Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 23, 2006CEhi't'itA~ POIM' CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENllA May 23, 2006 - 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 697 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Mack Lewis, Chuck I'iland, and Wayne Riggs. IIL CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of May 2, 2006, Planning Commission Minutes. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS Pgs. 1 - 30 A. A public hearing to consider a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating 6 residential lots. The subject property is located in a TOD-LMR, Law Mix Residential zoning district and is identified an the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W lOAB, Tax Lot 1500. The address is 1927 Taylor Road and is located south of Taylor Road, west of Haskell Street. north of Palo Verde Way. Karolyne J. Johnson, Applicant. File Na. 06067 Pgs. 3 3 - 28 B. A public meeting to consider a request for Class "A" Nonconforming structure designation, in the Residential {R-1}Zoning District an Property Identified as Tax Lot 37 2W 03DA, 4200, 65 Crater Lane; Damion Hillyer, Applicant. File No. 46077 VI. MISCELLANEOUS VII. ADJOURNMENT PCD523D6 City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes May 2, 2006 L MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Chuck Piland, Damian Idiart and Wayne Riggs were present. Commissioner Mack Lewis was absent. Also in attendance were: Torn Humphrey, Community Development Director; Don Burt, PIanning Manager; Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician; Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary; and Chris Clayton, Deputy Public Works Director. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Candy Fish made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 4, 2006 PIanning Commission meeting. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion: ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Piland, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VL BUSINESS A. File No. 06025: (Continued) A public meeting to review a Site Plan application for the purpose of allowing the construction and operation of an Industrial Park in phases. The proposed development is within the M-1, Industrial zoning district. The subject parcel is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W O1BD, Tax Lots 300, 400 and 700. The property is located at 4595, 4611 and 4625 Table Rock Road. There were no conflicts or exparte communications to disclose. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, presented the staff report far this application, Plan,zing Commission Minutes Ma}, 2, 2006 Page Z recommending approval for the development of Phases 1 and 2 at this tune. 1Ie ~nentianed a warranty deed fora 50 feet road easement that would affect Phases 3 and 4 which would be considered at a later date. The public portion of the meeting was opened. Bruce Abeloe, agent for the applicant, stated Phases 3 & 4 were conceptual only at this time for the purpose of facilitating storm drains and water. The public portion of the meeting was closed. Chuck Piland made a motion to adopt Resolution 691 approving the site plan application allowing for the construction and operation of phases l and 2 of an Industrial Park within the M-1, Industrial zoning district located at 4595, 461. ~ and 4625 Table Rock Road (Jackson County Assessor's map 37 2W Ol BD, Tax Lots 300, 400 and 700) based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: ldiart, yes; Riggs. yes, Fish, yes; Piland, yes. Motion passed. B. File No. 06053: (Continued) A public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating three individual parcels, The subject property is located in a C-4, Tourist & Office Professional Zoning District, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 2100. The subject property is located on East Pine Street, west of Hamrick Road, and east of Interstate 5. There were no conflicts or exparte communications to disclose. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented a staff report for this application which had been continued from the Apri14, 2006 Planning Commission meeting at the request of the applicant. The tentative plan for this property has been revised by the applicant to reduce the number of lots from three (3} to two (2). Parcel #1 is for Sonic Drive-in and parcel two is 2~- acres and will remain larger for the time being. It will later be subdivided, and at that time, applicant intends to dedicate an interior public road. The road in question lies to the East of Sonic Drive-in and next to the bank. Candy Fish asked about a traffic signal. Tom Humphrey responded that City staff was looking at what could be done to get by without a signal at that location as it would be classified as a capital improvement. A traffic consultant is being brought in through the TSP project, and it is anticipated that a better solution would became available at that tune. Chuck questioned right in/right out. Ken said that Public Works has recommended right in/right out. Planning Canrnissio~r A9inutes ,Jay ~, .2006 Page 3 Chris Clayton, Deputy Public Works Director, stated Public Works would require that traffic be physically restricted with a barrier and that the staff' report would be updated to reflect this requirement in conjunction with the development of paz•cel 2. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Frank Pulver, agent for the applicants, appeared and said it was important to the applicant that the partition of parcels 1 and 2 be approved at this meeting for financial reasons. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Damian Idiart made a motion to adopt Resolution 692 granting tentative plan approval for a land partition to create rivo (2) individual tax lots for commercial use within the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional Zoning District (37 2W 42I), Tax Lot 2100} based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Piland, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. C. File No. 06060: A public hearing to review Tentative Plan and Planned Unit Development applications for the purpose of creating a subdivision consisting of 24 dwelling units (within 12 buildings), a playground and an existing home. The subject property is located in an R-3, Residential Multiple zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1400 & 1500. The addresses are 737 & 7~5 Hopkins Road and are located east of Freeman Road, west of Briarwood Drive, north of Hopkins Road. Jon Gray, Applicant There were no conflicts or exparte communications to disclose. Wayne Riggs stated he had made a site visit. Ken Gersehler, Community Planner, presented a staff report stating that there were issues with the project. The application was filed the day after the new code ordinances took effect (February 13, 2006}. The new code calls for a minimum of 5 acres for a PUD. This is significant legally. If we proceed it would be a policy issue. if challenged at any paint, it would be overturned. For this late application, the new rules apply. Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician, advised she had spoken directly with the applicant, and applicant was aware that the application was late. Applicant stated that he wanted to submit it anyway since they had been working with City staff for the last couple of months. Ken added that notice of the changes of code ordinances had been sent out, and everyone should have been aware of the filing deadline. Further, Ken advised he had discussed this issue with Doug Engle, City Attorney, who suggested that it should be denied and there is potential for being challenged. Planning Comn:issiatz Alinules A1ay 2, 2006 Page 4 Discussion ensued concerning the impact that the PUD would have on the reside~~ts of the Meadows, deck setbacks, road width, t11e design of the turn-arou~ld at the end of tE7c road in the I'Ull, storm drainage and the canfiguratia~l of the intersection of'Hopkins and Bursell. Ken suggested that ifthe application were to be denied, the City could offer to waive the one year period to resubmit an application. The public portion of the meeting was opened. Cal Martin appeared for the applicant and stated that it was an unfortunate glitch that the application had been filed late; that it was not intentional. Mr. Martin claimed that a great deal of time and effort had gone into this project and that it had been City staff who had informed them of the date that the application had to be submitted by. Mr. Martin discussed various alternatives that could be looked at for some of the issues confronting this I'UD application as they pertained to the design of aturn-around, window placement on the units, and parking, Mark Burkhalter, attorney, appeared on behalf of neighbors to the west in the Meadows . He advised the planning commission that as the application had not been filed in tune, if the planning commission disregards code and approves the application anyway, the neighbors will appeal. Mr. Burkhalter additionally addressed concerns about privacy issues with regard to fencing, landscaping, decks and windows. Traffic and the hum of the air conditioning units were also brought up. Tim Coy, a neighbor, spoke to the commissioners, citing concerns about privacy, the degradation of the view, drainage on the property and traff c. Howard Misner, a citizen, said he thinks Cal did a great jab of giving the project a lot of thought, planning and did his research. Mr. Misner thought the City should move on past the one day issue as a lot of work had gone into this project and the design of the buildings was a great use of the property. Cal Martin came back to testify. He reiterated that he was advised by staff that the application could be filed by the I3`~ of February. He speculated that if the application were denied, fewer units, less square footage and fewer benefits would be available far the residents. Mr. Martin expressed that the heating units could be moved to the side yards but added that newer units were very quiet and sound deadening panels could be used. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Ken Gerschler again reminded the commissioners that the application was submitted after the code changed and should be denied as recommended by staff. Planrxing Con:rraission A~inule.e A9ay 2, 2046 Page 5 Damian ldiart made a motion to adapt Resolution 693 approving tentative plan and planned unit development applications for the creation of a subdivision consisting of 24 dwelling units to be located at 737 and 745 Hopkins Road {Jackson County Tax Assessor's map 37S 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1400 and 1540) with the additional conditions of a buffer for the heat pump units and a requirement for the applicant to workwith City staff to make the units more attractive. Candy Nish seconded the motion, stating that there should have been better communicatian between staff and the applicant.. ROLL CALL: Fish., yes; ldiart, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, no. Motion passed. The Planning Commission adjourned for a break at 8:55 p.m. and reconvened at 9:05 p.zn. D. File No. Ob054: A public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating a subdividision consisting of eight {8} single family residential lots. The subject property is located in an R-1-14, Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 36S 2W 35DD, Tax Lot 1100. The address is 523$ Gebhard Road and is located south of Wilson Road, west of Hamrick Road, north of Rabun Way. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to dzsclose. The public works staffreport and a copy of the master plan were distributed to commissioners prior to the meeting. Lisa Morgan, Planning Technican, presented a staff report and read the conditions of approval rota the record. The public portion of the meeting was opened. Charles Jakabosky, applicant, stated that his family was working with City staff to create a good environment for families and had hired the best consultants to make it happen. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Damian ldiart made a motion to recommend approval by the City Council for a Zone Map amendment to change the zoning of this property from R-1-10, Residential Single Family to R-1-6, Residential Single Family. Chuck Piland seconded the mation. ROLL CALL: Fish, no; ldiart, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. Chuck Piland then made a motion to adopt Resolution 694 approving tentataive plan for a subdivision consisting of eight ($} single family residential lots at 5238 Gebhard Road (Jackson County Assessor's map 36S 2W 35DD) based on the standards, findings, Planning Conunission A~inutes A1ay 2, 2006 Aage 6 conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports.. Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. E. File No. 06071: A public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating four (4) single family residential lots. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Single Family coning district and is idcntifwed on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 03All, Tax Lot 3000. the address is 1015 N. Tenth Street and is located north of Kings Court, west of Tenth Street, cast of Crest Drive. There were no conflicts or ex parse communications to disclose. Letters of opposition to this tentative plan application were received from neighbors Jason Winegar, Barbara Larson, Richard and Kathy Hufteling, Orville Norris and Dack Doggett were read into the record by Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician. The objections pertained to the potential construction of 2-story single family residences being built on the subject property and water run-off. Applicant, Brad Parmenter, later stated that he was developing the property far sale and was not intending to be the builder so he had no control over what was going to be built. Lisa Morgan then presented the staff report and explained that the lot line adjustment for this application had been completed administratively. Public works distributed a revised staff report requiring applicant to dedicate a 10 foot easement for irriprovements along N. 10"' Street, to which the applicant had no objection. It was further requested that the applicant mark the redwood tree on the property to prevent its removal during the grading and construction phases of the project. Chuck Piland made a motion to continue the planning commission meeting past 10:00 p.m. Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Following discussion concerning the preservation of the redwood tree located on the property, Ken Gerschler suggested that the applicant designate the tree to be added to the City's significant tree inventory to which the applicant agreed. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Wayne Riggs made a motion to adapt Resolution 695 for approval of the tentative plan application to create four {4} single family residential lots at 1015 N. Tenth Street (Jackson County Assessor's Map 37S 2W 03AD, Tax Lot 3000) based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff reports in addition to the applicant designating the 36 inch redwood tree to the City's significant tree inventory. Damian ldiart seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. Planning Commission :Minutes Mau 2, 2D05 Page 7 F. A public hearing to consider a legislative Land Use Regulation amendment to Title 16 and Title 17 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code and to formulate a recommendation for the City Council to review these amendments on May l 1, 2006. There were no declarations to be made by commission members. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, presezlted proposed amendments to Titles 16 and 17 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code in five sections -Definitions, Accessory Dwelling Units, Flag Lots, Building and Design Standards, and Zoning Districts, recommending nothing be done with the Building and Design Standards section a# this time as they needed further clarification. Suggestions submitted from Montera & Associates, LLC were reviewed and discussed and minor changes were further suggested for inclusion to the proposed amendments. The public portion of the meeting was opened. Barry Robino, General Manager far Grange Co-op, requested clarification of the amendment to the Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance, and Tom Humphrey assured him that there were na consequences of the amendments that would affect the Grange right now. Howard Misner indicated that his property was changing from C-3 to G5. Mr. Humphrey tall Mr. Misner that his property was legally non-conforming and that the City was adding definitions to that zoning district. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Chuck Piland made a motion to adopt Resolution 695 approving that the proposed amendments with revisions and corrections be forwarded to the City Council for approval. Damian ldiarl seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Piland, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, no. VII. MISCELLANEOUS IX. ADJOURNMENT Chuck Piland made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at l 1: I5 p.m. Planning Conzrnissiorz Minzrtes A1ay z, zfl(}G Page 8 The foregoing minutes of the May 2, 2046 Planning Commission meeting were alaproved by the Planning Commission at its meeting an June 6, 2006. Planning Camrnissian Chair ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Planning Department STAFF REPORT Torn FE a r3~phrey,/1!C P, Community De~e~opmerrt Qirector/ Assistant Ci[y Administrator sTA~~>N~ RE~oxT May 23, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: Planning Commission review of tentative subdivision application that will create five residetatial lots at 1927 Taylor Road i~1 the T4D-LMR zone district on property identified as Map 372W 1 OAB, Tax Lot 1500; Karolyne Johnson, Applicant {Farber Surveying, Agcnt~. STAFF SOURCE: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner BACKGROUND: The subject property is located south of Taylor Road and west of Mae Richardson Elementary School. This application would create five (5} parcels of land ranging in size from 2,057 square feet to 16,9$8 square feet respectively. Parcel number 5 will retain an existing home and will be further divided in a subsequent Iand use application. FINDINGS: Staff f nds that the tentative subdivision is compliant with code as shown on Attachment "B" subject to the recommended conditions of approval shown below. ISSUES: In considering an approval of this tentative plan approval application, the Planning Department identifies that there are several items worthy of consideration: 1. The Public Works Department is familiar with the project area and has been working with the applicants to complete half-street improvements with the adjoining Jans Court subdivision. The improvements will result in a complete street section to serve both developments. 2. Aright-of--way vacation has been shown on the plat for a portion of Taylor Road. Due to the potential problems associated with reversion of the vacated area, Herb Farber has related to Tozn Humphrey, Community Development Director, that the final plat application will not be submitted to the City until the vacation is completed. EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" -Tentative Plat Exhibit "B" -Planning Department Compliance Table Exhibit "G" -Public Works Department Staff Report Exhibit "D" --• Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "E" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. , approving the tentative subdivision. Johnson Court Subdivision 06067 Johnson Court Staff Report.doc Page 1 of 2 RECONIMENDAT~ON: ~~ppruva~ or fcesoiuraon Ivo., subject to the staff retaorts, eorresponclel~ce fi-c~a~~ age~~cies az~d the conditions of approval. Johnson Court Subdivision ObOb7 Johnson Court Staff Report.doc Page 2 of 2 Eo 0 PINE STREE pN AHASE I GQ (LOP A 9~ VICI~IiTY f41f AP , v E LOT 2 ~ ~¢~ ~ 4~~0 1 A t: G p ~ ~ (\ Na Scal• ~ AGSL w \ Ex SrNC DNCRETE I, PRp s s 2 w ~ Gov e ~ 4 / ~ ~ - \ ~' .°' raNor Roatl $ ~ t2~.SO0 \ " 9 ,, P u R_ ( ~~ ~ ~ 0 R+a;e~t sot, -w -w-w w-v -I _ To s~ AcArea zl.9a' ' zl.c L ~ ' ' e S11~a pln R~ _ ~ - LpT t ~ - Pap7O~fl t9' 4VE~~ ~ _ rUILDING -3594 Sq.It. ~ __.--~ n X EN4ELOPES I z4e 3L4 L.753 124 % 38 76.47 f LOT b I LOT 2 € 6535 Sq. ft. °- x497 5q.n. { - ~ ~ ~ ~ - fz6s eFE , 7].45 ~ _ r ~ ~ \ 97.39 ~ LOT ] _ ap \ ~ I 2057 tiq.ft I ~a ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 7]46 - °i ~ ~ U I ~ ~ c L9T 4 . 6t3o Ssfl. \`~ q. I z9s7 sq~a. ~ ~ ~ R - ~ ~\ ~ L~a~ Q ~ U ~ $ $ ~,~ 99.29 ~ Lor s \ z1~99' \ \ 56988 Sq.ll. ~ ~ \ ~ ~ `\ O I ` n ~ O I .. 126fi SFE---__-.-_ ~ -_ . ........ ....-_ _-~ `~ I Exisnnc` \ HOUSE ~ \ 60 LOT 4 1356t Sq.{t, w m $ u SCALE: !" ~ 30' 70' 0' 30' 9' ix~cf9renen P1ROF683101+AL LANA 9[TAV;YDR ELEGTRO~fIG DOPY OREG99 NLr zd. oa N~RR(R 21ESi AR©[R RENEwA1 DATE 12-]I-97 AssesspRS MAR No. ]7zw19a3-ts9n _+OA.J ~ ~ ~I SHED r- ~ ~ ________ zs• R=' SeraAC ~ C°r 7~ 1 ~Or r F~gCSrONe SL$ s ~r~srON Shle~t f of 1 CSia9 PINE STREET STAriOCF, PHASE 3 LGr , TEN TA TI VE S'JBDlVlSIOIV PLA T JOHNSQN COURT n E LOT i I 2765 Sq-ft. 43.9 L9T z ~ ~ z7da sq.n. o - -~--~ Lp7 ~~ 3 x755 54~1t. t{`E ~_____J H 79.9 0 O~ LOF S U E 27d5 Sq I!- €€ Z O I ___~ ° lil ~ LOT 5 n O I Is7s sq.n. a _. _ _____ ~ i LOT 6 ~ { 2785 Sq.lt. Lw-„_ -.