Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet - February 6, 2007
CENTRAL POINT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 6, 2007 - 7.00 p.m. Next Planning Cozxzzxzission Resolution No. 715 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian ldiart, Chuck Piland, Wayne Riggs, Pat Beck, and Mike Oliver III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of January 2, 2007, Planning Coz-nmission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS ~~$~ t - 50 A. File N©. 07019. A public hearing to consider a request for Site Plan review to allow far the constzuction of a medical office building. The proposed development is located at 870 Front Street and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's zxzap as 37S 2W 11 CB, Tax Lots 441 and 500. The subject property is located within a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial, and TOD-GC, Transit Oriented Development Corridor General Commercial zoning district. Applicant: Providence Health System_Oregon; Agent: Michael C. Robinson Pgs. 51 - 63 B. File N©. 07028. A public hearing to consider a request for a Variance in preparation far a Tentative Plan application for the creation of three (3) single family residential lots. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Single Family Residential zoning distirct and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W l ODD, Tax Lot 2100. The address is 1676 Beall Lane and is located north of Beall Lane, west of Chickozy Lane. Applicant: Dorothy Norman; Agent: Herb Farber Pgs. 64 - 74 C. File No. 07029. A public hearing to consider a request for approval of a Tentative Plan application for the creation of three (3) single family residential lots. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Single Family Residential zoning distirct and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1 ODD, Tax Lot 2100. The address is 1676 Beall Lane and is located noz-th of Beall Lane, west of Chickory Lane. Applicant: Dorothy Norman; Agent: Herb Farber k'ianning Commission Agenda - [~ebruary 6, 2007 z'~s. 80 - 96 D. File No. 07030. A public hearing to consider a request for approval of a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating fzve (5) commercial lots. The subject property is located in a C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district and consists of approximately 4.87 acres (identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W Ol C, Tax Lots 802 & 803. The proposed project area is located on East Pine Street, west of Table Rock Road. Applicant: Excelsior Investment Co.; Agent: Hoffbuhr and Associates, Inc. VII. MISCELLANEOUS A. Removal of trees on City owned property located on Upton Road B. Urban Growth Boundazy Expansion Update C. Regional Problem Solving Update VII. ADJOURNMENT Planning Cocnmiss€on Agcctda -February 6, 2047 City of Central Paint Planning Commission Minutes January 2, 2007 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Chuck Piland, Damian Idiart, Candy Fish, Wayne Riggs, Pat Beck, and Mike OIiver were present. Also in attendance were: Don Buz-t, Planning Manager; Connie Clone, Community Planner; Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. III, CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Chaizrrzan Connie Moczygemba requested that the Planning Secretary recheck the audio recording of the December 5, 2006 meeting to clarify Damian Idiart's vote on zone change amendments for cell towers {which proved to be an affirmative vote for Resolutions 712 and 713). In addition, Mrs. Moczygemba requested that language be inserted into the minutes of the December 5, 2006 meeting reflecting that Matt Small agreed to the removal of a walkway between Gebhard Village and a private park in the Green Valley Subdivision. Pat Beck made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 5, 2006 Planning Commission meeting as amended. Chuck Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Candy Fish abstained. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A, File No. 05011. A public meeting to consider a request for extension of White Hawk Estates Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Duncan Development, Inc. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose except that Commissioners Damian Planrring Conrnrission lllirrrrtes ,Imrtrary 2, 2D07 Page 2 Idiart and Mike Oliver each stated that they were a good friend of the applicant. Neither felt that this would create bias on their parts. Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician, presented background information and explained that the applicant was still working with an environzrzental consultant and the DEQ to complete the review process. If the extension is granted, the revised expiration date would be Thursday, July 5, 2007. Wayne Riggs made a motion to grant an extension of time to White Hawk Estates PUD for submittal of a final development plan. Candy Dish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. B. File No. 6060. A public meeting to consider a request for extension of Gray Court, PUD, a Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Jon S. Gray There were no conflicts or ex parte caznmunications to disclose. Planning Technician, Lisa Morgan, presented the staff report stating that the requested extension of time would allow the applicant to resolve civil drawing design issues and receive completed survey information. The revised expiration date would be July 2, 2007, if approved. Damian Idiart made a motion to grant an extension of time to Gray Court PUD for submittal of a final development plan. Mike Oliver seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. C. File No. 07021.. A public hearing to consider a variance to the 20 foot access standard by creating an 18 foot easement access for a second parcel to be created by a minor land partition. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified as 683 Pittview Avenue {Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W 11D, Tax Lot 300}. Applicants: Calvin and Jeannine Lanfear There were na conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Mike Oliver and Wayne Riggs said they had made site visits. Planning Manager, Don Burt, presented to the Planning Commission that the applicants were applying for a variance to the minimum lot width requirements, side yard setback requirements and the 20 font minimum access standard requirements for a flag pole in the R-1-6 zoning district. Mr. Burt stated that Planning staff was recommending denial of the requested variance as no hardship exists. It is the applicants' desire to create a minor land partition that is causing the hardship. Mr. Burt described the existence of a proposed, although not yet adopted, circulation plan for the future development of interior lots in the neighborhood which is the subject of the variance being requested. He explained that in order for the City to implement the circulation plan, some form of Plmuring Cosvr:ission hlin¢ades Janxary ~', 2007 Page 3 variance would have to be given to the property owner. Otherwise, the probability of the circulation plan's successful implementation would be very low. In addition, if the PIanning Commission was interested in pursuing this plan, they would have to direct staff to prepare fzndings for a preliminary plan and consider the matter at the Februazy zxzeeting. Mike Oliver asked if the original circulation plan had been approved by the City Council, to which Don Burt replied that the plan had not been presented or approved. The circulation plan only showed how to provide for circulation to interior lots which would minimize requests far variances and provide services to those interior lots. Ifvariances were approved in the area prior to implementation of a circulation plan, the City would end up forfeiting its ability to put the plan into place at soz~ke future time. Covington Court, located to the west of the proposed plan, would became a part of the circulation plan if this altez7~ative was selected. Mr. Burt additionally pointed out that if a variance were to be permitted without conditions, a future circulation plan would be lost. Commissioner Idiart asked if the Lanfears had been advised of the existence of a circulation plan at their pre-application conference. Mr. Burt informed him that it had come up afterwards. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Herb Farber, agent for the applicants, came forward and advised that the parcel in question was likely a remnant from other land divisions that had taken place in the area which would account for its Iong and narrow configuration. Mr. Barber said that the applicants had met with neighbors to consider various alternatives and had exhausted their remedies in that regard. Mr. Farber indicated that the applicants would be agreeable to stipulating that their property would be available at some future date to accommodate a circulation plan. In addition, Mr. Farber informed Commissioners that applicants intended to "sprinkle" the house which would satisfy the safety requirements of the fire district. Calvin, Jr. and Jeannine Lanfear signed in and stated that when they initially purchased the property, they were aware that twenty-fzve (25) feet would be required between the existing home and the property line to create access to another lot for future development. They thought they would either remove two {2) feet from the side of the existing home or purchase additional property from a neighbor. Neither option has proven to be feasible. Commissioner Moczygemba asked staff when the minimum lot widths had changed in code. It was pointed out by staff the code had changed from 60 feet to 50 feet recently; the zone change from R-1- $ to R-1-6 was said to have occurred in 2003. Chuck Piland asked Herb Farber if applicants would remove two feet of their home. Mr. Farber said that it would be a last resort. The lot is not a standard lot. It would still be too small to put a road in without affecting the lot width requirements. The only way the Lanfears would be able to build on the back of their lot would be through a variance. Planning Convnissiort Mittutea• January 2, 2007 Page 4 The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Commissioners discussed the merits of pursuing a circulation plan far the neighborhood in question at this time without any conclusive results. Chuck Piland made a motion to approve Resolution No. 714 denying the requested trvo (2) foot variance to the 20 foot flag pole access standard, denying the variance requested to the SO foot minimum lot width requirement ofthe R-1-6 zone, and denying the variance requested to the minimum interior side yard setback of five (5) feet, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Daanian Idiart seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, no; Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, no; Piland, yes; Riggs, no; Moczygernba, yes. Motion passed. D. File No. 07020. A public hearing to consider approval of a Minor Land Partition for the creation of a second lot located in a R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district. The address of the property subject to this partition is 6S3 Pittview Avenue {Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W llD, Tab Lot 300). Applicants: Calvin and Jeannine Lanfear Herb Farber requested that applicants be allowed to withdraw their application for a minor land partition at 683 Pittview Avenue. Chuck Piland made a motion to accept the withdrawal of the application for a minor Iand partition at 683 Pittview Avenue based upon the request of the applicant's agent, Herb Farber. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Lone Redwood Grove ~- Tree Dama e Planning Manager, Don Burt, presented Commission members with a copy of a certified letter and City Arborist's report that was sent to Brad Parmenter, developer of the Lone Redwood Grove subdivision, concerning damage to the "lone redwood" tree located in the subdivision. Mr. Burt stated further that a return receipt had been received. Damian Idiart requested that the Planning Commission be provided with photos of the damage to the tree should this matter become an issue. Urban Growth Boundar Ex ansion U date Don Burt, Planning Manager, reported that the Citizens' Advisory Committee had completed the first round of discussions with property owners located in the proposed Urban Reserve areas. Mr. Burt estimated that approximately 90% of property owners queried were in favor of an Urban Planrrirrg Commission Minutes .Iarrrrar•y Z, zQ~7 Pnge S Growth Boundary expansion. Staff is now attempting to define areas of expansion, and an update will be provided to the Commission at the February, 2007 meeting. R.__ e~ional Problem Solving_Upd~te Mr. Burt advised Commissioners that the Regional Problem Solving policy committee had made changes to the areas proposed for an Urban Growth Boundary expansion as follows: CP-1B - acceptedthe Tolo Road area and that was all; CP-GA -apiece was removed; CP-3 -all county lands were removed; CP-8 -taken out completely; CP-2B -accepted in its entirety; CP-5 -previously accepted; CP-4D _ dropped all lands with the exception of the Greenway. Alternatives to the originally proposed Urban Reserve areas will be presented to the Planning Commission at a later date. Staff is being encouraged to continue to look at lands located north of Wilson Road and some exception lands south of Beall Lane and west of Hanley Road. New maps will be prepared by staff. IX. AD.~OURNMENT Damian ildiart made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the .Tanuary 2, 2007 Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on February 6, 2007. Planning Commission Chair PF~QYID~I~IC~ HEALTH SYSTEM ~ RAC OI~I A~a~1~TDA ~'1'1'1~To Ffl,1 i~`Do {17019 ..._,.~5 k-3~4 ~., ,~`I ~~ ~ ~i. ~~~~~~~ Febru~~t'y {, ~(~(~'~ C4t`~1t't1i11"1~1j tie:<<•I~,f~iiu~ui I i~~raori /\; t n~i (itf (iris"i slr;aic>i STAFF SQUI~CE: Connie Clone, Co unity Planner BACK CB~~IT'~ l). Providence Health System.-Oregon is proposing the construction of a medical office building on 2.63 acres (Tax Lots 401. ~ 500) to be located on the Westside Lumber site at 870 Front ~trect (Highway 99). The proposed facility will ~~"~, °°, consist ofa two-story, 32,000 square foot building. Parking and fi. a~ : "'°~'~~ >~ loading for162 parkitlg stalls and one loadz'ng berth comply with. ~ ` ~w . the code requiremc~lt of Section 17.64.040 H(2). Providence will also purchase Tax Lots 600 & 700 to the south of the proposed ~ '~ project site fo~~ ~i~ulu~~e expansion. °, ,~ The subject site has existing structures associated with the lumber business. These structures will be demolished as part of the site ~~ , preparations. With the exception of stor~rr. dra%nt~ge, all. other ~ utilities are available and adequate in size aEaii capacity to serve the `' project. The proposal will have one full-movement driveway ir~om <4 , m. Front Street (Hwy 99), thus eliminating one of the two current ' `M ~' ~ ` ,, .:* access points. ~, " , ~~ .,: ,, This project site is within the C-5 Thoroughfare Commercial and ~ `^ °~`. . ~, x tl~c Transit Qriented District (TCYl7) Corridor. Section 17,65.020(13) ofte CPMC states, "At the discretion of the applicant, a develoi~rnent appl ieatiotl within the TC?D corridor shall be subject to: 1. The normal base zone require.tt~er~ts ~xs identified on the official zoning map and contained in this code, or 2. The T(7D corridor i~<quir4~7~e:nts contained in this chapter,"' The Applicant has elected. to use the C-5 base zone requireme~ats for dais Site Plan review. 1 Page 1 of 4 The two-story building is thirty five {35) feet high in compliance with the C-5 height regulations, Section 17.46.040. Rooftop mechanical equipment is approximately 7.5 feet and will be screened by a louvered metal screen so that views of the equipment are obscured on all elevations. The rooftop mechanical equipment or screening is not required to be included in the calculation of building height by definition, Section 17.08. During preliminary discussion with Providence representatives, landscape and `hardscape' revisions were suggested along Front Street to visually draw the building closer to Front Street and to provide for pedestrian access in accordance with TOD Corridor standards. In addition, Front Street (Highway 99) is classified as a Major Arterial Street and as such the street tree provisions of CPMC Section 12.36.100 apply to this application. Five {5) additional street trees and suggested redesign features have been implemented as shown on the landscape plan, (refer to Applicant Exhibit Sheet L 1.1 }. The Site Plan application includes architectural elevations, parking anal landscape plans (Attachments B and C) and a traffic analysis for the proposed project. The Providence Health & Services Traffre Impact Analysis, November 30, 2DOb, found that all mobility standards are met or exceeded and no proposed mitigation measures are required for this development. The City Public Works Department reviewed this report and is in agreement with the conclusion. Internal circulation is provided by a two-way drive aisle that circumnavigates the building, providing continuous internal circulation. Providence will also provide two {2} cross-access easements to adjacent properties on the north (tax lot 400} and the Providence owned tax lots to the south of the project site. Providence has requested that the cross-access easements be granted with the understanding that they will be developed later and that Providence will be allowed to control its on-site parking. Each cross-access easement will ultimately eliminate three parking spaces per easement. The Site Plan shows 162 parking spaces and a minimum of 160 parking space is a requirement of Section 17.64.040 H(2). The additional four {4} spaces can be generated by the use of compact car parking spaces as described in Section 17.64.070. Parking spaces can also be added as a part of a future Providence expansion to the south (Tax 600}. On Thursday, December 7, 2006 Providence held a community meeting to introduce the project and to answer questions raised by residents and business owners in the vicinity. The project design and scope, hours of operation, landscape plan and access were the general topics discussed. The project has been well received by adjoining property owners. FINDINGS: Refer to Attachment "H". ISSUES: 1. Providence has agreed to provide two cross-access easements to enhance internal circulation and public safety. While they agree, they have also expressed concern that any future restaurant and pharmacy uses may infringe on the medical practice and patient parking. Staff s recommended conditions of approval allow Providence to draft easement language that will enable the applicant to manage this concern (see Condition of Approval No. 1 a & b). ti Page 2 of 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Applicant shall prepare and record two cross-access easements as follows: a. A reciprocal cross-access easement along the north property line (Tax Lat 400) which is not intended as shared parking. Said easement will become effective at such time as Tax Lot 400 reciprocates with across-access easement. The easement shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation with the Jackson County Clerk and building permit approval. At the discretion of the applicant, the cross-access easement may restrict access from restaurant and pharmacy uses on adjacent property. b. The second reciprocal cross-access easement for property to the south (Tax Lot 600}, also owned by Providence, is to become effective at such time Tax Lot 600 reciprocates with a cross-access easement. The easement shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation with the Jackson County Clerk and building permit approval. At the discretion of the applicant, the cross-access easement may restrict access from restaurant and pharmacy uses on adjacent property. 2. The Applicant shall submit a site plan diagram indicating the two future crass-access easements and a revised parking plan to illustrate all of the required parking spaces for the medical office building prior to building permit approval. 3. Consolidation of Tax Lots 401 and 500 will be done prior to approval of any building permits. 4. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Public Works Department (Attachment D}, Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment E}, Fire District 3 {Attachment F), and the Central Point Building Department {Attachment G). 5. The Applicant shall submit lighting and signage plans prior to building permit approval. Said plans shall be consistent with the provisions of CPMC Sections 15.24; 17.60.110 and 17.67.050(M). 6. Site Plan Approval shall lapse and become void one year following the date on which it becomes effective. ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS: Attachment "A"- Aerial and site photographs Attachment "B"- Providence Health System Project Narrative and Response Attachment "C"- Site Plan Map/Landscape Plan/Elevations Attachment "D"- Public Works Staff Report Revised Attachment "E"- RVSS Comments Attachment "F"- Fire District No. 3 Review Attachment "G"- Building Department Staff Report Attachment "H"- Findings Attachment "I"- Proposed Resolution Page 3 of 4 ACTION: Consideration to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Site Plan application for Providence Health System -0regon medical office building. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution ,conditionally approving the Site Plan for Providence Health System - Oregon medical office building. Page 4 of 4 ch ent " "« rial and site photo ra hs rovidence Health ytem- regon roposed eical rce uilin ite ~.., v ~~ .y ~ l il~~~d~ ' ., 1 1i r ~ S?i L i '3 t~ < ~' ' ~ ~ ~S ~ ~ .. ~ " 5~~ ~ ~ µ 3 ~ ~ ,. y , a. ~ ` ~CCf:S.S ~Cf'? ~~ ,!' 3~:z ~ ~: ' ~ t; ,;~'q~ 5, " ~ ~ yw. w " es ~~~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ro ~µ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ m ~- ~ , ~ ' _ ~ ., "~ ~ N'.' Y ' s a ,r: .F~~~~,-r.. ....,,~ i ~ ~ ~. ~ ~" ~ ~, ~°~ .., ! ~ . 444 f 44( ~ ~ 1 ~ , {,?' ~ "~ s ~_ ,. ,~'' ~h a, ,.; ,,6~ '~~ ~ . t ~ Sm V ~ dr"' A w. .,. , :, µ e I ` W l ,E ~,~~ ~ .. re J y ~. ~,,, ... ,F .~ ra '^ ' a" , Y m "~ ., ~,...~ ~ fi « .~ .... ~~ i •y~ j, . . , pg. „ , ~,~ , :i , ' ~ e~ k ~`~.