Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 17, 2005o~.il' f li, tit)t~:' ._ 'j :il() f3.Cll. t ~~~i Willi?':,Il" (~t)1i1iI11S:~1(%il I. r~~I:I':'~I~`€xC.:~~..IJIDT+C?1~.~r~C~:t~ I. ZZ~I.i; ~':~LL ,. ~tillllllt;'11( '!'l'111~1~ ,( :~1U1~;' ~li=}1, ~alillill? It}..1; (. ~'T<it;li T t.;S= L:, r?CUI.'ti~?:~,',(7cI, ~I111~:h T~ililiC'l, ~±i:l ~'i'~~i~';-1~'. Rlt;r ,'&(':i;,7y.« 4qi q~~Pt,`''1p4 A'. `"y9~3.-~eC?~S~i', i~~(.,. ~', A. Y r ~3 1 ! V~ L_..'~l'~t3 A. I:it~ic~t~°~rtclaprovalcfMay3;20#~,T'}< ~l~ir,s~,C:~:;~iil~~i>~i~iit~fi.?:iit~' V. PUBLIC ;~&'}g§',!'1.1~~'!~~..~'1 Y .i.e YT l' ~ t i, i ~',:~1 Q5 . Pti}>iic I?ea; i11~ t~1 rcvic•~z :111 a;3},licatic~l? II]1• ~i 11?itlor p~llric?:n, `~'}~c ptlrp~)~c c?f ihi a})1)li~ <tiit>r1 .5 to cl e<?te t}lr0c intiliz icltlal tax ic)tti. 'I h:; 1)rc~l)~rt} i"~ 1ti~~i1`c~I ~: iillin al, l~- 6, I`~.C'tililC;ililill X111`',}l.' ~'~1i111I}' /:i?rlll?>?; (}t~lllCt. 11]l; I`I[>pC1liV )ti 1C1f;1?ti}1Ltl (111 tll~'-,l1Ll~~c111 ~'gs i_]9 C<>ltl]ld :'`,~~t„or' l.i:ip =,~~-)", ~~~, .1 i l)I3, }`ax }.{:?t;{s) 1?i1iJ. "I ~ alv is ]cx:ai~~il he p,o}.c3 _ a?t~l ll? oI~ fill~sf. G1c11 p3~i~ ~~ ~~lut}1 ~?l:'Plttvic~~ ,1v~~llrlt.. ~'asl ~?~'~,~ . .;ll.lZilact a11~1 ~~ t:t ~~i~ ;~ 1~'1~?ril}:; -~vcllr;c. "1hc ac}~11~~ ~ X45 Pittl'icti~ ,~vi;rlt?e, 1 ~. Pl~blic; rlcariil~= t<) review ~~z apl~Iicatlc>?1 P~lr a t1?i??0r pal ~i~zr~11. 'I7ic ~?wr.~})o,;c o}: t}?is ap})Iici?ilc:>1 ]s to c1i'rltc t~vc~ ]ncli~ i<}ual tax lr)fs. "1-}lt° I)ro})Lriv ]s ltl~lt~:tt iti 1t111n fill R-~:, 1.~t~sidtl tia} I c)1~' T~;;n4ity ~°,~>nil?=~ clisf.lct. 7 },~ 1).rlpcrf~~ l~~i<.ic1)tificd o.1 i}1t, l~~c'~c~r? Ct}ul?~~ 1~s~.,~c1; ~ ]n~l,~ ~?~ .}~~ 2Vv ~ti=}{~, lax i.c~i(s) ~(;(). } }1L prc?pclt~'1~ locsitecl :1o1-th o}, Sonic -~~ ~1?llc:, ~{~ut}; 0t~ I:ltcl ~tatc ~, west u~ Del Misr. T11e tlclc3r~ss is ~2U~ ~ollrc~ ~~ .~ . ~.. ~`Ll~}~1C 11i:li'lll4.r tCl reV1C1t' it ~.~ i',ftt~t't':l'l; i~~~lll ~Ij7i)li't:.li.zl)Ct. T}l.i; p:ll'pllsi_ t.ll tli?15 ~ipl~~1~.c3t1(~~11.5' to crac l it ~;vc}r~ i> i<l.x l~lfs. I ~1,,; ,)rte})crfy i~ }cx:i?tctl =._; ~,;;i1.1 a .I. ()l)-I~ti1AZ; Law Mix Pgs4t-~~ J.:c~ic}c;l?ti<]1 ~onii?<~ clistlict. T}?c f)rt>}~~~°rt~ i~ iclcl?iilic~l011 f}?c,}i1cl:`ul? C'c~tll]fV ASeS+v-t''S 1??atl ~1~ 3' 21~' 1(}A~, Tax Let(s) 1(>>;ti ~~.1 i)i). }..iic propel t~' locirtccl ~,luth c~~"Tay]a~• r3cas~~as Road, north of ~'alo Verde Way, east of Bract Way a~~ct west o~ US t-ti~t~way ~9, Tt~e addresses are t 9~t5 & t 9{7 Taytor Road. VI. M~SCELLANE4US "VII. AI}~C}URNl4~ENT PC45I745 City of Ccxxtx•al Point Planning Commission 11Zinutes May 3, 2005 L MEETING CALLED Td 4RDERA.T 7200 P.M. II, RC}LL CALL: Chairperson Connie Moc~ygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiaz~t, Mack Lewis, Scott Mangold, Chuck Piland and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; Dave Alvord, Community Planner Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator and Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician. III, CURR:ESPC}NDENCE There was correspondence distributed related to Items A & C IV, MINUTES Commissioner Piland made a motion to approve the minutes from April 5 , 2005. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion, RQLL CALL: Fish, yes; Tdiart, yes; Lewis, Abstain; Mangold, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, Yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPF.ARAIVCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Continuance of a Public hearing to review Tentative Plan and Planned Unit Development application for the purpose of creating x2 single family residential lots. The property is located within an R-~.-6, Residential Single Family zoning district, The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W ~.oDA, Tax Lot(s) 6500 & 6600. The property is located west of US Highway gg, north of Beall Lane, east of Snowy Butte Lane. The addresses are 3328 & 3286 Snowy Butte Lane. There were site visits made by Commissioner's Mangold, Lewis $~ Riggs. .Planning Camrnissian Minutes May 3, 2t1QS Page z David Alvord, Community Planner discussed the highlights of the Punning Depa~~tment staff report. Mr. Alvord stated that the City received a revised tentative plan on Monday. Mr. Alvord stated that due to the small lot size a Planned Unit Development is the best use of land. Losing a lot would increase development costs. Manta Way should be renamed, and the applicant would be required to submit a list of names to consider prior to final plat. Mr. Alvord referred to the revised Tentative Plan submitted. He stated that Lots ~-g shall have single story homes only, which will be stipulated in the recorded CC ~ P.'s. Italian Cypress will be planted along the easterly property line of the development. Iie reviewed the applicant's revised findings dated May 2, 200 for the Planning Commission. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director asked Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator to give the Commission an update on additional information for Snowy Butte Lane improvements. Matt Samitore explained that Administration had requested that a LID be formed to make all of the Snowy Butte Lane improvements at once. Mr. Samitore stated that the resident's on Snowy Butte Lane have been asked if they were willing to participate in a LID. So far, they have not received ~o% participation required to enforce a LID. Mr. Samitore would like to a conditional of approval for developers to sign aNon- rernonstrance agreement in the event a LID is farmed. There were discussions regarding the varying street widths from 24'-~8' on Manta Way. The Public Works Department would not object to the Planning Commission requesting that Manta Way be ~$' wide at the north and south end. The 28' portion would allow parking on one side of the street, the 24' wide section would not allow parking on either side. Chairperson Moczygernba explained that during the continuance ofthis application at the last meeting, the public portion would remain open for testimony. Don Burt of Lardy Engineering, agent for San Ignacio Place came forward to discuss the application. He stated that he understood the concerns of the surrounding property owners. Mr. Burt explained the other alternative to create private street with flag lots would not be compatible with the existing development in the area, The plan proposed offers the best street circulation plan for this development and future development for other property owners to the north. The revised Site Plan Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 20115 Page 3 illustrated building Footprints to establish that reasonable sized homes could still be built on the smaller lots, anti still meet the setbacks. Mr. Burt stated that reducing a lot along the eastern partisan o£ the development would not eliminate the privacy concern expressed by the neighbors. There are existing evergreens that will have to be removed. Evergreens at maturity are very large and can take up most of a lot. Mr. Burt stated that his clients are in Favor o£the Snowy Butte Lane improvements and they are willing to sign anon-remonstrance agreement in addition to installing fiber optic conduit, Mr. Burt concurs with tl~e staFF reports and findings. There were questions regarding open space and sidewalks. Mr. Burt explained that it isn't practical For a development this size to have open space, The applicant's intention was to incorporate some open space with the streetscape plan. There will be street lights installed in accordance with City standards. Anita Grube resident o£ Jessica Circle spoke. She stated that lots ~, 6, ~ and part o£ lot S touch her property line. Mrs. Grube did meet with Mr. Burt, and feels that their concerns were well addressed, She understands that just as much property will still be touching her property regardless o£the number oflots. Mrs. Grube is happywith Italian Cypress being planted, There will not be any dropping leaves and the appearance will be the same year round. No one else came forward to speak in Favor o£ or against the application. The public portion o£ the meeting was closed. There were more discussions regarding Snowy Butte Lane improvements. The Planning Commission will have an opportunity as a Flannel Unit Development to review and approve the final development plan. Commissioner Piland made a motion to adopt Resolution 6q.~, approving Tentative Plan and Planned Unit Development applications, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports, in addition to the following conditions: ~.. Applicant's shall sign aNon-remonstrance agreement; 2. Applicant's shall install the minimum size conduit for a fiber optic networ k, and 3. Streets shall be 2$' wide. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion R~}LL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Mangold, yes; Filand, yes, Riggs, Yes. Motion passed. Planning Camnrission Mirzrztes May 3, 2fJOS Page 4 S. Public hearing to review an application far a Zane Map ~~xnendment, The purpose of this application is to accoznrnodate a Planned L7nit Development consisting of 9x single family lots with open space, The property has recently been annexed rota the City of Central Point. The property is identi~i.ed on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 3~S 2W o2, Tax Lats 2'7oC} & 270., The property is located south of Zara Lane, north of Beebe Road, east a£ Gebhard Road and west of Hamrick Road. Tl~e address is 7x8 Beebe Raad. The applicant is requesting to change the zoning from R-L, Residential Low Density to R-x-~a, Residential Single Family. Chairperson Moczygemba asked if there were any ex-pane communications or conflicts of interests to declare. Commissioner Idiart stated that he is a personal friend of the applicant but does not feel that he unable to make an unbiased decision. Commissioner Mangold declared that he had met Mr. Duncan several months ago, however there were no discussions regarding this application. Tom I-Iumphrey, Community Development Director discussed the history behind the property in this area. He explained that the master plan has been refined to meet current needs and other development in the area. Mr. Humphrey made reference to the Gebhard / Beebe Road improvement concepts and informed the Commissioner's that if they make a recommendation to the Council to approve, they can expect to see a Tentative Plan in the future. Mr. Humphrey stated that the McMurray's {property owners for these applications) were involved in the meetings regarding this area, The circulation plan has been identified in the plans and ties in with the other properties. Mr. Humphrey discussed the future UGB and how it will be moving out in this vicinity. Most property in this area was zoned R-~.