Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - March 1, 2005VI. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Pc03U105 City of Central Point Planning Coimnission Minutes February i, aoo5 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT ~:oo P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairperson Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Mack Lewis, Scott Mangold, Chuck Piland and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; Dave Alvord, Community Planner Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator and Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was correspondence distributed related to Item A. IV. MINi7I'ES Commissioner Piland made a motion to approve the minutes from January i8, 2005. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, abstain; Lewis, abstain; Mangold, abstain; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion carried. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review a Conditional Use Permit application for the purpose of constructing a temporary RV parking facility. The nature of this use is a conditional use within the MMR -Medium Mix Residential, within the 1~vin Creeks Transit-Oriented Development. If approved, the proposed facility would be fenced in with a chain kink fence and will be accessed off of Haskell Street. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 3~ 2W o3DC, Tax Lot 3400. The property is located west of US Highway 99, north of Taylor Road, and east of Vakkey Oak Boulevard. Planning Coumrission iLfinutes February 1, 1005 Pnge 2 Scott Mangold asked to be excused from making a decision on this application because he lives adjacent to the subject property. Dave Alvord, Community Planner presented the staff report and findings. Mr. Alvord brought attention to the Public Works email distributed at the meeting. The applicant will be required to put in a gravel base and not pave the site due to it's temporary nature. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director explained that once a UGB amendment is completed, a permanent RV storage site will be considered. Herb Farber, agent for Twin Creeks agreed with the staff report and has nothing to add. Mr. Farber concurred with Mr. Humphreys statement regarding the UGB amendment. No one came forward in favor of or against the application. The public portion of the meeting was closed. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 63~, approving a Conditional Use application for the temporary RV site in Twin Creeks, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Lewis, yes; Mangold, abstain; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion carried. B. Public hearing to review an application for a minor partition for the purpose of creating two separate tax lots. The property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district. The subject parcel is currently occupied by Seventh Day Adventist Church and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W o3AD, Tax Lot ~ooi. The site address is 625 North Tenth Street. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner presented the staff report. He stated that vandalism has been recognized as a problem on the property and gave the history of the property uses. The church would like to convert an existing building on site into a caretakers residence. Since residences are not listed as permitted or conditional uses, Planning staff recommended that the Church partition the caretakers residence onto a separate lot which would make it legally conforming in the residential zone district. Mr. Gerschler explained how the creation of a flag lot would not be the highest and best use in this situation and offered an alternative method involving a reciprocal access easement. Mr. Gerschler reviewed the Public Works requirements which included a io' ROW dedication on the Plnnning Conunissron ~Ltinutes February 1. 2005 Page 3 Church property that fronts loth Street. Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator asked to amend the condition regarding street trees. The Seventh Day Adventist will not be required to put in street trees until the improvements to iott~ Street have been made. The easement will be a permanent access and will be recorded with the final plat. The residence will be required to have a separate meter, and a two car carport or garage. Pastor Treat, agent for Seventh Day Adventist provided a history of the uses on this site. The church has no intention of selling individually. Pastor Treat gave a progress update on the modular unit that they use as a classroom. The firewalls are completed, and the skirting will be completed as weather cooperates. No one spoke in favor of or against the application. The public portion of the meeting was closed. Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator will confirm the requirements of having a separate meter. Commissioner Mangold made a motion to adopt Resolution 6g8 approving a Minor Partition to create two parcels, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director gave a summary of the items the Planning Department is currently involved in. Mr. Humphrey gave an overview of the Council retreat, and the Chamber Awards ceremony. He mentioned that we will be having a CAC Study Session and Orientation next Tuesday. There is a Downtown Merchant's meeting coming up and a week long Highway 99 Corridor Plan Charette the week of February i4, zoo5. There will be monthly meetings with the Advisory Committee through the end of June, at which time there will be a final improvement plan to adopt. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fish made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 8:05 P.M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March I, 2005 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Plan fora 4 lot subdivision known as Bar Borough located north of Beall Lane and west of Glenn Way in the R-1-6 zoning district (Map 37 2W l ODD, Tax Lot 1900). Annlicant/ Owner: Jeff and Julie Barber 1642 Beall Lane Central Point, Oregon 97502 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide an 0.85 acre parcel of land into 4 residential lots. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment "B"). Auplicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20 et seq. -Residential Single-Family District Discussion• The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to subdivide a 0.84 acre parcel into 4 individual lots ranging in size from 9,043 to 9,639 square feet (refer to Attachment "A"). Setbacks for the R-1-6 zone are 20 feet from the front lot line, 5 feet per story on the sides and 15 feet from rear lot lines. If two-story structures are proposed there will be an increase to the side yard setback to10 feet. The maximum allowable height is 35 feet. The Public Works Department has submitted a staff report with recommended conditions of approval for consideration by the Commission (Attachment "C"). In addition to the adherence to the standard requirements, Public Works will require that half-street curb, gutter and paving improvements be made to Beall Lane. The Planning Department has submitted recommended conditions as Attachment "D". \\CPCHSI\Cl'rY WIDE\PLANNING\05024.DOC -1- VI. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Pc03U105 City of Central Point Planning Coimnission Minutes February i, aoo5 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT ~:oo P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairperson Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Mack Lewis, Scott Mangold, Chuck Piland and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; Dave Alvord, Community Planner Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator and Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was correspondence distributed related to Item A. IV. MINi7I'ES Commissioner Piland made a motion to approve the minutes from January i8, 2005. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, abstain; Lewis, abstain; Mangold, abstain; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion carried. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review a Conditional Use Permit application for the purpose of constructing a temporary RV parking facility. The nature of this use is a conditional use within the MMR -Medium Mix Residential, within the 1~vin Creeks Transit-Oriented Development. If approved, the proposed facility would be fenced in with a chain kink fence and will be accessed off of Haskell Street. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 3~ 2W o3DC, Tax Lot 3400. The property is located west of US Highway 99, north of Taylor Road, and east of Vakkey Oak Boulevard. Planning Coumrission iLfinutes February 1, 1005 Pnge 2 Scott Mangold asked to be excused from making a decision on this application because he lives adjacent to the subject property. Dave Alvord, Community Planner presented the staff report and findings. Mr. Alvord brought attention to the Public Works email distributed at the meeting. The applicant will be required to put in a gravel base and not pave the site due to it's temporary nature. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director explained that once a UGB amendment is completed, a permanent RV storage site will be considered. Herb Farber, agent for Twin Creeks agreed with the staff report and has nothing to add. Mr. Farber concurred with Mr. Humphreys statement regarding the UGB amendment. No one came forward in favor of or against the application. The public portion of the meeting was closed. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 63~, approving a Conditional Use application for the temporary RV site in Twin Creeks, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Lewis, yes; Mangold, abstain; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion carried. B. Public hearing to review an application for a minor partition for the purpose of creating two separate tax lots. The property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district. The subject parcel is currently occupied by Seventh Day Adventist Church and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W o3AD, Tax Lot ~ooi. The site address is 625 North Tenth Street. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner presented the staff report. He stated that vandalism has been recognized as a problem on the property and gave the history of the property uses. The church would like to convert an existing building on site into a caretakers residence. Since residences are not listed as permitted or conditional uses, Planning staff recommended that the Church partition the caretakers residence onto a separate lot which would make it legally conforming in the residential zone district. Mr. Gerschler explained how the creation of a flag lot would not be the highest and best use in this situation and offered an alternative method involving a reciprocal access easement. Mr. Gerschler reviewed the Public Works requirements which included a io' ROW dedication on the Plnnning Conunissron ~Ltinutes February 1. 2005 Page 3 Church property that fronts loth Street. Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator asked to amend the condition regarding street trees. The Seventh Day Adventist will not be required to put in street trees until the improvements to iott~ Street have been made. The easement will be a permanent access and will be recorded with the final plat. The residence will be required to have a separate meter, and a two car carport or garage. Pastor Treat, agent for Seventh Day Adventist provided a history of the uses on this site. The church has no intention of selling individually. Pastor Treat gave a progress update on the modular unit that they use as a classroom. The firewalls are completed, and the skirting will be completed as weather cooperates. No one spoke in favor of or against the application. The public portion of the meeting was closed. Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator will confirm the requirements of having a separate meter. Commissioner Mangold made a motion to adopt Resolution 6g8 approving a Minor Partition to create two parcels, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director gave a summary of the items the Planning Department is currently involved in. Mr. Humphrey gave an overview of the Council retreat, and the Chamber Awards ceremony. He mentioned that we will be having a CAC Study Session and Orientation next Tuesday. There is a Downtown Merchant's meeting coming up and a week long Highway 99 Corridor Plan Charette the week of February i4, zoo5. There will be monthly meetings with the Advisory Committee through the end of June, at which time there will be a final improvement plan to adopt. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fish made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 8:05 P.M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March I, 2005 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Plan fora 4 lot subdivision known as Bar Borough located north of Beall Lane and west of Glenn Way in the R-1-6 zoning district (Map 37 2W l ODD, Tax Lot 1900). Annlicant/ Owner: Jeff and Julie Barber 1642 Beall Lane Central Point, Oregon 97502 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide an 0.85 acre parcel of land into 4 residential lots. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment "B"). Auplicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20 et seq. -Residential Single-Family District Discussion• The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to subdivide a 0.84 acre parcel into 4 individual lots ranging in size from 9,043 to 9,639 square feet (refer to Attachment "A"). Setbacks for the R-1-6 zone are 20 feet from the front lot line, 5 feet per story on the sides and 15 feet from rear lot lines. If two-story structures are proposed there will be an increase to the side yard setback to10 feet. The maximum allowable height is 35 feet. The Public Works Department has submitted a staff report with recommended conditions of approval for consideration by the Commission (Attachment "C"). In addition to the adherence to the standard requirements, Public Works will require that half-street curb, gutter and paving improvements be made to Beall Lane. The Planning Department has submitted recommended conditions as Attachment "D". \\CPCHSI\Cl'rY WIDE\PLANNING\05024.DOC -1- Access to the lots would be fi•om a twenty-one foot wide private road connecting to Beall Lane. This type of private road is comprised of a shared ingress-egress access easement that benefits all of the parcels. A ten foot P.U.E has been shown behind the private road. Jackson County Fire District No3 will require that the private road be posted with "No Parking" signs and the turnaround will need curbs to be painted red. The district has identified fire flow requirements on Attachment "E". The Jackson County Roads Department (Attachment "F") will require a construction permit and requests that the applicant to submit construction drawings to the County for review. The County recommends no direct driveway access onto Beall Lane and the proposed subdivision shows that the private road is the sole access point. Rogue Valley Sewer Service (Attachment "G") states that there is an existing sewer main located in Beall Lane. Sewer service will require the construction of a new sewer main and manhole in the private road. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. Tentative Plat CPMC 17.20.050 establishes the minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District. All lots exceed 6,000 square feet, interior lots are at least 60 feet wide and corner lots are 70 feet wide. I. The project site is located in the R-1-8 (Low Mix Residential) zoning district and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 0.85 acres into 4 separate lots. The subdivision meets this criteria. CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the 5ndings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions in Attachments C and D. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: OCPCHSI\Cl1'Y WIDFU'LANNING\05024.DOC -`Z- 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Public Works Staff Report D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval E. Jackson County Fire District 3 Comments F. Jackson County Roads Department Comments G. Rogue Valley Sewer Services Comments 1'~,CPCIISI\CCrY WIDE\PLANNING\OS024.DOC -3- BAR BOROUGH SUBOMSION ~} ~ (FrL.k'%~'=~' "!`~ ,~~ TENfATNE im w \ I gar ~t I nor S2 I I e.I i 15 \ VICINITY ANP \ ,y gaw sF.t oun sa +c ' w--; ~ gar as OWNER AND DEVELOPER: ~t. ~ \ I ~ Jeff and Jute Barber I 1642 Beall lane I ' ~ Central Poin4 OR. 97503 to ' ~ i ~ a~ \ OCL ATION: I g. I T.L No. 372W tODD - 1900 I ~- C~ Poi ty I I ~ e ___-_____ _ __~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~on I Jac lcvon Y esa &URVEY BY: ' ~~ N ____________ ____~ ~ 9 I ~ \ ~ 79440 FGghr ray 62 I ~ Ea9b Point OR. 97524 I ~ ~' I is, ~ TOTAL ACREAGE: 0.85 Ac.t I I ~ 37,129 S.F.t I tm z g.aJ ~* ~ 8 `°Y ss a DATE: i I 1 ~ I j R December 28, 2004 I I ° I ~ ~ ~ I PROFESS ONAL I ~i ~ I w E ,7 I ~ I I M 4 & L t7v. o-w-m ~ t uull d I ' ff w I I ^ I ~ I~ I ~ I I ~ I I I LEGEND I I = GIY Waler Yaln -ai- =R.V.S. Sever Yoin I -a- = aemeoa Power I -+--•-- m aemeaa Power -- ---- = BuoNing S<lback tine o ~ ~ ~ I I PoIF 1 _ FlxY xro. slnYNklc Pool MEA (re aE auamJ l0i 3 B.O/J SFt fxw- RESIDENCE (la flEWVN) is A z vt Y U O w m tm x ~ ~ W _ O - z ~r n JO' ~~ ; s l0T 4 uamw ~ Y,fOI S.F3 x,avx i i ~d I -____IIi1- ~_ / I --{_ - J_ . Ala P,U.E ~ 3 ----~i -BEALL -~- ~~ .- City of Central Point CENT~L~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT POINT Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Alvord Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: February 8, 2004 Meeting Date: March 1, 2005 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating 4 single family parcels. One parcel has an existing home which will remain. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 10DD, Tax Lot 1900. The address is 1642 Beall Lane and is located north of Beall Lane, west of Glenn Way, south of Timothy Street, east of Snowy Butte Lane. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject properly. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Conditional Use Permit application review are set forth in Chapters 16 & 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. -5- Access to the lots would be fi•om a twenty-one foot wide private road connecting to Beall Lane. This type of private road is comprised of a shared ingress-egress access easement that benefits all of the parcels. A ten foot P.U.E has been shown behind the private road. Jackson County Fire District No3 will require that the private road be posted with "No Parking" signs and the turnaround will need curbs to be painted red. The district has identified fire flow requirements on Attachment "E". The Jackson County Roads Department (Attachment "F") will require a construction permit and requests that the applicant to submit construction drawings to the County for review. The County recommends no direct driveway access onto Beall Lane and the proposed subdivision shows that the private road is the sole access point. Rogue Valley Sewer Service (Attachment "G") states that there is an existing sewer main located in Beall Lane. Sewer service will require the construction of a new sewer main and manhole in the private road. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. Tentative Plat CPMC 17.20.050 establishes the minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District. All lots exceed 6,000 square feet, interior lots are at least 60 feet wide and corner lots are 70 feet wide. I. The project site is located in the R-1-8 (Low Mix Residential) zoning district and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 0.85 acres into 4 separate lots. The subdivision meets this criteria. CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the 5ndings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions in Attachments C and D. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: OCPCHSI\Cl1'Y WIDFU'LANNING\05024.DOC -`Z- 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Public Works Staff Report D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval E. Jackson County Fire District 3 Comments F. Jackson County Roads Department Comments G. Rogue Valley Sewer Services Comments 1'~,CPCIISI\CCrY WIDE\PLANNING\OS024.DOC -3- BAR BOROUGH SUBOMSION ~} ~ (FrL.k'%~'=~' "!`~ ,~~ TENfATNE im w \ I gar ~t I nor S2 I I e.I i 15 \ VICINITY ANP \ ,y gaw sF.t oun sa +c ' w--; ~ gar as OWNER AND DEVELOPER: ~t. ~ \ I ~ Jeff and Jute Barber I 1642 Beall lane I ' ~ Central Poin4 OR. 97503 to ' ~ i ~ a~ \ OCL ATION: I g. I T.L No. 372W tODD - 1900 I ~- C~ Poi ty I I ~ e ___-_____ _ __~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~on I Jac lcvon Y esa &URVEY BY: ' ~~ N ____________ ____~ ~ 9 I ~ \ ~ 79440 FGghr ray 62 I ~ Ea9b Point OR. 97524 I ~ ~' I is, ~ TOTAL ACREAGE: 0.85 Ac.t I I ~ 37,129 S.F.t I tm z g.aJ ~* ~ 8 `°Y ss a DATE: i I 1 ~ I j R December 28, 2004 I I ° I ~ ~ ~ I PROFESS ONAL I ~i ~ I w E ,7 I ~ I I M 4 & L t7v. o-w-m ~ t uull d I ' ff w I I ^ I ~ I~ I ~ I I ~ I I I LEGEND I I = GIY Waler Yaln -ai- =R.V.S. Sever Yoin I -a- = aemeoa Power I -+--•-- m aemeaa Power -- ---- = BuoNing S<lback tine o ~ ~ ~ I I PoIF 1 _ FlxY xro. slnYNklc Pool MEA (re aE auamJ l0i 3 B.O/J SFt fxw- RESIDENCE (la flEWVN) is A z vt Y U O w m tm x ~ ~ W _ O - z ~r n JO' ~~ ; s l0T 4 uamw ~ Y,fOI S.F3 x,avx i i ~d I -____IIi1- ~_ / I --{_ - J_ . Ala P,U.E ~ 3 ----~i -BEALL -~- ~~ .- City of Central Point CENT~L~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT POINT Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Alvord Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: February 8, 2004 Meeting Date: March 1, 2005 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating 4 single family parcels. One parcel has an existing home which will remain. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 10DD, Tax Lot 1900. The address is 1642 Beall Lane and is located north of Beall Lane, west of Glenn Way, south of Timothy Street, east of Snowy Butte Lane. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject properly. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Conditional Use Permit application review are set forth in Chapters 16 & 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. -5- 1. Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 2005. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Or. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is: 05024. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. -6- n ~~ o~ ,am. ~'~~'~% ,Cit of Central Point Public Works De>7artment PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT February 15, 2005 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Public Works Department Robert Pierce Director Rick Bnrttett Supervisor Chris Clnyton Deputy Director Mike Ono Teclnricinn Greg Groves Technician Koren Roeber Secretary II Public Hearin Tentative Subdivision for 37 2W IODD Tax Lot 1900 MargarttaMunoz g - ~ Secretory I Bar Borough Subdivision A plp icant Jeff and Julie Barber 1642 Beall Lane Central Point, OR 97502 Surveyor Kaiser Surveying 19440 Highway 62 Eagle Point, OR 97524 Pro e Description/ R-1-6 Zoning Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperBngineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Existing It:frustructure I. Streets: This section of Beall Lane is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County Roads. The road is currently designed }~ith two twelve feet travel lanes. Bar Borough Subdivision 2. Water: There is an existing twelve inch water line in Beall Lane. 3. Storm Drain: There are existing curbside ditches. Bar Borough Subdivision Special Requirements Private Drive Standards: The Developer shall construct the Private Drive Standards which are set forth in the Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details (Drawing A-10). The standazd calls for atwenty-one feet wide street. 2. DrivewaYLi tin~Plan: The Public Works Department does not recommend standard street lighting for the driveway access to Bar Borough Subdivision. However, the Public Works Department suggests each residence be provided with an individual driveway lighting system. Storm Drainaee Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facilityplan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 4. Fire Department turn-around: The developer shall design a vehicular turn around at the end of the private drive, per the standards and specifications of Fire District No. 3, prior to Final Plat approval. Public Utility Easement: Aten-foot wide public utility easement pazalleling Bursell Road shall be dedicated on the Final Plat. The easement will be shown behind the area dedicated to the City of Central Point for street widening of Scenic Road (Special Requirement 2). Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 %z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. 7. Beall Lane Improvements: Developer will be responsible for constructing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and landscape row adjacent to the Beall Lane. Developer has the option of building the improvements or paying the City for the amount of the improvements prior to Final Plat Approval. No Deferred Improvement Agreements are allowed for this section of Beall Lane. -8- Bar Borough Subdivision Stazzdard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). Irr working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff: In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees aze required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined -9- Bar Borough Subdivision by the Public Works Director). Bar Borough Subdivision - Plazrs 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Bar Borough Subdivision -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Bar Boro:zgh Subdivision -Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. -10- Baz Borough Subdivision Bur Borough Subdivision -Streets The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The deternunation of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Bar Borough Subdivision -Storm Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Bar Borough Subdivision -Required Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE), affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak -11- Bar Borough Subdivision Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ACOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. -12- ATTACHMENT D PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BAR BOROUGH SUBDIVISION. FILF. 05024 CHECK NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION BOX 1 of 3 A final plat application shall be filed within one year of the Planning Commission approval or the tentative plan approval shall become null and void. 2 of 3 The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the project area. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the City with written proof that all of the affected agencies are satisfied with the conditions of approval. 3 of 3 The completion of a reciprocal access easement and public utility easement will be required prior to final plat approval. Access to Lot 4 shall be only from the private road. VACPCI[SIVCI"1'Y WIDEVPLANNING\05024COA.DOC -13- 01!0712005 15:35 8264566 JCFD3 BUS OFC PAGE 02102 f ; /}:-(a ~^r,, lyre '%°_a~ ~~~ ~ City of Central Point Attn: Ken Gerschler -Planner White Ci~Ly OR 97503~~075 (54X) 826-7100 (voice) (541) 826-4566 (fax) Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road Re: Bar Borough Suhdivlsxon ~ lane #05024 1. The 20 ft access lane shall be posted with signs "NO PE1"LIKING" both sides. 2. The turn around shall be dedicated and identified in Red curb paiztt which shall be maintained visible in the future. 3. 'The 25 ft radius will be permitted in this project because the submission date was prior to the January 1, 2005 deadline. 4. The Fire 1-lydrant located to the west (left) side of the project plat map shall be accepted for serving the watex supply fox one and two family dwellings and must provide 1000 gallons pex minute. (lf the development of structures being built exceeds 3600 sq ft or are multi family dwelliugs the water supply shall increase to 1500 Gallons Per Minute. Thank You rc oxen Aeputy Fire Marshal. ~G ~~. -1~- January 7, 2005 01114(2005 10:05 15417746295 JACKSON COUNTY RPS PAGE 01/01 _ ,~,, \~ Roads .Eric Nicmcyep PE Traffic ~ADevefopmpn! linginav~ While Cpy OR 9750s JACKsoN coV~~Y ZOO Mtelope Rpaa Phpne: (541)774-8230 Fsxe (541}774-E295 nlemeyel~jacksoncounry.org wvnv.j~cksoncounty.org Roa s January 7, 2005 Attention: Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning 115 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Bar Borough Subdivision off Beall Lane - acounty-maintained road, Planning File: 05024; A residential subdivision. Dear Ken: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application for the tentative plan for Bar Borough Subdivision, afour-lot residential subdivision located approximately one- hundred feet west of Glenn Way. Roads and Parks has the following comments: 1. The applicant shah submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and Parks and obtain county permits if required. 