The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission Packet- March 6, 2007 (2)~ r ~ i~rn~~tiiy~ G a ~~°t i.~;1 ~,~ ~ ~ ! a ~' ~ ~.' Y ~, G' ~. N ~~ ~. ~ I[ ~ , ~ , ._~___. ..~ _ .. _._1 i _ ~._ ~ ~.... __,m~ ~'Llt~lic }~~~r?t`ii1~~ 1~ cot?~iclcr rr ~I~r~z?~f~TEi~~~ I'It?[i <t ~ ~lrL~r?i.ir?i? ic) c~~'~;<,itc~ .`~3 rcrr) Ir~t lint ~;i~~;>l~: ~l~~iTiiily~' r-i~~~iclci~ti~~ Ir)ts lc)~~ait°cl y~'ithit? ri l~-~?, 1Zesiclct?ti,tl ~L~~~,'t) I~ar~il~' t)niilt~ ~i~>trica. ~h„ 1)[~olx.t9ic~~ arc' itlt,irii(ic:~i c)i? tht~. .~l(;li;~()Tl ~~r1L111t~ '~~;`it:".til)i ~`, iT?11) ;[~ J i~ ~~~' ~ ~ ~:ss~, ~ a~i~ I.t)l.a .,~~~ €.~.:. ;~{){), ;~i11711i;~1[lt; ~ ii'i'lt£i4.?C ~?~1T1{)1)pl~ilty lttc:. ~`,+. m _. ~ ,~ .....___..W.-- _..._..~..... _ ...... __-__.__,___- [Sa _!t~OCL!"<lil. F~li~ill~) i'C,11111Cicltl ____,____W _......._._..._ .____. _....._ _m ~ _. _~_... .._... ,, ,_..._..... T11tw ~Lrl)~C"{;t~)~tPt'[it hi)CCCI (; (111 `it51S {)1 a11,7~'O;~:Tl7[~ktClti~ i.~ ~ ~r~ r, ~ ~lt ill?1~11C~1i?t 1S [1T'~?1>t)SIt1r? ~ i ~i)i., [hit ti cl 1-r[.t~,:~tr in size •c)t[~ .i,fi2.; sc.l. i~:;.~'tc) G.:7~~() ~c.l. f~~ct. l hc.~sc~ lc){ ,lr.i.s area eoi?~l~ic:ili ~vitli ti~hai ~~,c)[[i~t t~ i'~~t1L.irctl a:; ~1 itt~lot ~lr~clc)l~i?ic]?t. 1Ic>~tic~li~]•, ~1Llc to tl?c~ lc?i?~> [?tTt3•c)t~, c~c)i?ii.rui'ai.ic)1?~ t)i~thc t~tic) tai ]ois;, the ahhli~l~ilthas d~ter~~iit~t~.d that illc r~ZUSt ~;f~icir7t?t Liy~ c~hihc hr<,I?crtti~ i~ ~~ f'Iai~iai/~l (~i~it C3c:~,~elt?h~nertt. "~~~; a4;~ili;;i~T.tc;ii t,~?j.?lic.~[tic)[:?~ (I'l_J11 ~:: ~l~l'} i~rz tlLC "1'~'[?t~[tiic 1'Irtti al)i>lic~ati<)n toic ci)i?Liiiic)]tc~ i~>i` apprL?~ al. A.s a 1'larit?~:d ir?it I)~~,-L:lolnllt~'i?~, tllc atl~rlictlnt i~ aL~~ t~ ~'ar~r;'r.ol,~ tl?[~ t~l~icat ]~ii]?tr~t.]t~i Ic>t Si. L~~:gLtit•L~i??c'])ts for thi; It-;~ ~,~)1?il~~~ tli~tr~ic~i. I.1?ir~li)re, with a{)~~rt)va) c:)i•tl?c 1'II), tht~ I ~1?i~ttivty I'1 is CUt11~~lir?nt ~~itl1 the reciuii~etl~e.?1t~ its oLrtlir?r:d in ("l'~,~(' 1{~.1 t) __ "I~r~r~tati~~c Pltrr~s, C1'~~ii` ] 7.2-~ -~ 1~-, Rc,~iclci?li~tl "I lt~-c1 l~~lrni~y/,ot7ir?=~ ~?rad Cl':`UI.C 17.t~8 -_ I'Ir~rt~?r.c~ ~?r~it l:~e~el~l~ri~~t?ts, 12~~'~~° Ica :~~~~~~~~~~~~~~il « ~~ ~~~;1~~,~~° J I?t? isSLr~~ a~sclc,iat~°cl ~,~iih tht~ sttcc.c~5ftrl ii~~l~l~t?.iirr?tatit~t? c~l~tl?i~ l~t•c>j~t~t ~.~et'c clist~Lls~~.c3_ ii? tlet{Lil rlt[rin the r~i'iL'~~ t1~`tl?c .~'(.~L) ~apl~licati~>il, ~~~J ol~tl~~ [:oTlcliti:)i~s t?ftlie LEI) StI-)ljli~stic)ir rxrLl~t h~; r??~~t ~7r'~,;° iir rrit~e~ltar~c ~c1 a~?prL~v~~I of"t1?e i=i1?a[ flat 9~)z' the Ter~trlti~; c I"l 1. 1'i"]c~t• to sLrl~ir.ittir?t? rat? <il~~lflt~att()[~ c)t` f'l[l~tl 1'lcit, x,11 11c~~;~srrry ttilC Clarifictlc~tl~ ax~tlsi 1~ sLtc~cc°~sfL111~ r'csc~lti ed <?ir~3 alai*t'c~~ i~cl by tl~~; C"it~ C"~> cl ~~ t?t;c~'~;s~~Lt" tt"k ~~?rt1~a1[~tc° right-c?fi ~~,a~, Clrrt°k ,I,~L?iati~,=~; ~'1)i~ fl<t~~e 1 of requirements far ParkwaylSugar Pine Court per the approved Preliminary Planned Unit Develapment Plans. 2. Na other exceptions, other than thaw addressed in the Plan Unit Development application (hle 07432), will be granted. 3. The public pedestrian access easement from the development to Don Janes Park shall be identified an the Final Plat. ~4. Prior to submitting an application for Final Plat, the design of the intersection of Sugar Pine Caurt and North Mountain Avenue shall be approved by the City, The objective of this review is to assure that the design of the intersectian is safe far bath pedestrian and vehicular use. 5. Priar to submitting an application far Final Plat, the applicant shall comply with all conditions of the Plan Unit Development application (File No. 47032). E. Prior to submitting an application far Final Plat, the applicant shall submit to the City the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions demonstrating maintenance of common areas and fencing requirements slang Dan Janes Fark. ~. The applicant shall identify maintenance easements on the final plat far each lot on the side zero lot sine side. Specificity regarding the use of the maintenance easement shall be clearly stated on the titleJsignature page of the final plat to be recorded with the County. 8. The City of Central Paint Public Works has identified West Vilas as a Minor Arterial; as such the developer will be responsible for constructing sidewalks and a landscape raw, with street trees, far the West Vilas Raad frontage. ~, Prior to submitting an application far Final Plat, the applicant must obtain a portion of Dan .lanes Park for legal access to the development to make the connection from Parkway DrivelSugar Pine Caurt to North Mauntain Avenue. 14, Conditions as listed by the Jackson Caunty Roads (Attachment "Cr»), Fire District 3 (Attachment H} and Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment J~, ATTACHMENTSIE~;HICBITS: Attachment "A"- Tentative Plan Attachment "B" -Planning Department Findings Attachment "C>' -Applicant's Findings Attachment "D>' -Public Works Staff Report Attachhrnent "E" _ Building Department Staff Report Attachment "F" - RRVID Correspondence Attachment "Cr" -Jacksan County Roads Comments Attachment "H" -Fire District No. 3 Continents Attachment "I" -Jacksan County Surveyor Comments Clark Tentative Plan Page 2 of 3 Attachment "J" - RVSS Correspondence Attachment "K" -Proposed Resolution ACTiUNs Consider approval far a Tentative Plan application to create 5~ zero lot line single family lots. I~IECOMMENDATIt~N: Approve the Tentative Flan application per Staff Report dated March 6, 2047 including all attachments and exhibits to create 53 zero lot line single family lots. Clary Tentative Plan Page 3 of 3 ~~~~ ~ ~~~ Finding of Fact And Conclusions of Law City File No. 07025 Applicants: Heritage Development, Inc. Introduction: The applicant has submitted az1 application for consideration of a Tentative Plan in association with City File No. 07032 for a Plaz7ned Unit Development. The applicant is proposizlg 53 zero lot line single family residential lots located within az1 R-2, Residential Two Family zoning district. 1,6,10,010 Submission of application--Filing fee, Tlae applicant shall submit an application and tentative plazz together zi~itlt improvement plans and other supplementary material as may be reeluired to itxdicate the development plan and shall subzazit ten copies to the city together ~i~ith a filing fee defined in the city's adopted planning application fee selredule. The diagrams sub3azitted shall consist of ten copies at the scale speci~ed in section 16.10.4211 and one cope in an eiglit- and-one-half-inch by eleven-inch format. {Clyd. 2786 ~4, 1998; C9rd. 1684 ~6, 1993; Qrd. 1650{part}, 19901}. Findings: The applicant submitted all of tl~.e required supplementary material and fees necessary to deem the application complete. Conclusion: The applicant has met this criterion. 16.10.015 Application and review--Fees. Applications and review thereof sl2all conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.95 and alI applicable city ordinances and laavs of tl2e state. All costs of administrative and legal staff time costs, plans checks, construction inspection, preparation of agreements, in excess of the filing fee, shall be borne by the applicant and paid upon billing by city. Failure to pay such costs as billed shall constitute grounds for denial of final plat approval or building permits. {{ord. 1654{prtrt}, 1990). Findings: 'er Section CPMC 1.7.05, this application is classified as a Type III process, which requires apre-application meeting. The applicant satisfied this requirement on Noverriber 9, 20(}6. Conclusion: The applicant has rriet this criterion. 16.10.020 Scale. The tentative plan shall be drazr~n on a sheet eighteen by tzz~entzf~ four inches in size or a multiple thereof at a scale of one inch er~uals one hundred feet or, for areas aver one ~~Serverzilla~p1~2007 IJand LJse Files~07025 Clark - Vilas Tentative 1'Ian~Finding of Fact.doc Page 1 of 6 hundred acres, ofze ifzcla egr.rals trim ht.tndred feet, and shall be clearly arzd legibly reproduced. {Qrd. 160{part}, ~ 99C~}. Findings: The applicant leas submitted the xequixed suppler-nentaxy rnatexials. Conclusion: The applicant has met this criterion. 16.1U.fl30 General information. The follazving general information shall be shozctn on or included ztrith the ter2tatizre plan: A. Proposed Warne of the subdivision. This naarie must not duplicate ar resemble the Warne of another subdivision in the count f; Findings: The proposed Warne of the subdivision (Parkway} will not be appxoved by Jackson County Surveyor`s office. There is already a subdivision ire Jackson County with that name. The applicant must carne up with a new name and xeceive approval from the Jackson County Surveyors office priox to submitting a final development plan and final plat applrcatiorzs. Conclusion: The applicant will meet this requirement. B. Date, narthpaint, and scale of drazaing; C. Location of the subdivision by section, township, and range, and a legal description sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed tractor the tract designation ar other description according to tl7e records of the countr,~ assessor; D. Names rind addresses of the azrrner or owners, applicant and engineer or curve for; E. A title report indicating rill interests of record in the propert3,~ wlzicl2 is the subject of the application. {Qrd. ~65tJ{part}, ~~9p}. Findings: The applicant has provided all of the above listed information. Conclusion: These requirements have been met. 7.6,1Q.040 Existing conditions, The following existing conditions shall be shazrrn an the tentative plan: A. The location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to tl~e tract, easements, railroad rights-o~f zcray rind such other important features zrrithin ar adjacent to the tract as may be required by fhe citrf, B. Contour lines related to some established bench n2ark ar other datum as approved by the citrf zcrhen the city determines that the nature of the topography or size of the subdivision requires such data. Contour lines ,shall have the follozrring anininzurn intervals: 1. Tzvo fact caaxtaur intervals for ground slopes less than~ve percent; 2. Five foot contour intervals for ground slopes exceeding five percent; ~'~ : , ~~Serverzilla~pl~2t~0~ Land Use Files~C}~025 Clark - Vilas Tentative I'Ian~Finding of Fact.doc Wage 2 of ~ C. The location of at least one temporary bench zrrrrrk zt~itluzz the part bazsndaries; D. Location and direction of all zraatercourses and drainage systerrzs; E. Natural features, szrclz as rack arztcroppirzgs, rrrrrrslres arzd zrroodecl areas; F. Existing uses of the property, including location of all existing structzzres tttlzich the subdivider proposes to leave on the property after platting; G. The location ~rritlzin the subdivision and in the adjaitzirzg streets azzd property of existing sezrrers crud zrtater mains, culverts and drain pipes, azzd all other existing or proposed utilities to be used on tl~e property to be subdivided and invert elevatiozas of sewers at points of probable connections; I-~. Zoning on and adjacent to tTze tract. {C?rd. 1654(part), 199Q), Findings; The applicant has provided the necessary inforzx~ation. Them are existing irrigation lines on the subject tax lots as identified. Rogue River Valley Irrigation District requires those lines to be relocated. Conclusion: The applicant will be required to work with RT~V1D regarding this. 11,10.50 Additional information. The follaztJing additional infarznation shall also be inclrzded on the tentative plan: A. Streets, shozzxing location, 7r~idth, proposed nazzzes, approximate grades and approximate radii of curves and tl2e relationship of all streets to any projected streets as shozon of any development plan adopted by the city; Findings: Jackson County Surveyor's Uffice has required the applicant to corr~e up with a new name for the proposed street. There are existing streets with or close to the name proposed for Parkway Drive. B. Easements, shazr~ing the zaidtlz and purpose; Findings: The applicant has provided all the easements required for Tentative Plan approval. However, they will have to identify maintenance easerzlents on each individual lot on the side yards where a zero lot line will be when filing the final development plan. Conclusion: The applicant has met this criterion. C. Lots, showing approximate dinzetzsions, area of smallest Iot or lots and utility easements and building setback lines to be proposed, if any; D. Sites, if any, proposed for purposes other than d~crellings, E. Area in square footage of each lot and the average lot area. (Drd. ~bSQ(part~, ~ 990). Findings: The tentative plan identifies all of the above. ~~ ~. ~~~erverzilla~p1~200~ Land Use Files~Q7025 Clark - Vilas Tentative Plan~Finding of Fact.doc Page 3 of ~ Conclusion: The applicant has met this criterion. 16,1[?,060 Partial development. Wizen the property to be subdivided contains only part of the tract azr~ned or controlled by the applicant, t12e city Wray regr~rire a development plan of rr layout for streets, numbered lots, blacks, phases of development, and other inrprozrerarents iaz fire rctzdivided pardon, indicating inter-relationship zrritl2 the portion sauglrt to be dizrided. The city shall have authority to require that any adjacent parcel ar parcels ozrmed ar controlled by the applicant but not included in the proposed subdivision boundaries be included in the development zvlzenever inclusion of such parcel ar parcels ztaould be an appropriate extension of the development and in the best interests of the public, considering fire development plan and the relationship betzr1een the surrounding area and the area of proposed development. {Ord. 16&2 ~1, 1991; Ord. 1 &;~tJ{part), 1990. Findings: The applicant has identified that this project, if approved, would be developed in two (~} phases with the first phase closest to West Vitas Road. The improvements required and at what time would be determined and approved by the Public Works ~epartznent. Conclusion: The applicant has met this criterion or will meet the required improvements to be made as determined by the Public Works L}epartment during the completion of each phase. 