Modoc Subdivision Phase 1.Located in thNorthwest One-ouarter of Section 12 and the Southwest One-quarter of Section 1 Township 37 South Range2 West Willamette Meridian. City of Central Point Jackson County Or Off Hamrick Rd.l PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664-3321 < Fax 541.664.6384 ~7 BUILDING DEPARTMINT STAFr REPORT for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. -2- BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm. drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the ORSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted 155 South Second Sheet Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 f Fax 541.664.6384 BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT engineering practices. -3- A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the gradinglexcavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with the 2005 Oregon Residential Specialty Code should be submitted for each residence upon approval of this application. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Buiiding Department for approval prior to start of work. -3- 1 SS South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 • Fax 541.664.6384 gyp/ o~~~~`~E`I SEWfRfF~~ ~ ~ N ~}r~a ur6Mrr,~.~ ;,L w ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point -Mailing Address: P.O. F3ox 3130, Central I'oint,0t2 97502-OWS Tel. (541) 664-6300 or (541) 779-4144 FAX (541) 664-7]71 www.RVSS.us September 9, 2005 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Umpqua Dairy, File #06009 Dear Ken, FAX 664-6384 REGEIV SEP ~. 2 2005 PtpNNING Q BUILDING ^ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. d Sewer service to the proposed development will require a main line extension on the proposed Ice Cream Drive. We have received plans for a sewer extension on Hamrick Road in support of the Modoc Commercial Subdivision which will need to be completed before the sewer on Ice Cream Drive can be built. No work has begun on the Modoc project. The new sewer main must be designed and constructed in accordance with RV S standazds. , The proposed development must comply with the water quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES permit which aze currently being developed. We request that the following conditions be met prior to fmal approval of this development: 1. Sewer main on Ice Cream Drive must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards and accepted as a public sewer main by RVS prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Stormwater plans must be designed and constructed to meet Phase 2 NPDES stormwater quality requirements and approved by RVS. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SITEPLANRE V IEW \2006\06021-GAZELLE INVESTMENTS.DOC ro PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 673 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FORA "SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" FOR A DAIRY DISTRIBUTION FACILITY (Applicant (s) :Umpqua Dairy) (37 2W 12B Tax Lot 202) Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted applications for site plan and conditional use permit on a 4.64 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, October 4, 2005, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.48, M-1, Industrial District B. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval C. Chapter 17.76, Conditional Use Permits Section 2. Findine and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.48, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.72, relating to Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval C. Chapter 17.76, relating to site development, structure and landscape location, traffic access, fencing and landscaping. Planning Commission Resolution No. _673 (010/4/2005) 7~ Section 3. Conditional Approval. The applications for site plan and conditio~ial use permit herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4'~ day of October, 2005. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 4`h day of October, 2005. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. 673 (010/4/2005) 7Z City of Central Point, Oregon 7 40 So. Third St., Central Point, Or 97502 547.6643321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.central-poi nt.or.us STAFF REPORT October 6, 2005 Planning Department Tom Humphrey,AICP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a warehouse and dairy distribution facility in the Industrial (M-1) Zoning District on Property Identified as Tax Lot 37 2W 12B, 202; Umpqua Dairy, Applicant (Richard L. ICiehn, A.I.A., Agent). STAFF SOURCE: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing the development of a warehousing and dairy distribution center for Umpqua Dairy on Hamrick Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of its intersection with East Pine Street. The project is located on a portion of the property identified as the "Governors Shovel Ready Site" where the State and the City of Central Point are working together to create jobs. The special designation is designed to encourage a business friendly environment by providing afast-track approach of land use application processes and installation of required infrastructure. The distribution facility will include