___ - 7g.9 47.9 7 ~ d0 , $ LOr 7 ~ ~~ 2763 Sq.lt. rl -_ 43.9 __- ~ 79,0 ,_ 23.39 a ~ 1167 BG£ x1.90• r ~,\ ~ ~~ LOT 8 \ 92d6 54.11. \ n ~ ryy~ \ LOr r s Iota ttrd in the NORTHEAST ONE' QUARTER OF SECAON YO, 'STING RIGHT CF WAY TAYLOR ROAD TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, Yo aE vACAYEa WILLAAfETTE AIERfDlAN, Cf7Y OF CENTRAL POINT; JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON "- Ex~snNc cuae for -Ei(ISTING 12~ WAIER VNC 80B JOHNSON art d KAROLYNE J JOHNSON 7927 rarLOR Rona Cc'NTRAL POINT, OR8C0[V 97$62 NvTES: - IMPRpVEMENT i+fiTHIN E%i5T3NG 7AYLDR RpAD RIGHT-GF-WqY wSLL 8E COMPLETE UPpN VACATION DF ROADWAY. ~= PRaAOSEO pROPERrr unE ADJUSre_Nr - -= NOlue' Sf"E -ss- = SANITARY Sc"'NER LINT -t«v--~ >n AOI,s"!? LINE" (PGkL) -------= F1rOOD HAZARD AREA-- PAR FE.WA F?Rl! PA;.'EL 4ID09Z GDC1 C, DAiEB JA~tiIIAPY r9, i3&7. 8FE - RASE FLOBB cLE'JA iF.^.N -^LOi 5 IS E%PECFED TO REDEVELOP ?\ i?iE FUTL.RE W`.TU rH"c RESiDENTfgL LA,4E CGuALE>-cD AT ^r;5 rlazE. gDDI:ITIONAL u,Nrrs WILL aE AGDED uPpN RE?uvvAL cF T>~E Exis"^NG s'RUCr,;a_s AND A?PROVAL BY THE CfTY CF CENTRAL PCI,V i. -ZGNG4G IS LOW MI% RESID~N TlA;.^LMR -SM AlLEST LOT IS 2057 sq ft, AVERAGE LOT :S 5479 sq tt -TpTAL ARcA i5 27133 sG Si, or 0.62 ACRES -RESEDENTIAL LANE FO 3E CONSTRUCTED TO hiATCn ,iAN5C0'JR- HALF CF THE ROA3 r4 C:TY 0: C"eNTRAL PCINT StAkaARa5. Surveyad try. FARBER & SONS, INC. dba FARBER SURVEYING (54!) 86'hSSDD PO SOX 5286 a.3r onx srRE"Er cenrraAL enlnrr, ou~coN s7so~ DATE: FEBRUARY 27. 2006. REVS+CN I.IAY 17,2CCfi JCB NO.: t41B-06 DRAWING FfCE: 7035\CEN TpAL POINT\,J(JryN$G`+ TA l'Ld7 p6\ufCRO$:: p'/E'"1, 10NNSON TEkYATIVE.OwC /1 N ~~~1J1 ltVi~EM Il 6S~ ~ 99 PROJECT INPUT Grass Acreage 0.55 Environmental Lands 0.08 Exclusive Employment Areas - Exclusive Civ€c Areas - Right-of-Way 0.07 Net Acreage 0.40 Zoning LM R Minimum Density per Acre 6 Maximum Density per Acre 12 Project Minimum Na. Dwelling Units 2 Maximum No. Dwelling Units 5 Min. No. Dwelling Types 1 Public Works Deparfinent ATTA~HII~El~T " ~ PP Bo~M~erce, Director Matt Samitare, Dev. Services Coord. PUBLIC WORKS ST~4FF REPDRT l 7-May-06 AGENDA ITEM: Dive Lot Subdivision for 37-2W-10AB, Tax Lot I S00 Applicant: Bob and Karolyne Johnson, 1927 Taylor Road, Central Point, OR 97502 Zoning: TOD-LMR Traffic; Based on the Institute of Transportation Engizleers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, a five Iot residential subdivision will generate approximately S.OS peak hour trips (PHT). The City of Central Point typically requires traffic studies for any development that generates more than 25 PHT. No traffic study is warranted for this development. Existing Infrastructure: Water: A twelve inch water line exists in Taylor Road. An eight inch water line has been extened into Jans Ct. Storm Drain: There are existing curbside ditches in Taylor Road and a public storm drain facility has been extended into Tans Ct. Street Section: Taylor Road is a TOD Collector Street. Jans Court is a Minor Residential Street with parking on one side. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: Engineering plans have been approved for construction for the development of Jans Court. The Street has been designed a Minor Residential Street with Parking on the west side. All infrastructure improvements to serve the Jans Court Subdivision and the proposed Johnson Subdivision have been addressed. A Public Works Pez•zxzit was be issued with the approval of the fznal construction drawings. All fees are required to be paid in on a quarterly billing cycle, including inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection tizxze to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and band for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Conditions of Approval: l . Taylor Road Vacation -Prior to the issuance of the final plat for the proposed subdivision the vacation of Taylor Road must be complete. 940 South Third Street ~~ Central Point, OR 97502 •549.664.3321 -~ Fax 541.664.63&4 A~~A~~Mik~N~ d~, ,._._..SY BUILDING DEPARTMENT Lois DeBenedetti, Building O##icial BU1LD1lI1G D,EPARTi1/1PNT STAFF RBPORT DATE: 411 D/06 TO: Planning Department Planning file number:06067 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Johnson Court T1P Name: Karolyne J Johnson Address: 1927 Taylor Rd. City: Central Point State: Or. Zip code: 97502 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Northeast ane quarter section 1 O,Township 37 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian PURPDSiE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. -1- BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Lois QeSenedetti. Building Oflicia{ ~ . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply far all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. if a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the ODSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading! excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ORSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. -2- BU~LD~NG aEPARTMENT Lois DeBenedetEi, Building Official A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building official shall be submitted prior to final of the gradinglexcava#ion permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust contra!, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with the 2005 Oregon Residential Specialty Code should be submitted for each residence upon approval of this application. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. -3- ATTACHIV~ENT " ~- " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU'T'ION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE JOHNSON PLACE SUBDIVISION (Applicant: Karolyz~e Jah~~son) {37 2W 10AB Tax Lot 1500} Recitals I. Applicant(s) has/have submitted application for tentative five lot land division on a 0.62 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account 14142321 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May 23, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 1'7.65, TOD-LMR District B. Chapter 16.10, Tentative Plans Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the fallowing chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.65, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 16.10, relating to required information on plat, processes and the assignment of conditions by the City pertinent to the application. Planning Commission Resolution No. (0512312005) Section 3. Conditional Ap~araval. The applications far tentative land partitian herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth o~i Exhibit "A", being the official staff report attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Con~~x~ission and sig~led by me in authentication of its passage this 23rd day of May, 2000. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 23rd day of May, 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (0512312005) ~~~~~~ ~~~~ t}SE '' wt~Y ry~ t Cc~~kii;r~t~ifylh>>u~l~~~~tur~nli:irc~~tc~r/ P~~>~;i~,tai~~ ~~,t1, P~cl~~;ir_i~;ir<~1<:~. C~1ay 23m '()Uri AGA'~.A ITEM: File: I~lo. 06077 _ __ Consideration afa r'equcst fir Class "!~~' N~?7r~~~r~i-~~rn~in~~ ;ir~ar.~ture t1~°~;i~>>r~trior~ it~- ll~c lz~si<i~~3~i~.~1~(l2 1) ~a~lir~t; :District an Property identified as I"<~~ l:at _"7 21~V O:D~, 4200, (r`~ C.'rater l:~anc~; l.)tlr~ria>>r ] lllyer, pplicant. ~'1'~~I~'I~ ~fJIJRCE: Lisa ~~9a~•gan, Planning Technician BACKGRt`)I.INDc _ _ The applicant proposes to r~~ake an~icl~litic~;r t~, tlrc home i~~cated at 65 C~•ater 1.,,ane. I'retieutly the property is a Class "B~~ L,eral non-carr(<n»~in~, use by dc(-ault ~rz~d has submitted an ;r~~~liiation to ila~e the property reclassified to~4~ Class "A" T,ct~ak r~«r~-c~~r~lori~~iiig use to moveforward with. the additor~. The pause by default is a Class "B" Loral r~atrconforining strr.~cture because afthc single car ~~rracc~. When the house was constructed in 195, a single car garage was canapliar~t ~', ith the req~rircrracrrt at that time. Many of the homes in tlic nt~i~lil7~~r~l~r~~~>d Dave a single car ~,~ r<<<~c: tF~crcli~re ~il~,~~r~~~~iirr thus reclassification would not char~~e the cxistiT~;r clrar~icic~- or be det~°imental to the s~~rroun~~in~~ nc•ighborhaad. Th~.~ subject structure i~ iclenti~tied in the neighborhood ph~?tozrap}~s. (I~.c~l'c-• tar h:~hi~ait "1~"~) The present cc~lc r~;quires two off street covered parking spaces far sir~;~ic fiu>>ily residc~lcc~5. lw3ecause o~f the size of the lot and location of the existing strict ur-e, the applic,~rlt ~x ~ Auld not be able to provide an additional cavered parlcin~ srrace on the side yard ar~d ~rrect the b~.rildir~ ~~thacs. The current siele r and sutl.~ttck on the gar<r~~~; side is 8'. To add ari a~lclitional l~ariLi~~`r spay;; c,i the garage would z-ecl~iirc approximately 9 more feet. The current side yard s~ak~ack tar This zal~ing district is 5' for the first 1 ~ " in height. There have been two other reclassi(icatitrn applications su>aa~iiited far property located o~~ this street, Both applications were approved. The proposed addition is in accordance with ail ether applicable caries far lot coverage, setbacks and height. (Refer to Exhibit `C'") l~ k 1 `~ ~P l i '~ ~3 ~~ 'hl>c rpt~~licat~tas Endings atl~ret (I~~f'~~~ to >t?<~.hihit "A"~ address the approval criteria. far a recla~si licatian as set.. forth in S~:ction 17.56.030 which state that "all rzoncaanfaarmin~- uses and structures witlairr lrzc~ City of C"entr~al ~'vint shall be classifred as either C"lars A c~r~ Class 73 na~r~a~onfc~rmin~- uses, aCa;a~rClr~?~ to tha~,fa~llou~rt a:riter°ia~ ". The applicant has done a satisfactory job of addressing the criteria, which Planning staff concurs with, staff findrngs can be faund an ExhxbYt «D~~ 65 Crater Lane Reclassification Page 1 of 2 EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" -Applicants' Caz7respozader-ce/Findings Exhibit "B" -Neighborhood photographs Exhibit "C" -Applicants' Site Plan Exhibit "D" _ Staff Findings Exhibit "E" -~ Building Department Addition Requirements Exhibit "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of a request for a Class `A' Legal noncozzfarming designation for the existing structure located at 37 2W 03DA, Tax Lot 4200 also known as 6S Crater Lane. 1.) Consideration of Resolution No. ,Approving the Reclassification of the existing home. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. 65 Crater Lane Reclassification Page 2 of 2 ATTAGHME~T ".~^" In res once to 17.56.030 "Classification Criteria" 1. Continued usa e of the existin > ro ert will not he contrar to ublic health safet or welfare to the s irit of this title. This is a residential site and is used as a single family dwellin 2. The continued maintenance and use of the ro ert will not de Tess the value of ad'acent ro erties nor will it interfere with the future ossible develo meat of the homes. 3. The use of the structure was lawful at the time of its ince tion and it has not and will not serve as an hin but a sin le faznil dwellin . 4. The ro ert is not surrounded b an area in which there could be ma'or rowth this is an established nei hborhood. This nei hborhood is not reasonabl e~ ected to o under develo ment durin the nest five ears. 5. The ro ert is structural) sound and well maintained. The ro ert is oecu led and used for a sin le famil dwellin its on final intent. 