Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAP111314CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Central Point City Council Meeting Agenda City Hall November 13, 2014 541-664-3321 City Council Next Res. 1413 Mayor Next Ord. 1998 Hank Williams Ward I. REGULAR ME ETI NG CALLE D TO ORDER-7:00 P. M. Bruce Dingler II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Ward II Kelly Geiger III. ROLL CALL Ward III Ellie George IV. PUBLIC APPEARANCES —Comments will be limited to 3 minutes per Ward IV individual ors minutes if representing a group or organization. Allen Broderick V. CONSENTAGENDA At Large David Douglas Page 2-8 A. Approval of October 23, 2014 Council Minutes Rick Samuelson 9-15 B. Appointment of Darlene Taylor to the Multicultural Committee 16-17 C. Approval of OLCC Application for Second Location of Crown Market Administration 18-19 D. Approval of#GivingTuesday Proclamation Chris Clayton, City 20-21 E. Approval of Pancreatic Cancer Proclamation Manager Deanna Casey, City Recorder VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA Community VII. PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS Development Tom Humphrey, Director 23-31 A. Resolution No. __ , Annexation of 1.01 Acres, Located at 4173 Hamrick Road and Identified on the Finance Jackson County Assessor's Map as 372W03C, Tax Lot Bev Adams, Director 3300, Applicant: Jackson County (Humphrey) Human Resources Barb Robson, Director 33-57 B. Resolution No. Approving a Conceptual _---J Parks and Public Land Use and Transportation Plan for CP-4D, and Urban Works Area of the City of Central Point, Oregon (Humphrey) Matt Samitore, Director VIII. BUSINESS Jennifer Boardman, Manager 59 A. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (Adams) Police Kris Allison Chief 61-62 B. Discussion of 7`h and Oak Intersection (Samitore) 64-71 C. Discussion of the 2014-2015 Citizen Survey Questionnaire(Clayton) 73 D. Planning Commission Report(Humphrey) IX. MAYOR'S REPORT X. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT XI. COUNCIL REPORTS XII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - ORS 192.660 (2)(e) and 192.660 (2)(i) The City Council will adjourn to executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660. Under the provisions of the Oregon Public Meetings Law, the proceedings of an executive session are not for publication or broadcast. E11�I�a14 Ulq 8 d I Ti I i d Y Y Consent Agenda CAP111314 Page CITY OF CENTRAL POINT City Council Meeting Minutes October 23, 2014 I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Mayor Williams called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL: Mayor: Hank Williams Council Members: Allen Broderick, Bruce Dingler, Kelly Geiger, Rick Samuelson, David Douglas, and Ellie George were present. City Manager Chris Clayton; City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer; Police Chief Kris Allison; Captain Brian Day; Community Development Director Tom Humphrey; Finance Director Bev Adams; Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore; and City Recorder Deanna Casey were also present. IV. PUBLIC APPEARANCES City Attorney Sydnee Dryer introduced Hilary Zamudio, Associate Attorney from her office. V. SPECIAL PRESENTATION — Fire District No. 3 Quarterly Report Fire Chief Peterson reviewed the quarterly report. A recent survey shows that citizens are generally pleased with the organization and their people. He explained that they are still working on providing a second station to cover the Central Point area. VI. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of October 9, 2014 City Council Minutes B. Appointment of Candace Clements to the Multicultural Committee C. Approval of Street Closure for Community Christmas Light Parade D. Acceptance of the 1" Quarter Financial Statements VII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA B. Multicultural Committee Chair Amy Sweet introduced Candace Clements. She will be their new committee member if approved by the Council tonight. Ms. Clements stated that she is new to Central Point but enjoys being involved in the community. CAP111314 Paget City o/C',Ct' d Point City cc?"C"I Min utc, Oc tobcr 23, 2014 Pngc 2 C. Finance Director Bev Adams provided a brief report on the Quarterly Financial Statement. The taxes look like they will come in higher than expected. The projections look good for 2014/15 budget year. Kelly Geiger moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Rick Samuelson seconded. Rall call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingier, yes; Kelly Geiger, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. Ordinance No. 1997, Amending Portions of Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 16 Subdivisions in Regards to Structures over City Easements Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore stated that there were no recommended changes at the first reading of an Ordinance amending portions of Chapter 16 regarding structures over city easements. He explained that any structure that is placed over a water or storm line could eventually crack the line and cause damage to city property. There are very few city easements on private property and currently there are no structures that are causing problems. There were several structures that were illegally constructed and the city was forced to have them removed. These changes will clarify what a City easement is and what can be placed over it. Council Member Douglas does not like that the city is being so strict about what can be placed on an easement on private property. There was discussion that the City avoids putting these easements through private land, in most cases it is part of the subdivision plans and there are no other options to get infrastructure to specific lots. The City will continue to monitor the properties that have these easements so that new owners are aware of the rules and do not build over the easements. Kelly Geiger moved to approve Ordinance 1997, Amending Portions of Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 16 Subdivisions in Regards to Structures over City Easements. Rick Samuelson Seconded. Rall call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Kelly Geiger, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, no; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. B. Public Hearing — First Reading An Ordinance Amending the Central Point Zoning Map on Lot 33 of Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase 1 (1.81 Acres) From TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential to TOD-LMR, Low Mix Residential Zoning Community Development Director Tom Humphrey explained that this item should be postponed until December 11, 2014 in order to allow proper notification to state agencies. CAP111314 Page City "f c,0, d PC, n t City cc?"C"I MinOc, Oc tobcr 23, 2014 Pngc 3 Allen Broderick moved to Postpone to December 11, 2014, the Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 16 Subdivisions in Regards to City Easements. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Kelly Geiger, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. IX. BUSINESS A. Discussion of the Possible Creation and Implementation of a Franchise Agreement between the City of Central Point and Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS) Mr. Samitore explained that Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS) is the only utility that does not have a franchise agreement in the City of Central Point and they cause issues when they work in the public right of way. The City of Phoenix passed a franchise ordinance which places operating requirements and a franchise fee on RVSS. RVSS has opposed the implementation of the franchise fee and ultimately challenged the city of Phoenix's authority in court. The adjudication of this issue has resulted in both the Circuit Court and the Oregon Court of Appeals reaffirming the City's use of "home rule' authority to impose a franchise fees. This issue will receive final consideration from the Oregon Supreme Court in January of 2015. The purpose of the franchise fee is to reimburse the City for costs associated with utilities working in public right of ways. Depending on the percentage of fee adopted the annual revenue could vary from $75,000 to $95,000. The 2014/15 budget includes a utility fee increase of similar magnitude. If Council approved the RVSS Franchise Fee that money would be marked specifically to mitigate necessary right-of-way maintenance. The City would delay future street and storm water utility fee increases for the upcoming 2 -year budget cycle. Depending on the rate, an average RVSS customer would pay an additional $0.75 to $1.00 more per month on their RVSS bill. The cost of maintaining the public right-of-way should be addressed by a City Street and Storm Water Utility fee increase, or a franchise agreement that requires RVSS to accept responsibility for its use of the publicly owned right-of- way. It is more than likely RVSS will pass this fee on to the customers like every other utility. Council is more concerned that RVSS repair the right of way rather than charging the citizens another franchise fee. There are four options before the Council tonight: 1) Direct staff to finalize franchise agreement between the City and RVSS; schedule a public hearing for adoption of franchise agreement and begin negotiations with RVSS. 2) Direct staff to delay consideration of agreement until the Oregon Supreme Court has issued an opinion on RVSS's pending challenge. 3) Direct staff to develop a general franchise ordinance that controls any utility or service district such as a water authority or sanitary authority CAP111314 Page City o/C',Ct' d Point City Cmmci! Min utc, Oc tobcr 23, 2014 Pngc 4 operating in the public right-of-way unless otherwise regulated through a utility specific franchise agreement. 4) Direct staff to no longer pursue the development of a franchise agreement with RVSS. Mr. Clayton explained Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 14, which was in place prior to RVSS taking control. There was discussion regarding the ordinance in place in Jacksonville. They charge the utility for cutting into the street. Most members were in favor of this type of regulation over a Franchise Fee. Charge them on a case by case basis rather than across the board with a fee. Allen Broderick made a motion to recommend option No. 3 for staff to develop a General Franchise Ordinance that Controls any utility or service district such as a water authority or sanitary authority operating in the public right-of-way unless otherwise regulated through a utility -specific franchise agreement and similar to what the City of Jacksonville has in place. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Kelly Geiger, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. B. Discussion of Issues Surrounding the Calvary Temple Churches Operation of a Warming Shelter Mr. Clayton explained that the city has received letters from concerned citizens regarding the operation of the warming facility located at the Calvary Temple Church. He explained how the shelter has operated over the last few years. Originally it was set up one year when the temperatures dropped very low and caused health concerns for the homeless. City staff has sent written correspondence and met with the church administration to discuss issues surrounding the warming center. Discussion has mostly been in regards to compliance with fire, life and safety regulations. Staff is reluctant to allow this operation to continue because of direct conflicts with our land -use zoning and concern for the surrounding businesses and property owners. Community Development Director Tom Humphrey explained the Church is located in the TOD Employment Commercial (EC) zone. This zone does not permit the development of any structures or facilities dedicated to religious assembly. The Church is currently operating as a pre-existing, legal non- conforming use. Expansion of use other than for religious assembly is not permitted as part of the legal non -conforming status. When operating as a warming shelter they are operating outside of the approved use. A warming shelter could be considered a community service designation which is not allowed in the EC zone. The Central Point Police Department was contacted fifteen times for issues directly associated with the warming shelter during the 2013/2014 winter season. Additional calls were received for disturbances related to persons traveling to and from the shelter. The majority of these calls were for disorderly conduct. As a CAP111314 Page City "f c,0, d PC, n t City Cmmci! MinOc, Oc tobcr 23, 2014 Pngc matter of policy the Police Department will transport anyone needing medical or shelter assistance to a regional facility. The Shelter has become a destination for those seeking a less regulated environment than regional shelters require. Other facilities have strict guidelines regarding behavior and inebriation. Without adequately trained staff, the Calvary Temple Church has difficulty in enforcing regulations of this nature. The product of less stringent regulations has allowed warming shelter attendees to become a disruption to the downtown business district. Officers are better trained to know what type of help a person would need if they are willing to accept the help and the rules. Public Comment Shannon Payne, business owner and resident Ms. Payne stated that the shelter has caused problems for her and her family and employees. They feel like they are in danger. She was informed by St. Vincent DePaul that they are not going to be helping to support the shelter this year. The people using the church are abusing the system because they don't want to follow the rules of the established regional shelters. She explained some of the encounters they have had with the people using the shelter. The Council understands the need to help the homeless when the weather is bad, but they feel it is important to protect our citizens first. The church on Pine Street is not the appropriate place to help these people. Ellie George made a motion Directing the City Manager and City Attorney to Draft a Letter to the Calvary Temple Church outlining the need to discontinue further operation of the warming shelter. David Douglas seconded. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Kelly Geiger, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. C. Discussion of Streets and Storm Drain Ownership within the Hidden Grove/Green Valley Area Mr. Samitore explained that the Homeowners Association for Hidden Grove/Green Valley requested that the City analyze and evaluate whether the subdivision's current private street and storm drain infrastructure could become publically owned. The storm drain system has been cleaned and analyzed by city staff and they are in good condition. The street system was not originally constructed to city standards and there are many deficiencies when compared with a standard city street. There are problems with the street and stop signs, street widths, and construction. The sidewalks are the biggest issue for the City to take over. They were not constructed to be ADA compliant. The sidewalk issue would need to be resolved before the city can take ownership of the street system or we would be in non-compliance with the law. There was discussion of the cost to update the street system. There may be issues regarding the width of the sidewalks because of structures. CAP111314 Page City o/C',Ct' d Point City Cmmci! Min"tc, Oc tobcr 23, 2014 Pngc ti Council would recommend taking ownership and maintenance of the Storm Drain System but not of the Street System. If the subdivision can bring the streets up to city standard or at least take care of the sidewalk issues the city could revisit this issue again. Allen Broderick made a motion to agree to take over ownership and maintenance of the Storm Drain System of Hidden Grove/Green Valley Subdivision but not the Streets or sidewalks at this time. Rick Samuelson seconded. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Kelly Geiger, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. D. Discussion of Restriping South 99 from Pine to Bush Street to Include Bicycle Lanes Mr. Samitore explained that staff has contacted all of the business owners along South Front Street from E. Pine Street to Bush Streets. All of the owners agreed to the change and adding bicycle lanes. This will make the travel lanes a little skinnier than they currently are. We are hoping this will help slow traffic along the corridor. There was discussion that slowing the traffic on Hwy 99 will push traffic on to the side streets. Mr. Samitore does not think that will happen, this will only slow them down a little, it would still be slower traffic on side streets. Allen Broderick made a motion to approve the re -striping of South Front Street from E. Pine Street to Bush Street to include narrowed travel lanes and on -street bicycle lanes. David Douglas seconded. Roll call: Hank Williams, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Kelly Geiger, Abstain; Allen Broderick, yes; David Douglas, yes; Rick Samuelson, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. X. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Williams reported that he attended: • The Medford Water Commission meeting. • A Medford Chamber Forum. • The Greenway 20 mile bike path grand celebration. XI. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Mr. Clayton reported that: • He has talked to the City Attorney regarding forced annexation when a property sells. We have a legal authority to force annexation but not to require a property to annex if it changes ownership. • There is a Central Point Chamber mixer on October 28", everyone is invited to attend. It will be held at the Chamber office. • He attended the Chamber Greeters at Goodwill this week. • There is a citizen interested in Central Point becoming a Bee City. She would like to pursue the option of Bee Keeping in the city limits. CAP111314 Page] City "f c,0, d PC, n t City Cmmci!Min Oc, Oc tobcr 23, 2014 Pngc • We have received an Annexation Application for the new Jackson County Justice Court. It will come before the Council in December. • Community Planner Stephanie Holtey will be working on the 2014/15 Community Survey this year. XII. COUNCIL REPORTS Council Member Allen Broderick reported that he attended the Parks and Recreation Commission and Multicultural Committee meetings. Council Member Bruce Dingler reported that he attended the Study Session. There were no other Council reports. XIII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that: • The Freeman Road Construction project came in under projected costs. The main reason is because of the decline in gas prices. • Mr. Sutton is not willing to sell the property located at Hamrick and Bebee unless the city is going to give him 6 months to live on the property rent free. He would need this time to find a new home and move. There are other options the city can review in regards to the intersection improvements. Staff will put this issue on hold for now and review the other options. Community Development Director Tom Humphrey reported that the Planning Commission will be looking at the CP -4 expansion to the Urban Growth Boundary with the Jackson County Planning Commission on November 201". XIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION -None XV. ADJOURNMENT Bruce Dingier moved to adjourn, Rick Samuelson seconded, all said "aye" and the Council Meeting was adjourned at 9:02 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the October 23, 2014, Council meeting were approved by the City Council at its meeting of November 13, 2014. Dated: Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: Return to Agenda City Recorder CAP111314 Page A CENTRAL POINT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT 140 South 3rtl Street Central Point, OR 97502 (S41) 664-7602 www.rentra l pointoregon.gov STAFF REPORT November 13, 2014 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment of Darlene Taylor to the Central Point Multicultural Committee STAFFSOURCE: Deanna Casey, City Recorder BACKGROUND/SYNOPSIS: The City has received an application from Darlene Taylor to become a member of the Central Point Multicultural Committee. Currently the committee has four members Amy Sweet, Chair; Christina Garrett; Cherie Reeves -Rutledge and Candice Clements. The Tenn for Mrs. Taylor will end December 31, 2016. The terms for this committee are for three years. There is one meeting left in 2014. Scheduling this tenn to end in 2016 will vary the end dates for the current terms. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact to the City. ATTACHMENTS: Committee Application from Darlene Taylor RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Consent Agenda. PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED: No SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. CAP111314 Page a City of Centrai Point, Oregon CENTRAL Administration Department 140 5 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 POINT Phil Messina, City Administrator 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 Deanna Casey, City Recorder www.centralpointorezon.gov APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY OF CENTRAL POINT COMMITTEE ry Name: �� �7�-r�-/d'cq Date: IIonic Phone: Fax: Business Phone: 54ryce Cell Phone: s11 Mn E-mail: ey ecyt J_oZO I C C"YY) Are you a registered Voter with the State of Oregon? Yes ✓ No Are you a city resident? Yes ✓ No Which Cormnittee(s) would you like to be appointed to: (Dates ofineetings are listed at the end of this application. Please make sure those dates work with your schedule before you apply. Council and Planning Commission members are required tofile _ R _ p ttFs reports to the State of Oregon.) u Ott,— -1/j C"Ar mc, ag �'^^''� Employment, professional, and volunteer background: U Community affiliations and activities: 0t..�((��V (JidWr- 1 Wc�i fsi5 Previous City appointments, offices, or activities: � fes, _ i CAP111314 Page 10 Central Point Committee Application Page 2 As additional background for the Mayor and City Council, please answer the following questions. 1. Please explain why you are interested in the appointment and what you would offer to the community. J "W la UJ—', 7nD -T-2' f� CdvvvMu-M.s- C 2. Please describe what you bel eve e e major concern§ of the City residents and businesses that thiscommittee should be concerned about. 3'uJ e.a��cJ� a / AOIJ� CL�3. 3. Please provide any additi nal ' fomInon or comments which you believe will assist the City Council in considering your application. Q 11 l oc� k cia i �, 'td /3e ,`v cS V-16-% ' 5 ),"0 -i�o FtLa— )Clfk�- 4. Do you anticipate that any conflicts of interest will arise if you are appointed; and if so, how would you handle them? Meeting Dates (All meeting dates are subject to change or additions, times vary for each committee): Arts Commission: Meeting dates vary P Citizens Advisory Committee: 2"d Tuesday of every quarter. Council Meetings: 2"d and 0 Thursday of each month Council Study Sessions: 3rd Monday of each month (subject to change) • Multicultural Committee: 2"d Monday Quarterly Planning Commission: 1" Tuesday of each month Parks and Recreation Committee/Foundation: Meeting dates vary My signature affirms that the information in this application is true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that misrepresentation and/or omission of facts are cause for removal from any council, advisory committee, board or commission I may be appointed to. All information/documentation related to service for this position is subject to public record disclosure. Date: I 01/-M4 Signature: CAP111314 Page 11 DARLENE V. TAYLOR P.O. Box 367 Medford, OR 97501 541326-2655 daart520l3@yahoo.com Dedicated, hardworking person with high level of commitment and integrity. team building and strong leadership skills, creative problem solving, crisis management, devotion to community development and support, inter -agency negotiations, conflict resolution, technical skills and large project management skills. Education **Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR Bachelor of Science (B.S.) Business Management **Jackson County Sheriffs Department Training Program: Conflict resolution, restraint techniques and de-escalation **Tektronix, Inc. Management School - Portland State University, Portland, OR Business, Management, Marketing, Electronics, Training, Quality Control and IT Experience **Owner/Manager, Taylor and Associates 1990 - Present Real estate development and rental management. Rental applications, collect rents, maintenance and FED's. **Juvenile Counselor/Security, Jackson County Juvenile Detention 1991-1997 CAP111314 Page 12 Supervise juveniles in lockdown, conduct bookins/pat downs, prepare files/reports, attend court as needed, work with families, counselors, law enforcement, medical and court staff. Specialized training with Jackson County Sheriffs Department; conflict resolution, restraint techniques, de-escalation training, on-site personal evaluation of detainees, security training, pat downs, drug identification training and safety kit usage training (HAZMAT), CPR and First Aid certification; substitute teacher in juvenile classroom **Research Analyst, Tecolote Research, Inc. July 1984 - March 1989 Research, prepare presentations and travel to customer's location - satellite systems, AWACS, AEGIS projects, attend training and orientation sessions regarding special projects, maintain high level security of research results, write and test code, study Jane's and other pertinent materials, review prototypes, observe missile shots. **Support Group Manager, Tektronix Component Solutions September 1979 -August 1984 Beaverton, Oregon Manage Support Group - Safety, Training, Computer Support, Engineering and Quality Control. Completed Tektronix management training. Designed and implemented component failure reporting system for Oscilloscope Division. Wrote software and designed system. Worked with management, engineering, quality control and production. Worked on GANTT charting and long range planning; CAD/CAM. Assisted with new plant and robotics in Vancouver, WA. **Administrative Assistant, KWAC Radio/TV stations Supervise traffic, office and work with production and marketing; assure FCC compliance and reporting; attend special marketing training/presentations. **Assistant to Commander, Camp Lejeune Naval Hospital Assist with design and set up of new computer systems; assist with whole blood exchange program with Bethesda Naval Hospital. CAP111314 Page 13 Darlene V. Taylor SOPTV—Southern Oregon Public Television Citizen Advisory Board - Vice Chair OCFW — Oregon Commission for Women -Commissioner ORS -Legislation Review and Development GSA— Girl Scouts of America - Leader BSA—Boy Scouts of America - District Committee Member, Assistant Scoutmaster, Scout Reach Supervisor, Cub Scout and WEBLOS leader, Woodbadge Advanced Leader AIFF— Ashland Independent Film Festival SMART - Start Making a Reader Today KTVL Kid's Day VIPS— Volunteer in Public Schools and PTO Volunteer Special Education Advocate Children First For Oregon STAND DOWN - Veterans Services Care packages - prepared/shipped Care packages to soldiers DREAM - Girls Prom Dresses on loan - Organizer (Princess for a Day) White House Council on Women and Girls Oregon Women's Health and Wellness Planned Parenthood - Legislative Action Team Member and Escort VIPS - Volunteer in Police Service - Foot Patrol Neighborhood Watch - Organizer Planning Commission Member CAP111314 Page 14 Darlene V. Taylor Page 2 Children's Miracle Network Church Youth Group Leader Hospital Volunteer - Naval Hospital and Private Hospital AAUW - American Association of University Women Southern Oregon Antique/Historical Society Providence Hospital Festival of the Trees CAP111314 Page 15 Memo To: Honorable Mayor Williams From: Captain Brian Day Date: October 24, 2014 Re: Crown Market 400 Files of the Central Point Police Department contain no information pertinent to the request. Respectfully, Captain Brian Da Central Point Police Department CAP111314 Page 16 gAink MMg OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION VW LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION LICENSE TYPES ACTIONS 0 Full OrnPremisas Sales ($402.60/yr) 0 Change Ownership [,Commercial Establishment © New Outlet 0 Caterer 0 Greater Privilege 0 Passenger Carrier ❑ AddiUona Privilege ❑ Other Public Location ❑ Other ❑ Private Club 0 Limited On -Premises Sales ($202.60/yr) ®OIFPremises Sales ($100/yr) ❑with Fuel Pumps ❑ Brewery Public House ($252.60) ❑ Winery($250/yr) ❑ Other. 