approximately 15,000 of gross floor area for warehousing, truck shop and offices (Exhibit "B" Site Plan). Truck transfer facilities are listed as a conditional use in the M-1, Industrial District [Section 17.48.040(B)]. Sections 17.48.060 and 17.48.070 outline the site azea and yard requirements. The applicant has submitted findings of fact and supplementary information to demonstrate that the project meets the City's requirements. FINDINGS: The applicant's findings of fact (Exhibit "A") adequately address all approval criteria as set forth in Section 17.76.040. As a supplement to the findings staff has included by reference, as a condition of approval agency correspondence Exhibits "C","D" and "E". ISSUES: In considering an approval of this Conditional Use Permit application, the Planning Department identifies that there are two (2) issues worthy of consideration: 1. Does the proposed activity for the requested conditional use permit meet the requirements outlined in the municipal code? \\Serverzilla\PL\2006 Land Use Files\06009 Umpqua Dairy\06009.doc Page 1 of 2 73 City of Central Point, Oregon Planning Department 7405o.Third St, Central Point,Or 97502 CENTRAL Tom Humphrey,AICP, 547.664.3327 Fax 547.664.6384 POINT Community Development Director/ vdww.ci.ceotral-point.or.us Assistant City Administrator The project meets the siting requirements for the M-1, Industrial District together with off-street pazking/loading facilities and landscaping. The proposed use is surrounded by similar industrial uses and there is no conflict with existing residential uses. 2. Can public facilities and infrastructure be constructed to accommodate the proposed use? The applicant, along with a neighboring property owner, will be dedicating a new public street named "Ice Cream Drive", which will comply with Public Works Standazds. This development will connect into Hamrick Road which is a portion of the East Pine Street Corridor Study. The Public Works Staff Report elaborates the details for infrastructure improvements including water, sewer, storm drain and other private utilities that are currently in the area or proposed in the future. EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" - Applicants Findings , Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Map and Elevations Exhibit "C" -Public Works Staff Report, Exhibit "D" -Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "E" - RV SS Comments Exhibit "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. 674, approving the Conditional Use Permit RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. 674 \\Serverzilla\PL\2006 Land Use Files\06009 Umpqua Dairy\06009.doc Page 2 of 2 7~ Umpqua Dairy Applicants Findings of Fact for Conditional Use Permit I. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and ali other provisions of the code; Finding: The size of our parcel for development is approximately 2.G acres, which exceeds the ntinirnurtt Zot size required by CPMC 17.48.060. Our layout provides for 30 general parking spaces and 2 handicapped spaces. 77iere are 18 loading areas. The warehouse is set back from the property lines 132' from the north, 71' from the east, 59' from the west, and 238' from the south. The maintenance facility is located 120' south of the warehouse, 20' from the west property line, 104' from the east and 58' from the south property lines. 2. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Finding: As part of the development requirements for lots 1 & 2 of Phase I of the MODOC Subdivision, Hammriek Road will be improved as per the City of Central Point's specif cations to the eastern end of lot 2. The City of Central Point's public works department and the owners of lots 1 and 2 have developed a plan to bring a new road from Hammrick south to service the development. It has been recommended that this would be a public road and provide adequate width for use by our facility. 3. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; Finding: IJorth of the property is Reddmvay's largest truclFing terminal, west of the property is LTlvl's main concrete plant and oj~ce, south of the property is a large pond owned by LTM once used to irrigate the orchards, east of the property is a proposed distribution warehouse facility. As outlined in Paragraph I, our facility will have adequate roo»r for maneuvering with good ingress and egress on Ice Cream Drive (public road). The ridge height of our warehouse will be 20' 10"and ridge height of our maintenance facility will be 22 ' 6 ". Our entire development will be fenced and landscaped in accordance with discussions held with Matt Sanitore, Development Service Coordinator. A monument sign will be located at the entrance to the complex. Outdoor lighting will be used to illuminate the truck staging areas and maintenance building. 75 4. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community. Finding: The operation of this facility will be consistent with our operations in Grants Pass, Coos Bay, Klamath Falls, Eugene, Portland, and Roseburg. The warehousing and wholesaling of dairy products will be conducted under state and federal regulations and is relatively a quite operation. This operation is located far enough away from any residential areas that disturbance would be non-existing. 5. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare. Finding: Umpqua Dairy has met several times with the City of Central Point staff including the public works department, development services, planning department and the Jackson County Fire District to be sure that all safety and health requirements have been addressed The improvement to this property rill be done with adequate fire facilities and connections to public and private facilities will be conducted per city standards. Construction Engineering Consultants have been retained to engineer the public road as discussed during the pre- application meeting held on July 26, 2005. Page 2 -Applicants Findings of Fact for Conditional Use Permit 7~p 1 ~ ~ i=~ C`~i Eviv,Inp LTMFECWb . e eNS 1 tl Wd '"e _ ~- "~ „~'"^ i' ~ -- I Pro wd %% ~ LE ~; ~wJ In6ooo wLl ~ ~ ~ yj ~... r~,.~. - -----_ _ n g~ I i Y a ~.°i ,wn x~ ~ rr,° « x.. r .KK. _% ~~~~.~:~ ~P~L ~_____________~-..____ Prof°~~iluiY kinp~ Y. ........ MM-:-.~_ n.... ~.~.~... d a~ ~' y 's ~~ ~° ~~L~a Yin ..i~o c~u~ ~~~ ~~~ __.______ .y,-_-~-~ ___ _ ~. n r. ~'~ __ _ rru ___- . _ .- r __. ~~ o Q M,a.,"~~.,~~ \ ~ 1 T r,~~ ~ A ~~ ~ ~ ~°ufi l ~ ~ I :f i u ~ s i 1 • .,~ ~r.,a~ F°~as d~rlWnb~pyc~fbn,~~i nplnes,s OnwNpa ~nrxl I 0 1 I i `x~•~..-.~.--{O6Cw6A1sDPiW4-~•_~~- 1- r '!~ - ~-~ Fuhn Mv~bpmPN ~ IMINARY SITE PLAN PrtFL _ !W+!!^!~______.._._. . . _/~ LEOAL DESCRIPTION rr..w~r,w.ra~. YYYII~ __FL~ ~ IAI~".'._.. SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A s'r~__-.__..._...~.. New COxm,umwx Pnonm ...`.`r __.. Ui.,IP4UA DAIRY -----,av _.c= ---~ WAREHOU$~ & DISTRIBUTION PACILA7Y _r.___-_..._.._~-. 32f 3 HAMRICK RoAO, CENTRAL Po1NT, OR ~~~ o ~~ Q _o 70 y ~Y d ~y rr~~ ~I. r~ ~ RM~AN9 ~ ~ 9 p 4 i ~,.. ~~ 3 n ~~oa~w, 1 iR[ RNI I ti9 NORD [ ro AM ~ r ~"..,..a.w, 3 .{ d N A N - ___ Wiwiuci _._.__.~._ -_..___. ,.-r-....__.. _ NORTH ELETY /ATION ~ TRUCKSHOP BLO6. 6RC PLAN Review FORA Ntw Cwrt~R+mw~ewmrt UMPQLiA DASRY {II(ZAREHOM~BE &D IB'fRCIB UMIIRAL Po „CIL[fY RevsnHs i z 5 iR SFrun SOB tW5 ve.w A~3 SOUTH ELEVATION -WAREHOUSE & OFFICE BLDG. NORTH ELEVATION -WAREHOUSE & OFFICE BLDG. EAST ELEVATION- WAREHOUSE & OFFICE BLOO. WEST ELEVATION -WAREHOUSE & OFFICE BLDC+. o-- ~ ~. = I:iii z o-- o-- o- o- o- e- b b ~; ~9 ~.,....._ ._.._.._~.. -.._...~_ - -- __.._~_._ 6 ~~ : 4~ ~~ ~~i . ~ ~~ N A W1.] Niw COxaitaS Raoncr UMPQUA DAIR RICHARD L. KIEHN ARCHITECTS, A,LA. Y WAREHOUSE, D15rnmumoH, ~vm 1490 NW VALLEY VIEW DRIVE, SUfiE ~ll T3000SHOP FAQIISY ROStiEtf+l', OR414]0 Nib]105J6 FA%3t15]}]61S H.ulrtlac ROw, CpRR.LLPORrt, OR 74 e*t p ~€ A R~ D~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ \ . € ~~., / ~ ~ --o ~o o=a ~~ ~ ~ ~~,~ ~`=~ N[w Cexelp~ CIwM Pnw[C, A~ &~ o§ mg "3 ~ > ~ N ~ UMPQUA DAIRY ~ RICHARD L. KD;HN ARCHITECTS, A.LA. ~7 II ~ ~" 0 7Y,Vy~GU~ pay-m,~mpi„~ 7490 MN VALLEY VIEW DRIVE, SURE 200 5 Z ZAUCK~HOP 7=AC51yS~iYy/~) ROSE URG, OR BII>0 :K1/6T3d/'6 FA%~A15hYM1 _ W Public Works Department ~~w jx _ _ CENTRAL POINT o~~,>:< PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT September 19, 2005 TO: Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Minor Land Partition for 372W12, Tax Lot 202, Parcel #2 Applicant Umpqua Dairy Products 333 SE Sykes Roseburg, OR 97470 Pro ert Description/ M-1 Zoning Purpose ~~r/1'r-I1NtEl~T ~'L`• Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Transportation The proposed Ice Cream Drive is proposed as a fifty feet wide street with curbside sidewalks. Because of the industrial nature of the development no parking will be allowed on Ice Cream Drive (Condition #1). Ice Cream Drive will be classified a local street. Hamrick Road is classified as a collector in the City's Transportation System Plan. The proposed project entails the development of an 1,560 square feet office, 9,800 square feet warehouse, plus a 6,400 square feet freight distribution center with two truck bays. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual base figure of 11.01 average trips per a 1000 gross square feet for a general office, the office portion of the project will contribute 16.515 ADT and 2 155 South Second Street -Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~_ Fax 541.664.6384 $I PM peak hour trips. The freight distribution center is categorized in the ITE as a truck terminal. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual base figure of 81.90 average trips per acre, the freight terminal portion of the project will contribute 12.03 ADT and 1.2 PM peak hour trips. The warehouse/cold storage area has an ITE base figure of 4.96 ADT per 1000 gross square feet and .61 ADT per peak hour trip. Based on the ITE the warehouse will generate 48.31 ADT and 5.9 PM Peak Hour. The total ADT from the site is estimated at 76.85 and a PM peak hour of 9.4. The Public Works Department does not have standards that require Traffic Studies for new development. The City typically uses the Oregon Department of Transportation's (ODOT) Guide to Development Impact Analysis as a guideline for requiring traffic studies. The City of Central Point recently completed the East Pine Corridor Traffic Study which studied E. Pine Street, Peninger Road, Hamrick Road and a portion of Beebe Road. The improvements entail a