HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAP012215CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Central Point
City Council Meeting Agenda
City Hall
January 22, 2015
541-664-3321
City Council
Next Res. 1416
Mayor
Next Ord. 2000
Hank Williams
comprehensive plan map (Minor) to add approximately
Ward
I. REGULAR ME ETI NG CALLE D TO ORDER -7:00 P. M.
Bruce Dingler
Tom Humphrey,
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Ward II
Oaks interchange (Exit 35) including Dean Creek Road
Michael Quilty
(Humphrey)
Finance
III. ROLL CALL
Ward III
16-34 B. Ordinance No. An Ordinance amending an
Brandon Thueson
IV. PUBLIC APPEARANCES —Comments will be limited to 3 minutes per
Ward IV
individual ors minutes if representing a group or organization.
Allen Broderick
management of the Central Point Urban Growth
Works
V. CONSENTAGENDA
At Large
David Douglas
Rick Samuelson
Pages 1-7 A. Approval of January 8, 2015 Council Minute
Jennifer Boardman,
Pages 8-9 B. Child Trafficking Proclamation
Manager
Page 10 C. Financial Report
VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
Administration
Chris Clayton, City
VII. PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS
Manager
Deanna Casey, City
Recorder
11-15 A. Ordinance No. __ An Ordinance amending the
comprehensive plan map (Minor) to add approximately
Community
48 acres to the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary
Development
Tom Humphrey,
east of Interstate 5, North of Upton Road to the Seven
Director
Oaks interchange (Exit 35) including Dean Creek Road
(Humphrey)
Finance
Bev Adams, Director
16-34 B. Ordinance No. An Ordinance amending an
Human Resources
agreement between the City of Central Point, Oregon
Barb Robson, Director
(City) and Jackson County, Oregon (County) for the joint
Parks and Public
management of the Central Point Urban Growth
Works
Boundary (Humphrey)
Matt Samitore,
Director
35-53 C. Ordinance No. _ An Ordinance amending the
Jennifer Boardman,
_
Central Point Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 17.08.010
Manager
Definitions; 17.64.040, Land Use — TOD District;
Police
17.65.050 Zoning Regulations —TOD District; 17.65.070
Kris Allison Chief
Zoning Regulations = TOD Corridor
54-67 D. Ordinance No. An Ordinance amending the Central
Point Comprehensive Plan (MAP) from residential low density
to civic and the City Zoning Map from R-1-6 and park to
civic for approximately five acres located east of South Fourth
Street and between Bush and Ash Streets. (37S2W11BA, TL 2200
and 37S2W11BB, TLs 6300, 8200, 8300 & 8301) (Humphrey)
VIII. BUSINESS
68-76 A. Water Rate Increase— Medford Water Commission (Clayton)
77-106 B. Main Street Revitalization Act Endorsement/Resolution (Clayton)
IX. MAYOR'S REPORT
X. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
XI. COUNCIL REPORTS
XII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Council may adjourn to executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660.
Under the provisions of the Oregon Public Meetings Law, the proceedings of an
executive session are not for publication or broadcast.
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
City Council Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2015
I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Williams called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL: Mayor: Hank Williams
Council Members: Allen Broderick, Bruce Dingier, Mike
Quilty, Rick Samuelson, David Douglas, and Brandon
Thueson were present.
City Manager Chris Clayton; City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer;
Police Chief Kris Allison; Community Development Director
Tom Humphrey; Parks and Public Works Director Matt
Samitore; and City Recorder Deanna Casey were also
present.
IV. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of December 11, 2014 City Council Minutes
Bruce Dingier moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Mike
Quilty seconded. Rall call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Mike Quilty,
yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and
Brandon Thueson, yes. Motion approved.
VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA - None
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Public Hearing — First Reading of an Ordinance Amending an
Agreement Between the City of Central Point, Oregon and Jackson
County, Oregon for the Joint management of the Central Point Urban
Growth Boundary
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey explained that the Regional
Plan Element includes a provision that prior to expansion of the Central Point
Urban Growth Boundary the City and County shall adopt an agreement for the
management of Gibbons/Forest Acres Containment Area. In order to do this both
the City and the County have agreed the pre-existing City/County agreement
should be amended.
City and County staff introduced a draft of the City/County Urban Growth
Boundary Management Agreement at a joint meeting of the City and County
01
City of Central Pcaru
City Counal Minutes
January 8, 2075
Page 2
Planning Commissions on November 20, 2014. Additional new declarations were
added along with new definitions, the intent and purpose of the agreement and a
few new policies to clarify infrastructure in the Told area and the creation of two
new areas of Mutual Planning Concern. Each Planning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of the agreement to their respective elected officials.
Two minor revisions were made and are reflected in the agreement.
The proposed major text amendment will serve to bring the City of Central Point
Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement into compliance with the
Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan Performance Indicators. The proposal
is consistent with the Central Point Municipal Code -Comprehensive Plan and
Urban Growth Boundary Amendments And will serve to bring the City of Central
Point Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement into compliance with the
City's Regional Plan Element.
There was discussion regarding Gibbon/Forest Acres and the Jackson County
Expo property. Any growth that may happen in these areas will be discussed
between the two agencies to the satisfaction of both.
Mayor Williams opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward and the public
hearing was closed.
Mike Quilty moved to second reading an Ordinance Amending An
Agreement Between the City of Central Point, Oregon and Jackson County,
Oregon for the Joint management of the Central Point Urban Growth
Boundary. Rick Samuelson seconded. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce
Dingler, yes; Mike Quilty, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick
Samuelson, yes; and Brandon Thueson, yes. Motion approved.
B. Public Hearing — First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the
Comprehensive Plan Map (Minor) to Add Approximately 48 Acres to
the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary East of Interstate 5, North
of Upton Road to the Seven Oaks Interchange (Exit 35) Including
Dean Creek Road
Mr. Humphrey explained that the proposed Minor Map Amendment would amend
the County and City Comprehensive Plan Maps by adding approximately 48
acres of Bear Creek Greenway and Open Space land to the Central Point UGB.
The land proposed for amendment includes property that is in the public
ownership of Central Point, Jackson County and the Oregon Department of
Transportation. The land being added to the UGB will retain the County
Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning until such time as the properties are
annexed and the appropriate City Zoning is applied.
The proposed Minor Boundary Line Adjustment is consistent with the Central
P9oint Municipal Code and with the City/County UGBMA and it also satisfies the
requirements of the GBCVRP and the City's Regional Plan Element. The
proposed area will remain park and open space except for one lot. The property
0
u
City of Central Point
City Council morates
January 8, 2015
Page 3
owner requested during the Regional Problem Solving process that they be
included in the City UGB.
There was discussion of Dean Creek Road. The County has agreed to make
improvements prior to the city taking jurisdiction. Once the Park Master Plan is
complete we can proceed with an expansion to include the Talo area to the
Central Point UGB. We have met the Regional Plan conditions, performance
measures, and findings.
Mayor Williams opened the public hearing. No one came forward and the public
hearing was closed.
Rick Samuelson moved to second reading an Ordinance Amending the
Comprehensive Plan Map (Minor) to Add Approximately 48 Acres to the
Central Point Urban Growth Boundary East of Interstate 5, North of Upton
Road to the Seven Oaks Interchange (Exit 35) Including Dean Creek Road.
Brandon Thueson seconded. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingley, yes;
Mike Quilty, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes;
and Brandon Thueson, yes. Motion approved.
C. Public Hearing — First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the
Central Point Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 17.08.010 Definitions;
17.64.040, Land Use — TOD District; 17.65.050 Zoning Regulation —
TOD District; and 17.65.070 Zoning Regulations — TOD Corridor
Mr. Humphrey explained that the proposed ordinance is recommended because
of a recent request to change the zoning density for Twin Creeks Retirement.
During that request staff realized that there were issues in the tables referring to
senior housing. It is recognized that congregate housing, as a use, has
employees for housekeeping, administration, common dining options, etc., which
sets it apart from an apartment complex. For this reason the allowance of
congregate housing within the LMR zone has been restricted to those incidences
where is its part of, and under the same ownership of, an abutting congregate
housing project in the MMR or HMR zoning district. The design of a congregate
housing project in the LMR district will be subject to LMR residential design and
development standards, including density.
There was discussion regarding assisted living facilities, and if they are included
in the TOD zoning area. City Attorney Dreyer explained that this discussion
should be contained to the topic at hand which is for congregate housing.
Assisted Living facilities would not be included in this type of zoning. Congregate
Housing would be covered in any of these TOD zoning areas.
Mayor Williams opened the public hearing. No one came forward and the public
hearing was closed.
Mike Quilty moved to second reading an Ordinance Amending the Central
Point Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 17.08.010 Definitions; 17.64.040, Land Use
— TOD District; 17.65.050 Zoning Regulation — TOD District; and 17.65.070
�r
City of centra( Point
City (-'muc'd Minutes
January 8, 2015
Page 4
Zoning Regulations — TOD Corridor. Rick Samuelson seconded. Roll call:
Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Mike Quilty, yes; Allen Broderick, yes;
David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Brandon Thueson, yes. Motion
approved.
D. Ordinance No. 1998, Amending Central Point Municipal Code
Chapter 6.08 Animal Control
Police Chief Kris Allison explained that there were no changes recommended for
the proposed Ordinance at the first reading. She did state that she is working
with the local veterinarians to see if they would be able to assist the Police
Department in housing dogs that are found at large until the Jackson County
Animal Control can take them or the owners can be found. She also mentioned
that she has heard good feedback from citizens regarding the Ordinance. There
was discussion regarding the definition of a dangerous animal and the penalties
imposed.
Allen Broderick moved to approve Ordinance No. 1998, Amending Central
Point Municipal Code Chapter 6.08 Animal Control. Bruce Dingier seconded.
Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Mike Quilty, yes; Allen
Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Brandon
Thueson, yes. Motion approved.
E. Ordinance No. 1999, An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
Zoning Map on Lot 33 of Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase 1 (1.81 Acres)
From TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential to TOD-LMR, Low Mix
Residential Zoning
Mr. Humphrey stated that there were no changes recommended at the first
reading of the proposed ordinance. The developer will have to submit plans for
approval to qualify for the congregate housing requirements. This zone change is
specific to a specific lot in Twin Creeks.
There was s discussion regarding median density and trip cap limits. Staff
explained that there have been other density changes to Twin Creeks and that
the median density is still within the requirement levels. The Master Plan for Twin
Creeks was approved a few months ago in anticipation of these changes.
Mike Quilty moved to approve Ordinance No. 1999, An Ordinance
Amending the Central Point Zoning Map on Lot 33 of Twin Creeks
Crossing, Phase 1 (1.81 Acres) From TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential to
TOD-LMR, Low Mix Residential Zoning. David Douglas seconded. Roll call:
Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Mike Quilty, yes; Allen Broderick, yes;
David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Brandon Thueson, yes. Motion
approved.
VIII. BUSINESS
A. Planning Commission Report
04
City ofCentral Point
City Cruncil Minutes
January 8, 2015
Pug, 5
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey presented the Planning
Commission report for January 6, 2015:
Approved a Resolution recommending amendments to the Central Point
Municipal Code to add Chapter 17.08.010 -Definition, "Congregate Housing";
Chapter 17.64.040, Off -Street Parking Requirements, Table 17.64.02A
adjusting parking requirements for Congregate Housing; Chapter 17.65.050
Zoning Regulations, TOD District, Tables 1 through 3; and Chapter 17.65.070
Zoning Regulations, TOD Corridor, Tables 4 and 5, to delete the term "Senior
Housing' and replace the term with "Congregate Housing'. The Commission
discussed the context of the amendments with staff who explained the
dilemma between a previous map amendment and undefined code language.
The new definition and terms clean up inconsistencies and will allow the Twin
Creeks Retirement Center to add cottages to their campus.
Approved a Resolution to change approximately 5 acres of land in a city core
area designated low density residential to civic to reflect actual land uses as a
park, a park service yard and city corporation yard. They considered a city
initiated Comprehensive Plan and zoning amendment to change land from
residential use to civic use. The land is owned by the city and has been used
for public purposes until this time. The new designation would also afford the
city more options when considering a site for a Community Center or
something similar.
Continued a Resolution to approve a conceptual land use and transportation
plan for CP -1 B, for an Urban Reserve Area of Central Point. The Commission
continued this public hearing to their February meeting on order to allow
property owners in the CP -1 B area to receive individual notice and to receive
a recommendation from the Citizens Advisory Commission.
Approved a Resolution authorizing Testing Laboratories as a similar and
compatible use within the C -2(M), C-5 and M-1 zoning districts. The
Commission was asked to make a determination regarding testing
laboratories and the zones in which they might be permitted. The Municipal
Code has broad classifications for scientific labs and the prospective
business applicant in this case was very transparent about the fact that they
are testing various types of herbs including cannabis. The Commission
determined that the proposal qualifies as a scientific lab as the term is used in
the municipal code.
IX. MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Williams stated that at the first meeting of each year a Council President
must be appointed. He opened the floor to nominations. Rick Samuelson
nominated Bruce Dingier, no other nominations were offered.
Rick Samuelson nominated Bruce Dingier for Council President. David
Douglas seconded. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Mike Quilty,
yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and
Brandon Thueson, yes. Motion approved.
0v
Ci(y of Central Point
City Cou l Minutes
January 8, 2015
Page 6
Mayor Williams reported that:
• He met with Representative Sal Esquivel regarding a Vietnam Memorial Wall
in Central Point. They will be working with City staff to plan a wall in Don
Jones Memorial Park.
• He attended the Peoples Bank Chamber Mixer.
• He attended the Medford Water Commission meeting. They will be raising the
rates for outside customers by 5%.
• The Local Committee Assignment list has been handed to everyone. Please
let him know what committees they would like to represent and he will appoint
members at a meeting in February.
X. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Chris Clayton reported that:
• OLCC would like the Council to provide input regarding the rules association
with Measure 91. He will send out the link with his weekly report tomorrow.
• January 27'" is the Employee Awards Breakfast at Twin Creeks Retirement.
Council Members are invited to attend.
• He will be meeting with RCC to discuss options regarding a campus in
Central Point next week.
• Staff will be asking Council to consider the condemnation of a strip of land to
complete the turn lane at Beebe and Hamrick. The property is worth about
$250 and not worth purchasing the entire lot.
• The Study Session for January has been moved to a Tuesday to
accommodate a guest speaker. It will be on the 27' at 6:00 p.m.
XI. COUNCIL REPORTS
Council Member David Douglas stated that this will be his last meeting. He has
purchased property outside of the city limits and will be submitting his letter of
resignation to the Mayor.
Council Member Mike Quilty reported that he has been in Portland attending the
Connect Oregon 5 Meeting. They are prioritizing projects. He will be attending an
ACT and MPO meeting next week.
XII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samfore reported that:
• The Police Department has been making contact with the people who have
been causing problems at the skate park. Thanks to them and the cameras
things have been a little better over the last few weeks.
• There will be a preconstruction meeting the first of February for Freeman
Road.
• He spoke with Budget Committee Member Bill Stultz regarding RVSS and the
issues regarding storm water quality. It might be a good idea to have a pre-
budget meeting to explain these issues to the members so we do not have
the extensive discussion like last year during the budget meetings.
City of Cent.! Pnmt
City Caunul Minutes
January 8, 2015
Page 7
Police Chief Kris Allison reported that:
• They are reviewing their annual goals for the Police Department and will
present a report to the Council soon.
• There will be an article regarding the Central Point Police Department and
our Body Worn Cameras. We have had them for several years.
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey reported that the previous
owner of Red Oak Glass has passed away. He will be attending the service next
week.
XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION -None
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
Mike Quilty moved to adjourn, Rick Samuelson seconded, all said "aye' and the Council
Meeting was adjourned at 8:52 p.m.
The foregoing minutes of the January 8, 2015, Council meeting were approved by the
City Council at its meeting of January 22, 2015.
Dated:
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Child Trafficking Proclamation
Child Trafficking
Awareness Proclamation
WHEREAS, Hundreds of thousands of underage girls and boys living in the United states, and vastly
greater numbers more abroad, suffer in silence under the intolerable yoke of modern slavery; and
WHEREAS, The great majority of men and women over the age of 18 were first trafficked as minors;
and
WHEREAS, the victims of this scourge of modern day slavery lose not only their freedom, but also
their dignity, families, emotional and psychological health—and too often their lives; and
WHEREAS, We stand with all those who are held in compelled service; we recognize the people,
organizations, and government entities that are working to combat child trafficking; and we recommit
to bringing an end to this inexcusable human rights abuse; and
WHEREAS, The steadfast defense of human rights is an essential part of our national identity, and
as long as children suffer the violence of sexual and forced -labor slavery, we must continue the fight;
and
WHEREAS The President of the United States has declared January each year as National Slavery
and Human Trafficking Prevention Month, so we also add our support to this important initiative.