~ k ',: a '~r 1 .; : a ~ (i l 1. ~1~!"'1~~~~1 ~~ E6~~ BEFORE THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION In tl~e Matter of tl~e Site Plan Kevie~v Application by Pi-avidet~ce Health System- Oregon for Approval 4f a Medical Oflice Btiildiug iii the C-S Zoning District APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO } APPLICABLE APPROVAL } CRITERIA I. DESCRIPTION OF SITE PLAN REVIEW PROPOSAL Providence I Tealth System - Orego~l ("Providence") is requesting; Site Plan Review appravak far a proposed 32,400 square foot, two (2) story medical office buikding ("MOB"} located at ~74/8~0 liront Street (Oregon High«ray 99) in Central Point, Oregon (the "site"}. (E~hibit 1, Aerial} "The MOB will provide for ge~~eral nledicinc, diagnostic imaging, MRI, rehabilitation services and a laboz•atory. It will employ a total of 12 doctors and 59 staff. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Description, Ownership az~d Current Use. The 2.63-acre site comprises t«-o (2) tax lots, 372W11 CB Ti,s 401 and 500. These Iots form a rectangular site that Iles in a northwest to southeast orientation alo~lg liront Street. (Ilahiliit 2, Survey) `I°he existing buildings on the site will be raced. 2. Vicinit~~ and Suz-rolznding Uses. As sl7o~vn in the Vicinity Map inset of lxhibit 1, the site is located on Front Street on the west side of the City. Surrounding uses include asingle-family subdivision to the northeast, a battery sales warehouse to the southeast, and a retail center and drive-through coffee stand to the naz-thwest. Front Street separates the site from uses to the west. A vacated public street with a 20-foot wide sanitary and storm sewer easez27ent separates the site fz•ozn the single family homes to the east. Zo_._._~~in~. 1"he site has two zoning districts, the Thoroughfare Commercial Zone {GS) and the Central Point "Transit Oriented District (TOD). Tl~e C-5 zone is the base zone far the area. lts purpose is "to provide for coznznercial and business uses that are most appropriately located along or near major highways or thoroughfares, and are largely dependent upon highway visibility and easy vehicular access." Tile TOD's purpose is "ta promote efficient and sustainable land development and the increased use of transit as required by the Oregon Tra~~spoz•tation Planni~~g Rule." A development application urithin the '~f OD corridor can choose either the base zone requirements or the TOD zoning requirements. Central Point Zoning Ordinance ("CPLO") ~s~~~-oozsn..~:c;ni>> ~~32z~2. ~ 17.65.020. Providence lxas elected to use the C-5 base razxe requirelxxents but whez-evez- feasible lxas designed the MOB to promote tlxe efficient azxd sustainable land develapzxxezxt practices advocated izx the TOD district. 4. TrazxSi~ort_ation Facilities. The site has frantage on and access to Oregon Highway 99, a four-lane major arterial under tlxe jurisdiction of Central Paint. Tlxe closest ]xxajoz• izxtcrscetions to tlxe site are Pine Street (~- lanes} and Beall Lazxe (two lanes}, both of which are nxinor arterials. 5. Utilities and Public Sezyices. `I~lxe site is fully served by public and private utilities including water, sewer, power, azxd zxatural gas, a.nd is within established fire alxd police service areas. III. PROPOSED USI; 1. Site Desi~zx. As shown azx tlxe site plan i~x Exhibit 3, Sheet AI.Q, the MOB has been located izx the cezxter of the site, izx cozxzpliance with the setback requirements of the C-5 cone. This location provides for an even distribution of parking around the site, thus mininxizing walkizxg .distances to the building, an important consideratiazx for medical facilities. Access to the site is frozxx Front Street at a single fall-zxxovezxxezxt access point located on the south end of the development. This access paint provides far one lane into the site and separate left azxd right turn exit lanes. Once on site, velxicular circulation is provided by atwo-way drive-aisle that circumnavigates the building, providing for continuous circulationx. Providence will also provide two (2} cz-oss access easements to adjacent properties to tlxe north azxd south of the site. Far the property to the north, tax lat 400, a cross access easement will be granted at the nortlxeast corner of the Providence site, subject to this property being approved for a use cazxsistcnt with the medical afficc use and parking requirements. `I~he secozxd cross access easement will be provided on the south side of tlxe site to tax lot 600 wlxich is also in Providence's awzxership. 2. F3uilding Design. The 32,000 square faot, twa-story building is 35' high in compliance witlx the C-5 maximum height. Roaftap zxxechazxical equipment, which is not subject to the 35' height lizx-zitation, is approxizxxately 7.5' higlx and will be screened by a louvered zxxetal screezx so that views of the equipzxxent are obscured on all elevations. (Exhibit 4, Sheet A1.1} As illustrated in the elevations depicted on Exhibit 5, Sheet A~1.1 and Exhibit 6, Sheet A4.~, the building is of a contemporary design that canxbines traditional azxd zxxodern materials. The exterior consists of bz-uslxed silver zxxetal panels and tan calared pre-cast concrete, complemented by the gecxerous use of traditional red brick. Brushed sil~rer n-zetal 4 3 R63 R-0025/L1C;A L 11932772. t -2- panels are alsa used far screening rooftop mechanical equipn~lent. Window design consists of an alurninuzn/glass storefront system with brushed silver frames and light-brown glazed glass. The two-story plain entrance uses ligl~tez• colored glazed glass which provides for greater visibility into the public entrance whez-c it is appropriate, unlike privacy concerns in other parts of the building. (Exhibit '~, Color copy of Materials Board) 3. 1'arkizz azld Loadin . Tlie site provides for 162 parking spaces, six (6) of which are accessible to those with disabilities. This amount of parking meets the ininin-zuzn requirement of 160 spaces for the 32,000 square foot MOB based ozl the parking miniznuzrz for medical offices of one space per two hundred square feet of floor area. One (1} loading berth is provided in the rear of the building ire compliance with the requirernezlt for ape berth for buildings of 30,000 to 100,000 square feet. The berth's dimensions are 17'-6" x 33'-0, exceeding the minimum size requirements. (F.xl><ibit 3, Sheet AI.O} 4, Pedestrian Facilities. `i'he building and its main entrance are oz-iented toward Front Street, where an ample pedestrians zone is provided between the sidewalk and the main entrance. This pedestrian zone includes a marked crosswalk constructed of textured cazxcrete within a larger area of stamped asphalt that helps to differentiate this area from general circulation and highlight the building entry. The sidewalk on Front Street adjacent to the internal crosswalk has been widened and the pcdestz-ian entry point into the site clezxzarcated by low concrete walls and plantez-s that provide an attractive pedestrian entrance. Once on site, an internal five-foot {5') walkway sLJrrounds the building, providing for continuaus pedestrian connectivity to and area€1d the huiIding. (Exhibit 3, Sheet A1.0) S. Landsca in and Fencin . The Iandscaping plan provides far 29,969 square feet of site area to be landscaped, for a total of 26% of the site. The C-5 zone does not require a minimum azrzount of landscaping. As shown in Exhibit 8, Sheet L1.1, landscaping is provided in three distinct areas: around the perimeter of the site, adjacent to the building and at key vehicular and pedestrian entry paints. The planting list can be found on Exhibit 9, Sheet L1.2 Perimeter landscaping along Front Street consists of ground cover and low, two-three foot tall shr•~Lbs. This creates open visual access to the site fron-z the street, while framing the site. Landscaping at tl~e rear, adjacent to the residential area, has been designed to be sensitive to the needs of the residences by creating an approximately X 8-foot deep strip, adjacent to the existing six-foot high concrete wa11. This strip makes use of an evergreen hedge, a mix of deciduous trees and base planting that includes fourLdatian plants ranging in height from ground cover to four-feet. Landscaping on the north and south property lines is designed to aid ire the screening of adjacent uses by adding new trees to the existing trees in conjunction with evergreen rnatez•ials to maintain year-round landscapir~Lg. AdditianaIly, the exterior of the trash enclosure will be landscaped to screen it fr-arn view frazn adjacent propez-ties. 38638-OD28!LLiGALI [932772.1 -~- Lal2dscapitlg adjacent to the bui]di1~g includes special treatment for the four cornets of the building with trees of large canopies that help balance and soften the: building on the site. Tile initial planting ~~~i]I feature large caliper trees for immediate impact, Ot13cr planting adjacent to the building includes some tall trees with ero~.vns interspersed with faundatian platltings that will maintain views from tllc windows. Additionally, specitncn plants will be distributed tliraughout the planting beds for seasonal interest. Entries into the site, both vehicular and pedestrian, will be givetl special landscaping treatment to frame these entries and provide for a welcoming presence. This treatment includes trees, raised planters and prominent plant materials that highlight these areas, whip maitltait~ing site lines. 6. Lighting? and Signage. Lighting consists of cut-off site light fixtures at I $'-0" above finished gz•ade. Detailed Iighting plans will be submitted at the tune of development permits and will comply with all applicable lighting standards. No signage has been developed far the site yet; a signage plan will also be submitted at a later date in compliance with all applicable signage standards. 7. Transportation Impacts. A Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted by JRH Transportation Engineering in accordance with the City`s study requirements. The study is included as Appendix A and is incorporated by referetlce in its entirety. TI~e report analyzed year 2008 background traffic with the 32,000 square foot n~edicaI office building in place. Trip generation was calculated according to the ITE Trip Generation Manual 7Eh Edition land use code 720 -Medical-I~enta] Office Building. These trips were distributed and assigned to the surrounding traffic network during the Peak PM hour, which was determined to be 4: l 5 I'M to 5 : I S PM. The study demonstrates that for the year 2008, with the development in place, all movements from the proposed project and the unsignalized intersection at I-Iigh«~ay 99 and Cupp Drive will perforn-z above the City's minimum n~zobility standards. Thez•efore, no mitigation is required or proposed for this development. 38638-0028/LT:Gni.l 1932772. t _4.. IV. RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE APPROVAL. CRITERIA 1. The followizzg; approval criteria of Title 17, "Lo~zing" (the °'CPZO"}, of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to tlzis Site Plan Review application: • Chapter 17.GS TOD Districts acid Corz•idors; Section 17.b5.020, Area of Application • Chapter 17.4G C-5, Thoroughfare Comznercial District • Chapter 17.72 Site Plan, Landscaping; and Coz~stz-uction Plan Approval • Chapter 17.64 Off-Street Parking az~d Loading; . 2. CPZO CI-IAPTER 17.65, TOD DISTRICTS AND CORRIDORS 17.65.020, Area of applicatio>I>t. These regulations apply to the Central Point TOD district and corridor. The boundaries of these two areas are shown on the affzcial city comprehensive plan and coning zxzaps. A.. A developznent application within the TOD district shall comply with the requirements of this chapter. B. At the discretion of the applicant, a develop~nezzt application within the TUD cozridor shall be subject to: 1. The noz-znal base zone requirements as identified on the official zoning zrzap and contained in this code; oz• 2. The TOD corridor requirements contained izz this chapter. RESPONSE': Providence has elected to use the Thoroughfare Con~nzercial District, base zone reyuireznezats for this Site Plan Re~Tiew application. The TOD requirements do not apply. 3. CPZO Cl(IAPTER 17.46, C-5, TI~iOROUGHFARI<, COMi1~IEI~CIAL DISTRICT A. 17.46.020, Permitted uses. The following uses are pcrznitted izt the C-5 district: "A. Professional and financial, including;: 1. Banks and similar financial institutions, 2. Real estate., insurance, and similar offzces, 3. Contractor's offzce, 4. Medical services, clinics and laboratories." ~~ 38fi38-Of}28/LF,CrAi,l 1932772.1 -5- RESPONSE: The pre}posed medical office brailciing is a permitted use in tl~e C-5 district. L3. 17.46.U4U, lIei;ht regulaticrt~s. "No building oz- sh-rrcture shall exceed thirty-five (3S) feet in height i~1 the C-5 district." RESPONSE: The height of the building to the top of the parapet is 3S' feet iii compliance with this standard. Roofrtop utilities, which are slat subject to the height measurement, are 7.S' tall and will be screez~ecl. C. 17.4G.USU, Area, tiviclth az~d yard requireiaieaits. a.: "Lot Area. No requirements except as necessary to comply with applicable yard and parking and loadi~lg requirements." RESPONSE: Tl~e site size is 2.63 acres which accommodates the building and all yard, parking ar~rd laaclizlg requirerrzents as demonstrated in the responses to the further rcquirezxzez~ts of this section ar~rd Chapter 17.64 Off-Street Parking and Loading. b. "Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be fifty feet." RESPONSE: The site, comprised of tax lots 401 and 500, is approximately 400' wide. This standard is met. c. "Lot Depth. The mi~aimum lot depth shall be one hundz-ed feet." RESPONSE: The site is approximately 300' deep. 't'his standard is met. d. ">?rant Yard. `1"he (rant yard shall be a minimum often feet and shall be maintained as landscaped open space. When ofd street parking is located in the front yard area, the landscaped strip maybe reduced to not less than six feet with planning coznznission approval of the site plan." RESPONSE: The front yard setback is approximately 80' deep. The proposed site pla3~ provides fora 5'-6" landscape strip fc~r a portion of this front yard setback, slightly less than the six (C~) foot depth. The landscape plan provides far four (4) additional areas of landscapir-rg alo~~g this front yard setback irk depths of aver 20 feet, well in excess of the six-foot (6') zni~liznurn depth. The la~adscaping requirement within the fi•ant yard setback is rnet. e. "Side Yard. The side yard shall be a minimum of five feet, except when abutting structures are proposed for a common wall that complies with the Uniform Building Code." 38f38-0028/L~CsALI [932772.1 -~, RESPONSE: The setback on bath side yards is approximately 1(}S' deep. This standard is nzet. f. "Rear Yazd. No rear yard shall be required in the GS district except whets the zeaz- lot line abuts pzoperty in a residential (R} district acid then the rear yaz-d shall be a zrziniznuzzz of twenty feet. Where property in the C-5 distzict is separated from property in a residential {R} distzict by a public alley or stz-eet, no rear yard setback shall be z-equiz-ed." RESPDNSE: The rear setback is approximately 117' deep, its excess of the zzlinimum 20' setback froze adjacent residential pzoperty. This standard is met. g. "I1ot Coverage. No requirements except as necessary to caztlply with applicable yard, paz-king and loading requirements." RESPONSE: The proposal complies with all applicable yard, parking and loadilzg requirements as documented in these fzndings. This standard is mot. D. ]'~.4G.05U, General requr~•ements. a. "Uses tkzat are normally pet•z~~itted in the GS distzict but that are referred to the planning commission far further review, per Section 17:46.030(26}, will be processed according to application procedures for conditional use permits. No use shall be permitted and zoo process, equipt~zerzt ar zuatezials shall be used which are found by the planning coznznission to be lzaz-]nful to persons living or working in the vicinity by reason of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water--carried waste, noise, vibration, illulr~ination ar glare, or are found to involve any hazard of fire or explasiozz." RESPONSE: The application wiI1 be heard by the Planning Coznzxzission as a Site Plan Review, not as a Conditional Use. No harmful odors, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water-carried waste, noise, vibration, illumination ar glare will result fiozn this use. Garbage will be contained within abrick-faced enclosure. Delivez-ies will be accommodated in the designated loading space adjacent to the builditlg, set back over GS' froze tlae adjacent zesidential area. Normal delivery and garbage pick-up schedules will be observed. Lighting will be designed so that there is no spill-over onto adjacent uses. There are no known hazards of fire or explosion. This standard is znet. b. "No use shall be permitted and na process, equipment or materials shall be used unless izz compliance with all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety roguIatiozzs." RESPONSE: This proposal cans or will comply with all applicable state and federal envirol~lxzental, health and safety regulations. This standard is net. c. "Wherever the side or reaz- pz-opezty lines of a parcel in the C-S district abut parcels irz a zesidential {R} district, a solid v~rall or fence, vine-covered 38638-fl028?I.EfiALI P932772.1 -~- open fence or compact evergreen hedge six feet in height shall be located on that property line azaci co~ztinuously ~zzaintained to ensure effective buffc~-ing and visual screezzi~zg between tl~c two land uses. Where a public alley or street separates tlae two pz-opcrties, the barrier or screen shall be placed on the C-5 property at the time of construction anti ~~~ay include driveway and pedestrian ol~ezzings to the alley or street, as approved by the plan~ling commission." RESP011TSE: An existing six-foot {G') high CMU fence along the rear property line adjacent to the residential area will be retained. Additionally, a 19'-G" wide landscape strip with trees will be lalanted next to the wall, providizrg more buffering and visual screening. This standard is met. d. "Whenever feasible, buildings shall be located toward the rear of the lot with parking toward the street in tl~e front yard area for easy access and to mirzin~iize traffic zioise at the'rear of the property, especially when the rear property line abuts a z•csidential (R} district." RESPONSE: The building is set back 11 G'-7" fi•ozn the adjacent residential area, greatly exceeding the 20' ixziniznua~~z rear setback. Parking and circulation are distributed around the building, thus dispersing traffic noise around the site and reducizig impacts on the residential area. This standard is met. E. 17.46.070, Signs and lighting of premises. a. "No illumination sign or lighting standard for the illumination of premises shall be so designed and installed that its direct rays are toward or parallel to a public street ar highway or diz-ected toward any property that lies within a residential (R} district." RESPONSE: Alighting plan will be submitted at the tin~ie of building permit review and will meet this requirement. On-site lighting will consist of cut-off site light fixtures located at T S'-0" above finished grade which will avoid spill-over onto adjacent propez-ties and public rights-of way. b. "No red, green or amber lights oz• illuminated signs may be placed in such a location or position that they could be confused with, or may interfere with, any official traffic control device, traffic signal or directio~aal guide signs. ~~ RESPONSE: No green or amber lights or illuminated signs will be placed in locations that result in confusion with oz• interference with office traffic control signals. c. "Signs in the C-5 district shall be l~ez-ixzitted and designed in accordance with Chapter 15.24 and with Section 17.G0.110." RESPONSE: A signage plan will be submitted at a later date in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 15.24 and Section 17.G0.110. 38638-0~2RILEiCrAT,[ 1932772.1 -~'- F. 17.46.080, Off-street parki><>~g. "Off-street parking and loading space shall be provided as required in Chapter 17.64.,' RESPONSE: Off street parking and loading has been provided in accordance with the criteria of Chapter 17.G4 as provided in the responses to that Chapter clemonstratecl in the findings for that Chapter. This standard is znet. 4. CP70 CHAPTER 17.72, SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPING AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL A. 17.72.010, Purpose. The purpose of site plan, landscaping and constrzzction plan approval into review the site and landscaping plans of the proposed use, structure or building to determine compliance with this title and the building code, and to prazr~ote the orderly and haz-Inonious developzl~ent of the city, the stability of land values az•Id investments, and the general welfare, and to promote aesthetic considerations, and to help l3revent impairment ar depreciation of land ~ralues and development by the erection of stzuctures or additions to alterations thereto without proper attention to site planning, landscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in relation to the development of neighboring properties. RESPONSE: This application provides the necessazy information by which the City can make a determination that proper attention has been paid to site planning, landscaping azld the aesthetics of the project in compliance with the applicable standaz-ds. naade: B. 17.72.020, Site plalli approval required. A site plan application conforzrziz~g to the requirements of Section 17.72.030 shall be 1. For all construction requiring issuance of a bz.Iilding pez-rnit; or 2. Upon a change of use. RESPONSE: The medical office building is a change of use for which a building permit will be required. C. 17.72.021, Application and revier~~. Applications shall be accompanied by a fee defined in the city's adopted planning application Fee schedule. Such applications az~d tl~e review thereof shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.05 and all applicable laws of the state. RESPONSE: The fee for Site flan Review before the Planning Coznlnissian has been submitted with this application. ~. 38633-002R/I_EGAI~1 1932772.1 -9- D. 17.7.030, IrifQt•inatioii r•egt~ired. "A~1 application shall be filed which shall include die following information: A- Name and address of the applicant; B. Statement that the applicant is the or~vner of the property or is the authorized agent of tl~e owner; C. Address and legal description of the assessor's parcel ~lutnber of the property; D. The application shall include an accurate scale drawing of the site, containing, at a mini~nu~n, the following: I . Not•th arrow, . 