-B, except this parcel which was coned R-L. There have been some changes reasoning in the original creation of R-L zoning, and how this is not considered to be an efficient use of land. There were discussions regarding how much the Master Plan for this area had changed, when the Commission will be having a study session with Council regarding PUD's, school and street capacities. It was explained that Jewett Elementary is fully utilised right now, School District # 6, has purchased some property on Lipton Road, and will definitely have to make some adjustments as development occurs. Matt ~amitore, Development services Coordinator stated that as far as road capacities, the Public Works Department will probably be looking at more non-remonstrance agreements with formation of LID's. Platrnitrg Catntrrissiatr Mirrtrtes May 3, 2D[J5 Page 5 With. Blue Grass Downs, Phase I the construction traffic used Gebhard Road and had to receive approval from Jackson County. The City is loolzing at r oad improvement plans to be developed for that area inthe o6/0~ Budget year with construction happening in the o~/08 Budget year. The road will be designed to accommodate R-~ zoning throughout and can easily handle that capacity. Tony Weller of CES, agent for the applicant explained that they have been working on the Master Plan with the property owners, staff and consultants far a couple of years now. He discussed the history behind the Master Planning and the reasoning behind covering the East Pine Street Corridor Study, the burden of responsibility for providing open space, etc. Mr. Weller added that the non-remonstrance agreement is a good idea because the patchwork approach to road improvements doesn't work well. Mr. Weller discussed the applicant's desire for R-~-6 zoning versus R-~ -B. This enables to provide a quality development while keeping the lots and construction costs at a more affordable price. Mike Duncan of Duncan Development, applicant for the proposal stated that from a City stand point, the City is out of land causing prices to escalate. He explained that 4 years ago the average price per square foot for a residence was $go.oo, and now it is averaging $~.go.oo. Mr, Duncan feels that his application is keeping in line with the City's desire to encourage more unique developments with character, rather than large lot subdivisions with large streets. Duncan Development's goal is to try to keep property costs down due to availability of land. Tony Weller agent for the applicant added that during the construction of Blue Grass Downs, Phase I that his client and Jackson County worked together in regards to usage of Gebhard S~ Beebe Roads. They actually filmed truck traffic and road conditions. Determined where the construction traffic caused additional wear on the roads and did an overlay. Dave Webb, resident of Gebhard Road stated that his biggest concern is water. They have 4o fruit trees as well as other vegetation. He is worried about losing rain water that would have gone into the aquifer going down storm drains instead and how this would affect his 4 gpm well. He stated that being outside the UGB that he doesn't even have an option to receive City water in the event he loses water in his well. Torn Humphrey, went through the future plans for an UGB amendment that the City intends to pursue later this summer. David Painter, a neutral party asked Tom to discuss the zone change and ADU amendments that was brought before the CAC, Mr. Painter feels that this information would be relevant to the request for this application. Plarantrrg Conanrission Nitrates rt~fay 3, 2tJf1S Pale 6 N.lr. Humphrey went through the information that was brought before tl~e CAC and hawthe City is looking at implementing an alder way of development into cur rent plannizag efforts with prapez~ty owners being able to build accessory dwelling units to care for family members, etc. No one else came forward to speak in favor of or against this application. The p~.zblic portion of the hearing was closed. Commissioner Idiarl made a motion to adopt Resolution fi4fi approving a zone map amendmen#, based on the standards, f-zndings, conclusions and recommends#ions stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion RC?LL CALL; Fish, yes; Idiaz-t, yes; Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, Yes. Mohan passed. C. Public hearing to review applications for a Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment. The purpose of these applications is to accommoda#e a Planned Unit Llevelopment consisting of 6~ single family mixed housing units with open space. The property has recently been annexed into the City of Central Paint, The properly is identif-zed on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W o2, Tax Lot 2800. The property is located south of Lara Lane, north of Beebe Road, east of Gebhard Road and west of Hamrick Road. The address is q.g22 Gebhard Road. The applicant is requesting to amend the Comp Plan from Low Density Residential #o Medium Density Residential and to change the zoning from R-x-S, Residen#ial dingle Family to R-2, Residential Two Family. Commissioner Riggs has had communications with Ran Miller years ago, not related to this application. Commissioner Mangold made a site visit. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director explained that the development proposed for this project if the Comprehensive Plan and Zane Map Amendment were approved would be similar to Beebe Woods, A Planned Unit Development. Mr. Humphrey stated that most of the issues that would apply to this application were already discussed with the previous item, Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator stated that his comments for this application would be exactly the same as mentioned for the Duncan Development proposal. Kerb Farber of Farber Surveying, agent for the applicant stated that this is a golden Plcrnnirrg Contrrtission Mirtrttes May 3, 211(15 Page T opportunity to obtain higher density due to other properties designated for higher density being developed as single family residences. NIr, Farber stated that his office would be submitting Tentative Plan and Planned Unit Development applications for this property very soon. There were questions regarding the previous illegal activities on this property in the past and if it would have an impact. Bill Leep, speaking on behalf of Artner Investments, stated that the State has issued certification on this property and that it is safe to develop, This property consists of 8.~q. acres and he feels it provides a good transition between higher density and lower density developments. This proposal also provides a nice mix of housing, good circulation and more open space. Ike added that Central Point is getting an excellent reputation for quality developments and is striving towards providing more affordable housing. No one else came foz~ward to speak in favor of or against this application, The public portion of the meeting was closed. Mr. Humphrey stated that part of the East Pine Street Transportation Study included recommendations for signals at Beebe & I-Iamrick Roads. He said that he had recently communicated with other property owners in this area that gave him the impression they would be developing their property similar to Blue Grass Downs. Commissioner Idiart made a motion to adopt Resolution 64.7 approving Comprehensive Plan & Zone Map Amendment applications, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion, Rt.7LL CALL: Fish, yes, Idiart, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion passed. D. Public meeting to review an application for a Fence Variance. The purpose of this application is to construct a higher fence along the tap of a recently constructed footbridge for aces to Forest Glen Park. To ensure safety and privacy issues have been met, the Public Works Department has requested this variance. Een Gerschler, Community Planner presented the Planning Department staff repoz~t. Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator, explained due to Avista gas lines, and being in the floodplain, the footbridge had to have a higher span. This resulted in compromising residential property owner's privacy, and safety concerns for people climbing on the wall of the bridge. The Public Works Department requested the variance since a Plarrrring CornnFission Min¢rtes May 3, 2(7tt5 Page $ portion of the additional chain link fence in combination with the block wall would exceed the maximum allowable height of six feet. Commissioner Piland made a motion to adapt Resolution G48 approving a fence variance application, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports, Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. RC?LL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, Yes. Motion passed. E. Public hearing to review an application for a minor partition. The purpose of this application is to create three individual tax lots. The property is located within an R-x-~, Residential Single Family Zoning district, The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W ~.xDS, Tax Lot x3oo. The property is located north of Forest Glen Dr ive, south of Pittview Avenue, east of Burrell Road and west of Marilee Avenue. The address is 845 Pittview .Avenue, STAFF I2ECtJMMENDS DUE T4 THE NI,7MBER OF ITEMS C1N THE AGENDA THA THIS ITEM BE MOVED TQ A SECOND PLANNING CUMMISSICIN MEETING C}N NIAY 17, 2005. STAFF REPORTS 1?~.ND RELATED TC} THIS ITEIVI WILL 8E PROVIDED IN THE 1VIAY a.7, 2005 AGENDA PACKET. Chairperson Moczygemba asked if anyone in the audience was present to speak on this item that would not be able to attend the May ~.~, 2005 meeting. No one responded. Commissioner Fish made a motion to continue this application to the May t7, 2005 Planning Commission meeting, CommissionerPilandreconded the motion. RC}LL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Zewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, Yes, Riggs, yes. Motion passed. F. Public hearing to review an application for a minor partition. The purpose of this application is to create two individual tax lots. The property is located within an R-L, Residential Low Density Zoning district. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 36 2W 34.C, Tax Lot 3500, The property is located north of Scenic Avenue, south of Interstate 5, west of Del Mar. The address is 5205 Dobrot Way, STAFF I~-EC(7MMENDS DUE TIJ THE N~;-~~IBER QF ITEMS C}N THE AGENDA THAT THIS ITEM BE MQVED TQ A SECOND PLANNING CC}MMISSION MEETING UN i4ZAY 17, 2005. STAFF REPORTS AND CQI~;RESP©NDENCE RELATED T4 THIS ITEM WILL. BE PRt?VIDED IN THE MAY ig, 2005 AGENDA PACKET. Pltrtsrrirrg C'orrunission Mirurtes May 3, .2{1115 Page 9 Chairperson Moc~ygemba asked if anyone in the audience was present to speak on this item that would not be able to attend the May z~, 200 meeting. No one responded. Commissioner Fish made a motion to continue this application to the May x7, 2005 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, Yes, Riggs, yes. Motion passed, G, Public hearing to review a Tentative Flan application. The purpose of this application is to create G individual tax lots, The property is located within a TOD-LMR, Low Mix Residential zoning district, The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W ZOAB, Tax Lots ~tGoO & x.700, The property is locates south of Taylor Road, north of Palo Verde Way, east of Brad Way and west of US Highway gg, The addresses are ~-g45 ~ ~.g67 Taylor Road. STAFF RECOMMENDS DUE TO THE NI7MBER OF ITEMS ON THE AGENDA THAT THIS ITEM BE MO~trED TO A SECOND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON MAY t~, 2005, STAFF 1~;EPORTS ANT} Ct)Rp;.ESPt}NDENCE RELATED TO THIS ITEM WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE II~IAY ~~, 2005 AGENDA PACKET. Chairperson Moczygemba asked if anyone in the audience was present to speak on this item that would not be able to attend the May ~7, 2005 meeting. No one responded. Commissioner Fish made a motion to continue this application to the May ~7, 2005 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, Yes, Riggs, Yes. Motion passed, VII, MISCELLANEOUS A. Pilot Center ~ Tom 1-lumphrey, Community Development Director updated the Planning Commission on the status of the Pilot Center permits for reconstruction after the dire. During the permit process the City was able to hold permits and negotiate with Pilot to change the truck traffic direction, which will benefit the other businesses in that area as well. Pilot will also be creating a c~' x 12' office space for a Central Point Police Department substation to process incidents reported at Pilot. The access restriction for truck will remain. Ptanr~zng Comrnrssiort Minutes May 3, ~t?DS 1'ctge 1 t1 B. Quality Fend - Tozn Humphrey gave tl~e Planning Commission an update on. the Quality Fence master plan. 