Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet - January 15, 2008
~~t'1'ptAt. PC~A#1` CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 1S, 2408 - 7:00 p.m. Next Punning Commission Resolution No, 738 L MEETING CALLED T4 ORDER II. ROLL CALL Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Chuck Piland, Pat Beck., Mike Oliver, and Tustin Hurley III. COIl:RESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of November 6, 244'7 Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS Pgs. 1 - 12 A. File Na 06060. A public meeting to consider a request for extension of Gray Court, P1.~D, a Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Jon S. Gray; Agent: L. Calvin Martin Pgs. 13 - 44 B. File No. 08149. A public hearing to consider a major modification application to add. the Microvellum Office Parr site development plan to the approved. Snowy Butte Station Transit Oriented Development Master Plan {File No. 43436} in accordance with CPMC Section 17.49.344. The project site involves 6,41 acres located on South Haskell Street and identif ed on the Tackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 14AD, Tax Lots 744 and 774, APN I [?81328 and 14989418. The subject property is located within the TOD-GC, Transit Oriented Development-General Commercial zoning district. Applicants: Old Railroad Properties, LLC and MicroveIlum Asset Management, Inc; Agent. Montero & Associates, LLC. Pgs. 41 - 43 C. File Nos. 07119. A public meeting to consider a request for extension of White Hawk. Estates, a Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Duncan Development, Inc. ViL ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS VIII. MISCELLANEQUS IX. ADJQUI7:NMENT City of Central Paint Planning Corr-mission Minutes November 6, 2007 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian ldiart, Mike Oliver, Pat Beck, Chuck Piland, and Justin i-Turley were present. Also in attendance were: Tam Humphrey, Community Development Director; Dan Burt, Planning Manager; Connie Chine, Community Planner; Dave Jacob, Carnmunity Planner; Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. IiI. COR;RESPUNDENCE There was no correspondence except that Connie Chine, Community Planner, distributed color copies of the site plan and exterior building designs £or the Southern Oregon bead Start applications. IV. MINUTES Justin Hurley made a motion to approve the minutes of the September 4, 200'7 Planning Coznxnission meeting. Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes, ldiart, yes; {diver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; IJurley, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VL BUSINESS A. File No. 08142. A public hearing to consider a request for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of constructing a Southern Oregon head Start facilify consisting of two (2} classrooms on the Central Point Elementary School campus. The subject property is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1188, Tax Lot 6700. The proposed project area is located at 450 South Fourth Street. Planning Commission Minutes tVovetnber 6, 2fl(t~ Page 2 Applicant: Southern Oregon Head Start; Agent: Kenneth Ogden, AIA, Architect There were no conflicts or ex pane communications to disclose. Community Planner Connie Clone presented the staff report for dais conditional use permit application for a two {2) classroom (38 student) pre-school operation. Ms. Clone noted that the use has been classified as an educational use, not a day care center, and that the staff report addressed the use definition. It was also noted that the building has been situated in such a manner so as to preserve the Third Street view corridor and Hated that an additional condition has been imposed on the applicant to ensure an unimpeded line of sight to the administration building. It was further recommended that the future playground and associated equipment be fenced with a product similar in appearance to wrought iron to preserve the unimpeded line of sight. Mike Oliver asked if parking on the premises was adequate, regardless of whether the code considered the facility a school or a day care center. Ms. Clone replied that regardless of the use proposed, the use has adequate parking. The public portion of the hearing was opened and Ken Ogden, Architect, agent far the applicant, came forward and stated that Connie Clone had prepared a very comprehensive and accurate staff report far the proposed new school facility. Commissioners asked questions of Mr. Ogden relating to fencing materials and color schemes. Mr. Ogden said the fencing selected will be more economical than wrought iron but would be appropriate for the school site and complement the existing materials an site. After discussion, it was agreed that the condition for the playground, including fencing, would be modified to stay out of the sight clearance zone and would be subject to staff review. Judy Brown, Operations Manager far Southern Oregon Head Start, came forward and advised Commissioners that the capacity of the school would be approximately 38 students. A percentage of the students would be riding the bus to school; however, most of the children attending Central Paint Elementary walk to school. Hours of operation for the Southern Oregon Head Start facility would be staggered to avoid congestion and traffic issues. Ms. Brown added that the existing facility on the grounds of Crater Nigh School will be eliminated once the new structure is built. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Chuck Piland made a motion to adopt Resolution 735 granting a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a Southern Oregon Head Start facility on the Central Point Elementary School campus located within the R-1-5, Residential Single Family zoning district at 4S4 South Fourth Street (Jackson County Tax Assessor's map 37S 2W 11BB, Tax Lot 6'700, APN 10146129), Planning Cananrissian Minutes Navembet~ 6, 2f1(I7 Page 3 based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the Revised Staff Repor#. Justin Hurley seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; {diver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Hurley, Yes. Motion passed. 8. File No. 08143. A public hearing to consider a Site Plan application fair the construction of a Southern Oregon Head Start facility consisting of #vvo {2) classrooms on the Central Point Elementary School campus. The subjec# property is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1188, Tax Lot 6740. The proposed project area is located at 450 Sou#h Fourth Street. Applicant: Southern Oregon Head Start; Agent; Kenneth Ogden, AIA, Architect There were no conflicts or ex paxte communications to disclose. Connie Clune, Community Planner, presented the staff report for this site plan application, indicating that the applicant was proposing to construct a single story, 3,70{I square foot facility with two {2} classrooms. Ms. Chine described the proposed building materials and roof ng, advising that they would blend with the existing buildings located on the Central Point Elementary campus. IYIs. Chine described ingress and egress access points that are currently available to the facility and stated the applicant was not asking for consideration of any additional access points. The only issue for consideration by Commissioners is the applicant's proposal to utilize concrete block around the garbage enclosure. Ms. Chine suggested that perhaps red brick would be a better choice of building material to conform to the design of the administration building located on campus. The public portion of the hearing was opened, and once again, I~en Ogden, Architect, carne forward. Mr. Ogden said that if they were required to use red brick, they would like to use the same paneling system that has been used by Central Point Elementary. He added that they originally intended to use textured block with a solid steel gate which will be painted to match the block. Mr. Ogden described landscaping plans and a pedestrian path. The proposed playground is being constructed out of separate funds. Judy Brown came forward to share that the playground would need to be completed by the time classes start, probably in the spring of next year. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Damian 1Cdiart made a motion to adopt Resoletion 737 granting site plan approval for the cons#ruc#ion of a 3,740 square foot, single s#ory Southern Oregon Head Star# facility on the Central Point Elementary School campus located in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district a# 450 South Planning Commission Mim{tes NovemF~er b, 2tJfl7 Page 9 Fourth Street {Jackson County Assessor's map 3fi5 2W 11 BB, Tax Lot 6fi00, APN 10146129}, based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report and further requiring applicant to use building materials consistent with Central Paint Elementary School for the proposed garbage enclosure. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Hurley, yes. Motion passed. C. File No, 08145. A public meeting to consider a Site Flan application for the purpose of expanding the existing facilities for Conger-Morris Funeral Directors' Central Point Chapel. The expansion will consist of additional indoor storage, garage and crematorium. The subject property is located in the TQD-GC, General Commercial zoning district afi 800 S. Front Street, south of Cupp Drive, north of Beall Lane and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 11CB, Tax Lot 100. Applicant/Agent: S & B Western, LLC There were no conflicts or ex pane communications to disclose. Planning Technician Lisa Morgan presented the staff report, stating that applicants have chosen to have the expansion of their facility processed under the TOIL-GC, General Commercial provisions of code as a mortuary is considered a permitted use under this section of code. The site plan application proposes a single story expansion of the existing facility for purposes of adding a crematorium and accessory facilities, Applicant meets and exceeds the parking and landscaping requirements of the zoning district in which it is located. A discrepancy exists between where applicants' property begins and where the right-of way ends and therefore, applicant will be required to provide a revised site plan drawn by a licensed surveyor reflecting the actual property boundaries and measurements prior to issuance of a building permit. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Applicant Bob Neff came forward and responded to questions raised with regard to the installation of a crematorium on the site. Mr. Neff assured Commissioners that there would be no visible emissions, noise or odor generated. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Justin Hurley made a motion to approve the Site Plan application for the expansion of existing facilities for Conger-Morris Funeral Directors' Central Point Chapel to include additional indoor storage, garage and crematorium located in the TQD-GC, General Commercial zoning district at S00 S. Front Street {Jackson County Tax Assessor's map ~? 