HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 164 - McGrath CUPi ~ ~; ~;:
PLANNING COP+iMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 164
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND
APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION SUBMITTED
BY RUSTY McGRATH FOR CENTRAL POINT A.T.V.
WHEREAS, an application for a conditional use permit fnr an all
terrain vehicle (A.T.V.) repair, parts and accessories, and sales facility
in a C-5 zone has been submitted by Rusty McGrath, said business to be
located at 820 South Front Street within the City; the location more
particularly descra,bed as Jackson County Tax Assessor`s map Page 37 2W 11CB
tax lot 400; and
WHEREAS, the Central Point Planning Commission has reviewed and approved
the application at a public hearing held on the seventh day of February,
1989, now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FO~,LOWS
Section 1. The relevant criteria applicable to the within application
is as follows:
{a) The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as thoroughfare
commercial.
(b) The Zoning Ordinance designates the site as C-5.
(c) Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 7.7.76 describes the conditions
which, the Planning Commission must consider in order to grant a
conditional use permit.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: The
proposal meets the City`s urbanization goal for commercial land uses found
in the Comprehensive Plan because the east side of Highway 99 {Front Street}
is the primary thoroughfare commercial district {C-5). This area is devel-
oped primarily for auto related businesses and services. The C-5 zoning
recognizes these types of uses which will strengthen the corridor while
providing locations for these uses that are often not compatible with commer-
cial uses in other zones.
Planning Commission Resolution No 164 page 1
Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: The
proposal meets the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance for a C-5
zone because:
(a) ATV sales, service and repair is a conditional use.
(b) No evidence was submitted supporting a conclusion that the pro-
posed use would generate conditions that would adversely impact surrounding
properties.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the record herein and
the findings therefrom support the conclusion that the proposal is in compli-
ance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the applicable standards of the
City's Zoning Code. The proposed conditional use is hereby approved subject
to:
(a} Compliance with the relevant requirements of the Uniform Building
Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
Passed by the Planning Commission on
7389, and
signed by me in authentication of its passage this
March 1989.
ATTEST:
~~ ~: ~
~`
Planning ~mm~sSi
~! i ~ on Secretary
3rd day of
~-
Planning Commission Chairm
Approved by me this day of 19F;~
Planning Commission Reso. No.
Planning Commission Chairman.
16~ - page 2
AtrIUS210.89/PORES