Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - June 21, 2005CITY +DF CENTRAL FAINT PLANNING CCtJ~MMISSION AGENDA .Iu~e 21, x005 - '7:00 p.m-. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 6S5 I. MEETING CALLED T(3 ORDER IL ROLL CALL Connie Moczygeznba ,Candy Fish, Damian ldiart, Mack Lewis, Scott Mangold, Chuck Piland, and Wayne Riggs, III. C4I~:RESPUNDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and appxoval of June 7,2045, Planning Commission Minutes V. PUSL~C APPEAP:ANCES vI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to consider Punned Unit Development and Tentative Plan applications .fox a 21 lot subdivision known as Northern Heights. The subject property is located west ofNorth Third Street and north of Crown Avenue in an R-1-8 zoning district. The ~gS t-2s property is identifed on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 43AC, Tax Lot{s) 144 & 9944. 13. Public hearing to review an application for minor partition know as the Creekside Partition. The subject property is located north of Beall Lane and east of Elk Creek in an R-2, Residential Two Family zoning district. The property is identzfzed on the ~~~ ~~-`t`~ Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 ZW 11DD, Tax Lot 16841. C. Public meeting to review a Site Flan application for the purpose of constructing a professional office complex in the C-4, Touris and Office Proffesional zoning district. ~g~ `~$-~~ The properties addresses are 34 Freeman Court and 1492 E. Pine Street. ~co~a~os June 7, 2005 Minutes To be distributed at meeting' .K~-... ii L ~, ',' PLANNING DEYARTMEI`v~T STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 21, 2005 Tp: Central Point Planning Commission FRQIVI: David Alvord, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing .. To consider a Preliminary Development Plan and Tentative 21 lot subdivision known as the Northern Heights PC1D. The subject property is located west o#' North Third Street and north of Crown Avenue in an R-1-8 coning district {372V~T03AC Tax Lots 100 and 9900}. Applicant: Paul Grout P.t~. Box 821(} Medford, 4R 97504 tJ~t-vneriA~ent: Same as applicant Summary: The applicant has submitted a preliminary development plan to create a PUD and subdivide two existing tax lots into 21 lots; 201ots wi11 be residential and one lot will be designated as open space. Autl~©rity: CPMC 1.24,05(} vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application 1`or a Preliminary Development Plan and Tentative Subdivision. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment A}. Applicable Law: CPMC 16.10.(}10 et seq. _ Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. - R-1, Residential Single-Family District CPMC 17.68.010 et seq. -Planned CTnit Development {POD} 1tCpchsltdavidatNarthern Heights revised repor€.doc ;,,~,~ Background The property is planned for single-family residential and zoned accordingly at R-1-$. The density requirements for the R-1-$ zoning district allows for a maximum density of 5 units per acre. The minimum lot size is $,000 sq. ft. with a minimum lot width of 60 feet for interior lots and 70 feet for corner lots. The applicant is presenting a tentative development plan fora 21 lot Planned Unit Ti~evelopment to be known as Northern I-leights. C}ne of the lots is designated as open space. The project area is located west of North Third Street, and north of Crown Avenue and the Royal Ideights subdivision, and south of Scenic Middle School, The properly has previously been the subject of a Quick Response grant study from LCDCIC}DQT for amixed-use, high density development, After public comment the mixed-use development concept was rejected. Project Description: The applicant is proposing that the property be developed as a 21 lot Planned EJnit Development, with lots ranging in size from 3,950 square feet to approximately 6,000 square feet. Lots 1 through l 0 have a typical lot width of 50 feet and a depth of l l $ feet. Lots l l through l 3 are approximately 40 feet in width with a depth of 11$ feet. Lots 17 through 20 are smaller lots with widths averaging 60 feet and lot depth varying from 63 feet to $1 feet. With the exception of the C)pen Space lot, all lots are designed for single ,. family dwellings, lfthe project were to develop in accordance with the standards of the R-1-8 district for lot area and width, a n-~aximum of 14-15 lots would be permitted, The project will have public access from Third Street to Crown Avenue. It is proposed that a new public street, running east/west, will be constricted connecting Third Street and Crown Avenue. The proposed public street will be 4~-feet wide; with a 3~-foot curb-to-curb section, and afive- foot sidewalk and three-foot landscape buffer on the south side of the street. The sidewalk and buffer will be located along the entire length of the south side of the proposed public street. The landscape buffer has been condensed from 5 feet to 3 feet to increase the maneuvering area and accessibility of emergency vehicles, should they be needed in the future. The Tentative Plan also shows that the entrance to the PUD from Crown Avenue has been reduced from 50 feet to 32 feet, the reduced width will slow traffic coming into the project area as well as coming out of the project area onto Crown Avenue, the same is true for ingress and egress traffic from North Third Street. The proposed public street will be constructed to modified City standards with the exception that sidewalks will not be provided on the north side (Scenic Middle School}, and lots fronting this street will extend to the curb-line of the street. Three of the lots will front on, and take access from, Crown Avenue. The remaining 171ots will front an, and take access from the proposed public street (not yet named). 11Cpchslldavida~Northern Heights revised report.dac ~ ~~ The applicant has stated that he intends on constructing two-story homes in this development. I~lo request has been made for modifications to the setback requirerrtents. ~ six-foot privacy fence and hedge will lac installed along the south and west property lines to further alleviate any concerns that neighbors may have with privacy issues. ~3scussion: The applicant believes that unique conditions exist that supports the use of a PUD rather than a conventional subdivision (refer to Attachment B}. In summary the unique conditions are: 1. An unusual feature of importance to the people of the area or the community as a whole exists on the site. 2. The property is of irregular shape with limited access, or has unusual dimensions or characteristics which would make a conventional development unreasonably difficult and expensive. CPMC 17.6$.(110 states that the purpose of the planned unit development is to "gain mare effective use of open space, realize advantages of Zarge-scale site planning, mixing of building types ar land uses, improved aesthetics and environmentalpreservation by allowing a variety of buildings, structures, open spaces, allowable heights ands setbacks of buildings and structures." The applicant also believes that, because of the relatively small size of the proposed development {3,81 acres} that a PUD is the best option to allow development of these two parcels because of its proximity to scenic Middle school and surrounding neighborhoods; and that the wider streets and 6,000 sq. ft. lots would be more compatible with the neighborhoods that have been in existence for many years. CPMC 17.6$.{}20 states that "A P~TZ) ... may be an a tract of land of more than one acre but less than five acres f the planning cammissian~nds, upon a showing by the applicant, that a PU17 is in the public interest... and the developments would compliment each other without significant adverse impact an surrounding areas. " {CPMC .17.68.1124 (e) ). The project entails the development of 20 residential lots. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers {1TE} Trip Generation base figure of 9.55 average trips per day per residence, the project would potentially create 191 total average trips per day per residence. provide two separate routes for vehicular ingress and egress. Examples of projects that require a traffic analysis are; developments of 154 or more single family homes, 224 multi-family units or offce buildings of 55,000 square feet or more or a shopping center that is a minimum of 15,544 square feet. {C3DC}T's Guide to Development .impact Analysis}, The applicant has not provided a landscape plan. The city will require a landscape and irrigation plan to be submitted prior to the recording of the final plat that will include trees anal shrubs acceptable to the City's tree list. tlCpehslldavidalNorthern Heights revised report.cioc r ~ „'" The Public Works and Building Departments have provided their comments, recommendations and requirements for this application (Exhibits F and G). Rogue Valley Sewer Services was notified of this application and has submitted correspondence. Jackson County Fire District Number Three met with the City and the applicant and the agency is satisfied with the proposal. However, because of the overall length of the proposed street, Dire District Three will require two new fire hydrants to be installed within the project area. C.~nc hydrant will be located at the entrance to the development from North Third Street and a second hydrant will be installed at the Northwest corner of the lot that has been designated as open space at the entrance to the development from Crown Avenue. The applicant will need to provide the District with a complete set of plans and meet any requirements that may be assigned. Findings of Fact and Conciuso~s of Law: The applicant has compiled a list of f ndings (Exhibit B~_as they are listed in CPMC 17.6$.040 In reviewing these findings of fact and conclusions of law as submitted by the applicant, the planning commission shall find whether or not the standards of this chapter, including the following criteria ~CPMC 17,6$.040) are either met, can be met by observance of conditions, or are not applicable. A. That the development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions to the normal requirements of this title. B. The proposal will be consistent with the comprehensive plan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the city. The proposed P~T.Z~ is consistent with the residential designation for the Property as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. YT~ith regard to compliance with the zoning ordinance the planning commission has the discretion to determine whether or neat the proposal complies with the intent of the underlying ,district. The intent of the R- l district is to "stabilize and protect the urban low density residential characteristic of the district while promoting and encouraging suitable environments fear family Zife ". The question to the planning commission is whether or not this project is in keeping with the character of the immediate neighborhood. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the PUD will have minimal adverse impact on the livability, value or appropriate development of the surrounding area; Previously, it was noted that development of the property as a standard R-.l -8 subdivision wcauld allow for 14-1 S lots. The maximum density permitted in the R~I--B district is 19 leafs. The proposed PUL? offers 2f1 lots, The public facilities servicing the Project are sufficient to accommodate the additional units. The Planning, Public Works and Building Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and believe that with modifications, the project could meet all City standards and requirements found in l xhzbits 1, F & G ilCpchsltdavidalNarthern Heights revised report.doc ~,.. ~ .. D. That the proponents of the PUD have demonstrated that they are financially able to carry out the proposed project, that they intend to start construction within six months of the final approval of the project and any necessary district changes, and intend to complete said construction within a reasonable time as determined by the commission The applicant has provided sufficient itaformation to verify that they are financially capable of completing the Project. E. That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development or will lie obviated by demonstrable provisions in the plan for proper entrances, exits, internal traffic circulation and parking .