Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet - June 7, 2005
CITY OF CENTRAL I'C3INT PLANNINC* CC)MMISSIC)N ACUENDA .3afze 7, 2005 M 7;00 lz.~n. Next Piannitzg Gozxznzissiotz Resolutio~z No. 652 L MEETING CALLED TQ ORDER TI. RQLL CALL Cocznie Moczyge~nba ,Ca~zdy Fislz, Damian tdiart, Mack Lewis, Scott Ma~zgold, Chuck Piiand, and Wayne Riggs, III. CC}RRESPC}NDENCE IV, MINUTES A. Review and approval of May t 7,2005, Planning Conrnzission Minutes V, PIJIiLIC APPEARANCES VI, BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review an application for a Tentative Tian. The purpose of this application is to 10 attached single family tax lots. The property is located within a T(?D-MMIZ, Medium Mix Residential zoning district. The property is identified on the Pgs ~-~s Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W lOAA, Tax Lots(s) 750(} & 7600. The property is located north of Ash Street, east of Glenn ~Vay, south of West Pine Street. The addresses are 248 8~ 260 Hiatt wane. B. Public hearing to review an application for a zoning variance. The purpose of this application is to constrict a garage that would vary from the setback requirements. "I'he property is located within an R-3, Residential Multiple Family zoning district. The t'~~ 2~°`tt property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's znap as 37 2W 11813, Tax Lot 1500.. The property is located north of Alder Street, east of 4`zi Street, south of Oak Street and east of 2~~ Street. The address is 121 S. 3r`~ Street. C, Public hearing to review a Tentative Pian application. The purpose ofthis application is to create 6 parcels. The subject propez~ty is located within the Twin Creeks Master Plan ~~s ~2-~~ area, and identified as Twin Creek Crossing, Phase 1. The zoning consists of TC~I~-C1S, C}pen Space, TOD-IIMR, High Mix Residential; T©D-IC, Employment commercial; PC6b{}~OS T{~D-MMR, Medi~~na Mix Residential and is identi~'icd on t(~e Tackson County Assessors crap as 375 2W 3C ,Tax l:~ot{s) 14t}, 2(}3 & 2(}~l as~d 375 2W 3~3, Tax l.~ot l Of}. The property is located south of Scenic Avenue, north of Taylor Road, east of Grant Road, anal west of U51-Ii~l~~,vay X39. VI. MISCELLAN~4U5 RVMPO lnte~rated Land Use and Transportation flan I'gs s7-~s Presented by Dick Converse, Rowe Valley Council o~ Gouerntx~ents VIL ADJCI-~(.JRNMENT rco~o~~s I~Ia~ ~7, 2005 I~Iinu~~~ To 3sc 9i~tribut¢d at Ml¢~tin~ fiIiat~ ~our~ Subdivision PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPCIRT MEETING DATE: June 7, X045 TO: Central Paint Planning Commission FRC1M: David Alvard, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Tentative Plan fora 10-lot subdivision to be known as Hiatt Court Subdivision. C}w anger! A~Iicant: Marls Skillman 3650 Biddle Road Medford, 4regan 97544 Para~tX Description: 37 2W 14AA, Tax Lags} 7540 & 7644 Zoning: TQD-MMR (R-3} Surnary: The applicant has submitted plans for a tentative subdivision which shall be known as 1-Batt Court Subdivision; consisting of 10 padlats, 5 per tax lot with access being taken off of 1-Iiatt Lane. Padlot developments are a permitted use in R-3 zoning districts. Anthority- CPMC 1,4.024 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision an any application for a site plan. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.064 (Attachment A}, A Iicabie Law• CPMC 16.14.410 et. Seq. „Tentative Plans CPMC 17.24.414 et seq.- R-3, Multiple Family Zaaung District CPMC 17.65.010 et seq.- T4D Districts and Corridors CPMC 17.60.214 _ Padlat Development :~ Discussior~• The applicant, Mark Skillman, has submitted plans far aten-lot subdivision located an tax lots 7500 {248 Hiatt Lane} and 7600 (260 Hiatt Lane}; far the purposes of a padlot development an these two Tots; 5 lots per tax lot. Zoning for the project is TOD-MMR; base zoning is I2-3. {Attachment B-1} Because of the underlying R-3 zone, a padlat development is permitted. 'I"he Tentative Plan mainly reflects R_3 zoning characteristics in setbacks, parking, lot coverage and density. Minimum lot size for the project complies with the 2,000 square fact minimum lot size requirement for single-family-attached units in TOI) zoning districts. The applicant has submitted the project as a pad lot so that both tax lofts are used to their greatest capacity, while maintaining a unique approach to in-fill development. Each resulting tax lot will be oriented so that it faces the parking area which is shown on the Tentative Plan as a 24 foot Reciprocal Access/ Utility Easement. Staff recommends that this easement be reduced by 2 feet so that rear yard setbacks are 10 feet; bringing the development into compliance with R-3 rear yard setback requirements and will be compatible with other developments in the vicinity of the proposed project. Side yard setbacks are shown as T4D standard of 5 feet. Because the applicant has submitted this project as a padlat; the manner in which this development is designed is permitted under CPMC 17.60.ZI0{c}; "the pad cats within the parent parcel are exempt from the lot area, width and depth, yard and setback and lot coverage requirements to which parent lot is subject". A quick review of R-3 requirements shows a minimum lot size of 4,000 sq. ft. far the first lot and a minimum of 1,648 sq. ft. far each resulting lot. Lat width in R-3 districts is a minimum of 60 feet with no depth requirement stated in the Cade. Setback requirements: 20 feet; front yards, i 0 feet; rear yards, 5 feet per floor; side yards. Maximum lot coverage is 50°lo of the fatal lot area in R-3 zones, leaving 50°lo for yard space. Minimum lot sizes in TC)D-MMR zones is 2,000 sq. ft. far single-family-attached raw houses. Minimum lot width in T{JL?-MMR zones is 22 feet with a minimum depth. requirement of 50 feet. Maximum lot coverage is 80°lo with ZOoln for yard areas. Minimum setbacks: 10 feet in the front, 15 feet in the rear; 5 feet on the sides, Parking in R-3 zones requires that each unit be provided two parking spaces and one guest parking space per every four units. The site plan {Attachment B-1} shows that there will be 4 parking spaces per unit, thereby meeting the parking requirements. Access to the project area would be taken from idiatt Lane. The Tentative Plan shows a driveway of 20 feet in width, city standards far driveways is 21 feet. The applicant will be responsible for any frontage improvements required by Public Works. Additionally, the applicant will need to plan far Storm Drainage infrastructure, aTen-Foot Public Utili Easement to be dedicated behind the current ri h~ wad' .line, and a Street Tree Plan. 4 Tax Lot 76001 {260 I-iiatt Lane) is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (Community Panel Number: 410}092 0(301 C) as being in a l 00-year floodplain. Other developments within the vicinity of Hiatt Court have been able to satisfy FEMA standards for building in a floodplain, therefore, the applicant will more than likely have the same options to address this issue. Cane option is to show the base flood elevation for each individual tax lot on the grading plans for the site and submit flood elevation certifzcates for each lot showing top of finished floor being a minimum of 1 foot above the base flood elevation. Another option is the applicant could apply for a Letter Df Map Amendment {LC3MA) through FEMA which would remove the project area from the floodplain. A recent development in the general area of this project has been successful In obtaining LC3MA's through FEMA and this project could potentially do the same. A LAMA is obtained through FEMA and is based an topography vs. the base flood elevation, or how high the waters would rise during a potential flood event. The applicant would be required to f 11 out an application showing base flood elevation and topography. The process takes 6 to 8 weeks. The site plan shows landscaping along each side of the project area as well as the parking lot. 1-Iowever, the landscaping plan lacks details such as an Irrigation plan and a listing of proposed tree and shrub species the applicant intends to usa at the site. The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Coznznission assign a condition that the applicant provide a more detailed landscape plan that includes shrub and tree species together with an irrigation plan. A backflow prevention assembly will be required. The Public Works Department, Rogue Valley Sewer Services {RVSS) and Fire District Number 3 have been notifzed of this application. Public Works will require that the developer shall: 1, Develop a facility plan for the storm. drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that storm. drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 2. Maintain aten-foot wide public utility easement paralleling Hopkins Road; this casement shall be dedicated behind the current right-of-way line. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to he planted within landscape rows. {Attachment D) Rogue Valley Sewer Services has coxrr€nented an the project and have stated that there is a six- inch sewer main adjacent to the property but is sub-standard and cannot support the proposed project. The six-inch sewer main will have to be replaced with a new eight-inch line. The applicant will work with RVSS to install a new eight-inch sewer main. The project is located within the phase 2 NPDES Stormwater Quality rr~anagement area which is administered by RVSS. Storrnwater containment and runoff system will be required to comply with all applicable stormwater duality standards. ~~' Fire 17istrict dumber 3 1=1as commented on the project and is requiring a £'zre hydrant at the entrance to the project area, na parking signs are to be installed along bath sides of Hiatt bane; the curb within the dedicated turn around area shall be painted red and maintained as required annually by city standards. See Attachment F-2 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law: Pad apt Iaevel~a~rnents In approving, conditionally approving ar denying the plans submitted, the City bases its decision on the following standards from Section 17.b0.210: A. Padlat development applications shall be presented to the city; and processed by the city, in the same manzzer as a partition or subdivision application. first, in the form of a tentative plan, and. then in the farm of a fznal plat. All provisions of Title 16 of this Cade shall apply to padlot developments; provided, that the lot size provisions of Title 1 ~ of this code shall apply only to the parent lot and not to the padlot. ^ Minimum lot size in R-3 zones is 6,000 square feet. For multiple dwellings on the lot, the first lot must be 4,000 square feet with each additional lot being a minimum of 1,448 square feet. Tax Lot 7500 is 10,454.4 square feet; Tax Lot 7600 is 9,147.6 square feet. B. The parent parcel, from which the padlots and common area, if any, are to be created, shall conform to the standard requirements for fats in the particular zone in which the parent lot is located, including, but not limited to, requirements pertaining to lot area, lot width, lot depth, lot coverage, yard and setback requirements, number and height of buildings, density restrictions, parking requirements, and distances between buildings. ^ The proposed padlot development is located within the T4D corridor and is zoned T4D-MMR. Base zoning is R-3. The applicant is proposing asingle-family-attached development which is defined in the T4D as row houses. Minimum lot sizes for single-family-attached row houses is 2,000 square feet. Because this project has been submitted as a padlot, the applicant is able to use the 1,648 minimum lot size as specified in the code for R-3 developments as well as the 2,000 square foot minimum as described in the code for developments within the Tl`?D corridor. Maximum lot coverage in R-~ zones is 50°!~, whereas in the TOD maximum lot coverage jumps to 80%. The tentative plan shown an average lot coverage of 49°fo, leaving 51°lo far yard and common area. Front and rear- yard setbacks are shown. to be in compliance with R-3 standards with the exception of side yards which are shown on the site plan as 5 feet; which is the standard for development within the TCID corridor. Density requirements in R-3 zones is 6 units per acre minimum & 12 units per acre maximum {CPMC 17.28.080 C-1} Minimum and maximum density in TC?D-MMR zones is 16 & 32 units per acre respectively; the conobined square footage of both tax lots is 19,602 or .42 acres. The applicants proposal of 10 lots is a permitted density under padlot development requirements. The height of the buildings will be a maximum of 45 feet as permitted in the T4~D corridor. However, {~ t~ because of existing residences in the area that are not located in high density neighborhoods, CPMC 17.67.OSQ{I}{3} limits the height of new residential buildings within fifty feet of lower density neighborhoods to 3S feet. The developer has expressed that the new residences at this site will be the same design as those that were built next to Robert Pfaff Park (Attachments $-2 & B-3}. Those residences were 35 feet in height, and it will be required that the proposed project will not exceed 35 feet, Required parking in R-3 panes is 2 covered spaces per unit; 1.5 covered spaces in TUU developments. The tentative plan shows each unit will have 2 covered spaces with driveways that are wide and deep enough to provide two additional uncovered parking spaces. The homes will share a common wall. C. The padlots within the parent parcel are exempt from the lot area, width and depth, yard and setback, and lot coverage requirements to which the parent lot is subject. ^ Lot area, width and depth, yard and setback, and lot coverage requirements conform with bath R-3 and TC1D-MMR design guidelines, and have been "combined" ~nta a unYque design concept. Fi. Structures on padlots must meet ail applicable state of t~regon building code requirements, as well as all other applicable city, state and federal regulations. ^ The attached dwellings shall be constructed to applicable building and fire codes. The applicant shall comply with any additional requirements. E. Structures on padlots must be multi-dwelling unit attached buildings. No detached, single- dwelting unit buildings shall be constructed on a padlot. ^ The proposed construction is defined as single-family-attached rowhouses and fulfil the criteria for multi-dwelling units. F. No fznal plat far the creation of a padlot development shall be approved unless and until the developer has also previously submitted and received city approval for the covenants, conditions and restrictions applicable to the eon~.mon area, if any, providing for the continual management and maintenance of the common area and any improvements thereon. ^ The Tentative Plan does not Shaw any common areas. ~._.