The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission Packet - January 3, 2006its- CENTRAL POfNT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 3, 2006 - 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 683 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL Connie Moczygemba ,Candy Fish, Damian ldiart, Mack Lewis, Scott Mangold, Chuck Piland, and Wayne Riggs, III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of December 6, 2005, Planning Commission Minutes. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS A. A Public Hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for a proposed pad lot development known as Scott Meadows. The rg5 i-t3 subject property is located at 445 N. 9th Street and is located south of Hazel Street, west of 9th Street and north of Cherry Street. VI. MISCELLANEOUS VII. ADJOURNMENT PCO10306 Ptpnning Corm>isa'ion Minutes December h, 2005 Page 1 City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes December G, 2005 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT ~: oo P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairperson Connie Moczygemba, Mack Lewis, Scott Mangold, Chuck Piland and Wayne Riggs were present. Candy Fish and Damian Idiart were absent. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; Don Burt, Interim Planning Manager; Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician; and Matt Samitore, Development Services Coordinator. III. CORRESPONDENCE There ~a~as no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Mangold made a motion to approve the minutes from November i, 2005. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Consideration of Resolution No. 68o approving findings to support the request to have a legal nonconforming residential structure located at 4i3 S. Central Valley Drive. Applicants: Jay & Stephanie Hutsell. There were no conflicts of interest or ex pane communications to disclose. P[nnning Conuiussrmr Mintdes December 6. 2005 Page 2 Commissioner Lewis made a motion to adopt Resolution 680, supporting the findings for approval to reclassify a legal non- conforming residential structure located at 413 S. Central Valley Drive from a class `B' to a class `A'. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion ROLL CALL: Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion carried. B. A Public Hearing to consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a Sonic fast food drive up restaurant in the C-4, Tourist & Office Professional zoning district. The subject area is identified on the Assessor's map as 37 2W o2D, Tax Lot 2100 and is located near Umpqua Bank south of East Pine Street. Applicant: Abre, LLC. Don Burt, Interim Planning Manager presented highlights from the staff report. Mr. Burt discussed the unique circumstances dictating the conditions of approval including an update of the East Pine Street study to include the Sonic drive -through. There were questions regarding parking requirements. Mr. Burt referred to the table showing the total number of required parking spaces for the Layton Office Complex, how many have been used, and how many remain. This will be monitored as development occurs on this site, to ensure that there is enough parking when fully developed. Justin Gerlitz, Engineer for the applicant stated that temporary parking will be provided and their site plan has the nttmber of required parking spaces. There will be a bulb out and landscaping to help direct vehicles for traffic circulation. The driveway is adequate and wide enough to avoid traffic buildup off of East Pine Street. The applicant is aware of the conditions and accepts them. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the application The public portion of the hearing was closed. Commissioner Mangold made a motion to adopt Resolution 68i, approving a Conditional Use permit application for a Sonic Fast Food Drive -Through, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion ROLL CALL: Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion passed. P[anuing Commi.rrian Minutes' December 6, 2005 Page 3 C. A Public meeting to consider an application for the reclassification of an existing legal non conforming residential structure from a Class `B' to a Class `A' legal non conforming structure. The address is 4o N Crater Lane. Applicant: Cloverleaf Construction. Commissioner Mangold made a site visit Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician presented the staff report. She discussedthe highlights of the applicant's findings, identified the surrounding houses with single car garages and stated that approving this application would have no adverse impact to the existing neighborhood and would actually add to the value of the home and the neighborhood. Lee & Kris O'Driscoll of Cloverleaf Construction, agent for the applicant provided details regarding the project and confirmed that the previous addition would be removed and rebuilt with the necessary permits. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the proposal The public portion of the meeting was closed. Commissioner Piland made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 68z, to re-classify 4o N. Crater Lane, from a Class "B" legal non-conforming use to a Class "A" legal non-conforming use, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Lewis seconded the motion ROLL CALL: Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, ,yes. Motion passed. D. A Public meeting to consider amendments to title i~ of the Central Point Municipal Code. Applicant: City of Central Point. Don Burt, Interim Planning Manager presented the proposed amendments. He explained that the definitions currently have a separate code number for each term. The amendment includes a few more definitions, as well as combining all definitions under one code number. Mr. Butt stated that pages 57-58 are to be omitted; they were not intended as part of the proposed code amendments. Plmming Commission A4nuues Dcxeutber 6, 2005 Page 4 David Painter, member of the Citizens Advisory Committee discussed the Committee's review of the proposed code amendments and asked for an update on building height vs. setback requirements. Mr. Burt explained the setback requirements, and provided examples as to how they would work on the board. Mr. Burt went through each of the tables discussing the changes to specific sections. There were questions regarding the difference between the TOD district and corridor. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director provided the back ground and explanation. There was further discussion regarding the proposed code amendments and how this is the first in a series to be presented to the Citizen's Advisory Committee and Planning Commission. Commissioner Riggs made a motion to recommend approval of the proposed code amendments, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion ROLL CALL: Lewis, yes; Mangold, yes; Piland, yes, Riggs, yes. Motion passed. VII. MISCELLANEOUS A. Discussion regarding Miller Estates. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director presented the background for the approval of Miller Estates and how the City has had various issues to resolve including side yard setbacks, flood plains, reduced front yard setbacks, etc. He explained that the project is almost complete but that enough issues have surfaced to warrant a subsequent Planning Commission review. He would like the Planning Commission to direct staff how to proceed with this development. A resident of Miller Estates came forward to apply for a building permit to have a rear patio at~~rting installed. This resident went through the procedures properly by coming to the City, unfortunately the awning did not meet the setback requirements. Through the building permit process it was discovered that many of the residents in Miller Estates had already installed rear patio covers by Aladdin A~~ming, which has since been sold. With the exception of one resident applying for a zoning variance to have her awning installed, all of the others have been put in v`~ithout building permits. Plmming Connnissimr AAinutes Decenrber 6, 2005 Page The Commission directed staff to review the performance of Miller Estates, PUD, contact the City attorney, and look into the one variance that was granted and proceed from there. Mr. Humphrey gave the Planning Commission an update with the RPS process, explaining that LCDC was in the Rogue Valley. Various agency and city representatives participated in a bus tour. Mr. Humphrey said he would keep everyone posted with the ongoing process. The City Council appointed a new Councilor, Bruce Dingier at their last meeting to fill a vacancy in Ward I. There were questions regarding the progress for a new tree ordinance. City staff is still working on that. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Piland made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Mangold seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:2o P.M. Planning Department STAFF REPORT Tom Humphrey, AICP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator STAFF REP®RT January 3, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of a tentative subdivision to create four parcels in the Residential Multiple Family (R-3) Zoning District on property identified as Tax Lot 37 2W 02CB, 300; Steve Scott, Applicant/Agent. STAFF SOURCE: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner 1$ACI~GROUND: The applicant is proposing to subdivide an existing 0.24 acre parcel into four lots ranging in size from 0.05 acres to 0.07 acres respectively in preparation for "pad lot" single family residences. F;(NDINGS: The applicant's tentative plat (Exhibit "A") addresses the basic lot approval criteria for pad lot developments as set forth in Sections 17.28 and 17.60.210 which state that "The parent parcel, from which the padlots are to be created, shall conform to the standard requirements for lots in the particular zone in which the parent parcel is located". The Planning Department finds that the standard requirements and compliance are demonstrated in the following table: Code Section Description Existing Condition Com liance 17.28.020 R-3, Residential Multiple Family. Vacant lot. Proposed "pad lot" Yes Single and multiple family development with 4 dwelling units. dwellings permitted. 17.28.050 _ __ _ Area, width and yard Corner lot with 10,454 square feet Yes requirements. 7,000 square foot following a previous lot minimum lot size for corner lots. consolidation of Map 372W02CB- Lot width 70 foot minimum, No 201 and 300. Minimum lot width is lot depth requirement. Tenth 82.25 feet. Street is Collector with no special setback requirement. 17.28.080 Density is calculated by Vacant lot. Total allowable density Yes subtracting 4,000 square feet for for this parcel would be 4 dwelling first dwelling unit, 1,648 square units. feet for each additional dwelling unit. \\Cpchsl\pl\2006 Land Use Files\06037 Scott Mea~lsws\06037.doc Page 1 of 2 ~"~ ffi ®~~ ~~.A.i ®s~o~e ~/ L-TS.er R.t6433' a23rsf'o6' C LEN.06.1f `~( eRC-x B1T5'OB' E R` NP~~~ S/ ~ / ~ / / 3`~ry~ ~ ~ / .y~ EXHIBIT MAP 9VRVEY BY. T/MBERL/NE LAND SURVEYING ,uU,. INCORPORATED KERRY K. BRAD9NA{J L3. 2Z11 P.O. BOK 3064 CENTRAL POINT OREGON 41602 (641k64-7610 GPIl~ 444-6692 2 SURVEY FOR. 0 STEVEN ECOrf .(~ P.O. BO% 1096 J,Y MEDFORD~ OREGON 9]601 DATES NOV6TBER 2], 2006 ~ BITU9 ADIORE9B~ 446 NIN7"N BTREET 'o., f~ CENTRAL PoINr, oREGGN ~~~ i /~ rL P~, // P~'. ~~ / / ~~e ~ / ~j ~ yC%g j ~6v / / ~j po- / ~ ~o. // ~'~4I°~ ~/ e / / M1~0~ '"&. ~ / ~j °; ~ e yg'' aa'S '~2's. / Dc o- ba / , ~~~ Qo~ r / a4 ~ / ~~o 46~ ~~ sruE: r . fo• as ti~ P PROFISSIOmNAL LAND SURVEYOR araax InRn ""ky$guosRnw m. fa-s,se ~**~ ~a~y~p ~p Public Works ®epartment Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT December 16, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: Four Lot Subdivision for 37-2W-02CB, Tax Lots 201 and 300 Applicant: Steven Scott, P.O. Box 1096, Medford, OR 97504 Zoning: R-3, Residential Multiple Family Traffic: Based on the International Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, a four lot residential subdivison will generate approximately 3.98 peak hour trips (PHT). The City of Central Point typically requires traffic studies for any development that generates more than 25 PHT. No traffic study is warranted for this development. Infrastructure: Water: An 8-inch water line exists on Hazel and 9`" Street. Storm Drain: No storm drains currently exist on Hazel or 9~' Street. Street Section: Hazel Street is improved to Standard Residential Street Standards and 9`h Street is unimproved. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The City has obtained a Congestion Management Air Quality (CMAQ) Grant for the improvement of 9th Street from Laurel to Hazel Street. The grant will entail the development of a storm drain system, new water line and paving Laurel and 9~' Street to Residential Street Standards. Developer will not be responsible for improvements of curb, gutter or sidewalk along their 9s' Street frontage. The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 ~ 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 -4- except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Conditions of Approval: 1. Hazel Street Imnrovements -Applicant shall install standard sidewalk along the Hazel Street Frontage. 2. Landscape and Irrigation Plans and Improvements -Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, a landscape plan for the Hazel Street and 9''' Street frontages. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the right-of--way area. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 %2" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. 3. Public Utility Easement - As part of the Final Plat aten-foot wide utility easement immediately behind the existing right-of--way around the perimeter of the property. 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 ~- 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 -5- A 1 6 d~1JL'7IVIEIV I 66 c.s 99 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Lois DeBenedetti, Building O~cial BUILD/NG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: 12/23!05 TO: Planning pepartment Planning file: 06037 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Scott Meadows T/P Name: Steven Scott Address: P.O. Box 1096 City: Medford State: Or. Zip code: 97501 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 37-2W-02C6 TL 201. 300 PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely far use by the Central Point Planning Commission. -1- -6- ~UIL®ING DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive sails, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. -2- -7- BUILDING DEPARTMENT Lois beBenedetti, Building O(rcial A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved teat estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10.Application for building permit will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code (Based on the 2003 IBC). The plans (with code analysis) shall be provided from a licensed state of Oregon Architect /engineer. Compliance with 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code(with 2005 Oregon amendments) and the 2004 Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code as well as the National Electrical Code will be required. 11. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant location, as well as access to building. The International Fire Code (2003) with Oregon Amendments (2004) will be implemented as part of the plan check code requirement for this building. -8- f3UIL®ING DEPARTMENT Any changes proposed shall Applicant's contractor to the of work. CENTRAL POINT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official -~- be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Building Department for approval prior to start -9- 12/13/2005 12:06 8264566 JCFD3 SUS/~OFC ~+ uuppsp (~~ PAGE 02 Jackson County i"ire ®ist~°ict No. 3 8333 Agate Road ~°~~_`°''~° White City OR 97503-1075 ,% ,_ ,1~ . • (541) 826-7100 (voice) (541) 826-4566 (fax) °° °° ' "An Xntematiana0y Accredited Fire Department" '°bMad~'` December 13, 2pt75 City of Central Point Planning Department RE: Scott Meadows T/P • Provide a set of plans to scale, describing what type and size of buildings are being proposed. ~y~ • Access and water supply comments will be submitted after those plans are reviewed. Mark Moran DFM -10- 12/1612005 09;32 541-6b47171 PAGE 01!01 RVS A~~B°'lCI~IIVIGlV Y 66 lam": '~~, _ ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location: 13R Wast vitas Road, Central Paint, OR -Moiling Address: P.O. i3ox 3130, Central Point, OR9502-0005 Tcf. (541) bfi4-6300, Faz (541) (+(47177 www.AVSS,us Aecember 16, 2005 Ken Gerschler FAX 664-6384 City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Scott .Meadows Subdivision, File #06037 Dear ICcn, Sewer service to the proposed development will require a main line extension from the existirxg sewer main on Aaze1. Street, The extension must be designed and constructed in accordance wikh RVS standards, The proposed development must comply with the water quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES permit which are currently being developed. We request that the following conditions be met prior to final plat approval: 1. Acceptance of the sanitary sewer by RVS. 2, Concurrence by I~LVS that stonnwater quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES permit have been met. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, ~~-~~~~~~ C~ Pte. District Engineer K:\DATAW GENCIES\CENTPT\PJ.ANNG\S [JBDIV TSION\2006\06037- SCOTTMEADOW.DOC -11- ~TT'~~HMENT " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU"PION NO. 683 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL OF FOUR LOT "PADLOT" SUBDIVISION (Applicant: Steve Scott) (37 2W 02CB Tax I,ot 300) Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted application for "padlot" subdivision of a 0.24 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account 10132440 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, January 3, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.28, R-3, Residential Multiple Family District B. Chapter 17.60.210, Padlot Developments Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.28, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.60, relating to application presentation, special requirements Planning Commission Resolution No. 683 (01/3/2006) -12- Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for tentative subdivision is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 3rd day of January, 2006. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 3rd day of January, 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. 683 (01/3/2006) -13-