2W 11C8, Tax Lot 100} based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in Planning Conzrrzission Minzrtes November S, 2fJU7 Page S the staff report. Candy Fish seconded the motion. RULL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Oliver, ycs; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; I-Iuriey, yes. Motion passed. VII. MISCELLANE4CJS 1Ve~v Community .Flanncr Community Development Director Tam Humphrey introduced new Community Planner Dave Jacob to Commissioners. Mr. Iumphrey advised that Mr. Jacob will be working an long range and current planning, has family in the Rogue Valley and has previously worked far the Rogue Valley Council of Governments. Mr. Jacob is currently working an the Transportation System Plan and will commence work an specifzc items from the City's Strategic Plan in the near future. Regional Prvblem Salving Tarn Humphrey, Community Development Director, informed Cammissioners that the Regional Problem Salving process is continuing in spite of same of the feedback and comments received at public meetings. Initially there was same resistance from 1000 Friends of C}regan based upon differences of interpretation of applicable statutes. Mr. Humphrey shared that he napes the process will came to a conclusion reasonable soon.. In other action, Mr. Humphrey reported that developer proposals have fallen off, and there has been limited commercial activity. Staff will be wanking an establishing an eastside TC}D and preserving Mon Desir as part of a mixed use development. We are taking advance of the lull to get caught up an long range planning. VIII, AllJ4Ul~:NMENT Mike {diver made a motion to adjourn the meeting, Chuck Piland seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the November 6, 200'7 Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting an January 1 S, 2008. Planning Commission Chair ~,~'T`~~~~0~ t~tF' SPAY ~C1UF~2T, PUI~ ~~,. Iti.11111~i( 0..i~ 3~:. !.1 f ~ ~8w ®~ w I. li ~ . ~ ~ sl ~~~ ~' I(;;I I ~iilllI f,~..~, ,..:l 1, r_ .: 11 i....__. _..__. I ... ' ~.,13..`~__.,_ ,'l': ~ fr.;;'; .a"C~`,. ~3~~~~+'~~r - `~E.> ~~;`: %'Slai~k i C=tl Pi' C' ~ns~~~ i ~,< ~: t,.'~(k~I I ~~ ._. _ ._ _ _ C(~~?Sl;1CI"~ltiOIl (11~a l~illal I>~~'cltli~mcrit 1'li;n il~~h'siciliit111 i~,i~ Cirilti~ t'1?url I't ~l)- l~llt~ sl,i~3jr~t't hr1>izt~rlti is ~(71~11'[t.;Cl 111. <?17 ~y ~, [~i;'.;lil(:i111<1) 1A~ILlIII~)1( 1'ilrllll~' rAllllTl~' ili`.~ti'IL ~'[lil 3`; Iili'3ltlilt'Cl i)f"1 111 C. i1('i.`;t)11 ~~i)llllt`, ~. « ,~~,~sc>r ~ n3~t1~ ~1~ 3 i`~ ~\~;' I I i\, 1 t..~ l:t1t~, l lt)i.1 :.111:.1 1 ti()(), '; 11c ;?i~~~;ic~t) <tliti!~~ i~ ~7 c~ 7a y ' A°~l)I')zallll ~\(l~;t.l. :~1~~~~~ ".EIS: .i()]l `'t. ~Yl"~i\ rt °. •, ___ ~.+« ~~~i~ti'lil 1~jiillSll __. _ __. T,t~,i1 `tilol'1<11:1. I'1ii11ili,l~ `I'~~_~lllli(:i;tli 1~~C'~~~~~~~~[i~;~~o w_ _ ~. ~~ Illy SUC?~t'~i j')1'O)C~C~ hllt)b4f1 it . = ii~ii~ ~~t)1.l1't i~~,~ +~,?4 Ct~l7cilt{t>ilally" .11 )1)i't31 C'(l ~?~' 1'it'S0l1tI!O11 ~t). fst1.~, txrE ~1a~ ~ '.1)i.i('i. l lli tl}?1?r't>Vill ~~'<1> 1t11" C(?!ltill"l1C;t1(?I1 cTi~;'~~~!t1<1('111'i1 `,lll`lil' ltatlail~` (l~~"<'lli,Tf?ti t'illlli~l'l`('C~ {' t~V~:l1~ t l) buil~lin);s. a11c1 n11(; t„~i~iiil„ 11(1;110 1~1i' a ii}iill r;;~'?:; 11 f1it.`>, ~11 ~EI1"il1~i,'V ~. ~l,'•tJ', t11~ l~litiTlllll`' ~ ()tilt;lititilt)11 `?t`ailti~t~ ~ ti1l ((~j~ 111(11?t}1 C~tl'1ST(~?37. irlilt~tli['1' ~i.\ ~~~ ITl(?:lt~t .. (:a~cnsll~ll ~~°~ls ~ralltect oll ~`~ll~~,ust I_ 't)t?~i 11~ ttli~ h,itlllnl4.'_ C'(11nlrl~~~;i11~1. 1`l1c 1~~11ia1 (1c~.cl(>hnlt~l~~ p~~ ti~:~as ~uh[ilit(CCl itl <l tilllcl~. lnalllT~r1~1 ic?r ilr tllc 11c~~~ ~Yi?irLltic3n clatc oi~,(i11Tli~u'ti~ ?. ?{)0~. T1a~ Pl~lnllill~ C1>111Inj~si~111`ti clrir~,ill~11 dill}ecltiil.l il:Tt~lu({t~(3 (ii:;~ll'litlil~l':~ c;(>t1(liti(11t`.~ iI~ i~111(~ws: ]. ~sl~l:l t~l~t:()11tili~C'I'illl~);1 lti 1111: 1)il(~ilTl'I"lt 1.11 I't'£11' (:lt'Vclt1;)ll G~ 1111"•1t7S So aS Tl(?t to omprl~~ll!tii~ lle prig ~ll:~~ ~1i ih~ ~1dl~lt:t.i1( t~~i~fi1T~;1TG~i~z111,t11~11i,c>3 ~t~?t~; 2. Tllll~r~o~>e the overfill ;_li~t~;~arance othe rear elev~lticln4 to brew u~ ti1~; lna~~illr; ~1('the >dl~'tl;jl~ws. Th~."+ a!~.t~il i. llti5 ~"~`~reSSeC~. <I.i1. (~ Ii"tet ti1P 1e eC}I1C~1t1+~1I1 1~l~IC,"T~ tt.) ca~SSl1.eS~? 1.1,.1 1131.x: ,`; tt?I ( 7'i,'r%ort. 'Till: ~ll~l~lic<lllt lla~ n(:»~~ st,hlr,ittctl tlTt; T'~I1al I~evelc3~~Tncnt ai~plicati<.111 l~(1r%11l~icl~laiic~nA along ~~itll ilTl~ 11(;~ ~ ~,izl~ti~ 7T11t)1'Iil~itjC)11 ~~i)I~ .(1t1t11 ~l~~j~l'(?Vial. The project l'S suh~ti{11ti~.tlly ct-rr~i~t~;11t itll tll~ i~r'eiirT?lTilry l~lall, ~(~jill i)1t~ ~>11i.T1~irl~~ c~~t`}~tt~rl5: 1. C}i/ ulljt lli7ti }~;e11 clrllill~ttl~(< i.;r; ~rl;cc1111n1cxi1lc tltili~i caill;CfctrUrls ti> tll~ elltirw c11~~ c1t11~11T~nt «hlcll is ilielliif ill a~ ~l ?i) Itrc>i f't 1': ~1?ollr7 t)1~ ncTrthe{~11 i71"c>t~~•rtti lit~c ~tlls ~?i~t?~j%'.Ct. 1 ills flct5 l~4'_St111CXi II1 it i~C'Cj~1Ctl(ll Ol tl](.' it+.!11111(.'7' OI 11I71tS 1LIlIC:Ii 711?l'+ CUI?Sl~to~~~ a~'i.~i~~F~~:'4- tilll~',ll' ~61I111.i' 1.111 *lij~t~i~, (1i?t ti{i?~',ll i;illlli~' t~tL`Ei~~'~~~:'€~ (fll"11~1111~ l1111~ ~1(~ C721e 44I:it111~ ~°li)~Tll; ~:t>1' <t lt?l~t~ !' ~~` Sill~~4 i<lillliw llti~;'('.llJllf? 111111`1, Gray C'tTUrt I';rta1 ~eveLo~rncllt Flan. Page 1 of 3 FINDINGS: Refer to Attachment "E" ISSUES: Building Elevations: The elevations submitted with the fizaal development plan do not rcl~lect the Planning Commission's condition for special consideration for the placement of the windows on the rear elevation. `~"c applicant's narrative (Attachment "B"), addresses this condition by stating that the windows facing adjacent properties have been removed. Removing all windows on the rear elevation would furthcr contribute to the look of solid massive buildings without additional features to break up a monolithic appearance. After meeting with staff, the agent submitted revised elevations relocating the windows on the 2"`~ floor to the sides of the units, reducing the size of the window on the 3"~ floor and repositioning them from the top plate (ceiling), rather than completely removing the windows. {Refer to Attachment ~4$s}} Architecture: During the original approval for this development, it was fuz`ther conditioned by the Planning Commission that the applicantlagent work with staff to make the units more aesthetic. Again, after meeting with. staff, the agent agreed. to redesign the rear elevation by adding architectural columns between the attached units, and paint the belt bands and individual units a different color to further break up the mass. The agent has submitted revised elevations incorporating the Planning Commissions concerns, and also added covered rear entriesldorrners. CC & R's: The applicant has submitted draft CC & R's that address the maintenance of individual properties as well as the continued maintenance of common areas. The tot lot i playground is identified as common area and is ensured the continued maintenance by the ldome tJwner's Association. Reduction in Dwelling Units: In order to accommodate utility connections to the development, it has been necessary to eliminate one unit. This will leave a single detached single family dwelling unit at the northern portion of the project. This detached home will have the largest lot with the PUE located within the side yard for this unit. l-lowever, this unit must be consistent with the architectural elevations of the attached single family units. (Refer to Conditions of Approval}. C4NDITI4NS ©F APPRfJVAL l . All building plans submitted shall comply with the architectural elevations as submitted in Attachment "B>a 2. The tot lot shall be bonded for with the Public Works Department to ensure its completion as identified in Attachment "C" prior to the signing of the final plat for recording, 3. A copy of the recorded CC ~& R's shall be submitted to the City prior to signing the final plat for recording. 4. The detached single family unit must be consistent with the architectural elevations submitted for the attached single family units. Gray Court Final Development Plan Page 2 of 3 ATTACI-IMENTSIEXH~ BlI TS: Attachment "A" -Final Dcvelopn~zcnt Plan Attachment "B°' - Revised l rlevatiazzs Attachment "C" - Tot Lot I:~esign Attachment "D" -Applicant's Narrative Attachment "E" -Findings Attachment "~''> - Proposed Resolution ACTIQN: _..__._.____ ~.._...V_._M__ ._.._._~_..._.,,__--------------.._ .............................- ----_._...~., --_._.._...~.._._----____._-_ Consider approval far a Final Development Plan application to create twenty-two {22} attached single family units, one {1}detached single family unit azad one existing home for a total of24 single family dwellings. RECtJMMENUATICIN: Conditionally approve the Final Development Plan application per Staff Repaz~t dated January 15, 2048 including all attachments and exhibits to create twenty-two {22} attached single family fats, one detached single family lot and an existing. single family residence known as Gray Court Subdivision, A Planned Unit Development. Gray Court Final Development Plan Page 3 of 3 ~ AGE GaAGt. ri A.°-UM r~it C.at:C'~,c.'... ~cS'? ~, >~4C~(i'~C1i-{/~ X ~.X~t.../~I•.lCYIPh•17~ .4F ~t7 ~i ~L~ ~ G~r~F-aGCn'~ fdt+'K.~h.7t~L.]~v .^. Rtia.~°NB.C'+~PG F~'Spf%:rat.T `4A'F'TUc°•a~.' ~a Gaa_ F tiysGxt`~'~"€1JCfJ..1P{'. L~C}S-E}E..°"`~ ~a Llh{. JP~i~r-i1CA ~10N`~r~iLi~a GGL.G~N F ~~ ~~ "~ V1L+:~~"~E-t Cl hh C?A`JiO13 `~'' CalPt... ~A~ti p'~ W. ~~ u ~ . ecn~~ont ~oxt~:ccic7 I E i _ r, ~~r .. -~3 5i ., ~ } ~. ~ ~ F z I ~~ I. ~-f_Cya ~~.. .. ~.. i~~-~ ~~~~ ~ ~ fyg°,.r{uciti P-~ Rug, ..', '. wE~t. CGGau' - - t . ".. • .° ai Fc'~.3Cw : 8 tJC, i ~~ P NxG GI;:`~*iG ,,, i ti 5 n. N~ •11 Wi't'; ~ . F tiL ~ `~- ~r --.--.'-~-5 ti:.. 1 :I r CuwnyhiP 37,£kxaRc2W, tierti'w iEA.'Taz tats fdQO Sad IStMI ii " ~ ~- -.--..- ~ Scc lur;n:rxaFs ?ark S>lan Shvx R; .~,; -. ~ -lee l'ypieaS 4.:a+u3:eaps Pi:u, - i.IS~1G 5 '~. o' R' »-.. Pl~ot'L`2; y' `~ ptTiars3cr caned Cesda~»- p -r-=-~-...,k...`'`~~ y , • k { .~ _-_'(----^-%,'"r-._. 38~ ~i2, -...,.~ aiZ,u ~Z ^.^^^-r- _....."""_`"~"...,"x" --. - rc`~- ~ , ~..P,.~~ f 0 c n ~~f fr ~fe!v~ \ 2"G"4t ~ ~ 3 E ~ € # I .. tcz'•o: `~ *f3'.o~ ~;5. ~,4.ti 1 ._- ` ~ ;~ f t ,3 ~. a t `~ C O t3 R. T ~'- ~°a.e.a;.T ee>a=e~ s.~raa; ~ - `sipd.st~r;.~.° .. ~ .ws r ._._ Pwa;"eeTy 4~w~. t:x;u.:_~r:ra ~yi~Nte,: "-----t.~,, .- ._ ,.~..-_. Tm ~ _ _... "f € i T._. ~ ~ _ } ~3 k i t i. k - ~ ,y~ :~! E S! !E ~ :3 I~ [ ~%~ € Sro E i 3 i8 ~ fo ~ 7.D Zl i 2~ f ~;l' ... .......... t 3 ~ '~~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ € ~ j ~S~YFical RCwk'Pkan ~_. ~ ; ~ F 3 ~ ~ t ~ t j ; { NGYI i C r r V o k ' 1{."j _. --~ }~' .....,.I-.~.~-2~ °~- __I- 32~ 32` '..-»,..,,:~'....--"~_?t7~.-..__..L ~2~ 32i ~. x_.. "J,t ...r.?f ~~ nw. FINAL DEVELOPMENT ~`~' PLAN .~ ,... z~. _,,,, ~-,~ ._... ~ a~ i }._. ' .- .--}f_._ _ __._.. ....._ .~._...__.. W { ~~ .. .. ..... .. ._...._._.. _._~... 1......,....~..... .__~.~....~.......~.. .........