1.6.10.O7U Explanatory in£ormafion. Any of the follozr7ing information may be required by the cihf and if it cannot be slzozrrn practicably on the tentative plan, it slxall be submitted in separate statements accompanying the tentative plan: A. A vicinity map shozUing all existing subdivisions, streets and unsubdivided land ozvnerslzips adjacent to the proposed subdivision and slTOZr~ing hozv proposed streets nzay be connected to existing streets; &. Proposed deed restrictions in outline farm; C. Approximate centerline profiles showing the proposed finished grade of all streets, including the extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision; l~. The approximate location and size of all proposed and existing zt~ater and sewer lines and storm drainage systems. {Ord. 16,517{part}, 199(7}. Findings: The applicant has provided the applicable items relevant to this proposal. The proposed connection via Sugar Pine Court shall be determined and approved by the Parks Commission and City Council. Conclusion: The applicant has met this criterion. 16.10.080 Tentative plan approval. ~ ~~Serverzilla~p1~2007 Land Use Files10~025 Clark -Vitas Tentative Plan~Finding of Fact.doc Page ~ of 6 Approval of the tentrztiz}e plrrax shrill nvt ccaaastitute~nrrl rzcccptrztzce of the firxrrl plat of the proposed subdivision or partition for recording; Irozc>ez~er, approzxzl of the tentative plan slxall be bitxding upon city for the purpose of the approzaal of the fiiral plat if the final plat is in substantial cortrpliance zzritlt the tentative plan and airy c'otrditions of approval tlxereof The action of the council in approving the tentative plan shall be noted orx tzz~o copies thereof, including ref~rezxce to any attached dociiraretxts descrilaitxg atxy conditions. tine copy of the tentative plan shad be returned to the applicant and the outer retaitred itr the citr~ files ztlitlx a nxerrxorandutn setting forth the action of the council. (turd. T 65(~{part), 399th). Findings: The applicant shall meet alI o£ the recommended conditions of approval associated with the CLIP, PUI~ and Tentative Plan applications prior to acceptance of the final plat for recording. Conclusion: City staff shall ensure that the conditions of approval have been met prior to signing the final plat for recording. 1.6.0A90 Conditions on tentative plan approval. The cit-zj Wray attaclx to any tentative plaax approval given under this chapter specific conditions deemed necessary in the interests of the public health, safety or ztrelfare, including but not lirrrited to the following: A. Construction rttrd installation of any on-site or off-site improvements, including but not linxited to sidewalks, curbs, gutters, streets, street signs rind street liglxts, traffic control signs and signals, zz~ater, storm drainage, srtnitrtry sezt~er, rind park and recreation improvements. In requiring off site improvements, the citzf shall fend drat said improvements are reasonably related to the development and would serve a public purpose such as mitigating rxegative impacts of the proposed development. All improvements required under this subsection slxall be trxade at the expense of the applicant, and shall conform to the provisions of the Standard Specifications rind Uniform .Standard I~etrzils for Public Works Construction in the City of Central Point, Clregon, however, the city, in its discretion, ntay nxodifiy such standards and determine site-specific design, engineering and construction specifications when appropriate in the particular development, S. An agreement by tlxe oza}ner of the property to zztaive, on his or tier belxalf and on beJxalf of all future owners of the land, any objection to the formation of a locrtl improvement district which Wray be formed in the future to provide ring of the inrprovernents specified in subsection A of this section; C. An agreement by the ozrtner of the property to enter into a zraritten deferred improvement agreement, providing that one or more of the improvements specified in subsection A of this section shall be made by the ozaner at some future time to be determined by the city; ~:a ~ ~ Serverzilla~ p1~2Q07 Land Use Files 0025 Clark -Vitas Tentative PIan~Finding of Fact.doc Page of ~i D..~.nJ agreement eaztered irzta pr~rsunnt to subsections ~ or ~:: of this section s7rrzjl be retarded in the count f recorder's af~ce rrncf slzrtll lae ttzfezrr~ec~ to tlrererrfter run zz~itlr the land, so rzs to bind future ozianers of the lands nffetted. flnJ rzrrd rzll recordirxg casts slzrzll be borne b~ the crpplitr~nt, E. Any other conditions deemed b~ tl2e tits to be rerzsonrrble ernd rrecessrzrzl in the interests of tl7e public lzerrltlz, safety or ctrelfrzre. {Qrd. 16&4 §~, 1993; Card. 16~a2 §2, 1991}. Fzndingst Deferred lmprovernent Agreements are no longer accepted by the City. Conclusion; All improvements listed above, iznprovernent$ specified by the City Public Works and improvements referenced by the February 15, 20071'ublic Works Staff Report can be monitored in conjunction with the City Public Works. $'1 . °~. ~ ~ ~erverzilla~ ply 2007 Land Use Files 07025 Clark - Silas Tentative 1'lan~Finding of Fact.doc Page 6 of ~ m ~~ ~' .. tk L~4:; C~f,i~ lk fi.: k'L.r'~N1`d4f`~C' t',U~,~~PL,11.>~>'~CfJ CR.t.~ C(kM'~ k C: Lf~k 1 kZAL I't:.?li~! k , cif ~i_:~.:aa,>i~ 1~ ~f~~>~~ ~di~°~T1~~R J9= ,L~f~ .~f='F~~..i~,~,~i~lt~l~ ) k'~R ~ I='L.~f+~~l~I:~ ~lf~{~1 f~i~4~~:LC31~1~~=:.fl!.~, } fl~ R~~~~RTY L~C~~'TL-:C~ ~3(r)'d~~S~~-k Cf~= ) RC~~~ R~~D, T4-1~ ~l1`=3.bt~:~~~f ~i~~r~`~. 1~ ~ ~~ `r~10; D~;LE CL~R~., 1 IE.Ri~C,~t,E: DLVL:Lt~P- ~~~4~~~1111A1' ~1.1~3i~E1Ii~1~~1~, ~~ ~'~-l-~t~~~I ) U~di-~~_C~~Vf`LC~~~~`ICi~,t~E~ f'k~DJE~4;~f. ~~I RE9TAL~. C}wnrs- I~~I Ciark k(;;i~t~~c~~ C~etr~~i~;~menfi Centr~~l ~701Iit. CSR 97502 Ci;n~ .. F ~ ,:,art ~-'~ f>c7x l~ 1;~ ~agl~; 1'"~ nt, C> R. 97524 {'.,~{,~1~:>Ui~iT1~- R1~~`lc~i"C~ ~[~s~~%~r1S ~'~~ HSSOCIcit~`>; k11G. ~ BbX ~.t3~r, Medtcrd, RJR X7501 1 }~(~ j } l~,' i t yr des~:ri~tcn- 7-2-01 BA, Tax Lctta 500 ~ 700 Acreage- 7.11 Ores acres Zcttrt- R-, f~E:~IC! ~nua(TX;n~ct-~am~1y D4:~~~ ~~,t Land Use- Detached ~4,agfe F{oily ttesici~~~~al i. NARRATIVE: The purpose of this Planned Unit Development application for Parkway Subdivision is to establish a detached single family dwelling project. The project includes requests to deviate or tape an exception from the Code for side yard setbacks and exceptions to the lot area and lot width standards for the land use designation present, R-2 Residential Two- FamilyDistrict via the Planned Unit Development {PUD} process. The purpose of this PUD application is to identify the residential to#s with the requested exceptions within the subject property. The intent of Parkway Subdivision is to provide for entry level housing on narrow lots for the future residents of Central Point. This process affords both the City and the Developer assurances that the land use modifications are agreed upon and established by a review process. The attached site plans adequately defines the proposed residential uses for the property. The proposed development for detached single family homes on narrow lots, with the requested exceptions, is to provide for zero lot line dwellings. These dwellings will have a zero side yard setback on one side of the lot with a minimum of ~ feet to the other side yard setback. This style ofdeveloprnent still provides usable private backyard outdoor living area, to assure that the livability of the neighborhood is maintained. The differing styles of homes proposed on the lots have considered the placement or design of windows on the house to support privacy for the occupants. The applicants have submitted a landscape plan, in conjunction with this PUD application. The applicant will provide landscaping in accordance with the Central Point Parks Department for the street scape along West Vilas Road, Parkway Drive and Sugar Pine Court. The nature and planned use of the proposed Parkway Subdivision PUD is to provide for a detached single fiamily residential development within an R-2 zoning district. The ownership of Parkway Subdivision a PUD is held by Dale Clark with Heritage Development Corp and Dennis Patterson. The proposed development schedule is to construct the project with two separate phases, starting in 2007. The engineering and design will include the entire area, while the improvements and construction will be conducted per respective phase, as soon as the infrastructure is in place for the development. The total net acreage for the Parkway Subdivision PUD site consists of 7.11 acres. There will be maintenance of the common areas {private minimum access] that will e the responsibility by owners of property that are served by these access ways, and the costs will be accrued with the mutual access and maintenance agreements that will run with the PUD. A copy of the Homeowners Association and CC&R's are attached for review and will be submitted with the Final PUD Plan for compliance. 2 ; ,~ ~~ CHAPTER 17.24, CPMC: '#7.24,010: The purpose of the R-2 district is to promote and encourage a suitable environment for family life at a slightly higher density than that permitted in the R-1 district, and also to provide opportunities for the development of lower cast duplex and attached dwellings. Where #his district is applied to areas of existing single_family homes, the intent is to preserve the low density neighborhood character, promote continued home maintenance and rehabilitation, and allow replacement housing at slightly higher densities that is compatible with the overall character of the neighborhood. Subsection 17.24.C}30{G}identifies that Planned Unit Developments are a Conditional Use within the R-2 district. The demonstration of compliance with the CPMC are addressed below far this PUD application. APPROVAL. CRITERIA: The application procedures and applicable approval criteria far a Planned Unit Development within the R-2 district are listed in Sections 17.68 and 17.76 Central Point Municipal Code {CPMC}. The criteria are: CHAPTER '17.76, C{~ND1T1C7NAL USE PERMIT: 17.76.010, Purpose: in certain districts, condifional uses are permiffed subjecf fo the granfing of a condifional use permif. Because of their unusual characterisfics or fhe special aftribufes of fhe area in which fhey are to be locafed, condifional uses require special considerafr'on so that fhey may ke properly locafed with respect fo fhe oiajecfives offhe zoning fifle and fheir effecf ort surrounding properfies. '17.76.040, REQUIRED FINDINGS: 17.76.040(A}: That fhe sife far fhe proposed use is adequafe in size and shape fa accommodafe fhe use and to meef all other development and iof requiremenfs of fhe subjecf zoning disfrict and all other provisions of fhis cede. 3 ~~ ~° ~ ~~ D"iscussion: Parkway Subdivision area totals 7.11 gross ages of land tha# is suitable in size for residers#ial developmen#. The proposed development is a zero lot line development for single family dwellings on narrow lots. This is similar to a duplex development with the addition of a boundary line to separate the dwelling units. There are exceptions to the Code that are being requested and discussed below, all o#her provisions of the Code can be me#. The proposed development does meet the density requirements and is suitable for residential uses as outlined within the Comprehensive Plan. FINDING; The City of Central Point can find that the size of Parkway Subdivision area is suitable for the proposed development as zero lot line .single family dwellings, With the requested exceptions the project meets all other standards of the Code. ~ 7.76.040~B}: That the site has adequate access fo a pu:~Jic street or highway and that the sfreef or highway is adequate in size and condition fc~ effectively accommodate fhe fraffic that is expected to he generafed by the proposed use. Discussion. The subject property has direc# road frontage ors West Vitas Road, along the northern boundary. The proposed Parkway Drive will eventually connect with North Mountain Avenue via. Sugar Pine Caur#, to enhance stree# circulation in the neighborhood. There is sufficient street capacity to accommodate the proposed 53 dwelling units on the subjec# site. FINDING: The City of Central Point can find that there `ts sufficient street capacity on Nest Vitas Road and North Mountain Avenue to provide adequate access for the project site and the development of 53 single family dwelling units. 17,76A40{C} That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or fhe permitted use thereof. !'~ ~.'` {.