NOW THEREFORE, Be It Resolved, I, Hank Williams, Mayor of Central Point, do hereby pro-
claim the month of January 2015, to be
"Child Trafficking Awareness Month"
And all upon citizens to recognize the vital role we can play in ending modern slavery and to
observe this month with appropriate programs and activities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby set my hand this 22nd, day of January, 2015.
Mayor Hank Williams
City of Central Point _
ENERGY AND COMMENCE '-
cotrgress of the anitrb 6tates
J)OU!5r of i�eprrsrntatiur5
January 14, 2014
Mr. Caleb LaPlante Mrs. Rebecca Bender
ACT Southern Oregon Rebecca Bender Ministries
405 NE 6' Street Grants Pass, OR 97526
Grants Pass, OR 97526
Dear Rebecca and Caleb:
Congratulations on year efforts to bring attention to the hidden threat of human trafficking in
southern Oregon and working with Jackson and Josephine Counties in proclaiming January 2014
as Child Trafficking Awareness Month.
Throughout January, communities around the country will mark National Slavery and Human
Trafficking Awareness Month with activities to prevent the coercion, predation and exploitation
of women, men and, especially, children by education and promoting practical community
engagement in order to end the tragedy of trafficking.
As you well know, human trafficking victims come from anywhere in society. It is estimated that
there are more than 100,000 children in the sex trade in the United States each yew. In the first
six months of 2013 alone, 140 calls and 23 cases of potential trafficking were reported in
Oregon. These numbers show that this is more than a simple law enforcement matter; it is a
human rights abuse epidemic.
Through the efforts of organizations, advocates and survivors like you, I am confident that these
victims can overcome the horrors and stigma of their plight and their communities can gain a
greater awareness of the magnitude of this issue.
Thank you again for all that you do to help bring an end to human trafficking and heal the lives
of those affected by it. It is an honor to represent you in Congress.
Sincerely, //��
'YVRJ�F+_u*"
Greg Walden
Member of Congress
Return to Agentla
Financial Report
Staff Report
.A
CENTRAL
POINT
To:
Mayor & Council
From:
Bev Adams, Finance Director
Date:
January 22, 2o15
Subject:
and Quarter Financial Statements
Background:
Finance Department
Bev Adams, Finance Director
The second quarter financial statements for the period ending December 31, 2014 will be handed out to
you at the meeting tonight. The due date for agenda items to be included in this packet was just a bit
earlier than the final work needed to complete the statements.
Now that the 2013114 year end audit is completed, all entries resulting from the audit have been posted
and the beginning fund balances shown are audited balances.
The recent refinance of debt is now completed and final payments on the old series were made in
December.
In a preliminary review of the second quarter, revenues and expenses are in line with this time period
and no significant changes or exceptions noted.
We are in the process of preparing a mid -year budget report to be presented at the February 121h council
meeting. This mid -year report will provide detail of the individual funds.
Recommended Action:
That Council review and accept the second quarter financial statements and report.
Return to Agenda
Ordinance No. _ An Ordinance amending the comprehensive plan
map (Minor) to add approximately 48 acres to the Central Point Urban
Growth Boundary east of Interstate 5, North of Upton Road to the
Seven Oaks interchange (Exit 35) including Dean Creek Road.
City of Central Point, Oregon CENTRAL
140 5 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 POINT
541.664.3321 Fax 54 1.664.6384
wwwcentralpointorezoneev C",
STAFF REPORT
January 22, 2015
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Community Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 14003
Second reading to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map (Minor) to add approximately 48 acres to the
City of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) east of Interstate 5, north of Upton Road to the
Seven Oaks Interchange (Exit 35) including Dean Creek Road. County File No. 439 -14 -00025 -LRP and
City File No. 14003; Applicant: City of Central Point.
STAFF SOURCE:
Tom Humphrey AICP , Community Development Director
BACKGROUND:
The adoption of the proposed Minor Map Amendment would amend the County and City Comprehensive
Plan Maps by adding approximately 48 acres of Bear Creek Greenway and Open Space land to the
Central Point UGB. The City Council passed a Resolution of Intent (No. 1378) in August 2013 to initiate
changes to its UGB in response to a request by Cardmoore Tucking to bring their property at Seven Oaks
Interchange into the City of Central Point. In order to extend the UGB to the Cardmoore property, the
City first needs to add land from Urban Reserve Area CP -4D.
The land proposed for amendment includes property that is in the public ownership of Central Point,
Jackson County and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The land being added to the
UGB will retain the County Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning until such time as the properties
are annexed and the appropriate City zoning is applied. The City Council conducted a public hearing on
this item at their last meeting, made no revisions and moved the Ordinance to this second reading.
ISSUES:
City and County's Regional Plan Elements include a provision that prior to expansion of the Central
Point Urban Growth Boundary into any Urban Reserve Area, the City andTackson Couno, .shall adopt an
agreement (Area ofMulual Planning Concern) for the management of Gibbons/Forest Acres
Unincorporated Containment Boundary (Performance Indicators 4.1.9.5). The two agencies concluded
that the best way to address this condition was to amend the pre-existing City/County agreement (This is
the subject of another item on the City Council's agenda). The UGBMA must be adopted before the
UGB can be amended.
Other conditions of he Regional Plan Element include; 1) the creation of Conceptual Land Use and
Transportation Plans (Performance Measure 2.7 and 2.8); 2) the restriction of new roadway access into
CP -4D (Performance Measure 2.93); and 3) the formation of and receipt of recommendations from a
County Appointed Agricultural Task Force (Performance Measure 2.22).
Each of these conditions have been or are being addressed. The City Council may recall its approval of a
Conceptual Plan for URA CP -4D. This plan has been vetted and approved by the Rogue Valley MPO and
by the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District. Regarding issues of roadway access, City and County staff
have worked out an intergovernmental agreement to tmnsferjurisdiction of Dean Creek Road when
property from CP -4D is annexed. City staff participated in the Agricultural Task Force and contributed to
11
the recommendations the County Board of Commissioners incorporated in the County Comprehensive
Plan.
FINDING: The proposed UGB Amendment may proceed having satisfied conditions and being in
compliance with the GBC VRP Performance Indicators, adopted pursuant to the requirements of ORS
197.656(2)(b)(C).
The City has criteria for initiating amendments to the comprehensive plan or the urban growth boundary
(ref. CPMC Section 17.96.200). The Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement with Jackson
County also provides a process for considering and adopting this UGB Amendment.
FINDING: The proposed Minor Boundary Line Adjustment is consistent with the Central Point
Municipal Code - Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments and with the
City/County UGBMA and it also satisfies the requirements of the GBCVRP and the City's Regional Plan
Element.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A"—Ordinance No. An Ordinance Amending the Comprehensive Plan Map (Minor) to
Add Approximately 48 acres to the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary east of Interstate 5, north of
Upton Road to the Seven Oaks Interchange (Exit 35) including Dean Creek Road.
ACTION
Conduct the second reading of the proposed admendment to the Urban Growth Boundary and 1)
approve the ordinance; 2) approve the ordinance with revisions; 3) deny the proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the ordinance and approve an amendment to the UGB.
Return to Agenda
iu
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP (MINOR) TO ADD
APPROXIMATELY 48 ACRES TO THE CENTRAL POINT URBAN GROWTH
BOUNDARY EAST OF INTERSTATE 5, NORTH OF UPTON ROAD TO THE SEVEN
OAKS INTERCHANGE (EXIT 35) INCLUDING DEAN CREEK ROAD.
Recitals:
A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute
(ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and
implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning
Goals.
B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with
ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals
and compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans.
C. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may
amend the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary with Jackson County which
was originally adopted on September 26, 1984 and has been amended at
various times since.
D. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.96.100
Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments— Purpose
and Chapter 17.05.010, Applications and Development Permit Review
Procedures, the City has accepted an application and conducted the following
duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendment:
a) Planning Commission hearing on November 20, 2014
b) City Council hearings on January 8, 2015 and January 22, 2015.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the
findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the City staff report, File No. 14003
and public records; determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires
justify the amendments and hereby adopts the changes entirely.
Section 2. The City Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) is hereby amended as set
forth in Exhibit 1 which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
1 �'
Section 3. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement
procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the UGB.
Section 4. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
day of , 20
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
'7,1 � _ � � -� ��� - - __ ��_
i �:
Ordinance No. _. An Ordinance amending an agreement between
the City of Central Point, Oregon (City) and Jackson County, Oregon
(County) for the joint mamnamement of the Central Point Urban
Growth Boundary
City of Central Point, Oregon CENTRAL
140 5 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 POINT
541.664.3321 Faz 541.664.6384
wwwcentralnointoregonecv c" '
STAFF REPORT
January 22, 2015
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 14010
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Community Development Director
Second Reading to revise the Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement (UGBMA) between the
City of Central Point and Jackson County to improve consistency with the Greater Bear Creek Valley
Regional Plan and the City's Regional Plan Element. Principal revisions add Forest/Gibbon Acres and
Jackson County Expo and Fairgrounds as "Areas of Mutual Planning Concern" to insure coordinated land
use preservation and/or development. County File No. 439 -14 -00030 -LRP and City Fite No. 14010;
Applicants: Jackson County/City of Central Paint.
STAFF SOURCE:
Tom Ilumphrey AICP , Community Development Director
BACKGROUND:
The City and County's Regional Plan Elements includes a provision that prior to expansion at the
Central Point Urban Growth Boundary into any Urban Reserve Area, the City and Jackson Countyshall
adoptan agreement (Area ot'Mutual Planning Concern) for the management of Gibbons/Forest Acres
Unincorporated Containment Boundary (Performance Indicators 4.1.9.5). The two agencies have
concluded that the best way to address this condition is to amend the pre-existing City/County agreement
(Attachment A). City and County staff have also added Jackson County Expo and Fairgrounds as an Area
of Mutual Planning Concern for two reasons: 1) the County recently added the Expo property to an
Enterprise Zone and 2) during the first Coordinated Periodic Review process for the Regional Plan,
Jackson County shall consider including the land occupied by the Jackson County Expo to the City of
Central Point's Urban Reverve Area (Performance Indicator 4.L79). For this reason, both jurisdictions
thought it wise to instigate early coordination through the UGBMA.
City and County staff introduced a draft of the City/County UGBMA to a joint meeting of the City
and County Planning Commissions on November 20, 2014. which was last revised in 1998.
Additional new declarations were added along with new definitions, the intent and purpose of the
agreement and a few new policies to clarify infrastructure in the Tolo Area and the creation of two
new Areas of Mutual Planning Concern. Each Planning Commission unanimously recommended
approval of the agreement to their respective elected officials. Two minor revisions were made and
are reflected in italics on pages 8 and 10. The City Council conducted a public hearing on this item at
their last meeting, made no further revisions and moved the Ordinance to this second reading.
ISSUES:
The adoption of this proposed Major Text Amendment (Legislative) would amend the County's Urban
Growth Boundary Agreement with the City of Central Point in order to address the Greater Bear Creek
Valley Regional Plan's (GBCVRP) Performance Measure 2.9.5 which states:
Prior to the expansion of the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary into any Urban Reserve Area, the
City and Jackson County shall adopt an agreement (Arca of Mutual Planning Concern) for the
management of Gibbons/Forest Acres Unincorporated Containment Boundary (same as previously
referenced in the City's Regional Plan Element).
Section 3.7.1 of the County's Land Development Ordinance defines a Major Text Amendment
(Legislative) as:
Amendments that directly affect adopted goals, policies, or pattens of land use. Examples include, but
are not limited to: adopting a new policy or implementation strategy; or revising goals of the Plan.
The proposed amendment would effectively result in new policy and/or implementation strategics within
the Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement with the City of Central Point and therefore falls
within the definition of a Major Text Amendment. Jackson County EDO Section 3.7.2(A)(1) states that
such amendments must be initialed through a County action such as an order approved by the Board of
Commissioners. Order No. 163-14, which was included in the record of the Planning Commission
proceedings, is the Board's action that initiated this proposal.
Major text amendments must conform to the approval criteria contained in LDO 3.7.3(B) which read:
The amendment will correct a substantive error, implement a change in policy, or bring the
Comprehensive Plan into compliance with State and Federal laws or administrative rules. Such
amendments may have widespread and significant impacts, which could require individual property
owner notice.
FINDING: The proposed major text amendment will serve to bring the City of Central Point Urban
Growth Boundary Management Agreement into compliance with the GBCVRP Performance Indicator
2.9.5, adopted pursuant to the requirements of ORS 197.656(2)(b)(C).
'flee City has similar criteria for initiating amendments to the comprehensive plan or the urban growth
boundary (ref. CPMC Section 17.96.200). In this case, the City Council passed a Resolution of Intent
(No. 1378) in August 2013 to initiate changes to its Urban Growth Boundary and its Urban Growth
Boundary Management Agreement with Jackson County.
FINDING: the proposed major text amendment is consistent with the Central Point Municipal Code -
Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments and will serve to bring the City of
Central Point Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement into compliance with the City's Regional
Plan Element.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A" --Ordinance No. An Ordinance Amending an Agreement Between The City of
Central Point, Oregon (City) and Jackson County, Oregon (County) for the Joint Management of the
Central Paint Urban Growth Boundary,
ACTION:
Conduct the second reading of the proposed admendment to the Urban Growth Boundary
Management Agreement (UGBMA), and 1) approve the ordinance; 2) approve the ordinance
with revisions; 3) deny the proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the ordinance and approve an amendment to the UGBMA.
Return to Agenda
I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON (CITY) AND JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON (COUNTY) FOR THE
JOINT MANAGEMENT OF THE CENTRAL POINT URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY.
Recitals:
A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute
(ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and
implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning
Goals.
B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with
ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals
and compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans.
C. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may
amend the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement
with Jackson County which was originally adopted on September 26, 1984
and has been amended at various times since.
D. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.96.100
Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments— Purpose
and Chapter 17.05.010, Applications and Development Permit Review
Procedures, the City has accepted an application and conducted the following
duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendment:
a) Planning Commission hearing on November 20, 2014
b) City Council hearings on January 8, 2015 and January 22, 2015.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the
findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the City staff report and file records;
determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the
amendments and hereby adopts the changes entirely.
Section 2. The City Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement (UGBMA)
is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit 1 which is attached hereto and by this
reference incorporated herein.
I
Section 3. The
City Manager
is directed to conduct
post acknowledgement
procedures defined in
ORS 197.610
et seq. upon adoption
of the changes to the
UGBMA.
Section 4. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
day of 20
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Return to Agenda
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON (CITY)
AND JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON (COUNTY)
FOR THE JOINT MANAGEMENT OF THE CENTRAL POINT URBAN
GROWTH BOUNDARY
WHEREAS, under ORS 190.003 to 190.030, and 197.175, et seq. City and County are
authorized to enter into intergovernmental agreements and are required to prepare and
adopt Comprehensive Plans consistent with Statewide Planning Goals; and
WHEREAS, under ORS 197 - State Land Use Goal 14, Urbanization, the "Establishment
and change of the boundary shall be a cooperative process between a city and the county
or counties that surround it"; and
WHEREAS, City and County have adopted a Regional Plan which necessitates revisions
to the previous agreement; and
WHEREAS, City and County recognize the importance of providing an orderly
transition of urban services from County to City jurisdiction and administration as the
Urban Reserve transitions from a rural to an urban character, and
WHEREAS, ORS 190.003, et seq. requires that an intergovernmental agreement relating
to the performance of functions or activities by one unit of local government for another
shall be adopted and shall specify the responsibilities between the parties;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and County adopt the following urban growth policies
which shall serve as the basis for decisions pertaining to development and land uses in
the area between the City limits of Central Point and its urban -growth boundary, and
other lands that are of mutual interest or arc of significant importance to Central Point's
long-range growth and development.
DEFINITIONS
I. Area of Mutual Planning Concern: A geographical area lying beyond the adopted
urban growth boundary in which the City and County have an interest in terms of
that area's types and levels of development, land uses, environment, agriculture,
and other unique characteristics. The area is not subject to annexation within the
current planning period but may be in the path of longer -range urban growth.
Therefore, the City and County will fully coordinate land use activity within this
arca.
2. BOC: Jackson County Board of Commissioners.
3. Comprehensive Plan: State -acknowledged comprehensive plan adopted by City or
County.