90-DAYAUTHORITY ❑ Chock here 6 you are applying for a change or ownership at a business that has a current liquor license, or If you are applying for an Off -Premises Sales lioome and are requesting a 90 -Day Temporary Authority AS: ❑Corpom5on ® Limited Liability ❑Individuals P Company CITY AND COUNTY USE Data application received:]�� The Clty oil r Coumy Go tlesion: (name or City or muray) recommends that this license be: U Granted Q Denied Rec'd 90 -day authority: O Yes U No L Entry or Individuals applying for the license: [See SECTION 1 of the Guide] (D TARAN HOLDING LLC QD 2. Trade Name (dba): CROWN MARKET 400 3. Business Location: 1205 PLAZA BLVD, SUITE #A, CENTRAL POINT, JACKSON, OREGON 97502 (number, sbeet, Cured mute) (dry) (county) (erste) (21P code) 4. Business Malling Address: SAME (PD fors, numteg ones, anal route) (city) (stets) W P code) 5. Business Numbers: 541-514.9661 541.897-4441 (Ptone) (fox) 6. Is the business at this location currently licensed by OLCC? [jYes ONo 7. If yes to whom: 00Type of B. Fortner Business Name: WA 9. Will you have a manager9 E]Yee ONo Name:AMRIK BAGRI (manger met fill out on Individual History form) 10. What is the local governing body where your business is located? CITY OF CENTRAL POINT (name ccny or county) 11. Contact person for this applicabon:AMRIK BAGRI 541-514-9661 3503 S PACIFIC HWY, MEDFORD, OR 97501 541.897 -WI I understand that N my answers are not true and camplete, the OLCC may deny my Ilcense application. Applicant(s) Signature(a) and Date: O a r 04v, Date (0'IS'I N ® Date ® Date! V -13-I h 9) Date 1-900452-OLCC 6522 . www.o 6,J Of �j�+J— (� - ( ) regon.govMlm (... oemrhl CAP111314 Page 17 Dear Mayor Williams, This year, on Tuesday, December 2, 2014, Hearts With A Mission is part of a call to action that will change the calendar and help make history. We are celebrating a day dedicated to giving - when charities, families, businesses, community centers, students, retailers and more will all come together for #GivingTuesday - a movement to celebrate giving and encourage more, better and smarter giving during the Holiday Season that we are proud to be part of. U.S. Mayors from around the country have supported the movement in their area. Mayors from Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, New York, and many other smaller cities and towns formally endorsed #GivingTuesday. The White House also publically supported #GivingTuesday. In 2013, more than 10,000 partners worldwide participated. Through the power of social media, more than 3 billion people helped spread the word, resulting in milestone trending Twitter and most importantly, a 270% increase in donations. As a #GivingTuesday partner from Jackson County, we would like to respectfully request that the City of Central Point officially proclaim December 2, 2014 as #GivingTuesday. The City of Central Point can really help to take #GivingTuesday from something that was big to something that will really change the way we think about philanthropy and community service for generations to come. The campaign provides a framework and ideas for people to choose their own best way to contribute to their communities and will provide the citizens of Central Point with an opportunity to share their giving story. For additional information, please visit the #GivingTuesday website at www.aivinatuesday.ora. It would truly be an honor to have the City of Central Point formally proclaim #GivingTuesday as a day of giving. Thank you for considering our request. Should you decide to approve our request, I would be happy to provide example content for use in the proclamation. Respectfully, Jason Mook I Hearts With A Mission 521 Edwards St I Medford, OR 97501 0: (541) 646-7385 1 C: (253) 219-5259 W: www.heartswithamission.org CAP111314 Page 18 #GivingTuesday Proclamation WHEREAS, Giving Tuesday was established as a national day of giving on the Tuesday following Thanksgiving; and WHEREAS, Giving Tuesday is a celebration of philanthropy and volun- teerism where people give whatever they are able to give; and WHEREAS, Giving Tuesday is a day where citizens work together to share commitments, rally for favorite causes, build a stronger community, and think about other people; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper on #GivingTuesday and on every day to recognize the tremendous impact of philanthropy, volunteerism, and community service in the City of Central Point; and WHEREAS, #GivingTuesday is an opportunity to encourage citizens to serve others throughout this holiday season and during other times of the year. NOW THEREFORE, I, Hank Williams, Mayor of Central Point, do here- by proclaim December 2, 2014 as " #GivingTuesday" in the City of Central Point, and encourage all citizens rejoin together to give back to the community in any way that is meaningful. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby set my hand this ____, day of November, 2014. Mayor Hank Williams City of Central Point CAP111314 Page 19 J� PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK November 4, 2014 Dear Mayor Williams As your constituent, I am writing on behalf of the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network and the estimated 39,590 Americans who will die of pancreatic cancer in 2014, approximately 550 of whom live in Oregon. In 2014, pancreatic cancer will afflict more than 46,420 Americans, 73% of whom will die within one year of their diagnosis, and 94% of whom will die within five years of diagnosis. My husband, Philip Schwimmer, a local architect in the valley for over twenty years was diagnosed with this devastating cancer in late summer, 2010. As a healthy, energetic 68 year old, he had no distinguishing symptoms except unrelenting back and stomach pain for a month or so before he saw his physician. As often happens with this cancer, the grim diagnosis comes after the disease process is rampant and life span shortened. In the fall of 2012, his quality of life became more important than his longevity. He died two years after being diagnosed, still sure he could beat the odds. To date, pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States, the third leading cause of cancer death in Oregon and it is the only major cancer with a five-year relative survival rate in the single digits at just six percent. Furthermore, the incidence and death rate for pancreatic cancer are increasing, and pancreatic cancer is anticipated to move from the fourth to the second leading cause of cancer - related death in the U.S. by 2020. We need your help to shine a spotlight on this disease and finally make progress in developing treatments and early detection tools. By issuing a proclamation supporting the observance of November 2014 as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month in Central Point Oregon, you can help us to raise awareness in our community. I have attached a draft of the proclamation text for your review. I am happy to provide additional official Pancreatic Cancer Action Network material, including pancreatic cancer facts and statistics and NCI funding information, upon request. We request that a total of two originals of the proclamation to be made available for our records. Please contact me at 541-821-2460 with any questions. I look forward to working with you to issue a proclamation that will recognize November as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month and bring much needed attention to this deadly disease. Thank you for your interest in this important issue. Sincerely, Merrell Schwimmer CAP111314 Page 20 Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Proclamation NMEREAS in 2014, an estimated 46,420 people will be diagnosed Wth pancreatic cancer in the United States and 39,590 will die from the disease; NMEREAS pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers, is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States and is projected to become the second by 2020; NMEREAS pancreatic cancer is the only major cancer with a five-year relative survival rate in the singe digits at just six percent; NMEREAS when symptoms of pancreatic cancer present thensdves, it is generally late stage, and 73 percent of pancre- atic cancer patients die within the first year of their diagnosis while 94 percent of pancreatic cancer patients die wthin the first five years; NMEREAS anprommatdy 550 deaths will occur in Oregon in 2014; NMEREAS the the Recalcitrant Cancer Research Pct was signed into law in 2012 which calls on the Natioral Cancer Institute to devdop a scientific frameworks, or strategic plans, for pancreatic cancer and other deady cancers, which will help provide the strategic direction and guidance needed to make true progress against these diseases; and NMEREAS the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network is the national organization serving the pancreatic cancer community in the City of Central Point and nationwdde through a comprehensive approach that induces public policy, research funding, patient services, and public awareness and education related to developing effective treatments and a cure for pancreatic cancer, NMEREAS the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network and its affiliates in the city of Central Point support those patients cur- rently battling pancreatic cancer, as wdl as to those who have lost their I ives to the disease, and are committed to nothing less than a cure; NMEREAS the good health and well-being of the residents of the City of Central Point are enhanced as a direct resdt of increased awareness about pancreatic cancer and research into early detection, causes, and effective treatments; there- fore be it NOW THEREFORE, I, Hank Williams, Mayor of Central Point, do hereby declare November 2014, as "Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month" IN W1Tf\ESS NMEPEOF, I hereby set ny hand this 13th, day of November, 2014. Mayor Hank WIliams Qty of Central Point Return to Agenda CAP111314 Page 21 Resolution Annexation of 4173 Hamrick CAP111314 Page 22 City of Central Point, Oregon 140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www centralpointore¢on %ov r ,A CENTRAL POINT STAFF REPORT November 13, 2014 Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: FILE NO: 14018 Annexation of 4173 Hamrick Road comprising 1.01 acres. This application does not include a zone change because the site has already been assigned a comprehensive plan and zoning designation of Tourist and Office Professional/C-4. It is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 03C Tax Lot 3300. Applicant: Jackson County. STAFF SOURCE: Stephanie Holtey, Community Planner II BACKGROUND: Jackson County is in the process of acquiring the subject site with the intent of developing the site as the Justice Court. The County is requesting annexation before moving forward with the purchase and subsequent site improvements. The Planning Department sent a letter to arca property owners to invite participation in this annexation. No requests have been received. The subject property is adjacent to the city limits along all property lines as illustrated by the site map, Attachment A. Currently the subject property is vacant and zoned by Jackson County as Rural Residential 2.5 (RR -2.5). It is designated C-4, Tourist and Office Professional on the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map. When annexed, the property will no longer have a County zoning classification. A Justice Court, considered a government office, is a permitted use in the C-4 zoning district. AUTHORITY: ORS 222.125 authorizes annexation of property contiguous to cities when all of the owners of land and a majority of electors consent. CPMC 1.20 vests the City Council with the authority to order the annexation of unincorporated territory in the Urban Growth Boundary into the City of Central Point. This annexation is a `full consent annexation' since the property owner has consented in writing to the annexation. CAP111314 Page 23 Annexation Criteria: 1. Written Consents: The annexation application includes written consent to annex from 100% of the property owners and a majority of the electors within the annexation territory, who have signed the annexation petition, which is evidence of written consent to annexation (Attachment C, Exhibit C). Accordingly, pursuant to ORS 222.125 and CPMC 1.24.020, the City Council may order the annexation without notice, hearing or election. 