new street being extended to the North of the subject property via a future bridge over Bear Creek that would extend to Hamrick Road. Additionally, intersection improvements at Peninger Road and E. Pine Street are scheduled. Application Review The applicant is proposing afifty-foot wide street with a paved with of forty feet, with curb side sidewalks. No parking shall be allowed along the proposed street. A waterline of the appropriate size shall be extended from Hamrick Road to the end of the proposed cul-de-sac. The size of the line shall be a minimum of eight inches and may have to be larger depending on the building and fire code requirements. Storm drain facilities shall be designed into the proposed street. Existing Infrastructure Streets: Hamrick Road is a paved two-lane road. No curb, gutter, or sidewalks exist. Table Rock Road is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County, it is currently a two lane road without curb, gutter or sidewalks. 2. Water: There is atwelve-inch water line that was constructed as part of the USF Reddaway development. 3. Storn Drain: A thirty inch storm drain facility is located at the bend of Hamrick Road. Umpqua Dairy Site Plan Conditions of Approval I. Ice Cream Drive Parking: No parking shall be allowed on Ice Cream Drive. Standard Specifzcatiora and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard 155 South Second Street ,~ Central Point, OR 97502 .541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 gZ Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Penr:it A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 • Fax 541.664.6384 83 Umpqua Dairy Site Plan -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Umpqua Dairy Site Plan -Protection of Existir:g Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction ofpublic works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Umpqua Dairy Site Plan -Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. 155 South Second Street e Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Uutpqua Dairy Site Plan -Streets The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Uutpqua Dairy Site Plan - Stornt Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. 155 South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 =Fax 541.664.6384 Umpqua Daisy Site Pian -Required Submittals 1. All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of airy permits, variances, approvals and conditions as maybe required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority (RVSS), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ACOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 155 South Second Street ~= Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 :• Fax 541.664.6384 ~+~ r: ~ BUILDING ~-~~ CENTRAL POINT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official DEPARTMENT DATE:8/25/05 BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Department Planning file no.06009 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Umpqua Dairy Site Plan, CUP Name: Ump~c ua Dairy Products Address: 333 S.E. Sykes City: Roseburg State: Or. Zip code: 97470 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Parcel 2 of Lot 1 .off Hamrick Rd.~See attached plot plan) PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 155 South Second Street =Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 ° Fax 541.664.6384 ST BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT -2- BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the ORSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. 155 South Second Street =Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 • Fax 541.664.6384 BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT -3- A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10.Application for building permit will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code (Based on the 2003 IBC). The plans (with code analysis) shall be provided from a licensed state of Oregon Architect /engineer. Compliance with 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code(with 2005 Oregon amendments) and the 2004 Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code as well as the National Electrical Code will be required. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. 155 South Second Street ° Central Point,dORb97502 • 541.664.3321 • Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~Q~EE'i SEWpRf`°9^ ~ ~ ~ N ~ «~~~, ~xKt3t( ~ f~~ ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Cenhal Point -Mailing Address: BO. Box 3130, Cmttral Point,OR 97502-0005 Tet. (541) 664-6300 or (541) 779-4144 FAX (541) 664-7171 wwwRVSS.ns September 9, 2005 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 9'7502 Re: Umpqua Dairy, File #06009 Dear Ken, FAX 664-6384 R~~~l~ ~t SEP 12 2005 PLANNING p BUILDING ^ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. t7 Sewer service to the proposed development will require a main line extension on the proposed Ice Cream Drive. We have received plans for a sewer extension on Hamrick Road in support of the Modoc Commercial Subdivision which will need to be completed before the sewer on Ice Cream Drive can be built. No work has begun on the Modoc project. The new sewer main must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards. , The proposed development must comply with the water quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES permit which are currently being developed. We request that the following conditions be met prior to final approval of this development: 1. Sewer main on Ice Cream Drive must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards and accepted as a public sewer main by RVS prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Stormwater plans must be designed and constructed to meet Phase 2 NPDES stonnwater quality requirements and approved by RVS. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, ~ ~v~-. Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SITEPLANREV IEW\2006\06021-GAZELLE INVESTMENTS.DOC 90 ,4Tr~H~~-~tT .,~. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 674 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FORA "SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" FOR A DAIRY DISTRIBUTION FACILITY (Applicant (s) :Umpqua Dairy) (37 2W 12B Tax Lot 202) Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted applications for site plan and conditional use permit on a 4.64 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, October 4, 2005, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.48, M-1, Industrial District B. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval C. Chapter 17.76, Conditional Use Permits Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.48, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.72, relating to Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval C. Chapter 17.76, relating to site development, structure and landscape location, traffic access, fencing and landscaping. Planning Commission Resolution No. 674 (010/4/2005) 9! Section 3. Conditional Ap rn oval. The applications for site plan and conditional use permit herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4's day of October, 2005. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of October, 2005. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. 674 (010/4/2005) 9x- City of Central Point, Oregon 7405o.Third St., Central Point, Or 97502 CENTRAL 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 POINT www.c i.cent ra I-poi n t.o r, u s STAFF REPORT October 6, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: Planning Department Tom Humphrey,AICP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a truck transfer facility in the Industrial (M-1) Zoning District on Property Identified as Tax Lot 37 2W 12B, 203; Gazelle Investments LLC, Applicant (Neathamer Surveying, Agent). STAFF SOURCE: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing the development of a truck transfer facility on Hamrick Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of its intersection with East Pine Street. The project is located on a portion of the property identified as the "Governors Shovel Ready Site" where the State and the City of Central Point are working together to create jobs. The special designation is designed to encourage a business friendly environment by providing afast-track approach of land use application processes and installation of required infrastructure. The distribution facility will include 10,260 square feet of gross floor azea for warehousing and offices (Exhibit "B" Site Plan). Truck transfer facilities are listed as a conditional use in the M-1, Industrial District [Section 17.48.040(B)]. Sections 17.48.060 and 17.48.070 outline the site area and yard requirements. The applicant has submitted findings of fact and supplementary information to demonstrate that the project meets the City's requirements. FINDINGS: The applicant's findings of fact (Exhibit "A") adequately address all approval criteria as set forth in Section 17.76.040. As a supplement to the findings staff has included by reference, as a condition of approval agency correspondence Exhibits "C" and "D". ISSUES: In considering an approval of this Conditional Use Permit application, the Planning Department identifies that there are three (3) issues worthy of consideration: 1. Does the proposed activity for the requested conditional use permit meet the requirements outlined in the municipal code? \\Serverzilla\PL\2006 Land Use Files\06021 Gazelle Trucking Facility\06021.doc Page 1 of 2 //D The project meets the siting requirements for the M-1, Industrial District together with off-street parking/loading facilities and landscaping. The proposed use is surrounded by similar industrial uses and there is no conflict with existing residential uses. 2. Can public facilities and infrastructure be constructed to accommodate the proposed use? The applicant, along with a neighboring property owner, will be dedicating a new public street named "Ice Cream Drive", which will comply with Public Works Standazds. This development will connect into Hamrick Road which is a portion of the East Pine Street Corridor Study. The Public Works Staff Report elaborates the details for infrastructure improvements including water, sewer, storm drain and other private utilities that are currently in the azea or proposed in the future. 