Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet - May 2, 2006
~-. •\ CENTRAL POINT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 2, 2006 - 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 691 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Mack Lewis, Chuck Piland, and Wayne Riggs. III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of April 4, 2006, Planning Commission Minutes. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS Pgs. 1.13 A. A public meeting to review a Site Plan application for the purpose of allowing the construction and operation of an Industrial Park in phases. The proposed development is within the M-l, Industrial zoning district. The subject parcel is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W OlBD, Tax Lots 300, 400 and 700. The property is located at 4595, 4611 and 4625 Table Rock Road. File No.: 06025 (Continued) Pgs. 14 - 24 B. A public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating three individual parcels. The subject property is located in a C-4, Tourist & Office Professional Zoning District, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 2100. The subj ect property is located on East Pine Street, west of Hamrick Road, and east of Interstate 5. File No.: 06053 (Continued) Pgs. 2s - 43 C. A public hearing to review Tentative Plan and Planned Unit Development applications for the purpose of creating a subdivision consisting of 24 dwelling units (within 12 buildings), a playground and an existing home. The subject property is located in an R-3, Residential Multiple zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1400 & 1500. The addresses are 737 & 745 Hopkins Road and are located east of Freeman Road, west of Briarwood Drive, north of Hopkins Road. File No.: 06060 PC050206 Pgs. 44 - 6s D. A public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating a subdividision consisting of eight (8) single family residential lots. The subject property is located in an R-1-10, Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 36S 2W 35DD, Tax Lot 1100. The address is 5238 Gebhard Road and is located south of Wilson Road, west of Hamrick Road, north of Rabun Way. File No.: 06054 Pgs. 66 - 82 E. A public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating four (4) single family residential lots. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessors map as 37S 2W 03AD, Tax Lot 3000. the address is 1015 N. Tenth Street and is located north of Kings Court, west of Tenth Street, each of Crest Drive. File No.: 06071 Pgs. 83 - 128 F. A public hearing to consider a legislative Land Use Regulation amendment to Title 16 and Title 17 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code and to formulate a recommendation for the City Council to review these amendments on May 11, 2006. VI. MISCELLANEOUS VII. ADJOURNMENT PC050206 Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 2006 Page 1 City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 2006 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORllER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Chuck Piland, Damian Idiart, Wayne Riggs and Candy Fish were present. Chairperson Connie Moczygemba and Commissioner Mack Lewis were absent. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; Lisa Morgan, Plamiuig Technician; Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary; and Matt Samitore, Development Services Coorduiator. HI. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. Tom Humphrey advised the Plannuig Commission that Scott Mangold had resigned as a Planning Commissioner. Mr. Humphrey also advised the commissioners that the meeting was being video- streamed onto the City of Central Point website. IV. MINUTES Damian Idiart made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 7, 2006 Planning Commission meeting. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion: ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. File No.: 05050 (continued) A public meeting to review a request to amend a previously approved Tentative Plan application for Phase I of Twin Creek Crossing subdivision. The amendment would create a total of 26 lots that would be consistent with the approved Twin Creeks Master Plan. The subject project area is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 3C, Tax Lot(s) 100, 203 & 204 and 37S 2W 3B, Tax Lot 100. The property is located south of Scenic Avenue, north of Taylor Road, east of Grant Road, and west of US Highway 99. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician, presented an overview of the staff report for this application which Planning Commission Minutes Apri14, 2006 Page 2 remained unchanged from the March 7, 2006 Planning Conunission meeting, stating that the modifications contained therein were consistent with the master plan for the project. She presented revised conditions of approval which included a third condition to submit a construction traffic map/plan approved by the Public Works Department and the Police Department. This map is to be updated as development occurs or changes in conditions arise. The Developer/Applicant and City mutually alu-eed to this condition. Lisa presented findings in response to concerns raised at the March 7, 2006 Planning Commission meeting. Herb Farber, Surveyor, presented a written rebuttal to statements made at the March 7, 2006 meeting concerning safety issues within the project and gave oral testimony as well. Applicant Bret Moore also spoke and stated that safety concerns are a high priority and are taken seriously. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Commissioner Riggs asked if the Planning Commission wanted to have construction traffic map/plans placed as a condition on all future developments. Nothing conclusive was decided at this time. Damian Idiart made a motion to adopt Resolution 689 modifying the original Tentative Plan for Phase I of Twin Creeks Crossing, with the revised conditions of approval as presented in Exhibit C. Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. B. File No.: 06025 A public meeting to review a Site Plan application for the purpose of allowing the construction and operation of an Industrial Parkin phases. The proposed development is within the M-l, Industrial zoning district. The subject parcel is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W OlBD, Tax Lots 300, 400 and 700. The property is located at 4595, 4611 and 4625 Table Rock Road. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented a staff report and requested site plan approval for this development. Commissioners and staff discussed concerns with the location of easements, placement of structures, demolition permit, noise, lot line adjustments and parking. A neighboring property owner came forward with concerns about parking and trash receptacles in the existing easement between his business and that of Peugh Industrial. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Tom Humphrey suggested the public hearing be continued until May 2, 2006 in order to give the applicant an opportunity to resolve the issues presented and to appear for this public hearing. Candy Fish made a motion to continue the hearing until May 2, 2006. Damian Idiart seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. C. File No.: 06053 A public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating three individual parcels. The subject property is located in a C-4, Tourist & Office Professional Zoning District, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W Planning Comrnissiorr Minutes ApYt14, 2006 Page 3 02D, Tax Lot 2100. The subject property is located on Fast Pine Street, west of Hamrick Road, and east of Interstate 5. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, requested a continuance of this public hearing. He stated the applicant had submitted a written request to continue this item to the May 2, 2006 Planning Commission meeting to allow additional time to resolve the issue of a road to the property. Damian Idiart made a motion to continue the public hearing on Bear Bridge Commercial Subdivision. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. D. File No.: 06072 A public meeting to review a Site Plan application for the purpose of allowing the construction and operation of a telecommunications site within Mt. View Plaza. The proposed site is within the C-4, Tourist & Office Professional zoning district. There were no conflicts or ex parte commmunications to disclose. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the staff report on the site plan review for the construction and operation of a telecommunications site withui Mt. View Plaza. He stated that the project meets all of the criteria for this type of application, subject to conditions relating to structure color, landscaping and a recommendation that a navigational beacon not be installed unless required by law. John Blackhurst, attorney for U.S. Cellular, appeared and presented a paint chip for consideration and approval by the Planning Commission. The applicant stated that the premises are well secured. A neighbor testified that she had no objection to the placement of the tower. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Damian Idiart made a motion to approve Resolution No. 690 for the construction of a telecommunications tower in the Mt. View Plaza area with the conditions set forth in Exhibit E. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. The Planning Commission took a break from 8:35 - 8:40 p.m. E. File No.: CP06-02-14 A Public hearing hearing to consider a legislative Land Use Regulation amendment and creation of a new Land Use Regulation. The Planning Commission is to formulate a recommendation for the City Council to review these amendments on April 13, 2006. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, presented the Planning Commission with code amendments and administrative procedure amendments. The purpose of the amendments is to clarify and streamline the public hearing process and make it easier and more understandable for commissioners and applicants. Certain application procedures are handled directly by staff in an attempt to expedite the process. Plan~aing Conzmzssio~z Minutes April 4, 2006 Page 4 Other procedures that require notice to the public or contain issues that would need to be resolved, would be handled by the Planning Commission. The appeal process has been clarified from decisions made by either staff or the Planning Commission. Discussion ensued concerning inconsistencies with the TOD district and what types of applications would be forwarded to the Planning Commission, posting of notices of decision to the City of Central Point website and how applications with issues would be handled. It was determined by the Planning Commission that anyone who signs in and gives oral testimony at a Planning Commission meeting is deemed to have given "written comment". Damian Idiart made a motion to forward the code amendments with revisions as discussed to the City Council for approval. Wa}me Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, reported that plans to expand the current Urban Growth Boundary are proceeding forward and stated that the State of Oregon had consented to the City of Central Point doing a 10-year projection and that the City would be moving into less controversial directions with the expansion to likely take place in the Wilson Road, Grant Road and Expo areas of the City. IX. ADJOURNMENT Damian Idiart made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. Meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the Apri14, 2006 Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 2, 2006. Planning Commission Chair ti i ~~I 1,1 i` 1 't ~~ 1~s ii..~li. i l ~ ~,~t ot'nii,~,nit~ I - 1~<~ir~~nn~~ni I)ir~=~ ic~i/ ST.A.~~'~'' ~~~:11'i~..IRT May 2, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: Continuation of a Site Plan R cview to consider an industrial p. + rk development in the lndx ~ , i ~ it ~ 1 (M-1) Zoning District on Property Identified as 37 2W 01BD, Tax Lots 300,400 and 700 along T;,bl~.~ Rock Road; Dennis & Edith Peugh, Applicants (Abeloe & Associates, Agent). STAFF SOURCE: Tom Humphrey AICP, Commu~~iy Development Director BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the previous Planning Cori a rni,, ~ .on meeting after a neighbo r ~: ~I~ ressed concern about losing access to his property because of obstructions created by the new develop~~ient. The legal disposition of a road easement was questioned but neither staff nor the Commission were able to resolve the issue at that time. The City annexed this property earlier in the year so that the owner could develop in Central Point, work directly with the City Departments and also take advantage of Central Paint services. Since the last meeting, the applicant provided warranty deed information that confirms the existence of a SO foot wide area on Tax Lot 700 that has been set aside for road purposes. This is illustrated by the dashed lines on Attachment A. This area along with a 12 foot easement that crosses an adjoining parcel provides access to tax lots 800 and 1200 which are owned by Jackie Newby. Amore recent agreement has been recorded which allows for `cross-access' among the various phases of the Peugh Industrial Park but it was not intended to serve other tax lots. The alder 50 foot `easement' may affect the development of Phases 3 and 4 as originally proposed but it does not appear to affect the development of Phases 1 and 2. Therefore, the owner has asked that the Commission consider only phases 1 and 2 at this time (see Attachment B). The existing building on tax lot 400 would remain but be reduced in size to provide limited storage. A cabinet shop operates from the older building but will relocate once new buildings are constructed. The applicant intends to use the old building until the later phases are reconsidered and developed (see Attachment A; revised site plan). FINDINGS: The applicant's revised site plan (Attachment "A") can adequately meet all approval criteria as set forth in Section 1'7.44.020 provided the conditions of approval (Attachment E) are implemented. ISSUES: In considering an approval of this site plan application, the Planning Department has addressed the following issues 1. The tax lots in question have numerous recorded access easements that are intended to benefit adjoining properties and/or the development site exclusively. Approval of phases 1 & 2 will not be in conflict with any of the recorded easements. The applicant has agreed to submit a separate Peugh Industrial Park 06025b Page l of 2 application for phases 3 & 4 at which time he expects to resolve access to the adjoining properties. 2. The existing structure on the project site is intended to be partially demolished in order to continue using it for storage. Part of it needs to be demolished in order for the new circulation plan in Attachment A to work correctly. As a condition of approval (Attachment E), the applicant will be required to obtain a building permit to demolish the building in whole or in part. 3. The landscape plan that was submitted to the Planning Department is not easily readable and appears to be inconsistent with the overall layout of the project site. The City will need a copy of the landscape plan that can be evaluated and a condition has been recommended. EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" -Site Plan Maps, Aerial Photograph Exhibit "B" -Correspondence from the Applicant and his Agent Exhibit "C" -Public Works Memorandum Exhibit "D" -Correspondence from Jackson County, RVSS and Fire District Exhibit "E" -Planning Department Conditions of Approval Exhibit "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. ,approving the Site Plan RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. Peugh Industrial Park 06025b Page 2 of 2 2 ~,~.,.r ----+- W ~ Q ~~ spun <K~.51 1 ~i o~. }e. Extsmis BUIlDIN6 su _ t____ -o ' Ma.6s' PHASE I I ; BUILDING ; I+cc M hfw~ ~ i 1 YM~ 0 ~ I c =_ I 1 may" 1 _ _" _~ __to'r~+'i ______-{ _~_ _-- I h_I___ 11 I II I _r___ s ~nr+"r 4l.1YNrlllry i 1 II 1 R~~~ 4.tw'" I 1 I 1 1 ; I I t ~ 11 I I 11 I II 1 ~ I I 1 IN i~ 1 i I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I _J.~1 _A-__ iI -i. Ye,ir /.o•.wi 51TE PLAN PHASEIt II wwm rla r•row Tv7 ~. IiaW, of tYu Ylp LaT4 °YlYOi iYO LYa 1 h 1 11 ~ .-" ~ ~ iE II 1 )ING N, 1 1 . v' 1 1 ~ 1Y 1 I~ 1 a I ~~~ ~ ~ ~, 1 ~ ~I ~ ~ ~~~ ' ° os ~ ~ ~ L 1I1 ~ 4~~ m~ <~ ~ ~I le 1 1 fl 1 1 ~~ ' 1 I -''~ 'l l Th•-/'INIMN~D N1s¢L >•IpNG ~- "~ __.__ NoKr H ILL ~Il~or - Q ~~~ ~ ~ P •'/ 3 .wNlrrAa. oATnf nl CrYY1CW ~ AHNGY ~e ua. w~s~e.~T V "'1 y~_y 11 OMWIN6 LTANL SITE REVIEYI A5102 ~, , /~ ~ --~-E~,, ~~~~~~1Vi~1 ~A~ LL 99 Dennis Peugh 733 Crlenn Way Central Point, {)R 97502 ~prii i 4, 2006 Torn Humphrey Planning Department City of Central Point 155 So. Second Central Point, C3R 97502 Re: Peutih Industrial Park Regarding pending approval of site plans at May meeting, ifyou are unable to approve all phases, then I would like for you to approve Phase 1 and 2, if possible. Then we will -make chanties to the plans or wwhatever is necessary for phases 3 and 4 for a later meeting. ~inCef ~~%> 11 l „~fi De ~s Peugh 5 C14J 171 LCJ CIb YJ tS: LCI m'il' f.3 r-}-'Jn 7J HC~GLIJG HLI'~IlIY I"t-il~t YJLt rJ3 ~~L~O~ C3G A~~aC1A I ~ti7'y tyi~`~i~ll~~~T, ri,.~.A. ARCHIT~C7UR~ D PLANNING O M~MQRANDUM INTERIOR DESIGN ~ Pa 1 ~f Date: ~~R~~ }~ ~ ~ 240Co ~ i'roject Na: To; ~~ ~R~-+C.~Id.~ ~ •Pr~jeck; from: g~Ut%~ ~-~l.G~ Subject ~ ~l INCU3+'{'T~1~t1.. P CC. N i ~ ~~ ~ T u ~ MESSAGE: ~. ~~~sT `~~ ~~w LNG ~ .. ! . `I'~t'~ 3ht~ _ ~ tEi1,~J FGR Nti4`~ ~ ~__ 2 ~ tv W t t.t..~~_ ,~R P~b.~ a~ i~1P -- a ~NL'f . '~4~ ~iT~ t't..o+r.a ~A4 ~t-4~c5~ t~'l. i5 ~7Tt~,}414~,~?~~ ",~.~ ~, Its ~~~~ ~tt~ _._~?~ --~~~iN +~~LI C~tq.~ ~' .r.. t.:.~t~ ~ ~ I~F~ ~ ~~ .~ 5 t~~ ~ try. ~ ~Vt APP ~• 1 t.1~ ~ . S ~ ~~ '1~#'G I ~,11~ ~ W 1 tz.r ~. ~ _ iZfi3~1Lt~ -~ Lob~O t i~li ' ~?~~ L-o~itTt ~Q.~ ~ ~t~~` ~~,~ ~sca~ t ~c a.ot~~ faei~5~ • B27 ALDER CREAK DRf~lE (5~1) 734-3858 MED~'QRD, ~R 975D4 772-G989 Y whn11 _L .t-./\~f~~t~~ .,....., ~AY• 1~~-t\7~n ~~~~ ~y ~= ~` AT1"ACHME~l1" " "~ 9f ~.~.~.. Bob Pierce, Director Public Works De artment ~'~~ ~` 1~ ~~~~-~-~ X ~ Matt Samitore, Development Services Public works Department MEMORANDUM TO: PL~~T~NING DEPARTMENT FROM: MATT SAMITORE SUBJECT: PEUGH INDUSTRIAL PARK DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2006 Planning Department: The Public Works Department has reviewed and approved the Civil Improvement Drawings for the Peugh Industrial Park submitted by Hardey Engineering in December 2005/January 2006. The plans were submitted when the development was to be built under County jurisdicition. The civil improvements will not change substantialy now that the development is being processed under City standards. The plans are in compliance with Public Works Standards for an Industrial Park. 140 South Third Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 7 1~~lr~.niulituuairvlill 1U; 44 ~n~,nauly uuul~ai7 nu~~,1J~ ran 1vv, X41 ll4 DLyu ~~~~~~~~ -- _~ JACKSON COUNTY xoQas February 28, 2006 Attention: visa Morgan City of Central Point Planning 115 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97602 Rows r, uui ~~ Frlc Nlezneyer, PE TY~a~c & Develapmeut Engineer 200 Antelope Roed White City, OR 97503 Phone:(841)774-8230 Fa~c (541) 774-6295 niameyell~j acksoncou rdy. o rg www.jacksoncounty.org RE: Peugh Industrial Park off Table Rock Road - acounty-maintained road. Planning File: 06025. Dear Lisa: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application for approval of the Peugh Industrial Park. The property is located at 4595, 4611, and 4625 Table Rock Road. Roads and Parks has the faiiowing comments: A Commercial Road Approach Permit from Jackson County Roads is required for any new or improved driveways off Table Rack Road. 2, Utility Permits are required from Roads and Parks for any utility work within the county road right-of--way. 3. The applicant needs to provide a hydraulic report and plan for review and approval by Jackson County Roads. Storm Drainage to Table Rack Road is limited to that area currently draining to the roadside ditch. Please contact Nancy Coates of Jackson County Roads at 774-6261 ar a drainage basin map. 4. After construction, the developer's engineer shall certify that the construction of the controlled storm water release drainage system was constructed per plan. A copy of the certification shat[ be sent to Jackson County Roads. Sinc rel , Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer . .,, ~ • ~v~~t~ ~~jy~8 1:\Engineering\DevelopmentlClTfES\CNTR1,PllOS025.wpd ii b1l 1'1/ 1~J~Jb 1'1:5'1 ~~~,EY SEW,~~~ ~. b41-bb41111 KV~; NAGE GJ5/F~:i R4C~JE VALLEY SEWER SER1/~GES Locution 13$ West Vilas Road, Central Point - Mailing Addross: P,O. R<>x 313q, C~:ntnil Ppint,OR 97502-(HH15 Tel. (541) 6G4~fi300 or (541) 7794144 FAX (SA1 j 6G4-7171 www,RVSS_us January 5, 2006 Ken Gerschler FAX 664-6384 City of Central Point Planning Department- 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Site Plan review for Peugh Development, File #'Q6025 There is an 8 inch sewer main along the East boundary of Tax Lot 700 and the East half of the South boundary of Tax Lot 400. The existing building on Tax Lot 400 is connected to this main line. There is also an 8 inch main line on Table Rock Road with a service sfiub to Tax Lot 400. The existing connection must be located and sealed when the building is removed. Sewer service to the new buildings will require connections to the existing main lines. Individual buildings can share service lines provided the services are adequately sized and the buildings are located on the same tax lot. The existing service stubs can be used if they are conveniently located, or new connections to the main line can be made. each new connection will require a permit from RVS and payment of related development fees. The property is within the NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Quality management area and must comply with relevant stormwater quality guidelines. The applicant must submit a stvrmwater plan demonstrating compliance with these guidelines. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, `~~ Carl Tappert, Pl_ District Engineer K:~DATA\Agcncics\CENTPT~'LANNG\Sixe~laz~Review\200C1Q6025-Peugh Industrial Park.doc a~ ~~ -----Febru-ary-~~; 2005- City of Central Point Planning Fire District #3 comments: Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road ~~~°.~st;°~~ White Ci OR 97503-1075 `~~ ,~~~? (541) 826- 00 (voice) (541 826-4566 fax ''9F ~ P~~~ ~~ ) ( ) ApgR~p~ "An InternationaayAccredited Fire Department" '°t<;~a''~ Project# 06025 Peugh Industrial Park • I will need to review a larger scale plan to make comments Mark Moran DFM ~_ ATTACHMENT E PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Peut=h Industrial Park. FILE 06025 CHECK NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION BOX 1 of 3 The applicant is required to modify or remove any existing structures on site in order to facilitate construction, parking and circulation in Phases 1 and 2 of the a roved site lan. 2 of 3 The applicant is required to apply for and obtain a demolition permit from the Central Point Building Department to modify or remove any existing structures on site. 3 of 3 The applicant shall provide legible copies of the landscape and irrigation plans to the City Planning Department for review prior to issuance of a building permit. The vegetation in the landscape plan must be consistent with trees and shrubbery typically used in Central Point and listed in local standards. \\SERVERZILLA\PL\2006 LAND USE FILES\06025 PEUGH INDUSTRIAL PARK ANNEXATION & SP\06025SPRCOA.DOC 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A TWO PHASE INDUSTRIAL PARK (Applicant (s): Peugh Industrial Park) (37 2W O1BD, Tax Lots 300, 400 & 700) Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted an application for site plan approval on three (3) parcels with a total area of 3.33 acres located west of Table Rock Road on property identified by Jackson County as Accounts 10195078, 10195060 and 10195094 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May 2, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.48, M-1, Industrial District B. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.48, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.72, relating to Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan approval. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan permit is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006) 12 this _2ndday of May ATTEST: City Representative 2006. Planning Commission Chair Approved by me this 2nd day of May , 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006) 13 4 ,.. Aµa~ ~ ~~„"^ ~ (oin 11~ii~~ ii7rt~y,Al( ~ `" ~ {,rniruniity i k~vc~lo~3i+~+ ni I?ircr t<~r1 l?~„isiaui („„{iy I~~Ii~I111iSSiral~>~' STAIL'~~' ~I"~I2T May 2, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: Planning Commission review of tentative subdivision. application for a commercial para. within. the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional Zoning District on property identified as Tax Lot 37 2W 02D, 2100; Bear Bridge LLC, Applicant. (Hoffbuhr and.. Associates, Agent) STAFF SOURCE: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner This application was continued at the request of the applicant at the April 4t" meeting to allow issues to be resolved with the Public Works Department. The subject property is located south of Pine Street and east of Bear Creek in the Layton Business Park. This application would create two (2) parcels of land of 0.75 and 2.03 acres respectively. Parcel number 1 will be for the Sonic restaurant for which a building permit has been issued. FINDINGS: Staff finds that the tentative partition is compliant with code subject to the recommended conditions of approval shown below. ISSUES: In considering an approval of this tentative plan approval application, the Planning Department identifies that there are several items worthy of consideration: 1. The Public Works Department is familiar with the project area and the pending Sonic restaurant and has determined that a traffic study will not be required. Traffic movements will be limited as identified in the Public Works Staff report. 2. Jackson County Roads and Parks will require a copy of development plans. 3. A lot line adjustment has been shown between parcel 1 and the adjoining parcel to the west. The Planning Department will require that the applicant file an application to adjust the line before proceeding with the final plat. 4. Parcel 2 may potentially be affected by the alignment of a new east-west road that will eventually connect Hamrick Road to Peninger Road. The road will be an issue to be discussed when parcel 2 is further divided in a future land use application. Bear Bridge Partition 06053.doc Page 1 of 2 EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" -Tentative Plat Exhibit "B" -Public Works Department Staff Report Exhibit "C" -Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "D"- Jackson County Roads Correspondence Exhibit "E" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. _, approving the tentative subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No., subject to the staff reports, correspondence from agencies and the conditions of approval. ~~ Bear Bridge Partition 06053.doc Page 2 of 2 ~",.d'" csn~ s ~ tl'a Sou°t tuhdP~a~ y 111met, wagon ?owr+ehgo 3'i Sou County, tasty of C~ntxal potM., Ja ~~ Tax Lat uw. ' a+a ___--- ~, ~-~-~ '1f~fad~a.~o„ 91smk OAR Jama` ~'~`~' ~.a~ pulv~c lil ~~~ ~ chtns ~,I~,~offk~reT tss ~~ g IypJ 1_LC Msdf won 9'13??4' .~ .~--~~ ..w--'^ 4185' _---' --"" ~~~~ ~~ ry ~ ~oo~ b ~lyattNa~T, ~ u~o~R~°R prvo ti ~ uaMwa+~ ...~ ~ "'`rl~r ___-- --- n zm~ ~ b ,, 4 ~' ~3a4oca: 29,'1@rt of ~ ' ~afaca: 3m,`1~ aft ~Sm• i 54! ~Y X,onkvg ' i~'n'~~,, j-`111 418 ~ 6TA76 ~ ~~ ~.... ~` P ~~e$~ ~~5 ara. __ ,~4`~ ....k ~~~ 6UR'~YNJ~x ITT ,~,,1,' Nof'~ t geaoc~atae, inc. gig ,pla~ada Fit„ g~ 1 1-Isdford, .{b.41 ~ ~+ C84U '{'19-~~ ~ ~,, smarm t~a~vtaed Apr'H 6,~~0) 8 ~ ~ „'~yby' ~T{7~ ~bs ~{ ~~ ~ $a~~~' Bf 2,Q>3 acs. D r~t~~ ~ ~~U6 „off ._.., -- ...' -- _...-~~_ ynwg ' M1 n. a Y ~°~"~" vrt~t. ~~ic gca~.~ ,.. N W M ~ 41 Pl1gT liter . DISft. ~TTAGMMEIVT `~ ~' Public Works Department CENTRAL POINT Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT April 19, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: Four Lot Subdivision for 37-2W-02D, Tax Lots 2100 Applicant: Bear Bridge, LLC 717 Murphy Road, Medford, OR 97504 Zoning: C-4, Tourist and Office Professional Zoning Traffic: Public Works recently required a Sonic Drive-Thru to update the E. Pine Street Corridor Study to decide on development triggers. This analysis will be conducted this spring. No traffic study is warranted for this development. Existing Infrastructure: All City utilities exist in front of or adjacent to the proposed development. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). 140 South Third Street ~= Central Point, OR 97502 ~ 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 r J a/ Conditions of Approval: 1. Right In/Right-out Movements -The west entrance onto E. Pine Street shall be right-in and right-out only. A raised concrete divider delineating this movement is required to be designed and constructed before the any development occurs for parcels 2 or 3. 140 South Third Street -Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 i~ BU[LD[NG DEPARTMENT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official tl @ AC! gM@®NT g~ ~ 98 BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: 2/02!06 TO: Planning Department P{arming file: 06053 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Bear Bridge LLC Name: Bear Bridge, LLC Address: 717 Murphy Rd. City: Medford State: Or. Zip code: 97504 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Southwest 1/4 of Section 2 (2D), Township 37 South, Range 2 West, W.M.,City of Central Point, Tax Lot 2100 PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. -1- 19 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CENTRAL POINT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing s#ructures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10.Application for building permits will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code. 11. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings. The international Fire Code (2003) with Oregon Amendments (2004) will be implemented as part of the plan check code requirement for these proposed buildings. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. Please. calf Buiding Dept. if questions. ~d ,. BUILDING DEPARTMENT ~EN-~-R,o~~ Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official POINT BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shat[ be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Gradingl excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any III material placed on the si#e. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. -2- 21 FEB/0212006/THU 09:37 Jp,C~SON COUNTY HO,~DS FAX No, 541 774 6295 P, 001 /001 ~~~~~~q yt~~~ BB9P ROr`ItIS uric Niamoyor, PLr Trn~c cPcDevelapme~zt Engtz~ee!' ~ 200 Antelope Road Whfts CRy, OR 97503 .~ Phone: (SG1) yT~t-6230 Fsx: (sat) ~7a-sza5 nlemeyel~Jackaoncaunty.org Ro ~~s www.jacksoncounty.arg January 31, 20.06 Attention: Lisa Morgan City of Central Point Planning 115 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Partition off East Pine Street - acounty-maintained road. Planning File: 06053, Dear Lisa: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application for a Land Partition. The property is located at 1760 East Pine Street. Roads and Parks has the following comments: 1. The applicant at the time of development shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and Parks and obtain county permits if required. 2. The applicant shall obtain a road approach permit from Roads and Parks for any new or improved road approaches off East Pine Street. We recommend limited shared access where possible on East Pine Street. 3. Please note that East Pine Street (County Arterial} has a variable right-of--way. The Average Daily Traffic count was 29,877 as of July 2005 west of Hamrick Road. ~. A north-south connector with a signal is planned east of the Bear Creek bridge. We would like to see land reserved for the future roadway. 5. We recommend preserving and enhancing the riparian zone with native plants. Sincerely, Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer I _\Engineertng\Development\CITI ES\CNTRLP'i106053_wpd ~~ ~. ~~ rT-~~~A~~~ ~~ 9S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FORA "LAND PARTITION" TO CREATE TWO INDIVIDUAL TAX LOTS FOR COMMERCIAL USE (Applicant (s): Bear Bridge LLC) (37 2W 02D Tax Lot 2100) Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted an application for tentative plan approval for a land partition on a 2.78 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account 10195953 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May 2nd, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval Criteria. The requirements for approval of land partitions and tentative plans are set forth in CPMC Title 16 and 17, relating to informational requirements, zoning, lot dimension, access, and similar requirements. Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct form and contain all of the information required by CPMC 16.10. B. Area and Width of Lot. This partition in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional district would create 2 individual parcels: All parcels meet the minimum area and width requirements for lots in the C-4, Industrial zone as set forth in CPMC 17.44, and such parcels meet the general requirements for lots contained in CPMC 16.24.050. Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006) 23 Planning Department STAFF REPC?RT Tom HurY~~hrey,AICP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator STAFF REPORT May 2, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: Planning Commission review of tentative plan for the Gray Court Planned Unit Development. The proposal is located within the R-3, Residential Multiple-Family Zoning District on property identified as Map 37 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1400 and 1500; Jon Gray, Applicant. (L. Calvin Martin, Agent) STAFF SOURCE: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner BACKGROUND: The subject property is located east and south of the Meadows Plamled Unit Development on two lots with long and narrow configuration. The applicant has proposed a total of twenty-five (25) lots; twenty- four (24) of which will contain townhomes and a designated "tot lot". The remaining lot will retain the existing house at 745 Hopkins Road. FINDINGS: This application is being processed as a Planned Unit Development because there is a single component that does not meet the standard subdivision requirements relative to the 20 foot front yard setback. The Planning Commission could approve the applications as submitted provided the applicants meet the criterion listed in Chapters 16.10, 17.28 and 17.68 together with the numerous conditions recommended by staff in Attachments "F", "G", "H" and "I". ISSUES: In considering an approval of this site plan approval application, the Planning Department identifies that there are several items worthy of consideration: This Planned Unit Development pre-dates the present code since the applicants have dedicated a considerable amount of time in working with staff to resolve issues. The previous code would allow a PUD proposal for parcels one acre or more. The present code requires a five acre minimum. 2. The application proposes a significant redevelopment of land which for the most part has been vacant open space. The two tax lots involved are surrounded by the Meadows PUD on the north and west boundaries and for this reason, the construction of 24 multi-story townhomes will have a direct impact on residents of the Meadows. Particular care should be taken in the placement of landscaping, windows and decking as to minimize the effects on the neighbors. The proposal requires approval as a Planned Unit Development only since the setbacks for the second story "deck" extends into front setback. All other code sections and public works standards have been met. 25 Gray Court Planned Unit Development 06060.doc Page 1 of 2 4. Deputy Fire Marshal Mark Moran would like to work with the applicant to design an adequate turn-around. It maybe necessary to shift the location of the most northerly unit. The applicant has the option of using fire sprinklers as an alternative to a tuns-around modification. EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" -Preliminary PUD Plan, Tentative Plat Exhibit "B" -Conceptual Building Elevation Exhibit "C" -Conceptual Floor Plan Exhibit "D" -Applicants Development Schedule Exhibit "E" -Applicants Findings Exhibit "F" - Public Works Staff Report Exhibit "G" -Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "H" -Correspondence from Rogue Valley Sewer Services Exhibit "I" - Planning Department Recommended Conditions Exhibit "J" - Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. ,approving the tentative subdivision and tentative planned unit development plan. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. ,subject to the staff reports, correspondence from agencies and the conditions of approval. 26 Gray Court Planned Unit Development 06060.doc Page 2 of 2 NAME 3 PGP{i:' SACCHP~RuM 2°CAUI°E~ {3~p~ Gf+a:eN MNrly, ~-+vq~P-MAt'Le 2 MAC~INOLIA X ~~1..ANgIANA .}I jc oll 66.h GiTI.JGC~ Mf+GNIOLIA 3 W It-Tons Ca,P-PeT .duNIPC-,rt. ~ 1 ~hL s{ P}{A('N EOLEPr•+l5 ~5Pfl3NCt ~NC~I GJ pPL 5 +/uoNTMU~i JAP. Go4DeN 5 G3PL JYft71NICP EUaNI'MU9 GIOLDEN C~~,RE~N) (p P(tUN UGj GIGi'(l;tJp. 2°GALIpEj2 6~.d ~ VI~U(LJUM DAVIDII 2 DIAL, DAYI D'~+ V I ~LI(4N U M . 6 6VX UGi r7E.n•IPEItVI(~2N~i 1 GAL CDWIMON 6DXWOOD N MPNu~L RYA ~FN'y ~ I >JDTa . 7owmbfp J'l. RvvKe 2W.SmKov 11M 7v Lob 1400 eed 1500 ~ ~r $m lv:gerscNv Perk plan Sheet_ :lp~ep~P..g~ . _ .. _.. c j W~~a'I•~ toNG. ~ F .. - I y1*d G I c ~ ~ ~ ~ \ o~ av ~ " ~>< _,_~ _.. . _. o , a ~~`\ PFoPERPI LWE i EXI~i'IN.q FE~I~&NGE .. I I 9 I 3! I 'I cL I ~~ET I I - Iy~ -- iypiw leeerrme . 1 l~ T -. I I Div' -1 `_ 1 SITE PLAN >^= zoo- ax yl I I I I , ~_ N ~ G H tZ~ G °_. 0 4---- - __ 1. 1: ....} _CD _. ~~ ~ oEt-K 000Y19 I I I ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ - -} I%II MIN 2 L1oi RNFA R3~ ((~q~ +'Y F[4.. ELYrL - __~ E--- h ......-. I '`~ G ., colp~*ICe 8 N L 6a~ /'aa. c,~'I~U cup» I y, T ____. _- - - - At I o -IY~' ..- LAND~G.,°.p ~ ~LA1J l I I 4 Ir. r Sw 7'ypicd Lw:duvpe l'lon }'(tOPe(LTy LINE 5"~q. of 6'perlmel<r w.wd fencinq~- -~ - 3Z ' oj2' ,~ ~ - 9R 92' „ 32 ~ 32' ~~_s_._~.. f - 12 3 Iq 5 ~6 I ~'1 18 I Ito 5 _- \i I i• N I\~.- Q.. I, NL l_, /. ~~ ,, I' _ _- I I I I I ~ I °: I . 1 PP Iy1NCa -I ~ ` to ~~- O V ~ T _ _ `'TFe eT GCNTe~ LINGf'~, '-.1"nxph.lt p.vinq~ - - re--_.__ .. --/-- o 4.~p /~ S l3 Ilq I 13 130 I I ( I I 1~~_ I 32' I 32' 5"g9:ol PlgoPe2n-I, w E~ -- -- I ~\ I ~, N IJ 1 I p_ I 38 19 ~ 20 21 122 ' Z9 ~^ i 24 I i ~ I ~ _~ I ~ I I ~ ~'` ( ~ I I ' I I i ~ ~~ I oa w~ :J x Cla ~~ u G ~S~W al-°- ~~ ~~~,R°w~ Sheet - A-1 .. w ~~ 9 r~'01~1~~~ c` l~ ~ ,~ > ~ ~- tt; o h7 °r C a H 0 z m r rn y ~ ~-3 O ~: `~ t~ F n n `~ 1, t (i ys ut I? (1 C Z S S s S ~ Y ih it ~_ _i fr _ Plarv~ine S IY~~elopmert Co~uvllsnss L. Calvin B4artin GRAY COURT DEVELOPDIENT _ ~ 390: Brid£eF~'n Drn'e ]35 NoPAios Rosd, Cev lral Point. Oreaov, 9?'0? - fr~ H & d ~ A ®~~~ 6L /" 99 s ¢5$ c v . C" C" N 7 ; o_ 1 s I ~ c -~ ~~ e ~ C') oz d r 0 o;- ro r a z ii L. Cabin Martin 3901 BnuM1~rt [Tis~en, GRAY COURT DEVELOPMENT ]i5 TfopW ns Road, Central Paint, Orcgou, 91.0? A,~"~°ACHM~NT `~~~ GRAY COURT PUD GENERAL INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE It is anticipated that four buildings containing two units each will be build in each phase for a total of three phases , Phase One : Units 1,2,3,4,11,12,13,14 Phase Two: Units 5,6,7,8,15,16,17,18 Phase Three: Units 9,10,19,20,21,22,23,24 Phase One would begin April 30th'2oo6,and last for 5 months. Phase Two would begin October 15~,ZOO6 ,and last for 5 months Phase Three would begin March 15t, aoo~ ,and last for 5 months All roads and infrastructure will be completed with Phase One and it may be that the rock pads and foundations far the following phases will be completed ahead of the schedule for general construction of each phase. PUD OWNERSHIP /HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION All work on the PUD documents will be done by Davis, Wright, Tremaine (Gene Grant Esq.) Attorneys at Law, Portland, Oregon and alI survey work will be done by Friar and Associates of Medford, Oregon. Site area is 579' x 162' = 93,798 square feet or 2.1533 acres Parking provided is as follows: Open parking 49 Garage parking 4$+ Total 97 / 24 = 4.04 per dwelling unit (does not include existing single family residence) Road width 26 feet Sidewalk width 4.5 feet each side of street Fire Department turn around at end of street exceeds Fire Department handout standards as adopted by the City of Central Point, Oregon Total square footage of living area in development excluding existing dwelling unit is: 37,800 square feet. 3Q I~~~~DM ® i69 GRAY COURT PUD APPICATION The applicant is requesting the granting of a P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) for his property and according to a plan submitted with this request. The applicant is Jon Gray and the property is Township 37, Range 2 West, Section 1 lA, and tax lots 1400 and 1500. The land consists of two parcels that extend 579 feet north from the intersection of Burseil Road and Hopkins Road. The parcels together aze 162 feet wide creating a combined parcel that is 2.15 acres in size and according to the zoning on the property would allow 25 dwelling units to exist under normal circumstances. The parcels currently have one single family residential dwelling each on them and it is the intent of the applicant to remove the western most residence and leave the southern most residence. The applicants proposes to build 24 townhomes each on its own lot with common area provided for roads, pedestrian walkways, landscaping and a fenced tot lot for children. The remaining residence will sit on its own lot near the entrance to the property. The applicant hired a traffic planner to examine the conditions at the intersection of Bursell Road and Hopkins Road and that study has been presented to the Planning Department for review and discussion. It was determined that the entrance for the project should be moved as far to the west as is practical to allow ingress and egress to the site that is as safe as possible considering the general location of the property. The consultant, RDK Engineering of Centxal Point, made long term recommendations that are not supportable by the contemplated project but the ingress and egress point is in a position to compliment the long term plan as well as the short term need for access to the applicants property. 17 68.44 Criteria to grantor deny a PUD A. That the development of a harmonious ,integrated plant justifies exceptions to the normal requirements of the title; The applicant has property that is in a long but narrow configuration and in order to meet the density requirements and create an attractive property that meets the needs of the market existent in the area; it is necessary to build townhomes that are three story with their garages beneath the living quarters of each townhome. The buildings are built in pairs with zero lot lines between them and according to all state building codes applicable to structures of their type and design. The design allows the applicant to provide a 26 foot wide access street with 4S foot wide sidewalks on each side and meet all of the setbacks required for side and rear yards and require the only exception to be that of the overhanging second story deck and bedroom above to be 10 foot setback from the edge of the private street. The vehicle parking for the units consists of two spaces per unit immediately in front of the garages and an oversized two car garage for each unit that can actually hold three small vehicles or two conventional. It is the desire of the applicant to 3i give generous sized units in the project. This results in a solution that provides ample off street parking and three bedroom, two and one half bath units of 1575 square feet in size. The front setback for the ground level is standard at 20 feet and the upper levels overhang by ten feet creating a partially covered parking area for occupants of the units and their quests. The parking requirement is more than met and very family friendly sized units are created. Partially covered parking for vehicles is considered a plus by the real estate agents that we questioned on the topic. This configuration does not cause a maneuvering difficulty and it leaves a distance between the opposing units of 56 feet which is more than enough far privacy of the opposing units. Side yard distances combined are 20 feet as per the land development code. B. The proposal will be consistent with the comprehensive plan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the City. The proposal as outlined and contained in the drawings herewith submitted is consistent with the comprehensive plan of higher density development and the zoning designation of R-3 which allows the number of dwelling units (24 + one existing) that are proposed. The R-3 allows 12 dwelling units per acre and this parcel contains slightly more then 2.15 acres. The only non-standard issue that the applicant addresses in this application is the 20 foot front yard setback. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the PUD will have minimal adverse impact on the livability, value or appropriate development of the surrounding area. The applicant believes that there will be no adverse impact to the livability due to the exception of the front yard setbacks in that it is actually viewed as a positive to have additional vehicle coverage during the hot months of summer. The surrounding area which is already developed on all sides will not have a view of the street side of the units and it is felt that this will add attractiveness as well as a positive function to the design. Realtors consulted actually felt that the overhanging of the upper floors would increase the value and desirability of the units. We would therefore contend that there is no adverse impact. D. That the proponents of the PUD have demonstrated that they are financially able to carry out the proposed project, that they intend to start construction within six months ojthe final approval of the project and any necessary district changes ,and intend to complete said construction within a reasonable time as determined by the commission; The applicant owns several rental properties in the Central Point and Medford area and is currently ready to begin this project as soon as this PUD can be approved and weather permitting. Private funding is available for this project and comes from a project nearby that is just completing. Applicant is a mortgage broker and is familiar with funding of these types of projects as are his agent. It is contemplated that this project will be done in 3~ three phases starting at the southern end of the property and working north to complete. Each of these townhomes sits on its own land and is sold very similarly to a detached single family dwelling unit except for the homeowners association which cares for the common area and roads. ~: That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development or will be obviated by demonstrable provisions in the plan for proper entrances, exits, internal traffic circulation and parking. Earlier in the applicants statement it was expressed that a traffic study had been commissioned and completed. The traffic counts for both Hopkins Road and Bursell Road are not excessive and none of the counts put those roads into sub-standard conditions of operation. This project will not alter the traffic count significantly and will not create a degradation of the current service level. It should be noted that modifications for the long term that are recommended by the consultant are not supportable by this project. 