2. Contiguous to City Limits: Pursuant to ORS 222.111, territory proposed for annexation must be contiguous to the City or separated from it only by a public right-of-way or a stream, lake or other body of water. The subject annexation area is contiguous to Central Point to the north, west, east and south. 3. Within Urban Growth Boundary (UGB): The annexation territory is within the Urban Growth Boundary of Central Point and is in compliance with the City -County Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement of September 1984 and amended in 1998. 4. Orderly Provision of Public Facilities: The City -County Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement requires that, in considering an annexation, urban facilities and services must be adequate in condition and capacity to accommodate the additional level of growth allowed by the Comprehensive Plan within the annexation area prior to or concurrent with the development. Public Works and Rogue Valley Sewer Services have reviewed the existing public facilities and their proximity to the annexation area and concluded that public facilities can be provided or extended to the site. Any future enhancements of these facilities made necessary by development of the annexation arca will be the responsibility of the developer and regulated through the City's land use application process. This will result in an orderly provision of public facilities to the annexation area. 5. Duly noticed and advertised notice of public hearing: Pursuant to ORS 222.120 notice of the November hearing before the City Council was published twice, November 3, 2014 and November 10, 2014, in the Mail Tribune newspaper and notice was posted in four (4) public locations. In addition, on October 23, 2014 notice was mailed to each property owner of record within 100 feet of the proposed annexation. There are two issues relative to this application: 1. Hamrick Road Jurisdiction. The County submitted a letter (Attachment `B") addressing the County's Local Road jurisdiction of Hamrick Road and recommended that the City assume road jurisdiction and annex the entire road right-of-way. City staff talked to County staff about the current status of Hamrick Road and the intended use of the area being annexed (County Court Building). Consequently, the City does not intend to assume jurisdiction of Hamrick Road at this time. CAP111314 Page 24 2. Hamrick Road Annexation. The proposed annexation does not include any portion of the Hamrick Road right-of-way. Based on the City's prior annexation records, portions of Hamrick Road right-of-way were annexed in 1998 per Resolution No. 821 and the remainder was annexed in 2003 per Resolution No. 998. The applicant is preparing a revised Preliminary Plat Map (Attachment C, Exhibit B) illustrating the current City limits in relation to the proposed annexation location. The revised exhibit map will be recorded with the resolution should the Council approve the annexation request. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" -Graphic Illustration of the subject property Attachment `B"- Jackson County Letter dated October 28, 2014 Attachment "C"- Resolution No. Ordering Annexation Exhibit A: Written Description Exhibit B: Annexation Depiction Map Exhibit C: Annexation Petition ACTIONS: Consider the request to annex approximately 1.01 acres located at 372W 03C Tax Lot 3300 and 1) approve Resolution No. Ordering Annexation; 2) approve with revisions; or 3) deny the request. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. A Resolution to Annex 1.01 Acres, located at 4173 Hamrick Road and Identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37 2W 03C, Tax Lot 3300. CAP111314 Page 25 ATTACHMENT Jackson County Annexation 4173 Hamrick Road ��- 372W01CTL3300 � I aie Pme Street ♦1 x 3 I � .x a i/ i i ---------------------------------- LEGEND City Limits Annexation Area File Na. 14018 Source: Stephanie Holley Community Planner 11 October 22, 2014 CAP111314 Page 26 ATI JACKSON COUNTY _ Roads October 2B, 2014 Attention: Stephanie Holley City of Central Point Planning 140 south Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Annexation off Hamrick Road — a county -maintained road. Planning File: 14018; 37 -2W -03C Tax Lot 3300. Dear Stephanie: ACHMENT "P� 'r Roads Enginrering KeNn Chr6H�we� Cautwnron Mwager WNWCk. V Wap Cb.) 9'x503 Pnnr: (sari"US ro:LMC naez55 cmbae@k.�Mr.wb —J,WWW.-ty.n Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this Tentative Plan Application for a two lot minor partition on South Front Street, General Commercial Zoning District. Jackson County Roads has the following comments: 1. When the property Is developed, the applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and obtain county permits if required. 2. Jackson County Roads would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report, including the calculations and drainage plan, for any new development on the subject property. Capacity improvements or on site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. 3. The Board of County Commissioners Order No. 6-99, adopted the r day of January, 1999, recommends that the city request road jurisdiction and annex the entire road right-of-way, pending amendment of the Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement. 4. Please note that Hamrick Road along this section of road is a County Local Road and is county - maintained. The Average Daily Traffic Count 150 feet west of Table Rock Road was 799 ADT on August 2014. Sincerely, Kevin Christiansen Construction Manager 1:1Etmineednglae -il m-=ITIestcNMLPTa401a.dw CAP 111314 Page 27 ATTACHMENT "-L-' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO ANNEX 1.01 ACRES, LOCATED AT 4173 HAMRICK ROAD AND IDENTIFIED ON THE JACKSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP AS 37 2W 03C, TAX LOT 3300. APPLICANT: JACKSON COUNTY RECITALS: A. Jackson County is in the process of purchasing 4173 Hamrick Road, currently owned by Jack Arrell, and generally described by Exhibit A, which is not located within the City of Central Point city limits. The Central Point City Council (the Council) is authorized under ORS 222.120 to hold a public hearing for annexation proceedings without an election for annexation. B. On November 13, 2014 the Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the annexation application, at which time it reviewed the City staff report, heard testimony and comments on the application to annex the 1.01 acre property specifically described in attached Exhibits "A" Written Description and Exhibit "B" Annexation Depiction Map. C. The City Manager, or designee, will transmit a copy of this resolution to the Oregon Secretary of State, and this annexation is effective when filed with the Oregon Secretary of State pursuant to ORE. 222.180. D. This annexation is a full consent annexation as lack Arrell has consented to the annexation, attached petition Exhibit "C". The City of Central Point resolves as follows: Section 1: The property at 4173 Hamrick Road, described in the above recitals and set forth in attached Exhibits "A" and "B" is proclaimed to be annexed to the City of Central Point. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this_ day of 2014. Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: City Recorder a c d rn Q 0 c d K Resolution No. CAP111314 Page 28 EXHIBIT "--L-- Exhibit "A" Annexation Description of Land into the City of Central Point, Oregon Located in Township 37 South Range 2 West, Section 1, W.M.; Jackson County, Oregon. Commencing at the Southeast comer of Donation Land Claim 55, Township 37 South, Range 2 West, W.M.; thence S 02° 55'W, 461.00 feet to the point of beginning being the southeast comer of those lands described in document 2011-016446 located on the west right of way line of Hamrick Road (a county road). Leaving said point of beginning along the south line of document 2011-016446 S 89° 52'W, 336.00 feet to the southwest comer of said document, thence along the west line of the aforementioned document N 0007'W, 131.00 feet to the southwest comer of volume 548, page 501; thence N 89°52'E, 323.00 feet along the south line of volume 548 page 501 and volume 503 page 143 to a point on the west line of relocated Hamrick Road described document 1994-2518 1. Thence southerly along the west line of Hamrick Road to the point of beginning. Basis of bearings: Survey 20490 This legal description is for a description of land to be annexed into the City of Central Point and is not intended to authoritatively describe the boundary of real property for conveyance purposes; the intent being strictly for annexation and zoning purposes only. Prepared By: Scott Fein, PLS, CWRE, CFEDS Jackson County Surveyor REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR L/o/rll� OREGON NOVEMBER 10, 2010 SCOTT D. FEIN 83181 Renews 12/31/20 j6 - 4173 G 4173 Hamrick Annexation Description.docx 14-21; 3255 CAP111314 Page 29 10/7/2014 EXHIBI i "moi" DOceSlgn Envelop ID: FBE4ECBI D21]4C3]-gl A0812AE75184 EXHIBIT" " ANNEXATION PETITION The undersigned hereby request and consent to the annexation to the City of Central POMA, Oregon, of the real pmpcty contigows tberOo described m Exhibit "A" attached haoto and by this reference made a pert ofthe within petition. By their signature hereto, the undersigned certify that they are tither enwral of land in the territory proposed to be annexed ea described in Exhibit "A", or are "electm. registered in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit "A". This petition, containing the request and mneant to said annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on or before the dale of the public hearing to be held upon the proposal m mmtim pursuant to ORS 222.120. "Owner" is defined by ORS 222.120 u meaning the legal owner of record m, where there is a recorded land contract which is in force, the purchaser theaamder. tf Orae is multiple ownership in a parcel of land, inch conaoshting owner droll be counted I a fiactim of the same extent as the internal of the owner in the land bma in relation to the interest of the other owners, and the more, ftactioo ,hell be applied to the pmxl'c Ind masa fin purposes of the consent position. If a corporation owns land in a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be considerod to be the individual owner of that land. "Etectot' is defined in said stature as an individual qualified to vote under Artide 11, Section 2 of the Oregon Constitution, which in tum requires that the individual be I S years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and registered to vote as required by applicable state law. Furthermore, ORS 222.270(2) requires that electors petitioning for annexation be registered in the territory proposed to be annexed. �iame/ArJdreaa.. Ja�f<. ri2%1 Elector til Owner? Signature 'Lai I dyd' ' Date 1019/2014 Amexuacn Petition Revised 9/26/06 CAP111314 Page 31 Resolution CP - 4D Conceptual Plan CAP111314 Page 32 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: File No. 14008 CENTRAL POINT STAFF REPORT November 13, 2014 Planning Department lour Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Consideration of a Resolution to Approve a Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for CP -40, An Urban Reserve Area of the City of Central Point. Applicant: City of Central Point. STAFF SOURCE: Toni Hunmhrev, Al BACKGROUND: The City's Regional Plan Element includes a provision that prior to expansion of the urban growth boundary into an urban reserve area it is necessary to adopt a concept plan for the affected urban reserve. Given the pending urban growth boundary application that includes parts of CP -4D, it is necessary that a concept plan be prepared and adopted for CP -4D. At the May 6"' Planning Commission meeting a draft of the CP -4D Concept Plan was reviewed and discussed, with direction by the Planning Commission to distribute the document to affected agencies for comment. RVMPO, the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, Jackson County, and ODOT have all provided their comments which have been incorporated into the plan. The Citizen's Advisory Committee has also reviewed and recommended approval of the plan. At the November 4"' Planning Commission meeting the final Draft of CP -4D (Attachment "A") was recommended to the City Council for approval. ISSUES: At this time the CP -4D Concept Plan has been reviewed by all interested agencies and comments incorporated in to the final draft (Attachment "A"). No major changes to Concept Plan CP -4D resulted from affected agency, CAC or Planning Commission review. The Conceptual Plan will establish the City's intentions for future land use designations, zoning, transportation networks and other infrastructure when it comes tune to expand its Urban Growth Boundary. The Concept Plan is a general land use guide (a first generation refinement) prepared in accordance with, and intended