Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - August 5, 2008~ ~I. P1 ~ ~~,;~ I ~'Oi+Ji' CI'I'~' 4~ ~; ~; ~~; C~''~' N~~ ~ ~ PtJINT ~~.AN~1:~'~~ ~:Q)Mi~~~~~~~,'~ AGENllA A~X~test ~, ~f)~b ~'~af)q p,m. I~~~,~t I'larit~ir~g Cc~znission tZe~c>h~tion Nc~. '751. i4 '.L.J .6, ~l \ ~4.F 6.+J..IiJ.IR:.IA,+R 3 `~.Y Y. I' ~~ R y tl'~ R'4 IItl ~~ ~~ GQnnie Moezygeba, L7aian Idiart, Chucl~ Piland, Pat I3eclc, 'file Oliver, and Justin Hurley III. ('~1~13I~~s1'(JI~~t~i~1C IV. MINUTES ~- Reviel;~ dn~cl ~~l~l~r«val cif July 1, ~(1t7$ Planning Cc~ issic~n Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEA NCES VI. BUSINESS ~'~~, ~~ ` ~`~ C. F>fle ~'ae 0"71_l~o A public lncctit~~ to consid~;r an I xtension request for "t~hite ~~~~~~k Estates, a f'lat~t7ed Unit Devclr~pment. hr~h~ie~tnt: ~)uncar ~~®~~lopment~ Inc. Pgs. 45 - S1 D. File_No. S1b0(02). A public hearing to consider a Resolution recommending approval of an amendment to the Central Point Comprehensive Plan updating the Buildable Lands Inventory section of the Land Use Element. Applicant: City of Central Point Pgs. 82 - 84 E. Fl_e___No. 8160(00. Consideration of a Resolution Declaring the Planning Commission's Intention of Amending the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan to Update the Transportation System Plan. Applicant: City of Central Paint Pgs. 85 - 8& F. File No. 09004. Consideration of a Resolution to Initiate an Amendment to Section 17.48.040 to allow Membership Warehouse Retail as a Conditional Use within the M-l Industrial district. Applicant: City of Central Paint VII. DISCUSSION VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS IX. MISCELLANEOUS X. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Paint Planning Commission Minutes July 1, 2008 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL. Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Damian ldiart, Mike Oliver, Pat Beck, Chuck Piland and Justin Hurley were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; Don Burt, Planning Manager; Connie Clune, Community Planner; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. III. CORRESPONDENCE Commissioner Candy Fish tendered her resignation to Connie Moczygemba, Chairperson, citing health reasons. There was no other correspondence. IV. PRESENTATIONS Mayor Hank Williarns presented a plaque to Candy Fish and thanked her for all of her years of service to the Planning Commission and City Council. V. MINUTES Damian Idiart made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 3, 2008 Planning Commission meeting. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: ldiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Hurley, abstained. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. File No. 08175. A public hearing to consider an application for a major modification to the conditional use permit for the McDonald's restaurant which was approved on August 6, 199G. The modification is in accordance with CPMC Section 17.09,300 and is in preparation far the site plan review (File No. 08180} far an addition to the existing building. The project site is in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district. The McDonald's Planning Commission Minutes July 1, 2008 Page 2 restaurant is located at 43 South Ninth Street and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02 CD, Tax Lots 2900 and 3000. Applicant: Glenn Chavez; Agent: Josh Welts, Westech Engineering, Inc. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Justin Hurley said that he had made several site visits. Community Planner Connie Clone presented the staff report for this modif cation to the original conditional use permit granted to McDonald's Restaurant for additional seating, a play area, and a cashier booth for the drive-thru window. Ms. Chine reviewed criteria and stated that the applicant meets and exceeds required setbacks. The Public Works Department has no additional requirements. No changes will be made to current operations, and all conditions of the original permit have been met. Further, Ms. Clone advised that there are no issues or conditions of approval required for this application. The public hearing was then opened and Connie Clone offered that the owner of the Central Point McDonald's, Gene Hill, was available to answer any questions that Commissioners might have. Chuck Piland asked why a play area was being added at a time when other properties are removing theirs. Mr. Hill responded that the nature of the play place has changed, and the new addition would include hoops, a slide and bicycles. Mr. Hill shared photos of a McDonald's property located in Portland, Oregon, with Commissioners and added that #here would be no cost for children to participate in the activities contained within the play place. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Justin Hurley made a motion to approve Resolution No, 747, a resolution granting approval of a major modification to the conditional use permit (approved August 6, 1996) fora 1,794 square foot addition tv the existing McDonald's Restaurant located at 43 South Ninth Street in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district (Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W 02CD, Tax Lots 2900 and 3000} based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Chuck Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: ldiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. B. File No. 08180. A public hearing to consider a Site Plan application for the construction of a 1,794 square foot addition to the existing McDonald's restaurant, bringing the total building size to 4,501 square feet. The project site is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district at 43 South Ninth Street and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02CD, Tax Lots 2900 and 3000. Applicant: Glenn Chavez; Agent: Josh Wells, Westech Engineering, Inc. Planning Commission Minutes July 1, 2008 Page 3 There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Justin Hurley once again stated that he had made numerous site visits. Community Planner Connie Clone presented a revised staff report for this site plan review proceeding. Ms. Clone assured Commissioners that the existing landscaping would be retained and applicant does not intend to add any new landscaping. Ms. Clone reviewed the issues and conditions of approval contained in the revised staff report. Mike Oliver expressed a concern regarding the location of an $-inch sewer line that is buried on the property. Ms. Clone stated that Rogue Valley Sewer Service feels that the information on the line location as presented (Attachment "A" of the staff report) is accurate and will not be affected by construction as the new addition will not expand into the drive lane and will be more than f ve feet away from where the line is buried. The public hearing was opened and as no one came forward to speak Far or against the application, the public hearing was closed. Damian Idiart made a motion to approve Resolution No. 748, a resolution granting site plan approval for the construction of a 1,794 square foot addition to the existing McDonald's restaurant located at 43 South Ninth Street in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district {Jackson County Assessor's Map 37S 2W 02CD, Tax Lots 2940 and 3004) based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Justin Hurley seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. C. File No, 08164. Consideration of a Resolution Declaring the Planning Commission's Intent to Amend the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan to Update the Buildable Lands inventory Section of the Land Use Element. Applicant: City of Central Point Planning Manager Don Burt introduced Commissioners to a draft of the Buildable Lands Inventory which has been created by the Planning Department as part of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. The purpose of the Buildable Lands Inventory is to maintain a record of available lands that can be used for residential, commercial, and industrial development. Mr. Burt explained that this BLl contains considerable support data and will be explained fully at the next meeting. For now, staff is requesting a resolution of intent to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan and scheduling the first evidentiary hearing for August 5, 2008. Chuck Piland made a motion #o approve Resolution No. 749, a resolution declaring the Planning Commission's intent to amend the Central Point Comprehensive Plan to update the Buildable Lands Inventory section of the Land Use Element. Mike Oliver seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. Planning Commission Minutes July 1, 2008 Page 4 D. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting Criteria for approving Decorative Exterior Murals in accordance wide CPMC Section 17.67.OSO.M.i.C. Community Development Director Tom Humphrey presented Commissioners with criteria to be used by the Central Point Arts Council {a sub-committee of the Downtown Improvement Committee) when considering mural proposals prior to their submission to the Planning Commission. These criteria incorporate the suggested revisions provided to staff following the June 3, 200$ Planning Commission meeting where this topic was originally discussed.. Commissioners requested that additional language be added to the proposed criteria specifying that self-promotion of the artist or a business be prohibited; that suggested sites be identif ed; funding be ideatif ed and guaranteed; that public notice and presentation to the Planning Commission be combined into one step; and that a completion schedule be added to the artist's contract. Mr. Humphrey then introduced Arts Council members Lesley Hopper, Jennifer Vranes, Carrie Andries, Robin Adams and Shelly Ball to the Planning Commission. Each person presented a short biography and reasons for wanting to serve on the Arts Council. In response to a query raised by City Council person Walter Moczygemba who was in the audience, Mr. Humphrey stated that the City Council was able to review any decision made by the Planning Commission based on Mr. Humphreys monthly report to them. He added that the Planning Commission makes its decisions in the best interests of the community. Justin Hurley made a motion to approve Resolution No. 750, a resolution adopting criteria for approving decorative murals in accordance wide CPMC Section 17.67.0S0.M.I.C. Damian Idiart seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. VII. DISCUSSION -None VIII. MISCELLANEOUS Downtown. Revitalization Mr. Humphrey reported that the Public Works Department has been great with the installation of benches and trash cans before the ~`~' of July weekend. Twenty hanging flower baskets will be installed on July 2, 2008. Four Seasons Nursery will be doing the maintenance on the baskets which will be removed on November 1, 2008 for the winter months. Planning Commission Minutes July I, 2008 Page S Chairperson Connie Moczygemba asked if it would be feasible to install recycle cans as well. Mr. Humphrey said he would talk with the Publie Works Director Bab Pierce. Re ionat Problem Solvin Tom Humphrey advised that the Director of the Land Conservation and Development Commission had been down to Jackson County to sit through part of the RPS process. DLCD is taking a stronger leadership role in making decisions. At the present time, it is anticipated that the stakeholders' agreement and draft regional plan will be presented to LCDC in October. The City of Central Point has already begun the process to amend elements of our Comprehensive Plan prior to approval of the regional plan. Railroad Crossing The City Council passed a resolution authorizing City Administrator Phil Messina to sign an easement agreement with the railroad. As an existing railroad crossing will need to be closed, once improvements are made to the Scenie Avenue crossing, it is anticipated that the Seven Oaks crossing or another crossing in Jackson County will be closed. IX. ADJOURNMENT Damian Idiart made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mike Oliver seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the July 1, 200$ Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on August 5, 2008. Planning Commission Chair F~~DER.AL EXPRESS ~ SI'T'S PLAN I ~ t i;,;lililhl4 ~~)~~"~~r7c.~~1~, ~~ ~ i ~ (?t'Ytillu it ~~k,v i~~ IaC°CIt:Y/ ~' ~ ~ .~r 1111 1i `,IIr lU~ Aus~usi ,~, ZQO~ .~ ~"F:~''~` _' ~'" ~+; _"~~ t ~~ I ~.~ t~:~~. Ofd ~ ~;~ / _ _..._.._ ~.. -- __ .~ _. w _. Co~7.~"Yali;.- Lulli;l! (lg~ ~l ~iitf' I~~ran a'evaCl~,' ~:Ot` ~'~'2{'_ CC1T75frtlCftC7tt (7~ cl )~).~ j 1 Lit-]tt,.it'(' "I C'~C7f` ~,7t111C1117 ~rT, for a p~tCli~`re dish°ibuiiC~il ~~d deliver}r center for Fedl ~w t1~~ot~TacL Tlic ~?roje.ci silt' is luc~ated in tl~e ~I-1 Industrial za3Y7ing district, Lot 9 0~ tentatively approv~cl l~e~Ic:rttl Wat}' I3usixhss I'arlc Vinci idctatifi~:d is on the Jackson County ~ss~ :~,~>~ ~: r~7~~p a.s 31> 2W 12 B, part of Tax Lot 20~l. Aj~plca~~t: Bob Dude, d1~aJon%s Medford, LLC; Age.~i: I'~catba7r~c~~ purveying, Inc. S'I`~~1~~'k? ~QU t~ ~' ~: a 4.~f)a911it:, Clltzac. ~.:oall ...-',,,M-'' C)n May 6, 2009 tlae Planning Cort~~l~ission granted tentative approval for tht~ ~~i~wvay Business Park Subdivision by Resolution :~'u. '7~6. Tire subdivision name has rhar~grd to ~`ederal Way Business Park. A final. plat for the subdivision has nut ~'~t iacen filed, and as such,. co~7~pl~:iiu1~ c>i' tlac~ subdivision is necessary and a condition of any site pl~tii approval. In addition, the site plan ind%cates an area for fttitare expansion. of the tn2ilding, truck and auto parking. The project site is large enough to accomc>d~itc this building and parkizig area expansion (see A c ent A, Applicant's sheet C,2). As submitted,. the future addition complies with CPMC scii~ack and parking requirements. FedEx C3round distrit~utioal a~~d delivery facilities are in operation 24 hours per day, seven (7) days a week, and 365 days per year. Incoming packages are delivered to the i'aciIity via tractor trailers sorted, distributed and lu~~cied onto FedEx Ground delivery vehicles. Thy;. delivery vehicles return with pacl~~~gcs picked ul, dui°in the day. These delivery vehicles are parked inside the facility until the next clay" s deliveries. Access: The project has direct access from Federal Way that intersects z~~ith I-Ia `ck Roac1. Federal Way is an industrial street within the approved subdivision. A condition ofthe tentative app~~o~ al for the ..~a.. Page I of 3 subdivision is the improvements to Hamrick Road and construction of Federal Way. The landowner, Cris Galpin, is working with the City's Public Works Department to design these improvernents. As noted in the Public Works staff report, a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required for this project; however, future structural development within the Business Park may trigger the need for updated data {see Attachment Dj. Landscaping: The design incorporates low ground cover planting with street trees along Federal Way and in front of the building. Lawn areas will utilize adrought-tolerant hydro seeding method similar io that used along freeway interchanges. The irrigation system will be designed to maintain all planting areas. Parking: CPMC Section 17.64.020 requires two {2) truck loading berths; this project provides two (2) loading bays and seventeen (17} docking bays. Packages are distributed to each delivery van through the drive-in loading bays, and the docking bays handle incoming packages. Additionally, CPMC 17.64{H)(2j requires two (2} spaces per each three {3) employees or one (1 }space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater. The project will have 40 employees (13 spaces) and the gross Hoar area will require 59 spaces. The project provides 64 auto parking spaces, the appropriate number of dedicated ADA spaces and a designated area far an additiona128 spaces. The project satisfies the off"street parking spaces requirements. FINDINGS: See Attachment "H" ISSUES: To date, the final subdivision plat has not been f led. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A fnal plat for the Federal Way Business Park subdivision shall be approved and filed prior to commencement of construction and issuance of any building permits. 2. An eight (8) foot perimeter fence will require a building permit per CPMC section 17.57.020. 3. Conditions as listed by the City of Central Point Public Works (Attachment D), Jackson County Roads (Attachment E}, Building Department (Attachment F),), and Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment G). 4. The applicant shall submit a signage plan prior to sign permit approval. Said plan shall be consistent with the provisions of CPMC Section 15.24 and Section 17.48.0$0. 5. Site Plan Approval shall lapse and become void one (1) year fallowing the date on which it becomes effective unless construction has commenced. ATTACHMENTSIEXHIBITS: Attachment "A"~ Site Plan, Sheet C.1 and C.2 Page 2 of 3 Attachment "B"- Building Elevations and Landscape Plan, Sheets C.3, A2.0 and L1 Attachment "C"- Applicant's Findings Attachment "D"- Public Works Staff Report Attachment "E"- Jackson County Roads Attachment "F"- Building Department Staff Report Attachment "G"- RVSS Comments Attachment "H"- Findings Attachment "I"- Proposed Resolution ACTION: _... Consideration of a Site Plan Review for the 59,135 square foot single story building that is a package distribution and delivery center for FedEx Ground. (File No. 8183}. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. ,granting Site PIan approval for the 59,135 square foot single story building that is a package distribution and delivery center for FedEx Ground. (File No. 8183}. 3 Page 3 of 3 EXH{BkT ~ ~ __. _. ATTACHMENT " R " I ;4 y. I 1, ,t ° ~ I I F vP;rcf' Siff Y, J ~.~Gsf~ -- ter-" .' -~_ ~---- ,w o,~ ~ !~'~ ~~ r x cn7 :ova sr aw Ec 3r iw fzc i I.a';Or tlGd -~a„ '' ! rru mcoaoaa tro ~ Tax io1 Too `J;~,\~q _s~ r/Sf NCL!1l. NYAr I I GGRDGV I ~? I !!~ e ~ wr .a mat ~ I ~iCINf1Y HAP i..___...._..__~__- _, r C t Ground f LOCATED 1N THE FFIJERAL WAY BUSINESS PARK , LOTS q E CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ~ JACKSON CDUNTY, OREGON p JUNE 20, 2008 ~f o ~ b ~ ~ ~': - - ' ''a ~ ~ ~._•c _ ~e~ ORS ~pt~ ~~ [V~R7-H CRaPHIC SCpLF; ~a ~ r _.._...._~ - oeo a aF .rr or ux« n.~re~ os1 xa. xrr,vav on xl ur r CITY RF CENTRAL POINT sTnucr r++tc~GbBr ~ __ ___ ~tsrz,/~,, P»x o~rr. as os ~ _ _ c t ~._,~- ...-.!._...._..------ -- - S i [,Q~~1 0% nkKr SCK(s!~~ 4 ~ ~ ~~~ ~iC~rvO ~IlCi~il~l Rljv`C ~PPAOK0.~ bnK _ 'v GhrSU TAtl'S N'rrra~r~a: bF r( ,d..: n.r~.+~. ~-....__~W -,_ O~ ~ t CFNTaAL PRINT ..._...-'- a v~rc. .aPxo~aa o,e rc 3 Ground -oa;m`HEr+u~ ~~ .~y.,._........_..- __ __~ a P.O. LOX r?2~ ~1r4.'DI'Olt~, OktC6v crsox sPPkOVFU: ~LLV~mm-mTD~rF~ ~~~~~ I qft e.Nf PROJECT LOCATION MAP e w~~~aw ~ vII. ISexl rrc-s2ae.rxs Is~EI aro-axan __~_.....-._........__-....~_~.~ .. ............_._.- .~ ~ ~ f c.r a A~ » a,.P„G,. oar a war ~, c~ aI a I ~~ ±, {{ 1 r J,-.~ iM~~;l:r! ~lar ~I~Jn~y~ aa:JS ~ , vl'1 lil3J:77JLlL %:]id1i1~ JY 3J //''''''B Praw NU:r: Irn ) 0.,Ce r rz COAF 5G'At PR0.rCl fl0'Jnf~AAx ~ ![ul aSARr CL (Yn APCC.S [A•lr1NF ,, cr n.osr'~a'N T 1 J P fFCSlU tl wn YC k~ ~ '~ r ' ~~ 900) - - - - - ~ YW . rw rrccxu GJS•NrSS PAFx a r ~ s' awn ~P,x rrxer~j uDrLmxD e,rrF (Y rHG1J I {I ACr NP11W+L Fti NN,11CU M JI a]' aeAV ARrA _ _ - - mm ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ - PA E R R,tvc r r re P ~.~ ..., ~ r '^ 7 ',j~s y ._.-1 \ .3 1 l ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~\ ~ ~n ~ ~~ ~ " ~ I _ . Q t ~ a r~ / ) d ~ ~ ~ r E I r sD~c~ ~ N I r ~~ ~ ~ c~ aver[ ~kf. ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ ~ f ~ nrl~ ` ~ n ~ L x . I ~ ~ 3 ' ` ~ f 1 4 ' ~ n Acx CO ~C6 (1rv,GK) \ UPUS:J :5" :iCF.r LrI~Vt F~F IF~RA( +'nx 9V?n(:: ~ - 1 , ~ AC~A'wSrFA fN}Y ]( .33 I (SLWEL/+~ SfP(WK - ~ ~ ! € 1 ~ crntt ~ ~ T O) rv,u e ~ ~. • I ~„ 1 II uwiD~ra rxrA cw ~ a i 0 r y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ` .~ E ~ ~ ++cwPUO L- w,riAr r ~ i. 1 ' w SFVER PrR PCG:Rn. r ~ 3 I s'r [q ~ ls' i i ~I ~ ,~ ' I ~ .w.„ ~ l - ... ~ k ~ ti ~ I ' n { I ~yhtcei ~~,sx~A °' : F .,c ,s' .._._.. ti ( \ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ I - P.]P ~T ~~ ___ 3l 00' YRO.F'Cl BCC OM.r ~ ~ I .. ~ ~_. .. ..., 1 ~ l k ~ Pe~PSrc nXr tlmRA.,r rrR rrc~a r ~ } r ~ 7 ~f ,',.l I ~ ~ .~ wA ers4rs PAfx I a '30.33" } I ~ ( E /( ' ' ~ d nu t t \~\ HLApr tuvy:xCOn rf0 (IIPKAI) i / ~ C I 1 J SITF PLAN FOR ~~r ~ ~ Ground cocATE~ IN SECTION 12, 7:375., RZ W., W.M., PORTION OF TAX LOT 20D crrr of CENTRAL Porrvr JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON JUNF 20, 2008 PROJECT 1NFORMATlON Lfcu oe'scawnov - ro~NS~rr ~> rwrN RAncr x ~s~ sfenw rae Lr Ar,r.wrrrr ,.rrewew, CNSCN CO.,vYV, OR£LOV, GFVbrAlfo AS iuy Pr ROP r0! PR0.£Ct AkfA - 81c AGCrs {xrr uuL TdrAL - u~~f (mat+SlM~t) PKLWOYO 1avwL - u-I (LY5.