Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet - October 3, 2006
~~- A C1;NTRAI~ Pd4NT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA October 3, 2006 - 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Colrlmission Resolution No. 708 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Chuck Piland, Wayne Riggs, Pat Beck, and Mike Oliver III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of September 5, 2005, Planning Commission Minutes. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS 1'gs. I - ~ A. File No. 07013. A public hearing to consider a Zone Map Amendment far the purpose of completing a housekeeping task that with the creation of Hamrick Business Park, created a split zoning parcel. The subject property is located approximately 25% within C-4, Tourist & Office Professional zoning district and approximately 7S% within a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial zoning district. It is identif ed on the Jackson County Assessor zx~ap as 37 2W 01 C, Tax Lot $03, and is located on the south side of East Pine Street, west of Table Rock Road, and east of S. Hamrick Road. City of Central Point, Applicant. Pgs. 5 - 13 g File No. 07008. A public hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit application for the purpose of occupying and operating a chiropractic office located within the Mt. View shopping center. There is currently a physical therapy office located in the same suite. The physical therapy office is moving to a larger suite within Mt. View Plaza. The subject property is located in C-4, Tourist & Office Professional zoning district and is identified on the Jacksor] County Assessors map as 37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 1200. The address is 1217 Plaza Boulevard, Suite F, and is located east of Freeman Road, and south of East Pine Street. Jared Dance, Applicant. PC100306 VI. MISCELLANEOUS A. Snowy Butte Station Architectural Modifications B. White Hawk Estates Update C. RPS Update VII. ADJOURNMENT PC10fl3U6 City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes September 5, 2006 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT '7:00 P.M. IL ROLL CALL: Commissioners Donnie Moezygemba, Chuck Piland, Candy Fish, and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; Don Burt, Planning Manager; Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was correspondence pertaining to item E on the agenda. IV. MINUTES Chuck Piland made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 1, 2006 Planning Commission meeting. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion: ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. Commissioner Pat Beck arrived at 7:05 p.m. and Commissioner Damian Idiart arrived at 7:10 p.m. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. File No. 6082. A public hearing to consider a Site Plan application far the creation of a five (5} unit zero lot line structure located in a TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential zoning district. The address is 124 North Third Street and is located north of Planning Commission Minutes ~5eptenrher 5, 2006 Page 2 Manzanita Street, west of North Fourth Street, cast side of North Third Street and south of Laurel Street (Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7700}. Home Brothers, LLC, Applicant. There were no conflicts or ex paste communications to disclose, Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician, presented the staff report. Chaiz-person Moczygezxzba asked what would be done to compensate far the removal of existing trees on the property and was informed by Ms. Morgan that there would be new landscaping around the proposed project as existing trees were tearing up the sidewalk.. A question was raised about alley loaded garages and Lisa pointed out that there were other developments in the area with carports off the alley. In response to a question raised by Candy Fish about the possibility of a bare wall facing Manzanita Street, Lisa stated that this is where the Planning Cazxzmission had discretion regarding design criteria. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Shane Elsdon, agent for the applicant, appeared and indicated he was available to answer questions concerning site plan and tentative plan applications. Chuck Piland asked what the applicant's plans were for the Manzanita Street side of the project. Mr. Elsdon responded that the windows were designed to blend with what's upstairs. Landscaping and alley improvements were also discussed. Lisa Morgan assured commissioners that the portion ofthe alley adjacent to the property line would be improved by the applicant, and the City had plans to improve the rest of the alley. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Candy Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 70S recommending approval of the site plan for the creation of five (S) zero lot line units within a TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential zoning district (Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7700) based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report with the addition of a "kick out" or some other architectural detail on the windows facing Manzanita Street to breakup the appearance of a solid wall. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes, Idiart, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, abstained; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. B. File Na. 06095. A public hearing to consider Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating five (S) attached single family residential units on property located in a TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential zoning district. The address is 124 North Third Street and is located north of Manzanita Street, west of North Fourth Street, east side of North Third Street and south of Laurel Street {Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7700). Home Brothers, LLC, Applicant. Plmanirag Cornrnrssiora Minxtes Sepiember• S, 2006 Page 3 There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician, presented the staff report and reviewed issues and conditions of approval. Chuck Piland requested that the staff report be corrected to reflect 4-foot landscaping stripas previously discussed in the site plan staff report. The public portion of the hearing was opened, and no one came forward to speak for or against the proposed tentative plan.. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Damian Idiart made a motion to adopt Resolution 706 recornxnending approval of tentative plan. for the creation of five (5} attached single family residential units on property located within a TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential zoning district (Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7700} based on the standards, Endings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Beck, yes, Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. C. File No. 07004. A public hearing to consider a Site Plan application for the purpose of allowing the construction and operation of a Les Schwab Tire and Service Center. The proposed Site Plan is within the C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial zoning district (Jackson County Assessor's map 37 2W 01C, Tax Lot $03}. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Portland, Inc., Applicant. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose except that Wayne Riggs stated he had made a site visit and mast commissioners admitted they were patrons of Les Schwab Tire Center. Planning Technician Lisa Morgan then presented the staff report noting the property for the proposed facility had a split zoning of C-4, Tourist and Office Professional, and C-S, Thoroughfare Commercial. Ms. Morgan advised that a zoning amendment had been initiated by the Planning Department as a matter of housekeeping, to place the property completely within the C-5 zoning designation. Ms. Morgan pointed out that the Biddle Road entrance to the property deviated from Public Works standards. This issue was addressed by Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, at a later paint in the meeting. Mr. Humphrey acknowledged limited access may force reconfiguration of ingress and egress if traffic increases. At present, there is a signal to the east and west of the property on Biddle Road, and Mr. Humphrey does not anticipate any problems at this point in time. In Planning Canrnissiotr Mimrles Septertrber S, 2006 Aage 4 addition, (here is a private road located to the south of the property for commercial traffic to access the facility. The public portion of the hearing was opened. George Bunting, agent for the applicant, came forward and presented samples of the intended rust and cream color scheme for the new building which would be compatible with buildings located to the west of the proposed project site. Mr. Bunting then proceeded to respond to questions concerning building setbacks and proposed design of the facility. Steven Clary, a resident of Central Point East subdivision (which is located across Biddle Road from the proposed site of the development), appeared in opposition and submitted a letter for the official record. Mr. Clary expressed concerns about noise from machinery, public address systems, visual pollution as it would pertain to signs and their illumination, an increase ofmotor vehicle traffic to the area, and restricted access into Central Point East from Biddle Road. Mr. Clary further stated that it would have been nice if Les Schwab had approached the neighbors to let them know what they were proposing prior to filing their application. Mr. Clary expressed his desire for professional offices to be located next to a residential area and not a fire center. Another resident of Central Point East subdivision, Rabin Munson, also appeared in opposition to the proposed development citing traffic noise as a detriment and expressing concern that property values could fall if a development such as that being proposed was located directly across the street from a residential subdivision. Commissioner Candy Fish informed Mrs. Munson that her real estate agent should have disclosed that the property located across Biddle Road was zoned commercial. George Bunting then addressed concerns presented, indicating that business hours would be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday; rotary air compressors areused in conjunction with their business because of lower decibels; service bays are oriented to the east and are located between 70 - 95 feet behind a showroom at the front of the store; trucks and trailers would be serviced at the very back of the property. Mr. Bunting added all work would be conducted inside buildings which would further minimize the noise impact of their business on any residential area in close proximity. Signage and landscaping were also discussed with regard to minimizing the impact on the residents of Central Point East subdivision. Chuck Piland asked Tom Humphrey if all properties to the west of the subject site were zoned commercial. Mr. Humphrey said all four corners of the intersection of Hamrick Road and Biddle Road were zoned commercial. Mr. Humphrey then presented a brief history of the zoning of property in the area and mentioned that portions of Central Point East had originally been zoned for higher density residential use. The developers of Central Point East then decided to utilize lower Planning Cornrnrssion Mirurtes Septe»a6er• 5, 2006 Page S density standards on the property and lots should probably have been sold for less because they were surrounded by commercial property. Mr. Humphrey added the remaining property between the Super 8 Motel and the proposed Les Schwab Tire Center would consist of a retail commercial center which was an outright permitted use in the C-5 zone. There are no projected improvements planned for the intersection at this time. If conditions warrant in the future, something will be done. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Chuck Piland said he would like to see Les Schwab dim their signs at night for the benefit of the neighbors. Damian Idiart commended Les Schwab representatives fez- the great job of orienting the building design in such a way as to be fz-iendly to the adjacent neighborhood. Connie Moczygemba asked if it would be possible to bond for three (3) years on tree care instead of one. Mr. Humphrey said he would check with the Public Works department on that. There was more discussion about traffic circulation near and around the Les Schwab project site and Mr. Humphrey said that ultimately there would be some form of a traffic restriction and not a traffic signal There are some alternative designs to take traffic away from the intersection. At present, there is no satisfactory solution to go to Table Rock Road from Central Point East, through the subdivision. Mr. Humphrey added it would be possible to add dimming of signs as a condition of approval. Damian Idiart made a motion to adopt Resolution '70'7 recommending site plan approval to allow for the construction and operation of a Les Schwab Tire and Service Center within the C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial zoning district (Jackson County Assessor's map 3'7 2W O1C, Tax Lot 803) based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report with the additional stipulation that if the applicant installs a pole sign, said sign shall be dimmed at 10:00 p.m. out of eonsideratian for the residential area located north of East Pine. Chuck Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. The Planning Commission adjourned for a break at 8:45 p.xxz. and reconvened at 8:50 p.m. Planning Cartmissiorr 1vlinutes September S, 2046 Page 6 D. File No. 06089. Consideration of an annexation and concurrent zone change from SR- 2.5 (County} to R-2 (City) on 2.23 acres located on the south side of Beebe Raad approximately 300 feet west of Hamrick Road (Jackson County Assessor's Map 37 2W 01C, Tax Lots 2300 and 2400}. Michelle Nistler and Michael Menefee, Applicants. There were no conflicts or ex parte comrnunicatians to disclose. Don Burt, Planning Manager, explained to commission members that in the past, the Planning Commission did not review concurrent annexations and zone changes. However, with the changes in code, the Planning Commission would be reviewing annexation and zone change applications and thereafter forwarding a recommendation to the City Council. With the exception of water, all urban services are available and adequate to serve the property. Water connections for properties on Beebe Road are slated to take place in summer or early fall of 2007. The most significant issue in evaluating this proposal is circulation. Staff presented a conceptual circulation plan far the general area. As properties develop in this vicinity, roads will have to be improved in conformance with the conceptual circulation plan. Eric Johnson, agent far the applicant, availed himself to commissioners for questions. There were na additional questions. Chuck Piland made a motion to forward a favorable recommendation far annexation and concurrent zone change to City Council for property located on Beebe Road {Jackson County Assessor's Map 37 2W OIC, Tax Lots 2300 and 2400). Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion carried. E. File No. 05060. Consideration of an annexation and concurrent zone change from SR- 2.5 {County) to R-2 (City) on .94 acres located on the west side of Hamrick Road approximately 400 feet south of Beebe Road (Jackson County Assessor's Map 37 2W O1CB, Tax Lot 900). Wisnovsky Homes, LLC, Applicant. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Planning Manager Don Burt presented a staff report noting that the subject parcel has water and sewer services available to it. Lee Brennan came forward an behalf of the applicant and stated that the road into the proj ect could work either way ~ it could be located along the northern boundary or southern boundary of the proposed development. Mr. Brennan added that the applicant does not want "right-in and right-out only" access to the property. Planning Conrmisrian ri~linrrtes• ~'eplenr6er S, .2QOb Page 7 Dan Burt indicated he would prefer the applicant to locate their street along the northern boundary of the project so as not to combine it with a service road that runs along the property line of the neighboring commercial parcel to the south. Mr. Burt did, however, agree that the applicant should be able to enjoy all of the privileges accorded a residential street. Damian Idiart made a motion to forward a favorable recommendation for annexation and concurrent zone change to City Council for property located on Hamrick Road (Jackson County Assessor's Map 37 2W O1CS, Tax Lot 900). Chuck Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, no. Motion carried. VII. MIISCELLANEOUS Don Burt made a power point presentation to the Planning Commission, providing additional information for consideration with regard to a proposed Urban Growth Boundary expansion. Mr. Burt advised that an inventory of residential lands had been completed, and currently, there is a 5 year supply of land available. Based on population projections from the RPS process, the City is looking at bringing in approximately 350 acres of land for residential purposes. Considerations would include zoning, contiguous to present boundary, distance from existing services, size, connectivity of abutting EFU {County zoning designation far Exclusive Farm Use} lands, and whether or not the parcels in question were environmentally constrained. EFU Iands would be considered when there was no other viable alternative. At present, the plan is to take the path of least resistance. Community Development Director, Tom Humphrey, explained that the City would evaluate properties on a tax Iot by tax lot basis far possible inclusion in a UGB expansion. Upon completion of a property inventory, certain EFU properties maybe considered as well. Candy Fish expressed concerns about including EFU properties; Damian Idiart suggested that proximity of properties to schools and the interchange be taken into consideration. Don Burt said the matter will be brought back to the Planning Commission to solicit comments on the types of zoning the commissioners would Iike to see applied to selected properties in the future. IX. ADJOURNMENT Wayne Riggs made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Damian Idiart seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Flmrruno Conxnission Minutes Seplernber 5, 2006 Page 8 The foregoing minutes ofthe September 5, 2046 Planning Comz~ission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on October 3, 2006. Planning Commission Chair CITY OF` G~I~ITI~AL, ~OII~I"t` ~OI`I~ CI-IAI~C~ ~.~-F R~PC?RT s~~ ,,. I ST~I~ 1~ DEPORT Scl~tc.n~ber~ 27, 200 P'I~r7~zi~4~~ C:~c~~~~~t'l:ri~~~t~ Teem hl~~~„i~ntc~y, niti~ G_oinnxnii( C7; ~ttelCaprrti'~~~ C)irc~ctt>it As~is(an; CiCyA<!m nist~atr>r AGENDA ITEM:. File No, 0'7013 ?.c~r~e Ch~n~,c Consideration of a zone change frr~m "1 uurist (C~4) to General Commercial (~-~) on 2.03 acres located on the south side ofBiddle Raad e~eg oi'Hamric Rand (.tacksu~, Jaunty Assessor's Map as 3'7 2W 01C, Tax Lot 803). Applicant;. City of Central Paint. STAF14' ~~31~1ZC`lE~ Dan Burt, Planning Manager The Property"s zoning is split between Thoroughfare Camrnercial (C-5) and Tourist & t7ffce-Professional (C-~. Figure 1 identifies the Property and current zoning. Section 1"7.1.2.050 states that unless otherwise specified, zoning district boundaries are based an: 1. Lot lines; 2. Street centerlines, or 3. Lot lines ar street centerlines extcncled. -..~--~iddt~-Rc>ad- _ .~. ~_ ~~ p ~ ,o. t _.._._ _ _ ~~~ ~r~ , axnros fi7.-1'L'F~1FER1'f T.y.._.,., l."Y Saar.!- 41 e~ a<, ~ ercti+ ?.00 ac~.7 Be1~a E~ ~~ s +` ~~~ • ] 8:_ 'L /h. ~ it "~'~:; 2.03 o.ca ~` 1 ~ - i. 9P ace. ~ ; Yi ' ~~ ~"~ l~ Section 17.12.050 further states that fa zoning boundary divides a °~°°_:`-' " i~ . _ _ ___ lot line into two districts, the entire lot shall be placed in the - - _ - - L ~ ~ _ ^ _ f district that accounts far the greater area of the lot provided that ~ ~~„ .. fi _ _. ? 5 55'}tT E G the zoning boundary adjustment does not exceed a distance of r _~.R ~1~,_ ' Pro ert twenty (20) feet.. Subject to the twenty (2c~) foot limitation such adjustments can b~; ~~.cco~~t~p]isi~~~l administratively. However, at appra~cirnately seventy-five (75~ feet the proposed zoning bouaidar}~ adjustz~i~;~~t ~xec:cds the twenty (20) foot t~laximum and therefore requires review and approval by the Planning Commission as a change of zone per Section 1'7.10, The following represents the chronology of land use actions that affect the Property and its current zoning status; Page t oaf 3 1. Prior to 1998 the Property was part of a thirty-five acre parcel identified on the Assessor's Map as 37 2W 01C TL 800 and was planned and zoned for Light Industrial use (Figure 2). The Biddle Road frontage of tax Iot 840 was approximately 1,400 feet. Tl~e Land Use Map designated tax lot $00 as Light Industrial Property (Figure 3). The Zoning Map identifed tax lot 800 as M-1. 2. On October 18, 1998 by Ordinance No.1794 the City Council amended the Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning Map far the subject property, and other adjacent properties. The subject property was re-designated from its Light Industrial land use and Light Industrial (M-1) zoning designation to General Commercial land use, and Tourist &Office-Professional (C-4), Thoroughfare Commercial (C-S), and General Industrial (M-2) zoning (figure 2). Tax E_ei Boundary ~T"exE Street Names BCG to NI-2 ,N ca ~ c~ R-1 and R-2 to N~-1 ~. ~. M-2). j-. 3. On September 2, 2003 by Resolution No. 595 the Planning Commission approved a seven (7) lot subdivision (Hamrick Business Park} of the subject property. a. On January 12, 2004 a three {3) lot partition was recorded (P-03- 2004) on the parent property. The subject Property became Parcel 2 of the partition. The Iand use designation for Parcel 1 (2.00 acres) and Parcel 2 (12.49 acres} were General Commercial land use, and for Parcel 3 (20.24 acres) was General Industrial land use. Farcel 1 was zoned C- 4, Parcel 2 was split between C-4 and C-5, and Parcel 3 was zoned b. On July 30, 2004 another three ~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ (3) lot partition known as Figure 3 --- ~ `~-- Hamrick Business Park was `~" - ~ sr~aie Roan - ~"" ' - - ~ - -'-- - - - --L- - -~-- approved and recorded for ~` '° -t" ° '" ~"°' Parcel 2 of P-03-2004. Lot 1 a (2.40 acres), Lot 2 (4.90 acres), ~ "`~""`°'~ ~ ' ' „~_.,~ ~ and Lot 3 (S.S9 acres). The °s I ~~~ ~` ,~ ~~~ subject Property became Lot 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ .,~.~'~~ ~; ' ~°~ , '~~ .,,;,,,,, ~ ` ~~ and retained its split zoning E ~ '~' ~ ~,,b.,: z~ ~..~, ,~ ~` ~~ I between C-4 and C-5. The split ~ ~ 1 ~ ' I i was approximately 60% in C-4 # E ~ ~~ "` and 40% in C-5. Lots 1 and 3 ---~--- ------, ~--- -. _ -~"- _ A µ ----- ^ * retained their initial C-4 zoning. ~-- - ___ _ 11 ~ ~~ MN . N M ~ ~"'~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~° .Y CYI' 4. On September 20, 2006 a lot line adjustment was approved moving the property Iine between Lot 1 and Lot 2 (the "Property") of Hamrick Business Park approximately 265 feet to the east T--. t .. ~.. -, . -__ f ~., ~ '~< ,; ,~ < ~. Page 2 of 3 ``~ (p'igure 3). With the lot line adjustment the Property's zoning retained its split designation between C-5 and C-4. With the lot line adjustment the Property's zoning designation was modified from 60% in C-4 to approximately 25% in G4 and 40% in C-5 to approximately 75% in C-5. FINDINGS Summa Given the Property's current configuration the proposed zone change is a minor adjustment placing all of 37 2W O1 C, Tax Lot 803 within the C-5 zoning district consistent with the intent of Section 17.12.050 and complies with the criteria set forth in Section 17.10.300(B) far approval of zone changes. ISSUES: The action considered under this application is the adjustment of the zoning to C-5 based on the Property's current configuration. Because the Property is predominantly within the C-5 district a change of zoning on the balance is consistent with the intent of Section 17.12.050. Prior to the lot line adjustment the predominant zoning on the Property was C-~. Consequently, under prior circumstances the proposed change of zoning would not be consistent with the intent of Section 17.12.050 and therefore not initiated. ATTACHMENTSIEXHISITS: Resolution No. ACTION: Consider of Resolution No. changing the zoning from C-4 to C-5 on the westerly portion of the Property. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. Page 3 of 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM TOURIST& OFFICE-PROFESSIONAL (G4) TO THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL (C-5) ON THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED ON THE 7ACKSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S RECORDS AS 37 2W O1 C TAX LOT 803 (City of Central Point, Applicant; File No. D7413) Recitals 1. The property is zoned for both C-4 and C-5. The proposed zone change would rezone the entire property to C-5. 2. Section 17.12.454 defines the limits of zoning district boundaries as being either property lines or street center Imes, or property or street center lines extended. The dominant zoning on the property is C-S (75%}. Rezoning of the property to C-5 is consistent with the intent of Section 17.12.050. 3. The Comprehensive Land Use Map designation for the property is General Commercial. The Land Use Map is not property Iine specific and is intended to serve as a general guideline for zoning. Rezoning of the property to C-5 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Central Paint hereby approves the change of zone from Tourist &Office-Professional (C-4} to Thoroughfare Commercial (C-5) including all findings of fact set forth in the Staff Report dated September 27, 2006, and concludes that the application complies with the requirements of Section 17.10.300(B} of the City of Central Paint Municipal Code. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 3rd day of October, 2006. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. (I013/0~ DR. ,JARED DAI~IC~ COIN D I'T"I OI~IAL~ U ~ ~ P~RIVI IT ~~~ t\~I ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ' '~„'I i~ '~ ~~~ (l ~ ,, ~, I i~ t~ctuber ~, 2006 1'l,.~u~~~irt~, 1~c~~a~irtn~crtit, ~.4FIII1't~ltl i ~ ~~(''V r (iii-~:'1' Il~i'C;C~~`~ ~~ - i s..in. ~~lfi 'kJnu ri>li~d:or ~(g~,~C1A 1'i~I?'~T: File l~U. 0'7008 ---_ --- Corzsici~:~~ation of an application for k~ C'~~t~ciitic~rzat lisc Permit ft~r the ohcration ~~i'~r1 eh~iropractic office located within the Mt. Vier ht>ppiti~ ("c~zter< ~~yzplica~rtts ~Tl-i~. ,tatted 1)~ance. Lisa Mor~~an, I'la~trtir~~ ~I'ech~~zic~a» I3A('t~~plt~~.TND: , , '' r' ~ i ly ' - fi _;- ,,; `. ,: ~ i;;i~~ - , ~~~ ~~ The ap~?licant icascd the subject property ~'~'ith the intentic*n cif opcraiin~, a chiropractic office ~vitlzin M~t. View ~lzoppn~ Plaza. The property is zoned C-4, Tourist and O1~iice Professional, and the address is 121'7 Plaza Blvd, Suite r. The subject leased space was previously occupied by a physical therapy c~i'tice which was grarztt.:d a C`Uncltoz~al Use Kermit i~z May c>i' 2002. With this approval the Planning Comi~~ission had already detcrrninect this type of use to be ctnzzpatible ~`~itlzin the C-4 zoning district. The physical tlzexal~y oft..-ice has leased a larger space within lvlt. View Plaza.. Conditional Use Permits follow the applicant as long as they are relocating within the same tax lot, (in this case relocating within the same Plaza}. The conditional use appro: al does not stay with the property itself. The uses arc si~zzi]ar in nature, therefore it is necessary ~~• ~, ~ , ~ :, ~ . , ~ for Active; Il~;altlz Chiropractic to apply for a conditional _ `.' use permit specifically for their proposed use. The ,~~ . ,, __, __ applicant has stated in the narrative submitted with the applicatic~rz that all recluiz•~~~ncnt~ti as outlin-ed under CPhrIC 1.76.040 shall be upheld. Refer to Art~C~lltl~'Iit `A') It was found the approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the physical therapy c> f1 ice dial not have any adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. Parking requirements are provided with the approval of Mt.View Plaza. The signage for Active Health Chiropractic is similar to the signage of the ather businesses located izt the plaza. This application has been duly noticed in accordance with 4RS 197.7G3. (Refer to Attachment `B'). FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "D" ISSUES: There are nat any issues to discuss regarding this application. EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" -Applicant's Narrative Exhibit "B" -Public Hearing Notice Exhibit "C" -Staff Findings Exhibit "D" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. , approving the proposed Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. ~, granting a Conditional Use Permit approval. r, ATTACHlVi~~T `~ ~ ~s Plaxiziing Department City of Central Point 140 Sa. Third St. Central Point, OR 97502 Re: Conditional Use Permit for Active Health Chiropractic at 1217 Plaza Blvd., Suite P in Central Point, Oregon. Planning Department- I am applying far a conditional use permit to be used at 1217 Plaza Slvd., Suite F, in the Albertsons Plaza of Central Paint. The leased location is currently occupied by a physical therapy office, Therapeutic Associates. i am proposing the use of that space as a Chiropractic office. It is my understanding that conditional use was granted for the use of physical therapy and therefore the conditions that have been required for that use would be very similar to my proposed usage. All requirements listed in Chapter 1.7.76.040 would be upheld. The site has adequate access to public street and the street is of adequate size to accommodate.traffic. Traffic is not expected to change from its current usage. Improvement within the site will be minimal due to the similar nature of business operations. Na changes will be made to the exterior of the building with the exception of a storefront sign that will be assembled to building code as outlined in the lease agreement. Hours of operation will be approximately 8a.m. to 6p.m. and will not affect the current status of operation within the shopping center. As mentioned previously, the similarity in operations between a physical therapy off ce and that of a Chiropractic office should create a smooth transition and have no negative affect an neighboring businesses or the City of Central Point. Please contact me with any fiirther questions. Thank you- aced Dance Chiropractic Physician 160 Lavender Lane Central Point, OR 97502 541-664-5565 ,::~ ~~, 9 City o~ Centra~ ~'a~tA~~M~NT ~~...~„~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tom Humphrey, AICP Community De~efopment Director Notice of Public Hearing Date of Notice: September 14, 200fi Meeting Date: Time: Place: October 3rd, 2006 7:00 p.m. (Approximate} Central Point City Hall 140 S. Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Conditional Use Permi# application for the purpose of occupying and operating a chiropractic office located within the Mt. View shopping center. There is currently a physical therapy office located in the same suite. The physical therapy office is moving to a larger suite within Mt. View Plaza. The subject property is located in C-4, Tourist & Office Professional zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 1200. The address is 1217 Plaza Boulevard, Suite F, and is located east of Freeman Road, and south of East Pine Street. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3} (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with suftlcient specifcity to afford the decision-makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. This notice is being mailed to property owners within a 100 foot radius of subject property. CRITERIA FOR DEGISION The requirements for Candi#ional Use Permit application review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to Genera[ Information and conditions of the project approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above_mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Paint City Hall, 140 South Third Street, Central Point, Or. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shaft be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 140 South Third Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is; 07©08. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext 291. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission wit! consider the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Conditional Use Permit application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~~TA~~il~~NT " G " Findings -Conditional Use Permit Applicant: Dr. Jared Dance Purpose: Consideration of a conditional use permit for the operation of a chiropractic facility within Mt. View Plaza File No. 0700$ CPMC 1744.030 (B) Lases other than those listed above may be permitted in a G4 district when included as a component of a commercial, tourist, oroffice-professional planned unit development that consists predominately of uses permitted in the zone..... Findings: CPMC allows other uses to be classified as permitted "when included as a component of a commercial, tourist, or office professional planned unit development that consists primarily of permitted uses in the zone". Conclusion: Mt.View Plaza consists primarily of permitted uses. There is a similarity of use with the physical therapy office and a chiropractic office. A chiropractic office would be classified as the same type of use as the physical therapy office, which has already been determined by the Planning Commission in 2002 to be a compatible use within the C-4 zoning district. The physical therapy office has proven not to have an adverse impact on the existing commercial uses within Mt. View Plaza; therefore there is not any foreseeable adverse impact with a chiropractic office. CPMC 17.&4.040 (G) Off Street Parking and Loading -Retail stores, personal services and other uses other than those listed shall provide not less than one space per each tu~o hundred square feet of net floor area (excluding storage and other nonsales or nondisplay areas). Findings: The Mt. View Plaza development was approved by the City several years ago with the intent of providing various farms of complementary commercial activity. Conclusion: The parking requirements for various uses were provided for with the approval of Mt. View Plaza. CPMC 17.76.040 (A) Conditional Uses -Finding and Conditions That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and slu~pe to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provision of this code; Findings: The existing site is adequate to accommodate the proposed use and meets the requirements of the zoning district. Conclusion: The existing leased space is adequate. .. CPMC 17.46.04U {B) -That the site has adequate access to a public street ar highzva~ and that the street or highznaJ is adequate in size and condition to effectively accarnmadate the traff c that is expected to generate &y the proposed use; Findings: Access to this site is provided by Plaza Boulevard, a private roadway that serves the Albertsons store, restaurants and other shops. Plaza Boulevard connects to Freeman Road. Conclusion: There is adequate access to Mt. View Plaza. CPMC 17.7'6.U4Q (C) - (E) Relating to health, safety or general welfaxe, increasing street widths, adjustments to off-street parking, regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress, landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting, property maintenance program, regulation of signs and locations, requiring fences, berms, walls to eliminate noise, regulations for times of operation, time period for development..... . Findings: These portions of the code are not applicable to this application. Mt. View Plaza is an established and partially developed shopping center. Conclusion: AlI of these requirements have been addressed with the approval of Mt. View Plaza. ~.... ~~TAC~~~NT ~~ D ~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPERATING A CHIROPRACTIC OFFICE LOCATED WITHIN MT. VIEW PLAZA AT 1217 PLAZA BOULEVARD LOCATED IN CENTRAL POINT, OREGON. (Applicant: Dr. Jared Dance} (160 Lavender Lane) (Central Point, Or. 97'502) Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning Commission far hearing on October 3, 2006, as a conditional use application for the purpose of operating a chiropractic office in an existing leased space within Mt. View Plaza with a C-~, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district of the City. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of or apposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.44, Tourist and Office-Professional B. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading; C. Chapter 17.76, Conditional Use Permits. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.44, relating to uses, in the G4, Tourist and Office- Professional district; B. Chapter 17.64, relating to off-street parking and loading facilities; C. Chapter 17.76, relating to conditional use permit requirements. .~ .. Page 1 of 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. (10032006) Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for conditional use approval is hereby conditionally approved, and will remain subject to conditions of approval set forth an Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Passed by the PIanning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 2046. Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2006. Planning Commission Chairman Page 2 of 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. (1D032DOb) I ~~~ '[~~ 1 +~ ~~ y~ iT i SKO~Y BUTT S'TAT~DI`I UPDATE >: ~~, „ ~~~ ~ti"intl.%~1i(:1~1~ i'~,:1}ll~i;,`.' ~ 4);?lil?!`,~~lllit ~. ~ i ~.17i i ~llt(li)~1!~(.:~/ ~~i~:~`~p ~, ~'.•f1?-Illii~lli.~' i ~~'1'l'1(;liilli.'li.L 1.'li~t~l'Ltil~ ~"~'~ ---~_'~y ~utt~:~ ~t~ti~a~a7, Tl~ia:,it C1~~~,~~,I(~(1 I~t~~,~1o~r7~c~nt (`~1'OI~~ u.,.~t~, ,~~a il~ Z;;.~' l~jO_:'~ ~f ~`,t~~• ~ '~ f~iC ;~11(~1\~ti il~ll~' ;?I?Jll{)IY ~~~~. ~1iiCi' ltl~~l Il~lil° OXII"li_'i' ~~91.`x ~r~il~'71T7 ~;y ~"f"'L~i (1l~IOI V+a~I. j,Z1 j'~'t_(rC!%ill!), ~~ ~}Illl I~l;~il i~l il,i i. ll '. Ilt'1'~ _'11~~i.`;l l'LXC: Li ~i ~' (.)J1 Li ~?i~O;l~i~i t !)71l'C Cl;~l lli(Cl~. ~}}T W(31>li 7 ~~~. ~~"~~ ~ tl~'~ ~;~/i+', 116_` 11~.s1 ..:1,)(1'%1 (; ~t~l ±ti I%lii ~tl IL! ,f);`, 11 f~'ci ~ ~ I131s.;1('Cj „'i )-`,i{1i' t(Tt~417~~t ;:~;~ i~~1147VvSi 1~1r.; 1 ilt,~±' 4.,Y"~~lS. i'~1Lx it, : i~ ~ r~~ 1,~.l.'i+l.~. 1~~'!.'1'll~1C~ ~3lfl~~llll`- ~h,l'i1111`,ti"U[7+ (-i~11'i(~ .~ !~~I' 1(i1 .1~~~)1't~~i~~ , ~~ I ~ ~ ~{ l.'tll~~ lx2'~~iE', ~~t)t'~"~-wiJ`j z\::, l~':~lilii=~ (~,~,1~`,) .%,Ol~i', 1 ~ll;~~t_` (:( i' ~ ~)I ~ t~l:~ liflil. lOl'~"i7~i( il.~ .'.; ~lt.f_~ ~ I i', 2.1 JUt1.i' ~lUCi ii ,~ p~ ~~ ,t:'lll)11. l~?t:0;(1 ii ~ ,f.'~. tl`i',.;1LI11~°lJ.t ~ i~o ~ I ~ (, 7~°ll.~(3.111. (li:[e~J11: ,c,1~i,`f.i l1. iiil.','[ ~~~~ )t It)i 1~~AJ ~,C)7~i'I!~i, ~ b~`1tilild;l ':~~ ~~ 1'l.~illlil~(~1~(li 711.° 21i1(.d ~'' I L.<i4. C~,i ~''` ~ ~ 1" 1 l.:1,~ ~ ! `ti :~ -.1 .:J ,i~~_l, IE_, [r: t, I. ~.~l 1,-~ {;'tllr -1;31.. "~, ~~~t)~1~'31~ t)~'vtill't' J~1 ~ t<1~~~]R li;t3. ;'1~~ ~.C}1;, ~' c'~ i~~'~U~~~ ~l ~~lf, ~t_t~l.',l tlll(1 1','t' ~sr'dL1L~.~ {py~~ ~~ii'!2~ ? ~i' ~li(;~',1(11:~ 1.11 / _).l( fii~)('11{`; ~ 6X. ~.. ~a i.~ ?;; ; i fi3~isi~~11_'t 11`I, 1 i~z,, 121c~~~f~t" ~t~c"~.1~ ~ ~ 1i,:1.t:f1~ `JL;:_' 1~~.7.1 ~)~(. ;I't1(' ill ~,6~ (l~iCi~ ~L~i~' h~)~l.i~i,'i'S i~~]<3L ~.~., ,.. ,' ~G ' Cl II','C'llt)ll: i l1ll~' ~~i7717i1?I;L L i)1111111~{:,lt)i~'~. ! ll~< <!I'"L ~i~.l; (l~:(1 Ifis.` ~;;i[!_,v_I „! iii,oi:~; _. , , r , X71 ~ li - liti`T~C'1 1 ~)t~;":i~ ~C~ lilt~IL ? C*l1~~~i`C`.~1! ~i311,`;lll`. 3ljr?,I~ ,]_311 ;1 ., ~ 1i7,?I. i u ~> ~„, C':1, ~.. ~ 1 ll~, 2t~.,1 )13;.,; i-i131 11 ,. ~~ ail (:: 11 ,73~r_% ~ i i C I{ ;7 - t ~ .~t. T, ! _... 1~S1 r°' 3 ,i t13~ ! ~jtE~ltII3 ~~ 1'1'1 ~ ~~~v (~{1f,C' tt) ~ ~~+11J 7 A`(~t 3._. J;7~1 li (';:ll '~a',.`;UI~ ~. 1 1 t ~ s lll, ~lli't'Ct~i~ i~~11,1~(~ ~III(:'_ ~l ~[AI ! ~_ _; I1~4_ S lUJVi3l.:1 ~I _ ~ ~„a ll~li' i 1 .~li. [t~ i I~'~liC tilt"~a` t I',;ns,( <.; lll;j ,r~3,~;~rl 111':i Il(. ,'~,{;i1~~i r ('(i~t~ ~` ~'sll~1 £1~)j!ll .~1>~t' 1i1.1.11i.'~Il(;1~: ~"lC~~;fI'%'11!~'z1L:i f'! tl7e: i 7~;y ~~;)(If, i; Ali?ltii~ i ;,li~il)11l117~.j. ~ cl(;~) ~ 1,~'~,''',,)iS.t'd11 J11 ,R .~'~1i275; E1.~1~~ 1i5 ~~{)(7 ~ i ~ 7i~li ~ ~ l!tU, ,i1:1~ ~ ~t! ci t)1i113+,11 i'{,~} :~tll._!(;iii3'+., k ~i(' i ~i < i •, ("1~+~1'1~1' tilULi Cl I1<<!,' C~' ~7117.~_I ~c,.C~l i~ „~ `7l) (~1_i '~' ~ 1. ~~~'C)I'lll7~i.;i~ (:C)~{)1' ~~'~1i`i>is' 13L7( 11.11t71?