~ Discussion: The proposed development of the site far residential purposes will not have a significant adverse impact on surrounding lands. The location of the site with the R-2 district is bound by R-'I zoning to the earth {across West Vitas Raad}, south and west, excluding Tax Lot 60th James Clark property. Tax Lot ~Ug is also zoned R-2 and contains a single family dwelling. With the proposed Parkway Drive along the eastern boundary, Tax Lot 6{}(} can feasible be redeveloped. The land towards the west is planned to be a new City park "Dan Jones Park", The proposed uses on the subject property are identical in character to the existing urban residential uses. With the similar uses prapased, no impacts on their permitted uses are anticipated. The property east of the project site, along West Vitas Raad is zoned C_-t a commercial zone in the City. The other properties to the east and along a portion of the southern boundary are zoned M-~ an Industrial zone. Any future development of these lands will not be adversely impacted from the subject site and design of the project. In addition, Parkway Subdivision is proposing a 6 foot solid vinyl fence along the common boundary slang with an evergreen vegetative screen. These commercial/industrial lands Dave frontage along Table Rock Raad and West Vitas Road to create acommercial/industrial street system. This will keep the commercial truck traffic separated Pram the residential neighborhoods. These commercial/industrial lands can be developed consistent with the Central Paint Ivlunicipal Code provisions. FINDING: The City of Central Paint can find that the proposed residential uses will not have a significant adverse effect an the abutting properties ability to develop consistent with the Code provisions. 17.?'6.04t?~D} Thaf fhe establishment, maintenance oroperafion offhe use applied forwill comply with focal, state and federal health and safefy regulafions and fherefore wi11 not be detrimental fo the health, safefy or general welfare of poisons residing or working in fhe surrounding neighborhoods and wi11 not be detrimental or injurious fo the property and improvements in fhe neighborhood or fo fhe genera! welfare of fhe community based on fhe review of those factors listed in subsection ~C) of this section. Discussion: The proposed use of the site is for detached single family dwellings. The prapased Parkway Subdivision will comply with all safety and health regulations through the engineering standards and requirements for public water, sanitary sewer and street circulation. 5 SEGTIC7N 17.8, P~.ANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS: Section 17'.88.010 Purpose: The purpose of planned uraif developmenf ~PUIJ~ is fo gain more effecfive use of open space, realize advanfages of large scale sife planning, rr~ixing of budding fypes or land uses, improved aesfhefics and environmental preservafion by allowing a variefy of buildings, strucfures, open spaces, allowable heighfs and sefbacks of buildings and sfrucfures. A PUf? should have a harmonious variety of uses, ufilize fhe economy of shared services and facilities, and reduce municipal costs of operafing and mainfaining services while insuring subsfanfial compliance wifh fhe disfricf regulafions and other provisions of fhis code. Discussion: The purpose of this PUD application is to allow for zero lot line detached single family dwellings on narrow lots within the R-~ district. The project will provide for several styles and sizes of single family dwellings. The square footage of the dwellings will range from approximately 1550 to 2250 square feet. This provides for a varied residential neighborhood development that will not look like a typical tract home subdivision. The standard size lets fronting an the planned Don .tones Park will be accessed by minimum access easements (private drives}. Additional off street parking is also provided for each lotto accommodate visitors to the future residents. These common areas will be maintained by the individual owner of the property that ensures that the maintenance will be provided by the home owners thru the CC&R's. With the development of the site to provide detached single family dwellings on narrow lots, when considering the density requirements for the R-2 district, exceptions to the lot area, lot width and the side yard setback standards are being requested with this application. The density of this project and all other development standards for the R-2 district are in compliance with the zoning district and only the design of the project as a zero lot line detached single family residential development justifies the PUD review. The use of public street right of ways, Parkway Drive and Sugar Pine Court, that will include landscaping, bicycle lanes and sidewalks will be constructed by the developer of the project. The minimum access way will be maintained by the owners of the properties being served. The provides an economy of shared facilities for the project, and no additional costs to the City for maintenance. ~T Finding: The City finds that the purpose of this PUD application for Parkway Subdivision, is consistent with this section of the Code, with the exception to the dwelling setbacks, lot area and lot width standards. The provision of private access ways, that will be maintained by the property owners, hoes not impose a financial responsibility onto the City and the shared facilities also provides for an economy of scale, Section 17.68,020 Size: A PCIC~ sha11 be on a tracf of land five acres or larger. Discussion: The Subject property within the project area contains approximately 7.11 acres, which dues meet the minimum 5 acres requirement. The proposed PUU does satisfy 97.68.02Q. Finding: The City of Central Point finds that the subject site does contain greater than 5 acres to qualify for a Planned Unit Development. C4NCIrUSl4N: The City of Central Point concludes that the site consists of 7.'11 acres and that the purpose of the application for detached zero lot line single family dwellings on narrow lots justifies this PUD application, in compliance with Section 17.68.010- 020 CPMC, Section 17.68.040, Criteria: A PUD sha11 be permitfed, altered or denied in accordance wifh fhe sfandards and procedures of this chapfer. In the case of a use exisfing prior to the effective date of fhe ordinance codified in fhis chapter, and classified in fhis chapter as a PUD, a change in the use or in lot area, or an alterafian of sfrucfure sha11 conform wifh fhe requiremenfs for PUI~ use. To approve or deny a PUp, fhe planniiag commission sha11 find whefher or not fhe sfandards of this chapfer, including fhe fallowing criferia are either mef, can be mef by observance of conditions, or are not applicable. ,~ A.~ That the development of a harmonious, integrated p1ar7 jusfifies excepfions to the normal requirements of this tifie; Discussion: The site plan identifies the most of€icient development of fhe land that integrates tie available land for residential purposes with buffers toward east buffering the commercial and industrial lands. In addition the project is minimizing the wall effect with a 4 foot fence toward the west adjacent to the park land, with the existing surrounding land uses. The proposed detached dwelling units are two story with up to ten differing styles of homes, to ensure that window placement and livability are preserved. The exceptions requested is to the lot width and lot area standards of the Code. Lots numbered as 1-~~, 25-27', 30-33, 35-39, 42-46, 48-53 do not meet the minimum lot width being 50 feet, and the minimum lot area standards being 5,000 square feet for the R-2 zoning district. The R-2 zoning district typically allows for duplex development within the minimum 6,000 square foot lots. The narrow lots vary in size from 3`123 - 5~7~ square feet, each lot containing a single dwelling unit. -f the development area was to a conventional duplex subdivision, this would allow for the same or similar number of dwelling units with the development of streets that would not need an exception to the lot width and lot area standards of the Code. All other stand-arils of the ordinance for development will be in compliance. Another exception being requested is the side yard setback standards of the Code for the R-2 district. The R-2 standard prescribes that a minimum of 5 feet be provided per story, These lots are proposed to be developed with zero lot line detached single family dwellings on one side of the lot with a minimum of 5 feet side yard setback on the opposite side. Finding, The City finds that the development of Parkway Subdivision is not practical as a s#andard subdivision with the R-2 district providing for duplex to#s. The app[ican#s desire to provide en#ry level Dousing forthe first time home buyer with de#ached two s#ory single family dwellings. This proposal is consistent with the exis#ing land use pattern towards the south and west while providing street connectivity. B.~ The proposal will be consisfent wifh the comprehensive plan, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the cify; Discussion: The subject property is zoned far two family residential purposes (Law Density} consistent with Comprehensive Plan designation far the site. The Law Density designation allows far the R-2 zoning district. The purpose of the R-2 district is to provide far a suitable environment far families at a s#ightiy higher density than the R-1 district. This is typical#y expressed as duplex lot developments. The proposed zero lot line development of Parkway Subdivision is very similar to the dup#ex development. The difference is that an additiona# property line is included separating the two family homes onto individual fats. This wi#l provide home ownership in an area that would other wise be rentals. This low density development will promote and encourage a suitable environment for new residents. Development of urban areas will provide additional housing opportunities for the future residents of the Gity. The policy of the City is to encourage we#I thought out developments within the boundaries of the City to accommodate the future residents without enhancing sprawl or need for expansion of the UGB. Findirtg~ The City finds that development of Parkway Subdivision and the proposed uses is consis#ent with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site and that the uses are also consistent, including the requested exceptions, with the zoning ordinance and policies of the City of Central Point. C.~ The location, size, design and operating characteristics of fhe PUt~ will have minimal adverse impact on the livability, value or appropriate developmenf of fhe surrounding area; Discussion: The location of the site with the R-2 district is bound by R-1 zoning to the north (across West Viias Road} excluding Tax Lat 600 James Clark property, south and west. The land towards the west is planned to be a r~ew City park "Dan Janes Park". The property a#ang West Vilas Road is zoned C-~ a commercial zone in the City. The other properties to the east and aiang a portion of the southern boundary are zoned M-1 an industrial zone. The size afthe project consists of approximately 7.~ 1 grass acres. The proposed use of the site is zero lot line two story single family residential dwellings. 10 ~. '-. Livability - Lands to the north and south are currently developed to urban low density residential standards, similar to the subject proposal. Land to the west is planned for a City park consistent with the R-1 district. The proposed uses on the subject property are identical in character to the existing urban residential uses. With the similar uses proposed, no impacts on livability are anticipated. The lands to the east are zoned for commercial and industrial uses, there will be no impact on livability. Value- The value of the surrounding properties may increase with the development ofthe site due to the improvements on the subject site along with the enhancement of the street circulation. Parkway Drive can provide alternative access to West Vilas Road from the residential development to the south. The proposed use is consistent with the planned surrounding area, thus, no impacts on value are contemplated. Appropriate Development- The properties to the north, south and west arelor can be developed appropriately to urban standards consistent with the zoning standards. Lands to the east are currently developed to Jackson County standards and are planned for City Commercial and Industrial uses to Table Rock Road. Any future development of these lands will not be adversely impacted from the subject site and design of the project. These lands have frontage along Table Rock Road and West Vilas Road to create a commercialJindustrial street system. This will keep the commercial truck traffic separated from the residential neighborhoods. These commerciallindustrial lands can be developed consistenfi with the Code provisions. :~=inding: The City finds that hods to the north and south are developed to urban residential standards, consistent with the Code; the [and to the west is planned as a City park consistent with the R-1 zoning and Code; the lands to the east and a portion of the southern boundary are currently developed to County standards, and are planned for commercial and Indus#rial uses. The development of the subject property will not have a significant impact on Livability, Value or Appropriate Development to the surrounding lands. '~ ~. D.} Thaf fhe proponenfs of fhe PULE have dera~orasfr~fed fiaaf tiaey are financially able fo carry Dill the proposed projecf, fiaaf fhey infend fo sfart corastrcrcfiota wifhira six monfhs of fhe fina! approval of fhe projecf grad any necessary disfrief changes, and infend fo complete said consfrucfiora wifhin a reasonable time as deferrrrined by fhe commission; Discussion: The developer for the project, Dale C{ark, has received financing approval to construct the project in Its entirety. It is anticipated to have final PUD plan and final plat by springlsummer of 2807. At which time construction for Phase ~ of Parkway Subdivision would occur during the summerlfall of 2007 with completion of the project by the end of 2000. Finding: The City finds that Dale Clark the developer for the project has approval for financing #o start and complete the project within a reasonable time frame. E.