'The areas in all directions of the project are essentially built out and it is not anticipated that a lot of additional traffic will be created from new development in the future. The access to the site has been moved to the far western side of the site to move it as far away from the intersection as passible. It is possible to make some minor improvements to the intersection that would enhance the safety of the intersection but they are still not totally warranted based on the ingress and egress traffic from this project. The accident incident record of this intersection is very good considering its unconventional design. More can be said about this at public hearing that could lead to some additional improvements. F. That commercial development in a PUD is needed at the proposed location to provide adequate commercial facilities of the type proposed. The are no commercial facilities contemplated or required by this project and proposal. G. That proposed industrial development will be efficient and well-organized with adequate provisions. for railroad and truck access and necessary storage; It should be noted that this project does not contain an industrial component of any kind. H. The PUD preserves natural features such as streams and shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain, if those are present The project only has a few trees on the southern end of the project and unfortunately due to the need to move the ingress and egress location as far to the west as passible it is necessary to remove some or most of the trees in the south-west corner of the site. The landscape plan calls for a number of trees to be replaced on the east side of the entrance to add privacy to the existing residence on the property and to make the entrance more attractive. There are no streams or other similar features on the site. The PUD will be compatible with the surrounding area. 33 The PUD is not a lot unlike the property to its east which contains multi-family dwelling units of a density similar to the project. The north and west of the project are bordered by a mobile /modular home subdivision and there will be attractive fencing and landscaping to soften the view that those neighbors have of the project. It should be noted that this property has been zoned R-3 and is being developed to the exact density allowed under that zoning designation. These buildings will be built with materials and colors that are compatible with the neighborhood and will essentially be single family in nature. Having a PUD homeowners association and by-laws will ensure that the homes are kept up and that the rules are followed regarding personal care of the dwelling units. J. The PUD will reduce need for pubtic facilities and services relative to other permitted uses for the land (Ord 161 S 67,1989) The only permitted use for the land under the R-3 zone is residential and that is what is being proposed. 3~ PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT TO BE DISTRIBUTED AT MEETING 35 ATT6°"~C~T 6t ~9 BUfLDfN~ DEPARTMENT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: 3/22/06 TO: Planning Department Planning file: 06060 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Gray Court P.U.D. (737 Hopkins Rd.) Name: Jon Gray Address: 901 Pittview Cir. City: Central Point State: Or. Zip code: 97504 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 37-2W-11A T.L. 1400/ 1500 PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 1 ~~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT CENTRAL Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official _ POI I~IT BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and cons#ruction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading! excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. 2 3'7 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fii! (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official ,shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Residential Specialty Code (2005). 11. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings. The International Fire Code (2003} with Oregon Amendments (2004} will be implemented as part of the plan check code requirement for these proposed buildings, 3 ~~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT L.ais DeBenedetti, Building Official Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. 39 -4- 02!22!2006 12:52 541-6647171 RV5 PAGE 01!05 11 N ®" ~Itl®~~~ 66 ~ ~~ ~~ January 5, 2006 ROGUE V,A,L,LEY SEWER. ~E~R~/~CE~ Location; l 38 West Vilas Road, Central Point, OR • Mailing Address; P.O. Box 3130, Crntrsl Yoint, OR 7502-0005 Tel. (541) 664~G300, Fax (541) 664 7171 www.RVSS.~s Ken Gerschler FAX 6646384 City of. Cetztral Point pl.anttfng Deparinte»t 155 South Second Street Central poitat, Oregon 97502 Re: Gray Court PUD, File #OG460 Dear Rc11, The house on. 745 l~opkins Road is currently served by a connection to the 8 inch sewer main in Hopkins Road. The proposed development will not affect this service. Tltc house at 737 flopkins Road is not aonrteeted to the public sewer. Service to the proposed development will require a xnainlinc extension along the proposed access toad. It maybe possible to extezld a rtaain line from Hopkins Road, however the terrain may prevent gravity sewer service. If this is the case, sewer will need to be extended from the cxistiztg zrtain lute near. the intersection of. T3ri.arwood attd Columbine. The proposed development must comply with the water qualityrequirem~ents of the phase 2 NPDES pclxxti.t wltic.}t are cuxrezttly being developed. We request that the following conditions be met prior to final plat approval: 1. Applicant must construct a new public sewer train in. accordance with RVS standards. This main line rrtust be accepted by RVS prior to final plat. 2. Applicant must subzrtit a stozxxtwater. plan to RVS to demonstrate compliance with the stormwater quality requirements of the phase 2 NpDES perttuit. peel ~ to call. me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, ~~~~ Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer • K:\DATA\A.GENCIES\CENT'PT\l?>J,ANNG\SUBDIVISION12006\06054-JAI~OBOSI~X.DOC 40 ATTACHMENT I PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Grav Court_ FI1,F, ~fiO(,n Check Box Number Description of Condition 1 of 2 The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the project area. 2 of 2 Conditions, Covenants and Restriction will be submitted to the City prior to submission of the application for final plan. \\SERVERZILLA\PL\2006 LAND USE FILES\06060 GRAY COURT PUD\0606000A.DOC 41 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL FOR THE GRAY COURT SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (Applicant: Jon S. Gray) (37 2W 11A Tax Lots 1400 and 1500) Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted concurrent applications for tentative land subdivision and tentative planned unit development on two parcels with an aggregate total of 2.15 acres on properties identified by Jackson County as Accounts 10202489 and 10202497 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May 2, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the applications, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.28, Residential Multiple-Family District B. Chapter 16.10, Tentative Plans C. Chapter 17.68, Planned Unit Development Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.28, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 16.10, relating to required information on plat, processes and the assignment of conditions by the City pertinent to the application. C. Chapter 17.68, relating to properties with unique qualities, mixing of building types and land uses. Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2005) ~~ Section 3. Conditional Approval. The concurrent applications for tentative land subdivision, tentative planned unit development and conditional use permit herein are hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of May, 2006. Planning Coininission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 2nd day of May, 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2005) 43 Planning C?epartment STAFF REPORT Tom E'Cumphrey, AICP, Comn7unity C~evelopment [)hector/ Assistant City Administrator STAFF REPORT May 2, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of an application for a Zone Map Amendment application and Tentative Plan application for Gun Jak Subdivision located at 5238 Gebhard Road. (36 2W 35DD, Tax Lot 1100). STAFF SOURCE: Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician BACKGROUND: This parcel was annexed into City limits on November 7, 2005 by City Council Resolution No. 1081. (Please refer to Attachment `A'). The property consists of 1.76 acres, and is pending a zone map amendment from R-1-10, Residential Single Family, to R-1-6, Residential Single Family. Pursuant to ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660 -Division 18, proper notification was filed with DLCD on March 17, 2006. (Please refer to Attachment `B'). The zone map amendment is scheduled for consideration by City Council on May 11th, 2006. Therefore approval, if granted, would be contingent upon a successful zone map amendment. The applicant has been working with City staff for several months, beginning with the annexation application. The City requested that the applicant work with the property owner to the north regarding placement of road, before proceeding with the annexation application. The applicant has successfully worked with the property owner for placement of the road. The road has been located on the northern property line to accommodate future development options for the property to the north. (Please refer to Attachment `C'). The existing home will be removed and redeveloped to compliment other development occurring in the neighborhood. The applicant is proposing the creation of 8 single family residential lots, ranging in size from 8,035 square feet to 14,490 square feet. The half road improvements will be in the same location as the existing driveway and will consist of a 7.5' landscaped strip and a 5' sidewalk. The other half of the road improvements will be made when the property to the north develops. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "D" ~4 ISSUES: 1. Approval of the proposed Tentative Plan will he contingent upon final approval on the zone map amendment as so noted in the Resolution. Please refer to Exhibit "E" for Conditions of Approval. EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS Exhibit "A" -City Council Resolution No. 1081 Exhibit "B" - DLCD Notification for Zone Map amendment Exhibit "C" -Tentative Plan Exhibit "D" -Findings Exhibit "E" -Conditions of Approval Exhibit "F" - Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "G" - RVSS Comments Exhibit "H" -Fire District # 3 Comments Exhibit "I" - Jackson County Roads Comments Exhibit "J" -Resolution ACTION: / A motion recommending approval or denial of a Zone Map amendment to change the zoning from R-1-10, Residential Single Family to R-1-6, Residential Single Family. / Consideration of Resolution No. , approving the proposed Tentative Plan. RECOMMENDATION: / A motion recommending approval by City Council for a Zone Map amendment to change the zoning from R-1-10, Residential Single Family to R-1-6, Residential Single Family. / Approval of Resolution No. , granting Tentative Plan approval. 45 ~1'TACHMEN~" " RESOLUTION NO 1 ~g ~ A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF 1.76 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GEBHARD ROAD, AND SOUTH OF WILSON ROAD INTO THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON (Applicant(s): Gerald & Carol Jakabosky (37 2W 35DD; TL 1100) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application has been made by the owners of certain real property for annexation into the City of Central Point, Oregon. The property consists of one tax lot and road right-of-way totaling approximately 1.76 acres. The property to be annexed is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 35, Township 36 South, Range 2 West, -Willamette Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon; thence West, 20.00 feet to the centerline of Gebhard Road; thence along said centerline and parallel with the west line ofsaid quarter-quarter, South, 112.00 feet to the west elongation of the most north boundary line of Bluegrass Downs, Phase 1 recorded in Volume 31 of Plats at Page 2 of the Records of Jackson County, Oregon; thence along said west elongation and most north boundary line and parallel with the north line ofsaid quarter-quarter, East, 687.OOfeet to the Southeast corner of premises described in Volume 451, Page 345, Jackson County, Oregon, Deed Records; thence parallel with the east line ofsaid Section 35, North, 112.00 feet to the north line ofsaid quarter-quarter; thence along said north line, West, 667.00 feet to the east Right-of--Way line of Gebhard Road; thence continuing along said north line, West, 20.00 feet to the Point ofBeginning. - The above described property is not within the City of Central Point's Current corporate boundaries, but is contiguous to the City's existing corporate boundary and is within the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). " Section 2. The owners of the property proposed for annexation are Gerald and Carol Jakabosky, and there is mutual consent to the annexation. Such written consent is on file at Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Section 3.ORS 222.125 provides that when all of the owners of land in the territory proposed for annexation and not less than 50% of the electors residing in such territory have consented in writing to the annexation of the land in the territory and file such written consent with the City Council, the property may be annexed without the requirement for an election or a public hearing. 46 Section 4. Annexation of the described property is consistent with the City's ability to provide facilities and services to the real property, as required by the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 5. Pursuant to ORS 222.125, the property described in Section 1 above, shall be and hereby is, annexed to and made part of the City of Central Point, Oregon. Section 6. The City Administrator, or his designee, shall transmit a copy of this resolution to the Oregon Secretary of State, and this annexation shall be effective when filed with the Oregon Secretary of State pursuant to ORS. 222.180. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 3rd' day of 2005. / `/,~ Mayor Hank Williams ATT City Representative (\over~O~ APPROVED by me this ~~day of-43e-t~bz~, 2005. <~ll~~ Mayor Hank Williams ~~ iI~I._~_ I_ _ _~_. ii _,, proposed ~ Annexation ~ for Central point SUBJECT PARCEL 372W35DD: TL1100 1.76 ACRES UGS City Limits Tax Lots \ \ ~ , ` ~ ~„ ~ ___-- _ , _...__.. r-...- _ - I~: ',~. ~..., _., ~ i i yy _._.u i x._.. _._L. ,--,..__t ~~ ~ V f VAY -• _.. _ _., ~ { .~~. ~ f~ .~.__~ ____1 .l ~ . C.._ _.......i ~. ~~ ~~ _~' ~ ,~ ~, \ ` ~~ l/~ i ~Q- .,....... i ,% ~ .~__-1 RK J -; I t u W E 5 i i, - This map is intended graphic display and reference purposes only. pMA NOVEMBER O8, 2005 Q ~. ` Q 1~ 0 a~' a cs C~? .- 0 r 1 t ~' P1-N' ~ ~R X~D ~ A~~~ ARC A ~ A~ ~~ t, SAN r ~uNp~~ ER 19, 2p05 \ OCTOg pO1N~ OF gEGtNNt~E N W• CORNER OF TME S.E• CUQQA TER QF S'ESECZION 35 20.00' 0 d ~mm 1W L'.1-r-~ ~...../ ~~ .~ w300 WEST 6$--~ ;'" 667.00 ~L ~~°° ~sT 687 A0' TL 1350 Tl- 1349 TL 1347 TL 1348 TL 1346 tTL 1345 D (~ B~-~ ~~ 1 pHA 36 2W 35D TL 40~ 'o a ~r S.E. CORp pE,GE 345 z VO1_u~E 45C4QNTY OR JACKSON RECORDS DEED -rL 12ao suRVEY BY: ~LIN~ _------ r~Mg~" ~r~NG ~A~D S~RR~~~D ~ ~ ~~GaRp° ~ L.S. 227 BR AOSN A P dRBOX pO ~~(' OREC g4~ 769 CEN 64_7510 CE~t- ~..-_ (541) -- DOR 15-1134-2005 Notice to Taxing Districts ORS 308.225 City of Central Point City Administration 155 South 2nd St. Central Point, OR 97502 g Description ~ Map received from: CITY On: 11 / 14/2005 OREGON DEPARTMENT ~I'`OF REVENUE Cadastral Information Systems Unit PO Box 14380 Salem, OR 97309-5075 (503) 945-8297, fax 945-8737 Description and Map Approved... Navember 22, 2005 As Per ORS 30$.225 This is to notify you that your boundary change in Jackson County for ANNEX TO CITY OF CENTRAL POINT RES. #1081 has been: ~ Approved 11/22/2005 ~' Disapproved Notes: Department of Revenue File Number: 15-1134-2005 Prepared by: Carolyn Sunderman, 503-945-8882 Boundary: ~ Change __i Proposed Change The change is for: Formation of a new district _~ Annexation of a territory to a district _ Withdrawal of a territory from a district _~ Dissolution of a district Transfer '-' Merge -' Establishment of Tax Zone Taxing District copy -Copies to: County Assessor, Department of Revenue, County Commissioners or County Court/Boundary Commission (If appropriate) 50 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE Bill Bradbury SECRETARY OF STATE November 15, 2005 City of Central Point City Recorder 155 S 2nd St Central Point, OR 97502 Dear City Recorder, ARCHIVES DIVISION ROY TURNBAUGH DIRECTOR 800 Summer Street NE Salem, Oregon 97310 (503) 373-0701 Facsimile (503) 373-0953 Please be advised that we have received and filed, as of November 15, 2005, the following records annexing territory to the following: Ordinance/Resolution Number(s) Our File Number OR NO 1081 AN 2005-0257 For your records please verify the effective date through the application of ORS 222.180. Our assigned file number(s) are included in the above information. Sincerely, ~~a~~ Linda Bjornstad Official Public Documents cc: County Clerk(s) ODOT Department of Revenue Population Research Center ~1 ... ; - ~ f 1 _ t „ .. .. : { ~ ~ wa'ti r4. i , Li i.i~ V / ~' - 4 .. a.~ y~..ay + ~: m S { ~ ~ ,, U ~ T ~z, y ~ ~ ~ _~ ",{.. ? ~ ~ O G LL J ' ,~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~~~~ s ~. I '~ a ~ i ~, ~~ ti a rv,' a ~>t n J `ri '~' AS ~re~~j'~ - 'X Y~`r +a ikM~P ~ A s v t t f ~ ~, ~ + w r ,i'.ti.'"'71;. ~~ ry .;4.5",'~ ~i~ t . ~n, s ~t"~;}~n~l'~''v+w7avT,R, .~°~.~'~^ :<'7a`~rr,"' ~t,+: ~+~'c~'. ~~'>.+4yytA?~'~q`~,;« ~~ ti+,i,; s 11 + +~'~~, iwr,~~f~.tit,, ~.,i,,yylrje;.+Y~ S '7~k~ir ~`~ ;i~ ':k+; 'f i! r "^„ ~,~Z.L'} ~ ~*n! ~, fiy '0k T~ 1`,iM +ek ~ k'a 1k , ~+ a+ t ~°~n y ~~ ~ < F "1,~ ~ Ss s ~~ f~ u~ yxA~'s ~ r ~~;~ .:n~^Si'"~~' :;': + x';3:5 + . v ' ~ <ti ~i ` t,r`L~T'^"v i.; ;~.r•~~' .e~~:;d'~~`~~z~. ?~ ' rSF M4 $ ~ > o ' s ~ y r ~' l'4 "z~ :~ar~ r 'r a:, ~ ~Yr' 4 %~ .vts ex' u~ s;~ x, "4'tst'~ ' '~' ~" `'~;Y~.,. '~ n'r{,",~,.,. lj~,Sr ~'~M` J ~,~F't<, ..,da-,,., `i+,~,:u`"q %~~.}, ;r.>P;.., ',~'1;".. ~~ t tr ~~~~ ~ y, ~ Kafir( X' ~;~: Jro5 ~ F o t o r'~y ;2iw'~~ir~~++'l~'S~."u~'~y'~y.cF~'f~~~g{ fi g~~w ' r* T I ,y~.~~,Jk`x.,,:+9',+'~,~~, r<. ~'i n«w `t:non+;~`~a'^~:«~~+";~'~*-9.~A~v~y;~ fnp . 5,c ~ i , ;j;; ki x'15 A,k fi 9 l''+kM1 w , gr,z'',~~t}: ~ \,: ~ ~ 04 rind )y~ ~3.' JA J ~{ ~\R ~3~1~`~ l a4 li.4 . 'il+'> tf y t¢ ' d s 1, Y ~~ 7 a w1++ ~~,'~~p~~'4 k` ~ q l '>~ 'r£ ..fit ~,f` r~4t xJ %b j ~i~ +,^a"~ ~ ~~~'v 1Q 4~ r'~ 'y~.'t~;z5~,;iR.+~^£'."i,,'N.:~z,,~..~~t>,'y,,.~~ry,,,<J;3~S~SI,:aT~yk"SS~L'r~~~~i;~:~~>%, +?~., ~. :~ ro Sri .. ..... . .. . .. ... .5a... ,a~z.w.,,,, e+ F ~,., ..,.,... ,r' t f,k.a~ ,t+~ a<~y.K,..; .., :~~"E>'Y11~1:£~ ti;r -~-+, u- ~ '~ M "~ .Q LL LL ~ A ^ .~ ,A ~- _ ~ n1 W '^ W • tl T// ~~~// ff^~ ., , ., ,, ~~ ~~ > ,.~ ~l 1- ~ .. , - ~ ~ % ; ;. :..<r `w ,~ a-',~ S 5 T ~~ ~~~ i ; ~ 3 i \ 4 it RS~r.~..iN~yyy~, ~!b all ..j ^M ~3 ~ w~ ~ ~,, ~~ s v 7+ ~ ~, u £ r ~ ~" .t+. , 3rty iuff,,,,~~ of fi fit: LL ~ ~ f+^tb~~t~~ r~ ,~"+~ xY fr te ~ ~ ~ " ~ `+ } ^ , yak ~~ ~.y R , v t ~ t ~~PP ~ ' a P ~y1 l 1 {~ ~ ,~ f n'~ „<„ ,~ .r rD~ ., o...., . , .x<a ,.., ,,,. I'~"'O TENTATIVE St1BDMS1aN PLAT SURVEY FORS IoGOled in the GARY GUNDERSON CHARLES JAKAHO`.,KY S23B GE73NARD ROAD REGON v75o2 A OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WES . 5(„JT'L{F~T ~~ CENTRAL PaNr, O WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY Of CENTRAL POINT, JACKSON COUNTY. OREGON DATE 1AHUARY 9, 2006 Jb-2'M-35C0 TA% lOT 1100 CROSS AREA: 1.70 ACRES ~ ~ ~AR~S ' ' ZONED' RR-2.5 MiE d51R1CT No. S 1U M. l1E Y01U~1E1Ep IIC6i NORTH-NORTHNESS BpINOARY OF BLUEGRASS OOMNS. PNASE 1 SNOMN AS N89'S5 n SVB CENTRAL PANT SQi00L dSTRICT C ES ROCUE VALLEY SENFR SERN ~TW ~1X iNE OTT OF CEMIRAI PANT BRASS p5K M SWINEAST OF CURB MI£T AT THE NORTHERIT END OF E`/EBROM AT 09' EVATION - 1267 g c Y . p,[ N1ET5EC~011 Ui SC01f£i- AN0 SAYANNAH DR1Y7:. BRASS dsK EL 6 y ETIg1MBRANCE NQITS eLUEGw. ~ ~ l1E p(O1dprY (/LS01QJ75 GRANTED k1 vOLUME J61, PAGE lH2 AND VOLUME 178. PAGE 105 MAY AFFECT 1115 f .~ 'i pROPETIIY, euE fE MOT LOCATAFtIE. I f I I I ¢ I t I { ~ f 1 :. ., ~ ,, ' 1f ~ ~1- . __. O. F._.. ..... l -. ..... .{ _ _ .. .. _.... .....- _ ~ 1 ._~. _ .. t. ... _.. UHrvN~ 20' - .. P0/ER POLE ` '--. )3 5 -..- - _ iACE OF Ci) _ ' • 7. _-UWa-POIS __; ___. _'__ ~ J' lANDSGWING ..___ _ ..___ __ _______ _ ___.. ' ~ I ~ I, I ' „ _._ .. . __.. _.1`_ 15.9J' n.DD' 71~r 71.00'_ J n.oD' I 71 DO n3 cDTlGNro I r = Ft~l f eow s~ ('eo3s sa. Fe.-1 1 ions sv. it, 1 1 1 ~ I _ .. I I.;i s ~~ HSEIBACK I 15~P ,v:l' ` >r ~ , ~ ~~.1 , ~ , , I I g ~ ~ ~ ~ 1$ r I ~ ACgK '- - !~ L 1 e L I g r - , I I 1 I SNED 1 I ~. ''' I I o 1 . ... I ~ T ' ~I 1 i 1 ~ 'J ' L 1 t __J L 1 I v.. ,17,.., L'_-- --~ 1 n f-1 i imi imir~D L- r JZ I L L J..,~ '~-~ I l j ~ I ~ O ., I -VO~OD~S~d OOO J 0 O __~_ 71.x• __- Typ 71.00' Obf ~~.. 6J9 JO' (BhSIS OF BFAWNGS) 71.b0 - ... ._ , _.', ,I _ I .__ __ 20 I I NBY55 ~f ORNLWAYI 1 I f i. I r +nl. I`Ivl. rf N`f,t , :1 I ~ ', f. t, t.. ~ '~ .. I .. , . I i ' I I i l I I iI }~p0gE7t POLE 1;; I ~ ,I I I ;\ I,` __.. a ruBUr1 ~- wY - - ---~ - I I - " - I .~ t3 ~ r I I i~ ) OF 1 SURVEY BY, nrsERte+F ~~ ~~)~ .~/,~, rtiGORPORATED KERR7 K. BRAD`-+1113) L.S. 2271 P.O. BD% 306A CENTRAL POINT, CREC~ON 9'1502 (5-0IXbA-75N) CELL qA4-bb92 E rc ~p AY (N0 SCALD ORNE BEEBE ROAD 0 117.01 ~____I 1 A1~~o. 1{ Wry ' _ f (2~~~'r1 2 J0~~ ~ ~ , L ~ ~~, o t~ Mouse (1700 s0 ~~ 17-~, ~t R~GAR GE t ° O/ 1= \ ~ - O IOAK t a I x5O) (2B g \ ., \ ~ g J 10• ~ t6' AN ~ 9 OAK ISO __ ~i0' \4,x1>a,\ \~g _'~\ Y' ` '~ __~-_ 7x.00' i _ 125.00' to \ f\, ~ \ f \ , ,. ,. \ \ \ ~ - \ \ \ I ~ \ ~ .. I' ~ / /~ ~. - - - ----- REGISTERED ~ PROFESSIONAL t1TND SURVEYOR La4c OREGON M~ l l t Y KERRY 7C~BRADSHAW SGLL£: 1' - 40 CprtOUR IN)ERVAL - )' ETP. 13-31-06 r T o...,,...,., Fem.\CaHam SoR~are 2004\WORIt~,bk6DO6M/C MrdRdCP Cwq ~~~~~1 LIYI~A M~ L6 Findings -Exhibit "D" Gun Jak Zone Map Amendment & Tentative Plan File No. 06054 Section Descri tion Comprehensive Plan - Findings: Both applications are substantially compliant Section 7 -Housing with the goals and criteria as outlined in Section 7 of the Statewide Planning Goal # 10 Com rehensive Plan. 16.10.030 General Inforjnation -General iriformatiol2 shall be shown OY 1nClllded Y(~itll t11P tel2tatlYle plal2.... Findings: The applications contain all of the general information re uired under this section. 