to facilitate implementation of the City's Regional Plan Element. EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A—CP-4D Concept Plan" Attachment'B— Resolution No. ,A Resolution" ACTION: Consider Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for CP -41) and 1) approve Resolution No. Approving Conceptual Plan; 2) approve with revisions; or 3) deny the proposed Conceptual Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. A Resolution Approving a Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for CP -4D, An Urban Reserve Area of the City of Central Point. Return to Agenda Page I of I CAP111314 Page 33 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 Sepreniher 6, 2014 Drug BEAR CREEK AREA CONCEPT PLAN A CONCEPTUAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR ' I' AN URBAN RESERVE AREA OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL PO/NT City of Central Point Adopted by City Council Resolution No. , November_, 2014 Page 1 of 23 CAP111314 Page 34 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 PART 1. INTRODUCTION As part of the Regional Plan Element' it is required that the City prepare and adopt for each of its eight (8) urban reserve areas a Conceptual Land Use Plan' and a Conceptual Transportation Plan'prior to or in conjunction with a I amendment within a given URA. This document addresses both conceptual plans, which are collectively referred to as the CP -4D Concept Plan ('Concept Plan'). Figure 1 illustrates CP-4D's relationship to the City and the other urban reserve areas. As used in this report the term 'concept plan' refers to a document setting forth a written and illustrated set of general actions designed to achieve a desired goal that will be further refined over time as the planning process moves Afrom the general CENTRAL (concept plan) to the POINT I specific (site development) . In the _ case of CP -4D the goal to be achieved is a first generation refinement of how the land use distributions and applicable performance ''�. indicators of the Greater — I— Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan (GBCVRP) A r Iis ii will be applied to CP -4D. The Concept Plan is a ::. ' general land use guide prepared in accordance rlguvi. catuai Row' with, and intended to Wban Reserves Areai facilitate implementation of the Regional Plan Element. It does not address compliance with the Oregon Statewide Land Use Planning Goals, applicability of land use planning law, or comprehensive plan compliance. These items will be appropriately ' City of Central Point Ordinance 1964 a City of Central PC int Comprehensive Plan, Regional Plan El emenp Section 4.1 Performance Ind Caters, subsection 4.1.7 e City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Regional Plan Element, Section 4.1 Performance Indicators, subsection 4.1.8 Page 2 of 23 CAP111314 Page 35 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 addressed at such time as the area's planning proceeds through inclusion in the urban growth boundary, annexation, zoning, site plan approval, and ultimately development, with each step being guided by the Concept Plan. The Concept Plan illustrates the City's basic development program for CP -4D; which is presented in Part 2 of this document. The remainder of the document (Part 3) is dedicated to providing background information used in preparation of the Concept Plan, including findings of compliance with the land use distribution and applicable Performance Indicators in the City's Regional Plan Element. In summary the Concept Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Regional Plan Element and Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan including all applicable performance indicators set forth in these documents. The development concept for CP -4D compliments and supports local and regional objectives relative to land use distribution and needed transportation corridors identified in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan. PART 2. THE CONCEPT PLAN The long-term objective for CP -4D is two -fold. First, to provide the physical connection between the City and a major future employment area (CPAB) as that area develops and becomes a part of the City. The second objective is to provide enhanced opportunities for open space and recreational uses that will take advantage of a regional recreation resource, the Bear Creek Greenway. The Concept Plan is comprised of two elements: a. The Conceptual Land Use Plan ('Land Use Plan'). The primary objective of the Land Use Plan is to refine the land use categories and spatial distribution of those categories throughout CP -4D. This is necessary because the Regional Plan Element only addresses land use in terms of general land use types, i.e. residential, employment, etc., and percentage distribution of the land use. The Regional Plan Element distributes land uses within CP -4D into two basic land use classifications; Open Space/Parks (99%), and Residential (1%). The Land Use Plan for CP -4D refines these allocations by aligning them with the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning designations in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Those designations are illustrated in Figure 2, tabulated in Table 1 as follows: Residential. The Comprehensive Plan's Very Low Density Residential designation was applied to a single one (1) acre parcel (tax lot 36 2W 34D TL230) on the basis that: Page 3 of 23 CAP111314 Page 36 CP -40 (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 • It is consistent with the existing Residential Low Density (R- L) land use designation and zoning for the area immediately to the east (Boes Subdivision); and • It abuts EFU zoned lands to the north and will be subject to the agricultural buffering requirements of CPMC 17.71; which requires significant setbacks from the agricultural use. At such time as the parcel is annexed it will be rezoned R -L, or an equivalent future zoning district, consistent with development to the east. ii. Parks and Open Space. The Comprehensive Plan's Parks and Open Space designation is consistent with the Regional Plan Element and allows for the continued use and improvement of the Bear Creek Greenway system. It also provides opportunities for passive recreational/open space use, i.e. hiking trails, picnic areas, Frisbee golf, that will both serve the local and regional community, and compliment the Bear Creek Greenway. Compatible zoning for the Parks and Open Space designation would be either Bear Creek Greenway (BCG) or Open Space/Parks (OS), or a combination of both. Acreage Future2oning Future Comp Current ownership Plan 20.88 BCG/OS P/OS City of Central Point 3.68 BCG/05 P/05 City of Central Point 3.30 BCG/OS P/OS Jackson County 8.39 BCG/05 P/OS Jackson County 23.57 BCG/OS P/OS Jackson County 18.50 BCG/05 P/OS Jackson County 1.00 R -L VLR Private 3.68 BCG/05 P/05 Jackson County 83.00 b. The Conceptual Transportation Plan ('Transportation Plan") The only regionally significant transportation corridor affecting CP -4D is the Bear Creek Greenway. The Concept Plan identifies the Bear Creek Greenway as an element of the plan (Figure 2, CP -41) Concept Plan) and Page 4 of 23 CAP111314 Page 37 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 includes policies that encourage the continued use and improvement of the Bear Creek Greenway. c. Implementation Guidelines The following guidelines are intended to serve as future action items: Policy CP -4D.1 land Use: At time of inclusion in the City's urban growth boundary (UGB) the property will be shown on the City's General Land Use Plan Map as illustrated in the CP -4D Concept Plan, Figure 2. Policy CP -4D.2 Bear Creek Greenway: The Open Space/Parks land will be planned and improved in a manner that offers passive recreational opportunities to the public and is compatible with and compliments the Bear Creek Greenway. Policy CP -4D.3 Bear Creek Greenway: Jackson County will continue to own and operate the Bear Creek Green way system and the County and City will coordinate open space/park plans within CP -4D to the mutual benefit of the Bear Creek Greenway system. Policy CP -4D.4 Streets: The public street system will be allowed to extend into CP -4D only to the extent necessary to serve the needs of future open space uses within CP -4D. Potential access points are from Dean Creek Road, Boes Avenue, and Old Upton Road. Through access will not be permitted. Policy CP -4D.5 Irrigation District Coordination. There are no Rogue River Valley Irrigation District facilities within CP -4D. However, as properties within CP -4D are included within the City's urban growth boundary, and further proceed through the development process, i.e. annexation, zoning, site development, the City and property owner/developer shall collaborate with RRVID as outlined in the protocols set forth in Jackson County's Agricultural Lands Element. Policy CP -4D.6 Agricultural lands. Land use actions within CP -4D shall coordinate with the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District in the manner set forth in the County's Agricultural Lands Element policy pertaining to irrigation districts and land use planning. Policy CP -4D.7 Concept Plan Modification. Modifications to the Concept Plan shall be subject to the same review and collaboration procedures used in approving the original Concept Plan, and shall be processed by the County as a Type 4 permit. Page 5 of 23 CAP111314 Page 38 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 F-1 CENTRAL POINT ExiV5 F—-' FL- %�9177�I- �gsTq IN I y � 1 I F 1 L t N 1 r N Figure 2. Concept Plan �eeena nreei. me:v:me. sR _ _r..m_. Tolo Area (CP -4D) le�,Pr=vao, lea, ��. ���.I Concept Plan ., '- Date: 7I1812o14 Page 6 of 23 CAP111314 Page 39 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 PART 3. SUPPORT FINDINGS The findings present in this section provide both background information and address the Regional Plan Element's Performance Indicators. a. Current Land Use Characteristics This section describes the general character of CP -4D in its current condition. Natural Landscape: With the exception of one one -acre parcel used for residential purposes and Dean Creek Road, CP -4D remains undisturbed. Bear Creek traverses the area (south to north) and is the predominant physical feature. Associated with Bear Creek are areas of flooding and wetlands. Cultural Landscape: CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) is a triangular-shaped 83 acre tract that runs along the northeastern side of 1-5 connecting the current city limits to CP -1B (Figure 1, Central Point Urban Reserves). Table 2 identifies; by assessor number, acreage, zoning, comp plan designation, and ownership, the seven (7) properties that comprise CP -4D. The City and County account for 99% of CP -4D and are currently used for open space purposes as part of the Bear Creek Greenway system (Figure 3, Aerial Map). Much of the area is impacted by a variety of environmental and agricultural constraints. The eastern third of CP -4D is within the 100 -year floodplain of Bear Creek (Figure 4, Floodplain Map) and the area is also impacted by wetlands. Acreage Zoning Land Use Ownership 20.88 RR -5 CIS City of Central Point 3.68 RR -5 OS Chyof Central Point 3.30 EFU CIS Jackson County 8.39 EFU OS Jackson County 23.57 EFU CIS Jackson County 18.50 EFU OS Jackson County 1.00 UR -1 SFR Private 3.68 EFU as Public 83.00 Within CP -4D there is a one -acre parcel currently developed as a single-family residence. This property abuts City lands to the east zoned for RA use (Residential Low Density), undeveloped City owned land to the west, and agricultural lands to the north. Page 8 of 23 CAP111314 Page 41 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 Access to CP -4D is currently available via Dean Creek Road from the north and Boes Avenue from the east, neither of which provides through access. Along the east side of CP -4D are lands used for agricultural production (orchard and hay). �-1 CENTRAL POINT V757 \ N AFigure 4. Flood Hazards �gena Tolo Area CP413) Concept Plan ����� rrood mem 2011 mxE d.�s wmon�a� orte, 922014 Page 9 of 23 CAP111314 Page 42 CP -41) (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 b. Current Land Use Designations & Zoning Most of CP -4D is planned and designated for agricultural (EFU) use. These EFU lands are owned by Jackson County (Figure 5, Zoning). None of the EFU zoned lands are, or have in recent history, been used for agricultural production and the soils are of low agricultural suitability (Class IV -VII where not built as a roadway or within the Bear Creek floodway). A CENTRAL POINT N A Figure 5. Zoning Page 30 of 23 CAP111314 Page 43 Tolo Area ICP3DI LagenaC°Zm,,g ""�° (]�°��°.