~:: ~ii;1117. 4'li{f~~1.1 I~'.1.1~!I~C:> ~l7l~l[Il' E13,l~11.' 1I1C~(~lCllltt7 ~.711i~~1t1.~.";. ) f;1S i t,~llll~(~l'lll LI]~Lf3 tll.ih'.7"21~'` C'`lt):;~1U."f?CT~1~ .~~:'!'~, l) lli~'f°~: ~ili,.;37)11! at~1f~~~1>i !!i. ~ f;l 3l,~ ~~Oitt~ ~~~,;~~13>>t`1`!h.1?~~:;. ~ ~11,' 2i~(`{7 ~I!'.:% i~, i~, I .'vltl? li)1fYlii'?11` ~`~~~'~.~'~ i;~, i!Ofll(`, Ji 13_f. .~,'`'~ d 1 C' ~1.F7i~ii1~c31~1I .1 ~~ ~(' `;C ifi,_ il'l.,~1 : ~ ~ _~ .r a loll{>Ci)l~y' C}11 ~T , a~f i41 1 ~i~ ii;~ ,'.3'., j ,1 . ~SC l ~":. 2ii~t' .`;C)O~'+.'i~ l~l flli i%fl ~1-I3i T~_ '[ili ;mill ,7' UT'r;l1ti11r11 i,~~~ ~. ~ ,;, i~~.;1)!)~(;'~ ~~~_ ~!~ ~ ~ ',li_;1i~ ) X16' ~~t?~liifil'-51~?!1 1, [l~;i~ ~. ~~ C i lii,j('l+~Cil~;(1 l~ Il:; 67-1r'~ l=1 (' 1~'fiit)31 l~.~a'7; ~»x !i1( J ,~l~n ~'ift ~ ri i.l ~,-7': ~' ~ ,. ~~~. ~ 1,~i_~.1It ''"~~. IJ(a(1Srlllt~/'.:r'("U11~1J11~ ,~,,~ i 0:111 I i I7;~ ~~~at'1 i _. ~ ;. ~i~~~ ~ C}~` ~ r ~. T. ~ 'i - ,~ ,7. ~'~(~ i ~{..:~3 .a;t' 1.,~(.li l~~l i'1I(. ~,~Ui~, f,J~ I 'ti ,'t .~i 71{'17 tJ 7Ci ~G.~ ~.tJt)i~) a..,. ~~~ \t,~.7(7 ~.rt'~11U 'ii1~11,1 j'~[.'i~i ~'ili)([> i(;~~ i ~ 1~iiCi i ~~l~t"< Ll1Hl+.~lt)' ,z 1V~,~ t~;{.'C! ~.,;11~U~ ,, ,,~~„ i i,;~~ ~lla~ .'>~L"' i~l(1il , I~il~ ~il]Cl {'Y ~~~~.'~' ~t„i ~ ttt`«a~S l.r. ~.~-j 31 f'~?! A,i~L{w S ~ L,~l~w7q A ~ ~E,~~1~j~ ~.#$ l LI'YIJ~~ ~~~1 Ak ~~~; `:~,.,) { ~~ii~,~ ~i3C ()~' ~~~r~~nn~~v-r ~r s, City of CeE7tr~l Point, Oregon 140 So.TF-ir[i St., Centrai Point, pr 97502 541.564.3321 Fax 541.6b4.b384 www.ci.ceritra I-pa i nt.ar. u s September 12, 2006 David Meltzer Construction 20 East Valley View Road Ashland, Or. 97520 Rl: Building Plans Submitted for Snowy Butte Station Dear Mr. Meltzer, Planning Department Tam Humphrey,AECP, Community Development Qirectorl Assistant City Administrator The Central Point Planning Department has reviewed the above referenced plans and we cannot process them the way they have been submitted. I have compared your plans with the >'nunicipai code for Transit Oriented Development (TODj Corridor zoning and there axe a number of points where the plans .fail to meet the code requirements. The following is a short List of the inconsistencies. • Setbacks -The alley loaded garages have a four {4) foot setback from the alley. The minimum xear yard setback for the TOD-LMR zoning district is 15'. No variances far a reduced rear yard setback were approved in the Master Plan. • Garages -The interior townhoznes show a single car garage, with a gravel parking area beside the single car garage. CPMC 17.64.100 (E)(1) requires that, "all areas utilized for off street parking, access and maneuvering of vehicles shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and adequately drained". The dilexntxt,a will be paving this space while not exceeding the Iot coverage requirements. • lr,ot Coverage - In the TOD-LMR district a rxtaxintum of $0°~ lot coverage is allowed. I,ot coverage refers to all inaperviaus surfaces, including buildings and paved surfacing. The plans submitted are right at the $0% Iot cavexage allowed without calculating the additional parking space. Adding the parking space will exceed the rr><aximum lot coverage allowed. • Architecture - The arehiteckuxe of the buildings is not consistent with the architectt>ral plans that were approved in the Master Plan. Additionally, the proposed architecture does not meet the TOD design requirements and most notable is the building form and massing depicted iri the elevation drawings. CPMC 17.67.070 says that, a welt designed nezv project can establish a pattern or identity from zotaich future development can take its cases. • iJnder the section devoted to Building facades, the code says that, "All building frontages greater than forty (~0) feet slrcrll break any flat, nronolitlric facade by including discernible architectural elenrents such as, but not lirsrited fo: bay windows, recessed entrances and windows, display windozc~s, cornices, bases, pilasters, columns, or otlrer architectural details or articulation combined with changes in materials, so as to provide visual interest and a sense of division, in addition to creating community character and pedestrian scale, Your building proposal fails to accomplish these design goals, • Master Plan Deviations -The plans submitted are not consistent with the approved Master Plan. The two options provided for townhomes within the Snowy Butte Station Master Plan all have two (2} car garages, are two (2) stories, have a 20' setback from the garage to the alley, and meet the design criteria fax the TOD district (refer to the enclosed excerpts from the master plan). • Exterior Wall materials -The exterior siding submitted for the building plans is noted as having vertical Duratemp siding, which has the appearance of being T1- 11 siding. T1-11 siding is a prohibited building material in the TOD district under CPMC 17.67.070 (D) (7.) (h). Please provide a sample of the siding proposed. It appears that you may have decided to pursue adifferent home-buying market than was originally envisioned and that you have shifted from a two story to a single story home. The resulting square footage has affected setbacks and lot coverage. We are willing to meet with you at your convenience to discuss the above listed inconsistencies and to look at options for bringing your building plans into compliance with the zoning code and/or the master plan. 1 have consulted with the Building Department inspectors who think that basis changes can be made to your plans without withdrawing them. or significantly affecting your cost. Again, if you have any questions, whatsoever or need assistance in resolving these issues please do not hesitate to contact me. Sin e , To phrey, AICP Enclosures: Cc: Chris Galpin Building Department Public Works Department 1?ile Craig A. Stone & Associates, L7D. Motltero ~ Associates, LLG Gaipin LLC - (Applicant 7~1} 779! 0569Enue, Medford, Or. 97504 541~7a9~ 77' Medford, Or. 87504 P.O. Box 8273, 8+€edfard, Or. [ } (541)779-534$ ~---x~`--~-~ ~3 s 3,> ~; _ r ~ P.tt10 0• FAtrlu.Y sa w ws 0 - . ut: s ~~~ O ~ ,., ~ _ . {ol~~ .uv .~ OW xx~. n ~ SEt.2 I „~ ,~.~ Total Area: 'i6fi2 Sq. Ft. Main Fioor: 900 5q. Ft. Lipper Floor: 762 Sq. Ff. PUD PLAN ~~', O~N EXnib,t 2.8.4 TYPICAL TOWN HOME PLAN (OPTION 1 ~ (y41) 7791 564enue, Medford, Or. 475Q4 8Q2 Nadia Way, Medford, (541) 779-0771 ~{---u'----~} ~~ ~,,~ GIZEATROOM rra ^ ago O ~iM~tO ~r IIPq~EN a .~ ro~a+ , F ~. ~' . 3- ~~' ~ ., ~0 PI.AS~i Total Area: 1495 Sq. Ft. Main Floor: 757 Sq. Ft. Upper Floor: 73$ Sq. Ft. A'.CI ON ~Xt'Elbif 2 e V r TYPICAL TOWN HOME PLAN 40PTION 2] ~ r yyy .. =k J~ . ~r A a ~ ~ Craig A. Stone & tlssociatos, LTD. Montoro & Assaciaf©s, LLG Gaipin LLC - (rApplicarrt) _ ~~ 7 ~' r ~tdb~`I Au6rtt.~', FaA~fGrd, C f. 97~.;~~.9 f,~~2 t ~i ~ ~ 3~, Mca'o~d, f:)t. &%~Ob +' U, k r,~ f.;i7t, `A~~dforcl. f.rG .%(~~J4 (C~i i 177J-{75~r9 {`1) J, ~ JT~' ~ ~ :> .1 } r'~-53A6 ~a ~~ f a: _ ~ .+aa0 ~ ~`~~ .. fi asaa ' ~; aaaa " _ :.~'~'. ~ ~ , szaa aaaa (~'"~ ~ ~, > 7~, ~ I 3 l ~ I I .,r:~~~~I C ! 1 ~~~ ~ aaaa y+ti r {~ aaaa ~ ft soo ~:~ 7aaa acao sBOO J a~0o jr"'~ ! tg 7aaa ~ 5C as ~T• '`J~ G9aa 4s3ao ~ ~~~ M.. 70oa p~ '~ 2oa ''~ ao 7 xoo vao •.~ f,., ,~, r ~.R~r,x ~ ,,%~, .- ~,, aao "`• Rndustr9ai ~ .•' •_ aoa - ,? `` MFR .~ ~ S`~` r ,.. '- J ,r ,,~ 1 ,,. '~ ,aaa aoa ~ 95,28+1 Sq Ft ~• ~~ ~' r ,S^'`,.,. `~ '~ ~ . 7aaa°" ";Gomrna~roPr~; t` ' suss aaa ~,"~ ~ + `~, ~ aaaa " ~''" " I,iyhf ~~ ~ a a 7oa MFR ` ..~'` `'~ f,..,~ •~` IaTdus4rial aaa ~~ soo y .I 33,4$3 Sg Ft `4..• ..- ` ''~ "'~. r "i . u,66.a '-~`I ht "'v. ,"~ " ~,.. ", ( aaa x Baa ~,uctu~~ at«r'c xx> C _.---~ ~ p3L-Sl~l 7aaa _. __. _~ ~; JJJ \ ~ ~°i 4 t aaa MFR f '^~ MFR ~\• ~ °',~ ~"'~ n7ao . xWW.y R.sawabo ""` 'i 5o,ao5 s:, ~r ~ ~ rQ~,szs s~ ~t ~ "', "`•`~ l 7aaa ~ y "\ x 9oa Park -'`~ ~~ ~ ~ .! ,%~ 19 `,4 : ' \.. r~.>< aaaa ~' ,,„..,~ ~~.{"~,. ,,. :. s ~, h --~....... ,..._........_ ,ti .''~ sBaa ,*, `;.,,'''' ~*. .E a'~+«'' `/ ~~R~ 1"1",I...i°`I"1_t'.T7"(.__,. ~ .~~,~ ~`~~ 700 aaaa ",,~ ,-'" '~ ~r ~'r . ~,~ ~, oo~~rasckr I E ~ I (t ~ I I j "'~. ~` \ ~, aaaa ~ " y,r.r'' ~~`.%i'`,/.~ ~ ,_,1_I1 f.W .L1 ~1~J .s,", \.•~`\ ""\"~, s9ao aaaa ~ ~. y ~ _ ~ "1 T'f 11~ '~ "~ aaaa 1 r' r~ "~~ t I i""C'T f T 1'T 1' -%. .. 