~ ~._ _.... ~........ .. .....r-.._.~..__... ..- ...__.._. 3_._. ...._~._~____ r ~2' ... ..-~ I .. .. ww_ ~.~.."..~x ~- .. ;~ , ~~ ~ ,. 1 ~, I~ .~ i _ ..._ . _-. _.e. 1 ,~,.. - _ ..... REAR E~.EVATI+~~i sra._ I'..a•• '~.'^I'7 FRt`~NT ELEVATIQN I14"~ i'-0" SiI~E ELEVATICIN irs^~ t•._p_ "L,tj~. pt3 _..,.. ~~~_.~ .._......~ , ~G U?-S i i~rruY7;.2 :_ `,. .. ~~'' fir, ~... j t i f ~ ~ 1 f# I ..~ f i~ C ...~; '~4"j ~.S s~.14, s!~ ~~,k~~ ~~?a'~'i$'~ s;~~i~~~t_W ~ ~ 4 ~~ ~ S 1 ~y_ j ~~~w~~7~± ~ ~ n. z m z -~ ~~~1~~~~~~ ss_~ts L c~1V111 ~c~/~i 111, I~eve~oper's Agent 3901. Bridgeport Drive, Medford., C}regon, 97504 {541} 557-4374 C)ffice, (541) 210-1063 Cell, {541.} 282-9535 Fax _. Design, Construction Management, Construction Cost Estimates, Contract tVegotiations Feasibility Studies, Quantity Surveys, Contract Management, Contract I3is,~ute .Resolutions City and Regional Planning, Land Development, Lobbying, Wastewater Technologies 10 l 061200' NAI~;.R.ATIVE To: City of Central Point Oregon Planning Department Re: Final Plat Submission fox Gray Court PUD Via Land Z~elivery This narrative is to give an overview of the above project located at north side of the intersection of Hopkins Road and Bursell Road and also known as Township 37, Range 2W, Section l l A and Tax Lots 1.400 and l 500. The zoning district of the City of Central Point is R-3 and this project has a file number with the city of 6460. The project preliminary plat and site plan was approved by the City Council of Central Point and the applicant is now submitting for a final plat approval. virtually all ofthe work on the infrastructure has been completed and inspected by the city during the process. Sewer, Water, Storm Drain, Power, Cable, Telephone, Curbs, Paving, Perimeter Fencing have been completed according to the approved drawings. Some items remain to be completed and they include a railing at the west side of the entry onto Hopkins road where a small retaining wall creates adrop-oft: Reflectors have been ordered for the fence at the north end of the cul-de-sac to warn vehicles that they have come to the end of the street. The sidewalk is completed up to the first home sites on both sides of the street and per an arrangement with the city the sidewalks will be completed as the homes are built and their driveways are poured. It was suggested that in doing so we could prevent damage to the sidewalks during construction of the homes. Lighting has been ordered through PP&L and should be installed and illuminated as transformers are installed to 1'uge 2 of 3, firay PtJCa, Narrative serve the individual ponies. Should the city require a band far the lights the applicant is willing to da so. Same changes to the original plan were necessary to complete the site work and the fallowing is a list: l . The curbs far the street were changed to mountable curbs throughout to alert those backing out that they are about to enter the roadway and to slaw dawn those entering their driveways. 2. The entry road at 1-Iopkins was moved to the east slightly to preserve about six large trees that add much to the beauty of the area. 3. The 24f~' dwelling unit was deleted. to allow the looping of the water system to the east into Briarwood Drive. This now means that ail of the sewer and water connections go through the property of Dr.Marlan Morse to Briarwaod Dr. The looping of the water system could not be extended as originally intended due to the unwillingness of the members of the mobile home subdivision to the north to allow such a connection. The storm drain system continued through the property about one half the distance to the north and now includes a separator far trash, debris and ail. 4. Several lengths of fencing have been repaired and or totally replaced during the construction and now is complete. 5. The designs of the residences have now removed all ofthe windows that face outward from the property to neighboring properties. 6. The electrical plans far the residences have lighting on the entry columns that are activated by light sensors so that street lighting is supplemented. These lights are only l0' from the edge of the sidewalk and should be very effective at lighting the walking areas near the residences. The original concept of this development has not changed and that is to give buyers the opportunity to own a comfortably sized home with upscale amenities that they can afford, Considering the current condition of the pausing market these hames should be at a very attractive price and give owners excellent value for their investment. It should be recalled teat the reason teat this project is a 1'UD is due to the relatively narrow width of the existing properties. The design only deviates from "normal" standards in the area of front yard setbacks. In the design the second floor overhangs 1 E}' to allow for a bedroom an tpe tpird floor and a covered deck an the second Hoar. The resultant l {l' of cover at the driveway parking area is a plus far the homeowner. It is felt by the developer that there are no negatives to this design caused by the deviation of the PTJD. The applicant feels strongly teat the deviations from the original plan are minor and advantageous to the neighbors and tpe eventual owners of the residences. The location of the street entering Hopkins Road now in use pas seemly presented no problems in teat Page 3 of 3, Gran Pt/t~, Narratn~e visibility is good in all directions and far enough separated froze the stop sign on Kopl~ins to allow ail to maneuver without difficulty. All changes were reviewed with the city staf'f' before implementation and they agreed that they were reasonable and app opriate. t ~ L. Calvin Martin, Agent for applicant ~,- ~~~~~~~~ to ~ ~~ Findings of Fact And Conclusions of Law Final Development Tlan Findings City File No. 06060 Applicant: Jon S. Gray Agent: L. Calvin Martin 1 ~ 68.(Jb4 Final development plan. A. within six months following the approval of the preliminary development plan, the applicant shrill fcle a final development plan witty the city, containing in final form tlxe information requt`red in tlxe preliminary plan. Tlie some shall be reviewed by the planning commission and decided by the city Council as set fortlx in Chapter 17.Q5 of tlxis cede. The council may, in its discretion and for a good cause, extend for six months the period for the f ling of the final development plan. ~'. Tlie permit for a PUl) shall expire and become void one year from the date on whiclx it was issued unless an application for extension is filed and approved by the planning commission. The one year shall commence with approval of the final development plan. Finding: The applicant successfully received extensions to keep this project from expiring, and has submitted the; final develc~pznent plan in a timely manner. Conclusion: The applicant has met the criterion.. ~~ .ATTA~H~~~T " ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS GRAY COURT LOCATED AT 73'7 AND 745 HOPKINS ROAD Applicant: Jon S. Gray (37S 2W 11A, Tax Lots 7.400 & 150E1} File No. 06060 WHEREAS, the applicant has subrrlitted an application for Final Development flan approval for a Planned Unit Development and subdivision known as Gray Court located at 737 and 745 Hopkins Road Street, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor`s map as 37S 2W 11A, Tax Lats 1400 & 1500, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and "WHEREAS, on January 15, 2008, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the Application Review Process - Section 17.05, Residential Multiple Family -Section 17.28, and Planned Unit Developments 17.6$ of the Central Point Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Final Development Plan appl€cation, has considered and finds per the Staff Depart dated January 15, 2008, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the Final Development flan is consistent with the intent of the CPMC; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution l~lo. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated January 15, 2008, which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. ~. ,.. Planning Commission Resolution No. (1/15/200$} PASSEL) by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 15th day of January, 208. Planning Comr~iission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 15th day of January, X008. ~'lanning Commission Chair Planning Carnr~ussion Resolution No. {1 / 15/2008} ~~A~JCJ~R ~~JL~1IF"I~A'T"~{',?I'~I 'T`CJ ~CJ~~~'Y BCJ`~"'~"~ !~aTATit3~ ~~A~T~R P'LA~ b , ~~ l e ' .. m ~.C i, 1~~ ~~. ~ i ~ ~, .,,; r ___... ,• ~'rrrlsi_<~cr'a?ic)T~ ~~l~thz~ a~a;{rr t)~rrr~rli~:a2ic?r, ap{',Iit;.riicril tc> ~rct~I t1r~ '~~ticr'trvcllt~r3r O[~fic~ ~'~r~h sr~~~ t~eeclr)pn?er~t plan to tlr~ al~Tpr'tnt;ci ~rr~)l~'~~ i3rrti~~ `~t~r.iit)r1'J r°a~~sii. C_)Ti~°~r._,:,~ I ~t~ti~cit,lrrric~nt ~ltrstcr~ I'l~rn (I~i~le 1`~cj, (?it)~(j.) irr <:~:c~c)rci<rirc;c t',it{3 C'l''~~1(` `~t°~:tic)~~ 1 °I.(?9.:i{)(). l l;ti i7ac),i'i;t ;:ii.t; i~T~c)lti~~; i>.~~ l ac.tc~, 1<i~~riur.3 c>N~ `r)rrtlr 1 f<tsh,~ll ~>trc~Ci arr{ ir_1<;ntafi;,~~ ~)n tIT~ .1~~~,ltis<rrl {'t)rrt~i~~ %'~Sw~~syr)r'~s rl~ztp ~~5 ~ t~; ~'G~i' J t)i~ l)., ~f~~~~~~ LC~t~, :,'t=){) ~~rTtl ''_' ~. ;~~I'1~a ~[ {)~ 1:~~'~3 ~rncl l i7r)~~)O1 ~. "[~l)~: sirhjr;r~t p?'c)p~~~~~~ is I~~t~aicr.I ~~iil)iTT t1)~~ ~('Ot)-G , li'ar)sii ()ric'"r]iC'C1.1)i>>~l,>pTri~:t)t-~(;erlerai (;~rrt~~ni:ecial i.cri~iTlp ~iistrici. ;1p17lic;~}nt: ()lci (~ailr'truL Pra?p~Tt~es, ~,~:~ r`~lltm ;~`i?t;T'(3~ t',llrlrll .~,y',`;%t ~;'l~lrlJ.~'t`r11t'illi ~Il~~ !'1,~~r1%; :G'`~U1ltt.'i'() c~t' i1ti4()t~l<ttti,'ip ~..~... ~t~T~tYic: ("l~rY~~a t~,;~T~~ra~t~r~itc 1'ltrrirr~~ ._ PI'h~ `~r~o~~,~ l~uitt: `~t~rtic)rr 1.ra~lsitC~r'i~~z~ti.cll~evlc?l~t~~c,r~t ~'1a~,~cr' '1~itl (tl~e~ °`1~f~~stT°I'l~Tr~~°) ~~~i=; aITI)~r~>ve in ?{3~)3. l lTC; (~.~ 3 at~s'c pi'i)j~'c sitrv is l~~,is~Trat~:c~ i~or' cr3rnr~~i~rti:itri <rT~ci light iticlrrtitrial Trst~ ~Ttlcl. is It)catccl o.~ Elie %171attet~l il'ilc; ~;±)1~';tJ) I:s)t ;;,-~ and Lot :~ ~ c>f ~r)c)i~~ 1>att~; ~;talinr), 1'Iurst~ li. "!`hc al~pi'c±~~~cl ~,'lastcr ._ , PhTrr prc>~,~TClc.s io-r. hl?tLil'~' ~:<,~Tnrn~;T'~;i.rl,']i~,}~i. ~ra~arstr'Tt~l tr~,~~ ~>1~l1iTS s~i_~~a 11c-wevr~~, a~rec~ ~,~ ~.~, e~at)~~rr~c:~t11 c[esi=~r1 ~,ias TAD `- .... .. prt s~ntecl c1~3.rirr=r tl~ oT~i~~.iT1a1 r'~~ic~~~.-. a~l~~i' ... sate, ~s f:;rT°s'cr,tl~ , _ ~ ~ e ~: • ~; tlis~;rrssic?r) pu~~lx~se~~~ t1r~: ~~ 1-rrcrjt;i:i sits is r~i~:r'r'cd a w ;, to as tyre lti~li~rt)ve~1lr.Tan 4~fice Yank l~l~c~ °`CJfiice - . . Park."). ?