3. A barbed wire fence has been proposed and can this feature be approved by the Planning Commission as a part of the site plan review? Chapter 15.20.070 prohibits the use of barbed wire within the City of Central Point. While there aze other properties within the City that have bazbed wire, most have pre-existed prior to annexation or they have applied for a fence variance under the provisions of Chapter 15.20.080. For this site plan review, the Planning Commission cannot include the barbed wire fence as a part of the project package at this time since the fence material is illegal. The Commission should consider approving the proposed fence without the barbed wire and advise the applicant to pursue a fence variance at a future date. EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" -Applicant's Findings Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Map, Elevations Exhibit "C" -Public Works Staff Report, Exhibit "D" -Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "E" - RVSS Comments Exhibit "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. 676, approving the Conditional Use Permit RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. 676 ~~~ BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION POft THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT FOR 3.88 ACRES, LOCATED SOUTH OF HAMRICK ROAD IN SOUTHEAST CENTRAL POINT, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON Applicants: Gazelle Investments, LLC Agent: Neathamer Surveying Inc. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW EXHIBIT "A" I. Findings of Fact for the Subject Property: Pro e T37S, R2W, Section 12B, Tax Lot 203; 3.88 gross acres, more or less Owners: Gazelle Investments, LLC Agenh Neathamer Surveying Inc. Existing Zoning_ M-I (Industrial District) Proposed Use: The applicant is proposing a trucking distribution facility on the site; such facility is permitted in the M-1 District subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Current Land Use: The property is currently vacant and undergoing a Partition application for the purpose of placing the proposed trucking distribution facility. Adiacent Zoning: All properties adjacent to ttre subject property shaze the M-1 zoning designation. Access: Currently access to the property is taken off Hamrick Road. Future access will be taken off of the future proposed Ice Cream Drive. Public Facilifies: Public facilities exist in the vicinity to service the Property including water service, sewer service, storm drainage and streets. Sco ey of Application: The purpose of this application is to permit the proposed trucking distribution facility. Exhibit B Site Plan of the Proposed Trucking Distribution Facility Exhibit C Copy of Submitted Partition Application Exhibit D Excerpt from City of Central Point Zoning Map l ~~ CRITERION 3: That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof FINDING - As shown in Exhibit D, and stated in the findings of fact, the subject property is adjacent to Industrially zoned properly. According to the CPMC, the purpose of the Industrial zoning districts is to provide azeas suitable for the location of light industrial uses involved in service, manufacturing or assembly activities. The proposed use, although permitted conditionally, will have no significant adverse effect on adjacent industrial uses. The site design and landscaping proposed will adequately screen the proposed use from adjacent industrial uses. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed tnicking distribution facility will have no significant adverse impact on permitted uses on abutting property. CRITERION 4: That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare o[ persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods or to the general welfare of the community. FINDING -The applicant will ensure, as will any conditions of approval that the Plamung Commission might impose, that the facility will operate under all required local, state and federal health and safety regulations for the proposed use so as not to be detriments( to their employees or the general welfaze of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and community. Therefore, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed conditional use complies with Criterion 4. IV. CONCLUSION: The Planning Commission finds that the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet alt other development and tot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code. The Planning Commission finds that the site Las adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use. The Planning Commission Gnds the proposed use wi-1 have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. The Planning Commission finds that the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health amd safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods or to the general welfare of the community. Respectfully submitted, NEATHAMER SURVEYING, INC. By: Amy Weiser, Planning Consultant ~~ 1~ ~z u I~ t- u ~~~-~- ~_ `~ ~~ ~w »R TAX 11JT.5 203 REDUCED SCALE i i I ~ I I r- <a.. MODCa CONDI710NA4 U51= Yi=t~rvil l A portion of Lot 2 of Modoc SubdNislon Fhase V, Located to the Northwest Ona-gvartor of Section 12 and the 5oothwest Ona-quarter oMerldltaanUty of Gant3al Pofnt, RacK on Gou Cg Oregone PREPARED FOR: REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR Ca.c.P e, IZ(Lduanct~ ~~ OREGON JULY 09, 2001 CAEL E. NEATHAMER 56545 °H'~'~1 Renevda/ Date /2/3//06 <ors Neathamer Surveying, Inc. _ _ _ _ _ _ PREPARED BZ': 3126 State St. Suite 200 P.0. Box 1584 Medford, Oregon 97501-0120 Phone (541) 732-2869 FAX (541) 732-1382 DATE: August 25, 2005 PROJECT NUbtBER: 05056 Sheet I of I C7 LTM GAZELLE INVESTMENTS, LLC 520 Coachman Drive Jacksonville, OR 97530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FlIIIIRF tOAnING DOCK PRE-FlNJ LIIL ~_ PRD~•~ DOCK DOOR SIGN, GUI"fER @ DOWNSPBUT B ~___ _~_.