16.10.040 Existing Col2ditions shown on tentative plan.. Findings: The tentative plan contains existing conditions such as power poles, trees, and existing structures. 16.10.050 Additional information -The following additional information slulll be included on the tentative plan; streets; location, width approximate grades, approximate radii of cilrves and the relationship of all streets to any projected street, lots showing approximate square footage and dirllensions; and easements..... Findings: The tentative plan includes all of the required information. 17.20.020 (A) Permitted Uses -Single Family Dwellings Findings: This tentative lan is a ermitted use. 17.20.050 Density, lot area, lot width, and dimensions..... Findings: The minimum density range for this size parcel is 7 units with a maximum density of 10 units. This proposal falls within the minimum/maximum density range. The proposed lots fall within the minimum/ maximum lot size requirements with the exception of Lot # 1. Lot # 1 is at 14,490. The reason for this is to meet Fire District # 3's requirement to provide an adequate emergency vehicle turn around with a minimum radii of 28'. This will be identified on the final plat as a temporary easement, until the property to the north develops and the other 1/z of the road improvements are made. At that time, the turn around will no longer be required and Lot # 1, can be divided into two lots. Further dividing Lot # 1 will still meet the minimum/maximum lot size and density requirements of the code. ~~ Conditions of Approval -Exhibit "E" Gun Jak Tentative Plan & Zone Map Amendment File No. 06054 Condition Number Descri tion 1 of 5 Applicant must meet requirements of the Building Department, Public Works Department, Planning Department, Fire District # 3, and Jackson County Roads 2 of 5 Applicant must show the temporary easement with a minimum 28' turn around required by the Fire District on Lot # 1 on the Final Plat. 3 of 5 Final Plat must have a county approved street name and subdivision name. 4 of 5 Tentative Plana royal is valid for one ear. 5 of 5 The applicant agrees to sign a recordable document with the City that Lot # 1 will be divided into two lots when the temporary emergency turnaround is no longer needed on Lot # 1. This will be required before final lat a royal is anted. ~~J ATTACF~MENT~" " ~UILDIN~ DEPARTMENT Lois DeCienedetti, 6uiiding Official BUlLD1NG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: 3/21 /06 TO: Planning Department Planning file: 06054 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Jakabosky Tenative Plan Name: Charles Jakabosky Address: 5238 Gebhard Rd. City: Central Point State: Or. Zip code: 97502 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:_Southeast 1/4 Section 35, Township 36 South.Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Central Point, Jackson County, Or. ~'UJ4/'®SE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 1 ~~ ~lJlLD[ioi~ DEP~R1`ME~1T~ BUILDING ®EPAI~TIVtENT DG~MENTS. Loris I~eCienedea:i, Building Official Z . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. if a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street fighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of a!I test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent Loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/ excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material paced on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shat! be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. 2 BlJ(LC~IN~ ~EPART(~IE~IT Lois DeBencdetti, Building Official A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official ,shall be submitted prior to final of the gradinglexcavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property cal! the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change) fo improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Gents( Paint shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Gode 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10.Application for building permits (for each residence) will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with 2005 Oregon Residential Specialty Code. 11. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant location, as wel! as access to buildings. The International Fire Gode (2003) with Oregon Amendments (2004} will be implemented as part of the plan check code requirement for these proposed buildings. 12. Storm drain must be designed by engineer, and approved by City plumbing inspector 3 59 DV~L1./~1VV ®EPARTh~EI~1T Lvis DeBened~tti, Building Official Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the App{icant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. ~~ 02f 22f 2006 12:52 ~~ &~~" ~- f~ ~~ January 5, 2(106 Ken Gersckllez City of Central Point Planning bepartment 155 South Second Street Celttral Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Jakobosky Subdivision, )F'i+r #06054 Dear Kez~, 1;A~ 6G4~6384 The subject property is cul•rently served by a connection to the 8 inch sewer main in Gebhard Road. '1'lais service line must be located and sealed within 5 feet of the property line when the existing house is removed. Service to the proposed development will require a mainline extension along the proposed access road. The proposed development must comply with the water quality requiremments of the Phase 2 NPDES permit which are currently being developed. We request that the following conditions be met prior to f..l.zTal plat approval.: 1. Appl..i.eant rriust locate and abandon the existing service lateral when the existing building i.s rem.oved. 2. Applicant must construct a new public sewer. r~.aixl. i~~. accordance with. RVS standards. This zr~.atn l~tt.e zr~ust be accepted by RVS prier to final plat. 3. Applicant must submit a storrztwater plan to RVS to demonstrate compliance with the stormwater duality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES perr~nit, Feel free to call rae if you have any questions regazding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, ~~~~ Carl Tappezt, P.E. District Engineer K:~DATA\AGENCIES\CENTP'Z'~PI~A~1~1G\SLTBDIVISION\2006\0G054-JAKOB OSKY.DOC 6i 541-6647171 R11S -~°A L1~IICpPA~GTE° 02105 1 I~1~ 611!/ 1 C 1 V 1 u 3s ROGUE VALLEY SEWED SERV~CE~ tocaticm: 138 West Vi1ag R.c~d, Cc~itrat Point, OR - Mailing Address: F.O, Pox 3130. Ca~tral Foist, OR 7502A005 7'cl. (541) dG4{i3Q0, Fax (541) 6b4-7171 www.RVRS.ua ATTP~CHNIENT `~ ~ Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road ~~~°~°''"'°r~ White City OR 97503-1075 ~'~` ~~4 (541) 826-7100 (voice) (541) 826-4566 (fax) ~'9~A~~~~,~,,,.,~°~ "An Internationa//y Accredited Fire Department" l~~arnrt~~` February 22, 2006 City of Central Point Planning Fire District #3 comments: Project# 06054 Jakabosky Tentative plat • Fire hydrants will be required for this project • Larger scale plan for review will be needed for better Fire District comments • Street width appears to narrow • Minimum inside turn radius R-28 or to meet City standards • Dead Ends shall have an approved turn around • No Parking signage and curb painting shall comply with final road standards once presented _" 'f'J C~ G ~~u~~ ~%( ~ `> ~(~f!/'r / ° ~ ~t /~ {~ t,v^ c.t,,~ ~ O -,1~R ~'~ ! "C-- S v (~,,ik~Fl ~ Mark Moran DFM ~~ ~~/'1~t-IIVI~N I ~e y -~i~.~a ui~uia~~iuu ~_ ""~+ ~.oa~s February 24, 20Q6 Afitention: ~.isa Morgan City of Central Point Planning '(55 South Second Street Central Poinfi, OR 97502 RE: Subdivisian aff Gebhard Road - acounty-maintained road. Planning File: 06054; Jakabosky Tentative Plan. Dear Lisa: Roads i;ric Nictneyrx, I'E ?}•a~c & Development Finguzee~~ 240 Anfelcpe Road White City, OR 137503 Phone: (54~} 774-~2s4 Pax: (54t) 774-295 niemeye-f~}ackson oounty,ag ~w.vi.Jackao ncounty,org Thank you for the opportunity fio comment on this application for Jakabosky Tentative Subdivision, an eight-lot subdivision off Gebhard Road. Roads and Parks has the following comments: 1. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and Parks and obtain county permits if required. 2. The applicant shall obtain road approach permits from Roads and Parks for a road approach to Gebhard Road• The paved approach shall have 30' approach radii. There steal[ be no direct driveway approach off Gebhard Roads. 3. We will concur with any right-of-way dedicated. 4. Gebhard Road has a load limit restriction, fihe app[icanfi needs fio indicate fio the County where the alternative construction access will be located. If you have any questions or need further information feel free to tail me at 774-6230. Sincerely, -~.:~ ~.Y Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer L-1EngineeringlDevelopmenriCtTlES1~NTRLPT106058_vr~d PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVALTO CREATE 8 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, WITH LOT # 1 TO BE DIVIDED INTO TWO LOTS AT A LATER DATE (Applicant: Charles Jakabosky) (36 2W 35DD, Tax Lot 1100) Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted application for a tentative plan application fora 1.76 acre parcel located on property identified by Jackson County as Account 10192844 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May 2, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 16 -Subdivisions B. Chapter 17.20, R-1, Residential Single Family District Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.20, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.60, relating to application presentation, and special requirements Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006) ~~ Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for tentative subdivision is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H" and "I" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of May, 2006. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 2nd day of May, 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006) 65 C'lannin, ~:~~~~.r~trraen F I ~~~ ~ ,! ~ 1 I~ ~i ~ '., ~ 'I"c~rT~ I-IurrrC~t~rey,A1C~~3 ~- , ' ~, i;~ Comn7unity C7~velaprn~nt C7ir~ctdrl • , Assistant City Ac~mir7istrator STAFF REPtJi2T May 2, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of an application far a Tentative Plan application far Lone Redwood Grove Subdivision located at 1015 N. Tenth Street. (37S 2W 03AD, Tax Lot 3000}. File No. 06071. STAFF SOURCE: Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician BACKGROUND: The applicant had purchased 1015 N. Tenth Street with the intention of dividing into four lots. This parcel alone did not meet the minimum requirements to successfully subdivide into four separate lots. The applicant was able to work with the adjoining property owners to purchase portions of their property without compromising their minimum lot size and setback requirements. These lot line adjustments were processed administratively in accordance with CPMC. (Please refer to Attachment `A'). The applicant now has a parcel large enough to divide into four lots and meet the minimum lot size requirements far each lot within the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district. T77his application has been duly noticed in accordance with ORS 197.763. (Please refer to Attachment `iD'>. The property is now a vacant lat. The home previously situated there has burned down. There is a large redwood tree with a 36" trunk located at the rear portion of proposed Lat # 1, as well as two unidentified trees located towards the front of proposed Lot # 2. As per the City's Comprehensive Plan, the City encourages that every effort should be maintained to preserve the existing tree inventory on the proposed lots. (Please refer to Attachment `C'). Lots 1 and 2, will take access from Crest Drive and can have individual driveways to serve each proposed lot. Lots 3 and 4, will take access with a shared driveway from North Tenth Street. North l Om Street is classified as a minor arterial street, FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "D" I ISSUES: 1. The City must receive a copy of recorded lot line adjustments prior to signing of the Final Plat. Please refer to Exhibit "E" for Conditions of Approval. EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" -Legal notification of Lot Line Adjustments Exhibit "B" -Public Hearing Notice Exhibit "C" -Tentative Plan Exhibit "D" -Findings Exhibit "E" - Conditions of Approval Exhibit "F" - Building Department Staff Report Exhibit "G" -Public Works Staff Report Exhibit "H" -Fire District # 3 Comments Exhibit "I" - RVSS Comments Exhibit "J" - Resolution ACTION: / Consideration of Resolution No. _, approving the proposed Tentative Plan. RECOMMENDATION: / Approval of Resolution No. _, granting Tentative Plan approval. 8"1, 1 Tf'1,A,.ef~llV1ENT " ~~i s' €-- E>. ~ ~.- _. , Citv of Central Point CENT-RP POINT Planning Department March 15, 2006 Brad Parmenter 1610 Jasmine Avenue Medford, Oregon 97501 RE: Property Line Adjustment for portions of Assessment Plat 372W03AD- 3000, 3001, 3200 and 3300. Brad: Our office has reviewed the proposed property line adjustment for the above-referenced lots and determined that the resulting lots are in compliance with the City of Central Point zoning and subdivision regulations. Accordingly, the property line adjustment is approved and a zoning clearance is herewith enclosed subject to completion of the following items: All lot corners shall be surveyed and monumented in accordance with ORS 92.060 (3). 2. A record of survey shall be filed with the County Surveyor and a copy of the recorded survey provided to the City. Sincerely, Ken Gerschler Community Planner cc: Public Works Department Timberline Surveying Richard and Katherine Hufteling Julie Storms 155 South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 ext. 231 ~ Fax (541)664-6384 Hall, 140 South Third Street, Central Point, Or. 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 140 South Third Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is: 06071. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext 291. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the application and technical staff reports. The Commission, will hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. If allowed, any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ---~ i \` --~~- _iliJ F ~ -,, `` `, \ ~~ ~---;~ T I 140 S. Third Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 664-6384 R~ Ham/ i~ ~. TENTATIVE SUBDIVI540N PLAT SURVEY BY, nr~i~~ SuRVr;Y FOR located in the LANl7 SURVEYING TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, u~ INCOt~T~ s`z°° PARMENTER NORTHEAST 1 f4 OF SECTION 3, OREGON 1610 ,p~t4NE AVDIUC KERRY K. BRADSNAW 4.5. 2711 nEDFORD, ORECAN 97501 P.O. HOX 9064 WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, JACKSON COUN (sal ~ 751 c~I~ ~ ~~ PATE, nARCN 7, 200E \ \ < SINS ADDRE55+ 1015 N. TENTH °"TTZEET \ \ SRACT "~' CQiTRAL POINT, OREGCN 57`-+02 \ \ DAWN HOPE ESTATES \ \\ FS 18357 \ \ \ / i \ \ \ \ \ ~$ OWNER- \ / / \ //^\\ DGYdNY BIGGS \ \ 7HE MONUMENT£D (£NTERUNE Cf CREST DRIVE SHOWN AS N20Y74'19'W IXJ 1NE IG[A7 N. RtV 907501 \ MAIAMA NLLAGE PLAT. \ ~ ` \ DATUM T \ \ ~ \• POWER POIE / CR~Ep( DTHE 1EI EVAT1' ONO rH~S MORASS DISCOWAS ESFABLfl15HEDE9V THiSNOFiiCE NEOCTO ERRQ N \ C \ ~ \ 37-2W-03AD TL 9221 l'1N 'R1E AREA. BRASS DISC ELEVADON a 1236.02'. ~,' \\ 'p J^~ .~ \\ C. k pIAAA SCH£MANSKI /~/ 2003 FROM PREVIOUS VERTICAL CON(RO \ \\C\2\~\\ \ \ \ Ty \\ \\ \ \ \ /~~ \ \ ~ \\ 1~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \, ~ \ \ \ \ \ `'' 37-2W-03AD TL 9222 ~ TIM & BARBPRA RAY /4\\ \\ \ \ ~\ .\ .\ \\ / , 37-2W-03AD TL 3002 \ \ ' ~ GViY k SCOTT HANSOM ~ C Aj ~J ~ \ /' POWER POLE ~?. ~'\~Ql• R. '~ \ f- / \ 9~0° ~•) .t 9•"3~~~ Jack \~~~q„ \ / / 31-2w-03A0 TL 9223 \ ``\ ` y+ryk ~ ~~ •\ \ \\ \ \ FINE HYDRANT SUE (CHORD vs \\ 5y` A~ \ /. 37-2w-o3w n 2900 ~\ /LOT 4 'tlF~4~, \~ \~ T ~ ~~~ \\ ~/\ ~ ` \ 6AR6ARA (ARSON ~6 /' \\ . \ \\ ~ 000 Sq. FC ~ L \ ~~~\ ~A9y\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ ~ •Sp ., y/ \ \ \ ~ ~ \ FENCE ~ / \~~ \ 37-2W-03AD TL 2800 \ P N \ I \ 2 4. 38 REOw00U k Qe / ~ 1256 \ \ ORViLLE & JACOUEL:NE MORRIS \\ ~~ P \ C,~ \ 4 „R~ / ~, /// j -\\71 \ ~ \ \ ~a \ ~\\ ~a /EAT t ~ ~ tAT 3 / \\ ~i°¢~ `~d> \\ \ ~ ` g\ ~ ~ / f 6 65 Sq. t. ~` 6032 S . Ft. / \ \ \\ // ~ /, L \\ 5~ \ \ \\ ` 1 /', ~\ . C\ 0~\ 5e9' ,OFD / n1' ~ /y~ \ / ' TYYY T"'_ V r~~_ g. ~ / v S2 5' / \ \ A~ c+\ ~\•'F~ \ ~ 6422 IQ. Ft. ~ 37-2w-o~1.D n SzaD \\ / JUUE STORMS \ 37-2W-OaAD 7L 1800 \ \'\~ ~~I ''\ $~\ \ J ~ > I' / `~ U 1J a \ I ~p05~i• 0~.260~ yl.BB~ J~\ 2.n © }git7r, ~~ (PRDpO5E0 U1J / . \\SO aapp /-- \\ \ ~\ \ \\n \ 569 / /~/ ~' .-• ~-- \'`~~„ \ ~' HYDRANT \ `\~ ~1/T-WATER\ ~ ~ 37_yw_03A0 Tl 3001, 3300 ~ / ~' \ b\/ \ VALVE \1 RICHARD do KATHEPoNE HUFfEUNC I ~ ~ ~~ ~~, a7-2w-oanD n aSOD ~ q 9r. - JASON WINEGAR \ \ ~~ ~ - - ~_ - ,~~ - ` /~1 ~ \ - j--j- SCALE: 1" ~ 30' `\ ~ / -- ~ \ \ ~\ -j CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1~ - ~~ ~\ 1 C: P m Files CAASOn SoN i "- ~ `~'- _ ____ A SHEET 1 OF 1 y7_2w-D3AD TAX LOT 3000 GROSS AREA; 30x75 sy. Fc (DaD Aa+ES) ZONED: R-1 FIRE 0 STRICT No~3~ 0{S[RICT ROGUE VAUET SEWER 5FTtVICE4 tt 3606 I6 ~5 N . 40~ 5-Frc,¢~ REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON JULY ta, 19V1 KERRY K22~RADSHAW EXP• /2-31-07 (0-Sati Findings -Exhibit "D" Lone Redwood Grove Tentative Plan File No. 06071 Section Descri tion 16.10.030 General Information -General information shall be shonm or included with the tentative plan.... Findings: The applications contain all of the general information re wired under this section. 16.10.040 Existing Conditions shown on tentative plan.. Findings: The tentative plan contains existing conditions such as power poles, trees, and existing structures. 16.10.050 Additional information -The follozaing additional information shall be inch.tded on the tentative plan; streets; location, width approxiratate grades, approximate radii of curves and the relationship of all streets to an y projected street, lots shozt~ing approximate square footage and dimensions; and easements..... Findings: The tentative plan includes all of the required information. 17.20.020 (A) Permitted Uses -Single Family Dwellings Findings: This tentative plan will create a total of four 4) sin le famil residential lots. 17.20.050 Density, lot area, lot width, and dimensions..... Findings: The proposal meets the minimum re uirements of the code section. ~i ~TTA~HIVIEIVT " ~=- Conditions of Approval -Exhibit "E" Lone Redwood Grove Tentative Plan File No. 06071 Condition Number Descri tion 1 of 5 Applicant must meet requirements of the Building Department, Public Works Department, Planning De artment, and outside a enc re uirements. 2 of 5 Applicant must provide a recorded copy of the lot line ad'ustment rior to Ci si in the Final Plat. 3 of 5 Lots 3 & 4 shall take access from North Tenth with a shared drivewa 4 of 5 Tentative Plana royal is valid for one ear. 5 of 5 Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan, every effort should be made to preserve the existing trees on the roe .Particular) the Redwood tree. AT 1 AV~M~N 1 " 99 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Officia4 BUILDING DEPARTItAENT STAFF REPORT DATE: 4{10/06 TO: Planning Department Planning file number: 06071 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Lone Redwood Grove T/P Name: Parmenter/Storm/Huftding Address: 1610 Jasmine Ave. City: Medford State: Or. Zip code: 97501 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 37T-2W-Northeast 1/4 Section 3 PURPOSE The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. -1- BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUiLD1NG DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with al} current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and Chapter 4 of the ODSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered, c. Elevations ofi the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Gradingl excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and ORSC chapter 4 regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. -2- "~ ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT Lois DeBenedetti, Building Official A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits wilt not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalied. Exception: 1. The upper 1. 5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of- way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point sha61 require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with the 2005 Oregon Residential Specialty Code should be submitted for each residence upon approval of this application. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. -3- ~ ~i Public Works Department ~~~^- CENTRAL Pd 1 NT _ _ _ _ ___ . _, ;r~~ PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT April 18, 2006 r't°~.~ 9 !°11 IIVI~NT 66 ~ Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. AGENDA ITEM: Four Lot Subdivision for 37-2W-03AD, Tax Lot 3000 Applicant: Brad Parmenter, 1610 Jasmine Ave., Medford, OR 97501 Zoning: R-1-6 Traffic: __ Base on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, an fourt lot residential subdivision will generate approximately 4.04 peak hour trips (PHT). The City of Central Point typically requires traffic studies for any development that generates more than 25 PHT. No traffic study is warranted for this development. Existing Infrastructure: Water: A twelve inch water line exists in North Tenth Street. An eight inch water line exists in Crest Drive. Storm Drain: There are existing curbside ditches in Tenth Street. No storm drain facilities exist in Crest Drive. Street Section: North Tenth Street is currently atwo-lane street paved to twenty five feet in width. The City has recently retained jurisdiction of North Tenth Street from Jackson County Roads and is in the process of obtaining funding to improve it City Collector Street status. Crest Drive is a standard City Street. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. 140 South Third Street =~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Conditions of Approval: 1. Tenth Street Improvement -Developer will be required to install curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to North Tenth Street for parcels three and four. Additional asphalt is needed for this to be accomplished. The Developer shall in lieu of installation pay the City for the estimated value of this improvement. The city will install curb, gutter and sidewalk along North Tenth as part of the City improvement plan estimated to start in 2008. 2. Public Utility Easements - A standard ten feet wide Public Utility Easement (PUE) shall be dedicated on the final plat adjacent to North Tenth Street and Crest Drive. 3. Shared Access Drive -North 10th Street is classified as a Collector Street in the City Transportation System Plan. Limited access is required upon the street. Applicant shall share one drive-way access for Parcels three and four. 140 South Third Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 * 549.