4 a 30a aaaa '~ °•~,. ~F/Qrn ~ ~`- `* \\\ 1 1 1._L..LI 1Jel ~ I L L!_J / ",,~ ~ :, '~ ,~a,n, e,ao ata0 "~ Ga0 ~"' ~/" '~ a0a0 f~~, a7aa ~„~9i, 98~rt~l ... ~~. _~54 ~SFRI.__..f___.../ `"y ~ ~,,~~, z9 j33,~Ft I GIViG ~ ``"." ~ saoo sao0 aaoo aBna _./ __ _.._.L l.~. ~ _L_. , 1 ___' ~' ":9^5 Sq Pt ~ ~ •• "gas" sal sae ~' sa«, ~ `~ o '.9oa ',,~ aBa .w zaa `i", sos .. soo y o . ~~ `?`* .x7aa ,., sxa ~ SFR t-_~.. '~ '~. ~` "•\. Saa ~ ~ ~ kid 7 t, ,y = eyV+ Sts aaa ~' ~ Prrk "~ ~` `\ a 5aa Safi ~ ( ..._,.I,..__..~......_...f..,......_a.........~ .~....~...,..~~~.._ °~,.n.~ ',: assts °a aaa x sta aae Baaa eaa...a ~. aaa c<>c;tt't' a$U~ 6a0 SIB 597 ~t x 5aa 7a0 Sir' S75 ''aaaa { ia00 xa00 19a0 '.'~f~u~N 1 1 aaa 4oa Bon 7{fj(`~ 9aaa a ro ao 7aaa 9 Saa aono SPpz[~)F't' `f1ASC;9T7I1' x &aa _.~.- .-~--r pT v~ ~- Exphibit~yG. PRELiMINARYF'L6C}F'[rFtN ~N~E~ I Y E~~ET 1'""L/1 ~:ENTRAL PC71NT. Ot~EGON o ~ ~ ~/ ,' ° ' ~p~1~C~~ ;Jnnx~ _"` 1 I SNOWY BUTTE STATION PHASE 2 ~ y 1 / ,\ ] RS ~^ ~ ~ ~~ - - ~ `~ I ~ ~ ~~ [q ~.0 r ~ ~ I A rpplp! Of P p~lfO Of LOt3 t !a .~ 7 pR7 B, OGalPd Aflr 5efF0! P~:1 Afla{~ 1Meh46Il Lal9 a f t ar7.?, and 3 and 4, of The Gooksey .^ddRKn to Genlra7 Aofnt, and Lots 8, G and palrcns m p 184'41~74'E uSA9' ~ 10u'1b 112b5' ~ ~' h843 ~"~ ;1s ~- I of Lots J and K of the ~r+y EU1le GYChcrds, fcrtlally located Nlthfn 17eeaNaa Lcr# Gfahr 7< OPEN ~ I I I~ 7 ~ ~ 68 - ~ ~J 57 33 n I Na. 53 and 1,b. 54, h lh6 NortMast LYro-cuxlar of Sectfmz f0, and h thn hbrtiarest Rra- ~ t$t~~ g6 Iff - -~f3 '4116 112A6' "iii ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ b'e 13 ~3 I grKa-ter of 5eclkn 11, Tormh.~ 37 South Rmyro 2Ybs! of tM YPfWnatte Merdrrn, Gty of 0 6 ~ I ~ I ~ ,_ I I~ 'L~ ~ ~ - `G7 ~, I II ~ ~- I I Lantrar Poht, .fxbcn Gccr+ty, G3-agar. '5f'16 II766' (;~ ~ •. C! tS4 nt 3 #'C~ rn I ~~i ,"~, I PREPARED F'OR: 1'D, s/4• p FS4.5176'E 115A9' I ~ I 1] ~ g I ,, ~ -:(I] ~ 6b ~i ~ I I iti'1 PIPC PPA 9N P'ip` ~ IS '51~b II296' ~~7 +? CI 184 S b'E I.g I~ ~ ~ I I ,De . $ Ig ` I (i k I ~ `Q~r I 1nrvFSrons 17, ctc i~H 5•~ 7477 t1 1~ I$I I : ~ ~ .1'76 II7Bi' ~ ~_ ~~` F64•5 f T 3r 4L ~ ' I AJ BOX 4764 O_ ll:: ~ I I n~reuteMr, ol.owt 9~aor 323 I " ~~la `.~' 8~ i$ "'° ~` 3 i~~ ~ ~ I p r, i O ~_~O rs45176E 113.04 r' y.. t I F8.4•sl~b'E us.o9' ~ ,,la; user ~~ g Ig 6 ~ Ir, .,.r I n~I 5?`?b 117da' > ~: p tb4 51 a'E-f13 I ~~ I I 333 I ~',~ 3 ~ "~ ~'~ ~ ~ . ' I m~ } ~3 •st'zb nzba' k54 sl a'E-7>,a I~ ~ I ~ ° Is4•slsa~ 1U`A9' I ~' ~, ~; ~ l3 Q ~ t~ `~$ at 3 `f 'Q`f~~ ~.I I %' ~ "' LS •• 74 112,b4' 4 M`r y Ct tb~ 91 b'E:-.3i9 Z' C~ • ~O 2' `~ !s' PUE~._ u b ~13 '' ~ uz9a' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~4 1 1 O n 1 O 51.6, it?b0.' _ tt54 5'k ~ 1 !' ri t `5' \ i sxeErs rs4.5776'E IFiA9' 1 ,~,y ~ y 1 >, \, ~ f -~-! $ ~$~ ' s~~' '• $ ~~ = S ~'~ ~, ~ ss4~osa-r+ 3saas' o I , ~} ~ ~ ~ I p I . s'sa Ils,go' IG1 s3'sa•E' Isss~• 1 ~~\ ,,•.~ ~ \ } o s 35 I g gi ~ `', r'\°\ ~. ~r~,.~. ~t~TS t _ ~• $ I~ 3~~ `` S 76 11191 ~ + ' ~ ~ ~ G\ ~. 4 \ lltf6rff OF MGtiY TO !~ 1 ~,. ~ I I 3 C7 ;F ~~ ~~• .' \ ~ • ~ \ AEt71WiID f1xkTC7¢ TO 5- I g is I$ ~ ~ 5•':6 fls9l -r~ w w0~ .~~~ v `•• \`\ ~ \ oecc.vurrcw .-~.f1 ~ Dt fiE1~~E g 363 ill ICI ~,,. ,f,, ~ ,3~~" ~ ~.\ \ \ uy a r~-14sa •1 99 ~ `~ ttiti CQ 'q `•~~,,y~\ ~\, \ (} `t O O -~ A~ (P[lPLICI : [Tr~'T ! `J" 3, ~\n\ ., \\~\ \ ~ Uf 2 ~rv s/ Nt~x 1a~a•sl2b~e Il,4pq' ~ ° ~~ ~, t\s ~ `~ F.,/. ~ ' ~ ~ \ . ... ~ ~ ~` ~,•-~ lal Ir 56t'37409Y IIZXI' /~\ \~ °a ~~ •i- m~ \~,/ ro^ \ ~ ~ $ % 2 /~ I O - ` `j of OPEN ARFA ~ 1~~~~ \~ /~ '"'~d~,~y ~ "- 0~ ~ ~_ ~~\ \, \ \ 15" PUS m ~ • ~~ I~ Ili I~ ` t Ipu~uc> ,B ary ~~ `,.;' ~~,.y.~'~;.r ~ ;~(3~ ,`-~-~ ~~,.;-. ~Y\\ h a~ ~ U,a O 3 n; lS3\ ';' ry' ~~ ~ is ~~'4 ' 48 / :::. i t ,~ n \ qy~~ ~ m~ R54.51'3b'E IrbbO ~ 5 ~s~ a3~ ~S ~ a cb.o , }ice ~`,ta7 ~l ?' ~ ~ 3 ]p8 • _ ~g~ ~ per` ~ ~' ~ i :- - ~ r ~ \~ Na9'54'22~! : a ~f,2 \., ~ - \ ~ .; ~ a .b\,~s ~3 c 5 :~' ~ ~-~ i_` .` ~ t os6' •\i, i la CVl \ `\. C~'h\~ i Y i' ~,•t• .' A ~\%vt'~_. ~ / ~'° O.qb 0~~~~ \ \ l z `~ ~a~J. ~ ~ Sr~ • \ \'* L{f'~~ .6'r .y. P^, ~~~`.~ , ~_ ~ ,p -:: ~aa~ _\(Ni,cSy \~a C ~ ~~ 56d'S05a•FY ., ~" 6`64; '9''j ! \ aesr' ~ 171.'IIZONPIN` r`~ ~~`~ryg -J~.7 \~ \ \ /, .D:/.( ~ `N ~ `~~s\~`'\b.'~a,. -t'' ~,a._. ~~~,3~ys~ ~~~ 1 T~.,1~ l3E. GOR {pr p ~. ~8 \ ~ Lf?,`,~1~ C ; . }'~o 22 / ,~ Ja' PUa~~ , r6, aLK I, arar~ a,3j. ~ ~ `tom. ~ \ ~ y>. ~ ~ / ~~~ \~b 3s 41 'i ~~, € aeefx nn U ~° 18 y~ f /~r\\tiO \ • ¢~ j i; ^ R>- D ~\`h \ ~ r € X41' ~ .2• ~']-? \ \ $ \~\ ~rl.._J ~~~~4~~~. CL / ''c~ y 'vc~'1L\, u\~~g c~,~ nHdti 7~0~ 1~r-1 ylt j 30, ~3 ~4v, "<s . I~ ~} \ " \ ; -. . "°'~.`~: \ i" i.~ _~',~ I'A .. _O,-y.'y y.2 L.~jY~ ~# I `~ i S G 12 ~4" \ \ '1'~'J 1, r'I> .' J r S ti P,n ' ~\~ rJ^/ t~1 4O I I -. I ~F7~S4 /,~,~ Y' 'i' -l~U~ir~'~.~ ~•~~ ~+,1,9i~, ~ .1 ~ r. r~ 0' /~ '~~'~ _ V~'S~ oA6' Iz~ - f `'i }~sy°>ip .o° /i ` ~ `` -s. + .[~B/,, ~. ~ ~ .>'orro4.5os6'E IL3A8' , ! a 13 "r K O F x~ p~' f~{~~• t~C Ir 4 ~~, ~ / ~ ~ ! / /_ti'7 `• ~ ~\`~'. 'f S LIV~/r^ ~ 1~ tR-I V' ~ f~/`~ ICI ~8.6:t; f 3P 6:' - yn `St.~A a'S7\° /4 / .2':! i, c., .\\ \•-'~ ` ~ 7v'S'/ ~ r~. ~ $ -:~f~ n6+'SO [ __ti~ ,t _ rY'i ~~fO~. a ~~$~ /~~r I it ~`~~4 i `~6S ~~` ~ ,~ J \ ` ~1 ~ 3 ~ YO$ >~s4•so s~~15 9 ;~, I~ ,, , S ~ -• ~ / ~/ 70 V ~ ' ~b\• _ \ „~I Gb $ ~~ ` tltry~~e 5056E ![3AB' Fn. Ptisrra c,vPruxrED ~ s ~ - / 9 A~'a\' \ ~` ~~' r • '' ~ V ~ L f"' • .@~~~I t~l : r r1 1J rRlMtA'~KG'PEa ~~~~/ ~ y7S \\ \ \'`_r16.T'L -. ~ a3rP• ~~ m tlrr re648 • D 9 9 \~~ ,\ • .. etacElYPn .. REGESTERED ~ k'~,Q G~'~v/ p ~ 8S ~ ~~ e`q'---•--- •,~ ::NT ~ ius 1.". `_`.}* EY PRDF'ESSIONAL o.&~ 4. ~ :' _ I mrs taY- LAND SURVEYOR ~~ • ~ O 31. ~@r"" ~`~~ z~ e ,(c. ?ao gs - `- ~ -ssa•so'sa•w _ I~3sl _ ~~ C I ?Ale survey canalala of: ~./ sI ~ ~ ~-~ g ...... ec~aKe> stay 1 ~. f1gLl4&Qa... a,~:ry~ ~ a-sio~r~~p\ ~a. 5sa•~'~I'rt s5w'ws9rj ,p m..LCMnva+cw ~ "~~ ~b. rIJT~.IRE PHASE 3 74.00' 4o1a y.~a{a) NarretS+a ~ h OREGON ~~` M.wxJ.v 1-/l'nltie ~ JULY OQ. 2001 ~~-`-A7SGl.'PCR'JN lbl•4d / ~J,2 ~FD. 4l4'^LON PIPE FPR JACKSON COUNTY GEt E. NEAIT WA[R ~ \ \~ 9V 700 PFp•11MNGN /i fD 1' IRON AIAE I~".''• SrJRYEYOA sg~5{~5 ~ ` ^~~~ t'fRON PlI~'d',4.4.5 ~ ~ -J 715A'4031F. 5.48' (O.Q161N LM1a[lYr1NU RB[rer+'p/AptO /713//06 CHICORY LANE~~~ / to Ewk~m ea.+ty A+eesxn r-kp Fb. 9711^1 !a/D, r Lois San-t)GY7, 9~ 1W NG, ra,1 Lo[ y4~ ora.hg H,Ut51 FtoJecM+661ph, LI.G\kwealon A, 5mrg &Rle Stallq»a»ry 9Ate Sta >'h3~-o z sxasr s JY SCALE I• = Fi0' IIIWI~Y111~ O Fi0 IZO 180 PREPARED BY: Nee them er Srzrveying, Inc. 3126 StAte St., Suzte 200 P. d. Box 15144 Medford, Oregon 37501 Phone (541J 732-2869 FAX (541) 732-1382 DATE: Scpterxzacr .i5, 2005 AROJECT NUhfBER: 64098 Sheet 3 of a ~ o ~. ~ cc ~~ 4 ~{ `...~ ., _n~''~ ~ry h;~1, - ~ ~ jrc ~ ~ _ ~ r ~, .t tea': - _ _ 7~/~ 311 _ ~ ,. $Si7 ,• ~~ ayT ;N/' J9't '~ . _ ~Ff~ -_ _ __- -- 5 ~.. .a-. . _ ,. .. .... ss ~ r _~ _ - ~ ,. p .,. -~ r ._, S -, _, _ ___ _ __ ,. __.._ __.__. y. .... -. v,,. - ~ ~' " ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ W 4, ~~ m y p '~"''1a yy„d d« A ~' ~k ~ ~ r 5y ~ .~ ~ a ~° Y », ~i b ~, y . r nk„ w .. w e ..... '., ~ ~l V C ~(k . ,~.. J4~ ~ ~ ~E ~ r 4 LL i W~, , ~ E S R S .GY. `. ~ _ ._. 'i 1 ~1'. __~. '`Y ,; Y ~'a~0. ~~~~~~SSSSSS ~~l~~l 'r 1 .. i i ~~~ ~~ \~ ~ ,; ~ ,~ i { ' Y ,, 1 1''T: ~ ;~~. . 1 W t ~5 , i t _. ., '.' r ~ ~J V ~_ _ _. .. _~ i A~"TAI~~~I~T " ~ ~~ Craig A. Stang 8~ Associates, LYD. Niontero 8~ Associates, LLC 709 Cardley Avenue, Medfortl, Or. 97504 9D2 Nadia Vt+ay, Medford, Or. 975D4 (541) 77g-0569 (541} 779.0771 GalpEn LLC - {Applicant) P.O. Box 8271, Medford, Or. 975D4 (541) 7735346 w z J a PROPERTY LINE _ ~ _ a 3 DRIVEWAY ~ DWELLING -- -- - ~C ~ a Q ENTRY YJALK w ~ 0 ~ ~ - - - ~ W J a ~ r~, w ~ w _ ~' ~ ~DRTVEWAY ~` '~ Q~ DWFLLWG ENTRY WftiLK v ~ g ~ ~ V PROPERTY LIRE TYPICAL OF ALLEY LOADED TOWNHOUSE LOTS SCALE: 1 "=40' LOT 44fOTWS. DEPTHS I & SHAPES VARY STREE'i• TYPICAL OF DUPLEX LOTS SCALE: 1 "=44' a ~ ,.' -'. PROPERTY LINE - - - - ll.. ~ o ~ z E ~ ~ ~ I w ~ w ~ a ~ ~ wl DWELL]NG T1J a ~ a ~ wl ~ ~ GARAGE o. ~ 1 -PROPER'T'Y LINE - - 1 ~ ~ ry TYPICAL OF SINGLE FAMILY LOTS SCALE: 1 "T4fl' NOWY I3i3']C']['7G E~TA'I'ION PRDPERTY LINE ~ w O F T 1 h w ~ T U O pWELLING z o _ 1 i GARAGE 1 DRIVEWAY . A.O.U. h € a LANDSCAPE GRAS I z LLi ~ ' I '' • . . F- , ~ cC ~~ PROPI=RTY LINE N ~ Ip~ ~ ~ a z CDNCRETE RT690 ~ '` A.D.U. ~ ~ U a ~ DWELLING i °' CRUS $ •~EMPACTED T ~ I I pRIVEWAY GAF2FlGE I PROPERTY LINE TYPICAL OF McLAUGHLIN CT. LOTS SCALE: 1 "=40' Exhibit Z.