HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 242 - Griffin Creek Estates VarianceI f ~ ~
- ~ ~~~ ')
Pl'.,~NNZNG COMMZSSZC}N lz~.sar_,U~zoN No. 242
~~soL~uTZaN G~~~vTZNC ~ ~~r~~zvz~raN v~.~z~.~rc~; ~o~z
GPZFFIIV C.REEI~ FSTA.TFS ST7PL}zVZ~zDN
recitals
~.. L3y appla.catian an. ~.ugust 11., 199?_, Tecl. 33rar~ch has
request.ecl a ~,ubd~,visic~r~ var~_ance :for Gri.f~in Crook Estates
subdivision.
2. The rec~~.zestecl varl.ance i:~ for a lot wkz_i.cli is substandard
in widt.b. and in average depth..
3. On October 20, x.992, the Central Poa.nt Planning
Commissa.on, in accardat~.ce w~.th CL'MC Chapter_ 1_.2~, conducted a
public hearing oa~a sd;i,d application.
~VoSa, therefore,
BF IT LtE5OL,VED L~5'' "f'HE' CzTY DF C:ENTLd~1L, POINT }-'L,~NNZNC
COMMISSION AS FOL,LaW~:
Ser~L:i.ox1_.,_ C7~~t~~x:~i~__fo~° ~~?pra_v_a_1_. The cr~.teria for
approval of subd:i.visa.an variances are set fort,_l~i i,n CPMC
16.~0.02a, which requires the applicant to prove, by clear and
convincing evidr_nce, t_haf. the applicatinrz meets five separate
standards listed thea:~ein.
Sect~_asz 2 . ~'~.z~d_%~g~_o~E _F~c~~:_.
~.. The applicant seeks approval of a subd:i.vision lot i.n an.
R~1-~8 zone which is substandard in t:wa respecter:
a. zt is approx3.rnatel~ 50 feet wide. CPMC Section
17.20.050 requires lots in R-]..--8 zonal to be at )east 70 feet.
w~.de; and
b. The average depth of the lot: is .155.5 feet< CPMC
16,24.fl50 rest.z:icts the average depth of lots t.o na more than 2.5
times the width., t~ahi_ch would be 125 feet.
2. Except. for the wi.dt;h and average depth, the lot a_n
cluest:i.nn a.w in compl.~.ance w:i.th all requirements of CPMC.
3. A structure complying ~r:i_th applicable law could be built.
on. the lot, vah.a.le still observing the rec~i.at.red setbacks.
1. -° PL,A.NNZNG COMMZSSTON 1~FSOL3UTZON NO. __242__ { 100992 }
ilr-;c~t:ion ~. CarzcJ.usi.on:> o~ ~~aw_. ".t'izo appl.it,ax-z'c has pzoved by
c.l ear and c;onv:i.r~ci.ng evidence t.hal:
1. 'the strict application a~ ~.he lot sire rec~uirc~ments or
CPNC t~rould ~:e.7ult in an unnecessary haa:ciship to the ap~ali.cant;
and
2 . Al 1 of tkae other standaz:~cis irz CPMC 1C .40.020 pertai.n;i.ng
to subdivi.si.on variances have been islet .
Sect.i_on_---4.__~~?Pz_c~v~~__of Variara_ce. Applicant's rec~uest.ed
subcla_vision variance is i~ae~~eby g~:anteci.
Passed by the planning Commi.ssi.on and s:i_gned by me in
authenticat:i.c~n o:t its passage tkzis ~~ ciay n~
___~.C~'t..~ 19 9 2_ .
~/
T?l.anning Comtrtission. Chairman
.ATTEST
Design -ed .ity Re~aresentative
Approved by rye ~.hi s ~~~~ day o~ ~~~~~ 1992 .
P 1 craning Comrni. s si ora Cha ~ rman
2 ~~ PLANNING C~MM~SSION RESOL~7C7:CN N0. 242 {100992)