'I'l~zey have already removed some older structures which have already unproved tl~e appearance, they intend oil expanding the square footage of the metal fence making area, and adding a showroom. V`It.T. ADJfl-Up;.N'MENT Commissioner Lewis made a motion to adjourn. the meeting. Commissioner Riggs seconded tlae motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at ~.o:o~ P.M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPCIRT MEETING DATE: May l7, 2005 T(~: Central Paint Planning Cornznission FRG1M: l~.en Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative flan far a 3 lot partition known as the "Whitten Partition" located south of Pittview Avenue near its intersection with l~.ensington Court in the R-1-6 zoning district {Map 37 2W l TDB, Tax Lot 1300). Applicant! fJ~~vner: Ardele Vijitten 845 Pittview Avenue Central Paint, C}regan 97502 Agent: Timberline Surveying P.C}. Box 3064 Central Paint, Oregon 97502 Surn~nary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide an existing 0.85 acre parcel of land into 3 residential fats. Authority: CPMC 1..24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the; Public 1~earing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment "A"). Applicable Lave: CPMC 16.1 O.OlO et seq. -Tentative Plans CPIVIC 17.20 et seq. -R-l, Residential Single-Family District Discussion• The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to partition a 0.85 acre parcel into 3 individual lots ranging in size from 8,050 to 17,420 square feet respectively (refer to Attachment "B"}. There are two homes with garages and storage buildings depicted on the plan, but none are proposed to be removed. The existing hawses meet the rninimurn required setbacks and wilt ~-T:IPLANNINC105043\OS 043. DtiC s ~~° eventually need to be retrofitted with a two car garage or carport if any improvements, upgrades or additions are planned. Setbacks for the R-1 zone are 20 feet from the front lot line, ~ feet per story on the sides azxd IS feet from rear lot lines. The maximum allowable height for structures is 35 feet. The Planning Commission may consider requiring the "hammerhead" turnarouzad to be shifted slightly toward Pittview Avenue. The current confzguration as proposed could create a problem for parcel 2 if the existing trailer home were replaced with a stick built home. There may not be enough. room for the maneuvering of vehicles if a larger building footprint were proposed. Shifting the turnaround as recommended would not compromise setbacks on Parcel 1. Access to the lots would be from atwenty-one foot wide private access road connecting to Pittview Avenue. The Public works Department has identified the minimum standards for the development and for the road in their staff report {Attachment "C"~. Additional right of way may need to be dedicated to the public along the Pittview Avenue frontage. The Planning and Building Departments have submitted recommended conditions of approval {Attachments "D" and "E"} for consideration by the Commission. Rogue Valley Sewer Services, Jackson County Fire District Three and the Jackson County Roads and Parks department {Attachment "G"} have submitted correspondence for consideration by the Commission. Each of these agencies have requirements that will need to be met by the applicant prior to the City signing the final plat. Findings of Fac# and Concizzsions of Law Staff suggests the following fzndings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. Tentative Plat CPMC 1'7.05A50 establishes the minimum area, wid#h and access requiremen#s for the R- 1-0, Residential Single-Family District. In this district, parcels mus# con#ain a minimum lot size of 0,444 square feet. Lots must have a# least 00 feet of lot frontage. 1, The project site is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single- Family zoning district and consists of a tentative plan application fox the subdivision of approximately 0.85 acres into 3 separate lots. Lot frontage for lots 2 and 3 is met with the access easement. CPMC 10.1.0.410 requires #hat applications for tentative plans be submitted wi#h improvemen# plans and other supplementary informs#ion as may be needed to indicste the development plan. F~~:ll'1.,ANN TNG1oS443t05043. DOC n P 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative play for the Proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and dctc~-~nined that the project ~xxeets all City standards and requirements subject to tlxe recommezxded conditions in Attaclxznents C and D. Recommendation; Staff recomcrzends that the Planning Commission take the following action. 1. Adopt Resolution No.~, approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recoznnxended conditions of approval; or ~. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments• A. Notice of Public l*Iearing B. Copy of Tentative Plat C. Public Works Staff Report D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval E. Building Department Staff Report F. Correspondence H:tF' ~,AhI~FING~a54431{}5043, DOC ~ ~-;. r {~ ,~ ,- ~~~1TFC~1L- PLAIVIVING EF_PAR7"ME11I7" ~~ ~ 1T Tom Nutnphrey. A1CP Community Development Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Alvard Community Planner visa Morgan Planning 't'echnician Na#ice of Public Hearing Date of Notice. April 12, 2t?05 Meeting Date: May 3, 2005 Time: 7;00 p.m. {Approximate} Place; Central Point City Hall ~ 55 S. Second Stree# Centro! Point, Oregon NATURE t)F MEETING Beginning at the above #ime aril puce, the Central Poin# Planning Commission will review a Minor Par#ition application. The purpose of #his application is #o crewte three individual tax lots. The property is located with'sn an R-1-f, Resident'sal Single Family zoning district. The properly is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 11 DB, Tax La#{s} 1300. The property is loco#ed north of Forest Glen Drive, and sou#h of Piriview Avenue, east of Burrell Road grid wes# of Marilee Avenue. The address is 845 Pittview Avenue. Pursuant to GRS '197.7£3 {3} {e}, failure #o raise an issue during this hearing, in person ar in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-matters and the parties an opportunity #o respond to the issue wilt preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, l~.IENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTIGE 1T MUST BE RPOMPTI_Y FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA F©R DECISION The requirements for a Minor Partition application review are set forth in Chapters #6.36 & '17.2{} of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General information and conditions of the project approval.. '#. Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 3, 2005. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Car. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is 85043. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5, For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at {541 } 604-3321 ext 202. SUMMARY C}F PRC3CEDURE A# the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application{s} and technical s#aff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, praponer~ts, opponents, and hear arguments on the applica#ion{s}. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the application{s} as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. }>` i,~ rte, 1.q~ t`~.. ',. ~3 ~'"` ~`~. o ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~' ~ L.taGAT>=D Its "_ ~'~" TIDE t1€7RT#~WEST Ql1ARTER f?F TIDE b' cS) ~ 50LtT1-i~:AST QUARTER OF S~i~7'IC~N 11 u T4WN5!-EIP 3? ~Oi1TN, RA1+tGE 2 WEST, ~ ~«~£ r~ ~ R~K ~°"",~,.~.., }W+~1rL~Ir~AyMEI'TE MyrERC~~~yICAr+~^l~~F t2~ y~i50 Sy~Sgty{ JALrt`~."7. 4.~/iY ~~~T i j 1./i`rl-~.+i'i ,,,,,y s~ P I T T Y~ I E W A ~/ E N U~ e.t'C~rvii`~w xvExa~E ~ ,2D6 .,-•KCnw :_!xa cx okrcN GEttTRAI. i~ttT, oRFi~bli TELEi'SKkiE ra.X -'{~'•t--- •'~'"'-ru. ...-... °" '-`">a F~$RUARY 8, X005 N Ek7F.S7Alp $atiRU recs: IV E~~r?! ~*~ . I~S +.~'S~ L DIUYt.N+lY ,f. ..~ .r kl liEYEkx ~ 10` PUE DCi~TiFdG F>~R PIT"Y'Yl~W SUS Gruver $n th~1 5k ON ~AGt'i 51DE t3F I D't~ LINE ~ ~ °'`!"i ail ~ ~""~ ~- A w H ~ ~ ~ Trrse~Lr,Y~ rs~: ~ # 1 3 rp 4°-,- ~,' ~'"`~ 1!y~M1~ ~ j ra'r~s.~ ~kue U ~l uNn 5uRVEYlr7G 1 { {~ S ~~ jj¢,}~ '" 5!M'v ~ KERRY K. $RAU3HAY/ /.a. 327) ,~~~ i ~ l ~ r ~ i ~ ~ CElfiRAt POiiYF' 4REC~+ RT541 s ~ ~.R ~aoe ~ ~i ~ ~ _ _ ......., _ ...i ~ I. ~ {a;$)cw-7slo c~k nw-ccaz y,~ ~, .111 ~ i L.S ~ l t rca~saE carkE 1 !'CE7 t"i !! i 3 t7,~_o~_,~~s~~F..-~~~^~~''~~}+`~~~~' ~ ~ - cuRS ~5xc~+ currt~z. 'J4l~~J ~ >3 I pk,t~+ ~~`'' .~' ~ T3 TiR {iL•DFtp6 h iYi73i` ~-i ~ L~.i3F9 ft~.EP~ 1,1SJLE15 NC7'i'~ ~ ~yr,+~.. "••" ~~ y ~1~` ~ I ~~ (~,~ '6 .JJINT FkL~1.Ee IJ]'1[.E~a6 liL7't'EA LT;~ a,r,..~ ,y ~i~~ sra~ k`"'- ~ ~ ...~.--- CHAiNwUNKED FENCE i tt \1~r1t ! J qQ,.' 15! INGI N ~~ 1 -c«L- t7Ji~'tN1rAD LtNE5 T37S f ~. ~ suEC,~ r.S75.R?~t.kiCH t(? n. ksoo L _ J k~ '~1 ~I s TL taoo p.u.E. ~usLrc ltiTLiTY E~+.sErtENT '-~ ~ t 541ED I ~t (_ _ ~k~ StI _~, ! "' ++ork ~!~ „~ ,~,~. ~~ ~ 55C7F1 SANITARY 8~1ER 1'IANFIOLE - ~ij~ A- ~W{ SDMF! S7L~ftM ARAtN ~ '!00'E 134.17 " T Q ~ T'REE r"'"`"i ~ ~ ~ --5s-- UNDERGROUND £+ANiTARY SEWER 1 ~ -w- UNDERGROUAtD WATER 1 i 1 T«kT5 R.4W 1lLip ~Jk U7IL17Y ~tiEC'11E1~"E' ` 1 ~IkHHEY F'RCkF'05ED (PRIY'41'E} ~ F'AR~EL. 3 ~ 1 q BENGN MARK Izc~o ~1" T.'! iStt "" :'°h ~ ~ $RA55 Df5C !N 1 NF:ADWAf.L OF BRIDGE ON SEALL rkERRkiT ~ i ~ ~ 4rUiE CKER ELK G ` REG153EREl7 ~ 3 ~' ELEVAT(C!k 12Q3.Cf FEET CITY OF C!']~iTRAL Pk7iNT PROFESSiANAt DATUM {FF31l4) LANp SURYEYQR I 1 s' P.u,e. C1 ~ $!t. x sslwa Fwx ORECpH T~'75.f2.2W.ilC4 'n~ JOKY kK !M {~ t.~''IT IR; I:RYA~.! ~~ 1•~T KERFYY K ggRADSHAW l127t T.l75,R.7lI.MW T.3TS.f2.3H1.iI0$ 7.'37S,R.3W.kICd ~ ACREAGEk 0.65+r- ACRE r.%!, k7-3k-tr3 9P15KL SPR ILL ¢pt2LfiLL LUT 3 l.OT 2 L4T { ZONING. Ra-a EASY S T R E E T ,~7.3TR.2N.IIE18 TL 33aa 5 l1 S D I V 15 1 C? N =,uElrt' ~ of r sN~ET_/ --- - '~ ; ' tt~~ '1M ~1 _, rA,~.a _ ,__ ~. .~ -c=ea.a c~ ~ 4i SE£ SHEET C2 J: OR PITTVIEW n j - .sa ~ ~ ~ AVENUE tMPROV£Mi~NTS. 1~, ~ °- .. 1NV'~P ° ~ I 9 A~G~" 13 v t~ , ~ ~ e7 f TL 1 x€00 ,~ ~ 4. VALLE ~ ~ _I-_ .~. -- --~-- ~ x I i 21' PAVED ACCESS ~ L.. _~.. _.._ _..,... ..~ P7 {}20LSF ~ { 8c PUE _ 3 ~ x ~ ~ J ~. ~ ~ C~ ~ \ ~x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.5% =87.35 ~__ < f` 12 ~ ~ -87.2 ~ _.___ T.375.€~.2W,11 ~ i W ~ ~ ~~J ~L ~ J~{} J LISK ! r ~ ~ ~` 1 F'AR EL 2 7.aa 8050 SF f ~ _1 L. __..~ 17 ~ ci =87.75 ~ ..._. • NOTE: WATER SERVICE L1N£S =g ~ 16 SHALL HRV£ 18" MINIMUM COVER LM p, g; "~"'" AND SHALL B£ INSTALLED OVER -~ f SANITARY SEWER AND STORM -- - -•- - ~ `~'L~ DRAIN W€TH fi" MENIMUM CLEAR ~ ~ DiSTANC£ AT CROSSINGS, i o ! I PARCEL 3 I ~ Soso SF ~, T.3~S.R.2N1.11DB ~ //f~ib~ h~y ~~~ROO ~ BEACH MARK ~ BRASS D3SC IN SOUTH HEADWALL OF BRIDGE ON BEALL LANE OVER ELK CREEK £LEVATtON. 1293.17 FEET CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DATUM (FEMA) - - - - CONTOUR INTERVAE.: ONE FOOT - - - - ._ - ~ I ~ SITE P~A~! SCALE: 1 "=2a' TACT IFORATIt7N j-•' .. ~~ #~ ~ECE~D RVEYOR: GAS COMPANY: JAGKS4N COUNTY ROADS AND PARKS ~.<<nn ,,," ~: .._ .... Bob Pierce, C?iroctor Public Works De at~finertf ~~~f~ ,p `~T ~A Maff Samifore, ©ev. Ser~trices Coord. _...~. __..~.~...~ ~ ~ V 1 ~~t1~ .._.____._._.~_...~_ ~_._._._.____.._.___ ~_________.~._.._..___.__ ~t`~;~~r~t-~ P~B~1~C` ~C)RI~~' ~TA.~'F ~'.EPQR~ April 18, 2005 TC?: Planning Department FRC?M: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Minor Land Partition for 37 2W 11D8, Tax Lot 130(1 UV~hitten Minor Partition Applicant Ardele Whitten 845 Pittview Avenue Central Point, DR 97502 Prosy Description/ R-1-6 Zoning Pu~,~ase Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department ~PtiVD} standards, requiremen#s, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DevelopertEngineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. .Exrstirtg .~nfrast~-uctut~e 1. Streets: This section of Pittview is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County Roads. The road is currently designed with two twelve feet travel lanes. 2. Water: There is an existing eight inch water line in Pittview Avenue. 15~ Socrth Second Street ~ Central Point, CSR 9752 •5~1.664.332~ ~ Fax 54~.fifi4.6384 ~~ Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power {PP&L}, .Cams {Avista}, Coznznunications {Qwest}, and unitary Sewer {RVSS}. In working together it is the Department's expectation that tl~e developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns anal work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to tl~e developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Vilorks Department, to scree the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. .Developtttent Plans -Required .fitfortttatinrt Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 9S°la complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS, Fallowing plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall subrriit {4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sazaitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Perttrit A Public Works Permit will only e issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Puhlic Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the f nal plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements {as determined by the Public Works Director}. Wliittert ll~inor Partition -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95°lo complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works 955 South Second Strut ~ Central Point, CyR 975x2 + 549.664.3329 ~ Fax 549.864.6384 .:~. ey Department. 