~3 rRrµJ MrYiCAn I. X+YrS u[D1 qrD, LiC s~rrt r auu rsD uua..ds .wnr ,m xANSAS arr. uo a+m asrarR cPNSr ucnav F.+la,+rren~a ca+wLrANrs. x+c PAIRiCM uA wFD, uARx xwRn 1,l ,~~ wrsr vAw srrrcrr, wnr -m of pl pRp LRFOCrv 9)aG, SITE SUMMARY Gtwxc rsr AFrA) MSFkLVl,Crv Crn!(H / P A~ D.... ... 33,3,) Y Lf Ck ~rq .... ...................... S.P185r Pu ............ .............. sa ss 3'r P H ( W C!S RVFO SFAIrAARO ................... . . c1 r0 DCM ............ ............... ~ L O PFµ ................ ............ £6 CWIDW 0 lSu+Lif MP) ................ .T Lv»RW CI p+L w~lLHl ....... ......a . L / H rXµt CR ........................... J DIX SIMACF ...... ........ ...........~ I: } \ C~:l+NL IFCFS ~t Ntl-si'.1 - - _.... - - ~" -Y 'i!W'•t .. ~V'+(?: ~- .~~, f^ t.l~ c •: IUlLPC „A w,(w FCY.S wAV /•- PfR F(Df'Rµ wAV BUJNf:S HARx v~~ / 1\ ~W11 - °`314.8 ~ w ..., .. /, ~< .; .:. 1 b' CriAaY !HM rLrcC1' ~ J PRY~£C1 FIfJ+'GARY \' ~ ' I~ GACV vsrD CvAYfo (rmiGA!) N©I~TH GRAPHIC SCAi.E ~n '~' } ._ ! c - o u ;d'1 1;19~~7;1135 `G:Iil3i1J ~ ~~ ~ / / W. --. s,~ . {) _._ ~.. ~`~~;;'.:-::. .~yt _ p ,~p ~•7~~d1 nRA»N Lr: u+x oArF~ a~/us ~_., Rrws~PN uArr ar ~SyS'f~~/ 0 arfarrn Br: cxn -_ oArX: w/tu _ S~~ PA / ff~/ CITY OF CENTRAL PAINT C N BIa~FN F R_INC APRRaVFO: OA (C. vrxuv scALrsu ~ --- _ ,~,__. _~ ` R ~ ~~' ~a 'C ~R _ ~ C~n'5U TAK~S APRRDxra: ~ DAlr. ',,,"0srs'4°ic„rs:u'avu>'c - -'-.~~_ ~ ~ ....._. APPXO.fO: ~_~ _ .~ _... ~ Dnlr. 0 ! T..........__.. .__ 4 eCEN7iiALPOINT ^- W (fVn(i _ uvviti Pl{, (,',ew) 7>Ox i2m~F,S01C~1 ne-ii~uE ePxoJro: DArr. __..... ..,~... Y.US ~ ~ SITE PV.N ..._I ~ w u. ,t.. r. s.. s rte.. ,.c. :n: ~ r [.... ENT "~_'' FRONT BU1LpING ELEVATION WEST VI SCk(. r.[p FRONT BUlLD1NG ELFVATlON FOR ~~ -~Y Ground c~~ r~~f o~ ~ 1.:=? , A -- `F ~° .. LrC' •F aRI=G~~~ roenxv nr: xwc ai~e~-a/as xo x a.m nr cwsov NST R U C T I u+[a:[n or: ~-~~~~_~ onrc -- CITY OF C£NTF.AL POfhT GO f~~ O,y A ....__.,__. r[mrr scu[fvr _-_~..._. .. _..._ - ENGINF.F:RINGS vreo.ev: an m~ v ._ motei _..._._..._. -- ..~, a...., x.Yii t7n~s ULTA~~ MP.en~f0.~ ~~Si.^.. a.~c .e„s~ s.n,ou..~r _.........._.. _... ___ _ . CENTRAL POIM ~w~, nr~vear[a: a~tt: o , I Ground wv.~w. aoa IY.4 ~ 4F.9TOk~. 6RECOJ a'ran~ naaaoKO. """"""- ~ Hart ---~--_.~._~.-----~~~. ~ ,_J-~ FRONT SUILDIhG ELEVATION .nnc,wm rEf. (call ~zo-cxae . rxr Is~il r,s-zlac -.-.-~-~---._-_ ..-~...__ _ 'i~°J _ r~ o ATTACHMENT "~=~ G~ ~~~~ ~~ {;~ '~ ;~f ~~!~ ~ i~~~ ,, ~~ ~~ W J SOVTN ELC VAF3ON ~ » ~ a____...~ NORT4i EiEVkTipN Ci A-;~~:d:.o. IO O QI~ :~~:.~_ SNILOtNG CRO55 SECTE4N `~' av-~' N ~~ ~ ~ w ~ 0 ~~ m r~ ®g '~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~~ 5H[ET nU1ABEP A2.0 o; A"f"~'ACHM~NT "~" ~~ galbraith S~nPN~~tG ~uuOlnucNU: xnx n.v reaW ~£G5„„~~5T8R~0 Y`~'1Y~'~`nI ~ ~~YU yo 4y,~'.Y ~'" sCARt A~c~ Fed)_,x Distribution Center Ccauul Potn4 OR evuroxs L PftEtliA[ttPAY P.AxIZVG5CNE0ULE PftCLIlAItLWYLpNf)SGAPE N61ES V ~ .u v..rr w.r.l d..w.. ~ .x~.ru ~Y~ wxx...iwire.onwi ~.ne.ww.w ___ w.nn i~FO+'+niWL~aw W++l..f~u.'~awa ..o...... ....,, ~...~... ~A ..~ ' ,...~u.~~a...arc.~~..a.w....~wew.. ~- .~.;~..~.,~......~ I~.w~wn«w.. wa,~.w......... rm.,~,. .v+. ~.. -": ~%ISW .~w,.a,a... n~o.~~.e~~•. x v w.v~.+>ar'.,.,..b..,.. ".,~v.+~....~..,a~w~MV.~,..e..ra~.a.a. vbew+vun v~~~. BEFORE TH)fr CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ cc JACKSON COUNTY, OIZFGON IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ) SITE PLAN APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ) EXHIBIT "A" PACKAGE DISTRIBUTION CENTER LOCATED ) IN THE FEDERAL WAY BUSINESS PARK } FINDINGS OF FACT SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, } JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON ) AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW APPLICANT: Jones Medford, LLC AGENT: Neatl-arner Surveying, Inc. I. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY The Applicant is seeking Site Plan Approval far a 59.135 square fao# building encompassing a package distribution and delivery center for FedEx Ground within the M-1 Industrial zoning district. APre-Application Conference was held on June 3, 200$ to discuss fhe proposed site and procedural requirements pursuant to Sections ] 7.64 and 17.72 of the City of Central Point Land Development Code. Said package distribution center site is located within I.ot 9 of the future Federal Way Business Park Subdivision, fronting on Federal Way southwesterly of the intersection of Hamrick Raad and Table Rock Road (Jackson County Assessor's Map Number 37 2W 128, Tax Lot 200}. The total project site area is 8.26 acres, consisting of: a central employee parking area adjacent to the primary access point; an accessory parking area for trailer, dolly and tractor ta•ailex parking; a paved lot encircling t1~e central structure for internal looped circulation; and the central building housing the distribution center itself. Contained within the package distribution center are administration offices, resixooms; material handling and van loading areas. In addition; there is an area at the northeast corner of the proposed structm•e indicated for future building expansion. The intent here is to provide the ability to further expand the shipping and processing uses within the facility, if such growth was deemed necessary at a point in the future. This expansion area would contain the equipment needed fox shipping and processing uses. As spawn an Sheet A2A of the structural elevations plans, said expansion area would include 4 additional docking bays a]ong the northerly elevation ofthe structure, Additional areas for potential future employee and tractor trailer parking are proposed as well. Distribution and delivery facilities for FedEx Ground such as the one proposed are in operation 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and 365 days per year. Each pick-up and delivery facility primarily sorts and redistributes small packages, housing a professional office and management staff, as well as well as a labor workforce. Incoming packages are delivered to the facility via tractor tr•ailers from Hubs and other facilities throughout the FedEx Ground system, and are received through the unload-docking doors sealed to each trailer arriving to the facility. Though the hours of operation are unlimited, these deliveries occur primarily during evening and early morning hours, although deliveries to the facility from smaller tractor trailers can occur during the day. Once received, the packages are sorted, distributed and loaded to FedEx Ground delivery vehicles parked inside the facility (this process takes approximately 4 hours). The FedEx Ground delivery drivers arrive in the morning and then the vans exit the facility to deliver packages to customers. FedEx Home delivery vehicles arrive shortly thereafter, the drivers load the packages sorted for there, and then the vans exit the facility. ' The FedEx Ground delivery vehicles return to the facility in the late afternoon to early evening with packages picked up during the day. FedEx Ground delivery vehicles are parked inside the facility and turned off until they leave again the next day. Any packages picked up during the day are unloaded from the vans and sorted (an additional 4-hour process] to destination trailers waiting at load doors. This process is repeated daily. Jones Yiedford, LLC Site Ptah Findings q~ II. ADDITIOI\rAL EXHIBITS PROVIDED Exhibit D -Related Plans (Site Plata, Structural Elevations, Landscape Plan) Exhibit C -Aerial Photograph Exhibit D -Assessor's Map of Project Site Exhibit E -Site Plan Review Application Form Exhibit F -Agency Authorization Forna Exhibit G -Fire District No. 3 Review Cortaments III. APPROVAL CRITERIA Pursuant to the June 3, 2008 Pre-Application Conference, tlae provision of Sections 17.64 attd 17.72 of the Central Paint Land Development Code apply to the subject pxaperty as stated below: .17.72.020 Site plan approval required. A. A site plan application conforming to the r•equiremerzts of Section 17.72.030 shall be made: 1, For all constr•arction requiring issuance of a Building permit. E. When the siting of a structure has the potential to interfere with futan•e streets extended from subdivided or partitioned lands, such site plans shall be subject to approval by the planning commission. F. No building permit shall be issued until approval, as provided in this chapter, has been obtai~Ted for any building or strarctur•e requiring playa approval according to the provisions of this title. 17 72.040 Standards. In approving, conditionally appravirag, or decaying the plans subnaitied, the city shall base their decision on the following standards: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of as7alls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of fhe neighbor•lzood, and in such a naanner• as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as Haight be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The planning commissron may require the rraafntaining of existing trees for screening purposes and for sound and sight insulation f •om existing neighborhood use; B. Design, numher• and location of ingress and egress points so as to irrapraa}e and to avoid iaaterfererace with floe traffic flow an public streets; C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flaw facilities in such a rnaraner as is compatible tvith the use for which the site is pa°oposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic jlow on public streets; D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible x~ith tlae design of theia° Buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; E. Accessihiliry and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb arzd property, includfng, but not limited to, suitaBle gates, access roads and fie lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus. 17.b4 020 Off-street loading. A. In all districts, kept those specifically excepted and noted, for each use for which a building is to be erected or structurally altered to the extent of increasing the floor area to equal the minimum floor area required to provide loading space and which avill require the receipt or distribution of materials or merchandise by truck or similar vehicle, there shall be provided off-street loading space on the Basis of minimum requirements, as follows: 1. Commercial, industrial, and public utilfty uses which have a gross floor area of five thousand square feet or more shall provide off-street truck loading or unloading bey°ths in accordance with the following table: Square Feet of Ftoor Area No. of Berths Required S, 000 to 30, 000 1 30, 001 to I00, DDO 2 Jones Medford, LLC z Site Plan Findings B. ~ loading berth shall not be less tlaara ten feet wide, thirty f ve feet long and have a height clearance of twelve feet. l~~here the vehicles generally used for loading and unloading exceed these dimensions, the required length of these ber7hs shall be increased. C. If loading space has beery provided in connection with an existing use or• is added to an exis7ing use, the loading space shall not be eliminated if elimination would result ira less space than is required to adequately meet the needs of the use. 17.54.030 Off-street parkiftg--Recluirer! In all districts, except those specifically excepted grad noted, in connection u=ith any use whatsoever, there shall be pr•oyrided, at the time any building or structtn•e is erected or is enlarged or increased in capacity or the use is changed o,• increased in intensity, off-street parking spaces for automobiles for the enlarged or increased portion in the case of an addition or for the building, structure or use in other cases, in accordance with the requirements herein. 17 64.40 Off street parking--Nuttrher of spaces. The number of off-street parking spaces required for specific land uses shall be as set forth in the following schedule: USE STAN17AR17 7. Industria! acrd Mara factoring 2. Warehousing and other Not less than t~vo spaces per each three ernplayees on the hvo largest adjacent shifts'", or one space per• each orre storage facilities. thousand square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater. {'One space per evnplayoee if tJre business has only one shift). 3. Industrial vehicles. One space for each vehicle kept or operated in connection tit~ith the use. N. FINDINGS CriteriDn 1 ~. A site plan application conforming to the requirements of Section 17.72.030 shall be trade: 1. For all construction requiring issuance of a building permit. E. J3~hen the siting of a structure has tlae potential to Truer fer•e with f rture streets extended from subdivided or partitioned lands, such site plans shall be subject to approval by the planning conurnssion. F. h'o building permit shall be issued until approval, as provided in this chapter, has been obtained for any building or structure requiring plan approval according to the provisions of this title. FINDING -The proposed Site Plan Application is consistent with all applicable design standards set fortis in Section 17.72.©30 for issuance of a building pezxnit. The proposed structure is located centrally within the subject property, takes access from the proposed Federal Way and does not create any potential to interfere with future streets currently proposed at this tune. CONCLUSION -The Site Plan Application as prepared is consistent with Criterion I . Criterion 2 In approving, conditionally approving, or denying the plans subrrritted, the city shall base their decision on the following standards: ,4, Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site !n such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a nrmaner as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The planning commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screening purposes and for sound and sight insulation from existing neighborhood use; B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to inrpr•ove and to avoid interference with tlae traffic flow on public streets; C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flaw facilities to such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; D. Signs and other outdoor advertising struchrres to ensure chat the}} do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and ~>ill not interfere with ar detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Jones Medford, L~.C Site Plan Findings 3 • ~~ E..4ccessibilit}1 and sufficiency affirefightingfacilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety oflife, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to frre apparatus. FINDINGS -The proposed Landscape PIan reflects the Applicant's efforts to provide an aesthetic value to the currently vacant property thxough professional building design and landscaping. As shown on said plan, landscaping design for the developed portion of the subject property contains a variety of low ground-cover plantings, with Marshall Red Ash and Red Oak tz~ees along the property's entire Federal Way frontage for a visual screen affect. 131oodgood I'Iane trees shall be placed intermittently along the westerly facade of the structure for additional aesthetic value. Areas indicated as `low-maintenance lawn area' are shown along portions of the subject prapez-ty. These areas indicate sections of the site that are not proposed to be unproved at this current time. Said areas will utilize ahydro- seeding method per the same specifcations currently employed by ODOT along areas such as landscaped fxeeway interchanges. This method makes use of a particulaz• seed which is very drought-tolerant and is recomzxaended far areas that receive 10"-18" of annual rainfall. The method has been utilized throughout county and state highway areas of high congestion to minimize maintenance while providing a clean, professia~~al look. Said areas will not receive supplemental irrigation but should be mowed at ]east twice each year (late spring and fall). Fencing along the perimeter of the subject property will be 8' tall, consisting of black vinyl-coated chain link design. An aesthetic mix of two-tone monarch brick along the metal-frame structure's facade, combined with the intermittent trees along the westerly side of the structure, provide a clean view from the access point sufficient for the M-1 zoning designation. Access for the subject property is taken solely from Federal Way, which connects directly to Hamrick Road. As discussed iza the Pre-Application Conference, impact to the existing public street (Hamrick Road) has been addressed previously in the Federal Way Business Park Subdivision; which is approved and currently under construction, The proposed access point onto Federal Way was deemed adequate with no addi€iona] access points required. The proposed structure is located centi•ally within the subject property; therein providing for an efficient design which lends itself to sufficient supply for parking, loading and looped internal circulation. This configuration suitably pz-ovides the necessary balance between vehicle/pedestrian traffic flows and parking/loading areas within the M-1 zoning, in a safe and efficient manner. As shown on the structure Elevations plans within Exhibit B (Sheets: C.3 & A2.0), the proposed signage far the site is limited solely to a singular small lit sign located along the westerly elevation of the proposed structure, to«~ards the upper left-hand corner ofthe side elevation. As indicated in the review comments supplied by Fu•e District No. 3 and ixacorporated herewith these findings, the Site Plan has been reviewed and approved with conditions for construction. CGNCLUSIOIlT --- The Site Plan Application overall is consistent with Criterion 2. Criterion 3 A. In all districts, except those specifically excepted and noted, for each use for which a building is to be erected or structurally altered to the extent of increasing the floof• area to equal the minimum floor area requn°ed to provide loading space and whic)z o~~ill require the receipt of• distribution of materials or merchandise by truck a• similar vehicle, there shall be provided off-street loading space on the basis ofn:inimum requirements, as follows: 1. Commercial, industrial, and public utility uses 1~~hich have a gs•oss floor area offve lhoiesand square feet or more shall provide o -street tt•uck loadin ot• unloadin berths in accordance wiih the ollowin table: .~7urrre Feet of Floor,4rea o. ofBertJts 1Zequired 5, 000 to 30, 000 1 30,00] to 100,000 2 B. A loading berth shall not be less than ten feet wide, thirry~ve feet long and have a height clearance of twelve feet. Where the vehicles ge~aerally used for loading and unloading exceed these dimensions, the required length of these berths s{tall be increased. Jones Iv€edford; LLC Sice Plan Findings ~•~ ~t~~1~"P1 ;. -Cuxrer~tly tic 6tr~uctural plan. ~~all ~!",7rt~,~.~~~ l~l°:~;16~ ~h~i~_, `~~ l:>~_,i;,~ ,~~~~~~ ;,1~, ~~, the ~~>u'herly side crfth~~ Mini,', u. y - t~,ell ~.~ at~cnt~~;;1 $°x~° ir~di~~i~.~~:al i x is i~t 1 :y ~ !<rn_ ti,, ~~?ri!i~~ l~+ s~:,l~ f~;t~~~ ~li~c~ 1~1:'.ff). P~cka~~cs ~11Y' ~11ti'I'~buted t(~ each delavety ~"~:n ~ill~~~ ~; ?!R (~I;'tiC ill ~(1<< ~I 1 ' ~ ,. Sll:i ~hl' d(l.'i~lil ~_ ~} V'ti h~i .~;~C ll: J7L171~~ ~,~~es. This number of loa~.iu ~,~e~i~~ adc~._~nttil,, Ir~;~cllc> t~„~ ~~t~~.~~ <;t'the pral~~c>sed use whil<: r;orr t~~ri,~ awiontly addressing the require~.r~;~ts in SeCtit>>~ ;.(~<',.~)?t). CpT'~tCLUS1Ul~T -The proposed parking anal In idi,~~_ f ~~~ili[ie~: ade~~ratel;~ ~~~~icl css t~u~~. rcq~.iirc~n,cnts of Section 17.64.020 and are consistent with ~~°iterion 3. Criterion 4 ~i. i.4 iii: d'~ ., ~XC~, " 1'i05G' S~76Ct~ZC(dl~)' C_.: ~i ~l!:'r~ C7~~ . ~ - ~ ,~ !~r! ~"C)71YY4'C.'Z!O!i '.~. ~'' u7tV 2d9~ W~'t4kl'SOGtV'L'Y, ~~. ' c' G /t ~1L' j~r01atf.~C'f.~ (i~ ,,.~ ~ ,,, << <)i! l _. ~I'lfCFi<) 2 , (., . ~. li ! i,ti i 1 ,.~~ ~_ !~~' X}9t? t .~5- ~. a.. ~./ .. ' [~~~ f~7~ t!S"6 2S C)]u+'.'i ~ GJ i c~ ~rrl li7 ~i lt`--. ~_~ ., 1'LxG'C'1't!)I',.i(!U ii ,~. ~~rt .'7. (. '!'('<~f7) ~, ._ 1~ L., %'~. ")i1 tP2 j~7(?C"Lr `. c' U, .N, _,~, .~~ ~ i ~. yy r ~lC ~.!"_Ot'VRG~tYx i,~..-,~( '~ lii ..'Cq)u~~,.~i~l~~i ,r.'12'(1(.,i l.~lii l.,~ii .li. ~,_ ,., ~~~'J ,~(,~:511^~Gd Gt7Kl1,<~ Sn r, ., re;,:~r'Me~(G ~ cr ,i . _[, _ ,~_,i1 i ~ as :u~i rr r! r'~~ ~.>riC ,<>SCI P r.~'~~- l i,Sf 5 7; 3 a /:;11i U a _.._ _ !. l;r t- ru,l crnu 1 L~r~ it~Iir~ 1 t: ~~;!; _~ r .. ~, 77;t~7;3~G1}2 d~..$~S (:1:-ii lr.'O ,_U~~c'~.-',Y J'eY t~~tC~t X72ree L?Ytaa~O~yf2G5 ~/7 ?, . ~. fit~t7 ~l'~'~'c'~I 6d .l~,c.:'it~ ~, ~~`7~ ~', ClY C7t7G' Sj7~lC~ 4rQC11D7 ,~,t~„_ ~.~.,~'fla~~>~£?G~~~~r'is~4~OC7J"GXYG'uf~.l;7"i?i„~~i'dS~1~Pillu]'. ( ....1C',5(7QCGf72P 2G1C~i ~ ~ lc '.; tai' v1 ~h'tl ~i: ('OI971GCZiUn Nrd~~2 1~2G' t4S~r. 1~~'~-~L}i `~C~ - ~'~~ere is an antrc~hwitud nun7laea~ of 40 ~;~:p~o, t~cs o;i ~;~~:~'fr!~~>>n,, ±!,p lar~esf s}?'ti; ar~c~ the rtcil9t~. rn~~.~_l~ Cf"lt<ii~l~ 59,135 square feet ofi area. Pursuant to t~_~~ ~~eq~.~~c~l::,~~s ~:;i'S,~~~e~~ i"T x,4.040 )is~eti ~~bovc: ~i,e ~~~~~lic~~~7t ~z~d,~ that tl~e calculation utilizing the ;~~~~~s f„~~,~ area shoal, be applic,':. 