2. Scale used, 3. Address and legal description of the assessor's parcel number and tax lot of the property, 4. Lot dimensions, S. Applicable city zoni~ig dESignation, 6. Setbacks, 7. Proposed landscaping, 8. Location of all buildings, parking areas, streets, accesses, sidewalks, and other improvements, including the~~dimensions of each, 9. Ground and architectural elevations, 10. Distances betwee~~ buildings, parking areas, streets, sidewalks and other improvements, l 1. Srurout~ding land uses, I2. Easements, 13- Adjacent streets, l4. Off street parking calculations, ~ 5. Existing trues, I6. Pedestrian routes and sidewalks, 17. Fenci~~g, 18. Screening of outdoor trash bins, and 19. The location of all public improvements a~ld alI utilities, including theiz- relation to other utilities in file area; E. Construction plans and such other plans and informatio~l as are required to show the architecture of all buildings and other in~prove~nents; F. l~~ the discretion of the city, a traffic study performed by a licensed pz-ofcssional engineer; and G. Such additional i~~formation as is necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter." 38(38-0028/I_EGAI,I ] 932772.1 -I ~- RESPONSE: All z•equired information foz~ this applic<ztion as listcci above izas been provided. This includes ail application form, legal description, Ietter of authorizatioa~, mailing labels to all propez-ties within 100' of the site, a narrative demonstrating compliance with applicable standards, site plan, elevations, landscape plan, materials board az~d traffic impact study. E. 17.72.040, Standards. In approving, conditionally approving, or denying the plans submitted, tl~e city shall base their decision on the following standards: a. "Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a zrzat~ner as to use the sazxze to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existi~lg ~leighboz•hood uses. The planning comn~zission nay require the zxzaintaining of existing trees for screening puzpases and for sound a~zd sight insulatiozz froze existing neighborhood use;" RESPONSE: Landscaping, fencing and screening have been designed to screen the building frozxz the adjacent residential area. An existing six-foot (6'} high CMU fence along the rear property line adjacent to the residential area will be retained. Additionally, a 19'-6" wide landscape strip witla.trees will be plazated next ta. the wall, providing more buffering and visual screening. Rooftop zxzechanical ecluipn~eazt will be screened froze view by surrounding uses. This sta~~dard is zxzet. b. "Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the tz-affic flow on public stz-eets;" RESPONSE: '~I~wo existing access points will be consolidated into one full- nloveznent access located at the southern end of the site, thereby izxzproving upon traffic flaw ozzto Front Street. This standard is znet. Additionally, the city has requested that Providence consider providing access easements frozezts parking lot to the adjacent lot to the north in the event of rcdeveloprr€ent. Providence will a~~z•ee to provide one cross_access easement providing the Planning Commission includes two conditions of approval: That the easement shall become effective with the ~~rant of a reciprocal cross- access casement by the adjacent property, and That Providence shall have the right nczt to provide the reciprocal cross-access casez~~ent in the event it disapproves of tl~e use oz- the amount of parking pz-ovidcd for the pz•oposed use. Providence agrees with the city that in some instances, cross-access easements would be helpful to further the flow of traffic off the highway. However, Providence has long experience operating medical office~b+>ldings. Because of the high dezxzand for 38638 (1028/[.,EC3A[.I 1932772.1 -11- parking, competing parking uses leave an adverse; impact oz~ Providence facilities. In the event the site to the laortli is rcdevelopeci and aparking-intensive use is proposed, Providence ~~~ishes to reserve the right to prohibit across-access easement in order to pz•evezit that use's parking from barking on 1'~-ovidczace property. c. "To provide off street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flaw facilities in such a ~2~anner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to izxzprove anal avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets." RESPONSE: Adequate parking and loading facilities have been provided and distributed on site in a manner that promotes internal circulation via the two-way aisle that circumnavigates the building. This allows for all internal circulation to be accommodated on-site without need of reentering 1"ront Avenue. Pedestrian flow is achieved by the generous pedestrian connectiaz~ froze Front Street to the building's main ezttxance, to where this connection meets alive-foot {5') internal walkway around tl~e building. This standard is znet. d. "Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from tz•affic control sigxzs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs;" RESPONSE: Signage will be designed so that it does not conflict with traffic control signage or interfere or detract frozxz nearby signage. e. "Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, lizxzb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fzre lazaes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus;" RESPONSE: Access and on-site circulation have been designed with adequate widths and accessibility so that f re apparatus cart reach the building. This standard is n~zet. f: "Coz~apliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section 16.20.080 pertaining to the zxzaxiznum number ofsingle-family dwellings or dwelling units allovrable on cue-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws;" RESPONSE: No dwelling units arc proposed. Does not apply. g. "Coznplialice with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and its environs. The architecture and design charactez-istics of adjacent properties oz' uses. In addition, the planning commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, or other development r~ 38638-0028/LE;C}/~ L l 1932772.1 -12- requiz-ezxzc~lts that may be necessary to ensure land use compatihility a~Id ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point resit{cots." RESPONSE: As den~onstz•ated iz~ the site plan, elevations, la~~dscape plan, and znatcrials board, the proposed medical building is aesthetically i~lcasing anti can he found to be acceptable in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and 1tS enVll'Ons. 5. CPZO Chapter i'7.64, OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING A.. 17.64A10, Purpose. "The following regulations are. established to provide for the off street parking of automobiles, tz-ucks and other vehicles in connection with the uses of land pcz-zrzitted by this zoning ordinance. Various land uses generate vehicular traffic according to their specific characteristics azld require differing a3nounts of off street parking and loading area. These requirements will help to relieve on-street parking dez~aand and traffic congestion by ensuring adequate off street parking and loading facilities where they are needed n~zost." RESPONSE: Parking and loading have been designed in compliance with the purpose of this Chapter. 13. I7:64.020, Off-street loading. a. "ln all districts, except those specif tally excepted and noted, for each use for whack a building is to be erected or structurally altered to the extent of increasing the floor area to equal the n~inazx~uzxz floor area required to provide loading space and which will require the receipt or distribution of materials or merchandise by tz-uck or similar vehicle, there shall be providcdnff-street loading space on the basis of zxzinimuzrz requirements, as folIows:" 2. "Office huildangs, hotels, motels, hospitals, schools, institutions, public buildings, recreational or entertainment facilities, and any similar use which has a gross floor area of thiz-ty thousand square feet or more shall provide off street truck loading oj- unloading berths in accordance with the following table:" Square Foot of Floar Area No. of Berths Required Less than 5,000 0 3a,0aa to IOO,Oaa laa,ool and over .RESPONSE: The 32,000 square foot building requires one (1}loading berth which is provided to the rear of the building. This standard is net. ,~. 3 863 4-(3028; LEGAL l 1932772. i -13 - b. "A loading berth shall not be less than ten feet wide, thirty-five feet lozrg and have a height clearance of t~~relve feet. ~~here the vehicles generally used for loading and unloading exceed these dimezasians, the required length of these berths shall be increased." RESPONSE: Tl~e landing berth is 17'-6" x 35' -0". This standard is met. c. "If landing space has been provided izi connection with azz existi~ig use or is added to an existing use, the loading space shall not be eliminated if elimination would result in less than is requirc;cl to adequately meet the needs of the use." RESPDNSE: The loading space is provided in connection with a new use. Does not apply. d. "Off street parkizzg areas used to fulfill the requirenents of this title shall not be counted as required loading spaces and shall not be used for loading and unloading operations, except during periods of the day whezz not required to meet parking needs." RESPONSE: The one (1}loading berth does zlot rely upon off street paz-king and is dedicated to loading only. This standard is n1et. e. "In no ease shall any portion of a street or alley be counted as a part of tl~ze required parking ar loading space, and such spaces shall be designed and located as to avoid undue interference with the public use of streets or alIeys." RESPONSE: No portion of any street or alley is counted towards the parking or loading requireznc~~ts. This standard is znet. C. 17.64.030, Off street parking-Required. "Yn all districts, except those specifzcally excepted and noted, in connection with any use whatsoever, there shall be provided at the tune any building or structure is erected or is enlarged or increased in capacity or the use is changed or increased in intensity, off-street parking spaces for auton~zobiles for the enlarged or increased poz-tion in the case of an addition or for the building, structure or use in other cases, in accordance with the requirements herein." RESPONSE: Off stz-eet parking is provided in accardaz~ce with the proposed chazlgc iz1 use. This standard is z~-zet. D. 17.64.040, Off street parlcicig---Numt~er of spaces. "L1SE STANDARD Office-Professional ~.. 38638.0023/LEGAL.1 1932772.1 -14- 2. Medical and de~~tal offices; Nat less than three spaces per practitioner; plus clinics. ane space per each two employees, ar, ane space per each two hundred square feet of floor area, whichever is g~z•eater." RESPONSE: The 32,000 square foot building requires a minimum of 160 parking spaces. The site plan provides for 1 G2 parking spaces. This standard is net. E. 17.64.100, Pat-king design requit-ements. a. "Size of Parking Spaces. The standard size for automobile parking spaces sha11 be nine feet in width by twenty feet in length. A compact car parking space shall be eight feet in width by flftecn feet in length, as provided in Section 17.64.074." . RESPONSE: All parking spaces arc of the standard size, nine feet by twenty feet. This sta»darcl is znct. b. "Parking Lot Aisles. Tlae width of parking lot aisles shall be as illustrated in the diagrams entitled "Parking Standards," contained in Ordinance 1512, az~d adapted by reference." RESPONSE: The parking lot aisles are consistent with City's parking standard diag7•aztZS. This standard is met. c. "Access. There shall be adequate provision for ingress and egress to all parking spaces." RESPONSE: All parking spaces have direct access to two-way internal circulation aisles. This standard is met. d. "Driveways. Driveway width shall be measured at the driveway's narrowest point, including the curb cut. The design and constt~uctioz~ of driveways shall be as set forth in tlae Standard Specifications and Unifarna Standard Details for Public Works Construction Manual." RESPONSE: The proposed driveway width of 36'-0" provides foz- three {3) 12-foot drive aisles in accordance 4vith the referenced standard. This standard is met. e. "lmpraven~ezat of Parking Spaces. 1. All areas utilized far ofd street parking, access anti maneuvering of vehicles shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and shall be adequately drained, including prevention of the flog of runoff water across sidewalks or other pedestrian areas." 3RG3R-0028/L);C;Af~] 1932772.; -15- RESPONSE: The access, parking and ciz'c€tlation aisles will be; paved with a hard, durable surface and will be engineered with adequate drai~~age facilities to pz-eve~it the flow of runoff tivater acz-oss sidewalks and other pedestrian areas, This standard is net. 2. "Requiz-ecl parking areas shall be designed with fainted striping or other approved method of delineating the individual spaces, with the exception of lots containing single- ar two-family dwellings." RESPONSE: Parking sfaces will be delineated by striped painting. This standard is znet. 3. "Parking spaces for uses other than one- and two-family dwellings shall be designed so that no backing movements or other znaiieuvering within a street or othez• public right-of--way shall be necessary." RESPONSE: All parking spaces back into the izatez-nal drive aisles, not onto a street or other public right-of way. This standard is met. 4. "Any lighting used to illuminate ofl=street paz-king or loading areas shall be so arranged as to reflect the light away frazn adjacent streets or properties." RESPONSE: Alighting plan will be subzrzitted at the time of building Permit review and will meet this requirement. On-site lighting will consist of cut-off site light fixtures located at 1$'-d" above finished grade which will avoid spill-over onto adjacent properties and public rights-of--way. 5. "Service drives shall have a minizrzuzrz vision clearance area farmed by the intersection of the driveway centerline, the street right-off way line, and a straight line joining the lines through points twenty feet from their intersection." RESPONSE: The driveway centerline of the access drive at its intersection with Front Street provides for minimum vision clearance. Landscaping on either side of the driveway will consist oflow-growing vegetation that will not interfere with minimum vision clearance. This standard is met. 6. "Parking spaces located along the other boundaries of a parking lot shall be contained by a curb or a bun-zper rail so placed to prevent a motor vehicle from extending over an adjacent property li~~e, a public street, public side~~ralk, or a requiz-ed landscaping area." RESPONSE: Curbs or bumper rails will be provided next to parking spaces located adjacent to other properties. This standard is zz-zet. 7. "Parking, loading, oz- vehicle maneuvering areas shall not be located within the front yard or side yard area of a corner lot abutting a street .~ 3 AC,38-0028![,L:GAI.I 19327721 - ~ ~?- in any residential (R} district, ]xor withicx any portiozx of a street setback area that is required to be landscaped in any coznznercial {C} or industrial (M) district" RESPONSE: The front yard setback fi•ozn Frolxt Stz-eet is 10' per C-5 z•equireznezxts 17.d6.O50.D. Tlxis setback is to be maintained as lazxdscapcd open space, but znay be reduced to a depth of six. (G} feet whczx off street parking is located in this front yard area. The proposed site plan provides fora 5'-C" landscape ship far a portiolx of this front yard. setback, slightly less tlxazx the six {6) foot depth. However, the landscape plaza provides for four (4} additional areas of landscaping along this fz-ozxt yard setback in depths of over 20 feet, well in excess of the six-foot (6') nxiniznuzn depth. Therefore, on the whole, the landscaping rcquireznent withiz-1 the frozxt yard setback is met T'. "Limitation ozx Use of Parking Az-eas. Required parking areas slxall be used exclusively for vehicle parkizxg izx colxjuncticin witlx a perznittcd use and shall not be z-educed or ezxeroached upon in any manner. The parkizxg facilities shall be so designed and maintained as not to cozxstitute a nuisance at any tune, and slxall be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons or property, or uzxreasonable impediment to haffic, will result." RESPONSE: The parking area will be used exclusively far the medical office building and has been designed to provide for adequate parkizxg spaces and circulatiozx that will not result izx a hazard to persons or property, or uzn•casorzable izxzpedzzxxezxts to traffic. This standard is znet. V. C~NCLUSIQN For the reasons contained in this application, the applicazxt respectfully requests that the city approve this applicationx. 38G3R-(1028/LiiGALI J 932772.1 -1 ~]- EXHIB>~TS Exhibit l: Aerial Exhibit 2: Survey Exhibit 3: Sheet X11.0 Exhiblt ~I: Sl1ce1 /11 . ~ Exhibit ~: Sllcet A~.l Exhibit 6: Sheet A~.2 Exhibit 7: Galaz• copy of Materials Board Exhibit 8: Sheet L1.1 Fahibit 9: Sheet L1.2 38G38-4428/t.CGP.L11932772.1 ' ~ ~- '~ ~u t _.... 1 1~ i t i ~ ~ ~ ~ ij 1 ~ ~~~~1P~ •:~~~~~ilb~Ea~.~lt°~f1! i ~ u i ' d 3 ~ ~,Zlt 1: x.h ,.~ ~ a~ ~ r`t~i ~\ k v it c ~~ I ~ S f~~ 1 ~ 1~7rQflt~RAI ,O„TECHh7t7I (7 .~Y - ~ r ~~" I~ tt ~, ~ ~` out. ~ ~ -: r P !~j ~t- ! a - e ~~Pi ~ ~x ~,~ a L?. k ~'j'' a 3 '~ y ;~ ~_ I ' ,~ r-- ~~'' ~' ~x r t a r ~-- 9 ~' ~" Mal Maker ~ ~~u ti ,~i' ~~~y ~ ~ ~' ~ t a~a> r~' ~r'~.~ ~ ~ I ~~ " ~ ~ `(Vt~ `~~ ~ f ~~ ~ar ~ ~~~~~ i' ~~'-~M~ICc".^ ~IC11'1 "4 ~ ~4>3ki ,rSr~~ } ~~``s (F~ rk uu~.~~„~, a "~'ws'"_~ _ 7 ~ ~.{-L_~~ k 's ~,~y3 ~ i FrankCquntrrr L® nd _ r~s~~ >~ ~L a r. 7 ~ o ,~ ~! r ~ t .fit : t IlyF ^,~ ~ ~C! ~(- f~-~-°-,-~'-~--,. -.{~- i i ~ ~ fiax Lot Outltnds ~ ~ ~\ ~ J }^ { _~' ~ q ,r .,~..~ k1 r~ ~ ~I ~ f ~~ 1 ~I ~~ LS ~ 3l, 1 J i t ~ a~ '~y r ~~~~,~ s.' ~ y r i )~ti.=~ i ,jam t~wl~' ~p ~ Tax Lot NumtrGrs y ~ l7 ~ -.-'L•"~'-ai ~4tY .}' !.~ ~". ~ • ! ~~' z. ~, ,,, .. r vil~yla. .~>r,~f,.~.a....-_l ~~.......,i`~_ ~ _~~ u ~"_ i ~-- .,-ti ~c ~ ~,rt-~~,~E ,,,,~ - CovntywdGO Cofor• ~ ~ L ~ ~~'~`,~... - }( 7~j ~y Ott ~~ {_ (( Aoriat Pfwtos 2005 _ 4i! ~f! ~ ~ ~£ ~~~ ;. ~ Jlnti:fj ~ 1Fti ~ r k ~ ,'i. i:_. k L S ~~,ry'~ i ~ 11 ~ ; ~l ~ t ti J ~ ~~ ~ x ~ tr ? ~~,~ j ~~~J ~~~.~`~~ ~ ~ a ,F~ } ~~ ! RoNuo Walley 3owar ~'v'~J i ~ v•"F~i ~,` -'--t 3;" S~ -.^.....-.s'it'~~~v ,S'.~'.. 3....7 r'"r 89rY7c8 StlWtlP'Lltttis ~rs~,y t `~s2 i3'~'--_1nL'`~ ~u~.~-~, ~~A~~~,~~~~~i4,s.ti~"""177 ~ '~°i]'~ ~ r r ~3a ~,. ,_ ~ ., ~ r ~ 7>~ .r~' ~~'LA~'~n~ ~;. lttil'rut k'h tz,~'~r~ ~r - 1 )~ }.!'`11 4'1. 1 -lam J ~1/'.-~! ~ •.~15\yJ~ ~,5 ~~ _ ii f ~ ~ ~ +.: ~ ,, -- 'a 1 +`L~~,~{" }"yy'~ .~~~ tt ~ ~~ .i t1'~1' ~Cza:~"e~ ~ ` iii ~ ti>~~1. i y ~..~~- Y"~ - + ~.. - y'4~17'I_ 1. J '_' _,.,..~ ~ Z~Z ~J Ct +C 1 J' ~~yf'`~ t- ~ J~ ~ ~ ~. _. ~, J ~} ~~44 {~r ~ ~ :- Sh ~ ~ ~ i ! 3"L~}J~ ~ rf'4 Iltl3{'.}~ ~ ALL ~-. „~~-~~~ ~ f awl=>r ~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ a. -, ,•,~. n t rat rw- , ~~ ~ 1 °°ry v.~vv !' 3 ''~}''nuull ~ T ~ G~ ~m.~~~' ~ Iff'~~'A Vii. c1 +i r '`~ w~"i~ ~ la~.~ ~} J ~~^~ y ; ' .f -:a T's ~ `~ r ~ - ; y O ~ ~ ~. ~ti -. t t tr `~~;••~~r (r i ,~1'v~~~ 1 -sue; ._.__.~ •'4 j , t`~Y'4~ t9~h, N' .~~ 1! ~`]~4`Y 1{, ..rv ~+~~t Fp ~L 1~ { l ~' ~ '~ '~` err 1 § 1 ~ ~ t h ~~:;? -.~ '+T9'{i I~r~. ?7~' -_;:~ ~°e-~,~; >Fa`+~a~~j~~ r~,~ ~' ~ Jt'S`e~r4.. s~ .,r ~ ~r~rJ s 1 ~ i~ ~! r: ':1 `y r~ 'r,:L~~~ 1 t ~~` :~'"') f.`~'~ j --7 ,, ~ _- _~~ ~~~t `~ `s ~~r,}7:°~~ " ~ I -r, ~ ~~~~t3 }, ~ - ~ 1 _ 1 ~3~~," C~~3~ uY ,f I ~: 1`'~,~~~R t'r'y ~ , l r ~r ~l'¢-~ ~ R, ~ t ,r= 1~r~$r ` ~` '!!~/!~ ~. ~r ~'j ?p ~ I1 ~7~. 1~ L,..6i }'t "".4~~~{1---j~ ~ 4t - A ~ 1 v'1°~'Sz:4 ~3c-r'~.-, !~ {,.~~w.'s~ I(, i3 ~ ~~ r'°°'` F ~ ~ 7 •~'~ ~~rr~~,;~~ ~ ]I , l ~ 4 ~ L:; 'i y~ LF 1 ~s. ~i S~ L~3 i t` r, .t .rte ~r .t;, ~~ 4~ ~ ~~'.,4. ~-v r ~~k^1 ~ - _~_~ G ~` ?~~ ~~-~~ ~- ~4} _ bra r ~u~ ~ ~,' ~ ~ t 5 a y"t-~~p _,~'JL' ~ ~~ ~, ~, ~ L~~ " i `f~ ~,ti, lp~r--~~~} ~n~_ ~.; +P' ~, >r ' ~ r~7 ~--~f I: ?~1~~ r '~ Ill~~]~I Ali--~~-..+ ,` b' t • ' •~ I~ ~' IZ+J ~ }~: .~ l ~ I ~r~_ t--r, '~ ~,i t `'r-Fw-•--I r uv ~~ Jt~>7~1 }Ll~i ~'~ ~' f• 111 '~-1J.S`+~~ r: _ •r11'r~J '~`~ ~ ~I~ S~~- ~?'~7`2~r t r ~~-~ .~~~ ir--"`~" ~ rJ~ vil .Y~"~rJ -=-~Y. ~ Y'--,i~ ~...~u' III 1 i 1 - ~~}~ ~` ~ _ -~- -~ ~~. , t ~ ,, ~, ~.. ~ ~l_f.~'1 ~tlt-4 yyl~ if _;!~ ~?jl: i.' t' -1~ I t'.~~~r' - i ~~,ii } -., -- ~ -- ~ `i 1 + .1 J ~. ~, t . ~ h 1 ~ L ,,w ~ - ,,,,, '- r: .: , ._.,.~ ^"~~..~, r~ ~ 'ti~:~„ q ~>a, a ., ~--~- ~~ _ :~ ,_ ~ r hl y . ax 7 ~ ~ , ., a ~~ ~ ^ ~ M ~ ~' p ;3,_~ , i 1® „ n rv iF"Lf and ~` ~. ~ w ~ ~,'ab'U li „',; tiY .,r Y, ~~^ I ~ tl„ a "~, l~~.,~ # . :~ i'i,a:e,o r•~,:~,,;p.> ;.'. I'. ::lor.;a ~,!!;,.a rareart;,,~ g~MF,,~r ~~r•~~~yTg7 rg~ y4 Crtraled ~.vith hfapMakar Mnp created cn i Eh111BT! 1 ~ ~~ a ~ ~ V V V A 9 1 1 oa~e~;orf nsrp;s Baca:) on a d;grtal data4ass: iIa?d P;y Jackson County rrcm a ti~anety arctrs ,lachsen County cannot accep! ns~b;7y for nrrorc, cm;ssicrrx or anal aa;ura,y, Tt;era are no reties. exirre;serf ar;mplietl, i6:2./lki vseny v~ab.)acksanrarnty orq G d0 '9x Loans m9a,wulmrns I ~ooo-ooaonoad I a]9xnx 13nroaa .OY-.1 YnO9 1d0 +Paa0w10 S~v1 -, W4 Nalsan srot'iP eas :alr9 :S.VOle3lµll 0 gma ~~~ o c `o ~ ?n ~~ ~ D < ~~f mm 7~v~~ ~ ~n W $ c ~] m ~ rJ w p N ~~o zWp Ly O~~ <rym~ ~mn ~ D ~F~ o -ri y~a N2c ]+ ~ !~ ymA 0 ado a ~ ooi z r Ono {7 ~ px' S ~~y fil ~ 4 D ~ ~~D ~ r a S IT7 pxp ~ {n i o ~ -~r~t N x~[? ~ 40~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~o_ oyr 0 ~o= p >' S gn°~ ~pN z~ OY t9/ae/r r+wn nO53~3 aoA~nss qmm IYNOi941dOPJ soar 'e adelataas aozrbinarrt xev>ra a9 ¢tak sr 3w stxyrluvprplrt A~xo ]w ' ~ 900 nl 1M OayvP 'x003a0 90 ANYdnC9 30xra115Ni 3114 3lLLtM3~N Aa moa0aa 4[6<uo Hanna xA9ao '1LGa3a ]teP Aarwiu-gae 3W Nt maD3C. sY A"-0dv AvNt AvM-J9-SillOtt P1n SupnasY3 an Avw Om' a(;a)xL mifg3d5 51 N]6AN lYw mv%a AOx 5300 A31a16 siw n Aoralr>,v ~Ixousoa 3nurroa Sae 'Imaaa4 ao yvAS 3w ai ma]y5flaa a-0A]Aare 9NY1 Y 5'Y 'rv0;wa0 trAPbsad4ad An I6 satdua>, x3waru ctrptsa39Nn 'xoLLrauuxa sett d4 31v9 3xt ao A4aACt M exY rdsN aw wtv ,te aaaoaY ar s0a+9xYxs '9i '(^1+1a~ ~'{°~1<lY ~u~'f ~93atxL v atevlsnueesa°1orYiz;b ONY 'SOOT W $~M 4m Y1TI A9 P;x.pav ONY 99HSn[nxs3 AtINKK' 'SF35anS 3YLL fool rtS v/YAYV a0d SAN3rpM[03a ttt130 w]natG aw W JY~te a~O dYrl Sal[rvlrw ~ap pt St~SN! :x0a]dP jo Aavdlk)0 3 wa'mx] ]µ9 3llala3ln aNY 'n315AS WtrSt 3 xiox0ad OA ~~~ Lu 'Ap tLSY-s991tsS) zosLe a3 '~NOd trwtm L33ats 4aau woos wt 1x31uxna30 axwxrtd 1Vpd 1Yai+6a d0 up P uui9wnr Pnwoz ~/~ NU3a3rv 3211[31101dolma3nlWnOt v~+a3LPp :IXO'M'CI NOLL0.3C 335 Sl H3Yf3MM3a OMkava Axpa3d SB 30YlZ310010] 13]1109 :1 N]CJP nnnOhn r_:a3 sl - a eL33i o -acs ~t33r s1 - Lxoxs :stnvPta axw+,lm xnwaya~nnneNN 3OOa hx' UX rd9:xm1 Augd `/ta 143 3H[ A DY'LI 9.w'S3'tt SNOUa}5 X35 'x03a3N aDn3At OA 5(gYfnnN 001 vx[LYq axu3tn son a3w0 Oxv' irNp55ACtld YY13a 'NHOanLLLSYI -ngb3nlWa sash pJlAina3d hvgliTiMOO 'MlC3x10) wo0waoa Pax {S-a} AOta15p 1~'ga3tnga 3bYJH0001paL :OV-Nm twVL/C1/f 3CVOdn ASY1) Ll 81tLL UOOa 1Ydgtinx xKptl ritl[N3J JO Alq '3000 ON JZ Tp01 ~~~ '9002 'Si A'1M PaAVO 'OLSL[0 a36Y1nN a3W0 S1xOd3a 3YLL AbbtmtR?aa'iwdn00 bNlN"5}a 3118 aAeLa3e[IY bl U38W0330 Sv 3mS ax! 4 hUadaf3530 T'03l Sutx macL.m9 .