2- The applicant sha(I obtain a road approach permit from Roads and Parks for the new road approach to Beall Lane. We recommend no direct driveway access to C3eall Lane. 3. Please note fhat Beall Lane (County Collector) has a variable right-of-way With an Average Daily Traffic count of 6000 as of October 2004 fifty yards east of Highway 99. Roads and Parks recommend frontage improvements and that they be constructed to Central Point's road standards. Sincerely, ~~ Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer I:IEngineering~Developmeni\CITIESiCNTRLPT105024wpd.wpt>- t J - 02/08j2005 11:31 ~~~~,~v s~w~, f~ ~° "~ , Febzuazy 8, 2005 541666417171 RVS ~~ l l~,GiY~/lf:3yt lG S~ PAGE 01/01 ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point - Mailing Addreas: P.O. Hox 3130, Central Po1nt,OR 97502.0005 '1~1. (541J 664.6300 or (541) 779-4144 PAX (541) 664-7171 www.RVSS.us Ken Gerscbler FAX 6646384 City of Central Point Planning Department 15S South Second Stzeet Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Bar Borough Subdlvlsiou, File #05024 Dear Ken, There is an 8 inch sewer main on Beall Lane izl front ofthe subject property. Service to the new lots will require construction of a manhole oven this pipe and extension of a sewer main along the access toad to Lot 1. All new sewer must be designed and cozrstructed in accordance with RVS standards. We request that completion of the sewez and acceptance by RV5 be made a condition of final plat approval. Feel free to cal] me if you have any questions regarding sewer service foz this project. Sincerely, G%~~ Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer l~:\DA,TA\A.GENCIES\CENTPT\l'LA1Wi G\SCTBDIV1SI01~1\2005\05024-BA.R BOROYJGT3.DOC -16- PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March 1, 2005 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: David Alvord, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Heazing-Site Plan Application of 37 2W 11A, Tax Lot(s) 27100 and 27200- At 715 Hopkins Road: Skillman Brothers 12-plea Owner/ Applicant: Mark Skillman 3650 Biddle Road Medford, Oregon 97504 Pro er Description: 37 2W 11A, Tax Lot(s) 27100 & 27200 - 0.48 acres ZoninE: R-3, Residential Multiple Family District Summary: The applicant is requesting site plan approval to construct three four-plexes at 715 Hopkins Road. Two of the three units will be attached (Buildings A & B), creating aneight-plex, and the third four-plex (Building C) will be unattached. (Attachment B-1). Multiple-family dwellings are a permitted and encouraged use in the R-3 zoning district. Authori CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a site plan. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment A). Applicable Law: CPMC 17.28.010 et seq.- Residential Multiple Family Zoning District CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan Review -17- Discussion: The applicant, Mark Skillman, is requesting that the Planning Commission review and approve a site plan that would allow him to construct one eight-plex and one four-plexes at 715 & 725 Hopkins Road. Two units will be attached; sharing a common wall (Buildings A & B), creating the eight-plex. Building C will not be attached, thereby creating two structures at the site. The buildings (B & C) will be connected by a breezeway. (Attachment B-3) The site plan shows that Buildings A & B would share the 0.33 acre parcel with the third four- plex (Building C) being located on the smaller parcel. The floor plans and elevations (Attachments B-2& B-3) depict each of the four-plex units as having 832 square feet with two bedrooms and two bathrooms. Because of the way Building "C" is located on the site plan, the west property line of tax lot 27200 runs right through the building; therefore, the applicant will be required to apply for a lot consolidation prior to submitting building plans. Building setbacks in the R-3 district are 20 feet for the front lot, 10 feet for the rear and five feet for the side lot lines. Parking requires that each unit be provided two parking spaces and one guest parking space per every four units. The site plan (Attachment B-1) shows that there will be 27 total parking spaces, thereby meeting the parking requirements. Access to the project area would be taken from Hopkins Road. Presently there is curb, gutter and sidewalk installed along most of Hopkins Road. The applicant will need to plan for Storm Drainaae Infrastructure, aTen-Foot Public Utility Easement to be dedicated behind the current right-of--way line, and a Street Tree Plan. The site plan shows landscaping on the east boundary of the project area as well as in the front and rear of the buildings and the parking lot. However, the landscaping plan lacks details such as an irrigation plan and a listing of proposed tree and shrub species the applicant intends to use at the site. The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Commission assign a condition that the applicant provide a more detailed landscape plan that includes shrub and tree species together with an irrigation plan. A backflow prevention assembly will be required. The Public Works Department, Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS) and Fire District Number 3 have been notified of this application. Public Works will require that the developer shall: 1: Develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 2: Maintain aten-foot wide public utility easement paralleling Hopkins Road; this easement shall be dedicated behind the current right-of--way line. 3: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within landscape rows. (Attachment C) -18- Rogue Valley Sewer Services RVSS was satisfied that the sewer line that would serve this project was more than adequate and upgrades would not be required. Fire District Number 3 did not comment, however the applicant will be required to follow any and all recommendations and requirements as set forth by Fire District Number 3.. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law: Site Plan Review In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases its decision on the following standards from Section 17.72.040: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property. ^ Amore in-depth landscape and irrigation plan will be required when the building plans for the three four-plez units are submitted. An irrigation system with backflow prevention assembly will be required. B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ The proposed four-plex structures will take access from Hopkins Road. Storm drainage infrastructure and a street tree plan will be installed. Aten-foot public utility easement will have to be established and dedicated to the city per public works requirements. C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ The off-street parking requirements for the three four-plea structures are two covered spaces per individual dwelling unit. The application shows two spaces per individual unit. The off-street parking and guest parking requirements have been met. -19- D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ No signs have been proposed at this time. Jackson County Fire District Number 3 will require that the address be prominently displayed on each dwelling unit. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; ~ The proposed project will be required to meet all applicable fire safety standards and requirements as set forth in the Fire Code. F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction meets the minimum setback and distances between structures requirements for the R-3, Residential Multiple Family District. G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ The proposed four-plexes and on-site improvements comply with the intent of the district. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the proposed site plan based on facts presented by staff; 2. Continue the review of the site plan at the discretion of the Commission; or 3. Deny the proposed site plan Attachments: A Notice of Meeting B Site Plan (B-1), Floor Plan (B-2) and Building F,levations (B-3) C Planning Department Conditions of Approval D Public Works Staff Report. E Comments from neighbors -20- ~D w ATTAC~INdENT A ~ENTRAL• PLANNING C_^-~ s,-;;~ ~~ T POINT Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Alvord Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Meeting Date of Notice: February 8, 2004 Meeting Date: March 1, 2005 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Site Plan application for the purpose of building three (3) four plexes. The subject property is located in an R-3, Multiple Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 11A, Tax Lot(s) 27100 & 27200. The address is 715 & 725 Hopkins Road and is located north of Hopkins, east of Freeman Road, west of Briarwood and south of Mountain View Drive. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Conditional Use Permit application review are set forth in Chapters 16 & 17 of the Centra{ Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 2005. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Or. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is: 05028. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Site Plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions, __ t ~~~i .....' ilexes) ~'_ Idda.~err ~..® ® g -23-, i i ~ -" __~ --~---- ~--- - ~ ~ ~ I i ~ i f 1_L_ ~~ias ~~ v~~uMlf-~`(5~`f~~ N r~-rz~-u D 5 to Iy To Ih sb -24- 1~TTACI~IVIENT DANIEL R. HORTON ARCHITECT 169 W. MA[N • P.O. BGX bD2 EAOLE POIN'1: OR 97514 12/27/°`} B-1 02/22/2005 11:07 5414825355 ~:. _ ,a¢; -- - I ~-ra B. , .. tl ~_ a.' - ~ .. ~ r ~.~,,.v,' .. .. a. . ~ : ~ . ' ., • ;t.,. i ra' - ~ WJ; ' ~ ^. ' BP.', ~. ry ., ' ' , 2«G f/ H "~~"]~ ~... .. Y ~. . \• [ ` ~ R utt •---~ ' ] ~ e~.. O i . ~ ~ o ~~ ~ (9 . .1 ~j `~ ': • , • Y.~, '. h efA4 ~~ ~~ ~' s.. r. .•. '~•. .. ~ ~ .' .: ., • ® ~ . ~ ~ i'1: BEDf20aM ~` +~ ' BAT N . pne ona nvY an r-. vianW -. 111,0, FWIM~YM WA.v.I • vA. rxm. eim enro wre+d reRdrR _ D 6W1 , ', .. eM/LeO EULI.'fXSLi {e!f.Vl . .. m~.L.rvRY pAMe, NAe:ecva wedb W bk keLC ' P.1 IBRI MEFCIIlNCe~O]ll~fApn - ;~arr.~ecCeee erAe wrier. ' ~ Axb nelson+>`•~tumvn+ ArNAxrnoMNb Yilpwe onu en>:w. eeNaeleNSn ry.Re UGV]IJ nOCR MIlro~ fAJW.t2L M fnOVri',e ELCO ADAPtAE]ILIM NDtEB ~.' ': '~ LNlR N,OpR V4i6 Nee egIdTRIKA{+AD)o ewrteue ~ enrsnroMe wn>t weraum. A]}, ieele. ngWe'fAMlICe6 eCnnlnLm.Me ERM DAM Af G0.eEON,Me +]b' LLb! I.OfD'/! ATKIIG1t11'• M1YRL.l1 d%t6 %Ll ElLC11tlG [wttMal510 ee eeeNteO!»i M1611LtV!M Nm'LLdd NAN b~ AeOTe KOdl. hPo.Nf IN1M Mlle:llAMiCkhitrE!