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 J 8 V Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road omm;,~;°h White City OR 97503-1075 ~ ~;r (541) 826-7100 (voice) (541) 826-4566 (fax) ~9~ s~°a ~ CCNED~'~ P "An InternationauyAccredited Fire Department" r°~~=~a~ ~ '~ April 10, 2006 Fire District #3 Comments: Project #06071 Lone Redwood Grove • Submit plans for Fire Hydrant location • Type of buildings planned Mark Moran DFM 04111!2006 11:00 J~~a~~.6Y SfW~~~ . ~. ~`' I~ ~~~,~,: A.pzil 11, 2006 541-6647171 RUS °~'~(''/~ (~~/~ FACE 01102 1 1 !'i~ 1 i l V 1~ ~~ LL -°'°r'°' 98 ROGUE VAL~.EY SEIrIVER S~RV~CES Location; 138 West Vil:ts Rood, Central Point - Mailing Address: PO. Bax 3130, Ccnt.rnl Point,OR 975020005 Tel. (541) 6b4fi300 or (541) 77y-4144 PAX (541) 664-7171 www.RVSS.us Ken Gerscb.ler FAX GG4-6384 City of Central l?ou~t Planning Department 155 South. Second Street Ceixtral Point, Oregon 97502 Re; Lone Redwood Partition, J~S1e # 06071 Dear Ken, The subject pzoperty is currently served by a coz~ncction to tl~e 8 inch sewez-.m.ain Crest Drive. T.hi.S connection must be located and sealed within 5 feet of tb.e property line when the existiz~.g home is removed. The service cart later be extended to serve development on Lot l.. Sezvice to Lot Z will .require a new cot,nection to the zx~ain line on Crest Drive. Sewer service to Lots 3 and 4 will require a main l.i.ne extension on 10`" Street. The most logical place to begin this extension is the intersection. of 10`x' and Crest. Tl~e sewEr main zr.ust be designed and constructed i_rz accordance with ItVS standards. If you need addi.ti.oy~al information, please call me at G64-G300. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, 1',E. District Engineer K:\DATI•~\11GENCIES\CENTPT\PLnNNG\PARTITION\2006\06071 LONE Ir~EDWOOD.DOC so ~,~'T'A~-I~JI~~IT " -~ !, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVALTO CREATE 4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS KNOWN AS LONE REDWOOD GROVE SUBDIVISION (Applicant: Brad Parmenter) (37 2W 03aD, Tax Lot 3000) Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted application for a tentative plan application for a parcel located at 1015 N. 10~' Street, property identified by Jackson County as Account 10137294 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May 2, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 16 -Subdivisions B. Chapter 17.20, R-1, Residential Single Family District Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.20, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.60, relating to application presentation, special requirements Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006) ~1 Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for tentative subdivision is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A" "B" "C" "D" `B" "F" "G" "H" > > and "I" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of May, 2006. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 2nd day of May, 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006) ley ©f et~tr ,i ~ Fl~l:> ~~~ , , _ ,~ 14Q 5o.Tt~ird St., Central fain[, Or 97r t~ 541.664.3327 Fax 541.664.6384 w~vw.ci.central-point.err.us S'l"A~~"I+' ~EP4T~`lC May 2, 2006 :~~~~~~~;. ~, F i~~lit i iuin~)ilrr,~,hit i; ~47C7"1PT1Ui~ii~~ U~w~~r>~~nu'~i( f)ir~r~ t<>r/ !\;~:ititru ~i i~ity /~,<iniinistrator ITEM: Consideration of amendments to Title 16 and Title 17 of the City Code, City of Central Point, Applicant. STAFF SOURCE: Tom Humphrey, AICP BACKGROUND: In July 2005 the City Council passed a Resolution of Intent directing Planning Staff to amend portions of Municipal Code Title 17 (Zoning) to reflect locally recognized strategies and to better define the City's commercial zoning nomenclature. The permitted uses within commercial zones are better described and standards far site plan review have been added. The C-2, Commercial Professional District and the C-3, Downtown Business District zoning classifications are being deleted because they have long been replaced with newer classifications such as EC, Employment Commercial and GC, General Commercial zoning. City staff is also introducing other changes to the code including adjustments to Flag Lats (Section 16.36.040) and the permission to build Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The amendments presented in this report have been reviewed by the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC} with a favorable recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This is the third set of `legislative' amendments being presented to the Planning Commission this year. For purposes of the Planning Commission's consideration each proposed amendment is attached as a separate section, labeled as Part 1 through Part 5. The proposed amendments and a brief summary of each (in italics) are presented below. Section 17.08.010 Definitions, Specific; Sections 17.32 C-N, Neighborhood Commercial District; Section 17.44, C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District; and Section 17.46 C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District. Summary: Update the description of General Definitions, alphabetize and add definitions for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU); Anchor Tenant; Retail Establishments, Large; Shopping Center; Shopping Center Anchor Tenant Ratio; Shopping Center, Community; Shopping Center, Neighborhood; and Shopping Center, Regional. The new definitions are self explanatory and have previously been discussed with the Planning Commission. Pros: Nfodernizes the description of general definitions and defines terms used in the ordinance that have not been clearly defined, or are not defined at all. The change simplifies any future uncertainty about the City's intent for the uses that are defined. Cons: None. Page 1 of 3 -,, t c 14{}SC3.T~tiYf~~t.,CE't'ICYd~PCal~ i,C1~ ;ii;' ~ I~;iii I I~iin~~I,rP~~,l11t I'. r 541.f64.3321 ~ax54~~664.~~84 ~ • , ~ t ~~n~uu~nuy I?c', t~ln~>nx iii ~,~trri i~~ri lNi!~1Vir.CL~4~'t"I~fd~-~X01f1t.C1C.~15 ~ ~ ~ ~ I `,I`;I~lll[ (It,~,~[~1lll~ll`,Il.lf~)I Part 1 Clarify and/or Add Definitions to Section 17.0$.010 and Cross 12cference these Definitions to Sections 17.32, Section 17.44 and Section 1.7.46. 2. Section 1'7.'77.005 through 1.7.77.070 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) Summary -Currently the use of an ADU is limited to the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) zoning district or in alder parts of town where they have been `grandfathered" in the past. Section 17.77 introduces the ADU to other parts of Central Paint where they can meet the general and special provisions of this section. Pros: Permits the establishment of an accessory dwelling unit outside of the TOD in conjunction with a single:family dwelling within a single family residential zoning district. Provides potential for more affordable owner and/or renter occupied housing. Cons: May be perceived as `crowding' or an unrestr°ictive residential land use . Part 2 Add Sections 17.77.OOS through 17.77A70 Accessory Dwelling Units. 3. Section 16.36.040 Flag Lots. Summary - Madijies an existing subdivision code provision which required a newly created lot to be twice the area of the minimum lot size for the zoning district. The new language limits the number of lots that can use the flag pole' access to two (2) and stipulates private driveway improvement standards. The amendments also uses an illustration to minimize confusion. Pros: The amendment encourages modest infill development and is a more efficient use of residentially zoned land.. Cons: None Part 3 Modifies Section 16.36.040 Flag Lots 4. Section 17.72.010 through 17.72.080 Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Summary -Modifies the existing site plan code provisions to promote `sustainable' development, reduce automobile reliance and improve building design standards in areas of the City beside the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) district. Code changes add new language for Approval Standards and Criteria; for Site Design Standards; and for Building Design Standards. They address streets, parking lots and walkways,• natural features; view sheds; transitions in land use density; landscaping and lighting. The changes also place greater emphasis on a building's architectural features. Page 2 of 3 '-` It;)/ ~f ~i~i a ~ ,l111; j 1405a.Th7ird5fi~„Cents IPo'~~~,ar975CT2 ~ I~- ~ ~ Itrniluin;~luc~y,I~l(I', 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664,6384 { tvc~t~'1triUt~lt)~ l)tw~~l~>~n~it nt;)i~~{~~ torf www.ci.central-poir~7t.ar.us ~ f A`~~,iz(~u,+ tis,~ hrin~ini:~t~„i<,r Pros: Requires more innovation and creativity from new andlor redevelvpr"ng property and `raises the bar' in an effort to achieve the goals of the City's Comprehensive and Strategic Plans. Cans: Potentially adds cost to new development however this may be af~set by increasing the overall value of the property far lease or resale. Part 4 Modifies Section 17.72 Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval by adding sub-sections .41 through .43. 5. Section 17.12.020 Zones -Classification; Section 17.36 C-2, Commercial Professional District; and Section 17.40 C-3, Downtown Business District. Summary -Deletes references and follow-on explanation of C-2 and C-3 zones which were taken off of the zoning map when the City Council adopted the new EC, Employment Commercial and GC, General Commercial zoning districts in the TOD and TOD Corridor. Pros: Cleans up Title ~ 7 references to zoning that no longer exists in the City.. Cons: None. Part 5 Modifies Section 17.12.020 and deletes Section 17.36 and Section 17.40. ATTACHMENTS: A. Notice of Public Hearing, dated April 1b~' & Apri123rd, 2006 B. City of Central Point Zoning Code Part 1 through Part 5 C. Planning Commission Resolution No. _ ACTION: Consideration and Recommendation of Approval of Proposed Amendments. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of proposed amendments with revisions and corrections recommended by the CAC and Planning Commission. Page 3 of 3 ~l ! 1 /-1~~AY1~! ~~ tB /~ 99 City of Central Point Notice of Public Hearing Publication Dates: Apri116th & Apri123rd, 2006 Meeting Dates: Tuesday, May 2, 2006 -Planning Commission Thursday, May 11, 2006 -City Council Times: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall Council Chambers This is public notice that the Planning Commission will be considering a legislative Land Use Regulation amendment. On May 2, 2006, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to formulate a recommendation for the City Council to review at another public hearing on May 11th, 2006. The City has determined that adoption of this ordinance may affect the permissible uses of your property and other properties in the affected zone, and may change the value of your property. THIS IS TO NOTIFIY YOU THAT THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT HAS PROPOSED A LAND USE REGULATION THAT, IF PASSED, MAY AFFECT THE PERMISSABLE USES ON YOUR PROPERTY AND OTHER PROPERTIES . There is the possibility that, if adopted, new land uses and zoning would have an affect upon the value of your property. However, this does not mean that the impact would be negative or reduce the value and may in fact increase it. PURPOSE: To delete the following sections from the Central Point Municipal Code: Section 17.36 - C-2, Commercial -Professional District Section 17.40 - C-3, Downtown Business District And add, or amend the sections below as listed: Section 16.36.040 -Flag Lots -Amending Minimum Lot Size Section 17.08 -Definitions, Specific (Adding definitions for "Accessory dwelling units," "Anchor Tenant," "Large Retail Establishment," "Shopping Center," "Shopping Center Anchor Tenant Ratio," "Shopping Center, Community," Shopping Center, Neighborhood" and "Shopping Center, Regional" ) Section 17.32 - C-N, Neighborhood Commercial District (Deleting portion of purpose and additional permitted uses) Section 17.44 - C-4, Tourist & Office Professional District (Amending purpose and additional permitted uses) Section 17.46 - C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District (Addition of permitted uses & conditional uses) Section 17.77 -Adding section to allow Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU's) Section 17.72 -Site Plan, Landscaping & Construction Plan Approval (Amending existing subsections and including additional subsections) C~ In accordance with ORS 197.610, OAR Chapter 660 ~ Division 1$ and SB 543 notice of this proposed amen ent was filed with DI;,CD on January 17, 2006. The entire proposed ordinance is available for inspection at the Central Point City Hall located at 140 S. TI tird Street, C~ ~ ~ttral Point, Oregon 97502 or by visiting our website at _ _ _ under Public Notices. A copy of the proposed ordinance is availalal~~ for purchase as well. For additional information concerning this proposal, you may call the Central Point Planning Department at 541-6 3321. CRITERIA The proposed amendments will be reviewed as to whether they are consistent with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and whether the public necessity and convenience and the general welfare require such amendment. CPMC 17,$$.010. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned legislative land use amendment may submit written comments until the close of the public portion of the meeting scheduled on May 2nd, 2006 for the Planning Commission and until the close of the public portion of the meeting scheduled on May 11th, 2006 for the City Council meeting. Both meetings will be held at the Central Point City Hall Council Chambers, located at 140 S. Third Street, Central Point, OR. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, Planning Department at 140 S. Third Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502 or by email to li~ -' " '~_ ' : o ~ ~ P ~,~,.. ~_~~F. 3. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission & City Council. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon, including the City staff report, are available for public review at City Ha11,140 S. Third Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502 or by visiting our website at .+ i ~ _ _ ~ ;.c u~ under Public Notices. Copies can be purchased at City Hall for 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext 291. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE: For additional information, please contact Tom Humphrey at 541.664.3321 ext. 230,, City of Contra} Point Zoning Coc}c -}'art 1 Section 17.48.014_Definitions, Specific lecessorv Dtive}IinF Linit (ADL). "~lccessorv D~vclht)~; I)~~ll.' SIJCiIIl~ an tlUachrcl or det<~ehed unit that {provides rout{Mete independent li~~ing,lzcilii.icti~)tu1 that ticr~,eti~it:_tzt~ accesso)~; uce tci a uritnar~~ single d~~~cllin~*,t~~iit., i\c~~tis~rv. c3w_e!I),iig tic3.tt~, dtf,f4t (r~ti. ~~nest cluarterti. ~yhich clo no€ provide ilydepenclcr-t Il, ing_l~tcl(rti~~.. Anchor Tenant. '`Anchor •l°ettant'' means a 1_ar~c 12etaii lstablishment :arch ati as stational or regional chain store straee~icall~r pl~eecl in a sho{~k~iii~ ccitter,so as to ~c»crute tltc mole customers for all of tltc stores located ip tl~c sl~yp{.~i~~b center. Itrtai} Estab}ishntcnt. Larne. A retail establisltrnent (C~enerai Merchandise Sales), a retail grocery establishment (Food attd L3evcraste Sales o€• an cstablishrnent r~~iilt a calnl~ination of bout uses with a floor area of thirt~° thotlsalul (3(},OOO~sc i); •)re feet or jreater. which includes ~ro5s floor area outdoor ctora~e areas. and nnv outside are<) «~hich provides associated services to the ,public such as but not limited to outdoor ntercltanclise display. sttaci: bars etc. "Cho door area does not ntcludr molar ti~chii;Ie ~azking or loadinm areas. For the ptu-pase~ of detetzninina the ak,plie•tbility of the thirt~}~ tltou~and (30 O()0) square fnot t7c>~~r.arrtt, €he agr)•eszate sc;uare t:ootar~e of all ac{jacent stores. which share clteckstancls. ntana<=entent a controlline o~v_,__n~r~lt_sp iluetest, attcl starage areas shall be considered ot)e_establislnttent, e.,., a }}Inns nurset•v associated i~~itlt a *Sencral merchandise stare. suelt as a home impravcntent store. Shopping Center. "Shopping Center" means a group of commercial establishments planned, developed, owned or managed as a unit; related in location, size and types of shops to the trade area it serves; and including an overall landscaping and parking plan and other design elements intended to tie the individual stores into the total "center" concept. Shopping Center Anchor 1'rztant Ratio. "Sltoplting Center A-tchar Teltant Ratio'' is the share of a sltoppi)tg center's total gross floor area that is attributable eo its anchor tenants. Shopping Center, Community. "Shopping Center, Community' is a sho{aping center with 2 or snore anchor tenants and having a total gross floor area of not less titan 100,000 sy. ft. and not more than 300,000 sc{. it. with a znaxitnunt anchor tenant ratio of 50~%0. Shopping Cente~•, \eiglt}torhood. "Shopping Cc€ucr, Neighborhood'' is a is a shopping center with 1 or )Wore anchor tenants and having a tat<~I gross floor area of not less than 50,000 sq. ft. and not snore tltau 50,000 sq. li. ~~ith a tnaxnttuJn ancltar tenant ratio of 1 of7 C~ Shopping Center, Regional. "Shopping C`cntcr, 1Zcgion~Il" is tl shopping center with minimum of 3 anchor tenalz.ts and having a tot<rl gratis 17n<n• area <~f not le„ than 3()0,00() scl. ft. lvitl.I a maximum anchor tenant ratio ofGO°i,,. Chapter 17.32 C-N, Neighborhood Commercial District Section 1'7.32.014 Purpose. The neighborhood commercial (C-N) district is iutencicd to _ p pp' gJ#icilitics to serve the clay-to-day retail and ~oeteteli:_ce~xers______._._~-._. rovide locations for convenience sho In service needs of adjacent neighborhoods, and to implement the Central Point comprehensive plan. The C-N district locations should be away from the downtown business dIStrict and central to or on the peripEtery of residential areas for ease of access. The C-N district provides a way to reduce automobile trips by allowing businesses within walking distance of many homes. Sec#iott 1'7.32.420 Permitted Uses. The fotlowillg permitted uses and their accessory uses are permitted outright, subject to compliance with all applicable Inullicipal, state, and federal environmental, health, and safety regulations as well as the requirements for site plans in Section 17.72. CJ. ltieiz*ltborhood Shop Ip'I~Centers. ~vlticlt ntav incluclC any of the }termitteci uses in this section. Chapter 17.44 C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District Section 17.44.010. Purpose. The C-4 district is intended to provide for the development of concentrated tourist commercial and entertainment facilities to serve both local residents and the traveling public, and also for tEte development of compatible major professional office facilities. C-4 development should occur at locations that will maximize ease of access and visibility from the Interstate S freeway and major arterial streets and to be convenient to the users of Expo Park, the airport, and downtown. (Ord. 1436 Section 17.44.420 Permitted Uses. B: Tourist and entertainment-related facilities, including: 15. C`ommwtuv sl1C}nollt~ Centers wltlch maV ltlcJtldc anv of the I~ermitted uses itt this section and stay also include the tiilioevittg uses: a. Supermarkets; b. Department stores; c. Sporting goods; d. Books and stationary; e. Gifts, notions and variety; f. Florist; g. Leather goods and luggage; 2of7 ~~ h. Pet sates and related supplies; i. Photographic supplies; j. Heahh food; k. Self-service laundry; 1. Antique shop; m. Delicatessen; n. Pastry and confectionary; o. General apparel; p. Shoes and boots; q. Specialty apparel; r. Jewelry; s. Clocks, watches, sates and service; t. Bakery, retail only; u. Bicycle shop; v. Audio, video, electronic sales and service; w. Printing, lithography and publishing. Chapter 17.46 C-5, Thoroughfare Conunercial Distc•ict Section 17.46.Q2Q Permitted Uses. C: Retail outlets, including; 29. Colnlrurnity sh•__o~,~p1_n•g_ccntel: ~?.~Iuch lnav include anv rzf~ the permitted uses in this section and maw alalso include the foflo«~in~, uses: a. Super rnarkets: b. Dcpartmc:llt stores: c. Spo1-tin~ r;onc{s; d. BOOks at1Cl SfF1t1o1tarV: d. G{ftS. 11ot10115 arld 4`arletY; f. I= lorist: g. Leather <~oods and lu<~<~~1~e; h. Pet sate; and related supplies; i. Photographic supplies: •j. I•Iealtl~ food: k. Self=service laundl•y: 1. Antique sho ~; na. Delicatessen: n. Pasu•v and confectionary: o. Ciencral apparel: p. Shoes and boots: q. S seciait ~ a > >ar•el• r. .le~~s~elr~=: s. Clocks. watches. sales and service• i. Baker4-. retail onlS~; u. Bic ~cle sho : ~~. :audio. video, electronic sales and ervice: 3 of7 1e. Pritttitt~ lithograt~li~~ and ptil~li~hing, 30_. 1.~rge Reaail,__1SI~I~litihnac~lts.lcs~_lh~tn..SU,OOQ sdi~c~rc, Section 17.46.030 Conditional Uses. The following uses are permitted in the C-S district when authorized in accordance with Chapter 17.76: 2~. L_ar~ Retail Establislinfci3t_grcaicr_th~tn_i;Q,~00_~quarc_fccL, 26_Accessory uses and buildiz3gs custonlariIy appurtenant to a permitted ~~,- - Formatted: Indent: Left: i^ use, such as incidental storage facilities, niay be permitted as conditional ' ~ Formatted: &iltets and Numbering uses when not included within the primary building or structure; 27`Permi[ted uses that are referred to the planning commission by city •~- ~ ' -Formatted: Indent: left: 1^ staff because they were found to exhibit potentially adverse or hazardous ~ ~ Formatted: euttets~and Numbering characteristics not norinaliy found iii uses of a similar type or size (Ord.l _ •~•~~~ 4of7 City of Cen#rat Point Go>Ilin~ Coctc -- fart 2 ACCESSOR'k' I)~~1~IsE.[..IN{= UNI'1;S (A1)L]} ~~Ctlt~Itti; 17.77.{}10 l'el7taitte<1 in residential 1Z-i. and !t-l Districts 17.77.E?20 }?royisions for tivater and sE:~ver. -_.~___ 17.77.(}30 Only one accescc~t~y: cl~velfing mit•.l>e1R5ittLle.-(;~il~ily d~~~ellins:_ 17.7?.0~0_.__.-_--General provisions, 1?.77.0,5{1 Special proF'iS10I1S. 17.77.060 1'etniit -Pee ~~~rplication - Inst>ection. 1?_77.0711 Detached from single-family d~yellin~TS~~ccial, 17.77.00 1't>rUOSe The purpose of this section is to allau~ for cstal~ltshment C~i alt ac:Ct-«ttl'S d\~°v']Jitli? Elillt 111 et~njultetion ~r•ith a Sill~te-Tamil-r_d~~°etline within a sint*_le-family resi.ckcntial zoninEr district. An accessnr~~4~eIlins tnav be pe2•mitted as a means of providing more aft~~rdable l~c?usina oppartttnitics for }roun~T families. etltllty nesters and othe;rs• encouracinL additional density »~itlt minimal cost and ctisruption to surronndin~ Iteielltiarhoods: al.lowint irxlividuais and smaller households to retai22 large houses as residences: pravi.din~c~~nvenient care for the elderly anti ittfirm on a lc7n~-term basis; and altoivint~ more ener<~v-efficient use c>f lar«c. older homes. 17.?9.010 Perrnitted in redden#iat distz•ic#s R-1, and It-1. Accessory dtivelliug ul~its~ADLJs shalt be a~~ertuitted use in the K-I_ attd R-I residential districts as accessory to sin~lc;-famil,~ d~vellin~s subj.eet to the provisions of t1Eis eha} ter'., 17.77.02{1 Proyisiorts for water and se~F•er. No ADL' shall be permitted to be added t~,_created i~•ithin, or constructed on the same tot as the sirt~le-family d«~ctlin~~ to ~vhictt it is accessory without a prior certification from the public ~yorks dep~rtt~tent c~f_the city that ttte ~ya[er sutpiy artd sanitary se~yer facilities sen~in~ tl~e site of prnpgsed ,•1DL ar•e adequate. 17.77.030 O~rty one accessory dwetlink trni# nei:• sin~Ie-fanzi.ly d«•e11in~. Only ogre l1Dt1 shall be t~ermitteci as accessorv_to a single-family d~~•ellin~. 17.77.040 Genera} trovisions. j [) A.DUs sltal] be permitted as second d~vellinn units that are added to or created within or on the same lot as a sin~lc-family clwellin~:. S of 7 ,L?j_ r~}I housins; ancl_lniilding. c<xies anc#,_vt<tliclarcls_~hail_1)~„<tp.#>(ici~l)iC _i,<)__i3EI.,.\E711 IIiClUditlSr. httt nOt 11lnite(# t0,,,(lIC building ccsd~_th~ a~lui.iihtiig cci<1~,_II>c c.ic~t~icit co<ic, the r~tecitai~i.cal code, the firs code._uulail_3C(hlll(I11C1)Iti.<?# 111E C~lly elf (tlitl.d) ~~tlllll;, (;~ :1DUs that are adc{eci tt~_,gr created ~ti•itiiill_single-l.