~ ;kpd sxl of J311 zr9K eo a~masrP r '15Y3 .01 ,80 .SC woos laaaFS LSaU 93LYOYh OfrS i0 }klalytl[TA TU tq 35x3Nt :13FLL5 k5aa mlvavw Orv5 jp 3Nna3x[p3 3w al ATYS 00'062 30 3Y.SYA5:0 v 'ASVd ,OS .lt .K wa0.Y ICWO-29 Ax3nnPtW On5 ~ 3lIR .l'kLiwbON Sat w 3nx-µ SaNo]aa Js3Mktaox aw m 1~ ze'tft do 3aHYJSw Y 'ASav..at .ao .n wa9N aarl AYM-eo-Aorta Ata]LSrJ ans H9 Tfktw ttQS ,tvMgix OUgrdl'133a151hpkLf wna5 A axn .,'0 3Nn AYM-JO-11tlW A1X315Y] 7N1 Stn al lOl Cn5 A a3Yb'.)7 15YJN11g5 3w OL 1313 m'06G A 3O'.Y1Sl9 Y '153M .OL ,tt .sC woos Ot AOT OM ~] 3Hn A~QwfAB 31~y W z+rcAw `~VINA'!91 m9~3aa s~Y a+ico- Wi ma~nn.~fQ iooa xi '~nAS~jub~iea d aa-0on -I 'M of ais9 uNVawM r mx}nxw r uaJdoaa AypYtP OxpB Csri '1 'ON lXNS#L i S3ttlv cY 53rpN WYS nD awl SO v'A4S 3 . GIG K 1µa0n m1no3~ '.WYAS lStlJ OIAYOYA RYS da 3Mlalll[(;7 3x1 tp AWd V 1Y 9WlMm5 ~sMOtad sY a3aiax3a ON1391:30NYd Ono YAO]a9 AArvmO I+DSAYI' SOa053a "IYOLAIO 9C9Z9-ZO '9H 1V]nnaa0 M "Z4aL 'tL itPd'[3M19x NO mOWO)n 'AkTd ~aL#D] JO Alb 3w dJ 0191 nv a0xvN0a0 Aa 03CV5YA SY 'L331µ5 15b1J ml»vn .p AtP4a04 Y aw 3hMa 539YYJ P3lvOV/. 3110 A TiY OS:Y OW 'Af brd's<Yw JO A 3nnIW. oJ9w93a SY 1'ON W51aL%3 53tirv Pty,531gx 't Htp]8 ~ 'L AOT J9 NOµaOd Y 0.w 1 SAOt a fpO1P atl 'LI ONY 'O1 F'O1 arvae ONY mlma3n 3LLaMitvn 'JSaM L 3Twa 'HLn05 Olxvt .wuv0ii4P AP NOPO a9d Y N~1 ¢3LYN6M'JN~d ONY ~'AKbanvd~v 'a~~s~a'~s~ son ux]aoaa m trwa ao an:np~d msu6s 3aY s3P 4mmwP an 41 'tiwt armor AY SI Aaad AGOJ W 131K3 3111 30 i'n3COA 3WIg8 axe Cln lah~ OlnfOa'! xv mtl[x5Y3n 3aY 50.N'~Ol n8 3w d0 svotsxana P.>•'dAl%] m 'al 't]HOnY1 AavlPlvs ap dnn5 'dn0a 31SYM 01195 V SY 3S0 3e5 .•o 37N3oi13 aiavAa35N Ox SI 3tRILL 'LI SaAVd3a a0 M1OlOra1;SN00 )ftYMw5 a0 A33a1S 1x1 as Ap a0xA01A.3 3'6+Aa3560 av sl 3a3w Iwel,xsa~r a nuatrvoa aw nonL 3rennm CNY 'm50cOaa t# K31.ndna adw9 5}vn ivM-~-tItlN 133aL8 rx 83awx0 Atn ~o dPQ]tx0xv ON SI 3a3w 'Oe '131X15 SINL 30 5N2H9n s+m3a M9eAx1 N9umar arcmne as twu9nAxsrwa 96caure WpM ~NAOn wav] .i0 5'.JN39r~a 3annxE4p Ox 51 3a3w 'Ll 900E '91 1Sf4nv COLYO A3hW]S OCaI v30 v W P2.YP SI AaAans S ILL 'Yl 11'[821 31 MMVICZi3 '3xre 1rc3n OMI 66 AYMNO:x n0 a31upP 1syANtMS 3w iV 333a0.w0 NI OSq 59rMf ,f v 0.x'90 'IX4 S94t a T~I.JUVk 3w Ski txiSaliS S UYdOJwN01jvA3'9 ~ SVO~TU Tt q 3aY1; xvwW 5t Ow H,Yw OOOV av3A Wt 3Nl wwY6 3a APH S]Pp A1aad0ad 5M1 Za6x 't "aadY mSIVa mn craw astcu aaennv vkYe uiNnnnw •drn IYdIJ a3a sr x1 5bvds t - Oav0. vx5 :S3OYd3 9NkNYd 'JNµ90~ 'It ao 'ulsq-0 NosegYr 'saao9w .t3xarn: •lsvu MBnOx A3naes SvM A3+>pri Sa8 a0! ONkLY38 i0 9hY0 3w '01 'IOLCOV extYa3nm riaoa 3w wtM Iriu9rm 39 a'ar Hs Ohv AOOL Tt vadv tSaAYOdn ASVi 'LI 3µ8 3W0 tvagt3nn tnOa tYaINO AO uq 3N; aid SY 31lI 51\~YOaM3a x'nQAiS ~ 'Irioa3nno9 :rara4) aDfAtR.O] OOl 0.w { 101aL9b lYC}pMnt1O 3aYlHa00a0N1J t-a sl a1aWZ AKtadlp 3w '6 '90ex 'a1 Atn• Pura ' a[6ru0 a39nryN aAOaa lavd3a 3uu Au,xmroad'ko~}au do .txYdnpO 3'JNVtlnSNI 3uµ 3µ8aiMY A9 m151~mRf Atgdvx a4P 'B 3 'S1YlfASp'STN NSb Oa~S a0 3:aaYAaMNOx 3Ar ~d'L va 3NL PNwgraY ao No sxriax Prorclna -0N 3av 3mw '9 3s'MmwP ssrvrn AYM-.w-Axnia anew 3m sAa3aLS~m 's Ai NO 53aNY33 31v.M :S 310vnaam 31µ 11µv001 AYN9lCyHd SYH 3H NOOOw1Y 53Ancn 0m>a>~x;C a~ PdtvOpt ATY9ltlHd SON SYH bW.1tW6 3w N[iP vx SASH] xPµvOpt a1JH1 JO DN3fFn3 3Kllut a0 3t8ss5 3ar 1tOwA S3llnan 350X1 11x0 'h a9 3a0n 'Slipv Ota C fu ;3]A 36Y'ms Fu4'ete n/IR+ ri1011'C zxes NOa3a0 •Aw:od trwxz~ Actors ixow woos Tresrocs asaa4w ua3doad a 'axoxs w AmoxnP9 3w ro rwurxt 31µ lOlxµ5x0a3a at A3M1ans s'w u Oxfg3 tl0 135 SSNroe m 100YInN SKIl1i1RS ma3nM3a Svc Ya6 'SPapP3a A:a1aM1. 'AFNCW NOSk)Yf ]ILL Ix a3Td Attxiroasals SvM A31SlRS 5M1 'VOO3a0 'AtNn00 x05» Irut[ aa8mx A3va1S Sv 431} ONv c94z '09 xYrr xo Aata,>s .m cam3a r oaaraund a3mwnN 3w xaixzxo~aox as ~ i siwNl ~:uvoa%sti'nn+,~^.nvi o~inva'1 "S~OA Ittx`H .~n~ -- .. ~~_ .. N9 ~~ ~t 'J--atlvNWa. 'NO]ItlN Pa11Ote L Cm AlYJdOlw i03C8f5 A C ONi L St3Javd 103An SaPP'NO`i3a0 AIN00] xOSlgvt $IItlW3a Tlptil0 'C8S080-YppL Y3aHP.N 3NANOXq tOCL 't1 +!3901-00 NO Qi'8W53a 'Arvuw araAx30 JO .Uq ]111 0; QAI.'NN00 tlYdla 91N 3'3xrx}[,xnn ONNhTUNI '1N3n3SV3 a'3M35 AaY26NYa Onv xna0 nypl5 39x1 1WA OO4Z v -0E S< 9NY ALa3d0ad 1]3'&IS JO C OtSr Z 't S1t3aYd A~a3AJY 53p0 'N90.3E0 AtN005 :i0slo'm'S0a0S3a ]Ypll3O'BCOL9-LO a.]ennr LNJna000 TCOL 'S2 a301[NON w ff30bOma 'Y,wP 3PM 0.w T~IY D Fx?Kbndda tatY0.aNa3a ~ rv3txnn aptjA 31(]aYi '0.1 'rg3esu mtos s1 axY ua3doad 19avns d9 r aw z 'e svamd imtn s3oa 'xP03W 'uxm9 tgSx9v; 'sOamaN tYOLW 'aC9Z9-SO b.SBnnx AtCilY000 Lsaatz3 do wueo aumw-0Yn aw~N~:lut31x mtss°nrax°sxw°a"ie A~rn 53lxif avA ;aa31Q'S,tatµ9nal5 Ol StpuwPV a4 s•1tlPWIW15 UY 1vw '4181 34NrN WV NGLLYOYh 3w rvl 5x4k09A153a 'SI lOrv Si P1n AI.a3d0atl lp3`nfb 103ity AOx soap 'INp-0pp 'A1xCAa xostow YOaW3a TpIW 'ICY; 3avd 'uhf 3nOMN %13V01 mA]n[: Oxsa;06an4 T~-0W1 .tVM .Ab;~W WY Y~ (P) 'x0P]a~P '4teSiN00 N05k'fYfw' SOW03a tvduq 'B9G 39~d Z Y ]rtrtAA Nx '6t6e 'et AYN NO m0aW3a'A44µ50 M31YM .Up xv P3+3rog0 5350da0d tvnYO a0d AYM JO Asgia Y {Y) O C:A104 10n 51 OVV AIXtdObe SO'.fBl'S SO33N SO~S]aa 'N9O3aa 'AL N000 xtY.'AOYf'SPa4O09 rigl3J0 'SSOl T AWntladi NO µdaa00]a 'C CS 31vd'SOY 3wrY3A NI 0.YY '[M 30vd '4[[ 3Rnxn HI 'CS01 'lC AavnYVr w g30a003a aA7µY1pe1g0 xy3aO NY 'aWOlatva w P1unNp4 Ax]ndxA3 30 Piva.9i ANVx31N1YY1 OY:OOtaNI '.teplWa3[t JO N4µnpltll5p Ow tmbsn`eswae IA3 AYM A LxOta do ;wa-0 3PM 100.1 OL Y rS dJ0 A19t0 - xoa tYrl un wa rvoln al PtYN]4 ~ MO OLLSYtd MOtttA Ov6t rnYAS a a eo a]9nnN 6 a.3MOd 0xroa9m9Hn asn s.NOUdnz3 Acadia auu ~ u¢xod d 3'qd ut?4n w~ JNOxa3tit INP14a0a3ak0 AOR 1M Nv3Y3 m4 rtepAS NLS LhYa6ta 3a9 q AsYAUnS nvG 14LlON SY) 3]Olmn C S+0 0. (µ31u 5v) aLµ3n • 2N3ny.Yd AO a-0W _...___-- 1¢J19H SVJ 3nrin . 3w1 ~~ _v OBLob Zsut a)w0 S ~ 3X;1 Aav9xfC8 mdM15 ?di/M a1 B/ Q4MJ • 3NSt AtpOdOYd - --- - NBVa JAVO ~ AYM JO 1NOft1 ^p~s~ - - - ~~ i,` -- 1 EI f i ~-° -- i a ~~ Es 1 _ _€_ e~ a x: i -La..Z._ ~w n~ 1 __ _ ._ i. T~ i ~. Jy'J$ Ox xOx dv~v ~l~t~E in ~,. F ~ € g {!I p i ... ~ ..~~ rvs~s, c r~a:~ ' l . , ,. ~ ! 1 k ~ t ~r G~ C P I C pI f ,f ~~___ ._ _ . ~, ._ _.. _. ..._. _._._. _. .,__ ~_~ _~_..._. ~r .~ -~-w-- ----- _~ ..~~ S 3~"°~ ~ s i c I ~ 1 _ ~ 1 ~ j f ; .: 1 ~ ' f ,, s~ ~ ~ ~j~ M ~ ~~ ' ~ i i ~ ~ ' yekpt, J: ` _ ~ ~ i _ ~ !! .. b ._ ,...__ .... _.._ ~ ~ ~~, I _, ~~ __ .. .{ ,,., •. p u ~ Y ~ i ~ <~ ~ I ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ - F FgS ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cj r ,~ ~~ r , ~ ~, ,~ /ii ,~ ._. _.. - `~.' ~gg a M .; ...._._ .. ~ ~ o _ ' E w . :~ ____ ,.______. .~ .. ~' ~ ~. r ~~,_ k i ~, w c i t ~ ~ I~ i~ f `°, f f /y i i•__ 4 II _ ___ ~ p _ f ~3 q~ ~ _. _ ~. __ ._.. ...... ... ...... ~ _ _ _ __.__.._ '._ ~ _ ~ _ _ _ ~~.._ ._. _.~ _ ..._.~....... ~ I ~ .6 ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fI ~ II I V a ~ C • ~ ~ I ~~ ~~ E µ ~ ~ ~~ -~._ ~ ~ _.._._ _ . - sn.:~~~~ m~~ I _.~ - _._~ ..._ ~ p w~ ~~~- „_ c F ~~~~~ ~ ._.___.._.u _ __ - __- A ----- ---_._.. -:'~~ $i k cap .g dPfiterence yaa can fee' ~ -.,- ~ .~.., 1 E~~.~IIBIT 3 «•Y ~~tv+.wm~.1. ~~ v'c I f ~N n~1 nl V+ z r R N L N . !h "rn ~_- 8 Rn 4 ;ST PRCI~eRTY LINE X n ~ ~, f71T13 ERC,JT 5i,ee"E i ~TH F.\'G~'ERTY Li\`E 'k PRC°ERTY LINE STING ~iH $TQEEi RESIDE\~E f F!^C,~'tRTY LINE E ~ ~ I AON SI. Jc AGENS & AS~OC[ATES, [NC. ~~ ; ' ~ ~ ~~ ,~~ A caring difference you can feel EXHIBIT 4 /. ~~ " L ' nr `I b f~ . °~ 9 t. ~~ rT ., ~ ``°~,. --,....,~,~ ~M 1. w_,,, ~ 4~ ~,°"_l. ~~ 1 ~,~ ~iY ~ ~~w 1Y (i ~~ I ~~~ ~ ~~~ -. ~~~ ~ ~.. _. ~.. ~l c ~~ ~~. ~a ~,._ ~ \g ~"`., ~4 ".., .+. 1 ;` l _... I ~; ! _ ~ ~'~ ~ n. r.' ~ ~ _, 1 i l RAY - -i ~ ~ ~ I ~""`, '°"+,. # n - . _ . ~ i... . . p l & ! #'~ ~. '» 4 r ~~~ - ~:, .~ .. E ~.~ ,' _ -- - _ e r, . ~( l ~ ~ is ...... .....~r ' - ~ ~~ 4 W~ ~~ ~~ ~ 4 -j..-, f - -. 1 - ~ v~k 3 ~ 6 ~ f + `~ , i~ N .. ~.. iry ~ ~ ~ ~ tv K t 9 i ", ~$•r JON R.IUR(}ENS&A55pC3ATE5, INC. ~ 4f ~ j ~1~~_ i l'~,.1~',.. ,n,T K:Si tTFC','JRC IP±A'fiNlti:; -- 7 A Baring ditferenee you can feel l ....._~._..:a__. _.____._i__.......... .._ n ..................re. . i C7 1 z ~ ~r? in l 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ',~ ¢~~ ~u I I F~ _~ ~ ~ E~111B~ A g~~ i ~~ i p ~1 N ~ h A p~} n r~ N § fn 4 i~ h (~~ i' li~.~.:..... . ...... _..C ___..____.__.-~ -2.____.. !.. ........_..._~ ~ ~ 3 M t ~ r ~ ~ ^d" ~ ~..w ~ ~ ~. i _,_ , ~ ~ ~ .~ -~~.. r, ~~ . ,- , ~, .,, . _~ ~ 1 -i ~~~ . - ~~ ~#~ , ~ ~~ ~ ~ _., ~, "`~ ~ ; ~~ ,~' .._7 ~.~._ ~~~f~~~~;^I ~~ e ~~~ .._ ~' 1 ~ L ~ ~~ A carFng difference you can feel ,.. - 3/_ < •~li - t~ 7= _ ~. _ 1 ~_ M W rf. (~:. { - - - _c€~+am+n - - __ - ~ . -- . _ _ ~ ~ ~ - .- - ~ ~ ~ ~. ti,. 1;1t.t.t\~a. s\vSv vt'3AI"F4 _. ~ ~...>-m-.ass..-...~.. ~..~a.,,_ - -.'°'g- --re-.. - - -. <. - ~ ` - - - , -.: _ - _ - - ~ __~ __ - _ _ __„ _ _ _ __ _ -_ _ _ ' - _ >: - _ "'~°y _ _ _ _ _ _ - . A }O70(7 s i ~00.~3 ~ ~ ~~~a\OOJt'X'~:r '' I ~O'k~?~> \ \ \ ~~' ~'~.ii j \ ~('}1 ~J~ (};j \~+~~i ~,~j,`~ i'.t is ~' ~' y, y aL, ,k ',~ "~ ,~' :~ a3 .r'~t ! ~ w. y <'f ~ ~ ~3 ,y+ 2r ~ _ f ~. r Y F 'jv ~-._ + AAA ~.~ ~ , rl~, ,,: •~i .; . _..,, ~" ~__.... : r,F~: r i F ~.~ h} li• ........ ~y ` ~ ~ # .. 1 ~ :~r. ' ! ~ . ~ ; ~ ~ 415, ,. .. .... .. ..... ie ~ - ~ ~ v~'l~~ ' i { h ~.,i 7 gi, N~ i~M1 .l h .t v ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 A .. { t' r'1r'~ U V at"3 ~1i){ ~l ~ ~: ... ~ ~ ~ i Y ~~ I ;; Y ~~~'( ~~ ~~JJ !~ ~y ~. ~s}y(~~.1.,Jy~~r3y~ ~y1~ :w~/ ~ y y ~ ~ y ~ ~ y ' .. +tx~M ~!~~' "~ ' . ll "'S} ~' N 'x'F` ~ ~~~~~ '~'•'N~~' ~~' ` ~ ~' . - .S '-.. - '~ '~ h T rF (+ T' rS'F I 'T. £ F .T V l ' .; F ~ ~ ! __ I >n -- ~ 1 A 'A•I . f ~, .... ~ fy - r ~._„ -. - . ~p ~ M1f ~ M 1 : ~ 74.x', .e,i ti• - K - ,. 4r k~ k-'~. k d`+ 'Y` '~ ~ $' ~ o. x~rsY ` } 6 ,:~ I t .L .. ~. Y ~ I i I If~' -. ~ 1 $ ~' , ~ ~ r 3~ - ' ~~ A in ~.~- 1 ~~ ~ ` 'ti- u1 -- 1{ ,,. 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ L `f. 1~~iFi,,~- ~ ., . ~rZ~~ , :S~S"ZC )6f ~,, ~ "~ ~ iLr~' }f ; f' ` ? . w h: 7 ` ~ 1 I ,.1 wt a.rY~ ,t ~ i (, v .. v -+f. rs k x. _ 1 ~. ~ 4 1 1'7 i ','63GCYJC/.L~7 - - 9r`l 'L-Y ~~'.~ # _,,,, . _ :YY.rn.RhX'F 7:!? ~ .._1:...r, • V-~;}: t. -. : ; [:. i.+Atii.GW...(i. 4 t . SOUTH FRONT STREET ~ ', m ~W w (~ m ro ~ ~ C U_ ~ ~~g~ T 2 a I u C v ~ C w d. C r~ I ^ww~ww 9gaiargtr ucarpgc ref CrriIA. A.#i Ai}~ uneaglroe# Ilrur uriu.rc,'~;oiler. t) M u Q L' L 'L ~ ~ w ~ rt ~ F ~ w Y N 4~O 4 ~~ ,,~,~517 ~1~~ -~ 15~~} AUM. - ~~.. `>~ .I~,f_ 11,v~ l.e Landac aPO ~~. .... . Plan '4 Scaio 7" = 20' ;au.porGV~~. Madara E7e~ign Inc ,'a <, scH~anrnocuu¢rxs AE.ANT LEST U.urx 11' GMnl.,rr N:Vlla Gc::ttt-:i N?'a4 wb iru.>: C Ctvmy fth•:lkrP[arry~ I'rssn ' Iia'n'xv'v: Ewq`n[n n ;,Ixkrgld ROr:d Uts~;s~ry Cs kn ;S Wl ' 'f I 1= KIISUC I'rVU , u sra :!•! I,T yv ~hC.'S4{Ir RD11 ' ( J..S Cik!tiraIX: ' trixn 1.4s1 ToCOrCJ::I'GkxVV:i`t' .. n nsny. b EiaN OS ' .L'v: lt4nx:'fkwruxr - G M'};l v, i. '4 'r.^.w iY't.c lW:: ' /Ma lU:hntun'Ca:. FL'el: '„ Ifnl*n la a: Y t: d[y' M A l.EN r:rtnn;'PnUU' f.N y i _ - v, t;,~ a f;ryapJ,i L' Cu{>a'u f'y:9s ('31py;l;:s'! :stns u{ ' r Z[r;c,a Gdcr U •c Cur:,}rmv:3A:aCe'F,lus(F:Vtsy - 7a.gANxrnn: (;r„nn V~ . S'r:trs h' ; /ilnla l-alxV~ nJkrc rR'4.;:o L.Y.rluts (iCVaur : ... 1'~ recrn,;ac trobr a A:aWO F:I' x 7r, wV CCCac:YaS.;'Sn: _,i rY :ti :]} . = 15 l aw Axnu:r. t:l- ~ tiai:7'Evab;: /~.r<u'WRry ehkrn -:1 ~ •~ G: ~'. C1[n[,ylf 1inlr a'r:wr E3tnlvyi3vsh f7xn:t U{,At:s lh:Y„vq::'C:cni,.s t>>, Y ' Y ' >il .~ " ~ fMytS'$:Elil (17'C Fu:nym;q;yt,::,s Ca'rp,:Ctu 1{ NI ' .A + , IXGCSic S:b is {!(ka I:S:.:1v.1 ~UIUa,.f .ti ~~ .N - I:v.YtJUtn C'.nip:e:.1 (i:r.'C: r , livva~Rtrsl,SHn :v'Enm:YC ' ' i ' (i::ixs Pry,:M Rlhs {s+, , ( . y;Ch' PURLGn1Ln1>M u:hnf'lY ` :.1 r 0 - G'{:}$. P}T::uL'Y.IS U.Ip( . w ..:urf Flr~:rlilh:y 5::10.`s 5'(if:lul' 6 .P S/ }%ss'1K•r. fypa~IJnu'x+M Y,:a .nwx w;rri •:rKlirtwakxryryY 'VVl; ly r. u1 I{0.1,4 Ly fix'll!YT lTvxl P:xttM 1 ' Nrd,.: QMns(ia'Fn'.1!Prrllc" •4 Fti 6 sroro Tl 6a:lxa]C AUybLEid[i Jwr l ' n',~sThs[i.>.1y:.::w'PAC.icr, R.V ~I tur. I rnab C(V~ ds K:+xLkslxx'i I AI ' Jtrv[wnrsfgCxr4ns l'rcy:o[!1'uV> 4j Slu „ : i«dtr JaC!IS in su: Qia L c 3 IX1 +lr<ia:: 4s +'as t:xl.rsi'A4L;;,iYiVSn,ri ' 111 F4 , , Y . c Ladv~r~[y'}. I'~':'[P;x'xcu F ,xrus E;:KL\b:;xs:li'Ch'a l.uao` r;: +l:w. ' ' ;g 7 rzfaaod..',rra,, nvk,rK,: rx nu:U u r :><P..we: Iz~[%~+vs' ' "" ' sx: vtxcrun ~vw'(I wl anxrn yr r:wr [i s t`E . .r. a .•a>:w Cr'.asp'x fRRfGATlON i hCU:urkrl(fic ntt}TK+':sis:sn]taA.InvsRl6o lp aJAt+:t:rnyr,ntrl[rnu «: ptkyly,R~k-,. '~,.tSrnalNry b'd10.xUF$yo-lRltfe,Md%!p(119 f>a'Fa.[n dl 3S p}xir V;i'J VS Cttt unlAi ;~i:n. b.,iwu p'{x'CVyn$I nlrc:d!aros dr9lc ur, nue'u~rant n., :ter: wrr::ar Lrr,~Mgr]tiy6:wn to W'fmd.edlfoa{xxnbkl ucm ur [ur%iarTV:A LVCk11aN [kNr-a En::C;l la k.at a'.1ao.e f(dlia.'a. 51:"kr:.vc nWSwn }:tw aliaaa:.5ppn .]s ., S;nVi,l[vUZ;slp.;,ys to oKlaCp N'y~vt~x}yoYite:US:n sht3: yeas .vki ¢"f'`5>14][;ri. Ik4uJ: r' Iu.n 3'ovs Oln:.as us['N ruiaiKJ w.sh sulyd110.n(nsyV'r{ups lh lmny:rE:uYC ellxl'~yl of •` I~:rra~csl:a'nr.lm:kwsvt [:'~seamt,.i~:>aaut~lw,4a n1119af ec.'.vyro u'reFa:.anal E, Nll ua.':,:~17lv;rn:rn:han cYCl]FxVC.aF.P7lSNJti`••••..••••.•.'...«. - ar w,,;,>mlw:ia.n u:u rraam,xy M.zt.w uepcv ll>,`;t .rtw,m aaxr:asw:ll>nr.'1[gwlo:r~r[x}ltrnr ax:lnwmr,,,a;s;::l~r lvrrar uxr.u hlfnsrceY, lrpu vlul`LWl'vf'. xtr-0rrkYl l;,'"x:u:~nMn Ml Llysl Me Ua PVC CI"1i.7 A'Rl i.. G I?eR-Ifau9[/kuW CwY'y~i4h[r:JrY\YVr[untnw:I1J[[It•a: ulyr;s [.~'llr,rAx..4kr,J':.ttnc<t, 14n4N nra,:.culx•omno'.'ntrnd lap++:ug.:xaJ xr;n lwkr trp]Y Ea:a`JV];: q} 1] [n R?C rye`~,xVnl:c.-0:VV:rJJr,'CIn1.Qf~'S%[[e Ly p}iAr.~css'%rSiW lc'r:riJ.Y,rJllTarineu,+' 1 Id l'c q,nrook.pv{3,yrls:rJ,•,~Y~'ramV(x4:l a: rvnlo:UM1flrisla u'1V ylu :rcnr nk c:co oe Inv axq+[rrxx i S':o+O.sO.lrmr u,IJ:.VIa-[x:JO:sxilvi EVCSnI~[i91'al,'M VrVa sW-:vs n1y.-r LIYJ:uxl xlY a.4rva3 1y I'mv..i,=nl+V rvih l'rC:v:t.lrytvn;n'ng tk{rnw;Cf(rlltu cvl:uni,ta {uniwry}v 5: Vnwr„pt.mw wilt CdlgiYilu sUt[r!mit3[rnnWr[i-'.Inlns tn.;~,r::[..ra: ;tl'elMa'al+.:u[r1'v a."Y VJ[p I1vyv1 Fbxl l'`. [Fay. gTxM,,4] :x1[5 u: v,14e_~r;xl t:: NIIS,n..rTr lh:o%{I{IxI MIdO Sy'st,„I Jaiahs17 r:1c q,:erl:x~y slsAtxh FC}% f;aKVCC~ 1'-ll:}/,1u Ctx.{k ~' PVt: Swuvo Ci 1.^s mcMr..:;. G~NERAf_NdTES Af~NTfNG 1'.r :[n:nlr'xE I.: t<: (x[,.a.',1 :n;n-C:xua.e•. w;l; yrrc„ . . ~r.Y 4'sC'wltls::v.:.;;(xf t'4rivn' SuCC;q..,~`•Sr+Nn';[J:rv..l+l'u:M;x;t:.^, Cl. n^aLV.~6:tltlnlnb N>f1..'p,1J I:, r'-~ x1[e'e'rr:i;w:::::talbul is l~C luv:G:itt r. i:t. e1:4: I4 LV V'-ar,[,.s n'1G:R'fr'.~rs rn lh'rr.~;!t-r:lcv.IV**~vJ;rrlV O: IsY•c rtt(2Vf.l::n afwfl r'k:tr C. W33 4 I17 rsC1%: n•:;Y~ :.:] r'JI.,'r: w! :n~\i.-IV:,ia :a;X\c[u.li ys116~IC~1G rbi,vbr ,IS fP;:.~n la}I~Yf~1 VLve,,~x jCrrv"-c.:,l1:.v4'...:t;.:v:[.r.'t:.yhr.t:r:.^. ti r.F la!'-:^[a. sl: ui[<O:.s: L^ P::1[AVi:aIA'l'tviYm:.r~ 1r0.::YV4;yr•A:wMls;. xy [a Ix•t;rU:(tl%['~nn~ttJxlt ti Iv~i Yf lrhl.r~:;ia^w'n o: M1::~-r.1 $:aarsi'L Jr-v')':a•f3K'•Jfi ~nl;: p;-0:+.k:lcrms ["- "' :a-4t:=];;xyy a'Y.,y;1.y1-(a5'. rrU.eMl:tlj]d MHrrv:X Lx'A: '::vnr~aa tk.''~,t p:;e:ls nn'1'.q;h:r:rl, rc[x tr.,[uca,.::;rsl, tw;la eacr:e o~ to a.ny"n I:a, rr.]1' Ihers en y1.'rv S;:Fd t:ni prr h[,-'s:runxbmv.y aI1X Ilvsueq, Uf%latf'd•gc.?::,::x(biia[::I: I:^:n rr,u;,v'r:I.Yrn:::bv::(Iryl',I:U.:+;xa'i:r, :•:I ,:::,:e • 1x1lxw„s?13:x-.]1':nn,t.;u-.rP+'rx:r:w\9:1.],c [nv n:i:ur to su's umry nl krsn!(wc s:lxn:>[•' nvvr• ; s:Ru`::~xy :bti(X:::.irn:: vl:xx inJ vx. rnl i?:xr, 1. ! (i.u'O'da•Y{.sn1:1Y,x':r.]:=;vU:i?n:ol ua:'u:I:n:.:PuY r•V,4LJ:xal, hjw:.~l;y;Ek,i l.v:tlx,l :w'r'1Nu'k'9 [S n~YF :R' c u Iv:a M1 lial'I.v,.'1[hl'ntnhx;s: rl'::o-l s".171':1.uYC(:-a:un Q::rl(J,7.id[e.kw i]tti.^0 N Pcxihuvd re;i:rp'4adt.u'r,;::sxcc: sv u•,h<x.,: mz'A1CCa.]r v^s a: Pa is E3c:pF.j;,cr/;1:~tXls',t;llral:xu:s.v~lo..::4t15V :=[t'~-'f::!x 1~sdn;.y '1 `y (::kv..:n r:.naifa 1'ar C:r:r':rrG':. rv;Arsvsgry.:a~n::. iti~;r -I; ' ~r.. ~., ~ ] CiAi:!a rxbP9;{.:][t ,.>uf:l:; A:.x}r A 17enprFi o'NI V[:laylW.'ra~as r/V„'io- 11/." a I;LIn•: lu xr-,:uJ:r iv` fa CCr.r[aC• ;tr,Yw: - xl(«tvt+'sn:naro:«t yr er.f,vul:, I,[..,1w::rtn u:::a~,':1~-:,ealcd,lr.o,r,,`Iwrn:l t>w nl~l„vw, or l.'rc..c:w. v,,v::r~ a:.'ui Mo ln,wla r,rv .: Slta~:gxn]ICIrL',.wr,f„;q•rvl rl nxy!,l,{sryl:ut'1. Sa,rm x'J ax na;n,,;ry {a:rarr•.; :N;tltxna lu%+:r+a Wasn~y. unrry Ilul],[IY'slra;,kxrw :nq V*A¢nik.l:nr s';avy til.?snblkKlslniV Hssih r.Nrq'.c.r uny.R UVrI~;[,n IXxr In m.;fx':nvl Akk'. s s^iW:1C;1F;.'n:nL`}-v:n:lur,l!'t.lr]LI Ir J: I(lw [k`F4h o'.: n.t-a < Sa:lb La (1P,]a'I I:y'H tr%s;x ll:abn O[{xl` :~ Sx MO?:[;fn'vz n li'+:kl:n'C::'r En m Ovrit :R1:nl, fY:..V itslln'. na lleao ;,dt tr:xa'::'.}: rr.a':: nryx>:I;• :axti0.:;r; (t'uT.Rn PraY!x ii r~:,.l„'na: I;, .u;I:o:wJ t° IArlar::rnrk'r~>la.~,:r.,r,.;. (: 1 Y,rti i:L P.s ,lvl"« tswa'tu:,xK!;EKI']F ' rNCYao.: JJ ~~rs nr rvaNrHNr~:eel uY rrm agv:;M1't ynm.kx a4'l,n.,l, Lo; lxt In, ~N ro •1 C un scJ IS Ia1J vsl;r'1.i5!>v\f rl:.]>c~ i• fotn Ua1 .'1 ra:::.:.vnssx'er:l,.: II,1:. cu:e:.:r o 1>,Hd~rolmmcrn,t:,v>IO,~luvsSJUlvf;;a: fix:rv„clo nµxy{I]a„-u ra(rirW:1J.r'i:xtl,1:[.S;ra: JOS.pil n:r;p;nesv:rcnt i'1:s Lrzv! E7 IAV:'x:el: pirY,arl.xc05 r. n ivnttl f, a[ l hbC rp[k1,4:n IYrv:Gx'r ;; [n n:lnx:' u' c rzr;'w.ea:,y rr[ea[;;n :++,~v,Uay;,*~ot,:'9~ U !.'y:slh r. rln:.pl la .tRtn'J Icn'.-"} 1: PtprxJl'r:si\-n',:r cOn ilti.d h;.: tb e::{i h:a:ln lfrtM.%[k..%1rn:t~ r I~q'r1::9;sar:[1:FUgmi:rMa;ry'<,I, ]Iq:Cp li•RYV.IIbO:sl :la ivn U1Y. 4~.v.~ I:tt, uraH1',fJ,:1;;}' o! irp YV':1.^.lrx IC W- \u'us:burAr l:N Pxw'v IrY:'axw%nYw GRADfNG ' fa2+.(k.l:a rcHt I1V: K+d-a<:rasw ranu+al a' [4 his 1 5P. "o' C iTJ! te::r I[q run]a'd] of w:{xtiW f (KA:zq ff:[,v::n ai IuFHYIp J:u~: clIXgr2 is anxCm A.bl'LTd p'u 5155'dro 1'M.arlyr,R'JV ¢v:frptp 5.' d vnhla W [ It ntdj W faGui:a316,rJa Clr;n IJI t6 W`r.pv.+. 5:«1[,Y;wu C%li~ilyq] d li&Xa ay. ; :' PLv:nnpy C'uRy sal SabJ dRY.~M[tJ1YC-•ia:aYt xiUlfl.'IWA UWgrkH t'V%I.npy F0a5ia fs':*("k W'1Vpa [t•sA15i:.r;tUd a L',.x] x. lar rb:,~ki:;ld:u[oa,1,:W~:.raJyrdtk: xlisn6"a'rxrallp'rrna:r:ll :vV::6t lU: s:_lj'J W s iviV n.}(:Ss,]fpy 1 nrt a^.A1r1 G:rp ara:yt'O.ty.7.y[:1 ' ..r' ^.' IJtfir:nG"NWn'nn:J:xi l6tdrncr cup~ilryv-la:r(31rc'ra lw'vs.', T:~l:u 511a r1.; 5•I:rs)J;i-I111ui to L+ggv'Ah lstlNx S{x1.7"a lr:t}'1 fn'ppl nuqu•tilty~ Im v:kxll :ix! I:.iy hb[rrolwYa:~Pf~,.:n':S J:r nalti~'va rFTinr;pi! S [Haab g;wsuv rn Nxw J;FU: rn LUa snwnllrv.~ptlg:u:fu nuµ-:pp, 3')'~`, u:0:, rru:Ja .r lkvs tr*J,+'ROI.]S'WeAr t.:rr[xeln['r~:YC:u A:I(:tytrprA::rl~la iY:X,tOf¢{W;:ily O :e:~ d'n::Y lrIX11 «:h YtxuS.`xvL 16La 0.Y1a N 6t>.Y] 4 w:ir :1510Pt:11'u},:0 Ls,."q:s, 3 h "'canoe cr: mxa' 1> i~.rs;.w'cu;mns.o::>xw~hl,•k, ;gs.»rah,y~,;lay tx:%]lam al~.x. ,ww '•syl: v!c\~u, arvnl::gcn xn,; [r..*losrgxl'dil`.a1r:c .i c'ro.lax<M,~r.lvtr~lx]r,;.tw•yaU i~xuf WSl th:o~;:gvll saa Landacapn ~wtaiiss Madara Design Inc a o~ ~a ~~ C, V 0. ~~ ~~~ ' PHdVIdC CF UEdfdku MudfGl4fHllR• Rl'MI}rvsf. ,IJfV9lx,ppfllll[i 11pf.1'rvaY,09'Po} t: :C C f. [p ~ L ~ 1. I ~, 1 c ~I~, G u a t'r, n`~? ~~i~i \. -f ~r /r1 n,Z~`~ k,ihss: sran[u',w.,, o..wr,rwx hl.. 1 r~ sCAfdlAUCOpCUI~ENrs (,- Public Works Department ~ v- CENTRAL PC)INT ._J3 i I~:~y~~. Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitore, Dev. Services Caard. PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT REVISED January 24, 2U07 AGENDA ITEM: Site Plan Review for a medical office building on property known as 37-2W-11CB, Tax Lots 401 and 500. Applicant: Providence Health Systems, 4700 NE Glisan Street, Suite 100, Portland, OR 97213 Zoning: C-S, Commercial Thoroughfare Zoning Traffic: A Traffic Study was required and prepared for the proposed application. The study was prepared by JRH Engineering. The study concluded that the proposed development would not deteriorate the level of service at the proposed intersection with Highway 99 or at the intersections of Highway 99w at Beall Lane, Highway 99w at Cupp Drive or at Highway 99w and E. Pine Street. The Public Works Department has reviewed this document and is in agreement with the conclusions. Existing Infrastructure; All City utilities exist in front of or adjacent to the proposed development. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and stoz-zn water drainage facilities. 1n general, the Department's "Standard Speci#ications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specif cations from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued. Conditions of Approval: Conditions have been met 940 South Third Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502.541.664.3321 ~~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ Q1!Q2I2f1Q+ ©9: ~6 5~1-i;fa4 r 1 r 1 r~'JS F` GE Q2/'Q4 ~~~~~~H~ENT' 66 ~ ~~~~ 5~~~ a ;~~:: ~. -_- -_ROGU~ V,A,LL~Y S~V1/ER SERV~C~_ S Locaciotl~ 138 West Vifes Read, Ccr~n;~l r'oiitt, ~R ~ 4tailinfi Address: P.O, Bnx 3130, Cents( Point, (>~ 75~2~(1005 Tol. {5'11) GG4-G3pp,.i=nx (541) C~G4.71 rt wwtiv.RV85.us December 29, 2Q06 Connie Clure FAX 6646384 City of Central Point Punning Department 465 South Second Street Central point, Oregon 9702 Rer Site Plan review fnr Providence Medical Center, File # 67019 Sewer service to the subject property comes from an existing $ inch main line located within the vacated portion of '! s~ Street. Connection to this sewer main will require a permit from RVS along wifih payment of related development fees. the property is within the NPD~S Phase 2 stormwater Quality management area and must comply with relevant stormwater quality guidelines. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of the proposed development be sut7ject to the #olfowing conditions: 1. Applicant must obtain a sewer permit and pay all related development charges prior to connecting to the sewer. 2, Applicant must dedicate a sewer easement over the existing main line if none already exists, 3. Applicant must submit a stormwater management plan to RVS to demonstrate compliance with water quality standards. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, ~~ ~~ Carl Tappert, PE District engineer ~~ i~:IUATA1Agenci.cslCF~I~'~~'1PL,AYi\G15itcPlanReview12007147007~©~ik Glen.doc January 4, 2007 Connie Clune Planner City of Central Point Jackson County Fire District No. 3 ~ `... 5333 Agate Road ~ - White City oR 97503-1075 E~ ; ~ iF (541) 826-7100 (voice) (541) 826-45fifi (fax) InternatronallyAcrredited M zQ05-Z01D Project # 07019 Providence Hospital • Larger size plan will need to be reviewed by the Fire District to verify access lane will meet the required width of this size building. • Parking Lot is a single entrance 1 exit style design. We would prefer to see a second egress point on the North 1 West side of the building. • Fire authority will need to approve the location of (FDC} Fire Department Connection, Vault and Hydrants. • Signage and Curb Paint plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Authority. • 13 ft 6 inch height clearance is required for all travel access points Mark Moran DFM 49 ~~ ~ ~~ _ 9 CIC~' t"J ~,i''1111'~t~ ~t~t"1~, t't' ~ , I -~~ssrr,,, ~ ?s.