2. C}nce approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. T~T'hitten Mintar Partition - Protection crf existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1, The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2, All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction ofpublic works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifzcally designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of tlae Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. ~T'hitten .Minor Partitr""can -- ~Yater Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor sha11 provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the C}regon "Mate Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon Mate Kealth Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. X55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, t7R 97502 ~ 54~.6fi4.332~ ~ Fax 59.664.6384 _, a~, . 2. The Gity of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. T3''liittett Ming Pat•titivn --Streets The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations anal provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety anti. mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA} or as adopted by the C}regon Department of Transportation ~ODC)T}, tJregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TCJD, neighborhood plans; approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. N~hitten Mittot• Partition - St©t rat Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. if a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. if the Gity does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of {7regon DEQ, DSL and UDFW and United States GCE and consistent with AP~VA Storm Water Phase 11 requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted far specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Whitten Minor Partition - R~riuired Subtttittals X55 Soufh Second Sfreef ~ Cenfral Paint, 4R 97542 •541.664.332 ~ Fax 541.fi64.6384 _~.~~` All design, constructions plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be n-equin•ed by ether agencies, including, but not linnited to Oregon Department of Piste and Wildlife {DFW}, Oregon Depaz-tnnent of Environnnental Quality {DEQ}, Oregon. Division of State Lands {DSL}, ~3regan Department of Transportation {OL}©T} approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority {RVSS}, and Jackson County Road and Park services Departnrnent {JC Roads), DAL and ACOE, as applicable {wetland mitigation}. 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. X55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97~Q2 + 541.~i64.3321 ~ Fax 549.F~i4.6384 :_ ATTACI-IMENT D PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL W~IITTEN SU}3DIVISICIN, FIDE 05043 CHECK NUMBER DESCRIPTIQN OF CONI}ITI©N BOX ~ of 2 ,E~ final plat applzcatlon shall ~~ filed wlt~llll Olle year of the Planning Commrsslon approval or the tcntatlVC plan apprOVal shall b~'coZ~e null and Vold. 2 of 2 The applicant shad comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the project area. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the City with written proof that all of the affected agencies are satisfied with the conditions of approval. itC~G~~Sl1CITY WIDEi~'LANN1NG15041145443COA.I~OC i. t4 CITY (~F C~I~TR~L POINT BZ~ILDI7~G DEI'AIZTIV.E~]T STAFF RFPURT APPLIGANT: Name: ARDE~E WNITTEN Location: PITTVIEW AVENi.JE City: GENTRAL POINT State: flR_ Zip Cade: 97~D2 C}WNER: Name: SAME PROJECT DESGRIPTION: Planning file no. C15C343 - MINOR LAND PARTITION BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building departmenfi with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Ghapter 4 of the £)DSG. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the fallowing information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. !~. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations far foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive sails, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads, e, When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geatechnical recommendations. 5. Gradingl excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSG Appendix J and chapter 18 and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradingJexcavatian permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. ~ foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. -~ _" CITY C}F ~ENT~:AL PC)I~T BU~LD~I~G D~PART~~NT STAFF R~PtJRT page 2 2. The upper ~ .~ foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6, To move or demolish any existing structures [orated on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7`, Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.20, This is not a plan review, This repor# is preliminary and compiied solely for use by the Central Poin# Punning depar#men# for use in preparing the Planning departmen# s#aff report. Central Point Building De By: Lois ~eE~edetti Dated: March 15, 2805. ~:. ~~~~~~~`t SEW~ra~fi~y RCI~UE VALLEY SEWER ~~R`VICE~ Location: 338 West Vitas 1Zoac1, Central Point - Mailing Adc3~~css: F?O.13ox 313(}, Central Point,t7R 97502-OOC}5 `1'el. {541) G64-G30{) or (543} 779-4144 I~Ax {541) 6G4-7171 www.liVSS.ns March 15, 2t}OS Ken Gerschler City of Central Paint Planning Department 1SS South Secand street Central Point, fJregon 975fJ2 Re:'V`~I~itten Partition, 372'~11DB --130(1, file # 05043 Dear Ken, FAN. 664-63 84 The subject property is within the RVS service area and the Stormwater Quality boundary managed by RVS. The existing house an Parcel 1 is served by a connection to the 8 inch sewer main in Pittview Avenue. The proposed partition wi11 not affect this service. Service to Parcels 2 and 3 will require a mainline extension from Pittview down the proposed access easement. RVS requests that approval of the proposed development be conditioned upon the following: 1. Applicant must design and construct the sewer main line extension in accordance with RVS standards. 2. Applicant must comply with erasion and sediment control regulations in effect at the time of construction. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, ~~~~~ Carl Tappert, P.~. District Engineer ~:IDATAIAGENC1ESlCENTPTIPLANNGIPARTrTION1204~51UJK1TTEN f}5043.Dt~C ~~. ~ ~' ~ ~ . ~~~ ,~acksc~n Counter Fire District ~~, 3 83 ~ 3 Agate Read White ~ityr C)R 9753-10~?'S ~~~-~.) sz6-~~.©© ~voice~ ~~~~.~ 82C-456 Sfax} March I4, 20(}5 Lisa Morgan - ~er fie: Whitten Minor Partition # lJ51J43 - `ire Safety Requirements • P©st street. signs " l~~iC} P.A-RKI1~~ ~-~Y T~+~," both sides and in the required ~~rn around area. Mark Moran DF`N.~ f -~ ~3/21/20~5 i~:~a. ~~~~~~4s~s~ ,~~c~«a~ caa~~~ ~~s ~~~~ ~~~~~ JACKSON COUNTY Roads March 17, 2005 Attention: Lisa Morgan City of Central Point Planning ~ 55 South Second Street Central Point, 41~ 975C}2 ~2,vads ~Ctc ~iern~yer, PE TYn~c ut: ,Devetopment Engine' ~C1LY Antelo~se f2aad `1Vhite City, CtR 57505 Pharte; {541}7~4-$~$~ Fdx' {b41 } 77A-f3285 rii~ri8yd1'~gaUtsoricounty,atg rvww.jacicsoncounfy.arQ RE: 11~lhitten Minor Partition off Pittview Avenue - acounty-maintained road, Planning File Q~04~. Dear Lisa: Thank you far the opportunity to comment on this application fdr the tNhitten Minor Partition. if apprr~vedk the partition would create a resi~lent'ral development that would have three parcels. The subject parcel is located can Jackson County Assessment Plat 372V'V1 ~ DP, Tax Lot ~ X00. Roads acid Parks has the following c©mrnents: 1. The applicant would need to submit construction plan., to Roads and Parks, so we may determine if county permits will be required. Road approaches from Pittview Avenue shall tae completed under permits from Jacl~sr~n County roads; Additionally, any work within the county's 60 foot right-of way shall be under a permit from this department. ~. Jackson County has a jurisdictiana! transfer program applicable tc~ County roads located within city limits. If Central Paint accepts jurisdiction of Pittview Avenrae, Jackson County would provide funding approxirrrate equal fio the cyst of asphalt surfacing the roadway. If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at T74Y6230. Since~relyf ~ L.~" Eric I~liemeyer, P~ Traffic & ~eveloprnent Engineer I:1~ngEnc~ringt~}avelapmentlCti IE~tC~lTFt1.PTiQ5C~d~.wpd i_ ' ~, l"~ ~, _ ~, ~'LA.NN~N~ DEP,A.RTMENT STAFF REP'CDR7[' MEETING DATE: May 1 ~, 2(305 FROM: David Alvord, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public I-iearing -Tentative Plan fora 21ot pa~~tition Known as "The Thomas Partition" located west of Dobrot Way in the R-L zoning district {Map 36 2W 34C, Tax Lot 35[10}. A~~caz~t: Gary Holt 1800 Cofer Butte Road Medford, Oregon 97544 (.)weer: Julie and Steve Thomas 1.541 Oleander Medford, Oregon 9'7504 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide a 1.00 acre parcel of land into 2 residential lots. Authority: CPMC 16.36.410 and 17.16,014 vests the City of Central Point with the authority to process this application as a Minor Land Partition and render a decision. Notices were ,given in accordance with law {Attachment "A"}. Applicable Law: CPMC 16.14.414 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 1'7.16.414 et seq. -Residential Low-Density District CPMC 16.36.410 et seq, -Major and Minor Land Partitions Discussion» The applicant has requested the City to approve a minor land partition. The original parcel is located in aLow-Density Residential District, with a minimum lot size of 15,40{} square feet per parcel. The original parcel is 1 acre in size; or approximately 43,560 square feet. The applicant wishes to partition his lot into 2 parcels so that a home site can be provided for a family member. Parcel One, once it has been partitioned will consist of 17,684 square feet and proposed Parcel Two will consist of 23,846 square feet. Both resulting parcels are well above the 15,444 square foot minimum, {refer to Attachment "$"}. 11~~chsllcity wzdelPlanningi{}54441050~5 Dobrot Partition.doc Thv Tentative Plan {Attachment "13"} shows an existing home and garage on t'arcel C)ne; the garage which is 84~i square feet will be reduced down. This will accomplish two things; {1} to accommodate the extension of the driveway along the south property line; {2} to meet the covered parking requirement afcwo-vehicles per residence. However, CPMC t'7.tf.(}50 {D-3} states that any building located in a side yard being served by a driveway must be setback from the driveway by 2fl feet. The applicant can either build a new garage ar a carport in a new location on the lot to comply with the covered panting requirement. Parcel Two has a small shed located on it, the applicant plans to remove the shed from Parcel Two prior to building a residence on Parcel Two. Currently, the pause that is located on proposed Parcel One is on a private well system; asix- inch asbestos water line runs to the north of the home but there is not a waterline in front of the existing residence. Parcel One is served by RVS~. The applicant can bring water to parcel two by taking one of two options. The first option is to obtain an easement from the neighbor to the north to set additional water meters and extend an 8 inch water line to the south. Option 2 -the applicant could sink another well to service the new residence. If the applicant wishes to have a well drilled, he will be required to show approvals from Jackson County Health prior to final plat. Dabrat Way is classified as a Local Access Road. A "Local Access Road" means a public road that is not a county road, state highway ar federal road. Local access roads are roads that have been dedicated to the public but not accepted by the County for maintenance. Local access roads can become County roads through the Local lmprovernent District {L11} process. Access to tooth parcels is off of Dabrot Way and is shown as 20 feet wide, with a PtJE incorporated into it. The city standard for private drives is 21 feet in width; Public Works has commented that a PUE will not be allowed as a part of the driveway and the applicant will be required to dedicate a 1(}-foot PUE adjacent to Dabrat Way and the private drive on the final plat. A "Local Access Road" means a public road that is not a cannty road, state highway or federal road. Local access roads are roads that have been dedicated to the public but not accepted by the County far maintenance. Local access roads can become County roads through the Local Improvement District {LiD} process. 