<~rni_ly„d~~-ellittgti, s1t(t.ll,__i~~t~t~ required to have se.paratc„iiu(e}~cl~dent utilit~~.connct.h~sm ,hci~~e,~cr.,_ 11~11~ th~t__~tiz:_ detached from_tlie srn, ~,Ie,_fami(v dwCliltlg ((S 4x'itzclt (Ili V a1c acccsse~l y ~h<ill h.i~~,~c.1~artltc i~ndc~teltdent tttility coiu)ecti~iis, tlnct ~oficl waste ec~li~e.tl~t», 4 The ~rosti floor area of an .\ccc;ssc~r~~.13ti~-cllit?~.ainit_shall cnnt;>n..~ttt_nu~rc,tl}<tiz ~><~: u of tite~r~ss floor area of tiie niaiti_dn;clli~lg.in ~aF,t~>>cv_l»(yr_tg th~_c.o{~SU~li~tf<~n c?#' €lte Accessory D~t~elliifg Ufait e>r 90f) scleiare feu, whtc,li c,x~r iti ie~~._ ?tio subdivision of lan~3 ~ir_riglatti c»^e~ocu#oininiunt iss tilk~u~eci sew as to ~Iiat~le Ilte safe or transfer of the Accessory Dwellin<b CJ~iit rode ~endc;l3tly_~f ~j~e main Ihvc!„_,,,liizg, Unit or other portions of the. X~ropert~~. (C} Ali ADUs shall he c{esigncd to mallttalu tl)e 1p~~,e;tr~tlce of the single-fantity du~cllinsY to wb.icii they 8i•e accessory. If an ADU exteltcis bevonci t#le curr~n€ focttttrint of time ~inble-fainih= d~ve111nrr it must be ccs~tsi~tent u~itli the cxist3ns; roof ip tch_ sidinf~ and K'indows of the sins~le-family dive([inrt. If a separa€e entrance door is_provided, i€ roust be located either off the rear or side of the sin~tle-fat1111y c)welllnt?, l~itY_1C{C31ftOFt~ to au e~istin~ stnletur~: or buildut~h~l} not e:xeeecl the alk>ivable lot cc?vcraee or encroach into the required setbacks. (?) All ADUs xx'hich arc at(ae}led to a tingle-family cixx•ellinzT slial3 have a sep<n~atc elitrancc ii~r the Accessory nweililt~ Uni€. t_iot it 511711„itot be located on the #i•oltt ol'ilte exis€in<,~ building.., (g1 At least two isfl=street parkuts; suaces sliall bc; provided }or each ADU in addition to the off-street,}aarkin•~paces 1'ecluired f'or tl~v sineic-f~amilt~ dwelling. U All AI)Us shad have separate s€I•eet addresses t}tat are v#siblc lroitt the strut and that dearly identify the loca(icm n#'thc ADt;. 17.77AS4 SpCCial prtlvisioiis. (}) The oxvner or contract purcltaser of record of the Siugle-f8it111y-_,(iWellin~= to which alt .~DLt is accessory shall i•e.~id~ either Ili the sntgle-ta1n11y du~c;lllni; or the Ant? a, a penltaiient place of residence and tihal3 not be permitted to ~•ent or iea~e the Dante TZie o~vnersltio of AUUs ntav riot he separated from oxvIlei'Ship of the Slitgle-fatnily dxx~e[lin~ to xy}licit they are accessory. No home occt~~tioiis, day care cente~~s or aclu}t filster homes sltall be I~ern3itted in r1.I)L1s or in slltgie-fauu}v dwellines to ~x~•Ilich they are accessory. 6of7 I7.77.OG0 Pet'ntit - F<<c - :1ltl)lic:tticrn - [uspi'cticrrr. { i} No ADU nta~_ be adder{ ic, created tivitltin <)r con~tructc:cl.ujq~i_tl~c__~,;~~ic;. lr,~ _a~_;i ._T__.._____.._~____......_._....__~._....>.......__..._... _.._... sir~~ke,=f~r~ti_]~~ d~a~elli_ii~ 1x~illtc~tit ~i •p~ri~tit,_tji~r~fctrc._isst~~cl.l~)_._t_lic.{'Isixlt).i~~~ I)..rj~ar[t»c. #1t_ {2,} Ak] applications fin• ADIJ pcrrnitti_sh_ill tic «~t_.(iii;ii~_..jry~~lidcd,_k>~~...k{tc.._I'I;i~iii.i~l I)cpartmm~t, and the.fee ft?r__~ __,uch j~crlnit, s{tall,l3~ ~tti j~ro~ ~tie,ti ~;t_tlie, hiril<1~ttg_ce~eic, [r3~~_t3efore any.pern~it_fc~r the creati~n_c?r..c~nslrustic?n__c>I-_atz_:~J)U_.i~_.j;r~nt~;.et,.tIxe proposed site thet•eot and the 1~1{tiffs ane~ til,c~iiicatit)nl thrr•t (<>>c st),tll be insj~cctcti jt~,the buitdin~: ofiicia] to assure that t~)e,j)Ct)__!_rSIOIt~ pl'II1t~ C{1FlptC1'_al'C t1C?t ~~1~?{1t~Ct. 17.77.070 Detached front single-fsrtnil~~ dwegiri~ -- Suecial. The fol{oa~ins~•,pr•ovisinns shall be aj~plicablc to detached t\k.~lis:, (1} ~L'aier, sewer and solid c~~aste collection shat{ be by ~}'8V Ol CC111nc;L'U(1t1S 1nC{ ~CCI'1c:C that is cornjiletely separate;~t <tp rt atr<i irutepent9cn.tj~ineler~d. ji•c>n~__tkte. sin~Ic-Ftinul}~ d~3~etlirtt to ~~~ltich such. ADU is accessory. (2) :1.11 detached Al7ts shall comply ~+-ith all setback arts( tieparation recluiremenis lcir deiaclteck accessory buildings except shat the ntinimwn rcar~.~ard setback shall bc. 1{}feet. Dc;taclted ADUs sha{1 lie dc'sis;netl in such a_mnnner as tt~ blend •t3~it}t_.or cornplentent the architectural desi~ri of the sin, lc-family dwellins; to which such .\k)U is accessot~-; approval of such design shall be made by the appeal board of'adjusinrent. (~ Detached ADUs shall ahttre tl)c same hard-surfaced drivc.,.__:u°ay as tlte: sirt~le-fantite~ dt~~ellin~,to «-}tich such ADU is accessory. and shall have direct access to the strut u t~~ltich the single-family chveliistc ti•onts. ]ya nets or adclittonal curb cuts shall be t~ermitted fi7r the ADU. (5_1 Detached ADUs shall have a tniniroum of 24 feet of unobstructed street fronta~~e ~;'ith no inten~enin~ stniclure:s to ensure adequate ~>isitiikity and accts. f,>r erneroer.tcy vehicles. ~ of 7 9 ~~: City of Central Point Zoning Cocie -- fart 3 Section 16.36.040 Flag Lots. No partition shall Uc approved in which a flal; lot, as defined in dais chapter, is created unless: A. The parent and flab lob, excludnag~hy (lag.lwlv,,~~•hcthc~•, Ic;c, tttlc,c~) an ~<tsc me,n(, shall cantt~iy ~L~iilt,llae tnilailaauzaa lot Stae lot,~lu»c>>>ton „ticl ti~lh,~k tuluti,e.~i~cnt, ' • , for the zoning district in which tlae lot5,~i~c_located; ~, ., • - t .--- --._....... - B. 7'he f1Tab_}pole shall he~ao less thali twenty. feet wide and paved~o,priv~tte_standards 't~`~ as set forth itt the Standa-mci S}aeci)icatiotis Tic( CI»i,('ot~~n_1)etv~ils~Ci~•• of;Ce~ttr~l `~ Point Public Wol•ks_l?e}~~rtnlenf {Ord. 1650 (part}, 1990). '~• ~, C. i~`o fence, structure.- or anv other p1i~_tiic:.al ~b~t<iclc shalll lie r~laced ~iritltin tl~e fla? ~~ '`. .. pale: and ~ '. ~` 7?~/1 n~axiazturn of,_t~y°a (2 lots are allo~a:cci ~~ccc~s frgti~_~ Il~ig_l~ol~, ~. ` Street lofl . . Deleted crcalcd is at Ic~ai hvicc as I~ct,c in am Deleted ~ccua Deleted ,s ~~ Deleted: r.-..-.....-. .,. 'Deleted ~5 ~~~ Deleted ~~'~t~ _ ~Farmatted: Indent: Left: 0.25" Deleted: access to the lot is Deleted: with cartem or axplu~ltic surface ~ Deleted: city _~ Formatted.: Bullets and Numbering Formatted: Bullets and Numbering 9 City of Central Point Toning Carle -fart 4 Chapter 17.72 SITE PLAN LANDSCAPING AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL Sectioa~s: 17.72A10 Purpose. 17.72.020 Site plan approval required. 17.72.021 Application and review. 17.72.030 Information required. 17.72.040 raval Standards and Criteria. 17.72.41 Approval Standards and Criteria, Circulation and Acecss -~-~ Standards 17.72.42 Site Design Standards 17.72.43 Iiuildiarg Design Stanclards~ 17.72.050 Conditions on site plan approval. _ _ _ _ 17.72.060 Building pertnit issuance-Plan change. 17.72.070 Expiration. 17.72.080 Site plan compliance-Certificate of occupancy. 17.72.010 Purpose. The purpose of site plan, landscaping and construction plan approval is to review the site and landscaping plans of floe proposed use structure or building to determine compliance with this title and the building code, and to promote the orderly and harmonious and sustainable development of the city, the stability of land values and investments, and the general welfare, and to promote aesthetic considerations, and to help prevent impairment or depreciation of land values and development by the erection of structures or additions or alterations thereto without proper attention to site planning, Iandscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in relation to the development of neighboring properties, anti to reduce auto reliance and to incrc,ase transii use as required by the Orman "l'ransportation Planning Rule, (Qrd. 1436 ~2 {part}, 1981}, 17.72.20 Site plan approval required. A. A site plan application conforming to the requirements of Section 17.72.030 shaI[ be made: 1. For all construction requiring issuance of a building permit; or 2. Upon a change of use. t of 21 Deleted: Design Deleted: ~ ~~ 13. ,Upon change of use the requirement for a site plan application }nay be waived Deleted: isccpt fur ak C•i zoning .. by city staff if staff determines tiaat no modiGcatioc}s are necessary to the distri"' _ _ - ~ ~_ ___ existing access, parking, driveway, or any other facilities on the site. Deleted: ni>n,rat;ha"~~r,r"`~ C,~Site plan applications for properties located in 12-I., or R-1 districts shall be reviewed and approved by staff unless referred to the planning commission when unusual features or circumstances of the site or building could result in an adverse impact on the neighborhood or adjaceccf properties. Staff may, in its discretion, waive the site plan application Ming fee and any of the requirements of 17.72.030 (D) for: ., ~` ly Deleted: <tt: In the C-3 zoning disWa, the rcquircmcnt for a site plan at>E>lication nny tx ~{ wai~•cd by city staff iL'~ C <rl>'i'he projcci involves either a ciu~nge of use or on3y nrainicnancc. rchabiliunimr or:nocknrizatirnc ofan existing building: atxt c@: City siafZ'ektennines t4iat nn nxxli(icatiats arc necessary to the existing ~; access, driver4:ry, or any oUtcr ficiiitics nn Urc sift, cxcludingparking.~ Formatted: Bullets and Numbering 1. Single-famiEy residential structures; and 2. Storage sheds, patio covers, garages and carports, decks, garebos, and Similar non-occupied structures used in conjunction with residential uses. .D. When the siting of a structure has the potential to interfere with future streets extended from subdivided or partitioned lands, such site plans shall be subject to approval by the planning commission. ~._ L.~;rt;e retail establislvneuts and sho~~iccg•cecuers shall be submit fo approval by the planniit~comt3}.issiocc. t -- ~ - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering G. No building permit shall be issued until approval, as provided in this chapter, ~~;-' - Formatted: Indent Left: 0.5" has been obtained for any building or structure requiring plan approval according to the ~ Formatted: Bullets and Numbering provisions of this title. H_;_,. Site plan applications for properties located in R-2 or R-3 districts shall be reviewed and approved by staff if such applications consist of entirely new construction of a single building on a single tax Iot having direct access to a public street. Staff may refer such applications to the planning commission when unusual features or circumstances of the site, building or improvements could result in an adverse impact an the neighborhood or adjacent properties. (Ord. 1745 § 1, 199b; Ord. 1730 § I, 1995; Ord. 1717, 1995; Ord. 1702 §3, 1994; Ord. 1684 §63, 1993; Ord. 1b15 §52, §54, 1989; Ord. 1436 §2 (part}, 1981}. 17.72.021 Auplication and review. Applications shall be accompanied by a fee defined in the city's adopted planning application fee schedule. Such applications and the review thereof shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 1.24 and all applicable laws of the state. (Ord. 17$6 §9, 1998; Ord. 16$4 §b4, 1993; Ord. 1436 §2 (part), 1981). 17.72.030 Information required. An application shall be filed which shall include the following information: 2 of21 ~~ ;- - Formatted: Indent: left: 0.5" Formatted: Bullets and Numbering e,9 ! A. Name and address of the applicant; B. Statement that the applicant is the owner of the property or is the authors7cd agent of the owner; C. Address and legal description of the assessor's parcel number of the property; D. The application shall include a~i accurate scale drawing of the site, containing, at a minimum, the following: 1. North arrow, 2. Scale used, 3. Address and legal description of the assessor's parcel number and tax [ot of the property, 4. Lot dimensions, S. Applicable city zoning designation, 6. Setbacks, 7. ,~`andscaptng_plan>._ _ $. Location of all buildings, parking areas, streets, accesses, sidewalks, and other improvement, including the dimensions of each, 9. ,~rchiteetural elevations, -. 10. Distances between buildings, parking areas, streets, sidewalks and other improvements, 1 t. Surrounding land uses, 12. Easements, 13. Adjacent streets, l4. Off-street parking a~arkinL calculations, I5. Existing trees, 16. Pedestrian routes and sidewalks, 17. Fencing, 18. Screening of outdoor trash bins, 19. The location of all public improvements and all utilities, including their relation to other utilities in the area; and CDeleted: Proposed 1 ~ Deteted: Circwnd and n~^~ E. Architectural plans and such other plans and information as are required to show the architecture and exterior materials of all buildings. incltidinu other improvements; F. In the discretion of the city, a Traffic lni,}~act Analysis preparecl~y a licensed _ - ~ o~~: ~~'a~~~~ -- .._ ,professional, traffic.engineer; and _ _ _ _ - - Deleted: • Deleted: traffic G. tSuch_additional information as is necessary_to carry out the purposes of th_i_s _ ~~_ _ Deleted: y chapter. {Ord. 1685 §65, 1993; Ord. 1436 ~2 {part), 1981). Formatted: Bullets and Numbering 3 of 21 e1° 17.72.44 r~uproval Sfanc{ands and C:ritcria, Gc~nct•aL In approving, CondllloilaJly approving, or denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their decision on the~standards,.~r~id e;rit~;r'i,a„set_fctrth in 5cc,trc~ns_I 7 72,=4g. th.rou~h_ 17.72.43 A. Landscaping and fencing and the constnzciion of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantsally interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. Tlie planning coimzzission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screening purposes and for sound and sight insulation from existing neighborhood use; $. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with dze traffic flow on public streets; C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestriaez and veliicIe flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; E. Accessibility and suff`zciency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fzre lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; P. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section 1b.20.080 pertaining to Fhe maximum number ofsingle-family dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cui-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and its environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the planning commission if found to be incompatible with the existing architectural or design characteristics of adjacent properties or uses, In addition, the planning commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, or other development requirements that may be necessary to ensure land use compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point residents. (Ord. 1702 §4, 1994; Ord. 1684 §b7, 1993; Ord. 1436 §2 {part), 1981). 4of21 Deleted:~nndards _ .........-.._._..........._......v_....._..,....,_~ _-- _...---.____•~---.--...._._._ ____.._l Deleted: following I Deleted e~ .'~ .27.72.41 :1F2>rot•al Standards and Criteria. Circisl;ttion and Access Standards A_ Public Strut St~nc{ard 1. Except forspecil7c traz~~x~},t<~tion. fac:ililic~,_idc~ttit3_ccf__iti._lhc.cit~~'s Transportation Svstcm Platt. tltc ~trcc,t p~~lc5tt.i~~n,'I>}1.e,1~.c.~ssu.~t~,~,,li l.E comply with standardss ~Lt fc~sth-in,thc, ~ts}»:c}arc3.Sp~c.~_f~c.<tttott~_<md C.Jnil~trn~ I3etails, Cit~• of f:'eniaal I'ntiit.l'ubltc. ~~~rk> 1)~f~<uttti~»t_~I},li ~>..pl~~ for all development. 2. All >stility lines shall b~ tt}ndcr rround_i~u(__uti[itti~ ~~ai:lt access lids._m_ty be located in the sidewalk area. ~. Connections shall he ~tt~-ided bef~~~ec;ai ne~~~trcea:5 i~i_a.•f~03a district or con•idor attd exisfii_.A.._~•~_l~cal and t~iinc~a~ c<~lic~t~c~r streets. 4. Public street. drivctvay, loadit~ area, anc{ surface parkin lot crossiu~s shall. t~~ clear] ~ marked and with texhn•ed ~tccet~t pa__,ti•itt.};•or p~~intec(tri,pe~. ~. Public Off-5tt•cet Access~a~ a~Pedestrian access_u~a}~s and ~rcen~va~~s slzottlcl be t}rovidecl <ts neede•__•_ d to su21plement l~~clecirian routes ttlont;.puhiic streets. I3. Parking I_ot I.~rive~vati;s I. Parking lot driveways t{3at link public streets and~or private sts•ects with p~arkit~ stalls shall be <{e.siLngd as private streets. un3e~s cane nf'_the f6110~~1'lrla ]5 met: a. The parking ]ot driveway is less than one hundred {eet lAn~.?; h. 7`(te t~arki.tts; lot drivewav set-~-es one or t«a residential units: or c. The parkitt~ lot drivewav provides direct access to an~lzd p~rkin~talls. 2. `I~lte mttztbes• and ~~-idtla of rlri~Jetiv~~s and ctu•b cuts should be minimized and consolidated «•lten possible. 3. «'here possible. parkins? lots for tte~a- development shall he dasietted io provide vehicular and pedestrian connections to adjacent sites. ~. Lame driveways should use distinctive,pavin„a~atts;rns. C. Un-Site F'4destrian and I3ic~-cle Circulation. .~.tiractive access rontc~ for edestriatt travel should be i~rovided hv; ,... 5 of 2t ~V 1. Reduci~i J c~, iista~tceti f~~lc~:c~~n.<icatiilzi#ic~n_c or.icl.i~~i~~_~i~~ca~.u_ch_<ts puhli~ sicieti.alk~ ae11Ci fatttfdln#; c,nlcifElc.~~..\t•'hcic af~ti~c~t»,i<stc cic~c,Ic~p _ . _.. .. pedestrian routes tht_o~ii ~it~~ ~.cici_hwlciin~. to 5u,ppl~n~4i)t tltr public; right-ni=t~~av. _. ro~~ic ntsr aEt attract7~•e. ci~nvensent pedesu•r<m acce~s~~~ay_~~i t~ui[<iing 6I] f Ca]1C8S. 3_ }3rid~c,ing across barrier` ttnci_ ~hstuclc:v u~ft„<~s #ragttie;ntcei i~aih~yr~y_ avste:n~s. Fvide streets.,Ile~ty}~ wc.IllCl~Ea[ li<l}IaC,,.jn(i ~hanr;c ~n le~cl b}~ conncctizz,~t~edestrian ~~atli~i~~~; ~~~itli.cle~rly marked cr~~s5tngs_ a,i~cl invitiztm sidewalk design. 4~,Intes?ratinr signage and iightin~~,.s}-tc~n ~~~hich ol'fe~~s i~~tere~:t end safety fo~edestrians. a. Goanecti__ ~.~arki,•_n~ttreas and dettnatiaris ~vitli pedestrian paths i.denti#ied throuLla Eis~ of c}istittctiyc•teal-ir~_~iz~ettet•ia(s..pa~~etnent stripitx~;s, grade separations, or lattcisc~~inL 17.72.~i2 Site Design Standards r1. Respect for;=~cisting F•aci}ities and On-Site FeatureG 1. Adiusttnents should l7e ~nac{~ duriit~site design t~_improvo_t13e: ovcr<-11 rel.ationshiA of a dev~elo~itnent or nn ~t~ciividu~il building the surraundll3Q contest. ~. ~latural Features I3uildin~s should he sited to preserve sinni#icant trees 2. F3uitdinss sltou}d be ,itcd to ~i}~oid or Icsse~i the int pact of de.velp ~7,1._~iciit on en~~ironinentally critical areas such as steep slopes, tivetlands._anci stream corridors. 3. Z~'Itcnet~cr possible, +~~etlands, rr,~, o~~c,;and natural areati ~lrauld b maintained as public preserve, and :~s open space ouportunities itt neighborhood,. ~}. In residential developments. the locaticm of rooms shnuld he considered in viet~- of solar c;xuosure. e•e. printarv living spaces should be oriented south. but a ~a~8st faein~ kite}~ei~ ~la~ul l be avoided cas it nlav result in sutnsner o~~erheatink. 6of21 ~. Outdoor strice slrcnilcl_he stratci;ic~illy si.lcd lu; soltr_<<cccss.aid, ti~~: COO~jitP~~Uttlnter ta~tit(35._ h. S hallow itttpacts. particular!}din ~e,~intcr, ctit acijacc~tl bitildit~s tnicl outdoor spices should be az-oideci. t_ Existirt~ Buildines vn_tlie Site t. l~'here a ne«= btiildin~ ti}tarc~_titc_~ifc.»_itfa aid itCjJll,li'ti~l~C.c:~1ti(ltl~ t~uitdina,or is a tnaictr addition tto_sitch a wilding, the~clesi~~n nf_ihe new buitdutgshould be compatible; 4vith the: oric*intil. Z._.~ieU. l~uildin~tro tamed f'c.~r e~iting_tic;,isEtl~orlic~etds ~vitl~ a ~}~411- de,fined artd de~irabi.e charact~r_dtotild b~ cotitt~atilsle tvitli or cc~niplemcnt the architecttn•al cltaractcr atici siting_p~ttern of nei~hbarin buildini;s. D. Net3• Prominent Situctures, slx~nt~i~iitcenters~ ttnd lttrgv retail esE~blishnrents 1. K.ev ubii.c o~• civic btiilciitt,gs,_~uclt as contmunity centers, churches, schools. libraries, post of~ccs. and museums. should be placed in ~•otninent locations. such as frotttin,~oii~{~ublic squares ar ~~~bct~e pcdestriatt street vistas termittate, in order to serve as Itindmarks and to svntbolicallv_reinforce their itn ortance. 2. Shopping C'entcrs and Lartre Retail I'stablishments shall be located o!i arterial or collector streets. 1~. Vie~s~s. The ntassiit~ of uulividual huildings should be adiustecl eo preserve important viet~~s white benefiting_new and eYistin~ occupants and surrotutdin« ttt~hbgrhgods. l~. Adjoittini? Uses and Adjacent Sorvices t. 'S~`lieti more irtteni~~e uaES, much as connnercial. inducfrial. or niultifatnily dtivellin~s, are within or adjacent to existing sinele-fant.ily neighborhoods. care should be taken to minimize the intact of noise. lii;litittg~and traffic an adjacent dt~=eliings. 2. Activity= or equipment areas should be strategically located to avoid disttirbine adjacent residents. 3. ;111 ou-site service; areas. loadintt zones and outdoor stor~,~~ areas. ~;=ante stot•atTe. dist~asal facilities. transfornter and utility vattlts. and similar activities shall be located in an area not visible from a street or public urban space. 7 of 21 ®~ ~l. 51L1)f OhSCUI'lll~.r'SCI'('Gilliti,T_~IY1~I ~)C_l)fO\-'IC{~lj_,t<,1:_<3ctlVl,l_IC~,<lE'C.~~.anci eyu~tnent thai_wili create nc».tic tiuylt a, londu)g_,in<1_\~hcc,lc. arc,as, air conditiot)i»~ uuit~. ])cat puttlp, c~h.ttist•_t<tt~~ <itlci_~<lib t~~ c.c?mi> ~ct~r~. tc? a\roid clisturbinsr acliaccnt resiclcnta. ICI, T'ran~itior)s in Dert_sii4• 1. Iii~_]ter densitZ. attaclt~c] ci\\~elling deyc~iments shall.. mii~imirc;--impact oz) ttdiacetlt existi~ ]c?tver_"cl~nsi(y din;.;lo,tas)yil}~_ci~vc,ll~ng,~ici~~hl?arhogci by adad~u1 sting hci~ltt. massizzg atlti matef,;ii115.<tr~c{;'~lr l~_prc)}.iditf.~adcclit~te buffer strips \aith ~°~~etatit~c screetzs. 2. Adequate buffer stz•ips \vith vcget~tti\~c screct)~ sll~t_I1 be pfacc;d Io rnitieate the impact of hit;h~r <leesit\~ de.~.elc~pmeizt an adjacent le~ti+~c;r density development. :3. Ne\t' residc;r)tial builclit~~ tvithir) filly feet ol~exititin ~ ls, c)\t; density residential development shall be nc>_higfacr than thirt}~ Si~;c feet ~.nd slid! be limited to single-fazn.il~_ detacl)eci c,r aitache;ci ur)its, clu}~leae~.•irilalcxes or four-olexes. 4._New eonune:reial builclin~s «~itl)in fitly feet crf existirz~, loy\- dcnsi~. residential ciel~cloninent shall. be ran higher tlzazz fort,\,~•-five; feet. ,1. I'arki t~ 1.. F'arkitt<= Lot l.,ocation c. If a buildink adioins sheet, or access\vays art hva or mor:; sides. off-street ~arfcin~ sha111~c a11c)tiY•ed bc;t`3=een the bt~i[_ciizit*. and the t~edestrian route in the follo~\~in; oi~der,of_I,~riority_ l st. Aceesswavs: 2nd. Streets that are non-transit streets; 3rd. Streets that arc: transit streets. d. l'arlcine lots and ~arattes shottld not be located within €~~~cnty feet of a street coaster. 2. l'arkint~l..nt Desi;~n a. ,~11 perimeter anti interior landscaped areas must ]rave protecti`~c Curbs alontz the c~e~. Trees must have a~uetc protection .froth ear doors and bun~crs. 8 of 21 V b. A poi•ti~~n ol~ih~,_stafi<l,}E_ci.p~irkm~;p_rrc t»a~~ br la>icls~a}x:d insicad_of,p,j~c,ct :I h~ i tndsc<lpui <u,~a ln,iy_..t>c. a}2_tc~ ri~,a icct_in front of the ~}>~c.~, 3~ mc.~tiury¢ ]l.cmi_,f link }~~u<}llcl, t~~ tlr~ <lttecliga gfche burhhc,r cif,~l,~c,htc.lc,}t.~ing,tlu.~}~ icc__I and~~,tputg.ml.ltit he rg_gu_ndur4~cr_hlattt~._Y he Jtutdti~~t}tng d~/c;S ttc~t a}2tLly fo~~•tucis._~iiy peritnetcr or intcric~r.}parkint;_.lrit...lat>_<lsc,iping rec;u.irenzcntti, l.~ui does COUtiI t0~4alCl~.cnt},.n\Ct 11~,~1t;C„]dnc{5u~}ntle_rvclun~raa~.;at, c. Itt ardor to cantrc~l dust algid muclall ~-ch.icl~.are<]s must,bc t axed. d~r•111 }ra~•ki~t.~_trc_l~ ~mt1t be su_i}~ecl, in_cc~nf~rnr._inc;e ~y~it(i_tl7c tit}; of L;entra( I'ourt.parl:it~.~ dirtiemion ~t mclt~rc3~ pct SecU~~~,17, e. •€'hottsthtiirl tiitit~,ol~parkins? <tnel ~~clticl~ access ti17<~itld be uect to miniinire the im,Exfct t~f automobiles on the pedestrian environment. adjacent properties. anti peciesh•ian ~afet,~. f Lar<~e,~arkit~t? (nts S}tOUld 1)e dlVtded lnta sItt2~1C1' 1I~C85_ USitt<~, fUl' C;Xarl7plc', lanC{SC~trl~ al' S,~LCi~i~~lr~itt__7~,,pF(tiCril~~,~ I'Ur L'_aCl]?~ trarkin, ~ paces ~~ minimum of ].f~U sa. ft. al:3ancl~cani.n=_> must be roeis{ed. K. _Lazrdscauiuz~ 1. Perimeter Screcnins and Plantine. 