~s noted previously the additronal tr~a~c generated by the PIIb? vs. a standard development approximates an increase of 6t1 average daily trips, or 6 trips during peak hour. The existing street system can adequately accommodate the additional traffic. F. That commercial development in a PUD is needed at the proposed location to provide adequate commercial facilities of the type proposed Not applicable G. That proposed industrial development will be efficient and well organized with adequate provisions for railroad and truck access and necessary storage Not applicable H. The PUD preserves natural features such as streams and shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain There are no natural features on this site warranting preservation. Not applicable. I. The PUD will be compatible with the surrounding area Consideration of this criteria is subject to the discretion of the planning commission, and involves alignment with criteria ~, ~, C, and ~: ~s designed is it the planning commission's finding that the Project is compatible with the characteristics of the immediate neighborhood; which is single :family residences on S, Q~Q sq. ft. lots. J. The PUD will reduce the need for public facilities and services relative to other permitted uses for the land. As proposed the Pt1a will not have any impact on the need for public services. tlCpchsildavidaiNorthcrn I~eights revised report.doc .~ ~ -• Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: ~, S5` l .Adopt Resolution No.~, approving the tentative PUD plan subject to the recommended. conditions of approval {Attachments ~ }; or 2, Deny the tentative PUD plan; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative PUD plan at the discretion of the Commission. Att~C~lnti ents. A: Notice of Public Hearing B: Applicant's Findings of Fact and Conclusions C: Tentative Plan D; Development Schedule E: Planning Department Conditions of Approval F; Public Works Staff Report G: Building Department Staff Report H: Correspondence from other agencies 11Cpchsltdavida~Northern Heights revised report.dae ,.. ~ .. _- = Ci~`y of +~er~fral P'~it~~` ~ x tea, ~.~, ~ -- .~. ~"~`~~a"~'""~~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~ ~ ~~ Tom Humphrey, A1CP Community Deveioprrient Director Kent Gerschler Community Planner Dave Aivord Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: May 31, 2005 Meeting Date: June 21, 2445 Time. 7:40 p.m. (Approximate} Place: Central Point City Hall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE C3F MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review Tentative Plan and Planned Unit Development applications. The purpose of this application is to create a Planned Community comprised of 24 individual tax lots. The property is located within an R-3-8, Residential Single Family zoning district. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 43AC, Tax Lot{s} 1fl4 & 99fl4. The property is located north of Victoria Way, south of Scenic Middle School, east of Comet Way, and west of Crown Avenue. Pursuant to CARS 197.763 {3} {e}, failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NC?TICE Td IVl©RTGAGEE, LIENHC3L.DER, VENDC}R OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YCtU RECEIVE THIS NQTICE IT MUST BE RPC}MPTI_Y FORWARDED TC3 THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 240 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for a Minor Partition application review are set forth in Chapters 16.36 & 17.24 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to Generafi Information and conditions of the project approval. 1 +~. C 4'e,~s4L. ~.,., ...•, .~ C+4»...-,F i !`s....a«..T Tl ..,.... t. nTti !~'T ClV"5 w- fC A 11 r'r ,t ~.nn y .r. -n _ it ~ z ~ rr .~ rnr. . -- 7- PUBLIC COMMENTS ~ , Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 21, 2(}Q5. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Paint City Nall, ~ 5~ South Second Street, Central Point, C7r. 9702. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 1 ~~ South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Rlumber 'ss 0053. Copies of the same are available at 1 ~ cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at {541 } 604-~~~~ ext ~~~. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application{s) and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application{s). Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set Earth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the application{sj as submitted. City regulations provide that the Gentral Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. `~-~ ~~~ The intent of the proposed PUD is to blend the best use of R-1-8 single family} zoning with the surrounding neighborhood and to design a developmen# that promotes esthetic appeal, functional design and family living by using the follarving criteria: • Build single family housing that best blends with the surrounding neighborhood by using the flexibility offered by the PUD ordinance. ~ Maintain the five-units-per-acre density sought in R-1-8 zoning, ~ Build upscale two-story, architecturally interesting housing in lieu of simple entry-level, single-family designs. • Formalize and maintain an existing child drop-off point for Scenic Middle School, create open space benefiting the 1'U~ and the surrounding neighborhoods, and address backyard privacy by installing perimeter fencing; controlled setbacks, architectural review, and reduced lighting permitted through flexilale PUD ordinance requirements. Chapter 17.6$.020 requires onl~r one of faur canditians be met far use of a PUl3. This application meets t~va of the four conditions. An unusual physical feature of importance to the people of the area or the community as a whole exists on the site, which can be conserved and still leave the land owner equivalent use of the land by the use of a planned unit development, In this case, the neighborhood residences have been using this property as an access and drop-off point for their children attending Scenic Middle School. Additionally, the surrounding neighborhoods have been accustomed to backyard privacy and the open space nex# to their homes. Through use of the planned unit development, access can be maintained far children entering Scenic Middle School, seclusion can be provided for neighboring homes by installing asix-foot privacy fence, and open space can be created to provide a camrnunity ar child gathering area. The property is of irregular shape with limited assess, or has unusual dimensions or characteristics which would make conventional development unreasonably difficult and expensive. Because of the narra~v dimensions of this parcel, the standard practice of taking access off two sides of a street as a #echnique for efficient and cost-effective lots cannot be used because the parcels do not have sufficient depth fora 20-foot driveway and home while still maintaining the setback requirements of Chapter 1'7,20.050, .r Circulation Plan -Summary The circulation in and around the new Central Point neighborhood is intended to be simple and direct for pedestrians, bicyclists and cars alike. C}n the site a new neighborhood lane run along the north edge, adjacent to the middle school. This new Zane will connect Crown Avenue with North 3i~ Street. The new street will provide a car and pedestrian pathway linking Crown Avenue and North Third Street with the Scenic Middle School. April 25, 24€}5 _ Z~avid Award - . - ~ City of Cen~rai Point - P'lanizing Division ~ . ~.~: ~orthem Heights P`U9 - Dear David, .. - _ - " ~ Itis myunderstanding°that yQUreq~air~, prier to.prelirninary plan approval, a ~et#~r~frc~m _ . "" - - ,us indi.cat~rig"~iat'the t~orro~er and praject axe pre~uati:~ed for>sutidivsian £~nan~cing. ~ _ , - 'Paul Grout has contact our'Yan~c~conc~rni~a~ financing fc~r the~l~ra.err~: Heights.PUi~. fl~.ir initial discussicros and preliminary review ofPaul's'nancial statements indicate that this . - project-and his financial condition meet the requirements far financing by Peaple's:Bank of Commerce. ~ ~ - " Alfhough._a complete loan application has.not been received -far tl~s pro,}ect and a cc>mrniniient_'letter has not been given, the bt~rxower oral prci}ect meet our reclni.rements . ~ ~ . -,.for siibclivision f~in~ncing. I expect to hake a eomptete Tcaau application. ~itlain the next " week that wi11 riio~ve~this project~frotn.the pt`e-clualifi~#.i~. state to the loaiz conr~tment . - ~ stage.. . .. - Tf you have any questions or i can be of any fiirtlier aasistaryce, .please fill free to cantaci . me at.7fi4-7654. ~ - . " . Sincerely,' - - ~ . _ ~ - ~eii Txa~trnan - ~ - - President - - -. - 541-'?fi6-535£l ~ Fax 54Iµ7'74-765 ..: ~ . _- - ... - - ::.:. .. . ~ . .- ... .7501 Biddle Rt~ad !~ .Med~'oxd, C7R 975Q4 _ . r ~ J ,.- TENTATIVE PUi~ F'~A~1 of St,iRVEr 8Y. rrrr~~,~~rlu~ NCaRTI-#ERI~ I•-IEIG~T~ F'[_1G LAtJ#~ SURVEYING "V"vr INCARPCJRAT Ep Eacated in the KFF2RY K, tiR+SYvNAW L.S. 227! fox 3044 :7 0 NORTHI*AST it4 OF Tt?#~JNSHIP 37 SOUTH, SECT#ON 3 I2ANCYE 2 L~lEST, . . tscl4a4-7s~`IO~c,~L~wr~s-f~ L~E~LAi"#ETTE MER#DIANt , CITY CAF C1=N"F'l~A[w POINT, JACKSON Gt7Ut~ITY, O#?EGON $(}RV1rY' Pans Gi7~ir t kSSaGiATE3 LLG PA£iL GRpJT, REGISTERED AGENT a.a. 8aX a21D t'tf.'xFFRDe PRECiCx! 475:5! DATHs APRIL 25, 200'5 _ 5ixU5 ADDRE55, t75q rkI1RD STREGT PiDRRrN ' CEtiTT~W_ i~IN7 , GR£fi.71 47502 -- NOrES, 9T-7w-Ou4C. rAX Lt71'8 100, <MCK.? CaROS3 AREA. 3.42 A~RFr GENrRAi PatNT SCJ~£30;. PISTRIGf r ( ROG17£ VNS.EY SEwEY2 SE4tYit~S ! f ! ZON£Ds R-F, R-I«a r~ ~ ~ ~ir'}p2 , 11£ k 1 jVt Igp # GLCYATiCN t2Ab.a3' t ! $CgNiG MIDSkE aGFiCX7L V#C#NlTY MAP (Na acALe) I Q Mi ~4 Y ~I U. ~, yI NMi'aa i G` I022.i5S' RP.40RP N!}4"'.b' E 4621.1 ) ~•- _._. s' eKk'rpY .... -. T ~ T ~t2.b2' 42.43' 60,b7' 5488' S0A0' 40?t7''«--'i ~ a7.5a` 50.7,{' 50,72' SO.7r' 50.x0' 50.4 50. y0.44' 50,63' 60.42' h ~~»~ ~ y~ C.. .5*z~ )f ,4. 4x61 51d. FT.i "'~ 2P.._"(~7'* ~ 't I `~`y-" -'¢b" r-_1~t."'..~ r-'M^_y r__tfi"..y 13 i £'l~. ~' ~ -°1C7'."-y r__"4"."."y r--~"_i r«»..7.....y r__T_`y -^'b"_o r__~C"_t r-_'31'-"'s r__?__'+ ..»..r.»_y P~ 5505 O # # 1 .`f~l t 3 i 1 I ~..»°-iQ2.00L«...a ~ ~ ~ .l £.: I.3 I.I +.t a.i ~SN i~i i'i i'i tt }~$* 1 t i ~~`f i i{ i i i i i ~~$` i i ~~`{ i i ~]~p~$ f A ~f` > )} t £ i 1 °~2. fkF.' I i ii ~'j 512. 1 ~ a I t ~ yi (i Q I "XO~'IQ~"L•T ~ 1y IJi #~' I! IjOI £ I t O ' I£ {f~i ' I A (,~'~ I I t !/4~ ' I I O yf I Y P {' I t ~KI'e! I i i ~ ; I f ~ 1 ~~ L..~,,,j,yy..«J' I E i --W"'{F...~J ~ gR~{ ~ Q I $~ ~ » 12 i D) #~ f] ~ ' Q ~ f ~ ~ i O ~ i 4 ~ ; £i ~ ( ~ O Y ~ 1F S 4 ~ t ~ ~ i ~'~` ---- ztx .trrr----- i 'f t ~ I ~ { ~-----~~'__a R; :~ ~ ~' c~#1 i ~ e ~ i ~r i ~ i ~ i r r r 1 ~ t ~ t~r ~ ~ Ia sb.50' {e~y 1 '1~ : I t ^~k 4I 4 '1} > i '~ ~}1 ~~, tI i I e '~I t I r , I £ 'f~ III : I t '£~ I f '!~ I I £ '~} III ~$ r I i "1) 1 F ~,-«_ i .F" L--y .--J i.-..y7.--J L«...y ,.,...J ~..«.-~~.~.rq ~ {1t 6....x"1-»! L_...y:L....J L...« ~--3 L..«y'Y.__J . L__ ~...»J L-~.T --J L--y .».~J L»» Y._wJ L..... Y«..1 i-«.~1.