11Cpchsilcity widetPLanningt05044t05~45 Dobz~ot Partitipn.doc There are three kiands of local access reads: • DeededlDedicated (Nan-maintained} Roads have aright-af way that has been deeded or dedicated. to the general public, however, there is na responsibility upon any person{s} or agency to maintain the traveled roadway. l-listorically, by default, local landowners have taken primary responsibility far maintenance of these roads. (example: Dobrot Vijay} • Restricted Residential Roads have aright-of--way that has been dedicated to the general public. Additionally, there is a formal maintenance agreement among all the property owners who have a driveway off the road or are otherwise served by it. The owner maintenance agreement is stipulated in the public record when the right-of way was originally created. • Court Declared Public Roads have aright-of way that has been declared open to the general public by a judge in a court of law, Generally, these roads result from court cases in which someone claims a legal right to an existing traveled roadway where na right-of-way exists as a matter of public record. Usually the court does not establish maintenance responsibilities and the right-o~E way width is typically limited to the width of the existing physical roadbed. The residents in the area have raised concern about sharing the costs ofraad maintenance, such as re-surfacing. These concerns will naturally become greater as this section of the city begins to grow and mare parcels derive their access from the road. As of now, there is not a mechanism in place to ensure that all residents along Dobrot Way actually pay for their share of the cast. It is retarrunended that a shared maintenance agreement bt retarded along with the final partition plat to ensure that these Costs will be equally shared by all the residents clang Dabrat Way in the future. Additionally, the developer will be responsible for the installation of Curb, gutter and sidewalk slang the section of his property that fronts Dabrat Way. At this time, such improvements da not exist within 500 feet ofthe proposed land partition and therefore a Deferred improvement Agreement between the applicant and the city will be allowed. Properties to the west have a county zoning designation of Exclusive Farm Use ~EFU}. The Tentative Plan shows there is a 75-fact buffer zone an the west property lz'ne of proposed parcel two, which includes Griffin Creek; the mandatary 25-fact top of bank setback is included within the 75-foot buffer zone which is required per CPMC 17.16.050 (F}. Storm water drainage far Parcel Cane Consists of curbside ditches along Dabrat Way. Drainage far Parcel Twa Could be Contained and diverted to Griffin Creek that flaws slang the rear of the second parcel. Additional storm drainage requirements will bt per Public Works requirements and specifications. Setbacks far the R-L zone are 20 feet from the front lot line, 10 feet on the sides; provided however, that side yards abutting a street or a proposed ar planned future street shall also be subject to the following. "Far structures or a part of any structure served by a driveway located on the side yard, the minimum side yard setback, for that part of the structure serving the driveway, such as a garage or carport shall be twenty feet" {CPMC 17.16.050 (D-3} and 10 feet from rear lot lines". 11Cpchsllcity widelP]a~u~ing1050441050AS Uobrc~t Partition.dac .~ r~ Reca~'nmendatior~: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions. l . Approve the Tentative Minor Land Partition, Resolution No. based on the Findings of fact contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions ofapproval as set forth in this staff report. ~. Deny the Tentative Minor Land Partition based. on the findings of Fact articulated by city staff; or. 3. Continue the review of the Minor Land Partition at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A. Notice of Public Hearing B. Tentative Plan C. Planning Department Conditions of Approval D. Public Works Staff Report E. Building Department Staff Report F. Comments from agencie f'~le.t~~- ~c~~+rS 11~pchsllci#y widell'lanni~7g105044toSO45 S3obro# T'ar#i#ir~n.dac x'~ r.~ ~~~ Torn }iurnphrey, A€CP Camrnunity t7eve€apment pireetor Ken Gerschler Cornrnunity P€anner Cave Alvord Camrn~nity Planner Lisa Morgan Planning 'Technician I~IotiGe O~ Pt~I~~1G Hearing date of I~atiGe: April '12, Zf305 tVleetin~g date: May 3, 2005 Time: 7:030 p.m. {Approximate} PIaGe: Central Point City Hall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, aregon I~ATUI~L QP #~I~~TING Beginning at the move time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Minor Partition application. The purpose of this application is to createtwo individual tax lots. The property is located within an R-L, Residential Low Density zoning district. The property is identified an the Jackson County Assessor's map as 36 2W 34C, Tax Lot{s} 350fl. The property is located north of Scenic Avenue, and south of Interstate 5, and west of Del Mar. The address is 5205 Dobrot Way. Pursuant to 4R5 197.703 {3} {e}, failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in wri#ing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NC3TICE TC3 ~'IC~RT{~AG~E, LI~I~H~}L©~R, VEIL©t~Fi ~R SELI~~R: t)t~S CHAF'T~R 2'15 Ri~QUIR~S THAT IP 1l'E3U I~ECEIV> THIS I~~TICE IT ~dUST ~F ~Pt~b#IiPTIb.~' F'~R~AR~L~3 Td THE PtII~CHAS~I~. This notice is being mailed to property owners vrithin a 200 foot radius of subjecfi property. CR,I`t`~I~IA I'll D~CISI~~! The requirements for a Minor Partition application review are set forth in Chapfiers 16.36 & 17.16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to general Information and conditions of the project approval. PCI~~IC C~II~~~TS K~ ,- .~ . .-„ ~: ;; ° ~ Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 3, X005. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Hall, ~ 55 South Second Street, Central Point, Or, 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File l~tumber is 05045. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page, 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at {54'I} 6fi4~3321 e~ct 292. SUMMARY ~7F PRC)CEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application{s} and technical TEN7A7YVEPLA7" C. ~ D B t? C? 7' WA Y PJ 9 R 7 "l T! t 7N Lora#ed !n 7:38 S. R.2LY. W.M. SW114 of S:~'G. 34 ttitM. J&ch'san Gaunty, flregan H ~_ [~[~~~~ C^' t 1 r teJLi x rxlrutl rr;tt 7)rnrr.txrr J I~ t ltrtJ xtrfilltllF !in{r{ltlr .-.. ~YnMi l JxflFltt tltfJfi ~.. ^ ^ u...... .... 1rJYttr~3xr! rlJir J frrkixtpt r+Y.Jfrtfft ti `^~ !v ~3 i ~ i;y ] ut !i r. ~ ~ tii axJ. rrxlrlJ! {er (may )) rrxrrcrrJ r{ n _... \` \\ \`\ {t Nil trn) ~\h, \ tonto-xn, \ '~\ xaxn uuuxuxr r.rrnur '`.~ \r_~__~~_~___. it{!rJ ilxrt ~ xxfkri r lbfr {Jit{(f 7,lrrrhxri! ~ xuYNr.1Nt trrtl~JlSUr{f rl! irY.{rrl if{f Jrxr{ ntlJfxifxt tlY.!!kr}tl J ...» ........., -........./j rnNx trxtrr xrrrtu.+,r+ ruv rut,lrrr rux rrr {NJ+ 1r ~ fixtxt x trN!/Y tYllxr (~ tl7Y)Sf.)Sir f : +` frtlk J(xNxxrlxr rIX.N{!!rx {~ r ! kffR ~ ~` r ~~ ~ xixtr)xx #r!t ~ urrur.xxu ' t x+xn xrx»r,fru rrY.urtr)r 3 xrrr uux xrJrxu.»» xJ{r! ixlruertu uY.{tNtfl ______.~M.._a rxxfr i bluu iiyl xt)Y7lr~f Nr I JJJri t7xnJ{r!!t NYMtk7f1Y t xitxJJJ xiltfltl!{tixlix JxWlit.axi{ f Nx!{xF}fu{rdF flr.rrNttr ~' VfalNlIYMAF BTkYE'JIt117JY47f rfKa11{S ~~. norw.tr QE'NTRdGPO~Jf ONRr3PP2 J~Fi~trcxaNr ~NO1N,~~~ a+nrhacr' r+wr~~rJOrN~rrn~yrNa raaucrar~antrrr>:~un rrrs~ernurNSr.surr~ra .u~+tnwu or~crcwrraot x~soFataz onora~ar t~NplSSJtCl4~J3c3~ 2aNtNG i.otcR~ ~ Fd.R5sttsFN7rJ.ttolKntusm" Ylfr600 SO. F76flNldttRt torsr~ at~r~ Aluaiq.,¢r%xS L['l?Rt aS'SaHIP77aN OatAVli1Y'At JI rM xWfxLt;7 A1RKd N iWNtKM tM1Sts nAU fli M fcm'Sr# 3l xanlr; 6itYJ' S K51 kxlAYri'fJ uLix'iaY .rsu%ar m.,xrr air«.~ rurr {fsr »aa r[ mrnrr rraem ».w Jxrr,~ !A 7xC lrkt r>xart W &'C+~n"x'4 tnYx:t n 31at{ JFtI,~ m[}rrt hKwrM a ruauFxr 7 rxwrr; test, fxxu rrnr fMJxr rwsr, srnx{x; an miner xrxrm rata m nc rnrx ruxrr a rsrexwxvc ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~, a E ~ '> .Vx~ ~. a ~G $ ' ATTACf~MENT "C" PLAI~I~3ING DEPARTMEi~"T CE'3~11~fTIC)N~ C}F APPRC?VAL Dobrot Way Minor Land Partitiozl, i~ILE {15~14~ CHECK ~ 1VU1l~BER ~ UESCRIPTXQN 4F CC?NT.~ITICTN ~~~ ~ E I ~ 1 of 4 A final plat application shah be f"iied Within one year of the Planzling # Commission approval or the tentative plan approval shah become 1 null and void. Should the applicant Wish to provide a Weli to the neWiy created parcel; prior to the City signing the final plat or processing permits, the present or future applicant{s} shah provide documentation from Jackson County Health Department approving file neW Weii. 2 of ~# The applicant shall comply with ail federal, state and local i regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the project ~ area. It is the responsibility ofthe applicant to provide the City With written. proof that ail of the affected agencies are satisfied With the __.. _ ._ ~ conditions of approval. 3 of 4 The structures shall meet the required setbacks. The garage Within ~ the 21-foot-private drive right of Way shall be moved to a minimum of 2C~ feet away from the driveway. 4 of 4 A shared maintenance agreement for Dobrot Way shall be recorded along with the final plat to ensure that maintenance costs are equally shared by all residents along Dobrot Way in the future. _.__ ___ _ - ----..J ti~pchsllcity widelt'zazzazng\05044t(}~045 l~obrot Partition.dac xs _ ~=? h-, ~f ~. Bob Pierce C3irector Public Wanks Ile arlmer~t ~~;_°~ ' ~ ~~-~~» 11Aett Samitore, flev. Services ~©ord. P~~IT~ , ~.TTACI~MENT"D" %~~~~~vn P ~BLIC YY~CJRKS 5~.~.FF' .R.EPDR I' April 18, 2(305 T©: Planning Department FRDM: Public Works Department SUBTECT: .Minor Land Partition for 36 2W 34C, Tax Lot 3500 Dabrat Way Partition Applicant Gary Holt 1$00 Coker Butte Raad Medford, ~3R 975(14 Pte. ~~X Description/ R-L Zaningixne Purpose Provide information to the Planning Comrriission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as ".Developer") regarding City Public Works Department ~PWD~ standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Paint Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted far any information not contained in a Public Warps Staff Report. Existing .irnfrastructure 1. Streets: Dabrot Way is a Local Access Road. The right-of way is public, but the maintenance responsibilities are Chase of the property owners. 2. Water: There is an $-inch water line to the North ofthe subject property. No water line is present in front of the existing residence. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, C3R 97542 +~ 541.664.332 <~ Fax 541.664.fi384 E u~~ .;~,: 3. Storm Drain: There are existing curbside ditches. Dabrot Way Partition Special Requirettrents l . Public Utilit~Easement {PU ~: The developer shall dedicate an the Final Plat a ten feet wide public utility casement {PUE} adjacent to Dobrot Way and the private drive. The PUE cannot be located within the private driveway as depicted in the Tentative Plat. ~. Pittview Avenue Improvements: Developer will be responsible for canstrc~cting curb, gutter, and sidewalk for the subject property. Because the area does not have any curb, gutter or sidewalk within 5{?(} feet a Deferred Improvement agreement will be allowed. 3. Grading Permit: Applicant shall abtain a grading permit from the Building Department prior to any construction occurring. 4. Private .Drive: The standard private drive for Central Paint is twenty-one fect. Applicant will need to amend the plans to reflect this standard. 