~~-- ~~~~ 3 ~~~J Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adapt Resolution No, ,approving the preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision for FIiatt Court Padlot Subdivision, based an the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval as set forth in the staff report, or 2. Recon~rnend denial of the preliminary development plan for the 1-liatt Court Padlot Subdivision based on findings of fact articulated by the commission; or 3. Continue the review of the preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission, Attachments• A Notice of Meeting B Site Plan (B-I}, Floor Plan (B-~) and Building Elevations {B-3} C Planning Department Conditions of Approval D Public Works Staff Report. E Building Department Staff Report F Comments from other agencies VQ~ CENTRAL POWT City of Central Point P~ANNfNG' D.EPA~T'MEN~' `1'om IInnF~hrey, AICP Conxmunity Development bircetor Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Alvord Corontnnity Planner Lisa 14torgan Pianning'Fechnician Notice of PubCic Hearing Date of Notice: May 17, 2005 Meeting Date: June 7, 2005 Tirne: 7:00 p.m. {Approximate} Place: Central Point City Nall 155 S, Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose o€ creating ~ 0 attached single family homes. The subject property is located in a TQD- MMR, Medium Mix Residential zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 'lOAA, Tax Lot{s}75010 & 7600.. The addresses are 248 & 200 Hiatt Lane and is located north of Ash Street, east of Glenn Way, south of West Pine Street, east of Glenn Way. Pursuant to CJRS 197.763 {3} {e}, failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue, NOTICE Tf7 MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA Ft'~R DECISION The requirements for a Tentative Plan application review are set forth in Chapters 16 & 'l7 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. ~~7 PUBIC CC3MMENTS 1. Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up anti! the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 7, 2005. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, flr. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above wit[ need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4, Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is: 05847. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at X541 } 564-3321 ext 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. C .,~. L L D ~'d *'=°~w. ~ ~ ~- Cs r•~`w.-, :q.{t~ ~. ~ I. w~. ~ '-E' 4 L ~' i" ~F s'-,~. ~ i. y~~ P';k"+ („ *L • Ca ~r 1@f' LlraH1' 1W tp~ {}}+$ i~fOQpED J ~ Wt't. ~ ~.1Gi.}T_ryp. OF 3 ~ lll31. ~ #` Gt7NC ~ '~ E ~ ~ FEAT FlxiP ON ~ ---~--- ~ ~ cctic. P.aD-rrP. t i - __-- - f i ..., ~.~...»~„ ..,.5... u M'ar ~ ~ WAt.C. Li1~E-TYP. ~ ~ tI/ L$`,.~. ! LLW~.d. t.SFiE-71 P. Q y K I ~ ~ K MA ~ [NAT AlG~N TYP. ' ~- $ H~ _~ ~~ ~ ~ tc~ull~1~4U5~ 2~ ~ zd` ~ ~~~nars~.~r~r ~. a ,~~' '.~ ~`C~L~JN4-~C: ~5~ m ~ ... ~. W, ~._ .~...,. ~ . ~ 2 G.b;}R ~ s~ L,~., ~ ~ 2 GAR ~` ~ Cx,4~'AC`x~-TYP. _____- I ~ Y rr».~ ..`--_ C:ARAGE-TYP. '~ t { ~ J i g, : S 41Gt1 vALVEB d'' -i- ~ ttt6iRD ~~ z$a ~. ~.~. ~ 5 t , u i E ems, ~. ~ ~ 6-ta~~ mac. ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~~c. trtErh~9 ~~ ~ , ~ ~:.- ~ x ,~ --,~ ; c t =.v ~- ~ , ``'" ~~ ~~` ~- d5` ----~-°~ ~° W ~~t ~~?cl8rltks Gltf1~U~Y% ~~ ~1 ~: $tM. ~~ =c' ~~ Y^ t ~`; o .ss_ - _ ..... , z ~ ~? i u r ,. i-1~NPh'4tL-"~Y~'. 3Ea" 1-il~x#-~ tU~LLL S~i1~. f~C~; if2C R~~C> ~ ~~~~ n:~~v;rS~:. ~ .~~4 i~ ' :.": ,'.'.iJxi~:'`t~~i'~•,,«E,"'~'?~"ct,+`s,'.GS~`ri~':Ya:a~"',~~2!::'`Y=~w ~~`~~r";:};~"~~R ~~'tt:':n:~~YYS\: .~.- . .'t .y y is ~.`;1'M1'C2 :'.~l'; t: r•~.: ~+; ~~S'~ ~4 •~ ~ ^'^ai ~k~~~~twr~~v{Y > ,:~~ 7"''w `~i ~f .`. :, I,.. "ice: ~sr.F: v=} y = Y,>.~ r; ~3t ern ;i v~;«,x v~`~v r".Ii `:.`.:.:v; 4.`t:'.» ..;;f:x>b., '?erN fix`.: .:.r`'.. :.:y r . .r., .~~... .~+y =4. Ft- nn~, Y~ ''"~ t.t`"" .~iS-.. .u ~:~%: c°= tnJi„ ..fir .•ry. c: a.!uynJ. .t.j': <ryy:'. ~'~^: ~~. :r - ~ .. ~~; - i ~.... ~ ..:... ::. ... .~ .. .i ~.:. t:..:-.. ...:. n- - .: :.:. rv :" ~-,fL . •:w - . }'° b - ~ - i~ ;~ Vii' q~sn, . i}:' . - G ! ~Cr. _ . ,,', ' .. ` ~$L~!'. „ _,i , . }`, :: : .,_ F 1t~'~' . r. - ~1. "~~~ :':''• r,~~ ~ ; " `,t ~. t t .. f'~t u y~~ ~ f; ~ ..~!'~ ~ :~ i.;' ~, . ' ~ . J~ . .R, ~:5. „.,. ,:~ . ti, ,.v. y r iv ~:~i to...,~`.: ~+ . , . _. . .»~. ;,~. , <. ,. t.,,> .:: .,.. >;., p;~.~ "~:; .rya.. t:'~~.. ~::Y.' :..yn. ~.}' fJ 'fnt ~~: ~.ju M?. t~' `(+;i ~.J ~x~s~. d j{:: pia :':A.~~, j ~:h', . ~~# ., R: 4~,: F> ,k.. s ~^r, ~:", _ _ x; y,i i~i{.,, ~~.t: i. %:., S' ~ .b.w ._,iC; %~t< j'af... y~u` 4 ^t ;;'S . Y y W ..: `„~ skk. F.k.,.r.x ,~ii': : .,;ztit i~3`^ - :'. }.„` .i.A$, ~, Yr',~_.. - K t'~" Cry: ~$ },2 •'~ Y.`Z:: L`::. 1. k.. Y '~K~. Ki Y.+ Ran .w. a".o.. :.ti:; :': .t~Rry: ~tti: _~." ~~~ 55.i;~. .f ;r . ~. . rY i s `~~F: NC ~~".<.~. ~ . .v.r - :C >r'; wr z~ „y . , ;. ~~~'i <x+: ~ . =.:j.'~ ~s-.a , 4 n}~y. ~: ;;~:~' .. s u.~ . ~': 'n ~i~~ 4~ :~~~~ _ .~.~ a;~, `,(,~ ;` ~rsN ~~4y ':F X ':".L ?y i.~ ..{. yy h~ n'):. n~ .x~ ;,,~ .. j,' ;i' ^:f~ '~;a.. ;^a' S z'i?i~'.~; ':.'y , ~~~~ t is t. _~i {.'"': ~. ii>E. ~y 4. ~y tH s 5.. '~I$' ~ •r ~ry4W. ,~ x \~ ltpY~' •• a. ~.~:.:.i.: i'4~.% '.,1.. F ~r~ $v~ .~ `Xi ~rY ~ ~S ,~. y, r6. ":':n' 3 ~;'`t*'r t.~ s:~" k.. : ~.. .~c', '~:" .F., ~. :g'.`~. .. }t ..6 "~.~a' ~~~ '"S': ~,~ ,.,:W .~ ~'y~ s~ ,, ~. ~:~ .~. -~~:: ~~ :>~: .. ..:~.. ,j~ 'pt,r',.. F~'~r ~ ~~ ..-.F~i' k ~ v r} ^ A k•... : r . .5 `.''k r, ~d ~::st':5:~ q~.. ~FS'~;' ,.h...3. , .l :- . .o:S ". is ~, ,~ r, "fi.i~. i ~ "t ~.~' :,.~. '~,k . t b:t,± ,t.~,i 1~ i ?.;v~ ~i ."y~ ~~ c ~: ~ ~. ~ kc .. '', cY~Y: .,yy '~~ry. / fib' 'I~. ~.. '.5... ~~ Yr~ V ~ ..F+~t ~y~ti~v`%5' ..Y`~F 1 SMi` „~~~ { dY ° `:~..~ i . tit; :'~,.; ",' :`~"~ ~~ ~: ~: ~,?~A; :~ . ;~ M+.:. `` "„~~y' I/5.- ,b w . a::.. _ _ r~s v a +:fr ''"L` :'~'; _ j ..~ ' Z r'y;':;'^'~y s..'. ': ~.i _ _ v" L.~°i . +'4 ~ j ... . ~;3:.~' ; T":.` < °J . - i~ I r. _ . :_ .. a2. ~2: _ __ ' .S : ~.~ i. eT-~j':~... z f ~~~ . y .T ..1: _,~u _ t _ _ . _Z ?=. f _ _ ..:.. . ,.. . _ ~.'~ : 'fE': _ y,k~_ . ~. ..: x ' .~~~ _ . G _ . 'J <:: . ''Si:::' ,G _ _ t_ `Y {:}: ~: ..... ~ _ _ _ _ ,. .. .. ;, - ... .... _. _: it`` ~ .~, !'.~. . .. _... _ . ; .. :Y' __'Y ~.:.: ~t ~'.. +.: .Y~ <+ .... ., _._ ::r. ~ ... ~i ~.. ": ... ..~~_..., .._. .'iii.. ~.',.~:.-.'. <'_~ ~ i, e ~.}`. _ _ $_. _:.~: _ ... -.. _ _ _ - ... : v _ _ ? Y,:: 1~ _ 'S. _ _ _ _ : _ N _ _ . -~ ~ ~~~~ - _ _.}~t`__s l . ?.'s S - • SF _ :?`1 fr y. . rJ_'~ it; ; _ ~~... i. ~ •~S'r: _ _ " Y'.: ._1 ?. lei :'h. - - "xh ~. ° _ if ~'e: K: ' +k: `Z': - ^ ~:'sr: ~ . =5+~ : `r' ~ i*s .~y. . X^~ ~..ci ' F , r' _ _ «.~; . _ _ r.S _ , _ ail:' ~.. ~.: ~' :, .. '.. _ - r i ` ~ ~~ _ a] .a r~~~F ~ :~: ~.. ~: = iYi~ ~. :.i ~'?. .~ '~ :~_x,;. r:%f - »~. ~~' ,ry-: "~,y.. ._~L ,w .. _ :> ~ :' - ' ~...: ~:.y` Sir ~. J~f _ yea :1:f. :i y' 2+` '.rYi':_ ATTACHMENT C RECQMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS dF APPROVAL 1. The applicant shall meet all of the requirerrients established by the Public Works Department, Fire I}istrict Number 3, Rogue Valley Sewer Services, and any other agency requirements. 2. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall make all efforts to preserve trees on the site which may be considered of a significant or historic nature. 4, A, privacy hedge shall be planted along the north, east and southern property lines. S, Rear windows shall be of a dimension and placed in such a way as to add to the privacy of the residents in the area of this project. ~~~ Public Works I?epartntent +~E~`r~T~AL P~ 1 RAT Bo#~ Pierce, director Matf Sarnitore, ©ev. Services Coord. .w _ _____ _ ___ _ _ ... P~IBLI~` T~Q.~':KS STAFF RL'PCaRT May 23, 2005 Tfl: FROM: SUBJECT: Planning L?epartment Public Works L?epartment Tentative Subdivision for 37 2W 1 OAA, Tax Lots 7500 and 260{} Hiatt Court Subdivision ~plicant Skillman Brothers 3650 Biddle Road #23 Medford, OR 97504 P.~. Descriptioxal TOl~}-1t11MR (R-3} honing Purpr~se Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department (PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Departrr~ent Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards ~ Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specif cations should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Existing Infrastructure 1. Streets: Hiatt Lane is a private street owned and maintained by the homeowners who reside upon it. 2. Water: There is an existing eight-inch water Izne in Hiatt Zane. 3. Storm Drain: There is xx-inch storm drain facility 1.00 feet from the property on Hiatt Lane. 155 South Second Street ~ Cerrtrai Poirtf, 4R 975U2 = 541.654.3321 i=ax 549.fifi4.6384 ~~~ Department, to serve the development, The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. .Development Plans --Required Infornxation Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least ~5'°l0 tomplete_ The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Fublic Works Staff In order to be entitled. to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. Ali submittals anal responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval, Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profzle for streets, water, storm drainage and. sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erasion control plan, utility anti outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traff c studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Turks Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. .After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the f nal plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond far any uncompleted improvements {as deterErr~ined by the Public Works Director}. Hiatt .L,ane Subdivision -Plans Three sets of plans at ~5°Ifl complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the fzeld. A rnylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. f 55 S©ufh Second Sfreef £~ Cenfral P©int, C?R 9?5Q2 ~= 54 ~. 664.3327 -Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~ Hiatt Lane Subdivision _ Prcateetian ref Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be Shawn on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: The exact locations of underground facilities shad be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation. with the public ar private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from. damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated far alteration ar removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. ~. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose ofpratecting ar relocating existing facilities. Hiatt Lane Subdivision - T3jater Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, ar an extension of the City uTater system. All requirements of the C}regan Mate Plumbing Specialty Code and the Clregan State 1-lealth Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems. shall be strictly adhered ta. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted far specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Hiatt Lane Subdivision -,Streets l . The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97'S0~ ~~ 54?.fi1i4.3321 Fax 54.664.6384 ~~~ visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act DADA} or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT}, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Hiatt sane Subdr`vision -Storm Amin It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. if the City does not have such information, the engineer shalt present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design.. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase 11 requirements. ~. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Hiatt .Lane Subdivision -Required Srrbmr""hats l . All design, construction plans and specif cations, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required lay other agencies, including, lout not limited to Oregon Department of Nish and Wildlife (DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ}, Oregon Division of State Lands {DSL}, Oregon Department of Transportation (C~DOT) approval for storm drain. connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority {RVSS}, and Jackson 155 Saufh Second Sfreef 4n Cenfra! Painf, QR 975t?2 ~ 541.664.3321 <- Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~ County- Road and Park Services Department ~3C Roads}, DAL and AC()E, as applicable (wetland rnitigation~. 2. Fire Dzstrict No. ~ must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to f nal review by City PWD. 3. wring construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted. in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 155 ~©ut~t Seconc# Street ~ central Fbint, C.~R 9 a5t~2 =~ 54 9. fifi4.3321 Fax 5~ 1. fifi4. fi384 ~~~ CITY (~F ~EI~TTR;.A.L P~JINT B~.TILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT APPLICANT: Name: SKILLMAN BROTHERS INC Location: Hiatt Lane off of Haskell Sfi City; CENTRAL POINT State: OR Zip code: 975fl2 OWNER: Name: SAME PF:OJECT DESCRIPTION: Plannin file no. fl5fl47 - 1 fl lots Hiatt Subdivision BUIE.DING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 7 . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with al! current State of Oregon adopted codes. ~, if a private storm drain system is proposed ifi must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street 1'sghting must be reviewed and permitted by the Cenfiral Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter ~ $ and Chapter ~ of the ODSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered, d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacenfi loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. _~_ ~~~ CITY CJ~F CENTRAL PC?