3~~~ ~~ ~i,,,~_ « rrit~~ra;m~ r.i ~~ s,_<<.,;h,~~cl parhir, ~ =la«ces. The 64 standard pa~~hui- 51~act, ~'~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~'~e praposecl Si~~ lyJe:~~~. as ~~.~~I~. a~ th,~, <:i additional haYUi.~~,~~ perking spaces, denaonstz~.te il:at sac hair iii ~ ~ ~ ::>nt, is more i~~~.r ~u1i~ci4uil~~ i~~~t. .~1i~ is due in part to t~~, ~rast experience over time co~~tr~~ctin~~ a~:d ,~~ evious '<~.c7it:'~s identical to t'.ae one currently proposed, therein allowing Fed~x Ground. to calculate the ~ l i ~g ~•ecluin r~c~~ts r>>~~,essary for such ~,n event. In addition, it is a~~tici~ated that same oftlse package handlers and office stai'!~ ~„~t~~ likely elect tc~ Lar.~~~~c .~~ass-transit for their con 7 1_nC~{s, ~crcin diminishing the passible number of e~nap~loyees ,~a,1; in;; o=~ site. Ct~lrlCp;USi©lV ~- Tlxe Site Plan is consistent with. Criterion 4. 'hlae €::~,~n ~r~i~~sion concluds~s f I~ut the z~ecl~~est complies ~i~ith ,4cctions 17.64 anc3 17.72 ofi the Central 1'oirrt Land 13t~~~z~lolnru~nt Code. Iiespectfitlly submitted, ~r By. _ Cori ~th~ ~ per, Project Manager Jones Medford, LLC SSte Pl, µ ~ ~ - r" ct ~`~ f ~ &. ~ '. B a Ri'. .. ~r~b 1'ierc~, C7ir~cfcrr ~` - ~ i. ~ ;~ ~; Matf ~mifc~re, l~v. Services ,~ ~ ~,, .. F~13LIC ~ S ,~TAF.F' IiE.F'"C?RT 71! 12008 ~x CQ~rtcr'cial ~x~~ldin~. Applicant: l I_;l~l:;~ (~~round Zoning: M-1~ L:i~~l~t Int3ustrial _~ ~,~uh~3i~,~.~ ,_~ ,m_n.~.. ~~~ i~~thiic stu~ty is warranted "~r ~~li;~, development. The u~~datt~3 1'S.l~ and ct~rreslx,tulin sioit plat7necl i{~rthi~ a,~'7r~t~la i<~ it~eJi~de eveaatual widening, ofi l ~ihle Rr~el<. Road, r°,+idenin<~ n~~ l ~l<attiric:k Rc~~ui sittJ inie~r~i,etic~tt rili~nn~~e~3[ ~,~1~ Httta~irich and __ T4i171e Rich IZ~ra~l. 7~zo a~ciditional t~ ~9t~c sii.ltlieS are '~~arraratc~~ for t'a~y develoiameii9. >uh~egttent clevcl~~pntetat wtih~tt the ht~ ~iacs~- pa~~h ~~~~ay require additi~.ntal trali4 studies depcttili3~~~. ~aa tlac~ia cstia~a~ed traffic volu3ne, f';~~:~stit6~? 1tt31'a::t'1F<'(183" <` All u~~lities are l~ein`.::~ ~~tructed as pari of thy- llc°det~tl 1'~'~~v subdivision `oTFciiticat~.~ of.'~.lalat`,~, ;,le 1. Street Trec P;an:. Pl~uttiit~s Thal} comply with ~:1t~~tieipal bode Section 12.30. Tree hlantiraz~:, shall laa~~e at least a 1 '/~" trunf.. diam~°iet~ ~t the titaa~: of installation. All ~trcet rr'ees shall k~c irriZ~~tcd rr~itia apt <~utoxata,ic: ~~~~tler~~-ound it°rigatior s,~ste~rt. I`aaia~tettance of the landscape ra~~~~ 1}~-ill be the res~onsiia;lity ~~~1~ tlae ~t~~~pc,~~~~~ ~,~~=~ter~s ~~~lao ~~~o~~a fire prope~~ty dire~a ly ~~ci;;:~~cent to the landscape strip. 2. Storm T~ `aie,' Detention. Applicant will st~l>>aiit to the Building and Public Narks ]7epartment and Rogue Valley Sanrt~~t-y ~~~» er their storm water <?cientiot~ flan. Applicant shall c~»~cli.~cat a pre atad post development run-off plan aaad detain all i~atwr on site that exc;ceds tl~ac difference. 14(7.. ,Saufh 3"~ Stre~f Cenfre/ Poinf, C.~h 9 X542 ~~~ 'l. G4.3329 ~ Fax 541. GG4.6384 Jt1I,/i4/2008/tr~Qid 89.57 JRCKSON S0~1NTY ROABS SAX ~I~o, 5~1 774 62°5 J~,iy z, 2aos Attention: Connie Clune City of Central Point Planning -140 South Third Street Gentrat Point, QFZ 975[32 RE: Development off Hamrick Road - a county-rr~aintained road. Planning File: 0$183. Dear Connie: ~, 001/QO1 Reads aa~tefi rbllu, PE 27,n, ffZc 6t ,pevalopnrenl Elrgfireer [06 nnteSopn Road Whlta Clly, OR 97503 Phono!(541~774-623U Felt: [56YJ 774-8295 pnllnrw(~ltJ a Ck80 R CO u n ~'.Of p 4 Wnv a 9 CK90 f t COllilfy.OtQ Thank you far the opportunity to comment an this application for the site plan far a 59,139 square foot building on Lot 9 of tentatively approved Federal Way Business Park. Jackson .. -•..... - ..°.Cflunty.Roads~-hae ~tf1e~-fiall©wing-comments, . -. ._..--•- •.- --.... -. ----. _.. _ . .._... _._. _._..-.-..- --.._.._ .. _ 1, Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right-o# way. 2.. _ .If county s#orrn.,drainage facilities are utilized, the applicant's. registered engineer shall - provide a hydraulic report and plan for review anc~ approval by Jackson County Roads. Storm drainage runol`t is limited to that area currently draining to the County storm drainage system. Upon oompletiort of the proj®ct the developer's !/ngine®r shill certify that the construction of the drainage system was constructed per the approved plan- A copy of the certification shelf be sent to Russ Logus at Jackson County Roads. 3. If the Traffic Study for the F~derol way Business PariC Subdivision does trot ta>`e in to account this facility, a new Traffic Study is recon-Imended, Sincerely, ~z.~~ J mes Philp, PE Traffic & Development tngineer 1:1EnglneeringlDeve3opmennCI7IESICNTRlPT1084 83,wpd ,. 14G S ~i~l~t~rci ~u cci:, Cc ni ral Pc+int, ~ , 7 {~2 ~ ~~~ 'T'odd ~~~G:< ~ •, ~_~~ii ~ ~ ~, ~ ± ~.~ gal S' L6C~•,.33L1 fax 541.664.1(st 1 ~ ~:_ , i .. www.ci.centk~l-pa~in~.crr us L.i 1 ~. ~'4_/. ~'~~~tililJl"! f~e~;', i°tment I'~a~lnix~~ ale: ~.,.F 1~.Iu~~dn~ ~efsa~~tent ITTCT: ~ eul : ~, I°`ame: ~7 ~ `~ : ;~entra~ ~a]I2t ~ra~ez~ty I:~c ~;c ~ ~ j Ji i `gin: fee attached ~: ~ i . Thy, staffre~art is to i•avide if~l"cn~~~~~~i:ian t~> ~17e I~lannng ~a»~r~-lssian and the ~~plicant 7 ~=~;ardin pity ~uzldin~ ~~ ~~7art1~~{'rTt req~~i~°~;~i~ents anal ~;t~r~c3i i.1C)11~ tc~ be included in the design and develaent aftl~c~ ~~rc~~c:~sed ~raject. '~i ~ ":~ is mat = ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ i, ,~,~ 'T'his re~art is preliminary and compiled ~vlely far use by the C:~Itral Faint ~'~~_7~'~Iia~ C;ammissian. I 1~(~ S Third ~frea~ ~c~nt`r~t~l Y~airrf, {:1~` 9"5(}2 ~~1.C~. "~~'~` F~ ~~4~`,64.199 Building Dept. Staff Report, Page 2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CQMMENTS 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all cuz~rent State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chaptez• 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are pz•esent, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineez•ing practices. . A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building Official, shall be submitted prior to f nal of the gz•ading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finaled. Exception: l.. The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 140 S Third Street ~ Central Poinf, OR 97502 ~ 549.6fi4.3321 ~ Fax 54.664.9671 .. ~~ Building Department Staff Report, page 3 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood haza~•d area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, erosion control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Application for buildzng permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code {2005}. 11. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. 12. No encroachment upon adjacent property is allowed. If grade changes at property lines occur, approved retaining walls must be planned and provided. If questions, please call Todd Meador.....664-6325, ext. 228. 940 S Third Street ~ Central Poinf, OR 97502 ~ 547.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.1619 0,/0212008 07:46 5A1-6647171 RVS #'AGE 0J./01 y4~ j~~~MENT « ~, ,~,c s~~ _t:_ t ~~` July 1, 2008 ROGUE VAL~.E'1~' SE'tll!'ER SERVl~ES T..ocntion: 136 1~1+c),ct Vile itnad_ Central rioint, OR • Mntling Ltidtln;ss: ?.O. 13ox a 13q, Conrrzl Point, QR 75Q2-Q005 'i`el. (541) 6fi4-fi:~f)(1, i~nx (5¢f) 664-7171 www.TiVSS,uF Connie Clune FAX 664-63$4 City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Site Plan review for FedEx Ground, File ~` 08183 The proposed project will be served by a new sewer main constructed for the Federal Way C3usiness Park. Plans far this subdivision have been approved but construction is not complete. The project is within the Phase 2 5tormwater Quality Management Area and must comply with starmwater quality requirements outlined in the RVS Design Manual. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of the proposed development be subject to the follawir-g conditions: 1 . Applicant must attain a permit from Rogue Valley Sewer Services to connect to the sewer system and pay all related development fees. The permit for the sanitary sewer v~ill not be issued until tl~e new main line construction is complete and accepted as a public facility by RVS. 2. Applicant must submit a site plan to RVS demonstrating compliance with Stormwater Quality requirements. Feel free to call me ii= you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, .f Carl Tappert, PE District Engineer .. K:~DAT~1/1ger~cs'cs1CENTP'I`~P~.nT~T1vG15ife~lrtnRcview120Q$1U~183 F~CI~x Grnur~ci,cEnc Attachment "H" FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No: 08183 INTRODUCTION In the Matter of a Site Plan Review for the construction of a 59,135 square foot building for package distribution and delivery center for FedEx Ground. The project site is located in the M-1 Industrial zoning district, Lot 4 oftentatively approved Federal Way Business Park and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 12 B, pari of Tax Lot 200. Applicant: Bob Gude, dba Jones Medford, LLC; Agent: Neatha~xaer Surveying, Inc. 17.45.020 Permitted uses. The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted in an M-1 district; subject to the limitations irnposed in Section 17.48. Q30: A. Warehousing; Finding: The proposed distribution, delivery center and office for FedEx Ground is a perzx~itted use in the M-1 zoning district. Conclusion: The proposal cornplies. 17:4&.030 Starzdardsfor perrrtitted uses. All uses 7~~ithin the M-1 district shall be subject to tlie,follou~ing conditions ar2d standards: .~. All rave materials, finished products, machinery and equipment, with the exception of automobiles and trucks normally used in the business, shall be stored 7~~ithin an entirely enclosed building or~ sight-obscur°ing, nonprerced fence not less that2 six feet in height; B. The facility shall be in compliance with all applicable state and federal er2viranrr2ental, health and safety regulations; C. .In any 1l~ 1 district directly across a street from any residential (R) district; all outdoor parking, loading ar° display areas shall be set back at least ten feet f •om the public right-of-vvay and this setback area shall be planted with trees appropriate for the neigl2borhaod, ground cover or other landscaping materials that are consistent with the general existing character of the area, or that will establish a landscape thear2e for other del~elopn2ents to follow. This setback and landscaping requirement shall also apply to M 1 lots fronting on any street designated in the campreliensive plan as a major arterial. Finding: All parcels or packages will be sorted and stored within the building. Finding: The project site is not locatedwithin a residential district and exceeds the miniznuzn public right-oi=way setback. The landscape design provides street trees along Federal Way and planting areas. Page 1 of 6 Conclusion: The proposal cozrzplies. 17.48.050 Height reguCatiofts. Maximum height of any building or structure in an M-1 district shall be sixty feet. (Ord. 143 6 ,~2 (part), 1981). Finding: The building elevations, {Applicant sheet A2.0} illustz•ate t}tat the building will not exceed thirty feet in height. Conclusion: The proposal complies. 17.48A70 Yard requirements. The following measurements indicate minimum yard requirements in an M-1 district: A. Front Yard. The fi-ont yaz-d shall be a minimum of tza~enty feet. (Also, see Section 17.48.030(C)). B. Side Yard. The side yard shall be a minimum of ten feet except uahen. the side lot line rs abutting a lot in any residential (R) district and then the side yard shall be a minimum of twenty feet and shall be increased by one-half foot for each foot by which the building height exceeds twenty feet. C. Pear Yard. The rear yard shall be a minimum often feet except when the rear lot line is abutting a lot in any residential (R) district and then the rear yard shall be a minimum of twenty feet and shall be increased by one-half foot for each foot by which the building height exceeds twent3~ feet. D. Lot Coverage. No requirements. Finding: The proposed project has a front yard setback of 196 feet fz•ozxz Federal Way to the building. Finding: The building is situated in the center of the property, thus the site design can meet all required yard setbacks. The design will provide a zninimuzxz side and rear yard setback of 2& feet. Conclusion: The proposal exceeds the required setbacks of the M-1 zoning district. ~ 7.48.080 Signs. Signs within the M-1 district shall be limited to the following.• A. 1. Permitted signs shall contain not more than one hundred square feet of surface area on any one side, or an aggregate of two hundred square feet of surface on all sides i~~hich can be utilized for display purposes; 2. Lighted signs shall be indirectly illurzzinated and nonflashing; 3. Identification signs shall be permitted z~~ithin any required setback areas provided it does not extend into or overhang any paj-king area, sidewalk or other public right-of way; 4. Signs located within vision clearance areas at intersections of streets shall conform to Section 17.60.110. Page2of6 B. Signs advertising floe property "for rent" ot° "far sale".Shall not e.~ceed four square feet of area on any on.e .side and one such sign .shall be permitted,for each street,fi'ontage. C Signs in the M-1 district shall he perl~zitted and desig~~ed according to provisions of Chapter 1 S. 24. Finding: The submitted building elevation, sheet C-3, illustrates a wall mouzited FedEx logo sign identifying the facility. An illustrated sign design will be required prior to issuance of a sign permit. Conclusion: The sign design can be reviewed during the sign permit process. CPMC .17.72.0.10 (A) Purpose. The pui7~ose of site plan, landscaping and constr~uctinn plan approval is to review the site and landscaping plans of the proposed use, structure or building to determine compliance with this title and the building code, and to promote the orderly and harra~onious de7jelop~nent of the city, the stability of land values and investments, and the general welfare, and to prorsaote aesthetic considerations, and to help prevent impairment or depreciation of land values and development by the erection of structures or additions or alterations thereto without proper attention to site planning, landscaping and the aestletic acceptability in relation to the development of neighboring properties. CPMC 17.72.020 Srte pla~z approval required: (A) A site plan application confot°ming to the requirements of Section 17.72.030 shall be made: 1. For all construction requiring issuance a_ f a building permit; or 2. Upon a change of use. Finding: The application and supporting docun•€ents provide the information necessary for review of the proposed 59, ] 35 square foot structure for FedEx Ground. The proposed building will require issuance of a building perzxzit. Conclusion: A Site Plan review for the proposed structure is necessary and the submitted application complies. CPMC 17.72.030 (A) - (E) Ifzformatio~i Required. This section of the code addresses all of the necessary information to make a decision for approval or denial of the site plan application. Finding: The applicant has provided all of the necessary information as outlined in the above referenced code. ConeIusion: The proposal corrzplies. CPMC 17.72.030 (F) In the discretion of the city, a traffic study peg farmed by a licensed professional engineer; Finding: The City of Central Point Public Works found that a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required for this project; however, future stz-uctural development Page 3 of b g~ - ~ ~ ~ within the Business Park play trigger the need for ulzdated data as evidenced in the Public Works staff report dated July 1, 2008. Canclusioxz; The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72.040 Starrda~•ds. In approving, canditiar7ally approving, or denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their- decision on the•falloia-ing .S•tandar°dr: CPMC 17.72.090 (A). Landscaping and fencing urid the construction of walls ors the site in such a manner as to cause tl~e same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing r~eighbarhaod uses. The Planning Commission may require the maintaining of existing tr°ees for° scr°eening purposes and far sound and sight insulation. from existing neighborhood use; Finding: The landscape design, {Applicants sheet L-1), incorporates low ground cover plantings that flank the facility entrance. Street trees are along Federal Way in conformance with CPMC Section 12.36. Trees axe also located in front of the building. The Iawn areas will be planted with adrought-tolerant hydro seeding method similar to that used along freeway intercha~lges. The irrigation system will be designed to maintain all planting areas. Finding: Fencing along the perimeter of the site will be eight (8) feet in height providing security for the facility and will be a black vinyl coated chain link design. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72.040 (B) Design, numberl and location of ingress and egress paints so as to irraprazJe and to avoid interference with the traffic flaw on public streets; Finding: The project Izas direct access from Federal Way, an industrial street within the approved subdivision, which intersects with Hamrick Road. One ingress/egress along Federal Way is proposed. A condition of the tentative approval for the subdivision lists the improvements to Hamrick Road and construction of Federal Way are required for final plat approval. The landowner, Cris Galpin, is working with the City's Public Works Department to design these improvements. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72.040 (C) To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian ar7d vehicle flaza~ facilities in such a manner as is compatible ~~~ith the use for which the site is proposed to lie used and capable of use, ar~d in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; Finding: CPMC Section 17.64.020 requixes two (2) truck loading berths; this project provides two {2) loading bays and seventeen {17} docking bays. Packages are Page 4 of b distributed to each delivery van through the drive-iz~ loading bays, and the docking bays handle incoming packages. Finding: CPMC Section 17.G4(I}(2} for warehousing and distribution requires two (2) spaces per each three (3} employees or one {1) space per 1;000 square feet of gross Haar area, whichever is greater. The project will have 40 employees (13 spaces) azad the gross floor area will require S9 spaces. The project provides 64 automobile parking spaces, the appropriate nuzxzbez• of dedicated ADA spaces, and a designated area for an additional 28 spaces. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72.040 (D) Signs and other outdoof° advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or detez• from traffic control signs ot• devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not intez fere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: As noted previously, the submitted building elevation, sheet C-3, illustrates an identifying FedEx sign attached to the building. A sign design will be required prior to issuance of a sign permit for all signs. Conclusion: The sign design can be reviewed during the sign permit process. CPMC 17.72.040 (E) Accessibility and sufficienc~> of fire frghting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasoz2able safetJ> of life, limb and property; including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and•~re lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; Findizzg: Deputy Fire Marshall Fire Don Hickman, in a June 13; 2008 memo, listed three (3} comments following a review of the project. Mark Kamrath, project designer, is aware of the requirements and agrees to meet each standard. Finding: District l~TO. 3 will review the structural plans and comment during the building permit process. Conclusion: Fixe District 3's requirements can be monitored in the building and engineering plan review process prior to issuance of a building permit. CPMC 17.72.040 (F) Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section I6.20.0$0 pertaining ro the maximui~z number of single family dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding: No single-family dwellings are proposed with this application. Conclusion: Not applicable CPMC 17.72.040 (G) Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Paint Page~of6 ~~ area and its environs. The architecture and de.sigrz pr•opo.sals may lie rejected by the Planning Carnnzi.rsiorz if found to be incornpatihle with the existing architectural or design characteristics ofadjacent pr°oper°ties or uses. .ln addition, the Planning Commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, or other development requiretzzent.s• that nzay he necessary to ensure land use compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and pr°ivacy of Central Point residents. Finding: The project site is located within an industrial zoned area with structures and uses of similar design and use. Finding: The project is designed to Federal Express specifica#ion and is similar to other such dis#ribution facilities. The building is designed to meet the heigh# and se#back requirements of CPMC Section 17.48. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page 6 of 6 ~~~~ ~~,~~HMENT ~~~" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 59,135 SQ. FT. PACKAGE DISTRIBUTION AND DELIVERY CENTER FOR FEDEX GROUND Lot 9 Federal Way Business Parr 375 2W 12 B, part of Tax Lot 200 File No. 08183 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a Site Plan application far a 59,135 square foot building far a package distribution and delivery center for FedEx Gxound, located on Lot 9 of tentatively approved Federal Way Business Park in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2408, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments an the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the M-1 Industrial zoning district Section 17.48, Off Street Parking and Loading Section 17.64, and Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Section 17.72 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application does comply with applicable standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Departmez Staff Report (Exhibit "A"} dated August S, 2048; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based an the findings and conditions of approval as set Earth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated August 5, 2008, which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and 'incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th day of August, 2008. Planning Commission Chair Planning Cornrnission Resolution No. {8/5/2008} ATTEST: City Representative Appr©ved by me this 5th day of August, 2008. Planning Commission Chair ~~ Planning Commission Resolution No. ($/5/200$) ADAM ~C~LT~Y GL1P ~oR YooAl""~'~`A~ G~~ G~KT~F~ Plnnir-, C?p.r~mrrt STAFF P T 1~c>r7r I~IurrrF~tarey,AICF; Car77r77trr~ity C~7cvelai~rnent l~irectarl Assist~r7t pity i~,<lr7iirtisir~tor S'TAF'F RAY'' R7[" 1lugust 5, 2()013 AGEI~IIIA ITEMS File No. 0818.5 Consideration of an application for a Conditional L1se Permit for the operation of a Yoga i Tai Cl~i center located within the Mountain View Plaza. Applicant: Adam I-laltey. STAFF SOURCE: Lisa Moz•gan, Planning technician ,` ... I3ACKGROUI`al1D: The appplicant leased the Subject ~~, ~ ~~ ~. s ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,~, ~ ;~ - ~ ; - ~ ~ ; ~ pTO'perty With the intention of ~~,,a fM ~ ~ " ~~,i~~,~. nd •~ ~ - ~; ~ ~ operating a Yalta 1 "I'ai Chi center n" ~~' ~ ~ , ~ ` ~~ ~~^~~~ within Mountain Vlew Plaza. The , , ~; ~" ~ ~ '~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ "'~ `>"r ro ert ~s zoned C-4 Tourist and , J ~ ~ ~ '~ ~' i t ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ QfEce Professional and the address ~,~r ~:, r t , ~ ~~~ , , ;~ ~~ ,, ~, ~ ~ ` ; ° ~~~~~~~ '~~~ ~~ '' is 1205 Plaza 131vd. Suite F. ~ ~'"' '; : & , P'ropcr~ed t.oction for ,' ' ,~ . °r' M. i '~ Yana t Tai chi Center ", The Yoga t Tai Chi center ~ v ~ i :~.~` ,. Mtt~ b~yCP ~~ `~ r wiyW'+-.~" i~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ , (classified as a physical fi ~,'' ~ ~~ ~'~ w ~„ fitness/conditioning center, martial ~,,~~i ~ _ , ~ .. ~ ~ ,, ~ ~~~ _; ~~ arts schools) r is a conditional use '" ~ ; ~ '~ within in the C-4 district ~, , ~,, , - = ,~ ~: r ° + , ;+ " . ~ , . ,, ' Curves, a physical therapy office ~ " ~ `" ~ ~~ and a chiropz°actic office have had ,, ~~ conditional use permits approved .® .~ , ~ ~ ~~ , and have demonstrated to be a ~° . ~"~` , .~.,,... > .~.- .~~ . •.,.~,~, compatible use within Mountain View Plaza. None of which have had an adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant has stated in his Endings that ail ret~ui~•ements as outlined under CPMC 17.76,040 shall be met. (Refer to Attachment `A') ~. Parking requirements have been met with tl~e approval of Mountain View Plaza. The signage far the proposed Yogal Tai Chi center is similar to the signage of the other businesses located in the plaza. Outside agencies and other City Departments have been given the opportunity to comment. (Refer to Attachments "S"_"G". This application has been duly noticed in accordance with ORS 197.703. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: None. FINDINGS: Refer to Attachment "H". ISSUES: None. EXHIBITSIATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" -Applicant's Findings Attachment "B" -Building Department Comments Attachment "C" -Public Works Carnments Attachment "D" - Floodplain Specialist Comments Attachment "E" - ODOT Comments Attachment "F" - RVSS Comments Attachment "G" -Jackson County Roads Comments Attachment "H" -Planning Department Findings of Fact Attachment "I" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. _, approving the proposed Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. , granting a Conditional Use Permit. °~~°ACHr~~~~r « ,~ FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS A. The site proposed is more than adequate in size to accommodate the use of the Yoga Center. Typical class sizes are between S and 12 people, a number which can easily be accommadated by the usable space. B. The Yoga Center should .receive no more traffic than other businesses in the shopping center, and will be most similar in operation to a "physical fitness/conditioning center; martial art school, as is described and permitted under 17,44.034, conditional uses. C. The Yoga Center will comply with all regulations that are stipulated in the lease in regard to signs, structures, etc, thus complying with the same regulations as the other businesses in the center. in regard to vehicular issues, the center will have no adverse affect on abutting property. D. The Yoga Center will only exist for the betterment of health and welfare of neighboring areas, and will comply with all local, state, and federal health and safety regulations. E. NA ~~- of Central ~Polr~t, C)r~gon Planning Departmenir t~W So.Tf~ird St, E~nirai Pofnt,Or 97502 ~L~~~ Tam Hurriphrey,A1CP, 541 ~5#"i4.332] Fart bG.4:~384 ~~ Cammuin#ty Devein~~~t Dir~kar! vvi+vw ti.ceritrai: ~oint.aru5 Assis#ant pity Aden#rsistratar Date: June 23, 2008 Return to: Lisa Morgan, Ext. 297. E-mail: lisamC~3ci.central-point.or.us REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ' ort X Jackson Coun Roads & Parks X Avista Utilities X Public Works De artment X Buildin De artirient X Qwest Communications X Central Point School District X Ro a River Valle Irri anon Dist. X Charter Communication X Ro e Valle Sewer Services X Pacific Power X Ro e Valle Txans ortation Dist. X Police De artment X Jackson Coun Surve or X Fire District No. 3 X U.S. Post Office X State Hi hwa Division X Flood Plain S ecialist -Central Pt. X So. Ore on Re 'onal Comm. - 911 Other: APPLICATIONS File Number Pro'ect Name 0$185 Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a yoga/Tai Chi center in Mountain View shogpin~ center Attached is a Planning action application. Please review and submit comments and/or a written xeport setting forth any necessary conditions as required by your department/agency to the Planning Department within ten (10) working days. If no comments are received within the ten day review period, it will be assumed that there are no comments. A Plaruung Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, August 5, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. ~ 1F ~`rt ~~ ~ ~'°t't ~, r.P~~ ~ ~ Pub ~. ~. 140 South Third Street + Central Point OR 97502 ~ 547..6b4.3321 s 541. 6384 ~ u~~r ~~ ~' ~ ~r~ oou~ ~-~ ~ .~~ ~ ~ . Page I of 1 ~TTACHNiENT' "" Lisa Morgan From: Matt Samitore Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 200$ 1:53 PM To: Lisa Morgan Subject: CUP for yogaltai chi Lisa, Public Works has no comment on the file 08185 Matt Samitore Parks & Recreation and Development Services Manager (541) 664-3321, ext. 205 6/25/2008 Wage 1 of 1 1 t ~~1 I[~I~~ 6 L6 ~ 99 Lisa Morgan From: Stephanie Woolett Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 2:30 PM To: Lisa Morgan Subject: Request for Comments: CUP-48185 Hi Lisa, The Mountain View Shopping Center, which is the location for the proposed Yoga/Tai Chi Center, is located adjacent to Mingus Creek. The parcel appears to be located in a regulatory floodplain; however, the structure is pre-existing so it should meet all of the floodplain development requirements. It is worthy to note that the mapped floodplain is located only along a small portion of the east side of the parcel. Other than that, !don't have any floodplain or stormwater related comments for this proposed use. Thanks for providing me with an opportunity to comment! O Stephanie Woolett, CFM FloodplainJStormwaterSpeciolist City of Central Point public Works 543.664.7boz, l=xt. z44 6/23/2008 ODO°I" nc~ticc acknc~wledcctlt; ~~()fi1~5 (Mt~ri!~:i<!i!a ~~"ic;w ;;Ire>p~ir~~; C'citlt~r' C:'t7I") ~`, ! 1 cif` 1 d ~. .. ~ o. t """. Lisa organ t'rom; PYLE~ david [david.PYL~adat.state.ar.us] ~r r~ : Friday, June 27, 2Ot}8 1'I :34 AM t'a: Rise Margan `~rstr~e~~t: C7daT native ackno~~ti~iecigement: tJ81f~` (Mountain View chapping Center CUP) Lice: The t~regan department of Transpe~r~~rtian at~preciat~~s tt~~e appartuni~~y io revic~nt t(7e naticed ~lcruntain View shopping Center application for Conditional t l-,~ ~'ermit (CUP, #~~,1 ~~) for tl~o aperatian of a yogalTai Chi center located an Freeman St. (a city << a). ~ ::~ ~ ,~li~: rnt does not ~ro(~osc uiroct access to a St~uc' highway, and the application does not propose ~ pl.~~« ar land u~;s regulation amendment required to be consistent with the Transportation Planning Rule.. We have no aamment. Thank you far noticing C7dt~T Development Review. We look forward to working with the city of Central Paint on future applications, Kind regards, i The OCa7 Region 3 1 District 8 ~ 140 Antelope Rd. i white City, aR'. 975U3 (541j 774.6399. (541} 774.6349 ~ .'•.: David.Pyl~esotfot,state.c~r.u~ ~ 5 l s: d :;. a J°+n~_ 6, 20(78 F1e: Nio~ntein View Shopping Center, Fiie #(78185 F~:\DATA~AGEI~CI~S\~',"~l`~T~'T\I?[..ANNC~r\CL"~'t2(7(7~3\()81~3S-MT VIEVt~ HOPI'INCr.DC7~ .~iJ~./0?/2000/,4'ET' ~ ~; ~? JAOKSON OOUNTY AORDS F n a; iI o, 5~ 1 7 i~ 6? 9 5 p. E 01 / 0 01 /~TTA~H~/1~NT " ~" JACKSON COUNTY Rnuas June 27, 2008 Afifention: Lisa Moran City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Contras Point, OR 97602 Aoadg J'nmes )Phiy~, k'1Ei Ti~aff c rk ,C77cvclop~n urn ~ s~'In¢~c.. 200 Antewpe Raad Wnlte City, OR 97b0a Phong: (6e1) 774-$2~0 >`B~C fEat) 774629E phi I pjw®j7cks0 nCOil nb.af9 vnxw jacksoncvur~b.org R~: YogalTal Chi center off Freeman Road - achy-maintained section of the road. Punning File: x8185_ bear Lisa: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on thlS application far the aperatlon of a yoga/Tsi Chi center in Mountain Vlew Whopping center. Jackson County Roads has no _aammen#s.--- - - .~__.._..-.~.W.~......._..... Sincerely, ~ MQ amen Philp, PI; Tra~G & 17evelopment Engineer I:lEnginearingl~evelopmentlCETIE5IC NTRLFT108185.wpd ~~ ~ITTACH~lIE~V1" " ~-4 " FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No: OS185 INTRODUCTION In the Matter of a Conditional Use Permit far the proposed operation of a Yoga /Tai Chi center within the Mountain View Plaza. The prapased center is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 1202. The proposed space is Iocated at 1205 Plaza Boulevard, Suite F, Central Point, OR 97502 (Applicant: Adam Holtey) 1'7.76.020 Information required. An application for a conditional use permit shall include the following information: A. Name and address of the applicant; B. Statement that the applicant is the owner of the property or is the authorized agent of the owner; C. Address and legal description or the assessor's parcel number of the property; D. An accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing must be adequate to enable the planning commission to determine the compliance of the proposal with the requirements of this title; E. A statement indicating the precise manner of compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this title together with any other data pertinent to the findings prerequisite to the granting of a use permit. Finding: The applicant has submitted all of the necessary information to proceed with the review of this application. Conclusion: The applicant has met this criterion. 17.76.00 Findings and conditions. The planning commission, in granting a conditional use permit, shall f nd as follows: A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code; Finding: Per the applicant's narrative, the existing space for lease is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. Conclusion: The proposed site and use meet this criterion. Page 1 of 3 t B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Finding: Mountain View Plaza is an existing shopping center with adequate access to a public street effectively meeting the anticipated traffic that would be generated by Mountain View Plaza and other uses within the shopping center. This was addressed in the approval of Mountain View Plaza. Conclusion: The proposed use meets this criterion as a tenant of Mountain View Plaza. C. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In malting this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; Finding: All site improvements, vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; building setbacks; landscaping, outdoor lighting were addressed with the approval of Mountain View Plaza. Conclusion: This criterion is not applicable to this application as a tenant of Mountain View Plaza. D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied far will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare afpersons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood ar to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section; Finding; The applicant agrees to comply with ail of the above requirements as stated in the applicant's narrative. Conclusion: The applicant has or intends to meet this criterion. E. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include: 1. Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use; provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions for the subject zoning district, unless a variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter 17.13, 2, Increasing street widths, modifications in street designs or addition of street signs or traffic signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use, Page 2 of 3 .. ,~ ~' 3. Adjustments to off-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics of the proposed use, 4. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress, S. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance program, 6. Regulation of signs and their locations, 7. Requiring fences, berms, wails, landscaping or other devices of organic or artificial composition to eliminate ar reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility or other undesirable effects on surrounding properties, 8. Regulation of time of operations far certain types of uses if their operations may adversely affect privacy or sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise conflict with other community or neighborhood functions, 9. Establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed, 10. Requirement of a bond or other adequate assurance within a specif ed period of time, l 1. Such other conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, Finding: All of the above conditions were previously addressed with the approval for Mountain View Plaza. They are not applicable to the tenant as he will be leasing a suite with all of the above mentioned improvements in place. Conclusion: These requirements are not applicable to the applicant. Page 3 of 3 f-- I TI'~Vf~111/IGIV 1 ~~ -~- ~i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF A YOGA /TAI CHI CENTER LOCATED WITHIN MOUNTAIN VIEW PLAZA Applicant: Adam Holtey (375 2W 42D, Tax Lot 1242 1245 Plaza Blvd., Suite F} Filc No. 48185 WHEREAS, the applicant submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a Yoga /Tai Chi center located within Mountain View Plaza. The subject property is located in the C-4, Tourist and Off ce Professional zoning district and is identified on the .laclcson County Assessor's map as 375 2W 02D, Tax Lot 1202. WHEREAS, on August 5, 2008, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly- noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district section 17.44, and Conditional Use Permit section 17.76 of the Central Point Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Conditional Use Permit application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated August 5, 2008, that adequate f ndings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the conditional use permit is consistent with the intent of the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff Report dated August 5, 2008, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5~' day of August, 2008. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (080508} ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 5th day of August, 2008. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (0$050$} VYH ITS HA~YK ESTATES ~XTE~ISION ~-~w~~ i i~i:;~l~llll`,' i_:; ~;,'I l 11:1!, v S /15Si<,I,:iii { ily l~t;t?~is~i~?r<i(r;r ',~rY~li'~~~ ~~li:~~~A~N~ril ,~ut~ust , :'t~0~ Cotaside~•aiion o~a a•equest for extension of White Hawk Pl4rnraed Trait Development t~pl?licaaat; Dauac~t~~ Deveh~~paaaerat, ~Ii-~c. Co ie Clauac, Community 1'laraner ... ~ . BAC~C~R~JU1°~i~a _ _ _ _______.______ ._r_._ _ __ .._~_ ~y P.esolntior~ No. 730 dated Jrrl~,~ 3, X007, the Plaranin~,~~ C(?lI7T111SSiol1 ap~~1°oved ~ m~jor• rntadific~tit~n ior• i17e redesi~ra of White Hawk Plararaed Unit Develohaaicnt. The t°etlesi~ra «as the prc;ii.;rrec~ naiti`~atiota P~n~ the cc~ntaminaaats fou~ad on the subject property. White hlaw~ is a residential development comprised of G1 loots desis~raed for detached sine,le-family dti~~elliia~s and the 4.3 acre comiaaoza a~•ea to park RVs in assi~;taed cnclt~sed units. In accordatac~; with `~ectiota 1.7.6$.060, a li~aal develo~rncaat plaza aniist be filed with the. City within six (6) months. ectio~l 17,68060 provides for a time extetasiorl of six (6) months, with good cause, for the ~ 1 i1a g <~ i tlae 9i ~aa t development pl . On January 1 S, 2O0~ the 1'laaa,ai,ag Commission granted a six ~6) anot3th cxtet~sion of the approved plan. Due to the tleclirae ira the housing ,rnaret, the applicant is recluestin~ ata ad~itiol~al six (G} tlzo~rth extczzsion of time to sul~~aait a final der~~elupiaiei~t plan. If granted, the revised expiration. date would. be January 1, X009. Figur•c 1 I~oclifi~~p Plan ~ ~~ 'i. '± ;- i (~ ~ i ~~ I , ± ,, i ~ i ~ a ~ I .. ... ~~ .~~ ~~ Page 1 of ~~,. <,~. ISSUES: Section 17.6$.060 provides for a six (6) month extension in fzling the fnal plan. This section of the code is not explicit as to the number of extensions permitted with the exception of reference to "...goad cause... FINDINGS: The request for a six (6) month extension was received in a timely manner. Current national and local market conditions are referenced as justification for the extension. ATTACHMENTS: ___ Attachment "A" -Request for extension letter dated June 25, 2p0$. ACTION: _ _ Consideration of the request for a six (f }month extension. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request for a six (6) month extension. Page 2 of 2 ~ e~ June 25, 200 Members of the Planning Camar~i~si~~a City of Central. Paint 1.411 Sauth Third Street Central Paint, Oregon 9'702 Subject, White Hawk PUD 1Dear Members: ~x ... 1'Due to an historic decline in the housing industry, we Dave been unable to achieve 1~canamic Feasibility far the development of White Hawk. Whale attempting to address 4i~,sxif~ieant changes in market conditions, this project has been at the fnrefrant of a~~F- interests and creative efforts. We Nape to begin ~i~~~elaping thy' la~~~d yet this year. ~~e respectfully ~~equest extension of the approval far the White Hawk PUD. Thank you far understanding the challenges of our industry. Sincerel~T ~` f.f' , Mi e i a~~,~ ~~,~, ~;lanaging iYle r- I3u~an ~eveiapment, LLC MD.gm PC7 Box 5656 • Centro[ Paint ^ Cregan 975x2 X541) 665-~Ah1D Fax (641) 665-2979 CCB #146858 CONiP~~HENSiY~ PLAN TEXT AM~NDIVI~NT ~ BUILDABLE LANDS ~NV~NTOF~Y ,, ~,. ~. ~ `' ~; E I , ~.: I , lone Fiuni~>i;rc,~,l\IC_l; +~~;'t-` _ ~ ~,_ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CCYniY~~n>~~i9~ Ur~~,~~~iu~~rn~~ni I),i ~ciorl /1~,~as;t~~r c.iiy iuli7un~v.rat~1' STAB, Via, N~ ~~:~~ ~~.~. August , 2U~1 ~~C~I?~~ I'I'~..