___-__ -__~~~_ \ ........ ...... ...q .........~...J za zz I,,.: zo la ~ Is 1a I Iz ! 10 ~ a I s I ® z^ ^ ~~ . ,. . FlN FL~R ELEV. __-_- -__- -- _ _ _ ^ ^ I' ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ----------- ------------ APRON SLAB AT FACE OF BUILDING 99'-10' LADDER & GRAB OUTBOUND SIDE ELEVATION (INBOUND SIDE ELEVATION SIMILAR) CONCEPT PROTOTWE EXTERIOR ELEVATON 12 PRE-FlN. MTL GABLE TRIM N D T E \ 6 / ~ MIL- BLDC. MFR. TO SIZE CURERS k DOWNSPOUTS AND \ DETERMINE LOCATIONS OF DOWNSPOUTS. (LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROX.) FLOODDGHiS & MAST. gggS ___- __ SfL STAIR ~~ -- ~ '! '~ -- PIPE BOLLARD FfO. k FNDN., 12 i ~: ' ~ ~~~~- PRE-FlN. MIL GABLE TRIM J~FLOODDGHIS k MAST, STL STAIR PIPE BOLLRD ___________________~r~_~---______ FTC. dt Fl ___..__.._ CO b ,, i~~ r r -v~~ ~a~ fi ~I ~I I) ~~l vuruu II~ ~o omui ~H~.J II i ill II II d _ d ''3~~i BI_-J J'~= J 0 Public Works Department •,>~,~. CENTRAL ___ POINT ~;~e~~a~ PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT September 21, 2005 TO: Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department r~ -~T~ ~;H~IE~r Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for 372W12B, Tax Lot 203, Parcel #2 Applicant Gazelle Investments, LLC 520 Coachman Drive Jacksonville, OR 97530 Pro ert Description/ M-I Zoning Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Transportation The proposed Ice Cream Drive is proposed as a fifty feet wide street with curbside sidewalks. Because of the industrial nature of the development no parking will be allowed on Ice Cream Drive (Condition #1). Ice Cream Drive will be classified a local street. Hamrick Road is classified as a collector in the City's Transportation Systern Plan. The proposed project entails the development of an 1,800 square feet office plus a 8,460 square feet freight distribution center with twenty-four dock doors. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual base figure of 11.01 average trips per a 1000 gross square feet for a general office, the office portion of the project will contribute 16.515 ADT and 2 PM peak 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ hour trips. The freight distribution center is categorized in the ITE as a truck terminal. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual base figure of 81.90 average trips per acre, the freight terminal portion of the project will contribute 15.90 ADT and 1.4 PM peak hour trips. The Public Works Department does not have standards that require Traffic Studies for new development. The City typically uses the Oregon Department of Transportation's (ODOT) Guide to Development Impact Analysis as a guideline for requiring traffic studies. The City of Central Point recently completed the East Pine Corridor Traffic Study which studied E. Pine Street, Peninger Road, Hanu-ick Road and a portion of Beebe Road. The improvements entail a new street being extended to the North of the subject property via a future bridge over Bear Creek that would extend to Hamrick Road. Additionally, intersection improvements at Peninger Road and E. Pine Street are scheduled. Application Review The applicant is proposing afifty-foot wide street with a paved with of forty feet, with curb side sidewalks. No parking shall be allowed along the proposed street. A waterline of the appropriate size shall be extended from Hamrick Road to the end of the proposed cul-de-sac. The size of the line shall be a minimum of eight inches and may have to be larger depending on the building and fire code requirements. Storm drain facilities shall be designed into the proposed street. Existing Infrastructure 1. Streets: Hamrick Road is a paved two-lane road. No curb, gutter, or sidewalks exist. Table Rock Road is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County, it is currently a two lane road without curb, gutter or sidewalks. 2. Water: There is atwelve-inch water line that was constructed as part of the USF Reddaway development. 3. Storm Drain: A thirty inch storm drain facility is located at the bend of Hamrick Road. Gazelle Conditional Use Permit Conditions of Approval 1. Ice Cream Drive Parkine: No parking shall be allowed on Ice Cream Drive. Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniforn Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the 155 South Second Street ~r Central Pornt, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 /f9 Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Pennit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Gazelle Conditional Use Permit-Plans 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Gazelle Conditional Use Permit -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Gazelle Conditional Use Permit- Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3329 ~~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Gazelle Conditional UsePermit-Streets The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Gazelle Conditional Use Permit -Storrs: Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has fornzerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. 