~T BZTILDIN~C DEPAR.Ti:1~F,NT STAFF REPORT Hiatt Subdivision A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compactions acceptable to the Building flfl•icial shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation permit is finalled. Exception: ~ . The upper ~ . 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2, The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 8. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements, 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Department for use in preparing the Planning department staff report. The Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 7, 2005. Central l ~oint Build~r~'Department By: Lo -2- Dated: June 2, 2005. ~~~ ~~~~~tx ~ ~~~~~,~. ~~~ s ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ z „1. - : ~. ~~~ _ ~ May 31, Zfl45 ~ '"~ALL~Y S~WE1~ ~RV1C~ I..oCation: 138 West Vitas Road> Central Point - Mailing t~ddress: i?C?. r3ox 313fl, Cents] 1'oin€,~R 975{12-0005 Tel. {54l} 664-6300 or (541} 7?9-4144 PAx {54i} 664-?171 www.RVSS.us K.en GersGhler FAX ~&~-6384 City of Central Paint Planning l~epactment 155 South SeGOnd Street Central Point, Qregon 975G~ _ ._.._ Re: Skillman Brothers Townho€~se Development, File #05047 Dear R.en, There is a 6 inch sewer main in l~iatt Lane adjacent to the subject property. This sewer main is sub-standard and in poor condition and cannot support the proposed development. Sewer service to the development will require replacement of the 6 inch main to the existing manhole on Haskell Street with a new $ inch sewer main, and extending the 8 inch main into the development as shown on the site plan. Rogue Valley Sewer Services will contribute to the construction Gast afthe affsite work an amount equal to the anticipated collection system development charge which is currently $5513 per lat. The Front Foot Fee of $27.83 per foot of frontage also will not apply due to the sewer reconstruction. The subject property is also within the Phase ~ NPDES Stormwater Quality management area which is aclrninistered by F.VS. Future developments will be required to comply with applicable stormwater quality standards. Feel free to Gall me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, ~~~ Carl Tappert, P,E. District Engineer K:1]~ATAIAGENCIES~CENTPTIPLANNGISUBDIVISI(~I~It2E3~151fl5E34'7-SK:~LLMAIV TC~WI~TEI~}USES.Df~C ~~~ ~ N :$r, ,,,~a~~CSan ~,.ountt~ ire ~is~rict ~,,~a. ~ „r +~ ~' ~ ~' a~C ~oac~ ~~~' ~it~ ~._~~ ~~ 9?'St~~--107'5 June 2, 2t}©5 City of Central Point Attn: I~,isa Moragn Planner Re. X5447 Hiatt Lane PU© See attached map with written comments for this project . = Add one Fire Hydrant at the entrance to this project = Install NtJ PARKING ANY TIME sign as shown on the plat map = Provide RED Curb paint to the area shown on the map = Follow Central Point City requirements to maintain curb paint annually. Mark Moran Deputy Fire Marshal ~2~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' .~-~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~-~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ .~ ~~a~ ~~ ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ to ~ a~ ?5 ~a +- ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ °,~~~ ~~~~ ~~ 4 ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~' ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ 3'~F ~ ~ ~- ~ ~o ~~ ~~ ~ 4q ~ •~.~~ ~i ~~~ ~~~~ .~ ~.~ ~~ a ~~~ ~~ ~g; ~~ ~~ ~~ ,- ~ ~ +9~.] ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ri ~~~ .. a~ ~~ ~ *o ..sue M~ ~sr ,~ ~ Q ~~ 6` CEt7AFt _ _ _ i ~ ,~,G G ~ D ~ G. G Cif ~~ P L ... p ~ ~ G L fi .r ~ ~` ~ ~ 3 ~~~~ ~' .CE3 ~~E ~ ;sue. t Edo i ( rya-t7c, ~- n. i ~Y ~ `...".~" ~ I!l,W.L L-?YN. 1 _ ~,! r,. .~ I uusa. ~~.rr~: ^ 1 m i ~ f ~ i E _. .__ ' 1 cEU~ t1:~a~srp ~' ~~ ~1 $ u ~ ~ wrrt. ,~' G ~ ~F~' _ ~ht ~ 1'S ~~~ n.~~s.~rr r~A~c~rs~ ~~ 11'S @ " Cat 3 -~---_--~-_.~,~ ~ _ __._._..1.------~ of 8 --~ ~ ~-__. .aG_ . - - ~ D s `~ ~. -s„~. ..~_ ~ . O ~ Lot ~ ~ - - 4 D ~ 7 GAR ~ ~°+ c+~tc~aa + ~ ~ 2 GAR ~ ~ GARAr~-TYP. _--___ 1 1 ~rr.~ar~ ~~ _------ GARACaE-TYP. `~ c .~. ~ ~ ~ s ssa~ vALVEB ~' ss ~ P~~~ 3` ... y... ~ t sut~, - " ~ ` 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Lot ~ _ ~ . ~ ~ ' ~ ~ a~r ~ `4` ELEC. t'lETER$ Eyq?31~?E~ _.____ ~ J ELEC- F'IE3#:~3 E L ~ ~"~ L '~' BL cwt' L ~ •L is ` ~~ ~a~~ --------~----i ~ -. ~~ t,~J4, Q .-y/ ~~~~ CJRIY~SII,AY ~~~l~o' ~`~~ T2T S. 3~d Str¢¢t ~onin~ ~~rian~~z PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 7, 2445 TO: Central Paint Planning Commission FROM: David Alvord, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Tentative Plan far a 10-lot subdivision to be known as Hiatt Court Subdivision. Owner/ A nlicant~ Mark Skillman 365(} Biddle Road Medford, Qregon 97544 Pro er Descrit~tion: 37 2W lOAA, Tax Lot{s} 7544 & 7644 Zoning: T(JD-MMR {R-3} Snxnznarv~ The applicant has submitted plans for a tentative subdivision which shall be known as Hiatt Court Subdivision; consisting of 10 padlats, S per tax lot with access being taken off of Hiatt Lane. Padlot developments are a permitted use in R~3 zoning districts. Authority CPMC 1.24.424 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a site plan. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.454 {Attachment A}. Aurilieable Law: CPMC 15.14.414 et. Seq, -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.24.414 et seq.- R-3, Multiple Family Zoning District CPMC 17.65.414 et seq.- TOD Districts and Corridors CPMC 17.60.214 -- Padlat Development :~-~ Discussion• The applicant, Mark Skillman, has submitted plans for aten-lot subdivision located on tax lots '7500 {248 Hiatt Lane} and '600 (260 Hiatt Lane}; for the puzposes of a padlot development an these two lots; 5 lots per tax lot. Zoning for the project is T{7D-MMR; base zoning is R-3. {Attachment B-1 } Because of the underlying R-3 zone, a padlot development is permitted. The Tentative Plan mainly reflects R-3 zoning characteristics in setbacks, parking., lot coverage anal density. Minimum lot size for the project complies with the 2,000 square foot minimum lot size requirement for single-family-attached units in Tt~D zoning districts. The applicant has submitted the project as a pad lot so that both tax lots are used to their greatest capacity, while maintaining a unique approach to in-fill development. Each resulting tax lot will be oriented so that it faces the parking area which is shown on the Tentative Plan as a 24 foot Reciprocal Accessl Utility Easement. Staff recommends that this easement be reduced by 2 feet so that rear yard setbacks are 10 feet; bringing the development into compliance with R-3 rear yard setback requirements and will be compatible with other developments in the vicinity of the proposed project. Side yard setbacks are shown as Tf}D standard of 5 feet. Because the applicant has submitted this project as a padlot; the manner in which this development is designed is permitted under CPMC 17.60.210(c}; "the pad lots within the parent parcel are exempt from the lot area, width and depth, yard and setback and lot coverage requirements to which parent lot is subject". A quick review of R-3 requirements shows a minimum lot size of 4,040 sq. ft. for the first lot and a minimum of 1,648 sq. ft. for each resulting lot. Lot width in Rµ3 districts is a minimum of 60 feet with no depth requirement stated in the code. Setback requirements: 20 feet; front yards, 10 feet; rear yards, 5 feet per floor; side yards. Maximum lot coverage is 50°l0 of the total lot area in R-3 zones, leaving 50°lo for yard space. Minimum lot sizes in TOTS-MMR zones is 2,000 sq. ft. for single-family-attached row houses. Minimum lot width in TQD-MMR zones is 22 feet with a minimum depth requirement of 50 feet. Maximum lot coverage is 80°lo with. 20°lo for yard areas, Minimum setbacks. 10 feet in the front; 15 feet in the rear; S feet on the sides. Parking in R-3 zones requires that each unit be provided two parking spaces and one guest parking space per evezy four units. The site plan (Attachment B-1} shows that there will be 4 parking spaces per unit, thereby meeting the parking requirements. Access to the project area would be taken from Hiatt Lane. The Tentative Plan shows a driveway of 20 feet in width, city standards for driveways is 21 feet. The applicant will be responsible for any frontage improvements required by Public V~orks. Additionally, the applicant will need to plan for Storm 1Jrainage Inf'rastruet~re, a Ten-Foot Public Utility Easement to be dedicated behind the current right-of--wa~ir~e, and a Street Tree Plan. ~~~ Tax Lot 7600 (260 Hiatt Lane} is shown on the Flood. Insurance Rate Map {Community Panel Number: 410()92 0041C} as being in a 100-year floodplain. Other developments within the vicinity of 1-Iiatt Court have been able to satisfy FEMA standards for building in a floodplain, therefore, the applicant will more than likely have the same options to address this issue. Qne option is to show the base flood elevation for each individual tax lot on the grading plans for the site and submit flood elevation certificates for each lot showing top of finished floor being a minimum of 1 foot above the base flood elevation. Another option is the applicant could apply for a Letter Of Map Amendment (COMA} through FEMA which would remove the project area from the floodplain. A recent development in the general area of this project has been successful in obtaining LOMA's through FEMA and this project could potentially do the same. A COMA is obtained through FEMA and is based on topography vs. the base flood elevation, or haw high the waters would rise during a potential flood event. The applicant would be required to f ll out an application showing base flood elevation and topography. The process takes 6 to 8 weeks. The site plan shows landscaping along each side of the project area as well as the parking lot. However, the landscaping plan lacks details such as an irrigation plan and a listing of proposed tree and shrub species the applicant intends to use at the site. The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Commission assign a condition that the applicant provide a more detailed landscape plan that includes shrub and tree species together with an irrigation plan. A backflow prevention assembly will be required. The Public Works Department, Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS} and Fire District Number 3 have been notified of this application. Public Works will xequire that the developer shah: 1. Develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and run~on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 2. Maintain aten-foot wide public utility easement paralleling I-Iopl~ins Road; this easement shall be dedicated behind the current right-of way line. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. `l'he plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications far the trees to be planted within landscape rows. (Attachment D} Rogue Valley Sewer Services has commented on the project and have stated that there is a six- inch sewer main adjacent to the property but is sub-standard and cannot support the proposed project. The six-inch sewer main will have to be replaced with a new eightwineh line. The applicant will work with R.VSS to install a new eight-inch sewer main. The project is located within the phase 2 NPDES Stormwater Quality management area which is administered by RVSS. Stormwater containment and runoff system will be required to comply with all applicable stormwater quality standards. ~} ~} e~ Fire District Number 3 i-las commented on the project and is requiring a fire hydrant at the entrance to the project area, no parking signs are to be installed along both sides of Hiatt Lane; the curb within the dedicated turn around area shall be painted red and maintained as required annually by city standards. See Attachment F-2 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law: Pad Lot 17evelcr~rn~nts In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases its decision on the Following standards from Section 1'7.60.210: A. Padlot development applications shall be presented to the city; anal processed by the city, in the same manner as a partition or subdivision application; first, in the form. of a tentative plan, and then in the form of a final plat. All provisions of Title 16 of this code shall apply to padlot developments; provided, that the lot size provisions of Title 16 of this code shall apply ordy to the parent lot and not to the padlot. ^ Minimum lot size in R-3 zones is 6,000 square feet. For multiple dwellings on the lot, the first lot must be 4,000 square feet with each additional lot being a minimum of 1,648 square feet. Tax Lot 7500 is 10,454.4 square feet; Tax Lof '7600 is 9,147.6 square feet. B. The parent parcel, From which the padlots and common area, iF any, are to be created, shall conform to the standard requirements for lots in the particular zone in which the parent lot is located, including, but not limited to, requirements pertaining to lot area, lot width, lot depth, lot coverage, yard and setback requirements, number and height of buildings, density restrictions, parking requirements, and distances between buildings. ^ The proposed padlot development is located within the TOD corridor and is zoned T4D-MMR. Base zoning is R-3. The applicant is proposing asingle-family-attached development which is defined in the TQD as row houses. Minimum lot sizes for single-family-attached row houses is 2,400 square feet. Because this project has been submitted as a padlot, the applicant is able to use the 1,648 minimum lot size as specified in the code for R-3 developments as well as the 2,400 square foot minimurrn as described in the code for developments within the TQll corridor, Maximum lot coverage in R-3 zones is 50°l4, whereas in the TOD maximum lot coverage jumps to 80°l0. The tentative plan shown an average lot coverage of 49°l0, leaving 51 °lo for yard and common area. Front and rear- yard setbacks are shown to be in compliance with R-3 standards with the exception of side yards which are shown an the site plan as 5 feet; which is the standard for development within the TUD corridor. Density requirements in R-3 zones is 6 units per acre minimum & 12 units per acre maximum {CPMC 