~~a File 1'~0. O~16t)(tD~? Consideration ofa Resolution Recommending Approval afar Amendmelit to the Ccr~tral faint Co~~~p~~~hensive Plan updatixlg the Buildable Land Inventory Section o1'the Land IJse I~;lement. ,~~~3t~taca~nt: City ofCent~~al Point ~iT~'~~~"` S~J~T~CEa I~ot~ Burt. l'la~~nint~ ~fianager BACi~txi2(~IU~Ill: Tl~e Plalar~il~~ Uehartrncr~t has pradc7ced a Buildable Land Inve~z~tory (>3LI~ as pa~~t of the. Col~iprelact~si~~~c flan ul7datc. The'IiT,T will ~iliin~ately b a section c~fthc Ladd [sc L~°lci~~et~t. The purpose oftllis sectic»l is to pre>~ ide <~ record ofthe availability of lt~ncis Ior ~~esiticl~iial, cc-~i~~~ercial, and industrial ilevelapnient. ~~he BI ,I is pr~:.hared in response to OI~`I 197.29(,(2) ~~~t~ui~~iz7~ than cities maintain an inventory oI~ buildable lands sufficient to provide ti twenty X20} year supply to accommodate prc~jecteci ~ro~~il~ needs. The calcul<~tion oI"builda.ble; vacant lend is based on specific terms that define the va~~iotts buildable land classifications, Itilany of tlacse definitions are presct~ibcd by law, and as such, are aci:i~owlccl`ed in the BLI as both a reference anal confirmation ol~coz~~plia~xce with state requirements. The BLI maintains azz accounting ofbraildable lands l~r~ land use classiiicatian and 2oninc. The City's Comprehensive l'1 contains five fS) basic l~t~zd use classifications and thirteen {13) si~b- classificatians. Each of the land use classifications arc supported. by one of"twenty (~0) ronin~ districts. Key findings within the BLI are as follows: General: As of July 1, 2(1U8, tl~e City of Central Paint°s urban area contained a total of 2,891 grass acres, Public ri~l~t-of way, par~slapc~~ space at~d civic rises account fox 31% of the City's total ~~-moss acheage, while residential. couln~el•cial, aY~d intlr~strial accat~nted far the remaining 69°!0. When public z-ight-of way is removed, then are 2,271 net acres ~~~ithin the City's urban area. Approximately 401 acres of the fatal t~et acreage of tl~e City is defined as Net Buildable Laird. Pagelof2 ~_. Residential Buildable Land: Within the City's urban area, there are 1,506 acres of residential land distributed over four (4) residential land use classifications. Approximately I5% {228 acres) of the City's total residential land is considered net buildable residential land. IndustriaVEmployment Buildable Land. There are approximately 4$9 acres of land within the industrial/employment classification, which is distributed over three {3) land use categories: mixed- use, commercial, and industrial. Approximately 35% (172 acres) of the industrial/employment lands are considered buildable. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: No conditions EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" -City of Central Point Buildable Land Inventory Attachment "B" -Resolution Recommending Approval ACTION: Consideration of a Resolution Recommending Approval of an Amendment to the Central Point Comprehensive Plan updating the Buildable Land Inventory Section of the Land Use Element. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. and forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council to approve the Buildable Land Inventory. Page2of2 ~~ c t °~+ ~ B ~' .n q `' . ~. t' _,.. ,4 f ~, i qtr i t buildable Land Inventory ~,, ;~ ~_x~, t;ity rf dGentrl Praint - Pl~nnirag C7~:prtmnt drift r12aQ8 ~ ~~ 1. PURPOSE T]~e rate of use and avai]ability of bui]dab]e land is a critics] component iY7 the ca]cu]us of s commaanity's growth and deve]opment. The purpose ofthe I3~-ildable I_,a~ac] Inventory (BLI) is to maintain a record of the avsi]abi]ity of ]ands for residential. commercial, and industria] development, The BLI is prepared in response to ORS ] 97.296(2} requiring that cities maintain an inventory of buildable lands sufficient to provide a twenty (20} year supp]y to accommodate projected growth needs. The BLI has no purpose other than to trac]~ the availabi]ity and distribution of tl,e City's bculdable ]ands. TI~e adequacy ofthe City's buildable lands required to satisfy growth needs during the panning period wi]] be addressed in t]~e Land Use, Housing, and Eco»omic Elements oft]~e Comprehensive Plan. T]le tern "buildable ]ands" is defined as ]ands in urban and urbanizable areas that are suitable, available and necessary for residentia] uses'. Bui]dab]e ]ands include both vacant ]and, in~ll ]and, and developed ]and likely to be redeveloped. ~<~~: Y .., .,, ... . ... ....... k'i~~arc !.1 ttwt~z,~,r. ~rci~:.~: zzH~7 The BLI reports ova tl~e foI]owing types of buildab]e ]and; T~esidentia] Landz a. 'Vacant ]ands p]am~ed or zoned for residentia] use; b. Partially vacant ]ands planned or zoned for residential use; c. Lands that may be used for a mix ofresidential and employment uses under the existing planning or zoning; and d. Lands that may be used for residentia] infil] or redeve]apment. 2. Ii7dustrial and other Emp]oyment Land a. Vacant ]ands planned or zoned for indastrial/employment use; b. Psrtia]]y vacant ]ands planned or zoned for industria]/employment use; c, Lauds that may be used for a mix of residential and employment uses under t]~e existing planning or zoning; and d. Lands that may be used for industria]iempoyment infil] or redeve]opment. 1`~ot on]y does the BLI' mai~~tain an accounti~~g of the City's buildab]e ]ands, but it also identifies the geographic distribution of bui]dable ]ands by Statistics] Panning Areas (SPA). Al] ]and within the City's urban area is al]ocated to one of nine (9) SPAS. f'or purposes of infrastructure p]annitag, the avai]ability oRS 197.295{~.} z ORS 197.296{3} Draft -May 200$ ~„ „,.. Page 1 of 3a r ,... w,. ___ Ptl1N'P of a buildable land, accounting by SPA offers insights into where future urban services such as streets, schools, water, etc. will be needed and tl~e ability of those systems to support future growth. Tlae BLI has been structured to accommodate periodic updates with minimal effort. It is recommended that at a minimum the BLI be updated once every five {S}years. It is preferred that the BLI be maintained on an annual basis. 2. DEFINITIONS The calculation of buildable vacant land is based on specific terms that define the various buildable land classifications. Many of these definitions are prescribed by law, and as such, are acknowledged in this BLI as both a reference and confirmation of compliance with legal requirements for calculating buildable lands. For purposes of convenience, the definitions used throughout tl~e BLI (bold} are presented in Appendix A. 3. SAFE HARBORS OAR 660-024-0060 permits cities with a population under 25,000 to use defined safe harbors in calculating buildable lands for residential and industrial/employment uses. A "safe harbor" is defined as an optional course of action that local governments may use to satisfy a requirement of Goal I4 - Urbanization. The use of safe harbors is intended to satisfy the requirement for which the specific safe harbor is prescribed. A safe harbor is not the only way, or necessarily the preferred way, to comply with a requirement. It is not used in the context of this BLI to interpret the requirement far any purpose other than applying a safe harbor within the structure of OAR 660-024-0060. The safe harbors used in preparation of this BLI are: 1. Net Buildable Acre. OAR 660-024-0040{9): Permits a local government to estimate that the 20- year land needs for streets and roads, parks, a~ad school facilities will together require an additional amount of ]and equal to 2S % of the net buildable acres determined for residential land needs under section {4} of this rule. For purposes ofthis rule, a "Net Buildable Acre" consists of 43,560 square feet of residentially designated buildable land, after excluding present and future rights-o#=way, restricted hazard areas, public open space and restricted resource protection areas. Buildable Residential Land OAR 660-024-0060(2)(a}: The infill potential of developed residential lots or parcels of one-half acre or more may be determined by subtracting one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) for the existing dwelling and assuming that the remainder is buildable. 3. Buildable Residential Land, OAR 660-024-0060(2)(b): Existing lots of less than one-half acre that are currently occupied by a residence may be assumed to be fully developed. 4. Vacant I[ndustrial/Employment Land, OAR 660-024-0060(3){a): Lots or parcels equal to or larger than one-half acre, if the lot or parcel does not contain a permanent building. This was calculated by identifying all industrially and comzz~ercially zoned lands of one-half acre or more with an improved value less than $100,000 as noted on the Jackson County Assessors Records S. Industrial/Employment Land, OAR 660-024-0060(3}(b}: Lots or parcels equal to or larger than five acres, if less than one-half acre of the Iot or parcel is occupied by a permanent building. Draft -May 2008 ~ Page 2 of 34 4. LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS AND ZONING The BLI maintains an accounting of buildable lands by land use classification arld zoning. The City's Comprehensive Plan contains five (5) basic land use classifications and thirteen (13) sub-classifications. Each of the land use classifications are supported by one of twenty (20) zoning districts. ]n Appendix B of the BLI an accounting is also maintained of the buildable lands inventory by Statistical PIanning Area {SPA) and Transportation Area Zone (TAZ}. 5. METHODOLOGY To maintain consistency in the management of the BLI the methodology used in the BLI is presented in Appendix B for reference purposes. 6. BUILDABLE LAND SUMMARY As of July 1, 2008, the City of Central Point's urban area contained a total of 2,891 gross acres (Table 1). Public right-of=way, parks/open space and civic uses account for 31 % of the City's total gross acreage, while residential, commercial, and residential accounted for the remaining 69%. When public right-of way is removed, there are 2,271 net acres within the City's urban area. Approximately 401 acres of the total net acreage of the City is defined as Net Buildable Land. The suitability of the net Buildable Land acreage for development is defined as follows: 1. Vacant Land -These are vacant lands on which there is no development. Infrastructure is generally available. These lands are intended to satisfy 70% of the City's future growth needs. 2. Infill Land -These are lands which are partially developed. Infill land is intended to satisfy 20% of the City's future growth needs. And 7'ahle I City of Central Point General Land t~se Distribution Zoning/Land [,use Total Acreage Percentage Very Low Density (VLDR) Low Density Residential (LDR) Medium Density Residential (HDR) High Bensity Residential (HDR) 112.47 903.79 245.49 244.04 3.89% 31.27% 8,49% 8.44% TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 1505.79 52.09% Mixed Use, Residential Mxed Use, Commercial [ 8.32 65.25 0.63% 2.26% `T'OTAL iVl[XED USE 83.57 2.89% C-2 (M) Commercial Neighborhood (CN) (4'CPO) Thoroughfare Commeroial (TC) 12.08 18.12 117.39 8.79 0.42% 0.63% 4.06% 0.30% TOTALCOAIMERCIAL 156.38 5.41% Emp1o}rc~tent Commercial(EC) Light industrial (LI) General Industrial (G]) 24.69 152.46 72.28 0.85% 5.27% 2,50% TOTAL 1NDtISTR1AL 249.43 8.63% 1VIC ( ° TOTAL CIVIC 105.12 3.64% Bear Creek Greenway Open Space 77.38 92.86 2.68% 3.21% TOTAL OPEN SPACE 170.24 5.89% Public Right-of--way 620 21.45% TOTAL ALL LAND t~SE CATI;GOTtII'sS 289(1.53 100.00% 3. Redevelopment Land -These are lands which are improved, but the improvements are generally old and the land value exceeds improvement value. Redevelopment Land is intended to satisfy 10% of the City's future growth needs. Draft -May 2008 ~ Page 3 of 34 ~. The distribution of Net Buildable Land is categorized as either residential, or industrial/employment land. 6.1. Residential Buildable Land Within the City's urban area, there are 1,506 acres of residential land distributed over four residential land use classifications. Approximately 15% (229 acres) of the City's total residential land is considered net buildable residential land. Table 2 identifies the distribution ofthe Residential Gross Buildable Land by vacant land type (vacant, infill, redevelopment}. Figure 1 illustrates the geographic distribution of Gross Buildable Land. The estimation of Residential Redevelopment Land used U.S. Census American Housing Survey (AHS} formula for calculating housing loss and using the higher state average for housing loss, it is estimated that during the period 2008 through 2030 the City of Central Point will lose an estimated 14 residential units per year for a total of 310 dwelling units. Using an average residential density of six (6) units to the acre, this is equivalent to 52 net acres of Residential Redevelopment Land. The rate of demolition versus new construction should be monitored and adjusted in accordance with actual redevelopment activity. As indicated in Figure 2, the majority of the City's buildable residential acreage is located witifin SPA G and H. 5.2 IndustriaUEnr-ployment Buildable Land. There are approximately 489 acres of land within the industrial/employment classification, which is distributed over three land use categories: mixed-use, commercial, and industrial. Approximately 35% (172 acres) of the industrial/employment lands are considered buildable. Table 2 identifies the various vacant land types within each industrial/employment buildable Iand category. 6.2.1 Mixed-Use Land. The City's mixed-use lands total 84 acres, of which 17% (17 acres} are considered buildable land. The mixed-use classification can be found within the Transit Oriented Districts and allows for a mix of uses from predominantly residential to predominantly commercial. 6.2.2 Commercial Land. The City's commercial lands total 1 S6 acres, of which 46% {6l acres) are considered buildable land. ti.2.3 )[ndustrial Land. The City's industrial lands total 249 acres of which 3$% (97 acres} are considered buildable land. Most of the City's Industrial/Employment Buildable Land is located in SPA I (Figure l ), which accounts for 55% of all Industrial/Employment Buildable Land. Draft -May 200$ ~~ Page 4 of 34 cable z City of Central Point Net Buildable Land Inventory' by Land Use Classification ACREAG)- Total Grass Envir. Net ZoninglLand Use Acreage Vacant Inlill Redevelop Buildable Constrained Public Lands Buildable Very Law Density (VLDR) ] €2.47 0,65 21.48 16.54 38.68 - 9.67 29.41 Low Density Residential (LDR) 903.79 53.00 71.50 15.39 139.89 - 34.97 104,42 Medium Density Residential {HDR) 245.49 57.73 26.48 13.0] 97.22 5.93 22.82 68.41 High Density Residential (HDR) 24k,44 16.20 9.24 ] 0.37 35.81 0.50 8.83 26.48 TOTALIZE$IDENTIAL 1„545.79 127.58 128.70 55.31 311.64 6,43 7b.29 228.88 Mixed Use, Residential ]8.32 0.69 - 0.81 ].SO - 4.38 1.13 Mixed Use, Commercial 65.25 8.39 2.24 7,13 17.76 - 4.44 13,31 TOTAL M1aED USE 83,57 9.08 2.24 7.94 19.26 - 4.82 14.45 C-2 (M) 12.08 - - 1.48 1.48 - 0.37 1.1 I Commercial Neighborhood (Ch) 18.12 0.57 4.53 5.11 6.21 - 1.55 4.66 Tourist Commercial end Professional Office (TCYO) 1[7.39 50,33 7,73 6.42 64.48 - 16.12 48.36 Thoroughfaze Commercial (TC) 8.79 5.35 3.18 0.00 8.54 - 2.13 6.4D TOTALCOAli14ERCIAL I56.38 56.25 ]1.44 13,01 84.71 - 2D.17 60,53 Employment Commercial {EC) 24.69 L 19 3.32 3.75 8.27 - 2.07 6.20 Light Industrial (LI) 152.46 74.85 16.42 11.60 k02.B7 - 25.72 77.15 Genera[ Industrial (G[) 72.28 21.56 - 3.63 25.19 7.29 4.48 13.43 TOTAL INDUSTRIAL 249.43 97.b4 39.74 18.98 136,33 7,29 32.27 96.78 Civic { C) 105.12 4.58 - 0.18 0.66 - - 0.66 TOTAL CIVIC 105.12 4.58 - - 0,66 - - 4.66 Bear Creek Greemvay 77.38 - - - - - - Open Space 92.86 2,80 - - - - - - TOTAL OPEN SPACE 370.24 2.80 - - - - - TOTAL ALL LAND USE CATEGORIES 2,274.51 297.90 162.13 95,42 548.57 13.72 333 55 401.34 ]tote: ' Al€ figures exclude existing public strcet rights-of--way Draft -May 2008 Page 5 of 34 Figure 1. ~`-ty of Central point uiMdable Lands Inventory ~~ ~u.;~ `- a ___.. P `y. ~E ~___ , i Underdeveloped Commercial ~ Industrial `vacant Commercial r~.lndustrial °_-'-.~ Underdeveloped Residential 'cant Res~lential UI~ ~ V n m Draft -May 20Q$ ~• ~.~ Page 6 of 34 APPENDIX A Definiti©ns Development Constraints: Factors that temporarily or permanently limit or prevent the use of land for economic development. Development constraints include, but are not limited to, wetlands, environmentally sensitive areas such as habitat, environmental contamination, slope, topography, cultural and archeological resources, infrastructure deficiencies, parcel fragmentation, or natural hazard areas (OAR b60-009-0005(2}}. Environmentally Constrained Land: Lots, parcels, or portions thereof that are unbuildable due to environmental constraints such as floodways, slope, wetlands, etc. Gross Buildable Acre: Consists of 43,560 square feet of residentially designated buildable land that includes future rights-of way, restricted hazard areas, proposed public open space and restricted resource protection areas. Land to Improvement Ratio {L:I Ratio): The ratio between the value of land and the value of improvements as measured by taking the value of a parcel divided by the value of the improvements based on the latest Jackson County Assessor records. Industrial Use: Employment activities generating incorxre from the production, handling ar distribution of goods. Industrial uses include, but are not limited to: manufacturing; assembly; fabrication; processing; storage; logistics; warehousing; importation; distribution and transshipment; and research and development. Industrial uses may have unique land, infrastructure, er3ergy, and transportation requirements. Industrial uses may have external impacts on surrounding uses and may cluster in traditional or new industrial areas where they are segregated from non-industrial activities (OAR 660-009-0005(3}}. Industrial Lands Industrial, Buildable Lands: Industrial, Developed Land: Nan-vacant land that is likely to be redeveloped during the planning period (OAR 660-009-00050 ). Industrial, Redevelopment Land: Industrial, Prime Lands: Lands suited for traded-sector industries as well as other industrial uses providing support to traded-sector industries. Prime industrial lands possess site characteristics that are difficult ar impossible to replicate in the planning area or region. Prime industrial lands have necessary access to transportation and freight infrastructure, including, but not limited to, rail, marine ports and airports, multimodal freight ar transshipment facilities, and major transportation routes. Traded-sector has the meaning provided in ORS 285B.280 (OAR 660.009-0005(8}). Draft -May 2008 ~ Page 7 of 39 ~~ Indus#rial, Short-Term Supply of Land: Suitable land that is ready for construction within one year of an application for a building perenit or request for service extension. Engineering feasibility is sufficient to qualify land for the short-term supply of land. Funding availability is not required. "Competitive Short-term Supply" means the short- term supply of land provides a range of site sizes and locations to accommodate the market needs of a variety of industrial and other employment uses (OAR 660-009- 0005(10}). Industrial, Site Characteristics: The attributes of a site necessary for a particular industrial or other employment use to operate. Site characteristics include, but are not limited to, a minimum acreage or site configuration including shape and topography, visibility, specific types or levels of public facilities, services or energy infrastructure, or proximity to a particular transportation or freight facility such as rail, marine ports and airports, multimodal freight or transshipment facilities, and major transportation routes {OAR 660-009-0005(1 l )). Industrial, Total Land Supply: the supply of vacant and developed land estimated to be adequate to accommodate industrial and other employment uses fora 20-year planning period. Total land supply includes the short-term supply of land as well as the remaining supply of Iands considered suitable and serviceable for the industrial or other employment uses identified in a comprehensive plan {OAR 660-009-OOOS(13)). Industrial, Vacant Land: A lot or parcel a} Equal to or larger than one half acre nat currently containing permanent buildings or improvements; or b} Equal to or larger than five acres where less than one half-acre is occupied by permanent buildings or improvements (OAR 660-009-0005(14}}. Net Buildable Acre: Consists of 43,560 square feet of residentially designated buildable land, after excluding present and future rights-of--way, restricted hazard areas, public open space and restricted resource protection areas. Other Employment Use; All non-industrial employment activities including the widest range of retail, wholesale, service, non-profit, business headquarters, administrative and governmental employment activities that are accommodated in retail, office and flexible building types. Other employment uses also include employment activities of an entity or organization that serves the medical, educational, social service, recreation and security needs of the community typically in