--J - ~ ~i42a £a. PT'. i' y I I L._--+a,65L--_:::---_aa,a6:___.i 5o.a7+ 5a.ea' s0.ar R__._..k~ooL_-` "'~ ~~ ~ 44.04' 50.741 60.72' So.7r 50aa s6.4a` 56.cr 60.44' so,u' so.4s' s0,4z' 5a~r4a'a~w c"51.14' ZPLAr REGG+RiJ, 5+3<r45'2o"w) sa4'aa'24~w 145.60' S0' Sbq•Ap'17'w cos.a2' {auAT REC6RD, $a4'.ip`IO'Fi 404770') ___..__ _--.____. _. _ i ROYAL NE3GNT3 EYTR381Ctt No-, { (FLAT ti8GCf2P, S54'~iD'45'w) _ aGALEI #~ r ~1 CONTOUR ENTERVAL . #' 1 # # p # # ~ # # ~' I I ~ i LrATUM f3RA58 D18C FN SO+JSt1wE5T CORNER OF HEA.PwAit e7P N61J °wCRJEC AV6NUE HRkfixE OVER. GREh"FEN CRCEK. rNC L`LCVATIOFf 47f 7HI5 8RA55 DISC LQA3 G5TA5LIaFfED by TFFIa ta'7#CE IN (:{TC6GIC OI° 2703 FRQ`S PREUiIXfS V6RrtCAL f.{;N7"RCM. EN T4iE AREA. ~ DISC ELEVATit?N - 1234.62`. `~' q N I !--* ~_ -CaNx'fb~i POINT etg00 aET r1rW NAIL 30' n 0.EYATIQI i2d3,56' I~ ~~ I L I ~ # I REGIS3'ERED PR4FESSIONAt LAND SURVEYOR oRECON JULY iw ?MT .KERRY K~~RADSNAW C%P. 12-31^^05 kML ~~/-~r~1J -- s a T.~E~ELQPMEI~'T SCHEDULE NORTHERN HEIGHTS PLTD DVELdPM~N`I" SCHEDULE. Applicant will start devel4p~nent of Nf)RTHERN HEIGHTS within 30 days of Central Paint Planning approval of this application. Land development is expected to take no longer than 30 days. The development schedule is expected to be as follows: ISM application approval in June of x(105, 2" developmentlconstruction beginning in June-July of 2005, and 3~~ final plat approval with home construction/common open space landscaping complete in April-inlay of 200. ~~~~ ATTACHIV~NT E PLANNING DEPARTMENT REC©MIVIENDED C!aND~TI4NS 4F APPROVAL l .Prior to lnal plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy of the prapased covenants, canditians and restrictions (CC&Rs~ for Northern 1-leights PUD within one year's time, ar June 21, ~(}Q6. 2..The applicant shall camply with all requirements unposed by affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of the Northern Heights PUD, Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3.The applicant shall camply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirerr~ents applicable to the development and construction of the Northern Heights PUl7. 4.~treet shaven on Tentative Plan shall be named prior to recording of Final Plat. S.Applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the city prior to recording of Final Plat that will include trees and shrubs acceptable to the city's tree list, Each plant and tree will need to be of adequate size and irrigated to ensure they will thrive. 6.Miniznum setback requirements an lots will be 2C} feet for the Front yard; 15 Feet far the rear yard and S feet der fluor for side yards. 'I.No structures, ineCuriing covered parches, patios, decks ar balconies shall be Glaser to any property line than what minimum setback requirements far this PUD allow. 8.A six-foot privacy fence and hedge will be installed along the south and vUest property lines to assure privacy far the existing neighborhoods. ~iCpchslldavidatNorthern Heights revised regort.doc .~. ~~ r G--rc 1--f t t".~ - ~ --- ~-~.,-. Public Works department PL~I3Ll~' 13~D. May 23, 2{705 T4: Planning Department 'ORT CENTRAL POINT Bob Pierce, C3irecto Matt Samitore, I.~ev. S~tvices Coors FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Tentative Subdivision for ~'~ ZW 03AC, Tax Lots 10{l and 9300 Northern Heights Planned Unit Development Applicant Grout & Associates, LLC P.O. Box 8210 Medford, OR 97501 Pro~e . Description) R-1-8 Zo_ Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant ~hereinaf~er referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department {PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications, Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works StaiTReport. Existing Xnfrastructure 1. Streets: North Third Street is a designated a Collector in the City's Transportation System Plan. The Right-of way is currently sixty feet, The City will be using the existing right-of-way when Third Street is eventually widened. 2. Water: There is an existing six-inch water line in North Third Street and in the Scenic Middle 155 South Second Street ~ Centro! Point, C7R 97542 •541.664.3329 ,r. Fax 541. fifi4.6384 ~f~~ School Property. 3. Storm Drain: There is an existing thirty-inch storm drain facility in Comet Avenue there is also an existing 10 inch storm drain facility to the south of the subject property on North Third Street. Northern Heights Punned Unit Developments Special Requirements 1. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and z~uun-on onto the proposed devclopment. The system will need to be publicly maintained. 2. Public Utility Easement: Aten-foot wide public utility easement will need to be dedicated behind the right-of--way on the Final Plat. 3, Public Street: The applicant is proposing a 44' wide city street. The curb to curb face of the street will be 32' wide. There will be a landscape row and sidewalk along the South side of the proposed public Street. Public Works suggest eliminating the 1' buffer along the North side of the development and shifting the curb as far North as possible. This will allow for a street with a curb to curb face of almost 34 feet which is near the standard residential street standard. Public Works will support parking { both sides of the street because of the wider street and only access along the southerly side. ~. Street Naming: Prior to Final PUD approval the developer shall submit a name for the proposed public street. 5. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the land- scape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36, Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 ~/z" trunk dzamcter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automat- ic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. 6. Third Street Landscapes; Since the City is not requesting additional right-of way for the North Third Street the Public Works Department is requesting that the setback area adjacent to the lot bordering N. Third Strut be landscaped and maintained by the homeowner with street trees planted 20 feet on center. The area will not be allowed to be fenced. Standard Spectfieativns and Goals 955 S©uth Sec©nd Sfreet ~ Centre! Poin#, C?R 975{12 ~ 541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~ The Central Point Public Works Departmment is charged with management of the City's infrastzucture, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specif cations and Uniform Standard Details far Public Warks Constzuctian" shall govern haw public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Warks Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not awned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power {PP~cL}, Cras {Avista}, Cammunirations {Qwest}, and Sanitary Sewer {RVSS}. In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs ofthe development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Depat~tment is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrif ce quality for the sale purpose of reducing cast to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development, The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans _ Required Infc-rmatuan Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95°l0 complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to fi,~rther review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. Ail submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval, Upon approval., the Applicant's Engineer shall submit {4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitazy sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic st€~dies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Depa~°t3ment Director approves the f nal construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit, Ali fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for 155 South Second Streef &~ Centro! Point, t.~R 975012 ~ 541. fifi4.3321 ~ Fax 54 9. &64. fi384 .,. f ~''~ any uncompleted improvements {as determined by the Public Works Dir~tvr}. Northern Heights Planned Unit.Ueveloptnent -Plans 1, Three sets of plans at 95°lo complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Depart meat. 2. Once appxoval is achieved the .Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Depart merit for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A xny- lar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be redluired before the frnal plat application is processed. Northern Heights Planned Unit Development ~-Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Workn ,. projects as follows. l . The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construd?- tion, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and con- struction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer, 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction fox the purpose of protecting ox relocating existing facilities. Northern Heights Planned Unit Development -Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and X55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97542 ~ 549.664.332? ~ Fax 541.6fi~.fi3$4 .»~~' ~- approved tentative puns. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shad provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the tJregon State l~lealth Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to, 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards 8~ Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Northern Heights Planned Unit ZJ-evelopment -,Streets The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs ofpeople with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All de- signs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA} or as adopted by the Qregon De- partment of Transportation ~(~D4T}, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elerr~ents of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Northern Heights Planned Unit Llevelopment -,Storm Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. if a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations, If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactozy information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be re- quired to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Depa~ment that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in con- 155 Soufh Second Sfreef ~ Cenfral Poinf, tJR 97542 •54 ~t . 864.332 ~ ~ fax 541. fifi4. fi384 =19 •. farmance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase Ii requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific in- formation regarding the design and construction of storm dram related components. .Northern Heights Fluzzned Unit Development -,Required Submittals 1. All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to accept- able professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon De- partment of Fish and Wildlife {DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ), Oregon .Division of State Lands {DSL}, Oregon Department of Transportation {ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. l~rrny Corps of Engineers {ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority {RVSS}, and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department {JC Roads}, DSL and ACOE, as applicable {wetland mitigation}. ~. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City P WD. 3. Dearing construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department far approval prior to installation. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Paint, OR 975Q2 ~ 541. fiEi~4.3321 ~ Fax 541. fi64.63$~ ,,,,, ' r CITY aF C~I~TRAL P€~I~T B~CJILD~~IG DEPA~TM~NT STAFF RE~'URT APPLICANT: Name; PAUL GROUT. Location: North 3`~ St.- Northern Heights PUD City; CENTRAL PdINT Mate; dR_ Zip code; 97502 dWNER; Name: SAME PRdJECT DESCRIPTIdN: Plannin file no. 0505 - 2Q lot Northern Hei hts PUD BUDDING DEPARTMENT CL)MMENTS; ~ . Applicant, went and contractors must comply with all current Mate of dregon adopted codes. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3, Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Paint Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by 0550 Appendix J and chapter `l8 and Chapter 4 of the dDSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limped to, the following information; a. A pint plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b, Descriptions and classi~catians of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d, Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive sails, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with dSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and flDSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed nn the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. ..~_ ,,,, ~' ,,,~ r CTS ~F CENTRAL Pf~~NT BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF F~.EP4RT Northern Heights PUD A sail investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the gradinglexcavation permit. Building permits will net be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled, Exception: 1, The upper 1. ~ foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. ~, The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.1X}. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled safely for use by the Centre! Point Planning Department for use In preparing the Planning Department staff report. The Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, ,June21, 2045, or ,luly ~, 2005. Central Point Building By: bated: June 3, 2005. Iwois _~_ .rte H ~~ ~ # ~. r-t C ~~ „~aG'~C.son ~ountt~. 'ire ~is~rict ~o. ~ ~ 3 ~' 3 ~~~a~e ~.oad May 7, 2t~C15 Ken Gerschler -Planner City of Central Paint Re: Northern Heights PUD Fire Safety requirements • is the street width truly going to be 32 feet drivable width? • Curbs shall be painted yellow on the corners of Crown Ave and the PUD travel lane '` ~ Designated turn around shat! be posted with approved "NC} PARKING ANY TIME" Signs The curbs shall be painted Red and maintained annually by the property owners group, All parking laws will apply and be enforced in this private street development. ~- "No Parking" °`Any Time" signs shall be installed on the school side of the street as shown on the plat map signed by FD #3 and dated 5/'171X105. • Install and approved Fire Hydrant at the entrance N 3~~ street. • Install Fire Hydrant at the entrance of crown and the PUD street • This PUD development will be responsible to move the existing fre hydrant located behind the Middle School and refocate it to the an area approved by the fire district and school district. This hydrant was a requirement of the sc ols development and can not be altered. ~/Ma k o n ~~`~"~--- DFM ~~~ X r .v= < I t1 .. 1. SJRYSY BY. 7'it7BFRGtN~' 3,AtJt7 St1RVEY(NG ,ti1,~';. #NGOFtPORATEi7 KCRRY K. SRAD°•-~L~3d G.3. 2T7# P.a. scat 3or.3 ~ ~ .. ~F f ~ ~}~ U ~St :ui': S 4: ... ~~ . ,, I , , T~NTATiVI~ PUI~ Pl~AN of NC~RTN~RN 1-~EIG~T~ PL1D , . Eocatec3 in the ( NOR"~NEAST 1!4 O1= SECTION 3, TOWt~4~3aIC' 37 SO3JTNr RANGE 2 !%~lEST, WILC.AMET'~"E MERiL33AN, C1TY OF CEN'i'RA1.. POINT, JACK50N GOUN'('Y, OREGON GRASS .AREAS 3.4x IO'oca r # r,., GY?ttTiA,t. POINT sCN3%k. D#STRFGI' ?~.:r AtIC1J8 YAEA.Et' SEi~#ER °.+2RV#GES 3 '~ "~ 7G/HCDe R-f: R`#^m F ~ Y, s,~.r ~RR~57lKE~ ~tr' '~" 1 El.CVATICN ix+#Cb5' Sur .z4tk I ;`` i+uat% 3t?RYEY #"O3i~ GROCtT i• ASSOG#ATF.B~ 13.4 PALI. GROUTr REC.isT~"R.I"'D AGENT P.Q. eoc axro fTEDI'ORD, oacGOr3 ar>Sa# iMTE+ AML#6 2Sr 2706 3tTUS ADORESS~ #75R TNtRD STRE't"f NORTN `°~~y,A cExTR,u. PoINr, aarrar+ ~ ~, ,~ er=a "i''$ro 3'7-?W-03AG TAX LDYS 300 9406 tl, . ~, C}» ~42e lva. 1...--MI.EG~ 92W 16'01 RCh'AL 13ElGNTS P.i<'7'Ati'StCfi No. < 5G4LEs IM r+ 6d' ccx~rcxr~x (Nr~RVn~ . !3 r": ~ n r~c,:A.n~7, ~~Ch~, ~ t».. ( 1 1 I i } I t ~ [ I "` I i ~°' i c~~.S' ~S `'~%ey,e .. 4 tin f g' RC+YAL HEtGNTS E%TF,r'#310N Nn. 3 ~7A7Ut"{ $RASS Di3G #N SOVTWNE.ST C4'+Rt3EiL Of NEAC.%J.ALI. QP NEW sGENIC AYENGE BRIR'.rE OVER GRit7'IN{ GREEK. TNC ElEVATiON OP 7NlS W2A5s DI3G NiA.s ESTAflLlsNED 6Y '(}fl5 OF!!G3 iN OCTOk7w°R OF ' 2003 FFOM PREY#3X}S YERTiGAL CtANTFN~. 1N TNC AREA, E'RA`A3 DISC G'LEVATiON - (734.02'. YfCINlTy }`TAP (NO sCI.LC) R£CIST£R£p PROFESS(ONA~. l.ANCI 5URYEYOR +~ fi. I~er tt£RRY K~2~RAOSNAW cxr. Ix~as-oa )' a ( ii,! AR ~ ~'~}~ 'JAY 1 e ~:;,t,~~~ E4r n o`R _ U: ~A;" s .s c3o 4.i? ~;~ ~ I 11 at1' ._..... K[f.GEi EiO.ti? n.r ~, 53:~ f..: r ..:. \~:: ~ , ( .M ~---•-GCXNTfiCx. POINT W04 sET FS7.G NAIL 30' ~ ELEYATtON - #2.33.54 ( i 35E55.~R'S iTAP Nn.. 37-sw-o3!.G TL's #ao, aaa~ 5i-~Ei~T I C3F 1 aw~aoY,,, r7#.ar..~#.a, sorw,~< xn~wl«~xw~«,c.,iwa # `~' ~.~. ~ ~S.s'9 :M1 ....~;~. ....~ _ May ~, ~{~~}~ Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Qregon 9'75fl~ Re: Northelrn Heights PUD, File # 05053-PUD Dear Ken, I~AX 664-6384 The subject property is within the RVS service area and the Stormwater Quality boundary managed by RVS. The subject property is currently served by a connection to the 8 inch sewer main on North 3r~ Street. This sewer main has adequate capacity to serve the proposed development taut may not have adequate depth. There is also a sewer main on Victoria Way which can be eXtended to provide service if the main on 3ra Street is not deep enough. Ail new sewer mains must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS Standards. 1. The sanitary sewer system must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards and must be accepted as a public system by RVS prier to final plat approval. 2. The applicant must demonstrate compliance with RVS stormwater quality requirements prior to final plat approval. Tf you need additional information, please call me at 664-63t1~1. Sincerely,'"' ( •-C Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer 1~.:1I~ATAIAGENCTESICENTPTtI'ZA.NNGIPUD1pSp53~pUD NpRTHERNHEIGI~TS.I~4C Location: 138 west Vllas load, Central Point _ Mailing Address: t?C7. Bax 313C}, Ccntr~l I'aint,0l2 97502-0{l05 Tel. (S41) 654-6300 car (541) 779-4144 FAX {S41} GEi4-717I c~~~vtv.RVSS.us Creekside inor Partition PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REI't~RT MEETING DATE: lone 21, 2045 TQ: Central Point Planning Commission FRtJM: Ren Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing --Tentative Plan fora 2 lot partition known as the "Creekside Partition" located north of Beall Lane and east of Blk Creek in the R-2 Zoning district {Map 37 2W 11UD, Tax Lot 16801). Owner: Mt, Valley & Associates LLC 105 West Valley View Blvd, Suite 4 Talent, C}regon 97540 Agent: Larry vellums 105 West Valley View Blvd, Suite 4 Talent, C}regon 97540 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide an existing 4,53 acre parcel of land into 2 residential lots. Authority: CPMC 1.24,050 vests the Punning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 {Attachment "A"). Applicable Lave: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 16.36.040 et seq. -Flag Lots CPMC 17.24 et seq. - R-2, Residential Two-Family District Discussion: The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to partition a 0.53 acre parcel into 2 individual fats of b,160 and I5,9~b square feet respectively {refer to Attachment `B"}. This partition is proposed on parcel 2 of Partition Plat P-25-2{}04, which was approved by the Planning Commission as the Coffin Partition and recorded at the Jackson County Courthouse on March 5, 2004. The proposed plat does not shave any existing structures on the lot. C:~©CUMENTS ANL7 S~TTINGStINT~RNtIYiY UC}CI.~MENTS1Q5052AAAA.DdC ~ ~ r Setbacks for the R-2 zone are 2fl feet from the front lot line, S feet per story oz~ the sides and 1 ~ feet from rear lot lines. A special creek setback measured 25 feet frozrz top ofbank will be applied to both lots since Elk Creek is in the area. The maximum allowable height for strzzctzzres is 35 feet. Access to the lots would be from atwenty-foot wide "flag let" private access road connecting to Beall Lane. The Public Works Department has identified the znini~rzuzza standards for the developrrzent and far the road in their staff report {Attachment "C"}. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and determined that the applicant has proposed creating a "flag lot" and in applying the requirements of CPMC If~,36.040, this application cannot be approved since it does not comply with code. The criteria is further discussed by staff in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Building Department has submitted recommended conditions of approval {Attachment and "E„) for consideration by the Commission. Rogue 'V'alley Sewer Services, Jackson County Fira District Three and the Jackson County Roads anal Parks department (Attachment "G") have submitted correspondence for consideration by the Commission. Each of these agencies have requirements that will need to be met by the applicant prior to the City signing the final plat. Une of the project area neighbors intends to provide comments on the application but the City has not received correspondence as of yet. Findings +~f Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. Tet2tutive Pltzt Criterion 1 CPMC 17.65,050 establishes the minimum area, width anal access requirements for the R-2, Residential Two-Family District. In this district, parcels must contain a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. Finding: The project site is located in the R-2, Residential Two- Family zoning district and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 0.53 acres into 2 separate lots of 6, 164 and I S,}9G square feet. The application has beezx proposed as a "flag C:tCtC7CLIMENTS ANI~ sET`I'INCrs1INTERNIMY DOCUMENTSto5o52AAAA.DC7C r ~~+/~~ lot" partition and in reading the applicable code, Chapter 16.36.040, the applicant shows that two parcels would be sharing the single "flag" access which is not permitted. Criterion 2 CPMC 1.6.36,040 identifies the requirements for the creation of "flag lots" and states that "14) The lvt created is at least twice as large irr area, excluding access, as the rnirrirnrrttr lot size fpr the zdrrirrg district in }vhiclr the lot is located, acrd; Finding: The total project area, less the flag, is less than 24,000 square feet, which is the minimum area required to support two lots. There is not adequate net area to create two lots and comply with the requirements of CPMC 16.36.040 {A}. .8} 7"he access tv the Ivt is nv less than twenty feet wide acrd paved with cerrrerrt yr asphaltic surface to city statrdards. " Finding: The project site proposed for partition is a lot that was created as Parcel 2 of Partition Plat P-25-2004. Further partition of this parcel will result in the creation of a "flag lot" with the expectation that two new lots would share the single "flag°' access. There is no provision for this configuration in the Central Paint Municipal Code and. therefore, it cannot legally be approved. Criterion 3 CPMC 16,1.0,010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and outer supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. Finding: The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project has submitted the proper maps and documentation but the configuration of the proposed land division is not legal. Planning Commission Clptions: The Planning Commission has the following action options in deciding this matter l . Deny the tentative partition; or 2. Continue the review of the tentative partition at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Notice of Public Hearing B, Copy of Tentative Plat C:~I7f3CUMENTS ANI~ sETTINGSiINTERNVvt`a' I70CTJMENTS\Q5(152AAAA.370C ,~r '~,~ ~""' C. Public V~orlcs ~~aff Repo~~t D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval E. Building Department staff Report F. Correspondence C:1I3OCUAriEN`CS AND SETT1NGS1lNTERNiMY L}OCUM~NTS1(}5f?52AAAA.DOC „~ r '- ~i~y of ~era~ral Pc~inf ~! 