17.28.080 C-1) Minimum and maximum density in Toil-MI~~R. zones is 16 & 32 units per acre respectively, the combined square footage of both tax lots is 19,602 or .42 acres, The applicants proposal of 10 lots is a permitted density under padlot development requirements. The height of the buildings will be a maximum of 45 feet as permitted in the T(lD corridor. However, X04 because of existing residences in the area that are not located in high density neighborhoods, CPMC 17.67ASO~I}(3} limits the height of new residential buildings within fifty feet of lower density neighborhoods to 35 feet. The developer has expressed that the new residences at this site will be the same design as those that were built next to Robert Pfaff Park (Attachments B~2 & B-3}. Those residences were 35 feet in height, and it will be required that the proposed project will not exceed 35 feet. Required parking in R-3 panes is ~ covered spaces per unit; 1.5 covered spaces in TUD developments. The tentative plan shows each unit will have 2 covered spaces with driveways that are wide and deep enough to provide two additional uncovered parking spaces. The homes will share a common wall. C. The padlots within the parent parcel are exempt from the lot area, width anal depth, yard and setback, and lot coverage requirements to which the parent lot is subject. ^ Lot area, width and depth, yard and setback, and lot coverage requirements conform with bath R-3 and TC}D-MMR design guidelines, and have been "combined" iota a unique design concept. D. Structures on padlots must meet all applicable state of Clregon building code requirements, as well as all ether applicable city, state and federal regulations. ^ The attached dwellings shall be constructed to applicable building and fire codes. The applicant shall comply with any additional requirements. E. Structures an padlots must be multidwelling unit attached buildings. No detached, single- dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed on a padlot. ^ The prapased construction is defined as single-family-attached rowhouses and fulfill the criteria far multi..dwelling units. '. No final plat for the creation of a padlot development shall be approved unless and until the developer has also previously submitted and received city approval for the covenants, conditions and restrictions applicable to the common area, if any, providing for the continual management and maintenance of the common area and any improvements thereon. ^ The Tentative Plan does not show any common areas. ~~~ Re~camnaendatian: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ta.e one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No. ,approving the preliminary development plan and tentative subdivision for Hiatt Court Padlot Subdivision, based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval as set forth in the staff report; or 2. Reeorm~nend denial of the preliminary development plan for the Hiatt Court Padlot Subdivision based on findings of fact articulated by tine commission; or 3. Continue the review of the preliminary development plan. and tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A Notice of Meeting B Site Plan (BMI), Floor Plan (B-2) and Building Elevations ~B-3) C Planning Department Conditions of Approval D Public Works Staff Report. E Building Department Staff Report F Comments from other agencies ~~}~ CENTRAL POINT City of Central Point PLANNING DEPA~'i TM.ENT 't'om tiunt~hrey, A1CP Camruunity Devela}rment Director t{en Gersebler Community Planner Dave Alvord Community Planner Visa Mangan Plauniug'I'echniclan Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: May 17„ 2005 Meeting Date: June ~, 2008 Time: 7:00 p.m. {Approximate} Place: Central Point City Nall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, (Jregon NATURE flF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating 1{~ attached single family homes. The subject property is located in a Tt~D- MMR, Medium Mix Residential zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 10AA, Tax Lot{s}75Q0 & 7604.. The addresses are 248 & 260 Hiatt Lane and is located north of Ash Street, east of Glean Way, south of West Pine Street, east of Glenn Way. Pursuant to C}RS ~ 97.763 {3} {e}, failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTIGE Tfl MORTGAGEE„ LIENHflLDER„ VENDOR flR SEDER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FC}R DECISlflN The requirements for a Tentative Plan application review are set forth in Chapters ~ 6 & 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. ~~~ PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 7, ZflflS. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Nall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Or. 975U2. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4~. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, aregon, The City File Number is: 136047. Copies of the same are available at 16 cents per page. ~. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541 } 664-3321 ext 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ul ~. 221' TT'P.- 24' ?YF'. ~2fb' 1'YP. ~'~' $ A ~~ } L Cc (t -•^ it F?' k L ~,. ~ P L L Cx =3e~.~ L ,. ~ ~~; L L .a.. G -}- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~• ~ DCxL~il.ICaF~1' a t y Wrc I I .____ i ! i ___- p~. 7I~..a ~ ... ~~ ..,.~ WING ~At { ~ I <FEAT A?aE xt~ ' ~` ~t 1 ~ Wt~f. ~ WM, r' 8 ~. d.f,o. s~ ~ ~ ~ fi 7 z~E~ x~' I ~E ~.. ~ °~ ~~,, 5 TC~t~4~C~U5~ PAF~C41`fx i+ ~ /UtiLiTY F',LR~Et~lCs ~1~1T Uh~ITv I ~ _ ..L _._-- - AG vINCs ` ~.l~~' S ~ 1 ~ L •Tt'P ... .» ~. s ««. c..... ~ . I ~.or t,n~ i I ^ I '' ~' f I I e~ ~, I ~ ~ Y 2 CAR ' a ~ -~ ,. rn . 1 GARAGE-tYF . ~ ~ i 5 'PION YAI.yE$ +Z• -i- FG~C~ ~~ ' "`"' -I ' --{- T P ~---~ i ~ PA - ~ wrL C.cxisc. gci-t Wn' N ~ ~ ~ a. rrw ~. I ~ ~ vE ~ L©T ~ ' ~ ' V F Y.w/ j I ~~ coNc ~ ei.A~-rrP. ,~ ~,,,G?T I1 b` CEDAR i~,4T PSX"F~' CN I CONC. PAD~i77'. ~~ K ~ ~ ~y $ 4 c ~ ~ ~ T©Ex~NNU~~~ ~l1~IT~ +[ ~~ '~ z cAR _ GAGE-"i"YYP. L4T ~ ~ J 3' L4T 5 I s s-RECEae~n ELEC.r ~~~_ ~ ~ ~., .,.~- ~ ; s ~3 L ~ ~' 20>' 'x' ' ~- ^ "'-a'iy~' ~ ~ ~' "~~~~ t ~ ~ ~ %'R S 2b'R l N1,4TT L,,41~1~ ~,-~~~ .~. ,... .... _ - ti~ AG PAVING': '" .» ... ~€~' I 8~` ds hlOR71-# f~ISS~m~t ~~~~~~r~C ~t'~~ ~l-~~ f ~{ ~ 1~F 4$'ftt3~s CTRIYk1ik4Y/' V .~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ .. ii~.j;SS{e;t.;, v" f t'i ~r+}'y.~.~•• i~~j.:'v~L",3~%4~~~ i."iv YpY.+h!4('.. ~: :MF~.ji ~Y.;` ~~{k`,L'.~.^i..pY~„5", :~'in^~.{fra?:y:~f ~~''~}~J 5•, r.;. si^ r~. °;a: ;. ;;'h w'"~.+c.x,~"fir:;.^:J"~". ;sr.; t ^,.. :... ire ~,.' .. u~~` '' .;F~'~ .. - :'; `~~:; rl ~*C. . ~n _ ..... ~:a v . ....~-: ~ :.:.... ,4~^~~~. .. ... ~ ~...~. r .~. .:.. .. f.~}. Ti ~,.., ,. sv., ,..... .. r~: :. ~i ;,,i't; ,n. ..`k' 1 {t. rye ova ~ „ ~ ' „i}.. ~.~rt' hy tik: r-~. vY}~ a .. ~ ~' .ran s . i..t ~ m ,m ,.~~ n S 4` ~: ~.° #h`. ~+rv tl . ..,. +~i a., may`>,'.'i't;~- , ;~ . {•1 „~. „4'.: w~• ,«. ^}~ t, :- ..:'1 ~i: A~-n ..,.. '•' ,, ^ e~ S":~. _ £i°.} : ~. .~~' ... . ~~ ~'. Yr.: ~ ..~ ., ,. >. ~, ~' •~y ;G ~..~.. ~` ro ~ , 3 5. ~~. ~~~ . 1. a. .~ S ..L Y~,... !. . ~,.~ . 1 v `i::Y t1: t.k . 5 q ::T-t '.~ l ~ . ~. `C 'is.6 ti ~ h <: t~~ a.~ ~ 3 `~ :'J:~xr~%f rt'ei~l ~x i;.~. ~u `;^Y ~. to ~Q .t~?,J ;x. ..+'> r.~ ,y' ~'e s ~,~• ...~'-.,4. ~t '~`" ~'* { 5¢~£s. ..xH ~~AZ:~ {s E . ~... :..,:.: ~ ...r- .. a. 'l. 'r. .C rr .- ..r , ltd. _ t ' :f''« .=z,..~ r.r, t ~.. _~:: ~i :. - . ..v ,.~ a C.' t r ,~ n. "`~ ;~f::r '' ~~. ;:yy: w;.' :.: , ~' .., .. }y ., i .,_..` ,; ~a ';.a~-` . ra •~ . ?' ., ; ;,' jr ! . '~ ra:. '~dt~~'t~= - ~:~• ~..3. 'N 8 ,..1 ff , ~,.:,.. n 'n.~o, ti:'.':,i~v:.. •. ::...1 ~' .:. '• ~r_: ,~ ,, Y~ m .. .. ... ... .. '.:.:.~~. e, :, r~ . .Tif.ni so... s ..~s ,.e%¢~. ~~: `,Y ,t i'€ . , ~4",''a ~,~'~ u: ~' v,1 ~. } e.' r+ .'~. E. d; i 1 . di' t.: iii 'F Y2F. ~'i R.:\n~. ~ Yr. C ~' n4x; r.~E,. ~' • `••• ~ 'n{'~ ''1~.s.x.e 'A'L'F`A :.t~~<~ 4Cv. ~%1:. 4 F: ~y ~y ,~&~. - t;: a;. '°t's: ". M19 #:: ;, a '~r~" cQt. <c; z• ~.,.-. :;;J: ,- .x .: .% ~iifi~ r.~~:» • .., rte.: .. s• e~ r~.: .. ,;~' 1 }'@ ... .. ~.r~f.. ;'S': ~""~ "~Sii'' ~.i .:R ..:.'. ~i ... ~: i..rli :.~~. .:+.~ v n N~~~ ~y ~~ 'ii$ .,.. y .y., ~ .t.~ ~S.ti +~ ..~... a.-~:~> ~.t .v Ar ..st.~_;'. is nU.ui.'~.'w.. ::Y~i~~t: i. ~. .~ { t r . . . X 9 S ..i., C~i~- ~ - .~ t ~'A4 ~r 1{ 7 ;.~ R..3. .x .1,. .. t t tai+. - t .y~ L;i"'. ~Y.' Y v,;c. e~~ }~. x. `..myc, ~*: M1 3'... 1..<l"i. rn ~jk .. N i~~c.._ t .'. 'iG ~.~ 3+. a - . ~s~, its. jj,, ".~:'~'' S 1 ~;A. ~'r. ~.:; ~. a . ',t i:f':'s '.;G ~}:': 4.+, r. ,.q . ^a• .. _~~~ ~'i'^. vh. . Y... r`:~~F :::f' - ~; ~,,~_ ,f~~P~ a.l ~. .~';~ f~'~'<Y ~ ...~ .. :;.. } ti<:~~* %~;» ti_ ., ~. ~>, ., . ... :%.~ Si: - .; - . .. :. . ^.-` c ~,~, ,r 1' ..~ ; . sz :: '': p.:. ....,t y.. %..yte..a;eyr S~',r..~::. ~...:~r ..:7.,,: .GSM :.: .. ~.. ... .:. .. - `t k~ 5 ::J (. . ti:+ - .:4'. :..L =. - ~'S tt': .k: •.S- . r'~+ ` .. '.5~ : ....... ...r .. n. .. .... .. .''1i: M1' .. t:: y#_..+ ~'1.'. r ti. ~: %ta'i' I" • ~• ~~ ~ .;'~ a ` ~,ti, w~1 .~' ' z. Nt ~ _ _ ":~ . . ~~r% j-; i ~ F~. "..t „ Q , ,'~5 •~'> ' - .. . s'~:~',::.. f.µ': Z .~.~:. ~~•: '~. - -~wiin+- i - : ;'%~. . t.: ~',''% +Lr ..v'u tii , '~. (, ,'Yi,: a) `: Ii 1,. ~:~ AtS' ~.t„" .J i Y ati~ :t. T•,ti} '~'.. y+' l k X~:• 'F r•~ , `: . ' .. [+~fr. :'~:,e ...f . .,. '.~~';x' ti ~' ,:.1 ''• ', • u` ""+' .iF :vi .,.:A ?~t;~r. `~ ?,. ~ty ~ •: <, ;r„ S «. { .•r. ~~~~ , ~, r. =t ... :iY~.n .:r.. :tia;r x: ~...~,... WMr~MM}5 . :1s v^R ~. 1: v~ >'Y ,`y,~; ~" ' bn~« } r ~;~ +'1v~~" '::f ;,: }.,, y~:`. ~ i, y;. S. '.,1: ~YC :'''~5: ~~: .s z:'a ~'S i s'`''[ ~~4.:~: ,ir:. v~~ V :h.' f , ii { iyy '4:`; .~. ~~i;, `. F %~ ~( ii : ~ , ,~4`. ~~~... ^ ij:€, iK~+; ` v.( •~.~}, f... ~r .~ `a... . t':• f ~.i< `'~°., A} ,F . x.~,t4~~ :1~• ~r~ x...e '~J:' '+:r h:. ' Y •': i ,`: ~~; r. '.::{ti ~~t.:~ ri kk+} '.1.. :.) . =3;i. ;.'S ,. `:y I~'~ y'uf `~e i `~'+~:.''t`, . r5 vi.,. t ,ilm.:'..,. ..Y.... .~ i^~:,. .;~:r b~ ,t ~.{~ a,: rt :h. MMr+'• ~5 ;i <?i V tiir `~vy%'.. .'tt .1'^...' :: e~~ is '''t Y~ ~~ ;:~~ ~. '.<.t • ''. .~`S 7...' . f. ,~i e:;r,;u:. rwe: Jc:r~ .::~: ' ~"~: ,i ~ '~~. C': •1:~~, .4a l.,.w,,.. ' ,,: {.'y .':.'.' i ,'.- ':j:> ';;2'~ .':r: ,,~. ,t.. ,`.: . '~~' . }''~.~ ~.. ~ ~ryyy~ „}%' ~y,,~,~nti •`t ~ij ati;:. , ::,p;i; ' ~. Y.'. ~:`. t`. u..., ~`i:" ,~5,'," ~~.1. ~, 'i'~ a ^. v ':r. .e't e,' _ ..`}r,. ~r~~ N~1. vi . Fr.~ l` ~::~I~ elf ~ >i< .sti~h .y~. ~~. ` ::~.'..,.1 .~ ,jK. „J . ~.*i:" . . :` ~• . X:^;.. ::r •: ',t '~ Hr ';i.'. t ~'; ~. :'r;.. ~~I ~~j7 ~yj ' tiC''v "a ~t ..-_ ,,.......... .: r. .... .. nii;`; . .... ..........r...%'e~iui ~'i+2Y~n>~us!y~~ti ... .~,:~... .~,,. .., ~1. '{., was, ,.. ~^`. •~ir'^ ~: ~''.,. ~',~', ^' c. t, ' v; ,~ "_.. ..5::~t.+ s~: ,t Y i ^: T'o nt'^( ::1+: f `Y . t' ~: '4 ''3 /'7r ~a3c 1 t 5', ~` ~t k ,i f ~~ \ :CT 'S,: :':t ~' 1`"~'~ Y }T . t i.!'.: 1 ti `.•~' . 1't . ,7, r` t' ~.~. .~9T. . h a~ ,i~`.. ;: 7ti: .a?' ., S^,, 'f. ./ : ,:t.t r':7' ?5u '-~:" is C' ..1 ~ v,; ~; .,. ; :f 3y ~~: :.it. .~~. .:r:'t :~~: ~.£d ~`.r r'. Fu;. ,, C ^ h ^ C~. ::{, 'h ~'v ti" `,i ~`Yi r'%,r t" :t y; ".f.. tits. {;.,'" fit. ii ..Z ,f.. Z .. '..L , ~.(ir ::r~~::' r ~^' ' .:,~ v. :.t:: ::2~'- t,. '."r. ; i ,:t, ~,y;:., ..~: ~.. ~~:..': ;.:i. 4. :~, 4?' +} e . ~.hch r' .r~:: :`~9i' ..~:~I f f+'.ii. .4~, ]~ `~`{:. ': ..f .f, n.'u~'. t:'. ':~I/'i ''t ~`:^ .t;' - 5.,: :t rt .'r,~ yi• t;,~ 'It?.+ ":t. CS ,t. 4 . 5.. +Yn. !ry,r., ,;,~".`':{~.,:•r4't'~r~•,~.. Y:~~ ~'S.5''~'.f.,`,`~r~r,-. .Y :k ~ `~S L'}.. ` - .:. i. :~a . i 4 ^ 1..:,~ ~; ~, i~ ''t' !~~;. r'^ .\~ ,y;` ~:i:. I'>. ~'S : t.. - e.' ~( .~. lri; ;.,{,,n r: M:: at= ,`'Sig: i'1 i:,~ :.ln~ .':'h '. t'~~~ 7::e ,d t.• ,~.5'.: '~'C'v, rr.+ ~ I'',1.: 4~+ t:.\J f;t ".~ :? ti •`.y:; :'7:~ P~.'j %, 1',' .:t .n ,r v~':. Fs''I -.q: •f ryi ~:x t .~ ~t:~ f+, ~'r (r. i'1 4: ~),..:. f'~ ."r.. ~. •''4 . ~.y.~j >".J:. ;.ei . 'r: ~f 4,,: ~::4':'. ~';5.': 't~' try. ~~A~t1~~~.: ~j, z •.%y~1 , ':$. ,'1 ' ~..tj.n ,~~. :: ~;?. ,ia i, ~'4s ~7i+ 1 ~ ' `r; =ii .~ t x ..4,',.. ~~~. S~$,: ..yt i . i'aa~ :i ~I. '.i:. ri ~~~• ~ `, '~f'ia •J~. ~.5 ~~ : ~Y' F~ ~` r",, rte _ S'i7'' ..;L++ S'k. ~'f sir rt YL ` ,l1 ra ~: i,.: . ..; }.... in'} ~Mn; ~.Y:t +~ _ +: Wi ~~.kt.' :~': +; IIIrI z .i.. - ::: :'ti 5 ;.. n'yV, wr"".: ,,X~~ ~ :i~`: ~,4.: ,. .:"1", M' `~' 't'. y N.: a °~ _ ' ;: ~~r ;~Y.. Y<` C. ~I4 '^hi ~'.Z.' ~T" F:i '} ' } " ~.: 't:( . ~~;~t y~ rt$. ~ 'S ~' 'ili" `if.. ry •.~... - '•.~'f. ~'' ~~:Y•. ;{i%` 1~'~• 'i',. tt 't.! zaY..; lM1i ,:A:',• ~; ': <'~~'~. :~t~'. -!'~ '~'f . ~~1...'. ;: - ?~;{.~ ,.7'S~.r ':~ C "•l ~.~': ~ ti<~ C'.~'. x y'$`.'. v,v, mr t"' Y .*t.. !~i 1:' il• ~~.h.,- - ~~// '~.X'~~'in ~'i~ it i,tviy . nS'" . ~Y.; .~t~. r. ?rt} ,. ic?: ,:ty ~'Yt.. 5 ~'* f. ,~~E'~ >' 'wt~~ ~ •w ''!n~ ~~'~ ~".. ~_. ,ay ; ~ ~, .,~•„ r,.f~r %:~ ' ~ vi`. ~..r .v ~ r}i r:ti: t • "2,5 rz+{ .., :.It,~: . `;tr?.. r,<., _ ~. ,r,+~. L. F~~ r;:~;y} ;~':~~ 1~ ,dry ~:'i ~• :.rl }: `4~.•~ ,. •~•. J,.' • . +.e:ti 3'. ~ ~~1 ~' ,: ~'. :i i" :.~{'. ° ;~=., :; ,`.?` _ ,Y ` . s^^ &`'. ... ~,~~., ~~ ~.~ iii. :.~ ::,r'. .,, y~`` .~ »: ;Iw'. . ). '~ ':xti }~ ~':. 1'r ~.~: ~' j.' ,Sr....~ ...' J ?r;?A +~: h7 *s,r~~~ ~.\" .Ili:. i~ j~( a~`~''~, is •. ,;.5 ~ j .,~. "'~~h. C :.~ii h ~':«'rs . .::.. ;v. .3'•• ~;: ~'~? 4. ~ G~' •t :~ti.', L 1~ ~; •V u~ i~S C.~ ys~. ti• ~:.. '~l ~; ~$, ~t~~ ' ~~. `%1 "^ ~,. ,•,. e t :'r 4v ti'. «"... rt . yy 1,T r , .... ~~ ATTACHMENT C RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CUND~TZUNS 4F APPROVAL 1, The applicant shall meet all of the requirements established by the Public Works I7cpartt~tent, Fire District Number 3, Rogue Valley Sewer Services, and any other agency requirements. ~. The applicant shall subzx~it a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall make all efforts to preserve trees on the site which may be considered of a significant or historic nature. 4. A privacy hedge shall be planted along the north, east and southern property lines. 5. Rear windows shalt be of a dimension and placed in such a way as to add to the privacy of the residents in the area of this project. ~~~ Public W©rks f~epar~ment A CENTRAL POINT Bob Pierce, Director Matf Sarrritore, C)ev. Services CQOrci. P~BLI~` T1T~'O~'I~S ST~:~'~' R~PQR~` May 23, X445 TO; FROM: SUB.fECT: Plarrc~ing Department Public Works Department Tentative Subdivision for 37 2W 14A.A., Tax Lats 7500 and 7604 Hiatt Court Subdivision A~prtlzcant Skillman Brothers 3650 Biddle Road #23 Ivledford, OR 97544 P~~~ Description/ TC)I~-It!