2, Parkin« Lot Lanciscapin~ and Screen_in~, ~. I'arkin~ areas shall be screened t~~itl; landsc~rin>,~fences. walls or a combination thereof as fella«:s: i.__"I'rces shall be ulantcd an the narkins* area neritneter anti shall be s aced at tlrit•h~ feet ou cc;ntcr; ii. l..ive shntbs and graund col•er plants sl.rali be planted i.n the landscaped area: iii. T:ach tr•ec shall be located in a four trot by fozu• font ntinintutn plantinz;arva; iv. Shrub attd ~rattnclcovcr beds shall be three-feet t~-ide minimum: v "frees anct_sizu_bs zxtust tie fu11~- uratected fram potential clarna~e b}~ vel•ticles. 9of21 a t~.--_Stirl<icc_I)~t'kliag.<3rc~IS.tihrt(f..t)r~_>~;i<IL I;critt~LlC!:.h<;i-kii-i~s.h)t Ltnclsc;hiitg.ac~~t~~tt tq.a titic~t_fh_it,ttt~c.t.c~n~ c>f (I>c Icillci~~`,ing standards: i. A fi.~e-(oc;t-}vide..pla~t,tirig,qtr.i.h_I;ct~~~ccii_tl;~,;>ubl_ic_ri.ght- n{=~~a} arici.tll~ p~ckina ~rc.<t., _I,Itc_I~lantir;~ sts tp n3ti~~_l;e intern{}~ted E;~_;~edcstrtan-~ce~s~ible and ~chica i~t, fICCCaSl1`ii ~ti, 11antltt~* 51:1 )S ~ttitll. ~)C ~illtt(:d \Vttil<Ut ....~ __.' ._~__.~ ~ .I_ _ I2 _._...._..__...__.__.._._ e},erc?t~een hec[~i:. Iled~c:: ~h.~ll.vc net less titan thirtc~-six inches ~ncl ncf titc7rc;_tha;l_ tart}_ci~ltt_ i~;cl;e~ iri licigl3t 71 ntaturitv~I fcci~, atici other„I~ttad5cp~n~; ~h~~ll t,c;.,}~f<~ntcci and roaintaincd to aft<tt„~d isdequatc ~igttt di5ittnc~ liar vclticle~ eni~cin~ iFnci_exiting ilte ~arkint; lc~t c. <:?aps in a buildittg_s_fmnt~7gc s)it g..l~ec~c5lriait su_eet that are ariiaccn( to ot:l=streeE }~arkin~,ateas and ~yhiclt exceeei ~ixiv-t.i~~e feet its length sh~sl{ f?e rec{acct{ tc.>_iic>_ttiore thta~i_si~tv„(ii~t_tvct in length tltcot~h isle of a minirttut;t eight-foe~t-hrs~h ~~re,e.tt i~tali.__:Clte screen ~~~alt shah be sotid~gri3l~mesit or_lattice t13at ottscure_at least titirtti ;tercertt of the interior vien~ {e.:r. at least tItirt~~et•cettt solid material to sc~•cnty percent traItti;sal"M1C~`. ci^ I'ar}__.,.:i~tg Area interior I..andsc~~in i.:lmount of Landscaping. x'111 surface parkins: areas with nutre than ten sp_tici`s mutt provide interior lanclsc•3ps corn 1 `ins= ~~~itkt one orboth nfihe srattdards stated lteio~~•: !1 Standard I. Interior Iand______._sc~}~is~g ~ttust be pr~cttiWaded at the rate of ts~-enty sq>.ta€"e feet }der stall. Ftr Ie:ast one tree must be planted for ever•i~ twc, hundred square feet of landscaped area. {iroundca~~er }slants must cant til e:tely cover the t~ent~is~der of'tlic tattdsca tecl_area, B Stazictarci 2. C)ne tree must be provided for ever} fitur harking spaces. If surrounded by cement. the tree planting area must have a tninimurn distension of four feet. If surrounded by asnltalt the tree nlantini~ arena must have a mittinutnt dimension of'three feet ii._ Dev~lolnnent standards for~arkinry area interior tandscapin<~: f0of2t ~.~'~,~i~li-J~~iidc~ii~in.;;..ri>ua crmii~h~_~i~ith_api7lic~ihlc yt~}dards 1.'rc cs a??d_shruh~ mz?st -~e, fully protected fi•c?rn j~otcntiail dam.<j~.~ ley ~chrc.leti, L.~__Intc:-rior-marl:tit.~,arca_i3ildSCfll)il_t~i11USl hC di~}lcc,cd t{irougl>c?u.t-ilrc._p irkii~~:,ctz-za Sc~mc Uc.vs may_bc. grqu,pcci Utit_.[hc s-raupl nui5t hc_dis}>u~cd; I'erimrlcr ku~dscai~ing niw_~?nt suhst_it}itc fc~r interic~r.laitcitc<+t~i~tg; i~c?~~_~~.c;r._irigc~:ic?i: lanciticct.pr._t tlta~~~ta~pcri-nuer l.lndscapin~ ors lon~t~ it_extends fi~ur fccc or more into flze p=arkin~ a~•ca_t~rc~rn_t(~c perimeter landscr~~e fine, i'arki»g areas riiat_t3re iliirty feet or lc~ izi 1~=idth nr<t ~ locatc;lhci3• intcrigr iandscapin<, arnuncl tJte c:dge.c~f tbe_I~arkiiit; arci.__Inte;•ic>r,landscanictg {~laceci alor~s~ a}i cd~c i ir} addition to ariv required ~eruneter lartdsc~{~ing. _I.,aitd~ca Hinz; Near Buildings. Lcittclc^apin~ s3l~ilE.ser4e ~s a screen or huf'fez• t~ soften tine at?~earaoce of•,trtzctures ar uses such a4 parkinsz lot. or large blank walls.-or to increase the attractivetze5s of common open s paces. 4. Serf-ice flreas. Service ar••._ eas, loac{iu~= zones. ~~asie disy~o~al or stor~iie areas mttst be fitilti screened [i-otn pubf.ic vie:«~. Prohibiter{ screenine includes chainlink fencing ~x~ith or without slats. a, acceptable serecnin~~iftc_iudes: i. _~ sit-foot masortrv enclosure. clecorati~-e metal fence enclosure. a ~~~ood enclosure; or other anI?roved tnateriats complementary to adjacent buildings: or ii~:1 sia-foot solid ltedt_e or other ip nt material sci•c;cn_ i~i~ as approved. 5. Street ~•rces. Streot trees shall be recuired alone bc~tlt amides of alld~ublic streets ~~-ith a sr~acin~ of t~~°erzty feet to forht feet on center de~endirtz~ on the mature «,=idth of the tree crown and planted a mitti~nutn of'tevo feet from the back of curb. Trees in the ri~ltt-oC-~vav or side~s~ctlk easements shall lac a~~rct'c-ed acc:c>rdiT~s~ tU_size;_qualit~r~.tr:e hell desl~tt.- if ant~(icable. attci_izri<~ation slzali be required. Tree species shall be chosen ti•ont the city of Central Paint apt~ro~~ed street tree list. l l of 2l ~~ I... Li~htin<= 1. Jblini»>ttnL 1_i~lttit]•g.L.e~=~lti:,l~.1i.u_i.iitum.ligf_~ti,r~g_lu,~-cls.tih<i.11 t~c;,ht;c~};;idcd #or }Ll~ hl1c.~E1fCtV 111 ii~] UI'U811 ~l>rl(,Cti_O11C11_IO I)UhIlC_t,l(,t,U,I,iti<~n.; a. A t1111]ItnU111 a~~~r~l~c, libltt_fi~_c;l, c~f_~~nc <1nd two-tcn_tic f~c?tcandlcs is required fot•_ut_lrln_~lx3ccs_a)7d titic~ti•1ik~;,• h. 1lfleta]-halide or lan7pl ~ti~ith sin~il<irLC}lor_t_c:ml~cralurc and et_ficiettc~ rstin,~~hall lie ti~ec]__for_gciicr>_l,_Iigl~ting_at_i~uil_clii-g e~teriol:~_~~arking ar~a~ci rshan_sp icc~ Sodtlim_b<t,ul l~na} elemei~k~ ire nit ali~~vcd; e~14 a~in]uin liel}tit]<= le~_e:1s shslEid not c~cecil sib fooTcru]ct1e5 at it]ter~gctions c}roue alai une-half to~tcandlc~ in,~}arking ~rea~: ?. I~irture De~i>;n itt Put}];c Rights-c>t-~~'av a. Pedestriat] scale street {i1;=I]t%ng_~llail h~_p~c]r~ided incluclins~ call ~}edestrian steeets aloes arterials, tnaior collectors. ruiner collectors and local streets: b~Pedesfriat] stre;ct lilthts shall !~e t]n tallc]~than t»~G)1l}=,(e:ct along atterials and callecte~r~mmand tiixteen feet along local streets. 3~Ot]-Site I.ightin~==, Liahfit]g ,hall be: taco x)rated ininto the design of a ~)rojcct so that it reinforces the; edestrian end=ironn]ent, provides continuity to an ~rea__y _ind enhances_tl]e drama as]d nres~ltce of arcl].itecturai features. Street litthfinR should be provided a1o]]t; sidewalks and in n]edians. Selected street l~ht star]dard5 Slx>uld be al}propriatcly scaled to tl]c pedestrian et~viro~u~~ent~r~deguate illuiniitatic~n c}u)uki be provided for buil.dinl? el•]tric;s• corners of t]uikjinrs, crntrt~=ards Llazas anal tivalkways: a._A.ccess~a~avs throe<~f] surface }I at•kin~ lots sl]all be ti~~Cll li 7lttec{ with fixtures tto taller than t~x~enty feet: b. Locate and desis;n exterior lighting of buildintr, ~igt]s walkways. parking tots. and c)ther areas to avoid castiu<z light on neat=operties. c. 1'2x(rlri: height atxl lighting levels shall lie col]]mct]surate with their intended use at]d fiulction and shall assure comp~ttibilitL~ ~~s~ith ]lei lthorins; land uses. Baffles shall be incorporated to minimize Aare and to f'ocas lightins7 on its intended area: t2 of 21 d. Additii?nal ~cteai-itin_ori~nl,c<I,_~itc••liglttii~g i~ic.l_u<i.in+~_slcp lights, well ligltt4 <tiicl hollaa~<I, ~ll<tl,j.lte, ple~~.ici~cl <>_1<~ng al,l, coai•t,~lyd li~nc,,_allc~, tact oif ,trcct hli.~,ar>.d,pc,dy~tr•iar}_.h~itll~t<.i3': e. In addition to lig(itingstr~ct~,.sidr~~.#ilkti,_<ii7d__iyttl~lic.paces, additiottal_proicct lightuta is unuxtrttL4d_to higl3l.t,gltl..urd illuminate burlcling entr utce,, i ]nds~<]ping^.~t~ui\`••<ind,pecial features. 17.72.43 13irildIi2b llesi~n Sfailclat•ds. :~. General l~c.c1Q[t €Zzc~liremelt~s. cii~ned tc~ prot~idL a scnsiti.~c traltsition t<~ lcllgcet~t lc~~~.~r•dentiity residential structures. ~~~i(it,considcrati~n for scale. htilk~.ltei<„lit, setback. anti areltitectural ~it_a_rttcter of adiacestt sinttlc-frmtily Commercial Structures and multi-cl~vctling sl3clt11cl,_i~e itc<t•;}rtc3 d~t~ellinLs 2. Contmereiat ancl_i-tigli 1~•1ix ResiclelttiatK:oltlmercial: a. Canopies, overhaltbs or aa-nutss•Shall be t~ro~ ided over entrances. ~1~vnings at the «~iut~cl level buildings al•e; enanu•a led. The exterior wails of all buiiciin~ facades aloe<J~edestrian routes. including side or rcitlrn lacades, shall be o€~suitable durable btlildil]t;; materials iitcluclitlg the #t711o~~in~;._siuccn, stone. brick, terracotta. tiles cc<3ar shakes and slti.ttties. beveied ship-lap or outer narrow-course horizontal bo~rrd5 or siding. vertical board-artd-batten siding articuiated archttc;ctural cortercte or concrete masonry units iC13U), or similar materiais u~hiclt al-e lou- maintel~ance. u~eather- resistent. abrasion-resistant. and easy to dean. Prohibited buildin~~ materials include the #i>llo~s~in•,g: Plain concrete. plait concrete block. c<~rrueated metal, unarticu#ated ix~ard siding {c.g. T1-1 1 sidit_1~;,_plain piy~vood Shaer pres~boar~ EYtet•ior Tnstllated I=inisit Systems (EFFSI and similar quality. nondurable materials. ~._____ X111 build fi•ontaLes t=.rcater than forty feet in leu.~th shall lireak any flat, monolithic fas;acle by including ciiscel•rtabk architectural clemeltts suclt as here not limited to: bay ~vindcnt••s. recessed entt•anc:ts altci tviltdo~vs dls~ly windows, col•€tices. bases. pilasters. colulttrts or other architectural details or articulation combined with chan~_cs in materials. so as to ps•avicie visual interest and a sense of 13 of 21 divisiost. in addition tt) crcatins~ ~ommunit ~ character ~md 17ec{ct•ri:m ac<t1C_, TI>c oycr_111_cicibn.h~ill_-rccc~gn,i>e that thc.,tiitnple relief 1>ro~ i<!cd 1~~~ ~~ tnci~~ uttcxstti at ~.ill~ c~n_an ~~ihcrwi~c flat fak.7~1~ tn. ~tnd caf )t~c.11. ~ipc,,_tt~t curet- tlic rcgtrirc;-Inent~ s~f~lliis,s~ctig_ii„ J. Iiuikfing dc~i~ns that result in`i ~trccl i'rot~l<t~c ti~'ith~i tiniform_i>>~d mc~rtotpn~~us design titylc,, rc?ol7ir~c_ctr_fayaclc_t-1•c<tltn~~it,i,.pc}t•~i~c.ejat,t~lc rill dcvel<>pnacnt shall be: designed tc~ encc~u~c ise b~~ E~ede~lri~tnti tar prs~viclin~:„it s~fc. c~iu[oct~l>ic,.aitci_intcretit.Eig ~_.~(l:ing en~~ iiron Mien (,• and (:'onvenient. direct and iclcntitiablc buildt_ng access shall tie pravidecl to guide a~strians bel~r_ee~aedestrian streets,- ~ccessava}'s, transit facilitic attd ad•Itccnt buiklincti. )3. Architectural C:haractcr 1. Getaeral ._.._.___ a~ ~ lac arclaitecttsra3 charactcri.tics of surrottnclin~,,,bktilciing`,, %ncludius: historic bttildinLS. should be cansidcrccl, especially if a consistent patte:rst is already established by sitttilar or cc?niplem~nr<~r}~ httildit~~t~#icuiation, httildins: scale and l~rc~ot#ions. setbacks. architectural style, roof forms,buiiding details and fenestration patterns, or material.. In soave cases, the existin<T con€ext is not well defined, ot• naav be unciesiralaie. In such cases. awell-ciesignecl ne«;~aroject can establish a an tle:t•ta or identify frotat which fttitu•e developraes~t can take its cues. b. Certain builclin~s. becattsc of their size ~aose or location. should be given rotnincttce and distinct architectural character, ret7ective of their special function or t~ositioti. Exatttples of these special builditas7s include theaters. hotels, cultural centers. aaacl civic buildiaas;s. c. Attention should be taaid to the follou~in<~ archi#ecntral elements i. t3uilding fot-Ins attd tnassingii. Builtlirat; laeislt.t %ii. Rooflines and parapet features iv. Special bttildins? lcatures (e.g. to~vcrs, arcades. entries, carzoi)i_e_s. si~Jn,~__•~, s~,ancl artwork },__~~'incloty size, ortent~ttt?n and detatlit}~. vi..Matcrials and color; and vii. The huilding's relationship to tltc site;, c:lianate;. toga =r~lty atad surnaattdinc; bu%Idit~gs: 2. Specific, C'otatn2ercial and High '`1ia Residential 14 of 21 X09 a~C"omnl~t•cial sE~;ucaaires,_a,nci,.ii>i.11i„-d_~4clli.ti.gs,;~lic?u.id,h~ tiitc<1_ai~cl desigucd tc? }po\~tic,_t ~~,~i~lti\_4 tr ln~ttu>n.tc~_ Sd~<3(,L`flt 1(1\lCl_C1C31tilly resi(leut>~t1,~tnicttucs,_~~ Ith_c011~idc3•aticln l~~l, tJle scale, lxllk 1>~igllt, Setback and al~hitectut,lt-c:h tr Inter (>i, t<l~.~cult,~~ns?1~ lalnll}, h.__I~t zttztlti_d~\~(alin~ structures, tJlc 1~11n_layo}it_, oriciltaticm,.atld window tl'eiltlncnf r~Ctbe.hl~ll(Jllls;(lcti~tl ~l~c~uld n{fit tttf>>ns*~,up~»i tl~e 1z•ivac~,czfothcl~adjacent d~\yilil~~.s_ C. Bliildigg L.~ntrics 1. General a~..~l•be oric;ntati(m aF huildin~ entries shall: i. C)riezlt file prilnaru entrances tn~ti•ai•cl the ctre~t ratl~ci_tE~<in rile parking I(~t, ii iva?tU1~Ct,EhL' blill.dlJlf,~'S~,I?t<,t]Il caltl'iil1CL t(1 lllr; ~1dClV<11E: ~~~itli a ~x~ell-defined ledcstriaii ~~~alk\~•ar;. b. I3uildiu~ facades ovsr ttt~o luntcJred feet i71 length #:•zci7lt~ a strut ~r ptlhlic snacc shall i~vi(te t4~~o.c>r nmre p~3blic buildiiib e71tra71ccs. c. All entries fi•oz1ti71~ a pedestrian accesswav sllall he sheltered with a minitnum four-foot avcrhan~or shelter. d. ;'1u exception to all};pai-t of the rer~uircnlents cif ihis_sc;ctioil Shall be allowed upon tlujln, that: i. Tlzc slotle of the land be;twcen the huildins? and the tledestriatl street is greater than 1:12 for more than t\a~ent\~ feet and that a azzore accessible nedestzian route to t}le building is available from a different side of the buildini?: or ti. 'I~Jze access is to a courtyard or clustered development arld identi#:zcd pedestrianz access~vavs are pro.~ided throu«h a pal'king lot to direetly eclnneet the building complex tcj t11e most apprc~p.riate tnajor pedestrian route(s) 2. C`omtnercial alzd I-Ii~h ?~'Iix Residential a. I'nr nonresidential buildiilt;s, ot• notu•esidentiai pol-ti.ans of zttixed-use buildint~fi, lnai7l buil.din~ entrances fronting 15 of 21 pLclcstrian strcetshall_rcin~ii~ c),belt.c)ttri,n;;,>ic~rt>iti.[,hti~i»css,.li<?,uts for that builctin~r. t}~l~tvnresident%a1 and,mi~cd-usa_lx}(dins~s__,ti•c>_nting_a.,pedcIri;3n_ street <ltall 'e ar le~si (>nc m,utt-l~~uld~tt~,_cnh~pLC. ursc>itul Itt„tl~c t~edestrian sU-4e;.t i. Suclt an ezitraiicc.sli<tll„nc~t rcgu,irc,a.Esc(~c~trit>n,.1c?_I%rs( anti IhrUtt Jl) aarll;ilet,a )aI'~rtl * lot. t)r ~C}a(llil ~ itCCa l() mill access tb t13~ eitlrtizice_off ~~r_~h}ng_(_he_.hct{c~Friat~_~U•e~t,..i~>c the entrance mt~~ he thlnu~;kx ~,h~,i•cEl~bruczc;tia}~.<~rcarte, antecliarnt?er,,arc!r't,is(}~.~iitclf~~r,t~la~a, c}r;~imilar architectural feature ii. if-a building ha, E-rc.>rtta ~e cttt rttorc Flinn vne_,strecl;. ilte buildirtb sltall~r<)~.ide ~ inaitl_lziiilcliti~ ctit~'ance vrigr~tcci to at least one of the stret5, or ~~ air~le ~t>.it,,;:tttre at tlt4 sh-eci itatersectinrl: iii.. A htttldln, n1aV Itavc 11)Ot'C lltait C1ttC Illaftl t)ntlClill r elliranCe ot'lented f0 a SlI'c;Cl. allCl rllfl~' hilt'C ofller t;ntl'a11C~S facint of'1=siree:t llarkit~ and (o<idinp are,~ts~ D. Bttildin l Facades 1. <ieneral a~,'~.ll buildinsr frorltaees greater than fvrt~~ feet in lcn tg h shall break anv flat. nlvnolitllic facade by includint discernible architectural elements sttcll as bttt rent limited to: bav tivindo~~~s. i_ocesscd caztrancc algid «~indo~~~s. display ~x~rn(I(}~;-~C()C~1rCCS. IlasCti. Pilasters, cvluntns ar otllc;r architectural details ar articulation combined will}. changes in materials. so as to provide. visual interest and a ser)se of division, in addition to ca-eating cvmn}artily character and ~~edestrian scale. The, overall desiC7r_~.i_hrlll reco~rl~lize that the simple relief rovl(l~d b4 ~vindou- cutvut~ yr sills on an otllen}>ise that facade. in and of itself does not rlleet the recluirenlents of this subsection.. h. Buildins.~,dCSI£;ns that result in a street frvntase ~a>ith a tulifortn arld mvllotonous design :st}ale. roofline yr facade treatment shouitl he avoided. c. Architechual detailing, such as but not limited to: trellis. lonr: overhangs, deep inset ~vindoti~>s: should be incorporated to prop>ide sun-shadin~ Eirvnl the surnnler suu. tGof2l 1 d~To bala~ice,-Irc>t;i~i>>ital. Ic,ttt~r~s,c~p- lotrgcr_f~~c~~dcs._p~ertcal t~uilding,clenrttrts shall h~_~3nplr<>yicci, c. 71te dominant_f:~tltt>_rc_~I imy-,hitilc}i}ib_fr<~iita~:c_Ih~tt_i_vahl from a~cdcstt~an ~titi~t_c~l_ptrhlic c~}}pis ~pn~c shall hc, llrc._I><rh}tahlc at.,~ea ~~°itlt its acconr}fat. i~3n~_~~ttid«~~••~. and dgorl ,('arksn,~..lot_. - ~ara~e. attd s~~lia._~,~~}11 l~~ii<1c,5,(c.g,. -y4<rt~lrt~uscs) Is,tlf.lxrt dominate a ~c.destriatt street fi•oitta~c. £:~I~eL_;__elq~inents ~1i11,1 be de~i,gticd tc~,.c;r~~air~~t~gc iirfi~rritr}i SuI'4'E111aIlCe ot._stt_eet~ aucl other }public ~~ces.bv niaxit~ii~irta ti~lit lines bet~vicen the buildin~~ and the ,treet- ~. "lire exterior 44'~i ,1115 o~all huildr~iacades alons_,l~edeslrian. routes. i}~ctuc}i~t~ide,t~t- t•ertirii•faca<lusy~laall he ot'~uitable chtral~lc Inrildin~ materials iu4lucling the tbllo~4~i3tg: ,tucco, ::tong. Urick: terracotta, tile, cedar shakes and stria le beveled ar snip-la}? car otl~ler narro4v,caursc h~rizontat boards or siding, ~~crtical boarcl- and-battett siding:. articulated arcnl}itectural c<rncrete or concrete zilasonrv units (C~iL}. or similar materials 4vllich are loin malntcttance:. z4•eather-resistant, abrasinn-~'c;,sixt_ant, and east~_tc~ clears, Prahibit~d building materials irzcludc; the tollcnvin>;: Plain concl'ete.~,lairt concrete block, corrugated metal, u-rar4culateci board sidiu~ (e.~., "I.1-11 siding, plain }alvwoocl. sheet pressboarcl~; Ertcrior Insulated I=itlisl7 5vtem~ ~EII'S). and similar~ualitS_, nandur•able materials. lt..111 visible builclirrb facades with visibility Iroln a ~~ublic street or space. iticludiat~ side or retuni facades. are to be treated as art (?~ th_C_C111111 bU1lCitn,<_r {;leVatiOri and at'l3CUlatCd 3Ir t11L' ~~ClrC tTlCrnnc;t',. Coratiuuit~~ cif wise of the selected approvcc~ rnateria.ls rntrst be used on these facades. i.`~1.l~pra}~riat~~ sc:al~ci architcctttr<rl dctailitt{=. such as but nt>t limited to tnolditrgs or conrices: is encouz~aged at fire roollilte of commercial huildintr facades, and v.••here such detailingpresent. should be a mistimutn of at least eitl>t incites ~3-ide. i. Compatible building deli: n5 alon;t a street should be provid~:d throu~,h sinriIar massing~buildin~ facade. heitrht and 4vidt1l as 'a••ell as the: space bet4yeen bttildittgs) and lrontase setbacks. 2. Commercial aa.d I-iis;lr 14~ix RLsidcntial 17 of 21 a_Sidcti~:alk~ <tl>titting tntldii~~ ,hall hc_cc1}u~<i,tc~,<il,_Ict>rst c;i,ght felt fiom ixi•il(htt~ tack t(i p.rcn idy hic,tc,~Einn licnn_~ua,uid_t u,tt l7}. uae of elen~eiat, such ~i~ c~trfopic5 ..3ac, ulgs,_ot I~(,r~ol;~ Suppoet fi~r_thc~~ f~atulc,.,~hall n(~t,~,ti~hcdr.lx,(l~~tri~3n t~ iCfic;., b. (:aito,t3ic>~:_c~~-ea~lsangs or ~~~-nin1; sla~all,tsc,hi,iw.ic{cc{..c»_~r eniran~c5 T~~~nii~~ at Ulc._~,rouncl lytcl• (;_f buildin~ti jir. evscoura~c~. c. ltwnangv`3llalil tlsc \S!lal(jO1V_lxiyti (citt~ur abc>~rr t_l~~ n~rtiii~la~s or the tr~itsou~ light~•~hc?ul(} nit ot~scure or distract from t(ac ap~carancc ~C~tgatficant <ti•~hfteclu~al,lc.~tu.reti. •J he c;c~lclr c?f the avvniva~ shall tse coa~ahatible ~~ath it~_att<ut~etI but.l((ing: d. Ground ilo<.n• «'in(lo~v~ shall meet the f(slk3win~r critceia: i._Uark[~~~iital~rl ~~'indotvs ~tyci tstirrcn.~d._~yia~cl~~~y~ tf>,at block, t~~-o-wav visibility are prohibited as.~t•(~tmd floor rvindo4~,. ii.__C)~~ Ilac around floor, btvilding~ hrtll in.c(?ap~rate iarac: ti'IatC14SVS__SS'ith_]Ilutt~)alae lt'1;1{Io~L'G atld ti'a[i~Olil I1L'tits above encouraryed. lla. _tiYOtll](t tloC7r baialdtng faCadeS in(15t COtatam UEtOh6CUtti(1 ~r• indo~vs for at least fifty nLrcent of the ~~(°all area and _.~ seventy-five pcrccrat of the wall len~;dt t~°ithin the tu•st ten to twelve fee€ oi'wali height. iv, I..o~aer windo~~-sills shall aiot lse more tltaaa three feet abo~°e grade except where iaaterior floor levels prolaihit such placeaneatt, lag Wlaach Cast: the lt)\S'C;I' SVIt1ClOl\'Slll Shall IZC~[ ~1(: mc.~re Haan a maximutu of four feet above the fiaaislaed ext(:rior tirade. v. ~ryindows shall have vertical et~hasis in tsronortiota. horizontal ~a~indo~~•s may be: created u~ltea a combination (rf vertical windo«,~s i~rouped together or tivhen a horizontal windotiv is divided b,~ nsullious. 1r, Roofs 1. Cbmanercial and High i~9ix ItesidentialfCoasa.mercial a. Roof shapes, surface materials, colors, mechanical eclttipment and other peu.thouse functions should be integrated into the total buildinry dr„Sii~n. Roof terraces and gardens are encottra,ed. t8 of21 t,.Y b_~~'hcti the commcrcistl_str}Ic,(~rc_,h~>s„~~_(la3.t.plll.ii,i)c;l_I'txtl~tttlj<ic~ii,i. t«_pit~hu{ roof r~~icic,nt><tl_tiEi«c,tut«~_~tc.hhq<i h,t~~ih{t, u, ~ttcout<1 Ju[ u! tl3e a ~ c:<u tn4c t. a etadu~tl U1n,ttu~n o! roc)llutes. .._... b_.._.._ .__._.._1_I? ~_._____ __...___ .. __._... _ _ _..__. _-- ~. Lrterior Tiuilciins; l_i~htint; 1~__-C:otiiat~~rcial a~td•)Ii~h Mi~_Re~idcnlijUC_ommcrcial, a. l...i~~htut~•i it vUtlCil~t~ facade,:~li<31I,17c_{letii<~eci,,to cc>!~)lcaticti( _~_~ ..~ ille ilCChtlectUt'itl dLSl~tt. LI<~htiilgl~tili It.~t t3ra~~~_itic?t•clin7t c~tlentiort t« fire building. i~.l'rimar~;, lights shall address public sidewalks and.:or 1)C(~etili'1711 l)~aZ.ilS il(1 i1~ Ci;t3t ti) If]C btltl{itit~, b. N<) e~ctct•icx• l.i. rlt~_sltall be_lcrti~ittgcl ~EIc)~e tlte.sec~t~ci t7~~or af'builciit2gs for t1~~ptFt~~se aI'higltEighti~tb fife pre~ettce c~iwthe builclitt ~ i1~1 __,_C~O711L_>_SO ~~'C)ttl,{i fi33pd(;~ 11(~~JacLnt rc:~iciential uses;, G. Service Lones 1. 13ttildin~ind sites shc~ll_be ~)t'~aniied to gout) the utilit<n'isin tintctions a~}°ay ti'oEn the public vie~~. 2. L)eliverv and loaclin<a operations, tttechanical ~u%pn3eut l-IV~1C' ,trash a~ntpacting_callectiou, 1113{1 Othel' ltttlttU atld S{:I'VICc: 1tElletl{~tt~ shall he ittcox~,ratc<3 into the overall clc:sittit of ilte huildin ~s~ and the landscapitt,g: 3~'I`l2e visual and acoustic impact, of these functions. along with all ~vall- ~x ~xound-233otutted mechanical, electrical and Coll3n3ttli1cat10ilti e ui~ntent s13a1] I)e out of vice from ad'acent t~rot)crtics attd public )c~ clestrian,streets. ~. Screening ntateriais and Iandscane sc2'ecns shall be archilecturally compatible «<ith and not infe;xior to fl3e t~rincipal n3aferials oI'tlte building: a. The visual i2npact of chinutevs attd ertuipn3et~t shall he n3inin3ized by fife use of parapets, architeciurat sct•eet2in~, rooftop laxtdscaning, or by using, oil3cr aestheticall}~ pleasing,~n3ethods of scrcettittg and reducing the sound o#'such equipment. lI. Pal'kitttl Structures 1. T'arlcins. ~ara:~e; execriot:s should he designed to visually xc;s ect and inte~n•ate ~vlth adjacent butldtn?s. 2. Garage doors anct entl-ances to parkine areas sholtld be located in a sensitive n3annc:r using single curb cuts .vl3en possible I9 of 21 3. Residential parkin? titritctureti miltit_cc~,ml~l~~._~~mitll_t_ile. E<zc,icic rc:cluirctltents !or residential dc.~_etc~l7mc.n,l,~, 17,72.54 C'auditions ott Sltc I'lau :~uuro~aL~t h~ ct_t~~ tzt<t<< attach tit axtti.itc td [~t~t approval >?ivc;n tuit3ec_this c1~~tcr~~cci._fi~ cc~it<[iticanti-dccntcxl_i~ccc~ssitrti~..in the iutc.resls of ihe•~uhtic healt(t, ~atvt ~_<,r~ti~(i.at,~, m~liidut;;hstt,>tol_Iim>_t4ti tc~,; the lollo~t~int;: - B. ~'onsiruc:Lion_.ailc~..inst<lllc~tign_c>f any ctn.-5itc car qfl'-~itc_imprc~ti~cti~cnl.s, inrludin~ but not limltut to»cl~~tall.~ cuil~ti,_~utters .ta_ectti,_bike~r<ty>u sweet sites and, street lights. traf'Cc c<,ttirol :,~i<~ns and si >tt,_ta_ 1_ti ~vat~r. ~torrn drainage. sanitar`}~ se~~rer. and park anti rcc,reaticm itn,roventents. - - -1--- ~ 1_......._.._._.