-k' MM ~1,Y9.eC LC'f NOTT', (~NETRATICNH W INR. PAR TD 6E PROTECTED 6T~AN ~- HTOp'3YHTE11~Itd9TdLLEb 2 wnau~p~astaJCAr1D~a•9. suAU_ ~E o~ Nat I.E98 Tu. FoR INR PARK uiA,LL ~ANP 8EE® N GEh skl I«L PI 3 ^^^° X3/03 ` ~ _ WALL 6f~AGlNCz .. , ~mo2 acw :: `. . ~ 'd.TCiNAfd oRMm ~. ' v+rmarRAeva usr A AdN1EY:~ 'A1 e, P] ~~ b 4Bf11ae4Y 1Le1Ndy •,d Ir PAGE ©2163 ^~ pt~uloh~fin' [~ `~ . ~ 'P N. ' F.'.: ~ ~ o. kj " ~ .~'..~,. . "~Si~CLl"Od ~~~q ~~ .. .. . n s ' ~,:. !+. : • 'f9~' ik? I. ~tra '. y,..m i .: ~a I {, .: ~~'~~.''.zti~-a m ~:g~ : ~ ; ~y~~'n' "~%' . ' '. tl M. B~C~k"-BOOM' 3'.7 .; :. . ~ ~ WAPJG ' .. .. . . aRab r ~ ~' :GLOB nmi AcennO ap a e ~ : ' .. ~ ~ ~ . T L , ,i L~ ~ .. 'b .'..:.. . N~ ~a ' J " '~ ... '~ 'IL1 ~:.. .m ~ ~ :~ ~IfQED CCPIV'.~~ ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ :G N~• '. ~IP.~.-- ". j~._~ ' a: ~^ . ' :i~~.~p '. ~. a _ .:._. ..' ~9,._, . ~ ~~_A,~ +- x'.-16' L- . -- ' 4A': .... , .. ' .. , _ NEUI ML GEN7Re A3H pl?OJE ~~4 Iy7 P ~~ n DbNIEL R Ile 160 4t (' E ~qyw /MAl~4 iWIII r•t Nrwny nMWhn la'eE a 4 Jan 10 O5 11:53a Horton Rrchitects 830-1014 p.2 =27--- ~~TTA~III~NT ~-3 ATTACHMENT C RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant shall meet all of the requirements established by the Public Works Department, Fire District Number 3 and the Rogue Valley Sewer Services. 2. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall submit an application of lot consolidation prior to submitting buildi~ig plans. -28- A'I'~'AC~-IIi~ERTT I~ Public Works Department ~EN'i"RAL PINT PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT February 15, 2005 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Public Works Department bob Pierce, Director Chris Clayton, Deputy Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Subdivision for 37 2W 1 lA, Tax Lots 27100 and 27200 Skillman Brothers 12-plex Applicant Skillman Brothers, Inc. 3650 Biddle Road, #23 Medford, OR 97504 Pro e Descrintion/ R-3 Zoning Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standazds, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Repotrts are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. 155 Soufh Second Street Centra/Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.63$4 -29- Existing Infrastructure 1. Streets: Hopkins Road is currently improved in front of the subject property with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. 2. Water: There is an existing twelve inch water line in Hopkins Road. 3. Storm Drain: There is existing storm drain facilities in Hopkins Road. Skillman Brothers 12-plex Subdivision Special Requirements 1. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the properly owners. 2. Public Utility Easement: Aten-foot wide public utility easement paralleling Hopkins Road shall be ded- icated behind current right-of--way line. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. The plan shall in- clude construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 %z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an auto- matic underground irrigation system. The current site plan does not indicate trees planted Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specif cations are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 F> 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 -30- needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Departrnent Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the fmal plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 ~3 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 -31- Skillman Brothers 12 Alex Subdivision -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Depart- ment. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Depart- ment for construction records and inspection. T'he Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A my- lar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Skillman Brothers l2 plex Subdivision -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construc- tion, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and con- struction of public works projects. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 t~ 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 -32- Skillman Brothers 12 Alex Subdivision -Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, F,ngineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Skillman Brot{:ers 12 Alex Subdivision -Streets 1. The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All de- signs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon De- partment of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 ~~ 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 -33- Skillman Brothers 12 Alex Subdivision -Storm Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be re- quired to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in con- formance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific in- formation regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Skillman Brothers 12 Alex Subdivision - Required ,Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to accept- able professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon De- partment of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ALOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 , 541.664.3321 r=ax 541.664.6384 -34- ~`I'~'1~~~-II~/1EI~T`~' ~ February 20, 2005 ;,. _. ~~,; ~~~ ~ ~ 2005 City of Central Point Planning Commission 155 S. Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 To City Planning Commission: :;i5"Y ~.:; 1= C; t?iV TRr1t. POii1i'i My mother and dad have been property owners at 725 Hopkins Road, Central Point for about 42 years. Due to circumstances the property is now in my name. My dad actually grew up on the property next door at 715 Hopkins Road that is the subject of my letter. There has been a site plan application for the purpose of building 3 four plexes next door. I know the property on this side of the road is a]] zoned for multiple dwellings but I also feel there are a number of issues regarding that many dwellings. I am not against progress but I do feel there is a limit. 1. Safety: Hopkins Road is no longer a quiet residential road. It has become one of the links between Medford and Central Point. There is a great deal of traffic on this road all hours of the day. The speed limit is posted at 35 miles an hour but that speed limit is not always observed. There is a neighborhood market directly across the street from where the proposed four plexes will be. Cars are pulling in and out of the store all day. I feel with the added traffic from the four plexes, it will make it a very dangerous and congested area. There are a lot of children and adults that walk to and from the store. The added traffic will make it very dangerous to cross the road. There are caution lights but they don't seem to slow people down. It is akeady difficult to get in and out of our driveway with the traffic congestion there is now. Z. Noise Level: I have lived in an apartment complex before and know how noisy they can be. People tend to turn up stereos, children yell, adults yell. We already listen to loud car stereos with the traffic that comes and goes from the market across the street. There are a lot of older people that live around here. The Meadows, a retirement village, is right behind us. My mother is 81 years old and has had to get used to more noise than she tikes. 3. Privacy: We have a beautiful back yard that we like to be able to go out and enjoy. We have a 6 foot fence in back but with 2 story buildings going up that will take away our privacy. I do not like the idea of people being able to look over the fence into our back yard. When I had to move in with my mother to help take care of her, that is one thing about this place that I have really enjoyed. I work all day and it is very nice to be able to come home and go sit on the patio in back and relax. I feel this will all betaken away from us if these buildings go in. -35- Page 2 I am not against multiple dwellings being built. I am against 12 units being put in next door. I feel that is too many for that piece of property and this neighborhood. They could build a nice single story duplex or a nice single story fourplex that would fit that property better and not cause as many problems and congestion as the I2 units will cause. Respectfully, ~-~O Dee Coy Anita Coy -36- PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March 1, 2005 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Subdivision variance and Tentative Plan fora 91ot subdivision known as Borian Estates located south of Pittview Avenue and east of Sydney Court in the R-1-6 zoning district (Map 37 2W 11 D, Tax Lots 600 and 700). AAAheant/ Owner: Knapp Classic Homes, INC. 675 South 4a' Street Jacksonville, Oregon 97530 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 1.93 acres of land into 9 residential lots. The subdivision will require a variance from the Public Works standards and two side yard setbacks. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment "B"). AAAlicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20 et seq. -Residential Single-Family District CPMC 17.80 et seq. -Variance Discussion• The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to subdivide two parcels with a combined aggregate area of 1,93 acres into 9 individual lots ranging in size from 6,001 to 18,843 square feet (refer to Attachment "A"). Setbacks for the R-I-6 zone are 20 feet from the front lot line, 5 feet per story on the sides (10 feet if side lot line has street frontage) and 15 feet from rear lot lines. If two-story structures are proposed there will be an increase to the side yard setback to10 feet. The maximum allowable height is 35 feet. Access to the lots would be from a thirty foot wide public road connecting to Pittview Avenue. \\CPCI-ISI\CITY WIDI\I'I,ANMNG\05029_llOC -37- The Public Works Department has identified that the distance between the proposed road and Kensington Court is insufficient since the City's standards require a minimum distance of 150 feet. The applicant has requested a variance from this standard since he is only able to provide an offset of 109 feet. In the Public Works staff report (Attachment "C"), the department has evaluated the traffic volumes and patterns, the queuing onto the street and site visibility and determined that the reduced distance will not be a problem in this circumstance. In the future, the road width for the new street will be widened from the proposed width of 30 feet to 42 feet as the property to the east develops but it is unlikely that the increased number of homes will adversely affect the intersection. A second variance is being sought on this subdivision application since the existing garage on Lot 8 would be located within 5 feet of the Right-of--Way for the new road. In normal situations, the standard setback would be 10 feet but the Planning Department is willing support this variance because the garage door does not face the new road and there is adequate off-street maneuvering area. The applicant has submitted findings of fact for this variance request (Attachment "D"). The Planning and Building Departments have submitted recommended conditions of approval (Attachments "E" and "F") for consideration by the Commission. Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment "G") have identified the existence of an 8 inch sewer main in Pittview Avenue. Both of the existing homes are connected to RVSS and a planned extension will provide adequate capacity for the rest of the development. Jackson County Fire District No. 3 has presented a map with recommended conditions of approval (Attachment "H"). FindinES of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. Variance CPMC 17.80.010 Consideration for granting a variance. A variance may be granted if findings are made that the following considerations will either result from a granting of the variance or the following considerations do not apply to the requested application. The variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the city, such as beautification or safety; 1. The variances being requested will allow a developer to construct a quality subdivision that meets the expectations of the neighborhood. The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood; \\CPCHSI\CPI'Y WIDE\PLANNINC,\05029.000 -38- 2. The approval of the variance will not have any significant adverse impacts on the neighborhood because the proposed development was designed to use the current underdeveloped parcels in the most suitable configuration of roads and lot dimensions. The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district; 3. The subject parcels are zoned R-1-6, Residential Single-Family and the proposed subdivision is consistent with the sort of development that has been planned in the area. The issues concerning the reduced intersection distance and side yard setback distance would not change the nature of the development. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to other property in the same zoning district; 4. This subdivision has been proposed in an area of infill development. Unlike subdivisions located in undeveloped areas, the infill subdivision often is more difficult to design since the available land does not always provide an ideal connection to public facilities such as streets, water and sewer. The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family members. 5. The applicant has purchased two parcels with the intent ofdeveloping awell-planned residential subdivision. He has worked with the City to find the best way that the property could be tied into future subdivisions in an area where there is a considerable amount of infill development. Tentative Plat CPMC 17.20.050 establishes the minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District. All lots exceed 6,000 square feet, interior lots are at least 60 feet wide and corner lots are 70 feet wide. 1. The project site is located in the R-1-8 (Low Mix Residential) zoning district and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 1.93 acres into 9 separate lots. CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions in Attachments C and D. \\CPCHSI\CITY W[DE\PLANNING\05029.DOC -39- Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution No._, approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Public Works Staff Report D. Applicants findings of fact E. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval F. Building Department Staff Report G. Rogue Valley Sewer Service Comments H. Jackson County Fire District No. 3 Comments \\CPCHSI\CITY WIDE\PLANNING\OS029.DOC -40- ~-- _v C` i--- Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Alvord Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: February It, 2004 Meeting Date: March 1, 2005 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan & Variance application for the purpose of creating 9 single family parcels. Two parcels have existing homes which will remain. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 11 D, Tax Lot(s) 600 & 700. The address is 747 & 765 Pittview Avenue and is located south of Pittview Avenue, north of Forest Glen Drive, west of Marilee and east of Bursell Road. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THiS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Conditional Use Permit application review are set forth in Chapters 16 & 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March 1, 2005 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Subdivision variance and Tentative Plan fora 91ot subdivision known as Borian Estates located south of Pittview Avenue and east of Sydney Court in the R-1-6 zoning district (Map 37 2W 11 D, Tax Lots 600 and 700). AAAheant/ Owner: Knapp Classic Homes, INC. 675 South 4a' Street Jacksonville, Oregon 97530 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 1.93 acres of land into 9 residential lots. The subdivision will require a variance from the Public Works standards and two side yard setbacks. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment "B"). AAAlicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20 et seq. -Residential Single-Family District CPMC 17.80 et seq. -Variance Discussion• The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to subdivide two parcels with a combined aggregate area of 1,93 acres into 9 individual lots ranging in size from 6,001 to 18,843 square feet (refer to Attachment "A"). Setbacks for the R-I-6 zone are 20 feet from the front lot line, 5 feet per story on the sides (10 feet if side lot line has street frontage) and 15 feet from rear lot lines. If two-story structures are proposed there will be an increase to the side yard setback to10 feet. The maximum allowable height is 35 feet. Access to the lots would be from a thirty foot wide public road connecting to Pittview Avenue. \\CPCI-ISI\CITY WIDI\I'I,ANMNG\05029_llOC -37- The Public Works Department has identified that the distance between the proposed road and Kensington Court is insufficient since the City's standards require a minimum distance of 150 feet. The applicant has requested a variance from this standard since he is only able to provide an offset of 109 feet. In the Public Works staff report (Attachment "C"), the department has evaluated the traffic volumes and patterns, the queuing onto the street and site visibility and determined that the reduced distance will not be a problem in this circumstance. In the future, the road width for the new street will be widened from the proposed width of 30 feet to 42 feet as the property to the east develops but it is unlikely that the increased number of homes will adversely affect the intersection. A second variance is being sought on this subdivision application since the existing garage on Lot 8 would be located within 5 feet of the Right-of--Way for the new road. In normal situations, the standard setback would be 10 feet but the Planning Department is willing support this variance because the garage door does not face the new road and there is adequate off-street maneuvering area. The applicant has submitted findings of fact for this variance request (Attachment "D"). The Planning and Building Departments have submitted recommended conditions of approval (Attachments "E" and "F") for consideration by the Commission. Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment "G") have identified the existence of an 8 inch sewer main in Pittview Avenue. Both of the existing homes are connected to RVSS and a planned extension will provide adequate capacity for the rest of the development. Jackson County Fire District No. 3 has presented a map with recommended conditions of approval (Attachment "H"). FindinES of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. Variance CPMC 17.80.010 Consideration for granting a variance. A variance may be granted if findings are made that the following considerations will either result from a granting of the variance or the following considerations do not apply to the requested application. The variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the city, such as beautification or safety; 1. The variances being requested will allow a developer to construct a quality subdivision that meets the expectations of the neighborhood. The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood; \\CPCHSI\CPI'Y WIDE\PLANNINC,\05029.000 -38- 2. The approval of the variance will not have any significant adverse impacts on the neighborhood because the proposed development was designed to use the current underdeveloped parcels in the most suitable configuration of roads and lot dimensions. The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district; 3. The subject parcels are zoned R-1-6, Residential Single-Family and the proposed subdivision is consistent with the sort of development that has been planned in the area. The issues concerning the reduced intersection distance and side yard setback distance would not change the nature of the development. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to other property in the same zoning district; 4. This subdivision has been proposed in an area of infill development. Unlike subdivisions located in undeveloped areas, the infill subdivision often is more difficult to design since the available land does not always provide an ideal connection to public facilities such as streets, water and sewer. The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family members. 5. The applicant has purchased two parcels with the intent ofdeveloping awell-planned residential subdivision. He has worked with the City to find the best way that the property could be tied into future subdivisions in an area where there is a considerable amount of infill development. Tentative Plat CPMC 17.20.050 establishes the minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District. All lots exceed 6,000 square feet, interior lots are at least 60 feet wide and corner lots are 70 feet wide. 1. The project site is located in the R-1-8 (Low Mix Residential) zoning district and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 1.93 acres into 9 separate lots. CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions in Attachments C and D. \\CPCHSI\CITY W[DE\PLANNING\05029.DOC -39- Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution No._, approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Public Works Staff Report D. Applicants findings of fact E. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval F. Building Department Staff Report G. Rogue Valley Sewer Service Comments H. Jackson County Fire District No. 3 Comments \\CPCHSI\CITY WIDE\PLANNING\OS029.DOC -40- Ken Gerschler Community Planner Dave Alvord Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Technician Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: February It, 2004 Meeting Date: March 1, 2005 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Tentative Plan & Variance application for the purpose of creating 9 single family parcels. Two parcels have existing homes which will remain. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 11 D, Tax Lot(s) 600 & 700. The address is 747 & 765 Pittview Avenue and is located south of Pittview Avenue, north of Forest Glen Drive, west of Marilee and east of Bursell Road. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: ORS CHAPTER 215 REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THiS NOTICE IT MUST BE RPOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 200 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Conditional Use Permit application review are set forth in Chapters 16 & 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions of the project approval. PUI3L.IC COMMENTS 1. Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 2005. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Or. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is: 05029. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext 292. SUMMARY OF PROLE®URE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~ r ~ i H~i~~p~ t~ YCT I i I I l ~_ ~~~ ~ ll tdr~i~r~l~J1Nri! ~. ® " ~' ~.~:~ _ ~ Public Works Ike artment ,? c~ ~m y~ =, ~ ~° ~ Robert Pierce 0 ®R~ ~Q~ ° Director Rick Bartlett PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT supervisor Chris Claytwr Deputy Director February 15, 2005 Mike Ono Technician TO: Planning Commission Greg Graves Technician FROM: Public Works Department Develo mtent o ordinntor Services C SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Subdivision for 37 2 W l ODD, Tax Lot 1900 Karen Roeber Borian Estates Subdivision Administrative Assistant Applicant Knapp Classic Homes Margarita Mm:oz Secretary I 675 South Fourth Street Jacksonville, OR 97530 Surveyor L.J. Friar & Associates 816 W. 8~ Street Medford, OR 97504 Pro e Description/ R-1-6 Zoning Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standazds, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written incoordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. The developer has been in contact with the Planning and Public Works Departments in order to fmd a way to develop this unique infill area. The developer is requesting a smaller street design than what is typically shown by developers but is a standard City Street. In this circumstance the developer is requesting athirty-foot wide .ri~~tof--way. This right-of--way width is typical for Borian Estates Subdivision of the private drive, per the standards and specifications of Fire District No. 3, prior to Final Plat approval. 4. Reciprocal Access Easement: The developer shows an easement for access to lots 2, 3, 4 and potential lot 5. Developer must provide the city with a reciprocal access easement and a maintenance agreement for the easement drive. 5. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the azeas along the newly approved City Street and Pittview Avenue. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 ''/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. 6. Looped Waterline: The developer will be responsible for stubbing the water line to the East for future extension. The waterline will eventually loop through one of the properties to the East and back to Pittview Road. 7. Street Name: The applicant has not submitted a name for the new public street. Applicant shall submit a street name for approval prior to issuance of Final Plat. 8. Pittview Improvements: Developer will be responsible for constructing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and landscape row adjacent to Pittview Road for the subject properties. Developer has the option of building the improvements or paying the City for the amount of the improvements prior to Final Plat Approval. No Deferred Improvement Agreements are allowed for this section of Pittview Road. 9. Jackson County: Construction Plans for Pittview Road must be submitted to the City of Central Point and Jackson County Roads. Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities aze to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the -46- PUI3L.IC COMMENTS 1. Any person interest in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 2005. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Or. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is: 05029. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext 292. SUMMARY OF PROLE®URE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~ r ~ i H~i~~p~ t~ YCT I i I I l ~_ ~~~ ~ ll tdr~i~r~l~J1Nri! ~. ® " ~' ~.~:~ _ ~ Public Works Ike artment ,? c~ ~m y~ =, ~ ~° ~ Robert Pierce 0 ®R~ ~Q~ ° Director Rick Bartlett PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT supervisor Chris Claytwr Deputy Director February 15, 2005 Mike Ono Technician TO: Planning Commission Greg Graves Technician FROM: Public Works Department Develo mtent o ordinntor Services C SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Subdivision for 37 2 W l ODD, Tax Lot 1900 Karen Roeber Borian Estates Subdivision Administrative Assistant Applicant Knapp Classic Homes Margarita Mm:oz Secretary I 675 South Fourth Street Jacksonville, OR 97530 Surveyor L.J. Friar & Associates 816 W. 8~ Street Medford, OR 97504 Pro e Description/ R-1-6 Zoning Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standazds, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written incoordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. The developer has been in contact with the Planning and Public Works Departments in order to fmd a way to develop this unique infill area. The developer is requesting a smaller street design than what is typically shown by developers but is a standard City Street. In this circumstance the developer is requesting athirty-foot wide .ri~~tof--way. This right-of--way width is typical for Borian Estates Subdivision developments with no on-street parking and sidewalks on one side. The developer has positioned the road in such a way that when the property to the east decides to develop they will build the remaining portion of the road to a minor residential streetwith aright ofway of forty-two feet. This will allow for parking on one-side of the street. In the interim, the street will be classified as a public Residential Lane with no parking on either side. Subdivision Variance Developer is additionally asking for a Subdivision Variance to address the inadequate distance between Kensington Court and the New City Street. The City of Central Point Standards and Specifications requires that new streets be offset by at least 150 feet from center line to center line. The new proposed street will be a residential lane, and then eventually be upgraded to a Minor Residential Street. The current offset proposed is approximately 109 feet. The Public Works Department has analyzed the current traffic on Pittview Road and the offset from Kensington Court. Kensington Court has seven lots and the typical traffic from that subdivision enters and exits from and to the west. The main reason for the offset requirement is to make sure that there is adequate sight distance and queuing for vehicles. Public Works has looked at the traffic volumes, sight distance, and queuing onto Pittview and believe the location of the proposed street will adequately address the public safety. Existing Infrastructure 1. Streets: This section of Pittview is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County Roads. The road is currently designed with two twelve feet travel lanes. 2. Water: There is an existing eight inch water line in Pittview Road. 3. Storm Drain: There are existing curbside ditches. Borian Estates Subdivision Special Requirements Public Street Standards: The Developer shall construct the Public Street. The street shall include two twelve foot travel lanes and sidewalk on west side and one and a half feet for water meters. When the property owner to the East decided to develop their property they shall install an additional twelve feet to make the street a minor residential street. 2. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system, which provides for run-off from and inn-on onto the proposed development. It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 3. Fire Department turn-around: The developer shall design a vehicular turn around at the end -45- Borian Estates Subdivision of the private drive, per the standards and specifications of Fire District No. 3, prior to Final Plat approval. 4. Reciprocal Access Easement: The developer shows an easement for access to lots 2, 3, 4 and potential lot 5. Developer must provide the city with a reciprocal access easement and a maintenance agreement for the easement drive. 5. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the azeas along the newly approved City Street and Pittview Avenue. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 ''/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. 6. Looped Waterline: The developer will be responsible for stubbing the water line to the East for future extension. The waterline will eventually loop through one of the properties to the East and back to Pittview Road. 7. Street Name: The applicant has not submitted a name for the new public street. Applicant shall submit a street name for approval prior to issuance of Final Plat. 8. Pittview Improvements: Developer will be responsible for constructing curb, gutter, and sidewalk and landscape row adjacent to Pittview Road for the subject properties. Developer has the option of building the improvements or paying the City for the amount of the improvements prior to Final Plat Approval. No Deferred Improvement Agreements are allowed for this section of Pittview Road. 9. Jackson County: Construction Plans for Pittview Road must be submitted to the City of Central Point and Jackson County Roads. Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities aze to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (RVSS). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the -46- Borian Estates Subdivision sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. deevelopment Plans -Required dnformation Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staf£ In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public YI'orks Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Borian Estates Subdivision -Plans Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Sorian Estates Subdivision -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public -47- Borian Estates Subdivision Works projects as follows: The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Borian Estates Subdivision -Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans, neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. All requirements ofthe Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Borian Estates Subdivision -Streets 1. The Developer's street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobilityproblems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation {ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffc expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements ofthe Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be -28- Borian Estates Subdivision coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. Borian Estates Subdivision -,Storm Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the proj ect, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regardmg the design and construction of storm drain related components. Borian Estates Subdivision -Required Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE), affected 'irrigation districts, Bear Creak Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ALOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. -49- ~\ ~¢~?~cNstit~i~lt ~~!? January 18, 2005 Flftt®t~tGS F®~ VA,E31A.(NC~ R~GU~~S CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Department Re: Application for Subdivision of property located at 747 and 765 Pittview Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION This proposed project, to be known as Borian Estates, is very typical of development activity in the general area -with previously relatively narrow and deep lots being divided into building lots with general conformity to the R-1-5 area zoning guidelines. Anew street is proposed to provide public access down the east side of the property into the rear portion of the land. Seven new undeveloped lots would be created, along with one lot each for the two existing homes, which remain occupied by their prior owners. EXPLANATION OF NEED FOR 2 VARIANCES Street Offset Distance. Recent changes in City Public Works guidelines call for new streets, which are offset from a nearby existing intersection, to be constructed with a minimum center-line offset distance of 150'. The proposed project is constrained to a 100' offset. (An attempt to purchase the property to the east to allow a greater offset was unsuccessful). It can be found that the granting of this variance will not be injurious to the neighborhood, and is in keeping with the city's desire for orderly infill development. One of the primary purposes of aligning intersections (or separating them adequately) is to minimize excessive turning movements. It should be noted that the proposed street, and the nearby offset Kensington Court, each serve only a few homes, and it is unlikely that any traffic coming from one street would pass on to the other. Thus traffic movement is not likely to be adversely effected, as the very limited traffic from each street is expected to primarily proceed in an orderly fashion down Pittview Avenue to Bursell. Lot Setback Distance. The existing home located at 747 Pittview Avenue has a garage which faces Pittview. The City requests a 30' right-of--way for the creation of the new public street. The new lot, Lot 8, abuts this new street on its easterly property line. Zoning requires a 10' setback for corner lots from the "side street." The garage, in its existing position, would end up about 7' from the street right-of-way. It can be found that the granting of a variance from the statutory 10' setback to 7' will not adversely effect any party in the neighborhood. (Examples of this condition are common in the vicinity). The new Lot 8 would have no vehicular access from the garage onto the new street, but continue as it currently does to take its vehicular access directly from Pittview Avenue. Thank you for your consideration of our request for the noted variances. Knapp Classic Homes, Inc. Ray M. Knapp, President 675 S. 4"' St., Jacksonville, OR 97530 Phone & Fax: 899-A041 CCB: 091267 -50- ATTACHMENT E PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RnRiAN F,STATES SUBDIVISION, FILE 05029 CHECK NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION BOX 1 of 2 A final plat application shall be filed within one year of the Planning Commission approval or the tentative plan approval shall become null and void. 2 of 2 The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the project area. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the City with written proof that all of the affected agencies are satisfied with the conditions of approval. \\CPC2~ISl\CI"CY WIDI\PLANNING\05029COA.DOC -51- l~E~t7' CITY OF CENTRAL POINT BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT APPLICANT: Name: B®RIAN ESTATES Location: 37 2W 11 D TL# 600 & 700 City: CENTRAL POINT State: OR_ Zip code: 97502 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Planning file no. 050929 -10 lot Subdivision (SFD~ BUILDING ®EPARTMENT C®MMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors adopted codes. 2. If a private storm drain system is Point Plumbing department. must comply with all current State of Oregon proposed it must be reviewed by the Central 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the ODSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be providec in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Developer and/or contractor shall comply with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ODSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted before a building permit will be issued. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. -52- CITY OF CENTRAL POINT BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ~age 22 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Department for use in preparing the Planning Department staff report. Central Point Building Department By: Lois Dated: January 25, 2004 -53- 01/27/2005 14:42 ,~vp~,EV s~w~ys~b ~~ 1~'~ ~ January 27, 2005 541666417171 RllS / PAGE 01/01 .fy~"ir~ ~` ~+/1K~^ST ~"lr ie ROGUE VALLEY SEVI/ER SERVICES Location: 138 Wes[ Valas Road, Centrat Point -Mailing Address: P.O.33oz 3130, Cent[sl l?oint,OR 97j020005 Tel. (541) 6646300 or (541) 779.4.144 ;=nx (541) 664.7171 www.RVSS.us Ken Gerschler FAX 664-6384 City of Central Point Planning Department IS5 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Borialu Estates Subdivision, File #05029 Dear Ken, The existing homes on the subject properties are currently served by connections to the 8 inch sewer main in Pittview Avenue. Service to the proposed subdivision will require a sewer main line extension. The sewer extension must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards. We request that completion of the sewer and acceptance by RVS be made a condition of final plat approval. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for tl>•_is project, Sincerely, /~~~_ CC~~at1 Tap/ , District Engineer I~:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PI,ANNG~SUBDIVISIO~OOS105029-BORIAN ESTA'I'ES.DOC -54- ~ JCFII3 BtSS OFC EPt~'~~:x~~~ t;: ~ ; ,-'..,. .~' ~ 8264566 7 `DE- PL &Ttoo ~d~~AJY A3~`' bN x.2(2©85 11:1 ___ ~ gad. t 19 of ~.~n CortaY. ~PtTT ~ .. ~ ^~ D e pasy~ ~ 2i 2. 4aT% Fef N°ta t9 ny ~ F~ E`~ ,a q 1 r t ~J 1 pFwnc9 ~ `Jd C/^ f" o. ~ t0i 1 ~9 ~~~~~ ~ i~~ ,~ ,~ ~ . -- _,.~ tt . ~ '~, ~ r"""_ r ,.,,, ~s~,~.,d""' . ~ - L .- o Ww t08~~n _i./ tluNCC f~`EL ccµc P~ ~a ~~R ~~ ~ R ' t d 1 6 e~ Yl9B ,a 9 %~ tyt '~ 9 !l ~y i /f~.// ` $ t I.~' ~,OT 'J~ YF" ~ ,l k6 4. 1 s ` se ~~ ate ,s^ 1 ~ 1 ~~~ „ :,, ; , :.~ _ ~ G Xd- ~, a Rat J =~- _ i ~~,R a~„ ~` 5~~~ ~ ',,,f p~ ar ~~` L ~~ s d '' ~~~~ ~~ t~4~a .