~MP ~R-3 } Zon, i~ Purpose Provide information to the Planning Comrussion and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department (PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design anti development of the proposed, Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Departmment Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards ,~ Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information. not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Exislirrg It frastrue~ure 1. Streets: Hiatt Lane is a private street owned and maintained by the homeowners who reside upon it. 2. Water: There is an existing eight-inch water line in Kiatt Lane. 3. Storm Drain: There is xx-inch storm drain facility 100 feet from the property on Hiatt Lane. 155 South Second Street ~ Gentra! Point, QR 975x2 :~ 541. fifi4.3321 Fax 541. fifi4. fi384 Q ~.'~ Hiatt Lane Subdivision Special Retlur'rements 1. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 2. Public Utility Easement: Aten-foot wide public utility easement will need to be dedicated on the Final Plat. The applicant has not addressed where the PUE will be located, 3. Street Treece andsca, pe Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit far approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan far the areas designated far landscape caws. The plan shall .include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications far the trees to be planted within the landscape caws. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a l Yz" trunk dz`ameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Applicant has submitted an adequate landscape plan. They will need to add one tree to the South of Lot 6 to comply with the street tree standards. 4. Private Drive: The standard private drive width is twenty-one feet. The applicant proposes atwenty- faur feet wide easement drive. The drive will need to be signed or striped far no parking. 5. Addressing: Addressing for the site will be made from Hiatt Lane. The Private Drive will not be named. Stan~'ard Specifications nrrrl Gcr~rls The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In .general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform, Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planu.ing Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served. by public facilities. Public facilities not awned ar maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power {PP~L), Gas {Avista), Communications {Qwest}, and Sanitary Sewer {P.VSS), ~ working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a prof table development and will not sacrif ce quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. it is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works 155 South ,Second Street -~ Central Point, C7R 975(72 = 541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~ Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities arc constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development Uevelvpment Plans -Required .fin„ fvrmt~tr"vn Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95°l0 complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RV~~. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including con~€nents from Public Works Staff: in order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit {4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. in general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals, The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. .Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit, All fees are required to be paid in full at the tune the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Publ€c Works inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements {as determined by the Public Works Director). Hiatt Lane Subdivr"siren -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 9S°do complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A rnylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. ~ 55 S©uth second Street ~ Central Polnf, 4R 97542 ~ 541. fi64.3321 -Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~ Hiatt Lane Subdivision _ .Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities snail be shaven on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. ~. Any existing facilities not specif tally designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the l~?eveloper. ~. Suitable notice shah be given to ail public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Hiatt LameSubdivision -Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The l;?eveloper, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City uTater systerrz. All requirements of the ©regon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the t~regon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to, 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design. and construction of water system related components. Hiatt Lane Subdivision --Streets l . The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as 155 S©ufh Second Street f-> Cenfral P©int, t~R 9752 ~ 541.6fi~.3321 Fax 543.5fi4.638~ ~~~ visually impaired pedestrians anal mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act {ADA} or as adopted by the Clregon Department of Transportation {fJDtJT}, flregan Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination ofthe pavement width and total right-of=way shall be based on the operational needs far each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TbD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing carnrr~ercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of ether new or existing infrastructure. ~'iatt Lane Subdivision -Storm .i~rain 1. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area, If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria far the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. if the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide ail hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Deparfrnent that are necessary to substantiate the storm. sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and 4DFW and United States C(JE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase 11 requirements. 2. The City of Central Paint Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Hiatt Lane Subdr`visivn -Required Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as~built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to tJregon Department of Fish and Wildlife {DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Qualit3r {DEQ}, Oregon Division of State Lands {DSL}, Oregon Department of Transportation {UDC~T} approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. ~-.rn~y Corps of Engineers {AC4E}, affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority {RVSS}, and Jackson 155 ~©uth Second Street ~ Cerrtra[ Point, UR 97`52 - 549.fifi4.3321 ~ Fax 549.664.6384 ~~~ County Road and Park Services Z~epartment ~JC Roads}, DAL and ACQE, as applicablc (wetland mitigation}. 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prier to final review by City P~VD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer tc~ the City Public works Department for approval prior to installation. X55 S©uth Secorrcf Streei ~ Cerrtrai Pain#, DR 975x2 ~ 541,664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~ ~IT"~ OF CEN'Z'~;AL POI~~T BLTILI7ING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT APP~.ICANT: Name: SK[1_1wMAN BROTHERS INC t_ocation: Matt i/ane off of Haskell St. City: CENTRAL, POINT State: OR_ Zip code: 97542 OWNER: Name: SAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Planning file no, 45047 - '14 cots Matt Subdivision BUIL[71NG DEPARTMENT COMMENTS; '# , Applicant, agent and contractors mast comply with all current State of Oregon adopted caries, 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Elecfirical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter ~ $ and Chapter 4 of the ODSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plat plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and constr~.~c#ion to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 1 S and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. -1- ~~~ CITY C)F CENTRAL PQF~T BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPdRT Hiatt Subdivision A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement o€ €ill {including special inspections o€ placement o€ fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official shah be submitted prior to €inal of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation permit is €inalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 €oot of fill placed outside of public rights-o€- way, ~. The upper 1.5 €oot o€ fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the Gity Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area o€ the Gity o€ Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Gentral Point Municipal Code 8.24.124. This is not a plan review. Thos report is preliminary and compited solely for use by the Central Point Planning Department for use in preparing the Planning Department staff report. The Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 7, 2005. Gentral Point Buildir~DeparEmenfi By: edetti _~_ Dated: June 2, 2445. ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ Vacation: 138 West vitas 12oad, Central Point -Mailing Address; PC7_ Box 313(}, Central Point,t~K 97542-00{?5 .;,f . - , ~~ ` Tel. {541} 664-63{X} or {S41} 779-4144 1~Ax {541) 664-7171 www.RVSS,us _.~ May 31, 2005 Ken Gerschler FAX 664-6384 City of Central Point Planning 1-lepartment 155 South Second Street Central Point, ©regon 97502 Re; Skillma>u~ Brothers Townhouse Developznez~t, File #05047 Rear I~en, There is a 6 inch sewer main in Hiatt Lane adjacent to the subject property. This sewer main is sub-standard and in poor condition and cannot support the proposed development. Sewer service to the development will require replacement of the 6 inch main to the existing manhole on Haskell Street with a new 8 inch sewer main, and extending the 8 inch main into the development as shown on the site plan. Rogue Valley Sewer Services will contribute to the construction cost of the offsite work an amount equal to the anticipated collection system development charge which is currently $554 per lot. The Front Foot Fee of $2'7,83 per foot of frontage also will trot apply due to the sewer reconstzuction. The subject property is also within the Phase 2 NPDES Storrnwater Quality management area which is administered. by RVS. Future developments will be required to comply with applicable stormwater quality standards. Feel free to call me ifyou have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, ~ C ri Ta err, P.E. pp District Engineer K:1I:3ATAIAGENCIESICENTPTIPLANNCISUBD1VISlOl~I12005105047-SR:ILLMAN TC}`VVNHCIUSES,D(~C Q ~ac~.son ~,oun~y ire ~is~ric~ ~©. ~ $ 3 3 3 ,~'~~gate ~.©ac ;~;,r~~. X54 ~ ~ 8 26-r ~ ao ~V~~~~~ t~~ ~) s z.~~-~-~ ~ 6 ~~~X} June 2, 2f3C~5 City of Central Point Attn: Lisa Moragn Planner Re: d5t?47 Mutt Lane PUD See attached map with written comments for this project , • Add one Fire Hydrant at the entrance to this project « Install NC) PARKING ANY TIME sign as shown on the plat map • Provide RED Curb paint to the area shown on the map Follow Central Paint City requirements to maintain curb paint annually. .---"'~~'~"~'~'~-cam ~- Mark Moran Deputy Fire Marshal " ~ ~~~ x ~ x ~- ;.i p+ P ;i+ w w r ~~ ~~ ~°~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~" ~~ ~-~w~ ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~t ~ A ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~„ ~~. r ~x ~~~ ~~~~ ~~s~ 3 t E D i~ ~~ I E Ct ~` x5~~~~~~ ~~II ~~~ ~~ ~~ x ~~ ~~ a~} ~~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ -~ ~~~ ~~ r ~~ -~ ~~ ~-~ .... 1 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~~ r ~~ ... ~~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ s~~~~ ~ .yy ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~a ~ v ~~~~ ~ ~~ w N '"' ~~~-~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ -~~~ ~~ -~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~:~ ~' n r c~ ~ ~_ ~{ ~~~ t£ ~ ~ t ~ ~ o i~Pp i~ L ~~ ~~~ ~. ~'~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~~ a ~ v ~ a.~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~~ K~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. _~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~, `j~~\ { I ~~ ~ --~--, ~ 9' 20` TYP. 24' TYf'. --~--~-22>' iYF'. 9' di ~~t ~ ~ ~ rn/Jy 81~/'i b" CEDAR ~ ~ ( 1 ~ ~ '" ' G ~ ~*~ ~ ~l'1. ~ ~ ~ .: ~ ~~ i ~~ "~' ~t sn ~ ~' cr_naR ~ " • .. ~..C~~ ~ 1 -- _ ~I ~t^. t ~'- ~'~ # ~ ~ ~--- - ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~.a7 crc caic. ~.an.~'tn [ { _ ~~ 1 f I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ uta.~, s,a~-rr'P. ! y wry ~ ! uiat.~ Gnu-rrr. Q C ~ TrP~ ~ i 1 , 1 ~ ~ ~ ""' Q ~~"~. ~"Z. f fx ~* G t ~ ~at~~~c~u5~ 2 "~ 24' ~~~ ~. ' ~ ~ 2m' ~ Tc~~l~~C~l~S~ UNI~~J ~'d tUT[L1 #Y F'~~E~~ ~~ITv~ -- ~ .aa vet _ ~ ^ 1 ~. .~., f ^ . _ ~ ~ } ~ ' 2 CAfR ~ ~ ~ q~t~~1 E ~ ~ V '~ ~ 2 CAR ' GARACa~-NP. . ~ °" s ~ ~` GAR.4cs~-TYP. " ~ e ~ '~ a ~ Y ` ~ ~. ~ -£- ~` ~ ~ g t ifCN YALYES 4 ~ ~~ ~ ' ` o rxr x 3 ""'s" E (~ ~ ~--- '--~--I¢r`"""~ wet. ec~. ~aG-sx~r. j ~' j ~ ; ~' ccx+c' ~ s ~ s~.aa-st~r>. 3` ~.4~' S ~ ~ o ' ~ ~ 1...Q~" ~ ' ~K~a~~i~~fi--' '"""_ ~x.