large buildings or multi-building campuses (OAR 660-009-0005(b)). Planning Area: The area within an existing, or proposed, urban growth boundary. Cities and counties with urban growth management agreements must address the urban land governed by their respective plans as specified in the urban growth management agreement for the affected area (OAR 660-009-0005(7)}, Residential Lands Residential, Buildable Land: Residentially designated vacant and, at the option of the local jurisdiction, redevelopment land within the Metro urban growth boundary that is not Draft -May 200$ ~ Page S of 34 severely constrained by natural hazards (Statewide Planning Goal 7) or subject to natural resource protection measures (Statewide Plam~ing Goals 5 and 1 S}. Publicly owned land is generally not considered available for residential use. Land with slopes of 2S % or greater unless otherwise provided for at the time of acknowledgment and land within the 3 00-year floodplain is generally considered unbuildable for purpose of density calculations (OAR 660-008-0005(2)}. Residential, Developed Land: Residentially designated lots or parcels with an L:l Ratio of 0.30 or greater. Residential, In~ll Land: Developed Residential Land of one-half acre or mare, less one-quarter acre {10,890 square feet). OAR 660-024-0050(2)(a) Residential, Redevelopment Land: Land zoned for residential use on which development has already occurred but on which, due to present or expected market forces, there exists the strong likelihood that existing development will be converted to mare intensive residential uses during the planning period (OAR 660-008-0005{12)). Residential, Suitable and Available Laad: Residentially designated vacant and redevelopment land within an urban growth boundary that is not constrained by natural hazards, or subject to natural resource protection measures, and for which public facilities are planned or to which public facilities can be made available. Publicly owned land generally is not considered available for residential use {OAR 660-008-0005(13)}. Residential, Total Land Supply: The supply of vacant and developed land estimated to be adequate to accommodate residential uses fora 20-year planning period. Total land supply includes the short-term supply of land as well as the remaining supply of lands considered suitable and serviceable for residential uses identified in a comprehensive plan. Residential, Vacant Land: All residentially designated lots or parcels not currently containing permanent buildings or improvements. For purposes of determination of the presence of permanent buildings/improvements all residential lots or parcels with an improvement value of zero (0}, as determined by the Jackson County Assessor, are considered vacant. (OAR 660-024-0050(2)(b}} Safe Harbors: An optional course of action that a local government may use to satisfy a requirement of Goal 14. Statistica! Planning Area: The Central Point Planning Area is divided into nine (9} Statistical Planning Areas, each representing a unique geographic area of the City. Suitable: Serviceable land designated for industrial or other employment use that provides, or can be expected to provide, the appropriate site characteristics for the proposed use (OAR 660-009-0005(12}}. Draft -May 2008 Page 9 of 34 APPENDIX B Methodology for Calculation of Buildable Land The methodology used to inventory and calculate buildable lands is based on tlae definitions of buildable land types as defined in Appendix A. The base data source for identification of buildable lands is the Jackson County Assessor's Records dated April 17, 2008, which has been modified to include such additional information as Comprehensive Plan designations, SPA, TAZ, etc. The modified database is referred to as the Central Paint Land Use Database (CPLUD}. 5.1. Buildable Residential Land The methodology for calculating Buildable Residential Land involves seven steps as follows: Step 1. Sum acreage for all Residential Vacant Land. The CPLUD identifies all tax lots by their land use designation (Land_Use), development status {Dev_Stat), and improvement value (lmp_Val). When the improvement value of a property is zero the property is defined as Residential Vacant Land. The BLI sums the acreage for all Residential Vacant Land by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 2. Sum acreage for all Residential Redevelopment Land. The CPLUD identifies all residential tax lots by the year the primary residence was built {YEARBLT). Using the U.S. Census housing loss methodology presented in Appendix C, residential redevelopment land is calculated for lots less than .S acres as follows: a. For all developed residential lots less than .5 acres sort according to year built and place into one of seven age categories (Appendix B}. b. Multiply the area of each lot by loss rates for age category (Appendix B} to yield annual redevelopment acres. c. Sum annual redevelopment acres. d. Multiply the annual estimated redevelopment acres by 22 (years in planning period) to yield total estimated Residential Redevelopment Land. The BLI sums the Residential Redevefoprnent Land for all residentially designated properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 3. Sum acreage for all Residential ];Willi Land. The CPLUD identifies all residential tax lots for their infill potential. All residential properties in excess of .5 acres and with an improvement value in excess of zero are defined as Residential Developed Land. By deducting 10,890 sq. ft. from each Residential Developed Land record the balance is defined as Residential Infill Land (Res_Infill). The BLI then sums the Residential Infill Land for all residentially designated properties, by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Draft -May 200$ r~9 Page 10 of 34 Step 4. Calculate Grass Buildable Residential Lands. Using the sum of the totals generated from Steps l through 3 the BLl calculates the Gross Buildable Residential land by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 5. Sum acreage for all Environmentally Constrained Land. The CPLUD includes information on the acreage within each tax lot that is considered to be environmentally constrained (Envir_Const). The BLI sums the Environmentally Constrained Land for all residentially designated properties, by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 6. Sum acreage far all Public Need Land. Using the "safe harbor" described in OAR 660-024-0040(9) the Public Need Land is calculated by taking 2S% of the gross buildable residential acreage {Step 4), less environmentally constrained acreage {Step 5}. The BLl sums the Public Need Land for all residentially designated properties, by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 7. Calculate Net Buildable Residential Land. The BLl takes the results from Step 4 less the results froze Step S and 5 to yield Net Buildable Residential Land by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Section 5.2. Buildable Industrial/Employment Lands The methodology for calculating Net Buildable Industrial/Employment Lands differs slightly from the methodology for residential ]ands, and as such is restated in the seven (7} following steps: Step I. Sutra acreage For all Industrial/Employment Vacant Land. The CPLUD identifies all tax lots by their land use designation (Land_Use), development status (Dev_Stat), and improvement value (lmp_Val). When the improvement value of industrial/employment property is zero the property's development status is defined as Industrial/Employment Vacant Land. The BLl sums the acreage for all Industrial/Employment Vacant Land for all industrial/employment designated properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 2. Sum acreage for all Industrial/Employment Redevelopment Land. The CPLUD identifies all Industrial/Employment tax lots for their redevelopment potential. lndustrial/Employment tax lots that are less than .5 acres and have an improvement to land value (I:L ratio) of 30% or less are defined has having redevelopment potential (Resid-Redev}. The BLl sums the Industrial/Employment Redevelopment Land for all industrial/employment designated properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 3. Sum acreage for all Industrial/Emptoyment Infill Lands. The CPLUD identifes all residential tax lots for their Infill potential. All residential properties in excess of .5 acres and with an improvement value in excess of zero are defined as Residential Developed Land. By deducting 10,890 sq. ft. from each Residential Developed Land record the balance is defined as Residential Infill Land {Res_Infll). Draft -May 2008 ~ Pagel 1 of 34 The BLI then sums the Industrial/Employment Intl! La;ad for all industrial/employment designated properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 4. Calculate Gross Buildable Industrial/Employment Land. The BLI totals the results from Steps l through 3 by land use, zoni~~g, SPA, and TAZ. Step 5. Sum acreage for all Environmentally Constrained Industrial/Employment Land. The CPLUD includes inforrnation on the acreage within each tax lot that is considered to be environmentally constrained (Envir_Catast). The BLI sums the Environmentally Constrained Land for all industrial/employment designated properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 6. Sum acreage for all Public Need Lands. Using the "safe harbor" described in OAR 6G0-024-0040(9) the Public Need Land is calculated by taking 25% of the gross buildable residential acreage (Step 4}, less environmentally constrained acreage (Step 5). The BLI sums the public needs acreage for all industrial/employment designated properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. Step 7. Calculate Net Buildable Industrial/Employment Land. The BLI takes the results from Step 41ess the results from Step 5 and 6 to yield Net Buildable Industrial/Employment Land by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ. A summary ofthe results of each ofthe above steps is presented in Tables l through 3, and discussed in Section 5, Buildable Land Summary. Draft -May 2008 Page 12 of 34 APPENDIX C Estimated Residential Housing Loss - U.S. Census 1997-2003 For the purpose of calculating housing loss (residential redevelopment land), the City of Central Paint uses the methodology developed by U.S. Census. Tl~e U.S. Census calculates housing loss by applying ate annual rate of loss to the total existing residential housing units (HL~o} i~~ventory. For the purpose of this calculation, estimates of housing unit loss are based on data derived by the U.S. Census from the 1997-2003 American Housing Survey (AHS) national sample. This survey is done on an annual basis for states, counties, and metropolitan areas. In developing the methodology, the following are considered to represent permanent loss of a housing unit: • Interior exposed to the elements • Demolished or disaster loss • House or mobile home moved Since the U.S. Census no longer collects information o~~ demolition permits, annual housing unit loss rates are based on structure type and age of structure. This data is gathered a~td averaged from the annual AHS sampling. The standard annual loss rates by year built are as follows: Mobile Homes: 1.58% House, Apartment, or Flat built in: • 1990-1999: 0.031% * 1980-1989: 0.054% • 1970-1979: 0.103% • 1960-1969: 0.172% • 1950-1959: 0.249% • 1940-1949: 0.324% • Pre-1940: 0.364% • Overall loss rate: 0.295% Data for residential housing by year built for the City of Central Point is collected every ten years as part of the decennial census. Information an the year built is also maintained by the County Assessor's Office and is included in the CPLUD. Table 1 provides an estimate of the annual housing loss based on the U.S. Census loss rates noted above. Table 2 is the same information using the most recent CPLUD data, including acreage information. Table )[. City of Central Point -- Estimated Annual Residential Housing Loss, 2000 Census Year Structure Built Residential % of Housing Housing Loss Annual Housing Units Inventory Rates* Housing Loss 1Vlobile H©rues 43(? 5:35% 1.:58% 6:79 1.999 to 312000 372 7.22% OA310% .12 X995 to 1.99$ 908 1'7:b3% O:i)310% U..2$ Draft -May 2008 ~ Page 13 of 34 1990 to 1994 b45 12.52°/a 0.0310% .20 1981) 'to .19$9 486 '9.44% 0.0540% .26 1970 to 1979 1,028 19.96% 0.1030% 1.06 1i9t;4 to 19G9 6or ~ ~ :~~°ia 0:1720°ia ;1:04 1940 to 1959 488 9.48% 0.3000% 1.46 1939 or earlier :187' 3:63% 0.364{l% O:G8 Total units 5,150 100% - 11.90 Total % Loss 0.23% Table 2. City of Central Point - Estiruated Annual Residential Housing Loss, Year 2008 Year Structure Built Residential % of Housing Housing Loss Annual Housing Units Inventory Rates* Housing Loss Mnbite 1Iarrtes 526 7:97% 1$8% '8:31 1999 to 412008 1,724 26.33% 0.0310% .53 1995 to 1998 90$ 13:76/0 0:0310°,/0 2$ 1990 to 1994 645 9.7$% 0.0310% .20 1980 to 1989 486 7..37% O:OS40% .26 1970 to 1979 1,028 15.58% 0.1030% 1.06 1960 t©19G9 60b 9.18% 0.1720°l0 .1:04 1940 #0 1959 488 7.40% 0.3000% 1.46 :1939 or earrlier :187 :2:83% 0:3640% 0:6$ Total units 6,598 100% - 13.83 Total % Loss 0.23% A review of actual residential dernolitian permits issued in the City of Central Point revealed that during the period from 3anuary 2000 to May 2008, 86 permits were issued, for an average annual housing loss rate of approximately eleven (11) demolitions; which is very close to the 11.90 annual average noted in Table 1. When the Census ftgures are adjusted for residential construction between 2000 and April 2008, the average annual residential loss increases 13.83 (Table 2). For purposes of calculating the Residential Redevelopment Land the most recent average annual loss of fourteen (14) is used. In consideration of the above the calculation of residential redevelopment opportunities is based on the AHS methodology adjusted for actual demolitions between 2000 and 2008. An annual loss of .23% of tota12008 housing stock multiplied by 22 years yields an estimated loss of 310 residential units over the planning period. This figure is then divided by 6 (the average net residential density} to determine the number of residential redevelopment acres available during the planning period. Based oar an average annual loss rate of 14 units it is estimated that over the course of the planning period (2008-2030) that the City's residential housing inventory will realize an estimated loss of 308 residential units on 52 acres. Draft -May 2008 Page X 4 of 34 APPENDIX D Buildable Lands by SPA and TAZ rat~le C-1 C:ih- of C:rnrral Poinr Bttildablr Land Inreutor}•' bs' 5tatistiral Planniu~ area Acres Rede~'etola. Cross 1:n~~r. Public \et Percent Tanr1 T'cF Tnral ~"ar~us Tr.lill mrn~ Roiildahl~ f'nncrrni~~erE T,andc Aniirlalrla ~'I,DR TC3T.~I.~-ERI-L011"DE15I7I'RESIIUEI~I.~1 09.7 U.65 12.-r; 1`..OL~ 2R.u> O.OU ~.[3a i1.~6 6,~:~3°.° LDR rOI ~I. L013~ I3ElSI7'1" RESIDE\°TI.~L 1?5 e? O,C`s 8.55 (i 55 9.?-' L'.('ii ' `9 5 SS 1.95° .lII}R TOT3I.:IFEDI[li RESIDE~'TI.~3, 16.U' D.Pi Q, '0 U.3: 10.58 U.(' ~,?~ S.2? SDR rOI.3I.I#IGII D~~SITI'RESIDEl7L~I. (HD] 16.58 0.3~ 4.:5 1.65 '.+5 L+.(re 0 sa i.r6 4r.5U°9 tiL' TOTALl~IIXEa l:S~ O.Or+ G.Gv Q.OC' 0.00 U.CO G.O;~ v^.00 J.00 Ef,GO°u cc~ ToT.al.co~L>f~~~n-co~nlERC~.aL 9.~6 ;.19 i.arJ X05 ~.E~ fJ.(,3 i.16 ..a9 U.99'°a E\ rOT.~I.\~IGI-IF,OT~`HOOD{D~ftfERCI.~. 1.66 G.C~'v~ U.<: Cl~~t Ci.'~ 0.C•: i.lfl C~_:? f3.lb°'a C: C: TOI.~1L GE\-ER~L C'O\L1fEF.CLIL 0.4rJ 0.0u U.C]Ct 0UU G.CU 0.(~. C..OCi Cr.00 Ci11U°~ L`~ TOTAL INDUSTE2fAL 01.00 C.(r? U.00 CtUO O. G:, 0.('S u1J0 4.F'0 G.OC;°~ C-I~1C ............. IOT.~L C'I1'IC' . X15.63 G.?= 4A0 {EOrJ Cs.E6 O.C'3 4.CKi 4.66 '3.19°.0 P05 TOI.~iI. P.~RIiS F. OPE\ SP:1C.'E i i.`:? O.UU U.UO (tOC~ U.C3 C'.03 3iF~3 O.UU O.OU°•° ?OTAI..:~Li3I.;.~!'DiiSEC:arEGORIES. 3:r.?~1 3.50 33~? I9.SF X6.9« ~.(~ I~t.Q6 ~iZ,&5 I::I59~§ Ecae' A~.~ ip..-es exvv~ e~isF~~ F~~'.:~st•ee: ~iah:s-o`•way 1"abte C'? Citc of Central Point BEl3ldable bane Itll"QntOt'~'' bz' $tatiSilCal Plall Elll}~ --~z•f1 .Lin-es " Redevelop- Gross Eut~ir~. Pablic het I'e1•renF Land L'se Total l scant Iniill meat Buildable Constrained Lands Buildable Y 1ZDR S t.1T~ 1"ER~" L Vl1' DEZ*ITl" fiESIDE~TLii U.UC+ C+.^v3 U.Ou U.`v'3 O.~V O.C~':~ C'.C~ O.C~3 O.OU' e LDR TOT.~LLO«'DE\SITI-F.ESIDE!-I'I.~.L U.UQ fi.~(r O.Ou C1.~~'i+;} u.CU U.Czii O.uU `v.`v~~ C!f1Q°.z 1fT]R TnTaT itFT)TTlT RF9TT1=\'T'T.aF. 'fi 1 ~ f3 ? ~ ft [)" n »? ^ "•1 Cf 0:~ fi S ~ 0 ii r~ i4', kLt3K 1Ui:'lJ.Hl(.GHllE!'Sllltik.SlUt.\1L~{kUJk iJ.•i~ 1.b# U.V:t i.U= =.6i U.UCk U.U1 ~.?3 ::.yl"c !fC' TCIIAL ihIXED U5E 1d.G5 I.;? O.UU ,^=oj _'.M? G.44 G.?? i 55 1.67',s CC' TCrT~L,•.C)~t]ft~~I'S'C'a~L1SEIt'GT.-1L i'.5~ O.Cri C~.C~;'~ ..;7 0.;? Orfa O.i G._3 CSC', Et TOr3L \~IGIiBORI'lODI3 CO\L3tEKCLa:. 4.40 U.s i C'.00 G.C~i U.03 U.U4 G.4:= 4:C~3 O.Of~.° CC. TOT.~I. GE\"ER.~I. CO~IIIEIiCL~iI. 0.{JO O.G`J G.O:, C.4U U.i`:~ ..00 O.C>U U.G} 0.00=~ L!~ TrJTAL CJL3C3STR1/aL O.pO C1.CaJ G.C1.i 0. a;l O.:s O.r)0 0.^j i~.41 O.OCr:r L U. y.i (~.UJ .{l.1 ~3. ,I U.VV ]..l .;vii[ Pos royal. raRlts ,c oi'E~ >P.aCE l.as Q.4C, 4.flu ~.~~ 4.ao ~.(,~ 0.4;, 4.G3 0.00£ YOTt1L r1I.I, d.A.'\~ L-SE C',9.?EC.ORIEC 93.65 ~f.Od O.UO 3.02 - 7.Ta O.OQ I:77 ~ oS b35oh I~cte' At fiFu•es exdu~e eiist~-r,7 F~~~~ s4-ee: r~gF::s-rf-way Draft -May 2008 Page 15 of 34 Tnblf C-3 C'ih' of C:entt:~] Poi:tt T3lllldshlp T.artrl T'srptttnrp' h+r Statiatir•al PlaeutinG Aria :~ci°es Lalld L 5E Tat~l ~ acan~ Itlfitl lpderelnp- TRPnt C°ross >=nt•lt~. Buildable C'OllStl':Ilned PubHe Lanllt }ec Billdal)le Percent IJ.DK lC)1.~L1Eh1LU11111:\'ti1111;~S1Ulr\iL~. ~.Cj? V.t:Lt S.iS U.Ci;i €.;E U.L}'t'• :.~v 4.~' ~.~'tl",~ LDI2 TOTiLLO«-DL~E=ITI'RLuIDL\-TI3L ;".?6 C~.C~ 0.4U fi.25 O.J2 G.(f t~.GQ U?~ i.C,'?°.r 11T1R TC17aT. \TFT)TTIf RFSTfIT"\'71AT_ ' SO £~ ffs £1 cn fFf)'. frCY'. C.' fr,'E li fig f7;r5 i fi":~ HDR TOTAL HIGH DE~cIT~~ RESIDE~TI-lJ., (HDi 's;;5.5p p.lE l.b~ _'.?i ~.OC C~.t?;1 :.U' ;.{t5 1.1`~ lIL' TOTAL h41KED USE ±G,d9 1.13 1.93 1.40 +.~5 G.GCI :.13 3.57 1.'~`~ C:C: 70I.iL CCliL1IL~1T'I' C:O]LIiERCT.AL 29 5~ 2,E~, Ct,UCI 1.59 - C>.GU :.lE 3.5? 1.29°~ E:\ TOTAL \~IGHBpRHWD C'01L1i£RC"LAL 12.Ct$ Q.CG O.UU 1.ME 1.=E Cy.UC: l.~_ 1.1? J.u4`° CC; TOTAL GL\-ER~L CO'.G11~RC1~.L. a.OCt O.CG D.41r.~ U.Uu C~.OU U.GJ C.O;~ C3.C~ '.C~J`~ L\'I3 TOTAL 1NDl15TRlAL U.00 4.C0 O.~t UC„ U.ti~ Ct.D: U.C:.° G.G, ?.G~Q`~ CT'l'IC TOTAL C"IIZC 1'.6'? r~.CG 1.11 E:.C~.~ G.55 O.G 4.GC U.6: ~._'~1°° POS TOTAL P?.1tIi5 ~f OPEC SP.ACT:, =.Za rJ.CC' CI.CV tJ.U3 C+.G~ G.UC+ O.UU U.U? "s.UJ`c TO? iL ~T F; Ls1\~ Z'SE G.11'I=CURIES .?~.6$ ~f.:: 3.?:53 7 31 24.64 13:40 t.~ I8:6: 6.?896 Note' ~." :I~(i`FS £rju~E ExiSr~~ p4~'.=:5['EE.'~f'-:S-O~-'!n}, Talal: C_.{ Cih• of Central Point $uil~al)lE ]~atlCllSlt'e1:t01"}"~ 41. StaF1Sl1Ca1 Pla[ltlltt=.ACe:1 L7 e'~cres RedESelop- [-roes Eutit. Pvbli: let tnent Buildable C:anstr:~ined Land. Biddable Yerrent Land L'se Tatal 1-acattt Ixfidl lZDR TOM.~'ERl'L01~'D£~STfI~RE4IDE~~i:AI O.OC C.C;:} U.UO .~.Ot`~ S.O~a C.OU OU{~ C..0~3 U.ttU4° LDR TOIaLLO~['DE\.SITI'RESIDEl~I.->,L 1~U-~6 I ~ '.1` 9.£9 C.f1U 2~1' .~= =-11"'° \IDP. TUT_AT-jiEDIL~fTtE.SIDE~~I.AL 3L~.GU C' ~0 ' ,a O.SQ ?.sQ .EsG 09 ^.Si 1.19`.0 HDA TOF-AL HIGH DE15TI-R.e.51BE~-PEAL. (HDF l~.]` 0.3C1 C~.GU G.5' G 53 G.ftD J lv u.9 U.15°0 ]iL' TOTAL h11XEp USE 4.GU Ct~~ Cr.CfCt Q.CCt Q.CIU "v.Dit OC}Ca i~.OS~ C1,r.Nz°e CC TOI.,1I.is0\L1S~\7T7"l-Cl\LIiEACI.~1.L. O.VG U.~J U.U;i CEAi7 R.tltl CI.U;t OOU O.Cn1 t~.VC}°~° E.:\ TOTAL l-£IC;HBORHOOD C'O\DILRCI.AI. U.UU fJ.c:/ G.00 0,00 u.CIJ v fjQ Ct Oft v.Gfa b.rJG` e CG TOT_•1i.G£1-ERaI.[CJ~L\(ERCT.#I. O.OJ G.ri.l G.GU C.00 C_fl:l U.O+1 itOU .^r.(kj fl.CfC3°c L1TJ TUTAL 1HU[35TftIAL G Flo U~:t G.C~Q O.OJ G.~JiI p.Ot~ 000 v?J4 U.UO`,~° cl~zc TDF.AI,cnzc a.o~ G.c G.G3 ~.GJ ,I.~~ s.oa aoo o.~~ €I?sea Pr1~ -ff?TaT. P.ARI: S .G ft7F.1 SP aC fi. (I ft;] 0 tli f.~ D,~ C ftft G (It'r .1 f1Q fl flfi ,^;1t~7 ft 0(1°„ _IU1:AL ALL f:A:VD U)E. {3lE;Gt3K1>;:3 3;8.72 '2:14. 9,4:i '3.84 i~.88 ll,UU 3:ic II.3: . ..4.7~°,b t.'c;c ~ a:: 5Ew ac o~~rLjo axi:S ~a pw;: ^ st•cc: !iahs-c~-way Draft -May 2008 ~ a~.~ Page ] 6 of 34 Table C-: C itc.' of C'eatt•al Point BuEldable Land Irn-tntor~'' b~' Stad?t1ea1 d'lanr:tng Area Latlct [cF Iota: lacaut da51t :~fi1-f 5 Rederelop- Gross 1;,h~is~. meat Buiklabte Corruraiued Pub€ic L1udc \et Buildable percent ~ZDR TOT.•1L«Rl-L01~"DE~SIII'RESIDE~'TIAI 0.:30 fJ.CO C.OU Urjr, U.fr(i (tf'U O.UC O.UU f~.OU°a LDR TE)TAI.LOR'DE~SITI-RESIDEt-TI.-1L %?.i-€ "'_`~ i=.~1? 1-»= »V.I- nt~0 ~.ria 15.1? 4.?6°0 \1DP. TOTAI.\dEDLl. iRESITE~-7I.~1. :: ,4 .#.~6 U.UEt ~ 9~ IU.:S O.C~U '_6C 7.?? ; »,`o IIDF: TOT.~1LIiiGIiL1E~'SITI-RESIDE~7L~I,(fiDF '?.S$ ;" '.19 13_ 11.F? O.l~.' =.at E.SS _.U~°~ \di- TOTAL MIXJ=n USE ; 5.x,3 6.CA U.SU ' a= 9.?S U.E~G 6.96 .SB°.b C.l" TC1Tai.C:r)~(tTt \'(TS' C.()lfifFRC:'a1, n:xi n rr, ; o? n ?- j ,; U fif% n S~ t F9 rk 7n^;.. C~ i0T-~L ~-EIr_~BO~Hr3r1D C'C1~L~gRCL{L c._A_f O.cCr U.UU U.f,E~ [:.t~U t~.C~f~ n.E;t O.rjp U.{rE,°,; C'C: TOT.ILC:E1~It.1LC'0~111fI2C'L1I. C?U U.CU G.OU G.GE, O.G4~ G.UU U.Ut U.UG (LUV°;~ Lti-D TOTAL INDUSTtZ1AL G.JU C.t4 3.UU O.Oi' U.UU O,Esv UAt U.GO (~.UG°.a C'II-C' TOT.