Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - June 18, 1996 ~~ i~/' ` 'CITX OF.CENTRAL POINT ~ ~7 / PLANNING COMIVIISSION AGENDA ""~~'~',. June 18, 1996 -'7:00 ~.w". Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 353 L MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Cktuck lailand ~ Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy k~sh, Bob Gilkey, 'Karolyne:Johnson; ;and Valerie Rapp " III. ":CORRESPONDENCE ,.r, IV. MINC7TES `"i - z A. Review and approval of Jun~.4, 1996' Planuang Commission Minutes ' "V. `PUBLIC"APPEARANCES , VL `.:BUSINESS 3 _ 1 s A. Public Bearing - Review and recoinn}eq~latio~hregarding Tentative Plan Application for Snowy Mounty'i'iew Subdivision (372W10 TL 8400) (Appl;cants:' bean & Meridee Faucher) 19 -' 39 B. Public Hearing -Review and recommendation regarding Tentative Plan Application on Green Park Subdivision, Phase 5 (372W12C TL 3460) (Applicant, Pac'I7rend Tnc.) VB. MISCELLANEOUS ~`" VIII. ADJOURNMENT Y~ J CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 4, 1996 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. I1. ROLL CALL -Those present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Angela Curtis, Candy Fish, Bob Gilkey III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish moved to approve the May 7, 1996 Planning Commission Minutes as written. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the motion. ROLL CALL ,, VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Curtis, abstain, Fish, yes; Gilkey, abstain. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Review and determination regarding Comprehensive Plan/Zone Text Amendment to g_roperty on North 10th Street, commonly known as Gloria Dei Lutheran Church (Aonlicant• Gloria Dei Lutheran by Agent Alex Forrester & Associates) B. Review and de termin atio n r~. gardi ng_Site Plan Aonlication to fro e~rty on North 10th Str eet c omm only kno wn as Gloria Dei Lutheran Church (Aonlic ant• Glo ria De i Lut hera n by Agent Alex Forrester & Associates) Chairman Piland opened the Public Hearing on both Items A and B. Jim Bennett, Planning Director, read into the record a letter from the Agent for the applicant, Alex Forrester and Associates, requesting that both applications be withdrawn. The Planning Department recommended that the Planning Commission grant the applicant's request to withdraw the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, zoning map amendment, and site plan applications. Jim stated that the Applicant will resubmit the project as a Planned Unit Development that will not require a comprehensive plan and zone map amendment. „ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 4, 1996 Commissioner Fish made a motion to accept the withdrawal of the application for a Comprehensive Plan/Zone Text Amendment to property on North 10th Street, commonly known as Gloria Dei Lutheran Church (Applicant: Gloria Dei Lutheran by Agent Alex Forrester & Associates) and the Site Plan Application to property on North 10th Street, commonly known as Gloria Dei Lutheran Church (Applicant: Gloria Dei Lutheran by Agent Alex Forrester & Associates). Commissioner Dunlap seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Curtis, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes. C. RPSOlution No 352 A Resolution of Intent to Amend Zone for oroperty located at 372W3B Tax Lots 1501 1502 and 1504-N from Residential Two Family IR-21 and Ingle Family Residential (R-1-8) to Thoroughfare Commercial (C-51 Zone. Jim Bennett reviewed the proposed Resolution. He stated that all the property owners have been contacted and they support the zone change. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 352. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 352 to amend the Zone for property located at 372W36 Tax Lots 1501, 1502, and 1504-N from - Residential Two Family (R-2) and Single Family Residential (R-1-8) to Thoroughfare Commercial (C-51 Zone. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Gilkey. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Curtis, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes. Resolution was approved. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Jim Bennett informed the Planning Commission of projects currently in the Planning Department that would be on future agendas. Jim Bennett told the Commission that Paul Worth, as requested by the Commission, had inspected the sidewalk on Mingus Creek at The Meadows. Since it is on private property the City can discuss a possible guardrail with the management of The Meadows. Commissioner Dunlap asked about the portion of sidewalk on Freeman Road which crosses the creek and is City property. Jim stated that a request for a guardrail on this section of Freeman would have to be brought before the City Council. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fish made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Gilkey seconded the motion. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 18 , 1996 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: James H. Bennett, AICI~ Planning Director SUBJECT: Tentative Plan for Snowy Mountain View Subdivision Summat The applicant, Redha Corporation, is proposing a tentative plan for the Snowy Mountain View Subdivision consisting of thirty duplex lots. The site is zoned R-3, Residential Multiple- Family and is located between Columbine Way and Hopkins Road, west of the Countryside Village Subdivision, Phase I. A thori CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a subdivision tentative plan. Notice of the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. Discussion The Planning, Public Safety and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the Snowy Mountain View Subdivision and have concluded that it is in compliance with all city requirements if all conditions of approval are met. The recommended conditions of approval included in the Public Works Staff Report dated June 7, 1996 and Public Safety Staff Report dated June 12, 1996 are incorporated herein by reference. Exhi i A. Tentative Plan -Snowy Mountain View Subdivision B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Public Works Staff Report -June 7, 1996 D. Public Safety Staff Report -June 12, 1996 3 ~~r~,$zr ~ 0 O ~ (mil] i a ~t a w ccC •\ V ~ j F ~. 0 tl I I a r a ;I I i l' . I o 8 I ~ S a 'P i 0 ; " a `, ~! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I _ _ p u ~ r""- ~. ~ COLUMB INE_ u,.u off., •u_.. r..•. u ._ = . , WAY •IF _ _ _ wa 5 ' .. t ~ \~ ~. _..~ ~.M it .. ~.. ~ ._ o ~W t b l~ l I' ^ _ z a 8 1= ~I w l I ~ ° ~.~ ,.a.,,. ,.,. I ~ ~ ~ I I i ~I faPR 171996' Ix I I ,,., - I ,...N. ~I I clrv ~F. cer;rr,;~~_ rouvT ' . ,.. ,, ,..,., I I I I I _ I, II _ T i Aq F .~.3S~,o ° s../_-L~______ = ~ I ' ^ ^ l a a I® I I ,$,. . ~f,. I e~ ~ I ~kt e'a`t I 1 to mr. . u..w . . at _ ,..,.„. .,, ., a . ~I I _ ~ ' II E~ I _ ~ to I ; f s I '; :; ~;~; k~ ~ ,, , I ~ ~ = I ~ ~ z ~ ~ I . , a Z ~ ^: I= = I I i ,.I,..».. ,., .. I ig I I ..a.`,. ,Po. ,• d is ' I I 1 I I Nara,'. ,w.w I I I IY I . --~-~ __________ NOPI(INS__ ~' ~a~ ~ ~ I ~ - - N.,~ ~ .,.,,., ,N N I II ~ ~ I l p I~ ~ $ ^ - , ` ^I ~ I =~~ I~~ N.,, «.n II I I l ...... ....... Nasvr¢ uf.~e ..... II I ........I a „a I . I = ~e I ^~ i L ,.,.,, -- _ . --- i . J _ ,o ..,,.I,. Na,.,,.. ,,..a _ . _ _ ___.._ _ ._ . _.. _ .._ . R~::= ~, _.., ROAO ~ 6 _ _______ _ ___ ____ ~ qr__ , G zty o, f ~ G'e~2~~d~ 1'ozn~ EXHIBIT -!'L-^ .~x.~vnv~.~Er.~.~Tn~.~rr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date of Notice: June 3, 1996 Hearing Date: Tuesday, June 18, 1996 Time: 7:00 p.m.(Approximate) Place: Central Point City Council Chamber 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF HEARINGS names Benue Planning Direct Sandy Lomm~ Admiztistrati~ Planning Secreta~ Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for a land partition located in the Residential Multiple Family Zone (R-3) on property north of Hopkins Road, east of Primrose Drive, and south of Columbine Way. The site is located on Tax Lot 1700 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 37 2W 11A. The agent of record is L. J. Friar & Associates, P.C.. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for approval of tentative plans are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to tentative plans, land partitions, street, water system, storm drainage and sanitary sewer and CPMC Chapter 17 relating to lot dimensions. The Tentative Plan is also reviewed for compliance with the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday, June 18, 1996. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the hearing to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. ndStreet • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax (541) 664-6384 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3324 (extension 231). SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review hearing, the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan for the proposed land partition. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. The Council may, on its own motion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date, call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party aggrieved by the action of the Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing a written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the decision. N NOPHTENT/ADMIN 6 / ~ , PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT E~j$~ ' TENTAT/VE PLAN REV/EW ~~Q~ r~ ~~~~~~ Date: June 7, 1996 Project: Snowy Mountain View Subdivision PW 96017 Zone: R - 3 # of Lots: 30 No. of Structures 30 Applicant: Redha Corporation 339 West Valley View Road Ashland, OR 97520 (541) 488-3925 Agent: L. J. Friar & Associates, P.C. 304 So. Holly Street Medford, OR 97501 (541) 772-2782 Type of Land Use Action: Subdivision - T37S R2W, Will. Mer. Section 11A, TL 1700 Name of Development Snowy Mountain View Subdivision Applicable Codes: Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) 8.24, 8.