1L ~7"T~~-cr~~~'~t~- :A ~'~~T~~- PL.ANNING DEPARTMENT` ~~ ~ 1 'Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Ken Gerschier Community Planner Dave Alvard Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: May 31, 2005 Meeting Dots: June 21, 2005 Time: 7:00 p.m. {Approximate} Place: Centro[ Paint City Nall 1 ~~ S. Second Street Central Point, f~regon NATURE QF MEETING Beginning at the above time and piece, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Minor Partition application. The purpose of this opplication is to create two individual tax lots. The property is located within an R-2, Residential Two Family zoning district. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 11 D, Tax Lot{s}'1680'1. The property is located north of Beall Lane, east of Marilee Avenue, and west of Circle Wood Drive. The address is 612 Beall. Pursuant to c~RS '197,763 {3} {e}, failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties ort opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. Nt7TICE Td Mt3RTGAGEE, LIENHC7LDER, VENDt?R (~R SELLER: t~RS CHAPTER 2'15 REQUIRES THAT iF YQU RECEIVE THIS Nt7TICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FC3RWARDED TD THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FQR DECISC4N The requirements for a Minor Partition application review are set forth in Chapters 16.36 & 17.24 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General information and conditions of the project approval. PUBLIC CQMMENTS 155 South Second Street • Central Point, £3IZ 97502 • {541) 664-3321 • lax: {541) 664-6384 r ~~~"" E '~ w m `A E m ~~ ~A z'~ i $ v}~~ ~ n~~ ~~ ~ ~rn ~ ~~ ~~° 8 ~ S A Q Z tr H ~~ ~~~ ~I~~~~~~~ 4~~~ • \ '•,,~ . ~~~\ ~o~°z q ~dx H~O~ "I ~~~N o ~oz `~~n cyc .. t~ ~ ~ ~ y n at z n 4 ~~ ~. ~ .. ~ ~ aro $~ ~~ ~ ~ t}~ u pt .. 01 „_..~ 4I x `T na ....~.~._., C~ E ~!_ n 4 f0'49 tt"O+t erxrrawew.. ~ _~„T S ~' -e ~A~'~ ~U~ 4" a t~ 4 "~. `* ~~ 0 ~tl t7 Y *µ^~m !y, pbi- MM 9i ~p Y ~ N O~ Q'~ j(1II l~ _S'L_.. ~~ ".,y4" ~O-~ o ~~.] ~~ '~~. r ~i '~, r ~' ~~w~-- ~9-" i~'.~-~c:.t~ m ~`rt~t ~ ~ `~ ti~ Bob Pierce, C?irector Public Works aeparttnent ~.;=.~„° Matt Samitore, rev. Servr`ces Coord. __~-_____,~_.~...w_-_.~_~.____.__._.~..__--__.._~_.~_ ~~~T~~.,. P~I~T -_..~.____ ___________.___.__..__ _~_ _~_____________~_.__.... P~.~~,~c ~a.~s ~T~~~ ~~~oRT May 23, 2005 TU: Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Tentative Subdivision for 3'7 2W 11DD, Tax Lot 16801 Creekside Minor Partition Applicant Mt. Valley Association, LLC 805 Hillview Drive Ashland, UR 97520 Proms Descriptianl R-2 Zoning Put~pose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Warks Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed develaprment. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted far any information not contained in a Public Warks Staff Report. existing ,~trf~astructut•e 1. Streets: Beall Lane is a County Road paved to twenty-four feet in width. 2. Water: There is an existing eight-inch water line in Beall Lane. 3. Storm Drain: There is existing street side storm drain ditch. 155 So~rth Second Street 9.~ Central Point, QR 975t?2 •549.664.3329 ~;= Fax 549. fifi4.8384 .~~'~- Creekside Minor Partition Special Requirements 1. Sturm Draina e Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the stann drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 2, Public Utility Easement: Aten-foot wide public utility easement will need to be dedicated on the P`inal Plat, The applicant has not addressed where the PUE will be located. 3, Private Drive: The standard private drive width is twenty-one feet. The applicant proposes atwenty- four feet wide easement drive, which was what was approved as part of the Coffin Subdivision in 2003. At that time the Public Works standard was only twenty-feet for an access drive. The drive will need to be signed or striped far na parking. 4, Addressing: Addressing far the site will be made from Beall Lane. The Private Drive will not be Warned. =Standard Specificatit~ns and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details far Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department, Central Paint Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not awned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Paver {PP&L}, Gas {Avista}, Communications {Qwest}, and Sanitary Sewer {RVSS}. In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and wank with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvcrnents necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. L)erelopta~ent Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95°l0 155 Sputh Second Street ~ Central P©irrt, C)R 9T5Q2 ~ 541.664.3321 ,,, Fax 541.654.8384 ,,. ~i ,.. complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as ROSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each coznznent of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan. and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffzc studies, legal descriptions and a traffzc control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the f nal construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit, All fees are required to be paid in fizll at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Gt•eekside Minor Partition -Plans Three sets of plans at 9.~°lo complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Departz~ent. 2. Qnce approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the fzeld. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. ~reekside Minor Partition -- Protection of Existing .,Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 955 South Second Sfreet ~ Central Paint, C3R 975(32 •541.664.3321 ~: Fax 541.664.&384 ~~ .. for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffe expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take rota consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, T4D, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. C'reekside h~in~r Partition - Stprrn Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has farnerly been. established if it includes criteria far the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his starrrz sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of C}regon DEQ, DSL and E~DFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm ViTater Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Paint Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Creeksrde .tY,tr'n~r Partition --Required Sub~zzittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as maybe required by other agencies, including, but not limited to C}regan Department of Fish anal Wildlife {DFW}, C}regan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ}, Qregan Division of State Lands ~DSL}, C}regon Department of Transportation {{~DC}T} approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority {RVSS}, and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads}, DSL and ACtJE, as applicable {wetland mitigation}. 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to fznal review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Dcvelaper's Engineer 955 South Second Street ~ Central Point, QR 975t~2 +- 549.684.3329 =~ Fax 549.fi64.6384 ~~~ to the City Public Works Departme~.t ~'or approval prior to installatioc~. 155 South ,Second Street ~ Central Pofnt, QR 97502 ~ 549.564.332 ~, Fax 541.664,6384 •-~~' -. ATTACHMENT D PLA~tNING DEPARTMENT CfJNDITI4NS OF APPRUV'AL #.;reeKside Yartrtrtln, ~'tLL+' USUS"L CIIECK ~ NUMBER I7E~CRIPTIQN OF CC?NDITICIN BQX 2 H.ti'LANNiNG\2005 i.ANi~ USE FiLES105{}52 CRBEKSiUE {512 BEAi,L i.,ANE)105452COARE~iSED.DQC ••~~-. CITE" QF CENTRAL Pt3INT B~.TILDINC I~EPARTM~NT STAFF RI+aPQRT APPLICANT; Name; MEL AND CARDL C{)FFIN Location: Beall Lane. City: CENTRAL P©lNT State; flR Zip code: g75{3~ OWNER; Name: SAME PROJECT DESCRIPTIt~N: Planning file no. C?5fl~2 - Creekside Minor Partition BUILDING DEPARTMENT CQMMENTS: 'l . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with ail current State of C}regon adopted codes. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by C1SSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the tJDSC. A written report of the investigation shall Include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the Iacatian of all test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive Sails, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnlcal recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with QSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and 4DSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. _~_ •"~~~' •• ~IT~' ~JF CENTRAL, POINT BUILDING DE~'AR.'TMENT STAFF REPORT Creekside Minor Partition A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. ~ foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper '1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements, 7. Notify the City wilding Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.128. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Department for use in preparing the Planning department staff report. The Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, ,#uly 5, 2045. Cents! Point Building Department BY~ Dated: June 3, 2(}05. Leai Benedetti -2- r j~ f r^ ~~~~~lE~ ~~w~~t~~~fi May 9, 20{}5 E~t'~CIJE VALLEY S~W~R ~ERV~~ES Location: 138 westvilas Road, Central r'oint - Mailin~,Address: P~. Box 3130, Ceflt~~al 1'oint,C}12.97502-0005 Tel. {541 } 6f~4-6300 ar {54 ~ } 779-4144 FAX {541)664-7171 www.12VSS.us K.en Gerschler FAX 664-6384 City of Central Paint Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Creekside Minor Partition, File # 050523 Dear lien, The proposed development property can be served by making two service connections to the sewer lrlain on Beall Lane. This main line is within the City of Medford's sewer collection system and will require a permit from Medford to make the connection. The Medford pez~nnit will cover the construction of the service lines from the sewer main to the right-of way line. Extension from the right-of--way line to the homes will require a permit from RVS. RVS requests that approval of the proposed development be conditioned upon the following: 1. Applicant must obtain a sewer connection permit from. both the City ofMedford and Rogue Valley Sewer services for each parcel. 2. Applicant must comply with erosion and sediment control regulations in effect at the time of construction. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, P,E, District Engineer F,.1DATAlAGENCIESICENTPTIPLA~`ANC.~r1PARTITIf.~I~1120051CREEI~.SIl~E 05052.D(JC • ,T~ ~" naf ~lar ~~~~ e~~:1~ s ~a:~ r r~~l~~ ~i~;c:~~ur~ ~:L~ur~ i Y ~~-°~ ~-~~;c.~~. Paz r ~:~ Attention: Lisa 11~organ City of Central Pcrin# Planning ~ 15 South Second Street Central Paint, QR 9~5~t2 ~>u: Creekside Minor Partition off Beall Lane - a county-maintained read. Planning File: OSC}52, ~. residential partition. Dear l.~lsa: ]2oad~ F.r~c 1~ietneyer, t'E Trrr~c cL'• Devclopmcnt l:ngit~cc~r 200!•.hMlape E209d Y~'#l~e Gity, 4IZ 97563 Ptrone: {541) 77a-8230 F87C: {5d1} 77d-6295 n;emeyei~~s citsan ao u nty.o rg wvnv.jac+csoncaunty.arg Thank you for the opportunity to comment an this application for a minor land parfiition for Mt, '~a11ey Assoc. LLC, a two-lot residential partition located on the north side of Bead Lane west of Circle Woad Drive. Roads and Parks has the foiiowing comments; ~ , The applicant shall submit construction drawings try Jackson County Roads and Parks and t~btain county permits if required. 