6. Continuance of this nonconformin use will not in an wa dela or obstruct the develo ment or establishment of an ad'acent ro ert or ro erties. To whom it may concern, I am wanting to add apprax 400 square feet to the back northern portion of my home. We will be extending out one of our rooms to make it a master bedroom with full bath. This will by no means affect parking on our street and will still leave my RV parking available. This addition will up the value of any home as well as the other houses in the neighborhood. Most of the addition will be in the very back and will not disrupt the normal neighborhood type housing look. Please accept my request for this addition. Thank You w ;~ ~ ~~" ~~~ i6 ~~ 9~ . u ~~~ ; ~y,,~' li ,., .y", ~',/ ~', Ali,, ~W ~'` I~ 1,i~ ~'~ ~ ., W ~, ~' „a. a N ~:: "a „' !,,, m i, W~ ~ ~ ,li M, W I ' p, P M N ~ ~ ',', i ~ /, ' ,, ~ ~ '~~ Y ~~~~~~ u'u 1 J'~, k I r l 1 ~, ,. ~ A°. ~ „~ ~ I J ~ ~'~) ~ ., ~ , I ~ ~ m ~,Y ^ ~ 1x „, ., b~ ~ .. ~ w . r, w~ ,. ~' ~ re1 .;, ^~ ,, i ., ~ ~ ., ,~,~~ w" ~ rt, b ^ ~ ~ ~, , ~~, ~ w " r'„ ' ~v ~ ', "v"''~~, rr,; ~ ?,,',.' .,,, I" fir' No M Y, o~ .,, d o. i~,e~l, ~ ., ~ M ~, ~ ~, ~1~ ~~.~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ W ~~,~. i ~ ~„ ~ n _r> -"_ __ `tea- - ~ ~~ ~ --_ g 4, ^,~ ~ ~" ~ ',/'~ nr i ~;',; 1,'' "~ M P~~ i l' ~„I:''w"~ P"I I'e N Nm N rvi r "~ Vi ~ °~'"d x~ ,~, i ~', ~ '^ d .. ' 1 ~ ~"^ ~ ,. w,., p., a-, ., .. ~, ~ ~ ., ~ ,., ~„ ^ ` ., . a ., ;. :, ~~~, " ~c ~~~~ ~^ w ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ ~ ~ . i i . :' ,,,, w ~ ~ .,: v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ^ ~, a~ ', .,, '"n, a".;.o. r ,s„ ~ ~ r iV ~ 1 ~Y~~l ., ,+, ~'~„ ~:,ry ~~~~ ~ d,~ m.'? ^ ^ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ i ~' ,~ ~. ~ i ", , , i ~ i m ,. "„ '' ~,~ ~ m i m.'.. ~ o ~~ ~ .. ~ d.. .. ~^,. ~. .~ ~. r... fir. ~.. ~?I ~- Z W H ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ,,. _. ~ ~ :~ .~` c ~ 1~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ .~: _. ~~~ ,..~.. ~~ ~- . , ._M., , ,/ ~~~~.} _~ 4~~~~~.~ _~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~'~ -~ ~~ ~-~ ~v ..._...~.._~.. s-~- ~~~ ~c~~j~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~-. ~~ 1~ r! ~~~~~ i ~~ >> ATTACHMENT " ~ " Staff Findings Reclassification Application Applicant: Darnion Hillyer Property Address: 65 Crater Lane Central Point Munici al Code Classification Criteria 17.56.030 {A) All nonconforming uses and structures zc~ithin tJ1e Cii-y of Central Point shall be classified as either Class A or Class B noncon rmin uses, accordin to the ollourin criteria: 17.56.030 (A) (1) Continuance of the existing use or structure would not be contrary to the public health, Safetlf OY zE7elfare, aY t0 the spirit of this title; Findings: The existing home will continue to be used as a residence. Most of the homes located on Crater Lane have single car garages and therefore the reclassification to build an addition would not be contrary to public health, safety or welfare and meets the s lilt and ur ose of this title. 17.56.030 {A) (2) The continued maintenance and use of the nonconforming propertl~ is not likely to depress the values of adjacent or nearby properties, nor adversely affect their development potential in conformance u1ith present zoning; Findings: The applicant wanting to build an addition to the existing home demonstrates the willingness for continued maintenance of the property. With two other reclassification applications being approved on this street, approval of this application would not depress the values of adjacent ar nearby properties, and if fact contribute to increasing the value of homes vn Crater Lane. Since other properties are adding to their existing homes in the immediate neighborhood, it is unlikely that approving this application would adversel affect an o#ential new develo rnent. 17.56.030 {A} (3) The use or structure zoos lawful at the time of its inception and no useful purpose would be served by strict application of the provisions or requirements of this chapter with which the use ar structure does not conform; Findings: This home was built in 1959, as most of the homes built on this street. At the time only single car garages were required, therefore was Iawful at the time it was constructed. 17.56.030 (A) (4} The property is not predominately surrounded by conforming uses or structures and, considering current rozi~th and develo ment trends is not reasonabIi ex ected to ~ - ~ .. came to development pressures during the next f-rzie dears; Findings: Since other homes on this street are adding on. to their existing homes, it is very likely that other homes on this street gill do the same thing, rather than redevelo in . 17.56.030 (A) {5} The properh~ is structurallp sound, zoell-maintained, and occupied and used far the purpose for z~~hich is zi~as designed; Findings: The building department will require proof that the existing home is structurally sound and adequate #o build an addition. The addition will add to existing living area, and will continue to be used as a sin Ie famiI residence. 