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.04, 12.08, 12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64 Prepared By: Paul W. Worth -Public Works Technician Snowy Mountain View Subdivision - PW 96017 June 7, 1996 -Page Two I. TENTATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (16.10, 16.24) rue noo,..i„rb.., Srarns• Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.10.010 Filing Fee MS 16.10.020 Scale MS 16.10.030 General Conditions a. Name of Subdivision MS b. Date North Arrow Scale MS c. Legal location of subdivision MS d. Names/Address of Owner/Surveyor MS 16.10.040 Existing Conditions a. Location of street widths & easements, etc. TPR/DMS/FP Locate end Labol all easements on Final Pla[ b. Topographic Info TPR/DMS/FP Show Contour lines c. Benchmark established TPR/DMS/FP Show Benchmark d. Location and direction of all water courses N/A e. Natural features rock outcroppings, marshes, N/A wooded areas f. Existing uses of the land MS g. Location of all existing streets and utilities DM Show all existing utilities h. Zoning on and adjacent to tract is compatible MS 16.10.050 Proposed Plan a. Street Location, and the lanes, grades, radius of curves, relationship to other existing DMS,CPP Show street grades for individual or proposed streets, and other streets utilities. b. Easements-Widths/Purpose FP, CPP Show all easements on final plat and c. Lot Dimension MS construction drawings d. Other Uses NIA e. Lot square footage MS *ST ATUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD - DMS - DOES NOT MEET $TANDARD NA - NoT ARPUCnRLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED V Snowy Mountain View Subdivision - PW 96017 ` June 7, 1996 -Page Three Tentative Plan Requirements (16.10, 16.24 -Continued) ~,-:.~_ n .......:...:.... C~nrucK Cnnriitinne/(:~mments\tnfn Neadrd 16.10.060 Partial Development MS Is other property adjacent to this property being considered in the design) This property can be owned by the subdivider. 16.10.070 Explanatory Information a. Vicinity maps to explain relationship to existing streets, can require correction to existing streets. MS b. Proposed Deed restrictions CPP/MS At the time of Final Plat c. Center Lane profile of streets to show grade 1100" beyond street) CPP d. Approximate location and proposed size of utilities. MS,CPP 16.24.010 Block length MS Width MS Shape MS Not greater than 1200' MS 16.24.020 Block size MS 16.24.030 Blocks Easements a. Utilities MS,FP b. Water Courses N/A c. Pedestrian Ways N/A 16.24.040 Lots Shapes and Sizes MS 16.24.050 Lots-Size & Determination MS Lot length greater than 2.5 times width prohibited 16.24.060 Through Lots N/A 16.24.070 Lot Sidelines MS 16.24.080 Large Lot Subdivision N/A STATUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED Q Snowy Mountain View Subdivision - PW 96017 ' June 7, 1996 -Page Four II. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineating improvements, curbs/gutters, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck access, traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bikeways. A. Existing Conditions 1. Street Name -Hopkins Road - CSM Descriation -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Existina Conditions 60' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 2 7 VT/D yes yes yes yes Jurisdiction -City of Central Point Future Reauirements 60-66' Property to Property 40' Curb to Curb 2 moving lanes 2 parking lanes 2500-5000 VT/D Required Required Required Required 2. Street Name -Columbine Way LS 159 Jurisdiction -Private Ito be dedicated) (Note: Does not meet standards for street design. See Exhibit A, Condition 2(dl• Also refer to Planning Commission Resolutions 280, 3/8/95 and 302, 10/4/94) Descriniion -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Existin~onditions 50' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 2 ~ VT/D yes yes yes yes Future Reauirements 50' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 moving lanes 2 parking lanes 2500 VT/D Required Required Required Part of traveled way 3. Street Name -Village Drive LS 176 Jurisdiction -Private (to be dedicated) (Note: Does not meet standards for street design. See Exhibit A, Condition 2 (d) Description -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Existina Conditions 