5. Addres~ s_i~: Addressing for the site will he made from Dabrot Way, The Private Drive will not be a named. ~. Water: The developer will either need to abtain an easement from the neighbor to the North to set additional water meters, extend the eight inch water sine to the south in order to serve the subject property, ar will need to drill a new well to service the new residence. If the developer chooses the last option, of drilling a new well, they will need to provide documentation prior to Final Plat that it has been approved by Jackson County Health Department. Standard Specifications attd GaaLs The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities, In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and LTnifarm Standard Details far Public Works Construction" shall govern haw public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications frazn the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately screed by public facilities. Public facilities not awned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L}, Gas {Avista}, Communications (Qwest}, and Sanitary Sewer ~RVSS}. In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the 1 ~5 South Second Street ~ Central Point, C.~R 975012 •541.66.3329 ~ Fax 541.66d.63&4 developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a prof table development and will not sacrifice duality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public imprave~nents necessary, as determined by the Public tVorks Department, to serve the development. The Department and the develaper also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Z?evei©pment Plans -- .Required Xnfarrnation Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95°!0 complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as Ii.VSS. Fallowing plan review, the pla~~s will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval, Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profrle for streets, water, starrr~ drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. ,Public Wr~rks Perratit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final constriction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the develaper. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improveanents {as determined by the Public Works Director}. Z?cabrvt ~'ay Fartiti~n -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95°lo complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit faun sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construotian records and inspection. 155 South Seconci Street ~ Central Point, C?R 975(72 « 541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the held. A mylar and digital copy of the f nal "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed, Zlobt•ot Way Partition -Protection of ,Lxistirr~ FaciCities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any publz`e works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the ,..,#: _ Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. ~obt•ot Way Faa~tition -- Water Connection 1. Water system designs shad consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide tl~e necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifzcations should be consulted for specifzc information regarding the design. and construction of water system related components. 1?obr•ot Way Partition - StY~ets X55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, C7R 375t?2 :549.fi64.332~ ~ Fax 54.684.6384 i~ ~ ~ ~~ (,~' 1. The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracl£s, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act {ADA} or as adopted by the Oregon Department ofTransportation {ODOT}, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastzucture. Uohrvt Way Partitintt - Sta>atn .Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the proj ect, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has forrzzerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. if the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE anal consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase ll requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. ]7r~6rot Nay Pa~•titian - Required Subrrzittals 1. All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any peri~iits, variances, approvals and conditions as maybe required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife {DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ}, Oregon Division of State Lands {DSL}, C}regon Depaz-tmerzt of Transportation {C}D{~T} 955 Soufh Second Streef ~ Cenfral Point, OR 975x2 « 549.864.3321 ~ Fax 541.564.6384 ~~ k-~ _~ ..~ {_- approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape beans, LT.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ALOE}, affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley ~az~itary Authority {RVSS), azzd Jackson County Road and Park Services Depaztznent {JC Roads), DSL azzd ACME, as applicable {wetland mitigation). 2. Fire Distzxct No. 3 must approve all streets and water izxzprovement plans in writing prior to fzz7al review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shah be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 155 .South Second Straot ~ Cezatral Point, QR 975(?2 •54~.fifi4.3321 ~ Fax 541.5fi~.6384 c5 `. C~TTACt~~i~'~T `°E~3 APPt..1CAl~1T: Name: GARY HALT Lacafian: 520 D4BRUT WAY Gift': CENT[~AG PQ1NT State: C3R Zip code: 875~~ QWNER: Name: STEI/E ~ J1J~.lE THQ1tAS PRC)JEGT n~SG€~1PTIC)N: Plannin fie na, 05045 - M1N4R LAND PARTITiQN StJ4LD~~i~ dEPARTMENT CE3t~~1l6ENTS: 'l . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with ail current State of Oregon adapted codes. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit 'sssued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Palnf Elecfrical DeparEment. 4, Provide the building department with a Ceotechnical report as required by ~3SSC Appendix J and chapter '18 and Chapter 4 of the CJI~3~C. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plat plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b. l~escriptians and classifications of the materials encaunfered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recamrnendations for foundation Type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects o€ adjacent loads. e. tfirrhen expansive sails are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness, Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Gradingl excavation permits are required in accordance with C~SSC Appendix J and chapter ~ 8 and ObSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or s#ructure sf~alf be placed irr accordance with accepted engineering practice. A sail investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of f Il (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Buildirtg C1fl'RCial shall be submitted prior tc~ final flf the gradingiexcavation permit. wilding permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation permif is finalled. l;xcepfion: 1. The upper ~ . ~ foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of~ v~ray. _~ ~t STAI'F ~EPQRT ~~ ~. The upper 'l .~ foo# of fail #hat does not underlie buildings, s#ruc#ures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any exis#ing s#ruc#ures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requiremen#s. 7. No#ify the Gi#y Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development ~ any man-made change} #o improved or unimproved real es#a#e lavated wi#hin the flood hazard area of the Gi#y of Cen#ral Poin# shall require a Development Permit as se# forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8,24.'l~g. This is not a plan review, This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Department for use in preparing the Planning Department staff report. Central Point Building Department By~ Dated: March 1 ~, 20015. ~. enet#et#1 ~~ March l4, 205 Lisa Dorgan -Planner ~3 ~ ~~~~~ ~.~~d C5~~.~ X26-7xoa (voiced ~541~ 82&-~56~ ~~~~~ ~T 11-~CHMENT "F" ~ `.~~ Re. #~1~Q45 ~c~br©~ may I~in+mr P~~c~n ~ Past street signs "NC} P.~~~G A~~.'" T`Il'VT~" both sides and in the req~red t~~. around area. ~ ~t~inim~zm. 20 foot driveway width. (~ could not tell the drivev~ay v~ridth offthe plat ~ was given. R~ar~ Moran DF~ 4 i ~ ~~ i} ~. 88,151288,5 15:18 5~11666G1`~171 RVS F~3 :~ z _" A'I"TACT ~NI~I~IT "~'„ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ifoc~#ioti: 1-38 West Vils& ltvad, Ceztt~ ~'vzsat - lvZa'tlin~ Address: P.C}. Box 313{x, Cu-~t~1 poir~4'~R 975~Ot105 `~3.. (541} fi64-fi30a oz` X541} ~73n41Aa4 SAX (54~} 6f~#-7171 w4vs~.RVSS_us FF "» lVLarch 1.5, ~OflS ~.en Gerschler City of Central paint Plarsni:~xg I~epaxtment 155 Sauth second Sheet Central, Paint, C7re~;an 97502 Re;1]ob~'ot Way ~'artitiom, 352W3~€C -- 350D, T~`i~e # 05Qd5~ Dear Tien, The subject property is within the RVS service area. and the Starm~vater Quality bouz~daxy managed by RV 5. Tlae existing pause on Parcel 1 is sertred by a corinectian to the 8 inch sealer main im 17a1~rot Viray. The proposed partition will nvt affect this service. Service to parcel 2 Will recluixe anew connection to the main line and extension of the service lateral dawn the proposed easement. RV~ xequests that approval of the proposed development be conditioned upon the fallowi~.g. 1. Applicant must abtai~ a sewer conxrectian Permit axed pay related development fees to Roue Valley Sewer SexVices. 2. Applicant n'iust comply with erosion arzd se~ent canhol regul.atiaz~s % e~"ect at the tirtae of coustrrzctian, Feel £ree fio call me if you have any questions regardi~.g tllaxs praj ect. Sixtcerely, Carl Tappert, P,E. District En~i.neer K:IAA.TA~A.CENC~SIC:~~T'T~'LAGtPARTITTt~N12flt~S11:?t~SRC~T {}5045.~t~C Central ~'oint City Fall 1 ~5 South 2nd St Central faint, CSR 9'502 Centlerxsen: April 29, 2~t1~ We are not in favor of allowing the creation of two individual tax lots at 5205 Dobrot Way. 'There are a number of reasons why we oppose it, such as crowding, increased traffic, sett;ng a prudent for partxt~o~~zg, t.'i^v, ~3Lit {3~.Ir ~?r2*~S'~ai~' Ci~II~^veTn ~s t~iv rC?ciC~ 2tati°,.}~~. ~5.3 yf2'~ l~now, the city of Central Point does not maintain Dobrot Way, but is maintained by the property owners of Dobrot Way. Twice in the past 25 years we have gotten together and contributed money for the re-surfacing of the street, and both times one property owner has declined to contribute to the joint effort, {a different owner in each case} mal~ing it proportionally mare expensive £or those of us who did cs~ntribute. Since we have no power as individual land owners to tax our neighbors, we are at the mercy cif those who do not want to contribute. In both cases the owners who chose not to participate were newer residents cif Dobrot Vday. Thanks for this chance to express our sentiments. Cordially, Bev and .Duane Shinn 5092 Dobrot ~X: ay Central Point, {~R. 97502 ~~ A~ 3 2~~~ ~I`rY ~~ t~~t~7~3AL ~C31~T E----t~ N tV a t.~C.~ ~ M ~-~t t s`s .~ ~.~.1 `~7 '-~ C.C "f"°r' ~ l µ ~: 1~' it,~l T"f~ 1~ ~_ ~ c~ l .E-F } `~.~ G1 f ~ ~. JUh t;~ `7~- G--~ tvy t '~~ E ~T"~-r~~"~-- ~ r I~-- ~ ~ i r '~ t~ 1~- /G'" 11--C.~` c.c1 a~.t ~ ~"I ~ ~!J U ~©5 '~ ~l '~~ P ~ w...--1:' ~ M l Tyr j i~+'f J'=~- lam./ -j !V ~. f % ~ +~ f~1 I'-yi~ i-~ /~-'..?"" ~ ~' ~. `~- ~ r x-7-7(,.f ~ c ~`'l G'~ 2 ~ .~ G~ ~ ~-- ~- ! .+tl ~c' S 1V) ~ ~..,tt.c,, - ~'1 ~ fit._.- ~ "'"t" T2- t-~ ~~i C.- .~ rt.-# T7 1v~ C~ 2-~ ~ '~ r~ x---12 ~ -f~i~3 ~3'~"2_... /~.,~ ~~~.! G~ u-' f.-t ~-~ iz- ~ t..>; t,1 l=l--~.~ i~,-r-}r7.-~? c.~ ~" -7" 1-,r=te"- r fZ a' lr`'-~1->~ r.~ ~ ~ Y„-. `~`" ~~" +~--- C..~3`r- . '7"`. C~ f~' l~ ~- f" l~ l f'~- S r ~2-i'~,.J~ ~ L7/Y2 ~. i 1.11? ~~' I.~ 1..~ U`.! t G.-~~--- t 1~-~C.~ 7~z.~ F~ f~'"4`` --~"~~-~r !'~ :.a /-rr`,~-~.. rte.. ~ ~-.- ~ r2_ 1"J ~-~ `~ ~ t/~.~, ~r~ ~ ,cam ~--~.-' '~ t~-; ('J~-~ ~2..._ f ~ ~ f - J ._.....< 1 _ _~ '., ... 1 fl _.