~L C'IS'IC B.jU Cy.CG ^v ~r;~ 4.U C' U.GG 0.6G O.UC U.GG f~.'? +"e PO.S TO7.~ii P.~:S ~C- OPir1 SPACE. U.JU 4.L"t, •`vJ3CE UAQ O.UU U.PO L~.UC tlOU (~.UU°a 1"US:~1;:0.t.i.~L:~i~lll;S~C:?~iktTt3diEd~` Z-dl:[~2 :d:: Z[1.3~ ii:7; ~~:57 U.t'U d3.~.ti 3d:U4 17.U1°,•§ Nxe' k~ ,ig;~:es ev.v~E er~stna pvb5c scree: ~i;h:s-e'-way, Table C-6 C'itr-at C:er;tr'at Yoiat J~331€d3b€F Land Its}'PnEOI'1'' b} Statistica€ Plarmir.~ ~il'ea .lCr't$ Rede~'eJap- C+rnss Er.~'ir. Public het F t L,~udL~se Total Vacant Infil€ tnent ]3eiJdable Lonstraiued Lauds cr:cu Buildable SZDP. TOT.~L Z"ER1~LO~TbE\SITI RESIDE\TI.~LI U.Uf, C'.U:r O.UC ~.UU •,^:.~Ji `~.U.r Gf:~ O.l) L.G,I°.~. LDR TOT.~.I.LC~t'DE~SII3'RESIDE~'TI.~1L :?~1.?? ;.?7 6.5: 5.',a ;5 U.UO ~.9U 11.'C E.+1`° .11I}R TOI.~I. .IIEDIIII RESIDE\°Ilsii. ..1? 1.=5 G.C~~ G.U9 ' S` C.OU C..9 i.lE ti.8}`c IIDR TOI.S.i. iiIGFI D~SITT RE5I7E~TL~i.. {HDF 1U.'C 5.31 0.;)~r G.OU 5._ 1 U.OU 1... '.9I '.53`. o BIZ` TOTAL MIXEEI USE ?.13 U.'b O.UJ Ci5`. ..__ 0.00 G3? I.OC ri.-1`4 C'{' TOTaLC'0\LlIi1TT5-C'OiL~IERC'I.~.1. f1.0p 0.0:~ O.UU C.Sa 0.6w U.UD E.1fi O.dI U.~~l`.a C1 TOT.~L T~IC*IiBORHCI3D CC\LiffRC'LiL 0.04 D.O~ O.C~ .UU ..^..U•~ U.UU E.U.; U.OE G.O:i`a ................. E G TOT.',L. G)»1~IZ.~L. GO.IilI1:P.C.I.iL Q.00 U.UJ C~ f„I G4U i:.U: C+.4:~ I:.U: U. U U.C?J`. a L~"IJ TOTAL INtJ115Tf21A1_ UAt~ C•.U;~ 4.UU G'.UU 'v.UC C.UU C.tY.~ U.UC G.U{~`-a fTl"TC' TC}TaI. C.T~"tf: 0 rife l2 ;?1 fr !,,': ^~ nrt r: fiP C, bn C rt . G 6F f, »7~" POS TOT.4I. PARKS & OP£\ SPACE U.{EU 0.U_i U.DU .00 0.0: O.UCt C.UC; 0.0: C3.t~0`•e TO?4I: ALi.LA~'D DSE C~T£G(1RIE5 .. I10:i8 IO.~ ti.F8 1.0: 2=.09 :0:00 ts:11 dS~b 1°t&~re hc:e' N 4g~;~es ez~u~ exist'~g pub'cstree: ri~h:s-o'-waa~ Draft -May 2008 ~ `~ Page 17 of 34 Tal+lc G? Cih' oEE'entra[ Faint I3nlldabiF Lan(1 I3r1'£I1I01'~'~ b~' Stab<. tit:ll PlanniE:g ~:'F2 G .Acres Rrdr~rlop- Gtor ~nri_. Pa3~tic \ct Lard L-~r 7ot:d 'Vacant Tltfill rr:ellt Iinildalrle Coestrainecl Lands Eui[dahie Pe3cPnt l-LDR IOI.-~LS~RI'Ldlt`UE~tITI'RESII3E1-IZ~I : -, ~.C:<J CE.GD l i:; i.~~ G.GG fi.;fi 1.1~ C'.1:3`e L.DR TOTAL LOR'DE\5I7~-RESIBE\~TI:~I. Cj.4•`: J. C3;i U.GU t~.G:3 Ci.~:1 G.G'3 (I.¢fl G.CU Ci.UG°° \l7lR I'OI.1L 3fEDIL3`. RESIl7E\~I.~.i, gr,grr E ;0 :.65 -1.?? s ,.gip i n: ;p,.1 :G.r> 1y ,2`. kIAR TOT.~I. }IIGH DE~4ITI-EESI~E1"TL~L', CI'![3F y a? 1.' 1 (i.GG 1.'G 5.61 45G 1.:E _.S~ ' ;~`° .IIL' TCJTAL MIXE© USE 1..4? :~.PG 4.[iFJ ~.;r> '_.iG C.GO U.''_ 1.?"." i.13`,° C'C TOT.it CO?t:.4IE}7I3- C't]\i~;LRCLAI. 4.G:= ?. GO ~i.£iG U.UO Crii G.00 U.GG G.00 G.C~G°° C'~ TOI.-1,1 \-EIGH$4RfiC}OD CCE\L~iERL:I-i1 t~.GU 3.:x.1 (i.QO 4.t'tJ .^,..i U.GCi G.QG G.C~`v ,1.4i;`a CG TOT~ii. C:E~-ER~L C:O1L1fERG1.aI. (tGC' .;.;r-r 4.0~.~ 0 C'© V.GG G.CI;I O.ir(3 fJ.(~D C.(~C3'o L~-D TOTAL tNDiJSTRIACr 4.OD }.C':i 6.03 ~i.40 v.G:l G.f~O O.pG G.00 0.(~0°~ CT~7C TOZ~I. CIZTC' CtA4 ''-?d ii.GU G.:S G.bS v.C3':i G.6G U.Sb 4.~:`; POS TOT.~L P:1R:tit & OPE': SP:~CE C3.frD '.SO (;.GU U.U.} '.54 C..GCt 0.(iG =.SC' ~.G1`.a TL3T.~L ~ L-lh~J ~STC~I~tiOitlLS I39~'.9 5:.?_ i.f5 9.:-E c99i 6.43 1:..t~0 yU.97 ~9.~1:°,6 tv`c' r!: ~IG'J'ES ExCU~E £'!i5G'G C46"~ St'eE: ~i]l'~.S-f'-5V.'~ Tabie e_s Citc' of Cenu•al Point I3U11(Ial)1P I.a]1I1 Iriti Pnfrl"~'~ 1)t' Sf:l tl;t1C:11 PlaI1ElEEl~.~['f:l I,~~nci L-ae Total 1'atant nfill ;~C3YS IiF~P?PION GI'a;i El~7l'. Enept Buildable C'ons.eaiped Pnl)lif Lands APL J3nilda3ale PEl'Ctnt tiZDR TOT~L~~Rk-I.011"AE~SITI'REiIDE~~-LEI QCU C,.f;^ 4.1i3 v.(i,l 4fEiE t3.i(i tl.£1G (Y.(3G 0.(!G`° LDR TUT.~L. LOS" D~ SITS' PiE5~1E1`IT.37, i,, M aO.CS - -- 031 S~ _s G Ou 11.1u o?.5r lIDR TOT.~I. 1fEDTf3t RESIDE~T~L. i.'6 S.Eu 1~.$1 1G ":1 Ofin 5.6? 1~;.0~ 6.:G°° HDR TOT-:L HIGH DE\SIT~-RESIDE~TI.~1.(IIDF 'S.S;i 4. CG G_E)G ?.:i 3~t5 GOu G.51 1.5= 01.68°0 lIT- TCITAL ill{XED C75E U.G:: O. G'„ U.~)il "v.VJ CUU GL~L~ %.GCi l-S.U9 G.(i0`.° C"C TC1T.~1,I.'::O~L~IL:1~Ti-C:0\i~IERC'L~I. O.QCi :?.:u° 1.6~ u?; 2ja= ;1{Ep 5:?S 1~.4v 6.°0`.0 C~ 70T~1L ~'EiGHSORHOODC'0\LIiFRC'L~L C.v"t' C.S~ 0.4U ~.S? ?~-3 C~{1rJ i.~f Y`.05 i.5'~°0 l-u T47~LC;E1~iZ:~,I,.CC/\L3IEFCI.'#L G.4G O.LC~ 9.40 CI.V:F 'uUD '`Jtaj G.O~J O.PV :i.i7{1'.0 ...................... L~~ TOTAL Pl€1LISTRIAL Gi.ir;o :.Cfi 9 ~3 1.5 2? }8 ^uGG 6.?~ 'G.JS ?.Eil°.o f li'If' Tt~Ta7. l'T~TC fi (} ~ (:' fi] £i ilCl Ck fi! (i fif, CICr(} ^ C3Q Ci AF " }i0~ YCS ICJJ:I.l, 1'.~I(iti.S & Vpt\ tiPA(;1_ l!.U's 4l(;J Ci!3U U''.Ckl UC1U ilUU G.Ui! U.fiU 3,CiG".o TOI.AI, AIL I<rt.•'D G°aE C:~TECARIr.S «5799 19.93 G1.95 29 ~+ 16690 0.00 ai.t6 i:5.3~ ~6.779c I:c~' .4 - igu~es exdu~e axis~aa pc:;:,c si-ee; rgh:s-c`-wa: Draft -May 2008 Page ] 8 of 34 Talr]e C'-o CiM' ofCentrat Poiat Bnlld:t3ale La13 Cl lns'eFtio]-~'` i~~• Sta tisrtcal T'Lvt~3fug ~}•e~ 1 ~i•res " l~:ederelop- is~OS< Lnsir. Public het Fe[Yeni Land L"se Total 1 acttai laf~ll event Bui]daUie Constrained Lauc€s BuildaUle 1Li31( 1C11~1-1LH]LU11 UI.~SlI] li1.S1UL\11.x! C3fJ~i U',u,:i (i.(.'J EipIJ O.tJU U~:U V.V'v' ~J.VU I~ V.~~i".~ S ~JUU r~AF U.U.' 'v.~V JV:7 UU`y } Ly .U,1 U.4J°< 11DF TOT.~.I.IIEDIt~11P.ESIDE!-TILL Obi: O.:fi G.f)~i {?.CrJ 0.0;,= Gbb OAO {J.bO {J.G~~~ HDR TOT.aLH1C>HDE~SIT1-P.1:SIDE~-TI.1<l..(liDl Or3,3 6.uJ C°.Cf; ;~.bG r~,rfn ppv. G.UO 4.G3 O.C~.`6 IIL- TOTAL MIXED USE OGC C.U`0 O.C ^..f~U U.00 00 G ~JO G.C6 G~.f~;?`~ CC TdT.aI- C'O~L1fL~TTI" C'03L1fERC1.aI, 5 i 54 ~5.1j 6.OB x.44 :'.4k C GG; 5'.rJO ?G.4? r. '-`~ C~ TOTAI.1'EIGHBOP.HOOD C41L1TEI2CLaL. iroO C.~.~ O,b: v (i0 0 G`? 0.00 0.0£° O. b.' r..r,~°z. CG TdT.~,I. C:E\-E~~I, CO~L~IFHCI.~L€. S ~ 4 ~.~5 3.1s O.~r~ 8.S-t x3.00 ~.1; 6.~0 ' ::`< I~-D TOTAL INDUSTRIAL 1.1. C_' c;.;-i 6.ti4 O.SS ]?b.E€ ~'G ?.-O ;0.19 ; ;,',~ CIlZE' TOT.~L C3`-1 C' O,UU C~."<i C.C>0 .i.GO U.S~ O.GC~ C~.i~~3 y.6E 0.'=`~ P05 TOT.~ii.P:~HIiS&OPE\SP~CE S~.SC C.,;:~ C.C, G.CO O.tJ;; Gt~O f~,R3 G.L~"~ C.O;=`:< TOT.~1..~L.1, L?.~~ LSE C:4TEGOKiES Z r "r.ZO 124:1; la:S" 5::9 144:06 ;.Z4 34x3 104.25 3 i:~15k Plcc f. i6:~^~5 =r;,iw~3e E);SC'1~ p~b':P Si'?E: rph.:5-C`-v/ej~ Draft -May 2008 ~ Page 19 of 34 Table C-10 ~u~-ix•~ou- ~ci~n~ted ZR{~kll ~uentalls~ Rede~•np- \et Fatal let ?oral ~-aea~t ~'ac:ent Caustk aiued Pejblic wear Buildable $uildable Percent lr?,Z :3cre> :acres _~rres :~c~~es Land; Acres acre. Acres i ~i3 iJ.U~} i1:L'4~ ~.:t~~i tJ:l~kJ' '4i~t.~t1 ~.~~ 3:~V ~1.~V ~>s.31.~ ~ ~57 1.``~I~ ~~.ac' ~I.aC~ ~~.!~~ a.Q'~! v~.li~# o.ac :J.G~ ~.917~ro 1 66 ~.<<!l'; C .a C < r.C•C! < ti C !.C~ t~ a C ! ~ ! a.G~J J.aG G.CO 17.~C7°~v X ] 2'!4 ~:L3 }~ yy ~~ y 3J.L`4 p~`ry '~ V.~~ /~ yy (( }} U,~V yy }} p~ yy d 4f:WV i:~~ :._~a 7' x:~~ - .~ ii G~ 215 ~.~~ ~.? 4 1 .~~ a.ro a.~i~ ?.1 ~ _'.aQ ?.s? ~.a~~~J 21~ ~.Cifii '0.~(.~ t~t:li C O.C,'CZ ~ ; .~ a U:E~Q '~:4~ t s 1 C~:( ~~ b u C1°~ 21 f 1'~ ~' r ~,.a.t ~ y 4~ ~li ~~.fi'4~ / ~ 1 V. V`~~ ~k .'-:w 1 ( 11 H~] q f i~.JU p ~ ~ 4T .lJ.~'.8h~ +} . 215 « ~:01 p 1i:~~Y" ,(~ +~py V.37 ~y~,py V:4Yt3 ~y /~ V-V~ ~.~' t ~+, y ~:ad : ~`. .« }Y' ) ~sf iC.: ~ ~ 219 ~,. l ,. r.~.z, z -ll7 4!.IJn a.Lf't! [ 5 1.47 il. ~ '! [ J ~ 7V.1i1 / ~ f rL.L1 3 G1~ } 22Q ~ ' 1 fa.~C 6:66' ~ y 'tf_t3D fl_~U 6:~0 x.(36 p ~ D.c`6 ~7.~L~ j j ~ O:~Q°/~ 221 C~.~7r ~.~~ ~~~.C~1 ~!.C>>~ ~.C~~! ~!.UCE Li.OI~ ~.CCI ~.~~0~~ 222 ~.€'.1!~ ~!:.~~ ~_~~! ~1:~i~ l~:~J Q:{r11 +~:~!~ ~_~Q l~:t~~Q~ 223 .~? O.aC C~.CC! C1.G~1 a.C!Cr i.f;Ct Ci.aC ,r.CO Ci.~©t 224 ~.i~ ~l:t~U fi_t~[t ~~~ ~:~~ ~!;!~6 t~:40 0 O:D°k 225 1 ~.ti$ C!.1- Ct.CC a.~~t a.C!b~ ~i.S-i .C~] Q."6 C!.~'4l0 -226 I S:aB ~!.t~t~ ~:GO ~i:00 L~.~1~ ~.~~ ~.%a 2:9 2:24°~b 227 ?.~'-? 6. ~ yt.L'CI C€.C'~ a.l;~ C!.~?C! 6. - ~.~~' G.E2~:0 '228 C1.~iG ~.~30 ~.0~ tl_60 x:00 ~:Ofl ~.~+G Or00 ~}:~D°J~ 2 29 1.11~ C ( 1.a L' F .~'i l ~ C ~. U u C1.C1~1 ~~.CC! tl.a! ~.G' C ~ O°i C!. C o + LiJO }} +~~~ SLI: ~~.. 99 }} [ } O."}~7 ~~ `` 7] .7'. F.L. j ~ { ~~ } ~!_Vi/.. ~:~ ~.~ 7 1~'. ~~~~ ~~ T i~.~$ ~j iy .~~ j 1~:'J~pi$ 231 1>.2_' ..^~ i~.VL! J.!3 ~~ a.o~! ~.ii -~.a~ :.C't ~.~~~i's 233 ~.~J~ ~.a~~ 1.~< i~.!~i# a.Q~i l.h' ~,.~~~ ~. !~ 2.~9~io .'234 '.69 U:iIG~ ,~7_{~0 ~_t~9 a:~0 ~.~1 ~i.~i; x.45 {1.4;~°k zs~ t.~s c!.ls c~.~:~ t!.cc3 a.~!~F ~!.~~ c!.~ ~a?~ a.~s~ .236 a:85 0:.~0 ~;i~4 :t~9 O:~t~ fl:tF`!~ ~:ar~ {i:~.. l3,O11°k 237 .~~ o.oc ~a.a;~ o.c>o o.~a ~!.i~ ~~.i4 a.~:~ C~.15°~a 239 i_~, 7 ~.V4 ~.t~'i~ ~.L~~ ~. 4~~! U.C`l} l~.V~ '.!_VL~ 63.s~r L7 QI7 240 ~.~J4 ~1.t~0 fl!.[3~7 !~efr0 Q~l•10 4aC~~ 1:09 ~:~~ ~1'~°k 241 C!.aC {~.4C C~.Ct~ a.GC! a.ot! c?.C0 O.aC ~1.£~1 C!.~0°~ :243 t~:OiG •t1:0~? ~:_~S0 ~1Ot~ ~3>1r1~ OvO~ 0.0~ 4:~9 0:01°~ 244 .~~ C!.aC~ ;~..~? tk.G•C! O.Q~ f!.~„ C1.~? a.~ 0.76~6~ 2~5 f!:li~ x.00 ~~t1 fit~b Y1~30 x.09 O;OQ ~.{~D D~}l]~,b 246 6.GC ~.aC L~.GO Ci.C~I~ a.0~ CF.C!~7 tZ.4C C~.r~O O.~1D°.~~ 247' 3~'~ 1:i.45 x!:€10 Ot4f~.. OO~k 4~_I~ 0:~9 0. D,4Z°k 248 0.{]C O.GC ~.C'Cl 4.CC! a Cl:~ ,!.CO C!.aG Ci.CC~ t1.v0°~; ~~s ~i:~~ a.~~ ~:a o,~ a:~~ ~_~~ ~:aa ~.~~ a:~r,~,~ 254 9.i6 .19 I.~C! zi.G9 a.~u ?.~C~ 5.2C 4.6` 4.9i°ro ~~~ ,{~ fy 'V-~1~ ~y ~;i3~ ~} 'i.~:iP1F g~f~:/~ U:IiV /y{~/y ~V:iJ3F y~~ yy~e,~~yy .41:V'V //~~ ~.',P~ J~ s~,pJ'y~ ~}:~(j- n~y p~rryy .. E3.RSQ6~ 252 ~.a~ r!.ac Ct.{~t~ C1.C0 a.CiG ~J.CO a.a0 fl.C'C~ D.t~C7°s'a 253 i0.:r ~ t'!:tlt~ x_40 €x_00 t1.1~110 3.~8 ~.~$ 2~~5 ~:;~5a1~ 254 a.oa ~~.a~ ti~.cr~ c!~~o a.n~ ~,.!sC~ a.ac a.{~c~ a~a°.~ 255 ~:~~ s3;~1~: x.#10 '#1.[~0 O:iJQ .3~i '?',8~ 2~~ 2:3:1°.~ Draft -May 2008 ~~ Page 20 of 34 2 JV 3U.41 V.V" L~. l~ j S. l . V ~ ~. " t~ ~~.1~ ~~. ~ G S F S. G. ~ '~ ('~ ~~ yy ,L~~ ~ (~ ~_i7~U ~ y 1.:7 ~.,` p~ ~~ jj }} ~ [ Y.~i51'V ~~ yy 4.V~ .~,:~~ p ~, 1' ~Y7 ~ p F k-tT '7 }p y ~ ~~i~"..~}'Vg,1~7- 258 C~~OC C.~G :~G~~ Ci.iv~ r,.~t.t~ ~~.~~ 0.0~ ~~.C~t O.~Q°~~ 2~~ ~:~G ~:~~ ~t~'~ ~l:lF~!' :~14 ~;~Q. x.44 ~_~~1 Q.~~~.+~ 2B0 Ci.~~ [~.C~~ ~r~ .~.r~ ~.Ot~ ~~.GC~ O.bC ~~.r~ o.u~°ra Draft -May 2445 ~. Page 21 of 34 Table C-11 .~2 Total Acre- ~'acapt Ara•es Infiil Z"grant Acres ~715'i761f- ineutall~- C'r~nstrain+~d Acres Pu3~Iic Lauds F~edecop- inenr Acres het Tot:~l Buiidable Acre. 3LIju'fBCI het Builda131e Acres Peresnt ~~~ ~.G~tk c~-btu b.~~k G.;.k~ a.c~i ~.~o c.~o 4.oLk ~.~a°~ ~ay ~5Q PP55 ~`'~ :4i'.V~ ~y/~ ~~:5: ~y /~ _~ti.V"~! ~~~~ . .lD;'4'S~ ... ~,~: L'4f ~V:~~ ..y .p/y .11:i11~' ~.3}: f ~:i34d~~`4 ~ s6 b.~~7 ck.bt~ o.~~: ~:~o b.~~k ~-ao e.Gb o.~~ ~.c~o~f° ~ " I~ .Ci b ~ ~ ~~. Cl b (~.il i k ~ r'. J ~7 b.~rik :1. b G ~'. { ~~ ~ b. ~ i l °.~o Q . Q © od i ~:i~ ~~ }y ~ F '.f...~1. ,, ~y -~..17~ ~~ yy .~.~`z* aa yy / ~ ~~1:'sAb -~:~~ ~~ y ~:lT~ y ~ ~ y .~:'i1V ~ {{ ~~, ? y W.lib ~~ yy yy yy~ ~ S.F,•i,;l)~~4 2'17 14.x. J.~~ O.tl~:k O.~kO b.Gtk ~.~ ~` F,.StI C.Oi 4.Sn°JS ~y p .218 ~~yy ff11,,??~~ AF:VXf ;;~~yy f4 V.bG ~~gg ~~yy '+J<Gl+ pp ~~yy77~~ V.Vl~ ,f~ ry lt.: ~V ~~gg ~~++yy~~yy t'.VV ~~LL ,~}'yy ix'.Yl~ ~~yy ...:: "J ~~ ,ry. ~.y.:1..:/.. V L'ld~JB 2~9 b.n~~ b.b~ b.~kc~ ~.oo b.c~k Lk_o~ ~.ckb b.Ga a.a~91a 221 ~2.:~1 ~~-1i? 1.G 7 Ci.C1t1 b.l{~ 1,9i1 ?.S~ 2..- 2.b"n_°1o .222. l'~.~~i ~-~G ~:1~~ l~t:bC3 ~Y~ i'}~~G '~`x~b Q.'~i~ (3:i~0a~~ 223 b.~.1~k ~i.b~1 O.C~O G.DO O.C~~ k.OG C~.40 O.GQ p.L~O°. 224 ~.~~ ~:~G O.,bb G:4~' ~. 4.~bG b:bb 4;~3b il:l~(3°,~ 22~ 0.[1Ck Ck.G~k O.C~yk 0.~~0 Q.k;-:r tk.00 G.bO O.Ob p.Qp~'b 226 b;J~k ~.~0 t~~~ b:Ob 'tl:t ~:OC~ b:~~} 0:~~ fl:OQ~~ 227 0.0~ ,.~~ b.k~s~ c.~~~ b.c•~k ~k.[11] c.:k~ b.a~ ~.c~a~,~ zap 0_~~ ~.~~ ~-~~ a.~~ ~ ~:i~o ~:~ ~:~ ~:~~~ 229 b.~~€k ek.oc O.G~k c.~kb o.~~k ~.oG r.Ob ©,c~~ O.Qp°%4 23(~ ~.~b 5.~~i b:b~ 1:{J~0 b..bb b:bG 'S{i[I ~:'tl 4:~7°~ 231 b.kyk Ck.Ot~ O.O~k 1~.~10 ~1.Gk sk.b~~ G.tkO O. CI~k p.p0°,~ x.32 :ljb ~_~D ~::~~ t~~ fl:fl~a ~_4G 'i~:~i'9 ~~li~.. :{IfJ°~O 233 b.QCk Ci bry 6.G~~~ C.~kO O.Oti ~k.O~J f.~kv O.G~k fl.Qp~'~ X34 b:bb ~:~~ ~_b~i i;:4fl 4.:b~ ~:~G ~:~~ ~.~~ ~:1~Q°~ 235 0.+]°~i ~O.O~i O.f;:k C.~kO O.G~G J.Otk C.Ob t1.0~G Oi.pO°f~ +y+~ ~~36 ~~55 ~~~yy~~yy W'UU ~:~~ ... ~.V:.ti~ ~~Q1i V.~ ~,4fV ~f, y~F1 V~:VCP f~a;,r~ '~tli'NV .b:~p°.da 237 b.G~k ~.oo o.~~~k c~.uo o.c-~ ~.bG ~.~~o c,.oo ~.~aa~~ 238 ~_~ ~:~0~ ~3~4b G~i~ C~:t3~ b_~d ~4Q bbl'! ~IOl7°~° 239 O.Gtk Ci.bG O.Ci~i C.~JO b.G'G ~;k.OG G.bb O.t~~O J.pp~:f~ 241 b.~~k ~~.~_~~ b.n~k c.~~ b.{;'tk ~.oo c.€~e~ b.~~k o.ac~{ ~ ~3 b;b ~;t ~ ~ o _~ ~ ~:~ ~ :~~ ~ ~: ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~:~~ ~~ > y L~~ V . t~ ~ / y L~. V 4 ~ / ~ y V.l~ ~i k f ~ ~.~~ V ~ V . ~~'~ / ~ ~ ~ V 4 } / ~ ( ~ .'a~ b b .G i k n ©°f4 p .V ~~~ yy ~~ ,,s ,,r :SI.~kJ 55 }y~~ ,,+ ~:Sr1L~ ryry , ~,~il n ~~:~V / ~ .~-~ ~~ yy y ~y ~ "cd_Wl} ~~ ~~ yy,, ~~ / 'V:~V yy ~~ {{ ~~ 'V:'V ~~ 77 R U '~W~ 246 O.L~v~ Lk.O(1 O.t7~f C.CkO b.~wk Ci.OI~ L.tkG O.Gu p.pp°~`a 2$ ~ Q: ~ ~ ~_~G I}i~1~ ~£:~Q 4.:~1 ~_bG ~: ~ 1~ 1~1 ~.{ ~ :B Q ~~ F p 248 t y b.~tik ~k.~t1 b.Uk V.~~O V.U'~k i.bl~ f y G.'Jb ~5 b.G~ ~~ F 1 ++,,{ U.L'U Ch7 grab 4.G3 Ck.O;! b.G.G I,.Ob 0.~lQ ;k.00 G.CkG O.O.k p.Dp`.'f° 25'I ~:~lb ba~iG t3.(Ib b:~l~ b:~Q ~:~~ +~~(~ ~8~i4 ~.~~°.~ 2ra2 O.Otk ~k.bG 0-O;.i C.GO O.Gb yk,OG ~.DO G.GL~ p.Qp`.~° :253 4.b4 b.bG b:bb 4:Q0 fa_bf~ bbG b;bt~ 'b•flb $~:?Gp°k 254 O.t]~~k ~~.rG 0.~}.i G.~00 4.J:~ ~k_00 C.C~O t~.Oti~ j3.GpQ~ 25~ b-fib ~_tiQ ~_0~ .~0. C~:~1 i~:b~l `C~.~4(I b:t3{~ i3:~C~°k Draft -May 2008 Page 22 of 34 25fi 4.C~0 4A~ C~.rCi G.C~~i ~,.r,'Ct ~.~?J ~~.~~ b.fl4~ LI.L?n°a 25~ CI.t~C~ ~~.OC~ ~.~v~ G_~C~G ~.~;a ~~.00 ~_.DO n.t7~ C3.OG°ro 2 603 ~.li' ~ ~1.O C ~ CF.6n ~.L ~C= ~ i .G ~ ~ ~1.Ot~ G.Lj~ ? D. 0 0 Cj. SCI°r 6 X~ }} '{3~~ :. ,, ^^ ,L 1'-~'J ii { :~.~fiit ~.7.' ~ I~~ yy ~~~~f ¢ ~ , W-kPAJ ~..~ gq ~ y i~:~-°5 yy73 y p 'Y 1.171 y~ p b~.,~~~f~9 Draft -May 200$ ~ Fage 23 of 34 Table C-12 1 ~ 1 ~ ~. ~~ ~ i Lyf F ~s ~~ esi.l 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~~3~~ ~~~ ~i i'~. : ~ ~ ~ F~ En~-irn n- ': :~..djusied .. -. .: Infill rrEeutall~- fiecie~•ap- fat?otal het Tot:~l ~':~eaut ~"aeaxrt C'onstr'ained Public n-ey~t Buildable Buildable Pet°eeut r:~Z ~.Cr'e5 :~1CrE'a :~C3'£ .'~Cre L'aI7Sl< ~cro ~.cz°es ~~,cres r..~c! ~ r°:~F ~ ~.U t ~~ ;[. ~ ~s ~.all 1 E~.:+, fu ~ :b ~ i~.~#3 ~ ~ F. t~ :.~..$.~ ~5 ,t E5~ 1 Y~.»'~ /+ G L}.US t f + l~Y. t}~ / ~ r.~.rV + i).VV / ~ r ~ l+.`~~s' 1 -F`. ~'} 1 p fy :V-~?6 ^ ~ J.~ ~~+9 X513' ~~.'~i~ ~:~~ 0'C~ U~.O~ ~:~~ ~`~:~~ ~~.~~ ~:~"~ ,l ~_~.3a,~,. '~~~ 5~.u1 ~.~~ ~.c~~ I~.i36 if.Ui1 ~.~I~ ~7_C~ 7.u 6.~4L Z ~ 4 X3:4.1 ~:~ 3 ~ ~:~~ :~Q ~1~~ ) f~~i ~7: 1 ~~~ ~:~t l °, . 1 215 C1.~C // ~~ ~.ti ~j { 3.~Y rJ.~~ ~ 1 ~.~fV ~.~5 , t A.~7 ~.~•' ~ l 4.J~~J3 ':276 r3:~~ .~?.~ ~I.L~ :~3U ;GQ ~.fl~ ~3.:?a ~~: '~'1:'2~°~ 217 C1.~`a 6.6E ~>.~~ ii.~l~~ {i.l'~ ~.i~~ Q,~1li ~.~:{I 6.~11~'~~ 2~1~ ~3::~3fJ ~.~9 l~~lt? ~3.d~~ ~:~6 ~.f~t~ Clt~~ ~_~ t7B~~s~ 219 a.~'~ ~.04~ c.c~~ r;;.{,q ~.c~ +~.cr~ a.~~~ ;~.~~ o.aa~sa 221 0,~7~ b.J~~ f~.~4 ~.~r~ ~~.C~~ r~.~{3 Cr.GG Ci.6t~ Cl.t3p°~'a 22~ ~21:?1 1.2~ ~:I4 ~:ti~ Sl:~~ ~.?1 1~t:6~ r:~8 5:25°.k 223 ~9._<~ 0.?~ C.~1G U..rC~ O.G~1 C.~~O 0.2~ €r.lS ~7.i2°~~ 22 5 6. ~°4~ r ~ i. C r i G. ~ ~ .ir~ i~. ~ i.r, 1 t i C . ~s 4 i t. C ~ ~ F.i~ ~ O O .fl a °/ a 0C 2~'4l C Y~ ~13. ~' ~ , y ~ l ~ V . U ''ii ~ y p ~ 3.V ~ { 4 ` , '~J:L ~ ~ } ~ y 1J:~U t ~ r i ~ t t5:kl t ! p ~, f y ~ s ~J .4flf ~ t ( , .V_~V ~+ ~ / f 9 i: V 6.t@ - L 227 ~ y ~.+J i ~ r ~ l y . ~'~~ V L f ~ f ~ ~.~~41 V r l i.' . ~11 ~ ~. r' L ~ + i .i~CJ ~ ~]. ~~~ 1 ~ .~'i ~ 1 ~ 1 U . ~Sl ~l O 2~8 r 1 t;z~~ Pp yy ~/ s, tie;xa~ ( ~. ~:~~ ~~ yd ~~ y +J.11~~ ~~ ~~ ryy 77 V.~11 vv ~~ V.~~ ~y ~.L~ yy ~~r p V_~i3 p/ ~7 ]] tJ:1~4/k7 229 0.:7;~ C~.6.~ C.~,O r_•.~:~~J 0.6Cr 6.k~~ G.~C C~.i6 a.aaa~a 23fl ~.~U 6:~~ 6;i}D :~~' Li(~ ~:fl6 i7.~f? ~_[1C~ :€~~',4~ 231 ~.t1? fi.0~~ ~.,L r1.CrC~ 0.6fr r:~.LrrE S."~S ~.c~ 4.~,vU,:; ~~~ ~a_~~ a.~~ ~:~t~ ~~:~a Cr:~~ ~:~a ~:a ~:~~ ~:~a~~ 233 ~ ~.i~ ti l .{)i ~ ~. \r r ~ ~ r , i.li~ ~.~i~I f i ~'. ~ ~ I i t~ . ~ I~ ~I ~ ~. ~~i9 ~ . ~ ~ ;?34 i~ ff ~:~y nn ~~ tt Le. a]hJ I/ 11 ~~ 11 S!:'+1V ~~ yy ~3.V.4T ~:~ ~~ ~~ ss ~~ y / !.i.`~l7 }} pp ~~ ~~ ~~S5 V:VV" ~ 3 ~ } f7_L~~ ~~p ~~~ p ~ y ~:lil.7~ 235 a.~y~ ~.~; c.~~a r,.~~~ ~.~~~ c_~,o ~.a~ ~t~.~~ o.aa~~~ 236 a:~~ ~:~ ~,~~ :~a :~~ ~.~;c3 ~.~~ ~:~~ ~~t~~~ 237 ~.~~~~ ~3.4~i G.~4 r.~i0 C~.G~i r.:~o {~.OG Cr.GO L1.a0°~ 239 Q.~~~~ ~.~~~ G.CrO r,.~~~ lGa r.~~ o.rr {r_rt~ a.aa°lb ~~~ o.:~t~ a.o~~ c.1r~ c.cr~ o.c~r c.~~c~ ~.~o cF_ri7 o.aa~,~ 2 44 ? ~. ~ ? C ~. C ~ l C :. C rt~ r,. t ~ ~ C ~.+~ 5 C~. ; r ~ O . l t~ a -U' ? O . C f ~ GJ s ~ .245 y ~~ y ~:~U1! p ~ p ~ ~t y 41.~JV ( ~ 1 1 V.~~ yy yy ~ yy ~;§74` S5 (( ~~ ,,{ "{J;LJij A, ]~ 1 ~ ~.V~ ~~ yy ~~ yy~ yy V:VV yy j~ ii ryry 3l:~V {n {{ ~} yy ~~ ~ 4l:lfll~fO 2 46 O .t~ ~ C ~. J C ~ C . C 1 0 r ~. ~3G 3 . E ~ ~ 1 C. 4 ~ ~ . O G~ L1 ~ 1. C 17. a a °r 'a ~ y Z ~ ~ ~~ pp / ~~ ~s3.~4f yV ~~ yy }}~T ~~p ~Sf..U'+f {f // { y ~~ ~ aS.~1ii ~~ ~ y S7.kl~ ~ y ~ e z - ~ V_ U 'Fl ,{ ~n ~;~V yy ~~ {{ yy -tl.31f~ ~ y ~ ~, l ~.l f ~ ,~ gy ~ / 1 .' ~ i ' ~ i~,N }} p L~i1 V.~I L~ a.Ui~ ti.kli! 'J.~S{ y + F tr. lj l~ U.ir~ t~.4V rr ~( ±± 5 L~, li4~ yy }} ( ~ ~ ' ~ 'J.L1L1 ~J~ 2~~ ~~:~DB 't~.4li 2:~~ ~.f1t3 ~_ ,~_0{l '?:~~ 1•~? 1~'~7'~~ 25U 4 3 ._~~ C~.~1 ~~ 1.?~ ~s.~ 7 0 l. t G 6 G.l fi ~.S S i .y ', 6. ~ 3 % ~ + Z.J.t ~~ 55 ~L':~~ g ~l}:~~ ~~:~~ y~~ ~ yy ~,VV ~ y ~ ~ 1 ~V.:V'~~ f s( ~'cy iF'.~lV :: ee ~~~5f ff ~~ 11 ,,it :Ad:~3! ~, yy 77~ p ~-:17t3 :fG 252 ~1.?fi U.O~ C~.~D rs.t3b ;I.CCi ~'.~~ ~.2~ I_~S 1.1 ;~~ 253 1.:~3 c~:t~~i ~.4D 3~[~ ~.~U +~;~~ ~:~6 ~:~s 0.23% 254 ?1.3~ ?.'~ i,..~, rs.:7fii O.CI~ ~.?~ 5.85 ~€_~=. 2.9a°.~ 255 ~3:~3fi t}~~ ~:~Q ~3:~ib ~1; i~:~t~ t1.t31~ C~_t30 f~Clt3°.~ ~,: Draft -May 2008 ~ Page 24 of 34 ~J~t ~.tfi ~J.~1';J ~;.+~~ ra.~l~ ~.~"~ ~.~~ ~1.~~ L~. ~ Q.~F°.ro X58 bS..s6 z.~b 3. ;', r,.C~4 {~.r;-~r l.~l G.~B ,.C-+ 4.L~~°s~ ~~GJ9 30..:1 ~ .~'.~~ ~.:.~~ ~:f11 ~; ~?tl'' '~:OLf l~~r~ ~:U'~ ~.~V~~ ~$~ sz..-~z ~.~a F.~t~ 1~_~I~1 J.Ci7 ~'.~~ 1~.V_`• ~r.?-'t ~.~"~i°ia t ~~ ~'aii~l x.£15 ('~~-e ~t i'rn:: ti:~~ ~:~~ ~:f [l '~:~~°~a I~. Draft -~ May 2408 $ '~ Page 25 of 34 Table C-l3 ~~ is ~i. f .Yl=T~Yr x ~ F$ F r 1 A~ .~ dt ~ ~~ '~~~J ~:1 Lit ~~_ ai I , L.n~-ji~on- Adjusted ~~t:~[ t'aca~,t IufiIl '4~aeant uie~ntnllx~ C'ou~t~-:~iued Fu~lic fiecle~-ap- men[ het Tat~l Suildal~lr Zet ~iuilda}31e Percent T:3,,Z :~CI'e: .',cres .~c~~es :acre, Lands Acres Acres Acres 75t1 ,3:~~ $J:l)l~ C1 U;~~ 4i:~t4) ~-i1Lt -lf:~.1i~ tJ.L'i~ €1:13 fps 15f C.00 O.C~G ;1.Gi1 O.~li~ G.C€0 tl.f_~ O.C€€' ~1.OG Q.1C3`~s '1~$ ~:fi4 Os~O- 0:1}0 b~10 4?J4 O.'.~ i3:~€~ ;O.r,O. ~1.~C'~~, 9~6 1?.{~0 r7,OC O.GO 0.0~~ G.~14 3.15 .15. 2.3y ?.~.~°~ ,2'E~ r 3: ~ O:C~O: r:~4 ~:~10 G:0 0 0.3? 3.C1€ ~ ' 30: ~°~ Z~ 215 7 7 ':..11 4~.J ~ ~.~! ~.V1.~ { ~ r.~~:l 1.~': 3 .~.'t~i }.ryL+ 7{ f ~. i 14fJJ ~~~ ? x:42 '~.;~# 4::3~i ~1.{1~1 O.~J4 ~.~~ 1i.3~~ l.~~ 1? X15°~a 21 P 1.~£• 0.4€; 0.50 O.Oti O.~i4 .~ C~7 4.4G O.~C~ 0.~6b.~ 27~ O.t~f~ O:t~O 4:~Q €x:00 O:t~O' ~7<Otl ~.~i0~ :.. 17.30 t}~kQ°.~ 219 ~.~~ ~-Gr .€.G0 ~.~ti~ G.~~~ y€.GEi [~-[€G G.Or, Q.~~°ifl Z~CC ~:~~ O.flt~ ~;t~0 ~.~~ v:~~ ~~~ 4~[~ 0~~ O:C3~~b 227 4.CI~1 0.4C '~€.GO 4.0~€ €,~40 it.4[~ 4.~.tQ Z~.4U ~-3L~°ia 222 b5:i5 O1G :~ ~:.:.~ 0:00 ~t:04 ~ ~; 5,32. 3.~~ 4:34~,~ 22~ Q,~;~ ~,+~~ C~,~~ 4,~~~ G.C~O ~~.~:~ O.~G 0,04 O.yO°r~ _.. .224 ~3:OG _ ~:40 0:01 4.:30 `C~:~34 0:~0 ~7:~1C~ `.~1.4i3 {1.:~I3°1o` 225 4.04 0.40 O.O~i O.On r.~tG ~~.G{, t~.C~C 0.40 t~-u0~FS LL~ ~~r~1 L~.YJ ~k. €14~ V,L'i1 ~',i€Y' ~L~. X11' Vi~t1'~ y~~VY L'.4 Qb13 228 ~:~?l~ ~:~~ ~: ~{i ~: ~ ~ li`:~~ ~_~>~` ~ ~/ '~.~:~ ©.°I~4°J6 22~ ~4.~2 i€.4'~/ C 1.4;4 yy I 4.41'~~ ~.14 .~:.J.~'~ ~.1i5 t.~l 4.14'13 23i? .. {3:10 O:C~C~ O:f3t~ ~3:~t0 O.;~gi fl_Ofl 7:i3~. O;t1(P .. €l:~[3°k 237 O.Ci4 0.4C ~€,Op 4.0~, i~.°~~0 ~1.t70 O.C~G 0.4G O.fsO°~`~ 232 1~:~~ ~J:O>~ ~1:0~ :~~ €G;~)b ~-_;S ~i.38• ~_=?~ ~:~~°~ 2 3 3 ` . ~ 0 .18 Ct. G~ O 4.t~ t j ,rE L O. ~ I, G ~ ? C ~. ~ ~ 0 . 1 8 0. " O°Ib ij X 1} ~ 1 ~.,Y.:JY! ~1 ~ V.~[ f y ~ 'V.~~ ~ 4 -~-~~' r ~ ~~:~sl ? ~ ~':'U4 rry ~ r~ f y. ~ R.+: ~i'U t},, ~r ~ T S5~ UsVAf~ } ~y ~ ~ ry V:i7U .~ }T ~:if !J~~ 235 l.?2 0.4C L,.0~1 4.0~} 0.~~0 ~t.€,0 O.OI~ 0..4~; Q.OC~°~ .236' ~:~5 0:41 ~.~~€ ~.{l~€ O:Ot~ 4>q. ~i.0~ ~~30 a:~G~°~ 231T t.? 0.4L' ~t.t}~ D.00 €s.{€4 Ci.lO C1.C-C 0.4G O.~C~°la 238 t~~3i# flt30 C~:DO #1:0~€ ~':~34 O:t~O ~:0~ t~.(Di#. t~:~Ct°k 235 ~.~` 0.2C {,.0.0 O.C1.i Cr.00 0.°' 0.~1 O.fS D.74a,~ .24{1- 4:fi'? ~_9~ t~.4~ ~:fl4 €~:t?4 ~~i;{3 ~,~~ x:46 "1:~~°,~ z47 e.is ~.4r ;~.~~ 4.O:t C.Ci4 c~.o~ l~.oc 0.4C o.~Q~.~ 2~3 13.~~ '~~~ ~i:35 ~3;~~1 ~.~0 '0.~3 ~.~' X1:92 ~.~kff°.~ 244. 0.,5 0.40 ~i.00 4.0;~ 0.v4 O.CO O.t€G {€.4€ ©.OE141~ 24~. 7:'!'t U ~d' 'ca:~V ~.,VYA iY:Vi 1-~~ ~.V~~ V-Y3'~ L,k3V~la 246 1].C~~ 0.41 0.G0 0.0°vt U.04 ~€.;' 0.:8 0.23 0.31°~~ 24~' ~i:95 i~.25 ~3.:~0 4.:00 O:~i4 t3.0 '0.?~ 0.'19 ~}:2Q°~ 248 4.`' 0.4~ ~t.01.1 4.O:i 0.04 C€_G~7 O.C~G 0.4C t1-00°l~ 249 3.f r 0.9~ 0.91 €~-04 ;4:04 I.~6 3.=1~ 2:~~ L.T9o~ 250 1~.?2 O.OG 8.~4 4.O~t C'.04 1.39 10.15 ?.63 ~i,25`~ ~5~ 44:5 .32.5 ~?(10 ~.fi4 C:04 1;4? 29.~f~ 22;4 '4.4'1°~ 2~~ 1,.48. S. ~ "~.LO 0.00 O.Ct4 4.~t? I x.43 9-81 10.6E°~ 253 2:t7:3~ t3:bl3 1_~S t3{l~d Q:t3t3 3.;6? 3.35 2.51 2.x`3°a6 254 3.12 .46 fi.l0 O.t1~~ G.UO 0.1> .~1 .21 ~.?'°~ ~~11 ~y ~f ~ ~~ Draft -May 2008 ~ ~ Page 26 of 34 256 11 .6d x.38. ~4~.it~ ~.Ciwi ~.4L~ ~.~~ ;.?3 ~S~} ~,.~7Sb X57 l~.~ ai~~. ~~.~? +.:~ t~.~0 ~_~~ 5.~~~ 5:1~ ~~1'°:S 258 t~.?~ ~.bC• ~'~.LC~ ~r~.p7 is.~~~ Ci.GC~ C~.~t3~ 8.~+1 O.vL~~~~ 26© a.?1 ~~.1'~~` ~~.~~il ~.i1~1 G.JG til.l~ t1.~~fQ {1.~t=' L).