155 South Second Street > Central Point, OR 97502 .541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~+~- BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE:8/25/05 CENTRAL POINT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Department Planning file 06021 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Gazelle Investments Trucking Facility Name: Gazelle Investments,LLC Address: 520 Coachman Drive City: Jacksonville State: Or. Zip code: 97530 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 2 of Modoc Subdivision Phase 1. Located in the Northwest One-Quarter of Secstion 12 and the Southwest One-quarter of Section 1. Township 37 South Range 2 West. Willamette Meridian. City of Central Point. Jackson County Or. PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF' REPORT -2- BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. if a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the ORSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be {invited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 ^ Fax 541.664.6384 lZS BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT -3- A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10.Application for building permit will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code (Based on the 2003 IBC). The plans (with code analysis) shall be provided from a licensed state of Oregon Architect /engineer. Compliance with 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code(with 2005 Oregon amendments) and the 2004 Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code as well as the National Electrical Code will be required. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. 155 South Second Street =Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 • Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ ~~~Q~EE't SEWfafF~i C ..fv~SR~,e+ N ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Cenval Point - Malting Address: PO. Box 3 (30, Central Point,OR 97502-0005 Tel. (541) 664-6300 or (541) 779-4144 PAX (541) 664-7171 wa~w.RVSS.us September 9, 2005 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Gazelle Investments Trucking Facility, File #06021 Dear Ken, FAX 664-638~~~"~ ~hti~ >1 '< CITY OF ~=~ <`Kk~` pO1N7 SEP 12 2005 WLANNING ~ BU0... ~ `~ pUSLIC WCFtKS DEP i . v Sewer service to the proposed development will require a main line extension on the proposed Ice Cream Drive. We have received plans for a sewer extension on Hamrick Road in support of the Modoc Commercial Subdivision which will need to be completed before the sewer on Ice Cream Drive can be built. No work has begun on the Modoc project. The new sewer main must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standazds. The proposed development must comply with the water quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES permit which aze currently being developed. We request that the following conditions be met prior to final approval of this development: 1. Sewer main on Ice Cream Drive must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards and accepted as a public sewer main by RVS prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Stormwater plans must be designed and constructed to meet Phase 2 NPDES stormwater quality requirements and approved by RVS. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, /-~~' Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SITEPLANREVIEW~2006\06021-GAZELLE INVESTMENTS.DOC ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 676 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FORA "SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" FOR A TRUCKING DISTRIBUTION FACILITY (Applicant (s) :Gazelle Investments) (37 2W 12B Tax Lot 203) Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted applications for site plan and conditional use permit on a 7.60 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, October 4th, 2005, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.48, M-1, Industrial District B. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval C. Chapter 17.76, Conditional Use Permits Section 2. Findin¢ and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.48, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.72, relating to Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval C. Chapter 17.76, relating to site development, structure and landscape location, traffic access, fencing and landscaping. Planning Commission Resolution No. 676 (010/4/2005) I,Z,$ Section 3. Conditional Approval. The applications for site plan and conditional use perniit herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4°i day of October, 2005. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 4°i day of October, 2005. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. 676 (010/4/2005) i29