~ Thal traffic congesfion will not likely be created by fhe proposed development or wil! be obviafed by demonsfrable provisions in fhe plan for proper enfrances, exifs, infernal traffic circulafiora and parkr'ng,~ D'€scussion: The development of the project will not have a significant impact on the transportation system in the area. Parkway subdivision will construct b3 new dwellings that will generate approximately 508 ADT based on the ITE Manual 7#~` Edition. It is anticipated that approximately 50°l4 of the trips will travel west along West Vilas Read to Pine street. The balance of fife trips generated may go east along West Vilas Road to Table Rock Road, There will be no significant impacts on the local transportation system in the vicinity. .Finding: The City finds that the genera#ian of approximately 508 average daily trips will not have a significant impact on the local street system and that there is sufficient capacity existing #o accommodate the development. ~ ~ :-~ ~.' F.~ That commercial developraaerat ira a PUt~ is needed of tfae proposed locah`on fo provide adeguafe commercial facilities of the type proposed.' Discussion: Not applicafi~le. There are no uses proposed that deviate from the underlying R-2 two family residential zoning. The proposed uses are for residential purposes exclusively. Finding: The City finds that the proposed use for the project is strictly residential and that this standard is not applicable. ~.) Thaf proposed industrial development wi11 be efficient and we11-organized wifh adeguate provisions for railroad and truck access and necessary storage; Discussion: Not applicable. There are no uses proposed that deviate from the underlying R-2 two family residential zoning. The proposed uses are for residential purposes exclusively. Finding: The City finds that the proposed use for the project is strictly residential and that this standard is not applicable. N.) The PUD preserves natural features such as streams and shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain, if these are present: Discussion: There are no natural features present on the subject property. There are also.no wetlands present on site. The existing irrigation ditch will be realigned and piped underground consistent with the Irrigation District standards. Finding: The City finds that Parkway Subdivision does not include a natural feature within its boundaries. 13 ~.. '~~ 1.) The PUC1 will be compatible vtjr`fh the surroundir~cd urea; Discussion: This PUD application is not proposing any non-permitted uses. The only proposed use is single family residential, consistent with the surrounding Comprehensive Plan designation and the R-1 zoning to the north, south and west. The proposed uses are identical and compatible with these surrounding existing and planned uses. The lands to the east and a portion of the southern boundary will be separated from the residential development with a 6 foot solid vinyl fence with an evergreen Phofiinia hedge to screen and mitigate any potential conflicts. The proposed street circulation can also provide a separation of residential neighborhoods and traffic from the industrial uses and traffic. lw i nd i.-.:._.1~.:. The City finds that the proposed use is single family residential, consistentwith the R-2 zoning districtand surrounding residential uses to the north, south and west. The proposed landscaping and 6 foot solid fence will ensure that the residential uses are screened Pram the commercial and industrial uses to the east. J.~ The PUCE wi11 reduce need for public facilities arrd services relative fo afher permitted uses for the fund. Discussion: The permitted uses for the R-2 district are: Single-family dwellings; Single-family manufactured home; (one two-family dwelling; Public and private schools; Churches; Public pants and recreation facilities. This PUD is proposing zero loft line Single family dwellings. There will be no greater demand on the public facilities than the permitted uses listed. Finding.. The City finds that the proposed use being single family residential is a permitted use and that (here will be no greater demand to serve the site with public facilities, 14 ~~ r CONGl.USIflNS: The City of Central Point concludes that this PUD application for Parkway Subdivision is in compliance with Section 17.68.04U GPZC}, in that this proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site and that the uses are also consistent, including the requested exceptions, with the zoning ordinance and policies ofthe City of Central Point. The Gity concludes the project is consistent with the R-2 zoning district for density. The exceptions to the Code are the Lot area, Lot Width, and setbacks for the R-2 district. All other development standards of the Ordinance will be met. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding uses and zoning districts, thus, no adverse impacts on surrounding lands are contemplated. 17.68.850, Preliminary Development Plan: A preliminary development plan shall contain a written statement and maps and other Information on the area surrounding the proposed development to show the relationship ofthe planned unit development to adjacent uses, both existing and proposed. Discussion: Submitted with this application are the site plan maps and detail plans with the applicable standards for development. The standards found in Chapter 17.57, Fences, will be addressed during the review and permitting processes. All proposed uses and locations for the development of Parkway Subdivision are in compliance with the applicable Chapters. The site plans clearly reflects the proposed uses and locations for development consistent with the Central Paint Municipal Code. The submitted Preliminary PtJD plan along with these Findings of Fact have addressed the applicable standards of the Cade and Section 17.68.050 CPMC. FINDfNG; The Gity finds that this application with the submitted site plans and maps for Parkway Subdivision a PUD has addressed the site plan standards of the Ordinance and has identified the applicable information required for review. 15 ~. C©NCt.US14N: The City of Central Point concludes that the applicant for Parkway Subdivision PUD has identified the existing and proposed uses an the submitted site plans and has prepared Findings to demonstrate compliance with the Code criteria for review, consistent with the standards of Section 17.68.050 CPMC. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: The City of Central Point can conclude that this application for a Planned Unit Deve€opment has addressed the app€icable approval criteria as outlined in Chap#ers 17.24, 17.68 & 17.76 GPMG and that this app€ica#ion is in compliance with the Gentra€ Point Municipal Code, Central Point Comprehensive Plan, and sta#e law. With the at#ached documents, site plans and information before the Gity of Central Point, the app€icant respectfully requests approval of this application for a P€anned Unit Deve€opment for Parkway Subd€vision. Respectfully Submi#ted: Dale Clark Heritage Development Corporation ~. 6 ~. ~.. Pubfic W©rks department ~. (~.ii'r c;t ~E~T~~1L PCJtNT PUBLIC ~C?.~`K~` S'AFE' REPORT February IS, 2007 P~~T~~.o~11r1~~T ;~ 5a Bob Pierce, Directt~r Matf Samitore, Dev. Services Coord. AGENDA ITEM: Fifty Three Lot Residential Subdivision far 37-2W-OlBA, Tax Lots 500 and 700 Applicant: Heritage Development Inc., 3365 Snowy Butte Road, Central Point, C}R 97502 Zoning: R-2, Residential Two Family Zoning Traffic: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers {ITE} Trip Generation Manual, a 53 lot subdivision will generate approximately 53.53 peak hour trips (PHT}. The City has recently updated the City's Transportation System Plan {TSP}, The recent analysis shows that the intersections of Beebe/Hamrick Roads and MeadawbroaklBiddle Roads to be failing in the PM Peak. A signalized intersection is scheduled to be installed at the intersection of Beebe/Ilamrick Road as part of the North Valley Subdivision landwuse application. The secondary access point onto North Mountain Avenue must be approved by City Council because the proposed street access proceeds through Dan Janes Park. The access cannot be granted without City Council approval. The Cauncil may impose f nancial or other obligations upon the developer for this access. Infrastructure: Water: There is an existing 8-inch ductile iron waterline in North Mountain Avenue and a 12-inch ductile iron in West Vilas Road. Storm Drain: There is an existing 15" I-IDPE storm. drain line in West Vilas Raad and a 24" in North Mountain Avenue. Street Section: ~V. Vilas Road is improved with no sidewalks. North Mountain Avenue is an improved city street. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Paint Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details far Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specif cations from the Public Warks Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile far streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm. drainage basin map, erasion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a 944 South Third Street ~ Cer7tral P©int, {~R 9?542 •541.664.332 ~ Fax 541.fifi4.fi384 ~~ traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued. Conditions of Approval: West Vilas Road Frontage Improvements: West Vilas is classified as a Minor Arterial. Developer will be responsible for constructing sidewalk and landscape row, with street trees, for tl~e West Vilas Road frontage. 2. Quiet Title and Access: The City and the applicants are currently working in collaboration to resolve a boundary and ownership issue regarding the twenty to thirty feet of area along the south boundary of Don Jones Park and the applicant's parcels. Until this is resolved the City cannot legally grant a road right-of--way or sell a portion of Don Jones Park to the developer. Until this is legally resolved the connection onto North Mountain Avenue cannot occur. 3. Don Jones Park: The City Council has ultimate authority on selling a portion of Don Jones Park to the Developer for legal access to the development. Until the City Council has given approval for this sell the connection of the proposed Parkway Drive to North Mountain Avenue cannot occur. 4. Street Tree Plan: Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 ~l2" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. 144 South Third Street ~ Central Paint, OR 97'542 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 549.664.6384 City of Central Point, C~r~gon 140 ~a.Thircl St., Central Pc+int, Or 97502 541.&&4.3321 Fax 541.664,f~384 www.c's.central-~oint.or.us CENTRAL POINT Building Dopa~~~ment Lois 1}eF3enecietti, E3uildir~g Official B~CrIZrD~NG DEPART~!iENZ' STAFF I~.BP(~R.T DATE: 12/2'7/06 TQ: Planning Department Planning ale: 07025 FRt~M: Building .Department SIJBTECT: Clark Tentative Plan Name; Heritage Dev. Co. Address :365 Snowy Butte Ln. City; Central Point State; Oregon Zip Code: 97502 Property Description: 37S~2W-O1BA- TL 700/8Q0 PURPOSE: The star report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. 'This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 1 F .~ City of Central Paint, Greg©n 1 AO St~.Third 5t., Centrai faint, Or X37502 547.664.3321 :'ax 541.664.6384 www.ci.centra!-point.or.us CENTRAL POINT ~1.11EC~ltlg de~?al"tC7"letlt ~~is (~7eE3enetietti,E3uild9r~~ Oi'#'icial BUILD~I~C DEPA~2T~ENT COMMENTS. l . ~ Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with al l current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point building Depaz-tznent. 2. If a private storm. drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by tl~e Central Point Electrical Department. ~-. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical repoz~t as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A_ written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. ~Vhcn expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations, ~. Grading/excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding az~y fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private storm drain work must be permitted and inspected by City wilding Dept {prior to backfill~. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official, shall be submitted prior to final of the gradinglexcavationpeanit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation pcrznit is ~naled. Exception: l . The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of way. 2. The upper I .S foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. ~.~. ~. City of Central Point, C)regarl 140 So.Tltird St., Central 3'oint,flr 97502 541.6&4.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.central-paint.or.us Building Department Lois DeBenedetti, l~uilcling Official 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. '7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. .Any development (any man-made changed to unproved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.1.24. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 1.4. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Residential Specialty Code I~2445~. I I . Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings. The International Fire Code X2443) with Oregon Amendments {2444 will be implemented as part of the plan cheek code requirement for this proposed building. l2. froperty lines must be established and pinned by Lie. CJregon Surveyor prior to azay building inspections. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. Feb {~6 07 fl3:53a ~~-rin SifEs - (~~+1} 773-620 I? fl ....,- ~..~ague ~-zv~er Va~~e~ ~r~ga~ic~~~ ~J~s~~~~~ 3139 l~~errintan 12oad I~ed~czrd, C}R 975111 (541 } 773-6127 Ir`ax X541} 773-5424 ~tr~et~site: ~~~=w.rr~; id- February S, ~S~(}7 Cit,r of Central I'oixtt Planning Depaz~zxr.ertt x.41} South °Third 5€, Central Faint, {~R ~75fl2 Attn: T..isa Morgan R.e; Park-~ray Subdivision, 37-2=01 Tax lots, ?0~ ar~d 5~}4 _- c~'`~4 ~ ~ Rome lover Valley Irrigati~an District has an irrigation facility kzao~aa as tour CJptot~ Lateral that traverses through this proposed developxnent_ Asub-.lateral branches ofFc~l' the xxtain lateral part way thra this property. Rogue River valley has been assured by the developer that these facilities will be piped to csnr specific.atic~ra artd that easements specific to the 12ogue River 'tralley will be issued. As afthis date we have not seen an etagineered set of ixrigativz~ pipeline plans, ar any specifics to the easements, I understand that due to the topography ol` this develapxxzent location, a siphon drill need to accarst.odate this relocation and piping of the distric€s Facilities. Rogue Ricer valley Irrigation District requests that the devei~rper must have arz approved piping ,plan. signed ofi'by the irripation district prior to cornxnencernertt of this project, This lateral in a very impc~x€ant cartduit to travel irrigation waters to the earth end of our irrigation boundaries. Easernerats £arthe irrrziga€ion Facilities need. to be specific to the Rogue River valley Irrigation District. This will insure cur Cuture operations and maintenance oFthis district facility. please beep the district posted ort this approval from the City cif Centrat £'c~int. Thank you, ~~~~~~ ~~~~ . Jew Etcher Manager, RRVIp ~~ J~~'~/1Gr'1~C~1/;/~I ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~i.~~~01~ ~DI~~~•~T}' PO,~,~i~~ l~rA ~~~s. ~s~i r7~ ~,,,~~, =~-=a JACKSON COUNTY RoQas Jar]t-lary 'i~, 207" Attention: Lisa Morgan City of Central Point Planning ~ 4(~ South Third Street Central Point, OR 9762 RJ~: Subdivision off West Vitas Read -- a countynrnaintained read. Planning File: ~7{~25, A residential partition. Clear Lisa: ~2a~ds Eric 3Yierrtcyer, I'Sl Z}aIltrc~ Devetopn7~rttE`rrgt~teer 200 Mialapa Road Wtilttt City, CsPi B7:i43 Ph4a~: (6d S } 73d-6231# Ft+x. {BAS} 77A-6236 n[amQye3lg~?jac~ooncauntyarq anvw.fIICKSOncounty.arg Thank you for the opportunity #o comrn~:nt on this application far Parkway Subdivision. The residential subdivisican will haue fifty three lots and located on the south side of Wes# Vitas Road. Reeds and Parks has the fallowing comments: ~l . The applicant shad suiarnit construction drawings #o Jackson Coun#y Roads and i'arks and ob#ain county permits if required. 2. The applicant shall csbtein a mad approach permit frorr~ Roads and Parks for ariy new or improved read approach to V5/est Vitas Read. We recommend r1c direct driveway approaches to fittest V'ilas Rand, 3. Please note that West Vitas Road is'a county arterial road and has a varia[ale right-o# way wi#[~ an Average Daily Traffic count of '14,767 as of July 2(}06, one-hundred-yards west of Table Rac[t Read. 4, Jackstan County Roads and Parks recommend thirty fc-ot radiuses at West Vitas Road. The applicant shall prouide a sight distance analy~~is for the intersec#ion of West. Vitas Road and Parkway prlve. 5, ,iackson County Roads and Parks has concerns about the partial road at the intersection with West Vitas Road. The width of #h.e road wouCd cause safety cor~cerris. 6. The ~Ity of central Poin# should provide for future eastlwest rand connectivity. 7. if county storm drainage facilities are utilized, the applicant's registered snginet~r shall verify that the drainage system has adequate capacity to accept additional runoff from this development. ,~acksan C~+unty Roads and Parks sha[I review, cornrnent and approve tl~e hydraulic report including the caiculation~ and drainage plan. Capaci#y improvements or on site detention, if necessary, sha[i [ae installed at the expense cif the applicant, Sincerely, Eric Niemeyer, PIW Traffic & Development i=ngineer 1:tEnc~lneer}ngtCa~uelapmentlCITIE5ICNTR~P'rt0702&,wFd -~ ~"> . ~~ ~ ~. x . January 4, 2447 Attn. visa Morgan Planner City of Central Point A`TT'ACH ~I11 ~~`' "_..,~-...w, ~~ Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Read White City C)R g7~03-1~?5 X541} 826-710?(} (v©ice} (541} $2fi-4566 (fax Internationa//y Accredited - 2Q[75-2Q1 Q ~' Project #017425 Clark Tentative Plan • Connectivity of street access will be required for this development. Exception; All buildings are provided with approved NFPA automatic sprinkler systems. • Signage and Curb paint plan to designate No Parking zones will be approved by the Fire District and City. • Fire Hydrants shall be provided every 344 feet, and have a Fire Flow capability of 1544 GPM a~ 24psi minimum. • Vehicle impact protection will be utilized if a hydrant is located near a possible vehicle impact zone. • Maintain at least 3 feet clearance to all hydrants this will include landscape materials. • Hydrants setback will be within 10 feet of the curb face. • Street radius minimum R-28' • All other Fire Codes shall apply to this project. Mark Moran DFM ~~ ~E~~ ~~~ From: Roger Roberts [RabertRR a(_`}jacksancaunty.argl Sent: Wednesday, ©ecember 27, 20Q6 6:19 PM To: kisa Morgan Subject: Proposed Parkway Subdivision Yourfile no. X7025. I have reviewed the notice of the planning action application for the above project. The proposed subdivision Warne is already in use. t~RS 92.090 states: ~~ ~1 }Subdivision plat names shall be subject to the approval of the county surveyor ar, in the case where there is na county surveyor, the county assessor. l~lo tentative subdivision plan or subdivision plat of o subdivision shall be approved which bears a name similar to or pronounced the same as the name of any other subdivision in the same county .... ~~ The project will need a different name. The developer andlor surveyor should check with this office far the acceptability of a proposed name, and the name can lac put into reserve far that development. Also, the ~praposed street name is the same as an existing street in Medford. The developer needs to use a street Warne that will not cause confusion in the event of an emergency situation. Again, this office will review the proposed street name and, if found acceptable, it will be placed on a reserve list for that development. Roger Roberts ,Jackson County Surveyor 1 fl Sa. t~akdale Rm ~ 18a Medford, C7r 97501 Tel 541-774-6192 I'ax 541..774-6193 RobertRR~jacksoncounty.org ~..~.. Ft1 f ~2I2~CI ' X59: ~~ . ~~~~ ~~~ b ~fi~ La~aticn: 138 wcat Vitas 12a~d, Central Point, OR - Ivt~flitt~ rlddress:l',C7, Bay 3130, Ccrttral Pont, Oft 7502~Q(}OS '1'cl. {5a 1) 654~i3tt0,1~ns {541 ~ ~{,q 7I7 t uru4~w.1{~1SS.}~s ~GCe1~`~~Gr ~~~ ~{)~~ City off` Ccnt~°al Point Punning ;©epartrla~~~.t 3 SS ~outb. second Street Contra] Poznt, t3regc~n 97502 R.e: Parkway SubdYV~isi~ran, I'ile #07425 Dear Lisa, Scwex sezvice ~`ox tl~ie Proposed dcvelopzz~ent will req:.tire a maul izne e~tcnsiozx from ~e e~zsting sewer on ~To~`#k~ IVlountai~x .A,.YOnue. Ta.~is sewer ~I.i~,. rn~st be desi.gr~ed arzd cdnst;^uctcd. in accord~ce with RVS standards. 'T'l~e i»ropcrty zs w%#hin Ll1e N.PDES ~'ha.se 2 tlrzxnwatc~r Qualify managetl~ez~t area ar~d must campl.y t~ith relevatzt stazmwatez glxality guic3.eli~.es. Feel.:~~ee tc~ call nee ~~`you have any questions rcgaxdh.~~ sewer service £or this pra~ect. Sincerely, ,,--'~". ~~ at-1 Tapp E bistri,ct EngIncer ~:~.;1~.A.'~'AIAGFI~'CZFICENT~''~'1PL~1I'~~IG~SUB.L~1Vl~Q~i12,007~~}'1t~2S ~?~~.WAY~ s~br.~-~s~c~~l,l~aC ~ r ~~~I, ~'~~ r~L~ ~~~~ k~~~ A ~~ ~~,SP PLANNING C©MMI5SIC~N RESGLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TO CREATE 53 ZERO LOT LINE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS Applicant. Heritage Development, Inc. (37 2W 01BA, Tax Lots 5Q0 & 7(}0} File Nc~. Cl'702 WHEREAS, Applicant has submitted an application for a Tentative Plan in conjunction with a Planned Unit Development to create 53 zero lot Tine single family lots within an R-2, Residential Two Family zoning district on two parcels with a combined approximate gross acreage of 7.11 acres on properties identified on Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 01BA, Tax Lots 5010 & 700, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and L1~HEREAS, On March ~, 2007, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted adult'-noticed public hearing on the applications, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application; and ~1~HEREAS, the Planning Commission`s consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to Tentative Plans, section 16.10, R-2, Residential Two zoning districts section 17.24, Planned Unit Developments, section 17.68, and Conditional Uses, section 27,76 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No, does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department staff report which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and z"ncorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication ofrts passage this 6~ day of March, 2007. ~_, ~> ~ _. Planning Commission Resolution No. (03062007) Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this stn day of March, 2{107. Planning Comrxussion Chair c~>=~ ~ r.~ Planning Conunissipn Resolution No. {03062007} F~'~TFi~~~~I~IT C:~~~`~Fi AGENT I :File No. 0'036 t '' March ~, 2007 annir~ art rat 1cara~ I~It'r~a~.a}are.=y, 0~1t:.6' Ccsrnraaaataity C)c~v~m3oF~rrarrat C.3ir~ctort a';ssista~nt City>~t3rrairti5tr'a~tc~r Cansideration of a bite Plan application to develop a 1~,Q-unit senior citizen retirement facility (assisted living} located in the T(~Z)-1-ZMR, High Mix Residential zoning district and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's snap as 37 2W 03C, T Lot 100. Applicant: Twin Creeks afire ant, regon i ited Partnership; Agent: onald L. Grimes!, Architect) STAFF S U C: Zion Burt, Planning Manager AC G Ul'~T : The project area is approximately 4,23 acres and located within the Twin Creek Master Plan area. '.. ~ ~ ~ ~' The Property is planned and zaned for TOZ)- ~ ~ ~, ~, i ~ ,`. ~~""`""' ~' ,: Z-1MR, High Mix Residential zoning district ;~ °~~ m . . 4 .!r^. ...... ...u ~Pigure 1 }. The Project is subject to compliance ~ ' , ~ ~,.~~~ w > . with the requirements of the Twin Creeks Master C' ~' " , ' ~"`'° ~ " , . "" " '.' ' , ~ .... .. , __. ~ -,,. ,~ m.. a V ~ ~ .~ ., ,..,..... Plan and tghe underl in T4Z)-Z-1R zonln ~r ~.M ~~~ N`. y.. Y, '. ~ ~ , district re urrements. ;~ '~~-, ~`~: ~ . .,:~ ,t, ',`~. ~, ~~ Page 1 of ~ :~ ~!¢ of the residents, The Project's design includes parking {109 spaces} and landscaped areas ether than the courtyard. The applicant also proposes that the Project be enclosed with a six {b} foot wrought iron fence. The TC?g district limits the fence height to four {4} feet. As proposed the fence would require a variance. Uses: The primary use of the Project is residential. Because the Project exceeds 40 dwelling units it is required that a minimum of three housing types be provided for in the Project. The Project offers only one type of housing type, Senior Housing. Because the Project is a component of the Twin Creeks Master Plan it is the determination of Staff that the need for a mix of housing types has been addressed through the Master Plan, and that within the Twin Creeks Master Planned project there are more than three {3} housing types. The Project also includes supporting accessory uses as noted above. The accessory uses are being Twin Creeks Retirement Center In Sq. Ft. Percent of Building Area Percent of Site Area Gross Land Area 184,258 Net Land Area 162,2U6 i Buildin Area 18{?,828 Units: 120 Studio 52U5 2.8 2.8 113edroom 43177 23.8 23.4 2 Bedre~ozn 63483 35.1 43.4 Total 111$65 61.8 60.?1 Aceessor Uses ra____... r_nrn ~t h -x ^s ' CPMC Section 17.67.070{ll){2}(d}~vi) x CPMC Section 17,65.050, Table 2 ~ CPMC Section 17.65.050, Table 3, Senior Housing ~ CPMC Section 17.65.05(}, Table 2{f} s CPMC Section 17.65,050, Table l considered as uses accessory to the primary residential intent of the Project and not as stand alone commercial uses. This is an important consideration in that as accessory uses parking is included under the primary use, i.e. one { 1 } parking space per dwelling unit is required and that the one parking space includes the pro rated share of the parking need generated by accessary uses. The accessory uses are also being treated as exclusive employment areas for purposes of net acreage calculation4. The applicant notes in their application that they will encourage use of the dinning facilities and the community room by residents other than these residing in the Project. if this were to occur the use of such facilities by outside groups would result in the reclassification of these accessory uses and the requirement of a conditional use permit. Included in the design is a police substation, which is classified as a Civic use. Civic uses in the HMR district require a conditional use permit. The table to the left identif es all proposed uses and the square footage and percentage of each use. c"s~ Page 2 of ~ `~ ~ ~'1~€'k~gg~~" ~~~~1 k. C7~' I ,''7 1'Of li'1e f~l'Of'?et~i~' If3t_' ;l~illllilttltll ~511O~"et1 iEi'ils(i~` E`, _i~) if1~'t'~f111~?, LlilliS 11t.`i' ill,' ~, i, ,.i . ~~~~e ~~~4ed c~r~ ~>~c li ~, clest,lt~- ~:~~tlr,ltl~llxrlrl ~l rauu11771n71 0l~ ~,>iJ ~Ir,~a~llirl)~. 1711T1:, t; r~:rfUU~'r#. ~~a~~lricl7 1>; e()1i i~;tetlt ~~ ill the 1'l~ojeet j:>X'tlj:7~~ s;1. r. .1lie Y',"lc3}i7177L317? ~}ll3l'~'Uti.