~~°i~ Draft -May 2008 Rage 27 of 34 ~~ Tale C-14 Ezzrir~n_ :lcl;us#ed Inflll mentaI3~• I~iede~•o~- het To#aI et Ivt;~l Z~ncant 1`aczzx# Ga~str:tiz~ec~ Fnblic znezz# Buildable Buildable ~~rC~ltt Tel _~cres ~cz-e,> .•'.eres ~cr~e± Lards acres ~cz•e; Acre 15G 4.~4 ~7:4C1 ~J!'r4 0;4U ~1- 4:14 1:44 0;44 Qllll~~'o 157 F.~~: 0.66 ~~r.4{r O.OC~ Cr.1~0 4.O~Li 0'.06 O.Or:• ~.C3Qa~ ~~~~ U:~r~ '~;~ ~_~~ 4:~0 ~r.~t3Q 4:~~J i3:~Cl ~~~ fJ~C~ ~_. 1fi6 ?6.11 r.~.40. ,r.Ct~ 0.44 0.00 6.0~€ G.uO 0.6G O.fiiO~`o 21L x.33 11.04 ~fil0 '0:44 fl:CI4 0;€~{) O.Gf3 x:00 l3BB~s~ 215 11.x` t~.4[ i1.G0 ;J .44 0.00 6.04 4.34 0.44 0.{1D°b 215 0:~-~ '£i:~~ 0_~Ci ~1:C~13 u:f~0 ~:~~ ~!~~ :~C t1~0° 21 t C.CEO 1).44 ti.i~4 0.6C 0.00 O.r;1 C.Cr6 0.4C D.L~©°`~ 2'iv ~.~~ 1:~4 ~1.fl0 0:~3~ Q13~ G~.~O 4:44 ~i~t~ ~:'£3tl°>~ 21z r.~~E~ 0.41. ~4.C0 0.44 0.OG O.O.i r.Oq O.OG O.C~Otaa ~2{~ 1~:~~ <~1:41~ ~_C~~ 0:13 ~i:C~l... 1?:0~ t~:~i~ O:D~ 801~~ 22t -.w~. 11.4c cr.c>~ o.6c c€.e-~, 4_a~~ c.o4 o.or> a.oa~~ 22;~ C.Cr4 C~.OQ ~~.Gal O.OG ~i.r10 4.043 rJ,U6 11.64 O.Lti~1`:a .224 ~.~~ `#I:3~ ~i~~ :~G OC~O 0:~4 t3:44 tJ'~} ~J~tl 225 C.Cr4 0.4f~ ;,.00 0.6C .~.r0 O.lr;1 Q.CrO 0.01: tI.DQ°~ Z~~ ~.~?4 11:1?~S ~i_~tl O:C~O Q.<{~4 >~:~~1 Qr;iJb b4 !~: 22r .4_`: 4.64 4.G0 OAQ '1r.00 0.0.E Q..rO 0.04 11.DQ°~~ ~~~i =1:~4 '~1.(l{'~ ~:~ - ~.{~~._ 0.:~0 .~.~t12j1 ~~,~~ ~~l~l~i t+.~lr~b ~~~ +~.t~e a.ac c~.ca c~.a~1 c~.co o.c}t~ c.na a.ac o.QO^o ~~~! ~5.1•~ '11-:011 ~7_(.~'ll 0:4r} ~:~~ >~00 (~:OL '~:{}~ ~:1~17~b 231 t~.ti10 ~s.4r: 3~r.40 O.Ors ~r.GO 6.O.i rv.LrO C~.OC ~.130~a 23~ 0:~i4 tl:t~l~ O:t~ 1I:01? 6:11' 4:00 G:04 0.64 t1:llCl°~ 23:~ ?.~I" 0.04 O.GO 0.4€: O.GO C~.Oti 1;.;14, 0.6C O.C~D~`o 23~ 0:1?4 t]:OC ~i~t1 ~<0~ €~:~r 0`_~0 :~1~} 4:53(3 Q.~.[l 235 4.46 OAC O.CrO O.OG C~_t~0 6.014 G.04 C1.4G 11.OC~~o Z36 l:z}~ tl.~U ~:~Q fl:43[i ~;I~t7 0~0 ~i:~1Q 4CIG ~}.~D~i 237 1.~1? 0.04 t,1,G0 U.40 lr.(30 6.i~1r G,00 0.04 O.DO .235 x:40 t1.44 O:t~i 4:~4 flCa~ O.~t ~:~ t1:1~t~ 0:317' 230 C.OC~ O.OI'. O.GO O.OIr 4.G0 4.44 4°.00 0.60 O.OC#°`~ ~4t~ 1''~~~ 4:4C~' ~_~~ 41.4 4.04 4:0~? 4.4313 0:01 ~:~~°~ 241 O.ti10 0.4C= 4r.tj0 0.40 4.00 0.00 C.CrO 0.60 ~J.1)0 2~€~, ?..5~ ~i017 43.00 ~0:4r~ 4:C~L1 4:11£1 f1:0t3 '13:~bG 0:00 24~ t~.~r4 0.~4 °~.G~1 0.64° 4 04 4.110 O.t14 O.OC l_l.(}0`~~ ~~~ ~.~~ ~i:53i1 ~~ 4:417 ~~~~ 4.t~~ C?:434 ~~~ ~1;~3~°~ 244 C.06 O.Qr.I 0.+10 O.OG ~r.r,~ 4.OCi C.~rG 0.4u O.D11°~~ ,24:t E~:414 0.0+[3 43.170 {1:530 0<r30 43:1]43 {3:Ot3 4:t~(1 SI~Dt7°~ 24~~ ? I.~b O.OC ~~r.40 OAr, Cr.GO 4.Otr C.04 OAC 11.60°.' 2~1§ 1~:1s4 41:453 4<f~0 fl:~3G ~1_t~~l 4.14 41.14 ~1.13C'~ fl~#13 25C~ C."' t1.6G 0.00 0.44 ~~.CrO 4.0°;~ G.4r4 O.bC 0.{30 X51 3~:?~# fl.~3~ ~r:0~1 0:(Dt3 0.~4 (3.I14 i3:43t} ~i4~ 53:1~[~ 252 ~.Ol ~1.~}G O.GO 0.4G ~~.Cli O.1r0 C.00 0,41: tl.{3Q~ ~~ ~.~~ ~:~~ ~i.:~ ~.>~~ ci:~~ ~:~ 13:4153 ~.~~ ~~~'~~~ 25L ~.~~# 0.00 O.G4 0.64 O.CO 4.O~r t;.00 0.00 CI.S3C3°.`a X55 13:4143 1~55~~ 43.5341 1~.53~i ~~41~ 4:I1?J 13_~1~3 `11:5343 51_f3l)~n Draft -May 2008 0~ 1.= Page 28 of 34 e~ 2sb ~.?? C~.€}G Ci.G~3 ~.C~G ~~.~:~0 ~?.Ci~i GAO ~.OG ~.GC~% 2z~ r,~? ~_GO ~~i.G~ o.oaa C~.C~ W.c7~ e.~ro ts.~G o.CO~~~ ~~~ ~;~3 ~1:t~t~ ~i:~3~1 ~~~5 0~ ~:~~i t~:~~ u r~ fi1:~~~/~ 23(- U.~~ O.UG ~.€: [1 ;~.OG C3.~Jt~ C~.~CE ~.tiiG C~.C~C ~J.CO~o ~3~~ ~.7r ~:~J~ ~1:~1 ~.~t~ f),Eti7 ~.;'~J :. ,~~ {,~. ~1:~C3'DAa .. . . . . a s k )' ~. .. . . .. .. L/ Drat -May 2008 Page 29 of 34 Table C-l5 e ~~ _,~,, ~, ~ ~~ ,1 u ~~'l ~~~~ ;~. En+•iran- .~dj~IutQ~ InfiEl ]nen#71l}- Recie~•©p- tet Total \et TCial ~ aC911# ~ aC8i3# C~GU ~I'aiz3ed p1t ~311f IIIp13t ~U1~(~a~?~E ~LIi~C~~~31Q ~@I'C~I3t ~.~,~ +~~~^_ 3CI'E; n :ten tSiC1k5 .~fIES :acres ~.~llCiS - ~fl•@C .~fl'e"s Afres :'wFV ±3':gJiJ tf:BJV Y~_V+SP '~1:1.i`(#~ UL331 'i3;~U '({;~f,~ ~l.:ij-~l. .Ll.~u'.L) s~ '57 G.~4 [~.C1G C1.4G C~. f,'i1 4.OC3 ~+.C€~' ~ 4C~ i~.~'l~ ~.~i ©{.'s7 ?66 G. Ci O U .C€U t~. O U C ~. C < 0 0 .0=,.r L ]Cj t %- t~ 4 G u. t ~ ~ t O.ilb°r ~ + ~ ~.,, .~ y y g , ~ 7 ~ ~ y p ~ y ~ d ~y ~ y y y ~ y ,~ y r f ~~5 O'.t10 ~.'~11i X7.00 Lr.00 4,€;'J ~i.C€4 t~.00 0.~~0 O.~:C1°ia 217 0.C€Q U.C~€_ 0.4C 4.Ci, 0. C1 r:~.00 C1.4G ~`i.GO f].~uCr°1a ~~ S ~ ;~1ta,... ~1~~ ~S r"1,~ f3~ ~) f~, ~. ~~ ~1 C1~ ~i f~tr i'1 ~ti: 219 C.04 f~.C10 O.C10 °0.110 4.01 0,00 ~i.Ors Cr.U{3 0.00°la ~~~ kr.~3~ X1.0#~ ~J~~C~ irQ ~:? x€:00 ~_~~3 4~~1 '1~:f3.~1°~O 22i 0.L10 ~.QO O.OG Cr.0~0 4.CC~ 0.Cr0 O.OG C,.C'Ci C7.QQ°~a 2~2 t~.3'3~ ~:~~ ~7.~~ ~.4Q ~ t~:ta~? 6~~D 0<t~L~ 0:~fl°,~ 223 G.C14 ;1.00 0.4G O.GO O.t;~i C.CrO 01.00 C1.0'0 Q.tiC)°ro ~3.!~t3 :i~~ l:)c~~~.~ 225 0.04 (.,°~~C 0.00 Cr.C•t1 4.GC~ 0.Cr0 O.C'C ,,,r.~ 0.~1~4; 227 G.00 C.4C C~.4C ~,_€,~ C'.fiC) G.Ci4 11.00 C~.i,Ct L1.~Cr°~.~ ?28 l~C€? 4.43 ~1.Q0:. O:U~~1 0: '1'~.~t? ~i:~3~' ~1_~~ ~.~3t~°~ 22~ 0.70 C.C€~~ 0.40 Cr.OC) 4.t~~~€ C.C~O O.OG ~.Gt1 Q.uA°~ ~~ti e:i~c~ i~.o)~ ~~~~ ~.~n ~: Q:~~ ~:~i~ ~~;s~ ~:a 231 0.04 G.=0(~ 0.40 tr.Cu O.O~tr 0.Cr0 €1.00 i3.€ CI d.Ob% :232 .2;8`? ~:~4 ~i<Ot7 C)_~0 (3t~€ t?:?4 0:44 Ci.33 ".74°lb 233 '=.L~ ~.Cir O.OC '1.~~ ~'1.G'".~ ~i.ilfl t1.0€; ~,r,f;~ 0.~011ra 235 '.~? 0.: G O.OC Ci.C°ti1 O.JC1 0.6~ .l ~ Ci.S6 4.~~7°~a 236 ?.~"" ~l:~ia ~:Q~ ''O:~L1 ~~~~ i}.~~ ~:~3 ~;~;C~ ?_'~ °E Ala 237 C.8 a 4`.iil; ;1.0€; °~1.G0 0.0tr C>,€~ 0.41: i1.G~1 f7.0~1~ ~~~ U:6t3 ~:~.1~ ~JO)~ ~J:G'U 4~:~:1'b7 [1.~~1 tLOI+ 5~.~~1 t.~.~(~"~6 239 0.04 ~.4C ~i.OG Ci_L'0 O.E~ G.€74 0.40 C€.CO 0.~,~0`'ro 2413 0:04 ~cCl~ 4:OG ~):i~°0 C3_i 4.00 t7.~1C 0:00 Ci:£i7~~a 24 1 C . ~ 74 U . O r ~ O.OC Ci.€>: G C1.C~.1 O. C € 4 €;~ CZ. O t,.G C ~ O . Q O°r 3 a ~ ry 243 yy ~~ l ~ if.V~ ~~ y5 y~ y5 S5 ,,f NiVU' ~.~~ ~~ qq ~:)~i7 ~, ~~ yy pp ~~ ~: VI1 yy ~, ~ i3.V~ nn {{ yy ~/:1~V ~1 77 ~~ pp yy^ Lf .43Q~lO 344 G.00 U.CrO O.OL' C,.1.7Li O.C=~, C.10 t~.4C :1_C0 ©.~~°,~a 245 f3:04 ~:C14 C3.b0' U:l?0. Q:l7J L:~}4 ~1:OC3 i?:{D{1 ~:~Do~ 246 0°.00 U.C1C O.OC C€.0'Cr O.G'~r Q.C,C' 11.00- Ci 0'±1 0.0~{la 24~' 6;~s ~€:~3 x€:00 C1;C0 O:Cr~ [~.;~ ~1:~ ~.7~3 3:~1~~~ 2d8 C.00 (~.z€C yi.4i7 Ci.CO 0.0'i €x.00 [1.00 C€.0t1 C).°3Q°la 2~9 4:#lt) ~~i0 fl:~0 Q:f~4 4.4~ Q.>L10 '~:~~ ~~~- C1:t~°.~ 2511 0.00 (1.C~G D..Ot 01.00 O.C~~ 0.x'10 t1.Q0 C~.GC) L1.00°r'a 251 4.2~ ~:~?0 O:t3t~ 0.40 4{~1 >~:0~7 O:~iO ~i.~k0 Q:~PQ°k 252 G.04 U.CrC 0.00 J.CO 4.0~~€ C.QO 0.40 C€.C:C1 ©.40°t3 ,253 9:~~ ~'».=~3 ~:()G I::~}~7 {3: "x.11 5.~"~ x:34 ;~,2:~fla.~ 254 ?.<1 °x.31 0.40 Cr.O'0 0.0:1 C.C10 ~.?1 ?.9S ~i.17°r'a 255 )ffl4 ~:QC ~1_flf~ C)_ 1~ '€7.~4 fl:QG 0_~Q t3€~0°~ Draft -May 2008 ~'~ ~'~ Page 30 of 34 t 23~ J..I~~ ~.~ry +~.~G ll.~+`~ ~.~'tl 1.~~ =~.~-Ci _.~is I f.~'t~f~ 7ifl ~' (#n (I ~li ~ ~(; til It(I t",~ ~:~ I~ t'1(' it ~(i {3 Et(I (I ~1(1~'~, 2~C1 C.(ICt i1.41Ci O.Oi~ sI.G~I 0.~€;t G.~{~ ii.OG il.~:t~ Ci.vCi°lo 84~ _. G ~~ O:Oi7 ~.~~ ~ ~~ C~ ~~ ~.C€~ ~~?~~ ~J C~ 4 :~Q4~ t~ .. ~_' ~ ri: I I, e Il.ull~, mxaeci•~+ --- I '} _} ~~I~~i~~~. ;€11'~~'.I € '.. Draft -May 2008 Page 3l oF34 Table C-l6 x AZ dotal _~ere> ~4`acant Acre: Iafill ~-ac:ant Acres Tierle~•elop- xnez~t Acres Gros B~Eilciable Aches xutn.t~~iis• C:onstrai~eed Ac~•es 1?ubiie 1..auds het $niida~ale Acres `1~Ci ~'~~~ ~'r~~ 2~'b' ?.1'S- ~#:~~ ~1G~0 1`I~ .x.:49 'E5r ,?.fi » ~, i. l ~ . ~ S ? ~~;F O.i ' ~#., C~.C~ C 1 x.53 I ~.~ . B ~ e ^ ( ' ~ y ~ry+ y ~ y ~+ ~ * ( y ~ y y ~ ~ '~ 6~ ll:?-~i~ 5.~~ 1. 5 6 ~ .c1 ~ ; ~ ~ ~` ; ~ . G y ~ . ? ~ IO.: ~.i ]~ ~ . LI~'.' wl .f:~'.~ l'.C. ~~ gg ~a'~}~ { v { 3 C3:~~.'Y.. _~:-~:L f ~ } p ~ ~ lA _Lq~' qq y~ yy /~ + y ..1:7'ti: ~~_-;~.~' 275 93.5 26 _. -.+ ,.. ^.t#~ S.G ~ C3.G~ = CfZ 12.05 277 i~.35 ~, ;~ __. to 5~ ~,.u~ ~~ r, ~_c~ ~.,~ ~. ~a.~s 279 ~?~.~5 ~~.~; ?.1S 1.1z ?f.6S ~~.C~O 6.6" ?O.J1 .227-. 1'~S~I > . af: e4 4:r 3 0:34 ~I:S*0 4.3? X1:87 ~~:51 227 29 ~'' G.G~C i.~6 i:._ 1 ?.-iS ~.~~ L.52 1.56 2,22. I~1<S~. 1.90 ~~43 .~~ i3 ~'? 7L~1€ 4:49 I7_~8 223 i~i.?u C3.2i tii_C0 6.~tr~ U_2~ ~3.C~ C.C~b C~.15 224 2.9<~~. .. ~.71~ 7~G~0 ~~.I~ 7.:1~ 7~0~ 7:74 7.Iy . 2 2 5 i ~.t ~V Q .1 ~ ;i.U ~ i;~:}5 , 4~-6~ L ~. G ~ l C .l 6 ?a i~.~ ry + y ~! + 2.25.. 77 gg S~,i~6 ,~ y ( R, 11.~U y q ~_~ii' ~..~~ 7 E.~~ / y ~ y, ry i/_~Tl.i f j, j q tJ.~!~? 7 7 E.1~ 227 14.3 ~.....~ ~j.~~ ~.~.~~; ~.~ry ~~Ea~ G.1~ i~.~~ 223 ~3:~p ~.~.4 ti1_~i*~k:. ~:~.~ fj'?.~ ~1~~~ L~:~1 7_~:~1 229 Sa.22 C~.G~ 1~6G 1.~? ~.6{ '~.GO C.91 ~ -, 23C~ ,r~:5.1 .1~:_7~ ~'.~~ 3.ui -,- ~:~ ~;~7 a4:~~ 14.:5 237 ?y ,~ `~ S_;S 1.3 1.5-1 ~~.G~~ 2.96 5.55 232 ~=~:~~ x:.31 ~.~ 7:~i4 1 ~~ t?.:U31 ~:~39 I:46 233 20.4 5.15 1.9~ C.9S~ z_1Ci `~.~Ci ~.;~" ~.3< 235 '.S'1 C~.6S l.f;~t G.~}^ 1.1-I Ci.~O C.~9 0.56 237 i.9~ ~~.CaC C~..G°°~~ G.11 ~?.1 U.GtI G.~? ~:~.C~S ~3~. ~:'?.~ 7:37 7.7~ G:1 < 7_l a 7:71 7~7~# ~a.13 239 10.? ~1.'G ~r.~'~ ~.~,-i~ :~.6> li.CfL~ U.15 ~.~6 247- 19.:49 ~.~~: 7~(~1 ~':7~ ?:+~ 0~7L7 7.~7 1-~{1 247 01.34 [~.€~C O.C--~ e.~0 C-_C~ ~_CQ ~.J£7 C~.rr0 2.43... ~~.>~-~ fl.35 1~7? ~,,~:, ....._. . ~_[ 47~ 0'.x.1 1:~3 244 ?.~_' C~.G1 ~~.53 C.29 Ci.53 L~.~CI G.21 :1.6~ 24~ 9.44 7,~r ~~~~ 7:4~ 7.3 7:70 7:I~ 7.5 24ia 1:.06 x.01 C~_C~i C.31 'J.?? C1.C~1 €~.~~ Ci.16 247 1:x:1 r ~.:~~ 7..70- fl:~il 1.:43 E~:~'ll 7.36 It1T 248 3i.~3 U.LIU if .~i ~' ~.i~l,• L~.l~U t~-V ~' V.~FV tip. is l~ ..249 ~5.~~ ..7..~u~ ~'.~~ ~.~~ ~.3? 4:7U 1..33' 3.99 250 65.56 i.19 1_~ 2.;~~3 S.G~ 4_~0 x.01 I2.~~ 25# 92':2 . 3~s,5:4 fl_ _ x:81 .... - . _ .33:.34... S_93 6.15: _27~~~. 252 .~~ ~- S.^6 C~_~0 :?.?~# .~0 ~.C~3 :~.I3 :~.;S 2s~3 _ .. ~5.i:r 4,41 1.65 ~:~5~ 17.'S 7.37. r.:~'~. x:71 Draft -May 2008 ~'.~ ~ Page 32 of 34 2?5~ ~+.C£ti I ~.'~ ~ 1.3 r:.2~ ~~_1 ~ ~ G Q 5 ~~4 1 ` 1 ~~+^la: 1~~ .. : :..-1,ti31. ~a53~ . lf.:~L'~ .... .. 5.1.+:~'U' ~A:IYLi ~. .i~ 35..~0 ~} ((}} 11 ~~ JL _. Draft -May 2008 Page 33 of 34 ATTACHMENT "B" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATING THE BUILDABLE LAND INVENTORY SECTION OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT WHEREAS, an July 1, 2008 the City of Central Point Planning Commission, in accordance with Section 17.05.500 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code, initiated a Type IV Legislative change to the City's Comprehensive Plan to update the City's Buildable Land Inventory; and WHEREAS, the amendment has been prepared in compliance with ORS 197.296(2) and consistent with definitions and safe harbors provided by Oregon Administrative Regulations as relates to the calculation of buildable land; and WHEREAS, the amendment does not amend any policies of the Central Paint Comprehensive Plan, but only serves to provide a factual accounting of the City's buildable land inventory; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2008, the Central Paint Planning Commission conducted aduly- noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the Buildable Land Inventory; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by the Resolution No. does hereby accept, and forward to the City Council, the Buildable Land Inventory as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" far f nal consideration and adoption . PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 2008 Planning Comrnissian Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2008. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (0810512008} GONIPR~H~NS~Y~ PLAN TEXT AN~~~DIVIENT ~--~ `TRANSPORTA'T'ION SYST~IVI PLAN ~'It~r~ni~,~ ~ ~~~~,,,r=t.t~~7e~~ { .., a ~. >~~; ~~ti ~` ~`.~ Cc~nuuiir?iiyl~< ~c~l~;~;iu~~rjt UuecC~r/ ,t \s<:i~t:,~~t t i1y ~'<{;t?inis?i:~icas ~LI~,List Jay ~~~ A~a~',~' l~:''i 1(J~ ~" x'10 ~ IBC 1~I0. Ogl6Qr{Q3) Cansideratia~z afa Resalutian I~ecIaring the Planning Cammission's lnte~atio~~ of ~~nae7~dit~~ the City of Ge~~tl~al Paint Cax7ip7•cher~sive Plan to f.Tpdate the Transpartatit~n fit-stem. flan, ~.p~plie:~~~~ta City of Central Paint Uan Burt, Plannin<~ h'Iarla~wer 1~A+C1~.~~iC~UNU The City afCentral Poi77t rec~~.~ 7i;res thy; inll~artance in having arlcl tx~aintainins~ a ct~ardinate~I nct~,c~rk aftranspartatian facilities fi1;ut ~e,~ves ci~rr•ent and fi~turc state. regional ~~nd local t~~a~~sportati<~n needs. In response to this objecti~~e. the; City has prepared ibis Trat~spart~ation ~;vsten~ Plan {:'I~SPj to assure that not only ~tr~ the transl~ar[atiazi needs c~f'its citizens zl~et ili ~ tit~~.elti and el'Cicient ~j~ann~r~, but that in dain~ sa, the t~~nsparttiti~~n system will contin~ie to be ifa~praved in a I1lanner that supports projected ~rawth and enhances the quality of life c~i~thase living ar~d visitii7 the City all Central faint. This TAP has been prepared ti~~itJ~~in tJ~e context afan urban area cansistitl~ af2~8~Q acres, the state's Transpartatian P14~nnit~g Pule (Tl'P.), the Regional Transha~-ration Plan (I~l'P), and other local transportatiolzplons. The -~'~`~" will serve as the Transportation l let~~ent ai~the City~s Camprehcr7sive Plan n~ectin~.~: the requirements of statewide Planning ~ic~al I2 - Transportation. The fallowing represents the principles that have guided the preparation and future implementation of this TSP: Ta strike a balance between accessibility and connectivity afpeople and goods, while beeping the system safe, attractive and well~aintained. 2. Ta advoc{tte_ la~~d use patterns, such as transit-oriented development and izl-CIl strategies, that support the canti n ued enhancement of multi-modal transportation. 3. Ta increase street s~~stc:m safety and functr'an through the adapiian and implementation of access ~natia~enient standards far the purpose u,(-~7~ait~tairain~, and preserving the existing investment in transi?artation facilities. Page I of 2 ~. Ta design streets in a manner that maximizes the utility of public right-of--way; is appropriate to their functional role; and provides for multiple travel modes, while minimizing their impact on the character and livability of surrounding neighborhoods, business districts and the environment. ISSUES There are no issues in initiating consideration of the amendment. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NA EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS Attachment "A" -~ Resolution of Intent ACTION Consideration of a Resolution Declaring the Planning Commission's lntention of Amending the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan to Update the Transportation System Plan. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution Declaring the Planning Commission's lntention of Amending the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan to Update the Transportation System Plan. Page2of2 ATTACHMENT "A" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S INTENTION TO AMEND THE CENTRAL POINT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN SECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN WHEREAS, in accordance with the Central Paint Municipal Code, Section 17.96.020(A} an amendment to the Central Paint Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by adoption of a resolution of intention by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further acknowledges it is the City's objective to sequentially update all elements of the Comprehensive Plan over the course of the next twa years and that in doing so hereby waives the provisions of Central Point Municipal Code, Section 17.96.030 limiting review of comprehensive plan amendments to January of even numbered years; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point deems that the public necessity and convenience and general welfare of the public require such an amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, that it is the intention of Planning Commission to amend the Transportation System Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this S`~' day of August, 2008. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2008. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (0$10512408) ~on~ AM~K~M~KT M--E M~ ~ ZoHIHC DISTF~IGT ~4CBLNl~~~.I~'~~;1'VI; FileNoo Q€tl(-3 (~ ~';„ .~ ~ f. r t~ f ~ (, July ~~, {~~}~ i~~;+iliilli ~ 'c i:.1 ill"1C'Ilt. tc,i i ~ lh .n~~!ol +l ii .t urt:~orJ CoT~sideratiou o~I~c,soluton to initiate a~z atncnclzl~ent to Seciioxl. 17.48.{J4tJ try alloy Mezaibersl~ip Warelzousc~ Ret4zil as a conditiorz>ezl use within tlae M-1 Industrial l~ists~ic:t. AIpi~EieQ~zitt City of Cc:r~g~°~~l Point,. STAFk ~st)IJI~~'l~~o Don 13u~} AIt:;P, EDFP Pl ing Manager BAC:~ C~T~OL7ND4 A request was received to consider allati~~in~ membership warehouse retail clubs as a conditional zis;; ~~ithin tl~e M-1 zoning district. Membership warehouse clubs are large format star~.d alone retail stores such as Costco, dam's Club, etc. Only members are allowed to shop the stores. At thei~° .Tune and July meeting the Citizen's Advisory Committee considered a re~~z~est to permit rsiembership warehouse clubs in the M-I zoni~~p, district, a~~d forwarded a favar4zble recommendation subject to limiting membership warehouse clubs z~s a eo~ulitional use only. The CAC's recommendation. was based on the following: 1. Curr~:n,tly, the City does not have sufficiently zoned commc~•c:ial lands to accommodate such a use; 2. Meinbez~ship warehouse clubs are freestanding warehouse facilities used for retail sales and are architc~;turally cc~lzzpatible with. ~>~~arehouse. uses within the ~~z-I district; 3. The primar~~ impact cif ~i n~ei~lbcrship ti~-archousc~ club ~a~o~dd be traffic. Typically, a membership warehouse club will ~ener•ate terl ti~l~es the. trahf'ic of a light it7dustrial park. For this reason the CAC recommezzded allowitzg 1zlen~hership ~~~arehause; clubs as a c~azzditioaal use only. The conditional use permit process would allow for cvaluatioza and mitigation oftraffic impacts, and. 4. Future conversion o an abandoned mejl~b4rship warehouse club to a warehouselindustrial facility. would be easily acco~7~plished. T'I1~1~)i1'V(;~: Pendizlg initiation of code amendment., Section 17.1fJ.~00 regulates the processing ofte.~t amendments to the city code. The proposed charzgc would be processed as a Type I"~l, Legislative Action (section 17.OS.St?t?}. Findings will be prepared pending initiation ofthe proposed code amendment by the Flaxming Commission. I~~11;~~ Compatibility with the purpose and intent othe M-l District. The purpose of the M-1 District reads as follows: Page I of 3 "The purpose of the M-1 District is to provide areas suitable for the location of light industrial uses involved in service, manufacturing or assembly activities and having high standards of operation of such character as to permit their location and operation in close proximity to non-industrial areas of the community." Allowed uses within the M-1 district include: - Wholesaling; - Boat sales; - Automobile and truck sales; - Retail lumber and building materials; and - Commercial uses {conditional use permit required) that are compatible with and closely related to a permitted use ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" -Map of M-1 zoned lands Attachment "B" _ Resolution of Intention ACTION: Consideration of Resolution to initiate an amendment to Section 17.48.040 to allow Membership Warehouse Retail as a conditional use within the M-1 Industrial District. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. ,, initiating an amendment to Section 17.4$.040 to allow Membership Warehouse Retail as a conditional use within the M-1 Industrial District Page2of3 a~ sr ~_ i. ,. a.~.~ ~ ~ ~~ i '~ ~',-~S~ 7 I i ~' 4 - ~, i li ~ I ` C. ~ ~,'' A~ ~~' ^~ t ,F I I C I r~~ t i ~~ 1 EE,.w., i i - ~ i < ~ ~~'~ ~ i ~ I ~ ~ 1 i !.~ ~ Y'~ 1 / v 'T 'l~W ... 1` /C• ~ _ 1. ~ T. r~! w Fx~ ~ .~~ ~ ! ; ~~ ,~' ~ I ~ ~ c y `o' tm`I.- ~°' , . ~~ rr ~ n Ir i i I x ~ I. ~' f ~ NYI ~ 1 b i ~~~ ~.;d 1.~1 7 f~ ,V u -'~~ ~ r3 F ~~~.~, 1 ~ ~ I. 1 ~ ~~ ~ }/']El ~ i t i '~ '3 r~ 1 1 ~~~ 1 L Tilt {~ 7 ~~ ~~ I I.~J M {#j~ y~ ~ ~'~ ti~ r, l q ~ ~ ~ t ~~ F ~ ,. 1 ~ ~'~ ~~-j .3+ H ~.: t fns a ~ ~L ` mat ' ~ , `~E' at~~~~`;,d~, ~ jar Y ~ .~ 'F 1 ~( { E ; f i ~ ~~ryry . 3~1ji-.. ~~?~~d~: t~;'wCi"i ~~r ~. ~~`I~.I ~__~a_ ~_~.v~`,a~~~~~nJ ` M.. i i . '~: I t 47w ~ ~ 1 ~, I ~ r I ~. i'~ 71 ~ ) H fry ~ ~ "1 1 ti, ~ , I ~ t~ ~ ~~ . _.~.'.R.I,;..ly,aJ ,K~~i:' xislad~`ri~.6° . ~v. 4,e •--1.._- rai~aai .tiw..~s „y~ t~41 ~ In~a9v~d ti,~.. .~-1 inventory A~~p *r~ `1... _, ~ l; ~ I~ d 1 + ` i r ~~ '`~ ~~ ;, dsrFd ~~:. I ~ ~~ ~~~ 1 ~- ~ x ~ ~ - t 1_,.,. ~, '~ ~ t ~~ ~~ ' 3 1 ~I I ,(. ~ ) ~ 9 ~ '. ~ ~~ S5 ~ ~II~~1 ~~rµ 1..~. ` ._ dm~ r rage 3 of 3 ATTACH1V1Ef~T " ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S INTENT TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 17.48 - M-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, ALLOWING MEMBERSHIP WAREHOUSE CLUBS AS A CONDITIONAL USE WHEREAS, in accordance with the Central Point Municipal Code, Section 17.10 the City has established procedures for amendments to the City of Central Point Municipal Code and that amendments may be initiated by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Paint deems that the public necessity and convenience and general welfare of the public may bene#"it from such an amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, that it is the intention of Planning Commission to initiate an amendment to Section 17.4$ allowing Membership Warehouse Clubs as a conditional use within the M-1 Industrial district. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th day of August, 2008. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2008. Planning Commission Chair 99 Planning Commission Resolution No. {081451240$)