2. The applicant shat! obtain a road approach permit from Roads and Parks for any new or improved road approach fa Beall Lane, ~. Please note that Beall t_ane {County Cc~llector~ has a variable right-of-way v,rlth an Average daily TrafFic count t~f 4585 as of September 20}4 one-hundred-fifty Feet east ref Burrell Road, Sincerely, Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic ~ Development Engineer t:tEn~}nc~r'sri{~lDeve l apm ~nttClTt S1ChITRLPTt05452.vrpd s ~~ ~' ,,~ac~.son ~,ountt~ ~irc ~istrict od ~ ~~ ~~'= $ 3 ~ 3 ~'~~ate load .:-~, .~: {~'4't } SZ6~~ 1 EEO {void} ~~4t } 82b--4~b~ ~~-ax} May ~ 7, 2D(~5 Ken Gerschler --Planner City of Central Paint Re: #fJ5C352 Creekside Minor Partition and Variance • An approved turn around shall be required, • What is the distance to the nearest Fire Hydrant from the entrance of the development? Mark Moran DFM w~~{ Duncan Professional ~ffi~e Comply PLAI'~NING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT I~~EETING DATE: June 21, 2445 TtJ: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician SUS{M~ECT: Public Meeting- To review a Site Plan Application The subject properties are located within a C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District. This proposed use is an outright permitted use within the C-~ zoning district. The subject properties are identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37 2W 2CD Tax Lot{s} 140 & 204. The addresses are 30 Freeman Court and 1492 E. Pine Street. A~>lieant Mike Duncan -Duncan Development 25 South Front Street Central Point, Or, 97542 Owner: Patricia A. Ford P.O. Box 26 Midland, Or. 97634 ,A,~,~ent~ Ralph Tahran, Architect 13741 I~naus Road Lake Oswego, Or. 97034 Summary: The applicant has submitted a Site Pian Application to construct a 3,640 square foot professional office complex. Authority: CPMC 1.24.450 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public meeting and render a decision on any application for a Site Pian. Notice of the Public Meeting was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 {Attachment "A"}. A livable Law: CPMC 17.44 et seq..... C-4, Tourist and Office Professional CPMC 17,64 et seq. -Off Street Parking & Loadmg CPMC 17.72 et seq. --Site Plan Approval Process •' ~~ "" Current Property Characteristics & Uses: There is currently a duplex situated on Tax Lot 100 and asingle-family residence located on Tax Lot 200. The appl€cant will remove both of these existir~ structures. The applzcarst would have to consolidate the two tax lots. Discussion• Professional office facilities is a permitted use within the C-4 zoning district.. The proposed site consists of two tax cots and combined is approximately 14,3 74 square feet. The applicant will own, operate and lease out office space. The building is designed to accommodate 2 M3 tenants. A lot eonsolidation will be required, which is included in the Planning Department Conditions of Approval {Attachment `E') The proposed building is single story with a maximum height of 20 feet. The office building and parking will take access from Fxeeman Court, with the building and small private courtyard facing Pine Street. The applicant has submitted a project description {Attachment "B") that explains their development proposal in greater detail along with building elevations and landscape plans {Attachment "C"~. Comments for this site plan have been received from Jackson County Fire District Number 3, Public Works Department and the Building Department. {Attachment `D') Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following f ndings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. CPMC 17.44 et seg. ~ 4. ~"yurr'st and C7 tree Prn~; essaanal CPMC 17.44.11~'U (A) - Permitted ZJses The proposed site plan for a professional office complex is a permitted use in the C-4, Tourist and (Jff"ice Professional zoning district. A business license would be required for any tenants. At time of issuance of a business license, all proposed uses would be reviewed to ensure compliance with permitted off ce uses for the C-4 zoning district. 17:44.11411- Height Regulations The proposed building will be 20 feet tall at the top of the cornice. The maximum height allowed in this zoning district is 60 feet, ~~~~ 17,44.1154-Area, Widtli and YardRequirernents With a lot consolidation the subject property would be approximately l4, 3'l4 square feet. The minimum lot size is S,C#04 square feet. The front yard setbacks are l0 feet, consistent with the Cade. The front of the building will be facing Fine Street, that would be considered the front property line. The side yard set backs will be a minimum of five feet, also consistent with the Code. 17.44.464 -General Requirements (-g) All businesses, services and processes shall be conducted entirely witltitr a completely enclosed structure, with the exception of o, ff-street parking and loading areas. No outdoor uses areas are proposed, with the exception of the trash enclosure. (C) ©pen storage of materials related to a permitted use shall be conditionally permitted only witlrirr an area surrounded or screened by a solid wall or fence having a height of six feet. The only open storage proposed is for trash, which is identified as being enclosed. ~) .Front yard areas shall be planted with lawn, trees, shrubs, flowers or other suitable landscaprng materials and shall be continuously mnintar`ned in good conditions and in arr attractive manner: The landscaping plan (Attachment "C") includes an attractive low maintenance ground cover far the larger areas, along with hedges for the courtyard and parking lot area. Seasonal flowers will be planted in large concrete or ceramic planters at the entrance of the building facing the parking lot. All landscaped areas will be fully irrigated. The parking area, Freeman Court frontage and Pine Street frontage will also be screened and shaded with larger canopy trees. The applicant has met this requirement. 1 ~ 44.474 -Signs and Lighting of Premises (A) No illumitrated sign or lighting standards used far the illumination of premises shall be so designed acrd installed that their direct rays are toward or parallel to a publr'c street or highway or directed toward any property that lies wr`thin a residential district. The signage the applicant has proposed under the project description {Attachment "B") meets this section of the code. A sign permit must be obtained through the Build'zng Department, at which time the specifics of the signage will be reviewed for compliance under Chapter 15.24. The applicant is proposing soft decorative up lighting on the building. This should not cause visibility problems with traffic on Fine Street or Freeman Court. The applicant has not 11Cpclasltcity wideiPlazu~ingt20o5 Land Use Piles\45o69 I7t~~eaz~ Site Ptari (Comm Office Bldng}toSO69 staf~'Repor~.doc ..w, l~'~~"' mentioned parking lot lights in their prapasaL Since there will be landscaping screening around the parking lot as required under General Requirements, it is Staffs recommendatian that adequate decorative lighting be incorporated into the parking area for safety reasons. 17.64.44tJ - l)ff -Street .Parking and Loading (H) Office Professional shall not he less than one space per each three liurtdred square feet of grass floor area. The proposed buildmg is 3,604 square feet, and by Code is required to have a minimum of 12 off=street parking spaces. The applicant has met this requirerr~ent wit1~ 12 off street parkin; spaces. 17.72 -~ Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction ,Plan Approval 17, 72.1t14 -Purpose The purpose of site plant, landscaping and construction plan approval is to review the sr'te and landscaping plaits of the propased use structure of huildittg to determine compliance with this title and the huildittg code, and to promote the orderly and harmonious development of the City, the stability of land values and investments, and the general welfare, and to promote aesthetic considerations, and to help prevent impairment of depreciation of land values and development by the erection of structures or additions or alterations thereto without proper attention to site planning, landscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in relation to the development of neiglihoring properties. . As illustrated in the applicants site plan, elevations and landscaping plans this proposal meets the purpose of this code. This design will further enhance the existing commercial activity in this area and will provide assistance to the City's ongoing efforts in providing an attractive entrance to the downtown area. All other areas of this Title have been tact at this stage. Construction plan approval will begirt ante the applicant has applied for building permits if approval for this site plan is granted. tiC~chsllcity widelPianning~2U05 T.and Use Fiiest05t?G9 Duncan Site Dian (Corncn C}ffice i3idng}1U5069 Staff Repart.doc +r ~Q rr' Recommendation: Staff recoxnznends that the Planning Commission take the foiiczwing action: l .Adopt Resolution No. 'approving the tentative s~civisien subject to the recommended canditions of approval; or 2. Deny the Site Pian application; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Pian at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. I~lotice of Public Dearing B. Applicant's Project Description C. Copies of Site Plan, Landscaping Plan, and Building elevations D. Department Staff Reports, Memo's and Qzxtside Agency Comments l . Planning Depaz~tment Recommended Conditions of Approval ilCpchszlcity widelP]anningt200S Land LJse Files105069 Duncan Site Pian {Connor Ofnce Bidng}105069 Sta#~ Repo~t.dac r ~~,r ~~~'~'"~~~. PLANNING ,DE'PARTMFNT ~~ ~T Torn Humphrey, AIGP Gommunity Development Llirector Ken Gerschler Community Planner Gave Alvard Gommunity Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Meeting Date of Notice: June 6, 2005 Meeting Date: June 21, 2005 Time: 7:00 p.m. {Approximate} Place. Central Point City Hall ~ 55 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE C}F MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Site Plan application. The purpose of this application is to build a cornrnercial office complex, which is an out right permitted use. The property is located within an C- 4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 02CD, Tax Lot{s} 100 & 200. The property is located south of East Pine Street, north of Oak Street, west of Freeman Court. The addresses are '1092 1=. Pine and 30 Freeman Court. Pursuant to ORS 197.703 {3} {e}, failure to raise an issue during this meeting, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-matters and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TCt M©RTGAGEE, LIENHt}LDER, VENDt7R C?R SELLER: C}RS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPT~Y FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject praperky. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for a Site Plan application review are set forth in Chapters 17.44 & 17.72 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. 155 South Second Street • Cetltrall'oznt, OR 97502 • {541} 6~4-3321 !Fax: {541} G~4-G3S4 -~5L!" 1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~k~~ ~~~ _~ I .~ s ~'`~ x[.w~~.r +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ xs 1` ~ ~ ~ ,1. ~~~~~~ ~_ .~. }j}~ .+~" ~. , s ~ ~ .. ~ N iM~~' • ~.~.~ ~~~ A ~~ ,~s 1 +,.Z ~ i S - - i ~Xit~s ~rxYC~E'A ~' _LR ~ i ~l~Y 1 ~ ~ ~ H ~ # ~~ ++ //~~ ( ~ } (y ~ i 3, "'l~ li }~~,y ~~/nom y " I~ r I „ I~ i ~^y-^~-' ~ Q ~ { -'~ ' W~'6~P+'3flF~i- PE.LTNEE~ .b. + 4 •~... "` f ~ PQf~1LRtttl, QREGntt~ 2389 ~ # ~ : i ~ 1 tJ~. ~.'LC? c~NjJ_LC" ~l ~,~~ ~ _ ~ G1 U ND CL7s'~ 1~- ~ 1 :,! ~~ ~ ~ ~~ '~ ~ C~rfND GCNL.R ~''E'c7t'5 CsaG. _ _ . _...... A .~. 'l.RRlCl~Y! ~~ ~ ,a,.