Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 281 - Forest Glen, Unit No 2./ , ~ r.~t:.. ~7 PI.,ANNINC COMMISSTt~N RESOi,tJTION NCB. ~. A RESOi,UTION GRANTING APPROVI~L OF A TENTATIVE PLAN FOR UNIT' NO, 2 OF FOREST GIFI~;N SUBnIV?SION (Appl.ica~t: Cr_awn. West I~evelnpmez~ts} (37 2~1 :~ 1.A Tax i,ot 1.800 } ( 37 ?_W 12B Tax Lot. 50(3 ) BE IT RESQI,VEI~ BY THE Pi,ANNING COMMISSION OF THE' CITY OF CENT1tAL P07NT AS FOi,L,OWS Section _l. Nature of A licata~.an. This i.s an applicati_or~ for apprnval of a tentative pl.ar~. for an 1.8--1ot subdi_vi.siaxa in an R-1-6 district. of Central Point, Oregon. The Planning Commission reviewed the appli.cati.nn and tentative plan at a public hearing on. March 15, 1.994. 5er.tinn 2. A. _r.nval. Cr.~teri..a. Th.e criteria for_ apprnval. of this appli.catian are found in CPMC Chapter 1.6, rel.ati!.~g to tentative plans a~.d subda.visi_an.5, and in Chapter 17, relating t.4 zoning and lot sizes. Section 3. ~'indi.n s and Conclusions. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. Tentative k'3.an R~q~xi._rements. Th.e applicati_nn. and tentative plan herein are i.z~. the correct farm and contain. all. of the infnr~natinn required for the same under CPMC Chapter 16.1.0. B. Area and Width of T~at.s. They subdivision l.at.s average 8,228 square feet anal a11. meet. the R-1-5 district 1. at size requirements of 6x000 square feet far interior. fats and 7,000 for cor_nez l its found i_n CPMC 1.7.20.050. The rr~i.nimum width requirements of CPMC 1.7.20.050 are also met, with interior lots at ]east 60 feet wide and corner_ lots at least 70 feet wi~l.e. C. Blocks a.nd Streets. The tentative plan proposal, for the layout axed dimensi.on.s of streets and binrks is in compliance with the requirements of CPMC Chapter 16.213 regarding streets and CPMC Chapter 15.24 regarding blacks. Section 4. Cond~.~~onal ApAroval. The appl.icatian fa:c tentative plan apprnval for Forest Glen Subda.visiaxa Unit No. 2 is her.aby appr_nvecl, subject to the following conditions imposed under a.uth.arity of CPMC 1.f .10.090: Con.d t i. c~n.s 1. The storm drainage easement hPtweex~. lets 59 and F,O, az~cl through lots 57, 58 and 59 heading north shall be 20 feet wide: 1. ~- Pi,ANNING COMMISSION RESOi~t]TION NO. ~~ f (431b94) ?. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and rr_a.wl. spaces with positive drainage away from the strt.zcture and drain. lines connected to a curb dra~.xz nr axa appravPd storm sewer. Devel,csper shall prnvide the necessary storm d.ra~_xtage impravemexzts and lot grading to assure that all lots, streets and properties drain properly. Developer shall submit a grading plan with. the construction drataings and perform sizcb. grada.rzg and dra:i.nage improvements to satisfy tha_s cnndit.aon, leaving only minor gradixzg required for each lot rltzring house cnnstruct.i.nn. 3. The Development Plan prev3.nusly apprn~red far this development includes the extension of Coachman Drive th.rouc~h lot 51 of this stzbd~.vision, 1t a.s not r.ertain that Coachman Drive will be extended through lot 51, because the status of the property direr.tly north of lot 5l_ is not settled a.t this time. Applicant is seeking to have the property z:e-zoned to R-3, artd that process has not been camplet.ed. Until it has been decided whether or not Coachman Drive wall be extended, J.at 51 sha7.l not be sold or developed, but must remain available for tzs as an extextsinn. of Coachman Drive. 4. Tn the event that it is decided that Coachman Drive wi3.l be extended through lot 5l_, developer shall dedicate lot 51 to the City for street and j~tility pur_peses. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication. of ~.ts passage this ' ~ _ day of .~~., ...,...,.,.,..__...WW_,..._ ~ ~ , Planning C.ammi_ssinxz Chaa_rman. R.TTEST City Repr entatave Approved by me this ~,~ day of 1994. - - _ Planning Commiss3_nn Chairman 2 - Pl1ANNTNG C©MMZSS~ON RFSC}Li.TT~ON NO. ~_ X431694)