__,~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: May 17, 2005 TO; Central Point Planning Commission FROM; 1~.en Gersclrler, Community Planner SUBJECT; Pubhc Hearing --Tentative Plan far a 6 lot subdivision known as McArthur Court located south of Taylor Road and west of Kaskeli Street in the TOD-LMR zoning district (Map 37 2`~V lOAB, Tax Lots 1600 and 1700}. Applicant! Owner; McArthur 1-iarnes Construction 1967 Taylor Road Central Point, Oregon 9'7502 Agent; Farber Surveying 431 Oak Street Central Paint, Oregon 97502 Summary.: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide two existing parcels totaling 1.1'7 acres of land into 6 residential lots. Authority; CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to bald a public hearing and render a decision an any application far a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Nearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 {Attachment "A"j. A livable Lave; CPMC 16.10A10 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 1'7.65 et seq. - TOD District Discussion- The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to subdivide two parcels with a combined aggregate area of 1.17 acres into 6 individual fats ranging in size from 6,707 to 11,570 square feet prefer to Attachment "B"). There are two homes with garages and storage buildings depicted on the plan, but Wane are proposed to be removed. The house on lot 1 !oaks like it crosses the boundary with parcel 2. The existing hawses will be required to meet the minimum 5 foot side yard setbacks and will need to 3 ~:tF'LANNIT~IGt504 t\0504 t.DC}C F.,s be retrof"ztted with two off street parking spaces; one of which will need to a garage or carport. Future ADU construction will require additional parking, City staff recommends that the Planning Commission require a condition of approval that the two sheds shown on Tots 3 and 4 be removed since these structures are located within the 25 foot special setback for Griffin Creek. if the structures are not removed, future landowners nay perceive tl•~at the buildings are "grandfathered" and add on or improve the structures. While a landscaping and architectural review for the project site and structures is not part of the land partition, the applicant should be made aware that the TQD district will warrant that these items be addressed prior to fznal plat. The existing lzoznes will need to be included in this component of the review. Setbacks for the TC>D-LMR zone are 10-1 S feet from the front lot line, 4-5 feet on the sides {depending on structure type} and 15 feet from rear lot lines. Any of the parcels with frontage to Griffin Creek will be subject to the special setback of 25 feet from top of bank. The maximum allowable height for structures is 35 feet. Access to the lots would be from a twenty-one foot wide private access road connecting to Taylor Road. The Public Works Department has identified the zninirnurn standards for the development and for the road in their staff report {Attachment "C"}. The Planning and Building Departments have submitted recommended conditions of approval {Attachments "D" and "E") for consideration by the Commission. Rogue Valley Sewer Services, Jackson County Fire District Three and the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District {Attachment "G"} have submitted correspondence for consideration by the Commission. Jackson County Roads and Parks had na comment. Findin s of Fact and Conclusions of La~v Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. Tentative Plat CPMC 17,65A50 establishes the zzxinirnurn area, width and access requirements for the T4A-LMR, Residential Single-Family District. In this district, applications can include a minimum lat size range Pram 2,000 to 5,000 square feet. The acceptable density range is 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. 1. The project site is located in the T{~D-LMR {Law Mix Residential) zoning district and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately l.l'1 acres into 6 separate lots. The size of each lot varies with the largest proposed parcels being located adjacent to Griffin Creek. If the areas designated as Right-of Way dedication and creek special setbacks H.iF'~.ANNiNGl5441 tf}5041.I~OC 3 ;. are taken into account, the minimum density caz~ be met. `l"he proposed lots arc located within an area where accessory dwelling units can be constructed which will eventually increase density within the development. CPMC 16.IO.p10 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted r~vifh improvement plans and other supplementary i~rformation as may be needed to indicate the developmeztt plan. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions in Attachments C and D. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: l .Adopt Resolution No., approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval, or ~. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A. Notice of Public Hearing B. Copy of Tentative Plat C. Public Works Staff Report D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval E. Building Department Staff Report F. Correspondence H:1T' LANNtNGiS 441145 44I . UC?C t~ ° t . °,: ~r~y ~~ c~~~-~~~~ ~orr~~ ~E~~T~~~.• PLANNING C3EPAI~TMENT ~~ ~ ~~ Torn Humphrey, AICP Community Deveiopmenf Director FCen Gerschler Community Planner Dave A[vorci Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Nearing Date of Nance: April 1 ~, 2005 Meeting Date: May 3, 20f35 Time, 7•.Of~ p:m. {Approximate} Place: Central Point City Hall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE tJF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan application. The purpose of this application is to create 6 individual tax lots. The property is located within an TGD-LMR, Low Mix Residential zoning district. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 1 OAB, Tax Lot{s} 160fl & 170#1, The property is located south of Taylor Road, and north of Palo Verde Way, east of Brad Way and west of US Highway 99. The addresses are 1945 & '19£7 Taylor Road. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 {~} {e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude 'an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE T4 Mt}RTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENpC.1R C}R SELLER: aRS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRE5 THAT IF Y©U RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TC? THE PURCHASER, This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 2Q#} foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for a Tentative Plan application review are set forth in Chapters 15.14 & 17,65 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. c~. PUBLIC CO~tIMENTs 1. Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 3, 2005. ,.,5. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Nall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Or. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Nail, '# 55 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is fl5fl41. Gopies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at {541 } 064-3321 ext 292. SUIV'iMARY {)F PRC3CEDURE At the meeting, the Punning Commission will review the application{s) and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony Pram the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application{s). if allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related #o the criteria set faith above. At the conclusion of the review the Punning Commission may approve or deny the application{s) as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point Gity Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. :'vltiTY Zvi Aim' Np Scaa A~~i. ~°. k ~' tartar Raac ~ ~k `a.P PrajacS 5:?a $o- c, >"~ .- ~+kaa 4~ 2 WATER iAE7ER5-.,, O ~ E -^ - _ RI.N _ ... _ _ -P~. _~ =~.. -per 1 ~ ~ ;~`~'"t 1 ~~ t t I'~-- T~?4MAS L & LYNOA t7 S ~ TOwLER ~ 37-2w^-taAB TL 1$Oa tt ~ ZahE LMR i t `~'' t l "'..- t i t t t t i III 1 t 4 1 "' l.~ Lows , - r ~ ~ 1 C3tY ~~ ~ Ct fiAt _ TAYLOR ROAD o~ ,,r~ `r~y, ~ ~ R ¢ r 21k .x*~~ -HCR'fH ttNE OF DLC 53 k THE CENTER LINE OC THE £7St9ItHG 7AY{,OR RO_d0 ~~--"~- S2 -----~~J {~4e~•~ 'A\4• 10#.i 94.4 ... 4 ~4 2#' Ui30ERCE?puND PLASTtO PIPE ~ 44' MaR 97DRN WATER $YS7EM ~ f .^'r Tl~ t ~.., ° TAYLOR ROAp Lar 7 t-.4`z'-sa 7777 Sq. f 6A5 uETER b h rtDUSE '" 0 ip' PVC PR ..-- • 11.4 .~ R+P#8 Lr+T5.3 c L6r 6 ?4t2 Sq.f}. ..~ ° '•' ~~ r °- _. ~ - - ia3.4 ~ iD.o 7a GARAGE 67D7 Sq.£t. ~ PATIO do LAYtK AREA LOr 5 73Q5 Sq.ft. c NWSE "` -R- 94.8 _ - --x -°---x--k-------- 'o ;- snEn LC77 3 '8 °i 2~. •.~„ 8985 Sq.ft. ° ~t't7r vas ~~~ trN~ -~.,, t757075q.ft. ORtr~~~ Lpr ,~ ! / REa7STEAED )t zstzor• z•;sszotsAZ. ~ LAiVt7 St3'Y2VEYOFt ~.ti,..+~ ~~ I ORE06M .tLY 2G, 1445 1ER~RY2188 AR9ER RENEWAL ttAtE 17-37-tl5 'SSORS MAP FILE NIT. 31 2W 10A8 77. iBDD,T700 for ~s r t r I 1 1 x•~~G~ro~ 1 ~~ p~kU~Dli~lsl4N 6RIVE KAROLYNE J JOHNSON 37-2w-taAS rL t5aa ZONE LMR a O.a~ o eo ~`"" ...,,ti -.. StlEO `'--. for 1~ 1 ,~~ / 1` `~ Lor r~ Ir t / ! 1 -~ i Srt$$t 9 pf ! Mc ARTHUR CDURT TENTATIVE SUBf~lVSlDN MAP located +n tha NOR7hlWEST ONE QtiAR7ER OF SECTION 36, 7OWNSNlP 38 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST; WlLLAME7TE MERIDIAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON far MC AR7NU1? HL?MES C©1~157RUC7TON ass? rartoR ROAfJ CENTRAL POINT, OREGdN 97SO2 MAP LEGt;ND ® r WA9ER METER RjW µ RlCNT-OF-S"IAY -C~ =POWER ROLE (PP&L) Eri---- a GtJY WERE -PL-- ~ OVERtfEAO POWER LtNE (FP&L) = FIRE HYDRANT pit =WATER bALVE i2a =GAS VALVE ,_ --x- ~+ FENGE ~~ ~:! ' °~"`= SEWER LATERAL (~ ~ STORM DRAIN MANHOLE' ~! STL}RM DRAfN GUR& tNLET o ~ SEP77G TANK RECORD OWNER ARGtiiE R & ELAINE C MO ARTHE3R 37-2W-taAB 7L 18a0-17aa ZONE LMR ~QT~S -- Tata! area = 57~.~fl Sq. l-t. - Centres! Paint Schap! p)st. Na. 6 - Fire District NO. .3 - Rague Rr'ver Valley lrrigatian gist. --- RagLle Valley Sewer Services Survayatl By. PARSER & SONS, 1NC. dba PARSER SURVEYING {549} 664-5599 PO aox seas ~3Y OAK STREET CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 SCALE: i` .+ 30' o• 30' sa' OA 7E: FEBRUARY 22, 20A5 JOB NO.: 730#-A5 pRAf41NC rll,E: J08S~LwhCM1 Potnk\NCArthur rY i+fo G+'a+kY A(kra5arv+y~Y+RtaIlW MCp.FCX 1~ubfic U'~orks Department pu~~~c ~o April 18, Z(l£}5 T{~: Planning Department 'ORT CENTRAL POINT B©b Piero, director JVlatt Samitore, C3ev. Services Ca©td. FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Tentative Subdivision for 37 2W 1 {}AB, Tax. Lots 160U and 170U McArthur Court Subdivision Applicant McArthur Homes Construction 1957 Taylor Road Central Point, (~R 975Q2 Property Description) T4D-LMR ~o.g ^ Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, recluirerrtents, and conditions to be included. in the design and development of the proposed. Lather information from the DeveloperiEngineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specif cations. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards &Specif cations should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Existing Infr~xstructure 1. Streets: This section of Taylor Road is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County Roads. The road is currently designed with two twelve feet travel lanes. 2. Water: There is an existing twelve inch water line in Taylor Road. 955 South Second Street -~ Central Point, 4R ~75U2 ~ 54 ~. fi64.3321 ~ Fax 54 ~. fifi4.6384 "~; ~" Storm Drain: There are existing curbside ditches 3W.icArthur Court Subdivision. Speciat ,Requirements 1. Right-af Way T?edicatian: An approximate 10-feat section of right-af way along the northern property boundary shall be dedicated far the widening and improvement of Taylor Raad {Note: applicant has shown the needed right-t~. f way dedication on their tentative flat) Taylor Raad is classif ed as a Collec-- tar in the City of Central Point Transportation System Plan ~TSP}, with a proposed right--of-way width of seventy six feet. The current right-off way of Taylor Raad is sixty feet. 2. ~torzn Drainages h~frastzucture: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides far run-off from and run-an onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 3. Public Utility Easement: Aten-foot wide public utility easement paralleling Taylor Raad shall be dedi- cated on the Final Plat. The easement will be shaven behind the area dedicated to the City of Central Paint far street widening of Taylor Road (Special Requirement 1}. 4. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape caws. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications far the trees to be planted within the land- scape caws. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 Ala" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automat- ic underground irrigation system. 5. Ta ly_ or Road Improvements: Developer will be responsible for constructing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and landscape row adjacent to the Taylor Raad. Developer has the option of building the improvements ar paying the City for the amount of the improvements pricer to Final Plat Approval. 1tiIa Deferred Im- provement Agreements are allowed for this section of Taylor Raad. 6. Private Drive: Central Paint Transit Oriented Development Guidelines allow far a private access drive to serve up to six lots. The drive shall be designed and constructed per the Central Point Standard and Specif cations. The standard private drive width is twenty-one feet. The applicant will need to amend the plans to reflect the City's standards.. 