~ l;t~~eP'i3~?e 3;7 Chi 1rir 1111 II;~.Uie iii ~)iiSG'i] il(1 ti Ilt_'t r'at'i'f'61S',t; C:~IfC.t,lfii(1t)1l, l\]ter' ti]i1Tlf' ]CIL~.> (:-i)11:?I(li„;7'3t1Qi1 Lr7C lli'3. <lCl~i;i1<',C (1i the 1~)~[7fef;t lEle ~lIY1f7t)tief] Cd)~tT+:?12i' i~; (~;~',''u, ri1'fil0il 1`i Uw3 ct~t77171i~lnc~e ~r~ii17 i.l~~ C1'~~TC, ~~s~~°~~~~~~,, ~ectic71~7 17.,(~~tl. ~I'~ii~>ic' ~ 7delrCifics the 17liilil77T1rn }:~~1r1:ir1~, ~~~~4fuiT~csllelli~; iilr the 1'l~tr~j~°t~i. e 13~1se.~ C7?l 1114: 1~~'01E'C,;1 :i st'~~Cr}I(' 71,`'~CSct I711t711S1111'll Ul f _~>(~ 1~f11'f~it7~2 S~)dG~C'S 7lCi.' t1eCU~lf`. ;~;~ 11OtCG] 1;i1C°11t;r ~`> i~t~ll ~71~ IO91~~71.T,1s~, ~>p~u,es tzrc l~ccf~lil'eil. I'~~r~ the ~!~O13 rc°~~.i~l~ttio~l '>(}"r~, t1i~([TS_ f~~lr~hil7~~, sf~<~ci ~, rr~t~:;t h~~ CC~~eceia. :qs c~~ ~i„Uecl tll~, l'c~ljcc~ rltl]}' flrc~~iil~ ~; #>r 7~ r{~~-e.rer] 17~71~1<illt~, sC~~lcc~;. i'~s flr~llx~~ecl d11~; 1'r~lject is sllot`i: l l 17ct7•l~itl~> sh~~cc°~; ~Ulcl 1`et171ires ~kl~ i ~11~~1 ~ <1cliti~~U~~±I 2 . sfl<~1~;~..; 17e d~;~>v~~~r~c~l. ('~ll~sc~~>1e17t1y 31~ Pt~i>jcei clr.°~i~z~l r~~°i3l tle~~l to ~bc. i~~tT~liliti~r! tzl ac~'<>r~~r~lt7~l~1t~~ iht° ~~cldi9ic,ilal fl«r]<iilp> :'c~cflTi~`~~~~li„1it~. Tlter•c ~3rc Ili'i'~ i;i4)T7~ in file (~ilcle ill~~t allow fill crec.lits trl the f7~1.r 1:i11s.r, ti~'l~~'r1 11<1tt ;ii i~; ,t~ itil~t171e. C~lrrentl~, ~:«~ tT~~zl~sit sel~ic~:~ ~1r4°~ re~,st>~~1~lhlti ~li~a~lahlc t~l ille C'{oj4~•t site, ~l~lle 17~~,~re;i ir<lUSit si~l~ i~; sl~i :~f~'i;()ili] f`~17'e('tclllr."~ ~,aUT~t'1 ~>l1"G'.(',t., „ ~~~~r~€~~~~~~~>i~~„~ E~~.~ ~_~~~^ ~~~a~s~s°.; '1tlc 1'~~clject in{~JT.uI~ .~~ ~~(7.(~f~~~ sclU~lr'~~ i~selof~l~lrlclseal~e~_I Ullc17 s1><~cc n ~acc~~u:r~lin~ CoT° 2~°fo <~f ~1ie ir~t;~1 l't'~~hc~"t~,~ arc~3. ~1~17r ~-r~.i~~ilnUrt7 0}~~~°il s;~~zc~. ~`c{:fUir~°rs7~~lii is i ~"~, . .~>ra~~~iit~:~~ ~p°~~~ ~~~~~;v~o ']~hc° ']~~+iirl t,'ret:l.s ;'~~'I~1,5ter 1'I~IU (~,°1t~~;tcr flail} COf7t~17I]S 1~t't)~,'ISlO71,`~~ ]Ul~ s(allOi' 12f)IISIU(~3 (~l,ststC"i1 19V`lli}7,) " ~~~;~z~°~° ~ ti~ithi~l tllc 1Ii~~1R clistliet'r'. '[~kle ];cy r•~,nL4~h~s tt~l~>1?1i.C1 ill the ;Master 1'1~71~ for eol~sTdel`<7Uol~ of ~~•;ti ~~:°c] 1rvUlr: ulcltl~l~:: . ~, lattilc}it~t~ clc5g~7 ~rlal~ll~tsi~~~; t isU~:il clr`it~nit~tic~rl <~t1d r ~~~ - ~ an~nee.tivit~~; _, ,~ ~. I Prea~ct is al•cl~ltec~llr~~jl~v 1T~[e~~l~~~ted ~rlto Tlertz1717c1r1wtld. ... "j p.~oviilitlf~ 13t~r~~le-~Ii1i. r~orl-~il~stilU)iotl ~~ <litllo~;lll~el`c; ~; ,, , _ ~. T_al~cls4.~;lhed eTltllts ~lr~cl }>~~71~le.tls 1~~rtl~~iue o1~~tn°tu~litics ;~~w ~' ~'~"~1~~1t1.?. ~'<lt]]{;i`13]L'. ~3(1C} t.',~ll'C}'.'-]lillcr. ]~lliltjiillr r7~:~~~i3YL' :lii;~ 17IC)))Oft)O[ls OI 4)tttCl{?OT s~~lt~e`1 ~l"Ol'Itle ~~'i=~~~~ iii .~iii;lOtilii;, . i1i'iL1 ~' ~ 4, C'ltlse ~t~t~~in~itvtp t;'~llsit, allcl T'ctail ~~itiimize tlYe Tcliai~c4~ "l he T~7"t>jeet' tlesi~~tl sttcce:;sfltllr ~7dc1T-rt:sses these Cclllsiclertltit~ns. It is noted tll~l.t the ~;'1'asLer ~'Ittz iclelliil~ies <:l s1~e~il-ic site, otllel~ tll~lr~ the l'1:o1~Teriy.. 1i~r11~e1~ sc>tlh orl 1 tasltel] `~itreet as a 147c~~iicTn 1)r' assisted 37c~~lsit~~7 i 1'i`7U~`e ~" j. 1_l~is is beitl~ reL~d as a sU~~e:siec] Ir~ciltioll alic3 does rli?t exel~lcle ~l~,sistecl living; uses its any tlt}ler 11~;'lIZ loeaiions +,~itl~ill the l"~~'ill ('r~cek areal. -1h~ .'~~<~stel•:Pl~~%7, as •~v~.:ll ~l:s tl~e zo~?iTl=> ~~c:}zulatii>tls, ailou i-c7~ ~~ssisted lip ilig i~l. ~~iy li~'~1~ <listl`i~;t. ~ Il.>iil ~ Cl"CSC tieLticsn 17.ti5.C5(), l table. "~.,(~~"I(; ~?eCl`IOit ~ /.f7:`.U.`?{). "I'tablt ~ ~iCT°kIGTH(JSTTT ~ CP:4'14:, sei;LlOra 17.bti.0~0, i able 7° ~ ~°, it C=eeJ,s "1 ransit (~ri~°t1(cd Deg ei;~),ralc;ri'r 'r"it~ai'~~ayier i'la?T, [~eccrrll~er 14, 2U00, r ~ ' '~ Paeo~ 1 The approval criteria for the Project are in Section 17.66.OS0 and requires that the applicant demonstrates compliance with the following CPMC provisions: Section 17.65.040 Land Use - T©D District, Section 17.6S.OS0 Zoning Regulations - TQD District; Section 17.67 Design Standards - TUD Districts and Corridors; Section 17.60 General Regulations Section 17.64 Off-Street Parking and Loading Section 17.'70 Historic Preservation and Uverlay Zone, and Section 1'7.'76 Conditional Use Permits In reviewing the Project it has been determined that as presented the Project is in general compliance with the above criteria (see Attachment "C" for detailed f ndings}. Areas ofnon-compliance are: L Minimum parking requirement. This application has been conditioned to provide for the minimum required number of parking spaces. 2. Number of covered parking spaces. This application has been condition to provide for the minimum required number of covered parking spaces. 3. The need for a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed police substation. This application has been conditioned to apply for and have approved a Conditional Use Permit prior to occupancy of the police substation. 4. Fencing height exceeds the maximum allowable four {4} feet. FINDINGS. See attached Attachment "C" {To be distributed ender separate cover} ISSUES: In reviewing this application the Planning Commission should address the following issues: 1. That the proposed accessory uses are in fact uses accessory to and subordinate to the primary use of the Property for senior housing. These accessory uses will generate additional parking needs for employees. The CPMC does not specifically address parking requirements for accessory uses. At a minimum sufficient additional parking should be provided for the maximum employment shift. This information is not currently available. 2. The encouraged use of the community room and dinning facilities by groups outside of the Project. The impact of this proposal is not quantifiable with regard to requirements for additional parking. If the applicant decides to proceed with these "encouraged" uses then it is recommended that they be treated as a conditional use. As a dining room, or corc~mmunity roam, serving the residents of the Project they would retain their def ninon as an accessory use and stand approved as submitted. 3. Fencing height. As proposed a variance to the fencing requirement is needed. ~~ Page 4 of 5 ,~; CfJNDITIONS QF APPROVAL: 1. Prior to issuance of Building Permits the applicant shah provide the required minimum number of parking spaces and covered. parking, including the additional parking sufficient to accommodate employee needs. The minimum number of parking spaces shall be increased to in an amount sufficient to provide one parking space per employee on the maximum shift. ~. Prior to occupancy of the police substation the applicant, or City, must receive approval far the police substation as a conditional use. 3. Use of the dinning hall and community room by outside sources will ba considered as non- accessory uses and will require approval of a conditional use permit. Prior to such use of those facilities the applicant shall apply for a receive approval of a Conditional Use permit. ~. Prior to construction of any fencing that exceeds the height limitation the applicant shall apply for and receive a variance to the fencing height limitation, E~;~IIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" -Proposed Project & Landscaping Plans Exhibit `B" -Applicant's Findings Exhibit "C" -Planning Department Findings Exhibit "D" -Public Works Staff Report Exhibit "E" -Building Department Staff Report Exhibit `"F" . ... RVSS Correspondence Exhibit "G" -Fire District Na. 3 Comments Exhibit "H" -Proposed Resolution ACTIONt Consideration of Resolution No. , approving the Site Plan Application. ~IECOMMENT3ATION. Approval of Resolution No, ___`_, granting Site Plan approval. g ~ °~. Pa e 5 of 5 `~' `~' ~~~ _... _._ ._~`Y ~..~ Aj? ~ 3 ' ~• / 4 cGt GJ. f k~ ` GaCwG_ Gs.k<L: OFR4R~ Q+- GJ ~ s i ~ .~.._ i G G 3 O fl h3: V~:1~ ..~. ;..~. ice... __........i~ ..--~..._.--.- w rw a ....~......-...-:-...::::_....;: rw w Utv:T A !:'1~ ~ 4 O k P ~ A ~' ~ na: _ ' ~ _ f~ 4 ' ~ x L": ru ~:J I A. tAGt G gAG;: tF. C knGG X91: GAY.I.G[ :.S^ GhNAG G 4w4~ UARhLC Gr,RAL.`. +~ ~ a-.-~ ...... ~~ ~ ( j ,.y ~3 ~ f ~ NC O F `+e' / " UnIF B y ` -~ '"'~ ~° O O R '..2J a~ vN . ,w~ P L k hi '--y GASip,~, G 4huC G.i4.r.v'C A.hG^_ G/~khG'~ GARnG: GxMhG_ GAfi G~ ~ l ai ~ .........~..--. r `' ~ _ ...__.~ e ~ ` i ~ _~...~ 'r € ..... . ~ ,_ , e ~ i ~ - 3 ` C: r G (~ F C. Ct O R. F E. A H l~v«. Q .~ N~fi Wca: w ~ ~' ~ _i ~ ~ U ~ ~ o P ~ a . t tai i:J uraw.Gr VCTY G L"~ ~ ~...]} uC+~'.ag. tYV PAM1n C~ ~~, ~ knkX,~,Y~tiG ".~~"i""i Y.} v..... 0 a !~ ~~~ vn~ VS }~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~u 7 tmm7 ~ `3 N, MtCv L' POLY q`!'iGG ~mFCTt r:~a Gdw~. >a-. x.T I ~a•~~ a+~ 1 PART 3 A G '`acres ,>;,~. ~ ~ . _ _...y_..~.._;' !'~ ~.ne. orn.: r-c P~ O Q f3 f' L ~,.N ______-. ~~g ~:n t~.CF v ~ J C U ~ ~_.. ~~,0 O R P [, A N l~J •c..w yr . r,c• ~~ Sao ~~ ~a ~a~ '3~ mQ ~~~ ~~:i t':l.S ECO ND FLOOR PLAN ~..,~c= AS ec...a ar~v . na y ._. _.... ~' ..........___. ~ 3 ~ ~ ..R. C:~nocuments and Settings~h9atthew~lataE SettingslTemporary tnterrtet Files~OLK~37lTvrin Creeks Base 1219dG.DWG, Cayouti, 12/14J2(706 f:~t1:20 AM, F~lattheav Rustler Peak Street ,1 3 ~ . i 1 }i , * ' "' C : sy .~e~~~~s~~ .C ~«...~ `~ ,,. " ' ' ~ ' ..w4'~'~ ~}~.. " ~ G }} e..~:. ~ .§5 ~ ~ ~ rre M , ~ 'v„ ...- ~ ~ Y u ~?Yr~, i rye ; -;?~ z 7F -~-".h. y~' µ~ ~ ,t .}, J : Y, . SL f` ?`~~ ~~ F4 T i ( } ~+ .2 .~ ~ ~. ~ L ` ~' - " ~~$ r~ p gg' ~ ~ 7 ',~. e~ '~ R ti ~ ~3 '~ ~~ . G7 ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ti.r 4 .'~. ~ ar l ~ 1 ! ar . , ,• k ~? R~, t ~- ~ ~ V7 r~'} ne~ t "~~ nb ' K j ~O ~Q~ i~}1~, i ~ ~ :+ j ~ q W SY G S fi ~ ~~ ~} ~~ ^ ~ :i' z ~ ~: E . tom, qy ~ ~ ~,`ti tit l/~.- F ~, ~ W....., e .. x" ~. u . ~ .Y +~~ {~ I ~- Via.'.:.:: ~ ~ ~~ ti ~ ;%+::,'1::,-'. ~.- 4'.+ti ;:s'-.'.'.n 3 ~. '4".u%.~~:~ Sit 3z,4 ~~, ~~ry~4"' •'+~+~ 6 ~'iV +i E t l i f J S~ $~ ~ rt ~ty~~ W a ~} ( V & ~ ~ € iF A\ ~ Ti 8s N O -~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~_~~~ rwrN c~~~s ~~Y~~~n~~~~ c~N-r~R Madam Design lnc ~ F"°` ~i ~~ ~° ~ ~g~3~~~`~ TWIN CF2EEK CRbSSIN~ LOOP ~da~cnar~5~aaa„m,o~~ana,co„~~:xes~ ~ 2599 Wds FacSO Rd ;- Q.. ~' ~_ ~a ~ ~} Central Paint, Or c~,~ao;Hta~e~~rz - ~t~ 5a4-8&d-705S E°Y~' hC.~ h -.'Y. °n u r r u 0.t.+"~Fr.0.xr.MPetmx6ai wx ==dart..` +rstlr.:«rufM wi w» W Wu/tYxrataY ~+ rrr,we.~.su K mw>s:a uW, IIa1"NewsS Va'aWYWS3. #~`xra 1 > towl+C aa^+4STrMClwdw:l rod Nt M WsH ~~arx~t H.~rtbw:Srsann.un: usn+Yrowds.2. rYp a ?TVVS*t*'+sa.`+l sap C<wR W tt vw welax psvc .u sibn tyyE H wire FtsvW cart v-0 U K wx. „AU0'MSU.cawSA'wMwsbr w:rnsw m/s:wr%tro ,nw. _ ~.uryb ttn.-i/.sV ~r4repta:py~x 'ag4C+roM1w~Po 4raWCTas~ atN+su ~wtiy,~nu ai's..'YS+nsa'W SS.~.rs4 e~x..wy'.epp. qyV utt,'yC . ~ttmxs /n T.s~vs.R e'px•• ,~n.wY n.~.r«...i c amx ~ uc'«;,aN.,.aau.kG:w. ~'+yuas. asxps+q p.-oe.. un.s .°v+W'M?a'x.iW:w'm: n,xn i. GCMPRt.~M4T[S ~~h-n~vMr ttwr CV'ntax. ' ^pe sMxi[Y~W.:C>`~ m-~ev~N+u..n~waN uneu,.4vu, Mfg v'mt u'»,a'w C+ary,w at+.re.~r:xM1C` Yx+Utw'.rM. atiw: ~s..~ parkas. n.scY~w*X+crYrn Yebtw.vtC n.WUa.OY:K. w.AprT 1e.M.N. >t'. z ~ eYeWnhr G,rkw n.a..: t :Y„ ~tt~vx Ce µva:[]Si`L.tmne uydw-a~nM.a v.:tryq h Ibrirn+wxT1 W w:tx, r.:,...~.y.:,,.,. C RK+.sesmY rcaMwahmng.tyedws1s, C w»tv M-w'w.V um 'maC C «O+Go-wev44 rracFFln' dttnN+xtsmwes.susC<rrc a,w.ncer..n. wcaw..w..xw:ax*A+n:-.„c4.w. ~ w~.M,..+<,'. wnt,~xi,waaiwi.,.,r.s,~m<o-ov.~..a '.C Rwva Vax COS Wd SM1MtC an~avs ~ 5}-'~Y.~Piid ~vv.nsrs GGlw:a G.rtpmsrrcn0 Swingp;w APP. 72 flYC T F'x~~oR 6Ax'N fliPa ElSrx~ Swing P~Pn[Cnr Typwy; tread A»sam7iJ r~k-.. ~_]x f w-eo '~ O-:iS; ~_ ~e .y ~------.-~..~_-iti tr= `emu ~--° O R AINACC SYJAI.E C.NYfit# 'a .~ y e ~t Wca~nav~wt~raanUmr. ~ ~Xv.p:w ttnsa+-0iuen iG: if.'mse. 4Rat cx>,rVt WS¢S wr icpC 2 WbdO b w nwn ARPARiR. c.,y,+w.T.e.mu. ..a..,w~r tcac 0 i, ~ .A~N,~.,wa n w {~ .aiai«<.aza,•.«m.. w.s.sraYw ~ c ti .,osu.v Nc+tes ~.auM1r~.„.RIX~,:>a«.~w>rt~a.w.. N.u<~>.„ ,"v+H.W'M.tp.Kkrw4w,lu::r.sunw:4Yr•C SY+bttWn. 1~ :a v/sx.snnq S.a[wwcbb bxtem. nrp la !rri ation Parts ~ +~wrw.N.uat«,.Mw .«nw.rmw.,Nw Q} .ri'.4^1C Y04ro desxyt }xu0. WMW pwN.C.. ndNanO'+~dlpn<+wtnhttn. rle¢liavni nrss?Ms+) wn wM<nxwy ~ N.utsw Lds;cn»w2mnblr+'i.ro iKakh t yta wxam _ YY ritGUCrcmM'f•rwke Ws wextatwb~ 1r61C~ uvswben'+.Y.M. s CvwM' <iwkvavt afH'OAi'.Y SVe at mbS GeNS#~~ l~ fian tiC G.W-^A :M1Y-:? ^H'.rtmxM+Ca+NWf 6», NMhs sMa.U4aessea:n vn wq WNSmC3Ml.urta'rcuq seih YLCOJiG W;t:•' NRS%WmeY+dmmtt!eittpY.m aW WnYUIMaMnm6MlN wx OMerMw:n+ ercur+Ym: a nasm.xvs. t<~b cYSS:tc~o'+, ~ry~~;~ E,aow C+KA WNiM1'rotWi.wxnuxw waum am lcGCUrn Mhnwta.nn > N.ar faY cifW.W Vn 4rCSR ~ayw wl~.a Can W. ugxf.C Min 6a"wn mcsiatdnc5cy w YMCM> YsC+wIH m(Mmef ms,+trIXUr.Y tx Nxaw latvswem H%nu'w'MMNM Nsd6L'[rcmM..M1'x3M'RUnsr%i~ hm~~ t. V.nsin~".rcYMKO~nCN#GVNrv~tlx M' crs.G.s wA M1Y kFwOeisa.nwpm.SUtiN w+hs s'dpa5q a.x aae ssa..ec m~x~+ot~nwacm w«m.u.imrwx.nt.«aaumrb.-i*w+.h~wts,. N1>'wsL ivrrq Yks+Pipgp cwwrwT 3SM(fpi+ GlV'NM1NSIM4bdlLSr Ndx~J>.iwx~ kom<wu tonwx.p pyi .~ .Nanra pJG Wje~U OHmNr3<WCUpeudA kKS. wtna+adue.ar. PQ NP _t~werb edo.q PY++:naN M` WLIMroiw. V."rvAUm ...... .iraxw. MG h%Wts1C GMtlWn.If?raN.un,w M1. gG+itOwa'.loedJkwfatrn ' ..m %SiSy *:ag NMt'+OOYMxxsbGttx.ua n•mY-hu~aNa W'ionSVN.tam M em~.mmipp. WM dx?kC rnn.'nKkPeMwNamimrsn Yax.wMe:resiWs(m swryGwray tYgaM AC M1 M a!tG~~awpwtry~ Owtl..h t,uprai{u ~~ Nr%,Nw. ~ NpxtYdlN~.:YwtnMPweGan9W YWb1.wlMtlm wK Mw.stNUx.lerCyggsyqsansqsweNi.tk. GMweL+e.tpcwLu .wMrnf Y.Cxsta~. vs~s.nM.HnrwrtmSfAw, SAi~ .. rUMwN x'-_ ?mrr N.Lt t:SraKKSSwes tWrtY HaN..pK W4 w'~h+Mnt'rmAUww. fNxsMtl C#ltl M1iM1'e Y:ly:aN nxww, ys4ysa %w i'„4t5Gtx! t vM. MYi+MY C4h%h4a,bs~etthetts.sarcAeaeNrrtwtim us ~~~ inCrtW d.tbm bwt traDNnl:e6 ~}x abnd rrtcnsvryaavn'rWUae.i u.x~twa o-ume,are. u, ado-wmr.