~ I~.'.~11 !, ~ ~ ~. ~ j +~.8 1~~x~1~ 14~1';~x,l"k'u 5t .:_s, iii ~i='"ii~t Cn~i;' ~~r'' ~ ~' ~~i~ ~l L I Vii,-f t ''~i .1~ f~ci~} i i _ - ~~iG ~~ 'r:L I,~:~: 11 4 ~C,C~ .u:i ~~ ~ ~3 M Li4J~LLli1V4.! kl~l`.t"iTtVt~',~V ~ ~9~ ~' .lll'~~+d/~~,T DATE. 12/27f05 T4: ~laianin~ Dp ~x~ent Pl~~~_x~ing ale: 0'7019 FR4 ~~i~c~i~~~ Department U~~ECT. ~1a~n:1'rovidcncc Hca~th Sys. Address : 4706 IvF Cr`lisan fit, quite 100 City, fort. State. 4TH Zip Code: 97213 Property Des~;l-iption: P'U 'CAS. The staff report is to provide information to t1~e Pla~~i~il~<~ Co2n~~~ission and the Appli~;ant regarding; City Br~ildin~; Department requi~~~;~~~etxts ~z~ci ~onc~Xtioz~~ to be included ia1 the design and develt~pz~~c~~t oftl~e proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and cc~rt~i~ilecl solely 1:c~z~ use by tl~e Central. Point Planning Cc~rr~rnission. 1 66 99 4..-3 ~..}! ~...~~°4~. ~~I ~~~I~tl1 V'7 Rfwg `ti«'~ _ '_i. : ',i ', ~I~..~l~'~.,' ~ ~.I 'c'~ ~.~1~ 14 ~ >ck.Tl~irclSt.,C~-~~~_~~~'(~ir " ~7rK.77St~:~ ~ ~' I; t, L,:,,i>~ u.~~l~~t~~, i,; 'i~tc~Cl,iic.L.t) ~~1.~C~4.3,21 1~:~- 541.t~~ _ BUIGU1NCx L~EI'ATt`i'~~,~II~:I~T STAFF F2,F:1'CJ1ZT DATE: 12/27/06 T(~: Plannin,~ l~c~paa~t~r~cizt Planning fil+~ : 07019 ~I20: Building Department S JECT: Name: P~°avidence 1-lealth Sys. Address :4706 l ~lisan t, Suite 1 t~0 City: Part. State: CJR Zip Cade: 97213 Praperty Descriptian: P1~R~C~S~. Tl~e ~t~~fi~ ~-epart is to provide i~11-ot~~natian to the P'lanni~zg Corni~~isszan and tl~e Applic~~~t rl;~!%irc~tl~ City Building Department rcc1uremnts and conditiQi~s to be included in tl~e dcsi~~ll sand develapment al'the praposecl la~~aject. ~I,lii~ is not a p~~~n review. This repast is preliminary and compiled saltily ft~r use by the Cen~~•al. Pairai; Planning Commission. 1 ~, ~ ~ rsrra( ~"c.i~-~r, ~'`~ - ~ ~,~ '~; gilt ~i .~ (``"'; ~4 r~O. T'-.1 i~r, ~., ~_~-ftkCel~~Up(~p-i, [~~i `!;~~,.'~ ~~ ~ ~I i ~ ~i`:, (~(~~~ II ~r fr.`~~, 1, i~.~1%C~1I tt~(J!ilr.lil ~~~A.J~~~~ ~3J1. .'-15..$~ AYI ~`. A:a1L \~ ~~;,C ~ ~~~. 1::1 A. ~t 1. Applicant, agent and cant~•actar:~ ~r~l~~t ccrrnply with all current Mate afQregan adapted codes, and apply far all pcnx~its ~l~r~o~ar>Iz tlae central Faint ~~uildn~; Dep~~fiment. 2, Ifs private starnl dr~ra s~~;lc~~n is prcr~~crscd it must tae re~~iewec~ and a p~rrrxft issued by tl~e central Paint P~ttlr~lrin~; I ~cpt~rtnreir~. 3. Any px~iv~t~; street li~;~alir~4 ~z~ut be reviewed and permitted by the ventral Paint Electrical Dep~~~~t~r~ent. 4. Pravide t1~e building clepat~ti~~i.:t~t with a (~cateclr~~ical x°e}>c>rt as recluirecl by t~~~G Appendix 3 and chapter ~18 afthe C~SS~. ~ ~-vril:te~ rep<r~`t t~~~'tlre investigation shall include, but need not be limited ta, tl~e f~771c~~~ i~~g nfa~~matian: a. A plat plan sho~~~~irrg t}7~; locat~iaz~ of all test ba~•ings and!`c~r excavations. b. Descriptions anci cl~rssil~ic~~tions oftl~e materials encountered. c. Eleva~io~rs nt the w~1~:z- t~~blca, iferrc,auntered. d. l~ecamrr~~:r~d~.~titarls foi~ tor~-rd~rtian type and design criteria, inc~l~ldi~ir~ bearing capacity, prat~isio~~s to irritit7izte tl~e eifc~;t~ ofe~~~ansve sails, provisic~srs to mitigate the effects of liquefaction acrd s<~il titzength, and the cff~:cts of adjacent loads. e. When expa~~siti~~: soils ~rr~~.Y present, special p~•c~~risions shall be provided in tl~e aundatio~~ design and cansiruetio» to safeguard ~t~ai~tst cla~r»ge due to expansiveness. Said desi~7r shall be l~asecl on geoteci~ncal recorr~m~;ndations. 5. Grading/e~.ca~-~rtie~~ permits arc; required in accordance ~~ itl~ C7S~ App~rr~l~ J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. fills to be used to s~~l~pu~~t the fc~unclation of any building ar structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted en~;ineeritig practices. 1~ sail i.nvestigatia re}port, a~1cl a report of satisfactor~~r placement of ~11(including special inspections of plac~.~a rre~rt cif' fi 11 and compactions acceptable to the :building t~fficial, sl~.all be submitted prioz~ to final of the gradinglexcavatian permit. B~.tilding permits will not be issued ttnil gradinglexcavatian permit is ~~rL~llcd. Exception: l . 't'he upper 1.5 fast affill placed orttsicl~ arpul~lic rit~l~ts-of~way. ~. Tl-c upper 1.5 fast of fill tlr~,t dc>~ ~i ~~t~t tttrcl~z-li~; buil<l.in~s, structures, or v~;l~ic~~l~rr access ways ar pa~~hirrg ~rr~cas. 2 ~,; e~+ - - r!4~Cil~i'~i~ i(jltli,{".' ;,ii ~ ,'.1~(.3?lt~. C~Ilrt t~'r~, j; a T4US~.Tltrrt#St,i:,~i t ~IPaint C7r~175t~;~ I, _~ i, r !h, L?:I?~ ri~xlc~:(i ;~.~N~,1i+i IC'it~_sti S4i.6G4,~321 F~xm ~' ~ ~?. ~ ,~.,,1 '~ ~~?~rew,cr.central-~oint,4i ~~~~, ' _ >'' r i ~, ~. . To move or derrrc>lislz al"r}r existing strr~ctures located on the property, call. the Buildin,~ I)epartm~;~~zt _c~~~ p~;r-rnil r~c~uit-~~rrt~rri~. '7, Notify the City 13uildii~,~ I~e~r~rtrr,erat c~l• ar~y existint; wells, or septic systems located on the property. S. Any develol~rnent- (any man-zrr~ltjc cliarr~~e) tc~ i~n~~~-oued or uxrir~al~z'ovecl rc,al estate located within the flcaod hazard area oftlre City- ofCe~~ir-al Point shell require a Development Pcrl7~it as set. forth in the Central Point M~~r~icipal Code 8.4.12(}. 1:3ust control, ~rnd tr~tek cjut elimination.. proecl~tr-es r~~ust be implemented. 1(~. ~p~licalio~~ for bt~ilciira~ permits will require tl~~~ec sets of complete plans in~ic~tirl~~. c;.onazalitiric~e with CJr~~:.~c~n Str~zct«r~l Speci~.Ity Cade {2C}t~4). 1.1. Fire Uistr-ict 3 will deternaira~; i'ire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings, The Ir~teri~alirrr~al Fi~°e Code {2Q~:~~ j ~~~ith +C~re~on ~rtiUndments ~r?404~ will be itrrple~nented as part o1`the plan claec.lc code rec~~ut~e7~ac~rlt Tvr this proposed ~uildirx~. y changes ~a7-c~l~osccl shall he subii~%tted in writint; y tl~e Applicant, or Applicarll's contractor to the Building Departrl~er~t :for approval prior to star: ofwarl~. ,_w~ ..~ Attachment "H" FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No: 07019 INTRODUCTION In the Matter of a Site Plan Review for construction of a 32,000 square foot, two-story medical office building located at 870 Front Street. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11CB, Tax Lots 401 and 500. The subject property is located within a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial and Transit Oriented Development {TOD) Corridor General Commercial zoning district. Applicant: Providence Health System-Oregon, Agent: Michael C. Robinson. CPMC 17.46.010 Purpose. The C-5 district is intended to provide for catnnzercial and business rises that are most appt•opriately located along or near major highways or thoroughfares, atad are largely dependent acpota highway visibility and easy ~~elzicular access. CPMC 17.46.020 (A) {4) - Per»ritterl Uses -Professional and~nancial, including: Medical services, clinics and labot•atories. Finding: Under the above referenced section medical office building is a permitted use. As noted in the Staff Report dated February 6, 2007, this project site is within the C-5 Thoroughfare Commercial and the Transit Oriented District Corridor {TOD). Section 17.65.020{B) of the CPMC states, "At the discretion of the applicant, a development application within the TOD corridor shall be subject to: 1. The normal base zone requirements as identified on the official zoning map and contained in this code; or 2. The TOD corridor requirements contained in this chapter." The applicant has elected to use the C-5 base zone requirements. Conclusion: A medical office building is a permitted use in the C-S zoning district. The applicant has elected to use the C-5 base zone requirements. The findings provided in this attachment will address the approval criteria applicable to this project within a C-5 zoning district. CPMC 17.46A40 Heigltt regulations - No building or structure shall exceed thirty five feet in height in the C-S district. Finding: The proposed two-story building is designed to be 35 feet high. The applicant notes that the rooftop mechanical equipment is approximately 7.5 feet high and will be hidden by a louvered metal screen. The rooftop equipment is not required to be included in the calculation of building height by definition {Section 17.0&). 39 Page 1 of 10 Conclusion: The proposed building zrzeets this requirement. CPMC 17.46.050{S) Lot width. The tnininaum lot width shall be fifty (SO) feet, Finding: The subject site (Tax Lats 401 and 500) is approxizxzately 395 feet in Wldth. Conclusiou: The lot width exceeds the minimurzz lot Width required. CPMC 17.46.450 (C) Lot depth. Tlie minin2um lot depth shall be one hz.sndred feet. Finding: The subject site lot depth is appraximately 290 feet deep. Conclusion: The lot depth exceeds the minimum lot depth requirement. CPMC 1.7.46.050 (D) Front yawl. The front yaf•d shall be a minimum of ten feet and shall be maintained as landscaped open space. When off street parl~ing is located in the front yard area, tlae landscaped strip may be reduced to not less than six feet tivith Planning Commission approval of the site plan. Finding: The submitted building location site plan {diagram A1.0) depicts the front yard setback at approximately 86 feet. This setback area is intended to include the landscape strip {approximately 6 feet in width), five concrete site wall planters planter areas (appraximately 25' deep) and off street parking. The landscape plan {Applicant Exhibit Sheets Ll.land L1.2) describes the plant varieties and specific planting location within the front setback. Finding: 1~ront Street (Highway 99 West) is classified as a Major Arterial Street and as such the street tree provisions of CPMC Section 12.36.100 apply to this application. The landscape plan does provide a sufficient number of street trees within the front Street landscape strip. The fzve {5) additional street trees, recommended by Public Works have been added to the landscape plan (Ll .1) meeting the number required by Section 12.36.100 as evidenced by the Public Works Revised report dated January 24, 2007 stating conditions of approval have been met. Conclusion: The proposed building exceeds the front setback and minimum landscape area required in the C-5 zone district. Additional street trees have been added to meet street tree requirements of Section 12.36.100. CPMC 17.4G.05U (E) Side Yar~f The side yard shall be a minimum of five feet, except when abutting st~uct~.sres are proposed with a common wall that complies with the Uniforjn Building Code. Finding: The site plan indicates a 105 foot side yard for both the north and south side yards. ~~ Page 2 of 10 Conclusion: The proposal exceeds the side yard setback requirements. CPMC 17.46.050 (F} Reaf• Yarrl. No rear yard shall be required iit the C-S district except when the rear lot line abuts property in a residential (R) district and then the rear yard shall be a minimum of ttiventy feet. Where property in tlae C-S district is separated from property in a residential (IZ) district by a public alley or street, no rear yard setback shall be required. Finding: The subject parcel abuts property in a residential district and a 117 foot rear yard setback is indicated an the site plan. Conclusion: The proposal exceeds the requirement for a rear yard setback. CPMC 17.46.050 (G) Lat coverage. No requirements except as necessary to comply with applicable yard, parking and loading requirements. Finding: The proposal complies with all applicable yard, parking and loading requirements as demonstrated in the above findings. Conclusion: The propasal complies. CPMC 17.46.060 General regrsii•etrtents (A}. Uses that are normally permitted in the C- .5 district but that are referred to the Planning Commission for further review, per Section 17.46.03Q(26), will be processed according to application procedures for conditional use permits. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be used which are found by the Planning Commission to be harmful to persans living ar working in the vicinity by reason of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water-carried waste, noise, vibration, illumination or glare, or are found to involve any hazard office ar explosion. Finding: The proposed medical office building is a permitted use in the GS zone district. The proposal is not expected to emit orders, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, water-carried waste, noise, vibration, illumination or glare, or otherwise be harmful to persans living in the vicinity. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.46.060 (B} No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be used ucaless in compliance with all applicable state and federal envif•onimental, health and safety regulations. Finding: The proposed medical office building will comply with all applicable state and federal environmezrtai, health and safety regulations as stipulated in applicant's response "b", page 7 (Attachment "B"). i. Page 3 of 10 Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.46.060 (C) Wherever the side or rear property lines of a parcel in the C-5 district ab~.st parcels in a residential (R) district, a solid wall or fence, vine-covered open fence ar compact evergreen hedge six feet in height shall be located on that property line and continuously n2aintained to ensacre effective buffering and visual screening between the two land uses. Where a pacblic alley or street separates the two properties, the barrier or screen shall be placed on the C-S property at the tinze of cotastruction and naay include driveway and pedestrian openings to the alley or street, as approved by the Planning Commission. Finding: There exists a concrete block wall (CMU) along the rear property line. This wall buffers the residential area from the proposed medical office building. The applicant states that the wall will be retained. The proposal also creates a 19 foot, 6 inch wide landscape buffer between the CMU fence and the parking area at the rear of the property. This landscape strip is to be planted with trees and is expected to act as a visual screen. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.46.050 (D} Whenever feasible, buildings shall be located toward the rear of the lot with parking toward the street in the front yard area far easy access and to minimize traffic noise at the rear of the property, especially when the rear property line abuts a residential (R) district. Finding: The proposed building is located on the property to best buffer the medical office building from the residential uses on the east (rear} property line and to visually draw the building closer to p'ront Street in accordance with TOD Corridor requirements. A vegetation screen, parking and a concrete wall will minimize traffic noise at the rear of the property thus providing a buffer. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.4G.070 Signs and lighting afpremises A. No illumination sign or lighting standard used for the illumination of premises shall be so designed and installed that its direct rays are toward or parallel to a public street or highway or directed toward any property that lies within a residential district. I3. No red, green or amber lights or illuminated signs may be placed in such a location or position that they could be confused with, or may interfere with, any official traffic control device, traffic signal or directional guide signs. C. Signs in the C-S district shall be permitted and designed in accordance with Chapter IS.24* and with Section 17.6Q.I1 D. *Note: The sign requirements in Chapter 15.24 shall govern in the TOD district and corridor with exceptions listed in Chapter 17. b7.OS0(M) of the CPMC. ~~ Page ~ of 10 Finding: The applicant states that a lighting plan will be submitted at the time of building perzxzit review and will meet this requirement. In addition, on-site lighting will consist ofcut-off site light fixtures located at 18 feet above finished grade which will minimize light spill-over onto adjacent properties and public rights-af--way. Finding. The applicant states that no green or amber lights or illuzniz~ated signs will be placed in locations that result in or interfere with office traffic control signals. Finding: The applicant states that signage plans will be subzxzitted in accordance with the provisions of the CPMC Sections 15.24, 17.60.110 and 1'1.67.050{M}. Conclusion: The proposal caznplies. CPMC 17.46.0$0 Off street parking Off-street parking and loading space shall be provided as required in Chapter 17.64; CPMC 17.64.020 Off-Street Loading (2} Office buildings, hotels, motels, hospitals, schools, institutions, public buildings, recreational or entertainment facilities, and any similar use which has a gross floor area of thirty thotcsand square feet or more shall provide off-street truck loading or unloading berths in accordance with the following table: Square Feet of Floor Area No. of Berths Required Less than 30, 000 0 30, 000 to I00, 000 I CPMC 17.64.040 (H) (2): Not less than one space per practitioner; phrs ane space per each employee, or, one space per each two (200) hundred square feet ofgross floor area, whichever is greater Finding: The gross floor area is 32,000 square feet; therefore one loading berth and a total of 160 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan and application have provided 162 parking spaces. Six {6} spaces have been identified as ADA accessible as well as one {1}van space meeting the requirements of the Uniforzxz Building Code. In addition, one (1) loading berth (17' 6" X 35') is provided to the rear of the building. Finding: Providence will also provide two {2) cross-access easements to adjacent properties to the north {Tax Lot 400) and the Providence awned Tax Lot 600 to the south of the project site. Each cross-access easement will consume approximately three paz-king spaces per easement. The Site Plan provides for 162 parking spaces. The additional four {4) spaces can be generated by the use of compact car parking spaces as described in Section 1'1.64.0'10. Parking spaces can also be achieved as a part of a future Providence expansion to the south (Tax 600}. Page 5 of 10 Conclusion: The necessary street tree standards of CPMC Section 12.36.100 have been znet and are shown on the landscape plans Applicant Exhibit L1-1 and L1-2. CPMC 17.72.040 (B} Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flozv on parblic streets; Finding: There are two existing access points franc Front Street. This proposal will consolidate these into one full-movezxzent ingress and egress point from Pront Street (Hwy 99} thus eliminating one of the two current access points. The location and design of the access has been studied by the applicant's Traffic Engineers and by the City of Central Point Public Works Engineer and is determined to adequately sezve the needs of the project. Conclusion.: The proposal complies. CPMC .17.7.2.040 (C} To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flaw facilities in sacch a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and irz such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; Finding: The CPMC Section 17.64.040 H{2) requires 160 parking spaces, ane {1) loading berth. The proposal provides 162 ofd street parking, six {6} designated ADA accessible, one (1) van space and one {1) loading berth located at the rear of the building. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Finding: The building main entrance is oriented toward Front Street (Hwy 99) and a pedestrian zone is provided between the sidewalk and the main entrance. This pedestrian zone includes a marked crosswalk differentiated from the general circulation and the main building entrance. The existing sidewalk along Front Street adjacent to the internal crosswalk is proposed to be widened and the pedestrian entry point into the site. Once on site, the proposal describes an internal five (5} foot walkway surrounding the building providing continuous pedestrian connectivity to and around the building. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72.040 (D) Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffrc control signs or devices and that they are compatible witlx the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: The site plan submitted for this proposal does not identify signs or sign Iocatiazis. The accompanying Applicant's Response narrative states that Page $ of 10 "signage will be designed sa that it does not conflict with traffic control signage or interfere or detract from nearby signage" {Response narrative pogo 12). Finding: Sign standards and pez-znit requirements are found in Section 15.24 of the CPMC. The sign rcquireinents in Chapter 15.24 shall govern in the TOD district and corridor with exceptions listed in Chaptor 17.67.OS0{M} of the CPMC. Conclusion: Compliance with CPMC I7.72.040 (D); CPMC 15.24 Sign Cade and CPMC 17.67.OS0(M) will be zxzonitored during the building permit process. CPMC 17.72.040 (E} Accessibility and sa fficiency of firefighting facilities to sasch a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, lijnb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fif°e lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; Finding: Fire District No. 3 reviewed this proposal and provided written comments dated January 4, 2007. The review and comments, Attachment "F" of the Planning Department staff report dated February 6, 2007, have been forwarded to the Applicant's agent for consideration. Finding: The access and internal or on-site circulation have been designed to provide the width necessary to accommodate fzre vehicles with attention to the twining radius of such equipzxzent as evidenced by site diagram, (Applicant's Exhibit 3 page A1.0). Finding: Providence has agreed to cross-access easements on the north and south sides of the project site. Conclusion: Fire District 3's review and comments can be addressed by Providence as specified by said fre awthority. In addition, Fire District 3's requirements can be monitored in the building permit review process. CPMC 17.72.040 (F} Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section 16.20.080 pertaining to the maximum number of single family dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding: No single-family dwellings are proposed with this application. Conclusion: Not applicable CPMC 17.72.040 (G) Compliance with stcch architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point at°ea and its environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the Planning Commission if found to be incompatible with the existing of°chitectural or design characteristics of adjacent properties or uses. ~~ Page9of10 In addition, the Planning Commission reserves tlae right to establish additional height, setback, bt~fering, or other de3~elopment regacirenrents that may be necessary to ensure land use corrrpatihility and ensacre the health, safety, and priracy of Central Paint residents. Finding: Applicant Exhibit 5, Sheet A4.1 and Exhibit 6, Sheet A4.2 illustrate the proposed design of the building. The architecture is a contemporary design that combines traditional and modern materials. The building exterior utilizes traditional red brick, tan colored pre-cast concrete and brushed silver metal panels. Brushed silver metal panels are also used to screen rooftop mechanical equipment. The window design is described as an aluminum/glass storefront system with brushed silver frames and light-brown glazed glass. Finding: The proposed structure is similar in design to buildings recently constructed in the city and can provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood, the TOD Corridor and the City of Central Point. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page 10 of 10 ~~~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SITE PLAN FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING FILE NO. 07019 Applicant: Providence Health System-Oregon; Agent: Michael Robinson 37S 2W 11 CB, Tax Lots 401 and 500, 870 Front Street. WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted an application for a Site Plan fora 32,000 square foot, two-story medical office building on a 2.b3 acre property identified on ,laclcson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 11 CB, Tax Lots 401 & 500, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial and Transit Oriented Development (TOD} Corridor General Commercial zoning district and the application is consistent with the permitted uses set forth in Title 17, Section 17.46.20 and Site Plan criteria of Section 17.72; WHEREAS, the project site is within the C-5 Thoroughfare Commercial and the Transit Oriented District Corridor (TOD}. Section 17.65.020(B} of the CPMC states "At the discretion of the applicant, a development application within the TOD corridor shall be subject to: (1}. The normal base zone requirements as identified on the official zoning map and contained in this code;" The Applicant has elected to use the C-5 base zone requirements for this Site Plan review; WHEREAS, on February 6, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Comznissian considered the Applicant's request for a Site Plan; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's detezxnination that the Application does comply with the applicable standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated February 6, 2007; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission City of Central Point, Oregon by this Resolution No. hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conditians of approval as stated in Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated February 6, 2007 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incoz-porated herein. Planning Commission Resolution No. (21612007} PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by ~x~e in authentication of its passage this day of February, 2007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of February, 2007 Planning Com~nissian Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. {21612007) ~ORNA~ ~ ~'AR~AHG~ ~.. ~. ,.,',; ~ ' STAFF EG T February C, 2007 ~~t1t11t1g ~'p~t"'t~1~t1~ "1°c~rrt Hurr~iat~rey,A1CP, ~ c~mrntar7ity t.~~veit~prr~~nt C~irectorP Assistant City Aa~rrrir~istratcar AGENDA ITEt File l~to. 07028 Public hearing to consider a Class C Variance to three (3) standards oftl~e CPMC. The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor"s map as 375 2W 10DD, Tax Lot 2100, 1~7613ea11 Lane. Applicant: Dorathy L. Norman STAFF SOURCE: Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician BACKGROUND: ~,~, 4.m. ~ .,rot .~, ~ ,yew >,~ ~~, maam p ,~~,a.a xa . . ~ ,re~~ . ;,,,aa „emu ' Y'e'Yti St PD 4951 &@q: ;'W',W 1'w'SY axp ~~~' WmSu" rmca Y ratrem od5i as a:i1 w,raaa ~~ rows aaen YWwp .a~uP to ~ .u sx ~ raw. xia BNM+ a, ,,ai I rfque aJrvYm mwm wrrx . via 60k mass <.oci mu.. ~ renam ., a ~ x ,~m: ~~' aa,~, a,,,».,a ~~~ wu mwe, s rem. N m~µ, re. ~ aaa< r+nm mee; a~nrar aaaw area roe, ry ~ ,tw~w~~ ,4Mam ~C4it MkK~~ ~~ mb#eW pw61 bgwM1 ~ p M;Y:~1 9.49 %u4q AM9 BgY..V p kN WY i6ree ~... mno: A ~ amA;q 1 ~ ...!X6.4nNdd~ ~ re~" ~ a a re,", n I "~-~, ' ! , te a usnmx' ] ®~r~ '~' 6 w aram : p . . ,ara .~~ ~roYa~".'~7G a,.. anao rant ,m:+ tai ~~ xsmr amts F'roam ~ sores rpar ~'Y r arma~ in.a ., °!~YP ...... ... I,mi~4-01kR The subject praperty is appraximately .62 of an acre. Tn conjunction with this application, the applicant has filed far a three ~3) lot minor partition (City File No. 07029). There is an existing hawse located an proposed lot 3. The applicant and agent had originally applied far two variances for Lot 3 as follows: Variance 1. A side yard setback variance for the existing home along the western side yard. The pause was constructed in 1938. The 3.13' side yard setback is an existing condition; therefore a variance is not required. This eliminated the need far Variance 1. Variance 2, A side yard setback from the 20' flagpole easement. ~ i ~C~tp.'tii7ti ,. A flag pale easement is for private use and not public v a r_ .............,.~,. ~ ~..~ .. ~,-,.~. .~ :'= =`.'~ ... „w.,_..,, . use, and therefore not defined as a public street. Because . __ .___ the flag pole is not considered a public street the proposed Lat 3 is not considered a corner iot. Nat being defined as a corner lot, Lat 3 is not subject to the ten X10) foot side yard street side) setback requirement. A minimum five r~5) foot side yard setback is Page 1 of 2 required by CPMC. The applicant proposes 8.17 feet; which exceeds the minimum required by CPMC. Consequently, there is no need for Variance 2. During the review of the tentative plat it was determined, as a result of Beall Lane's designation as an arterial street, that the current access from the existing garage on Lat 3 would nat be allowed, Jackson County and Public Works have recommended that all three (3) lats take direct access from the flag pole. CPMC 16.35.040 (D} -Flag Lots, states that a maximum of two lots are allowed access from a, flag pole. 1f Lot 3 is to be required to access the flag pole then a variance to Section 16.35.040(D} is required prior to approval of the tentative plan. FINDINGS: Attachment "C" ISSUES: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Nane EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" -Tentative Plan Attachment "B" - ApplicantlAgent Findings Attachment "C" -Planning Department Findings Attachment "D" -Public Works Staff Report Attachment "E"- Fire District No. 3 Comments Attachment "F" -Jackson County Roads Comments Attachment "G" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of a variance to CPMC 16.36.040 (D}. RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the Class "C" Variance application, File No. 07028 be approved per the Staff Report dated February 6, 2007 including all attachments. Page 2 oft ~'~ {L ~ !9 / ~`'° ~ ZVtGpt~-y~sN ,~ ~4~GRA 4 3' Q5a J~c~E. 0 o~ BARGEE t ry sayl sort. N Q• LQT 0.R;,A LESS 1fiE P.DAry JU2? Sq,iE, OHO \\ rv {// ti ry~r 1 F 7 •c`~ ~~ A r4 ~~~ ~ 0~ ~Jh S ~ s(: t,~ r~ 4 m R»~e,oo E }.9~ RARC£t z 8S9B Sc_ft- LOT 0.9fA LE55 7ft. 9oAG 6332 5q,f;. aaA++OD.~~EA n.LL s<.T9 u SA.Tg PARCEL 3 Loi 0.REa g35< 5c,ft, LOT ARfA LE5$ irlC AOAp 6}a5 $Q,fE. ti3 E%1STlUC HCi+SE i0 R£NArN ~ZgG ~ 8.1J ~~,~~~ ~ s. ~ r~ ~rrv~ PAf?Trrrorv PI,Ar SQ ~`~ ''`' ~ PROPEr~rY LINE Al?J[15TMENr }G~ p0~ _ S`K~ a" loco ied .n ~~'~•~~ ~ i _~ ~ SOUTHEAST AVE QUARTER OF' SECTION 70 p ~ ~Z T4}4NSH1P 37 SOU77-l, RANGE 2 WE'S7 ~ 1 1ti1L1..4M~'7TE MERfQrAN. Cf7Y OF CENTRAL PAINT aEAU L++ JACK5DN COUNTY, OREGON rcwnT uAP +:o scALS for CJOROTHY NORMAN - I rca 1dEADOcv LANE sHADr cove, DRFCON eTS3e ~ = t%A.7E'R Fd£TEP t ®= 20' PROPOSED fNGRf.'S5 AND EGA.ESS, u71LTrr kn'0 € EASERGENCY U<NlCLf eASEI.lENT _ ~ = t0' P.fGNT-pF'--I'IkY DEOfGAYfON --55- - SANITARY $EYrR LfNE -PL- m FLOIY LINE -R- = PQISC P. LINE {PP&L) - C - = N.A 7URAL GAS LINE Ol -CAS METER '~. 8A$t$ OF BEARIldG 1$ TRUE NORTH. NAD 83/9F DATUM„ h5 DERfScD 8Y GL08hC POS!Trov1NG SYSTEM 0~7SrRVA71pN5. PUf ~ PUBLIC UT4tTY EASEd<EfS7 FOR lYk7EP., SAldfTARY SESrR, ~ S70RId pRAlN, PHONE, GAS. AND CkBLE TV. ZONfNG IS P-i-6 FF.(EPCSE{) 20.09 n+.pE rAGEAIEi:i EAR ihGRESS AE.*Z ~ - SI,SALLEST L07 !S 8354 SOJARE FEET OGRES>, UT,UliES. ANp CA?fR~LHCT SER`.1Cf5 carrA~t:wc d69A so.Ei. -LARGEST L07 IS SB99 50!lARE FEE.7 -- fNGRESS AND EGRL'$$ EASE7AENT 6604 SOUAP.£ FEET !I TOikL AREA 26992 SO.F7. FF' ~e~ ~ o ~, E 'LSO J C`~@ 0~~5~~ a~ ~ 1~ry G '~ ~. E o~c> f O f z p.- ... I Y ~ ~ ~ eo~ Rie~r-a-waY ocaeAnaR SS - 55 _ Ss ~---- S'.~ S }5 ------- Sr• SS ~~ .. w w ., a v - ., w- ,. ., BEAI_L LANE ?" GAS L4lE PER R5~3UilT pagW!NGS 6 [NGMt GAS fth°E PER t~59U ~T E>RAYRNGS ELK FAR+AS wC CA' ASSESSORS ArAP ..+LC +~+0. 3] 11t' IO~JD TL 2EpO Sheet 1 0{ T REGISTERED PF.OFFSSIONAL LAND BURVSYOR OREGON ,mx, xs. ~?es jai-Arzias u~R RENEN'A! pnSC +2-3s_9T Sarr veyed by fARBER dt SONS, lNC. dba FARBER SURVEYING (s4r) ~s~-ssss P 0, BOX 5286 431 DAK S7REE+ CENTRAL PDlN7, gREGON 47502 1P' i0 p' TP' _~ 60' QA 7E. OL 70RER J1, 200E JOS N0.' s<aa-o5 AAp/•col~on November 10, 2006 City of Central Point Planning Department 140 South Third Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Norrnan Variance application, 37-2W-lODD TL2100 at 1676 BEALL LN Background information: The project site is a long and narrow rectangular shaped tract with it sale access from Beall Lane. There is one existing home on the tract located approximately eighteen (18) feet back from the existing right-of way. It is proposed that the tract be partitioned into three {3) parcels. The existing house will remain on the parcel nearest Beall Lane. A ten (10) foot strip of land will be dedicated to the public to bring Beall Lane to current right- of way standards. The application is requesting relief from the Side Yard setback standard of 10.00 set forth in Chapter 17.20.050 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code {CCPM). In order for the Access Easement to meet the Minimum 20.00 width set forth in Chapter 16.36.040 B of the CCPM it must come within 8.17 feet of the existing home. This is the best scenario for developing this lot within the confines of the parent tract and still providing adequate access to the northerly parcels. C. Approval Criteria. The city shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application fof• a variance based on all of the following criteria. 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this code, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; Finding: This odd shaped parcel is a result of land use prior to our present day planning standards. Chapter 17.20.010-The purpose of the R-1 district is stabilize and protect the urban density residential characteristics of the district while promoting suitable environments for family life. This proposed development is consistent with other developrr~ent in this neighborhood in recent times. It is an infill lot and as stated in the background discussion is the best that can be done within the limitations of the parent parcel awned by the applicants. 2. A hardship to development exists which is peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography, or other similar circumstances related to the property over which the applicant has na control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the vicinity (e.~, the same zoning district); ~~~ Finding: The applicants purchased the property in this configuration therefore had no control over it. This hardship is not self imposed 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and city standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; Finding: The applicants are asking that they be allowed to develop their property to the same density as code requires and could not do without the approval of this application. Their intent is to build 2 single farn.ily residence to the rear ar North end of the proposed Parcel 3. The applicant has done everything within their power to utilize their property without hindering any future development. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, natural resources, and parks, will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development occurred as specified by the subject code standard; Finding; This proposed development will have no adverse impact on any natural features. S. The hardship is not self-imposed; and Finding: As previously stated this Iand was in this conf guration when purchased by the applicants therefore was not self imposed. b. The variance requested is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship. (Ord. 1874 ~S(part), 2006). Finding: The requested variances are the minimum that the applicants need to allow the addition of two additional dwelling to their property. Respectfully submitted, Herbert A Farber FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW File No. Q7U28 INTRODUCTION In the matter of consideration of a Variance Application in preparation of a Tentative Plan Application to create three (3} single family residential lots. CPMC 17.T3.~00 {C) - Approual Criteria. Tl~e Cit~j shall approve, approve zvitlz conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on all of the following criteria: 1. Tl~e proposed uariance will not be materially detrimental to tl~e purposes of this code, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in tl~e same zoning district or z~icinit~j; Findings: The only variance to consider with the proposed application would be whether three (3) lots can take access from a flag pole easement. CPMC 16.36.040 (D) allows a maximum of two Iots to take access from a flag pole. Beall Lane is designated as arterial street and for the purpose of safety to the public the City and Jackson County are restricting access to the property from a single access point. The current driveway is not suitably located to allow partitioning of the property. The need for this variance is due to the City and Jackson County not allowing any additional direct access onto Beall Lane other than the easement. Conclusion: The proposed variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this code. 2. A ]uzrdsliip to development exists z41hich is peculiar to the lot size or drape, topography, or other similar circumstances related to the properhj over zvhich tl~e applicant has no control, and zuhicla are not applicable to other properties in the uicinihf. Findings: The hardship to cause the variance is due to the classification of Beall Lane as an arterial street and a 10' right-of -way along Beall Lane for future improvements. In addition, coxxtrnents from Jackson County and the City recoxnz~nend that the existing home takes access from the flag pole, rather than maintaining a separate access onto Beall Lane. Conclusion: The applicant does not have control over the conditions of approval imposed by Jackson County and the City. 3. The use proposed zvill be the sa=ne as permitted under this title and citaj standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably passible zUhile permitting reasonable economic use of the land. Findings: The proposed use in combination with the recommended conditions o£ approval would present the best economic use of the land. Conclusion: With the recommended conditions of approval, this enables this proposal to maintain City and County standards to the greatest extent_ 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, natural resources, and parks, will not be adversely affected any more tluzn u~otcld occur if tl~e development occurred as specified by the subject code standard; iF'indings: The location of the existing house has been present since the original construction in 193$, at a time when Beall Lane was a lane. It has not caused any adverse affect and there is no need for a variance for this existing condition. The creation of two more Iots an this parcel would not adversely affect further development. The development of the additional two proposed lots would meet all subject code standards. Conclusion: Proposed lot 3 with the existing house taking access from the flag pole will not adversely affect traffic or access. It would eliminate two (2) access points in close proximity to each other onto a county arterial road, and would not aggravate any issues by developing. 5. The luzrdship is not sel f imposed; Findings: The hardship was not imposed by the applicant. It is due to the changing character of Seall Land imposed conditions of approval fxoxn Jackson County and the City. Canclusian: The applicant is not the cause of the variance. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance tluzf would alleviate the hardship. Findings: The cause of the variance is due to conditions of approval for the proposed minor partition. and is the minimum variance suggested to alleviate the hardship. Conclusion: It is the minimum variance suggested to alleviate the hardship. ~ ~~ e , . _ .. ~,~,, ~~ l%+~ a~ ~ lit ~L ,'., i f: ~ ~ , f Bab Nierce, ~irectar Matt Samitare, Dev. Services Caord. P~:T~3LIC !~/UI?I~.S' ~ST~4.FF12EPt~.tZT January 4, 2007 AGENIIA ITEM: Three Lot Partiti~~n for 37-Z~~ -1ODD, Tax Lot 2100 Applicant: Dortliy L. Norman, 100 Meadow Lane, Shady Cove, ()R 9'7539 Zoning: R-1-6, Residential Single F ily Traffic: L;Lrsed on the Institute of Transportation ~nineers ~ITI~,) Trip Gct~ertztion l~rlanual, a three lot 1~artitor~ will :-'~ ~ ~~~rate approximately 3.03 pear hour trips (PITT). The City ul~ Central Point typically requires traffic- st~zdies li~~' any development that generates more than 25 PI-IT. Na trzal'tic study is warranted for this dc~rclope~zent. L+:~isti~~ri Infrastructure: W41ter. There is an existing 12-inch waterline in Beall Lane. Storm Drain: There is no existin~~ storm drainage in this section of :Beall Lane. There is an existing county ditch in fi-<,~it ofthe subject pa,-cel. Street Section: Beall Z1ane is county road, currently paved to a width. of twenty-four feet. Issues:. This past. month the City has witnessed a significant amount of storm water coming froirz the subject property and pooling on the neighbors property causing some isolated flooding issues. The lacy. of storm drain facilities within the area ~~ i11 require some significant improvements by the developer to resolve. the storm drain. problems associated with this parcel. )`un~irzec~ring and ~lleyc yp-ztent F'Ians and Pi;rrt~its: The Cent~<<zl Point Public Works Department is ehac~.;ecl uitf~ mana~cment of the City's infrastructure, includinn sttreets, waterworks, and storm. water drain:~`~e facilities, In general, the Department's "Standard Specificatiaiisond. Uniform Standard Details for Public Z~'orks Coi~struction'~ shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed, The Developer is encouraged to obt<zin the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. 1n ~~rereral, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sc~~crs, storm drainage calculations, storm, drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency nc>tilic4itions and approvals. '1"he plan may also include appicabl< t~-<~i~(ic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction 1 ~+~ South Third Street .d, Central Paint, 1.~R 975172 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 f" ~~'. drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued. Conditions of Approval: 1. Public Utility Easement - As part of the Final Plat aten-feet wide utility easement shall be placed immediately behind the existing and proposed right-of way. 2. Beall Lane Frontage Improvements: Beall Lane is classified as a Collector Street. Developer will be responsible for constructing additional asphalt pavement, sidewalk and landscape row, with street trees, far the Beall Lane frontage. The City will be using a curb side sidewalk and a five foot landscape strip located directly behind the sidewalk for the design of Beall Lane. Developer is responsible for half street improvements. Civil improvement drawings must be approved for construction prior to Final Plat approval. 3. Right-of WaY Dedication: Applicant shall dedicate ten feet of right-of-way along the frontage of Beall Lane for future widening to a collector street. 4. System Development Charges Credit (SDC): Applicant will be eligible for SDC credit the up-sized portion of the street. A standard city street has a half street improvement responsibility of asphalt paving of eighteen feet, plus a five foot sidewalk and five foot landscape raw. A collector standard has a paved width of twenty five feet with a five foot sidewalk and landscape row. The developer is eligible for SDC credit for the upsized portion of the asphalt paving and the dedication of right-af way. 5. Grading Permit: Applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the Building Department prior to any construction occurring. 6. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the f nal plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet an center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 1/2" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be of the property owners who awn the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. 7. 100-year Floodplan: The subject property is within the Special Flood Hazardous Area (SERA} or what is typically referred to as the 100-year floodplain of Daisy Creek. All engineering and building development on the parcel must comply with section 8.24 of the Central Paint Municipal Code. 140 South Third Street Cenfral Point, OR 97502 ~~~ 549.664.3329 ~- Fax 549.664.6384 4~ H d AAA ~ d ~s (.~. 9~ December 2$, 2006 Lisa Morgan Planner City of Central Point ]ackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road ` ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ _ White City OR 97503-iD75 (541} 826-7100 (voice} (54~.