50' Property to Property 30' Curb to Curb 2 2 1 VT/D yes yes yes yes future Reauirements 50' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 moving lanes 2 parking lanes 2500 VT/D Required Required Required Part of traveled way ~~ Snowy Mountain View Subdivision ` June 7, 1996 -Page Five B. Street Standards ra„ no~,..l..a,,., Srarns'~ Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.20.020 Street Generally a. Location MS b. Width DMS,CPP See Exhibit A, Conditions 2c, 2d c. Grade CPP d. Relationship to existing street CPP e. Topography as it relates to drainage CPP Exhibit A, Condition #1 f. Provide for Street Construction CPP Exhibit A, Condition #2 & #3 g. Follows a Master Plan CPP See Info Needed Item #1 h. Traffic Volume CPP Exhibit A, Condition #3 I. Safety Features CPP Exhibit A, Condition #3 and #8 j. Accesses CPP Exhibit A, Condition #2 & #8 Comp Plans. Street R.O.W. & Widths LS ROW 50' MS LS Width " 36' CPP CS ROW 60-66' N/A CS Width 40' N/A 16.20.030 Street Reserve Strip CPP Exhibit "A" Condition #11 16.20.050 Street Extension CPP Exhibit "A" Condition #11 PWS,VII,G Street Intersection Angles 90° CPP Minimum corner radius - 30 feet at - right of way lines 16.20.060 Existing Streets additional width DMS,CPP Village Drive, Columbine Way, Exhibit "A", Conditions 2c, 2d 16.20.070 Half Street/Flag Lot Access NIA 16.20.080 Cul-de-Sac and/or dead-end NIA streets a. Shall not serve more than 12 lots b. Shall not be greater than 400' c. Turn-around 16.20.090 Street Names MS 15.40 Street Grades and Curves CPP Public Works -MA SA CS not greater than 6% N/A Standards -Not greater than 12% on LS CPP -Cannot be less than 1/2% CPP Curve Radius -LS - 100' CPP -CS - 100' CPP -SA - 200' -MS - 300' NIA Stationing CPP STATUS LEGEND: MS-MEETS STANDARD , DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS ~~ CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP -FINAL PLAT IN -INFORMATION NEEDED 1 " SNOWY MOUNTAIN VIEW SUBDIVISION - PW 9601 7 JDNE 7, 1996 -PAGE SIX 11. WATER IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flaw Protection. A. Existing Conditions 1. An existing 8" ductile iron water main lies in Columbine Way. 2. An existing 8" ductile iron water main lies in Village Drive. 3. An existing 12" ductile iron City water main lies in the North Lane of Hopkins Road. 4. An existing 16" MWC Transmission Line lies in the North Lane of Hopkins Road. 5. Existing fire hydrants lie on Columbine, Village Drive and Hopkins Road. B. Water Standards: Sr~r„sµ Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Water System provided mains CPP Exhibit "A", Condition N4 and General Public Works Standards Service Laterals, 1 ea. lot CPP Exhibit "A", Condition 5a Fire Hydrants not greater than 300' apart CPP Exhibit "A", Condition 4 Fire Flow 1000 g.p.m. provide minimum pressure 40 psi CPP Exhibit "A", Condition 4 and General Conditions 13.20 Backflow Prevention BPP Building Permit Process. Required for sprinkler systems. Exhibit "A" Condition 5 (b) IV. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local Systems Development Charge. A. Existing Conditions: 1. A 12" sanitary sewer line lies in_Columbine Way and also runs north to "The Meadows". 2. A 42" BCVSA trunk lies in the North lane of Hopkins Road, thence North along the East line of TL 1700 to the Regional Interceptor. 3. An 8"City Sanitary Sewer lies in the West Lane of Village Drive. 8. Sanitary Sewer Standards: ceor„s« Conditions/Cnmmonts/Info Needed nua .,y.,v.. _ ___ 15.40 Adequate sizing,Mainline services CPP Exhibit "A", Condition 6a, 6b Public Works Standards Regional SDC (fee paid at time building permit is issued.) BPP See Exhibit "A", General Conditions Local SDC (fee paid at time building permit is issued.) BPP See Exhibit "A", General Conditions "STATUS LEGEND MS -MEETS STANDARDS BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP- CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD TPR- TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION IN - INFORMATION NEEDED " NA -NOT APPLICABLE FP -FINAL PLAT i :~ . Snowy Mountain View Subdivision PW 96017 ' June 7, 1996 -Page Seven ' IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catch basins, and erosion protection. A. Existing Conditions: 1. A 24" storm drain is stubbed out to the easterly end of Columbine Way (flows west). 2. An 18"/15" storm drain Ties in Village Drive. (flows North) Note: Storm Drain catch basins in Village Drive do not meet City standards. 