~!ti~rrncilarr- r'~°cei~~ed ~rc~r~~irrisir'<ttiti'e situ flan a~;l)r'i)~;'ili !Y) ~;~m~5t~ tTCtic)n ~ftl~e ,. . Cf7["pC?r'atC- Ot 11%,t' l~uilclirj~~ ic> l7c° 1)c:atcc C12] tilt' SCtl.li:l7ur'11 pf)~'f:l~r~ ., Page 1 o General Project Description Architecture and General Site Plan: The modification is far review of the Office Park, Figure l {Attachment B, exhibit 5, sheet 2}. The Applicants are requesting that the pra~ect design be included and made part of the approved Snowy Butte Station master plan. The Office Park is intended as a mixed use development of office, commercial, retail, light industrial and potentially residential shave same office and/or retail structures. The Office Park design provides building footprints for office and retail buildings intended for purchase and/or lease. The architectural design of the buildings will be similar to that of the Microvellum Corporate building, which is consistent with the design standards established by the master plan {Attachment B, exhibit ~, sheets 9 and l o}. Circulation: The primary access to the Off ce Park is provided by the private drive extending east from South Haskell Street. To fi.~rther facilitate vehicular circulation the Office Park has two additional ingress/egress points heated at Ash Street and South ldaskell Street. The modification application includes site plan, architectural elevations, parking and landscape plans. The City Public Works Department reviewed the prapased development plan and found the prapased access points to be acceptable. The Public Works Department further found that a traffic impact analysis is not required. Landscaping: The pro,~ect includes twenty-two percent {22°l0} landscaping with the following characteristics as submitted in Attachment B, exhibit S, sheets 3.1 and 3.2: ^ South Haskell Street Frontage Landscaping: A frontage landscape raw with street trees and shrubs is designed to City standards. ^ Rear {Railroad} Landscaping: A fifteen {ls} foot wide landscape strip is prapased clang the easterly property line parallel to the railroad track {Attachment A, Sheet 1 }. This area is currently occupied by an unimproved berm. The berm will be landscaped similar to the planting design of the berm to the south. ^ Interior Landscaping: The landscape plan is designed to enhance the Office Park entrance while providing entrance stapes for the South Haskell and Ash Streets access points. The interior design also provides planting areas around each building and parking aisles. The landscape areas separate the parking areas and pedestrian walkway. Landscaped planting strips are designed to encourage the internal vehicular circulation patterns within the site and to canned the commercial development within Phase I and Phase II of the Office Park. The prapased landscaping complies with the minimum standards of CPMC 17.6'x. Parking Spaces: The project design for the Office Park will provide 24S parking spaces with the appropriate number of dedicated ADA spaces and exceeds the 16~} parking space requirement of Section 17.65.f}50 Table 3 of the CPMC. FINDINGS: See Attachment "G" ISSUES: There are no identified issues. ~~ Page 2 of 4 CC~NDITI4NS C3F APPRC}VAL: 1. The berm, located along the east property line, shah be landscaped and planted similar to the berm south of the subject site for continuity. 2. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report dated December 2i, 2007 (Attachment C}: a. Subject to Municipal Code Section 12.04 five (5} foot side sidewalks shall be required as part of the proposed site plan, along the frontage of property within the right-of way for South Haskell Street. Additionally, a seven and a half X7.5} foot landscape strip shall be required to be installed concurrently. The configuration of the landscape strip and sidewalk will be in compliance with Public Works Standards and Specifications drawing CP-ST-21 A. Both shall be approved and installed prior to the building final on the commercial structure. b. Prior to issuance of the final building occupancy certificate, the Applicants shall submit a landscape plan for the areas designated far landscape strips for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee. Landscape strips for the proposed development shall be placed immediately behind the proposed sidewalk location. Street trees shall be planted thirty feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details, specifications and species of the trees selected from the City's approved street tree list and are to lee planted within the landscape strips. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 Iz" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will lee the responsibility of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape strip. c, The proposed private drive shall be built to Central Point Private Street standards and shall be oonstructed with the appropriate Public Utility Easements. 3. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Building Department Staff Report dated December 19, 2007 (Attachment D}, Fire District 3 dated November 27, 20[17 (Attachment E}, Rogue Valley Sewer Services dated December 14, 2007 Attachment F}. 4. The cJffzce Park design necessitates reciprocal crass-access and parking easements for the two lots within the development as a condition of approval to assure the complex adequately addresses parking and access standards. These easements must be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded with the Jackson County Clerk prior to issuance of any building permits. 5. The Applicants shall apply for a sign permit consistent with the provisions of CPMC Sections 15.24, 17.67.05(} and 17.60.110. ATTACHMENTSIE~;HIBITS: Attachment "A" Microveilum Office Park Site Plan Attachment "B"- Microvellum Office Park Phase 1 anal 11 Master Plan Modifcation Attachment "C"- Public Works Staff Report Attachment "D"- Building Department Staff Report Attachment "E"- Fire District 3 Report Attachment `°F"- Rogue Valley Sewer Services ~~ Page 3 of 4 Attachment "G"- Findi~ags Attachment "H"- Resolution ACTIC}N: Consideration of Resolution No. ,approving the major modification application to add Microvellum C7f~ee Park to the approved Snowy Butte Station Transit Clriented Development Master Plan (File No. 03{}36}. RECC}MMENDATIi4N: Approval oFResolution No. ,granting approval o~`the Major Modification application. to add Mierovellu~n Offzce Park to the approved Snowy Butte Station Transit {oriented Development Master Plan (File I~lo. 03036). ~f. 3 Page4of~ Land 4J.SE' t ~r"~ n~.1Cy O{ {~~I1Cta~ ~OiIlt T.~.~}t COmmelrical Jackson County, ©regorz {~C1rO~j~'I ~ ~? ~{~(}7 Situs Address: Haskell Street Total Area: 278,917 Sq. Ft. +y.tyr ~~~~ e.Yn~ ~ ~~ ~ { L. W (lJ Zonin T.O.D.} (3(; ? Owner: ~@~f1s3C~CS: I„~tI~It1~5: BAs provided by the Ci€y o£ Central Point} C?Id Railroad Propert'se5, l..l.C Frone - 15'tnin. A Ileant~ Side^0`min. ---~- APproxiocationcxistingwaterline ~~ ~ Rear ~ 4' min. -st'- Apptox location existit>,gxformdrain MQnter4 ~r A3SOCIatG's, l.[.C Off-street Parking: ~ Parking Ioz L:~Izrs 4497 Brownridge Terrace Suite 105 t sp. t 400 Sq. Fc floor area w 25 spaces g41 779-0771 { } 49 spaces pxavidtd Vehicular Citcuiation 'Applicant is the authorized agent of the rnvrte; Space dimensions - 9'x?0' Pedestrian Circulation of the 5ut7;ect propetiy. Excess spaces FBO Phase CI ioxoxrtt ++ St',Al.£::.5 °24` cs ~f ff ~" Po en ro reCJOn Cc rC grtrogd ._. t ~r /rJ t D~ _ ~ 77 .» .,~ . ~ ' iii. .,; ~I~ i ~; ~+~` ~ ~~ , ii~ 4 ~~ ~~ r~ f y: ~ ~ f [ ~~ S1 :: ".' ... r . {. It~` . ~ i E Illt ~ _ ~ ~~:' ..... \:J ~ ~.f ~ \Ut '. ' : ~ V ~`' ~ ~ ~ ~` + ,r _....~._:; I €~~~ \\~4J~ ;iii # i t C~...~.: }. ii ....~. ( `.~~ ~ ~ ~ f. ~S~~ f/f,! i' .• ' ~~.~.. . , i ~ t 1 C~ i { . ~ x. ~ .. f ' ~ ~~~ ` E h> ,r .. ~;. ~ ~ -, t 4 .t 1 C' f ~ ~ R a'+Y.~ CCC mm3C ~ aa' _"E~.' '. f ~y ~ ,~ .-T - .iY% j , - * sac ~"~" ~ .. ., .... ., 'nlnrtx . snrrc .. .. . f f .. ... .. i~ ~ ,, ~ .. T-TASICELL . .. .... ....... i e.. iL V Exhibit 5 She et ~. ,~ ~~ . _. r a,,~~ w~~sr.~P. ,.<~ . a.'a, w,,;~;' (' v- k_ C ~~ ~ ~ . ^ ' ~ " ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; '~6 Y~ ~- ~ v%~ „ # ce a d a Y .. ., w~ ~~,. ~Ww p`~ M~•~., ~. ;' "',':'. ~ ~~:en~i d'~~IJ . ., x d Il~rrs ~s" P t ~"7 R ~ ~ ' ' ~' a^ . . . 5' e v '~ ~ ~ d nn, ~N . ~ . y q ~ i ,, ~ ~ ° w : ° ~ ~ ~ , w '~ . '" ~ "i~a, ~ ~~u .~. ,, ., ~ ' ,. .~w ,~ . ~. .. ... „,, ~„„ ~ ~ ~r a i ~ Mt~~-~te;i°~ Assc~~;iatcs, ~,L~~` _ Aenf '~' ~ - ,l f'~,~J`pal,,t.. ~d' i...'~dFI~:7 ~{~ 1 ,'t J~ ~ iii`; ~'~~.~. l~r)l1 ! ,,,,., 1?il~r~lf~C~r j ,`>/ItTIlji:)7i ; . JI'<':11)~i(iE;1 .. . a _ n ~, („~1t~r311~;fC 111 1,7htilil{ ~, i''r ~. hi~h([~~1ini: t)I{a 1~1,ih'~aii 1'ro}u,ltic=;. 1.(,~ ~~~ 1"~!i~sr.~~,~~ilf!FTI r~ss{~i ~,1•taa~ ~ ~ttt, IIY+~. s'~113ilrzz: ~1~01)-C;(.:, C.~w.loY"a1 C'cr,rlll3crcial ~~'{~ It'<{Yiu :ltt~°.' ~~~,1'a~i,r111i'd {471' ~}lIS d('~'l;lt?1)911c111. in{:11?t9c{l this hr{ ~r,~rCy dc~clo}~rirl~a` a~ltlsin.~ss }>1?rl:, /~ £i tzie ~ ~iUC~}! was eOT7I~l~e~~C~ ~C7C ~~~ ~a '',: i i ';'t' ClTi ~ lis~!> ~,li uiiliticti arc, loca~icd ~~;~ithin ~{~liill IIas1;c11 ',~ ~~;~f. . , ~1 <.ttci" - ~ ilcr'i= 1S 1111 c.'ilstlllf; 1~-Il7C 1 ~4'ati`r11llc 1 lar I~ ~{`: ittci ~,~;t1 lin l~lc al"C'a {)I'lllc t71{~~~(";'.:;i ~'i lVc7`<c.' (i'11c. ~ti~'cl`- "l~llcre is axistitl~w ~,f:u'cr irl .`'~otttlr I las~cll ~~rrcct i,ll-nl I:>r11.in - "I"her~. i;; ern c~isting 12-i11cI> ~t{7rrll drailr litre ill ~oatCi )1~1sI:cI1 Stt-tr;~;~ ~vsa~~s= __ .~ ~ ~~ it 1,~ u, n{:1 Ys~ ~~ ~.~,ith the 1~1"{7)3o~cd <leticl{>}~3nacnt. ~''f~~N(Ili',6l`a"~&-~a9§3@~ ~$,'9'f'~fPsS4kS6'3i~ ~ds~e~~f~ e$3lfR ~f'~'93AI@~aa _, _. _.m~..- ,.~. _.~ ~. .~~ ~,..,.,..,F ~,,.,~ ~ ~~.. T`~u. Ccnll'<11 1'{llnt 1'ul>Ilc '~~{lt;.s l~{.hartll3{.nt Is ~ h,n`~cd .~Ith malla~~.;lncrlt: f3~ the Ci~~ ~ tnirl?sttlZCturc" Incluciln~ srrc{~t~, ', 1[c~i~l~,'UY'li5" 11nC1 `il(?Till S'r~ir1'C)Y' df'ainll~i' I~aCtlltic5. ttl ~CilCl'£il. the )~cl?artnlcrlf~y "~at111Tilart~ `g1;~C113CRt10n~~ atli~ t_~Ilt'~~QI'ill :~i-lll{.lar`{.l Uciails #clr f'uhli{ ~'~ {lf`I~s CC>tlsiructi{>n°' shall ~~{l~~cl~ll 1~clti~, l~nllllic~ i~r~lliiic at`c ic> be eonstlll~;ie;i. (~1~{, fh~~~{s1;71~e~' is ,~,~{ c,~+ra,z{xi i<~ vbta.in the 111ic<;r ~{~rr~it3n oi~tll~,u, <;}~~~ lii,:ati{ms l~r~c7ll3 the ['llbli~~ 1'~'{ll~h_~> I )ct3:.etr~l~~l7i. In gcl3cl'111, the I>lasl sut~r33itr111 5ha11 irlcludc t~111n 1€nd Ilr{_I,l1c li>r ~irc{~ls. 1~~13tcr, stt?l~m draln~lrc a13d sl~rrlt~ry sewers. ,t~>rrt`t dr'alflalr% ~,81C=Ldatll)p!, tirOr'Ill C{1'alllilwc 1")Ati111 13113.0. Ci'(?SIOII ii~)I1C1'Ol 011111_ L1I1113A` 1lllii OUCSICIL 111,~C1lCt' rl{1~llIC{:Yt1f~11S ~]1(~r2~~Sft)1 il1~S. TI1~~ t7lrrll may =11 ~{~ include a~piicltblc trai~fic sttldic~. l~~,r17J ftc~cril7ti{nls at3c? << traf"9~ir~ c;<_,rltr{ll ~111n. A Public. ~,~,~"f~l-ks Pcrl3iit tiai~) f~rYl~~ he issued alter tiYC l)r~t7a;`ttlicut. Dil~cc.tt~r ~Yt~t~r{~ti°cs t}ic iitll~l r.{ nstt`uction t~r~~ti~,~tns~s. .!Of"t~'1~ r1~t7Y•t~ti~zl. tllc ~~.~ a~>sf3c:i<ricd ~~iih d3c~ cic~.'clol7r»~:rit ~rii1 be calcltl;ltc°cl 11r~c1 ;:lttl~~li~~cl to file }:>lal~lic; ~~f11:~1.<~ l~cl~li~it. ;~li. ~~.'r^:; ar•c r•ccllrircci kc~ ~~; p<l.id iri full at tllc tiYa~i~ ti1f~ 1'uhlic ~,~ cYr~l;s 1'crliYit i~ issued. ~.°`*::elri I'1.1lYlic `~~,'orks %rlspc°i.,t.ioll 14,~cs. ;11`tet° E~r•{~ic:c9: <•.flrYil~lctic7~1 tiurir3`~ h~: 3iri'~l.l t`lldt licatii>n 111"~>ccw. tllc f'lll?lic'UVc~~~4:s Ills~{~1`tf~~ ~~i91 1~alcrYlatc tllc aht~7rl~l?r`i~~tc lrrxii>>_rYai f~hir~lshc~ if~r3 tiri3c to 1z .the clc~clc11~3~r, 13elc~rc tl~3ir~ I113{ll 1~I~lt alp}llicatioli i , ~, ~~~_~csscd thx~ • - ,~ trt;3"~lc7pcr fllutit 1?a~.' 