Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution 248 - Leon Smith Site Plan - Laurel
~ f CI ..? PLANNING C4MMISSTON RESOi~F.JTION NO. 248 A RESOLUTION CQNDITIONALLX APPROVING A. SITE PLAN APPI,TCATIQN AT 427 LAUREL STREET {Lean Smith, Applicant) (37 2W 3DD Tax Lot 4300} RE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRP,L PCIN'.t', OREGC}N, AS ~'OI.,LOWS: Section 1. Nat;ur~ of Appl.icntian This is an app7.icat.ion for site plan approval far a second ~. i.ving unit in an R-2 zone an a 1 at: l acated at 427 Lain: el Street , Central Part, Oregon. Th.e second unit would be connected to an existing singleMfamily structure, thereby creating a duplex. Section 2. _ Criteria Applicable to Deci~ian; The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Cade apply to this appl~.cati.an: ~.. Chapter 17.24, Family District; 2. Chapter 17.60, 3. Chapter 17.64, 4. Chapter 17.72, Construction Plan Section, 3_. _ Findings Requiremen.t.s for Residenta.a~ , Two General Regulations; Off-Street Par~~ing and Loading; Site Plan, Landscaping and Approval. 1. The pa:apasal would create a two-fama.Jy dwelling, in an R-2 district, which is a permitted use. 2. The proposed single-story structu~:e is Jess than 35 feet in height and, therefore, complies with the height requirement. in the Code. 3. Tk~e lat is approximately 7,700 square feet, and them:fore meets the R--2 minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet for interior lots. ~-. The proposal would meet the set---back reglzirements for (rant {20 feet), side (5 feet per story} and back (10 feet}. 1 -~ I'LANNTNG COMMT 55TON RESOLUTION No . _ 24,x_., ( 412193 ) 5. The proposal catnpla.es vait:h Chapter ]-7.5Q regarding set- back, clear vision and related requirements. 6. Twa-f armly dwellings are required to have four 9--feat by 2.0-faat. covered parking spaces . The site plan submitted si~.ows three S-faot by 16-tact arid one ].0-foot by ].~-faat: spar..es, whicl~z do nat meet the 9-foot by 20-foot standard. 7. CPMC 17.b4.10C?C a:equiz:es axz 18~-foot access driveway. The site plan shawl a 10•-f oat driveway, which does not camply. ~ect~.an 4. C©ndit;i,a~a1 _A.P rov~~- The within app]. ].cation far site plan is t~erei~y c:axadit].oraally approved, sa long as the fallowing canditions are met: Conditions :~.. Applicant must prova.de four 9-foot by 20-~foot covered parking spaces, whale at the same time maintaining a minimum 26- foot parking aisle far all 90 degree parking spaces and complying with all Central Paint Municipal Cade standards on paving, drainage, lighting, clear vision, use of par]~ing areas and curb staps as pravaded in CPMC 17.64.100i~. 7_. The access driveway must. be a minimum of 18 feet wide. 3. No building permits shall tissue until applicant demanstrates, to the satisfaction of the Central Paint Fire Chief, that the proposed driveway access as adequate to serve fire and emergency vekaicles. 4. Applicant sha11 construct the additional dwelling unit sa that the exterior sid~.ng and raafing of t:he es~isting and new structures match in color, materials and appearance. 5. A separate water meter and building service shall be a~~stalled far each dwelling unit. 6. A separate sanitary sewer serva.ce from the sanitary sewer mainline to the new dwelling unit shall be canstructed. 7. Ali, raof drains, area drains, and crawlspaces shall have pasitive drainage away f rom the st~~uctur. e and steal 7. be conxzect.ed to a curb drain ar an a.ppraved storm sewer. Applicant shall provide the buii.ding's finished floor and property topographical elevations to determine that all structures wall drain properly. 2 - PI.~ANNINC COMP~~aSI(~N RiJSOL,UTl:01~ NU. 248 {x]_2193} 8. The construction a~ the driveway will regua.re the curb and gutter_ to be saw cut and replaced as a pa~:t of the driveway instaiiatian. Passed by the Planning Cornm:i.ss~_on and signed by me i.n autk~enticatian of its passage this :a_~ day of ~:~"" I ~ , ~. 9 9 3 . planning Car~tnissiorx Chairman ATTEST` City R eseratative Approved by me this "~ ~ day c~~ -~/ ~~- ~%,~ 1993 . Planning Commission Chaa.rrnan 3 - PI.~ANNTNG C{)MMISSTON RESQT_,UT':i`C)N Np, 248 {012J_9~}