4. Contract Annexation: A process whereby the City, County, and other involved
parties enter into a contract that permits:
A) The parties to administer urban land use regulations on the development of
property following an annexation decision while the property remains under
County jurisdiction; and
B) The City to annex property developed to City densities and uses, with the
improvement to appear on the County tax rolls prior to the effective date of
annexation, resulting in a greater benefit to the tax base of the community.
5. Council: City of Central Point City Council
6. Develop: To bring about growth or create new opportunities for growth; to cause
the expansion of available lands; to extend public facilities or services; to
construct, alter or expand a structure; to conduct a mining operation; to make a
change in the use of appearance of land; to divide land into smaller parcels; to
create or terminate rights of access, etc.
7. LDO: Jackson County's Land Development Ordinance.
8. Non -Resource Land: Land that is not subject to the statewide Goals listed in OAR
660-004-0010(1)(a) through (g) except subsections (c) and (d).
9. Planning Services: Legislative activities, such as adoption and amendment of
comprehensive plan text and maps, adoption and amendment of land use
regulations, and quasi-judicial processing of land use actions.
10 Resource Land: Land that is subject to the statewide Goals listed in OAR 660-
004-0010(1)(a) through (g) except subsections (c) and (d).
11. Subdivide or Partition Land. The act of dividing the legal ownership of land into
smaller units, as set forth in Oregon Revised Statutes 92.010.
12. Urban/Public Facilities and Services: Basic facilities that are planned for and
provided by either the private or public sector, and are essential to the support of
development to accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Such facilities
and services include, but are not limited to, police and fire protection, sanitary
facilities, public water and storm drain facilities; planning, zoning, and
subdivision controls; health services; recreation facilities and services; energy and
communication services; and community governmental services including schools
and transportation.
13. Urban Growth Boundary: A site specific line on the Official Plan and Zoning
Map of Jackson County, which identifies and encompasses urban and urbanizable
lands within the County, including:
A) URBAN LAND: Residential areas generally comprised of parcels smaller
than one acre, or highly developed commercial and industrial areas which are
within incorporated cities or which contain concentrations of persons who reside
or work in the areas, including land adjacent to and outside cities, and which have
supporting urban public facilities and services.
B) URBANIZABLE LAND: Areas within an officially adopted urban growth
boundary which are needed for the expansion of that urban area, and which have
been determined to be necessary and suitable for development as future urban
land and which can be served with necessary urban public facilities and services.
14. Urban Reserve Areas (URA): Land outside of a UGB identified as highest priority
(per ORS 197.298) for inclusion in the UGB when additional urbanizable land is
needed in accordance with the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 14.
INTENT AND PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT
The intent and purpose of this Agreement is for City and County to:
I. Enhance long-range planning in the Urban Growth Boundary and the Urban
Reserve.
2. Maintain and improve coordination and communication between City and
County.
3. Develop consistent policies and procedures for managing urban growth and
development within the Urban Growth Boundary.
4. Minimize impacts to property owners, local governments and service providers
related to the transition of property from within the Urban Growth Boundary to
within the City Limits.
URBAN GROWTH POLICIES
The City of Central Point shall have primary responsibility for all future urban
level development that takes place within the City and urban growth boundary
area. Additionally:
A) All urban level development shall conform to City standards, shall be
consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, and shall meet all
appropriate requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance and Map.
B) The term "urban level development" shall be generally defined, for
purposes of this agreement, as any commercial or industrial development,
and any residential development, partitioning, or subdivision that creates
actual or potential densities greater than allowed by the City's Residential
Low-density District (R -L). The expansion or major alteration of legally
existing commercial or industrial use shall also be considered urban level
development.
C) Urban level development proposals submitted through County processes
must be accompanied by a contract to annex to the City.
2. A change in the use of urbanizable land from a use designated on the Jackson
County Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Map to uses shown on the City
Comprehensive Plan shall occur only upon annexation or contractual intent to
annex to the City. Additionally:
A) Development of land for uses designated in the Comprehensive Plan shall
be encouraged on vacant or underdeveloped lands adjacent to or within the
City limits prior to the conversion of other lands within the urban growth
boundary.
B) Urban facilities and services must be adequate in condition and capacity to
accommodate the additional level of growth, as allowed by the
Comprehensive Plan, prior to or concurrent with the land use changes.
C) The City may initiate annexation and zone changes of lands outside the
City limits and within the UGB that are under a County "Exclusive Farm
Use" designation or otherwise enjoying faun -related tax incentives when
such lands are needed for urban development.
3. City annexation shall only occur within the framework of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and within the Urban Growth Boundary.
4. Except as provided in Policy 11 of this agreement, specific annexation decisions
shall be governed by the City of Central Point. The City will provide
opportunities for the County and all affected agencies to respond to pending
requests for annexation with the response time limited to sixty days to minimize
any unnecessary and costly delay in processing.
5. The establishment of the Urban Growth Boundary does not imply that all lands
within the Boundary must be annexed to the City.
6. Jackson County shall retain jurisdiction over any land use decisions, other than
annexations, within the unincorporated urbanizable area, in conformance with
these adopted policies. Additionally:
A) The City shall be requested to respond to pending applications for land use
changes in the unincorporated urbanizable area. If no response is received
within fourteen days, the County will assume the City has no objections to
the request
B) The City will request that the County respond to pending applications for
land use changes within the incorporated arca which could affect land
under County jurisdiction. If no response is received within fourteen days,
the City will assume the County has no objections to the request.
C) Recognizing that unincorporated areas within the Urban Growth Boundary
could ultimately become part of Central Point, the City's
recommendations will be given due consideration. It is the intent of the
County to administer a mutually adopted City/County policy in the
urbanizable arca until such time as the area is annexed.
Lands in the vicinity of the Seven Oaks Interchange, as delineated on Map 1
attached, are considered unique because of the transportation facilities present.
The I-5 Interchange Area Management Plan (IAMP) for Exit 35 addresses the
unique characteristics of the area and recommendations from the plan will be
incorporated into the City and County Comprehensive Plans. Portions of this area
are in Central Point's Urban Reserve while the remainder is designated an Area o/'
Mutual Planning Concern and shall be protected from premature deN elopmcm.
Additionally:
A) The County shall ensure that the arca remains in a rural character so that a
priority is placed on urban development within the UGB, as planned.
B) The Seven Oaks Interchange Area of Mutual Planning Concern shall
retain its present County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
designation, or similar "rural" designation, until such time as the area can
be shown to be needed for the City's urbanization, in accordance with the
seven urbanization factors of Statewide goal 14 and the provisions of this
agreement that pertain to City -initiated comprehensive plan amendments.
8. Lands in the N icinity of and including Forest/Gibbon Acres west of Table Rock
Road, as delineated on Map 2 attached, arc considered remote to Central Point at
this time. Although located outside of any Urban Reserve, this area is designated
an Area of Mutual Planning Concern and shall be protected from premature or
more intense development. Additionally:
A) The County shall ensure that the area remains in a rural character so that a
priority is placed on urban development within the UGB and URAs, as
planned.
B) The Forest/Gibbon Acres Area of Mutual Planning Concern shall retain its
present County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designation, or
similar "rural" designation, until such time as the area can be shown to be
needed for the City's urbanization or for inclusion in Medford or in White
City should it incorporate. Inclusion in a planning area will occur in
accordance with the seven urbanization factors of Statewide goal 14 and
the provisions of this agreement that pertain to City -initiated
comprehensive plan amendments.
Lands under the ownership of Jackson County between Gebhard Road and
Interstate -5 north of Pine Street, including the Jackson County Expo (fairgrounds)
and property in the ownership of Jackson Count adjacent to the Expo as A
delineated on Map 3 attached, are designated an rea of Mutual Planning
Concern and shall be protected from uncoordinated land use development.
Additionally:
A) The County shall ensure that all land use planning that occurs will be
coordinated with the City so that a priority is placed on urban development
within the UGB and URAs, as planned
B) The Jackson County Expo .Area of Mutual Planning Concern shall retain
its present County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designation, or
designations unique to the fairground master plan, until such time as the
area can be shown to be needed for the Citv's urbanization, in accordance
with the seven urbanization factors of Statewide goal 14 and the
provisions of this agreement that pertain to City -initiated comprehensive
plan amendments.
C) During the first coordinated Periodic Review process for the Regional
Plan, Jackson County shall consider including the land occupied by the
Jackson County Expo to the City of Central Point Urban Reserve Area.
D) The impacts of County development upon City and Regional
infrastructure shall be assessed and mitigated in order to obtain a mutually
beneficial outcome to both entities.
10. Lands within the urbanizable area which currently support a farm use shall be
encouraged, through zoning and appropriate tax incentives, to remain in that use
for as long as is "economically feasible".
A) "Economically feasible", as used in this policy, shall be interpreted to mean
feasible from the standpoint of the property owner. Implementation of this
policy will be done on a voluntary basis.
B) "Exclusive Farm" or other appropriate low -intensity rural zoning
designation shall be applied to areas within the UGB by the County for the
purpose of maintaining agricultural land uses and related tax incentives
until such time as planned annexation and urban development occur.
C) "Suburban Residential" or other zoning designations that would permit
non-agricultural land uses to develop prematurely could result in obstacles
to future planned and coordinated growth and, therefore, should be
restricted to only those areas that are already developed to such levels.
D) Agricultural zoning policies contained herein apply only to areas
identified by the City or County as agricultural lands within the UGB,
URA's or Seven Oaks Area of Mutual Planning Concern and shall not be
used as a standard to review other land use applications within these areas.
1 1 The City and County acknowledge the importance of protecting agricultural
lands. Therefore:
A) While properties are in agricultural use, the City will apply the below
standards when adjacent lands are proposed for urban residential
development:
To mitigate the potential for vandalism, the development's design
should incorporate the use of visible public or semipublic open
space adjacent to the agricultural lands.
A. To mitigate nuisances originating from agricultural noise, odors,
irrigation run-off, and agricultural spray drift, the development's
design should incorporate
a. The use of landscaping and berms where a positive
buffering benefit can be demonstrated.
b. The orientation of structures and fencing relative to usable
exterior space such as patios, rear yards and courts, such
that the potential impacts from spray drift, dust, odors, and
noise intrusion are minimized.
L. The design and construction of all habitable buildings,
including window and door locations, should be such that
the potential impact of spray drift, noise, dust, and odors
upon interior living/working areas will be minimized.
d. Physical separation between agricultural lands and urban
development shall be utilized to the greatest extent possible
to minimize adverse impacts. Site design emphasizing the
appropriate use of open space areas, streets, and areas not
designed specifically for public recreation or assembly
shall be considered.
B) The City and County mutually agree herewith that the buffering standards
established by the Jackson County Regional Plan and adopted by the City of
Central Point have or can and will be met, prior to annexation or urban
development of lands.
C) The City and County mutually agree to involve affected Irrigation Districts
prior to annexation or when contemplating urban development of lands.
12. The City, County, and other affected agencies shall coordinate the expansion and
development of all urban facilities and services within the urbanization area.
Additionally:
A) Provisions for urban facilities and services shall be planned in a manner
limiting duplication in an effort to provide greater efficiency and economy
of operation.
B) A single urban facility or service extended into the urbanizable area must
be coordinated with the planned future development of all other facilities
and services appropriate to that arca, and shall be provided at levels
necessary for expected uses, as designated in the City's Comprchensicc
Plan.
13. All County road construction and reconstruction resulting from new development,
redevelopment, or land division, in the urbanizable area shall be to urban
standards, except that the term "reconstruction" does not include normal road
maintenance by the County.
14. Except for URAs, no other land or non -municipal improvements located
outside the Urban Growth Boundary shall be permitted to connect to the water
line serving Erickson unless it is first included in the Urban Growth Boundary
or a "reasons" exception is taken to applicable Statewide Land Use Planning
Goals which allows such connection. The owners of such benefited property
must sign an irrevocable consent to annex to the City of Central Point.
AMENDMENTS AND CORRECTIONS TO THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY
The procedure for joint City and County review and amendment of urban growth
boundary and urbanization policies are established as follows:
MAJOR REVISIONS
Major revisions in boundary or policies will be considered amendments to both the City
and County comprehensive plans and, as such, are subject to a legislative review process.
A major revision shall include any boundary change that has widespread and significant
impact beyond the immediate area, such as quantitative changes allowing for substantial
changes in population or significant increases in resource impacts; qualitative changes in
the land use itself, such as conversion of residential to industrial use, or spatial changes
that affect large areas of many different ownerships. Any change in urbanization policies
is considered a major revision.
Major revisions will be considered by the City and County at periodic intervals in
accordance with the terms of the mutually adopted urban growth boundary agreements
between the County and each municipal jurisdiction. Itis the tntcnt of the goveming
bodies to review the urban growth boundary and urbanization policies for consistency
upon completion of the City and County Comprehensive Plans.
A request for major revision can be initiated only by the County or City governing bodies
or their respective planning commissions. Individuals, groups, citizen advisory
committees, and affected agencies may petition the County or appropriate City in
accordance with the procedural guidelines adopted by the jurisdiction for initiating major
legislative amendments. The party who seeks the revision shall be responsible for filing
adequate written documentation with the City and County governing bodies. Final
legislative action on major revision requests shall be based on the factors stated in each
mutually adopted urban growth boundary agreement. Generally these are:
A) Demonstrated need to accommodate unpredicted population trends, to
satisfy urban housing needs, or to assure adequate employment
opportunities;
B) The orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services;
C) Maximum efficiency of land uses within the current urbanizable area;
D) Environmental, energy, economic and social consequences;
E) Compatibility of the proposed change with other elements of the City and
County comprehensive plans; and,
F) The other statewide planning goals.
Major revision proposals shall be subject to a mutual City and County review and
agreement process involving affected agencies, citizen advisory committees, and the
general public. The review process has the following steps:
A) CAC and planning commissions review and make recommendations to the
City Council and Board of County Commissioners;
B) Proposal mailed to the affected agencies and property owners; and,
C) Proposal heard and acted upon by City Council and Board of County
Commissioners.
MINOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTS
Minor adjustments to an urban growth boundary line may be considered subject to
similar procedures used by the City and County in hearing zoning requests. A minor
amendment is defined as focusing on specific individual properties and not having
significant impacts beyond the immediate area of the change.
Application for a minor boundary line amendment can only be made by property owners,
their authorized agents, or by a City or County governing body. Written applications for
amendments may be filed in the office of the Jackson County Department of Planning
and Development on forms prescribed by the County The standards for processing an
application are as indicated in the mutually adopted urban growth boundary agreement.
Generally these are the same factors as for a major urban growth boundary amendment.
CORRECTION OF ERRORS
A. An error is generally considered to be a cartographic mistake, or a
misprint, omission, or duplication in the text. They are technical in nature
and not the result of new information or changing attitudes or policies.
B. If the City Council and Board of County Commissioners become aware of
an error in the map(s) or text of this mutually -adopted urbanization
program, both bodies may cause an immediate amendment to correct the
error, after mutual agreement is reached.
C. Corrections shall be made by ordinance, following a public hearing
conducted by both goN erring bodies, but hearings before the planning
commissions shall not be required when an amendment is intended
specifically to correct an error.
REVIEW. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. This Agreement may be reviewed and amended at any time by mutual
consent of both parties, after public hearings by the Council and the Board
of Commissioners.
10
B. Any modifications to this Agreement will be consistent with City and
County comprehensive plans and state law.,
C. Staff from City and County will attempt to informally resolve any disputes
regarding the terms, conditions, or meaning of this Agreement. For any
disputes not resolved through this informal process, the Council and the
BOC will meet jointly in an attempt to resolve those disputes. Either party
may request the services of a mediator to resolve any dispute.
D. This Agreement may be terminated by either party subsequent to
dissolution of a URA or an Area of Mutual Planning Concern. Such
termination shall proceed through a property noticed public hearing
process.
This agreement supersedes the prior agreement between the parties on the same subject
matter approved by the County on , 20 , and by the City on
,20
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Flank Williams, Mayor DATE
ATTEST:
JACKSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Doug Breidenthal, Chair DATE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
County Counsel
ATTEST:
City Administrator Recording Secretary
L
C
C
CENTRAL
POINT
A
Central Point
Map 1
Urban Growth Boundary
Areas of Mutual Planning Concern
Seven Oaks Interchange Area
@plllelYlelaymenlWLANNINGIGIS Map Prpjays\Gty PrgaYe\VG6Pgrremml PmeM 10131A6p
�l
Cy/
AOIN& .