~._..... d>`ll intprovetu.ents required uEtdet- thi subjecii~t~ shall bo made at the expense of the ap ~tll icartt. end shall ca~t1'c>rnt to the. rn'ovisiony of• tltc Stattdarcl Speciticatians and l_.it~ifc~rtit Staudarct I)ctails far I'ttblic '~G'ork5 C`onstructian tit the Ci~~ ofCvnlrttl Point, Orc~,on. I~Io~t~eher. the ciiy,_.in its cliscreti.on. may tuacli€i' such standarc(s and determine: sift-specific c{csiLn. enstineeritte ant[ construction specificaticxts t~•hen appropriate in the particular de:velo••pntettt: C. r1n a_~=_reemeiit t~v fife owner of thepropert~t« ~t•aivc. oft hi, or her behalf. and on beltali~af all future owner, ~i'th~ land, anv c7biec€ion to the fotntatiott of a local int,~navetnetti district ~vlti.ch u.tav be fartncd in the futtn•c: to pravide ttaty of the; impm~~etttents specified in sulnection•r1 of this section; D. An at7reement by the o~s'ner of the property to enter into a ~~~ritten defetxed itnprov°etnent aC reemcnt. pt•cn-iding Shat one or mare; of the intpro~~erttcnh specitie;c{ in subsection A of this section ,hall be tttacie by the owner at some future time to be determined h~:• the city: E. :ttty a>ree-nent entered rota pursuant to subsection I3 ot• C of thi, section shall be recorded itt. tho count} reatrdet•'s ofYice and shall be intended to thereafter slut tivith the land. sa as to bind future a«-ner; of tfte lands affected. Auv attcl all recarditte costs shall be borne by the applicant; and F. rlnv other cauditions deemed by tltc city to be rca,nnable attd ttece:ssarv in the interests of the public health, safety or welfare. (pt•d. 16$4 ~6Y. 1993 I7.72~.OGt) l3ttiiclin~ Pct•rni.t:Issuance-Platt Cltattge. A. T~lo builcii»apenttit t-r>ill be issttecl titr the constntction ~t=ithout the prior al I~rc,val by th.e~,lannin~ co~nittission tivltich. will be noted on the first pave ot't}te plats. C}ne co~t~~ of the ~I~tts shall he retained by the city and Erne scat sa~t•o4~cd sl~a[1 be s~iven to the develapcr or owner. 24 of 21 B. Amy change or deviation froze the.pla,~s,_tth12~<~}c;d.,t~y_tltc_.i~laiuiii~_co~i~m.iss_i<~n t~,~ithout the a ~roval of tltc lnzilcling zml~~c_~<~r Irn-~tnic,lurc.~,, the i,lanrt.in~; ciepartn>:ent for site pla2zs, or the l~ublr~ ~y~,rl.5 crrcctc~i, f<>r,iiul~(.ic., ~i>il»_c>~,crz~cr~15 l.zalll~econsideredaviolatioz~()rcS i6~~_S(~9,,1,9Q3-(_)rci; 1~36~21pa,ttj,l.cl~l), 17.72.070 Expiratinzi. A. E~ si.te plan appro~~al shall lapse and l~ccomc ~~czi<1 <Otte,}=s~r_fol(o~},in~,theclatc c~.n u-hic}z it became ex_tectiye tu)less._U~~ c,c?taci>trtmti. Qt flu ~.i_tc_l}laii appz«4 zl,_<z z;r~,ztc,~. or lesser time is prescribed as a condition of appro~_il, <~r urzl~,~_l)rr~z to_I(ie expiration ofczne veer, a l~uildiny_permi_t_j~__i~~ii~c~.by'..tl>~„f~i)i.fc1_sl).g,i.iESlx~,cl~,r._<tncl corzshvction i.s conz.nzcnced and cliiiee.r~lly„1)rrz~ta~cf tou•ard_~c3ml~letron.,~l_;_fi planning couznzission may extend the 5ite_plcrn_tl~pzJoval tot' a21 additional f~crioci of ozze near. subject to the recluirenzent~ oi~Section 17:7G:04U, B. Iran established tune limit for devc;lopzttent cxpirccl and nc~ extentiic~ri has been ;;rauieci, the site. 3azz a .proval sl~a}1 ~e_~-~~id. _(()rd, l G£;~1 X70. 19~_ 17.72.080 Site Pla~z Ccznzplirznce-Certificate of Ocetzpazzc~~. "1'hc city may refuse isst3ance ofa ccrti.f[cate of oc~ztnc}~_t~,r a chan~L oCusc until the <rn~~licant for a site plait ~~roval has completed all regttirenzents and conditions in accoz•dazzce ~~~ith the: site plan ap~~rc?ved b - 1~ 3ie planning commission. Vo person shall use or occu~buildirtg or~z~c~erty unless such person has c;ontplied «~itli the ap~~ticable zozzizzg_s~diz~ances, azi~• ct?zaditions i~laced <m the person's land use, al)pfic<ztinr~, and bas obtained a certifcafe cii' occupancv~Q2•d~l b$4 ~ 71. 1993). 2l of 21 Cih~ of Central Point Zoning Coclc -fart 5 Cltaptcr 17.12 ZONING DIS'CRIC'I' Sections: 17.12.010 Compliance with provisions. 17.12.020 Zones-Classification. 17.12.030 District-Location. 17.12.040 Zoning maps. 17.12.050 District-Boundaries. 17.12.060 Zoning of annexed area. 17.12.010 Compliance with provisions. (A} A lot shay be created or used and a structure or part thereof constructed, reconstructed, altered, occupied or used only as permitted in this code. (B) No lot shall be created if the effect thereof is to allow the perpetuation of a nonconforming use. (Ord. 1684 §27, 1993; Ord. 1436 §2 (part}, 1981}. 17.12.020 Zones-Classification. For the purposes of this title the following zones are established by the city: Abbreviation District R-L Residential low-density R-1 Residential single-family R-2 Residential two-family R-3 Residential multiple-family C-1 Neighborhood convenience shopping _ _ ~ ___^_ C-2 (l4I) Commercial - l~~fedical District aetetea: c-z coinnicrcial- • . ~ profcssional'r', C-4 Tourist and office-professional • Deteted• c-s Do~i~ntown ~~ GS Thoroughfare commercial Iwsincssdistrict M-1 Industrial ~ M-2 Industrial general B.C.G. Bear Creek Greenway (Ord. 1643 §1, 1990; Ord. 1615 §2, I989; Ord. 143b §2 (part), 1981}. I ?.12.030 District-Location. The boundaries for each district listed in this title are the boundaries indicated for the district by the city zoning map of 2987, which is adopted by reference. The boundaries shall be modified in accordance with 1 of 2 t~ ~. zoning map amendments, which anteztdments this section subse(luentty a(iopts by reference. {Ord. 1615 §3, 1989; Ord. 143Ci §2 (part}, 1981). 17.12.040 Zonin = maps. A •roning map or •roninl; znap aznczt<]znent adopted by Sectiozt 17.12.030 or by an amendment planning commission or by a modification by the city council of a map or map amendmeztts so prepared. The map or map amendment shall be dated with the date of its approval by the planning commission or the effective date of the ordinance that adopts tfze Wrap or map amen(hnent. A certilicd print of the adopted map or znap amendment shall be maintained without change in the office of the city administrator as long as the ordinance codified in this title remaiFts in effect. (Ord. 1615 ~4, 1989; Ord. 1436 ~2 (part}, 1981). 17.12.050 District-Boundaries. Unless otherwise specified, district boundaries are lot lines, the center lutes of streets or such lutes extended. If a district boundary divides a lot into two districts, the entire lot shall be placed in the district that accounts for the greater area of the lot by the adjustznettt of the district boundary, provided the boundary adjustment is for a distance not to exceed twenty feet. (Ord. 1436 §2 {part), 1981). 17.12.060 Zoning of anztexed area. All future annexations are expected to include only lands within the city's urban growth boundary (UGB). The comprehensive plan of Central Point includes a plan for future land uses within the IGB area. The zoning map described in Section I7.12.030 is consistent with the coznpreltensive plan and will determine the district into which a newly annexed area is placed. The appropriate zoning district snail be applied to the area upon annexation. (Ord. 1615 §5, 1989; Ord, 1436 §2 {part}, 1981). 1r r 2 of 2 Deleted: C'hxptcr t7.3G~1 9 ~2. COn1116:RCf n[: r)zortsston,~z. n1sTt,- itt:rq 4 Scctinns:¶ 9 17.36.010 I'aryx~sc.; 1Z.iG.D).0 Pemtiucd uses!: 17.JG,030 Couditiott<~t usoe.1. 17.36.040 I Might regulations c 17.36.050 Ana, width tmd vard rcgvircnrcnis.~: 17.3G.0(i0 (icncral nyuircnteuts r 17.36.070 Signs mul lighting of premises, { 17.36.080 Off-street parkint;.E 4 4 IJ 16,~1_Q_I?urp~~. The C-2 district is intended to provide n butter bctrvccn'J the central Mrsir>ess district antl rtcarby residcutial rteightx+rlmods by providing a convcnicnt location for low intcnsin- cnmmcreialand profcssional~ffice devcloprneut Il:at is compatible itith and serves the male ofsurmuruling neighborhoods. (Ord. 1436 F2 (pan), 19s 1>. t J3;36.OZlLenni4tc f~ucucg. The fohowingusesaretxnnitteditttltor""= ttt Deleted: Chapter 57.40¶ . C-3, DOwYr031'~ nt~Sl\ESS ' DI~TR_T_CT9 Sections:¶ 9 17.40.014 Purposc.~ 17.40.020 Pcnnitteduscs 17.40.030 Conditional usca.~ 17,40.040 Height reguiatitans z 17.40.050 Area, ~sidih artd yard rcquiremcnts. 17.40.060 Gcncral n:quircntcnls 17.40,070 Sits and Lighting of premises. I 17.40.080 Off-street parkirt>; Ir rs ~t 17 40 ) Purpose. The C-3 district is I4 intended to protect, stabilize and f improve the commercial characteristics of ~ ttte dottintown business district attd ~ provide s commercial enviranntem that is ~ pedestrian-oriented and encourages eompetitiat and retail Comparison shopping. (Ord. 1436 §2 (part), 1981) !{ ' S.Z~49.:~24.....1'el_t?tittcd.tks~s. The I following uses arc permitted in s C-3 i district:S; ~ =H>Professional and [financial, ittd, ""''~~j t Page 2: [1] Deleted donb i/i$J20068.i8:00 AM Chaptez• 17.36 C-2 COMMERCIAL-PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT Sectiozzs: 17.36.010 Purpose. 17.36.020 Pez-znitted uses. 17.36.030 Conditional uses. 17.36.040 Height regulations. 17.36.050 Area, width and yard requirements. 17.36.060 General requirements. 17.36.070 Signs and lighting of premises. 17.36.080 Off-street parking. 17.36.010 Purpose. The C-2 district is intended to provide a buffer between the central business district and nearby residential neighborhoods by providing a convenient location for low intensity commercial and professional office development that is compatible with and serves the needs of surrounding neighborhoods. {Ord. 1436 ~2 {part}, 1981). district: 17.36.020 Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in the C-2 Professional and financial, including: Banks and similar financial institutions, Accounting and bookkeeping, Real estate office, Insurance company office, Legal services, Medical services, clinics and laboratories, Architecture and engineering offices, Photographic and art studios, Building, electric and plumbing contractors' office; Personal services, including: Barber and beauty shops, Self-service laundry, Photo processing pickup station, Small appliance service and repair, Tailor and shoe repair, Locksmith, Travel agency, Counseling services, Day care center; Retail outlets, including: Supermarket, Convenience market, Drugstore, Health food, Books and stationery, Gifts, notions and variety, Music (including records, tapes, equipment}, Small appliance sales, Sporting goods, Bicycle shop, Hobby shop, Photographic supplies, Hozne furnishings, other than major furniture items, Leather goods and luggage, Fabric, yard and sewing supplies, Florist, Antique shop, Az-t and engineering supplies Audio, video, electronics sales and service, Garden supplies, Sit-dawn restaurant (no alcoholic beverages}, Delicatessen, Pastry or confectionery, Bakery, retail only, General apparel, Shoes and boats, Specialty apparel, Jewelry, Clocks and watches, sales and service; Television and radio studios and offices; Commercial parking lots; Other uses not specified in this or any other district, if the planning commission fznds them to be similar to the uses listed above and compatible with other permitted uses and with the intent of the C-2 district as provided in Section 17.50.140. (Ord. 1615 §35, 1989; Ord. 1435 §2 (part), 1981). 17.36.030 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted in the C-2 district when authorized in accordance with Chapter 17.75: Wallcovering, floorcavering, curtains and related sales; Art and music schools; Nonindustrial business/vocational schools; Commercial recreation establishments including, but not limited to, .~a Poollbilliard centers, health spas, exercise or physical fitness cczitcrs, martial arts schools, arcades/amusement centers, and similar facilities; Electrical and plumbing supplies; Heating and air-conditioning equipment; Auta and furniture upholstery shop; Auto and truck rela#ed service, repair at~d painting; Paint and related equipment sales; Boats and marine equipment sales; Hardware store; Photo processing laboratory; Department store; Private club and organizational tnceting facilities; Mortuary; Pet sales and supplies; Veterinary clinics and grooming, within enclosed structure; Major appliance sales and service; Printing, lithography and publishing; Glass and mirror sales and service; Furniture sales; Secondhand store; Meat, poultry, fish and seafood sales; Restaurants (including alcoholic beverages with meals); Dairy products, retail sales; Taxidermist; Monument sales; PubIiclquasi-public utilities and services; Limited manufacturing for on-premises sales; Limited wholesaling of permitted use products; Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage facilities, may be permitted as conditional uses when not included within the primary building or structure; Permitted uses that are referred to the planning commission by city staff because they were found to exhibit potentially adverse or hazardous characteristics not normally found in uses of a similar type and size. (Ord. 1511 §3, 1984; Ord. 1436 §2 (part), 1981}. 17.36.040 Height re ug, lations. No building or structure shall exceed fifty feet in height in a C-2 district. {Ord. 1436 §2 (part), 1981). 17.36.OS0 Area, width and and requirements. The following lot require- ments shall be observed in the C-2 district: Lot Area. No requirements except as necessary to meet the off-street parking and loading requirements. Lot Width. No requirements. Lot Depth. No requiremments. Front Yard. The front yard shall be a minimum of five feet between the front ~_ X21 property line and any buildings, structures or parking areas. The front yard shall be planted with lawn, trees, shrubs, flowers or othez- suitable landscaping materials and shall be continuously maintained in good condition and in an attractive manner. Side Yard. None required except when a side lot Iine abuts a lot izi a residential [R) district, and then the side yard sha[1 be a minimum of tern feet and, when the side lot line abuts a public right-of--way then the side yard shall be Five feet and landscaped as described in subsection D of this section. Rear Yard. No rear yard shall be required in the G2 district except when the rear lot Iine abuts property in a residential [R) district and then the rear yard shall be a minimum often feet. Where the property in the G2 district is separated from property in a residential district by a public alley, no rear yard shall be required. Lot Coverage. Maximum lot coverage by buildings and stz-uctuz•es shall be fifty percent of the total lot area. (Ord. 1684 §41, 1993; Ord. 1436 §2 (part), 1981). 17.36.060 General requirements. Uses that are normally permitted in the C-2 district but that are referzed to the planning commission for further review, per Section 17.36.030{31), will be processed according to application procedures for conditional use permits. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be used unless in compliance with all applicable state and federal enviz-oz2znentai, health and safety regulations. All businesses, services and processes shall be conducted entirely within a completely enclosed structure, except for off-street parking and loading areas, gasoline stations, outdoor eating areas or specially permitted outdoor sales. (Ord. 1615 §42, 1989; Ord. 1436 §2 {part), 1981). 17.36.070 Signs and lighting of premises. No illuminated sign or lighting standard used for the illumination of premises shall be so designed and installed that their direct rays are toward or parallel to a public street or highway or directed toward any property that lzes within a residential [R) district. No red, green or amber lights or illuminated signs may be placed in such a location or position that they could be confused with, or may interfere with, any official traffic control device, traffic signal or directional guide signs. Signs in the C-2 district shall be permitted and designed according to provisions of Chapter 15.24 and with Section 17.64.110. (Ord. 161 S §9, 1989; Ord. 1436 §2 {part), 1981). 17.36.080 Off-street parking. Off-street parking and loading space shall be provided as required in Chapter 17.64. (Ord. 1436 §2 (part}, 1981}. Page 2: [2] Deleted donb iji8/2006 8:19:00 AM Chapter 17.40 C-3. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT Sections: ~. 17.44.010 Purpose. 17.40.020 Permitted uses. 17.40.030 Conditional uses. 17.40.040 Height regulations. 17.40A50 Area, width anti yard rcquireme~~ts. 17.40.060 General requirements. 17.40.070 Signs and lighting of premises. 17.40.080 Off-street parking. 17.40.010 Purpose. The C-3 district is intended to protect, stabilize and improve the commercial charaetez•istics of the downtown business district and provide a commercial environment that is pedestrian-oriented and encourages competition and retail comparison shopping. (Ord. 1436 §2 (part), 1981). 17.40.020 Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in a C-3 district: Professional and financial, including: Banks and similar financial institutions, Accounting and bookkeeping, Real estate office, Insurance company office, Legal services, Medical services, clinics, limited laboratories, Architecture and engineering offices, Electrical, building and plumbing contractors' offices, Photographic and art studios; Personal services, including: Barber and beauty shops, Small appliance repair, Tailor and shoe repair service, Locksmith, Travel agency, Counseling services, Photo processing pickup station, Ai•t and music schools, Nonindustrial business/vocational schools, Physical fitness/conditioning center; martial arts schools; Retail outlets, including: Department stone, Funliture, Drugs, Health food, Hardware, Soaks and stationez•y, Gifts, notions and variety, Music {including records, tapes, equipment), Small appliances, Sporting goods, Sit-down restaurants and dinner houses {including alcohol), Tavern (beer only}, Cocktail lounges and clubs, Delicatessen, Pastry or confectionezy, Other specialty food outlets, General apparel, Shoes and boots, Specialty apparel, Jewelry, Clocks and watches, sales and service, Bakery, retail only, Bicycle shop, Toy store, Home furnishings, other than major furniture items, Leather goods and luggage, Fabric, yard and sewing supplies, Florist, Garden supplies, Major appliances, sales and service, Audio, video, electronics sales and service, Hobby shop, Photographic supplies, Antique shop, Art and engineering supplies, Pawnshop, Wall covering, floor covering, curtains, etc., Electrical and plumbing supplies, Heating and air-conditioning equipment, Meat, poultry, fish and seafood, Dairy products, retail sales, Mobile food vendors, State-regulated package liquor stores; Club and organizational meeting facilities; Walk-in movie theatre (fully enclosed); Hotel, with lobby and commercial uses only on ground floor; Television and radio broadcasting studio and offices; Commercial parking lot; Other uses nat specified in this or any other district, if the planning commission finds them to be similar to the uses listed above and compatible with other permitted uses and with the intent of the C-3 district as provided in Section 17.60.140. (Ord. 1736 § 1, 1996; Ord. 1727 ~ 1, 1995; Ord. 1(i I S §36, 1989; Ord. 151 I ~4, 1984; Ord. 1436 §2 (part}, 1981). 17.44.030 Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted in t}ze C-3 district when authorized in accordance with Chapter l 7.76: Auto and furniture upholstery shops; Commercial recz•eation establishments izzcluding, but not limited to pool/ billiard centers, health spas, exercise or physical fitness centers, arcades/amusement centers, and similar facilities; Secondhand store; Paint aztd related supplies and equipmc~zt; Printing, lithography and publishing; Glass and mirror sales and service; Pet sales and related supplies; Taxidermist; Public/quasi-public utilities and services; 'Wholesaling of permitted use products; Mobile food vendors; Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage facilities, zmay be permitted as conditional uses whezz not included within the primary building or structure; Permitted uses that are referred to the planning commission by city staff because they were found to exhibit potentially adverse ar hazardous characteristics not normally found in uses of similar type and size. (Ord. 1511 §S, 1984; Ord. 143b §2 (paz-t), 1981). 17.40.040 Hei hg t re~i,zlations. No building or structure shall exceed sixty feet in height in the C-3 district. {Ord. 1436 §2 (part}, 1981). 17.40.050 Area, width and , armed requirements. The following tat require- ments shalt be observed in the C-3 district: Lot Area. No requirements except as necessary to meet the off-street parking and loading requirements. Lot Width. No requirements. Lat Depth. No requirements. Front Yard. No requirements. Side Yard. No requirements. Rear Yard. No requirements. Lot Coverage. Na requirements except as necessary to meet the off-street parking and loading requirements. (Ord. 1436 §2 (part), 1981}. 17.40.060 General requirements. Uses that are normally permitted in the C-3 district but that are referred to the planning commission for further review, per Section 17.40.030 {L}, will be processed according to application procedures for conditional use permits. Na use shall be pernitted and no process, equipment ar materials shall be .. . `~ . used unless in compliance with alI applicable state and federal envia•oztznctttal, health and safety regulations. All businesses, services and processes shall be conducted entirely within a completely enclosed structure, except for off-street parking azid loading areas, outdoor eating areas or specially permitted outdoor sales. {Orel. 1 G 15 §43, 1989; Ord. 1436~~'2 {part}, 1981). 17.40.070 Signs and Iiaht111~T of premises. No illuminated sign oz• lighting standard used for the illumination of premises shall be so designed and installed that their direct rays are toward or parallel to a public street or highway or directed toward any property that Lies within a residential [R] district. No red, green, or amber lights or illuminated signs may be placed in such a location or position that they could be confused with, or znay interfere with, any official traffic-control device, traffic signal or diz•ectional guide signs. Signs in the C-3 district shall be permitted and designed according to provisions of Chapter 15.24 and with Section 17.b0.110. (Ord. 1615 ~ 15, 1989; Ord. 1436 §2 (part), 1981). 17.40.080 Off street parking. All development for which a site plan is required under Section 17.72.020 shall comply with the parking requirements of Chapter 17.64. All development for which a site plan is z~ot required shall not be subject to the parking requirements of Chapter 17.64. (Ord. 1730 §2, 1995; Ord. 1436 ~2 (part), 1981). 9 ~ A ~~R A6MAA.maR ~~ LL._..._ _.._9P PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO CPMC SECTION 16.36.040 AND SECTIONS 17.08; 17.12.020; 17.32; 17.36; 17.40; 17.44; 17.46; 17.72 AND SECTION 17.77 (Applicant (s): City of Central Point) Recitals 1. Applicant(s) initiated a Type IV Legislative change to the City's municipal code consistent with CPMC Section 17.05.500. 2. On, May 2, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Decision-Making Criteria. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.05.500(G) Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes the following: A. The amendments are consistent with Statewide Planning Goals #1 Citizen Involvement; #2 Land Use Planning; #9 Economic Development; #10 Housing; #11 Public Facilities; and #12 Transportation. B. The amendments are consistent with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Element 5: Commercial Land, Section 5.2 Cumulative Attraction and Section 5.8 Business Park District. Section 3. Recommendation. The amendments to CPMC Sections 16.36.040 and Sections 17.08; 17.12.020; 17.32; 17.36; 17.40; 17.44; 17.46; 17.72 and Section 17.77 are hereby recommended for approval, subject to the changes set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006) 2`~ Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of May , 2006. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of May , 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (05/02/2006)