~.l~ L~+N~SCAf'~ tLC~AS "Tt> ~ _ ` f - P - ~'~A~= -- ~ ~~~~5# 3"A~I~U SULLY ll~i~~C.~r'~~T`~.p wt7~f A cc~i~INA~'~~N ~ ~'Yi~t1~ GAC:..L~~Yr~N~ _ c~ ,g1.1'fp1~tAT"~A ~~f~N~..~{tS Ahl~ _ I~iP If~at3A~c~,J 9~a,~~iAl. ('LAN~"'S ~wcz~p ~~~ - aW~9 ~ AS~~s --~ _ , _....a...~__ .~-_- _- ...~.___. . ~-~---- ~~~.~.i~f~~ ~t~U~-T t , 'I°F?~L#MI~~.Y ~IT~ ~'~~! ,~'L~NRSGAI'~ P~..~~ ~ .. C~UNGA~1 D V~.1.~~ME~1'C ...~.~~_~.~. -R - . _ ..... _.....__. __ ~~;~~C~s~;~tx~' `'A' ,~„~,c3G~5d1'! ,C7~L11't~~ ~It'e ~IS~t"[G~ ~C?. ~' ,< (54 t } 82b~-7' i C3Q {voice {543 ~ 82~--~1-~~6 {~ax} .tune 15, 24€5 Afitn: Ken Gerschler CP Planner Re: Fa #3 Comments far Duncan Developmenfi Freeman Court • submit the lacafiian and distance fia the nearest Fire Hydrant. • An Additional fire hydrant might be required. • Haw many afl:~ce spaces and haw many stories? Mark Mayan - DFN ..- ~'~-~ Public Wa-rks Department 't;, CE~TF~A~ PC3I~T .. _,; , Bob Pierce, pirect Matt Samitore, Development Service .I~'ub~c ~~o~-.ks ..~? ~a~tr~-e~ t ~v1EME~RANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM; MATT SAMITC}RE SUBJECT: DUNCAN DEVELC}PMENT SITE PLAN DATE: MONDA"~, ~LTNE 13, 2005 Planning: I have reviewed the drawing submitted by Duncan Development for a proposed office at Freeman Ct?urt. Public Works does not have any cozmment or special conditions for this application, All of the utilities are present at this location and Freeman Road is a secondary arterial planned for anticipated corrunercial use. The applicant will receive SDC credit far the project because of the two existing homes. The applicant will get water system development credit if they need to upsize the water meter servicing the building. The applicant will receive street SDC credit of $3,248.60 for the two buildings. There estimated street SDC is $5,'731.38. This is based on general off ce use, with a building size of 3,60(1 square feet. The street SDC with the credit would be $2,482.'78. Matt Sarnitore Development Services Coordinator 155 Sauth Second Street ~ ~entra! Point, 4R 97502 ~ 541. fifi4.332 ~' ~ Fax 54 ~. fifi4. fi384 ...~ ~r'~r' .- C3U ~R~DI! V~ D~PART~VI~NT CENTRAL POINT C.ois QeBenedetti, Building ditici~ BUILDING D~PARTM';E'NT STAFF RF'Pt~RT June 14, 2~a5 TC~: Planning Department Planning file no. C}5C}59 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT; Duncan Development -Freeman Ct. Office Complex APPLICANT: Name; Duncan Development Address City: Central Point State: Oregon Zip code: 97542 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Freeman Court PURP(JSL The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. -'1- 1 ~S South Secancl Street Central ~'oir~t, flR 9'750 y Sol .66,3321 ° Fax 541..6~i4.63$4 y ~~ BUILI~fNG DEPA~TIVfENT STAFF REPORT BUILDING DEPARTMENT CtJMMENTS. 1, Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current Mate of C3regon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department, 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. ~. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by t~SSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the {JDSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlar excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based an geatechnical recommendations. 5. Gradingl excavation permits are required in accordance with C~SSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and {~DSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site, Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. _~_ 155 South Second Sheet Central Paint, Cy}R 9~75Q~ # 541.664.3321 ° Fax 541,664.6384 r,..~lr~ r STAFF REPORT A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building (~fFicial shall be submitted prior to final of the gradinglexcavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1, The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper .5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, Structures, or vehicular access ways or panting areas. ~. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Paint shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Paint Municipal Code 8,24.12t~. Any changes proposed shall be submifited in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. -3- 155 Sauth Second Street Central Poant, CJR 9'502 = 541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~ r ATTACHMENT `E' PLANNING DEPARTMENT C4NDITItJNS OF APPRf.}VAL Duncan Develapnr~ent -Freeman Court Prafessianal Office Camptex File No. 05069 CHECK BOX NUMBER DESCRIPTIQN 4F CONDITit7N 1 The applicant shah comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development. ~ The applicant shalt comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development. 3 Jackson County Fire District # 3 Conditions shall be met. 4 Rogue Valley Sewer Services Conditions shall be met. 5 Public Works Department Conditions shall be met. 6 Building Department Conditions shall be met. 7 Applicant must provide adequate decorative lighting in the parking lot area for safe reasons. S Applicant must consolidate the two tax lots. 9 Applicant shall screen the trash enclosure with a solid wall or fence to a hei ht of six feet. itCpchs tlcity wideiPlannin~12005 Land Use Fifes\fl5469 Duncan site Plan (~orz~zn ot~ice Bldng}~OSO69 staff'Re~art.doc y ~ ^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 21, 2005 TU; Central Point Planning Commission FRfJM; Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT; Continued Public Hearing - to consider a request to vary from the front and side setback requirements along Cedar Street and Freeman Road Appiicantl Qwner: Larry and Ceorgianna Dodd 482 Freeman Road Central Point, C}R 97502 A =ent: John D. Curtis, Esq. 55 North Third Street Central Point, ClR 97502 Surnr~aary: The applicants, Larry and Georgianna Dodd have applied for a variance from the front and side yard setback requirements at 482 Freeman Road so that the existing home can be demolished and replaced, This item was continued indefinitely from a Planning Commission meeting a few years ago. The subject parcel is zoned R-1-6, Residential Single-Family. Authority; CPMC 1.24.{}50 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a variance. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. Applicable La~v; CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. ~ R-1, Residential Single-Family District CPMC 17.80.010 et seq. -Variances Discussion Mr. and Mrs. Dodd, the residents at 482 Freeman Road would Tike to demolish a small 1,168 square foot home and replace it with a 1,702 single family residence that includes a 440 square foot two car garage. The 8,910 square foot parcel is Located at the northwest corner of Cedar Street and Freeman Road in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district, The basis of the variance request is based upon extenuating circumstances with the front lot line and the side lot Tines adjoining Freeman Road. In the time that has Lapsed since the Planning Commission last reviewed this application, conditions have changed on Freeman Road and the side yard variance ~~~ is no longer needed. The applicants home is presently within approximately l~ feet of the front lot line which is on Cedar Street and since the code defines this as the front lot line, a ZQ foot minimum setback is generally required. Cedar Street with its 80 foot wide right-of--way which is wide in comparison to what the Public Works p}epartzxzent would require with current street dedications. Per Matt sairiitore, the standards now identify that if a "standard Residential Street" is dedicated, it would have a 60 foot right of way, hence a variance froze the front lot line would not be required and there would not be a sight vision problem either. In observing the setback situations with the residences along Cedar street, most of the structures line up with the Dodd's home for the front setback. Although this street width information is helpful, the Commission should be aware that present situations show Cedar street as it is, . , air 84 foot wide right-of--way, and for the time being, a variance is still required. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law CPMC 17.8~.Olfl stipulates that the Planning Commission may grant a variance if findings are made that the Following considerations will either result from the granting of the variance or do not apply to the requested application: Criterion 1 The Variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the City such as beautification or safety; ^ Finding: A ne~v residence would meet current regulations of the Uniform Building Code and likely increase the property value since the existing home will be replaced. The proposal will allow the applicant to bring the residence into compliance with the City's off-street parking rec~uirezne~zt by providing a trvo car garage, Criterion 2 2. The Variance will not have any significant adverse iirzpacts upon the neighborhood; ^ Finding; The residential character of the neighborhood would not change as result of the proposed new construction since the new home will be constructed near its existing footprint, If approved, the reduced front yard setback would not be readily apparent since Cedar Street has a wide right-of way, much of which is a landscape strip between the back of curb and the property line. Criterion 3 3. The Variance will utilize property within the intent and the purpose of the zoning district: ^ Finding: Single family residences are a permitted use in the R-1-b zoning district ~~~~ and these structures are #ypically required to meet zoning setbacks. In other residential zoning districts such as the Transit tJriented I?cvelopnient, the City allows reduced setbacks for "living space" portions of the house. Since the applicant has proposed that the garage facade be set behind the "living space" portion of the house, this has an appearance similar to the TpD district. Even if a strip of Cedar Street were never vacated, the reduced distance would not be noticed by most people traveling by the property, Criterion 4 4. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to property in the sazxze zoning district; and ^ Finding: The 0.20 acre parcel is an average-sized lot by City standards fronted by an old street with an excessive right-of-svay width. If current Public Works Standards for the City's "Standard Residential Street" were applied, the variance would not be needed. Criterion 5 5. The conditions for which the Variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, not the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family zxzernbers. ^ Finding: The existing house was built on the parcel in 1945 and at that time, the setbacks were likely reduced from what they are by today's standards. This can be affirmed by looking at the setbacks of the other homes along Cedar Street. The applicants have submitted their own fzndings of fact and project description for consideration by the Commission (Attachment 45rj))~. Planning Corrznaission Uptions: The Planning Commission has the fallowing action options in deciding this matter: l . Approve the Variance application based on the findings of fact contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval, or 2. Deny the proposed. Variance application; or 3. Continue the review and public hearing for the Variance application at the discretion of the Cozxzrzzission. C:tL?OCUMENTS 1~1~IL} SETTII~IGS~~ENGiDES1~TflPtR'S FflLDERt(}0402.UflC ~xhibits~ A. Site Plan ~. Applicant's Findings and Letter of Project Description C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions D. Public Worl~s Staff Report C:tDOCt3MEi~TS ANI) SETTINGSIKENGID~S~ST©1'1R`S Ft)LI~ER\O(}(}02.1~C?C ~ ~~ ~ i ~ ~. ~- t ~- ~~ ,rr ~~~~~~ ~~~~„ r~t~o~ C3 ~~~~ j~~~~ 4{+ VARIANCE APPLICATICI~T FINDINGS This is a request for a variance to build a residential structure 10 feet within the 20 foot side setback requirement and a garage 10 feet within the 60 foot front setback of Code 17.60,090. The proposed garage and residence will. align itself with a pre-existing shop which is the same distance from the center-line of an arterial street, ie.f 10 feet within the 60 foot front setback. ~.. The variance mall pravade added advar~.tages to the z~eighborhood or c~.ty, such as beautificata.on car safety; The present dwelling is old, unsightly and dilapidated. Electrical wiring should be replaced for fire safety masons. There is no foundation to the present structure. It has rot and termite damage. The roof sags for this reason. Windows are permanently dammed or painted shut. The location for this house is on a street corner, plainly visible from the East and Routh . Building a new, home will improve the neighborhood's aesthetic appearance, as well as reduce potential fire hazard. As the house's property value increases, tax assessment and. revenue to the city will increase correspondingly. A new structure will enhance the quality and appearance of this neighborhood and community. There will be increased fire safety to the neighborhood with a replacement dwelling. 