111c I'clt~'arlt 1115j~c(;trt>Clti jf;~'ti ~t"1Cl bC}rrd Ic?1: i?t'1~ tlX1CUi'1111't1ci~;Cl llt`l~'~r~?\ ~'Crlt:tl~s (~t!`I ~_i'.'i~'i ~illtled ~7~ ~llc Y'trl7lif~ t~ c:?Y•1;~ 1~3ii~ct'tclt j. X40 ~~utn s~~~t ~~ c~nt~at ~~,~~, n ~a~ ~.~. ~~-3~~ ~ ~..,~ Conditions of Approval; Sidewalks and Landsca e Stri :Subject to Municipal Code Section 12.04 five ~S) foot side sidewalks shall be required as part of the proposed site plan, along the frontage of property within the right of way for South I-Iaskel3 Street. Additionally, a seven and a half (7.5} foot landscape strip shall be required to be installed concurrently. The configuration of the landscape strip and sidewalk will be in compliance with Public Works Standards and Specifications drawing CP-ST-2I A. Both shall be approved and installed prior to the building final on the commercial structure. 2. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final building occupancy, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape strips. Landscape strips for the proposed development shall be placed immediately behind the proposed sidewalk location. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details, specifications and species of the trees selected from the City's approved street tree list and are to be planted within the landscape strips. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 1236. Tree plantings shall have at least a I I/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be the responsibility of the property owners who awn the property directly adjacent to the landscape strip. 3. Private Street -The proposed extension of Cheney Loop shall be built to Central Point Private Street standards and shall be constructed with the appropriate Public Utility Easements. 144 South 3`~ Street ~ Central Point, fJR 97542 ~ 54 ~. 664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 ~~ r ~- . Cfi'~+C~I E~_.E i;~Y""" ~}t'1~;, ~,~~~E:~-~tl ~C.II~C~i(1t, ~ ~~;C7~l;r'~llt~('1~' Ike ~ ! I,;; ~; $t ., Cents' F'~iz~t, ~~f ;'S~~° ~'.~<I,! ~'l,r,ulc ',uil<1 nr; O,si~;al 561.66} 3 3 21 ; 54 { .6f~4. l 6 f I ww.c,central-pcsint.ar us ~~; ~1~t11I11114`? ~t_'(~~1('~tilt~"ilt ~~1<iftl"Iti7'~ ~1~~~: FRt~. Building I~~::~~zrtt}~e~~t ~~UI~Ji_~;CT`: nab i51,IIt.C,; J~~;si~~~~;s lba~°k T'~L~AT. Old. ailrt~ad l~'r~~a~r-ti~~~ Ll..t~. 1'1°~~,~~rty Des~~;r~~~iol-,:: 7_~,r_11~,D-'(.~{.)'"r'7 Th~~ t~~~~I~~°e~rt is tc~ ~rc~icle ~r~i~r'r~~<~tic~~~ tc~ the Planning. c~nln~i~;~>i~n and the .Applicant ~z~;~>>~'clir~i7 ~'i~y Building ~.~4:1r't~n~,nt ~~~.q~air~mnts and. ~nditions ~a e included rn the design an{~ ~J ~: ~ ~ 1 c~la,nen of the prap~scd prc~j ect. 'i ~a~~ i~ mot n ~~~~~n r°e°~ew. Tlli~; ~-~'i~c~t~t is preliminr~~ ~,~ld compiled solely c~z& use by the (.;e.ntrdl Poi~at ~~lalrt~ing ~ar~n~is ~i<~r~. ?4 S Third Strut Central Paint; ~ !> ~.`:,~'?' 49.66.33 Fax 5~.664.1~'9 `t Building Dept. StaffRepoz•t, Page ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT CC)MMENTS 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department, 2. ~f a private stoz-m drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Depaztrnent. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b, Descriptions and classif cations of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, includiza.g bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. ~. Orading/excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fzll material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private storm drain work. must be permitted and inspected by City Building Departrent prior to backf 11}. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactoz•y placement off 11(including special inspections ofplacernent of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official, shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is fznaled. Exception: 1. The upper 1.5 foot off 11 placed outside of public rights-off way. ~. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 94~I S Third Street Central Point, 4R 97502 ~ 541.664.332' =Fax 549.664. ~6~ 1 Building Department Staff Report, page 3 &. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located an the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24,120. 9, Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. A comprehensive erosion control plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Department prior to start of work. ] 0. Application for building permits will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code ~200~), The International Fire Code (with the State of Oregon Amendments-240`7}, NFPA 13, Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code (2407), Uniform Plumbing Code {with Oregon Blue Pages-amendments}. Plan check may take from 3 to 8 weeks, depending on completeness when submitted.....if requested, plan check my be initiated simultaneously with Planning Dept. evaluation (Plan Check Fee must be paid prior to start of plan check). A complete code analysis should be a part of the submitted plans. 11. Fire District 3 will determine f re hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. 12, Property lines must be established and pinned by a Licensed Oregon Surveyor prior to any building inspections. 13. No work is to start until Grading and Erosion Control Plans are approved and permit issued. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. If questions, please call Todd Meador.....664-6325, ext. 228. 3 940 S Third Streef =Central P©int, ~7R 975Q2 ._= 54~.fi6~.332~1 .Fax 549.64.969 ~ .. ~- ~ackson +~o~un~y F`~re District No. 3 8333 Agates Road White City oR 9?503-~0?5 {54i~ 82y~~~~)r-~~~?~iQtt/~~,v~o~i~cj/e~ ~54~/1~,~~j~jY\82jyfj~r4566 ~f~uc~ liLil~~MlilltMI~AMOt 1Yi~f~ ~ ~~ll~~~~11~~~~ November 27, 24{J7 Cannie Chine Planner Cenral Point Cammen#s for MicroveLLum ~uslness Park Phase L A~"TAGN~IE~T " * Can you have the developer provide fire hydrant Location information * L wlll review a closer to final plat and make additional comments Lf needed then Mark Moran DFM ~~ ,. } ~rs,t I(~,I GI ~('Illl<ii ~'OiCI'( {' "11'10' Qepartrr~ent "lip > .,~~,),~~i> ~r~r Or?Ci ~>I' t~C;rrfii~~l ~'~;'ii1t, ~iC:~~~i1 7fJ s ~' 4-~"^ Fie: bite Flan review for Mcrovellum uine~ Park, File X181 ~, t71 1 1 C li ,, F~c~ v~::t ,,~~,, ~ IsC,; ~ciC"~" si.~ StUl~sc,~,7 A'7 lllc: slisll~,C,~ ~?i~t,i7~,1"'t'~j/ <I'0, (1 i~ul.~{CC;'11 ~7u::E;l. ~..C7i"1d1~UtrsE"1 ...,'LIE_; sE'..'JC?!` ~"',~'i~~ fC C~(.I!I( c. I:.)i',I`I"Ilfl (i0iii ~i~%;~j}',,,' IICf's ~.V1~~ (:iC i~.`>l,lC'.l{ C;r)C)n he VI)"? I i iJd I~~c~C)C~ C:~r,V~;IU(~i"iii r~i (E ,ii. _. ~ ~~r"~C~~ii'~j/' I~~'~l%Itlllrl'i~l~ ~~I'!.)i ..., 1''1"1c1S~; ;~ .`,ls(3iL.dl~~~ C~~U21'.i\i t'71c3t1c~Cjvr1"lent area c nC1 Cl`)Lls~ C01'lli';~ f' `i':'I[~ ~ re~~,'1 c~fit s'iU'`rT"~~::~'[CI CfUcl~iY C~UI':{C:iIr1L?s. ~/'~.~C;' en(:GUI"nrlC>' t{~~:; c;t{_)~~~~:,cil> lC) i~t'.LSIC11`1 t'1"1e sltC:;;) [l~c:l: ic~n':)SStl~~,ill~ `C<i ; . 111 tls(~ 1~~; °vls'(~ C?r W~,~~I t_iLlcl~i~'~ l~rC)~CC~I~n. F~oOue V~~.1lr..y ~e~~5.%i rvice;~ Ec~~jutti~is t~~~ ~ ~,;•C%val of the rc~pc~sed d'evelopmc . ~ ';C y>(.,bjeot fry r3e oilc;'~,~~ln cc>rtciiiic,~~s: 1. A,;l~ll~;<~ra~ m~.,: c i~a.ir; ~_, ~~~r~~ r °~~ !rr~iG and' pay all relate+~ development Cl1~lr`~H,~ {`C~U! l(; ~IIC', Lcl`t ~?~ GJ11;~1(lCllo'n. ,4~~~ 'ICaI-I i~~~;~i ~~;k~~';t ~~. stol r;~~,~.~;~.ler plan to ITV fc~r eprc~val prior tca t1 8i=' ~ c':~r~ ~)' (;~>i icaliliC:II.?~`l. Peel free to c~ri~ r}~C; if you {~:~~~,'e ar;~ ~,,~sion~ rer~,r~iing this ~_)rojeot. iiC'"w' c ply, ~~ C~istriC;fi l =c~air~eer ~, h: ) ~s',`'~t il~,. I.~~. I' ~ i'i `V~V~,(i s.:~i'i~_.fil:i.1\is i~_ ~1Ck"t>VZw~Il1ITl X111 ~ :.......~.~ Attac1zI11E'zzt "G?° FIiNDINGS OF F.~.CT ANll CC}NCLUSZC}NS 4F LA'tV File No: 08149 INTRUI~UCTIflN In the of the major modification application to add the Microvellum Offzce Park site development plan. to the approved Snowy Butte Station Transit Oriented Development Master Plan (File No. 03036) in accordance with CPMC Section.17.09.300. The project site involves 6.41 acres located on South Ilaskell Street and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1OAD, Tax Lots 700 and 774, APN 1081328 and 10989018. The subject property is located within the TOD-GC, Transit Oriented Developznez~t-General Commercial zoning district. Applicants: Old Railroad Properties, LLC and Microvellum Asset Management, Inc; Agent: Moz~tero & Associates, LLC. CPMC 17A9,3dd Major modiCcations. .~. .major M~odi~catior~ I_?e~ned. The corrznzur~ity development dir°ector shall determine that a major modi~cation(s1 is required if one or more of the cliarages listed below are proposed; 1. A change in land use,- Finding: The approved Snowy Butte Station Transit Oriented Development Master Plan Master Plan} did not provide the development site design for the proposed Off`zce Park and an application for modification to the zxzaster plan has been submitted. Finding: The 6.41 acre project site is within the TOD-GC, Transit Oriented Development-General Commercial zoning district and is designated as such in the approved master plan for Snowy Butte Station. 2. An increase in density lay more than ten percent, provided the resulting density does not exceed that allowed by the land use district; Finding: Microvellum Office Park {Office Park} is designed as a mixed use site with offices, retail and possible second floor residential. The proposed density and uses are in conformance with the TOD-GC zoning district, CPMC Section 1'7.65. 3. <4 change in setbacks or lot coverage by more than ten percent, provided the resulting setback or lat coverage does not exceed that allowed by the land use district; Finding: Microvellum Off"zce Park is designed to meet setbacks and the lot coverage of the zone. The design does not exceed that allowed by the land use district. 4. A change in the type and/or location of accessways, drives or parking areas affecting off- site traffic; Page 1 of 13 Finding: The project site fronts the east side of South Haskell and Ash Street to the north. A private drive east of South Haskell will Provide primary access to Microvellum Office Park. The Private drive will be constructed to City of Cezitral Paint private street standards {Applicants submittal Attaczment "B" page Sh}. Two additional ingresslegress points are located at Ash Street and South Haskell Street. S. f#n increase in the floor area proposed far nonresidential arse by more than. fi fteetx percent where previously specified, Finding: The approved Snowy Butte Master plan did not specify the size and architectural design of the buildings within the Office Park. The submitted modification application provides the building footprint locations, the private street, landscape plan and the architectural prototype far structures within the Office Park 6. ~ reduction of more than ten percent of the area reser~recl for common open space; or Finding: The Office Parr is designed with landscaped pedestrian areas with out reducing the comzman open space of the original master plan. 7. Change to a condition of approval, or a change sinxilar to subsections (.f1)(1) through {6~ of this section, that could have a detrimental impact on adjoining properties. The city planning official shall Haire discretion in determining detrimental impacts warranting a major modification. Finding: The inclusion of the site development design far the Micravellum Office Park. to the Snow Butte Station Planned Transit Oriented Development Master Plan adds information to the original approved plan. Conclusiczn: It has been determined that a major modifications application is required far the addition of the Micravellum Office Park site development plan to the approved Snaw Butte Station Planned Transit Oriented Development Master Plan as provided in CPMC I'7.09.3C10 {A}. CPMe 17.09.3U0 B. Major Modification Applications; Approval Criteria..~n applicant may request a major modification using a Type II or Type III review procedure, as follows: I. ~lpon the community development director determining that the proposed modification is a major modification, the applicant shall submit an application form, filing ,fee and narrative, and a site plan using the same plan format as in the original approval. The community development director may require other relevant information, as necessary, to evaluate the request. 2. The application shall be subject to the same review procedure ~~ ype .lI or III), decision-mal~ing body, and approval criteria used for the initial project approval, except that adding a conditional use to an approved project shall be reviewed using a Type .III procedure. Page 2 0.£ 13 3. The scope of`t°evie~~r shall lie limited tc~ tTie traodifieatiar2 t~equest. .:For example, a request to modify a parking lot shall require site design review only for the proposed parizing lot and gray changes to assoeicrted access, circulation, pathways, lighting, trees, and landscaping. Notice sTiall be provided in accordance with the applicable notice requirements far Type II or Type I.ZI pracedur-es. 4. The decision-making body shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions ara application far major rnodi~cation based an wr°itten fzradirags an the eriter~ia. Finding: The Applicants submitted an application for review by tlae Planning Commission a Type 111 n~zajor modification of the Snowy Butte Transit Oriented Development Master Plan in compliance with section 17.09.300 (B}. The Appiicants seeks the addition of the site development plan for the Microvellum Office Park to the approved master plan (sec Attachment "B'>). Cancizxsifln: Application complies CP.M~` 17.65.115U Zoning regaclatic~fas--1'©~ distr~iet. ~1. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses in Table l are shown with a "P. " These 2.rses are allowed if they eorraply with the applicable provisions of this title. They are sa~bject to the same application and review process as other permitted uses identifred in this title. Finding: The subject property is located within the TOD-GC, Transit Oriented Development-General Commercial zoning district. Professional offices, retail and multifamily residential above ground floor commercial are designated as permitted uses, Section 17.65.050 TOD Table 1. Finding: Commercial and industrial uses are primarily intended for this district. Activities which are oriented and complementary to pedestrian travel az~.d transit are encouraged. Cflnclusifln: The applicatian complies. CP.1l~C 1 x:65: f174 {F), Development Standards. The applicable zoning standards are specijzed in Table S. Finding: The development standard far TOD-GC and the project are compared for compliance in Table 1 below. Table '1: CPMC 17.6v.05~ standards TdD-GC zoning district Required Project Front setback 15 ft. 15 ft. Side setback {b adj to residential 0 ft.l 15 ft 15 ft. NA Corner setback 15 ft,/30 ft. 15 ft. Rear setback 0 ft. 40 - 65 ft. Page 3 crf 13 {b~ ad' to residential 10 ft. NA Building Ifeight 50 ft. 35-45 ft. Lot Cavera e 85 °/a 78 °lo Landsca e I S °la 22 Conclusion: The application caz~~zplies. CPMC 17.66. (1.3f1 {Z), Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan approval. Tlie provisions of Chapter .17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan approval, shall apply to permitted and limited uses within the T(~17 district and corridor. For developn2ent or land division applications involving more than jive acres of land or forty dwelling units, a master plan approval, as provided in this chapter, shall be approved prior to, or concurrently with, a site plan, landscaping and construction plan application. Finding: A Site Plan for the proposed Microvelluzrz Qffice Park design plan was submitted as a Type III Major Modifzcatian application to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and added to the approved Snowy Butte Station Transit tJriented Development Master Plan {File Na. 03036}. Conclusion; The application complies. CPMC 1 T 66. U5(l applicatio~a approval criter~icr. B. Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction .Plan approval. a site plan, landscaping and constrarctiorz plan application shall be approved when the approval authority f nds that the following criteria are satisfied or can be shown to be inapplicable. 1. The provisions of Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan approval, shall be satisfied; and 2. The proposed improvements comply with the approved TC.?L) district or corridor master plan for the property,• and 3. Chapter 17.tri7, L)esign Standards--Tt~LL3 district and TaL} corridor. Finding; The Uffice Park development site plan and building elevations have been submitted as part of this application. Land area and dimensions, parking spaces, and proposed uses have been evaluated utilizing the site plan anal T4I~ district criteria of CPMC Section 17.55.050 and 17.5'7. Findings addressing Sections 17.72 and 17.57 are included in, Attachment "G" of the staff report dated January 15, 2008. Finding: Conditions of approval that must be met prior to issuance of a certifzcate of occupancy are listed and found within the staff repast dated January 15, 2008. The Applicants will receive written notice of any conditions of approval. Finding: The proposed Offzce Park, to include impravernents, complies with the approved T©l~ corridor master plan far the property. Conclusion: The application complies. CPMC 17, 67.44(? Circulation and access standards. Page ~ of 13 A. Pacblic Street Standards. Finding: The subject property is located on South l~laskell Street, an improved City of Central Point collector street. The approved Snowy Butte Station Transit Oriented Development Master Plan {Master Plan} recognizes this site as part of the commercial and industrial use for this development. The approved vehicular, hike and pedestrian design has been implemented with the infrastructure in place. Finding; Aeeess to the subject property is obtained via three {3} ingress/egress points. The primary point of access for the Office Park is the private drive. This private drive is located in the center ofthe property and will align with the existing street, Cheney Loop, to the west. Finding; Utilities are available aa~d adequate to service the proposed development. Finding: The utility lines are underground and are maintained with this design. Finding: These items are reviewed by the Public Works Department during the civil drawings approval process for compliance with City code. Approval of the on-site civil improvements shall be determined by the City Public Works Department. Conclusion: The application complies. CPMC .17.67.4SI7 Site design standards ~. Respect for Existing ,Facilities and C?n-tS"ite Features. I. adjustments should be made during land division and site design to improve the overall relationship of a development or an individual building to the surrounding context. Finding: The Applicants' architect has designed a building that will he compatible with the design of the Master Plan. Finding; The replat of Lots S4 and SS of Snowy Butte Station, Phase ll subdivision {hle {}S l4fl} was clone to enhance the design of commercial area and to facilitate the future Office Park. Conclusion: The proposal complies. 2. buildings should be clustered to preserve natural areas. Finding: No identif ed natural areas are located an or near the subject site. Conclusion; The application complies. CPMC 17:67.4.5f1 {`B). Natural Features. I. Buildings should be sited to preserve signif cant trees. ~~ Page 5 of 13 Finding: The site is void of vegetation. A lazaclscape plan {Applicazat submittal Exhibit 5 Sheets 3.1 and 3.2} provides pcriznetcr azZd parking aisle plantings with street trees. The bean located on the east property will be landscaped in conformance with and extension of the berm to the south of the project site. Conclusion: The application complies. CP11~C 17.67 t154{C). ~'opography. Finding: The project site is level with no unusual topographic features to consider. Conclusion: N/A 2. New buildings proposed for existing neighborhoods with awell-defined and desirable character should be compatible with or complement the architectural character and siting pattern of neighboring buildings. Finding: The proposed design of the buildings within the Gffzee Park is complementary to the adjacent, newly constr~zcted residential neighborhood to the west of South Plasl£ell Street. The subject area is a newly planned development. Conclusion: The application complies. CPIVIC 17 671154{F). New Prominent Structures. 1. Key public or civic buildings, such as community centers, churches, schools, libraries, post offices, and museums, should be placed in prominent locatio~2s> such as .fronting an public squares or where pedestrian street vistas terminate, in order to serve as landmarks and to symbolically reinforce their importance. Findings: The proposed office/retail buildings are privately owned. l'~o civic or public structures are located within the proposed site. Conclusion: The application complies. CP1Y1C 17.67.454 {G}, Views. the massing of individual buildings should be adjusted to preserve important views while benejzting new and existing occupants and surrounding neighborhoods. Findings: The subject site is neat identi#ied as having impcaa-tant views. The private drive is designed to enhance the entrance into the C}ffice Park. The westerly view for the residential units west of South Haskell Street has been preserved. Conclusion: The application complies. CPMC 17.67.115(1 {H~. Adjoining 1Tses and adjacent Services. Page 6 0£ 13 ~. Y~Tien more intensive uses, such as raeighbarizoad conarner cial ar raaz.rlti family dwellings, are within or adjacent to existing sr.'ragle-family neighlaar~hoads, carne slaauld be taken to minimize the impact of noise, lighting, and traffic are adjacent dwellings. 2. 14ctivity or equipment areas shoz.cld be strategically heated to avoid distzzr°bing adjacent residents. 