7. Addressing: Addressing for the site will be made from Taylor Raad. The Private Drive will not be named. 155 South .Second Street « Central Point, 4R 375D2 ~ 541.664.332 ~ ~ Fax 541.664.6384 Standard Specifications and f`vals The Central Paint Public Works Department is charged with management ofthe City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. in general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Paint Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not awned ar maintained by the City of Central Paint include: Power (PP&L}, Gas (Avista~, Carrununications {Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In warking together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specif cations are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is nc~t obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvernents necessary, as determined by the Public Warks Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans - Requr`red Infvrtnativn Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Fallowing plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be emitted to fixrther review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each con~rnent of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit ~4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. in general, the plan submittal shall include plan and prof le for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erasion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals, The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Warks Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Warks Permit is issued, 955 South Secarzd Sfreet ~- Cerafral Painf, CSR 975t?2 ~ 541.684.3321 ~ Fax 541.684.6384 .~ ~ except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the fugal plat application. is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements {as determined by tl~e Public Works Director}. ,McArthur ~'`vurt Subdivision -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95°lo complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Depart- ment, 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Depart- ment for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A my- lar and digital copy of the f nag "as-built" drawings will be required before the f~nai plat application is processed, 1V1'eArtliur Court Subdivr'sion -- Prutectinn of Existing .Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings far Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construc- tion, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and con- struction ofpublie ~svorks projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. McArthur Court Subdivision -Water Ccrnnectian 155 South Second Street F> Central Pains, C7R 97542 ~ 54~.664.332~ ~ Fax 54.664.6384 .~: e 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the (Jregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the C}regon State 13ealth Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Paint Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. McArthur Court Subdivision - Streefs 1. The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All de- signs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act {ADA} or as adopted by the 4regon De- partment of Transportation (4DC}T}, Uregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination ofthe pavement width and total right-of-way shah be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shad use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TQD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. .tl~"cArthur Court Subdivisiou -Storm gain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewexs entering and leaving the project area. if a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer nay use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. if the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be re- 155 Soufh Second Sfreef ~ Central :poinf, C3R 975{12 ~ 541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 . ~ ~~ wired to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shad be in con- formance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL anal ODFW and United States COE azid consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase ll requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific in- formationregarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. McArt7r ur Cnurt Subdivisrvn - Rerfrxir~ed Srr6mittcrrs 1. All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to accept- able professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limit~cl to Oregon De- partment of Fish and Wildlife {DFW~, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ~, Oregon Division of State Lands {DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation {ODOT} approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Coxps of Engineers {ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority {RVSS), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department {JC Roads), DSL and ACOE, as applicable {wetland mitigation}. 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shalt be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 955 Soufh Second Sfreef ~- Cenfral poir~f, CR 975Q2 ~ 549.664.3329 ~ Fax 549.664.6384 ~~ r~: ~. ~~ ATTACHMENT D PLANNING T~EPARTMENT CONDITIONS 4F APPRCIVAI~ McArthur Court SUBDIVISION, FILE 05041 C~~ECK NLT~VLSER DESCRIPTZC7~N {~F CC}NDITtC?N Ii{3X 1 of 3 A final plat application shall be filed wirthin one year of the Planzain~ Commission approval or the tentative plan approval shall become null and void. Prior to the City signing the final plat or processing perrrzits, the present or future applicant{s~ shall provide a landscape and irrigation. plan and architectural elevations for im rovements to the existin structures and for each new home. 2 of 3 The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and Local regulations, standards and. requirements applicable to the project area. It is the xesponsibility of the applicant to provide the City with written proof that all of the affected agencies are satisfied with the conditions of approval. ~ °f ~ The structures shall meet the required setbacks. The two storage buildings within the 2S foot special setback of Griffin Creep shall be demolished prior to the City signing the final plat. The applicants shall consult with the Central Point Building Department to detezxnine if a demolition permit is required. tiC£'CI-~SIICTTY WtI~EIPLANNII~G~SO41105D41CflA.DC7C ~~ -> z "~ ~., ~ ~-~°~ ~-~~..~~'~~ ~~ r HMV ~~ CITY OF CI~~T~:AL I'EJI~~T I3 CTILZ~I~~+IAG~, ~DEI~'},~p~.`I`~V1~NT k .ti.~.' J.` ~l~ QJE.\r~y APPLICANT: Name: MC ARTHUR NC}MES Location: TAYLOR ROAD City: CENTRAL POINT State: flR Zip code: g75C~2 OWNER: Name; ARGHIIr R, & ELAINE G. MC ARTHUR PROJECT I7ESCRIPTIflN: Plannin file no. 0~44'I - ~ LOT SUBDIVISION- MC ARTHUR COURT BUILDING DEPARTMENT GC}MMENTS; '[ . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed 'rt must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by flSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the flDSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Gradingl excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter ~ 8 and flDSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the -~- ~~' CITE' C3F ~~~TT~;A~, ~'C~~~IT BUILDT~G DIPAI~.TI~!I~EI~ST S``AI{T R.~PQRT gradinglexcavation permit. Building permits will not be issued anti[ gradinglexcavation permit is fina[led. Exception: 1. The upper ~ , 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fit[ that does not underlie build[ngs, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. ~. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building department for permit requirements. 7, Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.128. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely €or use by the Central Point Planning Department €or use in preparing the Planning Department staff report. Central Point Building Department By: Dated: March 15, 2C}0~. Lois Ja`enedetti -2- ~a . _~ ~, s e<~ var s.Lr .c..c..,...,..., a.a. ai ,~.a-TS. c r-eue,.1,.+ vr-xvsttisusr vvsai.~ ~ ,.r ..., { /} r,4<,... ,.,,~~ ,.,.., ~r~e Ntemeycr, Pa3 ?"r¢~c c"c 1~~.~uelr~#rntert# F_nE`ineer' 2DQ Anfe~7~e Road W bite Ctfy, OFZ 976{3 ~~ Phana: 45cE1 } 774-8230 ti Fax {,~"i4'f) 774-6295 ` nics~i~yet~j3j2cksancovnty.ar9 varnv jacksancour~#y.org March ~ ~, 2045 Attenticart, Lisa Morgan City caf Central P©int Plartrting ~ 55 South Second Street central Point, C}R 97502 R~. Subdivision ofl Ta~rlar Rand - a city-maintained section of road, Planning File; CI~fl4'1; 372W 1 C3AB Tax Trots '~ 64U and ~ 7{~4, Dear Lisa: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on t111s app~icatiar~ for the Mc Ar#l~tur Cote Subclivisian, Roads and Parks has no cornrnent. If y4~r harre any q€~estions car need further ir~~©rmatiorc feel free tc~ caiE me at 77~-~23D. Sincerely, ,~ ~1.,~.,,..--- ~ric l~lierneyer, PE Traffic ~. Development Engineer i;tEngi ns~ringlDev~iapcn~n#tGiT3 C=StCNTRLP"C10SOQ 1.wpd ~~ ~~ ~~.~.~1Z~7~t~, Cl.~! YJ~/ .Gr~Cl:J [J.~. J i ~~t,F~ J5: FY~h f . , ~~ Mal'ch 3, 2(~OS T..acatit~zt: 13$ West Yl&s Rt~d, Cept~t Paxat - Maziing Address' k~Cl. BoX 3190, Central, P~int,4l2 97St12-4d~15 TieJ. f54I) 654-300 c;r (541 779-41A4 SAX (542) 66~-7271. w~vw..~VSS.us Yen Gerschler l~`A~ 6~4M6384 City ol` Central Poinfi PXal~ling l~epartmeztt 155 Svuth~Seco~d tzeet Centxal Point} Qz~egon 9'7502 ~e.1Y~c Axthar Coua"t Subclivisxa», 'lie #OSt~1 Teal" S~.e~., 'here is a z~ew 8 azxch sewer rxtain ozt Taylor Road that cats be extended to provide serEr~ce to the proposed developrt~etzt. '~.~ cxtextsiol~ must be designed atld cansttucted ixl accarda~ce with RV'g staztdards. 'x'he proposed developzlrtent Faust comply with the water duality z equirena.ents of the Phase 2 NPAIsS permit which, are currently being developed. We l<equest that fihe followiz~tg coz~ditioxts be mefi prior to ~tlal plat approval: 1. .~.cceptance o~the sanitary sewer by l7.VS. 2. Cancuzxcnce by RV~ thst stoxluwat~ qualatty requirements o~the Phase 2 l~'I3l~S pmt have beela met. Feel free to :call me i~yau have arty questions xegaxding sewer sexvice £or tlazs pzoject. ~izzcexely, Carl Tappea;t~ 17istz%ct ~ngitteex K.1I~.AT.A,I~.GI1~tCTES1Cp~'TP'~Il.'LA~TNGISUBT~I"VI~IC?N'l20{lS1(15041- I',hC.ARTH~RCCJUR~`.T~4C ~,' $,. ~' X333 ~~ ~'~.~ ~ ~ ~~ X7503-075 (s4~) $~~-~~o~ ~~a {s~-1) sus-c~s66 ~~~ March 10, 2005 Lisa Morgan -Planning Tech Fire District #3 Comments far: Mc Arthur Court Subdivision #QSQ4l +~ Street Signage Required; "NU P.~-R[~iNG AT ANY TIME" both sides of the private access drive, • If the private drive exceeds 1511 feet in depth from the curb cut on Taylor Road fo the end of asphalt either and approved turn around shall be installed or all dwellings can be residentially sprinklers with an approved NFPA 13 residential type system to meet the Fire Code exception for no turn around. ~ No additional Fire hydrant will be required as long as the Taylor Road street realignment does not change the location of the fire hydrant shown on this plat map. Mark Moran DFM ~° ~x~ ,_, ~,.~ r` ;r S~~?~, ~ 'r.1 l ~ r~'~#:t ~h ~~~r," - ~~,; ~J ~ ~ ~.. ~~;1~. r;%r~i, `~~.. ~ ~~W 1'~L<~~_. ~..~gue I~.iver ~al~e~r ~rrigatic~n ~xStrict 3139 Merr'unan Road Medford, OR 975(1 ~ {54 ~} 7'13-612'1 Fax {54 t} '7"13-5420 Wcbsi#e: ~v~v~v.rryid.or~ May 3, 2045 ~C;ty ~f Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, flR 97502 Attn: Planner Re: McArthur Court, file # 05041 This pro,~ect fails inside the boundaries ofthe Rrrgue Raver Valley irrigation District. The district currently shows both tax lots, 372W10AI3,1'700 and 16{10 have irrigation rights. Landowner's must check with the district and show us how the water right assignments are to be placed. The Rogue Raver Valley Irrigation District requires that a subdivision review fee be paid prior to the districts written approval of this development. Please provide the district a check in the amount of $300A0 clang with a map showing the water rights assignments. If you have any questions, please contact this office. a Jeffiicher `~'` Manager, RRViD ~~~ SAY ~ 20~1~ GlTY bF GEtrlTRAt. P{J14~l~' a~ _. ~ ~'Qr/