-e�., «4,. Concept Plan a°—,- Datesrwzo is Page 30 of 23 CAP111314 Page 43 CP -41) (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 The southerly third of the area is planned and designated as Rural Residential land (RR -5) and is owned by the City of Central Point. There is a small one (1) acre parcel designated for residential use (UR -1), which is developed with a single-family home (see adjacent aerial photo). Based on CPMC 17.71, Agricultural Mitigation, the existing dwelling is classified as an Urban Receptor, High -Sensitivity (H), while the abutting EFU lands, which are used for orchard production, are classified as an Intensive Use. Given these two classification the dwelling does not meet the current minimum agricultural buffering setback requirements (100 — 200 feet) from the abutting EFU lands to the north. Consequently; and regardless of zoning, when annexed the property will be classified as legal non -conforming and subject to the requirements of the City's Non -Conforming regulations (CPMC 17.56). c. Existing Infrastructure Water Currently, public water service is not available to CP -4D, but can be easily extended from the Boes Subdivision. Sanitary Sewer There is a Rogue Valley sanitary sewer trunk line running north -south through CP -41) (see Figure 6, Utilities). Storm Drainage CP -41) does not have an improved storm drainage system and relies on Bear Creek for its storm drainage needs. Page 11 of 23 CAP111314 Page 44 CP -41) (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 A CENTRAL POINT N A Figure 6. Utilities �egena Tolo Area (CP�40) _ Concept Plan Date 5r2012014 Page 12 of 23 CAP111314 Page 45 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 Street System CP -4D is currently accessed by Dean Creek Road to the north, Old Upton Road to the south, and Boes Avenue to the east. None of the three streets offers through access. Dean Creek Road extends southerly from Blackwell Road into CP -4D terminating in a parking area for the Bear Creek Greenway. There are no plans to extend Dean Creek Road further south. Old Upton Road, although abandoned west of its intersection with Raymond Way, does provide public right-of-way frontage at the southern edge of CP -4D Boes Avenue provides easterly access to CP -4D as it dead -ends into the City owned property. Irrigation District CP -4D is located within the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District (RRVID). Some of the properties within CP -4D have water rights, but no irrigation service, while other properties have no water rights and no irrigation service (see Figure 7, Irrigation. CP -4D does not have any dedicated irrigation facilities within its boundaries. Most of the property abutting CP -4D on the east and north are in commercial agricultural use and provided irrigation services by RRVID. It is not anticipated, that implementation of the Concept Plan I cause future conflicts with irrigation services, or the current agricultural uses. Page 13 of 23 CAP111314 Page 46 CP -41) (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 A CENTRAL POINT N A Figure 7, Irrigation ro arz� a;rr �, xa xgmo s_�aw Dare_ 7123120 14 Page 14 of 23 CAP111314 Page 47 Tolo Area (CP -413j Concept Plan v�� w;r� a ro aroio s�d� ro arz� a;rr �, xa xgmo s_�aw Dare_ 7123120 14 Page 14 of 23 CAP111314 Page 47 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 d. Performance Indicators Implementation of the Regional Plan Element is guided by a series of twenty- two (22) primary and twenty-one (21) secondary performance indicators', not all of which are applicable to all urban reserve areas. Table 3 identifies the primary Performance Indicators applicable to the CP -4D Concept Plan. City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Regional Plan Element, Section 4.1 Performance Indicators Page 15 of 23 CAP111314 Page 48 Applicability Description yes No County Adoption X City Adoption X Urban Reserve Management Agreement X Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement X Committed Residential Density X Minimum Residential Density Standards X Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas X Conceptual Transportation Plan X Transportation Infrastructure X Conceptual Land Use Plan X Target Residential Density X Land Use Distribution X Transportation Infrastructure X Mixed Use/ Pedestrian Friendly Areas X Conditions Specific to Certain URAs X CP -113, IAMP Requirement X CP-4D,Open Space Restriction X CP -4D, Roadways Restriction X CP -613, Institutional Use Restriction X Central Point URA,Gibbon/Forest Acres X Agricultural Buffering X Regional Land Preservation Strategies X Housing Strategies X Urban Growth Boundary Amendment X UGB Expansions Outside of URAs X Land Division Restrictions X Minimum Lot Size X Cluster Development X Land Division & Future Platting X Land Divisions & Transportation Plan X Land Division Deed Restrictions X Rural Residential Rule X Population Allocation X Greater Coordination with RVMPO X City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Regional Plan Element, Section 4.1 Performance Indicators Page 15 of 23 CAP111314 Page 48 CP -41) (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 Preparation of Conceptual Transportation Plan X Protection of Planned Transportation X Infrastructure Regionally Significant Transportation Strategies X Supplemental Transportation Funding X Future Coordination with RVCOG X Expo X Agricultural Task Force X Park Land X Buildable lands Definition X e. Applicable Performance Indicators The following addresses each applicable performance indicator per Table 3: 4.1.5.Committed Residential Density. Land within the URA and currently within an Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) but outside the existing City Limit shall be built, at a minimum, to the following residential densities. This requirement can be offset by increasing the residential density in the City Limit. Dwelling Units per Gross Aae Dwelling Units per Gross Aae 2010-2035 2036-2060 6.9 7.9 4.1.5.1. Prior to annexation, each city shall establish (or, if they exist already, shall adjust) minimum densities in each of its residential zones such that if all areas build out to the minimum allowed the committed densities shall be met. This shall be made a condition of approval of a UGB amendment. Finding: Of the 52 acres in CP -4D the Regional Plan reserves one (1) acre for residential use. The one (1) acre reservation is consolidated in a single parcel (36 2W 34D TL230), which is currently developed for single-family residential use. As discussed in Part 3, Section (b) the property abuts commercial agricultural land and because of the placement of the existing dwelling cannot meet the minimum agricultural setbacks required in CPMC 17.71, necessary to accommodate a second dwelling unit regardless of the zoning. The Concept Plan applies the City's Very Low Density Residential (R -L) land use and zoning to this property on the basis that the R -L zoning: Page 16 of 23 CAP111314 Page 49 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 • Is consistent with the existing Residential Low Density (R -L) land use designation and zoning for the area immediately to the east (Boer Subdivision); and • The property abuts commercial agricultural lands to the north and will be subject to the agricultural buffering requirements of CPMC 17.71; which requires significant setbacks from the agricultural use, precluding any further developmentof the property. The R -L zoning district has a minimum density of 1.8 dwelling units per gross acre, which is significantly below the committed average minimum density required in the Regional Plan Element (See Table 4 above. However, the density Performance Indicator does allow exceptions to the minimum provided that any decreases in density are off -set by increasing the residential density elsewhere within the City's urban area. In Table 5 an accounting of the Gross Buildable Acreage within the City/UGB by zoning, current minimum allowable density per gross acre for each zoning district, minimum dwelling unit yield, and the average minimum density per gross acre defines the City's current minimum build- out density. Based on current zoning the City's Gross Buildable Acreage is capable of accommodating a minimum build -out density of 7.1 units per gross acre, which exceeds the current planning period's minimum 6.9, but is less than the long-term planning period's 7.9, required in the Regional Plan Element. Table 5 further illustrates (Adjusted Totals) thatthe use of R -L zoning in CP -4D, when added to the City's current gross buildable acreage, only fractionally reduces the average minimum gross density, but not below the current planning period's required minimum gross density of 6.9. Conclusion: Complies. With the use of the lower density R -L zoning the City's committed density is essentially unchanged and remains compliant with the current planning period's required minimum residential density standard. The City acknowledges that in order to maintain both the current and long-term planning period's minimum density requirement that: 1) Higher density zone changes may need to occur within the City as necessary to increase the average minimum density identified in Table 5; Page 17 of 23 CAP111314 Page 50 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 2) Future residential densities in the remaining URA Conceptual Land Use Plans will need to either meet or exceed the minimum established densities in the Regional Plan Element; or 3) A combination of the above. Gross Buildable Acres Min. Housing Yield Minimum Density/Gross Acre 14.63 18 1.2 57.02 177 3.1 36.16 83 2.3 13.78 22 1.6 14.20 67 4.7 51.16 563 11.0 72.33 340 4.7 52.82 601 11.0 25.05 545 23.4 .5 1 1.6 4.1.6 Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas. For Land within a URA and for land currently within a UGB but outside of the existing City Limit, each city shall achieve the 2020 benchmark targets for the number of dwelling units (Alternative Measure No. 5) and employment (Alternative Measure No. 6) in mixed-use/pedestrian-friendly areas as established in the 2009 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) or most recently adopted RTP. Beyond the year 2020, cities shall continue to achieve the 2020 benchmark targets, or if additional benchmarkyears are established, cities shall achieve the target corresponding with the applicable benchmarks. Measurement and definition of qualified development shall be in accordance with adopted RTP methodology. The requirement is considered met if the city or the region overall is achieving the targets or minimum qualifications, whichever is greater. This requirement can be offset by increasing the percentage of dwelling units and/or employment in the City Limit. This requirement is applicable to all participating cities. Finding: Aside from the single one acre parcel there are no proposed land uses within CP -4D that are candidates for mixed-use/pedestrian friendly areas. Conclusion: Not Applicable. Page 18 of 23 CAP111314 Page 51 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 4.1.7. Conceptual Transportation Plans. Conceptual Transportation Plans shall be prepared early enough in the planning and development cycle that the identified regionally significant transportation corridors within each of the URAs can be protected as cost-effectively as possible by available strategies and funding. A Conceptual Transportation Plan for a URA or appropriate portion of a URA shall be prepared by the City in collaboration with the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts, Jackson County, and other affected agencies, and shall be adopted by Jackson County and the respective city prior to or in conjunction with a UGB amendment within that URA. 4.1.7.1. Transportation Infrastructure. The Conceptual Transportation Plan shall identify a general network of regionally significant arterials under local jurisdiction, transit corridors, bike and pedestrian paths, and associated projects to provide mobility throughout the Region (including intra -city and inter -city, if applicable. Finding: Preparation of the Concept Plan included a review of the City's Transportation System Plan, the County's Transportation System Plan, and the RVMPO's 2013-2038Regional Transportation Plan. The only regionally significant transportation corridor within CP -4D is the Bear Creek Greenway system, which is predominantly pedestrian and bicycle oriented. The CP -4D Concept Plan acknowledges the existence of the Bear Creek Greenway system and includes guidelines that protect and enhance the Bear Creek Greenway. Aside from the Bear Creek Greenway there are no other regionally significant transportation corridors. Conclusion: Complies. 4.1.8. Conceptual land Use Plans: A proposal for a UGB Amendment into a designated URA shall include a Conceptual Land Use Plan prepared by the City in collaboration with the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts, Jackson County, and other affected agencies for the area proposed to be added to the UGB as follows: 4.1.8.1. Target Residential Density: The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate how the residential densities of Section 4.1.5 above will be met at full build -out of the area added th rough the UGB amendment. Finding: See Finding 4.1.5. Conclusion: Complies. Page 19 of 23 CAP111314 Page 52 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 4.1.8.2. Land Use Distribution. The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall indicate how the proposal is consistent with the general distribution of land uses in the Regional Plan, especially where specific set of land uses were part of the rationale for designating land which was determined by the Resource Lands Review Committee to be commercial agricultural land as part of a URA, which applies to the following URAs: CP -1B, CP -1C, CP -4D, CP -6A, CP -2B, MD -4, MD -6, MD-7mid, MD -7n, PH -2, TA -2, TA -4. Residential Aggregate Resource Open Employment Total Space/Parks 1%(1 Ac) 0%(0 Ac) 0%(0 Ac) 99%(82 Ac) 0%(0 Ac) 100%(83 Ac) 1%(1 Ac.) 0%(0 Ac.) 0%(0 Ac.) 99%(82 Ac.) 0%(0 Ac.) 100%(83 Ac.) Finding: As illustrated in Table 6 the proposed land use distributions in the CP - 4D Concept Plan are consistent with those presented in the Regional Plan Element. Conclusion: Complies. 