} 826-4566 (fax} InternationallyAccredited - 2U45-2U~Q Project # 07029 Dorothy Norman -Tentative Plat The following Oregon Fire Code {OFC) requirements shall apply to this project. • Turn Around shall be dedicated for vehicle turn around use only. • "No Parking Any Time" signs shall be posted as per OFC appendix D. Signs shall be clearly posted on both sides ofi the lane, including the terminating end. The turn around shall be clearly signed and red curb paint shall be maintained. • OFC definition for fire access, see section 502, which includes public, private, lanes, parking lots, etc. Local ordinance needs to be clear so City Code authority can enforce the No Parking requirement. • One fire hydrant shall be installed a# the beginning of the Access Lane and Beall Lane. • 20-foot curb face to curb face, access lane shall remain unobstructed at all times. • Dwelling cannot exceed 30 feet in height unless the access lane is a minimum of 26 feet width. Mark Moran DFM ~0 ~f PLAI'~NII`~~ CC?l'~i~lll~~~t~.'d ~~6~;~~T,1[l'~"1[t~-1'~1 T~T(;~.. A R1~`~~~L.LI'Tt~?~ "~'~~ ~~1't'~~t~~~D~; ~ ~'t,i~.~~ C' ~V~~1~l.~~f~.`i~:'I'Cl CPMC 1+5.:~t~.O~Q (~} ~~t.,~,t~~~~~~~8 ~~~~~~~~;t~, ~~~ sa~~~•~ ~~~~~ ~~•,~~~N,. ;~~~~`;~~~~; ~1~~plic,~nt; }~7~~rc~(i~y i~.. Narnaa~n ~~ ~~~ l Ullll, Tl?~ l..at ~ ~~ ~1P#~ 1 Ct202318 W E-[1~R~:A~~ the Applicant has sui~z~liuc~i ~iri applicati~m lu~• a Ci~~ss C Va7•i~i~lcc i~~ arder to ~t~;cornmadate a three (3) lat partiti~_~n (File No. I}'702~>~ li•o~n the ;;taiulards of the City afCentral Paint Municipal Cade as listed aba~ ~~ an prape~~ty iti~ntiiicc! on .~~zc1L~o». County Assessor's map as 37 ZW IODD, Tax Lat 2ItJ0, cansistiz~n ~~f appraxi.ix~tely . acres in the City of Central Paint, C~regan; and WI-;iE AS, during review of tine apl~licar~t's v<triat~ccs it was deter-~nif~cci th~~t tllc. variances as requested complied with exi5ti»~,~ st~inclards, ar were coY~sidercd i.,e~~ai Nola- Conforming; and. ~~ }-Il~~ AS, it was father determined that there remained a need for 4~ ~a~•iarl~:e t~~ CPMC l f.36.U40 (D); and ~r'tIF`R~`.~5, an January 17, 207 the City afCentral Paint publicly noticed tli~: rcqu~st for a v~~riance; and '~~'1-Q~,~AS, an Fehrczary 6, 200'x, at a duly noticed public hcari~~~,; the City of Central. Poitat Planning Comntis~ian, considered the Applicant°s request fur tla~:. variance; and.. WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned R-I-6, Residential ~irl~le 1~°anlily; and WET2~;.=~~, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based. an the standards and criteria applicable to Flag Lots, Section I~.~6.040, R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning di~ts~ict Section 17.20.050 and Class C variance Section 17.13.500 of the Central Paint Municipal Cade; and ''4~'IIE AS, after duly considering the Applicant's request and conditions imposed b~yoiid the Applicant's control, it is floe Planning Commission's determination that the Application meets a request far a ~~ar~~tnce~ now, therefore, BE IT RESULVEll, that the City of Ceaatr~zl Paint Planning Cammissian,l,}~ this Resolution No. i~ereby approves the Application based an the findi.n~s and conclusions of approval as set Earth on Exhibit "A" Planning Department Staff Report. ,_ Planning Commission Resoi~~tiuta No. (216/2007) which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein dated February 6, 2007. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of February, 2007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of February, 2007 Planning Commission Chair ~~ ~:~ Planning Commission Resolution No. (21612007) 1~4F~1VIAI~I ~ `1~'~~ITATIY~ PLAN ~~ 1~~ ,, t ~ ~) ~~~ ~ ~(741"fIT1CItTIt'y~ ~~^llC~ ~~~='g'ill ! J i < f,C>Y;! Ill 9~ ~=,~,isuit C_lv h~litiinis! r,~t~~r 1"'el?rU~-l; ~~ (1(~7 A~"1E'~.,ZCA~.TIC1N ITE~'Is T{`ILE I`+fC~. 0'~09~ `iCeaat~at~i~'a~ Pl<iaa ~$.~7~~Iicatii-aa Public hearing to cotlsicler' a mino-' ha-°titi<--~ to c'rc~-tc th-~ec (ti) resiclc-rtial lots Jtacatexl at ~ G7G~~~l3cafl Lane, The subject prc>l~erty is located i-~ an R-1-f~, IZ~sidealti;-1 Sii~~~,lc family zoninr> cii~trict~.-~cl is identifcd on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37~ ?~~' I ()I)1), Tax Lot 21.00, 1 t,;'t> I3cai1 Lane. ~11~~licant: Dorothy L. Norman TFF_S_U12.CE: _ Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician t3:~~'~.C~'~C)Cl~i)4 Tl~e su~jcct pa~~eutparcel consists ofapproximatel~= .~2 of an acre. There is an cxistitlg home on ~rol~c~sed Lot 3 ofthe Tentative Plan that.. wiil rea»ai-7, It was originally corrstriirted in 1.938, and is therefore exempt from the side yard setback requarcrn.cnts. T3~e applic~-r-i I ti~?cart originally sa~~n~ittccl a. variance application to seek relief fro~7~ setback reglurerrzcnts ii~r the existit~~~~ st-~rrct~trc. 1 ~~on f~-rtiler review ofthe requested variances it was drterrnined that the vari~zr~ces ti~er~ --ot ncc~~sary for tlx:; existing structure. However, due to cc~r~ditioa~s unposed lay Jael<so~a County (l~c~f'c~• to Att~aa~taa~a~;nt "~'~} that all three parcels take access from the flag pole, variance frorr~ CPMC 16 >6.040 (Dj is nc;cessary Beall Lane is cl~tssiliecl as an arterial street and req~tire~ a ten (10) foot dedication.. The proposed Ten~~rtive Plan aphlicati<n7 meets all other rega-irerne~-ls, as outlined in detail in the Planning Department finclin~s. (l~a~fcr tea ,~ttachtmcaat "il~""}. l~'il~'~DYNG~; _7,,_ ~~~t',fE',T' fit} ~~~ilClllitl$Yat E4$99`. 1~7L'9111..9: The i'c>llowing issues h~~we been noted during tlae review of'this application. 1. During the review l~rcrcess Jackson County imposed limited access onto Beall Lane which is classified as 4nr arter°ial street. This issue has been addressed through the review ofthe Variance application. (City 1 ilc No. 07028). Without granting approval ofthe variance, the Tentative flan. can not be approved as submitted. 2. Conditions imposed by Jackson County, and Public Works far improvements to Beall Lane along the frontage of the s2rbject propeaty do not allow the applicant an adequate turning radius to utilize the existing garage: o fi~ of tl~~c flag pole easement, according to AASI-1TCJ. The applicant would have to voluntarily agree to abandon the use of Clue existing garage and provide alternative covered parking for two cars on Lot 3. This is a ream>>r~ended condition of approval, Norman Tentative Plan Page 1 of 2 V 1 ...9~~E~,t `~ ~A•~Cs 5¢J 7~ 6~ J~c~£ `O o tTkRCEL + ~~ Es59s EC11 ry ~y~ io+ assn LESS Rs= eo.~ xo.z so ~!. o° u / o . 5 ~ ~ ~~ y' P ~ 'S '`p A~ ~ 2 .45 Sa.T; S 0 1z.G~ n• za,Ca A..43,9+ PARLEt, 2 easa san. fos taEa Eess TIE Roan A~32 san. AA ~a P~,o~G ~~ o~` 1zz~ UP 9~~~a5` . r 4__..~,_v..- vii - K (p ~. _.._..~ _.1.~_~~ r!Eall !1J. 'aCkA+Y 4h~ nn u.riE: ~~~~nn~~~ ;~~~~ r~ ~ rrv~ r~arzrr rraN r}z~a r PROA~r2TY LffVE f~DJi1STMEfVr !oculcd in SOUTHEAST CAPE LWARTER f3F SECTION i0 T01kNSFflP 37 SOUTH, 17ANCE 2 iS'EST WfL[.AMETTE MfRlOfAN, CITY OP CENTRAL POINT JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON fpr oo~orNY rvoR~ranr roo r.+£noaFV rnu[ SIrADr DDVt, nRECON s753s ! N3 iYn T£R kf{' F£R CT~ ~~ PL115fR POLO (PIS&1,) ® F 24" F'ROPOS£n nJGRF55 nuD EGRESS. uTq.Trr nND E7.rCRGCNCr VENIGLE £nSEM£Ni (~'""~ .-~ rn' Rlcrrr~nr- wAr n£nrcaTrvv i --is-! = SANI rIcRY SE Y~L~R LlMf - , - m sr Dvr t rrrE --- F ~ POW R I.InIC {PP&L) --c -- ~ rrnrfranr cns cfrrF ?b = GAS MfTER t}n5r$ af' BEARrhG r$ TRUE raORTr;, NA- 83/91 DA7UAf. AS tTf'RIYF.'n RY L'LaBnt POSI7IANrrJG SYS7£rd Of35CRVA7!ONS. PUE m Pi/!?L!C UT!{1TY F,ASFM£NT FOR YlATER, SFNITARY SC1t'[it, STORA! nRh111, Frronr£, GAS, NJU f:ALiLL il! -ZONING r5 R-+-6 y FAp74SE9 7dW WC[ Cw9Cu4,r11 FOR 1HGR(SS A!E,` ~- 51AALL£$T LDT I$ {~.)j^ $QEjAR£ FEET £G~55, iIF.E1m'S. A.YO EHCRGEIICY SCA5~CC5 CCNUxnuG s5o~ Sa,rr. E - LARGEST LaT !5 8899 501IAftE Ff.F;7 - INGRESS nNG' EGR£$S EA;EI.lE'N7 5bG4 $DUARE MEET - 70TH;, .4R£A 2599.7 Sn.F'', ~ ~p~ 'ti o V V n[!urUO~'[o xErL 1 ~"m ~4,~4 $ ~o`~z}~ ~ f 3^ 5 6t_]~ II O~ i P r WAF2Cf'L LO+ AREa S55a Se.R, L0: / 2rw iEcS 5s1. NnW 638d 54 rr m _3.53 E%rS11r:G !r WSE 'a +O HEVnay j29; e.tt ~ ! ........... - ..... ...... .... ~.... . REOiST F.REO ARDF'1~SSiONAL 7E.AND BU~SY08 ..~. ~ _~.._ a o v .° t f 1 a5 ^--~ % ;,5 --` S: -- _..._... c -- ? ~...- ~ ~.^ JJJ1 -'-'-- .1:a - ~ ~Y - r~ ~__ P ~. y ~_.- c +D RIGkT-OF-wnv DC9:ChT10.'1 S_ <C ~_. $S - .~, _t ~T . ORHGON ~~Q~L., LAND RCNEwsi OAT[ r2-S%-OT A SurveyeU by.' FARF3ER & SONS, fNC. dbc P'AR9E'R SURMEI?NG r GAS EPiE FEF AtIIi+~tT G.zwvn~;GS (54f} 884--5599 n~prs Gas .urr F(R ns4;htr pgaPmcs r'.O. F3DX 528Fi ^--^ ~ - = ^~^-~- ~.. .. r: K-._..` .37 6AK STREET CENTRAL POrt~'T, aRF.Gax 97502 zT_,ZW_5b +l.h^D L~~t FARrAS INv ~ ~a L ~ ~ SC.uF t' ., 20' 20~ '1p 'C. ?0' ~C 11ll1 Da TE: ~ CCT93F'A 3i, 2005 ass~ssarrs ~..nn nze uo a7 zw roaD Sh@at 7 off Tc zoo SOB l.0.: 1ldb-b6 _ _ _ Rnw~.yc s1: F: .ALTS \C~.Y ma{ aper.~r~NPRUnu~MrCRCSUR~rE ~no•r%lia- aFn:rea FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No. 07Q29 INTRODUCTION In the matter of consideration of a Tentative Plan Application far a Minor Partition to create three {3) single family residential lots, zdenhfied on Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 10DD, Tax Lot 2100, APN # 1020231.8. CPMC z6.10A~0-16.T0.(130 -Relating to Submission of application and filing fee; Application and Review; scale; general information; existing conditions; additional information; partial development; explanatory information, tentative plan approval; and conditions on tentative plan approval. Findings: The applicant has submitted all the necessary information relevant to reviewing a tentative plan application. Conclusion: The application was deemed complete on December 20, 2006. CPMC 16.36.040 - Flag Lats -~ No partition shall be approved in which a flag lot, as defined in this title, is created unless: (A) The parent and flag lots, excluding the flag pole, whether fee title or an easement, shall comply with the minimum lot size, Iat dimension, and setback requirements for the zoning district in which the Tots are Located; Findings: The parent parcel consists of approximately .62 acres. The parent parcel is located within the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district with a minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 square feet. The subject parent parcel is 27, 007 square feet. The existing house which is identified to remain on proposed Lot 3 was constructed in 1938 and therefore exempt from the side yard set back requirement of 5'. The existing house is determined to be legal non-conforming. The three proposed lots range in size frown 6,132 - 7,022 square feet not including the flag pole easement. The width of the proposed lots range from 64.79 on proposed Lot 3 to 84.64 feet on proposed Lot 1. The set back requirements for Lots 1 and 2 will be verified far compliance during the building permit review process. Conclusion: AlI lots meet this requirement. (B) The flag pole shall be no less than twenty feet wide and paved to private standards as set forth in the Standard Specifications and i.iniform Details, City of Central Point Prcblic Works Departmenf; Findings: The applicant has provided a 20' wide easement for access to proposed Lots 1 and 2, as well as a turn around between same mentioned lots. ~~ i Page 1 of 4 Findings: The Tentative Plan does not reflect any physical obstacles located within the flag pole easement. Fire District No. 3 has subanitted comments to ensure that this does not happen. Refer to Fire District No. 3 corx~ment<s. Conclusion: The Tentative Plan meets this requirement, and conditions of the Fire District ensure that compliance is maintained. (D) A maximum of two lots are alIozved access from a flag pole. Findings: A variance has been considered, prior to the Tentative flan review to allow three (3) lots access from the flag pole easement based on conditions innposed by Jackson County. Feall Lane is a County artexial road, and far safety reasons access points have been Limited. Conclusion: With granting of a variance, it has been determined that this is the safest best use of the subject property. CPMC 17.20.010 -Purpose -- The purpose of the 12-1 district is to stabilize and protect the urban lom densit7~ residential characteristics of t1~e district ulltile promoting and encouraging suitable environments for fanziI~ Life. Findings: The applicant has met the purpose of the R-1 zoning district by proposing three (3) single family residential lots. The design and lot size requirements in the R-Z-6 zoning district are consistent with the development that has occurred and will occur in this neighborhood. Conclusion: The applicant has satisfied the purpose of the RT3, Residential Single Family zoning district. CPMC 17.20.00 -Height Regulations - No building or structure shall exceed thirttj-five feet in height in an R-1 district. Findings: This is a tentative plan application and would not be addressed through the tentative plan criteria. Conclusion: This will be reviewed during the building permit review process. Page 2 of 3 CPMC 17.20.050 ~-Density, Lot Area, Lat Width, dirrrensinrr, brrildirrg height, lot coverage, and yard requirements - Tfre falinrr~ing regrcirerrrents slrrrll be observed in the R-1-& district: Findings. Density: In the R-1-b zoning district the minimum density allowed is 4 units per acre, and the maximum density allowed is 6 units per acre. Based upon the size of the parent paxcel (.b2 of an acre) the minimum density allowed would be two (2) lots and the maximum density allowed would be three (3) units. Conclusion: The applicant has met the density requirements of the zoning district. Mirximum/Maximum Lat Area: The minimum Iot area permitted iY1 the R-~-6 zone is 5,000 square feet and the maximum allowed is 9,000 square feet. The proposed lots (excluding the flag pole) range in size from b,132 - 7,022 square feet. Conclusion: The applicant has proposed Lots that axe within the square footage xange allowed in this zoning district. Minimum Lat Widtlz and Lat Depth: The minimum lot width within this zoning district is 50 feet. There is not a minimum lot depth requirement. The applicant has proposed lots ranging in width from b4.79 to 84.64. Conclusion: The lots proposed meet this requixement. Minimum setbacks, building height and maximum lat coverage: The mitumum front yard set back is 20', the maximum building height is 35', maximum lot coverage is 50%, and the side yard setbacks for new construction will be detexmined by calculations during the building permit review pxocess. Conclusion: Review of the building permits will ensure compliance with these requirements. Page 3 of 3 ~t m f; ~ ~~ . 8ot~ t'~c~rcc;~, L+~je~ctor Matt ~mitc-re, C~ev. ,~E~rvic~~ Cooed. .~'CIBLIC 1~0121"S ,~' ~"~ 1 ~'f ~' lz I .i'C~1 I ' January , 20Q'7 AGENDA ITE~~: Three Lot Partition. for ~'~-2VV- l t~I) [), "lax I :ot 2l (J~ Applicant: Dortz} L. Norm~in, l,C~d tvl~;titci~>G~r Lane, ~laady Cove, UR 17753 ?.,oning: R-1-6, I~.esidential ~in~rle Fazxzily Tr'zaflic: i3ascd ozr the Institute of Tr~~z~si~ortatioz~ l_,n~~i~lccrs (1~1"l :) Tr3t~ (.7cner~~tian Manual, a tt~rree lot hartitioa~~ will generate approximately 3.a3 peak hour trips (I'~I~T). `l'h_e City of E~'cntral ~1'oi~~t t~-pic;ally regrzires traliic sttidics for any dui uloprraent that generates more than 25 PI-IT. Nea traffic ~tz~c9t~~ ~s ~~~az~•z•~nted fc-r dais de~velt~l~~n~ ~zt. -?tistinn Ini'z•da~tz°zactz~r~~4 VJat+~r' "l'llcrc is an cxistaz~T l<'-inch ~~~,iterline in Beall Lane. 5to1•an Dr~~in: Thet-e is Ito e~istin~ storn7, drainage in this section of Beall. Lane. There i~ an existing county ditch izl front ofthe subject parcel. Street Section. Beall Lane is county road, currently paved to a width: of tti~ c~1t}r-four feet. Issues: This past month the City has t~ itnc~s~:~.l a significant amount of storm eater ct>ming from the subject property and pooling on the neighbors property causing some isolated floodiz~f; iss~z~;s. The lack. of storm drain facilities within the area. will require sozzie significant improvements by the developer to resolve the storm drain problems associated with this pa~~cel. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Departz7~cnt is char~~ed t~~itti ~manageme~~t of the City's i~3fi•astr~icture, inelt~ding streets, waterworks, aa~d storm ~~;:zter drait~a`~c f;~cifities. In gene~~il, the Departmezlt's -•tilandarcl 5hceificatio~~ and I?zziform Stazzdard Details for Public Woz~~ Constructiaz~" shall govern how public facilities arc to be corzstructcd. The Developer is encouraged to o~?tain the latest version ofthese specifzcations from the Public Works Department. ire ~cneral, the plan submittal shall include plan and pros=zle fc~r streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sc«crs, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basi~~ reap, erosion control plan, utility and outsit-le agency notifications and approvals, The plan may also include ~aiplicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A 1'ttblic Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction 9407 South Third Streef - Cen~r~! Paint, Of; 9~ a02 549.664.332 ~,,, Fax 541.664.6384 1' ~' drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued. Concliti©ns ©f Approval: Public Utili Easement - As part of the Final Plat aten-feet wide utility easement shall be placed immediately behind the existing and proposed right-af--way. 2. Beall Lane Frontage Improvements: Beall Lane is classifed as a Collector Street. Developer will be responsible for constructing additional asphalt pavement, sidewalk and landscape raw, with street trees, for the Beall Lane frontage. The City will be using a curb side sidewalk and a five foot landscape strip located directly behind the sidewalk far the design of Beall Lane. Developer is responsible for half- street improvements. Civil improvement drawings must be approved for construction prior to Final Plat approval. 3. Right-of--Way Dedication: Applicant shall dedicate ten feet of right-af--way along the frontage of Beall Lane for future widening to a collector street. 4. System Development Charges Credit (SDC}: Applicant will be eligible far SDC credit the up-sized portion of the street. A standard city street has a half street improvement responsibility of asphalt paving of eighteen feet, plus a five foot sidewalk and five foot landscape row. A collector standard has a paved width of twenty fve feet with a five foot sidewalk and landscape row. The developer is eligible for SDC credit for the upsized portion of the asphalt paving and the dedication ofright-of--way. 5. Grading Permit: Applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the Building Department prior to any construction occurring. 6. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated far Iandscape rows. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specif cations far the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at Ieast a 1 1/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. 7. 100-year Floodplain: The subject property is within the Special Flood Hazardous Area (SFHA) or what is typically referred to as the 100-year floodplain of Daisy Creek. All engineering and building development on the parcel must comply with section 8.24 of the Central Point Municipal Code. 140 South Third Sfreef Centro! Pornf, OR 97502 =~ 541.664.3321 ~°~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ City of Central Paint, Oregon Building Department 140 SaThird 5t., Central Pnint, Os 97502 541.664.333 Fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.centrat-point.ar.us Loris f3eF3enedetti, BI11Idtnt~ Ot•~3CIdl BUILDING I~I/PARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: avo3i07 TO: Planning Department Planning file: 07029 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Dorothy Norman-Tentative Plan Name: Dorothy Norman Address :100 Meadow Lane City: Shady Cove State: Oregon Zip Cade: 9753$ Property Description: 37~2w~lODD~TL2100 PURPOSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirel€nents and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is nat a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely fox use by the Central Point Planning Commission. City of Central Point, Oregon 740 5o.Tllird 5t., Central Point, Or 97502 54i.664.332~ fax 54t.664.6384 www.ci_central-point.or,us CENTRAL ~~~~~ 2 Building Department Lois t3eBenedettl, Building Official 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on tlae property. S. Any development {any manmade change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Residential Specialty Code (2005). l l . Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings. The International Fire Cade {2003] with Oregon Amendments {Z004) will be implemented as part of the plan check code requirement for this proposed building. 12. Property lines must be established and pinned by Lic. Oregon Surveyor prior to any building inspections. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. ~~ ;~ City of Central Point, C>regon 140 Su.Third St., Ce~rtral t'oint, Or 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 543.664.63$4 www.ci.centra I-poinY.nr.us Building C)epartrnent Lois ~ef3enedetti, $ullding Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: l . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department, 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter l8 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. Plzen expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geoteclznical recommendations_ 5. Gradinglexcavationpermlts are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 1S and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private stoi7zz drain work must be permitted and inspected by City Building Dept (prior to backfill}. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official, shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation permit is finaled. Exception: l . The upper l .S foot of fill placed outside of public rights~o~ way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways oz` parking areas. J?:I~,/i1/!i~(~'~/li~il 1'1'v~~ JAC~a01~i ~OUh1T~' PO~~US ;~~~ ]~T3~~, ~~'1 7;~.~.,,~~~ c~'. ~~~CEr1,9 ~a .._.~.----Y.--... ~.oads Ertc ~Vicmeycr, ~'~: 73•a~c 8c De~rlopnterc! EnginECr 20D Antatflpe Rosd Whlto City, OR 9'15(33 Phony: (sal} r7n-nzsn Fax: (541 } 774-82£35 ntamnyef~acksancnunty.crq wvrvr.Jsckeoneounty.arg December 26, 2906 Attention: Lisa Morgan City of Central Point Planning 1'15 South Second Street Central Point, OR 975Q2 RE: Major Partition off Sea![ Lane - a county-rrtaintained road. Planning file: 07029; A residential partition. Dear Lisa: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on fihis application for the tentative plan for Dcarothy Normans' property, athree-lot residential partition located east of Snowy Butte Lane. Raads and 'arks has the following comments: 7. The applicant shall sulJmit constrtactian drawings to Jackson Caunty Roads and Parks and obtain county permits if required. 2. The applicant shall obtain a road approack~ permit~from Roads and Parks 'For the new road approach to Beall Lane. We recommend no direct parcel access to Beall Lane, 3. Please note that Beall Lane (Counfiy Arterial) has a variable right-of-way with an Average Daily Traffic count of 6,818 as of August 2006, seventy-five yards west of Highway 99. Raads and Parks recommend frontage improvements and that they be constructed to Central Poinf's road standards. 