HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 114 - Pioneer Resources - Meadows PUD.~
PL,ANI~ZNG COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 1.7.E
A RESOI.,UTZON OE RECOMMF`NDATZON OIt
APPR.OVAI~ ()F A PLANIvEI} UNIT DEVELOPMENT
[aHERF,AS, on April. 7.0, ].986, Pioneer Resources, Tn.c. filed an app]_l.cation
for a planned unit development loca.r.ed at 5~5 Freeman Ro~.d presently knocan as
The Meadows Mobile Home Park, said ].and .further described as Jacksozz County Map
Page 37 2I~ 11A, Tax Lot 200; and
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing was posted at the Central Paint Library,
Central Point Post Office, Centro]. Paint Fire Station, and Central Point Ci#~y
Hall; and published in the Medford Mail Tribune on Apri]_ 30 and May 4, 1986;
and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 6, 1986 the Planning Commission
held a review of the proposal, provided opportunity f_or testimony from propa--
nents and opponents and received a planning staff report; and
t,THEREAS, subsequent to the review and pub7_ic hearing, the Punning Commis-
lion made a motion to provide recommendation. far approval. to the Cl.ty Council;
now, therefore,
SE IT RESOLVED that the Gity of Central. Point Planning Commission recam-
zr~ends to the City of Central Point City Council that the application for a
planned unit development submitted by Pioneer Resources, ]:nc. be approved faith
L•he following candltions:
L. Overall. Concept: The fact that this development began as a mobile
home park should be kept in mind. The basic systems of streets, water and
sewer lines, and other utilities have already been installed far the most part
and although they may not meet all Gity standards for "conventional" subdivi--
sions, they are appropriate for a mobile home manufactured home) community.
'Z'lze most significant change is that of otanership of the individual lots and the
homeowners association method of overall management as well as responsibility
f_or the financial. ~tiTell--being of the "community".
RESOLt7TI0I\T N0. .114 -- Page 1
2. Access: A 12-acre portion of the r}r. iginal. devel.npment :i.s not inc7.uded
in this proposal. This ros~i E_ts i.n the e]_iminati_cs~l of a street access from
Hopkins Road into the deve].apment 1_eav:ing only the ~`reeinan 1Zoad entry point. A
development o£ this type and site coi.~ld reasonably be expected to generate
].,200 vehicle trigs per day or more. 7t is required that the traffic be
divided between two or more access points. The most feasible location. for an
additional street access would be at the extreme east end of .Tay Street and ex-
tending southward to connect with 1-#apkins Raa.cl. T13e right-of-way for that
street doesn`t currentl}r exist 1~us: m:igllt be designed into the specif:~.c. p~.an
that is being developed fox- the Elk Creek Neighborhood. The right-of-iaay would
then be dedicated at the time of fntux'e partitioni..ng, subdi~riding or develop-
ment.
3. Visitor Parking: Each let taa11 include at least t~~ro off-street spaces
and the streets have a width of 40 feet allowing far on--street parking on both
sides if necessary. The recreational areas caithi.n the development ar.e intended
to be easily accessible by pedestrian;, and do not need additional parking.
~. Types of Homes Permitted: Conventa.onal homes may be built in this
development although clear emphasis is to be placed on manufactured homes with
both types of homes to be treated equa].1y. The setback requirements that
obviously discriminate against conventional homes are to be revised by the
applicant.
5. Design Requirements: The design review process built into the home-
owners association's functions are to ,creep developments to ensure that new
homes will be acceptable quality and appearance and compatible with develop-
ment bearing in mind l.ot sizes and tl~e intent to provide an affordable
community.
6. Landscaping: A11 7_andscaping is to be completed prior to the summer
of 1989 ar upon occupancy of 150 lots whichever occurs first.
7. 1'laygrorcnd: A playground is to be completed upon the occupancy of six
lots in the surrounding "family" section of the development. The. playground is
to be surrounded by a three-foot high chain-link fence.
8. RV Parking Area: A temporary recreational vehicle storage area is
allowed unti]. 125 lets have been. occupied at which. t:i.me the RV storage area
will be moved to the extreme east end of the development adjacent to the
freeway.
4. Homeowners Association Fees: An a.nitial association fee of $600 per
year is approved for the upkeep and maintenance of all recreational facilities,
common areas, water and sewer systems, streets, sewer and trash collection
fees, etc. Of that $4.00 per month is to be deposited in a long-range capital
improvements fund for major projects as needed. However, the bylaws of the
associatiaz: as worded permit the association to vote to eli..minate the $4.00 per
month fee if they feel it i, not necessary.
10. Possibility o£ Future Lot Lino Adjustments: Lot line adjustments will
be permitted provided the resulting lots are not smaller than the original
lots.
RESOLUTION N0. 114 - Page 2
11. Coordinat ion wa.th Adjacent Development: The .l 7_-acre portion of tl~e
original development to the south wa.J_J~ be separate and ~~ot a part of the
planned unit development proposed at this time. Tl~e streets whack have bee:?
stubbed to the south will remain closed. Coordination of any devcJopment o£
this adjacent area w:"s.ll be Left to the developer at such time this development
occurs.
12. F'lk Creek Drainage Improvements: Improvement of tlZe EJ_]c Creek
channeJ_ including clearing of brush, adding or enlarging culverts, and revising
head str:zcture is to be compJ.eted prier. to any development o.f the affected
flood-pran.e lands.
13. The C3.ty is to be authorised to enforce the prova.sions pertaan~.ng to
the improvement and maintenance of common areas.
14. Far West Bank, as major otaner., wi~.l contribute its share of home-
otaners association fees for each of its vacant lots unta..l they are soJ.d.
15. The minimum d~ael.l.ing size requirement contained an Arta.cle IV of the
covenants 9.s to be eliminated as at pertains on~.y to manufiactured homes and not
conventional homes, and also in considerataan of the smaller--than--standard Jot
sizes.
16. Applicant is to look into Li°ee types and assemble a list of trees
that would be most appropriate for placement in front yard areas as requires iTl
the covenants due to very limited front yard requirements.
Passed by the Planning Comm~.ssion this sixth day of May, ].98b, and signed
by me in authenticatian of its passage this 14th day of May ,
1986.
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
Punning Commission Secret`a. ,~~
l ~,,~
}t)aSOLUTTON N0. J-14 -Page 3