4.1.8.3. Transportation Infrastructure. The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall include the transportation infrastructure required in Section 4.1.7 above. Finding: The required transportation infrastructure per 4.1.7 is included in the CP -41) Concept Plan (see Finding 4.1.7. Conclusion: Complies. 4.1.8.4. Mixed Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas. The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate how the commitments of Section 4.1.6 above will be met at full build -out of the area added through the UGB amendment. Finding: See Finding 4.1.6. Conclusion: Not Applicable. 4.1.9. Conditions. The following conditions apply to specific Urban Reserve Areas: 4.1.9.2. CP -40. Use of CP -41) is predominantly restricted to open space and park land with the exception of an existing one acre home site. Page 20 of 23 CAP111314 Page 53 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 Finding: As noted in Table 4 the CP4DConcept Plan is consistent with the Regional Plan Element's land use type distribution, which allocates 99% of the gross acreage to open space/parks use. Residential uses have been restricted to the existing one acre home site. Conclusion 4.1.9.2: Complies. 4.1.9.3. Roadway Limitation. No roadways are to extend North, East, or West from CP -4D. Finding: Currently there are three public streets that access CPLD; Dean Creek Road from the north, Boes Avenue from the east, and Old Upton Road from the south. The CP4DConcept Plan does not propose the extension of any roadways from CP -4D. However, it is proposed that Boes Avenue and/or Old Upton Road may be extended westerly and northerly as necessary to provide access/parking to serve the future open space and recreation uses proposed for CP -4D. The determination of the extent of the extension of these two roads will be subject to more detailed identification and design of the future open space development of CP -4D. Through access shall not be permitted. Conclusion 4.1.9.3: Consistent, no roadways will be extended from CP -4D. 4.1.9.5 Central Point URA, Gibbon/Forest Acres. Prior to the expansion of the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary into any Urban Reserve Area, the City and Jackson County shall adopt an agreement (Area of Mutual Planning Concern)for the management of Gibbons/Forest Acres Unincorporated Containment Boundary. Finding: The City will coordinate with Jackson County and enter into an Area of Mutual Planning Concern Agreement prior to UGB expansion into CP -4D. Conclusion 4.1.9.5: Complies 4.1.10. Agricultural Buffering. Participating jurisdictions designating Urban Reserve Areas shall adopt the Regional Agricultural Buffering program in Volume 2, Appendix III into their Comprehensive Plans as part of the adoption of the Regional Plan. The agricultural buffering standards in Volume 2, Appendix III shall be adopted into their land development codes prior to a UGB amendment. Finding: CP -4D abuts EFU zoned lands along its easterly border (see Figure 4). However, the primary use of CP -4D will be for passive recreational use, which at time of design/development has the space and use assets that will easily comply with the City's Agricultural Mitigation Ordinance. Page 21 of 23 CAP111314 Page 54 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 The CP -4D Concept Plan also includes an existing one acre residential parcel. This parcel currently contains a single-family residence, but has the potential to be further partitioned. In addition to having to comply with the City's Agricultural Mitigation Ordinance the CP -4D Concept Plan designates the property for low density residential density (R -L), which is consistent with the residential neighborhood to the east. Conclusion: Complies. 4.1.13 Urban Growth Boundary Amendment. Pursuant to ORS 197.298 and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-021-0060, URAs designated in the Regional Plan are the first priority lands used for a UGB amendment by participating cities. Finding: The Regional Plan Element includes a provision that requires adoption of a concept plan prior to urban growth boundary expansion into an urban reserve area. The CP -4D Concept Plan addresses this requirement in anticipation of an urban growth boundary application into CP -4D. Conclusion 4.1.9.5: Complies. 4.1.17. Greater Coordination with the RVMPO. The participating jurisdictions shall collaborate with the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Organization (RVMPO) to: 4.1.17.1. Prepare the Conceptual Transportation Plans identified in Section 4.1.7. 4.1.17.2. Designate and protect the transportation infrastructure required in the Conceptual Transportation Plans identified in Section 4.1.7 to ensure adequate transportation connectivity, multimodal use, and minimize right of way costs. 4.1.17.3. Plan and coordinate the regionally significant transportation strategies critical to the success of the adopted Regional Plan including the development of mechanisms to preserve rights-of-way for the transportation infrastructure identified in the Conceptual Transportation Plans; and Finding: The CP -4D Concept Plan was prepared in collaboration with RVMPO with attention given to the effective implementation of the Regional Plan. On August 13, 2014 the RVMPO Technical Advisory Committee reviewed and approved the Concept Plan. Conclusion: Complies. 4.1.18. Future Coordination with the RVCOG. The participating jurisdictions shall collaborate with the Rogue Valley Council of Governments on future regional planning that assists the participating jurisdictions in complying with the Regional Plan Page 22 of 23 CAP111314 Page 55 CP -4D (Bear Creek Area) Concept Plan, 2014 performance indicators. This includes cooperation in a region -wide conceptual planning process if funding is secured. Finding: Any future modifications to the Concept Plan, per Policy CP -4D.7, will be prepared in collaboration with the RVCOG. Conclusion: Complies. 4.1.20 Agricultural Task Force. Finding: The Agricultural task Force has been formed and has submitted their recommendations to the County in the form of amendments to the County's Agricultural Lands Element. The City has reviewed the proposed amendments. The proposed policy addressing coordination with affected irrigation districts is the only Agricultural Task Force recommendation that pertains to the Concept Plan. The Concept Plan has been coordinated with the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District (RRVID) with no anticipated negative impacts to RRVID's ability to continue providing irrigation services. A policy (CP -4D.6) is part of the Concept Plan and is intended to assure continued coordination with RRVID as the Concept Plan is implemented. Conclusion: Complies. 4.1.21. Park Land. For purposes of UGB amendments, the amount and type of park land included shall be consistent with the requirements of OAR 660-024-0040 or the park land need shown in the acknowledged plans. Finding: Although not required at this time it is worth noting that OAR 660-024-0040 addresses determination of land need necessary to justify expansion of an urban growth boundary. The CP -4D Concept Plan serves only to illustrate consistency with the Regional Plan Element land use allocations for parks and open space as shown in Table 6, and does not waive the requirements of OAR 660-024-0040. Conclusion: Complies. 4.1.22 Buildable Lands Definition. Finding: The term "buildable lands" as defined in OAR 660-008-0005(2) is used by the City in managing its Buildable Lands Inventory and is the basis for determining future need. Conclusion: Complies. Page 23 of 23 CAP111314 Page 56 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONCEPTUAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR CP -4D, AN URBAN AREA OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT. OREGON WHEREAS, on August 9, 2012 by Ordinance No. 1964 the City Council adopted the City of Central Point Regional Plan Element; and WHEREAS, the Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for CP -4D has been prepared in accordance with the Regional Plan Element and Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan including all applicable performance indicators set forth in these documents; and WHEREAS, as a condition of the Regional Plan Element of the City of Central Point it is required that a Conceptual Plan for an Urban Reserve Area (URA) be adopted by the City prior to the expansion of the City's urban growth boundary (UGB) into the applicable URA; and WHEREAS, the City has a pending application with the County to expand its UGB into CP -4D; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS, that the City Council approves and adopts the Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for CP -4D, An Urban Reserve Area of the City of Central Point. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council directs the City Manager and the Community Development Department to use the CP -41) Conceptual Plan when considering UGB Amendments affecting this Urban Reserve Area. PASSED by the City Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of 12014. Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: City Recorder Return to Agenda City Council Resolution No. (11/13/2014) CAP111314 Page 57 Discussion Audit Report CAP111314 Page 58 Background: The audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2014 will be complete and a copy given to you this evening. City auditor Paul Neilson, CPA, from Isler CPA, LLC will be here and will present the audit. Please use this opportunity to ask questions of Paul regarding the audited information being presented or financial operations in general. Recommended Action: That Council accept, by motion, the June 30, 2014 audited financial report. CAP111314 Page 59 .A CENTRAL Finance Department Staff Report POINT Bev Adams, Finance Dtreao, To: Mayor&Council From: Bev Adams, Finance Director Date: November 13, 2014 Subject: Audit presentation Background: The audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2014 will be complete and a copy given to you this evening. City auditor Paul Neilson, CPA, from Isler CPA, LLC will be here and will present the audit. Please use this opportunity to ask questions of Paul regarding the audited information being presented or financial operations in general. Recommended Action: That Council accept, by motion, the June 30, 2014 audited financial report. CAP111314 Page 59 Discussion Intersection of 7t" and Oak Streets CAP111314 Page 60 A CENTRAL POINT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT 140 South 3rtl Street Central Point, OR 97 SO2 (S41) 664-7602 www.rentra l pointoregon.gov STAFF REPORT November 4, 2014 AGENDA ITEM: Re -Look at 7'" and Oak Street Stop Signs STAFF SOURCE: Matt Samitore, Parks & Public Works Director BACKGROUND/SYNOPSIS This past summer it was determined that the intersection of 7" and Oak could be reconfigured making Oak the thru Street and putting the stop signs on 71h Street. In analyzing the change it has been determined that the current configuration cannot continue because of the skew of the intersection and resident parking patterns. Issues: In order to resolve the site vision issues we have three options. L Make the intersection a 4 way stop. 2. Change the signage back so it has stop signs on Oak. 3 Construct bulb outs to move stop signs out far enough so vehicles can see around foliage and parked cars. ATTACHMENTS: Pictures of Intersection RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends option I or 2. PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED: No CAP111314 Page 61 ,y x. � x °'AMMER' AIM Ij { .. y �� v .`� ^ . w/ •:'�~ ..ice' ., r` +I , `� .. �}r. ,y '��y _ "i. dF ii :ole Business Citizen Survey Questions CAP111314 Page 63 A CENTRAL POINT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT 140 South 3rtl Street Central Point, OR 97502 (S41) 664-7602 www.rentra l pointoregon.gov STAFF REPORT November 13", 2014 AGENDA ITEM: Discussion/finalization of the 2014/2015 City of Central Point citizen survey questionnaire. STAFFSOURCE: Chris Clayton, City Manager BACKGROUND/SYNOPSIS: The city's strategic plan (goal 1, strategy C) directs city administration to periodically survey Central Point citizens on their satisfaction with general city functions and service levels. This has been customarily done on two-year intervals (2005, 2008, 2010 & 20 12) and over the next couple of months, the City will be hiring a consultant to conduct a scientifically valid telephone survey of citizens living in Central Point. The survey asks a variety of questions that aim to gauge citizen satisfaction with city services and the overall quality of life in Central Point. Additional questions such as rating spending priorities for programs, projects and services provide guideposts for future policy decisions. Although the 2014 survey will be similar to previous surveys, we will be seeking input outside of the statistically valid telephone portion of the survey. More specifically, the survey will also be sent via direct mail and will be available on the City's website to give everyone a chance to participate in this important opportunity. The focus of this council discussion should be to revise, add or subtract from the draft 2014 City of Central Point citizen survey questionnaire. After tonight's revisions, the document will be finalized before conducting the survey. ATTACHMENTS: I. Draft 2014 City of Central Point citizen survey questionnaire. RECOMMENDATION: I. As necessary, revise the draft 2014 City of Central Point citizen survey questionnaire. PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED: No Public Comment can be accepted on this discussion item, but no public hearing is required. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to direct staff per recommendation # as described above. Return to Agenda CAP111314 Page 64 2014 Central Point Citizen Survey f'ioal Ura /( Qnes(i000aire -No i , mi), 1 5, 2014 Part 1 - Residential Satisfaction 1. If you were to name one thing you most enjoy about living in Central Point, what would that be? a. Quiet Neighborhoods b. Scenery and environment c. Small town feel d. Safety e. Schools f. Parks and recreation g. Community events h. Other [specify] i. Don't Know/Refused 2. What in the City of Central Point would you most like to see change/happen/improve upon to make the community more livable? a. Decreased traffic congestion b. Increased availability of parking c. Improved roads and streets d. Reduced crime and increased safety e. Increased public transit f. More parks g. More recreational opportunities h. More cultural opportunities i. More sidewalksand streetscapes j. More businessesand economic growth k. Other: [specify] I. Don't Know/Refused 3. How many times have you used the following city services and/or departments in the last 12 - months? a. Parks & Recreation (facilities, parks, classes, department, etc.) b. Police Department c. Public Works Department (permit center, reporting) d. Planning and Community Development e. Finance Department Page 1 1 CAP111314 Page 65 f. HR/Personnel g. Administration (council, mayor, city manager, city recorder, etc.) h. Community Sponsored Events (fairs, festivals, open house, etc.) i. City Council meetings/Public Hearings (attended) 4. Of those city services and/or departments you have used in the last 12 -months, how would you rate your satisfaction with the level of service/offering on a scale of 0-10 (0 ="very unsatisfied" and 10= "very satisfied") a. Parks & Recreation (facilities, parks, classes, department, etc.) b. Police Department c. Public Works Department (permit center, reporting) d. Planning and Community Development e. Finance Department f. HR/Personnel g. Administration (council, mayor, city manager, city recorder, etc.) h. Community Sponsored Events (fairs, festivals, etc.) i. City Council meetings/Public Hearings 5. On a scale of Oto 10 (0 ="very unsatisfied" and 10= "very satisfied"), how satisfied are you with the City of Central Point regarding the following: a. Hours and days of operation b. Obtaining city contact information C. Times and datesfor special cityevents d. Accessibility tocouncil members and city staff e. The City of Central Point's communication with its citizens f. Crinne and safety g. Traffic congestion,road/street conditions h. Forms and/or applicationsthe city provide s/requires 6. In your opinion, what should be the top three spending priorities for Central Point's local government programs? Please prioritize in terms of a 1, 2, and 3 where 1 is the most important. a. Road maintenance and improvements b. Police department c Econornic development d. HR/Personnel e. _Parks facilities f. Recreation programs g. Don't know/refused 7. On a scale of 0 to 10, (0 ="very unsatisfied" and 10 = "very satisfied"), how satisfied are you with the direction the City of Central Point is heading? [Enter 11 for DK/Refused) Page 1 2 CAP111314 Page 66 S. On a scale from 0-10, (0 ="a very low quality of life" and 10 ="a very high quality of life"), how would you rate the quality of life in the City of Central Point? [Enter 11 for DK/Refused]. 9. Why did you give that rating? 10. What do you think the City of Central Point can do to improve the quality of life? 11. Have you made an effort to obtain information regarding City services or facilities from the City of Central Point in the last two years? 12. Which sources of information do you generally utilize to learn about what is happening in the City of Central Point a. Word of mouth b. City newsletter c. Parks & Recreation Activity Guide d. City Hall e. Local newspaper [Specify] f. City Website (www.centralpointoregon.gov) g. Business organizations (Chamber of Commerce) h. Community organizations (Kiwanis, Rotary, School PTA, etc.) L Local Television Channels j. Local Radio k. Social networking sites (Facebook, etc.) L Community events (fairs, festivals, school events, etc. m. DK/Refused 13. If 12(f) was selected, "On a scale from 0-10, where ()= "not useful" and 10= "very useful"), how would you rate the usefulness of the City of Central Point's website? 14. If 12(f) was selected, why did you give that rating? 15. Aside from the ones I just read, what other sources of communication would be helpful for you to receive information from the City of Central Point (i.e. services, events)? 16. What information have you wanted and/or needed to find out over the past 3 months? a. Hours for city departments b. Driving directions to City Hall c. Contact information (phone numbers, mailing addresses and/or email addresses) d. Times/dates/calendar for events e. Hours of operation for city parks recreation centers, etc. f. Applications and/or forms process g. Website address Page 13 CAP111314 Page 67 h. Other [Specify] 17. When seeking information about the City of Central Point, which of the following sources do you consider to be the most trustworthy in terms of accuracy and relevance of the information [Record all that apply]: a. City newsletter b. Media (reports/bulletins, newspaper articles, ratio, TV, etc.) c. City of Central Point elected officials d. City of Central Point employees and staff e. Neighbors/residents f. Business owners g. Social Media (Facebook, etc.) h. Other [Specify] i. DK/Refused 18. On a scale from 0 to 10, (0 ='very unsafe' and 10 ='very safe'), how safe do you feel in the City of Central Point? [Enter 11 for DK/Refused] 19. 1 am going to read a series of statements. For each one I read, on a scale from 0-10 (0 = "you strongly disagree" and 10= "you strongly agree"), please rate each statement individually. [Enter 11 for DK/Refused] a. "I believe the City of Central Point has been effective in carrying out their plan to manage growth and support services in our community." b. 'The Central Point Police Department meets the community's needs." c. 'The City's downtown improvements including widening sidewalks, planting trees, and installing ornamental lighting have helped create a safe and attractive business environment." d. "I am pleased with the City's efforts to provide greater variety of housing by developing townhouses, apartments and traditional housing in single family neighborhoods." e. "The City is doing an excellent job of keeping citizens informed about city issues." f. "I believe the establishment of a Central Point Urban Renewal Agency will create more economic development opportunities in the City of Central Point." g. "I would recommend Central Point to my friends as a good place to live." Page 14 CAP111314 Page 68 Part 2 - Department Specific Questions (2014 Draft) Community Development 1. On a scale of 0 to 10 (0 not important at all" and 10 = "extremely important") how would you rate the importance of revitalizing Central Point's downtown business district? [Enter 11 for DK/Refused]. 2. On a scale of 0 to 10 (0 ="not important at all" and 10 = "extremely important"), how important is Central Point's downtown to the overall development and image of the city? [Enter 11 for DK/Refused] 3. On a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = "not at all important" and 10 = "extremely important") how important is it for the Cityto continue to support local business development byoffering Destination Business Training? [Enter 11 for DK/Refused] Urban Renewal 1. In order of priority, where would you like to see Central Point Urban Renewal funds focused? Please prioritize in terms of a 1, 2, and 3 where 1 is the most important. a. East Pine Street & Interchange Planning (East of 10" Street) b. Housing Redevelopment Incentives c The Highway 99 Corridor d. The Pine Street Corridor (the downtown core from Front to 6" Street) e. Don't know/refused Jackson County Expo 1. In recent budget cycles, the City of Central Point has appropriated funds to support community events (Rodeo, Fourth of July, Oregon Quarter Horse and other equestrian events) held at the Jackson County Expo. What level of support would you like the City to offer the Jackson County Expo in the future? a. More funding b. Maintain current funding c. Less funding Pan lks & Public Wmiks Deparhnent 1. The City's long-term financial plan indicates that parks, recreation, and public safety will each require a $1.00 fee to maintain current service levels? Please indicate your support for a $1.00 fee for: a. Parks facilities and maintenance, including repair and replacement of playground equipment; (Record Yes, No, Undecided, Refused) b. Recreation programs, including city sponsored events; (Record Yes, No, Undecided, Refused) c Public safety/police protection (Record Yes, No, Undecided, Refused) Page 1 5 CAP111314 Page 69 2. Pending funding availability, which 3 parks and recreation amenities would you like included in the community? [Record top 3 choices only]. a. Year round swimming pool b. An additional water spray park c. Basketball gymnasium d. Dog Park e. Recreation Classrooms f. Little League Fields g. Additional community trails 3. On a scale of 0 to 10 (0="not at all satisfied" and 10= "very satisfied") how would you rate your satisfaction with the following City -sponsored events and recreation offerings: a. Easter Egg Hunt b. Friday Night Festivals C. Battle of the Bones d. _4`h of July Parade e. _Bike Fair f. Community Christmas & Lights Parade g. Recreate Guide Classes 4. Are there any other events or recreation offerings you would like to see in Central Point? a. Yes [Specify] b. No c. Don't Know/Refused Part 3 - Demographics 1. How many years have you lived in Central Point? [Enter 99 for DK/Refused]. 2. What type of housing do you live in? a. Multifamily housing (condo, apartment, townhouse, mobile home) b. Single Family Housing c. Refused 3. Doyouownorrentyourhome? a. Own b. Rent c. Refused Page 16 CAP111314 Page 70 4. In what year were you born? [Enter 1999 for refused]. 5. What is your ethnicity? a. White (Caucasian) b. Black (African American) c. American Indian or Alaskan Native d. Asian e. Hispanic/Latino f. Don't Know/Refused g. Other [Specify] 6. Gender a. Male b. Female Suggested Additional Demographic Questions: • Marital Status o Single o Married without children o Married with children o Refused • Please indicate your highest education Level: o High School Diploma/GED o Associates Degree (AA/AS) o Bachelor's Degree (BA/BS) o Master's Degree (MA/MS) o Doctorate Degree (PhD) • Please indicate your employment status: o Working Full Time o Working Part Time o Not working o Retired Page 17 CAP111314 Page 71 Business Planning Commission Report CAP111314 Page 72 7 City of Central Point, Oregon AL TRR 1411 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 975uz CENTRAL 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 POINT www.centralpointoregon.gov PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: November 13, 2014 To: Honorable Mayor & Central Point City Council From: Tom Humphrey AICP, Community Development Director Subject: Planning Commission Report Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director The following items were presented by staff and discussed by the Planning Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting on November 4, 2014. A. Consideration of Resolution No. 809 forwarding a favorable recommendation to the City Council to approve a Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for CP -4D, An Urban Reserve Area of the City of Central Point, File No. 14008. The Planning Commission conducted a final review the CP -41) Conceptual Plan in order to make a favorable recommendation to the City Council. The Commission previously reviewed this document in at least one draft form and directed staff to make revisions based on input from affected agencies and property owners. The revisions were made and the Commission unanimously supported the document, recommending approval by the City Council. B. Introduction and Discussion of a Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for CP -1B, An Urban Reserve Area of the City of Central Point, File No. 14009. After discussing a draft of the Conceptual Plan for the CP -I B Urban Reserve Area, the Commission directed staff to 1) complete the supporting findings; 2) distribute the document to affected agencies and 3) initiate public input on the plan. C. Introduction and Discussion of an Agreement Between the City of Central Point and Jackson County for the Joint Management of the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary, File No. 14021. The Planning Commission was introduced to a draft of the Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement (UGBMA) that is being revised by City and County staff to satisfy conditions of the Regional Plan. Among the revisions are policies to collaborate with Jackson County over Forest/Gibbon Acres and the Jackson County Expo. Both areas are proposed to become "Areas of Mutual Planning Interest'. The Commission will see this document again at theirjoint City/ County Planning Commission meeting on November 20, 2014. Return to Agenda CAP111314 Page 73