~ rY~e..«.e,.uw..>raa...,ca.,i..,..ce:d.~.. ,au+w+t.u+=r.za.m .. a.-a aaiwurnNtao. .NF ... o.c~z x:.,a,t ~,N,.a.,....wr~w.staw.:rT.a.a~.mnM1 U.n<.rn+Naa,..a,.,,. n uwsiro-.-A zwr~a.,,.,,.at«wN. w:u~.,ar., ~.~.,a w..M1a.~acsyao W ngixtxnna4~vc.x»a.xw. ~.«:~.:m waxwaw.m w.ew..~.ewra«..-... •• +.rr+s...c.vrw:.»:;ass rtl.++x.:msrIXim a'i.«iv.~v~..,: vSY:tQw.mw~rorsu t.CSi GuuwN.apG/MSW.smty sxTw kan eN.uyyY,gyyxs "^• K`IW2aNer~~m ~~usnYrvH..N.Sbntlta S.M+nnxat.e{t4f .y.{iyle t~Rgq •'n ; ryi4 ~ mbmnn W,~NauA~~rA .s i t6+x+a,a G p sY aa»dnw'¢.ur'. WetovaMOY' sn&w-rgaw.IX iwikct DY Mrtn. b vmp bm t4`t.stn np4[<rtm: rwgal W s. i'tk:'c~ CrC::tVaac t,:..a. yy svCovavrlerexa ~x'Ea'C YOVCWk iim~..n-.,r. .»c4,t,ra. , wk.s vr:<m. ~ ~ wv~ F n°`~` =~MU.~a. ~E...._ ~r....l I~1"1CiSCr-~~te hm CArttd Vy,MFs:.undy ri,,,~,',w, °i..~ eacfibw ake A C ~ ,~ ~i ~~^ t_ " ti5 ~ ~Q„ ttx ~~~~ 9 ~ vl~, S.i.. - lf.l.,l 1V Q r ~ ~ s.. "`~"-~~ U O r- ~ ~. lL 1~1'1~v 'tW W .~ v~ _~ .Nnm +a'+Yn o-Ka HUrw ~r ~vsOS1 s~l~i r.~Nrnriw »an vxar. nt CNLCtso pY; 'fM 42, 'i3.06 SG/V-.C: ~~ ~~t~ Enolosur~ St Controt3c~r F:lJtl$5~0505 CP RETTR[ MC4ST CCRlCC1PI4tALt4506-5-[E1-2.41vtc~, EX`S`CRICi42 Et.EVATIONS, 121F512(106 ~I:23:D5 4'M, ~4atthe'.v ;~ f ~ ~ ~ ,;>~ ~ ~ t3 ~ i f ~ y ~ _~~ 'F ; q ! ~ 1} T 3 ~ u f 3_ ~ i S ' ~ Y i ~ ~~~ ~~,, g 1 ....... ~ ~ ~ (~~,~r,~ (~ 4UE€ IS+it ~ _~f E.. t ( / 3 ` If ~ 1 11111 ~._ _ lS'._~e, ~ 1 # F3a" ^ ! ,~ ~ ~l rar ~ , I ~ / ~ ` 4~ ~ ~ ~ L39 I ~ F~ ~ ~ .-«d ~ ~ F ~ F a ^ [ ' ~ u~'~'i I '~~ i t ~ i ' ~ . ~ ~- ~I E ! ~ +~ . . r ~ 4 N i w ~ ~ r ~ t p~ b£d ~ F L f ~c _ N ~ .~cn <s 3 C D ~ [.: ~__ i~ 3 it ~ k ~ xJ g ""1 i rn -y 3..~' F "' ~ 1 ~ ~ i"x ~ _ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Gy fH ~ ':` ~ ' j G~~ ~ ~` `~ 2 i ~. i C A rn , . ¢ b ~ ~ ~ D F ~ ___. ~ WO ~ %. ( 3 € 2 ~~ ~ I I f1 _~ a ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ R n ~ ~ ~ n ~ Pfi.O.iEG'F' NftM~ 2 ' " " - GF3tAES PC R6ntltl i T~F f C.wfd ~ 'Fr'~Eh! GCd~~KS C..'~.T3~t~'S~s . T f I ~ 1"YVIN GQrEK$ GF20SSfh:6 LOOP A R C H I T E C ri o x ~ G~i~1Tl2t~L E~6{h3 i , o~'.~CyOhE a`T5a~ sao c«rrr, su~c ~,o r~,~. as, -rrz~aza avu%v g~~ nec ~s+~~-ns~~aeas ~r'esv . v }...i ~il45 Cat `:iJOBSt4546 CP RETiREME~T CTR1CDFtNAL14546-S-EE2.d~vg, C4URT1`AR17-~[_fV,12i15/20Qb 4:16:43 P~9, Mattl~evt ~rr C~ ~; O 3~c ~~~ -i ~m~ ~i D m~ !pq 1if_{ ~O 3~ w f37{y DO ~mc ~~~ ~ rn~ { rq i~ {~ b O 7_ N~ ~~n 4d ~~c r ~xr ~x~ rn~ rA rn~ <~ b -i C} Z ~~ OO ~cc -! ~ ~ s -~ -t rn~ C 3> -i O Z ~ ~ ., ~ Y ~zaaw~T ~crr~~ TYiI1v GR.~rKS RETIF¢EM~N?' GuN7`>=R aa~ato c. cft3t~es Pc i~ # s T1^it;~i GREEK5 G!2055lN6 L.t7oF' a r c rs t r~ c r n GW~€ e FtAL. PO[f~[T, f>'~60N 4l'7902 o7v s mmr, ssxrr: aso ek [[sip}-rrz-~aaw ir~6~, tEteGOY PISDt fN( C5if~]19-4eb3 f""'~ ~~~ ~~ Chapter 19.65 TOD Districts and Corridors 17.65.040 Landuse -- TC7D district A., 3 -The property is zoned NMR -High Mix Residential.Comrnercial. This project is designed with high density apartment, designed for the senior community, on the first, second and third floors. The finish floor has complementary "commercial uses", but all intended to be used by the tenants, but outside community uses are encouraged to use the multi-purpose room and the dining room. There will be a Central Point City police substation located on the first floor along the Twin Creeks crossing street. 17.65.050 Zoning regulation-Table 1,2,3 Zoning District _ HMR Multi-plex apartments -- permitted use Senior housing -permitted use Density 4.23A ~ 30 unitslacre -126.90 units min. ? 120 units actual Min. lot acres = 120 units x 1000 sq ftlunit = 12{7000 sq ft ~ 184,259 sq ft Average lot area = 12{3 units X 1500 sq ftlunit = 180,(}00 sq ft { 184,259 sq ft Min lot width -not applicable Min. lot depth -- 50' -~ 355' actual Building set back - frt -- min/rnax 0'-115' -15' actual Corner min/max -- 0'110' -15' actual, side 5' -15' actual {west} and 80' actual {east} rear {north} -10' --actual - 8"-6" Maximum building height 60' -actual 38'-0" Maximum lot coverage 85°la -actual 149,405 {$1 %} Minimum landscape area 15°l0 -actual 34,854 {18.9°l0} Parking standards 1 space per unit = 120 spaces ?actual 109 Chapter 17.601 Application review process for the T4D district and TC3D corridor 97.67.040 Circulation and access standards A. Public Street Standards 1. Public street standards comply 2. Block perimeters exceed 1,600 feet in the block this project is proposed. 3. The block lengths exceeds 500 feet along Golden Peak Drive 4. The major off street pedestrian/bike pathway that runs along the easterly property line will need to be used to meet items #2 and #3 listed above 5. The standards for block perimeters and length need no further modifications 6. All utility lines shall be installed underground 7. Connections are provided between new streets and existing streets {~, ~~, ~~ ~ 8. Pedestrian/Bike access ways are provided with-in public street right of way along Twin Creeks Crossing. b. This project Is not In a tranSlt station area c. All the sidewalks will be permanent d. Loading area and parking lot crossing are marked with painted stripes 9. Public off street access ways shall be provided along the easterly property line. B. Parking lot driveways 1. Parking lot driveways shall not be designed as public street because: a. The parking lot driveway is less than 100 feet long b. The parking lot driveway serves 120 residential units 2. There are only 2 drivewayslcurb cuts to accommodate this 4.23 A site 3. Pedestrian connection to adjacent sites will be provided but vehicular access will not be provided. 4. This project has standard driveways, therefore, will not require "distinctive paving patterns. C. On site pedestrian and bicycle circulation 1. The project will provide 5 locations where sidewalks tie direct Into the building entrances to the public right of way. 2. There is a sidewalk which starts on the "Twin Creeks Crossing" side of the project, and runs thru the entire project, without crossing parking lots, and comes out on the North West corner of the project on Rustler Peak Street. 17.67.050 Site Design Standards A. There are no existing on site features and the main entrance faces away from the existing single family development to the west. B. There are no existing trees to presence. There are no steep slopes, wetlands or stream corridors to impact C, Topography--The site is generally flat with approximately 42" of slope across the site. There are no needs for special treatments due to the natural topography. ~. Solar ©rientation -The main entrance has a. south-easterly orientation and the south facing units all have glass windows that are protected from high angled summer sun but allow low angled sun to penetrate the unit. All kitchens are not located on an exterior wall. The third story building is set back 81 feet from the north property line. E. Existing buildings on site -There are no existing building son site. The siding, roofing and windows will have the same appearance are the adjacent SFT homes across Rustler Peak Street and will have the same setback. F. New Prominent Street uses -- This project is not a "key public or civic building. G. Unfortunately the view from the single family units across Rusfiler Peak Street will not be preserved. ~~: t.:'§ 2 N. Adjoining Uses and adjacent Services 1. The project is adjacent to an existing single family Neighborhood directly across Rustler Peak Street to the west. The West end of the proposed project is the opposite side of the main entry elevation on the East: Most tenant and daily traffic will come on to the site ac on the east side. The level of lighting will be only from the patio's and one exit door. These lights are low wattage. 2. Outdoor activity would occur on the East side where the dog area, putting green and common dining facility are located. 314. These service areas are located on the North-East Corner of the building and screened by wrought iron fencing. 5. The group mail boxes are #ocated inside the building. I. Transitions in Density 112. The multi-family project will be 3 stories in height as compared to the 2 stories in height of the SFR. The multi- family massing will be much greater than the SFT. We have off set the building line at 4 locations along the elevation. All units have patios strut#ures which also help break up the building line. With all of this, we still must provide adequate landscaped buffer strips along the entire Rustler Peak frontage. The frontage conduit of a 6 foot planter strip along the curb, 5' sidewalk and either ~ 5'-8" or 23'-~ ~" of landscaping. 3, C?ur project is not within 50 feet of the SFR across the street. 4. This project is not a commercial building. 5, This is not a zone charge 6. Density is not increase incrementally to buffer the adjacent neighborhood. ,J. Parking 1. Parking lot location A,b,c The 28 garages and 40 of the open parking spaces are located on the side/or rear of the building depending upon what is defined as the front. If the front is the East elevation, which is the main entry but does not fronton Twin Greeks Crossing, there are 37 parking spaces at a 45 degree angle to the building. There are also 5 spaces located near the entry. The parking lot is not located between the main entry and the pedestrian route to the public right of way. d. The parking lot is located 49 feet from the street corner and the garages are set back 37 feet and 29 feet from the corner. 2. Design a. AH landscape areas shall be bordered by a 6" high concrete curb adjacent to paved surfaces. c. All vehicle areas are paved with concrete or asphalt paving d. All parking areas will be striped. 3 ~. e. All pedestrian access is [orated adjacent to the bui#ding and on#y cross a parking area coming from the common pedestrian access across the east end of the property. f. Qur parking lot is divided into two areas on the site. g. Qur parking is located on the sides of the building and not between the building and the public right of way. 3. Additional standards for HMR zones a. The parking lot that is #orated along Golden Peak Drive exceeds fifty percent of the total site frontage, but is suffered with the garages. b, Alleys not passible across the site because our site is surrounded on all four sides with public right of ways. K. Landscaping 1, Perimeter screening and planting a. North side of site 1. curb 2. 6 feet landscaping 3. 5 feet sidewa#k 4. 9 feet landscaping b. l=ast side of site 1. 30 feet pedestrian access to include: a. sidewalk b. landscaping c. wrought iron fence c. South side of site 1. curb 2. 12 feet sidewa#k 3. 12 feet to 20 feet landscaping d, West side of site 1. curb 2. 6 feet #andsraping ~. 5 feet sidewalk 4. 16 feet to 24 feet landscaping ~, Parking lot landscaping and screening a. Parking lot on the north side 1. garages screen parking lot from the north and there is not enough room between the sidewalk and the bui#ding. The main bui#ding screens the parking lot from the south. Landscaping and a wrought iron gatelfence screen the parking lot from the west and the east. 2,3,4,b. The trees in the planter bay are 9 feet wide and 20 feet long with a 6 inch high concrete curb which will protect the trees. Shrubs and ground cover wil# also be planted in the tree bays. b. Parking areas adjacent to a street 1. adjacent to Twin Creeks Crossing a. a planting strip with a minimum distance of 8 feet, 15 feet and 22 feet separate the parking lot and drive area from the public right of way. 2, adjacent to Rustler Peak Street. A 1 ~ feet by 20 feet planter screen the parking lot from the public right of way along with a wrought iron fence. d. Parking area interior landscaping a. Standard 1 =north parking lot between garages and main building - 20 sq ft per stall = 20 sq ft. stall x 34 stalls = 68(3 sq ft required Ethan 36(} sq ft provided. b. Standard ~ =north parking lot -1 tree per 4 stalls ~ 34 stalls ~ ~ 8.5 = 9 trees ~ than 2 trees provided, 3. Landscaping near buildings -- Landscaping adjacent to the buildings are planted on all four sides with exception of concrete access walks into the building. ~. Service areas located at the North -L=ast corner will be screened from the north by the garages, from the south by the main building and screened from the west and east by wrought iron fence with landscaping. 5. Street trees are shown on Twin Creeks Crossing {17 trees}, Rustler Peak Street {10 trees} and Golden Peak Drive {14 trees} L. Lighting: 1. Lighting: 1. Minimum light levels for public safety a. parking areas light levels are see sheet 1"1, attached 2. Fixture Design in public right of ways a. Pedestrian street lights shall be provided as fallowing 1. Twin Creeks Crossing {2 lights} 2. Rustler Peak { 1 light} 3. Golden Peak Drive { 1 light} Refer to site plan for exact locations M. Signs Type - HMR zone 1. {1 }free standing sign, 2 faces, located along Twin Creeks Crossing, refer to site plan. Sign lighting shall be ground mounted on both sides. The sign shall be a pedestal mounted sign, 2 feet by 8 fee#. The pedestal will be constructed out of stone veneer mounted on a CMU base. The overall height of the sign shall be 4 feet. Metal letters shall be used to read "Twin Creeks", Retirement Community. 5 ~.. ... 2. {~ }free standing sign, {~ }face} located along Twin Creeks Crossing to identify the City of Central Point Police Department office. {~) street sign stating "police card parking only" 17.67.060 Open Space Design Standards C. Open space amount 3 b. 600 sg.ft. per dwelling time 120 units= 72,000 sq.ft, required. Proposed open space to include: courtyard 13,672 sq.ft, outside landscaping 25,694 sg.ft. patio space 10,080 sq.ft. for a total of 49,446 sq.ft. ~ 7.72.03 Information Required A. Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, LLC 1122 Spring Street Medford, Oregon 97504 B. The applicant is no the owner. The owner is Bret Moore PO Box 3577 Central Point, Or. 97502 Twin Creeks Retirement, LLC is the authorized agent of the owner. Refer to letter enclosed, 17.05 Applications and Types of review procedures Table 17.05.1 review procedure Transit Oriented DistrictlCorridor Review Type Ill 17.67.060 Building Design Standards A. General Design Requirement 1. [energy Conservation Strategies a. all living units will have operable windows b. The passive heating and cooling strategies are limited to the orientation of window c. see b above d. Small roof are indicated over windows with south or easterly exposure e. Water saving devices would include" energy saver" appliances like water heaters, toilets, shower head and faucets. Landscaping include drip irrigation where feasible. B, Architectural Character 1. General The mass and size of this project is so much greater than the adjacent SFR {LMR} all we can do is use the same building shapes, materials, roof lines an try to break up the mass with porches that project out from the main building line. The building material will be shingles for roofing, vinyl windows, mixture of siding types and complimentary paint colors with the SFR units. 6 Public Works fleparfinenf t ~'° C.°{X[}~ ~~~~~L y P+~ SIT ~"~. ~z~~?t~ P~TBLI~` ~Q1~'.K,S S`~~FF.~EPtJ.I~T' February 14, 2007 AGENDA ITEM; fob Pierce, t~irectar Matt Samitore, C~ev. Services Coord. EXNI617" "~" Site Plan fora 120 unit retirement center Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, Oregon Lizxzited Partnership Zoning: TOD-I-IMR, High Mix Residez~.tial Traffic; Based on the lnterzza#iozzal Traffic Ezagineexs (ITE} Trip Genera~tioz~ Manual, a 120 unit retireznezxt cezzter wi11 generate approximately 20.40 pear. hour trips (PI-IT}. The City of Central Poizat typically requires traffic studies for any development that generates mare than 2S PI-IT. No traffic study is waz~ranted for this development. Existing Infrastructure; Water: An 12-inch water line exists on Twin Greeks Crossing, a 8-inch waterline exists on Rustler Peak and Golden Peak Drive. Storm Drain: There is a 24-inch storm drain line in Twin Creeks Crossing and 12-inch pipe in Rustler Peak and Golden Peak Drive. Street Section: Twin Creeks Crossing is a TOD Collector Street and both Rustler Peak and Golden Peak Drive are standard TOD residential Streets. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits; A Engineering and Development Plan has already been submitted and accepted by the Gity of Central Point Public Works. Conditions of Approval; Landscape and Irrigation Plans and Improvements -Prior to the building permits being finaled all perimeter landscaping and street trees must be installed per the applicants Landscape and Irrigation Plan. ~4t~ Sorath Third Street ~ Central Poirot, C)R 9502 ~~ 54.664,3321 f, Fax 54~.6Fi4.6384 City of Central Paint, 4reg~n 3Q0 Sa,Third St.,Central PoPnt,or 975fl2 543.664.3323 fax 563.664.63$4 www.ci.central-point.ar.us CENTRAL POINT ~~~~~~ R 6i ~~! Building Department Lois €~eBenedetti, Building Official B~;~ILD1~G DEPARTIViENT STAFF ~:F,PC)RT DATE: 41/12147 T4: Planning 1~epartment Piazm.ing file: 47436 FR~'}M: Building 1~epartment SUB~:iECT: Twin Creeks Retirement (Senior Retirement Apts.) wane: Twin Creep Retirement-C~LP Address :7.1.18 Spring St. City: Medford State: Oregon Zip Code: 97544 Property Description: ~7-2W-03C- 1.40 PURPOSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Co~n33cnission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. 'T'his report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Plaa<7ning Commission. 1 i4 City ©f Central Point, fJregon 140 So.Third St., Central Point, Or 97502 545.664.3321 fax 541.664.6384 www.ci .ce nt ra I -po t nt.o r. u s CENTRAL POWT wilding Department l.ais DeBenedetti,Suilclirtg C}fficial BUILDII'~I~G DLPARTMEItIT CfJMMEI~TS: l . Applicant, agent and co~~tractors must comply with all current State of C}regon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. zf a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit. issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street fighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geoteclanical report as required by (~SSC Appendix J and chapter l8 ofthe C~SSC. A written report oftlae investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. 12ecommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. S. Grading/excavation permits are required in accordance with CSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private storm drain work must be permitted and inspected by City Building Dept (prior to backfill}. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction] acceptable to the Building C}f~.cial, shall be submitted prior to final of the gradizig/excavation permi#. Building permits will not be issued until gradingJexcavation permmit is finaled. Exception: l . The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of way. 2. The upper l . ~ foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 ~. City of Central Point, Oregon 140 ~a.i`hird St., Central Poirit,Or 97502 541.f~4.3321 ~dx54i.664.6384 www.ci.central-point.or.us Building Department Bois DeBenedetti, Building {}fFicial ~. T© move ox demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systei~ras located on the property. 8. Any development zany man-made changed to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Z~evelopment Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.2~-.I20. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 14. Application for building permits will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code (2444~,The International Fire Code (with the State of Oregon Amendments-2444}, I~TFPA l 3, Oregon Mech. Spec. Code X2444}, Uniform Plumbing Code with Oregon Blue Pages-amendments}. Plan check may tape from ~ to ~ weeks, depending on completeness when submitted.......ifrequested, plan check maybe initiated simultaneously with Planning Dept. evaluation {Plan Check Fee must be paid prior to stiii•t of plan check.}. 11. Fire Z7istrict 3 will determine fl€re hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. The International Fire Code (2443) with Oregon Amendments X2444) will. be implemented as part of the plan check code requirement for this proposed building. 12. Property lines must be established and pinned by Lic. Oregon Surveyor prior to any building inspections. 13. ~o work is to start until. Grading and Erosion Control Plans are approved and permit issued. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department fox approval prior to shirt of work. If questions, please call Todd Meador.......664-3321. ext.22 ~,~..... ... ----- ~1,'~t~r~2~Ft7 ~ Et. X17 ~ -~ ... i"-'~CE X11 ~t1 EXHIBIT ° F " # ~t '~' r ~. tss~ t+ t.crcati~n: 33~ Woat'Sli3as Road, ~eorrai Poifyr, OR ~ Mniiing hdcircns: P,fl. fox ~13t}, CentF:zl Point, aR7S[3~.-ttf3~5 Tcl. {~dt) 6G4~t~3t}t3,1"ax {S41} 6647171 ww~v,ltV$S.ats Lisa N#organ FAX 664-£38~ City of Gentra# Pa#rtf Planning Qepar~rnent '# 56 South Second utreet Gentra# Paint, ~regvn 9~6a2 Rert Site Plan review fiar Tuvin Creeks aetirement Center, Fi#e ~ t}7036 "here is arr 8 inch service latera# stubbed into finis pr©perty near fiche Nr~rtheast corner, Phis service has adequate capacity fio seNe the proposed use. The property is within the NPbES Phase 2 Stcrmwater Quality management area and rr~ust comply witl~t relevant starr~nwater qua#ity guide#ines. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval ©~ the proppsec# deve#apment be subject ter the fQl#auvirtg conditions: '# . Applicant must cabtair- a sewer permit and pay a## re{aced development charges prier to connecting to the sewer. 2. Applicant must submit a starmw,ater management plan to RVS to derrrc~nstrate trorrrpliance with water qualifiy standards. >=ee# tree to ca## me if you have any questions regarding tl-ris project. Sincerely, J ~~, ~, ., _.. ~... _ _..". Gar# Tapped, P~ District Engineer .~ ;;.~ ~~ I~:t7~.~1,T~1.1~~er~ct'e~1CT3~?~"~~'I,t~NNGtSitcPlszzRevie~v1~007tfl7U3 G-TwitzCz'eeltkct~rcrz7c~~.dt7c aackson County Fire District No. 3 ,~ _ 8333 Agate ROad ~~ ~~ ~ ~. ~` White C~ QR 9?503-~~,t}?'S '~ ~' r ~~ (s4~.} s26-7100 (voice} (s4~.) s26-4566 (fax) ~: ~- . Internatiana!/y Accredited - 2tIt15-2Qj11 - r `~~ January '15, 2ClCl7 Project # C}7436 Twin Creek Retirement • Fire Hydrant and Fire Access layout initially looks goad. The location of the Fire Department Connection {FDC}far the fire sprinkler system will need to be approved by the Fire District. The vault currently Shawn appears difficult to access. All NFPA 13 standards shall be met. A check list is available from the Fire District. Mark Moran DFM R~ ~~ r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ASSISTED SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 120 RESIDENTIAL USES AND RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY USES Applicant: Twin Greeks Retirement, Oregon Limited Partnership (37 2W 030, Tax Lot 100} File No, 07036 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an applicafiion for a Site Dian application for the construction of a senior lousing development within a TC~D- HMP, High Mix Residential zoning district. The property consists of approximately 4.23 gross acres and is identified on the acksoz~ County Assessor's map as 37 2W 030 Tax Lot 100, in -the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 20307, the Central Point Planning Comznissiorz conducted adult'-noticed public hearing on the applications, at which tune it reviewed the City staff reports and l~-eard testimony and comments on the application, and WHEREAS, the Planning Cornznission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential section 17.65, Applzcation Review Process section 17.66 az~d Design Standards -- TQD District section 17.67 of the Central Point Municipal code; and BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point I'Ianning Commission, by this IZ.esolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit „A,J the Planning Department sfiaff report which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6~ day of March, 2007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Appra~red by zne this 6~ day of Mareh, 2Q~}7. Planz-zing Can~znzssian Chair .. F€R~~N[A~`+,i F~C)AI~ ~1V~PI~C~-''~t~l'~~~T~ ~~rr 4 f ~V d rl 4! ~ lW„ 11 !1 i~. ~~~~~_ _, k `.. f. . ~:. ti .< ~hez. ~ LP Y ..'~ L'i .13~E.il ~/~ Y~Y~~~~l~a\,.,~7 1~~~1 ~;~3 ~~.d ~/E~!'~e~l..ilt, ~l t fjj// p / ~clf~ F'ir,r ~ ;~. 1?i~~t~c;ftfyy'et><' lV.~~'i!~ if,~)l?f )1{-', ~l,'It. ~'~ .`A',I_.1. ~,(.i(j(f..l. )'(~;.`~E:111ctIlC)rl tt)~~11~ hlitllnrtl~? {.~Oillnlr.` 1;?'~~l i'~~I 1.: i'cl) U)iiaUil ill ~ i'Ce, i,i~i i',,~ ;.Vlli il,f~~'~,ii'~':, ~~~i~:~ li; '~,i,l~,l,ii ~'(aurrtain View ;~i1c~l~}~ilt).~ C'{~rltcr. '1"~~a~~i~~:; ~~w ...~.v ,~r.~ ~_..__,~~ ,_._ .m ~~ ~.._~ , ,'~_'i! i I~,i. ~_~ S~`, F±;li~i ~ 14 _i Tti?ai} lIr]Clt_1 .}aC~}iS~+i7 ! ,i;illi ,}t.lii ~I?;; ~'i ii;i_i_ 1' I~i~1c11L'+i ~}]111 i3llfi' I`rttrTS(]c~r'taiic]t] `~~,s1eTn 1'lai] as a. Coilccic]T' ~il'ee1. 11 ctrr°T-er]tl~;~ cxTS]irr,tlrc°cl tts a 1vvcT-I~lr]c 1'ctaci Gv~iil] cctrb sick riiicl]cs. l reel~rttl] Rc]aci et]rT-i'ntl}' ~tc'ilc°ratcr:; 17ct~~'c~crlr +'i.()t)(1 13T1~ i ().i)()(1 v'c°1]i{~lc~ l ril>c ~r ~is.l~. v4 Baer, .1 ~tAlns.f]. ~-lr]c;~] .trt~l i~~'_itT~'I, titirtlc]triles currclltly ~~rs1 ril l~rt;cclra<< i:ct~,:l. °orr]] l)r<tir]: 11]irri~ ~tr'e c,tlrrenil~ r•crtTCi.sicic: ditches tl]at ~rr'e :;~~rter-el\ urlcii•1 ~l~i'.;. ;;~ 4TH; ~l:i~.+W:s;. iil'i',et `'yee[lt?1l: ~.,tlr'r°er]tl\ f'Teer]]~tl] ]ii~~tti is _t 141't)-~4lle L't)U1lI~' 1't)il(.i. ;~i;\i'cr: l'1]eT'e are iltti~T'rl]itii~rl.1 s,~~xer i.is1<,~; ~.\ii}]ir] l'3~t;c~•r]]~rr1 lsclac~l, ~~~~ta~~°~'o T ;, City ttl~,a'{6ell « CiesT;_~r] C'Otltl`21e1 1() ()131'.( f~.r143iT1C'i~t'ltl:? ~a~l 1'i'iil- I()1' SI;(, \\'li~i]l~rl~ ~lil(i }7i1.1'Iill''. (?~ ib,:'~'it7;3~"i }~i><tl i'r~t]] just. ~;<ltstl] c]f~t11G 11i,. ~~ie\\ `~hi]i)i;~intz ('i:T]ti:t' tc~> llc]l~l~in 1~'.tTac. C)f3l.C' i~, r]ear-in4~, il]e fis]~rZ di`si;Yt1 ~~11~rse ictl` tlt~: r'c]acl ar]ci 1]tls ln'esc°nteci ti]c° t'i1~ ~~;'iil] t\\c? ciesi~j,n ollircTl]s. l }]e i~ir~;. c~l~liclt] is f~>' }]~ basic t'ii~F C°c>ilcctor "~treel \~;itl] t\~o il'~i.\e3 lar]es. a c~etttc:l- ttTl~r] lal]e. (>ic\ele lanes oral side\~alk. `11]~~1'e i5 c>ne }71aee rte~rT ti]c i]]id-}~c~i.l]i c]f~l.'ri:er]]an 1~claci \\'1]er'e 111e slol]e can i~o111 tl]e ~lclt~ti] <trxi ~c>t<Ih side vf~ihe slrec°t 3o1•c;e (1]~: f:ric;yeie }~rTtc° anii side\~ali~ ic? ijc° ccl-~slTari:c3 lor' a(~i~r•c>tiit]~raicly _>(.)() feet. 'I lac s~cc>1]d clesi~;n O()tit)n 1trc3\ic.les t\\o tT:{TVeI lar]es, a cenfieT• tttrr] laT]e ar]ci instettcl_ c>l~ cane si~ecific Icrcaticrn ~~'1]er'e i:lte sicle\~all anti bic~ele lane eo-•1]ai~iiate, user tl]ai cicsi~~T] c)1)licTrt irT t\\o ciifl~l'eTTt lt,>~alic~z~~ 1'clr' a ~isuai tl'tt(~iic calmit]~~ ef'feei. I3cTii1 design i~l~tic:TT,~~ hay ~ I,~ ~. ~] 1]1'esc;l]tc;ci to tl]e rTeit,~l~bctt°I]ctoc} resicii~riis ~ttt~i t;li~ C:iti~~;~1 vita ~~rtznitt (C,'r1C'~. I3o1h ~:;rclups have ~~~ ,,_lc rucc~l]]1]ic:r]cititictt]s iitat ii]c; ('t\ use ()Z~tic]t] f 'Tile,1'tii?lic ti~%clr'ks Deia<tl'ts]]c;s \\'t]rrld (ike i=~eclla~c"i~ froT1] the i?l~sni~t~ C~tr~i~i~~ion on both desl~n options and a recosl]lta{:~t]ciatic>t] to City CotltlLl ui~ ~~Izcii c?i~tit]tt thc\ 1]r-~f~ct`. 941 ~pcl~~~ Ttair~' ~fr~~~ ~ Central F'c~ir~~, t~P ~~~C~~ - v4l.t~E~~.:3;3 l ~ Fax 549.~~4.~384