Cl:W1RAl,
POINT
Legend
Urban Growth Boundary = Forest Gibbon Acres
Urban Reserve Areas A
A Central Point
Map 2
Urban Growth Boundary
Areas of Mutual Planning Concem
Forest Gibbon Acres
1kpfYeI%*perrmaMNNIIIS MOP RojCoC)Qry I'M,oWIGEAme OM AMC M 20191 Map 22
V
rte-
A404A,
CENTRAL
POINT
f ff[-
�1n ® \
k,
Jackson County
Expo IS Fairgrounds Area
t1 �
Central l
Legend
Umen Growth Boundary
^ Urhen Reserve Areas
LJ Jackson County Expo Area
0
l,xelV¢IdmenlPI NNIN0815 MV Pmj>tgCO Ryexx%UGBApreeme xxx 3013Wap
Exit 39
Central Point
Map 3
Urban Growth Boundary
Areas of Mutual Planning Concern
Jackson County Expo Area
Ordinance No. _. An Ordinance amending the Central Point
Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 17.08.010 Definitions; 17.64.040, Land Use
—TOD District; 17.65.050 Zoning Regulations —TOD District; 17.65.070
Zoning Regulations — TOD Corridor
STAFF REPORT
AA
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPORT
January 22, 2015
Planning Department
Tom Humphrey, AICP,
Community Development Directoi
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 14022
Second reading to amend the Central Point Municipal Code, Chapter 17.08 .010 Definitions, defining the term
"Congregate (Senior) Housing"; 17.64.040, OffStreetParking Requirements, Table 17.64.02A adjusting parking
requirements for Congregate (Senior) Housing, 17.65.050 Zoning Regulations, TOD District, Tables 1 through 3,
and 17.65.070 Zoning Regulations, TOD Corridor, Tables 4 and 5, to delete the term "Senior ]lousing' and replace
the term "Senior Housing" with the term "Congregate (Senior) Housing"; Applicant: City of Central Point.
STAFFSOURCE:
Tom Ilumnhrev. AICP
BACKGROUND:
As the result of a recent application three issues came to the attention of the Community Development Department as
follows:
1. Section 17.65.050, Tables I and 4 refers to "Senior Housing' as a use; however, the term "Senior Housing is not
defined. It is proposed that the term "Senior housing` be replaced with "Congregate (Senior) Housing' a more
generally acknowledged and accepted term within the housing industry. Additionally, Congregate (Senior)
Housing will be listed under the multifamily dwelling housing category in Tables 1 through 5 in Sections
17.65.050 and 17.65.070.
It is proposed that Section 17.08.010 Definitions be amended to add the term "Congregate (Senior) Housing to
mean a multi family living arrangement, with common dining facilities, designed for healthy older adults in which
residents live in their own living unit and have various opportunities for socialization win, other residents.
Housekeeping and maintenance services are providers, but health maintenance services are scheduled
independently by the residents.
2. Section 17.65.050, Tables 1 and 4 prohibits `Senior Housing' within the LMR district. The proposed amendment
will allow Congregate (Senior) Housing within the LMR district, but only when part of an existing or proposed
congregate housing project located on abutting property order the same ownership within the MMR or HMR
district.
3. Table 17.64.02A Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements currently requires 1 parking space per dwelling
unit. It is proposed that the required parking be reduced to .5 spaces per dwelling unit per the Institute of
Transportation Engineers, Parking Generation, 3r° Edition.
On January 6, 2015 the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments and by Resolution No. 812 forwarded
a recommendation to the City Council to approve the amendments. The City Council conducted a public hearing on this
item at their last meeting, accepted staff revisions and moved the ordinance to this second reading.
ISSUES:
It is recognized that congregate housing, as a use, has employees for housekeeping, administration, common dining etc.,
which sets it apart from an apartment complex. For this reason the allowance of congregate housing within the LMR zone
has been restricted to those instances where it is part of, and under the same ownership of, an abutting congregate housing
Page 1 of 2
project in the MMR or HMR zoning district. The design of a congregate housing project in the LMR district will be
subject to the LMR residential design and development standards, including density.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A"— Ordinance No. An Ordinance Amending the Central Point Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 17.08.010
Definitions; 17.64.040, Land Use —TOD District; 17.65.050 Zoning Regulations —TOD District; and 17.65.070 Zoning
Regulations — TOD Corridor.
ACTION:
Conduct the second reading of the proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance and 1) approve the ordinance;
2) approved the ordinance with revisions; 3) deny the proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the ordinance and approve amendments to the zoning ordinance.
Return to Agentla
Page 2 of 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT ZONING ORDINANCE,
CHAPTER 17.08 .010 DEFINITIONS; 17.64.040, LAND USE — TOD DISTRICT;
17.65.050 ZONING REGULATIONS -TOD DISTRICT; 17.65.070 ZONING
REGULATIONS - TOD CORRIDOR
Recitals:
A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute
(ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and
implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning
Goals.
B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with
ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals
and compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans.
C. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.10.100 Zoning
Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments — Purpose and Chapter 17.05.010,
Applications and Development Permit Review Procedures, the City has
accepted an application and conducted the following duly advertised public
hearings to consider the proposed amendment:
a) Planning Commission hearing on January 6, 2015
b) City Council hearings on January 8, 2015 and January 22, 2015.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the
findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the City staff report; determines that
changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby
adopts the changes entirely.
Section 2. The City zoning text is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A which
is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 3. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement
procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the zoning
ordinance.
Section 4. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
day of , 2015.
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Return to Agentla
EXHIBIT "A"
Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS
17.08.010 Definitions, specific
"Congregate (Senior) Housing" means a multi -family living arrangement with common
dining facilities designed for healthy older adults in which residents live in their own living
unit and have various opportunities for socialization with other residents Housekeeping and
maintenance services are provided but health maintenance services are scheduled
independently by the residents
"Dwelling Unit Living Unit" means one or more rooms designed for occupancy by one family
and having no more than one cooking facility.
Chapter 17,64 Off -Street Parking and Loading
17.64.040 Off -Street parking requirements
TABLE 17.64.02A
RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Use Categories
Minimum Vehicle Parking Requirement (fractions rounded down to the
closest whole number)
RESIDENTIAL
Single -Family Residential
2 spaces per dwelling unit, both of which must be covered.
Accessory Dwelling Unit
1 space per accessory dwelling unit.
Two -Family
2 spaces per dwelling unit, both of which must be covered.
Multiple -Family
1 space per studio or 1 -bedroom unit;
1.5 spaces per 2 -bedroom unit; and
2 spaces per 3+ -bedroom unit.
plus 1 guest parking space for each 4 dwelling units or fraction theradf.
Mobile Home Parks
2 spaces per dwelling unit on the same lot or pad as the mobile home (may be
tandem)', plus 1 guest space for each 4 mobile homes.
Residential Home
2 spaces per dwelling unit, both of which must be covered.
Residential Facility 1.75
spaces per bedroom
EXHIBIT "A"
TABLE 17.64.02A
RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
CHAPTER 17.65 TOD DISTRICTS AND CORRIDORS
17.65.050 Zoning regulations — TOD district
Table 1
TOD District Land Uses
Minimum Vehicle Parking Requirement (fractions rounded down to the
Use Categories
closest whole number)
Congregate (Senior) Housing
4.5 spaces per dwelling unit
Boarding Houses, Bed and
1 space per guest unit; plus 1 space per each 2 employees
Breakfast
C
CHAPTER 17.65 TOD DISTRICTS AND CORRIDORS
17.65.050 Zoning regulations — TOD district
Table 1
TOD District Land Uses
Use Categories
Zoning Districts
LMR
MMR
HMR
EC
GC
C
OS
Residential
Dwelling, Single -Family
Large and standard lot
Zeno lot line, detached
Attached now houses
P
P
P
1.5
P
P
N
N
P
N
N
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Dwelling, Multifamily
Multiplex, apartment P
Congregate (Senior) Housing L6
P
P
P1
P
P
P1
L1 L1
L1 L1
C N
N
N
N�
N
Accessory Units
P1
N
Boarding/Rooming House
N
C
C
N
N
N
N
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 1
TOD District Land Uses
Use Categories
Zoning Districts
LMR
MMR
HMR
EC
GC
C
OS
Family Care
Family day care
Day care group home
Adult day care
P
C
P
C
P
P
N
N
N
N
N N
N N
C
C
C
N
N
N
N
Home Occupation
Residential Facility
P
P
P
P
N
N
N
P
P
P
N
N
N
N
Residential Home
P
P
P
N
N
N
N
SER er- WOWS ia9
R
P
L4
Al
6
Al
Commercial
Entertainment
N
N
C
P
P
N
N
Professional Office
C
L3
L3, L4
P
P
P
N
Retail Sales and Service
Sales -oriented
Personal service-oriented
Repair -oriented
Drive-through facilities
Quick vehicle service
C L3
C C
N N
N N
N N
L3 P
C P
N P
N P
N P
P
p
P
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Vehicle sales, rental and repair
N
N
N
P
P
N
N
Tourist Accommodations
Motel/hotel
Bed and breakfast inn
N
C
N
C
C
P
P
P
P
P
N
N
N
N
Industrial
Manufacturing
N
N
N
N
P
N
N
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 1
TOD District Land Uses
Use Categories
Zoning Districts
LMR
MMR
HMR
EC
GC
C
OS
Industrial Service
Light
Heavy
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
C
N
N
N
N
Wholesale Sales
N
N
N
N
P
N
N
Civic
Community Services
C
C
C N
N
P
C
Hospital
Public facilities
Religious assembly
Schools
C C C C
C C C C
C C C C
C C C N
N
C
N
N
C
C
P
P
N
N
N
L2
Utilities
C
C
C C
C
C
C
Open Space
Parks and Open Space
p
p
P
P
P
p
p
N --Not permitted.
P --Permitted use.
P1 --Permitted use, one unit per lot.
C --Conditional use.
Li—Only permitted as residential units above ground floor commercial uses.
L2 --School athletic and play fields only. School building and parking lots are not permitted.
L3 --Ground floor business within a multifamily building. Maximum floor area often thousand square feet per tenant.
1-4—Second story affices may be permitted in areas adjacent to EC zones as a conditional use.
EXHIBIT "A"
LS --Only permitted as a transition between lower density zones and/or when adjacent to an environmentally sensitive
area.
LF>— Permitted only when ort of an existing or Proposed congregate housing project on alculting property under the
same ownership within the MMR or HMR district
Table 2
TOD District Zoning Standards
Standard Zoning Districts
LMR I MMR I HMR EC GC COS
Per Net Acre
Maximum 12 32 NA NA NAF
NA NA
Minimum 6 14 30 NA NA NA NA
Dimensional Standards
Minimum Lot or Land
Large single-family 5,000 SF
NA
NA NA
NA
NA
Standard single-family
3,000 SF
NA
NA
NA
ftNA
NA
NA
Zero lot line detached
2,700 SF 2,700 SF NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Attached row houses
2,000 SF
1,500 SF 1,200 SF
NA
NA
NA
NA
Multifamily and settle e
+aeesx+9
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-age Minimum Lot or
J Area/lJnit
Large single-family 7,500 SF NA
NA NA
NA
NA
NA
Standard single-family
4,500 SF
NA NA NA NA
NA
NA
Zero lot line detached
3,000 SF
3,000 SF
NA
NA NA NA
NA
houses
2,500 SF
2,000 SF
1,500 SF
NA NA
NA NA
�Afl2chod,,row
Multifamy ae9-SeR1ef
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 2
TOD District Zoning Standards
Standard Zoning Districts
LMR MMR HMR I EC I GC C OS
Minimum Lot Width
Large single-family 50'
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Standard single-family
50' NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
Zero lot line detached
30' 30' NA
NA
NA
NA NA
Attached row houses
24' 22' 18'
NA
NA
NA
NA
Multifamily aad-sena
H
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Minimum Lot Depth
50'
50'
50'
NA
NA
NA
NA
Building Setbacks
Front (min./max.)
10'/15'
10'/15'
0'/15'
0'
15'
5'
15'
Side (between bldgs.)
(detached/attached)
5' detached
0'
attached
(a)(c)
5'
detached
0'
attached
(a)(c)
S'
detached
0'
attached
(a)
0'
10'(b)
0'
15'(b)
0'
20'(b)
5.
Corner (min./max.)
51/10'
T/10'
0'/10'
5'/10'
15'/30'
Y/10'
15'/NA
Rear
15'
15'
10,
0'
10' (b)
15'(b)
0'
0'
20' (b)
S'
Garage Entrance
(d)
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
(e)
NA
Maximum Building Height
35'
45'
60'
60'
1 60'
45' 1
35'
Maximum Lot Coverage (g)
1 80 %
80%
85%
1000/1.
100%
850/0
25%
Minimum Landscaped Area
00
20% of site
area
20% of
�sitearea
15% of
site area
0% of
site
15% of
site
15% of
site area
NA
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 2
TOD District Zoning Standards
Standard
Zoning Districts
LMR
MMR
HMR
I EC
GC
C
OS
(j)
area
area
(h)
Housing Mix
Required housing types as
< 16 units in development: 1
listed under Residential in
housing type.
Table 1.
16--40 units in development: 2
housing types.
> 40 units in development: 3 or
more housing types (plus
approved master plan)
Notes.
Ni applicable,
(a) The five-foot minimum also applies to the perimeter of the attached unit development.
(b) Setback required when atljacent to a residential zone.
(c) Setback required is ten feet minimum between units when using zero lot line configurations.
(d) Ten feet behind front building facade facing street.
(e) Garage entrance shall not protrude beyond the face of the building.
(f) Net acre equals the area remaining after deducting environmental lands, exclusive employment areas, exclusive
civic areas and right-of-way.
(g) Lot coverage refers to all impervious surfaces including buildings and paved surfacing.
EXHIBIT "A"
(h) Parking lot landscaping and screening requirements still apply.
(i) Landscaped area shall include living ground cover, shrubs, trees, and decorative landscaping material such as
bark, mulch or gravel. No pavement or other impervious surfaces are permitted except for pedestrian pathways and
seating areas,
Q) Rooftop gardens can be used to help meet this requirement.
Table 3
TOD District and Corridor Parking Standards
Use Categories
Minimum Required Parking
Residential
Dwelling, Single -Family
2 spaces per unit.
Large and standard lot
Zero lot line, detached
Attached row houses
Dwelling, Multifamily
Plexes
1.5 spaces per unit.
Apartments and condominiums
1.5 spaces per unit
Congregate (Senior) Housing
.5 spaces per dwelling unit
Dwelling, Accessory Unit
1 space per unit.
Boarding/Rooming House
1 space per accommodation, plus 1 space for every 2 employees.
Family Care
1 space for every 5 children or clients (minimum 1 space); plus 1
Family day care
space for every 2 employees.
Day care group home
Adult day care
Home Occupation
Shall meet the parking requirement for the residence.
Residential Facility
1 space per unit.
Residential Home
1 space per unit.
4-6�
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 3
TOD District and Corridor Parking Standards
Use Categories
Minimum Required Parking
Commercial
Entertainment
1 space per 250 square feet of floor area, except for theaters which
shall provide 1 space per 4 seats.
Professional Office
1 space per 400 square feet of floor area.
Retail Sales and Service
Sales -oriented 1 space per 500 square feet of floor area.
Personal service-oriented 1 space per 500 square feet of floor area.
Repair -oriented 1 space per 500 square feet of floor area.
Drive-through facilities Parking as required by the primary use.
Quick vehicle service 1 space per 750 square feet of floor area.
Vehicle sales, rental and repair 1 space per 1,000 square feet of floor area.
Tourist Accommodations
1 space per guest unit, plus 1 space for every 2 employees.
Motel/hotel
Bed and breakfast inn
Industrial
Manufacturing
1 space per employee of the largest shift.
Industrial Service
1 space per employee of the largest shift.
Light
Heavy
Wholesale Sales
1 space per employee of the largest shift.
Civic
Community Services
Number to be determined as part of site plan or conditional use
review.
Hospital
1 space per 500 square feet of floor area.
Public Facilities I
Number to be determined as part of site plan or conditional use
EXHIBIT"A"
(Ord. 1981 §4 (Exh. D), 2014; Ord. 1971 §4 (Exh. C) (part), 2013; Ord. 1867 §4(part), 2006; Ord. 1815 §1 (part), Exh.
B(part), 2000).
Table 4
Table 3
Use Categories
TOD District and Corridor Parking Standards
Use Categories
Minimum Required Parking
MMR
review.
Religious Assembly
1 space per 100 square feet of floor area for the main assembly area.
Schools
lit spaces per classroom.
Utilities
]review.
Number to be determined as part of site plan or conditional use
P
N
N
Open Space
Parks and Open Space
Number to be determined as part of site plan or conditional use
review.
(Ord. 1981 §4 (Exh. D), 2014; Ord. 1971 §4 (Exh. C) (part), 2013; Ord. 1867 §4(part), 2006; Ord. 1815 §1 (part), Exh.
B(part), 2000).
Table 4
TOD Corridor Land Uses
Use Categories
Zoning Districts
LMR
MMR
EC
GC
Residential
Dwelling, Single -Family
Large and standard lot P L4 N N
Zero lot line, detached P P N N
Attached raw houses
P
P
N
N
Dwelling, Multifamily
Multiplex, apartment
P P
Lt
L1
Congregate (Senior)Housing
L5 P
L1
N
C
Accessory Units
P1 P1
N
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 4
TOD Corridor Land Uses
Use Categories
Zoning Districts
LMR
MMR
EC
GC
Boarding/Rooming House
N
C
N
N
Family Care
Family day care
Day care group home
P
C
P N
C N
N
N
Adult day care
C
CN
N
Home Occupation
P
P
P
N
Residential Facility
P
P
N
N
Residential Home
P
P
N
N
Seaiecideusing
N
R
64
N
Commercial
Entertainment
N
N
Professional Office
C
L3EEEP
Retail Sales and Service
Sales -oriented C
Personal service-oriented C
L3
C
P P
P P
Repair -oriented
Drive-through facilities
Quick vehicle service
N
N
N
N
N
N
P P
P P
P P
Vehicle sales, rental and repair
N
N
N
P
(Tourist Accommodations
Motel/hotel
N
N P
P
Bed and breakfast inn
C
C
P
P
Industrial
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 4
TOO Corridor Land Uses
Use Categories
Zoning Districts
LMR
MMR
EC
GC
Manufacturing
N
N
N
P
Industrial Service
Light
N IN
N P
Heavy
N
N
N
C
Wholesale Sales
N
IN
N
P
Civic
Community Services
C
C N N
Hospital
Public Facilities
Religious Assembly
Schools
C
C
C
N
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
C N
N N
Utilities
C
C
C
C
Open Space
Parks and Open Space
P
P
P
P
N --Not permitted.
P --Permitted use.
P1—Permitted use, one unit per lot.
C --Conditional use.
L1 --Only permitted as residential units above ground floor commercial uses.
L2—School athletic and play fields only. School building and parking lots are not permittetl.
L3 --Ground floor business within a multifamily building. Maximum floor area of ten thousand square feet per tenant.
5
EXHIBIT "A"
L4 --Only permitted as a transition between adjacent lower density zones and/or when adjacent to an environmentally
sensitive area.
1-5—Permitted only when Part of an existing or Proposed conn ❑ to housing project on abutting Property under the
Same ownership within the MMR or HMR district.
Table 5
TOD Corridor Zoning Standards
Standard
Zone Districts
LMR
MMR
EC
GC
Density --Units Per Net Acre (f)
Maximum
12
32
NA
NA
Minimum
6
14
NA
NA
Dimensional Standards
Minimum Lot Area or Land Area/Unit
Large single-family
5,000 SF
NA
NA NA
Standard single-family
3,000 SF
NA
NA NA
(Zero lot line detached
2,700 SF
2,700 SF
NA NA
Attached row houses
2,000 SF
1,500 SF
NA NA
Multifamily and Gen ;F Illing
2,900 °CNA
2;g00-SFNA
4;8g0
NA
SFNA
Average Minimum Lot or Land
Area/Unit
Large single-family
7,500 SF
NA
NA
NA
Standard single-family
4,500 SF
NA
NA
NA
Zero lot line detached
3,000 SF
3,000 SF
NA
NA
Attached row houses
2,500 SF
2,000 SF
NA
NA
Multifamily a44d-sealer4aeusiag
-S NA
2800-SFNA
Nq
SNA
4FNA
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 5
TOD Corridor Zoning Standards
Standard
Zone Districts
LMR
MMR
EC GC
Minimum Lot Width
Large single-family
Standard single-family
Zero lot line detached
Attached row houses
Multifamily eadaea 8F hOUS..y
50'
50'
30'
24'
NA
NA
NA
30'
22'
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Minimum Lot Depth
50'
50'
NA
NA
Building Setbacks
Front (min./max.)
10715'
101/15'
0'
15'
Side (between bldgs.)
detached/attached)
5' detached
O'attached(a)(c)
5' detached
O'attached(a)(c)
0'
10'(1b)
0'
15'(b)
Corner(min./max.)
5710'
51/10'
5'/10'
15730'
Rear
15'
15'
0'
10'(b)
0'
15'(b)
Garage Entrance
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
Maximum Building Height
35'
45'
60'
60'
Maximum Lot Coverage (g)
80%
80%
100%
85%
Minimum Landscaped Area (i)
20% of site area
20% of site area
0% of site
area
15% of site
area
Housing Mix
Required housing types as listed under
Residential in Table 3.
< 16 units in development: 1 housing type
16--40 units in development: 2 housing types
NA
NA
EXHIBIT "A"
Table 5
TOO Corridor Zoning Standards
Standard
Zone Districts
LMR
MMR
EC
GC
140 units in development: 3 or more housing
types (plus approved master plan).
Ni applicable
Notes:
(a) The five-foot minimum also applies to the perimeter of the attached unit development.
(b) Setback required when adjacent to a residential zone.
(c) Setback required is len feet minimum between units when using zero lot line configurations.
(d) Ten feel behind building facade facing street.
(e) Garage entrance shall not protrude beyond the face of the building.
(i) Net acre equals the area remaining after deducting environmental lands, exclusive employment areas, exclusive
civic areas and right-of-way.
(g) Lot coverage refers to all impervious surfaces, including buildings and paved surfacing.
(h) Parking lot landscaping and screening requirements still apply.
(i) Landscaped area shall include living ground cover, shrubs, trees, and decorative landscaping material such as
bark, mulch or gravel. No pavement or other impervious surfaces are permitted except for pedestrian pathways and
seating areas.
J
An Ordinance amending the Central Point Comprehensive Plan (MAP) from
residential low density to civic and the City Zoning Map from R-1-6 and park to
civic for approximately five acres located east of South Fourth Street and
between Bush and Ash Streets.
(37SZW11BA, TL 2200and 37S2W11BB, TLs 6300, 8200, 8300 & 8301)
STAFF REPORT
January 22, 2015
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Community Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 14020
Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan (map) Amendment from Residential Low Density to Civic and a
Zoning (map) Amendment from R-1-6 and Park to Civic zoning for approximately five (5) acres located
east of South Fourth Street, between Bush Street and Ash Street. The Project Site is identified on the
Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S2W I IBA, Tax Lot 2200 and 37S2W l 1 BB, Tax Lots 6300, 8200,
8300 and 8301. Applicant: City of Central Point. -
STAFF SOURCE:
Tom Humphrey AICP, Community Development Director
BACKGROUND:
During the course of evaluating the above referenced properties as the site for a prospective
Community Center and/or other uses, it came to City staff's attention that the zoning would not only
restrict the development of such uses but that the zoning and land use designations were inconsistent
with one another. Furthermore, the Parks maintenance yard is a legally non -conforming use in `Park'
zoning and the Public Works maintenance yard is a legally non -conforming use in R-1-6, Residential
Single Family zoning. Should these uses continue or should the properties be redeveloped for a use
like a Community Center, the `Civic' zoning would be more compatible and appropriate.
ISSUES & NOTES:
There are 4 issues/Notes relative to this application as follow s:
Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments, CPMC Chapter 17.10. This municipal
code section provides standards and procedures for major and minor amendments to the
Central Point city zoning map. In this case, the application was initiated by the City
for property in its ownership and the action is considered a `minor' amendment and a
Type III process. The amendment should be based on the following criteria; 1) its
consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan, 2) findings demonstrating that
adequate public services and transportation networks will serve the property and 3)
compliance with the State's Transportation Planning Rule.
2. Comprehensive Plan Compliance. Approval of the proposed zone change must be found
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan Map. If the Comprehensive
Plan designation is changed to Civic on the five lots in question, then Tax Lot 2200 would
immediately be compliant (the skate park is already zoned civic) and the other four lots will
become compliant when they are rezoned from R-1-6 and Park to a `Civic' zoning (refer to
Attachment A).
3. Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning. The proposed land use
designation to the west is Jackson County School District #6 property (CPE and District
Administration) which is already designated `Civic' in the City's Comprehensive Plan Map.
.A
City of Central Point, Oregon
CENTRAL
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502
POINT
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384
www.cenyalDointore o¢ n.gov
'
STAFF REPORT
January 22, 2015
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Community Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 14020
Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan (map) Amendment from Residential Low Density to Civic and a
Zoning (map) Amendment from R-1-6 and Park to Civic zoning for approximately five (5) acres located
east of South Fourth Street, between Bush Street and Ash Street. The Project Site is identified on the
Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S2W I IBA, Tax Lot 2200 and 37S2W l 1 BB, Tax Lots 6300, 8200,
8300 and 8301. Applicant: City of Central Point. -
STAFF SOURCE:
Tom Humphrey AICP, Community Development Director
BACKGROUND:
During the course of evaluating the above referenced properties as the site for a prospective
Community Center and/or other uses, it came to City staff's attention that the zoning would not only
restrict the development of such uses but that the zoning and land use designations were inconsistent
with one another. Furthermore, the Parks maintenance yard is a legally non -conforming use in `Park'
zoning and the Public Works maintenance yard is a legally non -conforming use in R-1-6, Residential
Single Family zoning. Should these uses continue or should the properties be redeveloped for a use
like a Community Center, the `Civic' zoning would be more compatible and appropriate.
ISSUES & NOTES:
There are 4 issues/Notes relative to this application as follow s:
Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments, CPMC Chapter 17.10. This municipal
code section provides standards and procedures for major and minor amendments to the
Central Point city zoning map. In this case, the application was initiated by the City
for property in its ownership and the action is considered a `minor' amendment and a
Type III process. The amendment should be based on the following criteria; 1) its
consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan, 2) findings demonstrating that
adequate public services and transportation networks will serve the property and 3)
compliance with the State's Transportation Planning Rule.
2. Comprehensive Plan Compliance. Approval of the proposed zone change must be found
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan Map. If the Comprehensive
Plan designation is changed to Civic on the five lots in question, then Tax Lot 2200 would
immediately be compliant (the skate park is already zoned civic) and the other four lots will
become compliant when they are rezoned from R-1-6 and Park to a `Civic' zoning (refer to
Attachment A).
3. Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning. The proposed land use
designation to the west is Jackson County School District #6 property (CPE and District
Administration) which is already designated `Civic' in the City's Comprehensive Plan Map.
Land to the north, south and east is designated residential and is typically compatible with
schools, churches, parks and other public uses.
4. Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Compliance, OAR 660-012-0060. Criteria for TPR
compliance is addressed in the City findings (Attachment B) demonstrating adequate public
services and transportation networks. In this case, Plan Amendments will legitimize existing
uses on the properties involved and which are already receiving public services and are part
of a transportation network. Public facility master plans identify various future public
improvements including the replacement of a traffic signal at Fourth and Pine Streets.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Although a decision to approve a minor amendment may include conditions, staff has not
identified the need to impose any conditions at this time. This item was reviewed and
discussed by the City Planning Commission on January 6, 2015 and their unanimous
recommendation of approval is attached in Resolution No. 813 with findings (Attachment B).
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A"—Ordinance No. An Ordinance Amending The Central Point Comprehensive
Plan (Map) From Residential Low Density To Civic And The City Zoning Map From R-1-6 And
Park To Civic For Approximately Five Acres Located East Of South Fourth Street And Between
Bush And Ash Streets.
Attachment `B"— Planning Commission Resolution No. 813 and Findings
ACTION:
Open public hearing and consider the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (Map)
and Zoning map, close public hearing and 1) move ordinance to a second reading; 2) move to a
second reading with revisions; or 3) deny the proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct Staff to schedule the second reading for the next City Council meeting (February 12,
2015) to approve amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Map) and zoning map.
Return to Agenda
J �'
ATTACHMENT " A
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (MAP)
FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY TO CIVIC AND THE CITY ZONING MAP FROM
R-1-6 AND PARK TO CIVIC FOR APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES LOCATED EAST
OF SOUTH FOURTH STREET AND BETWEEN BUSH AND ASH STREETS.
(37S2W11BA, TL 2200 and 37S2W11BB, TLs 6300, 8200, 8300 & 8301)
Recitals:
A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute
(ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and
implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning
Goals.
B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with
ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals
and compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans.
C. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may
amend the Central Point Zoning Map which was originally adopted on August
29, 1980 and has been amended at various times since.
D. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.10.100 Zoning
Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments — Purpose and Chapter 17.05.010,
Applications and Development Permit Review Procedures, the City has
accepted an application and conducted the following duly advertised public
hearings to consider the proposed amendment(s):
a) Planning Commission hearing on January 6, 2015
b) City Council hearings on January 22, 2015 and February 12, 2015.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the
findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the City staff report; determines that
changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby
adopts the changes entirely.
Section 2. The City Comprehensive Plan (Map) is hereby amended as set forth in
Exhibit 1 which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 3. The City zoning map is hereby amended asset forth in Exhibit 2 which
is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 4. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement
procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the zoning
and Comprehensive Plan maps.
Section 5. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
day of 20
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
City Recorder
EXHIBIT
A
CENTRAL
KANT
current Designation
Aesidendal Low Density{R-W -
t
Legend
rca
liisSlu Laa SIi4 C0➢ 4esimlul Caener¢W hd."W Citi t.d Q'. 5pm
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
2008-2030
EXHIBIT
Legmdl
iCU
11imf Re
Cum SIN. TOD
Rui3¢tial
Ca mmukw Ic7
mllrul
Ch k+ad 0,, Span
,•,
-
]U➢brvri::Y
� ^seu^. p.....
... -., _,.:;?�
..'=]era...
r...n lr,u
-
$1 `.?a
Comprehensive
Land
Use Plan
W:N/KAL
POINT
1 ELEMENTARY
/f►,
CENTRAL
POINT
Zoning Map
Population 17,335
EXHIBIT " 2-
A( A'
-ASHD'-
R-1-6
SHD
Upend
1-11
of wo
-
e.n,roo,
I
EXHIBIT " 2-
A( A'
-ASHD'-
R-1-6
SHD
6
R=1-6
BUSH
GRAND -AV
1-11
of wo
-
6
R=1-6
BUSH
GRAND -AV
k
• Resi
r•• Single
(R
P5 .
A
CENTRAL
POINT
Zoning Map
p puladon 17,235
CENTRAL
POINT
ELEMENTARY
EXHIBIT a 1 "
Parks & Open Space (OS( �-
UI
to
Civic (C( J
J'
R
I-
0
of
�I
I
mom„
��,�• ,mm
�F
nmv
ATTACHMENT" L
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 813
A RESOLUTION FORWARDING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE
CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE COMPRHENSIVE PLAN (MAP)
AMENDMENT AND REZONING OF APROXIMATELY FIVE (5) ACRES EAST OF
SOUTH FOURTH STREET BETWEEN BUSH AND ASH STREETS FROM LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO CIVIC
FILE NO. 14020
Applicant: City of Central Point;
WHEREAS, the proposed Comprehensive Plan (Map) designation and zone change
constitute a minor amendment; and
WHEREAS, Section 17.50.400 of the municipal code dictates that the City Planning
Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council on an application for
a comprehensive plan map amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Residential to Civic uses
will make existing legal non -conforming uses, permitted uses in the zone and will
also be more compatible with long range plans the City has discussed relative to
other community -related uses; and
WHEREAS, As evidenced in findings and conclusions, the proposed plan
amendment and zone change are consistent with applicable standards and criteria in
the Central Point Municipal Code, including the Statewide Planning Goals (where
applicable), the Comprehensive Plan, and Statewide Transportation Planning Rule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. 813, does recommend that the City Council approve the
Comprehensive Plan (Map) amendment and zone change from Low Density Residential to
Civic. This decision is based on the Staff Report dated January 6, 2015 attached hereto by
reference and incorporated herein.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
6'h day of January, 2015.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this 6th day of January, 201
Planning Commission Resolution No. 813 (01/06/2015)
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
File No.: 14020
Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission
Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan (Map) and Zone Change (Map) Amendment Application
on approximately five (5) acres located east of South Fourth Street, north of Bush Street and
South of Ash Street. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S2W
I IBA, Tax Lot 2200 and 37S2W 11BB, Tax Lots 6300, 8200, 8300 and 8301.
Applicant: ) Findings of Fact
City of Central Point, Oregon ) and
Conclusion of Law
PART 1
INTRODUCTION
It is requested that the above referenced tax lots be redesignated and rezoned to a Civic use to reflect
current land use activities and to minimize land use limitations for future uses contemplated by the City.
These findings have been prepared with the understanding that both the Comprehensive Plan (Map) and
Zoning Map will be changed to become consistent with one another.
The zone change request is a quasi-judicial map amendment, which is processed using Type III
application procedures. Type III procedures set forth in Section 17.05.400 provide the basis for
decisions upon standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan, when
appropriate.
Applicable development code criteria for this Application include:
1. Statewide Planning Goals
2. Comprehensive Plan
3. State Transportation Planning Rule
4. CPMC, Chapter 17.10
Findings will be presented in four (4) parts addressing the requirements of Section 17.05.300 as follows:
1. Introduction
2. Statewide Planning Goals
3. Comprehensive Plan
4. Summary Conclusion
PART 2
STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
A finding of consistency with the applicable statewide planning goals is generally reserved for major
amendments only (reference CPMC, Chapter 17.10.400 Approval criteria).
Finding: The proposed Comprehensive Plan (Map) designation and zone change constitute a
minor amendment and are consequently not subject to the Statewide Planning Goals. The Oregon
Department of Land Conservation and Development was notified and has chosen not to
comment on this amendment.
Conclusion: Consistent with Statewide Planning Goals.
PART
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map currently designates five acres of land as Low Density
Residential this is being used for Civic purposes (City Corporation Yard, Parks Maintenance Yard,
Skate Park and soccer field). The Civic land use designation will legitimize these legal non -conforming
uses and be more consistent with plans that the City has discussed relative to a Community Center.
Finding: The project site consists of approximately five (5) acres of Low Density Residential
land being used for various civic purposes. The Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Civic uses
will make legal non -conforming uses, permitted uses and will also be more compatible with long
range plans the City has discussed relative to other community -related uses.
Conclusion: Consistent.
PART 4
STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION RULE
Section 660-012-0060(1) hi'lnere an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility,
the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to assure that
allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards (e.g.
level ofservice, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) m'the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment
significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
a) Change thefunctimnal classification ofan existing or planned transportation facility;
b) Change standards implementing a functiwwl classification system; or
c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation system
plan.
(A) Allow types or levels of land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that are
inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility;
(B) Reduce the performance of existing or planned transportation facility below the
minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard
identified nv the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(a): The proposed plan amendment and zone change docs not change
the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility. The proposed zone
change may increase Average Daily Trip (ADT) generation over time, as shown in Table 1. The
current trips being generated by the City -related uses provide the minimum ADT while a heavier
use (i.e. a community center or school campus) provide the maximum ADT. The proposed zone
change will not cause any changes to the functional classification of any existing or planned
transportation facilities.
Table 1.
Proposed Zone Change Impact to Average Daily Trips
Zonin =
Site Acrea =e
Min DensityMin
Units Min ADT
Max DensityMin
Units
Max ADT
Civic
5.00
N/A
N/A 399.5
N/A
60K CPA
1649.4
R-1-6
5.00
4
20.0 190.4
6
30.0
255.6
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(a): No significant affect
Finding 660-012-0060(t)(b): The proposed plan amendment and zone change could increase
the ADTs over time (Table 1). However, the proposed amendments will not cause a change to
standards implementing the City's transportation system.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(b): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A): The proposed plan amendment and zone change will not cause
an increase in land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that would be inconsistent
with the City's functional street classification system for existing and planned transportation
facilities. As shown in Table 1, the proposed changes may increase ADTs over time but not
significantly more than those non -conforming uses already generating trips.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B): The proposed plan amendment and zone change may result in a
gradual increase in ADTs over time and as property redevelops as demonstrated in Table 1. The
proposed zone change will not reduce the performance of any existing or planned transportation
facilities below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the Master Plan, or
in the City's Transportation System Plan.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C): The proposed plan amendment and zone change will not cause
the worsening of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to
perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the Master Plan or
Comprehensive Plan. Captital improvements are scheduled in the City's TSP that are anticipated
to mitigate the impacts of redevelopment in this sector of the community.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C): No significant affect
PART 5
ZONING ORDINANCE
17.10.300 Quasi-judicial amendments.
A. Applicability of Quasi Judicial Amendments. Quasi-judicial amendments are those that involve
the application of'adopted policy to a specific development application or code revision, and not the
adoption of new policy (i. e., through legislative decisions). Quasi-judicial zoning map amendments
shall follow the Type III procedure, as governed by Section 17.05.400 using standards of approval in
subsection B of this section. The approval authority shall be as follows:
I. The planning commission shall review and recommend land use district map changes that do
not involve comprehensive plan map amendments;
2. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city council on an application
for a comprehensive plan map amendment The city council shall decide such applications; and
3. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city council on a land use
district change application that also involves a comprehensive plan map amendment
application. The city council shall decide both applications.
Finding 17.10.300(A): A plan amendment and zone change application has been submitted to
redesignate five acres from Low Density Residential to Civic and to rezone R-1-6, SF
Residential to Civic District. The proposal will be considered by the planning commission and a
recommendation will be made to the City Council for final decision.
Conclusion 17.10.300(A): Consistent.
B. Criteria for QuasiJudicialAmendments. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve
with conditions or to deny an application.fir a quasi judicial amendment shall be based on all of the
following criteria:
1. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals;
Finding 17.10.300(B)(1): See Part 2, Statewide Planning Goals findings and conclusions.
Conclusion 17.10.300(8)(1): Consistent
2. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan;
Finding 17.10.300(B)(2): See Part 3, Comprehensive Plan findings and conditions.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(2): Consistent.
3. The property and affected area is presently provided with adequate public facilities, services and
transportation networks to support the use, or such facilities, services and transportation
networks are planned to be provided in the planning period; and
Finding 17.10.300(B)(3): Public facilities, services and transportation networks have been
established pursuant to the City's TSP and are sufficient to serve the allowable uses. The
proposal will not significantly increase the demand on public facilities over the current uses.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(3): Consistent.
4, The change is in the public interest with regard to neighborhood or community conditions, or
corrects a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or land use district map regarding
the property which Is the subject of the application.
Finding 17.10300(B)(4): The proposed plan amendment and zone change are consistent with
Strategic Planning goals, are in the interest of the community, are compatible with surrounding
land uses and correct inconsistencies in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning maps.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(4): Consistent.
17.10.600 Transportation planning rule compliance.
Section 660-012-0060(]) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility,
the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to assure that
allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards (e.g.
level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc) of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment
significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
a) Change the functional classification of an existing orplanned transportation,facility;
b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation system
plan:
(A) Allow types or levels of land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that are
inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facilio"
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility below the
minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Finding 17.10.600(1): See Part 4, Statewide Transportation Planning Rule findings and
conclusions.
Conclusion: Consistent.
Summary Conclusion: As evidenced in findings and conclusions, the proposed plan amendment and
zone change are consistent with applicable standards and criteria in the Central Point Municipal Code,
including the Statewide Planning Goals (where applicable), Comprehensive Plan, and Statewide
Transportation Planning Rule.
Water Rate Increase — Medford Water Commission
Parks & Public Works Department Matt Samitore, Director
CENTRAL 140 South 3 Street Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.7602 1 w .centralpcintcregon.gov
POINT
January 8, 2015
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Matt Samitore, Parks & Public Works Director
SUJECT: Water Rate Update 2015
PURPOSE:
The Medford Water Commission has recently updated their rate model which will have an
impact on our rates. Additionally, per our water rate plan, the City also needs an increase to
accommodate for recent construction related inflation. Inflationary cost increases of both
constructions materials and labor are now impacting the City's adopted Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP).
SUMMARY:
The Medford Water Commission sent notice that they will be increasing the bulk water rates to
the other cities, which includes Central Point, by 5%. The winter rate will increase from $0.46
to $0.48 and the summer rate from $0.64 to $0.67. In the 2013/2014 budget, the City
purchased $599,000 dollars' worth of water from the Medford Water Commission. A five
percent (5%) increase will equate to an additional $30,000 in costs. In order to cover these
costs, based upon 2013/2014 water purchases, we will need to increase currents by $0.38 per
customer per month.
In 2012 and 2013, the City updated its water rate model. The updated 2013 model removes
water related projects that will be associated with specific Urban Renewal projects. By
removing the projects associated with Urban Renewal the amount of revenue needed to keep
up with inflation and the revised CIP is 1 tol.5%. The rate is anticipated to increase that same
amount each year for three consecutive years. The increase can be split numerous ways on
the base charge, R&R charge or consumptive rate charges. Several options are proposed for
Council consideration. Additional information is provided comparing Central Point to the state
average for both base rate and consumptive rates.
Configuring Water Rate Model.
Staff has proposed several options for adjustments to the rate model, including one option
which is just an increase to adjust for the Medford Water Commission increase (Option A).
The rates shown below are shown on a per month basis.
Option A: Medford Water Commission Only
Option A
Current Base Rate R& R Rate
Volume Charge
Volume Charge
Volume Charge
1.00
First 8ccf
8.22 ccf
Over 22 CO
Current
5
12.00
$
1.00
$
0.86
5
1.67
5
2.75
Nedfcrd Increase
S
12.38
5
1.00
$
0.86
5
1.67
S
2.75
Di'`rsrer,=e
5
0,38
Option B: Medford and Central Point Increase split evenly.
Optror.8
't rrent Base Rate R& R Rate
Volume Charge
Volume Charge
Volume Charge
First 8 cd
822 ccf
Over 22 ccf
Current 5 1200, S 1.00 S 0.86 5 1,67 5 2.75
Atecford S 0.38 S 1.00 S 0.87 S 1,68 $ 2,76
Central P1ir,t 0,12
Difterence S 0,50 0.01 0.01 0.01
Option C: Medford and Central Point Increases base charges only.
Optior.0
Current
Medford
Central Dol nt
Difference
Current Base Rate R& R RateVolume
Charge
Volume Charge
Volume Charge
Firsts ut
8-22 of
Over 22 cut
$ 12.00 S 1.00 S 0.86 $ 1.67 S 2.75
$ 0,38 $ 1.00 S 0.86 S 1.67 S 2.75
0.42
$ 0.80 0 0 0
Option D. Medford and Central Point Increases, Medford Base, Central Point
consumptive only
Current B a se Rate R& R Rate) Volume Charge Volume Charge Volume Charge)
Gim Btt! 822 «f Over22ccf
Current S 12.00 S 1.00 S 0.86 $ 1.67 S 2,75
Medford S 0.38 $ 1.00 S 0.88 S 1,70 S 2.79
Central Point o
Difference S 0.38 5 0.02 S 0.03 S 0.04
Option E: Medford Increase, All three years of Central Points Increases spread over all
rates.
Option E
Current Base Rate R& R Rate
Volume Charge
Volume Charge
Volume Charge
Girst a cat
8. 22 «f
Over 22 act
Currer•.f S 12,00 $ 1.00 $ 0.86 S 1.67 5 2.75
N,a dfcrd $ 0.35 5 100 S 0.89 S 1.72 5 2,83
Certral Paint 0.37
Difference 5 0.75 S 0.03 S 0.05 S 0.08
RECOMMENDATION:
Discussion of options and a recommendation to staff on which option to bring back for formal
resolution.
Return to Agenda
Water Utility Total Costs Report
175----- ---- ---- ----_--- --- --
I
125 - - - - - -- - — - --
CenVal Point-
Aera9e
100
75
50
25 �!
0
^O �O „O P9 yo 60
Consumption (CCF)
65 entities M) CIVIQATA
Search parameters: Water Average, Minimum I Central Point Oregon I Population 0 - Maxi
Distance 0 - Max I Single Family 15/8" meter I Usage 0 - 60
Entities
Noddy
Nbang nR 50520
7 1 10 1 20Cost i.
1 30 1 40- 7 1 60
$1758$3096$7576$100561$12536$150161$17496
Ashland
Ashland, OR
21,4fi0
$21.371$47.04I$83.44�$125. 14�$172.14I$219.14�$266.14
Astoria
Astoria, OR
Y0,110
$18091$449NI$7180$9866�512551�$15237�$17922
Baker City
Baker Ciry OR
9,890
$32.32$37.131$43.931 $50.73�$57.53�$64.33�$]1.13
BeawrroneeaveMR
OR
90,935
$1200$4070$69401$98101$1268q8155501$18420
Bentl
Bentl, OR
76,925
$16 441 $26.521 $43.321 $60.12 1 $7fi.92 §93.72 $110.52
Cem,al Paint
Central Fomt,OR
fl�OF
$13001$2322$39921$65261$92761$120261$14776
Coos Bay North Bend
Water Board
Coos Bay, OR
25,720
$18.501$3]581$64.831$92.081$119.331$14fi58$173.83
Corvallis
Corvallis, OR
54520-
$15041$3314j$5824j$84 84j$11'i 441$158041¢i6464
Oallas
Dallas, OR
14,620
$16.10 $28.21 $45.511 811 $80.111 $97.411$114.71
Fa,rmew
Falnnew, OR
9745 11
-------------
$16921$36521$56121$75721$95321$11492$13452
Florence
Florence, OR
8,4]0
$16.741$36.44j$60.09$85.891$111691$137.49$163.29
Forest Giooe
ForesrGro�s, OR.727,500
$2129$3493$8089$99531$136231$173931$21163
Garibaldi
Garibaltli, OR
]80
$�54.64�$]5.211$95791$116.361$136.93
IGrants Pass
I Grants Pass, ORI1
14.660
$16 821 S25 621S36 g21$49 W 1$62671$76071$89371
Gresham
Gresham, OR
105,795
$1547$37.371$60.681$89.261$122.461$156661$188.86
Hermiston
Hermrston,OR
16865
$16181822081$31001$36 7(11$46 41$54 111$6182
Hillsboro
Hillsboro, OR
92,350
$12.931$30491$56.831$90.131$123.431$156731$190.03
Janotion Cdy
Junction Ciig OR
5,670
$970l$3170$537nl$75701$97701$119701$14170
Kerr
Salem, OR
36715
$5.01 1$18.011$31.01 $44.011$57.011$70.011 $83.01
Klamelh Falls
Kllaamath Falls.
21480
3280 1$2184$40881$59921$78961$97991$11708
La Grande
La Grande, OR
13,095
$18.351$21.611$31.411 $41.211$51.011$60.811 $70.05
Lake Oswego
Lake Oswego,
OR
36725
$23881$51161$99801$167401$?35001$30260$37020
Lebanon
Lebanon,OR
15,565
$19.461$64.661$109.861$155061$200.261$245.461$290.66
Lmmin CM
Lincoln GN OR
7260
$21231$46:311$72111$103.911$135]11$16751$13931
Matlras
Madras, OR
6,046
$25.551$32.05 1 S45.051 $58.051$71051 $84,051 $97.05
Medford Waler
Commissmn
Medh+N.OR
75780
$762 x$11 I8577691$2360 $3123�$397fi�%4829
Milton Freewater
OR n-Freewater•
7.055 1
$19 801 $23.37 $34.14 $44.921$55.691$66 461 $77.23
Awauhle --
NLlwaukie. OR
"".400
$681 J$37711$68311$99. 5111130411$16131!$19: 21
Molalla
Molalle, OR
7,800
$11.131$35531$59931$84.331$108731$133.131$157.53
hbnm Doth
AAonmcuth, OR
9720
$13571$33071$52571$72071$91571$ 11107$13057
Myrtle Creek
Myrtle Cr,,k, OR
3,440
$47.00$59.001$79.001$99.001$119.001$139.001$159.00
Newberg
Newberg, OR
22230
$7148$48781$8508$123881$160081$19798$23528
Newport
Newpad, OR
10,065
$19.851$43501$70.811$98.111$125.421$152.721$18002
Ontaua
Onfano OR
11375
$11201$23521.$8534$47161$58 98�$7080�$8262
Oregon City
Oregon CiTy OR
32,220
$14]01$39301$63.901$88.501$113.101$137]0$162.30
PendIelan
Pendle7 n, OR
17515
$1810$29651$41251$5:375$66251$78751$9125
Phoenix
Phoenix, OR
4,550
$34.00$38611$55.161$73.041$90.911$108]91$126.67
Portland
Podland. OR
585845
$3340$70221$10704�$'i4386�$18t).88I$2P 50$25432
PrineWle
PrineNlle, OR
9,260
$17.211$35.111$53.011$70.911$88.811$106.711$124.61
Redmond
Retlm ontl OR1
26305
$1432 $25821$37321$ 48. B21$60321$71821$8332
SalemSalem,OR
15]460
$6.321$3217$997$83.721$109.521$135.321$161.12
Sandy
Sandy OR
6780
$640 1$31001$55601$800$10480$12540$15400
Scappoose
Scappoose, OR 11
6,665
$1570$44.131$72551$100.98$12940$157.80$1B6.2fi
Seaside
Seasid OOR
6490
$40101$56.x21$8232$108521$134 72IS160 921$187 12
Sherwood
Sherwood, OR
18,255
$18]4$56.891$96.041$137.231$19fi.32$255.42$314.52
Silverton
Stivertori3OR
965
$14921$36221$5752$79821$100.121$12142$14272
Sisters
Sisters, OR
2,040
$20.591 $20.591$30.591$40.591$50.591$60.591 $70.59
Springfield UtllftyB..Id
Spnn9f ld, OR
501000
$13801$29551$46191$63271$8023 $97251$11427
StanFleltl
Stanfelq OR
2,315
$26.00$3722$48.44$59.6fi $70.991 $82101 $93.32
$tayton
Siayton, OP.
7660
$2346$32 USI $4057�$492i�$5787$66471 $750E
SL Helens
SL Helens, OR
12,890
$10.401$62201$114.001$165.801$217601$269.401$321.20
Sulhedin
SuShetlm.OR
7880
5991$158 al
Sweet Heme
Sweet Home, OR
9,005
$17.901$53,601$113.101$172.601$232.101$291.601$351.10
Talent
Talent. OR
6095
$d'290$3n 74�$8641�$10250$1389175 251$211 53
ITh. Galles
The Galles, OR
1 14,440
$55.301 $55.301$5363 $76.201$88.771$101 341$113.90
TgaM
POrtland.OR
48415
$24381$61681$711031$16373$216431$269131$32183
Tillamook
Tillamook, OR
4905
$11.251$39.301$67.351$95.411$123.46$151.51�$17966
Tualafin
TualaLn.UR
26060
$6901$30801$54701$78601$102501$126401$15030
Umatilla
Umatilla, OR
6,530
$12.38$21.73$31.061 $40.431$49.781$59.131$68.48
lkneia
ikneta,OkF
610
$15.151$4140J$70801$106671$141381$17fi 691$21200
West Linn
West Linn, OR25,250
$19461$26201$48.60I$71.00 $93401$115.801$138.20
Wtlsonalle
Nnlsonmlle, UR
19565
$19561$45881$78781$111681$144581$177481$210.38
Wootlburn
Woodburn, OR
24,080
$12.811$29.661$51.14I$78.541$105.941$133.341$160.74
WOOu4illage
T�outdale.OR
3,L'0
%2 1191$34031$5043$66831$8323$99631$11603
Water Utility Total Costs Report
20D -- - - - .--� - -- i -- --
150
- Central Paint X
W A�em9e /
Minimum
0_-
U
J _
Consumption (CCF)
80 Entitles MI C.IVIQATA
Search parameters: Water I Average, Minimum I Central Point I Oregon I Population 0 - Max
Distance 0 - Max I Single Family 15/8" meter I Usage 0 -60
Water Utility Total Costs Report
800_—
•o• Central Paint
•+- Average /
Mammum
:R �Mnimum
400
U
200--
80 Entities
o
Consumption (CCF)
h CNADATA
Search parameters: Water I Average, Maximum, Minimum I Central Point I Oregon I Population 0 -
Max I Distance 0 - Max I Single Family 15/8" meter I Usage 0 - 60
E,
Water Utility Total Costs Report
Bao
•- Cent�l Point
.• Auemge
,.-Netlmum
Minimum
e 400
U
200
0 °1
Consumption (CCF)
80 Entities III CIVIDATA
Search parameters: Water I Average, Maximum, Minimum I Central Point I Oregon I Papulation 0 -
Max I Distance 0 - Max I Single Family 5/8" meter I Usage 0 -60
Return to Agentla
Main Street Revitalization Act Endorsement/Resolution
/\
CENTRAL
POINT
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
140 South 3i° Street Central Point, OR 97502 (541) 664-7602 www.centra l pointoregcneov
STAFF REPORT
January 22, 2015
AGENDA ITEM: Briefing and discussion on issues related to the Oregon Revitalize Main
Street Act.
STAFF SOURCE:
Chris Clayton, City Manager
BACKGROUND/SYNOPSIS:
The Revitalize Main Street Act would authorize a statewide 25% rebate program for the
rehabilitation of historic commercial buildings—stores, hotels, theaters, apartments, factories, mills,
etc. The Central Point comprehensive plan (chapter 6) identifies historically registered structures
within the City. It is assumed that properties identified in the City's comprehensive plan would be
eligible for this funding source should the Revitalize Main Street Act legislation be ratified. The
rebate would help offset the high cost of restoration, seismic retrofitting, and code compliance for
property owners/developers. Funded by the auction of state income tax credits at a capped amount
(similar to the successful film production credit), a significant percentage of this incentive would be
directed toward rural communities.
This modest, cost-effective investment by the state will help revitalize Oregon's downtowns and
pay dividends for decades to come in the form of new jobs, income and property taxes, cultural
heritage and tourism, business incubation, seismic safety, and the reuse of existing infrastructure.
An economic impact study conducted by EcoNorthwest projects that in 2018, with a state
investment of just $10.6M, we would see:
• 4 times more buildings restored than without the stale incentive.
• 1,369 Oregon jobs per year generating income of $25.5M.
• $2.3M net increase in property taxes per year to pay i'or schools and services.
• $13.3M new federal Historic Tax Credit dollars invested in Oregon per year.
• $35.8M net increase per year in direct development spending.
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Data Sheet on Revitalize Main Street Legislation/Program
2. F.CONorthwest Economic Analysis
3. Letter of support template
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Council motion directing staff to prepare letter of support (Mayor's signature) for the
Revitalize Main Street Act.
PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED:
No — Public Comment can be accepted on this discussion item, but no public hearing is required.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to direct staff as follows......
Jobs & Economic Development on Main Street
Many of Oregon a historic downtowns ore suffering from o downward spiwl cf di,-
investmen, and neglect. it time to Non #hat around. We con afro,, .. invesinrenl to
revitolize our Main Skeet, as desirable places to live, work, and shop.
Proposed: The Revitalize Main Street Act
• A 25% rebate for certified rehabilitation of historic commercial buildings —
stores, hotels, theaters, oporiments, fraternal lodges, factories, mills, etc. (Would
not apply to single family homes.)
• Requires a minimum Investment of $10,000; target the most importora properties —
those listed on the National Register of Historic Places; must retain historic character.
• Funded by the auction of state Income tax credit at o capped amount. (Like the
film production credit, and we end up with a tangible asset that lads for decades.)
Why Do We Need It?
• The high cast of restoration, code upgrades, and seismic reinforcement often
creates a funding gap, making rehabilitation financially out of reach.
• The state rehab rebate can be paired with the Federal Historic Tax Credit (20%)
to close the financial gap keeping many buildings from being restored.
• Oregon's current financial toolkit falls short. Federal and local Incentives are
available, but the state is the missing partner needed to offrad more investment.
• Investment in rural communities is especially Important. Approx. 2,600
buildings in 77 towns could use the credit. Two-thirds are o aside' of Portland.
How Would Our State Benefit?
• Job creation. Rehabilitation of old buildings creates more jabs dollar -for -dollar
than new construction, manufacturing, mining, and most other industries.
• Readivated Main Streets. Upper fears became occupied, new businesses move
in, tourists pull off the highway to eat and shop.
• Mare Income tax nevem.. New jobs will be created through construction,
suppliers, services, and the businesses that move ire. the refurbished buildings.
• More local tax re ..ues from Improved property values to pay for lam] services.
• Sister, seismically upgraded buildings with AOA and fire code compliance.
• Reuse of existing infmslmdure. Saves money and the environment.
• Productive, tangible assets that contribute to their community for decades.
Our Main Streets Matter. Raise Your Voice!
Rehab incentives have a proven track record for economic development in 35 states.
It's time Oregon had one, tool
• Add your name to the list of those endorsing the Historic Rehabilitation Incentive of
www.ResmreOiegon.arg/rehob-fax-credit
• Join Redom Oregon and make a donation to support our legislative effort.
• Contact your state Representative and Senator, fell them you need this, and ask them
to support the Ravealbe Main Sweet Ad.
• Shore examples of historic buildings on your Main Street that can't be refurbished
without the help of a date incentive.
Rehabilitation Incentives are Well -Tested in 35 States
• 35 states offer o rehabilitation incentive or tax credit. In 2013
Texas and Alabama added one, Wiscomin quadrupled their credit,
and California passed a bill unanimously that takes effect in 2015.
• The Federal Historic Tax Credit (HTC) has generated a 26% return
for the government's investment. $21 billion in credits generated
$26.6 billion in federal tax revenues.
• State incontives create a ripple effect in local economies. In North
Carolina, every dollar generates $12.57 in economic benefit.
• According a a 2013 Rutgers University study, a $1 million investment
in historic rehabilitation yields markedly better effects an employ-
ment, Income, Gross State Product, and stare and local taxes than an
equal investment in new construction, manufacturing, or services.
VIRGINIA: In 10 years, $355M in state credits spurred. -
*
purred:• Rehabilitation of mare than 1,200 londmork buildings.
An aconitic Impact of nearly $1.6 billion In the state.
• More than 10,700 jobs.
• 93% of property owners Indicated state sax credits were
essential to their decision to undertake the project.
bELNNFSOTA: The first year offer passage in 2010, an
tnvesiment of $49.1 M in rehab credits generated:
• 14 rehabilitation projects totaling $343M of expenditures.
• Every $1 of sate nvestman was motdxd by $71n private
investment, and generated $8.32 in econamic activity.
• Sfam economic output increased $451 Ak
2,948 new jobs were created with income of $752.4M.
MARYLAND: From 1996-2008, $213M in tax credits
resulted in:
PROJECTED FOR OREGON:
—h: 2014 W& a arab Mreetmene ofiner vex-
• 441111010 buildings rehabbed ilsofs wflhold the sMte xscxnttve.
• 1,369 lobs pet year generarNg kxvtse of $253A1
• $2.W net increase At psopeny taxes pits y,,,, m Pay fa
scisoob and servlcu.
• $13 3M naw federal Historic Tox Credit daunts seem in
Oregon pes year.
• $35AM net gab pes year An dlred Ckinmi pasent •p•m*4
PRIV944-0,
CAL
IRVESTjT ,aenne.
.xrurx.
Suisec
so
•�
(r:-4)
0
0
-
L
J
o
O
O
O
cd
O
ryoo
G)
co
Cd
4-
0
V)
m.
Q
�E
O
LOU
m
}
k
f
|
}
(
§
k
(\{\
/}}
\
\
(
k_
A®
`
c !!
!
$}
kk}\)(
/
\
E
`)!!!)
}§§/°
ƒ
�Be»e!
r
m
u u
I� O�
C
N
7
0
u
uj
E
°
Z
E
c
0
u
u
JW
m
uLU v
c
O
u
o
=
o
C
O
m
m
u u
I� O�
E
E
O 'E
.E °Y 'E c S d 19 °
0 _ 2
w N O E N E ry E 'S '; » G R 6" C P 6= w --• c x C,
o a o
a v v Q e° ry y E ro m w yy" Y a
E _ v
E E i E
. wE D ° o m ,Q s T '�'� 8 —ni, E d .o v; ? co_ -� x o$
v 2$ 2 ry m g L f E v
3 o 9 'a° l o c o 'c a Q .Li `u $ c c G g d
v _ 9 v w N u o b 'o v o S, u 3
egg«Bpi =a $��s ■ �2� g
g0 nLo
0
O y o 0 v g L" 8 3 E a to -8v v v v o c w v
E �o, m F c E o oz v a$ -rl o c
n m 8 d v O
O U V O
v _ Yl
`o i v n `o E ,'°" o v a cn ; t dT i v E
`ry Y p� .pp_� Y � 8 0 �' Er
VI 9 U a' 4! « i° n ° .Y d 2 cc L C L L L C y ■'
i e.°p V= °� 9J. a N t o o c a E a ^ S O a u p 8 E> o O■
O O O" ° 9 C° 'J O Y
c_ v o g t O c i" c$ "p E 3 env c v p
r c N o° o c E a u
w eArc=u`S.Q v.�rc�rcacE o$wm =.•9L�s`
n `o S -o F`o
m
Y
a
9
Y
E
g0
L
Q
n
`n
.Y
2 0
N
u
le
F
of
c■
F
co
o
d«
8
w
rt e
O
N
Yf
w
C
o
s«
E
n
'm
c
o
a6cov
E
"�
iu,
v e
e
Q
--
:cc
3-
$ o
E
mo
E
r°
re
a O
Y
v
E°'
[ a
o
`ed
a
°
i
oN
E
9t
sY
8z
a
a
Q"
L
3
a
S
an
d
Yn
VC0
Om
d
Y
C
�29
yLy`
nJC
iC
iE
b N
nC
�a
9A
■
E
E
O 'E
.E °Y 'E c S d 19 °
0 _ 2
w N O E N E ry E 'S '; » G R 6" C P 6= w --• c x C,
o a o
a v v Q e° ry y E ro m w yy" Y a
E _ v
E E i E
. wE D ° o m ,Q s T '�'� 8 —ni, E d .o v; ? co_ -� x o$
v 2$ 2 ry m g L f E v
3 o 9 'a° l o c o 'c a Q .Li `u $ c c G g d
v _ 9 v w N u o b 'o v o S, u 3
egg«Bpi =a $��s ■ �2� g
g0 nLo
0
O y o 0 v g L" 8 3 E a to -8v v v v o c w v
E �o, m F c E o oz v a$ -rl o c
n m 8 d v O
O U V O
v _ Yl
`o i v n `o E ,'°" o v a cn ; t dT i v E
`ry Y p� .pp_� Y � 8 0 �' Er
VI 9 U a' 4! « i° n ° .Y d 2 cc L C L L L C y ■'
i e.°p V= °� 9J. a N t o o c a E a ^ S O a u p 8 E> o O■
O O O" ° 9 C° 'J O Y
c_ v o g t O c i" c$ "p E 3 env c v p
r c N o° o c E a u
w eArc=u`S.Q v.�rc�rcacE o$wm =.•9L�s`
n `o S -o F`o
a)
v c
i v
E E 3 ?' .. F ., ti 3 ° n .P o ,p a = v co .s, ga u$ E $„
E Y _g 2 3 a E °' o ,
o
3° C n E N E v E E
n E
0
o. ~ `o i Q
a 6° 6 N 61 u� °° p_ o" N^ d Y
n E p1 "a' c v n b u c$ E "u °L`' u d o
EO`no ,°o L n Po
„ u 0
a a
E E C E« o y u P
�o v E._ a.w n i- uF�fi uw'^ `o
o.x n o .5 'S au O 5 n'a ^.e u a
°._ .°, f.E E n° E E 2 9n
aP.° i N a a O$ u °^ u^ a L O c
`- E `^ E
o O a 0
o
O_O 6c5 _o g�
uv '^ u cc
u2 v_a'sD2 ro c 9 u Yvv ., u� z .� u u E
r i Y E~ 6„
o« „yg NCE L wc nan ro^ LE.e
C
u 3 o
Z UE
E
L
3
`o It E
E E ? n
10 o C
o
tog
Z Y2 s n$._a2 $�`c 3 E $ �' 2r 1O 2 On'„�,k 6K u�c E h
nu
i m n u 9
n
.0 p
P$ m m'
19 o
C E n
-0 u a ° SS° p
a b 8 u
y" E Y c « n V
E
v o 5 0 0` m F. � C u O � E E m a—'
` 2c 2` «° L C oL' p=$
o v o
xL ° u a ti c Cca V.
YL .� �D o
E_
r
c n
S
n p'
u. c
c S a_° 3 a Y = �^. 9 k $ a fie ' m 4Y �pp ' o 0
Q�°
e"co�+u c oc .b a c n v c E n .S0. na E
m 3= C u
Ev�9b$�39 m ey^"c E`qz
� wE�Br H-�py�ti SL9 �Yg �"atga &nY a�£�
€o O
s a Ei
fr;f{t; !(}f)!t»! `!■§z!! � !!!!-2
[!!!!2/](:|(\ƒ$t) (°
13 C)
•|i){!«®!{
#r/ ! •;
;
/2!!!fil; ¥_E;{;l•I\
Elrl�l. .. . ; .