$ pRELIhAINAFtYPUDPLAN TYPICAL SITE PLAN OF LOTS CENTRAL PO[NT, OREGON ~YHITI~ HA~'Y~. ~STATI~S Cj~'L~A`T`I~ ~.~ m ~~tY~1'~~ ~~Cf11"1~ 1:<1.1i?~r1~, ~C?illlil"~;`,iC~ii ~i~! ~,,}yi,:it•"+,~ i~~.~~'~, f)iil(~li1~i?' s/C1{)~7~11('J~I ~>;YC~~;~1(%C` ~. ~:"I" ~`~~"iliit f~~~~ ~'laxazaeci t7~~i~ ~~~~. cl~„>a.)~~r~i ~I'U~) ~n ,it:. ~~1t, ;•, ~ .~ C,'~~t~ i~~r1~ '~~ti Tsr,~ -.:! v c~t~ ~t'~~~~~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~iw~f~u ;~{~ ~~j~;~~ ~-~firl~ ~~,. ~1iC'1111~1~ 1~~~~ I1; .?Lli~ ~~ilO`. tlilC~'11£1.1 l1 !1l' il?,~, i ~ ii 15 ;;(';l ~ ~ ! ~ ~n 1 lU'~:al t i ~~1)OI~i);"~?IJ ~7i ~~" ~~~C, ~lYl)<s 'Cl ~~1'Illf ill~~ ,~ ~;'('i;,~~s(?t'~l+ ~)i~, ! ~~ i )~.c~?+; ~lf{ ~ ~ i11t1~t ~ ~ i rl~~C:1}> ia1.~l .., ~ ~~I°. ; -U1)(;,) i ~1~?:~- ~~,£~L.'" . C', L4.,)~,iUt1r; t'i;lj ,i„1111 „l~i~l ~ ~i' ~{?(~i° ~~ ;°~ti'iC°1i7:'!iL; ~-~ I'ii(<i('lliilt.'i1L )~~. ~ {t. _ ~" ,,. .x ,il{t J; ~. C)i r, i i.~ `(I ll)ill 1I'{1. - ~~ l:t%~.~ i .. p~~. h~ ~ l i. flii,C .t:~'~ t LE}i77T it 7ZL ~i~ (t~'C>f'-~~ ,~i ~~`. 11\~!i>>`.~' i isi:1('; ail c~ ~i30 '.i ~ lii1,° ~'11 b', !fl ~._ 1 ~'(1~~~' LU ~~, i I_t,. t.1 ~~~;.'~! .7. ~~1 ~~11 i:~~l_1 ., 1Jlsit,~11. .~~ ~ SIr.1 i.1"(i lii_1. L. illy' i'l~;l 111 :" ~ s. ~i'?;1~'i+l>_i~L)L ~'`/tlU1{i {'l),]~i~l~i'! 4lii(~ till~~~)G~' i Oi1111..~1(1(',il l=? [il °.x.111_ i iOt,'vh Oi'l11")(_)511 II ~);(~ F~'(1LIiC1 ,a+~ij')i. J.." h !"1 L"..1 !'~~4"'!~ i~h1.11, t tt 1 Ylft':~ t;'('(~11 j„.. ~. =.:~1 ~,~il-,C31 P'(+1f.~[;(:, (~;i" t~itii-.("<?L1 1!?!l1~71 r a)j _. ~~_~.'if~`tU11 i{)~` .~'a-}j~;l ':~. Ott w ~1~.~ i17.i~3~ I.Li~' i l ~ ;..1('C111~cI ~`.(! ~('? i')i11 1'~tli1 (_; d. i1 P1 u?i 4; 1 !I Sa_;~i`~l~~IIL.`3 ~ ~ Ib ~ ~ 1 of '}` j 1}4 (t~ i~t~ ~1 I` ~~ E,j 17 ~~ l~i' X37"~ ~"',)'(' ~'O1L~~t"~ `~~S~s~!~~r'`•.~ ~?~'P~('li~illt<;i CC7iL`~~i~L!i li[,)11,. l~t.~ ~1i rlaO1'~#,;fj11S11 15 Ifl{+u',i~ ti.t~ j.i i 'Ili.. ~,'~,talJllil~ ~,_,~ ~=°;iC~~J ... ~l ~~? ..,)Li.°t~~~c~"_ " li.l~~.; i~l<LL . n ~u.`,~ !i lEI~.;C ,~i.~Y~...~;9.J.. ~ZS.).(,~ 111.;' ~ A"i'~". „l~;j_!~ 1? i.C1 ~ ~. ~.f~.)~',~t.i!I:;, i ail?I..l I~~,iiil:.~l;~.){1 ~'d't71 _ ! ~1~ij~l'C)ti Ill~)~lll, It ~11,a 1~{rYl ~111~`- l~ I_la ~ ~~.~~1 i,~ ~~ilt;~)i:.~~ U1C }'~ iSlfltl~l~_ ~.1~'"]'~<171~I1i.;il~`4'•~lld: 'l'1: i_il~,' ~':!lill+.l ;~.,1<.i}.i.. <1,1)i'1t~+)\ ~'1 ti:1Ql2;il ct. ,131'l'1.iJllt 1':it'~` 1'1..1 Li l`~Ui~.ll .i,:~:ll.lt)il ,11ii..~ ~'tii<;1~ I~11I.r t1~)l.il`(;)Vd~. ~U i1+:;i~,tJi115 j' f~114.t'~_;1~. i:i tics i1[11's. ~~, a ~~qq~ ~ . '(t",~7"yi. i[\'~.C ~'[~i C'i ~~ ill°. le ~ )"lf:,'i:, G_Lll" ?. ~)._1!i 9 L3. ~1t~. ~il)i :°tl ~~l'l.dJlllir~l(~s,! 1 ~ ,,,~jf1~)t~' rl 51,111 ...^. ~_,i.Ll1~l i() ~~r_,~-) 11()()1 ~4)iT; illiJil1~111~~\r {L{i,~~il:~ ~yGl)11~"t }. #~~~il!~.::;t it)~ ~.':`~ `it"li?l1 ~1"C71T1!.ill3?:;1.i; Li~:~ ~~:)1":+i'1~;!11:3 Cl;t[~'i.~.~Li11~ ~~ ~{~Q~7 ~).l ir~~; i E}A f __...r.~...~,........_-- _....~..~........__ f ~~ I 44c~~ 1 ~ I ~~ I ~ ~~_ OPf,~i SPA .y=~ 4_ 3 -~ '-?- t ~~--- - ©3 t 29 I 28 ~ Z7 I 2b I 25 ~ 2d I 23 I 22 ~ 2i I 20 ». ~ ~ I i 22_ ~ 21 as 19 1e fT -- f 1G ~~--~~-~.~ I I I I~ 15 i 6 ~ 7 ~ 8 9 + 10 11 ~ 12 ~ 13 ~ vi O t 14 i ~.~,. I 40 ~ 45 ~ 19 ~ --- l --__- 4t 4q t 1s I // fT ---~_°~__ ,1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ 43 / 1G / ,,~~ ~ /J \ ~ ~ ' ~ '~ 15 ~ / ~I I ---T-^..__~--- '~\ 14 ~ i i ~ i ~1 13 / / ~.~ r ~/ ~ f I 2( 3 1 4 ~ 5 I b ~ T i 8 I 9 I 1Q I It ~ 12 // ,/ ' f I ~ y~.~'~ /,/ .~ J ~ Y t k y~~~ A~~ ~~~ ~~~ w U 1 XX t~ . ~i ~ `' 4f !; ~ ` ~ \~ ~ ,,~~ ~` `11`.j,_ 1 4~-lr ~j r ~ ~$ t cr.\ 1 ~ ~ ~ I $P,.F:SII RC?AD ~~ ,~ ~ -_ •_ °~^- i~ ,~ ~ _ PR~IMVfINARY ~ ~•r ~ ~ ~ Y Y $ITE PiJ~! emlt'wlaty?/?.m _~ i 1 1 .r: -~......~..~._..~._.L....~a.....~..._ ~~_.~ I ~ v r ~ rod PAI.Wt3'URl'V~+ r -(. ~ _ _ _ r ~ €~ a N \ 1 \ 1 ¢a V f O I 1 { X r ~ ly ' ~ i5s~ Li~C~i~~°L'~r~i~~°R;~n ' i°~° R\ ~ t~ . ~.~.. i ~ 1 ` ._.._... ._.._.._ _ ...~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ K r-- - .~...... ~~ rili`n~~+i~1.~Rjie~Ti\iM v~\~K Vy. r+li ~~ ru I I~ ~~ _...~_ ______W_.__~_____ __~__._.~.._ ~ I ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~; ~ ~~ i ~ _ py _ ~d ,~ _ _ ~ N 1 ~`1 ~` ~a ~~ i~ i WNET'E HAWK t L ~r r~ er. wao~ rroo t :tn ~R ~ ~eoc ~a.,~ls. use ~aral~~..,~~orm~ ~-sas-nn ~TTA~HNIENT " " City of Central Point, Oregon 140 So. Third St., Central Point, Or 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.central-po i nt.or.us .- CENTRAL POINT Panning Departrnen~ Torn Flumpltrey,AICP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator Apri13, 20176 Max Rosenberg, R.G. Western Region Cleanup Group Manager Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 11#12 Lincoln St., Suite 210 Eugene, OR 97401 Re: Proposed Development of 718 Beebe Road in Central Point Oregon by Duncan Development Dear Mr. Rosenberg: I am writing to express the Central Point Planning Departrrtent's strong support of Mike Duncan's development plans for the Beebe Road property referenced above. The area in question has been in the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) for the past 20 years and was arkrtexed by the City in late 20(}4. The City Council subsequently approved a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this site in July 2005 with the expectation that it would develop and provide additional entry-level homes in flat community. Unfortunately, Mr. Duncan has encountered some set backs to his plans and he has shared these with us. It is our understanding that past farming practices at the Beebe Road location have raised some question about its appropriateness for residential development tireless the Department reconsiders its standards or the developer makes same changes to his proposal, or both. 1 hope that we can reach a compromise that will benefit everyone. The City stands ready to cooperate and to consider changes to the oxiginal project proposal if it will result in a better end product. Our community is experiencing significant increases in real estate values which add to new housing costs and price many first-time home buyers out of the market. White Hawk Estates proposed small lot single- family detached dwellings with a number of amenities including a park site. Alterations to the Duncan proposal that will enable him to work around residual agricultural contamination will. likely necessitate higher residential densities. The City Platuzing Department will consider and support a modificatiore to this proposal if DEQ can work with us. I have discussed and support Mr. Duncan's idea to redevelop the former orchard as a City park with appropriate environmental mitigation measures such as sail capping. This plan would be in conjunction with an increase in the number of homes elsewhere on the site. His offer of park dedica#ion will provide the City with additional community open space and this is always well received. Mr. Duncan has consistently cooperated with the City on all of his projects and this one will be no exception if approached reasonably and fairly. i would be happy to discuss the particulars of khis matter with you further and can be reached directly at 541-423-1025. S' c 1 , T phrey AICP ATTA~~MEI~T " '~ ~2~1 it L~~' °~~`~lLfLl tlavolapmanF. Ek June 1, .2006 Members of tlae Planning Commission City of Central Point la0 South T{iird Street Central Point, OR 97502 Dear Members; Dn July 5, 2005 the City of Central Point Planning Commission unanimously approved Resolution G58, approving a Planned Unit Development and Tentative Plan Application for our subdivision on Beebe Road, known as White Hawk. We subsequent requested, and received, asix-month extension of that approval to July 3, 2006. We are again requesting asix-month extension while we work with other governmental agencies to obtain their approval of the site for development We appreciate your consideration and patience during this process and will await your ..~~~ . PO Box 5656 • Central Point • Oregon 97542 (541) 865-iwAND Pax (541) 665-2979 ~-mail: duncande~elopmentC~charter.net CCB #1468: