HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAP061115Central Point
City Hall
541-664-3321
City Council
Mayor
Hank Williams
Ward I
Bruce Dingler
Ward II
Michael Quilty
Ward III
Brandon Thueson
Ward IV
Allen Broderick
At Large
Rick Samuelson
Taneea Browning
Administration
Chris Clayton, City
Manager
Deanna Casey, City
Recorder
Community
Development
Tom Humphrey,
Director
Finance
Bev Adams, Director
Human Resources
Barb Robson, Director
Parks and Public
Works
Matt Samitore,
Director
Jennifer Boardman,
Manager
Police
Kri s Allison Chief
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
City Council Meeting Agenda
June 11, 2015
Next Res. 1422
Next Ord. 2011
I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER -7:00 P.M.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. PUBLIC APPEARANCES—Comments will be limited to 3 minutes per
individual ors minutes if representing a group or organization.
V. CONSENTAGENDA
Page 2 - 7 A. Approval of May 28, 2015 Council Min utes
8 - 9 B. Street Closures for Battle of the Bones
10-11 C. Street Closure for 4" of July Freedom Festival
12 D. July Meeting Schedule Change
VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
VII. PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS
14-17 A. Second Reading — Ordinance No. __, An Ordinance
Amending Chapter 8.04 Nuisances in Regards to Home
Grown Marijuana and Medical Marijuana (Allison)
19-22 B. Second Reading — Ordinance No. ___, An Ordinance
Amending Section 8.02.010 Definitions Chronic
Nuisance Property in Central Point Municipal Code
(Allison)
24-93 C. Public Hearing/First Reading — An Ordinance Amending
the Comprehensive Plan Map (Minor) to Add
Approximately 47 Acres to the Central Point Urban
Growth Boundary North of Interstate 5, East and West
of Blackwell Road in the Vicinity of the Seven Oaks
Interchange (Exit 35) Including Portions of Dean Creek
Road (Humphrey)
95-96 D. Public Hearing — Resolution No. , A Resolution Certifying the
Provision of Municipal Services by the City of Central Point, Oregon
(Adams)
97 E. Public Hearing — Resolution No. Electing to Receive State
Revenue Sharing Funds for Fiscal Year July 1, 2015 — June 30, 2016
(Adams)
98-132 F. Public Hearing - Resolution No. , A Resolution to Adopt the
Budget, Make Appropriations and Levy Taxes for the Biennial Budget
Period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017 (Adams)
134- 138 F. Resolution No. , A Resolution Adopting General Procedures for
Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 (Clayton)
140-142 G. Resolution No. , A Resolution Revising the Classification Pay Plan
(Robson)
144-146 H. Resolution No. A Resolution Extending Workers' Compensation
Coverage to Volunteers of the City of Central Point (Robson)
IX. BUSINESS
148 A. Freeman Road Waterline Replacement (Samitore)
X. MAYOR'S REPORT
XI. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
XII. COUNCIL REPORTS
XIII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
XIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Council may adjourn to executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660.
Under the provisions of the Oregon Public Meetings Law, the proceedings of an
executive session are not for publication or broadcast.
XV. ADJOURNMENT
Consent Agenda
CAP061115 Page
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 28, 2015
REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Williams called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL: Mayor: Hank Williams
Council Members: Allen Broderick, Bruce Dingler, Brandon
Thueson, Taneea Browning, Rick Samuelson, and Mike Quilty
were present.
City Manager Chris Clayton; City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer; Police Chief
Kris Allison; Community Development Director Tom Humphrey; Finance
Director Bev Adams; Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore; and
City Recorder Deanna Casey were also present.
IV. SPECIAL PRESENATION— MAYA Scholarship Award
Multicultural Committee Chair Amy Sweet presented Caitlin Wright with a $500
scholarship for her commitment to helping others see that personality is more
important than skin color.
IV. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Bernard Spahn, Medford Resident
Mr. Spahn stated that when smoking bans went into place the citizens all learned
the rules and are now accustom to the regulations that were put into place. With
the approval of Measure 91 people will do the same and get use to the idea of
Marijuana being grown and sold in Oregon. He did not state if he was for or
against the ordinance being presented at the meeting tonight.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of May 14, 2015 City Council Minutes
Mike Quilty moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Brandon Thueson
seconded. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Taneea Browning,
yes; Brandon Thueson, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and
Mike Quilty, yes. Motion approved.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Ordinance No. 2007, An Ordinance Amending Title 8 of the Central
Point Municipal Code, by Adding Chapter 8.45 Homegrown and
Medical Marijuana
CAP061115 Paget
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey explained that this is the
second reading of an Ordinance restricting homegrown and medical marijuana
grows in the Central Point City Limits. The Council held a public hearing at the
first reading on May 14, 2015.
He explained that there were no recommended changes to the Ordinance at the
first reading. The proposed ordinance will require marijuana cultivators engaged
in recreational or medicinal cultivation, drying, production, processing, keeping or
storage of marijuana to ensure that this marijuana is not accessible, visible or
order causing to other persons or property.
Council Member Rick Samuelson moved to approve Ordinance No. 2007,
An Ordinance Amending Title 8 of the Central Point Municipal Code, by
Adding Chapter 8.45 Homegrown and Medical Marijuana. Mike Quilty
Seconded. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Taneea Browning,
yes; Brandon Thueson, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and
Mike Quilty, yes. Motion approved.
B. Ordinance No. 2008, An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
Municipal Code to Add Section 3.25 Park Maintenance Fee
Regarding the Adoption of a Parks Maintenance Fee for City Parks
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore explained that this is the second
reading of an ordinance putting in place a $1.00 Parks Maintenance Fee. The
city will start collecting this fee in July, 2015. The Citizens will see the fee on their
July water bills. There were no recommended changes at the first reading of the
Ordinance. The funds received from this fee will be dedicated to the maintenance
of current park facilities.
Bruce Dingier moved to approve Ordinance No. 2008, An Ordinance
Amending the Central Point Municipal Code to Add Section 3.25 Park
Maintenance Fee Regarding the Adoption of a Parks Maintenance Fee for
City Parks. Taneea Browning seconded. Rall call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce
Dingier, yes; Taneea Browning, yes; Brandon Thueson, yes; Allen Broderick,
yes; Rick Samuelson, no; and Mike Quilty, yes. Motion carried.
C. Ordinance No. 2009, An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
Municipal Code to Add Section 3.26 Public Safety Fee regarding the
adoption of a Public Safety Fee for Increased Funding of Public
Safety.
City Manager Chris Clayton reported that there were no recommendations at the
first reading of an Ordinance setting a $1.00 public safety fee. This fee will be
collected on a monthly basis from the Central Point water bills starting in July.
The funds generated from this fee will be dedicated to the City's School
Resource Officer positions.
Council Member Brandon Thueson moved to approve Ordinance No. 2009,
An Ordinance Amending the Central Point Municipal Code to Add Section
3.26 Public Safety Fee regarding the adoption of a Public Safety Fee for
CAP061115 Page
Increased Funding of Public Safety. Mike Quilty seconded. Rall call: Hank
Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Taneea Browning, yes; Brandon Thueson, yes;
Allen Broderick, yes; Rick Samuelson, no; and Mike Quilty, yes. Motion carried.
D. Ordinance No. 2010, An Ordinance Creating Section 1.04.060
Uniform Appeal and Hearing Procedure of the Central Point
Municipal Code.
Mr. Clayton explained that the proposed ordinance puts in place procedures to
appeal administrative decisions of the City Council through ordinance adoptions.
The Council recommended removing the option of an appellate board from the
process. Appeals to administrative ordinances will now go directly before the City
Council. Those corrections were made to the ordinance being voted on tonight.
Council Member Mike Quilty moved to approve Ordinance No. 2010, An
Ordinance Creating Section 1.04.060 Uniform Appeal and Hearing
Procedure of the Central Point Municipal Code. Rick Samuelson seconded.
Rall call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Taneea Browning, yes;
Brandon Thueson, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Mike
Quilty, yes. Motion approved.
E. Public Hearing/First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter
8.02.010 Chronic Nuisance Property Definitions Regarding Marijuana
in Residential Neighborhoods
Police Chief Kris Allison explained that the proposed amendment is to include
violations regulating homegrown and medical marijuana. This will allow the city to
deem a violation of chapter 8.45 as a chronic nuisance property if violations
occur. This is a housekeeping item regarding the homegrown marijuana
concerns in town.
Chief Allison stated there is one recommended change to strike out all
references to residential neighborhoods. After some discussion staff would like to
see this cover the enter area of Central Point, not just the residential areas. Al
references to residential neighborhoods will be removed for the second reading.
Mayor Williams Opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward and the public
hearing was closed.
Council Member Mike Quilty moved to second reading an Ordinance
Amending Chapter 8.02.010 Chronic Nuisance Property Definitions
Regarding Marijuana in Residential Neighborhoods. Brandon Thueson
seconded. Rall call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Taneea Browning,
yes; Brandon Thueson, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and
Mike Quilty, yes. Motion approved.
F. Public Hearing/First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter
8.04 Nuisances in Regards to Homegrown Marijuana and Medical
Marijuana
CAP061115 Page
Chief Allison explained that this is a housekeeping item to put in place the tools
needed to enforce the homegrown regulations the council has approved. This
ordinance allows the city to deem grows a nuisance affecting public health
regarding odors emanating from the premise, noise from a grow operation,
visibility of marijuana from outside a household, and failure to maintain marijuana
in a secure structure as defined in 8.45.
Mayor Williams Opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward and the public
hearing was dosed.
There was discussion regarding the guidelines for what is considered a proper
structure in regards to marijuana grows. The general penalty for code violations
will cover any violation under this new ordinance, no additional penalties' are
recommended at this time.
Mr. Clayton explained that the open burning issue that was brought before the
Council at the May 14`" meeting is covered under this Chapter.
Council Member Rick Samuelson moved to second reading an Ordinance
Amending Chapter 8.04 Nuisances in Regards to Homegrown Marijuana
and Medical Marijuana. Taneea Browning seconded. Rall call: Hank Williams,
yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Taneea Browning, yes; Brandon Thueson, yes; Allen
Broderick, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Mike Quilty, yes. Motion approved.
G. Resolution No. 1421, Approving a Supplemental Budget for the
2014115 Fiscal Year
Finance Director Bev Adams explained the reason for the supplemental budget is
because of increased cost in liability insurance, park playground equipment that
was approved as an add in item for the budget and a budget correction that was
missed during the final preparation of the document last year. There are also
forfeiture funds from the High Tech Crimes Unit, and Freeman Road cost
increases. This is a public hearing because it is over the 10% that is allowed by
State Law.
Mayor Williams opened the public hearing. No one came forward and the public
hearing was closed.
There was discussion regarding the increase in liability insurance. This was not
caused by accidents at the city. Some members in the insurance pool made
some poor decisions regarding employee terminations causing the cost of the
pool to increase. Staff explained that it is best for us to stay in the insurance pool
with CIS our rates have not increased in several years. The cost of being self-
insured could be very expensive if there were a large claim against the city.
Council Member Mike Quilty moved to approve Resolution No. 1421,
Approving a Supplemental Budget for the 2014115 Fiscal Year. Rick
Samuelson seconded. Rall call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Taneea
Browning, yes; Brandon Thueson, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; Rick Samuelson,
yes; and Mike Quilty, yes. Motion approved.
CAP061115 Page
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Williams reported that:
• He attended the Rodeo Sponsor Kick -Off at the Dodge Dealer for the
National Anthem competition.
• He attended the Rodeo Sponsor Dinner.
• He attended the Memorial Day event with state representatives.
• He attended a town hall meeting at Crater High school that Senator Markley
was presenting.
• He attended the special Medford Water Commission meeting specifically for
surrounding cities.
VIII. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Chris Clayton reported that:
• The city lost two family members this week. Didi Thomas who retired from the
Planning Department passed away on Friday, and Rick Bartlett who worked
for the City for almost 30 years passed away on Monday. The City will plant a
memorial tree for Mrs. Thomas and installing a bench for Mr. Bartlett.
• He attended the Memorial Day event at Don Jones Park, it was well attended
with approximately 300 people.
• He attended the Medford Water Commission meeting. They will be doing a
projection for the next twenty years using the RPS numbers.
• Senate Bill 964 puts teeth into the medical marijuana law and has momentum
in the Senate.
• Council members may hear about a property dispute between the Bel -Tone
property and the new owners of the Pfaff building. This is a civil matter and
the city has no easy solution for them. He will send more information in his
weekly report.
• We will begin an outreach program for the citizens regarding the two new
fees and the marijuana grow regulations.
IX. COUNCIL REPORTS
Council Member Mike Quilty reported that:
• he attended the Airport Advisory Committee meeting. The airport is closing
down the run way late at night to complete some construction.
• He received a phone call from a citizen regarding fence issues. He is
wondering if the city has any laws regarding sharing the cost of replacing
fences between properties. It was explained that this would be covered in
some CC&Rs, but it would be a civil matter, not something regulated by the
City.
Council Members Brandon Thueson and Rick Samuelson reported they attended
the Study Session.
Council Member Taneea Browning reported that she attended:
• Greeters at the Big House.
CAP061115 Page
• the Fire District meeting.
• the Memorial Day event at Don Jones Park.
• the Town Hall meeting.
• the Medford Water Commission meeting for local cities.
• the Rodeo Sponsor Dinner.
Council Member Allen Broderick had no report.
X. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that:
• the Freeman Road project has come to a standstill because we now need to
replace 700 feet of asbestos water line. He will be using any excess amount
budgeted for the 2015/17 budget year. This was an unexpected delay and
cast for the project. He is hoping the project will be done in mid to late
August.
• There have been several inquiries for development projects over the last few
weeks. It looks like we should be having an uptake in development very soon.
Police Chief Kris Allison reported that:
• The City has given a conditional job offer to Derreck Moore to move into a
police officer position. If he accepts the offer we will be advertising for a
Community Service Officer position.
• The Central Point Police Department will oversee the CERT operations and
training for the city.
Finance Director Bev Adams had no report.
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey left earlier in the meeting.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Mike Quilty moved to adjourn, Allen Broderick seconded, all said "aye" and the
Council Meeting was adjourned at 7:58 p.m.
The foregoing minutes of the May 28, 2015, Council meeting were approved by the City
Council at its meeting of June 11, 2015.
UFSiTII
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Pagel
Parks 8 Public Works Department
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
JUNE 4, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
MATT SAMITORE, DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: Temporary Street Closures for Battle of the Bones 2014.
Matt Samitore, Director
SUMMARY: The 2014 Battle of the Bones event will be held on June 26 and 27 in Twin Creeks
Park. General setup will be start on Monday June 22. The shutdown will go into full effect on
Friday, June 26. Portions of the North and South side of the loop will be starting to be closed on
Thursday June 19.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends the temporary street closures.
CAP061115 P,g 8
SUNLAND AVE
OAKLEY ST
RED OAK ST
VALLEY OAK BLVD
iGRANT p �
r
m
/-� O
4� LIS
c N2 0
cn
RUSTLER PEAK AT
i
CAP061115 Page
X00■ �■.•
O O O 00 00 00 Ui n N >Z
m m a a o
m m
V m o m m m
o A m
m � s
o
� F o
NI LlLIO
Parks 8 Public Works Department
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
JUNE 4, 2015
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
MATT SAMITORE, DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: Temporary Street Closure for Fourth of July Parade/Celebration.
Matt Samitore, Director
SUMMARY: The City of Central Point in collaboration with the Central Point Chamber of
Commerce are holding the annual Fourth of July Parade and Celebration in the park and the
second annual fun run. Several downtown streets will be temporarily closed during the event. One
northbound lane on Highway 99 shall also be shut down for the adult fun run. An attached map
shows the shutdowns and parade route.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends the temporary street closure.
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 10
/J
CENTRAL / �,. /•
POINT
/ %'
/
/ x r
< I
Code, High `� 2s�x V r '� �.. •• g
School t + -
9
i
P P o +
I t
/
�Ib e;. w w << x ��
1
•
iry
i Hall
Legend
• Misc. Signs
• 6 Handicap Peking
• ] Street Closed Ahead
CI 4 Reader Board
o Volunteer Post (25) —Parade Route
• 52 Canes
35 Delineator
.22 Street Closed
a 2 No Left Turn
Caution Tape _Detour Route
• 167 Barricade
• 8 Local Traffic Only
0 17 No Parking Barricade
1 No Right Turn
* Command Post
• Triage
CAP061115 Page 11
Staff Report
CENTRAL
POINT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Deanna Casey, City Recorder
SUBJECT: Change in July Council Meeting Schedule
DATE: June 11, 2015
Administration Department
Chris Clayton, City Manager
Deanna Casey, City Recorder
Our future agenda schedule dictates the need for only one council meeting in July. The
Oregon City/County Managers Association Conference conflicts with the first meeting
in July. The preference is to hold one meeting mid -month on July 16, 2015 and one
Study Session on July 20th.
Unless there are conflicts with the Council, staff recommends the following schedule for
July, 2015.
Cancel:
July 9, 2015 Meeting
July 23, 2015 Meeting
Recommended meetings:
July 16, 2015 Council Meeting
July 20, 2015 Study Session
MOTION:
Approve the Consent agenda as presented.
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 12
Ordinance
Nuisance Ordinance
Amendments
CAP061115 Page 13
155 south second street• Central Point, OR 97502 Kristine Allison
Ph: (541) 664-5578 • Fax: (541) 664-2705 • www.centralpointoregon.gov Chief
STAFF REPORT
June 11, 2014
AGENDAITEM:
This is a revision to the nuisances ordinance adding nuisances affecting public health including
homegrown or medical marijuana grows. Any violation of Chapter 8.45 shall be deemed a
nuisance affecting public health, including but not limited to odors emanating from the premise;
noise from grow operations emitting from the premises; visibility of marijuana from outside the
household as defined therein; and failure to maintain such marijuana cultivation within a secure
structure as defined in Chapter 8.45.
STAFF SOURCE:
Kristine Allison, Chief of Police
BACKGROUND/SYNOPSIS:
This is an amendment to the nuisance ordinance to include homegrown and medical marijuana
grows to deem it a nuisance affecting public health regarding odors emanating from the premise,
noise from a grow operation, visibility of marijuana from outside a household, and failure to
maintain marijuana in a secure structure defined in 8.45.
At the first reading of this Ordinance on May 28, 2015, staff recommended removing any
reference to residential property. Those references have been removed.
FISCAL
There is no financial impact to the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
RECOMMENDATION: j
To amend Chapter 8.04 to include ho grown and medicamarijuana grows deemed a nuisance
if not in compliance with Chapter 8.45. �'
PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED:
No the Public Hearing was held on May 28, 2015.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
Motion to amend the nuisance ordinance 8.04 to include homegrown and medical marijuana grow
deemed a nuisance in 8.04.040 (i) as defined in Chapter 8.45.
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 14
RECITALS:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.04 NUISANCES OF THE
CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE
Words "Rede through are to be deleted and words in bold are added.
2. Oregon Measure 91 and House Bill 3460 failed to address local concerns
regarding the growth of medical and home-grown recreational marijuana.
As a "home -rule" city, Central Point believes marijuana -related impacts to
the safety, welfare and property of Central Point residents is important and
feels the need to address related concerns.
3. The Central Point City Council has recently amended the Municipal Code
to apply new regulations regarding home-grown marijuana and medical
marijuana as it pertains to residential property.
4. Although specifically regulated via city ordinance, medical and home-
grown recreational marijuana have the potential to negatively impact
adjacent property and property owners.
5. The Central Point City Council believes the proposed nuisance ordinance
amendments, to include medical and recreational marijuana, are prudent.
THE PEOPLE OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 8.04 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 8.04
NUISANCES
Sections:
8.04.040
Nuisances affecting public health.
8.04.050
Attractive Nuisances
8.04.140
Summary abatement.
8.04.040 Nuisances affecting public health.
The following are declared to be nuisances affecting the public health and may be
abated in the manner prescribed by this chapter:
CAP061115 Page 15
A. Privies. Any open vault or privy maintained within the city, except those privies used
in connection with construction projects and constructed in accordance with the
directions of the city engineer;
B. Debris on Private Property. All accumulations of debris, rubbish, manure and other
refuse located on private property and which has not been removed within a reasonable
time and which affects the health, safety or welfare of the city;
C. Stagnant Water. Any pool of water which is without a proper inlet or outlet and which,
if not controlled, will be a breeding place for mosquitoes and other similar insects;
D. Water Pollution. The pollution of any body of water or stream or river by sewage,
industrial wastes or other substances placed in or near such water in a manner that will
cause harmful material to pollute the water;
E. Food. All decayed or unwholesome food which is offered for human consumption;
F. Odor. Any premises which are in such a state or condition as to cause an offensive
odor or which are in an unsanitary condition;
G. Burning Garbage or Refuse. Any burning of garbage or refuse;
H. Air Pollution. The pollution of any air within the city, whether from a source within or
without the city, by depositing smoke, particulate, odor or heat into the air by any
means;
I. Homegrown or Medical Marijuana Grows. Any violation of Chapter 8.45 shall
be deemed a nuisance affecting public health, including but not limited to odors
emanating from the premises or indoor structure; noise from grow operations
emitting from the premises or indoor structure; visibility of marijuana from
outside the household, premises or indoor structure as defined therein; and
failure to maintain such marijuana cultivation within a secure structure as defined
in Chapter 8.45.
J. Any street, road, alley, bridge, culvert, ditch or body of water within the city, whether
privately or publicly owned, which is open to use by the public, and which is in such a
condition or state of disrepair as to constitute an immediate hazard to the health, safety
or welfare of any person
8.04.050 Attractive Nuisances.
A. No owner, lessee, occupant or other person having control, custody or management
of any premises shall suffer or permit to remain unguarded upon the premises any
machinery, equipment, homegrown or medical marijuana, or other devices which are
attractive and dangerous to children.
CAP061115 Page 16
B. No owner, lessee, occupant or person having control, custody or management of any
premises shall suffer or permit to remain unguarded upon the premises a pit, quarry,
cistern, well or other excavation.
C. A nuisance as described in this section may be abated as provided in this chapter.
8.04.140 Summary abatement.
The abatement procedure provided by Sections 8.04.100 through 8.04.130 is not
exclusive; and furthermore, the health officer, the chief of the fire department and the
police officers of this city may proceed summarily to abate a health or other nuisance
which unmistakably exists and from which there is imminent danger to human life or
property, including but not limited to failure to secure medical or homegrown
marijuana so as to prevent access by children, visitors, casual passersby,
vandals or anyone not licensed , authorized, or legally permitted to possess
medical or homegrown marijuana.
SECTION 2. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City
Code and the word Ordinance may be changed to "code', "article', "section", "chapter",
or other word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered,
provided however that any Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions need not be
codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross references and any
typographical errors.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
day of 2015.
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Return to Agend
CAP061115 Page 17
Ordinance
Chronic Nuisance
Ordinance
Amendments
CAP061115 Page 18
155 south second street• Central Point, OR 97502 Kristine Allison
Ph: (541) 664-5578 • Fax: (541) 664-2705 • www.centralpointoregon.gov Chief
STAFF REPORT
June 11, 2014
AGENDAITEM:
This is a revision to the chronic nuisance property ordinance adding nuisance activities to include
violation of Chapter 8.45 regulating homegrown and medical marijuana.
STAFF SOURCE:
Kristine Allison, Chief of Police
BACKGROUND/SYNOPSIS:
This is an amendment to the chronic nuisance ordinance to include violations of the additions
regulating homegrown and medical marijuana. This will allow the City of Central Point to deem
a violation of chapter 8.45 as a chronic nuisance property if violations occur.
At the first reading of this Ordinance on May 28, 2015, staff recommended removing any
reference to residential property. Those references have been removed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fipanciat impact to the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
RECOMMENDAT4
To amend Chapter 8.021
homegrown and medical
PUBLIC HEARING RE(
Nuisance Property to include Chapter 8.45 regulating
No, the Public Hearing was held May
SUGGESTED MOTION:
Motion to approve Ordinance No. , Amending Section 8.02.010 Definitions Chronic Nuisance
Property of the City of Central Point Municipal Code.
CAP061115
Page 19
Return to Agentla
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8.02.010 DEFINITIONS CHRONIC
NUISANCE PROPERTY OF THE CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE
RECITALS:
1. Words I Red through are to be deleted and words in bold are added.
2. Oregon Measure 91 and House Bill 3460 Failed to address local concerns
regarding the growth of medical and home-grown recreational marijuana.
As a "home -rule" city, Central Point believes marijuana -related impacts to
the safety, welfare and property of Central Point residents is important and
feels the need to address related concerns.
3. The Central Point City Council has recently amended the Municipal Code
to apply new regulations regarding home-grown marijuana and medical
marijuana as it pertains to residential property.
4. Although specifically regulated via city ordinance, medical and homegrown
recreational marijuana have the potential to negatively impact adjacent
property and property owners.
5. The Central Point City Council believes the proposed chronic nuisance
ordinance amendments, to include medical and recreational marijuana,
are prudent.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 8.02.010 Definitions is hereby amended as follows:
Sections:
Chapter 8.02
CHRONIC NUISANCE PROPERTY
8.02.010 Definitions.
8.02.010 Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply:
"Chronic nuisance property" means property on which two or more nuisance activities
(as defined below) have occurred during any thirty -day period; property on which, or
CAP061115 Page 20
within two hundred feet of, any person associated with the property has engaged in two
or more nuisance activities during any thirty -day period; or property which, upon request
for execution of a search warrant, has been the subject of a determination by a court
that probable cause that possession, manufacture, or delivery of a controlled substance
or related offenses under Oregon law have occurred within the previous thirty days; and
the execution of the search warrant has resulted in the discovery of such controlled
substances, and/or property on which two or more citations for violations of the
Nuisance Ordinance Chapter 8.04 have been served on the owner, tenant, agent,
guest or licensee of the property in any consecutive thirty (30) day period.
"Nuisance activities" means any of the following activities, behaviors or criminal
conduct, as defined under Oregon state law: harassment; intimidation; disorderly
conduct; assault or menacing; sexual abuse, contributing to the delinquency of a minor,
or sexual misconduct; public indecency; prostitution or related offenses; alcoholic liquor
violations; theft; arson or related offenses; possession, manufacture, or delivery of a
controlled substance or related offenses; illegal gambling; criminal mischief; any attempt
to commit (as defined by ORS 161.405), or conspiracy to commit (as defined by
ORS 161.455), any of the above offenses; unlawful discharge of a firearm; unlawful
operation of sound -producing or reproducing equipment or unnecessary noise.
"Control" means the ability to regulate, restrain, dominate, counteract or govern conduct
that occurs on a property.
"Person in charge" means any person, in actual or constructive possession of a
property, including but not limited to an owner or occupant of property under his or her
dominion, ownership or control.
'Permit' means to suffer, allow, consent to, acquiesce by failure to prevent, or expressly
assent or agree to the commission of an act.
"Person" means any natural person, agent, association, firm, partnership or corporation
capable of owning, occupying or using property in the city of Central Point.
"Property" means any property, including land and that which is affixed, incidental or
appurtenant to land, including but not limited to any business or residential premises,
room, house, parking area, loading area, landscaping, building or structure or any
separate part, unit or portion thereof, or any business equipment, whether or not
permanent. For property consisting of more than one unit, property is limited to the unit
or the portion of the property on which any nuisance abatement has occurred or is
occurring, but includes areas of the property used in common by all units of property
CAP061115 Page 21
including without limitation other structures erected on the property and areas used for
parking, loading and landscaping.
"Person associated with" means any person who, on the occasion of a nuisance activity,
has entered, patronized, visited, or attempted to enter, patronize or visit, or waited to
enter, patronize or visit a property or person present on a property, including without
limitation any officer, director, customer, agent, employee, or any independent
contractor of a property, person in charge, or owner thereof.
SECTION 2. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City
Code and the word Ordinance may be changed to "code", "article", "section", "chapter",
or other word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re -lettered,
provided however that any Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions need not be
codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross references and any
typographical errors.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
PASSED by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
day of , 2015.
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Return to Agenda
CAP061115 Page 22
Public Hearing/
Ordinance
UGB Amendment
CAP061115 Page 23
City of Central Point, Oregon CENTRAL
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 POINT
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384
www.centralpointoregon.gov
STAFF REPORT
June 11, 2015
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 14009
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Community Development Director
Consideration of an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map (Minor) to add approximately 47 acres
to the City of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary (U(iB) north of Interstate 5, east and west of
Blackwell Road in the vicinity of the Seven Oaks Interchange (Exit 35) including portions of Dean Creek
Road. County File No. LRP 2013-00006 and City File No. 14009; Applicant: City of Central Point.
STAFFSOURCE:
Tom Humphrey AICP , Community Development Director
BACKGROUND:
The adoption of the proposed Minor Map Amendment would amend the County and City Comprehensive
Plan Maps by adding approximately 47 acres of employment land to the Central Point UGB. The City
Council passed a Resolution of Intent (No. 1378) in August 2013 to initiate changes to its UGB in
response to a request by Cardmoore Trucking to bring their properly at Seven Oaks Interchange into the
City of Central Point. In order to extend the UGB to the Cardmoore properly, the City completed an
earlier UGB Amendment south of this proposal in order for it to be contiguous.
The land proposed for amendment includes properly that is in the ownership of the Card Family and
Stallion Land Company. There are some portions of right-of-way that are either under the jurisdiction of
Jackson County or the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The land being added to the UGB
will retain the County Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning until such bine as the properties are
annexed and the appropriate City zoning is applied.
A public hearing was conducted at ajoint meeting of the Central Point and Jackson County Planning
Commissions on May 7, 2015. Each Commission recommended unanimously in favor of this amendment.
ISSUES:
City and County's Regional Plan Elements include a provision that prior to expansion at the Central
Paint Urban Grax•th Boundary into ani Urban Reserve Area, the C!N and Jackson County shall adapt an
agreement (Area afMutual Planning Concern) far the management afGibbons/forest Acres
Unincorporated Containment Boundary (Performance Indicators 4.1.9.5). The two agencies concluded
that the best way to address this condition was to amend the pre-existing City/County agreement. The
UGBMA was adopted earlier this year and this Regional Plan provision was satisfied.
Other conditions of the Regional Plan Element include; 1) the creation of Conceptual Land Use and
Transportation Plans (Performance Measure 4.1.7 and 4.1.8); 2) the adoption of an Interchange Area
Management Plan (LAMP) for Seven Oaks Interchange Area (Performance Measure 4.1.9.1); and 3) the
formation of and receipt of recommendations frmn a County Appointed Agricultural Task Force
(Performance Measure 4.1.20).
Each of these conditions have been addressed. The City Council may recall its approval of a Conceptual
Plan for URA CP -I B. This plan has been vetted and approved by the Rogue Valley MPO and by the
CAP061115 Page 24
Rogue River Valley Irrigation District. Regarding issues of roadway access, the applicant has worked out
temporary and long range access to their property from Blackwell Road. City staff participated in the
Agricultural Task Force and contributed to the recommendations the County Board of Commissioners
incorporated in the County Comprehensive Plan.
FINDING: The proposed UGB Amendment may proceed having satisfied conditions and being in
compliance with the GBCVRP Performance Indicators, adopted pursuant to the requirements of ORS
197.656(2)(b)(C).
The City has criteria for initiating amendments to the comprehensive plan or the urban growth boundary
(ref. CPMC Section 17.96.200). The Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement with Jackson
County also provides a process for considering and adopting this UGB Amendment.
FINDING: The proposed Minor Boundary Line Adjustment is consistent with the Central Point
Municipal Code- Comprehensive Plan anti Urban Grox•th Boundary Amendments and with the
City, County UGBMA and it also satisfies the requirements of the GBCVRP and the City's Regional Plan
Element.
The County's record requirements are fairly extensive with a file consisting of 971 pages. In an effort to
assist City Council in their review and action on this item , City staff has limited attachments to the
Applicant's map (Attachment A) and only a few excerpts from the County's record (Attachment B). If
there are members of the Council who would like to review additional excerpts identified in the Exhibit
Schedule, these can be viewed in the Community Development Department or at the Council meeting on
Thursday night. An ordinance to amend the UGB is included as Attachment C.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A"—Map of Cardmoore Urban Growth Boundary Amendment from Atlas Page 1
Attachment "B"— Exhibit Schedule and Excerpts from Jackson County Staff Report dated Apri129, 2015
Attachment "C" — Ordinance No. An Ordinance Amending the Comprehensive Plan Map (Minor) to
Add Approximately 47 acres to the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary north of Interstate 5,east and
west of Blackwell Road in the vicinity of the Seven Oaks Interchange (Exit 35) including portions of
Dean Creek Road.
ACTION:
Open public hearing and consider the proposed admendment to the Urban Growth Boundary,
close public hearing and 1) move to second reading; 2) move to second reading with revisions; 3)
deny the proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct Staff to schedule the second reading for the next regularly scheduled City Council
meeting (June 25, 2015) to approve an amendment to the UGB.
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 25
CAP061115
ATTACHMENT" $1
ATTACHMENT
FILE NO: LRP2013-00006 APPLICANT: CARDMOORE PROPERTIES ETAL
HEARING DATE:
5/7/2015 HEARING BODY: J.C.PLNG.COMM. & C.P. PLNG. COMM.
TIME:
6:00 P.M.
LOCATION: CP COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 140 S 3"" ST., CENTRAL POINT
EXHIBIT SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT
NO.
NATURE OF EXHIBIT
1
Page 1
Memo to Jackson County Planning Commission submitted by Staff, date 4-24-15
2
Page 2
Zoning Map submitted by Staff, dated 1-28-15
3
Page 3
Soils Map submitted by Staff, dated 3-10-15
4
Page 4
Wetlands Map submitted by Staff, dated 2-24-15
5
Page 5
Vernal Pools Map submitted by Staff, dated 2-24-15
6
Page 6
Floodplain Map submitted by Staff, dated 2-24-15
7
Page 7
Cardmoore Urban Growth Boundary Amendment map submitted by Applicant
8
Page 8
Aerial Map submitted by Staff, dated 2-24-15
9
Page 9
Research Sheets submitted by Staff, dated 2-25-15
10
Page 22
Property Owner Map & List submitted by Staff, dated 2-13-15
11
Page 25
Criteria submitted by Staff
12
Page 26 _
Staff Report submitted by Staff, dated 4-24-15
13
Page 64
Application submitted by CSA Planning, Ltd., Agent, dated 11-1-13
14
Page 421
Request for Comments w/mailing list submitted by Staff, dated 1-28-15
__ 15-
Page 429
Response to Request for Comments submitted by Kevin Christiansen, Roads,
-----
----- --------dated
2-2-15
16
Page 430_
Response to Request for Comments submitted by John Patterson, Fire Marshal
FD 93, dated 2-11-15
Page 431
Tclo Area Concept Plan submitted by Staff, dated 3-12-15
18
Page 451
Correspondence from Joel Benton, JC County Counsel, dated 11-26-13
19
Page 452
Notice of Incomplete Application submitted by Staff, dated 11-27-15
20
Page 455
Response to Incomplete letter submitted by CSA Planning, Ltd., Agent, 12-20-13
IAZONIDO P\GOMP PLANNI NGLRP201300006 CARD MooRE JGRA\JCPCEXH I BIT SCHEDULE_ CARD MOORE. DOCX
CAP061115 Page 27 Page 4
FILE NO: LRP2013-00006 APPLICANT: CARDMOORE PROPERTIES ET AL
HEARING DATE:
5/7/2015 HEARING BODY: J.C. PLNG COMM. & C.P. PLNG. COMM.
PAGE: .2.
EXHIBIT SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT NO.
NATURE OF EXHIBIT
21
Page 477
Notice of Incomplete Application submitted by Staff, dated 2-4-14
22
Page 480
Response to Incomplete letter submitted by CSA Planning, Ltd., Agent, 4-24-14
23
Page 571
E-mail correspondence from CSA Planning to Staff regarding Completeness of
-----
------------------
CP UGe Amendment, dated 5-9-14
24
Page 572
Revised Volume 1 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law submitted by CSA
-----
----------- -----
Planning Ltd., Agent, dated 2-9-15
25
Page 665
Traffic Impact Study submitted by CSA Planning, Ltd., dated 2-16-15
26
Page 812
0DOT correspondence regarding Traffic Impact Study, dated 3-13-15
27
Page 814
Addendum to Traffic Impact Study submitted by CSA Planning, Ltd., 4-14-15
28
Page 949
ODOT correspondence regarding Addendum to TSI dated 4-28-15
29
Page 950
Notice of Public Hearing Notary packet submitted by Staff, dated 3-13-15
30
Page 961
Notice of Cancellation & Rescheduled of Public Hearing Notary Packet
-------
submitted by Staff, dated 3-25-15
31
Page 971
Notice of Public Hearing — Media — submitted by Staff, dated 4-24-15
I:\ZON I NG\WP\COMP PIANN ING\LRPP013 00006 CARDMOOnE UGMA JCPC\EXH I BI r SCHEDULE_ CAnDICORE0013X
CAP061115 Page 28 Page 5
CRITERIA FOR A MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT
TO ADD APPROXIMATELY 46 ACRES TO THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY (UGB) ALONG BLACKWELL ROAD BETWEEN THE
INTERSTATE 5 SEVEN OAKS INTERCHANGE (EXIT 35) AND KIRTLAND ROAD
AND LOCATED WITHIN URBAN RESERVE AREA CP -113
FILE: LRP2013-00006
Statewide Planning Goals: Goal 1, Citizen Involvement; Goal 2, Land Use Planning (Part
II(c)), Goal 3, Agricultural Lands; Goal 4, Forest Lands; Goal 5, Nature! Resources, Scenic and
Historic Areas, and Open Spaces, Goal 6, Air, Water, Land Resources Quality; Goal 7, Areas
Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards; Goal 8, Recreational Needs; Goal 9, Economic
Development, Goal 10, Housing; Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services: Goal 12,
Transportation; Goal 13, Energy Conservation; and Goal 14, Urbanization
Oregon Revised Statutes: ORS 197.298
Cori Administrative Rules: 660-009-0010, 660-009-0015. s60-009-0020, 660-02_4-0020,
660 -024-0030,660-024-0040,660-024-0050,660-024-0060,660-024-0070
Jackson County Comprehensive Plan:
Regional Plan Element. Performance Measures 2.7, 2.8, 2.9.1, 2.9.5
Transportation System Plan: Policy 421-R, 4.3.1-B, 4.3.1-E
Urban Lands Element: Policy 1
Jackson County Land Development Ordinance: Section 3.7.3(C)
Return to Agentla
Jackson County Planning Commission
(� File No.LRP2013-00006 Exhibit # 11.
—pl� Offered by:_`�'Ct�{-
CAP661115 Page 29 Page 6 `\- ' y�
0ate:-1& CS-geceived by: IrN r\
JACKSON
COUNTY
Oregon
APPLICANT: Cardmoore Properties, et al
OWNER: Blackwell Consolidation, LLC,
Michael S. Card, Stallion Land
Co., LLC, Outdoor Media
Dimensions, Inc.
JACKSON COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF REPORT
FILE: 439-LRP2013-00006: Cardmocre
Properties UGB Amendment CP -1B
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The adoption of the proposed Minor Map Amendment would amend the
County's Comprehensive Plan Map by adding approximately46 acres of land to the Central Point Urban
Growth Boundary (UGB). The land is situated between the Interstate 5 Seven Oaks Interchange (Exit 35)
and K'kt!a.^.d Road -.::d located wthin Urban Reserve Area CP'. and is once. various ownership narnes
but all controlled by Michael S. Card.
Applicant's Volume 1, Section 4.2 contains a summary of material facts which include the following
details concerning the subject property:
• Property description, size, ownership, and authorization
• Latlegality-
• Description ofthe area for UGB inclusion
• Transportation facts
• Description of public facility and services availability including water service, storm drainage,
sanitary sewer, power, fire protection, police protection and school districts
• Environmental facts including floodplain, wetlands, topography and soils.
For brevity, those facts will not be repeated here.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA
The subject application must demonstrate conformance with the following review criteria.
Oregon Revised Statutes: ORS 197.298
Statewide Planning Goals: Goal 1, Citizen Involvement; Goal 2, Land Use Planning (Part II(c));
o
Goal 5, Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces; Goal 6, Air, Water, Land"
E
a
a
Resources Quality; Goal 7, Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards; Goal 8, Recreational
o
Needs; Goal 9, Economic Development; Goal 10, Housing; Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services;
U
w
Goal 12, Transportation; Goal 13, Energy Conservation; and Goal 14, Urbanization
m
o Y
6
¢
Oregon Administrative Rules: 660-024-0020, 660-024-0030, 660-024-0040, 660-024-0050, 660-
a
`
024-0060, 660-024-0070
a
o
d
Z
i
U U
4
cs l? t Page I
YPage e4ile:-LRt'2013-00006: Cmdmoore Propertzn�&Amendment CP -t8
Il. O
C
Jackson County Comprehensive Plan:
Regional Plan Element: Performance Measures 2.7, 2.8, 2.9.1, 2.9.5
Transportation System Plan: Policy 4.2.1-R, 4.3.1-B, 4.3.1-E
Urban Lands Element: Policy 1
Jackson County Land Development Ordinance: Section 3.7.3(C)
Jackson County/City of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement
The full text of the above criteria are Identified In Sections II through VII below in italicized text.
Staff's findings are found immediately following the respective criteria.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE OREGON REVISED STATUTES:
ORS 197.298 - Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary
(1) In addition to any requirements established by rule addressing urbanization, land maynot
be included within an urban growth boundary except under the following priorities:
(a) Firstpriority is land thatis designated urban reserve land under0H5195.145, rule
or metropolitan service district action plan.
FINDING: Staff finds that the City of Central Point was a participant in the Greater Rear Creek Regional
Problem Solving process that resulted in Comprehensive Plan amendments that established Urban
Reserves for the City of Central Point. Staff herewith incorporates Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites
analysis and concludes accordingly as follows:
With respect to the amount of land needed, staff relies on the City's acknowledged
Economic Element and herewith finds as follows:
Over the 20 -year planning horizon, the City of Central Point requires
approximately 51 acres of additional employment land in total, including
industrial, retail and office land needs.
The following medium and large industrial acreage deficits are projected:
i. 12 acres medium industrial
30 acres large industrial
In addition to aggregate acreage deficits, OAR 660-009 recognizes the need for
differenttypes of land required to meet the variety of employment opportunities
described at ORS 197.712(1). The City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan
Economic Element includes a description of site requirements and deficits of
needed industrial sites, as follows:
i. Medium industrial sites deficit of two (2) sites and acres based upon
typical site size of 6 acres.
ii. Large industrial sites deficit of one (1) site and acres based upon typical
site size of 30 acres.
-d 1—
stab
ejj��orr Aras a s Page 8 Page
X39-1,RP2013-00006 Cardmoore Properties rdh Amendment CP -IR
With respect to the priority of lands for Inclusion to meet projected land need deficits for
medium and large industrial employment uses, staff herewith incorporates the Urban
Reserve Lands Review in Applicant's Section 3 of the Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis.
Staff finds that the analysis proceeded in two steps to satisfy the priority lands statute for
Urban Reserve lands as follows:
The first step applied as a pass/fall test of Goal 14 Boundary Location Factors to
identify candidate lots that could reasonably be expected to meet the needs for
medium and large industrial uses The pass/fail tests included the following:
I. Consistency with the RPS Land Use Matrix
ii. Consistency with the City's adopted policy for industrial lands locations
to minimize conflicts with non -industrial uses
iii. Adequate site size for medium or large industrial uses
iv. Topography that is sufficiently flat to accommodate industrial uses
V. Provision of public facilities and services that are reasonably economic
and orderly for water, sewer and transportation
Goodway constraints
The
ons rain -
The pass/fail analysis yielded 30 candidate lots. Thirteen of these lots were not
classified as vacant under the State's rules for inventorying employment land
vacancy status and 17 of the candidate lots were classified as vacant.
The second step evaluated each potential candidate lot on a lot -by -lot basis. See
Applicant's Volume 3 Sections 3.2 and 3.3. That lot -by -lot analysis evaluated the
candidate lots under the Goal 14 Boundary location factors addressed in
subsequent findings below.
3. The alternative sites analysis identified 13 non -vacant lots that could be included as
Priority 1 land by virtue of its non -vacant status despite the fact that these lots would not
add supply to meet the identified urban land needs. Seventeen lots were identified with
the potential for providing supply under Priority 1. The Alternative Sites Analysis
evaluated the relative rating of these lots to meet identified needs consistent with the
Goal 14 boundary location factors. Reconciling the supplied acreage against forecast
demand from the City's adopted and acknowledged Economic Element, the City has a
need for two additional medium industrial sites and Tax Lots 600 and 700 can satisfy this
need. Inclusion of Tax Lots 2100, 2300 and 2400 would add non -vacant Priority 1 lands
that are currently planned and zoned for intensive uses within an Urban Growth Boundary
and advancing the Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan ("Regional Plan") goals for this area by
designating all properties included in this UGB amendment General Industrial.
In summary, staff concludes that the subject properties are Priority 1 lands and do not exceed the needed
amount of buildable industrial land Identified in the City of Central Point Economic Element.
(b) If land under paragraph (a) of this subsection is inadequate to accommodate the
amount of land needed, second priority is land adjacent to on urban growth
boundary that is identified in on acknowledged comprehensive plan as an
exception area or nonresource land. Second priority may include resource land
that is completely surrounded by exception areas unless such resource land is
high-value farmland as described in ORS 215.710.
�tkffb't nea a2 Page 9 Page 13
File: 439-LRP2013-00006: Cardrnoore Properties FUB Amendment CP -LB
FINDING: This application seeks to amend the urban growth boundary to supply lands to meet the needs
for medium and large industrial sites. An adequate amount of land was found to be available with
appropriate site characteristics to meet the need within the Urban Reserve designation. The Urban
Reserve lands are the highest priority and adequate in amount and therefore the alternatives analysis
does not proceed to exception or non -resource priority 2 lands.
(c) If land under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection is inadequate to
accommodate the amount of land needed, third priority is land designated as
marginal land pursuant to ORS 197.247 (1991 Edition).
FINDING: There are no marginal lands in Jackson County. Therefore, there are no Marginal Lands Priority
l(c) lands available for consideration.
(d) If land under paragraphs (a) to (c) of this subsection is inadequate to
accommodate the amount of land needed, fourth priority is land designated in on
acknowledged comprehensive plan for agriculture or forestry, or both.
FINDING: This application seeks to amend the urban growth boundary to supply lands to meet the needs
for medium and large industrial sites and an adequate amount of land was found to be available with
appropriate site characteristics to meet the need within the Urban Reserve designation. The Urban
Reserve lands are the highest priority and adequate In amount. Therefore, the alternatives analysis does
not proceed to resource priority 4lands.
(2) Higher priority shall be given to land of lower capability as measured by the capability
classification system or by cubic foot site class, whichever is appropriate far the current
use.
FINDING: This statute is properly applied to alternatives analyses for resource lands that are fourth
priority for UGB inclusion in Section 1 of ORS 197.298. Accordingly, staff finds that the analysis is not
determinative for first priority Urban Reserve lands and requires no further analysis where a UGB
amendment does not propose to include fourth priority lands.
(3) Land of lower priority under subsection (1) of this section may be included in on urban
growth boundary if land of higherpriority is found to be inadequate to accommodate the
amount of land estimated in subsection (1) of this section for one or more of the following
reasons:
(a) Specific types of identified land needs cannot be reasonably accommodated on
higher priority lands;
(b) Future urban services couldnotreasonablybe providedto the higher priority lands
due to topographical or other physical constraints; or
(c) Maximum efficiency of land uses within a proposed urban growth boundary
requires inclusion of lower priority lands in order to include or to provide services
to higher priority lands
e 3 Page 10 rage
-0000(.' Cardnzoore Properties� dnnendment CP -IB
FINDING: Staff concludes that there is an adequate amount of land to satisfy the identified urban land
need within the first priority Urban Reserve category and consequently there is no need or reason that
inclusion of lands of a lower priority is necessary.
III. COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS:
Goal 1, Citizen Involvement: to develop a citizen involvement program that insures the
opportunity for citizens to be in all phases of the planning process.
FINDING: Citizen involvement is assured by and through application of the county's adopted and
acknowledged procedures for the conduct and noticing of quasi-judicial reviews, including noticing and
public hearings.
Goal 2, Land Use Planning: to establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a
basis for all decision and actions related to use of land and to assure on adequate factual base for
_ rh decisions and -runs. Tuu12 04o praVideS or exceptions prcce5s in Part h.
FINDING: The County has acknowledged plans that comply with Goal 2. The adopted and acknowledged
Urban Growth Management Agreement with the City of Central Point provides for annual review of minor
growth boundary amendment requests and such requests shall be submitted on forms provided by the
County. Staff finds that the subject application has been filed and evidence has been provided by the
Applicant in the form of Volumes 1 through 3 and that said evidence assures an adequate factual basis in
support of amending the City of Central Point UGB, consistent with Goal 2.
Goal 3, Agricultural Lands: to preserve and maintain agricultural lands.
FINDING: OAR 660-024-0020(1)(6) provides that Goal 3 is not applicable to UGB amendment requests.
Goal 4, Forest Lands: to conserve forest lands.
FINDING: OAR 660-024-0020(1)(b) provides that Goal 4 is not applicable to UGB amendment requests.
Goal 5, Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas. and Open Spaces: to protect natural
resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces.
FINDING: Staff finds that the City of Central Point has an adopted and acknowledged Comprehensive Plan
to com p ly with Statewide Planning Goa 15 and that application of the City's Comprehensive Plan will assure
future compliance with Goal 5 in the protection of natural resources, scenic and historic areas and open
spaces.
Specifically, stafffinds thatthe subject properties are known to only be affected bytwo types of resources,
The first type is wetlands/riparian resources. Application of the City's Plan and development code
standards are expected to be adequate to protect these resources.
The second resource type is aggregate resources. Many types of urban development, such as schools and
dwellings, have the potential to conflict with aggregate resource uses due to noise and dust conflicts.
e34 Page 11 r a e
C'ardnmare Projeerdes TiM Amendment 01-713
However, the subject properties will be planned for industrial uses and industrial uses do not generally
conflict with aggregate uses. With respect to the specific conflicting uses In this area, staff herewith
Incorporates the information in Section 2.3.6 of Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis, and
conclude accordingly that the County's protection programs for the resources in this area do not Identify
industrial uses that would be permissible in the M-2 zone implementing the City's General Industrial plan
designation to be conflicting for the aggregate resources In the study area.
Goal 6, Air, Water and Land Resources quality: to maintain and improve the quality of the air,
water and land resources of the state.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject property can be served with key public facilities such as sewer and
storm drainage necessary to assure water and land resource quality and that service from municipal and
regional service agencies that are required to comply with applicable water and land quality permitting
will assure urban development of the subject property will not violate or threaten to violate applicable
state or federal environmental quality statutes, rules and standards.
Wlith, r_ at in quaaI't, .r resource. or- cxar nen G.. o regiu'nai uasi' a-
iiu tbruogh Point -
source DEQ permitting. Industrial land uses have the potential to affect air quality as a result of increased
truck trips in the air -shed. The proposed amendment is located in a place that is very close to Interstate
5 which will result in efficient truck traffic movements to the highway. Specific industrial emissions must
comply with DEQ permitting for point -source emissions If a proposed use would generate emissions at a
level that triggers permitting requirements in the air -shed.
Goal 7, Areas Subject to Natural Hazards: to protect people and property from natural hazards.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject property includes the floodplain of Jackson Creek. This area is
mapped on the original FIRM panels of Jackson County as an Approximate A -zone 100 -year floodplain.
Applicant engaged a registered professional engineerand filed a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) with the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and FEMA approved the amendment on June 11, 2013.
The FEMA approved 100 -year floodplain under the letter of map amendment leaves approximately 9
acres of buildable developable land on the subject properties that are outside the 100 -year floodplain.
Besides the floodplain, the subject properties are not known to contain any otherareas subject to natural
hazards under Goal 7 that warrant further Goal 7 analysis.
Goal 8, Recreational Needs: to satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and
visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities
including destination resorts.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject property has not been adopted into any local parks plans to achieve
Goal 8. It is not known to contain any unique resources necessary to attain Goal 8. The area is in the
general vicinity of the Bear Creek Greenway (Area of Special Concern 82-2) but this Area of Special
Concern is not mapped to include any part of the subject properties.
Goal 9, Economic Development: to provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a
varietyof economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon's citizens.
FINDING: Staff finds that: (1) Jackson County's adopted and acknowledged Regional Plan Element of the
Comprehensive Plan recognizes the potential far employment in the area of the subject properties; (2) An
s�o
ne Page 12 P 01 e 16
Crardemore Properties Py(�h Anaeadnvent CP -I/3
analysis of projected employment growth and buildable lands in the existing City of Central Point UGB is
provided in the City's adopted and acknowledged Economic Element which staff relies on to conclude that
the City's UGB does not have an adequate supply of medium and large industrial sites; (3) The City of
Central Point's Economic Element recognizes the benefits of expanded truck transportation and related
uses in the Tole area In and around Exit 35,
Goal 30, Housing: to provide for the housing needs of the citizens of the state,
FINDING: Staff finds that Goal 10 is not applicable to this UGB amendment or City of Central Point Plan
Map Amendment to General Industrial.
Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services: to plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient
arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural
development.
FINDING: Based upon the evidence in Applicant's Volume 1 Section 4.2.6, staff finds that the subject
nrnnerty ran feasihly he served yvith niihlir fadlities. Staff f.,thor finds thar rhe An.—n— A—N-i�
in Applicant's Volume 3 included analysis of public facility services and availability in its evaluation of
alternative rural lands to satisfy the identified urban land needs for medium and large industrial sites.
Staff further finds that the subject UGB amendment will improve opportunities for collaborative funding
of water service extension to the area and the same is being actively pursued between the City of Central
Point, the Applicant, and Business Oregon.
Goal 12, Transportation: to provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic
transportation system.
FINDING: Staff incorporates and adopts findings addressing transportation planning in Section V below
and finds that adequate transportation facilities will be available to facilitate the proposed amendment.
Goal 13, Energy Conservation: to conserve energy.
FINDING: Staff finds that energy is conserved by locating industrial uses that minimize truck travel
distances. The lands to be included are very close to 1-5 and will result in minimized truck transportation
movements while simultaneously removing some trips from other congested urban Interchanges in the
region.
Gaal 14, Urbanization: to provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land
use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries,
to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide far livable communities.
Urban Growth Boundaries
Urban growth boundaries shall be established and maintained by cities, counties and regional
governments to provide land for urban development needs and to identify and separate urban and
urbonizable land from rural land. Establishment and change of urban growth boundaries shall be
a cooperative process among cities, counties and, where applicable, regional governments. An
urban growth boundary and amendments to the boundary shall be adopted by all cities within the
boundary and by the county or counties within which the boundary is located, consistent with
cast
Sraff Repport pp P a g e
Pf0b)3KLRP2013-00006: Cardnmore. ProperlAoWRdrra ment CP -IR
intergovernmental agreements, except for the Metro regional urban growth boundary established
pursuant to ORS chapter 268, which shall be adopted or amended by the Metropolitan Service
District.
FINDING: Staff finds that this UGS amendment will provide for an orderly and efficient transition from
rural to urban land use by locating transportation dependent industrial uses close to 1-5 but in areas that
are uncongested by other farms of urbanization and associated traffic patterns. The lands to be included
are sufficiently near the urban areas of the rest of Central Point to allow for efficient access to the City's
labor force and for in -region freight deliveries.
Land Need
Establishment and change of urban growth boundaries shall be based on the following.:
(1) Demonstrated need to accommodate long range urban population, consistent with a 20 -
year population forecast coordinated with affected local governments; and
(2) nemanstrated need far housing, emnlayment opportunities, Ilvobifty o. such as
public facilities, streets and roads, schools, parks or open space, or any combination of the
need categories in this subsection(2).
In determining need, local government may specify characteristics, such as parcel size, topography
or proximity, necessary for land to be suitable for an identified need.
Prior to expanding on urban growth boundary, local governments shall demonstrate that needs
cannot reasonably be accommodated on land already inside the urban growth boundary.
FINDING: Staff herewith incorporates and relies an the City of Central Point's Economic Element which
establishes the City's need for over fifty acres of industrial land. With respect to the specific demonstrated
lands needs to be met by the subject properties, staff finds that the Economic Element identifies the need
for two medium industrial sites and one large industrial site over the planning period.
Boundary Location
The location of the urban growth boundary and changes to the boundary shall be determined by
evaluating alternative boundary locations consistent with ORS 197.298 and with consideration of
the following factors:
(1) Efficient accommodation of identified land needs;
(2) Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services;
(3) Comparative environmental, energy, economic and social consequences; and
(4) Compatibility of the proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural and forest activities
occurring on form and forest land outside the UGB.
Urbanizable Land
Land within urban growth boundaries shall be considered available for urban development
consistent with plans for the provision of urban facilities and services. Comprehensive plans and
_32)_
SmReport Page 14 Page 8
�i 1o'J'LRP2013-00006: Cardneoore Properties t (ab Am rdrnenl CI' -113
implementing measures shall manage the use and division of urbandable land to maintain its
potential for planned urban development until appropriate public facilities and services ore
available or planned.
Unincorporated Communities
In unincorporated communities outside urban growth boundaries counties may approve uses,
public facilities and services more intensive than allowed on rural lands by Goal 11 and 14, either
by exception to those goals, or as provided by commission rules which ensure such uses do not
adversely affect agricultural and forest operations and interfere with the efficient functioning of
urban growth boundaries.
Single -Family Dwellings in Exception Areas
Notwithstanding the other provisions of this goal, the commission may by rule provide that this
goal does not prohibit the development and use of one single-family dwelling on a lot or parcel
that:
(o) Was lawfully created,
/hl lies putside any arkrnAll_arlg_p_d arhnn nrniArt baundnry or imirrnrnnrnfod
community boundary,
(c) Is within an area for which an exception to Statewide Planning Goal 3 or 4 has
been acknowledged, and
(d) Is planned and zoned primarilyfor residential use.
Rural Industrial Development
Notwithstanding other provisions of this goal restricting urban uses on rural land, a county may
authorize industrial development, and accessory uses subordinate to the industrial development,
in buildings of any size and type, on certain lands outside urban growth boundaries specified in
ORS 197.713 and 197.714, consistent with the requirements of those statutes and any applicable
administrative rules adopted by the Commission.
FINDING: Based upon the analysis in Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis, herewith
incorporated, staff finds that alternative boundary locations have been evaluated on a priority basis
consistent with ORS 197.296 as addressed in Section II above. Staff finds that Applicant's Volume 3
Alternative Sites Analysis document analyzed lands for inclusion first by assessing fundamental
characteristics necessary to satisfy the demonstrated land needs for medium and large industrial sites.
These lands were classified as potential candidate lands and were then evaluated on a site -by -site basis
for its particular attributes under the Gaal 14 boundary location factors. Each candidate lot was analyzed
and assigned a relative score under each of the four boundary location factors relative to the other
alternative candidate lots.
With respect to the vacant subject parcels being Tax Lots 600 and 700, staff finds that Applicant's Volume
3 Alternative Sites Analysis demonstrates the subject properties are appropriate to include in the UGB
under Goal 14. Specifically, staff finds that the site by site analysis of candidate lands supports this
conclusion because:
With respect to agricultural use conflicts the subject properties abut agricultural land devoted to
agricultural uses to the east. However, the subject properties' main development areas are
located across Jackson Creek from the agricultural uses in the area. Jackson Creek provides a
natural buffer and the proposed use Is industrial which results in low levels of conflict with
CS®1-11111111111
p 1',y
Cardmoore Properfie%s0@lGaA dna �m,n1 CP -771
agricultural practices when compared to othertypes of urban uses. Moreover, the Regional Plan
Element includes specific acknowledged buffering techniques Intended to minimize such conflicts.
While other sites have a lower level of potential conflict with agricultural uses due to a lack of
proximity to agricultural conflicts, the overall expected conflict Is low and therefore the
differential in relative compatibility Is only somewhat less for the subject site than for alternative
candidate lots,
The subject properties are well situated to accommodate medium industrial uses efficiently. The
sites are flat and appropriately sized. They are located near an existing 1-5 interchange. The sites
are readily developable even with the application of riparian protections along Jackson Creek.
While some types of commercial development are possible, the highest and best use is expected
to be industrial. The subject properties were the most efficient when compared to alternative
sites.
The site can readily and economically be served by sewer, transportation and storm drainage. All
the sites in the Tole area north of the interchange are constrained to some extent by water
availability but groundwater wells are capable of providing adenuata ginply for irhao levels of
industrial development if necessary. Other potential boundary locations not in CP413 are
constrained by the capacity of the Pine Street Interchange to handle additional freight flows
associated with medium and large industrial development. Overall, Tax Lots 600 and 700 are the
closest to potential water extension from the Erickson Air Crane Site on the north side of the
interstate. Considering the sum total of orderly and economic provision of public facilities and
services, Tax Lots 600 and 700 were in the top three as analyzed in the Volume 3 Alternative Sites
Analysis. Moreover, this ranking would be further improved if water service extension in the
short-term can be made feasible through collaboration with Business Oregon, the City of Central
Point and the Applicant as is currently In process.
The comparative net ESEE consequences of the subject property were among the most positive
of all the candidate lands. Strong positive economic and social consequences are expected.
Neutral environmental consequences are expected. Slightly positive energy consequences are
expected due to efficient freight movements derived from Its proximity to Interstate 5.
This UGB amendment will expand the City's UGB into the Tole area by including the nearest lands
to the UGB extended through the Urban Reserve lands located along the Bear Creek Greenway
and therefore represents a logical extension of the City's UGB in this area.
Finally, the inclusion of the subject property is consistent with the amount of land needed for
medium industrial sites expressed in the adopted and acknowledged Economic Element for the
City of Central Point.
With respect to the non -vacant subject parcels being Tax Lots 2100, 2300 and 2400, the County and City
conclude Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis demonstrates the subject properties are appropriate to
include in the UGB under Goal 14. Specifically, the County and City conclude the site by site analysis of
candidate lands supports this conclusion because:
These properties do not abut any agricultural lands that are under intensive cultivation and
therefore are expected to be fully compatible with agricultural uses in the area.
_ 35_
Staff Kepor(epdgge I6 P a g e
Ae9`b1PL2P1013-00006_ Cardmoore Properttysa� dib T1'"1Admervl CP -18
The subject properties are well -situated to eventually be developed for large industrial uses. Tax
Lot 2100 together with Tax Lot 2102 already accommodate a large industrial use, being a trucking
and rail intermodal facility that is owned by the Applicant, who also owns adjacent Lots 2300 and
2400 and these may provide for future expansion overtime of this large industrial use despite the
constraints of the existing development on the sites. Tax Lot 2100 is planned and zoned for
industrial use and Tax Lot 2300 and Tax Lot 2400 are planned and zoned for Urban Residential
Use at a density of one unit per acres. The UGB amendment will support a land use change for all
parcels to industrial which is more efficient and will avoid potential conflicts between industrial
uses on Tax Lot 2100 and adjacent residential lands.
3. Tax Lots 2100, 2300 and 2400 can readily and economically be served by sewer, transportation
facilities and storm drainage. Tax Lots 2100, 2300 and 2400 are planned and zoned to allow urban
or near urban use intensities under County regulations so Its inclusion represents a potential
water customer to support future water extension to the area but failing to include It does not
prevent the urban intensity uses. In sum, these properties ranked as high as any other for
availability of services forthe non -vacant lands in the Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis.
The comparative net ESEE consequences were the most positive of all the candidate non vacant
lands. Strong positive economic and social consequences are expected. Slightly positive
environmental consequences are expected due to the potential for expanded rail freight handling
which is very energy efficient. Positive energy consequences are expected due to efficient freight
movements derived from proximity to Interstate 5 and expansion of the rail terminal.
This UGB amendment will expand the City's UGB into the Talo area by including lands already
planned and zoned for intensive uses in the County's Comprehensive Plan and thereby expedite
the implementation of the industrial employment area within the Told area without the loss of
any agricultural resource lands.
SUMMARY FINDING: Staff finds that this UGB amendment will provide for an orderly and efficient
transition from rural to urban land use by locating transportation -dependent Industrial uses close to
Interstate 5 but in areas that are uncongested by other forms of urbanization and associated traffic
patterns. The lands to be included are sufficiently near the urban areas of Central Point to allow for
efficient access to the City's labor force and for in -region freight deliveries.
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES:
660-024-0020 - Adoption or Amendment of a UGB
(1) All statewide goals and related administrative rules are applicable when establishing or
amending a UGR, except os follows:
(a) The exceptions process in Goal2 and OAR chapter 660, division 4, is not applicable
unless a local government chooses to take an exception to a particular goal
requirement, for example, as provided in OAR 660-004-0010(1);
(b) Goals 3 and 4 are not applicable,
—
3b—_ b" Return to Agenda
Staff Reportppg 17 Page 1][
Pfte0b1J 4PLRP2013-00006. Cardmoore PropernA, TVfi flmdc4i m7CCP-IB
(c) Goofs and related rules under OAR chapter 660, division 23, apply only in areas
added to the UGB, except as required under OAR 660-023-0070 and 660-023-
0250,
(d) The transportation planning rule requirements under OAR 660-012-0060 need not
be applied to a UGB amendment if the land added to the UGB is zoned as
urbonizable land, either by retaining the zoning that was assigned prior to
inclusion in the boundary or by assigning interim zoning that does not allow
development that would generate more vehicle trips than development allowed
by the zoning assigned prior to inclusion in the boundary,
(e) Goal 15 is not applicable to land added to the UGB unless the land is within the
Willamette River Greenway Boundary,
fJ Goals 16 to 18 are not applicable to land added to the UGB unless the land is
within o coastal shorelands boundary,
(g) Goal 19 is not applicable to a UGB amendment
FINDING: Staff finds that Section III herein addresses the applicable goals as identified in this rule. The
transportation planning rule/Goal 12 (OAR 660-012-0060) has been addressed due to Jackson County's
unique Comprehensive Plan requirements and Is addressed in Section V ofthis document.
(2) The UGB and amendments to the UGB must be shown on the city and county plan and
zone mops at a scale sufficient to determine which particular lots or parcels are included
in the UGB. Where a UGB does not follow lot or parcel lines, the map must provide
sufficient information to determine the precise UGB location.
FINDING: Staff finds that the Applicant proposes to include entire parcels In the UGB and has provided
maps in a format that a definitive UGB location can be discerned and incorporated into the County GIS
mapping systems.
660-024-0030- Population Forecasts
(1) Counties must adopt and maintain a coordinated 20 -year population forecast for the
county and for each urban area within the county consistent with statutory requirements
forsuch forecasts under OR5195.025 and 195.036. Cities must adopt a 20-yeorpopulotion
foremst for the urban area consistent with the coordinated county forecast, except that a
metropolitan service district must adopt and maintain a 20 -year population forecast for
the area within its jurisdiction. In adopting the coordinated forecast, local governments
must fallow applicable procedures and requirements in ORS 197.610 to 197.650 and must
provide notice to all otherlocal governments in the county. The adapted forecast must be
included in the comprehensive plan or in a document referenced by the plan.
(2) The forecast must be developed using commonly accepted practices and standards for
population forecasting used by professional practitioners in the field of demography or
economics, and must be based on current, reliable and objective sources and verifiable
factual information, such as the most recent long-range forecast for the county published
Staff Report3op 1 , Page 112
W. 6431LRP2013-00006. Cardtnoore ProperGe%s'PMI?yAAR menACP-lR
by the Oregon Office of Economic Analysis (DEA). The forecast must take into account
documented long-term demographic trends as well as recent events that have a
reasonable likelihood of changing historical trends. The population forecast is an estimate
which, although based on the best available information and methodology, should not be
held to an unreasonably high level of precision.
(3) For a population forecast used as a basis for a decision adopting or amending a UGB
submitted under ORS 197.626, the director or Commission may approve the forecast if
they determine that a failure to meet a particular requirement of section (2) of this rule is
insignificant in nature and is unlikely to have a significant effect on the needs determined
under OAR 660-024-0040.
(4) A city and county may apply one of the safe harbors in subsections (a), (b), or (c) of this
section, if applicable, in order to develop and adopt a population forecast for an urban
area
(n) Ifo-_ordinnrorin r�lar;n.r fn I-- -,1-p", by athm.reprevruu.,
10 years but does not provide a 20 -year forecast far on urban area at the time a
city initiates on evaluation or amendment of the UGB, a city and county may
adopt on updated forecast far the urban area consistent with this section. The
updated forecast is deemed to comply with applicable goals and laws regarding
population forecasts for purposes of the current UGB evaluation or amendment
provided the forecast
(A) Is adopted by the city and county in accordance with the notice,
procedures and requirements described in section (1) of this rule; and
A Extends the current urban area forecast to a 20 -year period commencing
on the date determined under OAR 660-024-0040(2) by using the some
growth trend far the urban area assumed in the county's current adopted
forecast
(b) A city and county may adopt a 20 -year forecast for on urban area consistent with
this section. The forecast is deemed to comply with applicable goals and laws
regarding population forecasts for purposes of the current UGB evaluation or
amendment provided the forecast:
(A) Is adopted by the city and county in accordance with the notice,
procedures and requirements described in section (1) of this rule;
(B) Is based on DEA's population forecast far the county far a 20 -year period
commencing on the date determined under OAR 660-024-0040(2); and
(C) Is developed by assuming that the urban area's share of the forecasted
county population determined in subsection (B) of this rule will be the
some as the urban area's current share of county population based on the
most recent certified population estimates from Portland State University
J8-
StaljRe[[,art Pagge 19 Page
�)i$e.0.')TFLR1'20l3-00006: Cardmoore 1'ropertaesv Arne'Tidrieca CP -7R
and the most recent data for the urban area published by the U.S. Census
Bureau.
(c) A city may adopt a revised 20 -year forecast for its urban area by following the
requirements in ORS 195.034.
FINDING: Staff finds that, based upon the information contained in the Jackson County Population
Element, a population forecast covering the 20 -year planning horizon of the subject UGB amendment is
in full force and effect and is acknowledged by the State of Oregon.
660-024-0040 - Land Need
1) The UGB must be based on the adopted 20 -year population forecast for the urban area
described in OAR 660-024-0030, and must provide for needed housing, employment and
other urban uses such as public facilities, streets and roads, schools, parks and open space
over the 20 -year planning period consistent with the land need requirements of Goal 14
and thic rules, The 9n-venc.r npad detarminntinng are actirror— a hirh, nithnngh Lased an
the best available information and methodologies, should not be held to on unreasonably
high level of precision. Local governments in Crook, Deschutes or Jefferson Counties may
determine the need for Regional Large -Lot Industrial Land by following the provisions of
OAR 660-024-0045 for areas subject to that rule.
FINDING: Staff Incorporates and relies upon the City of Central Point's Economic Element adopted on
June 27, 2013 through City Ordinance 1973 and finds that said Economic Element establishes the 20 -year
employment land need for the City of Central Point.
(2) If the UGB analysis or amendment is conducted as part of a periodic review work program,
the 20 -year planning period must commence on the date initially scheduled for completion
of the appropriate work task. If the UGB analysis or amendment is conducted as a post -
acknowledgement plan amendment under OR519Z610 to 197.625, the 20 -year planning
period must commence either:
(a) On the date initially scheduled for final adoption of the amendment specified by
the local government in the initial notice of the amendment required by CAR 660-
018-0020, or
(b) If more recent than the date determined in subsection (a), at the beginning of the
20 -year period specified in the coordinated population forecast far the urban area
adopted by the city and county pursuant to OAR 560-024-0030, unless ORS
197.296 requires a different date for local governments subject to that statute.
FINDING: Staff incorporates and relies upon the City of Central Paint's Economic Element and finds that
the analysis period is consistent in all ways with OAR 660-024-0040 with respect to land need. The actual
UGB amendment timing falls within the appropriate 20 -year planning period timeframe.
(3) A local government may review and amend the UGB in consideration of one category of
land need (for example, housing need) without a simultaneous review and amendment in
consideration of other categories of land need (forexample, employment need).
ppa e2O rage
Cardrnoore 1'roperri�s"19 JAnv dmemCP-1B
FINDING: Staff finds that the proposed UGB review is for employment land needs only and more
specifically for the needs of medium and large industrial sites. The rule makes clear that It is wholly
appropriate to evaluate such needs Independent of other potential land needs the City of Central Point
may have.
(4) The determination of 20 -year residential land needs for an urban area must be consistent
with the adopted 20 -year coordinated population forecast for the urban area, and with
the requirements far determining housing needs in Goof 10, OAR 560, division 7 or 8, and
applicable provisions of ORS 197.295 to 197.314 and 197.475 to 197.490.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject UGB amendment is not based upon nor planned to serve residential
land needs.
(5) Exceptfor a metropolitan service district described in OR5197.015(13), the determination
of 20 -year employment land need for an urban area must comply with applicable
requirements of Gaul and OAR chapter 660, division 9, and must include a determination
of the need far n short-term supply Orland f r em�1oymen1 uses consistent with 66n_nng-
0025. Employment land need may be based on on estimate of job growth over the
planning period, local government must provide a reasonable justification for the job
growth estimate but Goal 14 does not require that job growth estimates necessarily be
proportional to population growth. Loral governments in Croak, Deschutes or Jefferson
Counties may determine the need for Regional Large -Lot Industrial Land by following the
provisions of 660-024-0045 for areas subject to that rule.
FINDING: Staff incorporates and relies on the Economic Element for the City of Central Point in concluding
that the City of Central Point requires at least two additional medium Industrial sites and one additional
large industrial site to meet the 20 -year land needs for the City of Central Point. Moreover, staff further
finds that the City's UGB has a dearth of medium industrial sites and that this translates to an inadequate
short-term supply of medium industrial sites. Staff further observes that the findings supporting the
Central Point Economic Element established it to be consistent in all ways with the Goal implementing
rule.
(6) Cities and counties mayjointly conduct a coordinated regional EOAfor more than one city
in the county or for a defined region within one or more counties, in conformance with
Goal 9, OAR chapter 650, division 9, and applicable provisions of ORS 195.025. A defined
region may include incorporated and unincorporated areas of one or more counties.
FINDING: Staff finds that the proposed UGB amendment is not based upon a coordinated EGA for a larger
region.
(7) The determination of 20 -year land needs for transportation and public facilities for on
urban area must comply with applicable requirements of Goals 11 and 12, rules in OAR
chapter 660, divisions 11 and 12, and public facilities requirements in ORS 1.97.712 and
197.768. The determination of school facility needs must also comply with 195.110 and
197.296 for local governments specified in those statutes.
FINDING: Staff finds that this rule is directed at land needs and essentially requires that an adequate
supply of lands for public facilities be included to assure efficient urbanization. To this end, stafffinds that
_ `f V
Staff Report pAgge 21 J° a g e
iPe9aJ� LRP2013-00006: Cardmonre Proper4iLPa �tlmI Mont I -IB
the Central Point Economic Element Identifies the need to supply net buildable acres adequate to meet
the City's needs for medium and large industrial sites and that the actual proposed UGB area to be
included, depicted on Applicant's Volume 2 Atlas Page 1, will supply two needed medium industrial sites.
Staff finds that the UG6 area includes 8,7 acres (approximately 19%) of existing public right of way and
also plans the relocation of Dean Creek Road to Improve circulation in the area and thus the amount of
lands needed for public facilities and transportation have been appropriately considered in the subject
amendment.
(8) The following safe harbors may be applied by a local government to determine housing
need under this division:
(a) A local government may estimate persons per household for the 20 -year
planning period using the persons perhousehold for the urban area indicated in
the most current data for the urban area published by the U.S. Census Bureau.
(b) If a local government does not regulate government -assisted housing differently
th n_ ether hn__ in a types, it is aof rag uir,d m egn,mnre rhe u es f,r g C„„nom„,
assisted housing as a separate housing type.
(c) If a local government allows manufactured homes on individual lots as a
permitted use in all residential zones that allow 10 or fewer dwelling units per net
buildable acre, it is not necessary to provide an estimate of the need for
manufactured dwellings on individual lots.
(d) If a local government allows manufactured dwelling parks required by OBS
197.475 to 197.490 in all areas planned and zoned for a residential density of six
to 12 units per acre, a separate estimate of the need for manufactured dwelling
parks is not required.
(e) A local government outside of the Metro boundary may estimate its housing
vacancy rate for the 20 -year planning period using the vacancy rate in the most
current data published by the U.S. Census Bureau for that urban area that includes
the local government.
if) A local government outside of the Metro boundary may determine housing needs
for purposes of a UGB amendment using the combined Housing Density and
Housing Mix safe harbors described in this subsection and in Table 1, or in
combination with the Alternative Density safe harbor described under subsection
(g) of this section and in Table 2. To meet the Housing Density safe harbor in this
subsection, the local government may Assume For UGB Analysis that all buildable
land in the urban area, including land added to the UGB, will develop at the
applicable average overall density specified in column B of Table 1. Buildable land
in the UGB, including land added to the UGB, must also be Zoned to Allow of least
the average overall maximum density specified as Zone To Allow in column B of
Table 1. Finally, the local government must adopt zoning that ensures buildable
land in the urban area, including land added to the UGB, cannot develop at on
overage overall density less than the applicable Required Overall Minimum
density specified in coluym�n B of Table 1. To meet the Housing Mix safe harbor in
—`'k�—
Pa e 22 P a'Te 116
'P2013-00006- Cardmoore Propertiesa�l�CI dme dment Cl)
this subsection, the local government must Zone to Allow the applicable
percentages of low, medium and high density residential specified in column C of
Table 1.
(g) When using the safe harbor in subsection (f), a local government may choose to
also use the applicable Alternative Density safe harbors for Small Exception
Parcels and High Value Farm Land specified in Table 2. If a local government
chooses to use the Alternative Density safe harbors described in Table 2, it must
(A) Apply the applicable Small Exception Parcel density assumption and the
High Value Farm Land density assumption measures specified in the table
to all buildable land that is within these categories, and
(B) Apply the Housing Density and Mix safe harbors specified in subsection (f)
of this section and specified in Table 1 to all buildable land in the urban
area that does not consist of Small Exception Parcels or High Value Farm
I and
(h) As an alternative to the density safe harbors in subsection (f) and, if applicable,
subsection (g), of this section, a local government outside of the Metro boundary
may assume that the average overall density of buildable residential land in the
urban area for the 20-yeor planning period will increase by 25 percent over the
average overall density of develop edresidential Ian din the urban area at the time
the local government initiated the evaluation or amendment of the UGB. If a local
government uses this Incremental Housing Density safe harbor, it must also meet
the applicable Zoned to Allow density and Required Overall Minimum density
requirements in Column B of Table 1 and, if applicable, Table 2, and must use the
Housing Mix safe harbor in Column C of Table 1.
(i) As on alternative to the Housing Mix safe harbor required in subsection (f) of this
section and in Column C of Table 1, a local government outside the Metro
boundary that uses the housing densitysafe harbor in either subsection (f), (g) or
(h) of this section may estimate housing mix using the Incremental Housing Mix
safe harbor described in paragraphs (A) to (C) of this subsection, as illustrated in
Table 3:
(A) Determine the existing percentages of low density, medium density, and
high density housing on developed land (not "buildable land") in the
urban area at the time the local government initiated the evaluation or
amendment of the UGB;
(8) Increase the percentage of medium density housing estimated in
paragraph (A) of this subsection by 10 percent, increase the percentage
of high density housing estimated in paragraph (A) of this subsection by
five percent, as illustrated in Table 3, and decrease the percentage of low
density single family housing by a proportionate amount so that the
overall mix total is 100 percent, and
-�a
Stag�e{; oil Pa a 23 Page 17
1~r�e 479-LRP2013-00006: Cardinoore Properties`iu%Ci Amendment CP -IB
(C)
Zone to Allow the resultant housing mix de term in ed under subparagraphs
(A) and (B) of this subsection.
W Tables
1, 2 and 3 are adopted as part of this rule, and the following definitions
apply
to terms used in the tables:
(A)
"Assume For UGB Analysis" means the local government may assume
that the UGB will develop over the 20 -year planning period at the
applicable overall density specified in Column B of Tables 1 and 2.
(B)
'Attached housing" means housing where each unit shares a common
wall, ceiling or floor with at least one other unit. 'Attached housing"
includes, but is not limited to, apartments, condominiums, and common -
wall dwellings or row houses where each dwelling unit occupies a
separate lot.
C)
'Average Overall Dencity"mann, the averagedensit„ of nll b—Idrir,lo lend
in the UGB, including buildable land alreadyinside the UGB and buildable
land added to the UGB, including land zoned far residential use that is
presumed to be needed forschools, parks and other institutional uses.
(D)
"Coordinated 20 -year Population Forecast" under Column A of the Tables
refers to the population fore cost for the urban area described under OAR
660-024-0030.
(E)
"Density" means the number of dwelling units per netbuildoble acre.
(FJ
"High Value Farm Lond"has the some meaning as the term definedin ORS
195.300(10).
(G)
"Required Overall Minimum" means a minimum allowed overall average
density, or a "density floor," that must be ensured in the applicable
residential zones with respect to the overall supply of buildable land for
that zone in the urban area for the 20 -year planning period.
(H)
"Single Family Detached Housing" means a housing unit that is free
standing and separate from other housing units, including mobile homes
and manufactured dwellings under ORS 197.475 to 197.492.
(1)
"Small Exception Parcel" means a residentially zoned parcel five acres or
less with a house on it, located on land that is outside a UGB prior to a
proposed UGB expansion, subject to an acknowledged exception to Goal
3 or 4 or both.
(J)
"Zone To Allow" or "Zoned to Allow" means that the comprehensive plan
and implementing zoning shall allow the specified housing types and
densities under clear and objective standards and other requirements
specified in ORS 197.307(3)(b) and (6).
Star Report Pae 24 Page ITR
FV e'J ��LRP2013-00006 Cardmoore Propertiesa�iU Am drnentCP- 113
FINDING: Staff finds that the above safe harbors concern residential land needs and the proposed UGB is
directed at employment lands rendering the above safe harbors inapplicable to the subject amendment.
(9) The following safe harbors may be applied by a local government to determine its
employment needs far purposes old UGB amendment under this rule, Goal9, OAR chapter
660, division 9, Goal 14 and, if applicable, ORS 197.296.
(a) A local government may estimate that the current number of jobs in the urban
area will grow during the 20 -year planning period at a rate equal to either:
(A) The county or regional job growth rate provided in the most recent
forecast published by the Oregon Employment Deportment, or
(B) The population growth rate for the urban area in the adopted 20 -year
coordinated population forecast specified in OAR 660-024-0030.
(h) A Inrnl n_ _..„.,ent -ith n irinrinn -, inn nn or le„ assume that ,.tall
and service commercial land needs will grow in direct proportion to the forecasted
urban area population growth over the 20 -year planning period. This safe harbor
may not be used to determine employment land needs for sectors other than retail
and service commercial
FINDING: Staff finds that the application relies on the Central Point Economic Element and so application
of a safe harbor is not necessary. Staff observes that the growth rate targeted for employment in Central
Point is only slightly higher than the population growth rate in the adopted 20 -year coordinated
population forecast and it thus not substantively greater than the safe harbor in (b) above.
660-024-0050- Land Inventory and Response to Deficiency
(1) When evaluating or amending a UGB, a local government must inventory land inside the
UGB to determine whether there is adequate development capacity to accommodate 20 -
year needs determined in OAR 660-024-0040. For residential land, the buildable land
inventory must include vacant and redevelopable land, and be conducted in accordance
with OAR 660-007-0045 or 660-008-0010, whichever is applicable, and ORS 197.296 for
local governments subject to that statute. For employment land, the inventory must
include suitable vacant and developed land designated for industrial or other employment
use, and must be conducted in accordance with OAR 660-009-0015.
FINDING: Staff herewith incorporates and relies on the Central Point Economic Element, and concludes
based thereupon, that the land inventory within the UGB included suitable vacant and developed land
and the same was conducted in accordance with OAR 660-009-0015.
(2) As safe harbors, a local government, except a city with a population over 25,000 or a
metropolitan service district described in ORS 197.015(13), may use the following
assumptions to inventory the capacity of buildable lands to accommodate housing needs:
_,t, 1 _ Return to Agentla
StagRep ort e 9g Page ZS R a g e 119
FPe. X39-T,RP2013-00006: Cardmoore PrapertiesGS dmendnvettt CP -173
(a) The infillpotential of developed residential lots or parcels of one-half acre or more
maybe determined by subtracting one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) for the
existing dwelling and assuming that the remainder is buildable land,
(b) Existing lots of less than one-half acre that are currently occupied by a residence
may be assumed to be fully developed.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject application is not directed at residential land needs and therefore
this safe harbor is not relevant to this application.
(3) As safe harbors when inventorying land to accommodate industrial and other employment
needs, a local government may assume that a lot or parcel is vacant if it is:
(a) Equal to or larger than one-half acre, if the lot or parcel does not contain a
permanent building, or
(b) Fniml to or Inrner in an five a_. if la- then n„a bnif nr ra �f If, for
occupied by o permanent building.
FINDING: Staff finds that the inventory and inventory methodology in the Economic Element was found
to be consistent with the safe harbor inventory methodology and the same is reflected by the findings
supporting the City's Economic Element. Staff herewith incorporates the Volume 3 Alternative Sites
Analysis wherein lands that satisfied the pass/fail test to meet identified land needs for medium and large
industrial sites outside the UGB were classified as vacant or non -vacant.
(4) If the inventory demonstrates that the development capacity of land inside the UGB is
inadequate to accommodate the estimated 20 -year needs determined under OAR 660-
024 0040, the local government must amend the plan to satisfy the need deficiency, either
by increasing the development capacity of land already inside the city or by expanding the
UGe, or both, and in accordance with ORS 197.296 where applicable. Prior to expanding
the UGB, a local government must demonstrate that the estimated needs cannot
reasonably be accommodated on land already inside the UGB. If the local government
determines there is a need to expand the UGB, changes to the UGB must be determined
by evaluating alternative boundary locations consistent with Goal 14 and OAR 660-024-
0060.
FINDING: Consistent with the balance of its conclusions of law under OARS 660-024-0040 and 660-024-
0050 and the City of Central Point Economic Element herewith incorporated and relied upon, staff finds
that he Central Point UGB has a twenty year land supply deficit of 34 to 47 net buildable acres of industrial
land and corresponding deficits of two medium industrial sites and one large industrial site respectively.
Staff further finds that the land supply and demand analysis in the City's adopted Economic Element and
in the findings supporting the same did not identify any opportunities for land use regulatory changes that
would increase the development capacity for existing lands in the UGB in ways that would meet the
Identified needs for medium and large industrial sites. Staff finds that the Central Point Economic Element
and the findings supporting the same evaluates the redevelopment potential of existing lands within the
UGB on a site by site basis and through that process identified all lands that could reasonably
accommodate medium and large industrial sites consistent with the site requirements for industrial
development. Staff also incorporates findings addressing OAR 660-024-0060(2) that recognize
rdquasi-
no a Page 26 P i g e 120
Cardmoare Properties B Amendment CP -7B
quasi-judicial UGB amendments are not legislative In nature and therefore, are necessarily constrained by
existing land use regulations. Therefore, such applications are not properly bound to evaluate legislative
regulatory changes that might otherwise accommodate the land need. On this basis, staff concludes that
the land that must be added to the UGB to satisfy the identified 20yearland needs for employment land
is thirty four to forty seven acres and its associated two medium industrial sites and one large industrial
site respectively.
(5) In evaluating an amendment of a UGB submitted under ORS 197.626, the director or the
Commission may determine that a difference between the estimated 20 -year needs
determined under OAR 660-024-0040 and the amount of land and development capacity
added to the UGB by the submitted amendment is unlikely to significantly affect land
supply or resource land protection, and as a result, may determine that the proposed
amendment complies with section (4) of this rule.
FINDING: Staff finds that the inclusion of Tax Lots 2100, 2300 and 2400 will not significantly affect land
supply or resource land protection because none of these lands abut resource lands and they are
exception !ends _already planned for intensive uses that are ..urban or nearly so n all qstances and are
properly considered built underthe inventorying scheme for employment land.
(6) When landis addedtothe UGB, the local government must assign appropriate urbonplan
designations to the added land, consistent with the need determination. The local
government must also apply appropriate zoning to the added land consistent with the
plan designation or may maintain the land as urbanizable land until the land is rezoned
for the planned urban uses, either by retaining the zoning that was assigned prior to
inclusion in the boundary or by applying other interim zoning that maintains the land's
potential for planned urban development. The requirements of OBS 197.296 regarding
planning and zoning also apply when local governments specified in that statute add land
to the UGB.
FINDING: Staff finds that the land is proposed to be designated City General Industrial on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Map but will retain the County zoning that is currently applicable until subsequent
annexation and zone change to the appropriate City zone.
(7) As a safe harbor regarding requirements concerning "efficiency," a local government that
chooses to use the density and mix safe harbors in OAR 660-024-0040(8) is deemed to
have met the Goal 14 efficiency requirements under:
(a) Sections (1) and (4) of this rule regarding evaluation of the development capacity
of residential land inside the UGB to accommodate the estimated 20 -year needs;
and
(b) Goal 14 regarding a demonstration that residential needs cannot be reasonably
accommodated on residential land already inside the UGB, but not with respect
to:
(A) A demonstration that residential needs cannot be reasonably
accommodated by rezoning non-residential land, and
_ L) L'_
aadgggn-t Poe sa Page 27 Page 121
rile: 439-LRP20I3-00006 Cardoroore Pruperties ?/GI3 dnvendment CRIB
(B) Compliance with Goal 14 Boundary Location factors.
FINDING: Staff finds that the proposed UGB amendment concerns the supply of Identified industrial land
needs and that OAR 660-024-0050(7) is concerned with residential land needs and is therefore
inapplicable to the subject application.
660-024-0060 - Boundary Location Alternatives Analysis
(1) When considering o UGB amendment, a local government must determine which land to
add by evaluating alternative boundary locations. This determination must be consistent
with the priority of land specified in ORS 197.298 and the boundary location factors of
Goal 14, as follows:
(a) Beginning with the highest priority of land available, a local government must
determine which land in that priority is suitable to accommodate the need
deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050.
(b) If the amount of suitable land in the first priority category exceeds the amount
necessary to satisfy the need deficiency, a local government must apply the
location factors of Goal 14 to choose which land in that priority to include in the
UGB.
(c) If the amount of suitable land in the first priority category is not adequate to
satisfy the identified need deficiency, a local government must determine which
land in the next priority is suitable to accommodate the remaining need, and
proceed using the some method specified in subsections (a) and (b) of this section
until the land need is accommodated.
(d) Notwithstanding subsection (a) to (c) of this section, a local government may
consider land of lower priority as specified in ORS 1.97.2.98(3).
(e) Forpurposes of this rule, the determination of suitable landing accommodate land
needs must include consideration of any suitability characteristics specified under
section (5) of this rule, as well as otherprovisions of law applicable in determining
whether land is buildable or suitable.
FINDING: Staff incorporates Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis as its basis to evaluate
alternative sites to meet the identified land needs described in OAR 660-024-0050 above and to justify
inclusion of the subject property in the City of Central Point UGB. Specifically, staff finds that the Volume
3 Alternative Sites Analysis establishesthat there is an adequate supply of suitable lands designated Urban
Reserve, which is the highest priority of land available under ORS 197.298, and therefore there was no
need to include lands of a lower priority.
(2) Notwithstanding OAR 660-024-0050(4) and subsection (1)(c) of this rule, except during
periodic review or other legislative review of the UGB, a local government may approve
on application under ORS 197 610 to 197.625 for a UGB amendment proposing to add an
amount of land less than necessary to satisfy the land need deficiency determined under
S'[a 62ort Pa a et Page 28 Page I
1�:le: N'L,RP2013-00006: Cardnwore Properties n(;13Amendment CP -IB
OAR 660-024-0050(4), provided the amendment complies with oil other applicable
requirements.
FINDING: Staff finds that this rule provides essential clarification on the application of the priority lands
statute In the context of a quasi-judicial post -acknowledgement UGB amendment for less than fifty acres.
Staff finds that this rule makes clear that the application of the term priority in ORS 197.298 does not
preclude the inclusion of less than the amount of land projected to be needed as part of a quasi-judicial
UGB Post Acknowledgment Plan Amendment.
(3) The boundary location factors of Goal 14 are not independent criteria. When the factors
are applied to compare alternative boundary locations and to determine the UGB location,
a local government must show that all the factors were considered and balanced.
FINDING: Staff herewith incorporates Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis and finds that the
analysis therein explicitly considers all the Goal 14 boundary location factors and balances them in
determining whether the subject properties may properly be added to the UGB as supply to meet the
identified nerd, fnr medium _rd large iind��.tri i 61— craft herewith Incorporates the findings
hereinabove under Goal 14 thatexplainhow inclusion of the subject properties is consistent with and
properly applies the Goal 14 Boundary Location factors.
(4) In determining alternative land for evaluation under ORS 197.298, "land adjacent to the
UGB"is not limited to those lots orparcels that abut the UGB, butalso includes land in the
vicinity of the UGB thorn as a reasonable potential to satisfy the identified need deficiency.
FINDING: Staff incorporates Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis and the Volume 2 Atlas and
finds that the alternative land considered for inclusion was not limited to land that abuts the UGB and in
fact the study area included all land in the vicinity of the UGB that has reasonable potential to satisfy the
identified need deficiency for medium and large industrial sites.
(5) If a local government has specified characteristics such as parcel size, topography, or
proximity that are necessary for land to be suitable for on identified need, the local
government may limit its consideration to land that has the specified characteristics when
it conducts the boundary location alternatives analysis and applies ORS 197.2.98.
FINDING: Staff relies on the City's Economic Element for determining the qualitative site requirements
necessary to meet the Identified land needs and also incorporates and relies on the City's Land Use
Element, Industrial Development Policy No. 2 which is to "Provide locations for General Industrial (M-2
Zone) in the northwest portion ofthe community where such development can take advantage ofthe rail,
highway, and freeway facilities while having minimal Impact on the other non -industrial land uses within
the community".
Consistent with the foregoing findings, staff finds that alternative sites were evaluated for consistency
with qualitative site requirements and with Land Use Element Industrial Development Policy No. 2 on a
pass/fail basis and lands that failed this evaluation were not further considered in the more detailed and
rigorous site -by -site application of the Goal 14 boundary location factors and this limited consideration of
sites is consistent with and supported by OAR 660-0024-0060(5) for the subject UGB amendment
application because the relied upon analysis deemed those sites unsuitable to meet the identified need.
nega sz Page 29 t' a g, 123
File: 439-LRI'2013-00006: Cardmoore Properties (1GHAmendment CP -IB
(6) The adopted findings for UGB adoption or amendment must describe or map oil of the
alternative areas evaluated in the boundary location alternatives analysis. If the analysis
involves more than one parcel or area within a particular priority category in ORS 197.298
for which circumstances are the same, these parcels or areas may be considered and
evaluated as a single group.
FINDING: Staff incorporates Applicant's Volume 2 Atlas of Maps and Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis
as the findings of fact that collectively describe and/or map all the alternative areas evaluated in the
boundary location alternatives analysis. Staff further finds that the analytical methods in the Alternative
Sites Analysis are appropriate in all ways for the intended purpose and that Applicant's Volume 2 Atlas of
Maps properly mapped and evaluated alternative lands for inclusion in the City of Central Point UGB.
(7) For purposes of Goal 14 Boundary Location Factor 2, "public facilities and services"means
water, sanitary sewer, storm water management, and transportation facilities.
FINDING: Staff herewith incorporates Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis and finds that
analvsis has properly evaluated public facilities and services to mean water, sanitary cawa_r, _Imre, water
management and transportation facilities .
(8) The Goal 14 boundary location determination requires evaluation and comparison of the
relative costs, advantages and disadvantages of alternative UGB expansion areas with
respect to the provision of public facilities and services needed to urbanize alternative
boundary locations. This evaluation and comparison must be conducted in coordination
with service providers, including the Oregon Department of Transportation with regard to
impacts on the state transportation system. "Coordination" includes timely notice to
service providers and the consideration of evaluation methodologies recommended by
service providers. The evaluation and comparison must include:
(a) The impacts to existing water, sanitary sewer, storm water and transportation
facilities that serve nearby areas already inside the UGB;
(b) The capacity of existing public facilities and services to serve areas already inside
the UGB os well os areas proposed for addition to the UGB; and
(c) The need for new transportation facilities, such as highways and other roadways,
interchanges, arterials and collectors, additional travel lanes, other major
improvements on existing roadways and, far urban areas of 25,000 or more, the
provision of public transit service.
FINDING: Staff finds that the proposed expansion area has been coordinated with service providers,
including the Oregon Department of Transportation. With respect to water, sewer and storm drainage
facilities, staff finds that all regional systems (such as the regional water reclamation facility) can feasibly
have sufficient capacity to serve the subject property. With respect to transportation facilities to serve
the subject property, staff herewith incorporates findings under the Transportation System Plan criteria
in Section V below and finds that the site can be adequately served with planned and programmed
transportation facilities for the proposed development.
n sg Page30 axe
Cardnzoore PropertiesTY(N Amendment CF -1B
With respect to the alternatives analysis for water, sewer and storm drainage, staff herewith incorporates
and adopts Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis, with particular reference to Sections 2.3.3,
3.1.5, 3.1.6, 3.1.7 and 3.2.3 and finds that the alternatives analysis has considered the serviceability of
alternative sites from the perspective of feasibility to serve the subject properties and the full review
process has evaluated any significant potential impacts to existing systems.
660-024-0070 - UGB Adjustments
(1) A local government may adjust the UGBotonytime to better achieve the purposes of Gaal
14 and this division. Such adjustment may occur by adding or removing land from the UGB,
or by exchanging land inside the UGB for land outside the UGB. The requirements of
section (2) of this rule apply when removing land from the UGB. The requirements of Goal
14, this division, and ORS 197.298 apply when land is added to the UGB, including land
added in exchange for land removed. The requirements of ORS 197.296 may also apply
when land is added too UGB, os specified in that statute. Ila local government exchanges
land inside the UGB for land outside the UGB, the applicable local government must adopt
n pnrnnrintp rurnI inning dacignntinn cf nr the land ren —OnI fr^m the UGB before the Intal
government applies ORS 197.298 and other UGB location requirements necessary for
adding land to the UGB.
FINDING: Staff finds that the rule makes clear that there is no state timing mechanism that precludes
review and approval of the subject application. Staff further finds that this application adds land to the
UGB and therefore that Goal 14, OAR 660 Division 24 and ORS 197.298 apply to the subject application.
(2) A local government may remove land from a UGB following the procedures and
requirements of ORS 197.764. Alternatively, a local government may remove land from
the UGB fallowing the procedures and requirements of ORS 197.610 to 197.650, provided
it determines:
(a) The removal of land would not violate applicable statewide planning goals;
(b) The UGB would provide o 20 -year supply of land for estimated needs nfter the
land is removed, taking into consideration land added to the UGB at the some
time;
(c) Public facilities agreements adopted under ORS 195.020 do not provide for urban
services on the subject land unless the public facilities provider agrees to removal
of the land from the UGH;
(d) Removal of the land does not preclude the efficient provision of urban services to
any other buildable land that remains inside the UGB; and
(e) The land removed from the UGB is planned ondzonedfor rural use consistent with
all applicable laws.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject application does not seek to remove land and therefore this Division
24 standard is not applicable.
roRe4orr ee Page 31 Page 125
I[e: 4�-1d2P2013-00006: Curdmoore Properties t%6.4mendment CP -113
(3) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government considering an
exchange of land may rely on its acknowledged population forecast and land needs
analysis, rather than adopt a newforecast and need analysis, provided:
(a) The amount of buildable land added to the UGB to meet a specific type of
residential need is substantially equivalent to the amount of buildable land
removed, or the amount of suitable and developed employment land added to the
UGB to meet a specific type of employment need is substantially equivalent to the
amount of suitable and developed employment land removed, and
(b) The local government applies the some comprehensive plan designations and, if
applicable, the same urban zoning to the land added to the UGB such that the
land added is designated for the some uses and at the some housing or
employment density as the land removed from the UGB.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject application does not seek to exchange UGB lands and therefore this
Division 24 standard is not annlicahle.
V. COMPLIANCE WITH JACKSON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Regional Plan Element — Performance Indicators
1.7Conceptual Transportation Plans. Conceptual Transportation Plans shall be prepared
early enough in the planning and development cycle that the identified regionally significant
transportation corridors within each of the URAs can be protected as cost-effectively as
possible by available strategies ondfunding. A Conceptual Transportation Plonfor a URA or
appropriate portion of a UFA shall be prepared by the City in collaboration with the Rogue
Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts. Jackson County,
and other affected agencies, andsholl be adopted by Jackson County and the respective city
prior to or in conjunction with a UGB amendment within that URA.
2.7.1. Transportation Infrastructure. The Conceptual Transportation Plan shall
identify a general network of regionally significant arterials under local jurisdiction,
transit corridors, bike and pedestrian paths, and associated projects to provide
mobility throughout the Region (including intracity and intercity, if appliccble).
2.8 Conceptual Land Use Plans. A proposal for a UGB Amendment into a designated URA
shall include a Conceptual Land Use Plan prepared by the City in collaboration with the
Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts, Jackson
County, and other affected agencies for the area proposed to be added to the UGB as
follows:
2.8.1 Target Residential Density. The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall provide
sufficient information to demonstrate how the residential densities of Section 2.5
above will be met atfull buildout of the area added through the UGB amendment.
-51-
rt
Page 32 Page 126
FieP43FLR1'2013-00006: Cordmoore Properae.y JG,idmeendment CP -1R
2.8.2 Land Use Distribution. The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall indicate how the
proposal is consistent with the general distribution of land uses in the Regional
Plan, especially where a specific set of land uses were part of the rationale for
designating land which was determined by the Resource Lands Review Committee
to be commercial agricultural land as port of a URA, which applies to the fallowing
URAs: CP -18, Cli CP -4D, CP -6A, CP 2B, MD -4, MD -6, MD-7mid, MD -7n, PH -2,
TA -2, TA -4.
2.8.3 Transportation Infrastructure. The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall include
the transportation infrastructure required in Section 2.7 above.
2.8.4 Mixed Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas. The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall
provide sufficient information to demonstrate haw the commitments of Section
2.6 above will be met at full build -out of the area added through the UGB
amendment.
FINin Nr -This riff, ofrnntral Pnint hac a do Hied this Tnln Gran rnnrant 01— a sol anduse and
transportation Ian for the CP -18 Urban Reserve Area that satisfies the requirements of the V and
p p q Regional
Plan Element Performance Measures 2.7 and 2.8, as well as Transportation System Plan policies 4.2.1-R
and 4.3.1-E. This plan, included among the exhibits in the record of this file, has been reviewed by the
Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, Jackson
County, ODOT, OECD and 1000 Friends of Oregon, and their comments have been incorporated into the
plan. The City of Central Point's Citizens Advisory Committee and Planning Commission has also
reviewed and recommended approval of the plan. The Plan was adopted by the City of Central Point City
Council through Resolution No. 1419 on March 12, 2015.
2.9.1. CP -1B. Prioi to the expansion of the Cenaul Pulnl Ulbun Churvi Baunduly into the CP -
IB area, ODOT, Jackson County and Central Point shall adapt on Interchange Area
Management Plan (TAMP) for the Seven Oaks Interchange Area,
FINDING: Jackson County adopted the Exit 35 Interchange Area Management Plan (IAMP) for the Seven
Oaks Interchange Area on March 25, 2015 through Ordinance No. 2015-3.
2.9.5: CP -1B, CP -1C, CP -2B, CP -3, CP -40, CP -6A, CP -69. Prior to the expansion of the
Central Point Urban Growth Boundary into any Urban Reserve Area, the City and Jackson
Countyshall adoptan agreement (Area of Mutual Planning Concern) for the management
of Gibbons/Forest Acres Unincorporated Containment Boundary.
FINDING: Jackson County and the City of Central Point have adopted a revision to their Urban Growth
Boundary Agreement (UGBMA) that includes Gibbons/Forest Acres as an Area of Mutual Planning
Concern. Jackson County's adoption is through Ordinance No. 2015-4 adopted March 25, 2015.
Transportation System Plan — Policy 4.2.1-11
Jackson County will coordinate with cities on transportation planning and transportation
projects to provide well-connected transitions from city to County transportation systems.
�SBffi�i�RQrt
P" Page se Page 33
File: 439-LRP2073-00006' Cemdmoore Properties FMAmendment CP -IB
Strategies:
Require Urban Growth Boundary expansions to be accompanied by a conceptual
higher order street system plan to be adopted by the city at the time of expansion.
FINDING: Staff finds that the conceptual transportation plan requirements identified in the Regional Plan
Element Section 2.7 (above) serve identical purposes to the requirements of Strategy C of this criteria. A
conceptual transportation plan, consistent with the requirements of Section 2.7 has been submitted as
part of this proposal and satisfies the above criterion.
Transportation System Plan - Policy 4.3.1-e
Plan amendments, zone changes and type 3 and 4land use permits need to demonstrate
that adequate transportation planning has been done to support the proposed land use.
Strategies:
Inside urban growth boundaries, demonstration of adequate transportation
facilities for a land -use action should defer to the city's adopted Transportation
System Plan; this deference should occur in accordance with any applicable
provisions in the Urban Growth Management Agreement between the particular
city and the County. Absent an adopted Transportation System Plan for the
applicable city, land use actions related to transportation planning and
transportation project decisions will be based on the Jackson County
Transportation System Plan; application of the County TSP in this simotion should
account for any applicable provisions in the Urban Growth Management
Agreement between the particular city and the County.
Ensure that legislative land use changes will not result in land uses that are
incompatible with the public transportation facilities they will use through
compliance with, and direct application of, OAR 560 Division 12.
Ensure that quasi-judicial comprehensive plan changes, zone changes and type 3
and 4 land use permits will not result in land uses that are incompatible with the
public transportation facilities they will use. To meet this requirement, criteria i, ii
and in below must be demonstrated to be met through a Transportation Impact
Study (TIS) completed by a registered professional engineer with expertise in
transportation. Compliance with criteria i, ii and iii will be considered sufficient to
demonstrate compliance with the Transportation Planning Rule. The TIS
requirement may be waived if the Planning Director and the County Engineer
administratively concur in writing that sufficient specific evidence is provided from
affected transportation management agencies that the cumulative effect of
approving the proposed plan amendment, zone change or type 3 or 4 land use
permit, along with the potential forsimilor approvals on similorlysituated parcels
within 2 miles (.75 miles in the MPO) of the subject parcel (or portion of the parcel
that is requesting the land use change or permit), will not significantly affect a
transportation facility identified in State, regional or local transportation plans
(RTP 6-1).
t egrt eea,,Page 34 Page
File 439-LRP2013-00006: Cardmoore Properties UCB Amendment(,P-IB
N Approval of the proposed changes and the cumulative impact of the
potential for similar approvals on parcels within 2 miles (.75 miles in the
MPO) of the subject parcel would not change the functional classification
of on existing or planned transportation facility nor would it change
standards implementing the functional classification system (unless the
change can be made in conjunction with a TSP amendment pursuant to
policy 4.3.3-D).
(I i) Approval of the proposed changes and the cumulative impact of the
potential for similar approvals on parcels within 2 miles (.75 miles in the
MPO) of the subject parcel would not allow types or levels of land uses
that would result in levels of travel or access inconsistent with the
functional classification of a transportation facility (unless a functional
class change is made pursuant to policy 4.3.3-D).
(iii) Approval of the proposed land use changes and the cumulative impact of
the nnten tint far similar on urnlin lc an parcels w,m within J iles'I.7c Miles in
the MPO) of the subject parcel would not cause a facility to exceed the
adopted performance standards for facilities used by the subject parcel.
A facility used by the subject parcel is defined as any facility where
approval of the proposed land use changes and the cumulative impact of
the potential for similar approvals on parcels within 2 miles 1.75 miles in
the MPO) of the subject parcel would increase traffic on a facility by more
than 3% of the total capacity for collectors ond/or2%of the total capacity
for arterials and state highways. ODOT may determine that the subject
parcel, beyond this definition and in accordance with the Oregon Highway
Plan, will use additional state facilities.
FINDING: The Applicant has submitted a detailed Transportation Impact Study (TIS) which is included
among Applicant's supporting evidence. Review of the TIS by the Oregon Department of Transportation
has concluded that the submitted TIS demonstrates that the above criteria is satisfied. Staff therefore
incorporates the Applicant's TIS as evidence that this criteria has been met.
Transportation System Plan - Policy 4.3.1-E
Regional planning projects intended to identify future urban growth boundary expansion
areas, such as the on-going Regional Problem Solving (RPS) process, must include an
appropriate transportation planning component.
Strategies:
UGB expansions into Urban Reserve areas should not create
transportation problems that cannot be adequately addressed, given
reasonable transportation funding expectations.
Where UGB expansions ore proposed into on Urban Reserve Area
developed through a regional planning project, the proposed expansion
should include adoption of a refinement plan to be added to the
—I—
Aqw, aaea se Page 35 Page 129
File439-LRP2073-00006: Cardmoore Properties UGB Anrindrnent CP -7B
applicable city (or cities) Transportation System Plan at the final
proceeding approving the urban growth boundary expansion.
FINDING: Staff finds that the conceptual transportation plan requirements identified in the Regional Plan
Element Section 2.7 (above) serve identical purposes to the requirements of Strategies A and B of this
criteria. A conceptual transportation plan, consistent with the requirements of Section 2.7 has been
submitted as part of this proposal and satisfies the above criterion.
Urban Lands Element - Policy 1
Policy Jackson County shall maintain a long-range commitment to the implementation of
urban -centered growth.
FINDING: Staff finds that this policy directs the County to continue its policy of urban -centered growth
through procedures such as urban growth boundary amendments. Staff also finds that approval of the
subject application is consistent with this long-term policy direction.
VI. COMPLIANCE WITH JACKSON COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
Section 3.7.3 - Minor Map Amendments Criteria
C) Minor Comprehensive Plan Map or Zoning Map Amendments (quasi -Judicial)
All proposed minor map amendments wil) be reviewed for compliance with the criteria set
forth below and with all other applicable provisions of this Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan:
1) Adequate public safety, transportution, and utility fucilhies and services can be
provided to the subject property. In the case of a minor zoning map amendment,
adequate transportation facilities must exist or be assured.
FINDING: Staff incorporates by reference the findings of fact in Applicant's Volume 1, Section 4.2.6
showing that the subject property can feasibly be served by adequate public safety and utility facilities
and services. Staff Incorporates findings addressing transportation planning in Section V above. On that
basis, staff finds that adequate transportation facilities are assured.
2) The minor map amendment will not preventimplementation of any area of special
concern or restrictions specified for that area in Chapter 7 or the adopting
ordinance creating it, or both.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject properties are not located within any area of special concern.
3) On resource zoned lands outside urban growth boundaries, the entire parcel is
included in the minor Comprehensive Plan Map unless the purpose of the
amendment conforms with the criteria of Policy 1 of the Comprehensive Map
Designations Element.
_SS_
-WAgw, v,, Page 36 Page 30
Zile: 439-LRP2013-00006.Cardneoore Properties 8, GB drnendnvent CP -1B
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject properties that are resource designated (Tax Lots 600 and 700) are
entire parcels and are appropriately included in the minor Comprehensive Plan Map request.
4) Mop amendments outside urban growth boundaries and urban unincorporated
communities that will result in a minimum residential lot size smaller than 10
acres meet the requirements for an exception to Statewide Planning Goal 14.
FINDING: Staff finds that this criterion is applicable to proposals that will result in the subject property
remaining outside urban growth boundaries and is therefore not applicable. In any case, no residential
lots of less than 10 acres will be created through approval of the subject application.
5) Any minor Zoning Map amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
Map designation.
FINDING: Staff finds that that the Applicant does not seek a minor zoning map amendment.
6; .n [ha c,,.,a of a mi,aor Camprehc-sive Plar, "."ap
e, l-, community benefit
as a result of the minor mop amendment is clearly demons troted.
FINDING: Staff finds that the City of Central Point desires to increase their supply of lands for
employment opportunities, consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 9. The subject proposal is intended
to meet the objectives of Goal 9 as well as those of the City of Central Point. Community benefit is
therefore demonstrated.
7) In determining the appropriateness of the proposed re -designation, the White City
orlackson CountyPlanning Commission and Board of Commissioners will consider
any factors relevant to the proposal, which may include.: topography, geology,
hydrology, soil characteristics, climate, vegetation, wildlife, water quality,
historical or archaeological resources, scenic resources, noise, open space,
existing site grading, drainage, adverse impacts on other property in the vicinity,
and any otherfactors deemed to be relevant to the application.
FINDING: Staff finds that Applicant's Volume 3 Alternative Sites Analysis evaluated the above factors
relevant to the proposal. Staff Incorporates these analyses herein as evidence that such factors have been
considered.
Standards for Amending on Adopted Urban Growth Boundary, Urban Fringe, or Buffer
Area
In addition to the requirements contained in joint urban growth boundary management
agreements, all proposed boundary amendments must comply with applicable State Law,
Statewide Planning Goals, the County Comprehensive Plan and any Regional Problem
Solving documents adopted by the County.
FINDING: Staff finds as follows with respect to this criterion,
-53u-
t Iigdkil nage en Page 37 Page 131
Rile: 439-LRP2013-00006 Cardmoore Properties UGB Amendment CP -IB
I . With respect to State Law, staff incorporates above findings in Sections II -IV
demonstrating that the proposed UGB amendment complies with all applicable Oregon
Statues and Administrative Rules.
2. With respect to the Statewide Planning Goals, staff incorporates above findings in Section
III demonstrating that the proposed UGB amendment complies with the applicable
Statewide Planning Goals.
3. With respect to the Jackson County Comprehensive Plan, staff incorporates above
findings in Section V demonstrating that the proposed UGB amendment complies with
the Comprehensive Plan (which includes the Regional Problem Solving documents
adopted by the County).
4. With respect to the precise boundary location, staff finds that the northern planned and
zoned industrial area crosses existing property lines, but because these are not resource
zoned It has no potential to violate state law and the County will require the property line
adiustments proposed by the Applicant to align the HCR Lina �ith n _ erry lip—
condition for future annexation to the City of Central Point, a matter which the Applicant
has agreed to stipulate.
5. Requirements contained in the joint Jackson County/City of Central Point Urban Growth
Boundary Management Agreement are addressed below.
VII. COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN GROWTH POLICIES WITHIN THE JACKSON COUNTY/CITY OF
CENTRAL POINT URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MANAGMENENT AGREEMENT
1, The City of Cenhal Point shall have piimmy responsibility for all future urban level
development that takes place within the City and Urban Growth Boundary area.
Additionally:
A) All urban level development shall conform to the City standards, shall be
consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Pion, and shall meet all
appropriate requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance and Mop.
B) The term "urban level development" shall be generally defined, for purposes of
this agreement, as any commercial orindustrial development, and onyresidential
development, partitioning, orsubdivision that creates actual orpotential densities
greater than allowed by the City's Residential Low-density district (R -L). The
expansion or major alteration of legally existing commercial or industrial use shall
also be considered urban level development.
C) Urban level development proposals submitted through County processes must be
accompanied by a contract to annex to the City.
FINDING: Staff finds that the current proposal does not include urban level development but that future
urban level development can feasibly comply with the above policies and definitions.
'J-1—
�WXf J5w9rt aaea et Page 38 Pa g e 32
File: 439-LRP2013-00006: Cardmoore Poroperucs UGB Amendment CP -IB
2. A change in the use of urbanizable land from a use designated on the Jackson County
Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Map to uses shown on the City Comprehensive Plan shall
occur only upon annexation or contractual intent to annex to the City. Additionally:
A) Development of land for uses designated on the Comprehensive Plan shall be
encouraged on vacant or undeveloped lands adjacent to or within the City limits
prior to the conversion of other lands within the Urban Growth Boundary.
B) Urban facilities and services most be adequate in condition end capacity to
accommodate the level of growth, as allowed by the Comprehensive Plan, prior to
or concurrent with the land use changes.
C) The City may initiate annexation and zone change of lands outside City limits and
within the UGB that are under a County "Exclusive Form Use" designation or
otherwise enjoying farm -related tax incentives when such lands are needed far
urban development.
FINDING: Staff finds that subject application does not propose a change of use as described in policy No.
2 above and no development is proposed at this time. Urban facilities and services can feasibly be
provided prior to or concurrent with any future land use changes.
City annexation shall only occur within the framework of the City's Comprehensive Plan
and within the Urban Growth Boundary,
FINDING: Staff finds that annexation must necessarily be located within the UGB and that the subject
amendments would allow the subject properties to be annexed consistent with this policy.
Except us provided in Policy 11 of this agieement, specific annexation decisions shall be
governed by the City of Central Point. The City will provide opportunities for the County
and all affected agencies to respond to pending requests for annexation with the response
time limited to sixty days to minimize any unnecessary and costly delay in processing.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject application does not propose annexation and that this policy is
therefore not relevant.
The establishment of the Urban Growth Boundary does not imply that all lands within the
Boundary must be annexed to the City.
FINDING: Staff finds that future annexation decisions concerning the subject properties will be made by
the City of Central Point and are of no significance to the County's consideration of this application.
Jackson County
shall retain jurisdiction over any land
use decisions,
other than
annexations, within
the unincorporated urbanizable area,
in conformance
with these
adopted policies.
Additionally.:
A) The City shall be requested to respond to pending applications for land use
changes in the unincorporated urbanizable area. If no response is received within
fourteen days, the County will assume the City has no objections to the request.
— F Cq —
eeeaee rage -iv rage
2013-00006: Cordmoore Properties UGB Amendment CP -IB
3) The City will request that he County resp and to pen ding applications for land use
changes in the incorporated area which could affect land under the County
jurisdiction. If no response is received within fourteen days the city will assume
the County has not objections to the request.
Q Recognizing that unincorporated areas within the Urban Growth Boundary could
ultimately become part of Central Point, the City's recommendations will be given
due consideration. It is the intent of the County to administer a mutually adopted
City/County policy in the organizable area until such time as the area is annexed.
FINDING: Staff finds that future land use actions that involve the subject properties can feasibly comply
with the above procedures.
Lands in the vicinity of the Seven Oaks Interchange, as delineated on Map 1 attached, are
considered unique because of the transportation facilities present. The 1-5 Interchange
Area Management Plan (TAMP) for Exit 35 addresses the unique characteristics of the area
rind rerarnmandntinns from tha rIrm ,,ill on i„ rued int, tho rWy and Court,,
Comprehensive Plans. Portions of this area are in Central Point's Urban Reserve while the
remainder is designated on Area of Mutual Planning Concern and shall be protected from
premature development. Additionally:
A) The County shall ensure that the area remains in a rural character so that a
priority is placed on urban development within the UGB, as planned.
B) The Seven Oaks Interchange Area of Mutual Planning Concern shall retain its
present County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designation, or similar
"rural" designation, untilsuch time as the area can be shown to be neededfor the
City's urbanization, in accordance with the seven urbanizution factors of
Statewide goal 14 and the provisions of this agreement that pertain to City -
initiated comprehensive plan amendments.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject properties are outside of the Seven Oaks Interchange Area of Mutual
Planning Concern. Both Jackson County and the City of Central Point have adopted the Exit 35 Interchange
Area Management Plan ([AMP) and have incorporated the recommendations from that plan into their
respective comprehensive plans. Transportation -related criteria, along with accompanying findings, in
Section V of this document specifically address impacts to the Seven Oaks Interchange that may result
from the subject proposal.
Lands in the vicinity of and including Forest/Gibbon Acres west of Table Rock Road, as
delineated on Map 2 attached, are considered remote to Control Point at this time.
Although located outside of any Urban Reserve, this area is designated an Area of Mutual
Planning Concern and shall be protected from premature or more intense development.
Additionally.:
A) The County shall ensure that the area remains in a rural character so that a
priority is placed on urban development within the UGB and URAs, as planned.
-1i
d(Wff6rjgysrt ease a, Page 40 Page 134
File 439-LRI'2013-00006: Cardmoore Properties UGB Amendment CP -1B
B) The Forest/Gibbon Acres Area of Mutual Planning Concern shall retain its present
County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designation, or similar "rural"
designation, until such time as the area can be shown to be needed for the City's
urbanization or for inclusion in Medford or in White City should it incorporate.
Inclusion in a planning area will occur in accordance with the seven urbanization
factors of Statewide goal 14 and the provisions of this agreement that pertain to
City -initiated comprehensive plan amendments.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject properties are not in the vicinity of the Forest/Gibbon Acres Area of
Mutual Planning Concern and that this proposal has no effect on the urbanization policies related thereto.
9. Lands under the ownership of Jackson County between Gebhard Road and Interstate -5
north of Pine Street, including the Jackson County Expo (fairgrounds) and property in the
ownership of Jackson County adjacent to the Expo as delineated on Map 3 attached, are
designated an Area of Mutual Planning Concern and shall be protected from
uncoordinated land use development. Additionally:
A) The County shall ensure that all land use planning that occurs will be coordinated
with the City so that a priority is placed on urban development within the UGB and
URAs, as planned.
B) The Jackson County Expo Arco of Mutual Planning Concern shall retain its present
County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designation, or designations unique
to the fairground master plan, until such time as the area can be shown to be
needed for the City's urbanization, in accordance with the seven urbanization
factors of Statewide goal 14 and the provisions of this agreement that pertain to
City -initiated comprehensive plan amendments.
Q During the first coordinated Periodic Review process for the Regional Plan,
Jackson County shall consider including the land occupied by the Jackson County
Expo to the City of Central Point Urban Reserve Area.
D) The impacts of County development upon City and Regional infrastructure shall
be assessed and mitigated in order to obtain a mutually beneficial outcome to
both entities.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject application will have no effect on the lands under the ownership of
Jackson County between Gebhard Road and Interstate -5 north of Pine Street, Including the Jackson
County Expo (fairgrounds) and property in the ownership of Jackson County adjacent to the Expo.
10. Lands within the urbanizoble area which currently support oform use shollbe encouraged,
through zoning and appropriate tax incentives, to remain in that use for as long as is
"economically feasible".
A) "Economically feasible," as used in this policy, shall be interpreted to mean
feasible from the standpoint of the property owner. Implementation of this policy
will be done on a voluntary basis.
Page a rage 41 /" a g e
3-00006: Cardmoore Properties UGB Amendment CP -JB
B) "Exclusive Form" or other appropriate low -intensity rural zoning designation shall
be applied to areas within the UGB by the County for the purpose of maintaining
agricultural land uses and related tax incentives until such time as planned
annexation and urban development occur.
C) "Suburban Residential" or other zoning designations that would permit non-
agricultural land uses to develop prematurely could result in obstacles to future
planned and coordinated growth and, therefore, should be restricted to only those
areas that are already developed to such levels.
D) Agricultural zoning policies contained herein apply only to areas identified by the
City or County as agricultural lands within the UGB or Seven Oaks Area of Mutual
Planning Concern and shall not be used os a standard to review other land use
applications within these areas.
FINDING: Staff finds that the subject proposal contains lands that support farm uses and that the property
owner has determined that such uses are no loneer econnmir--ally feasihle. Siihjor_t properties with
Exclusive Farm Use (EFL) zoning will remain as such until annexation by Central Point.
11. The City and County acknowledge the importance of protecting agricultural lands.
Therefore:
A) While properties are in agricultural use, the City will apply the below standards
when adjacent lands are proposed for urban residential development:
To mitigate the potential for vandalism, the development's design should
incorporate the use of visible public orsemi-public open space adjacent to
the agricultural lands.
To mitigate nuisances originating from agricultural noise, odors,
irrigation run-off, and agricultural spray drift, the development's design
should incorporate:
a) The use of landscaping and berms where a positive buffering
benefit can be demonstrated.
b) The orientation of structures and fencing relative to usable
exterior space such as patios, rear yards and courts, such that the
potential impacts from spray drift, dust, odors, and noise
intrusion are minimized.
c) The design and construction of all habitable buildings, including
window and door locations, should be such that the potential
impact of spray drift, noise, dust, and odors upon interior
living/working areas will be minimized.
d) Physical separation between agricultural lands and urban
development shall be utilized to the greatest extent possible to
_ U 1-
&Q AWert as9a� es Page 42 Page 36
File: 439-L1iP2013-00006: Cardinoore Properties UB Amendment CP -IB
minimize adverse impacts. Site design emphasizing the
appropriate use of open space areas, streets, and areas not
designed specifically for public recreation or assembly shall be
considered.
BJ The City and County mutually agree herewith that the buffering standards
established by the Jackson County Regional Plan and adopted by the City of
Central Point have or can and will be met prior to annexation or urban
development of lands.
C) The City and County mutually agree to involve affected Irrigation Districts prior to
annexation or when contemplating urban development of lands.
FINDING: Staff finds that the standards identified above can and will be met prior to annexation or urban
development of the subject properties.
12. The City, County, and other
- ffaren hnfl rnrnnro rhe --
--d _ and
development of all urban facilities andservices within the urbanization area. Additionally:
A) Provisions for urban facilities and services shall be planned in a manner limiting
duplication in an effort to provide greater efficiency and economy of operation.
B) A single urban facility or service extended into the urbanizable area must be
coordinated with the planned future development of all other facilities and
services appropriate to that area, and shall be provided at levels necessary for
expected uses, as designated in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
FINDING: Staff finds that compliance with the above policy is not the iespunsibllity of the Applicant.
13. All County rood construction and reconstruction resulting from new development,
redevelopment, or land division, in the urbanizable area shall be to urban standards,
except that the term "reconstruction" does not include normal road maintenance by the
County.
FINDING: Staff finds that compliance with the above policy is not the responsibility of the Applicant.
14. Exceptfor URAs, no other land or non -municipal improvements located outside the Urban
Growth Boundary shall be permitted to connect to the water line serving Erickson unless
it is first included in the Urban Growth Boundary or a "reasons" exception is taken to
applicable Statewide Land Use Planning Goals which allows such connection. The owners
of such benefitted property must sign an irrevocable consent to annex to the City of Central
Point.
FINDING: Staff finds that the water line mentioned in the above policy may be extended to lands within
a UGB at some point in the future such as to the subject properties and that municipal connection and
extension into the UGB from the existing line is allowable under the policy.
— ua
LStAalj w, aaea 66 Page 43 Page 137
File: 439-LRP2013-00006: Cardmoore Properties UCBAmendneent CP-lB
VIII. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Applicant has stipulated to the following conditions of approval:
Dean Creek Road Realignment: A local commercial street or county road relocation will be
required (standard to be specified through agreement by Jackson County Roads and Central
Point Public Works) through Tax Lots 600 and 700 and being stubbed to the north property
line as part of any urban development approvals on these properties. The realignment will
be consistent with the Exit 35 [AMP and any relevant conceptual transportation plans.
Property Line Adjustment: Applicant will execute property line adjustments in the area of
Tax Lot 2100 (using pre-existing parcels not currently assigned tax lot numbers) to align the
approved UGB line with property lines prior any annexation approval from the Cityof Central
Point.
Contract for Water Service Extension: Prior to development of Tax Lots 600 or 700,
Applicant will enter into a contractual agreement requiring payment of pro -rata share of
water extension to the area and requiring connection to said system when municipal water
facilities are available.
X. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that Applicant's evidence demonstrates that the applicable approval criteria has been
satisfied. It is therefore recommended that the Jackson County Planning Commission approve the
application with the above -identified conditions of approval.
JACKSON COUNTY PLANNING STAFF
By: CrAMA,(deon, Senior Planner
Date:-//ZY//S—
[I:\ZONING\WP\COMP PLAN N ING\LRP2013-00006 CARD MOO RE JGRA\LRP2013-00006_STAFF-RE PORT. O CX]
Return to Agentla
lP3-
'fagrt Pae eT Page 44 Page 138
Fide: 439-1,RP2013-00006: Cardmaore Propertte.s i97GB Amendment CP -IB
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM -JACKSON COUNTY
To: Craig Anderson, Development Services
From: Kevin Christiansen, Roads
Date: February 02, 2015
RE: Planning File: LRP2013-00006; 36-2W-28, Tax Lots 600, 700, 2100, 2102,
2300,2400.
Minor Map Amendment off Dean Creek Road — a county -maintained road.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application for a Minor Map
Amendment to add app.,01ximatel„ 46 5 acir s tG the City _e Central Point i i -u__ r.-__.�
.,,rr�.,,.,.,.. .. ., �., y„ Central Point � Jaii �iuwui
Boundary north of the Seven Oaks interchange along Blackwell Road. Roads has the
following comments:
1. Please note Dean Creek Road is a County Local Road and is county -maintained.
There is no Average Daily Traffic count for this road. As a comparison of capacity for
Dean Creek Road, the capacity of a two lane rural road with ten foot lanes and no
shoulders is 5,888 ADT.
2. A Road Approach Permit from Jackson County Roads is required for any new or
improved driveway off Dean Creek Road.
3. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road
right-of-way.
4. Please note, Jackson County and the City of Central Point have previously entered
into an Urban Reserve Management Agreement (URMA) which requires the City to
take jurisdiction of County Roads within the urban reserve areas at the time of
annexation. Dean Creek Road would be one of these roads.
If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at 774-6255.
o
9
N
u�I
E
—
U
m
o
a
m
C''.Nsers\anderscrnWppOatalLacal\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Fiies\Con'.entOutlook\C6LEWGGM\LRP 2613-00006 docU
D
V1 45
CAP661115 _ �y'l Q -Page 68 Page
m
C 1 4
O
02/11/201; wl1c tl:18 7Ax 5419264565 dCF� 3 0001/010
REQUEST FOR COMMENT
Jackson County Developmenl Services
10 South Oakdale Avenue, Room 100, Medford, Oregon 97501
Phone: 541-774-6900 Fax: 541-774-679'1
File No: LRP2013-00006 AA -0O2 435-'_RP2013-00906
Date: J2llnafy 20, 2015 JOHN PATTERSON, JACKSON CO FIRE DIST E#3ARSHAL
T0. Agencles and nearby property Owners 8303 AGATE RD
WHITE CITY, OR 97503
A propose'. for e Minor Map Amendment (described below) has been submitted to Jackson County
Development Services for review You are entitled to comment on the appl:calion before the public hearing
is held. Comments should be made to, and additional Information concerning the application may be
obtained from: Development Services, County Offices Huilding, 10 South Ookdale Avenue, Room 100,
Medford OR 97501-2902, or by contacting Craig Anderson, Jackson County residents outside the
Medford toll free arna may cell 1-800-452-5021, ext. 6918; Fax: 541-774-6791. Please respond no later
than February 11, 2015.
Owner/AppllcantiAgent:
Cardmoure Properties at al - Owner
CSA Planning, Ltd. — Agent
Property Legal Descrlpton:
T 35 S, R 2 W, S 28, Tax Lots 600, 700, 2100, 2102, 2300, 2400
Current Zoning:
Exclusive farm Use (BFU), General Industrial (Oq and Urban
Resider l(UR-1)_
Proposal:
Minor Map Amendment to add approximately 46.6 acres to the City of
Central Point Urban Growth Boundary north of (he Seven Oaks
Interchange along Blackwell Road. -
( ) We have no comment.
( Ok) We recommend approval with no special conditions.
( j Th's property is not within ourjuntidictioa
( ) Please address the following concerns should this application be approved:
( ) INVe. encourage denial of this request based on toe follow: ig:
Signature:
Printed Name:
Phone 0.2-8- 'I/D7 Date:.
.Attachments; Zoning I
hNote to Agencies: Il yourproposod conditions o,`approval inolude the dedioa@on of land forpub/lc use or the provision
,ofpubilc imorevemaLis, please submit iwriPen fwding, wifh 56pporBrig data or inlormaton Meiji,sllry the requirements.;
;Specifically, the findings must show that there is an essential connection between your requirements and a'
�legitlmate governtrlenf purpose and that there is a rough proportlonailty between the burden of they
,requlremen t on the developer and the Impacts of the proposed development on public facilities and services.
;Ail requiremonts play ha sMlr,Ny ocrutlnlzed by tho courts and must have legitimate euSdorify sn they will not result in
,a taking of pr'ivafe ---------------------------- ...-__.'
Jackson County Planning Commission
File No. LRP2013-00�006� Exhibit # 16.
CAP061115 —�� —Page 46 Offered by:�ehm1(RaIIC(:vLn'ri 3
Date:`<�Received by.
CAP061115
Thursday, March 12, 2015 Draft
TOLO AREA
CONCEPT PLAN
A CONCEPTUAL LAND USEAND
TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR
CP -1B
AN URBAN RESERVEAREA OF THE CITY OF
CENTRAL POINT
City of Central Paint
Adopted by City Council Resolution No.1419, March 12, 2015
—` Page 76 Page 47
Page 1 of 20
E
x
w
i
PART 1. INTRODUCTION
As part of the Regional Plan Element' it is required that the City prepare and adopt for each
of its eight (B) Urban Reserve Areas (URAs) a Conceptual Land Use Plan' and a Conceptual
Transportation Plan'priorto or In conjunction with an Urban Growth Boundary(UGB)
amendment within a given URA. This document addresses bath conceptual plans, which are
collectively referred to as the CP -19 Concept Plan ('Concept Plan'. Figure 1 Illustrates CP-
1B's relationship to the City and the other URAs.
A
cEHTanc
POINT
il.
1 1
�
7t
I� -e
4:a
JtBf
As used In this report the
term 'concept plan' refers
to a document setting
forth a written and
illustrated set of general
actions designed to
achieve a desired goal that
will be further refined over
time as the planning
process moves from the
general (concept plan) to
the specific (site
development) . In the case
of CP -1B the goal to be
achieved Is a first
generation iefinement of
how the land use
distributions and
applicable performance
indicators of the Greater
Bear Creek Valley Regional
Plan (GBCVRP) will be
applied to CP -113.
The concept plan is a general land use guide prepared in accordance with, and intended to
facilitate implementation of the Regional Plan Element. It does not address compliance with
the Oregon Statewide Land Use Planning Goals, applicability of land use planning law, or
comprehensive plan compliance. These items will be appropriately addressed at some other
'
City of Central Point Ordinance 1964
`City of Central Point Comp rehenslve Plan, Regional Plan Element, 5ection 4.1 Performance Indicators,
subsection 4.1
'City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Regional Plan Element, Section 4.1 Performance Indicators,
subsection 4.1.8
Page 2 of 20
CAP061 115 —"1'Pa9a �t Page 48
time as the area's planning proceeds through UGB amendment, annexation, zoning, site
plan approval, and ultimately development, with each step being guided by the Concept
Plan.
The Concept Plan Illustrates the City's basic development program for CP -1B; which is
presented in Part 2 ofthis document. The remainder of the document (Part 3) Is dedicated
to providing background information used in preparation of the Concept Plan, including
findings of compliance with the land use distribution and applicable Performance Indicators
in the City's Regional Plan Element.
In summary the Concept Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Regional Plan
Element and Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan including all applicable performance
indicators set forth in these documents. The development concept for CP 1B compliments
and supports local and regional objectives relative to land use distribution and needed
transportation corridors identified in the Greater Bear Creek Vollev Rec ional Pion.
PART 2. THE CONCEPT PLAN
The long-term objective for CP -1B is that it will develop as a regionally significant
employment hub that is populated with transportation -oriented uses and
complementary businesses given the URA's proximity to an interchange, access to rail
and location on a state freight route. The area is currently home to aircraft
manufacturer Erickson Air Crane and Cardmoore Trucking. It is viewed as a future
Central Point employment area as it develops and becomes a part of the City. The
Concept Plan is comprised of two elements:
a. The Conceptual Land Use Plan ('Land Use Plan')
The primary objective of the Land Use Plan is to refine the land use
categories and spatial distribution of those categories throughout CP -1B.
This is necessary because the Regional Plan Element only addresses land
use in terms of general land use types, i.e. residential, employment, etc.,
and percentage distribution of the land use.
The Regional Plan Element distributes land uses within CP -113 into one
basic land use classification; employment (100%). Employment land
includes three categories: retail, industrial, and public. The Land Use Plan
for CP -1B refines these allocations by aligning them with the appropriate
Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning designations in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Those designations are illustrated in Figure 2, and
tabulated in Table 1 as follows:
Page 3 of 20
Page 49 Return to Agentla
CAP061115 LJ � „Page 12 Pa g
Industrial. The Comprehensive Plan's industrial designation is
intended to 'establish a strong and diversified sector' and to
'maximize new development opportunities'. Land Use Is broken
down into two categories with the possibility of a third.
• Light Industrial;
• General Industrial;
• Business Park (Business Offices and Service Commercial)
which is compatible with and closely related In nature of
business to uses permitted in the City's M-1 and M-2 zoning
but may be developed independent of those zones.
ii. Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan's commercial designation
is intended to meet the needs of the immediate market area
and not the traveling public In this rasa, retail uses grp internal
and to intended to serve the Tolo Employment area exclusively
and reduce out of area vehicle trips.
iii. Public. Parks and Open Space designation is consistent with the
Regional Plan Element and allows for the continued use and
Improvement of the Bear Creek Greenway system, natural
drainage and agricultural buffers. It also provides opportunities
for passive recreational/open space use.
44.92 Park Public/Open Space
It. The Conceptual Transportation Plan ('Transportation
Plan')
The regionally significant transportation documents affecting CP 1B are
Interstate 5 (1-5), Blackwell Road/OR 140 and the Bear Creek Greenway
Management Plan. The Concept Plan identifies all of these plans (Figure 2,
CP -1B Concept Plan) and Includes policies that encourage the thoughtful
development of the interchange and surrounding properties.
Page 4 of 20
CAP061 115 _l 3(�aa9e za Page 50
c. Implementation Guidelines
The following guidelines are intended to serve as future action items:
Policy CP -18.1 Land Use: At time of inclusion in the City's urban growth
boundary (UGB) the property will be shown on the City's General Land
Use Plan Map as illustrated in the CP 1B Concept Plan, Figure 2 except
where the concept plan depicts a designation that does not currently
exist in the City's Comprehensive Plan. In such cases, the City may apply
a designation it deems appropriate under its current map designations.
Policy CP -113.2 Transportation: At time of inclusion in the City's urban
growth boundary (UGB)the local street network plan, road alignments
and transportation improvements identified in various state plans will
be included in the City's Transportation System's Plan (TSP) as
illustrated Li -he CP Comccipt Pla. , Figure 2 an'u ,vuerc eomum. 1e
City has already adopted IAMP 35 by resolution.
Policy CP -113.3 Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement
(UGBMA): At time of adoption of a revised UGBMA, CP -113 and CP -1C
will take precedence over the Area of Mutual Planning Concern (AMPC)
a geographical area lying beyond the adopted urban growth boundary
in which the City and County have on interest in terms of the area's
types and levels of development land uses environment, agriculture,
and other unique characteristics. However, the City and County will
continue to coordinate land use activity within AMPCs.
Policy CP -1B.4: Committed Residential Density: At time of UGB
Expansion into CP -1B, the county zoned residential land will cease to
exist and residential land uses will become legally non -conforming. The
Conceptual Plan for CP -1B does not include any land designated for
residential uses.
Policy CP -113.5 Forest/Gibbon Acres Unincorporated Containment
Boundary: The City and Jackson County will have adopted an agreement
(Area of Mutual Planning Concern) forthe management of
Forest/Gibbon Acres.
Policy CP -1B.6 Agricultural Mitigation/Buffering: At time of UGB
Expansion into CP -113, the City and County will coordinate with RRVID to
identify, evaluate and prepare potential mitigation. The City will
implement agricultural buffers in accordance with adopted ordinances
at the time of annexation.
Page 5 of 20
CAP061115 —' `3� 74 Page 51
A
CENTRAL
POINT
m
Figure 2. Concept Plan
�edene - •.. ,,.•, To to Area (CP -1B)
CAP061 115 -Lfy_,,. s Page 52
I
m
Figure 2. Concept Plan
�edene - •.. ,,.•, To to Area (CP -1B)
CAP061 115 -Lfy_,,. s Page 52
PART 3. SUPPORT FINDINGS
The findings present in this section provide both background information and address
the Regional Plan Element's Performance Indicators.
a. Current Land Use Characteristics
This section describes the general character of CP -1B in its current condition
Natural Landscape: CP -113 is traversed by multiple creeks and waterways east
and west of the railroad grade which bisects the URA from the northwest to the
southeast. Various ponds and wetlands have formed along the creeks and some
are independentfrom them. Topographically, the land in CP -113 rises 20 to 30
feet from Blackwell Road which forms the eastern boundary of most of the URA
This results in something of a shelfthat is level with the railroad grade. A lot of
developable land is accessible to the railroad on the east and west sides of it.
In spite of the numerous creeks, ponds and wetlands present in the URA, there
are relatively few tax lots that are subject to the flood hazards as shown in
Figure 4. Those areas that are subject to flood zones will be required to perform
mitigation. Aggregate mining sites are mostly located outside the boundaries of
the URA.
Cultural Landscape: CP -1B Is principally oriented to the intersection of a railroad
and an interstate highway. Mines, quarries and mills characterized the town of
Tolo (northwest CP -1B) in the 1860's and it was envisioned to be one of the
biggest cities of Southern Oregon. It was platted In 1888, but was virtually
abandoned by the year 1918. In 1986, the Jackson County Commission returned
the plat to public ownership. The mill sites along the railroad have been reused
for long term storage and truck terminals. Aggregate quarries continue to be
operated outside the boundaries of CP -1B. Limited farming is done east of
Blackwell Road and other land has been subdivided into rural residential lots
west of Tole, Road. It is envisioned that this area could redevelop into a multi-
modal transport hub where cargo owners agree to move the goods by at least
two modes of transport under a single contract. Other employment is also
planned in the future under the jurisdiction of the City of Central Point.
Page 8 of 20
I , Return to Agenda
CAP061115 "t 3W,,ge n Page 54
A
CENTRAL
POINT
N
AFigure 4. Flood Hazards
lei enJ
Flood Zones 1011 Wo Area (CP -1 B�
l Concept Plan
`-----vm ezone Coo yp
CP -'3 _ %Shi ded(500Yp
Dae: 10113/2014
Page 9 of 20
CAP0e1115 _Lilt9 a Page 55
b. Current Land Use Designations & Zoning
Jackson County zoning acknowledges the unique geographic features of CP -1B
by designating land for both General Industrial and Interchange Commercial
uses. The area's proximity to the Interstate and the railroad justified these land
use designations originally and they are expanded in the Greater Bear Creek
Valley Regional Plan under the general category of Employment land. The
remainder of the land uses in the County's plan are as shown In Figure 5.
A
CENTRAL
POINT
N
�
' ` Figure 5. Zoning
I epentl
7l�7----r
I -t, 1c1V 0'1
Tolo Area (CP -1 ei
""'m Concept Plan
Page 10 of 20
CAP061115 -L1l1q9 Page 56
A comparison of the existing and proposed land uses are reflected in Table 2.
The proposed city zoning will be exclusively employment based in keeping with
the Regional Plan.
c. Existing Infrastructure
Water
Currently, public water service is not available to CP -1B, and will have to be
extended from the vicinity of Erickson Air -Crane property.
Sanitary Sewer
CP -113 Is In the RVSS service area and there are trunk lines east of the URA and
along Blackwell Road (Figure 6). More lines will have to be extended to the area.
Storm Drainage
CP -18 does not have an improved storm drainage system and relies upon
natural drainage and drainage from road Improvements to channel water to
Bear Creek.
Street System
CP -1B is accessed via 1-5 Exit 33, Blackwell Road, Dean Creek Road, Tolo Road,
and Marta Terrace. TAMP 35 and the OR 140 Corridor Plan dictate the nature of
improvements over the next 20 year period. These documents call for an
internal circulation plan which the concept plan proposes in Figure 2. The Bear
Creek Greenway will be extended through URA CP -4D into and around CP -1B by
taking advantage of open space and flocdways in Jackson County.
Irrigation District
CP -1B is located within the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District (RRVID).
Irrigation water is transferred via natural means, There are no dedicated
irrigation canals (Figure 7).
Page 11 of 20
CAP061 115 — `f gjee 80 Page 57
T
-
Ffii:.
�,e.,
,g3i:4
vr,l3rr
The proposed city zoning will be exclusively employment based in keeping with
the Regional Plan.
c. Existing Infrastructure
Water
Currently, public water service is not available to CP -1B, and will have to be
extended from the vicinity of Erickson Air -Crane property.
Sanitary Sewer
CP -113 Is In the RVSS service area and there are trunk lines east of the URA and
along Blackwell Road (Figure 6). More lines will have to be extended to the area.
Storm Drainage
CP -18 does not have an improved storm drainage system and relies upon
natural drainage and drainage from road Improvements to channel water to
Bear Creek.
Street System
CP -1B is accessed via 1-5 Exit 33, Blackwell Road, Dean Creek Road, Tolo Road,
and Marta Terrace. TAMP 35 and the OR 140 Corridor Plan dictate the nature of
improvements over the next 20 year period. These documents call for an
internal circulation plan which the concept plan proposes in Figure 2. The Bear
Creek Greenway will be extended through URA CP -4D into and around CP -1B by
taking advantage of open space and flocdways in Jackson County.
Irrigation District
CP -1B is located within the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District (RRVID).
Irrigation water is transferred via natural means, There are no dedicated
irrigation canals (Figure 7).
Page 11 of 20
CAP061 115 — `f gjee 80 Page 57
A
CENTRAL
POINT
N
A Figure 6. Utilities
Legend Tolo Area (CP -113)
L= ==s® Concept Plan
.,mni va,e wmenne
cP-10
Date: 10113/2014
Page 12 of 20
CAP061115 _`111 Page 58
A _
CENTRAL
POINT
0
I
I
i,
I �
rTT -- -
CAP061115 _tA1I Page 59
A�n
CP 18
_
-:
_
L
IbI
�. ��
......
ILL
_ �•1
. Y
_L�`
1.
.��
�
...
I�.:�i 11'I-
j
�� IIS ��
Li
.✓J
I _
AFigure
7lrrigation
Legcna
Tolo Area (CP -18(
AREA-
Concept Plan
p........5
V..vv.vl
OP 19
%x° �. I'n9aRL
Lana nRvlo
-
CAP061115 _tA1I Page 59
d. Performance Indicators
Implementation of the Regional Plan Element is guided by a series of twenty-
two (22) primary and twenty-one (21) secondary performance indicators", not
all of which are applicable to all urban reserve areas. Table 3 identifies the
primary Performance Indicators applicable to the CP -1B Concept Plan.
Description
yes No
City Adoption
X
Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement
X
011 111111% mffllmaiil�
�N=
Minimum Residential Density Standards
X
Conceptual Transportation Plan
X
Conceptual Land Use Plan
X
Land Use Distribution
X
Mixed Use/ Pedestrian Friendly Areas
X
CP 1B, [AMP Requirement
X
CP -4D, Roadways Restriction
X
Central Point URA, Gibbon/Forest Acres
X
Land
Urban
Land Divisions & Transportation Plan X
Rural Residential Rule X
Greater Coordination with RVMPO X
°
City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Regional Plan Element, Section 41 Performance
lodlcatars
Page 14 of 20
CAP061115 —ye 83 Page 60
Protection of Planned Transportation
Infrastructure
r t.__r4} tisat
Oil, <n�wswfKve�N�i::'"..'wiO,O
e. Applicable Performance Indicators
The following addresses each applicable performance indicator perTable 3:
4.1.2. City Adoption. The City has Incorporated the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional
Plan (GBCVRP) into the Central Point Comprehensive Plan as the Regional Plan Element.
Finding: The GBCVRP has been taken into account in the preparation of this Conceptual
Plan.
Conclusion 4.1.2: Complies.
4.1.3. Urban Reserve Management Agreement. An URMA was adopted by the City
when it adopted its Regional Plan Element.
Finding: The URMA has been taken into account In the preparation ofthls Conceptual
Plan.
Conclusion 4.1.3: Complies.
4.1.4. Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement. The UGBMA between Central
Point and Jackson County has recently been revised to institutlorr and dlrretthe
management of Forest/Gibbon Acres as an Area of Mutual Planning Concern. Other
changes inthe agreement add an intent and purpose statement, align procedural
language with the County Comprehensive Plan and obligate the City and County to
Involve affected Irrigation Districts in the land use planning process.
Finding: The UGBMA has been taken into account In the preparation of this Conceptual
Plan.
Conclusion 4.1.4: Complies.
4.1.6. Mixed Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas. for land within a URA, each city shall
achieve the 2020 Benchmark targets for employment (Alternative Measure No. 6) as
established in the most recently adopted RTP.
Page 15 of 20
CAP061115 - � cI 5age 84 Page 61
Finding: The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Appendix B, Page 10 lists a 44% mixed-
use employment target for new development by 2020. New land use categories In the
Conceptual Plan can be adapted to create walkable/mixed use neighborhoods in Cl
Conclusion 4.1.6: Complies.
4.1.7. Conceptual Transportation Plans. Conceptual Transportation Plans shall be
prepared early enough in the planning and development cycle that the identified
regionally significant transportation corridors within each of the URAs can be protected
as cost-effectively as possible by available strategies and funding. A Conceptual
Transportation Plan for a URA or appropriate portion of a URA shall be prepared by the
City in collaboration with the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization,
applicable irrigation districts, Jackson County, and other affected agencies, and shall be
adopted by Jackson County and the respective city priorto or in conjunction with a UGB
amendment within that URA.
4.1.7.1. Transportation Infrastructure. The Conceptual Transportation Plan shall
Identify a general network of regionally significant arterials under local
jurisdiction, transit corridors, bike and pedestrian paths, and associated projects
to provide mobility throughout the Region (including intra -city and inter -city, if
applicable).
Finding: The regionally significant transportation corridor within Cl is the OR
140 Corridor which extends from 1-5 Exit 35 to Browns boro-Eagle Point Road.
Additionally, the Interchange Area Management Plan for Exit 35 (TAMP -35)
identifies public improvements and projects that have been taken into
consideration as part of the CP -1B Conceptual Plan. The Bear Creek Greenway
system, which is predominantly pedestrian and bicycle oriented affects part but
not all of CP -1B. The Concept Plan acknowledges the proximity of the Bear
Creek Greenway system. The plan generally represents an enhanced local street
network and access management improvements that are proposed in the OR
140 Corridor Plan and in AlI
Conclusion 4.1.7.1: Complies.
4.1.8. Conceptual Land Use Plans: A proposal for a UGB Amendment into a designated
URA shall include a Conceptual Land Use Plan prepared by the City in collaboration with
the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts,
Jackson County, and other affected agencies for the area proposed to be added to the
UGB as follows:
Page 16 of 20
CAP061 115 — 'Aquae as Page 62
4.1.8.2. Land Use Distribution. The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall indicate how
the proposal is consistent with the general distribution of land uses In the
Regional Plan, especially where a specific set of land uses were part of the
rationale for designating land which was determined by the Resource Lands
Review Committee to be commercial agricultural land as part of a URA, which
applies to the following URAs: CP -1B, CP -1C, CP -4D, CP -6A, CP -2B, MD -4, MD -6,
MD-7mid, MD -7n, PH -2, TA -2, TA -4.
Finding: As illustrated in Table 4 the proposed land use distributions in the CP -
113 Concept Plan are consistent with those presented in the Regional Plan
Element,
Conclusion 4.1.8.2: Complies.
- All acreage figures rounded to nearest whole eurnber.
4.1.8.3. Transportation Infrastructure, The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall
include the transportation infrastructure required in Section 4.1.7 above.
Finding: The required transportation infrastructure per 4.1.7 is included in the
CP -1B Concept Plan (see Finding 4.1.7).
Conclusion 4.1.8.3: Complies
4.1.8.4. Mixed Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas. For land within a URA, each city
shall achieve the 2020 Benchmark targets for employment (Alternative Measure
No. 6) as established in the most recently adopted RTP.
Finding: The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Appendix B, Page 10 lists a 44%
mixed-use employment target for new development by 2020. New land use
categories in the Conceptual Plan can be adapted to create walkable/mixed use
neighborhoods in CP -1B.
Conclusion 4.1.8.4: Complies
Page 17 of 20
CAP061115 Page 86 g
U1� Pa a 63 Return to Agentla
-Z� l�
4.1.9. Conditions. The following conditions apply to specific Urban Reserve Areas:
4.1.9.1. CP -18. Prior to the expansion of the UGB into CP -1B, ODOT, Jackson
County and Central Point shall adopt and Interchange Area Management Plan
(IAMP) for the Seven Oaks Interchange Area.
Finding: As noted In Section 4.1.7.1, the CP -18 Concept Plan Is consistent with
the Regional Plan Element's Conceptual Transportation Plan, in that IAMP-3S
management strategies have been acknowledged and incorporated. The State,
County and City have each formally adapted IAMP-35.
Conclusion 4.1.9.1: Complies.
4.1.9.5 Central Point URA, Gibbon/Forest Acres. Prior to the expansion of the
Central Point Urban Growth Boundary into any Urban Reserve Area, the City
and larksnn GnHnty shall adnnt an agreement (Area of Miitiial Planning
Concern)forthe management of Gibbons/Forest Acres Unincorporated
Containment Boundary.
Finding: The City has coordinated with Jackson County and entered into an Area
of Mutual Planning Concern Agreement priorto a UGB expansion into CP -18.
Conclusion 4.1.9.5: Complies
4.1.10. Agricultural Buffering. Participating jurisdictions designating Urban Reserve
Areas shall adopt the Regional Agricultural Buffering program in Volume 2, Appendix III
into their Comprehensive Plans as part of the adoption of the Regional Plan. The
agricultural buffering standards in Volume 2, Appendix III shall be adopted into their
land development codes prior to a UGB amendment.
Finding: CP -1B abuts EFU zoned lands along various sides of its borders (see Figure 5).
There are some instances where buffering will be facilitated by natural stream channels
and public rights-of-way. Some buffering has been shown in the Concept Plan (see
Figure 2). In all cases, during the design/development phase, the City will implement its
Agricultural Buffering Ordinance to mitigate potential land use conflicts.
Conclusion 4.1.10: Complies.
4.1.13. Urban Growth Boundary Amendment. Pursuant to ORS 197.298 and Oregon
Administrative Rule 660-021-0060, URAs designated in the Regional Plan are the first
priority lands used for a UGB amendment by participating cities.
Page 18 of 20
CAP061 115 — f tet) Page 87 Page 64
Finding: The Regional Plan Element includes a provision that requires adoption of a
concept plan prior to urban growth boundary expansion into an urban reserve area.
The area coming into the UGB is part of the urban reserve for which this Conceptual
Plan has been prepared and therefore complies with the Regional Plan and the priority
system of the ORS and OAR.
Conclusion 4.1.13: Complies.
4.1.14. Land Division Restrictions. In addition to the provisions of Oregon
Administrative Rule 660-021-0040, the following apply to lots or parcels which are
located within a URA until they are annexed into a city:
4.1.14.4. Land divisions within a URA shall not be in conflict with the
transportation infrastructure identified in an adopted Conceptual
Transportation Plan,
Finding: The CP -1B Concept Plan was prepared in collaboration with Jackson
County and the RVMPO. Policies in the City -County UGBMA ensure continued
notification and coordination of Infrastructure with proposed land divisions.
Conclusion 4.1.14.4: Complies.
4.1.17. Greater Coordination with the RVMPO. The participating jurisdictions shall
collaborate with the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Organization (RVMPO) to:
4.1.17.1.Prepare the Conceptual Transportation Plans identified in Section 4.1.7.
4.1.17.2, Designate and protect the transportation infrastructure required In the
Conceptual Transportation Plans identified in Section 4.1.7 to ensure adequate
transportation connectivity, multimodal use, and minimize right of way costs.
4.1.17.3. Plan and coordinate the regionally significant transportation strategies
critical to the success of the adopted Regional Plan including the development
of mechanisms to preserve rights-of-way for the transportation infrastructure
identified in the Conceptual Transportation Plans; and
4.1.17.4. Establish a means of providing supplemental transportation funding to
mitigate impacts arising from future growth.
Finding: The RVMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) determined that
Conceptual Plan CP -1B complies with the Regional Plan Part 3 -Goals, Policies
and Potential Actions. The TAC voted unanimously to endorse CP -13 and to
support its Implementation.
Conclusion 4.1.17: Complies.
(� Page 19 of 20
CAP061 115 -� Page 65
4.1.18. Future Coordination with the RVCOG. The participating jurisdictions shall
collaborate with the Rogue Valley Council of Governments on future regional planning
that assists the participating jurisdictions In complying with the Regional Plan
performance Indicators. This includes cooperation in a region -wide conceptual planning
process if funding is secured.
Finding: The CP -1B Concept Plan was prepared in collaboration with the RVCOG.
Conclusion 4.1.18: Complies.
4.1.20. Agricultural Task Force. The Agricultural Task Force shall develop a program to
assess the impacts on the agricultural economy of Jackson County arising from the lass
of agricultural land and/or the ability to irrigate agricultural land, which may result from
Urban Growth Boundary Amendments. The Agricultural Task Farce shall also identify,
develop and recommend potential mitigation measures, including financial strategies to
offset those impacts. Appropriate mitigation measures shall be applied to Urban Growth
Boundary Amendment proposals,
Finding: The efforts of the County's Agricultural Task Force were considered in the
preparation of this plan. The CP -1B Concept Plan is consistent with the Regional Plan
Element, is consistent with the City -County UGBMA (which directs consultation with
affected Irrigation districts during UGB planning) and is also consistent with new policies
found in Jackson County's Agricultural Lands Element resulting from ATF
recommendations.
Conclusion 4.1.20: Complies.
Page 20 of 20
1 Ic'\Q-- Return to Agenda
CAP661115_l Wge 89 Page 66
01 cgu(Danar Imost of( ons,irt a(—
R
13, r Ari,( 6
I (ISI /v l l pc Road
WI ( Cly CR97501
�/' 9541,774-6196
Oregon
ti... y✓'� FAX 5541 774 6399
:K, e 6rowo, Uorcvnor
April 2B, 2015
KIMBERLY PARDUCCI, PE AND PTOE
SOUTHERN OREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, LLC
112 MONTEREY DRIVE
MEDFORD, OR 97504
Re: Addendum to Minor Map Amendment Traffic Impact Study—CardmoorePropertiesetal—
Owner, CSA Planning, Ltd. - Agent (LRP2013-00006).
TLtauk you for the opportunity to review the addendum (April 14, 2015) to the naffie impact study CIS)
associated with a Minor Map Amendment to add approximately 46 ,5 acres of unincorporated Jackson County
lands to the City of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The Minor Map Amendment proposes a
change in map designation from Agricultural I and, Urban Residential Land, and Industrial Land to Industrial
within the City of Central Point. The properties in question are Located north of Interchange 35 along
Blackwell Road (OR 140). 36-2W-29, Tax Lots 600, 700, 2100, 2102, 2300 and 2400.
ODOT staff has reviewed the addendum to the TIS associated with this proposal and determined that it
adequately addresses potential impacts to the slate's transportation facility.
You may contact me at 541-774-6399 if you have any further questions or require additional information.
Please contact William Fitzgerald at 541-774-6359 or Ron Hughes at 541-957-3696 if you have airy further
questions or require additional information regarding traffic engineering issues.
�):�
mseortation Planner, Davetopmcnt Review
Cc:
CAP061 115 —q Y Q.; ea Page 67
Jackson County Planning Commission
File No. LRP2013-00006 Exhibit 4 28.
Offered by_L07
Date4 -= O U in, Received by: LM
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP (MINOR) TO ADD
APPROXIMATELY 47 ACRES TO THE CENTRAL POINT URBAN GROWTH
BOUNDARY NORTH OF INTERSTATE 5, EAST AND WEST OF BLACKWELL ROAD
IN THE VICINITY OF THE SEVEN OAKS INTERCHANGE (EXIT 35) INCLUDING
PORTIONS OF DEAN CREEK ROAD
Recitals:
1. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute
(ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and
implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning
Goals.
2. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with
ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals
and compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans.
3. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may
amend the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary with Jackson County which
was originally adopted on September 26, 1984 and has been amended at
various times since.
4. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.96.100
Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments — Purpose
and Chapter 17.05.010, Applications and Development Permit Review
Procedures, the City has accepted an application and conducted the following
duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendment:
a) Planning Commission hearing on May 7, 2015
b) City Council hearings on June 11, 2015 and June 25, 2015.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the
findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the City staff report, File No. 14009
and public records; determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires
justify the amendments and hereby adopts the changes entirely.
Section 2. The City Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) is hereby amended as set
forth in Exhibit 1 which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
CAP061115 Page 91
Section 3. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement
procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the UGB.
Section 4. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
day of , 20
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 92
CAP061115
Exhibit A
Resolutions
Annual Budget
Resolutions
CAP061115 Page 94
Ak
Staff Report CENTRAL
POINT
O.r_an
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Bev Adams, Finance Director
Meeting Date: June 11, 2015
Finance Department
Bev Adams, Finance Director
Subject: Budget resolutions:
A resolution to certify municipal services provided by the City
A resolution electing to receive State Revenue Sharing funds
A resolution to adopt the 2015117 budget & levy taxes
Summa
1) The first resolution certifies the provision of City services and is required in order to receive state
cigarette, liquor, and highway taxes. We have budgeted $2,592,300 from these resources in the
next two years.
2) The second resolution requests and qualifies the City to receive $389,000 in state revenue sharing
funds. Note: A second public hearing is required tonight prior to adoption of this resolution.
3) The final resolution is to adopt the budget, make appropriations, and levy taxes for the 2015117
biennial budget period. Total budget to be appropriated is $42,831,087; with a tax levy for $4.47
per thousand of assessed value. Total estimated (budgeted) property taxes to be received during
the biennial budget period are $1o,168,oco.
The first two resolutions required by the State of Oregon can only be adopted for the ensuing fiscal year.
Even though the state allows for the biennial budget process, they will not allow cities to adopt these
resolutions for the two year period.
Following the attached resolutions is a copy of the 2015117 biennial budget as approved by the budget
committee for your information and review.
Recommended Action:
1. Hold a public hearing for citizens to ask questions or comment on the proposed use of State
Revenue Sharing funds, and for the purpose of allowing citizens to comment on or ask questions
about the approved budget as a whole.
2. Approve the attached resolutions.
CAP061115 Page 95
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL
SERVICES BY THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON
Recitals
ORS 221.76o provides that for cities located within counties having population over
noo,000 to receive state revenues from cigarette, gas and liquor taxes, the State of Oregon
must be satisfied that the City provides certain municipal services.
Therefore, the City of Central Point resolves as follows:
That the citizens of Central Point are provided the following services;
• Police protection
• Street construction, maintenance and lighting
• Storm sewers
• Planning, zoning and subdivision control
• Water utilities
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage
on June n, 2015.
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 96
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ELECTING TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUE SHARING
FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2015 - JUNE 30, 2o16
Recitals:
The State of Oregon sets forth requirements for eligibility of State Revenue Sharing funds.
The City of Central Point has qualified and desires to receive such funds.
'therefore, the City of Central Point resolves as follows:
Section 1. The City hereby elects to receive distribution under ORS 221.770 of the State
Revenue Sharing funds.
Section 2. The City hereby certifies as follows:
A. The City held a public hearing, after adequate public notice, before the
Budget Committee on April 13, 2015 at which time citizens had the
opportunity to provide written and oral comment to the City Council on
the possible uses of State Revenue Sharing funds.
B. The City held a second public hearing, after adequate public notice, before
the City Council on June n, 2015, at which time citizens had the opportunity
to provide written and oral comment to, and ask questions of the City
Council on the proposed use of State Revenue Sharing funds in relation to
the entire budget of the City for the biennial budget period of July r, 2o15
through June 30, 2017.
C. The City has levied a property tax for the year proceeding the year in which
State Revenue Sharing funds are sought hereunder and pursuant to ORS
471.81 o.
Section z. A copy of this resolution shall be filed with the executive department of the
State of Oregon no later than July 31, 2015.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage
Of' Julie 11, 2015.
Mayor Hanle Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Return to Agenda
CAP061115 Page 97
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE BUDGET; MAKE APPROPRIATIONS
AND LEVY TAXES FOR THE BIENNIAL BUDGET PERIOD
JULY 1, 2015 THROUGH June 30, 2017
RECITALS.
A. Oregon statute (ORS 294326) requires municipalities to prepare and adopt a
financial plan (budget) containing estimates of revenues and expenditures in
compliance with Oregon budget laws prior to making expenditures or tax
certification.
B. No increases were made to the proposed tax levy of the approved budget, nor were
any budget estimates increased more than m% as limited by law.
C. A public hearing was duly held by the City Council of Central Point, Oregon on
June n, 2015 for the approved biennial budget in the amount of $42,831,087.
The City of Central Point resolves as follows:
To adopt the budget, make appropriations and levy taxes for the biennial budget period
beginning July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2017.
Section 1. Taxes and other receipts of the City of Central Point are hereby appropriated
for the purposes set forth below.
Fund/Object Classification Appropriation FTE
General Fund
General Fund
-Administration
1,493,200
3 5
General Fund-
City Enhancement
4o8,000
0
General Fund-
Technical Services
1,134,050
2.0
General Fund
- Mayor&Council
123,100
0
General Fund
- Finance
1,617,300
6.0
General Fund
- Parks
1,796,670
4.0
General Fund
- Recreation
1,109,350
2.0
General Fund
- Planning
1,126,150
4 5
General Fund
- Police
8,781,750
31.0
General Fund
- Interdepartmental
2,280,920
0
Total General Fund
19,870,490
53.0
CAP061115 Page 98
Fund/Object Classification Appropriation FTE
High Tech Crime Fund
High Tech Crime Fund - Operations 108,525 0
High Tech Crime Fund - Interdepartmental 20,000 0
Total High Tech Crime Fund 128,525 0
Street Fund
Street Fund - Operations/Capital Projects 4,2o6,00g 5.0
Street Fund - SDC Capital Projects 96o,8o0 0
Street Fund - Interdepartmental 1,625,851 0
Total Street Fund 6,792,660 5.0
Housing Fund
Housing Fund - Materials & Services o 0
Housing Fund -Interdepartmental 0 0
Total Housing Fund o 0
Capital Improvements Fund
Capital Improvements Fund -Park Capital Projects o 0
Capital Improvements Fund -Park SDC Capital Projects 278,900 0
Capital Improvements Fund -Interdepartmental 198,855 0
Total Capital Improvements Fund 477,755 0
Reserve Fund
Reserve Fund -Capital Projects o 0
Reserve Fund -Interdepartmental 628,850 0
Total Reserve Fund 628,850 0
Debt Service Fund
Debt Service Fund - Debt Service 1,283,880 0
Debt Service Fund - Ending Balance 37,767 0
Total Debt Service Fund 1,321,647 0
Buildina Fund
Building Fund - Personnel Services 338,020 2.0
Building Fund - Materials&Services 53,900 0
Building Fund - Interdepartmental 181,305 0
Total Building Fund 573,225 2.0
CAP061115 Page 99
Fund/Object Classification
Appropriation FTE
Water Fund
559,500 0
Water Fund-Operations/Capital Projects
6,371,450 7.0
Water Fund -SDC Water Improvements
150,000 0
Water Fund -Interdepartmental
i.iai.cec o
Total Water Fund 7,712,995 7.0
Stormwater Fund
Stormwater Fund - Operations/Ca pita l Projects 1,602,740 2.0
Stormwater Fund - Quality 274,000 0
Stormwater Fund -SDC Capital Projects 113,46o 0
Stormwater Fund -Interdepartmental 704,36o 0
Total Stormwater Fund 2,694,56o 2.0
Internal Services Fund
Internal Services
Fund-
Facilities Maintenance
559,500 0
Internal Services
Fund-
Public Works Administration
1,192,600 5
Internal Services
Fund-
Fleet Maintenance
762,600 1
Internal Services
Fund
-Interdepartmental
u5,68o 0
Total Internal Services Fund
2,630,38o 6.o
Total All Funds 42,831,o87 75.0
Section z. As authorized by law and the Charter of the City of Central Point, Oregon,
there is hereby levied upon the taxable property of said city as shown on the tax rolls of
Jackson County, Oregon, for fiscal year 2015-17, the rate of $4.47 per $1,000 of assessed
valuation for general government purposes, as follows:
Subject to Not Subject to
General Fund Measure 5 Limits Measures Limits Total
Permanent rate limit tax $5.812 $5.8128
TOTAL LEVY $447 $447
CAP061 115 Page 100
Section a. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to enter the appropriation for each
organizational unit, program, and division of the budget separately on the proper books
and records as prescribed by law; and is further directed to certify to the Assessor of
Jackson County, Oregon, the levy of taxes of the City of Central Point, Oregon, and to
take all other steps with regard to said budget and levy as required by law.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage
on June 11, 2015.
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder Deanna Casey, MMC
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 101
City of Central Point
2015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 BudgeVU Wanslsx Page 102
(ApprovediReady to
be adopted)
General Fund - Revenues
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
]0-00-00-4205
Property Tax -Current
4,177,584
4,3o8,26i
4,So6,000
9,693,000
20-00-00-4110
Property Tax -Prior Years
204,139
238,508
200,0001
475,000
10-00-00-4120
Hotel/Motel Room Tax
418,484
373342
3940001
785,000
20-00-00-4230
Franchise - Cable TV
134,33q_
139,064
135,0001
270,000
10-00-00-4235
Franchise- Electric
547,210
578,642
545,0001
1,100,000
10-00-0-0-4240
Franchise - Garbage
123,580
127,224
124,000
250,000
10-00-00-4245
,Franchise- Natural Gas
169,844
173,404
180,000i
350,000
ro-oo-oo-4250
,Franchise - Telephone
44,019
46,527
45,0001
90,000
10-00-00-416o
iFranchise- General Utility License Fee
a
D,
o1
150,000
Total Taxes
5,819,200,
5,984,9721
6,125,000;
13,163,000
20-00-00-4220
Business License
505731
52,2801
57,000.
115,000
1D
-0o-00-4215
Business License Misc.
1,140
1,8001
2,00011
3,700
10-00
00-4220
Liquor License
120.
1,8451
Soo
1,850
Total Licenses & Fees
51,833.
55,9251
59,500
120,550
2n-00-00-4320
Federal Grants(CMAQ)
41,993,
153001
20,000
0
10-00-00-4330
State Grants 1
91,3501
48,7361
0
30,000
20-00-00-4355
State 911 Telephone Tax
90,0001
0
0
0
10
-0D
-0o -436o
State Cigarette Tax
24,5131
23,273
21,000
38,500
10-00-00-4365
State Liquor Tax
229,9641
238,
235,000
557,000
20-00-00-4370
State Marijuana Tax
o1
0
0
60,000
10-00-00-4375
State Revenue Sharing 11
142,3371
141,5941
168,000
389,500
20-00-00-4380
Jurisdictional Exchange (School Dist. #6) 1
of
53,1001
53,100
110,990
Total Intergovernmental
620,1571
520,3891
497,100
1,185,990
10-00-00-4425
City Overhead Fees l645,C)Ci
688,DCi
833,000
1,666,000
10-00-00-4420
Urban Renewal Services
o
0
0
20,000
10-00-00-4430
Lien Search Fees
13,795(
10,4501
10,000
20,000
20-00-00-4435
Park Use Fees
8,918
15,9351,
8,000
22,000
10
00-00-4445
Planning Services5,548
36,5391
39,000
102,000
--
r�r�e x.v,.eo
ll
vl
3,4`cy
u'.
o'✓ -6
20-0-0-00-4449
(Public Safety Fee
D
a
0
150,000
10-oo-oo
,452
1Park & Recreation Fee
31,2321
01
5,000,
150,000
10-00-00-4455
,Recreation Fees
63,2061
67,8141
80,0001
153,000
10-00-00-4469
,Administrative Fees
16,7001
26,0751
17,500
30,000
10-00-00-4475
1Vehicle Towing1,20D1
1,2751
2,000
1,700
1Total Charges for Service
785,5981
849,4971
994,500,
2,320,700
2015.17 BudgeVU Wanslsx Page 102
City of Central Point
2015/17 Biennial Budget
10-00-00-4510
IMunicipal Court Fines
io6,3oo
74,517
70,000
110,000
10-00-00-4511
Municipal Court Collection Int
11145
20,313
10,000
20,000
10-00-00-4515
_
.District Court Fines
19,4941
36,793
25,000
50,000
10-00-00-4520
Court Diversion Fees
42,1821
8,473
0
0
Total Fines & Forfeitures
181,1211
140,096
105,000
180,000
10-00-00-4710
'Interest Income
31,4421
28,453
30,000
10,000
10-00-00-4715
Loan Interest Income- Urban Renewal Loan
o
2,500
2,500
5,000
'Total Interest income
31,442
30,953.
32,500
35,000
10-00-00-4810
Miscellaneous Revenue
89,9861
124,945
25,0001
80,000
10-00-00-4811
_
(Parks & Recreation Events
83,2891
104,987.
105,0001
250,000
10-00-00-4815
('!Parks & Recreation Donations
2961
1,053_
110001
2,000
10-00-004820
(Police Donations Private Grant
501
1,410,
1,000
2,000
10-00-00-4823
Police - DARE Donations
5,6851
6,819
5,0001
10,000
Total Miscellaneous
179,3o61
239,213.
137,000.
344,000
10-00-00-4910
Transfers In
of
0
01
20,000
Total Transfers
o1
0
0
20,000
10-00-00-4010
Carryover Balance
3,201,2311
2,553,192
2,346,o601
2,501,250
Total Carryover Balance
3,201,2311
2,553,192
2,346,oGoi
2,501,250
NOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES
10,869,8881
10,374,2371
10,296,66o
19,870,490
2015.17 Sud 6AVQfst6l1NIs% Page 103
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 3udg9WPpIsVl0Nlsx Page 104
General Fund - Administration
1 2012/13
1 2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
I Actual
I Budget
Adopted
1010-00-5010
Salaries & Wages
348,0081
322,3371
296,800
635,600
1010-00-5030
Part-time Wages
0
01
45,400
93,200
io-to-00-_5_560
City Taxes and Benefits
212,562
1g3d161
165,900
164,400
Total Personnel Services
560,5701
475,6531
508,100
1,093,200
10-l0-00-6110
City Facilities Rental
24,00024,000
1
24,0001
48,000
10-10-00-6210
Advertising/Legal Notices
3,324
5,549
3,5oa1
11,000
10-10-00-627o
Lease/Rentals
4,741
4,1731
5,5001
11,000
10-10-00-6280
Travel/Training
1 17,7781
11,9951
12,000
24,000
10-10-00-6350
Professional Services
68,399
75,4811
90,000
180,000
10-10-00-6360
Contract/Other Services
35,375
2g, 5171
.7,500
65,000
10-10-00-6470
Employee Involvement Programs
8,984
3,6191
6,5oai
13,000
10
-lo
-o0
-652o
Equipment Repair/Maintenance
1540
1,000
2,000
10-10-D0-6610
Books/Publications
1,1zo
1,8151
3,5001
7,000
loco-oo-664o
Dues/Licenses
1,860
2,9841
4,500
9,000
10-10-00-6650
(Food
1,7071
7921
2,0001
4,000
1010-00-6680
(Office/Shop Supplies
1,7241
2,9281
3,500
7,000
10-1a-ao-6690
,Postage
1
1,1091
2,845
2,000
6,000
10-10-00-6695
'Sm. EquildJocls/Furniture
4,4261
443
2,500
5,000
1010-00-6740
1Phone/Internet
3,4981
2,777
5,000
8,000
',Total Materials & Services
178,1991
168,9181
193,000
400,000
Total Administration
738,7691
644,5711
701,100
1,493,200
General Fund - City Enhancement
2012/13
2013/34
2014/15
2015/17
Account
IDescri tion
Actual
Actual
Bud et
Ado ted
1010-15-6410
Community Events
12,863
8902
0
24,000
10-10-15-6420
(Downtown Revitalization
16,051
27,271
35,0001
60,000
101015-6421
(City Financing/Loans
125,000
0
184,6001
0
1010-15-6422
Utility Discount
14,4400,522
15,000
30,000
10-10-15-6437
Parks &Recreation Donation (BOB)
0
9,4711
25, 00a
50,000
10-10-15-6440
Food and Friends Program
12,000
12,000
13,000
24,000
10-1015-6450
Tourism Promotion
91,889
122,169
111,5001
220,000
(Total Materials & Services
272,1441
191,3361
383„1001
408,000
Total City Enhancement
272,2441
191,3361
383,1001
408,000
2015.17 3udg9WPpIsVl0Nlsx Page 104
City of Central Point
2015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 BudgeV(p10Br9tl$IS% Page 105
,General Fund - Technical Services
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Bud etAda
ted
10-10-35-5010
Salaries & Wages
145,791
152,049
164,10011
351,300
10-10-35-5020
(Overtime Wages
189
1,356
3,000'
6,000
10-10-35-556o
1Cit Taxes and Benefits
61,768
65,859
75,3001
161,750
Total Personnel Services
207,7491
21q,263
242,4001
519,050
10-10-35-6no
City Facilities Rental
5,0001
5,0001
5,0001
20,000
10-10-35-628o
Travel/Training
9,204
10,5781
10,000
20,000
10-10-35-635o
Professional Services
66
1201
5,000
15,000
10-10-35-6360
Contract/Other Services
396
1,2811
6,000
51500
10-10-35-655o
Computer Software Maintenance
78,36o
85,5861
89,0oo
226,000
10-10-35-6610
Books/Publications
o
0
500
1,000
10-10-35-6630
Computer Hardware/Software
56,667
127,7701
93,000
140,500
10-10-35-664o
Dues/Licenses
169
01
500
1,Doo
10-10-35-6680
1Office/Shop Supplies
1,002
410
2,0001
2,000
10-10-35-6695
Sm. Equip/Tools/Furniture
2,408
2,14411
2,0.0
4,000
10-10-35-6740
(Phone/Internet
1 21,986.
22,6831
25,000
50,000
'Total Materials & Services
175,257,
255,573
238,000
485,000
10-10-35-7152
Computer Hardware/Software
116,818
23,575
68,000
130,000
Total Capital Outlay
116,818
23,5751
68,000.
130,000
'Total Technical Services
499,8251
498,4111
548,400
1,134,050
General Fund - Mayor & Council
I
1
2012/13
1 2ot3/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
I Actual
Budget
Adopted
10-15-00-5010
Salaries & Wages
13,800
13,800
13,800,
27,600
10-15-oo-556o
Cit Taxes and Benefits
111091
1,109,
1,200
3,000
Total Personnel Services
14,9091
14,908
15,0001
3o,600
10-15-00-6280
(Travel/Training
2,6161
1,765,
7,00011
14,000
1. -15
-Do -6350
(Professional Services
_
1991
2,000
3,DO.1
4,000
10-15-0o-6410
Community Events
3811
2,66o�
7,50D!
15,000
1.-15-00-664.
Dues/Licenses _
24,6221
24,452.
25,0001
50,000
10-15-00-6650
Food
9891
1,104
1,2501
2,500
10-15-00-6680
Office/Shop Supplies
1,540
1,549
2,Dooi
4,000
10-15-00-6740
Phone/Internet
1,.94(
974
1,Soo1
3,000
Total Materials & Services
31,4411
34,505
46,2501
92,500
!Total Ma cr&Council
46,35o1
49,414
61,250
123,100
2015.17 BudgeV(p10Br9tl$IS% Page 105
City of Central Point
301.5/17 Biennial Budget
Return to Agentla
2015.17 3udg6SVQfsi4PSdsx Page 106
General Fund - Finance
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
I Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
10-2o-oo-5010
ISalaries&Wages
368,9zq
359,402
373,200
736,400
10-20-00-5020
Overtime Wages
281
0
1,200
4,000
10-20-00-5030
Part-time Wages
16,500
0
0
0
10-20-00-556o
ICit Taxes and Benefits
j 200,745.
196,657
187,000
419,500
Total Personnel Services
586,454,,
556,o59
561,400
1,179,900
10
-2o
-0o-6110
Facilities Rental
35,700
35,700.
35,700
69,400
10-20-00-6210
,City
'(Advertising/Legal Notices
1,077
2,317
1,500
3,000
10
-20
-0o
-623o
Bank/VISA Fees
25,166
36,703
42,000
go,000
10-20-00-6260
'Printing/Binding
13,341
17,130
14,000
29,000
10-20-00-6780
'Travel/Training
12,344.
7,675
11,000
21,000
10-20-00-6350
(Professional Services
42,408.
55,444_
45,000
98,000
10
-20
-o0
-636o
(Contract/Other Services
31,157.
12,302
20,000
34,000
10-20-oo-652o
iEquipment Repair/Maintenance
324
362
500
1,000
10-2o-oo-6640
Dues/Licenses
11975,
3,o62
2,500
5,000
10-2o-oo-6680
Office/Shop Supplies
7,5211
1,566
8,000
15,000
10-2o-oo-6690
Postage
26,68ol
30,517
30,000
64,000
10-2o-oo-6695
Sm Equip/Tools/Furniture
1 32
768
1,000
2,000
10-2n-oo-6740
Phone/Internet
2,721
2,995
3,000
6,000
Total Materials & Services
200,4441
2o6,542.
214,200
437,400
Total Finance
786,8981
762,600
775,600
1,617,300
Return to Agentla
2015.17 3udg6SVQfsi4PSdsx Page 106
City of Central Point
3015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 BudgPIWfi ;tA}¢x15X Page 107
General Fund - Parks
'
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
I Budget
Adopted
10-40-45-5010
Salaries & Wages
235,9821
228,1931
237,9001
495,370
10-40-45-5020
,Overtime Wages
6,8171
7,1031
6,Sool
13,000
10-40-45-5560
City Taxes and Benefits
131,3991
131,175'
139,5001
300,000
Total Personnel Services
374,1971
366,4711
383,900'
808,370
10-40-45-6110
City Facilities Rental
23,8001
23,8001
23,8001
47,600
10-40-45-6120
City Equipment Rental
30,0001
30,000
32,0001
68,000
10-40-45-627o
.Lease/Rentals
o
of
1,000,
2,000
10-40-45-628o
Travel/Training
8,877
2,491
3,000
6,500
10-40-45-6350
,Professional Services3,221'
1,07511
3,0001
106,500
10-40-45-6360
Contract/Other Services
131,445
151,48911
139,500
286,300
10-40-45-653o
Building/Grounds Maintenance
76,774
82,158
118,600
255,000
10-40-45-6531
Tree Maintenance: Tree City USA
o'
of
8,000
18,000
10-40-45-6610
Books/Publications
2.
4
0
200
400
10-40-45-662o
'Clothing Allowance
1,530
946
1,200
3,000
10-40-45-6640
Dues/Licenses
o
0
550
1,100
10-40-45-6680
Office/Shop Supplies
2,7851
1,2771
3,000
6,000
10-40-45-6695
iSm Equip/Tools/Furniture
1,753
1,972
2,000
4,200
10-40-45-672o
.Electric
37,882
36,148
24,000
70,000
10-40-45-6730
1Natural Gas
1,962.
2,536_
2,100
4,400
10-40-45-6740
Phone/Internet
4,377
4,521_
5,500
11,000
10-40-45-67SO
Water/Sewer/Stormwater
8,871
7,622
12,000
24,500
.Total Materials & Services
333,319
346,035-
379,450
914,500
10-40-45-7000
�IPrior Year Capital Improvements
58,708
1o,625
0
0
10-40-45-7150
1Parks -Equipment
o,
o_
33,000
0
10-40-45-7204
1Parks-Willie Mott
o
0
0
6o,0oo
10-40-45-7234
IParks -Sk rman Arboretum
9,799
11,693
5,000
13,800
Total Capital Projects
68,5071
22,318
38,000
73,800
1Total Parks 1
776,0241
734,824
801,350.
1,796,670
2015.17 BudgPIWfi ;tA}¢x15X Page 107
City of Central Point
2015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 9udgCAVQ6te05tlsx Page 108
General Fund - Recreation
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
10-40-53-5010
.Salaries &Wages
122,4201
126,873
132,600
263,200
10-40-53-5020
10vertime Wages
z, 563
9,451
4,So01
9,000
10-40-5v-5560
ICit Taxes and Benefits
73,6771
62,968
65,6001
138,750
Total Personnel Services
198,66o
193,292
202,700
410,950
10-41
1 City Facilities Rental
1 24,000
24,000
24,00011
69,000
1040-53-6210
Advertising/Legal Notices
131
0
31000
8,000
10-40-53-6230
Bank/VISA Fees
1,743
2,379.
3,50011,
7,200
10-40-53-626o
Printing/Binding
15,980
17,332,
19,5001
39,200
10-40-53-627o
Lease/Rentals
o
0
1,0001
2,000
10-40-53-6280
Travel/Training
7,7801
5,804
7,000
14,500
10-40-53-635o
Professional Services
830
1,520
2,0001
4,000
10-40-53-636o
Contract Services- Recreation
54,6221
56,030
56,3o01
113,300
10-40-53-6370
Instructors
7,56ol
10,515
14,0401
30,000
10-40-53-6410
Community Events
75,0111
0
12,100
26,500
10-40-53-6411
Community Events- Battle ofthe Bones
o
86,790.
75,000
200,000
10-40-53-6412
Community Events - BOB Music
0
0
5,000
11,100
10-40-53-6413
Community Events Children's Pre -K
o
0
5,900
12,200
10-40-53-6414
Community Events - Christmas
o
o
2,6o0
6,400
10-40-53-6415
1 Community Events - Egg Hunt
o
o
2,500
6,000
10-40-53-6416
1, Community Events - July 4th
_ o
o.
5,900
12,500
10-40-53-6435
Recreation Programs
57,2431
34,977
30,gool
64,000
10-40-53-6520
Equipment Repair/Maintenance
o
1,298
16,000
5,000
10-40-53-6530
(Build ing/G rounds Maintenance
598
62
2,500
5,000
10-40-53-6610
1Books/Publications
237
0
5001
1,000
10-40-53-663o
Computer Hardware/Software
(Dues/Licenses
1,271
4,258
8,000
16,500
10-40-53-6640
1,202
1,325
1,000
2,400
10-40-53-668o
Office/Shop Supplies
3,66o
744
4,500
9,000
10-40-53-66go
Postage
9,057
6,8141
9,200
19,300
10-40-53-6695
Sm Equip/Tocls/Furniture
1,042
0.
600
4,000
10-40-53-6720
Electric
2,585
2,59111
2,500
5,300
10-40-53-6740
Phone/Internet
3,484
2,991
5,000
5,000
Total Materials & Services
268,0361
259,42911
320,040
698,400
1Total Recreation
466,6961
452,721
522,740
1,109,350
2015.17 9udgCAVQ6te05tlsx Page 108
City of Central Point
3015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 Budg€O181BMINId x Page 109
General Fund - Planning_
2012/13
2013/14
1 2014/15
2015/17
Account
IDescription
Actual
Actual
I Budget
Adopted
10-50-00-5010
(Salaries & Wages
200,18q
170,348
16q,640
547,900
10-50-00-5020
Overtime Wages
0
0
1,goo
3,000
10-50-00-5030
Part-time Wages
57,194
56,680
58,500
118,400
100 -5p -pp
-5560
Cit Taxes and Benefits
10q,147
80,330
g2,q10
qo5, 250
Notal Personnel Services
11 362,5z6
307,357.
322,150
974,550
10-50-00-6110
City Facilities Rental
29,700_
29,7001
29,700
52,000
10-50-00-6120
City Equipment Rental
4,500
4,5001
4,500
9,500
10-50-00-6210
Advertising/Legal Notices
4,870
3,1001
2,000
10,000
10 -50 -Da
-628o
TravellTraining
4,357
7,099
9,000
19,aoo
10 -500 -Da
-6350
Professional Services
22,500
11,6n
15,000
30,000
10 -50 -0o
-636a
Contract/Other Services
14555
4,601
15,0001
20,000
10-50-00-664o
DuesJUcenses
1 1,375,
1,0652,0021
3500
10-50-0c
6680
Office/Shop Supplies
z,16z
1,zz3
1,0001
3,Doo
10-5a-oa-6690
Postage
401
1z7
500001
too
10-50-00-6695
Sm Equip/Tools/Furniture
o.
541
1,0001
1,000
100-50-00-6740
Phonellnternet
1,488
11538
2,000
3,000
Total Materials & Services
81,907,
64,6171
81,700
151,600
Total Planning
444,433
3719751
4018501
1,126,150
2015.17 Budg€O181BMINId x Page 109
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 BudgetNW2B19nad58 Page 110
General Fund - Police
1011/13
1013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
I Actual
Budget
Adopted
10-60-00-5010
Salaries & Wages
1,724,008
1,824,79q,
2,010,435
4,278300
10-60-00-5020
Overtime Wages
82,7541
105,4831
80,000
200,000
10-60-00-5020
Overtime Wages -HTCU
0l
33,6581
20,000.
0
10-60-00-5030
IPart-time Wages
34,9001
0
01,
0
10-60-00-556o
ICit Taxes and Benefits
`)89,003
1,075,489
1,1`)3.479.
2,588,000
,Total Personnel Services
2,830,6641
3,039,429,
3,303,910
7,066,300
10-60-00-6110
(City Facilities Rental
178,5001
178,500
178,500
357,000
10-60-oo-6270
'Lease/Rentals
70,2481
80,119
88,000
176,000
10-60-00-6280
(Travel/Training
41,240
32,396
46,Ooo
97,000
10-60-Oo-6340
I Dispatch Services
231,9931
234,022
240,000
520,000
10-60-00-6350
Professional Services
93571
11,635.
22,000
46,000
10
-60
-0o -636o
Contract/Other Services
26,2881
25,024
30,000
62,000
10-60-00-6410
DARE
11,3891
8,687
4,500,
9,100
10-60-00-6430
Investigations
1,20&
1,446
5,000
6,100
10-60-00-6432
High Tech Crime Unit
10,000
0.
0
0
10-60-00-646o
Volunteer Programs -Citizens On Patrol
2,613
4,255
4,000
8,200
10-60-00-6462
Volunteer Programs -Explorers
2,814
1,148
2,500
5,100
10
-6o
-cm -6510
Vehicle Repair/Maintenance
33,111
34,041
35,000,
72,000
10-60-00-652o
Equipment Repair/Maintenance
2,673_
1,5021
5,000,
10,200
10-60-00-6610
Books/Publications
! 1,121
848
500
1,250
10-60-00-6620
Clothing Allowance
19,748
20,992
15,000
31,000
10-60-00-6640
Dues/Licenses
5,922.
1,365
1000.
6,500
10-60-00-666o
Fuel
44,709.
44,577,
50,000
103,000
10-60-00-6670
Maintenance Supplies
351.
340
500,
1,000
10-60-00-6680
(Office/Shop Supplies
26,084.
22,722
30,0001
62,000
10-60-00-6690
lPostage
1 1,796.
1,675
2,5001
3,000
10-60-00-6695
Sm Equip/Tools/Furniture
14,179.
30,702,
30,0001,
67,000
10-60-00-6740
Phone/Internet
1 34,433
36,307.
35,000
72,000
Total Materials & Services
1 769,776
772,302
827,000i
1,715,450
Total Police
3,600,441
3,811,730
y, 13o,g1o�
8,781,750
2015.17 BudgetNW2B19nad58 Page 110
City of Central Point
2215/17 Biennial Budget
Return to Agenda
2015.17 6udget49 Idi1&Is% Page 111
General Fund - Interdepartmental
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budqet
Adopted
10-90-37-G24o
Insurance Premiums/Claims
76,184
85,203
125,000
265,oao
10-90-37-6340
Dispatch Services - g11
90,000
01
0
0
10-90-37-6432
Water Conservation Grant
101,483
37,7831
0'
o
Total Materials & Services
267,667
122,9861
125,000
265,000
10-90-37
8000
Transfers Out - Street Fund
50,000-
J
o
0
10-90-37-8000
Transfers Out- Debt Service(DJ Park)
130,000
78,5001
44,000
112,850
10-90-37-8000
Transfers Out - Debt Service (LID)
0
0
0,
100,000
10-90-37-8000
Transfers Out-HTCU
237,350,
20,000,
01
o
Total Transfers
417,350
98,5001
44,000,
212,850
10-90-37-9000
iContingency
0
01
160,00D,
180,000
Total Contingency
o
0
160,000,
180,000
10-90-37-9500
Ending Balance
1 2,553,193
2,635,169
1,639,360
1,623,070
'Total Ending Balance
2,553,1931
2,635,1691
1,639,360,
1,623,070
ITotal Interdepartmental
3,238,2091
2,856,6551
1,968,3601
2,280,920
Total General Fund Requirements
1o,869,8881
10,374,2371
101
19,870,490
Return to Agenda
2015.17 6udget49 Idi1&Is% Page 111
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 BudgeCAftM&1.k5sx Page 112
HTCU Fund - Revenues
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
201517
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
15-00-00-432o
Federal Grant
! 144,121.
170,773
20,000,
o
15-no-oo-4330
State Grant
w,cao.
0
20,000
0
15-00-00-4390
Contributing Agencies
72
0
0
0
15-00-00-4394
Federal Asset Forfeitures
2,850
59,874
10,000
o
Total Intergovernmental
157,044
230,586.
40,000
0
15-00-00-41,48
High Tech Crime Unit
1,227
4,073
a
o
Total Charges for Services
1,227.
4,073
0
0
15-0o-00-4910
Transfer In- General Fund
237,350
20,000
0
0
Total Transfers
237,350.
20,000,
0
0
15-00-00-4010
Carryover Balance
86,90o.
62,800
177,7SS
128,525
Total Carryover Balance
86,goo
62,800
177,755.
128,525
Total Revenues
482,520
317,46o
217,755
128525
2015.17 BudgeCAftM&1.k5sx Page 112
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 Budge$M!QfH,R.Wx Page 113
HTCU Fund
2012113
2013114
2014115
2015117
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
15-6o-co-5oio
Salaries & Wages
97,548,
o
a
o
15-6o-oo-5o2o
Overtime Wades
8,587
a
a
.
i5-60-oo-5560
City Taxes and Benefits
;8,120
0
0
a
Total Personnel Services
164,2551
0
0
0
15-6o-oo-6110
City Facilities Rental(HTCU)
40,9001.
0
of
o
15-6o-oo-628o
Travel/Training
4,4891
210
0
0
15-6o-oo-6350
Professional Services
o
2,112
91
0
15-60-00-6360
Contract/Other Services
187,
223
110001
0
15-6o-oo-6430
Investigations
loll
45
1,0001
0
15-6o-oo-6431
Federal Grant Expense
145,189]
106,788
5,0001
0
15-6o-oo-6432
State/Local Grant Expense
22,8841
7,300,
510001
0
15-6o-00-6433
Asset Forfeiture Expense
3001
118451
45,000.
108,525
15-6o-oo-652o
15-6o-oo-6550
Equipment Repair/Maintenance
Computer/SOftware Maintenance
1,3351
4651
3621
0
1,000
5,000
0
0
15-6o-oo-562o
Clothing Allowance
2691
3271
0
0
15 -6o -0o-6630
Computer Hardware/Software
1,195
1,9111
0
0
15-60-o0-6640
iDues/Licenses
1,100
6101
2,500_
o
15-6.-00-666.
Fuel
1181
20'
0
0
15-60-0o-6682
Office/Shop Supplies
1,o15
705
1,000
0
15-6o-oo-66go
Postage
551
93..
o,
o
15-6o-oo-6695
ISm Equip/Tools/Furniture
2851
140'
2,000
0
1S -6o-.0-6740
1Phone/Internet
3,814
4,000
1,000
0
'Total Materials & Services
223,699
126,687
78,500
108,525
15-60-00-7150
(Equipment
31,766
8,845
0
0
Total Capital Outlay
1 31,766.
8,845
0
0
15-6o-oo-8000
Transfers OutGeneralFund
0
o
O
20,000
Total Transfers Out
o,
0
0.
20,000
Total HTCU Operations
1 419,720
135,532
78,500.
128,525
HTCU Fund - Interdepartmental
2012113
2013/142014115
1. 2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
15-90-37-9000
Contingency
of
o.
.
o
Total Contingency
of
of
of
o
15-90-37-95Oo
Ending Balance
62,Bool
181,92811
139,255.
0
(Total Ending Balance
62,800
181,9281
139,2551
0
1Total Interdepartmental
62,8001
181,9281
139,2551
0
Total High Tech Crime Unit Requirements
482,52011
317,46o11
217,7SS�'
128,525
2015.17 Budge$M!QfH,R.Wx Page 113
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 8udgefMW".kkx Page 114
Street Fund - Revenues
1
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
!Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
20-00-00-4135
(Franchise - Electric
108,941
n5,708.
175,000
355,000
20-00-00-4155
!Franchise - Water
51,627
o
65,000
130,000
7TotaI Taxes
260,568,
115,7081,
240,000
II
485,000
20-00-00-4310
I
(Federal Capital Gants
172,947!
of
0
0
20-00-00-4330
20-00-00-4350
State Grant-ODOT(Bike/Ped Funds)
State Gas Tax
9,350,
943,847'
421,8751
988,3931,
0
990,000
0
1,996,800
Total Intergovernmental
11126,144,
1,411,2681
990,000
1,996,800
20-00-00-4450
Public Works Services
-18,5271
9,452
5,000
10,000
20-00-00-4462
SDC Street Reimbursement
m,544!
1o,604
10,000
128,500
20-00-00-4465
SDC Street Improvements
159,980!
161,553,
50,000
1,156,500
20-00-00-4470
Street Utility Fee
446,1581
449,9461
485,000
1,000,000
20-00-00-4474
Street Decorative Light Fee
of
of
9,000
Total Chargesfor Services
598,1561
631,5541
550,000.
2,304,000
20-00-00-4710
Interest Income
17,480
9,5741
11,000
16,000
Total Interest Income
17,4B0
9,5741
11,000
16,000
20-00-00-4810
Miscellaneous Revenue
16,680.
18,89411
S'000
385,000
Total Miscellaneous
_ 16,68o1
18,8941
5,000
385,000
20-00-00-4910
Transfers In
So, 000
0
0.
o
.Total Transfers
501
0
0'
o
20-00-00-4010
Carryover Balance
2,303,2o61
1,964,67611
1,594,73o1
1,6o5,86o
Total Carryover Balance
2,303,2o61
1,964,676,
1,594,7301
1,1
Total Street Revenues
4,272,234
4,151,674,
3,390 7301
6,792,660
2015.17 8udgefMW".kkx Page 114
City of Central Point
1015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 Budg&#JW9 lWsx Page 115
Street Fund - Operations/Capital Prolects
222113
2013/14
2024125
2015/17
Account
,Description
Actual
Actual
Budget i
Adopted
20-70-43-5cic
!Salaries &Wages
217,372
221,822
244,400
510,577
20-70-43-SO20
Overtime Wages
(City
1,52.
2,649
3,500
7,000
2000-43-5560
Taxes and Benefits
134,895
140,011
158,800
345,432
,Total Personnel Services
353,786
363,4821
4o6,700
863,00g
20-70-43-6110
'City Facilities Rental
36,goo
36,900,
36,9o0
80,000
20-70-43-6120
,City Equipment Rental _
130,000.
134,0001
140,000
336,o00
2-70-43-6130
,City Overhead Fees
126, 000
135,0001
150,000
304000
20-70-43-6140
,Public Works Overhead Fees
295,000
280,000'
245,000
500,000
2070-43-6230
Bank/VISA Fees
3,990
8,0781
4,5001
2,000
2-70-43-6270
I Lease/Rentals
o
6081
01
0
2-70-43-6280
.Travel/Training
9,812
8,0611
10,000,
25,000
20-70-43-6350
1 Professional Services
12,489.
17,704'.
10,000
32,000
20-70-43-6360
Contract/Other Services
54442,
47589'
40,000
11o,000
2-70-43-652
Equipment Repair/Maintenance
of
881
0
0
20-70-43-6530
Sidewalk/Bikepath/Tree Maintenance
14,5431
7,160.
o.
30,000
20-70-43-6540
Infrastructure Maintenance
58,2431
65,913.
250,000
577,000
20-70-43-6541
Street Sign Maintenance
7,6791
11,645
0.
16,oco
20-70
-43-6542
Street Light Maintenance(TOD)
2,685
6,56T
0
0
20-70-43-6543
,Street Light Retrofit Project
13,0391
13,915
0
0
20-70-43-6620
Clothing Allowance
1,7241
1,366
2,000.
3,600
20-70-43-6640
Due5/Licen5e5
2191
196
100
700
20-70-43-668o
Office/Shop/Safety Supplies
4,4851
5,513
3,000'.
7,000
2-70-43-6695
Sm EquiJoolslFurniture
9,5o61
8 Boo
91500,
22,000
20-70-43-6740
Phone/Internet
2,456,_
2,300
2,5001
5,000
20-70-43-676o
Street Lights
172,496
169,310
175,0001
350,000
Total Materials& Services
951,709
961,528
1,078,5001
2,424,300
2o-70-43-7150
Equipment
193522
36,42
0l
33,000
2-70-43-7200
Prior Capital Projects
52g,3o8_
572,473
01
0
20-70-43-7203
Beebe/Hamrick- Intersection
o
6,550
5,0001
50,000
70-70-43-7205
',Crater Rail Crossing (Const)
of
o
oI
500,000
20-70-43-7216
'Highway 99 project
1 0
0
0
0
20-70-43-7230
(Freeman Rd (CMAO Project)
0
15,283
130,12
0
20-70-43-7233
'Street Improvements
a
97,248.
119,880
245,000
Total Capital Projects
722,830
727,974'.
255,000,
828,000
20-70-43-8000
IITra nsfers Out - DS(loth/Seen is/Upton)
32,Soo1
32,6o0
32,000
100,700
1Total Transfers Out
32,500.,
32,600
32,000.
200,700
(Total Street Operations/Capital Projects
I 2,o6o,825
2,085,585
1,772,200
4,2o6,00g
2015.17 Budg&#JW9 lWsx Page 115
City of Central Point
20IS117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 Bud;,CAPWT1. W6 Page 116
'IStreet Fund- SDC Capital Projects
1
2012/13
2013/14
2014/1$ 1
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
_
Actual
Budget
Adopted
2070-59-7103
'Beebe/Hamrick(Signal)
o'
0
01
150,0.0
10-70-59-7105
(Crater Rail Crossing
18,343'1
36,060
15,0001
250,000
20-7D-59-7216
Hwy 99 Beautification Project
200,00011
270,127_
0'
o
z --7D-59-7230
Freeman Rd (CMAO Project)
0
0
200,000
0
zo-7o-5ggz33
Street Improvements
of
0
0
65,000
(Total Capital Projects
218,3431
306,187,
215,000
465,000
2D -70 -5q
-766o
Developer Reimbursements
5,49111
0
15,000
450,000
'Total Debt Service
5,4911
0
15,000,
450,000
zo-7o-59-8000
Transfers Out -DS(mth/Scenic/U ton)
22,900'
22,700
23,000
45,8-0
Total Transfers
22,900'i
22,700,
23,000
45,800
Total Street SDC Capital Projects
- 246,7341
328,887
253,0001
960,800
Street Fund - Interdepartmental
I
2012/13
1 2013/14
1014115
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
20-90-37-9000
Contingency
o'
0
100,000
157,000
Total Contingency
of
0_
100,000
157,000
20-90-37-9500
Ending Balance
1,964,67511
1,737,202
1,265,530
1,468,851
Total Ending Balance
1,964,675
1,737
1
1,265,530'
1,468,851
I otdl btreet onteme artmental
I 1,964,6751
1,737,202
1,365,530'
1,b25,651
I otai ]trees runs rcequuements
4,272,2341
4,151,674.
3d90,73011
6,792,bbo
2015.17 Bud;,CAPWT1. W6 Page 116
City of Central Point
2025/27 Biennial Budget
2015.1] Page 117
Account
Housing Fund - Revenues
Description
20-2/-3
Actual
2013/14
Actual
2014/15
Budget
20-5/17
Adopted
2g
-o0-00-4710
Interest Income
524.
01
o
a
25-00-00-482.5
Total Interest
Loan Principal Payments
524.
o
01
of
0.,
o
0
0
25-00-00-4010
Total Miscellaneous
Karr over Balance
o
40,401
01
0
o'
o.
o
o
'Total Carryover
40,40-
0
0
0
',Total Housing Fund Revenues
40,9225
0
0
o
Account
(Housing Fund -Interdepartmental
Description
20-2/13
Actual
2013/14
Actual
2014/-5
Bud et
20-5/-7
Adopted
25-90-37-6650
Food
40,925
0
o
a
25-90-37-8000
Total Materials & Services
(Transfers Out
40,975
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25-90-37-9500
',Total Miscellaneous
iEnding Balance
o.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(Total Ending Balance
(
01
o
1
0
0
Total Housing Fund Expenses
40,9251
01
0.
0
2015.1] Page 117
City of Central Point
2015/17 Biennial Budget
)015.17 Budg,CAliQ6QdY$x Page 118
'Capital Improvements Fund - Revenues
-
1012/13
2013/14
2014115
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
ActualBud
et
Adopted
3---D-00-4330
State Grants
a
33,0001
0
6o,00D
Total Intergovernmental Revenue
o
33,0001
0.
60,000
30-0--00-4461
ISDC Park Reimbursement
12,934
23,17211
10,000
123,8-0
30-D--00-4463
ISDC Park Improvements
65,409.
118,565
So,00o1
134,6-0
(Total Charges for Service
78,343
141,7371
60,0001
258,400
30-00-00-4710
1Interest Income
648.
6401.
700,
1,400
(Total Interest Income
648
6401
700
1,400
30-00-00-4010
Carryover Balance
78,238.
117,959
68,625.
157,955
Total Carryover
78,x38
117,95511
68,625
157,955
Tota CIP Revenues
157,229
293,3321
129,315,
477,755
Capital Improvements Fund - Park Capital Projects
2012/13
1 2013114
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
30-40-55-7240
Pfaff Park
01
36,941.
D
o
Total Capital Projects
0I
36,9411
01
0
Total Park Capital Projects
01
36,9411
0
0
Improvements Fund- Park SDC Capital Projects
11
1
,Capital
2012113
1 2013114
1 2014115
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
I Actual
I Budget
Adopted
30-10-59-7100
Building/Concession Stand/DJ Park
01
oil
01
80,000
30-40-59-7240
Pfaff Park
01
27,7161
o,
o
Total Capital Projects ;
oi
27,7161
of
301
30-40-59-766o
Developer SDC Credit Obligations
14,2741
l
24,2821
10,00011
55,000
Total Debt Service
14,2741
24,28211
10,0001
55,000
30-4--59-80D0
Transfer Out- Debt Service (DJ Park)
7,0001
6ai
100,0001
143,9--
TotalTransfers Out
_7,0001
6go0o11
100,00011
143,900
(Total Park SDC Capital Projects
21,2741
111,9981
110,000
278,900
Capital Improvements Fund -Interdepartmental
1
1
1
2012/13
11 2013114
2014115
2015117
Account
Description
Actual
I Actual
i Budget
Adopted
30-90-37-8000
Transfers Out- General Fund
0
01
01
0
30 -90 -37
-Boon
Transfers Out - Debt Service Fund
18,0001
5,0001
0''
a
Total Transfers 1
18,0001
5,0001
0'
0
30-90-37-9500
IEnding Balance
117,9551
139,3921
19132511
198,8S5
Total Ending Balance
117,9551
139,392.
19,3251
198,855
Total Interdepartmental
135,95511
144,3921
19,325
198,855
1
1Total Capital Improvements
157,2291
293,33111
129,325
477,755
)015.17 Budg,CAliQ6QdY$x Page 118
City of Central Point
201SIV Biennial Budget
2015.17 5udgeCB M&O.Wx Page 119
Reserve Fund -Revenues
2012/13
2013/14
2024/15
2015/27
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
35-00-00-4710
Interest Income
3,633
2,873
4,000
6,000
Total Interest
3,633
2,873
4,000
6,000
35-00-00-4910
Transfers In Facilities Maintenance
o.
80,000
oi.
50,00o
35-00-00-4910
.Transfers In Fleet Maintenance
o.
o
of
o
'Total Transfers
o
80,000
0
50,000
35-00-00-40W
iCarryover Balance
483,463
487,096
569,800l
572,850
,Total Carryover
483,463,
487,o96,
569,800
572,850
,Total Reserve Fund Revenues
487,096
569,969
573,800
628,850
Reserve Fund -Interdepartmental
2022/13
2023/14
1 2024h5
2015/27
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Bud et
Adopted
35-90-37-71o1
Facility Improvements
1 o
o
40,000,
o
35-90-37-715o
Equipment
o.
o.
0
0
3S-90-37-7151
Vehicles
o
o
0
0
Total Reserve Fund Projects
1 0
0.
40,000
0
35-90-37-9500
Ending Balance
487,o96.
569,9691
1
533,800
678,85o
Total Ending Balance
487,096.
569,9691
533,800
628,850
Total Interdepartmental
487,o961
569,9691,
573,800
628,850
Total Reserve Fund
487,0961
56g,969i
573,800
628,850
2015.17 5udgeCB M&O.Wx Page 119
City of Central Point
3215117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 e0dgcCAWdl Page 120
Debt Service Fund - Revenues
1
2012113
2o13h4
2014115
2015117
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
40-00-00-4310
Federal Capital Grant (STIP)
162,8641,
162,864'
161870,
325,728
Total Intergovernmental
162,8641
162,864
162,870
325,728
40-00-00-4405
City Facilities Rental
1
195,500
192,000
192,000
384,0 --
4a -00-00-444o
Debt Service Fees
781
31,36z
32,000
85,400
Total Charges for Services
196,281
223,362,
224,000
469,400
40-00-00-4610
LID Principal Payments
49,275
42,373
5Ci
40,000
40-00-00-4615
,LID Interest Payments
10,089
9,1941
10,000
4,000
'Total Special Assessments
59,364,
51,567,
Goi
44,000
40-00-00-4710
Interest Income
3771'
1
326'
tool
500
,Total Interest Income
3771
326
100
Soo
40-00-00-4910
(Transfers In- General Fund (DJ Park)
130,0001
78,500
44,000
112,850
40-00-00-4910
(Transfer In - General Fund (LID debt)
o1
0
0
100,000
40-00-00-4910
Transfers In - Street Op(mthlScenic)
32,5001
32,600_
32,000
64,700
40-00-00-4910
Transfers In - Street SDC (loth/Scenic)
22,900
22,700
23,000
45,800
40-00-00.4910
Transfers In - CIP- SDC Parka (DJ Park)
25,000.
65,0001
100,000
143,900
Total Transfers
210,400
198,8001
199,0001
467,250
40-00-00-4010
Carryover Balance
18,0421
47,01511
45,8001
14,769
.Total Carryover
18,04211
47,0151
45,800'
14,769
'Total Debt Service Revenues
647,328.
683,934
691,770
1,321,647
2015.17 e0dgcCAWdl Page 120
City of Central Point
2015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 BudgotAfti Page 121
Debt Service Fund
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
40-90-37-7531
loth/Scenic/Upton -Interest
43,237
34,415
25,100
a
40-90-37-7631
loth/Scenic/Upton-Principal
203,000
212,000
221,000
0
40-90-37-7501
(City Hall Bond Interest
_ 73,618.
69,718
65,650
0
40-90-37-7601
City Hall Bond Principal
120,000
120,000
125,000
0
40-90-37-7580
Don Jones Park - Interest
33,100,
28,500
23,800.
o
40-90-37-768o
Don Jones Park - Principal
115,00011
115,000.
120,000.
o
40-90-37-75i0
LID Bond Interest
12,3591
12,358
10,050
12,510
40-90-37-7610
LID Bond Principal
01,
50,000
55,000
11o,000
40-90-37-7515
Series 2014 Interest
o!
0
0
105,370
40-90-37-7615
Series 2014 Principal
0�1
0
0
1,o56,000
Total Debt Service
600,3131
641,991
545,6o0
1,283,880
40-90-37'95o0
Ending Balance
47,0151
41,943
46,170
37,767
Total Ending Balance
1 47,0151
11
41,943
46,170
37,767
Total Debt Se Nice
6473281
683,934
691,770.
1,321,647
2015.17 BudgotAfti Page 121
City of Central Point
2015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 Badg,C;Mube M1#Bx Page 122
Building_ Fund - Revenues
1
2012113
2013114
201415
2015117
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
50-00-00-4235
Building Perm its - Residential
1 22,877
68,2851
51,500
n0, o oo
50-00-00-4236
50-00-00-4240
Building Permits - Commercial
Building Plan Review
1 15,7251
29,5301
10,8101
536831
15,000.
35,000
95,000
70,000
50-00-00-425o
Electrical Permits
1 18,44411,
28,2881
19,500
40,000
50-00-00-4260
Mechanical Permits
1 5,807
9,5461
6,5oo
16,200
50-00-00-4275
Plumbing Permits
16,167
31,5541
17,000
40,000
Total Charges for Service
108,551
202,16611
144,500
371,200
50-00-00-4710
Interest Income
1,381
1,0431
1,S0a
2,400
Total Interest Income
1,381
1,0431
1,_500
2,400
50-00-00-4810
Miscellaneous Revenue
1,180
1,84311
0
0
Total Miscellaneous
1,180
1,843',
0
1
0
50-oo-oo-4o10
Carryover Balance
14 ,0411
137.823
133.495
1gq,625
'Total Carryover
145,041.
137,823
133,495
199,625
Total Building Fund Revenues
256,1531
342,875
279,495.
573,225
2015.17 Badg,C;Mube M1#Bx Page 122
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 Budger lila 9g;fix Page 123
Building Fund
1
2o12/13
1 2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
50-50-00-5010
5alaries&Wages
68,1381
103,878
io3,650
219,550
50-50-oo-5s6o
Cit Taxesaud Benefits
37,0361
42,3211
52.650
118,470
Total Personnel Services
105,174
146,199'1156,300
338,020
So-So-oo-Clio
City Facilities Rental
0
01
0
20,000
50-So-oo-6130
City Equipment Rental
2,200
212001
2,200
4,700
50-50-00-6280
Travel/Training
1,062
6571
1,500
3,500
50-50-00-6360
Contract/Other Services
7,942
8,7411
8,500
18,Do0
50-50-00-6610
Books/Publications
1 0
011
1,500
2,500
50-50-oo-66to
Dues/Licenses
135
690
600
1,200
50 -So -co -6680
OfficeiShop Supplies
1,032
674
1.,000
1,000
50-50-oo-66go
Postage
1 30
43
100
200
50-50-00-6740
iPhone/Internet
7551
1,036
goo
2,800
11Total Materials & Services
13.155,
14,0411
16,300
53,900
Total Building Operations
118,329.
160,2401
172,600
391,920
.Building Fund - Interdepartmental
2012/13
2013/14
2014h5
2015117
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
5o -go -37-9000
Contingency
0
01
10001
4,500
Total Contingency
1 o,
01
3,000',
4,500
5o -go -37-9500
Ending Balance
137,823,
182,6351
log 8951
176,805
Total tnaing Balance
137,823.
182,635',
103,8951
176,805
l Ioiainterdepartmental
137,823
182,635
1ob,b9g
181,305
11Total
Building Fund Requirements
256,152.
342,875.
279.495.
573,225
2015.17 Budger lila 9g;fix Page 123
City of Central Point
2015/17 Biennial Budget
2015,17 Oudget;M 6&9M1FRx Page 124
Water Fund - Revenues
1
2012/13 1
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
55-oo-0o-444o
Penalty Charges
70,890
76,668
75,000
150,000
55-00-00-4450
Public Works Fees
1,513,
3,935_
4,000,
2,000
5500-00-4466
SDC Water Improvements
40,785,
89,393_
40,000.
120,000
5500-00-4468
SDC Water Reimbursement
11,3701
23,297
10,000
6o,000
55-00-00-4469
Administrative Fees
1115101
9,700
9,000
18,900
55-00-00-4473
System Repair & Replacement
86,5o91
90,942.
90,000
180,000
55-00-00-4485
Water Connect Charges
7,9751
19,7So
7,500
24,000
55-00-00-4490
'Water Sales
2,498,7411
2,686,369
2, 65o,0oo
5,470,000
,Total Charges for Service
2,729,293,
3,000,055
x,885,500
6,024,000
55-00-00-4710
Il interest Income
7,7461
6,155
6,000
12,000
Notal Interest Income
7,7461
6,155
6,000
12,000
55-00-00-4810
,Miscellaneous Revenue
13,881
29,964.,
10,000,
16,oco
55-00-00-4840
Financing Proceeds
1,805,273,
0
0
0
Total Miscellaneous
1 1,87.9,154.
29,964
10,000
16,000
S5-00-90-4010
Carr over Balance
1,657,819,
1,299,427
1,794,16o
1,66oi
Total Carryover
1,657,819,
1,299,427.
1,794,160
1,66o,995
Total Water Revenues
6,214,01311
4,335,600
4,695,66o�l
7,712,995
2015,17 Oudget;M 6&9M1FRx Page 124
City of Central Point
1015/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 BudgetAlus3fuyx Page 125
1 Water Fund -Operations/Capital Projects
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
'Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
55-70-43-5010
1Salanes & Wanes
36S,S24
379,278.
403,700
841,500
5590-43-5020
(Overtime Wages
4,394
4,125
8,000
16,000
_55-70-43-5560
1 City Taxes and Benefits
221027
243,296,
353,2a.
t49,300
Total Personnel Services
592,945
676,700
664,900
0,406,800
55-70-43-6110
(City Facilities Rental
40,000
40,000
40,000
97,000
55-70-43-6120
(City Equipment Rental
85,000
85,000
89,000
210,000
55- 70-43-6130
.City Overhead Fees
354,000
355,000
445,000
890,000
55-70-43-6140
I Public Works Overhead Fees
227,000
227,000
200,000
410,000
55-70-43-6230
Bank/VISA Fees
31990
8,281
7,000
20,000
55-70-43-6280
Travel/Training
13,841
10,350
10,000
27,o00
55-70-43-6;50
(Professional Services
20,117
20,882
12,000
40,000
55-70-43-6360
IContract/Other Services
51671
61,230
45,000
120,000
5590-43-6422
Utility Discount
o
0
5,000
10,000
55-70-43-6540
Infrastructure Maintenance
99,512
106,526
rejoice
210,000
55.70-43-6550
:SCADA Software Maintenance
0
0
15,000
20,.00
55-70-43-656o
Water Rights Maintenance
22,985
24,350
31,500
64,..0
55-70-43-66io
Books/Publications
827
187
350
700
55-7043-5620
'Clothing Allowance
2,231
1,4511
2,200_
4,400
55-70-43-6640
'Dues/Licenses
4,567
3,153
2,000
4,000
55-70-43-6680
(Office/Shop/Safety Supplies
5,758
10,584,
5,000_
10,000
55-70-43-6690
iPostage
166
110.
250
550
55-70-43-6695
'Sm Equip/Tools/Furniture
8,825
4,929
5,000
10,000
55-70-43-6720
iElectric
9,367
29,313,
30,000
63,000
55-70-43-6740
Phone/Internet
91905
9,830
0,500
23,500
55-70-43-6750
1MWC Water Purchase
588,407.
598,4841
66ai
1,390,000
55-70-1,3 6752
Water Franchise Fee
51,627.
01
65,000
B0,000
Total Materials & Services
1,599,696
1,596,6581
1,770,800
3,754,150
55-70-43-7150
(Equipment
01
011
10,000,
27,000
55-70'43-7200
Prior Capital Projects
2,721,9451
19,4811
01
o
55-70-43-7200
Infrastructure Improvements
01
o
o,
275,000
55-70-43-7230
Freeman Rd (CMAO Project)
01
0
100,000
a
55-70-43-7249
1R&R Projects
of
0
100,000
115.000
Total Capital Projects
2,721,9451
19,4811
210,000.
417,000
55-70-43-7531
Note Payable Int - loth/Scenic/Upton
of
8,6271
8,500
25,300
55-70-43-7550
ILoan Interest- Water Reservoir
1 011
386,145.
187,300
354,300
55-70-43-7650
(Loan Principal Water Reservoir
o,
01
196,8001
413.900
Total Debt Service
1 01
394,77,
392,6001
793,500
1Total Water Operations/Capital Projects
4,914,5861
2,637,61011
3,038,300
6,371,450
2015.17 BudgetAlus3fuyx Page 125
City of Central Point
2025/17 Biennial Budget
2015.17 Budgc6.PWAHt1.18s Page 126
Account
Water Fund SDC Capital Projects
Description
2012/13
Actual
2013114
Actual
2014115
Budget
2025117
Adopted
55
SS
J0-59 7222
70-59-7222
Capital Projects -Equipment
Water Reservoir
o
o
o'
o'
0
15,000
65,oco
S0,000
55-70-59-7660
Total Capital Projects
Developer Reimbursements
0
0I
0
371
15,000
2,00o
115,000
35,000
Total Debt Service
o'
371.
1,000
35,000
Total Water SDC Capital Projects
1 0
371
26,000
250,000
Account
Water Fund -Interdepartmental
Description
1 2011/23
Actual
2013/14
Actual
2014/15
Bud et
z025/27
Adopted
55-90-37-9000
Contingency
of
0
145,000
251,100
55-90-37-9500
Total Contingency
Endin Balance
of
1,299,42711
0.
1,697,619
145,000
1,496,360
252,200
2,040,445
.Tota En mg Baance
',, 1,299,427
1,697,619,
1
1,496,360,
2,040,445
Total2,299,4271
1
1, 97, 19,
1 41,36ol
2,292,545
Total Water Fund Requirements
6,224,01311
4,335,600
4,695,66o
7,712,995
2015.17 Budgc6.PWAHt1.18s Page 126
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2015.17 SudgeruMarisseatdsx Page 127
Stormwater Fund - Revenues
2M2/13
1013/14
2014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
57-00-00-4450
Public Works Fees
0
31
1501
1,o00
57-00-00-4464
SDC Stormwater Fees - Imp
68,750
52,834.
30,0001
139,500
57-00-00-4467
SDC Stormwater Fees- Reimb
o
0
1,0001,
12,200
57-00-00-4471
Stormwater Quality Fees
i 115,0231,
112,478
ng000l
120,000
57-00-00-4472
Stormwater Utility Fees
702,061
707,406'
700,000
1,415,000
Total Charges for Services
885,834.
872,749I
841,150
1,787,700
57-00-00-4710
Interest Income
4,4023,7401
4,000
7,000
Total Interest Income
4,402
3,740
4,000
7,000
57-00-00-4810
Miscellaneous Revenue
1�! 711I
1,6841
0
2,000
57-00-00-4840
Loan Proceeds
0I
of
184,600
0
Total Miscellaneous Revenue
1 7"!
1,6841
184,600
1,000
57-00-o0-4010
Carryover Balance
476,752'.
662,o25I
731,390.
897,860
Total Carryover Balance
476,752.
662,025'
731,390
897,86o
Total Stormwater Revenues
1,367,6981
1,540,1981
1,761,140
2,694,560
2015.17 SudgeruMarisseatdsx Page 127
City of Central Point
3215/17 Biennial Budget
)015 17 9udget;Nn 61Sex Page 128
Stormwater Fund - Operations/Capital Projects
'..
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
20-5/-7
Account
Description
Actual I
Actual
Budget
Adopted
57-70-43-5010
Salaries & Wages
126,702,
123,471
143300
302,600
57-70-43-5020
Overtime Wages
6301
591
3,400
6,800
5770-43-556o
City Taxes and Benefits
74,8701
77,500
92,450
201,000
Total Personnel Services
202,2011
201,563
239,550
510,400
5770-43-6110
City Facilities Rental
27,000,
27,000
27,000
60,000
57-70-43-6120
'City Equipment Rental
40,0001
40,000
45,000
119,800
57-70-43-6130
City Overhead Fees
781
85,000
113,000
226,000
57-70
43-6T40Public
Works Overhead Fees
112,000,
112,000
110,000
226,0oo
57-70-43-62T0
.Bank/VISA Fees
3,9901
8,078
5,000
20,000
57-70-43-627o
Lea5e/Rentals
13,306'
831
23,000
46,000
57-70-43-678o
Travel/Training
2,960
1,686
3,500
7,000
5770-43-6350
Professional Services
10,311
34,019
15,000,
T5,000
57-70-43-6360
.Contract/Other Services
29,646
26,689
25,000
56,000
57-70-43-654o
Infrastructure Maintenance !
T,834
9,201
191000
2g000
57-70-43-6620
Clothing Allowance
1,820
910,
11500,
2,000
57
70-43-6640
Dues/Licenses
571
773
Soo,
Soo
57-70-43-6680
Office/Shop/Safety Supplies
4,913
5,131
4,0001
8,400
57-70-43-6690
(Postage
1,020,
301
2,000
6,000
57-70-43-6695
ISM Equip/Tools/Furniture
0
1,3531
8,600,
20,000
57-70-43
67To
(Disposal
4,271
3,947`,
4,5001
10,000
57-70-43-6740
1Phonepnternet
1,317.
1,470.
1,500l
3,000
'Total Materials & Services
332,959.
358,1-9
404,1001
845,700
57-70-43-7150
(Equipment
o
of
of
35,000
57-70-43-7200
Prior Capital Projects
109,293,
51,4971
0-
57-70-43-7230
Freeman Rd (CMAQ Project)
01
0.
246,600
125,000
57-70-43-7238
(Comet Ave
o
01
0
50,000
'Total Capital Projects
109,293,
51,497,
246,600
210,000
57-70-43-7531
Debt Service (loth/Scer ic/U ton)
o'
91
9,000
36,640
Total Debt Service
of
9,00011
9,000
36,640
ITotal StormwaterO erations/Ca . Projects
644,4521
620,1781
899,2501
1,602,740
)015 17 9udget;Nn 61Sex Page 128
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
Stormwater Fund - Quality
57-70-47-635o iProfessional Services
57-70-47-636o ICOntract/Cther Services
57-70-47-6480 Stormwater Quality Projects
57-70-47-6690(Postage
57-70-47-6695 1', Sm Equip/ToolslFurniture
',Total Materials & Services
57-70-g-I23o Freeman Rd (CMAQ Project)
57-70-47-7244 Jewett School Swale
Total Capital Projects
57-70-47-800o Transfer Out - General Fund
Total Transfers Out
Total Stormwater Quality
Stormwater Fund -5DC Capital Projects
57-70-59-7200 Prior Capital Projects
57-70-59-723o Freeman Rd (CMAQ Project)
5770-59-7238 Comet Avenue(And Victoria)
Total Capital Projects
57-70-59-7531 Debt Service ioth/Scenic/Upton
Total Stormwater 5DC Capital Project
Stormwater Fund -Interdepartmental
'Description
Transfers Out - General Fund
Total Transfers Out
2012/13
�1' 2013114
2014115
2015/17
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
01
1.348
2,000
4,000
01
7,488
10,000
20,000
57,9961
45,785
45,000
90,000
of
o
1,000
5,000
01
o
2,500
5,000
3,2251
0
of
o
61,2211
54,622
60,500
124,000
01,
o
S1,Soo
50,000
of
o
0
50,000
01
0
51,500
100,000
01
0
o'
50,000
01
0
01
50,000
61,2211
54,622
112, 0001
274,000
2012113
2013124 _
2014115
20x5/17
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
o
1,240
0'
o
0
o
11,00001
38,000
0
0
0
40,000
0,
11240
11,0001
78,000
0
11,500.
11,50011
22,460
0
2,453
2,500
13,000
001
23,953.
14,0001
35,460
2015.17 6udg&WHA rIukNx Page 129
2012113 1 2013114 2014115 1 2015117
0
o
0
City of Central Point
3015/17 Biennial Budget
Return to Agentla
2015.17 0odgeCW@fJr1AII Page 130
Internal Services Fund - Revenues
1
1011/13
3013/14
1014/15
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
I Actual
Budget
Adopted
6o-00-00-4330
Federal Grants (CMAO)
51,0001
of
0
0
Total Intergovernmental
51,0001.
o
o
0
60-00-00-4405
City Facilities Rental
270,0001
212,600
332,600
536,000
6o-oo-oo-4410
City Equipment Rental
291,700'
395,700
312,700.
748,000
6o -o0 -o0-4417
Public Works Overhead Fees
614,0001
619,000
555,000l
1,136,000
6o-00-00-4430
Urban Renewal Services
01
o
o'
10,000
60-00-0a-4450
Public Works Fees
25,5931
26,925_
15,000
40,000
6o -00-00-446o
Rental Income
01
2,954
500
2,000
60-00-00-4830
Sale of Assets
01
29,987
0
2,000
Total Charges for Service
1,221,1931
1,307,165
1,115,8001
2,474,000
6o-oci 4710
Interest Income
2,3891
1,593
2,000
1,000
Total Interest Income
3,3891
1,5911
2,0001
1,000
So-so00-4810Miscellaneous
Revenue
27,9181
8,4391
10,0001
2,000
Total Miscellaneous
27,918
8,4391
10,000
3,000
6o-oo-00-4010
Carryover Balance
228,610
2333161
139,0001
153,380
(Total Carryover
128,610
233,3161
139,0001
153,380
Total Internal Services Revenues
1,531,110
11450,5131
1,266,800
3,630,380
Return to Agentla
2015.17 0odgeCW@fJr1AII Page 130
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2D15.17 BudgeCPoi Page 131
Internal Services Fund- Facilities Maintenance
2012113
2013/14
2014/1$
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
60-70 11-6130
City Overhead Fees
12,000
1;,000
13,000
z6,000
60-70-11-6360
iContract/Other Services
96,552
46,002
90,000
187,500
60-7011-6530
1Buildinq/Ground5 Maintenance
74,558
64,285
50,000
112,500
60-70-11-6670Maintenance
Supplies
4,196
6,9131
5,000
11,500
6o-70 r,' 6695
11 Sm Equip/Tools/Furniture
2,879
4,1771
2,000
4,000
60-7oa1-6720
(Electric
57,365
63,29011
55,000
120,000
60-70-11-6730
iNatural Gas
8,439
91555
22,000
44,000
60-70 11 6740
Phone/Internet
620.
8421
1,000
2,000
60-70 it 6750
Water/Sewer/Stormwater
4,828.
3,459,
6,000
12,000
Total Materials & Services
261,426
211,524
244,000
5191500
60-7011-7101
City Facility Improvements 1
01
01
0
40,000
60-7011-7150
Equipment
0
26,o161
10,000
0
Total Capital Projects
01
26,016
10,0001
40,000
'Total Facilities
261,4261
237,540
254,0001
559,50 -
,internal Services Fund- Public Works Administration
1 1
2012113
1013114
2014115
2015117
Account
'1Descri tion i
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
60-70-27-5010
1Salaries & Wages 1
306,5781
304,521
335,0001
551,200
60-70-27-5020
Overtime Wages 1
2,0071
1,839
5,000
9,000
60-70-27-5560
ICity Taxes and Benefits
151,027.
157,785
172,000
309,300
Total Personnel Services
459,6121
464,146..
512,0001
869,500
60-70-27-6130
City Overhead Fees
75,000
100,0001
112,000
224,000
60-70-27-628o
Travel/Training
11,572
5,587
6,000
11,000
60-70-27-6350
Professional Services
16,744
25,0931
30,000
60,000
60-70-27-6360
Contract/Other Services
4,ocC
1,198.
1,000
2,000
60-70-27-6610
Books/Publications
202.
1191
500
1,000
60-70-43-6640
Dues/Licenses
291
7361
1,000
1,100
So 70-27-668o
Office/Shop Supplies
5,846.
3¢001
5,000
10,000
6o-70-27-66go
Postage
1,762
1,4191
2,200
4,000
60-70-27-6695
Sm Equip/Tools/Furniture
2,730
0
0
0
60-70-27-6740
Phone/Internet
4,091
4,0371
4,500
9,000
.Total Materials & Services
122,2441
141,7001
162,200
323,100
Total Public Works Administration I
581,8561
605,8461
674,200
2,292,600
2D15.17 BudgeCPoi Page 131
City of Central Point
2015117 Biennial Budget
2015.176udpo$#J`TT lAsx Page 132
Internal Services Fund- Fleet Maintenance
1011/131,
2023124
2014115
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
60-70-29-5010
Salaries & Wages
50,961,
50,448
52,500
112,450
60-70-29-5020
Overtime Wages
0
500
1,000
60-70-29-5560
City Taxes and Benefits
29,270
30,113.
32,0001
72,650
Total Personnel Services
80,231
Bo,561
85,0001
186,100
60-70-29-627o
Lease/Rentals
11,184
10,509,
15,0001
24,000
60-70-29-628o
Travel/Training
_ 183.
118
5001
Boo
60-70-29-6360
Contract/Other Services
20,392
24,8281
28,0001
60,000
60-70-29-6}0
(Vehicle Repair/Maintenance
24,642.
1
50001
16,000
60-70-29-6520
Equipment Repair/Maintenance
19,063
27,831,
10,0001
40,000
60-70-29-6620
!Clothing Allowance
47,039
01
250
500
60-70-29-6660
(Fuel
579
51,571.
52,000
108,000
60-70-29-6680
(Office/Shop/Safety Supplies
5,691,
1,037
Soo
1,000
60-70-29-6695
'Sm Equip/Tools
01
91309_
8,750
15,000
60-70-29-6710
IDisposal
501
0
100..
zoo
60-70-29-6740
Phonellnternet
2,1521
1,652
2,000
4,000
,Total Materials & Services
130,974,
133,530
112,1001
269,500
60-70-29-7150
(Equipment
2414071.
0.
100,00011
307,000
60-70-29-7151
Vehicles
o,
73,642.
01
0
(Total Capital Outlay
243,407
73,642
100,0001
307,000
Total Fleet Maintenance
454,613
187,7331
307,1001
761,600
Internal Services Fund- Interdepartmental
2011/13
1013/14
1014115
2015/17
Account
Description
Actual
Actual
Budget
Adopted
60-70-11-8000
Transfer Out- Facility Reserves
o1
80,000
�
0
50,000
60-70-11-800o
Transfer Out - Equipment Reserves
01
0l
0
0
Total Transfers Out
0I
80,000
0
50,000
60-7011-9500
Ending Balance
11 233,3151
239,394
31,SOO..
65,680
Total Ending Balance
1 233,315,
239,394,
31,500
65,680
1l oral mteme artmental
233.3151
319,394
31,5001
115,ba0
1 otal Internal Serves Requirements
1,531,210
1,450,513
1,2bb,b00
2,2,3932,0
2015.176udpo$#J`TT lAsx Page 132
Resolution
General Procedures
for Fiscal Year
2015 = 2016
CAP061115 Page 133
A
CENTRAL
POINT
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
140 South 3rtl Street Central Point, OR 97502 (S41) 664-7602 www.centra l pointoregon.gov
STAFF REPORT
June 11", 2015
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution No. _ A Resolution Approving Appointments and Adopting
General Procedures for Fiscal Year 2015-2016.
Consideration of Resolution No. Recommending: (1) Appointment of the following:
City Attorney, Sydnee Dryer; City Engineer, Jeff Ballard; City Auditor, Isler Certified Public
Accountants; Municipal Judge, Joe Charter; Insurance Agent of Record, Brown & Brown
Northwest. (2) Establishment of general procedures regarding: council expenses; designation of
depository; authority to keep, invest, transfer and expend funds; accounting principles; interfund
and overhead fees; outstanding checks; capital acquisition; summons, complaints, and tort claim
notices.
STAFFSOURCE:
Chris Clayton, City Manager
BACKGROUND/SYNOPSIS:
Each fiscal year the City Council considers a general procedures resolution which appoints specific
individuals or firms to represent the City in the capacity of: City Attorney, City Engineer, City
Auditor, Municipal Judge, and Insurance Agent of Record. Furthermore, the general procedures
resolution establishes and regulates procedures regarding the following: council expenses;
designation of depository; authority to keep, invest, transfer and expend funds; accounting
principles; interfund and overhead fees; outstanding checks; capital acquisition; summons,
complaints, and tort claim notices.
The attached general procedures resolution recommends no significant changes for the fiscal year
2015-2016. One matter of note is contract/agreement timelines. In the future, contracts/agreements
for general services will be procured in an effort to gain consistency with the city's new biennial
budget cycle.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budgetary appropriations for the contracted services referenced in the 2015/2016 general services
resolution are included in the 2015/2017 City of Central Point Budget. More specifically, these
costs are generally contained in individual department budget line items for contracted services and
professional services. The only exception would be the budget appropriation for insurance
premiums, which has an individual line item in the inter -departmental fund.
CAP061115 Page 134
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Resolution approving appointments and establishing general services procedures for the
fiscal year 2015/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution No. (1) Appointment of the following: City Attorney, Sydnee
Dryer; City Engineer, Jeff Ballard; City Auditor, Isler Certified Public Accountants; Municipal
Judge, Joe Charter; Insurance Agent of Record, Brown & Brown Northwest. (2) Establishment of
general procedures for the following: council expenses; designation of depository; authority to
keep, invest, transfer and expend funds; accounting principles; interfund and overhead fees;
outstanding checks; capital acquisition; summons, complaints, and tort claim notices.
PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED:
None
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to approve the 2015/2016 general procedures resolution for the City of Central Point.
Return to Agenda
CAP061115 Page 135
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING GENERAL PROCEDURES
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2017
RECITALS:
1. The Central Point City Council deems it appropriate to authorize certain
appointments and procedures relating to City administration, budget, and
fiscal management for fiscal year 2015-2016.
The City of Central Point resolves as follows: For the fiscal year 2015-2016, thefollowing
appointments are hereby made; the following policies and procedures are imposed, and
the same are hereby adopted:
Section 1. Appointments.
A. Insurance Agent of Record. Brown & Brown Northwest Insurance Agency
is hereby appointed to continue as Insurance Agent of Record for the City
for property, general liability, vehicle liability, workers compensation and
bond insurance through June of 2016.
B. City Attorney. Sydnee Dreyer of Huycke, O'Connor, Jarvis, Dreyer, Davis
& Glatte, LLP is hereby appointed to the office of City Attorney through
June 2016 and is designated as a sworn officer of the City under the
terms of the legal services contract dated June 2013.
C. Municipal Judge. Jackson County Justice of the Peace, Joe Charter, is
hereby appointed as Municipal Court Judge under the terms of the
intergovernmental agreement between the City of Central Point and
Jackson County through June 2016.
D. City Auditor. Isler Certified Public Accountants is hereby appointed as City
Auditor through June 2016 pursuant to statutes requiring independent
fiscal audit of the City, and subject to the contract for Audit of an Oregon
Municipality.
E. City Engineer. Jeff Ballard dba RH2 Engineering Inc. is hereby appointed
as City Engineer of the City of Central Point through June 2016 under the
terms of the letter dated May 15, 2007.
Section 2. Council Expenses.
City Council members may elect to receive compensation of $150 per month,
and the Mayor may elect to receive compensation of $250 per month. In addition
to said compensation, reimbursement may also be made to the Mayor or Council
members for actual expenses incurred while on official City business.
CAP061115 Page 136
Section 3. Designation of Depository.
Any Central Point branch of an FDIC insured bank, the State of Oregon Local
Government Investment Pool, and all successors in interest to those institutions
are each hereby designated as depositories for City funds, and the Finance
Director or designee may deposit monies belonging to the City in any or all of
said institutions in accordance with applicable law until further order of the City
Council.
Section 4. Authority to Keep, Invest, Transfer and Expend Funds
A. The Finance Director or designee is hereby authorized to invest any
surplus funds in accordance with ORS 294.035 and ORS 294.810, in
such investments as are authorized by said statutes, and to transfer funds
from one account to another.
B. The Finance Director or designee is hereby authorized to establish a
petty cash fund with a balance not to exceed $2,000. The fund may be
used to maintain cash drawer change funds and provide for
miscellaneous expenditures not to exceed $50 per transaction; except
that upon approval of the City Manager or the Finance Director a
maximum expenditure of $100 per transaction may be made.
C. The City Manager or designee is authorized to expend funds in
accordance with budget appropriations. All revenues received and
expenditures incurred by the City in implementing the budget
appropriations shall be reported to the Council. Such reports will normally
be made on a quarterly basis.
Section 5. Accounting Principles.
The City shall maintain its financial records in accordance with current generally
accepted accounting principles, and all applicable laws and regulations.
Section 6. Interfund and Overhead Fees.
Expenditures incurred by one fund for the benefit of another fund may be
reimbursed in accordance with acceptable accounting procedures as determined
by the Finance Director.
Section 7. Outstanding Checks.
Outstanding checks stale dated (at least six months after the date of issuance)
must escheat to the state under ORS 98.352.
CAP061115 Page 137
Section 8. Capital Acquisition.
Items costing more than $5,000 and having a useful life of more than one year
shall be capitalized.
Section 9. Summons, Complaints, and Tort Claim Notices.
The City Recorder shall be designated to receive all Summons, Complaints, and
Tort Claim Notices.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day
of 1 2015.
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
Recorder
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 138
Resolution
Classification Pay
Plan 2015/16
CAP061115 Page 139
Ill
A
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
POINTChris Clayton, City Manager • Deanna Casey, City Recorder • Barb Robson, Human Resources Director
STAFF REPORT
June 11,2015
AGENDA ITEM: Classification Pay Plan Revision
Consideration of Resolution No. Revising the Classification Pay Plan
STAFF SOURCE:
Barbara Robson, Human Resources Director
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
Annually, traditionally in lune, the Council is asked to approve the Classification Pay Plan with any
revisions from the prior approved plan. The last pay plan was approved in August 2014 following
ratification of the Police collective bargaining agreement.
Part A of the pay plan (General Service Bargaining Unit) is unchanged exceptfor some updated position
titles. The union contract negotiated in 2014 included a cost of living adjustment for July 1, 2015 based
on the January to January, All Cities CPI -U, with a range of Oto 3.5%. The CPI change was -0.89/, so no
cost of living adjustment was made to the pay scale. The list of classification titles has been updated to
reflect current position titles that have changed or will be added July 1 as a result of the budget
adoption process.
Part of the pay plan (Police Bargaining Unit) is unchanged except for an updated position title. This
group also bargained a COLA based on the CPI with a 0 to 4% range based on the Januaryto January,
All Cities CPI -U. The union recently requested to change the Master Police Officer position title back to
Corporal, and the city agreed to do that, effective July 1.
Part of the pay plan (Exempt, Non -Bargaining Unit, Management Positions) reflects no change in
salary range amounts but does move the Accountant/Supervisor position from Band I to Band 11. This
position's pay band was not adjusted when the supervisory duties were added to the position last year.
A recent salary survey indicated that Band I put the position well below market.
RECOMMEND MOTION:
Motion to approve Resolution
ATTACHMENTS: Classification Pay Plan (attached to resolution)
CAP061115 Page 140
RESOLUTION NO.
FIT 04Y01l111IS] 01* WRif0[viI:IX4]W-lulIyN/e1111IS] 7]e\I]Ie\01
RECITALS:
Chapter 2.48 of the Central Point Code authorizes and directs the City Council to adopt rules
relatingto personnel matters.
Policy #5.2.3 of the Personnel Policies and Procedures provides that the Council shall, by
resolution, adjust the salaries and rates of compensation and benefits for all City officers and
employees. The City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to make revisions thereto.
The City of Central Point resolves as follows:
The Classification Pay Plan for bargaining unit and management employees, as Exhibit A is
hereby attached, is hereby ratified and adopted.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of
20
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
CAP061115 Page 141
Return to Agenda
Classification Pay Plan Effective July 1, 2015
PartA: General Service Bargaining Unit Positions (hourly)
Classification Title Grace
Step
Step
Step
Step
Step
Step
Gentle 2J GS2J
15.42
16.19
17.00
17.85
18.75
19.68
Office Asslsbut
Crude GS6
16.82
17.67
18.55
19.48
20.45
21.47
Account Clerk: Accounts Payable
Account Cie rk: Payor I I mha as 0he rs
Account Clerk: Utility BII IIng
Community Development Support Specialist
Parks Maintenance Worker
Utility Worker
Gmtle5 GS5
18.91
19.85
20.85
21.89
22.98
24.13
Assistant Engineering Technician
Customer Service Technician
Equipment Maint Eabrication Technician
Planning Technician
PW Administrative Assistant
Recreation Programs Coordinator
Senior Utility Worker
Crude GS6
20.94
21.99
23.09
24.24
25.45
26.73
Acctg/Business Services Coordinator
Fd9R88FR9T8vImGia GIS
Parks Lead
Recreation Coordinator Special EventslMktg
G mtle7 GS7
23.08
24.24
25.45
26.72
28.06
29.46
Community Planner
Foreman: Streets. Water
Crude GS8
25.83
27.12
28.47
29.90
31.39
32.96
Community Planner II
Construction Management Coordinator
Environmental Serviceii Coordinator
Information Technology Specialist
Crude GS9
28.67
30.11
31.61
33.19
34.85
36.59
Pill Police Bargaining Unit Positions
Classification Title Gentle
Step
Step
Step
Step
Step
Step
Police Support Specialist Pilo
2,945
3,094
3,248
3,411
3,581
3,760
Community Services Officer P117
3,126
3,282
3,446
3,619
3,800
3,990
Police Officer P145
4,007
4,206
4,418
4,638
4,870
5,114
Master Police Of, Corporal P150
4,431
4,653
4,886
5,130
5,386
5,665
Part C: Exempt, Non -Bargaining Unit, Management
Positions
Classification Title
Band Minimum
Maximum
Police Office Manager
I
4,150
5,600
AccourtanUFimance Supervisor
II
5,150
6,900
City Recorder
II
5,150
6,900
Police Lieutenant (non-exempt)
II
5,150
6,900
Parks 8 Recreation Manager
II
5,150
6,900
Public Works Operations Manager
II
5,150
6,900
Building Division Manager
III
6,150
8,000
Police Captain
III
6,150
8,000
Department Director (CD, FIN, HS IT, PPW)
IV
6,500
8,700
Police Chief
V
7.150
9.100
Approved by Council
CAP061115 Page 142
Resolutions
Volunteer Resolution
CAP061115 Page 143
l
A
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
POINTChris Clayton, City Manager . Deanna Casey, City Recorder . Barb Robson, Human Resources Director
STAFF REPORT
June 11, 2015
AGENDA ITEM: Worker's Compensation Coverage for Volunteers
Consideration of Resolution No. _ _ A Resolution Extending Workers Compensation Coverage to
Volunteers of the City of Central Point
STAFF SOURCE:
Barbara Robson, Human Resources Director
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
Annually, in lune, the Council is asked to extend, by way of resolution, Workers Compensation coverage
to volunteers.
ORS 656.031 allows public entities, by resolution, to elect workers' compensation coverage for
volunteer workers. City County Insurance, the City's workers' compensation insurance carrier, requires
that the City pass such a resolution annually. This resolution continues the current practice of providing
workers' compensation coverage for city volunteers, with the exception of special events volunteers
who are covered under a separate accident policy.
The 2015-16 resolution includes the same categories of volunteers as last year's resolution and covers
those who volunteer on a regular basis such as committee members, the council, Police volunteers,
Kidventure volunteers, and other various program areas. This resolution does not include volunteers for
individual special events such as Battle of the Bones.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Worker's comp coverage for volunteers accounts for a very small portion of the city's total worker's
comp premium.
ATTACHMENT:
Motion to approve Resolution No. A Resolution Extending the City of Central Point
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution , A Resolution Extending Workers Compensation Coverage to Volunteers
of the City of Central Point.
CAP061115 Page 144
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION EXTENDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE
TO VOLUNTEERS OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
RECITALS:
Oregon Revised Statute 656.031 allows public entities, by resolution, to extend workers' compensation
coverage to volunteer workers.
Therefore, the City of Central Point resolves as follows:
Workers' compensation coverage will be provided to the following classes of volunteers listed in this
resolution, noted on CIS payroll schedule, and verified at audit.
1. Public Safety Volunteers
An assumed monthly wage of $800 per month will be used for public safety volunteers in the following
volunteer positions:
Police Reserve Officers
Volunteers in Police Services (VIPS
Police Explorers
2. Volunteer Boards, Commissions, and Councils
An aggregate assumed annual wage of $2,500 will be used per volunteer board, commission and/or
council for the performance of administrative duties. The covered bodies are:
City Council
Planning Commission
CERT (Community Emergency Response Team)
Parks Commission
Citizen's Advisory Commission (CAC)
Multicultural Committee
Budget Committee
An assumed monthly wage of $800 per month will be used for public officials for the performance of
manual labor above and beyond the administrative duties covered by paragraph 2.
3. Non -Public Safety/Boards, Commissions, and Councils Volunteers
All non-public safety volunteers and non -boards, commissions and councils volunteers listed below will
track their hours and Oregon minimum wage will serve as the assumed wage for both premiums and
benefits calculations. CIS will assign the appropriate classification code according to the type of
volunteer work being performed.
CAP061115 Page 145
Parks & Recreation — excluding "Special Events' covered under a separate accident policy
Public Works
Clerical
Preschool/Child Care Center— "Kidventure" classroom assistants
4. Other Volunteers
Volunteer exposures not addressed here will have worker's compensation coverage if, at least two
weeks prior to the onset of the work the City of Central Point provides written notice to CIS
underwriting requesting coverage, CIS approves the coverage and date of coverage, and provides
written confirmation of the coverage.
S. Special Events Volunteers
Volunteers participating in City -sponsored special events will be covered under a separate accident
policy and are not covered under this resolution.
The City of Central Point agrees to maintain verifiable rosters for all volunteers, including volunteer
name, date of service, and hours of service, and make them available at the time of a claim or audit to
verify coverage.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of
20
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
CAP061115 Page 146
Return to Agentla
Business
Freeman Road Water
Line
CAP061115 Page 147
P5W__
Parks & Public Works Department AOW%kL Matt Samitore, Director
CENTR
POINT
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 4, 2015
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MATT SAM ITORE, DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: Freeman Road Waterline Replacement
SUMMARY: The City has to replace approximately 700 feet of twelve inch waterline on Freeman
Road because the current waterline is too shallow and could potentially be damaged in the future.
This was an unknown issue until construction started occurring last month. Staff in coordination
with OBEC Engineering is attempting to negotiate a new contract to have Knife River and its sub-
contractor do this work, but at the time of this staff report that has not occurred.
If a reasonable price cannot be reached by Friday, June 5, 2015 the project will be bid and the bid
opening will occur in the afternoon of June 11, 2015.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff will present council with the low bidder at the council meeting if a
revised contract cannot be negotiated with Knife River.
Return to Agentla
CAP061115 Page 148