..--b-\|)\fq,ƒ!
.. . .,f,..l.$,
||r}\!;&§!! !!�f!!!�.kit�|
!
2§]E /]§lr
\)°(l•`,®!zz®|!!|§E]! „ |^;,/$
r®.,®|=.!/
,zl•:rw,t-.ff!!. ƒ!`!/!§_:
aƒ.kl•o. l�.•:4lE�e=l=��; ,'o t!
a :lm gel,,;e�;
;A,;,;2�!!K.6RZ* !
-\\!
F&=}
u
({/)E
\}k/
/\\\
.}!!{�)
49
■/��=,raal�!
fr;f{t; !(}f)!t»! `!■§z!! � !!!!-2
[!!!!2/](:|(\ƒ$t) (°
13 C)
•|i){!«®!{
#r/ ! •;
;
/2!!!fil; ¥_E;{;l•I\
Elrl�l. .. . ; .
..--b-\|)\fq,ƒ!
.. . .,f,..l.$,
||r}\!;&§!! !!�f!!!�.kit�|
!
2§]E /]§lr
\)°(l•`,®!zz®|!!|§E]! „ |^;,/$
r®.,®|=.!/
,zl•:rw,t-.ff!!. ƒ!`!/!§_:
aƒ.kl•o. l�.•:4lE�e=l=��; ,'o t!
a :lm gel,,;e�;
;A,;,;2�!!K.6RZ* !
2a°`o;t Q -W —, v 1. `oz Bioi
O s o '° Q E Q o '° $ a 9 z u o E„ `o
O� a 9 LL n �' n d E
YE K S 6a 9aZ L•c
j r:a�Ko `oE 9 p`satm
Q Z O L° 9 i tl V p O c E Y 4 °u u
l7O YS,y Y E E 8 ° uc32 „°L ° w
O Z 3 Q A y« Y .o Z 3 0 c v E E E y v o u$
u O010 o
v o o r u a p$
w Z O a `� $ n° z0 0 E' �c o xE u E o 0 L�0 3 g0 x": Po
I—Q w E E 3 w`a F � s `„'F c V w E
yj
iy
9
LLCc
u <—°
e$°$ Z
=seo
s E'�8
`o W
O E
x O n
y
O po
Z o
E
Z
? Cue m r nZ v 6
F IY W y N e x O q F W u F E 3 n e° Q W O t 9 .v O N C L y
f
0
S
uE
S t
q Y o a
E g 0
p '9
a
l7
vo u
aS
o
Y
a o
J t O
xc o o E n
3 x w
�=ate
=3ra«
IEL°
r
c°
9 u
q cd
C
B
' o
N
y c o
e
E
9$ oz a
8 �
Kd
-
N
S
A
$ o 0
._
JT 6 .
s
d
d N d `a yam+
> ? Y R
EEp
Y
x Q i .8 Y£
`,E.�ns
8
v u
c
o p E
3hh
O 17 1 N -oc 9
p L9
u
0
S
uE
S t
E g 0
E o
a
l7
vo u
aS
o
c°
9 u
q cd
C
B
' o
S $
p
9
8 �
Kd
-
N
S
A
$ o 0
._
doe-
s
Y
d
2
O v J
U
w a$
o C$ c Z NOF o o x .E Q o& E
o aE coo A �°oo-o coggg2B
aO -or F— v 9 C
^ T C mO o
v v
m v S 9 v 0`
n.
5°
y co S^� n S u v' o„ S u o g ca _ 'm, > ► _'u e
a 9 c a^❑ u e E " c« n Y '^':
E a E 0 o m t d o N a"
n ova a;
°°$ Ua' w Z
0
bco u co_ $ `off°- co o °� v q" _. 5 c
GG a�s
y F=$ E S 0 o
u
E °am°
q�p Cgu$ u 9 � a Od L SL hm Nx
y
z a9�oo?mE'Z ��w3Y `^c��ngm SdY u6wP naLo
CY
!{�;a` |;!||! I`J `!f§■! §!!ll...
'o 'o
444 �&tii: . -•+!!t
!WE! i�\!i7'6 (k019.68
. �.�§2!
f;�!||f.§;� a!°!! „ _!
k\)/k(!/{\\.{{|,/CY �)kkk)
l;,.,..,....a!|{;}{��|elfƒ!!
/)!#«!!f{!|!ƒ||\}/2t,}!\kms}E1;6 !
.,.7 ::=-,•!'-`....! «-;•!
k�`�jq �®`�£��E|imkk)!
§;!!;■{3!)!${§2!ll;ll|2
ƒ)f]{22/!|!!|)!!!!Z\k!|�_J§)$®|�\
/�}§�{
/
t; ES
0
#
f/!}!|
W ®®k
\�)�
2
\{
k
u
!
f|)f)|\§
u
K
04CE
)�\}�
!£!E!
-
\
�j�\�
-
t|(
k|};};
!{�;a` |;!||! I`J `!f§■! §!!ll...
'o 'o
444 �&tii: . -•+!!t
!WE! i�\!i7'6 (k019.68
. �.�§2!
f;�!||f.§;� a!°!! „ _!
k\)/k(!/{\\.{{|,/CY �)kkk)
l;,.,..,....a!|{;}{��|elfƒ!!
/)!#«!!f{!|!ƒ||\}/2t,}!\kms}E1;6 !
.,.7 ::=-,•!'-`....! «-;•!
k�`�jq �®`�£��E|imkk)!
§;!!;■{3!)!${§2!ll;ll|2
ƒ)f]{22/!|!!|)!!!!Z\k!|�_J§)$®|�\
P
m_
N
. O
N
P
N
N
C
N
H
N
ry
f
N
N
N
H
.Ni
e
P
N
N
O
^
O
O
N
m
N
N
N
N
tl
LA
N
0
b
N
P=
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
y
N
N
N
N49
N
O
N
P
O
O
Y
tl
O
N
M1
h
O
O
P
0
P
n
N
Nm
O
p
N
m
O
O_
tl
m-
N
P
Yl
m^
Y
Fl
N
O
tl
P
N
^
Y
N
O
T
O-
N
P
tl
NN
m-
C
n
O
N
O
vl
�
N
M
M
N
00
Ym
m
N
T
N
M1
`O
m
m
N
tl
N
m
N
N
fV
0'
M1
N
N
N
N
y
N
M
y
M
tl
m
n
tl
N
T
Y
Y
b
O
P
m
N
m
IR
m
N
n-
P
N
M1
P
m
1O
O
m
'Rn
O
n
P_
O
m
_�
O
N
O
P
O
n
m
m
m
N
I11
N
^
O
y
O
U
E
i
E
F
am
44
a
0
9
�i
m
V
3
°c°
y
v
9
d
R«
fl
a
o
n
o
=
m
o
E
3
t
_
:
c
Qa
c
«$
b.
a
U
L
,n�
$
ai
i
rc
2
m
a
w$
���
O
5=
C
6
9
9
d
9
n
a
V
]
b
C
w
N
OEE�3
,Y
iCylp
�
d
o
emsz
a
z
| !k\{/`0 2{«!%£}`!|f
. E `![�»-!�a !•a!!.®,_l,,,.
}!;aƒ •��I�;l.tr,)i)
lam,;:l:l:l;i!!
,,i:� 5" I`";Er!!�
Zrf/t/(:) {` - atafZ�a|:!!:
- _ E
]:!) ;fmwo1f\(/!:.9
:J
2#|$#!{))/«!;!`!'f!lw•r2U:2o
\.777�77,�;(}!!■!�\(}
))
l•F�•;�®.f® k
,;�a�lz,��}«|!!.\`,-■����
E�(/})r
!!»!!Z*£|),!l;mm
Z
O
W
y
�
N
P
n
_
NN
O_
N
m
vl
Ny
�
N
N
N
O
P
N
O
O
1�
W
N
n
M1
rj
N
M
m
d
N
W
p
M
0
PIpm
P
D
n
p
�
p
N
P
y
N
m
rypl
N
p
y
P
E
N
N
b
M
N
1pV
p
y
-
N
y
y
i
m
a
v
w
v
N
c
V'
lu
O l7
�,
$
Z
O l9l
.n
Z
O
W
Z V m t
y r c 6 w 3 t
E w m O E y r s o$ a y s c p E
v Cv ° -p ss Y d 9 °°�'E o
rdpr AN a„ 93�5o
0. :
Y _^ � °
E E E t
q E „L Cs ao �mQ�oca=
F-
E
E
°1 n
6d��s ooIV
daq:
i t 3 ou `^ p y& i e a d-9 a a
p;s o�3ae�0EE "0o
aem� a°�,'� t�q 9$gd3p�
n' E_➢
g° xv ^
EnL`°c'[ EE
E E e I Q _, q _ nc 2 w a E p w a
F
bg
A
L3
5
F
li
q •" VV
E
L
U
u
$
Q E
E s
w
E 9
3
T
E
^ o
g
u
o
F
n e
MZ
c a
O
E E w
u
o"
.E
y%
y Y„,
y
y q 0
V
Y
f
xv
o
atl «
x
F
0
m°
Z V m t
y r c 6 w 3 t
E w m O E y r s o$ a y s c p E
v Cv ° -p ss Y d 9 °°�'E o
rdpr AN a„ 93�5o
0. :
Y _^ � °
E E E t
q E „L Cs ao �mQ�oca=
F-
E
E
°1 n
6d��s ooIV
daq:
i t 3 ou `^ p y& i e a d-9 a a
p;s o�3ae�0EE "0o
aem� a°�,'� t�q 9$gd3p�
n' E_➢
g° xv ^
EnL`°c'[ EE
E E e I Q _, q _ nc 2 w a E p w a
F
bg
A
L3
5
F
li
00r Fig° «�nai8
° u
°�.< 9Ga��3 Eo$
a3° E A "aEa.L^920 °
5 u
9 u CO 3 a E 'E -0 �° M
fn •.'• .� p ToZ
Q z$ t i ;& E i
O E 6F E.
O 9
U w E: S 3 v
E
aFe v S Kc'o p n m 2,o i^ E a y
'o CO 9 9 F
X a o x g n n' 3 "u 9 3 Y E F u
°v n ap_$otiS9 cg' mS L`9gu n
E B t'o
Eow9 ='Q °'6c w :.ui G
v 9 A p E 9 9 c u'Sv':-� v E a o i c �' F 8 U
m pp a. •k p G o cn H e E 2 a ° 2 c
b y m ,° o p r�' E' d
`o i
U Z
rt v a a
40 a` w .9 y . 6 ..I - � = u g, .P E a � oi--',�'� y"° „ E `° E E ly
JU
Z
a
X
c
N
CL
OL
E,
x 3 z o- r �,
°x " h o 1 £O eg Y o !! 2z
O r; V
`o_ a Z F o n v m A v p
a azi E w 9 u v s
p
V O tj
i m O° W n u; CW ° ES H_
L O u
d y u c 6 3 a°LLy q u
" d i t4
w 5 n E Z 0 E 0
a_ 3 $ YF,q u�c N o00`0LL a
`nw0 u.2.M u co x0o a = 8i 8i y °
1Q
3
do�ore
;
o
$
v
Oc a
E
9
Y
Q
a
o C C
°
O x
z
Y
C
o c
x 3 z o- r �,
°x " h o 1 £O eg Y o !! 2z
O r; V
`o_ a Z F o n v m A v p
a azi E w 9 u v s
p
V O tj
i m O° W n u; CW ° ES H_
L O u
d y u c 6 3 a°LLy q u
" d i t4
w 5 n E Z 0 E 0
a_ 3 $ YF,q u�c N o00`0LL a
`nw0 u.2.M u co x0o a = 8i 8i y °
1Q
a
Y u0 V J� ° ^^ t YJ 8 Y 9 _'J ✓ E F
E o
a 0 8 �pu�p,, z o
. .p .e 3 C' pp C ge- a 'E a y n `m
.a°
T to
o
}n1 p p
e— Z c e g Z x v E e
O 3 E `n v
m Q ,£ U o 5 m E E? E 2 .. —0 K
.P E .P m w$ m 3 $ u 5 9 n 'o l7 O c �' $ O P m 5 c^ U ! Q w E 9
"_o E E m n Q^ E°° = .t � 9 C� �
.P u 'c u u v_ r £ a t' y" " v co ^ d "° @ wYn U O _ o
'S Z `u iO QQ p
E V
3 3 u s
l
AZO
2 iiL u^ C u 3 y0 0 N'3v c_ po n`,Q SOv ..pe
WO
Y!
o $
vc Y @ '°
° .
ig
$ 8 J
9 Y L OC LO �n�m^ °CLf
n O
eos
G all R' O po
ani z m62 ° a x „$ n o
y
yn
E, '' O SL9 Cum 5 ne�'��V �a
uO iF E taud'� u'uio= o'
E .o s a o
v`9a z v��;^ �a a o.us'E4asiZ� $e
Z w
K Ye 5 Q
u U m W $ `03
oy
z
Ff
O y V
p
O
`o
E 0
m
t t 9 i
Q c t
S i 8
S
z�rN
rm
€
9 w
oo
p
E_ E
N u T
c
p
W N V O
�
E
o
2
v
O
p
S
�
-
q
s
c
E
m
E w
3
5
E
0
v
y
y
Y
a
q
g
E
E
m
Y
v
9
S
u$
n
S
m
q�
0
y
$
O V
a
'p
�
V
q
9
?✓
Y�
pxp
O
E
C
C
3
9
C
d a
n
Y�
3
p=
m
0
o
• O`
6
C
q
9
Y
GY
9
L
C
Y
6
C
O
x
6
9
Y°
x
n
O
$
o
.L
n
O y V
p
O
`o
E 0
m
t t 9 i
Q c t
S i 8
S
z�rN
rm
€
9 w
oo
p
E_ E
N u T
c
p
W N V O
C r j
p
E 0
rm
€
=
oo
E
o
v
p
-
q
s
c
E
m
E w
3
5
E
v
§
!
13
16
)|!fc
}2!�!
f
!!!!E
=i!!§
f-5
E a
}{�{a
.--§#
}}k\\f!
§
!
)|!fc
f-5
E a
.--§#
}}k\\f!
x
0
z
d
6
a 3°c3 E! OOE
v
° Eo
Eo 0
.� °
0.
mz OErr 5
aN—E a5x�' aae - E�A9� b
vE;� "
u
o f.q
75
a F
y og
OZ c'
w€
u�ass
2�Ip?
YY �
on2 �d
�a
�m02�
€cry
oV 'Zm0•
sILI �
gao`
3'�oEu�
5$v$mi"
aEs ��R
Do-
E
2'Eg`fr
8m8�v2
E„$'$d
°n�g@
s a'vE
o FSA ° N
^E„ so
Fsmn”
�g9og8
E 'E
MAIN STREET MATTERS!
PASS THE REVITALIZE MAIN STREET ACT (LC 1 034)
January 2015
Dec,
Our historic downtown is the cultural and economic care of the community and members of our Main Street
business association and city government are working hard to bring the district back to life. But the cost of
much-needed building restoration, code compliance, and seismic retrofitting remains financially out of
reach in many cases. The Is an example.
We urge you to support and advocate for The Revitalize Main Street Ad as a modest, cost-effective
investment that will help revitalize our downtown and pay dividends for decades to come In the form of
new jobs, income and property taxes, cultural heritage and tourism, business incubation, seismic safety, and
the reuse of existing infrastructure.
The Revitalize Main Street Act would create a state Historic Rehabilitation Fund to provide a 25%
rebate for the certified rehabilitation of historic commercial buildings — stares, hotels, theaters, aparhnents,
factories, mills, etc. It would be funded by the auction of stare income tax credits at a capped amount
(similar to the Oregon Film Production Credit). The money stays here in Oregon and we end up with long
term, tangible assets.
An economic impact study conducted by EcoNorthwest states that Oregon would be economically better
off with this incentive. In 2018 with a state investment of just $10.6M we would see:
4X more buildings restored than without the state Incentive.
1,369 jobs per year generating income of $25.5M.
e $2.3M net Increase in property taxes per year to pay for schools and services.
v $73.3M new federal Historic Tax Credit dollars invested in Oregon per year.
r $35.8M net Increase per year in direct development spending.
Historic rehabilitation incentives have been proven effective in 35 ether states as a targeted means to
adrad private investment and capture more federal tax credit dollars. This Is particularly important in
smaller towns.
It's time for the state to Invest in Oregon's Main Streets and pass the Revitalize Main Street Ad In 2015.
Sincerely,
Return to Agenda