2. .The variara.ce wall n.ot have any significant adverse ~,ulpacts upon the n.eighborhac«d; . The present dwelling has been there for about 50 years. The neighborhood, from that time, has continually been comprised of single family residences. .~ garage located on these premises was constructed 50 feet from the center-line in 1985. Placing a dwelling 50 feet Pram the center-line will situate it at the same distance as a pre-existing structure. Situating a new dwelling 10 feet inside the 20 foot setback from Cedar Street does not appreciably impact foot or motor traffic, nor visibility, as the garage which is closer to the intersection will be further from the setback {24 feet}. The residential nature of the neighborhood will nit be changed by this request. PAGE ~. - SARIANCE APPLICATIC7N FINDINGS I}C}T~II~, LARRY & GEORGIANA awr ~'~ r 3. The variance will utilize property ~rithin the intent anal purpose of the zone district; The intent and purpose of the zone district, R-1 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, is to stabilize and protect urban law-density residential characteristics and to promote and encourage suitable environments for family life. A new, larger, single--family home will be constructed on this lot. The present dwelling is unsuitable and arguably unsafe for family life. The placement of the Name will be substantially the same as its present locatian. The prapased residence conforms to the present character of the area and zone district. A new home at this location will be better suited to family life and the neighborhood than the existing residence, A replacement single-family dwelling will preserve and be consistent with the present character of the neighborhaad. 9:, CareuFnstances affect the property that generally da not. apply to other property in the same zoning distract; fihere is a pre-existing 26' x 36` garage located 50 feet front the center-line of Freeman Raad and 5 feet. from the Northerly property line, C7nly 58 feet between this structure and Cedar Street to the South remain for location of a home. A sewer--l~.ne easement crosses the Northwest corner of the tot which forces the placement of a residence in the youth half of this lat. The ~t~ foot setback an Cedar Street leaves very limited alternative placement of a residence other than what is proposed. ~ . The caxs.ditiox7.s far which. the variance is requested were not self-imposed thrau.gh the applicant`s own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents emplaye~:s ar family members. In 1.985 this property gained approval and had a garage constructed a0 feet from the center-line of Freeman Raad. This garage was part of the owner- applicant's plan to later construct a dwelling the same distance from Freeman Raad. At that time the zoning and special setback requirements permitted these locations of buildings. Uwners-applicants relied on the 1985 ordinances when they undertook their building plan, Owner-applicants expended considerable sums to develop their plans. The setback ordinances subsequently changed. This frustrates the owner-applicant`s original plans. The adoption of setback requirements was by the City of Central Paint`s and not self-imposed. PAGE 2 - VARIANCE APPLTCATIGN FINDINGB DC?DD, LARRY & CEnRGIANA LETTER QF PRCtJECT nESCR~PT~©N This project is to build a residential structure 10 feet within the 20 foot side setback requirement and a garage 3.0 feet within 'the 60 foot front setback on the corner of Cedar Street and Freeman Road, in Central Paint, Jackson County, Oregon. 'The proposed garage and residence will align itself with a pre-existing shop which was constructed 50 feet from the center-line of Freeman Road in x.985. At that time the zoning and special setback requirements permitted these locations of buildings and this garage was part of the owner-applicant's plan to later construct a dwelling the same distance from Freeman Road. The setback ordinances subsequently changed, frustrating the owner-applicant's original plans. `T'he present dwelling is old, unsightly and dilapidated. Electrical wiring should be replaced for fire safety reasons. There is no foundation to the present structure. Tt has rot and termite damage. The roof sags for this reason. Windows are permanently jammed or painted shut. `T'he location for this house is on a street corner, plainly visible from the East and South, and has been there for about 50 years. The neighborhood, .from that time, has continually been comprised of single family residences. .A. new, larger, single-family home will be constructed on this lot. The placement of the home will be substantially the same as its present locatir~n. The proposed residence conforms to the present character of the area and zoning district and is modest in its size. The pre-existing 26' x 3~' garage located 50 feet from the center-line of Freeman Road and 5 feet from the Northerly property line leaves only 58 feet between this structure and Cedar Street to the South to locate of a home. A sewer-line easement crosses the Northwest corner of the lot which forces the placement of a residence in the South half of this lot. The 2~ foot setback on Cedar ,Street leaves very limited alternative placement of a residence other than what is proposed. Res ectf l submitted, 1 -' John ~. Curtis ATTACI~IMENT C RECQMMENIIED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CflNDITIC}N~ fl~ APPRQrVAL L . The approval ofthe Variance shaft expire in one year on June 21, 20106 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within. 60 days of Planning Coznznission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable focal, state and federal regulations . 3. Any new construction that attaches to the existing shop building must be designed in accordance with building code requirements including, but not Limited to, adequate ,garage wall type separation and with openings from a kitcLaen or Laundry morn. C:~3~UCUMENTS AID S~.TTI~GSIKENGiDESKTC}I'ER'S F+OL]~~~t00fl02.I~OC •'~ / ~ " ~~ Boti Pierce, Director Public W©rks Department Maff Samifore, Dev. Services Coord. _ .._~.....M..._...~__--_______.~._.~______.________..~~~~T~~~ .~._.~..____~- ____ _-______,---___.__.__ _ _~_____. _____--- Pt~1 ~T "~= c=~.~_.r? ~~~~1~ ~o~xs s~.~.~.~~~a~~ June 13, 2405 TO: Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Minor Land Partition for 372W11BA, Tax Lot 1500 Skillman Brothers A~olicant Larry and Ceorginana Dodd 482 Freeman Road Central Point, OR 91502 Property Descri tp ionl R-1-6 Zoning Variance .~pplicatit~tt The developer submitted for a variance application under a previous Public Works Director and an old set of Public Works Standards and Specifications. Since that time the City has adopted a new set of standards and specifications that are more flexible. This flexibility has allowed the developer to re-new their application. The applicant is requesting a variance from the standard twenty-foot front-yard setback and froze the sight distance triangle of Freeman Road and Cedar Street. The right-of--way of Cedar Street is eighty feet and is currently paved to a width of forty feet. The Public Works Department does not foresee the further expansion of this street at this time. The house will be setback thirty-five feet from the existing curb of Cedar Street and the garage will be setback forty-five feet. The applicant will be responsible for the installation of a sidewalk and landscape row for Cedar Street {See Special ,Requirement #2}. All of the houses within this area of Cedar Street currently are sited within ten to fifteen feet from the front lot line. Public Works does not see any adverse impact from siting the house at ten feet. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the site distance triangle requirements. Using the methodology adopted in the Public Works Standards and Specifications the site distance triangle is measured from the property line, This methodology usually works well if the property line is located a few feet from the back of curb. It does not typically work with there is a large right-of--way area. The site distance triangle for this lot is fifty-flue feet on Freeman and twenty-five feet on Cedar Street {See Site Plan). A small portion of the garage is located within the site distance triangle. Because the curb of Cedar is twenty-five feet from the property line 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OF2 9T502 •541.654.3329 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ... "~~ - the reality of the situation is that the site vision far this intersection will not be applicable. Existing Xrtfrastructure 1. Streets: Cedar Streets is an improved street with curb and gutter. Cedar Street has aright-of way of eighty feet. The street was overlayed with a new layer of asphalt pavement in 2}03. Freeman Road is a county road with curbside ditches and currently paved to twenty-four feet in width. 2. Water: There is an existing four-inch, eight-inch and twelve-inch water line in Cedar Street, and an eight-inch and twelve-inch water line in Freeman Road. 3. Storm Drain: There is an existing twelve-inch storm drain line in Cedar Street. Special Requirerrrents 1. Public Utili~ Easement {PCTE}: The developer shall dedicate on the Final flat a ten feet wide public utility easement (PUE) along the property frontage. 2. Freeman Road and Cedar Street Sidewalks: Developer will be responsible for constructing sidewalk and landscape row, with street trees, for the frontage of Cedar Street. Developer will lac responsible for install a landscape row with street trees for the frontages. The sidewalks shall be separated from the curb by a five foot landscape row, Sidewalk design will be built per Public Works Standards anal Specifications Drawing ~-S~ ~"ypical Setback Sidewalk Cross Section. The applicant shall pay the City for the Freeman Road sidewalks because final grade and exact location are not yet known. The engineering for Freeman Road will be done this fiscal year 2005.2006 with construction within 2006- 2001'7. 3. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrgation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 l2" trunk diameter at the time of installation. Ali street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be of the property owners who own the property dz`rectly adjacent to the landscape row. ~' 55 SQUth Second Streef ~ Cenfral Poinf, C7R 9 ~5Q2 + 541, 664.3329 =~ Fax 541. fi64.6384