17.56.030 (A) (6) Continuance of this nonconforming use zoill not in and ula~ delay or obstruct the development or establishment of conforming uses on tyre subject properh~ or an and adjacent ar nearby properties in accordance zoith the provisions of the zoning ordinance; Findings: The proposed addition meets the setback and lot coverage requiremen#s as required under CPMC 17.20, and will not obstruct development on adjacent ro ernes. ATTACHMENT " City of Central Paint, Oregon 1 AQ So.Third 5t., Central Point, Or 975D~ 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.eentra{-point.ar.us Building Depar~.ment Lois aet3enedetti, E3uildinc~ C)fftcial CITY OF CENTRAL POINT BI.JILDING D~PARTN~ENT A GUIDE FOR SUBMITTING PLANS FOR ADDITIONS TO A I2.ESIDENCE This pamphlet provides guidelines for contractors and homeowners coa~structiz~g an addition to a residence that if followed, will make plan submittal and permit issuance a more streamlined process. Listed below axe the types of permits that maybe required depending upon the complexity of the project: • A buiCditzg permit is required for the construction of the structural elerr>ents of the addition. + An electrical permit is required for all electrical installations. • A mechanical permit is required far installations of all elements and appliances associated with heating and air conditioning or ventilation. • A plumbing permit is required for the installation of all elements and appliances associated with plumbing. WHERE TO APPLY FOR PERMITS Apply for permits at the Building Department located at I40 S. Third Street, Central Point, 97502. Office hours are Monday through. Friday 9:04 a.rn. to 5:44 p.m.; telephone number is (541) 669-6325 ext. 250. WHAT T4 ~3RING FOR THE PERM~'T APPI,IGATIO-N Three copies of the addition's drawings z~rlust be submitted izli ink. All structural and architectural elements must be completely detailed and included on a comprehensive set of plans. The drawings must be to scale showing all dimensions. The minimum acceptable scale is 1I$ inch = 1 foot. The following information must be included, if applicable: • Plot Plan Floor Plan (show dimensions, header sizes, etc • Elevations (front, sides, and rear) • Foundation Detail and WaII Section • Roof Plan/Truss Plan SEE THE ATTACHED DETAIL AMID INFORMATION WREN AND WHERE TO CALL FOR INSPECTIONS It is the responsibility of the permit holder or the permit holder's representative to notify the City of Central Point Building Department when the stages of constriction are reached that require inspections. The automated inspection request telephone number is (541} bG4-0700. This number can be reached 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. T'YFICAL REQUIRED INSPECTI©NS • Foundation Inspections {before concrete is placed} • Rough Plumbing Inspection Floor Joist Inspection Underfloor Mechanical Inspection Rough Electrical inspection Topout Plumbing Inspection Frame and Mechanical Inspection • Final Electrical Inspection Final Plumbing Inspection Final Building and 1Vlechanical Inspection Residentia3 Additions Handout-Revised 01106 2 r--- ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ NSW A~71~i0N ~OOi` l.ii~ ~LI?ING l.il~ ._ - - -- - l CONC. AWRY i ~o~ p~ ~~ ~~~ p~~ r~-~~r Illl GREG DR. Ci;NTRAL POINT, 4R 9754Z~ GR.~G DR. 3 f I i .~ ?~ 150' g~_~~~ i~" x 2~" ~~oo~ ~c~~s ~aU~n~t~lOi~ p~~ LOOK I7~AM r 1 l I~~f3.oo~ 11~N€LAt1QN- ~o ~ov~r~ ~~ iso o~ l N4~~.00~ AAA IN V~E~ktk.A110N 5~~ 31~'1CA1, ~01,~7A310N f~3AlL ~ ~0~ M0~ If~o~MA~ION - ~ PPE ~`5 OR 6 p~Q~l~~ ~~"RIL ~0~ A~nl~10N5 2" X 8" ~M .10{53 C3i.f'GK 6 M~.. VISQl.~N l I l z" x B" ~~oo~ .~o~s3s ~ 2~" o/ C ._._. _ _ J 2" X 8" ~lM JOf53 26 --___._..._. 4 REVISED BY - GRS DATE - 01 /24!06 ATTACHMENT " ~ " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL FORA "TYPE A NONCONFORMING USE CLASSIFICATION" FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE WITH PRE- EXISTING COVERED OFF-STREET LIMITATIONS (Applicant {s} : Damion Hillyer} {37 2W 03DA, Tax Lot 4200 - 65 Crater Lane} Recitals 1. Applicant resides in a single family residential structure where a single car garage met the minimum off street parking requirement at time of construction. Present code requires that off- street covered parking be upgraded to present standard when building is enlarged. Applicant has requested to have the existing home recIassif ed to a Type "A" nonconforming use as a remedy for the 0.17 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account 10138840 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. The reclassification will allow the single family residential structure to be expanded with the present conditions since the findings of record demonstrate that present site conditions are inadequate to accommodate additional off street covered parking. 2. On, May 23rd, 2006, the Central Paint Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading B. Chapter 17.56, Nonconforming Uses Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.64, relating to parking requirements when structures are enlarged, required number ofoff-street parking spaces. Planning Commission Resolution No. {0512312006} ~~ B. Chapter 17.56, relating to the criteria for which a reclassification to a Class "A" nonconforming use may be granted. Section 3. Conditional_~pproval. The applications for reclassification of an existing structure herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under autharity of CPMC Chapter 1'x.55. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by zne in authentication of its passage this day of May, 200G. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (0512312005)