~a r~n~RS ~ , ~ ~ mac. raa ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fi `'~ `;~ ` , r ~ 5 .a r r ~ , c I .. .. ~~ __ __ it ~ ~~~ V' ~k~ PLANNING PIEPARTMENT STAFF REFC}RT MEETING PLATE: June 7, 2005 TfJ: Central Paint Planning Commission FROM; ~.en Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing - To consider a Tentative Plan far a 6 lot subdivision known as Twin Creeks Grassing subdivisian, Unit Number 1 located earth of Taylar Road in the TOD-HMR, EC and OS zoning districts {Map 37 2W 03C, Tax Lot 100, 203, 204, Map 37 2W 03CB, Tax. Lot 104, Map 37 2W 03CD, Tax Lot 124, Map 37 2W 3DC Tax Lot 3300}, A~plicantl Owner: Twin Creeks Development L.L.C. P.O. Box 3577 Central Paint, Oregon 9'7502 A~ent~, Herb Farber/Farber Surveying 120 Mistletoe Street Medford, Oregon 97501 S~mmarv: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 33.49 acres of land rota 6 lots with a mix of residential, commercial and open space zoning. This tentative plan is located within the Twin Creeks Transit Oriented Development ~TOD} master plan. Autbori : CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 {Attachment "A"~. Apniicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.65 et seq. -TOD Districts and Corridors I3iseussian• Twin Creeks Crossing, Unit Number 1 is a portion of a multiple phased camrnercial and residential development proposed north of Taylar Raad and east of Grant Road in the Transit Oriented Development (TOD} District. The Planning Department has reviewed the tentative plan (Attachment "B"} for compliance with the TOD Design Requirements, Guidelines and Comprehensive Plan. The area is designated in the TOD Master Plan far high mix residential development, employment commercial and open space. The mix of housing types anticipated have numerous lot sizes and configurations: The 6 «~a Tats that comprise Unit 1 of the Twin Creeks Grassing Subdivision range in size from 3.26 acres to 4,82 acres. This proposed subdivision is one of seven distinct neighborhoods located within the Twin Creeks Development which has been master planned with stringent standards designed to ensure project quality and to create a farm of community that lessens reliance upon the automobile by emphasizing public transportation, bicycle and pedestrian activities. Twin Creeks Crossing, Unit Number 1 is in compliance with the Twin Creeks Transit-Oriented Master Plan which includes pedestrian and bicycle paths, traffic calming measures, open space, landscaping and street light standards. This development represents the beginning of the next phase in W.L. Moore's agreement with the City. The Commission may recall that the applicants entered into apre-annexation development agreement with the City which established public improvement "triggers" tied to vehicle trips associated with the number of housing units. As of now, the developer has improved Haskell Street between Taylor Raad and West Pine Street together with a new signal and architectural lighting standards. I-Iaskell Street extends north into the T4D through property acquired from Rogue Valley Bin but full access to the area will not occur until a Qwest phone junction box is repositioned out of the right of way, The developer and City are working with ©D4T and the CC7PR railroad to construct the second rail crossing near the C}regan State Police headquarters. Park and open space has been accommodated in the vicinity of the proposed neighborhood where a 3.26 acre "Central Commons Neighborhood Park" has been proposed an lot 3. Additional open space will be incorporated as a part of proposed fats I and 5. The Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, Jackson County Fire District Number 3 and the Rogue Valley Sewer Services have been notified of this tentative subdivision. Rogue Valley Sewer Services will continue to work with the applicant in the design of infrastructure. Water service is in the area with details outlined in the Public Works Staff Report (Attachment "D"}. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. 1. The project site is located in the TflD-HMR {High Mix Residential}, TflD-EC (Employment Commercial}, and TUD-flS {flpen Space} zoning districts and increases residential and mixed use land use efficiency in this area. The proposed tentative plan far law mix residential development is a permitted use in the TQD zoning district. The zoning in turn is consistent with the T4D Comprehensive Plan map designation. The Comprehensive Plan encourages innovative residential planning and development techniques that would help to increase land use efficiency and reduce costs of utilities and services Comprehensive Plan, page XII-l2}. ~~~ 2. The project consists of a tentative plan application far the subdivision to subdivide approximately 33.49 acres for the purpose of developing Unit 1 of the Twin Creeks Grassing Subdivision. The fatal number of lots proposed far what the applicants have identified as the Unit 1 of their subdivision is 6. iJne of these fats is the Central Commons Neighborhood Park. The proposed mixed use subdivision will facilitate meeting the density requirement for the TC}D- HMR (High Mix Residential) Zoning District which is a minimum of 30 units per acre. There is no maximum density in the T4D-HMR district. TC}D-EC and T~JD-4S zoning regulations do not permit residential activities and zonmg densities do not apply. Each of the proposed lots within the subdivision will be further subdivided to meet the requirements of the TC}D Design Requirements and Guidelines. The tentative plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.10.f110 et. seq. 3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed bath the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions found in Attachments D and E. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adapt Resolution No,~, approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Notice of Public Hearing B. Copy of Tentative Plat C. Schematic of Central Commons Neighborhood Park D. Public Works Staff Report E, Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval 11CPCHS t1CITY W1D~IPLA,NATING12oQ5 LAND LJSE FILESIf}5050-T`WIN ~RE~K X'INCsto5o50.DC7C ~~~ ~i~y of ~enfr~f Porn ~7`-7"fI-~1~m.~nr.t` r~~t ~F~'~T~~- PLA~~i'~~ rF~,~ur~~~vr ~~ ~ ~ 1 Tom itumphrey, AlCP Community Devetopment Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Alvord Community Planner lwisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: May 'I 7, 20(15 Meeting Date: June 7, 20(}5 Tirne: 7:00 p.m. {Approximate} Place: Central Point City Nall '155 ~. Second Street Central Paint, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating six parcels. The subject property is located within the Twin Creeks Master Pian area, and identified as Twin Creek Crossing, Phase 1, The zoning consists of T4D-OS, C}pen Space; TCJD- NMR, Nigh Mix Residential; T4D-EC, Employment Commercial; TC}D-MMR, Medium Mix Residential and `is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 3C, Tax Lot{s} 1 fl0, 203 & 204 and 37S 2W 3B, Tax Lot 100. The property is located south of Scenic Avenue, north of Taylor Road, east of Grant Road, and west of US Highway 99. Pursuant to C}RS 197.763 {3} {e}, failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NC?TICE Tta MORTGAGEE, LIENH©ILDER, VENDC}R 4R SELLER: f~RS CHAPTER 2'I5 REQUIRES THAT tF YOU RECEIVE THIS NQTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property, CRITERIA FOR DECISION The reciuirements for a Tentative Plan application review are set Earth in Chapters 16 & 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions 155 Sc~utlz Seco~~d Street • Cetztt•al t'oitat, (~R X75{12 • {541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541} 664-6384 of the project approval. PUB[,IG COMMENTS ~ . Any person interest in commenting fln the move-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the dose flf meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 7, 2085. 2, Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Nall, '155 South second street, Central Point, Or. 97502. 3. issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Nall, 155 Sfluth Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is: 05050. Cflpies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at {541 ~ 664-3321 ext 292. SUMMARY ©F PF2OCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, prflponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan application as submitted. City regulatiflns provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions, 1 SS Sou~l~ second ~t~-eet • Cez~trat Poi~~t, OR 975172 0 X541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541 } 664-63$4 TEN 7`A T1VE PLAN Gr 37-2w»3C TL ,O6 ExtST,xG \ IRRICATFON UNE~ ~ 1 x60) t \? \ '~ I \1 L~LBT 77~ 1 \ S ~i.at"'f6{ 1 3,3.12 \\ ~idT'~~ LO7 2 \ ~ Fl.a~'S4"t ~ s.a2 AcMl. \\ o FL~St'TS'~ ( 275435 Sq.rt. \ ~ ~"tar?~ I t2+a_____. ~ ~"toT ~o"~ ,.57 ~LOt 6~ ~ 37-2w-3GB 7t 560 N4% ,~.}... -_J~OT 983 ~ 4.bb '•/ --~M...,...-^~TWIN G~.P EKS C.MflSSihY~ 26.0 r--~ ~,.... ,......__-__.,-.......... aT-2 I LoT 4o I ~ ~ { I LO7 34 3 ~ E ,~ I for 35 I I ~ F--~ I \ !LOT 37 I 1 q'Ar~ ~~\~, ~'" e_-. ".~ I "' E i t o E i i ~"~ --_.L...:.....1 E-{ani~XTidH Ewscu~laT""iN§frio.-f5~is2'~_~_a ~~~ ~ f ~ ( PORTTONS OF THlS EASE4EN'L-,-`! I t Q ~ ~ HAVE BEEN OUtT CtA1NE4 ~ -f r r ALL RE1AAtxlNG PORTIONS I hTEAhUQA?' f?RtV ARE PENDING D01T CtAlu t LOT T 5.23 Acne. 227705 sa.fi. LpT 3 MI?(£D 20NINC - tlPEN SPACE - MICH uix RESl6ENTtAtjCON,AEkGAL - ENPiOY,.,EN7 CON#4ERC1At • 14,862 9~,. ..,. 2ONiNC bj3$ ,. yy\ Lor S +y,29 Acrn. \ Aei'" ,, .~j\ 236596 Sq.tt. ,2b 95 F,,'~g8i ;e*~~ LOT 4 `'~• ~'b q' ryh~' .`~ ~ \\ 142463 5q.it ~ \ 2ONING },qt{g } \ 5 wi ~ \ Lg t1F' ~ O lC~ ~\t ~~ \ ", M 37-2W-3G Tt 263 T25i '" fp :^t \? ~ -"" j A ~~tt I^ 37-2W-3GD Tt 2 p \'T 1 }S O "~- 0 0 '{\ \\ ~,j~Y' PARx AREA ` O~ ~ M~ ~ PENOfNG GR1FfiN 6AK5 UNiT Na. 3 ...tom., n~ 6RIfF1N OAKS iIN}T N8. 2. PHASE 7 ~~'. ~~~~ ~ . INS7.N0. O2-82168 ^" '~' INST.NO. 76-44495 CORRENT CREEK INST.NO. 70-09994 LOCATION '~--PkOPOSED GREE% RELOCATION RTtIISTSRtb X'k2QFES5TtTNAL LANT3 SUF2VEYOR ,r',~'-t-.-. -..~ -~ scr zsa°x4Ne9 H`~ zing"}t°°' Sheet Y of f GSSESSCRS MFP f7tE N0. 3T 2W 0309 7t tOO, 37 2W 030 i'I.tOO, 203. 204, 3T 2W 3DC 3300, 3T 2W 3GO !24 NYM DELTA --, ARC RADE7S BEARN3 DSTAPGE Cl 3xab'2x 78,60' 136.06' N12'22'23'E 77.s4' c2 Ca G 3617'26' 106`15'37" 9x58'47" ias,ss` 376.42' 27T.03' z3b.oa 2OO.C6' 162.00' Nssrz'z3•w Nix%M9K+ NS4'a9'56"w 14429' 326.66' 24t~Y3` C5 35'33'62" 144.23` 238.OY N3'S2'ar'w 146.br C6 9r43Uk' 276.24' 162.Da' S3x36'A4'E 2446D' C7 c6 3x39`24^ 4a'66'6v- 18124 x59sr 276AtY abG.6a N72'22'23"E N6'30'68'E 360.75' 232sr C9 SS'2?•3>• 1649r 1)0.66' S26'23'37'E 163.31' Li3T 5 M3XE0 ZpNING .. OPEN SPACE - HIGH AU% RESiOENT1ALfC6N,4ERGAl - EUPlO'riA£N7 G6MUEkCiAt LOT 6 ZpNING - LtE03Ui1 Ni% RESiOEHTfAt RENEWAL DATE 42-3T-OS TWtN GREEKS GROSSING, PNASE 1~`~. 7ocoted to tha SOU7NWa~'S7' & SOtJ7NEAS7, ONE QLtAR7ER C?F SECTtL?N 3, T{)WNSNIP 37 SOU TN, RANGE' 2 WEST, C!7'Y OF CENTRAL, Pi?~NT WILLAME7rE ME'R7L31AN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON fOC TWtN CR~~K.S D~'VELC}PMSNT CO., LLG P, fl. SOX 3577 CENTRAL POPN T, QRECON 97502 N ~_~ -TOTAL AREA 33.49 ACREA - SMALLEST LOT 3.26 ACRES - AVERAGE LOT 4.82 ACRES -- NUIJ.BER OF LOTS ~ 6 ~ BRASS CAP !N CONCRETE CURB BENCH MARK ELEVATION 7253.25 FT .,,...,w.n...-,"s. ~ TAX LOT LINES .. Tti£ LARp£ LOTS BEING CREATED ARE E}CPECTEO TO B£ REPLATTEO AS FUTURE OEVELCiPMENT3 PLANS ARE SUBMITTED. -PROJECT Sr7E SOAtE: T" R 200" 2010' 700' O' 200' 400' OA 7E: APRft !2, 2005 JOB NO.. 8549-98 MAMq Rp xN1sR,rrnrc rOrrrltsn OI[rlri ucVK+cwOMIXO x,125\M1,M gt[Yf UroiY+v~1HICNNCxnP+ru Survoyad by: PARSER & SONS', lNC. d8a PARSER SttRVEYlNG (54t} 654--5599 Po eox 5216 437 oAx srR~Er CENTRAL PCNN F, t7RECC}N 97502 '~"lEZ:4l~,`~,'6`E~_C) CST i~€'r'~?~'~ t)~~~'lC~,i,4~~'1't-'~~~N"l' A Primary Architec#urai Focai Point B Shaded Seating Areas with Granuiar Paving C double Row of Qaks D Open i,awn {Passive and Active tlse} R Secondary Architecturai Focal Point {Such as pergola) GxftiGit 2t, G'errtrnl Conrnrpxs Neighbarfraod Park Preroty~lre Platr l~ ArcFsitectura[ Focal point {Such as Water Feature} C., - Architecture Focal point {Such as Curved Pergotas} H pedestrianCxreenway A9aster PEan Ap~~lication 32 ~ (~, ~~ 4fYEl.4PM£UT SUUMlliY: ~ 'c°=~ ---'^` {-'';~~,.'s~f EmplpymentJCommcrcbl {EC}: t.2 acres {S,$X) t.==::f V `~ -. ® kEgfi tkx Rts~d.fCamm {H3.iR}: t9_$ acrts ($.Gx) 59~ units 834 ujo m;nimum (650 sham} r f~a~',. "~~+' ~~ . ~}~ ' " 6 acrcx (k2Ax} f rauR 2T ~ ~ - ~C au;w+.:~ ,yY R *~ f~ ,;i :,,Vr:,, ~ ( }: . Ntdium Mtx Read<nl a AR4 vait5 6 FG vfa minimixn (E$7 sMr,'n} £ }+' ,~`~~ ?2 _ ~ :~^3 ~ ~ -}~ ~~ ta+r tXx RtsidanUOl {[.NtR}: 61.4 acres (28.7x} 368 units O 6 vja mmimv,s+ {,566 sho.nj ``~} ~~ S".3 ~ Cl r3~ = Y `~ , i`'w" ;:~ aotn SPae (OS}: i$.7 accts (21.4x} t ~ ,~ s l>~ ~ ~~, 4 ~ ~ ~ ` ` ".~.- Cir~c {4}: f 8.9 accts (7.3x} ' ~ ' ',,~ 5FY I ~ Rights of Way: SI.i csres (2p,OX} r (w ~ 4aT t' ~ /~ {; ~ `v' ~ 4y °q, ••~~'~'+ TQt9I $itG AlEO: 2~4 AGit5 {1 iY 103 Unffs mieemom (Si75 shown} ,~~ a ., tL~';+ ~. ~}}} l 1~ rc. <~ ~ cs ~ ~fl ~. ~ ~ ~ '°~'` ~_, ~} (:l Cl b ~ ~ O ` Q ~} ~ z L~ t-3 ~ ~f ~ ~ ~ ~'~' ~ ~' _ .~ ~~ , kz: [Y 4 ~ -' ~ I . . 1 ~ ~:.. v L) ~ ~ ._ ~ r r'Sr~ { f:'3 '`~ t i ~„, ~ ;R= S:r ......... !.3} . _ a ~ . t3 E~ ~ i ~ ; ~} ~ (:1 ~ fa C1 ~;1 rl f'1 ,> °" CJ C~ s:] CI to it , -y r' ,: ~ , 4~ - ' Ir^5" i ~~ ~ ~, ~~' ~~ t ls.er:ibrr ta. tanrt use Pra„ ~;;.::~ ; MastcePionAppEica;ian ~~-?~ 2~t Public Works Department ~.;z~-~~ ~~~T~.L P~ ~ ~T P~IBL~C Wt~,Fi,F~S,S`T~.F'.+~`.1~.~.PQR~' May 20, 2005 TC): Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department Bob Pierce, C7irector Matt Samr`tore, Qerr. Services Coord. SUBJECT: Tezatative Subdivision for 37 2W 03CB, Tax Lot 100 and 37 2W 03C Tax Lots J.0{}, 203 and 204 and 37 2W 3DC Tax Lat 3300 and 37 2W 3CD Tax Lot 124 Twin Creeks Crossing Phase 1 Applicant Twin Creeks Development Co., LLC P.O. Box 3577 Central Point, C}R 9'7502 Agent Farber & Sons, lnc., Farber Surveying PQ Box 5286, 431 C}ak Street Central Point, OR 97502 Property Descri tp ion/ TC}D-GC, T©D- HMR, TQD-MMR and TC}D-Civic Zonis Pccr~vse Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant thereinafter referred to as "Developer"~ regarding City Public Works Department (PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful gczide. The City's Standards & Specifications slxould be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Existing .Infrastructure 1. Streets: Portions of Haskell Street and Twin Creeks Crossing Loop are currently constructed X55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, 4R 97'SQ2 ~• 549,664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~~ per their transportation designation. 2. Water: There is an existing twelve inch water line in Haskell Street, an 8~inch water line in Blue Moon Drive and in Twin Creeks Crossing Loop. 3. Stone Drain: There are various storm drain lines within the streets surrounding the subdivision request. The Storm Drain System has been master planned with several sub- basins for an overall storm drain. master plan. Tr~viux Creeks Crossing, Phase 1 The applicant is proposing a large lot subdivision request that matches the Twin Creeks Master Plan. The larger lots will ultimately need to have a Site Plan Review or Subdivision request in order to develop the property. The developer has indicated that the reason for the subdivision request is to set-up the street system for the new railroad crossing as well as marketability of the commercial and multi-family areas. The Public Works Department will review each of the subsequent development applications more thoroughly when submitted. Special Re~ur'retttertts l . Rift-of Way T~edication: The applicant has proposed right-of~way dedications. 2. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The areas has been. master planned for a comprehensive storm drain system. 3. Public Utility Eas~t~zents: Applicant will be working with the developer to provide Public Utility Easements in the best places in order to provide for zero lot line construction around the central crossing areas. Standard SpeciftcatiQns and Foals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern haw public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power {PP&L}, Gas {Avista}, Communications {Qwest}, and Sanitary Sewer {RVSS}. In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the 955 South Second Streef ~ Cenfral Point, C?R 9752 •549.664.332?' ~- Fax 549.664.6384 developer to achieve the best outcome. 1-lowever, the Department is not obligated to assure a profztable development and will not sacrifzce quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. l?evelvpmettt Plans -Required Ir2f t~f~ntation Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95°l0 complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as RVSS. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comrrzent of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit {4} copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Publr'e Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director}. Tivin Creeks Crossing, Phase .1 -- Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 9~°lo complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. . 155 South Second Street ~ Cer~tra! Paint, OR 9~'SQ2 •541.664.3321 _= Fax 541.6fi4.6384 ~~ 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Twin Creeks Crossing, Plzase .l -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. Ali existing underground. and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Tfvin Creeks Crossing, Phase .l -Dater Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the C}regon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the C}regon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction ofwater system related components. Twin Creeks Crossing, Please .t -Streets 955 Soufh Second Sfreet ~ Central Point, t?R 975Q2 •541.664.3329 ~~ Fax 541.6fi4.6384 ~} 1. The Developer's street designs sha11 consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-izxzpaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act {ADA} or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation {(Jl~?OT}, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestz~ian flan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle -traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, T4D, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Tivirt Creeks Crossing, Phase 1- Stvrttr Drain Zt shalt be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. if a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. if the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of {~regon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States C4E and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase 11 requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Twist Creeks Crc~ssr'ng, Phase 1--Required Sub~rer`ttals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to C}regon Department of Fish and Wildlife {DFW}, C}regon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ}, Oregon Division of State Lands {DSL}, Qregon Department of Transportation {C~DC}T} 155 South Second Sfreet ~ Central Poinf, DR 975~J2 •54~.664.332~ -= Fax 5~~.fi64.6384 :': approval for storm drain connection. and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ALOE}, affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority {RVSS}, and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department {JC Roads}, DSL and ACOE, as applicable {wetland mitigation}. 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 955 South Second Street ~ Central Point, C7F2 97542 ~ 549.fi64.3329 Fax 549.664.6384 f~~ ATTAC~iMENT E PLANN)1N+G DEPARTMENT RECCJMMENDED CC}NDITIC}NS t)F APPRGIVAL 1. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy of the proposed covenants, condztions and restrictions {CC&P s} for Phase 1 of the Twin Creeps Crossing Subdivision. 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of Phase 1 of the Twin Creeks Crossing Subdivision. Evidence of such compliance shall be subzxzitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and construction of Phase 1 of the Twin Creeks Crossing Subdivision. ucz~exsz~ct~rv wt~zr~z„arrz~z~z~~~saso-~rwr~r cr~~~~ x~zrzz~~os~so.r~oc }~ F'©GL!'E VALLE'Y' V , - }T_ "" ~~~'-~~~~ METI~G7PC7LITAN PLANNING C7f?~.xAN1,ZATIC7IV .~~~~:i •~~ `` ~ ~ctartnL ~~rvs~o~r~r~ora ~.~Hx~r~c ~~ ~ s an era ra am • age am • ac saner e • ear • aenrx • a en • r e r y .~ ~ Jackson County = Rogue UaAey Transpartatian District • Oregon Department of Transportation ~~ DATE: June ~, 2005 Td: Central Point Planning Commission and City Council FROM: Dick Converse and Vicki Guarino, Rogue Valley Council of Governments SUBJECT: Integrated Land Use and Transportation Plan Central Point is a membez- of the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning C)rganization {RVMPU), which has adopted measures to reduce reliance on the automobile. The state requires these measures when a metropolitan area is unable to demonstrate through its Regional Transportation Plan that per capita vehicle miles traveled will be reduced by at least five percent over the planning period. {Jn December I3, 20011, the Land Conservation and L`~evelopment Commission approved seven Alternative Measures adopted by the RVMPC7 in place of the Vehicle Miles Traveled {VMT} reduction standard contained in the state Transportation Planning Rule, In addition to those measures, the state requires that cities and counties within the metropolitan area prepare and adopt integrated land use and transportation plans {ILUTP). several Alternative Measures relate to land use and, therefore, are closely linked with the ILUTP. In particular, two measures set benchmarks for the percentage of new dwelling units and employment growth that must occur within compact, mixed-use, pedestrian- and transit- fz~endly neighborhoods. By 2005, this kind of development must account for 9 percent of development in the RVMPO. As of 2003, ~ percent of residential growth and 40 percent of commercial and industrial growth in Central Point met the benchmarks. The requirements will grow more demanding in the years to come, increasing the need for ILUTP provisions. By 2020, nearly half of all development occurring since 2000 will have to meet the benchmarks. New bus lines and increasing the land use mix will help to achieve the objectives. C}ther• RVMP© Alternative Measures set benchmarks for bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and houses near transit lines. This ILUTP project addresses all of these standards and offers RVMPCI member cities suggestions for coning ordinance changes that can help the region meet state requirements ~~~ ALTER1rlATIVE MEASURES G`tlrrent Bertchnaark Benchmark Benchmark Target lu~~sur~ NONt MeascrCeci , 2oor~ 200 2vtc~ ~o~~ ~o2f~ he percent of total daily trips taken by Measure 1: ransit and the combination of biaycte l daily Trips I daily trips I daily trips °lo deity trips % daily (rips ransit and nd walking {non-motorized) modes. bicycletpedestrian De#ermined from best available data ransit: 1.4 ransit: 1.2 ransit: 1.6 ransit: 2.2 ransit: 3.4 mode share {e.g., model output andlor bike/pad: 8.2 bikelped: 8.4 bike/pad: 8.8 bikelped: 9.8 bikelped: t i cans ortation serve data . Measure 2: £lwelting Units Determined through G1S mapping. (L3Us) wTn % mile Current estimates are that ~2°fo of ' 12°l0 2111 30°l° 40l 50°l walk of 30-minute DU s are within'l4 mile walking ' transit service istance of RVT D transit routes. Measure 3: Determined through GIS mapping. l Collectors and Current estimates are that 2i°f0 of .!% 281° 3?% 481° 6t1% arterials wl6icycle ailectors and arterials in the MPt7 facilities have provisions for bicyclists. Measure 4: Determined through GIS mapping. l Collectors and arrant estimates are that 4B°f0 of 4?°! 50% 561° 64°f0 ?5 f° arterials in TOD allectors and arterials in TC1D areas areas wlsidewatks have sidewalks. Measure 5: Determined by tracking building 1 Mixed-use £}Cls permits -the ratio between new DUs in 0% 91° 261 4t °I 49% in new developmen ODs and total new DUs in the region. Measure 6: 1=s#imated from annual employment I Mixed-use ices from State -represents the retie of 6°I 9l 23l 36l 4410 employment in new new employment in TODs aver tataf development regional employment. Measure ?, Funding committed to transit ar Alternative biaycleipedestriantTOD projects. $2.5 $4,3 $6.4 7ransportatian mounts shown represent l~ of the ' NIA $35f1,Ot1t1 Miltr`on Malian Million Funding MPO s estimated accumulation of ` iscretiona fundin STP . lrn February 2E103, the Department of Land Conservation and Development conducted a workshop with the RVMPO Technical Advisory Committee {TAC} to present information about the Transportation Planning Rule {TPR} requirements for and benefits of integrated land use and transportation planning. At that time, the TAC recommended that RVCOG staff assist communities in conducting assessments to determine what each RVMPC} jurisdiction needs to do to comply with the TPR requirements. The purpose of the ILUTP project is to audit existing plans, policies, and ordinances with the specific intent of identifying opportunities and constraints to integrate land use and transportation planning consistent with the TPR. The audits will provide each jurisdiction a planning direction to enable land use choices and transportation opportunities that work together to reduce VMT per capita. RVCOG staff developed a checklist as a toot to evaluate haw effectively a jurisdiction's existing regulations support the relationship between land use and transportation. The checklist is based largely on Oregon's 1V~vclel :I~evelnpllzerat Code & tTser's Gacide for Small Cities, and identifies features that support conditions under which motor vehicle use may be reduced. The checklist for Central Point is attached at the end of this report. {~~~ 2 Central Paint is the leader among Rogue Valley communities in implementing Transit {Jriented Design through development of Twin Creeks and applying T{~D principles to its downtown corridors. Strengths ~ The city's R-2, R-3, and TpD zones permit densities of IO or more units per acre * Flaglots achieve infill • TfJD zones permit mixed residential and commercial uses f Industrial and commercial zones provide buffers from incompatible uses • Street access issues TSP encourages access consolidation Shared driveways recommended in residential and commercial zones Gflfl-fact maximum black length Traffic calming provided in land division regulations • Pedestrian access TSP encourages connecting access with adjacent lots The Core Enhancement goal is to enhance the pedestrian environment • Landscaping required in land division regulations Street trees in TC)Ds Landscape conservation Landscape buffers • Parking Shared parking permitted in TC}Ds Bicycle parking required in TC}Ds Rece,mrnendatians: Achieving the benchmarks adopted for the MP© will require concerted effort on the part of all member jurisdictions. The Model Code and Development Guide for Small Cities suggests several measures that Central Point has not yet incorporated into its regulations: Establish maximum lot sizes. `V~hile most zoning ordinances include minimum parcel sizes, they do not have maximum parcel sizes. The model code recommends that single-family zones have a maximum size of I20 percent of the minimum size, e.g., 8,4C1fl square feet in an SF-6 zone. In multi-family zones, the recommendation is IS(} percent of the minimum. Another technique is to allow lot size averaging, where some parcels can be smaller than the established size, so long as the overall density is not exceeded. Far example, permitting a parcel to be created at 9fl percent of the required ~,fl00 square foot size in the R-I-6 zone would yield a 5,~fl0 square foot lat. • Allow mixed use residential in commercial zones. This would allow developments similar to Four Oaks in other zones. Increase lot coverage [and building height`? where transportation facilities and public safety measures can be achieved. Current coverage requirements far single-family and multi-family districts are in the middle of the ranges suggested by the Model Development Cade. Far example, the RL zone limits coverage to 3S percent, while the model code suggests a range from 30-4fl percent. The R-2 and R-3 zones limit coverage to 50 percent, while the model Cade {~ c~ r7 suggests 413-60 percent. Central Point could increase its coverage, but it is clearly consistent with current standards. Consider requiring a portion of a commercial building to be at the property line, with entrances oz~iented to street to encourage pedestrian use. • Include criteria for evaluating proximity of transit to commercial uses in other than the TOIL sites. • As in many communities, Central Point's street design standards call for wider streets than the Model Code recommends. To be consistent with the goal of providing narrower streets, evaluate the standards in the Model Code when updating the Transportation System Flan. Proposed Zoning C3rdinance Revisions: If the City decided to include maximum lot sizes to ensure that zones achieve their desired residential densities, new sections could be added as follows: CHAPTER 17.16 R-L RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY DISTRICT 17.16,060 Areas width and yard requirements A. tat Area. The lot area shall be a minimum of fifteen thousand sgraare feet and a maximum of eighteen thousand square feet. Latsizes;:may" be averaged to aiiciuv tcits less than the rrir3irrun~ lot size iri the R~L District; as Icing as the average area for all lots is not less than allot^,~ed by the district. No lot created trricle~- this provisi4,fi shill be less ~i~an 9fl per`cerzt of tl?e rninimurrr !at size a,liawed in the R-L district. CHAPTER 17.20 R-1 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY CyTSTRTCT 1:7,2Q,f~2C) {J) Accessory dviiellirig iuri~ as ~]efineci irr Secticin 17.08.017 17.20.050 Area, width and yard requirements A, Lot Area. Devela meat e uirements R-1-6 R-1-5 R~1-10 Minimum lot area {interior}.... 6,(300 5,000 1.0,000 Maxirr~rum lot area (:interior).. 7,20(} 9,60E} 12;ODf3 Minimum lot area (corner)..... ... 7,000 8,000 10,000 Mai~irraurr~ lot area,.{corner).... 8,400 ' _ 9,600 12.,OQ0 Lat sizes ray be averaged to allow lots less than'the n~inimurn lot size in the R-1 District; as long as ti,~ average area far all lots is not less than allowed lay the district. No !ot created under this provision sl~ali lac less ti~ari 90 ,percent of the r~ir~imum lot size a{Icaw~d in the under-Iying district; CHAPTER 17'.24 R-2 RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY DISTRICT 17.24.030 Conditional Uses J:' Ground f'ioar br.islress ~AritP~iri a mtfltifarr?fil}r braifidrig. ` Brrrsi~resses shall be'lirrritedsto retail sales and service, and ~ersanal service_oriented activities that car~~,pkemer~t l~ighei' density developr~ient ar~d reduca automobile vehicle trip' rr~ilcs traveled. ~'fJ V 4 1?.2d,d5d Area width and and re uirements A_. 'i..ot.area.; 'i`Fie area-shall be.a:.m`irlirz~um cif six-;fil~ousatl`square~feet:=with corner lots.being'a:mini.murri:af:sevei~;tl~ousan:_3::square:felt.:.::Maximu'rri°lot;ara:si~a11 iae:.7;~#l0 square feet.virith carrier lofts iiavirig:a tmaximurr'of;;400.sgtire'°fet: l~at-sizes may: be averaged.ta ~lloVy.lots":less than; te:rminimum lair size fir}-tile R=2"district, as.lcin-g,as fihe average"area for. all Tats is riot less than-allc~wedby. ~1~e district~...Na lot created under fifiis:prcivision shall .be less than 90:percentof'the mriimurri lat-.size al(owed..in the R-~ district. 1?.28.034 Conditional Uses R-3 ,.-. . J; .Grc>-arid::floor;busipess whip: a multifarnily.~?ild~rig::l~usiriesses:shall_.kielimitiec.to retail sales and service; and::=personal service~orlentec~ activities".that _corriplet~ent Higher derslty: deveio,pmerit `and, red,iiee ,a~;tar~oi~ile ~er~icie.<trip:rriiles'traveled. Additional Possible Additions; BIJZi^DING. ©F2Il=NTATIt7N. ~.,.-,.Builgingssfiall,l~ave a`:primary-entrance ~~ilding entrances ix~ay incline. entrances. eritrarices.:orierit~:d -to.::p"ecie:stri:ai~`ptaas° to a cl,pster of units or;commercial,spaces erifirarca"-faelig`a she yairtl.v~ren .a:rli,rect'i 2{l} "feet ~n~:"Ierigth'is. prciv~ided:betweeri tF~e: of-virajr> s} orieri~ed to {fa;ci~sg)~the street,: }",iridiv~du'~l units; lo~bjr entrances; Eire.ezewa.Y/c~urtyarc~ er~trari~e's {~;;e„ Alternatively, ;a lau~ldiiig may have:its ~destriari;wafkway ot'exceedirig :t'1:~~ uileing eri~rance, and:.the si:reet i°ight- -" >:2.;::.t7ff=stt;eet-parking°driveways,03"yCi~l'iE'C'.VEIIICC7~~C'::.Ct~'GU~.+d~lOt~ 511~~11:riot;"bepla~e bets~reen a tiu~ld~rig`and"the street which ~s "usec! to comply v~i~fih subsection, ~",`"'C7_ corger:lots;'b€~i.lclirigs:'and 'their::cnfirarices~sl~iail';e"::cirae~tecl :.fio "tl~e :street; ~ti~rier parking,. drivev~ays~and"other vehicle areas shall:"be p.ra~iblted."#~eti~reen.f~uildlr~g; arid`'street ~corri~fs; b,_ Floor:area.,ratio:;Flaor.Area;Katios {FAR.s}control.;the,>bulk`eri~- mass..,rif`;rlovelopment FAR' is measured" ljy d~vidang:the grass enclosed, floor :area of a building {fir comtiiriation.;of'l~uildirigs iri'asingle,;.cieveloprrierit},:.E~}r'th~ laritf:ar~~a~of~°.tl~e develc~pmeiit"{r}at.:including street'rights`of way} ~'Eie rr~axirnum~'floor~area ratio shah . ~i'e;:{:? ~;- ,. -~ , ~ n~~ . perrr~i~`tl"e` ~~ .16:36.04t~ C:;:Use: iif:.S.ha,rec3<access:easerrierit;::.ar~cl divisions "shall use.at-shareu "access agreements as:ar~=alterriatiye to, the :flag lct'requir-emerits:;;of file :code: Wl1eCl four {4},Or fewer 105 are .l3eint~ ,Cr2ateCl.:Tt~ USe ~hls~trC#VisiOtl; :tote ~OI~OWlt1~ C4nClItlC3rlS shall `be met; A}: The area "of the:ahared"-access easerrient shall `be a"minimum- al= . twenty-gone ~2~.}.feet "~n;vdidth.-arid'snall :be `paved;to`:~publc works `. _ 'standards, .- . ,. _. B}" - :lvo structure°=shall encroach within .three' {}::-feet:--of tkie shared ' access easement>.The•structure:shall:l~e i~iiea~surecl troi~~i.tFie . furthest protrusicin: ` ~~~ 5 C;} I~ a garage, carp~r~ or aff str~~t parking area uses ariy portion of i~.E~e shared access easement, tine activity shall provide adequate n~ai~euvering area as determined E~y the .City, ,D) AI! other fire-life-safetyt utility and vision c6earanee regulat€ons sha41 - ' ` 'lae .adhered to, CHAPTER 1,7. 20 R-~. RESIDENTIAL SINGL'~-FAMILY DISTRICT Section ~.?, 20.50 ~C}~ G Residential Zones city: Cerrtr-al 1'r~irat cl~ie: Dec~raa~ier 2(~~14 FEATURE ZC}NE ZC}NE ZC}NE ZC}NE ZC~I'~E ZC}NE _ R-L R-~ R-2 R-3 TO DD PU D~ ~ P CU P CU P CU P CU P CU P CU 1 Zero lot-line ... _.. ... .. .. __ __ .. 2 Accessor dwellin .. ... .. ._ __ -- X X 3 Attached townhome -- -- -- -- X X X 4 Two-, three-famil homes __ _. _. _. X X X 5 Multi-famil __ __ __ _. _. .. X X 6 Care borne X -- -- -- X X X ? Famil da care -- -- X X -- -- X 8 Home occu ations X X X X X 9 Publzc/znstztutzonal »_ -- -• -- -_ _. ._ ._ X ~~ Churches X X X X X 1 ] Clubs, lod es ._ ._ _. .. X -- -- X 12 Crovt. facilities ... ._ ._ _- -- -- -- .. X 13 Librar ,museum, com, Cntr X X -- •- -- -- X 14 Parks, rec. facilities X X X X X X X 15 Schools -- •- X X X X 16 Child Care {Z2+} .. -- .. -- X X X 17 Food service {non-auto} -- -- -- -- .. .. ._ __ .. 1 S Laundr __ __ .. .. .. .. ._ -- X 19 Lt. Manufacturin __ __ ._ ... .. ... .. __ X 20 Retail Dods/services ._ __ .. .. .. .. _- -- X 2I Medical office/lab -- -- -- -. .- _- -- .- __ 22 Personal Serv. {barber, etc.) -- -- -- -- -- -- _- -_ X 23 Professional office -- -- _- .. .. .. __ _. ,.. 24 Re air services -- -- -- -- -- -- -• -- X 25 Mixed use .. _. ... .. .. .. __ _. X 26 B&B Inn .. .._ ... ._ __ .. ._ _- X ~~_ $: 27 Maximum. lot size 1'~o No No No Na 28 1~ensity ~O.t ac max No No Yes Yes Yes ...._M R-2 &3 only _ 29 1JnCOCtra e infill v __ .~__ ~ . 30 a. Fla lots Yes Yes Yes Yes 31 b. other {describe} 32 Max. lot coverage {enter %} 35 °l0 40% S4% SO°la 2S-IOfJ% 33 Buildin hei ht {enter feet) 35 3S 35 3~ 60 34 PrOXImIt to transit -- -- -_ -- Yes ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 39 t~.(} ~~ 42 d-~ Comrnereial Zones eity.• C`errtral Point cicrte: L7ecerrrlrer 2f1~4 FEATURE - .~. - ZC?NE ZONE ZC3NE ZC}NE ZC}NE ZONE .. - - -- C N C-2 C-2M C-3 C-4 C-S ~y,,;. _ __ ~ P CU P CU P CU P CU P CU P CU I Accessor dwellin s -- -- -- -- -_ __ ._ __ ... __ _. __ 2 Mixed use 2-esidential -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -. .. _. .._ __ 3 Sin le-fam. attached townhse __ ._ ... .. .. .. .. .._ __ .. _. ._ 4 Two- & three-famil housin -- -- ... ... .. ._ .. ... __ .. __ .. 5 Multi-famil housin -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -. .._ _. ,.. ,.. r`i Care home/facilit -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -. .- __ .. .. ~ Da Care {~I2 Chtldi"en} -- -- X X -- •- X -• »- c~ I-Iome (3CGI2 at2CJnS -- __ ._ ._ -- -- ._ .... __ ,.» -.. .,, 9 B&B Inns, vacation rental -• ..- .- ... .. ... ... __ _,. __ -_ __ IO Churches/tern ies X -- -- -- -- -- _.. .. _. .. ._ I I Clubs, lod es -- -- X X X l.2 Gov't offices -- -- -- -- -- -- -_ -- X l3 Librar ,museum, corn. Intr. __ _. .. .. .. .. ._ __ _. __ _- -- l4 Public arkin _. -_ -- -- -- -- X X X I5 Parkstrecreation facilities X -- -- -- _. -- -- X -- -- l~ Schools -- -- X -- -- X X X I7 Auto-oriented X __ _. __ __ _. ._ X X I~ Entertainment X X -- -- X X X l9 Dote]/motel .- .- -. .- .. .. X X X 20 Medical officellab X X X X -- -- X 2I Office -- -- X -- -- X X 22 Professional services X X __ _- X X X 23 Re air services {full enclsd} -- -- X -- __ X ._ ._ X 24 RetailJservice {non-auto) X X X X X X 2S Lt, Ind. onl with retail ~" -< - - - ~ X ~' _ - - - _- _ X 26 - ~... r Setbacks _ _. _-- - . -- _ . 27 a. No min. setback { 1n} Yes No No Yes No No 28 b. Max. distance {#ft.} None None None None None None 29 Floor area ratio _ 30 a. Min. ratio { In} No No No_ No No No 31 b. Floor/lot ratio {%} SO % 50 % .- __ __ .. ~2 Street entrance { /n} i No No No No No No 33 Ped.lti•ansit amenities No No No No No No 3~- a. Plazal ark 35 b. Sittin area 3f~ c. Cano 37 d. Art 38 e. Bus shelter 39 f. Connect wlad'acent lot 40 Proximit to transit No No No No No No 4I ~2 43 $ ~ ~1 Commercial Zones {cor~tintced) c~ty.~ Certtrrzl 1''r~zrat elate. I)ecerrtl~er- 2f1~4 FEATUP~.E ZQNE ZdNE ZCINE Z{~NE ZC7NE ZC}NE ~~ ~ TC}D~ P CU P CU P CU P CU P CI3 P GU 44 Accessor dwellin s X ~5 Mixed use residential X 46 Sin le-Earn. attached townhse X 47 Two- & three-famil housin X 48 Multi-famil housin X 49 Care homelfacilit X Sf} Ida care {~I2 children} X 51 Home Deco ations X 52 B&B Inns, vacation rental X 53 Churchesltem les X 54 Clubs, lod es X 55 Gov't offices X 56 Librar ,museum, corn. Intr. X 57 Public arkin X 58 Parkslz-ecreation facilities X 59 Schools X GO Auto-oriented X 6I Entertainment X G2 Hotellmotel -_ -~ G3 Medical officeJlab -- -- ~4 C}ffice __ _. 65 Professional services X ~~ Re air services {full enclsd} X 67 Retaillservice {non-auto} X f8 Lt. Ind. only with retail ~ 4µ - __ __ ' ~ _ .~~ " a~.~ ~ ~ F 4 .. _._..._-. .w~ 69 Setbacks _ _.. . 70 a. No rx~in. setback { ln} Yes '!1 b. Max. distance (#ft.} 0.15 _ 72 Floor area ratio ry. - _ _.~ _ _ ~ T~ r ~ . - _ ~3 a. Min. ratio { Jn} No 74 b. Floor/lot ratio {°IQ} 25-100 '7~ Street entrance { /n} Yes 76 Ped.ltransit amenities Yes '77 a. Plazal ark 78 b. Sittin area '79 c. Cano 8C} d. Ar-t 8I e. Bus shelter 82 f. Connect w/ad'acent lot 83 Proximit to transit No 84 85 8G ~~ i[nrdustriallErnl~layn~ent Zones city: ~`eftt~•at Point tlECte. Tlecetnber .2f~~4 FEATURE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ~~ M-1 M-2 _ ~ T -- - - P CU P CU P CU P CU P CU P CU ~ Li ht znanufaCturirl X X 2 Research X X 3 ~Iareh4usin distribution X X 4 Mini-st4ra e X ~ X _ _ 5 _ ~or~at~zercial uses _ _ 6 Auto-oriented X X 7 Entertainixient -- -- -- -- ~ K4tel1rri4tel -- -- -- -- 9 Medical facility -- -- -- -- IO Outdoor Sales X X ~ Pr4feS5i4nal SerViCeS X X l2 Laundr ~ ~ Re air 5erVICeS ~ ~ C'LVIC LiS2S ~ - v IS Cr4v't facilities X X 16 Utilities X X l'7 ~ ecial disc. Facilities X X 1.8 Vocational schools X X 19 20 2 J. 22 23 24 25 ~.~ ~4ri]rrierCial Oise l7 ~~ 4nl Yes Yes ~7 a. Max. s . ft. {enter #ft.) -- -- ~8 Setbacks 29 a. Buffers Yes Yes 3Cl b. Nei lib4rlio4d access No No 31 Street orientation No No 32 Pedestrian.-scale entr No No 33 Ped.ltransit arrienities No No 34 a. Plaza/ ai~k 35 b. Sittin area ~(? C. ~an4 37 d. Art ~~ e. BUS shelter ~~ ~Q ~- ~ d-~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ Design Standards city: C`etttrttl I'airtt flute: .l~ecetrtlier 2t~44 FEATURE ZC}NE ZC7NE ZONE ZQNE ZC}NE _- ~~ Residential PUD~ Gt~mmercial Industrial TCID~ _ .~ _ Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 1 Street-access ermit _ _ . _ - ~-.-= --~.--- .-__. - - - - 2 a. Conditions fora royal X ~ X X X 3 b. Access consolidation XZ Xz XZ X~ X2 4 c. Shared drivewa s X~ X~ X~ Xz X~ 5 d. Max. block len th 600 ft. X4 X~ X4 Xs X~ G Traffic calmrn X X X X X 7 Pedestrian access v $ a. Path rade se stated X X X X X 9 b. Marked crosswalks X X X X X 10 c. Connect wlad'acent lot X~ X2 X2 Xz X lI Landsca in wa~,.,,.~, - --- __ - ~ 12 a. Street trees __ __ _. __ __ __ ._ __ X 13 b. Landsca e conservation X X 14 c. Buffers X -- -- X X X -- _ - 15 Parkin _ - -" - -- iG a. Set max. far off-street T X X X ~ X 17 b. Shared arktn X2 18 c. Bic cle rkn re aired X 19 d. Protected walkwa s X 20 e. Street-like features X Street Design Standards ~' ~ - - STREET CATEGORY _ _ Arterial Collector Local es No Yes No Yes No Y _ DESIGN STANDARDS ~ _ 2I Motor Vehicle Travel Lane ~' - 22 a. Blvd.: 1 I ft. max. I2 ft. (11' in TQL}s) ~ X. ~ - ~1 _ 23 b. Avenue: 10.5 ft, max. 12 ft X _ - _ f 24 c. Residential, without arkin : 11 ft. max. .l2 ft X 25 d. Residential, with arkin : IO ft. max. 12 ft ---~- -- _ _.. __ ._ X X . 26 - °~ .__. e. Commercial: 10 ft. Max. ~~ft T X - - 27 f. Parkin one side: ].5 ft. max. tta ~~ ~ - _ ~ -- -- 28 _ .Parkin both sides: I4 ft. max. ZS ft _ X 29 Bike Lanes: b ft. wide, on both sides (S ft. in TQ.I)s) ~ ~ _ ~ 30 4n-street arkin , ~ - . -- - - 3 i a. 8-foot bas ~ \ _ . --- -~ _ _ W 32 _ b. Residential: 7-ft. lanes} (S ft,) _~ X _ ~ 33 ~ c. Commercial: 8-ft. lane(s) ; l - V - 34 Sidewalks {on both sides) ~~~ ,` - ,_ ._..__~__._. _ _ - 35 a. 6-IO feet wide {S ft. ota collectors} l X ~ 36 b. Residential: 5-~ feet wide ~ , X X 37 ~~~ 11 Integrate i_and Use and Transportation Plans Audit oP Existing Plans Central Point, Audit Notes The following typography elements apply in all instances: A. The double dash {--7 indicates feature is not allowed, or discussed in the city's documents. B. Items in bald italic type come from city documents, indicating a variation from the ILUTP checklist. In some instances, these features may contribute to the IL.UTP project goals, but were included in the original checklist. C. P=Permitted Use C=Conditional Use 1. Commercial ordinance permits parking in front. 2. Contained in TSP; encouraged but not required. 3. PUD applicable in zones R-l*. R-1, R-2, R-3, M-1, PUD ordinance does not contain any features relative to Alternative Measures that are not already present in the underlying zoning district. 4. TQD zone is listed in bath residential and commercial audits because it contains features of both categories. 5. Block length; Draft TSP sets a range of 350 ft. for local streets to 550 for major streets. The zoning ordinance sets a maximum of I.,200 ft. V ~ ~1. Z2