4, Jackson Co€.~nty Roads and Parks concur with any right-of-way dedication. 5 i n cerely, Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & ^evelopment Engineer i'1~nglneeringlpsvaiapmentlGITIESICNTRLPT107029.wpd i7 A~ 1 AtVI~IVI~ ~c~.__.___._ ~; Jackson County Fire District No. 3 ~ 8333 Agate Road :.. - .~ ._... - White City aR 975o3~io75 (541) 826-7100 (voice) (541) 826-4566 (fax) Internationally Accredited - 2445-24.24 - December 28, 2006 Lisa Morgan Planner City of Central Point Project # 07029 Dorothy Norman -- Tentative Plat The following Oregon Fire Code (OFC) requirements shalt apply to this project. • Turn Around shall be dedicated for vehicle turn around use only. • "No Parking Any Time" signs shall be posted as per OFC appendix D. Signs shall be clearly posted on both sides of the lane including the terminating end. The turn around shall be clearly signed and red curb paint shall be maintained. • OFC definition for fire access, see section 502, which includes public, private, lanes, parking to#s, etc. Local ordinance needs to be clear so City Code authority can enforce the No Parking requirement. • One fire hydrant shall be installed at the beginning of the Access Lane and Beall Lane. • 20-foot curb face to curb face, access lane shall remain unobstructed at ail times. • Dwelling cannot exceed 30 feet in height unless the access lane is a minimum of 26 feet width. Mark Moran DFM ~1l~2I2~E11 139:36 ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ .:~t~' 541-6547111 ~'~}S F'r";GE 134~i~~1 ~o~u~ u~~~E~ ~~w~R s~~v~c~s X_ncatian; ] 3R west Vitas Road, Ccntrni Ppinl, OEt - tvt.ailin~ Acitl+~ess: P.C3, i~ox 3130, Central Point, C)R 7542~t3bf)5 Tcl. (S~ll } G64-fi?100, 1;'ax (5d]) GG4-7171 ~wnv,~VSS.Iis D~~e1~~~ 2~, 2ao~ Lisa Morgan F.A.X f~G4~6384 Czty ol•' Centrsl :Point Pl.axxning Dcpa1-ttx~lcnt 1.55 Sout1~. Seco~xd Street Ccz,,1.1^a1 J?oint, Orcgo~~ 97502 Re: Nermax~ IPar~ltion, 37 2W IODD ~ 2Z00, FxXe # U'70~9 Deaz Lisa, 'here i.s an S ~zeh sewelr mlaia~. on Bsall Lane which sez-vcs the existing house, This sezvice will x>.ot be a£fcc#ed by tl~e p>c^oposed parti.#ion. Service to the two rear 1©#s will. xequire a znaitx Iinc extension aJon.g tiixe ~Sroposed access drive. Tl~.is exte».sion mt>s# be clcsignlrci ~'<~d constructed in aecr~rdat7cc wi#h RVS standards. The pxoperty is wittai,n. #hc NPDES Phase 2 ~to~xnwaCer Quality znanagex:ncnt area anal txl~ust cotx~ply with, z'ell:vattt stor~rl.water cltlality g~tidclincs. ~ecl free to ca.I1 znc ii`you aced additao~?ai in~orna.a#ion. Sin.cercly, `"" Carl 'Tappcrt, P.F, District fingineer K:IDATAIAGENC~.~SICENT'PT1T~Z.,ANNGIPARTtTION~2007107029 NORMAN.DOC p~ ~' ~u-b~ ~ ~ W~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL TO CREATE THREE (3) SINGLE FAMILY LOTS (Applicant: Dorothy Norman) {37 2W 10DD, Tax Lot 2100, APN # 10202318) Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted application to create three {3) single family residential lots on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 10DD, Tax Lot 27.00, APN No. 10202318, consisting of approximately .62 acres in the City of Central Paint, Oregon. 2. On, February 6, 2QQ7, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted adult'-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 16.36, Flag Lots B. Chapter 17.20, Residential Single Family Zoning {R-1-b) Section 2. Findin sand Conclusions. The PIanning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed during review of the associated Variance Application (City File No. Q7Q28), the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Mu;rucipal Code: A. Chapter 16.36, relating to flag Iots B. Chapter 17.2Q, relating to minimum/maximum densities, minimum lot dimensions, minimum Iot size & maximum Iot size Planning Commission Resolution No. (020bQ7) Section 3. Conditional Approval. The City of Central Point Planning Commission hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report dated February 6, 2007 ~cvhich include attachments , rnrhich is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage Phis 6~ day of February, 2007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 6~ day of February, 2007. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (02060 ~ ~ FtTH[ YAL,L,~Y C ~ ~IT~ R ~--y 'T~~I~TA"'t`IY~ F'L~A~ AGENDA ITEM; File Na. U70~4 ~ ` ~ '~~, ~ 1 ~, F~,l)~~tz~ti`~ t), 2007 .., ~ 4 Inn Iluni~~lury 1'.ti~,~~,~,3ni City %;~lnnni~ii,i~ii~ Consideration of tentative plan application for the purp~~~~ ofcreatinsz Jive (5) coninicr-eit~l k~i .The subject property is located in a ~-4, Tourist and CJfficc~ 1'i~c~1`cssic>n~il r.t~nin~~ clist7-ict anti c<~n~i~;t~ of appraxirnatcly ~.~7 <XCres, The subject property is i~lcr~tiliecl can tl~e Jack.~;c~n C'c~~mlti' r'~~~~;~or's xnap as ~7S 2W OIC, 'f~~~~ I,ot 802, The proposed project arc~~ is l~~catt°d on l~;a.~t l'irl~ ~it~-cc~l (~3iddle l~.oad), Applicant; Execl~ioY~ investment Company; .~ge~atq Ili>ft~u~»° :~r~d ~ssoc~6~t~s, Irte. STAFF SOURCE:. Connie Clone, Comr~~tznitti= Pl~~nner ~ACi1~GI20UND; ._`.`---~-~--w--_.. ~. t ~ co: ,, ~~~ ~ ~'>'' '>, i~~~s~`c ~~ j, t ~" Tigu~~e 1 The Super 8 Motel is adjacent to the west, the new '~ ~ r~~,,~j`%`" Les Sch~tiab t%ze facility is proposed to the east and ~~ USF Reddav.-ay Inc. trucl~in~ facility is to the south. The concf~et~ i,lnck wall ~~1<:~~~~ the private read provides traffic a~~d visual separation between LTSF ReddaG~ay inc. and the planned shopping facility, Page 1 of 2 FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "H" ISSUES: There are no issues to discuss regarding this application for subdivisio~~ however, the timing and type of development to follow may necessitate traffic mitigation. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Conditions as listed by the City of Central Point Public Works (Attachment D}, Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment E), Fire District 3 {Attachment F}, and the Building Department (Attachment G). 2. Site Plan approval is necessary prior to f nal plat approval. 3. Tentative approval to create a fve (5} commercial lot subdivision shall be valid for ane year from the date of approval. The final subdivision plat map shall be recorded and a mylar copy filed with the City prior to building permit approvals. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" -Aerial and site photographs Attachment "B" -Tentative Plan Map Attachment "C"- Tentative Site Plan Map Attachment "D" -Public Works Staff Report, Attachment "E" - RVSS Comments Attachment "F" -Fire District 3 Attachment "G" -Building Department Staff Report Attachment "H" -Findings Attachment "I" - Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of a Tentative Plan to create a five {5} commercial lot subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution ,conditionally approving the Tentative Plan to create a five (5) commercial lot subdivision as submitted by Hoffbuhr and Associates, Inc. for Excelsior Investment Company. ~~ Page 2 of 2 Attachment ~~A" -Aerial anti site photographs J. ~, ~ ~ ~;. a::. :„ ; ,,W, ~< ~!, &~ N~ i .y. I' ~. .~ ~~ n ;, µ . _~ ,. ,, P `~ ti I Y ~' ~~. ~~ r a ~ ~~ F ~ ,,, . «~ ~, „ .,w„ ~. .~ .. ., ~ ~ ,.. ~.rM..,: .~ ~-c ... ~...,~ ,. I, ~° ~. a .. ..., ~ ~, 1.. j ~'i: - ~ ~ r Private Road with Access Easement Road Access -Les Schwab site south property line ~~ N >r. VIG}N1TY T'lAi=' .r N.T.3, t~ 4~ 't' ~3 s ~~ ~s ~~ ~ (~ $~ a ;~' t2 c~ G; U ' y W c; ' ~ 5~ 'Q L~ u~ v, >•' ui ui t: ui o; [~ Fi (1 i ~i ~riN'1111MFS> ~' C~ p1~a810P41t t.AkD 3sJRVEYOR U1 C] OI~Of713 DANCMMHiG ~O LY mQ'1Mb1ShYCF a: sa+mr, s>, axe NORTH V~+L1-EY CENTEf2 TENT.4Tiv~ FLAN I.pG.1sCl H. tlon I fD]G) thm ~~ F l 8f~ Lat Ttlx in 7aumahipt y o° ~u~~in~ois~itt, IUM.. Jsckaon County, Oret~cn Ti -.::u Ys. -ate ~y ~i JL.::= C%1C+-cif 1'YC~i:- f~t.:+i:CS~fiY^/NN 1lJ:L'~T1 S1D©LE RO~i7 $ yr, sa ur ~ ' ~ ~ ~ A~'Pl~ IGaNTJOi1JNE~: Lot I ~ ~":°'°l ES(CELBlOR INVEBTM~NT CO. D36 acs. b'15 N. 5th Street ~ Jadcnonvllla, pregon 9153fd (5411 899-1Sm0 Lot 3 - ' : ~ 0.86 ace. ; SURY~Y l1`1Cz . ,,,,~ ~ Lot 2 ~ NoF'fbuFr t Ae6actatea, Inc. . 1.1m ana. g8m GoIF VICw i7r., 9t„ &11te 2fUl Medford, Oreg on g~5DA (5431'1'19-db4~ . 78~ i., ~ °~ Navembsr 9, 20mb ~ 4 a ;? BGiaOC??t. DISTRICT, 6 Iw'~1GATlaN UIBTRIGT, R.R.vl.p. ~ Lot 5 u• '~. L.Dt ~} 6Ahl3TATICN >3187RIGT, 12Y,6.8. 0Sm Ace. li4 ace. ~ee~R AT~A, d5h AGB. ZrjidMG, G-4 - , 7~~ o ;• tcu r~ roras - - -_ - - T EXIBTMG 119~s V.4GANT .-. t°f~l°09ED lf°vEEF it~1pl18T~'IAL/GOMt"tE1~lAi. ~ -^-- - -~,`` ......,. - _~ _',- '* - Mrns Aram ~ ~' ._. ~ .. - 405' b' Grit C!r t , LLCJ.TIGN Cf IWIIIR pNf sTOR7 D1u1F ~ 'tmOf te-1e7R'L cJt3LP. {EAbYf7efT LTf6 b' ~nRrH . v eourw Y G,i~.4~1•IIG 8G~l.E M .~ ~J ( g13y..' ;Y 1 I F/Js ~ GDIL NP•^!2fGK f24 Fp } ' i ;` €i ~I ~ ', `! I~ ,3 i 7[I~ fl ~~ 1 1 // o I / I . ! 1 f~` rr~ 1 i b I ~/? Ij ~ I I~ r' +~ it i i~__»____..__-.-.______________'_-'__..___.. _.. _...... _. 44 f ~ I~ f ~ i I I i§ f 1~ _, [ { ~ ! V I '~ 1 P ~ I f ~[~ 6 °~ I. ` I . !1. ' ~ ~ ~,I.. ~ I O k 3{ { I I f I ~ .i~ ,° ~ ~ f ~q 0 I , J~ j . f§ „ I €y I i ~ ~ ly 'I ~ i ~ I i I I j i t i ~~ ~ i II ;; 1 i I ~3 ~ n f' ~, I i'i ~ '` - i ~ ] w i . ~ I ~ ~ f f ~ If tl I ~ F P _`"'~ PR0~3ECT SITE !` ~~~~ rn _' l ~ AIM 4 "C$~ L ff¢ I 1 C I e I E I 1 tl II I {~ I f I I~ I 1 [~ i //\//~I~//1/ f' f '~s~1 ~ a ~ I I t ~. I~f 3!1 ~"= I i ~I }~ ___ ~ i I i i ~ - --~~ LES SCHWAB ~ i I ~4 ~ [ • } ; ip ~ , ~~ f I ~ ~ i ~~ i 3 I I{ I ~ i [ I 11S (f l l I I~ r c 1 e :I c i o I 1 1 f ~f I I i i { I 1 _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. l _ ~ _ ___ Y i 1 I°. _ --TFr-.~.. ~........~_-__-__-__ f ! I i 3 I f [E Y~________...__~-~~~-~__________________..___----_____ f {i ! [ .~ J~ _ _ I f 3 I f I 1 I ~ _ I t II+ I i i ( ~ ~ _ _ f f!/ ..r... _~ ~ IM 3 ~ [ f I i f~ I ` I i 1 I f i 1 I I 1 ,~_,~yyi I II 1 ~ I ~; ! ~ I fl II It ~ ~ I: fi I I s I ' f i I ~ I I 1 1 i 1 I II I I t _~»-- ----T---P v. f-~. ~ f a ~_ 1 I T ~ f ~ N g ~; ~~ ~~ ~ 3D I _6 0 O pm 9 D ~' I~ ` ~: ~~ I r~r 1'' 3 I 1' i i f j~ _.... 1 \~`___ ri --- f ! ~~ fIf I I ATT^ ~E~11~ L 1'OIl~1~° PUBL~+C" ARK STAFF' REI'C7RT e~~~c~uary , 2U(17 ~-~ob i-'lc~rc~, L7ir~~~c.for Ilfr~t »~~mitore, ;rev. Sc~ivrcc,s (~~x~rd. ,~~ FI~T)A >rT~:1~~7 a Pine Lat SuE~diti~isi~~t~ for 37-2~~"-tJl C~, '1'ax Lacs $~2 a»d ~~3 Apl~licant~ Robert r~cc;:lsicn• r~vestr~i~rt Ca., 6'7S ~. 5''' ~753C1 2aning: C-5y Camercial Thorou~lit`are honing Traffic: This proposal daes not include any specific comtnerci<il cl~~clat,rl~rnt ai~f~licaiic7,~, ~'~o t~°~a~'fie gti~dy is ~~,~~•~°ax~t~ed far this development. The applicant is req«cstitl,~ Gc dedicated ri~;lat-in mover~ezLt. "Lkze City has no objection to this request. Existing Infrastracture: All City utilities exist. in front of or scent to the proposed development. ~t~gii~~c~~•i~~g and Development Plans and Pe~rr~~it~< The Central Faint Public Works Department is charged. c~itl~ rriana~~4ir~c;nt of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage f~acilizi~s. I71 g~za~~ral, the Department's "Stands~c•d Specificatio7~s ~~nd Uniform Standard Details far public Works Constructio~~" shalt ~~avern haw public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version oi"these specifications from tl~e Public Wari:s I>epartment. Conditions of Approval: 1. Biddle load Frontage lr~~l~rovee.~~ts, Diddle Rand is classified.. as a Major Arterial Street. Developer will be responsible far a l~~ndsca~e rr~w, with street trees, for tl~e Biddle Road frontage as parcels 1, 2, and 3 develop. 140 South Third Street Central Point, C)F~' 9?502 541.664.3321 Fax 541. fi4. fi384 61I~2'2IIH~ ;J9:36 543.-664;1 r R~J~ ~'r;GE f1 It_id ~~~~~'~ s~~~ ~~ Vii;:' ~ ,,. k' ~ .,~fs4,;i~,~~,s~~4~. 7anuaxy 2, 2007 ...._R~G~lE 11A~.L~Y' SEWER S~RV1C'~S Lncaticrtt; 13$ West Vilas Read, CCntral Posnt, O.R • Mailing Address: P.C~. ~o~ 3134, Ca~tral poi~~t, DR 75b<-04t75 TcI. (i4I } C~(~4~Ci30D, R1X (541) 6G4 7171 ww4~,RVS~.~iS Lisa Mozgata ~A~s;. 6G4-63$4 City ofConixal Poi».t Pl.~,nning Ac~artment tS5 South Seea~a.d Street Ceat>;ai Point, O.regart 97502 ~ie~ Nalrfh Vaitey Centclr Subdivision, Fitt #07430 Dealr Lisa, The sewer main fvr which serves the subject property has been constructed but has not been accepted for use by Rogue Valley Sewer 5ervices< No sewer connection is allowed until the main line has been accepted. The sewer main will be accepted upon submittal tea RVS of as-i~uilt drawings and certification o1^ the cast of construction by the project developer, Upon acceptance of this sewer mairtT service to tats ~ and 5 will be available. Sewer service to tots 1-3 will require addlticanaf main line construction either from the abnve~ mentioned main lute or from the existing main afi the intersection of Biddle Road and Meadowbrool< Drive. The property is within the NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Quality management area and must comply wifih relevant stormwater quality guidelines. The applicant must submit a stormwater plan demonstrating compliance with these guidelines. l=ee! free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Szz~cerety, _ ~~~ ~.~. c--~_~ Cart Tappert, Y.E. T~istri.c~: EzlbitlBE>" K:U~ATA~AGENCIESICFNTPTIPL~N~TGiSTJBDZVISION12Q07107025 P.f~RKVVAY S~CTS3DiVISZ4N.D4C n ~, {~ ~ ~1~~ t L WO Yl~ January 4, 2007 Lisa Morgan Planner City of Central Point Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road -~ ~~- White City oR 97503-1075 (541} 826-7100 (voice) (541) 826-4566 (fax) InternationallyAacredi~ed - 2005-2010 Project # 07030 North Valley Center • Fire Distric# #3 will need to evaluate each site prior to development for access, sprinkler requirements, and other Fire Code requirements. Mark Moran DFM ~~ City of Central Point, Oregon 740 So.Thircf 5t.,Centrai Point, Or 97502 541.664.332] Pax 541.664.6384 www.ci.central-point.or.us Building Department dais [7eBenedetti, Building Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: 12127/Ob TO: Planning Department Planning file: 07030 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: ~° Name: Excelsior Inv. Address : b7S N. 5~' Street City: Jacksonville State: Oregon Zip Code: 97530 Property Description: 37S-2W-SW1/4 {sec I)- TL 802 & 803 PURPQSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely fox use by the Central Point Planning Commission. l ~, City of Central P©int, Oregon Building Department 146 So.Third St., Cen#ral Point, flr 975D2 541.6&4.3321 Fax 54i.664.b384 www.ci.eentral-point.pr.us Lois L7eE3enecfetti, Buildir~y Official BLT~LD~NG DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 ofthe OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlor excavations. b. Descriptions and classif cations of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/excavationpeanits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any f€ll material placed on the site. Fi11s to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official, shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavationpeanit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 r City of Central Point, Oregon 140 5a.Tllird 5t, Central Point, Or 97502 541.664.332] Fax 541.564,6384 www.ci.centrai-point.or.us Building Department Lois DeE3enecEetti, Building Official 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. '7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. $. Any development (any manTmade change) to improved or unimproved real esiate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Paint shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code $.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code (2004). 11. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings. The international Fire Code (2003) with Oregon Amendments (2004) will be implemented as part of the plan check code requirement for this proposed building. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. ~~~ G Affachmenf "H" FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File Nn: 07030 INTRODUCTION In the Matter of a tentative plan application for the purpose of creating (5) commercial Tats. The subject property is located in a C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district and consists of approximately 4.87 acres. The subject property is identified on the Jackson Corznty Assessor's map as 37S 2W Ol C, Tax Lot 802. The proposed project area is located an East Pine Street (Biddle Raad). Applicant: Excelsior Investment Co., Agent: Haffbbuhr and Associates, Inc. CPMC 1b.10.010 - 7.b.~0.070 Tentative Plans. This section of code provides design standards and principles of acceptability, t1~e inforntatior2 required to be inclz.tded on a tentative plan reap and other supplementary rnaterial that nTay be required far rezriezn of the application. Finding: The application and tentative plan map submitted contain the necessary and required information of Sections 16.10.010 through 1b.10070 as evidence by Applicant exhibit Attachment "S". Finding: Each of the five (5) proposed lots has road access. Lots 1, 2, and 3 have access via East Pine/ Biddle Road. Access fox Lots 4 and 5 is via private road access easement {document number 2004-073819, O.R.J.C.~.). Conclusion: The proposed tentative plan zxzeets these requirezrzents. CPMC 16.24.040 Lots-Uses. A. The city may, in its discretion, deny approval fot• the creation of any lot vy any manner if the effect of such creation of a lot would to facilitate perpetuation of a nonconforming use. Finding: The proposed five (5} lot commercial subdivision is within the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zone district and is proposed to be developed with a variety of commercial uses permitted in the C-4 zone. Finding: The subject site is currently vacant of structures. Conclusion: The proposed tentative plan meets this requirement. O ~;~ ~~ ~ Page 1 of 3 B. IVo lot shall be created unless it is in corrrpliance 7vitlr all applicable pr•a~1isians of this code. Finding: The proposed five {5) lot commercial subdivision is within the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district and is proposed to be developed with a variety of commercial uses permitted in t11e C-~ zone. Finding: The application as presented is in carnpliance with applicable provisions of this code. Conclusion: The proposed tentative plan meets this reyuirezxzent. CPMC 16.24.OS0 Lots Size and deterzninati©xz. Lat sizes shall conform with the zoning ordinance and shall be appropriate for the location ~f the sr,cbdivisian and for the type of development and use contemplated. Finding: The proposed fzve (5} lot cozxzzxzercial subdivision is within the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zone district and is proposed to be developed with a variety of cornzxzercial uses permitted in the C-4 zone. Finding: The tentative plan map describes fzve (5} Iots that meet the lot requirements of the C-4 zone district as described in Section 17.44.050 of the CPMC. Conclusion: The proposed tentative plan meets this requirement. CPMC Chapter 17.44 C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional District, Purpose. The C-4 district is intended to provide for t]re development of concentrated tourist corratrrercial and entertainment facilities to serve both local residents and the traveling public, and also for the development of canapatible rrrajor professional office facilities. C-4 development should occur at locations dint zvill maximize ease of access and visibility from the Interstate 5 freezva~ and major arterial streets and to be convenient to the r.csers of Expo Park, the airport, and dozvntaxvn. CPMC 17.44.050 Area, width and yard requirements. A. Lot area. Lot area shall be a minimum of five (S) thousand square feet. Finding: Each of the five {5} proposed lots exceed five (5) thousand square feet in area size. They are as follows: Lot 1 is 0.96 acre, Lot 2 is 1.10 acre, Lot 3 is 0.86 acre, Lot 4 is 1.14 acre and Lot 5 is 0.80 acre. Conclusion: The proposed tentative plan meets this requirement. B. Lot Width. Lot width shall be a minimum affifty (SO) feet. C~ Page 2 of 3 Finding: Each of the five (5) proposed lots is or exceeds fifty (50) feet in width. The zxziniznuzn lot widths are as follows: Lot 1 is 256 feet in width, Lot 2 is 104 feet with an access front to East Pine of fifty fect, Lot 3 is 72 feet at its' narrowest width, Lot 4 is 140 feet, Lot 5 is 84 feet at its' narrowest width. Conclusion: The proposed tentative plan meets this requirement. C. Lot Depth. Lot depth shall be a minimurn o/~one hund~°ed, feet. Finding: Each of the five (5) proposed lots is or cx.ceeds one hundred (100) feet in depth. Lot 1 is 160 feet in depth. The rcnlaining four lots are irregular in shape; however the minimum lot depth of each is as follows: Lot 2 is 25'7 feet, Lot 3 is 282, Lot 4 is 173 feet, and Lot 5 is 190 feet. Conclusion: The proposed tentative plan mcets this requirement. ~ ' ~.t Page 3 of 3 ~~~~~~~ ® 66~g9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO CONDITIONALLY APPROVE A TENTATIVE PLAN FOR A FIVE {5) LOT COMMERICAL SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS NORTH VALLEY CENTER FILE N0.07030 Applicant: Excelsior Investment Company, Agent: Haffbuhr and Associates, Inc 37 2W D1C, Tax Lat $02, East PinelBiddle Road WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted an application for a Tentative Plan for a five (5) lot subdivision on a 4.87 acre property identified on Jackson County Assessor's as map 37 2W 01 C, Tax Lot 802, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned as C-4, Tourist and Office Professional and the application is consistent with the lot area and dimension standards set forth in Title 17, Section 17.44.050, and with tentative subdivision plan map criteria of Title 16, Section 16.10; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for a Tentative Plan; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the Application does comply with the applicable standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated February 6, 2007; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission for the City of Central Point, Oregon, by this Resolution No. hereby approves the Application based an the findings and conditions of approval as stated in Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated February 6, 2007 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of February, 2007. Planning Commission Chair r~ ~: ~_) Planning Commission Resolution No. (2/6/2007} ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of February, 2007 Planning Cammission Chair 3 Planning Commission Resolution Na. (21612007) 1Vlisc~~~,A~~ous