3. rill on-site service areas, loading zones and outdoor storage areas, waste storage, disposal facilities, transformer and utility vaults, and similar activities shall be located in ara area not visible from a street ar urban space. 4. Screening shall be provided far activities areas and equipment that will create noise, such as loading and vehicle areas, air conditioning units, heat pumps, exhaust fans, and garbage cornpactars, to avoid disturbing adjacent residents. S. Group mailboxes are limited to the number of hozases on any given black of development. Only those boxes serving the units nzay be located an the .block. tl~fultiple units of mailboxes may be combfined within a centrally located building of four walls that meets the design guidelines far materials, entrance, roof form, windo~js, etc. The structure must have lighting both inside and out. Findings: The buildings' design and orientation are in keeping with the approved master plan. The landscaped perimeter, street trees and landscaped parking area provide a physical space ar buffer between the residential neighborhood and the proposed project. Finding: The proposed structures are substantially compatible with existing and. proposed buildings. Under the terms afthe Snowy Butte Station CC&Rs, all proposed buildings must be reviewed for reasonable architectural compatibility. The Applicants have secured approval of the Architectural Review Committee far Snowy Butte Station {Attachment B, Applicant submittal page 9}. Canciusion: The application complies. CF.tY.tC .I T 67. (15(t ~.~}. Transitions in .Z?ensity. I. kligher density, attached dwelling developments shall minimize impact on adjacent existing lower density, single family dwelling neighborhoods by adjusting height, massing and materials andlor by providing adequate buffer strips with vegetative screens. 2. ~Idequate buffer strips with vegetative screens shall be placed to mitigate the impact of higher density development on adjacent lower density development. 3. .New residential buildings within fifty feet of existing low density residential development shall be no higher than thirty eve feet and shall be limited to single family detached or attached units, duplexes, triplexes or fozzr plexes. ~. New commercial buildings within fifty feet of existing low density residential development shall be no higher than forty-five feet. S. Dwellings types in a TCJZ) district or corridor shall be mixed to encourage interaction among people of varying backgrounds and income levels. 6. Zoning changes should occur mid block, not at the street centerline to ensure that compatible building types face along streets and within neighborhoods, N~hen dissimilar building types face each other across the street because the zoning change is at the street Page 7 of ~ 3 centerline or more irafill housing is desired (for instance, duplexes across the streetfrorrz single dwellings), design shall ensure sirazilarity ira razassing, setback, and clzar~acter°. ~. .Density should be increased r'ncrenzentally, to buffer existing neighborhoods from incompatible building types or densities. Segz-rence density, generally, as follows; large lot single dwelling, small lot single dVUelling, duplex, townliorzzes, courtyard multifamily apartrzzents, large rrzultifarnily apartments, and mixed use buildings. Finding: The approved Snowy Butte Station master plan identified the subject site as cozn..ercial with znediu density residential, T{JD-MMR across South Haskell Street thus providing a buffer to the lower density residential further west. The proposed office buildings are a considerable distance front an existing lower density residential area along Tenn Way. Finding; No increased residential density is proposed with this application. CancInsion: the proposal complies. CPMC .7 ~. b7.11511(J}. Parking. Finding: The project design for the (3ffice Park will provide 245 parking spaces with the appropriate number of dedicated AI7A spaces and exceeds the 16{} parking space requirement of Section l'7.d5.(}S~ Table 3 of the CPMC. The fallowing table provides a comparison of the required number of parking spaces and the proposed number of spaces with this project. Table 2; Parking Use Minimum required arkin Project ravides Professional Office 51,21 ~ s . ft. 1 sp per 400 s . ft, of floor ~ 28 '[ 90 Retail Safes and Service 16,000 s . ft 1 sp per 500 s . ft, of floor 32 55 Total 160 245 Canclusian: The application complies. CPMC X 7 b7. flSt1(K). Landscaping. 1. Perimeter ,Screening and Plantr'ng. a. Landscaped bt~fers should be used to achieve su, fficient screening while still preserving views to allow areas to be watched and guarded by neighbors. b. Landscaping should be used to screen and buffer unsightly uses and to separate such incompatible uses as parking areas and waste storage and pickup areas. 2. Parking Lot Landscaping and Screening, 3. Landscaping Near Buildings. Landscaping shall serve as a screen or buffer try soften the appearance of structures or uses szzch as parking lots or large blank walls, or to increase the attraetiverzess of common open spaces. Page 8 0~ 13 4. Service ~1t°eas. Set°vice areas, loading zotzes, waste disposal or scot°age at-eas must be fully screened frottz public view. 5. Street Frees. Stt°eet trees shall. be rewired along both sides of all pzrblic streets with a spacing of twetzty feet to forty feet otz center dependitzg otz the mature width of the tree crown, and platzted a minitnutn of taro feetf•om the back of curb. Trees ita the right-of- way or sidewalk easements shall be approved according to size, duality, tree well design, if applicable, and irrigation shall be regatired. Tree species shall be eliosen from the city of Central Paint approved street tree list. Finding: The Applicants have pravided a landscape plan representing appraxiznately 22°la ofthe praject site {Attachment B, Exhibit 5, Sheets 3.1 and 3.2). .The landscape area exceeds the minimum landscaping requirement of l S°la far this site. Finding. A bean, paralleling the east prapez-ty line, provides a scene ar buffer separating the project site from the Central {~regan and Pacific Railroad. Planting of the bez~n is illustrated an the submitted landscape plan. The bean shall be plaz3ted similar to the planting of the bean to the south for continuity as a condition of approval. Finding: The landscape plan. illustrates an enclosed, screened trash area, {Attachment B, Exhibit 4, and Sheet 11). Finding: Landscape raves have been designed around the office buildings. Finding: A review of the planting diagram finds street trees are provided an South I-~askell Street meeting provisions afSectian 12.36. Additional trees are incorporated within the perimeter landscape plan. The additional landscaped area{s) and street trees will be included in the landscape and irrigation plan subrr~itted far approval by the City Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Conclusion: The application complies. CPMC I7 61. (JSU{~). Lighting. ~. Minimum Lighting Levels. .l#~inimum lighting levels shall be provided for public safety in all urban spaces open to public circulation. a. ~ minimum average light ZeveZ of one and two-tenths faotcandles is reduired for urban spaces and sidewalks. 2. Fixture Design in Public Rights-af Way. a. Pedestrian scale street lighting shall be provided including all pedestrian streets along arterials, major collectors, minor collectors and local streets. b. Pedestrian street lights shall be no taller than twenty feet along arterials atzd collectors, and sixteen feet along local streets. 3. (Jn-Site Lighting. Lighting shall be incorporated into the design of a project so that it reinforces the pedestrian environment, provides continuity to an area, and enhances the drama and presence of architectural features. Street lighting should be provided along sidewalks and in medians. Selected street light standards should be appropriately scaled to Page 9 cif 13 the pedestrians emir°ontnent. adequate illurnitaation should be pr~ovidedf©r wilding entries, corners of buildings, courtyards, plazas erred u~alk~~ays. a. 1lccessways through sz-rrface parking lots shall be well lighted with,~xtrrres no taller than twenty feet. Finding: Street lights Dave been. installed as per the approved master plazz {Exhibit 2.7.1, Lighting Fixture Detail}. These light are situated to illuminate the sidewalks for pedestrian safety. Finding: C?n-site lighting has been incorporated into the landscape design ofthe project. The site plan provides for additional parking lot and landscape lights {Applicant Exhibit 5, Sheet 7} to include accessways and walkways. Conclusion: The project can meet the criterion. ePMC .l7 67 (l5ll {M). Signs. Z. The pro~~isions of this section are to be used in conjunction with the city sign regulations in the Central Point Sign Code, Chapter 15.24. The sign requirements in Chapter 15.24 shall govern in the TQI? district and corridor; Finding: The rendered view of the Microvellum C~ffzce Park sign {Attachment B, exhibit 4, sheet 12} depicts a monument sign designed to be located along the private drive. The sign will identify the proprietors within the C}ffzce Park. A specific sign plan will be presented and reviewed by the City Planning Department prior to issuance of a building perrrzit to insure that the standards of Section 17.67.050{M} are met. Finding; A sign permit will be required. Sign standards and permit requirements are found in Section l 5.24 and 17.67 of the CPMC. Conclusion: Compliance with CPMC 15.24 Sign Code and 1'7.67.050{M} will be monitored during the sign or building permit process. CPMC 1 ?:1~. (12t? Site plan apprr~ual required: {.~~ ~ site plan application conforming to the requirements of Section 1 ~. ~2. (13~ shall be made: 1. For all construction requiring issuance of a building permit; or Finding: An application and supporting documents will be submitted that provide the information necessary for review for each of the proposed commercial office buildings prior to issuance of building permits. Conclusion: A Site flan Review for each of the proposed structures is necessary. The necessary application will be submitted prior to issuance of construction permits. e~ Page 10 of 13 CP11~C 1 ~ 72. (13(10) -- (.~~ .fin. fr1r~r~trztrctn Rer~uirerL This sectio~z of tl~e coeie addresses alI ofthe necessary iz~zformatioz~z to zrzakc a clccision for approval or denial of the site plan application. Finding: The Applicants have provided all of the necessary information as outlined in the above referenced code. Ccznclusion: The proposal complies. CP.t1~C .17.72, 444 Standards. ~n approving, conditionally approving, or denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their decision on the following standards: CPIYTC 17.72. ~4a (~1). Landscaping and fencing and the constructipn of walls ran the site in such a manner as ter cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme pf the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be lzeterogeneor.as to existing neighborhood lases. The Planning C'ammission may rega-wire the naaintainitag ~f existing trees fr~r screeningp~urpases and for saactad and sight insulation from existing neighbonc~aorl use; Finding: The landscape plan (Exhibit 5, Sheets 3.l and 3.2} replicates the landscaping design previously approved for the Snowy Butte Station Master Plan. The landscaping for the prof ect is expected to integrate with the existing landscaping of the surrounding development. Finding: The subject site has a planted berm along the east property line providing a buffer betweezi the project site and the railroad. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72, 4411 (B) L)esign, number and location of ingress and egress paints so as to improve and t© avoid interference with the traffic flaw an public streets; Finding: The project is designed with one primary access point, a private drive that shall be built to City of Central Point street design standards. Two {2} additional ingress and egress points serve the C}ffice Park. C)ne is from South Haskell Street and the second from Ash Street. The access points provide ingress/egress for the parking areas. Finding: The Applicants state that Phase Il of the Microvellum 4ffzce Park design will izzcc~rporate the two proposed access points Into the fizturc design to provide cross-access vehicular circulation. Finding: The three {3} proposed access points are not expected to degrade the public traffzc flow. Finding: The City of Central Point Public Works Department has determined that a Traffzc Analysis is not required for the project. Page 11 of 13 Conclusion: The application complies. CPMC .17 7,2, 444 (C) 1'o provide off-street par~~ing and loading- facilities atad pedestt~ian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use•for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; Finding: As discussed in the findings above, CPMC 17.67.050 {.1}, the Applicants have provided panting far the prapased project. The Applicants propose 245 parking spaces, to include the required ADA accessible parking spaces, thus meeting CPMC Section 17.65.050 Table 3 requirements. Conclusion: The application complies. CPMC 17. ~.2.11411(f~) Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter.frona traffic contrral signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: As discussed in the above findings, the rendered view of the Micravellum Office Park sign (Attachment B, Exhibit 4, Sheet 12} depicts a monument sign designed to be located along the private drive. The sign will identify the proprietors located within the t~ff"zce Park. A specific sign plan will be presented and reviewed by the City Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit to insure that the standards of Sections 15.24 and 17.67.050{M} are met. Finding: A sign permit will be required, Sign. standards and permit requirements are found in Seetian 15.24 of the CPMC. Conclusion: Compliance with CPMC 15.24 Sign Cade and 17.67.{}50{M} will be monitored during the sign permit and/or building permit process. CPMC 17 72.11411 (.t)). Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: As discussed in the previous finding above, the rendered view of the prapased rnanument sign {Applicant Exhibit 4, Sheet 12} illustrates an identification sign located along the private drive entry to the Office Park. A specific sign plan will be presented and reviewed by the City Planning Department prior to issuance of a sign permit to insure that standards afSectians 15.24 and 17.67.050{M} are met. Conclusion: The application complies. ~~ Page ~2 of 13 +~`PMC ~7. ~2.114(1{.L~}. ~Iccessil~ility a~zd sasfficietzcy off r•e.fightr'ng.facilities to suela a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety o f life, lirnh grid property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads arael.~re lanes so that all buildings on the prer~~ises are accessible tore apparatus; Finding: Fire District No. 3 reviewed this project in conjunction with the Site flan review ofthe 1vlicrovelluzn tJf~ce building ((18150} as evidenced by written camznents dated November 2`7, 200'7. The review and caznzrzents have been included in this staff report dated January l5, 2008. Finding: The project site has public street access and internal ar an-site circulation, with adequate width necessary to accommodate fire vehicles. Conclusion: Fire District 3's review and camzrzents can be addressed by the Applicants as specified by said fire authority. In addition, Fire District 3's requirezxzents can be monitored during the building perzrzit review process. CP11~IC .17.72'. f74~ {F}. ~`c~mpliance ti~~ith all city ordinances atad regulations, including Section 16.,11. ~8f1 pertaining to the ~a2aximz-~nz number of single family dlvellitzgs or dujelling units allo~.>able on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding No single-family dwellings are proposed with this application. Conclusion: Nat applicable CPMC .17 72. (T4t1(G}. Compliance with saseh architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area atad its environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the planning commission if found to Zee incompatible with the existing architectural or design characteristics of adjacent properties or uses. ~n addition, the planning commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setbaclr, buffering, or other development requirements that rraay be necessary to ensure Zand use compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point residents. Finding: The design of the proposed structures is substantially compatible with existing and proposed buildings. Under the terrrzs of the Snowy Butte Station CC&Rs, all proposed buildings must be reviewed for reasonable architectural compatibility. The Applicants have secured approval of the Architectural Review Committee for Snowy Butte Station {Applicant submittal page 9). Conclusion: The application complies. Page 13 of 13 ~~~~~~~~~~ f: ~ PLANNING COMMISSIt3N RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR MC-DIFICATIC~N APPLICATIfJN TO SNOWY BUTTE STATION TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN TO ADD THE MICROVELLUM OFFICE PARK SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Applicants: OId Railroad Properfiies, LLC and Microvellum Asset Management, Inc {37S 2W 10AD, Tax Lots 700 and 77~, APN 1081328 and 10989018). WHEREAS, the applicants have submitted an application to add the Microvellum Office Park site development plan to the approved Snowy Butte Station Transit Oriented Development Master Plan {File No. 03036} within the TOD-GC, Transit Oriented Development-General Commercial zoning district. The property consists of approximately 6.41 acres and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 10AD, Tax Lots 700 and 774, located east of South 1-Iaskell Street, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; WHEREAS, on January 15, 2(}08, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WI~IER,EAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to Major Modifications in accordance with Section 17.09.3{}0, TOD-GC, Transit Oriented Development-General Commercial zoning district Section 17.65, Design Standards TOD Corridor, Section 17.67, and Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval, Section 17.72 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, after duly considering Applicants' request, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application does comply with applicable standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A"} dated January I5, 2008; BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated January 15, 200$, which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. ~~ Planning Corrumission Resolution No. {1 J 1 ~/ 200$ FASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this l 5{~' day of January 2448. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST; City Representative Approved by me this l5{}' day of January, 2048. Planning Commission Chair ~~ Planning Commission Resolution No. {1/15/2048 ~~TATF;~, P'UI~ ~~~! , .R- ~~ i I, Jai ; ~ ~ ~, .:'~){)~' il~llEi~~ i' ~ ~il'~ .. ,.. ~, :i ~i ,. ~.:~f ,t~r.~.~~'.f~r~~,~ 11 ~•~',.4'na 'u'~-~6' ~~C~~ ~$~~~~`~ ~~~Ilsii{~~at~tic~l~ i~f ;i rcil~a;~st ?i~,~ i~xt~~l~sit>~~t o~`~T~'~~1~.~: l liltiv [: iati~~~°~-~ ~ni't T~~~~, i'1t>~7r-t?erit t~~~F~lict~ilt. 13i,~~c~~~~ t?t°~~e~J~lhrl~~„I~t. lt>c, Ct~t~~~i•-~ ,_'l~~n~, t~a~~:~iaitliitt~ ]'lanll~r B~'~~~'~~;a.~~.G~t1 .I Jar lZc~solutii3rl `'w'<~. %: ~ ~•_:_~~•:i~ Jl~ly :~, 2O(??, tl~~ 1'I~~Ist~ll~i;~ C"i~lnlnissii>>i ~Il~l~l-t~ti eci ~. ?x~~tjr~l ~n<~ililictlii<li~ 'i~l- tl~~.~ 1'CCIt_'~rl<>Ii «9'~~;'l~itc. 11~+.~~~~ 1'lal~l?c;cl [ "I~;t i~~rcJi~l~~7lent. The t'i~cl~siL~f1 ~v~ts t't~t; l~l-ci~,i'red tl~ltt.~<Itic~ll ic>r the contal~~itl~lr~t:~ (i?u;3ci t~l~ tlli? si117ject l~l't>~~i'rt~'. ~~~1~lte Hawk. iti <, ?'esiC3_i'iatial cic~ elc~l~lne~lt cc>t~~l7riscct z~l'61 lots ~i~~r~~rl~:~c.1 of Clia~:tc.l~i:~ci silt`>li:-i~3,i~l} d~a~:llill~s atul tl~L ~1.3 T ~. ilia'(.' Cf,)I li~li~71 ~)1'4;~3. t0 17~ifli 1~~' ~ 117 <l~S1r?IlC',~l i:1~Clt)sti~C~ i,ILIItS. 111 aC_cc~•clalic~C~ ~~iih ~c~i,ticjrl 17.(~~.1)(i(?~ a. ~it~tl,l Cleo ti'I()i~111~I1t ~"l~til 3i3t~>E '~t; 111~~ ti~'ti1~ t}~~ ~~I.t~' witlii2l siX l~~ 2'CLO11t11S. ~gi'~tic>>~ 1l.~$,~~(l provides 1c>t• 1 titrl~ e;;;.it~t+.sii.~i7 cli'si: ~6} I7~i~txii~s. ~~itln g~~~c~,l pause, it~i' tl~c~ lilili;~ o~tllc fi.lttl Cli;~ i'l<~1?rl~c~l~t l71<zn. ~tl~ ic; tl~c Cleclit7i; ire t1~4~ i~c~tlslt~ I~~i3rke;t, tlli; ap}71ii;?rlt is ri:clLlc~stll~~ C3.clditt~..?ta~~l time to si~l~l~~it. a till~tl Cc~ c:lol~l>~e.17t r71i~t~, l i' fzrtjt~ted, the rep isi'~l eel>il°atio~ date would July 1, (141~~. I'ae 1 of ~ ;', r FINDINGS: _ _ _ _ The request for a six (6} month extension was received in a timely manner. ATTACIIMENTS: Attach~xaent "A" - bequest for extension letter dated December 3, 2Q07. ACTIC}N: Consideration of the request for a six month extension. RECC}MMENDATI4N: Approve the request for a six {6} month extension. Page 2 of 2 ~ -- _ _ _ _" i~ ~ , , t I~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ,. ~ ~,- ~' ~ i l ~ ~ ~ ~ % ~ ___ ~--- ~__ _~ __ l -~ Ueveiopmnnt, 3!c ~~L ~ ' , December 3, 24f17 VIA .~ACS`I1V-fI~E 6b4-6384 ~~~~ ~ ~ Members of the Planning Comnrr`ssiorr City of Central Foint 4(15 Tlrird Street Central Por•rrt, C7R 9542 Dear 1#~er7rbers: Orr July 3, 2t1t17 the City of Central Poirit Plar~rring Conrrrrissiorr utrrrrrirnorrsly approved Resolrrtiorr 73(I, appro~lirrg tr rrrajor nrodificatiorr for T~Crite Hawk Plarrrred ~7rtit Developrrrerrt (File No, 11St111), ~e urxderstand drat this approval status rerrrrrir2s irr effect for a terrar of .18(1 days frorar the date of appr•ovar Irr light of the most severe housing deelirre since the Deltressiorr, eve need to delay the start of corrstr•uctiorr on tlrr's project arrd would greatly rrpprecirrte rrn exterrsiorr of `the approved Plrrrrrrerl ITnit :t7eveloprrrerrt for• anotTrer 18f1 days, fiorr of this request rind will a~vaif,}~our reply. ~© Box ~~~~ • central Point • Oregon 97502 {~~~ 7 665-~A~t~ Fax (~~~) 665-2979 cc~ ~~ 46858