6. Storm Drain Conditions: cror„~• Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Surface Drainage and storm sewer CPP Exhibit "A" Condition 111, 7(b) Public Works system Standards Provide drainage through the subdivision CPP Exhibit "A", Condition 7 (al (b) Are there adverse effects placed on downstream structures) CPP Exhibit "A", Condition 7 (a) (b) No catchbasin located greater than 350 feet apart for any curb and gutter section CPP Exhibit "A", Condition 11 7(a) Ib) Discharge Basin N/A ORS 196.800 Wetlands Disturbance CPP None shown on Wetlands Inventory Map ORS 468.740 Erosion Control Plan CPP Exhibit A, Condition N1 Roof Drainage, Area Drains, Crawl Spaces ORS 8.28 Flood Management N/A " STA TUS LEGEND: M$ - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET $TANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED 13 EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS SNOWY MOUNTAIN VIEW SUBDIVISION GENERAL o ORS Chapter 468.740 requires that all developments which will disturb 5 ACRES OR MORE of land adjacent to a stream which discharges to surface waters of the State of Oregon shall as a part of th o~ nstruction permitting process submit an "Erosion Control Plan." The "Erosion Control Plan" shall require a PERMIT from DEQ. No construction on any Tentative Plan storm drainage system can occur until authorization to do so has been granted by DEQ. Developer shall provide a copy of the DEO permit to the City prior to beginning construction. o Developer shall provide and install ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department for each sanitary sewer manhole with a depth greater than 4.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. o Developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum flow of 1000 g.p.m. at each fire hydrant. o Developer shall construct all utilities, streets, and other structures discussed herein, within rights-of-way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central Point, in accordance with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of this development. o This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission approval, could require resubmittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible for this review. _o All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner. o No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued for each portion of the project requiring a permit. o The Final Plat of this Subdivision shall not be approved by the Planning Commission until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by construction and acceptance thereof or bonding for construction. o The City shall approve street stationing prior to Developer's engineer designing the improvements for this Tentative Plan. 1~ EXHIBIT "A" Public Works Department Tentative Plan Conditions SNOWY MOUNTAIN VIEW SUBDIVISION 1. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage improvements, lot grading and stabilization materials to assure that all streets, lots, and properties will drain properly and provide foundation support. The developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings and perform such grading, compaction, stabilization and drainage improvements which satisfies the drainage and stabilization condition leaving only minor grading required for each lot during construction. 2(a). Construction of this development shall include but not be limited to the street subgrade, base rock, paving, lighting, traffic control and delineation improvements, water, sanitary sewer improvements, storm drain, curb and gutter, safety improvements, ingress and egress improvements, and sidewalks, and utility crossings including widening of that portion of Hopkins Road adjacent to 737S R2W, 11 A, Tax Lot 1700. All improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City of central Point Standards and Specifications for Public Works Construction. 2(b). The developer can secure the above future widening improvements for Hopkins Road by signing a Deferred Improvement Agreement to construct the above street improvements. The Planning Department has the option to require this security. 2(c). The City's engineer shall, at the cost of the developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the street section design in accordance with the Public Works Department Design Standards. The engineer shall use the following design criteria: Street Name Average Daily Traffic % Trucks Village Drive 1,500 VT/D 2% Columbine Drive 2,500 VT/D 5% Mountain View 1.500 VT/D 2% 2(d) Prior to dedication and acceptance by the City, developer shall design and reconstruct Columbine Way and Village Drive in accordance with City of Central Point Public Works Standards and Specifications. 3. The construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and a Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City of Central Point Public Works Department. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's Public Works Standards. The developer shall pay for all costs associated with the design and installation of the improvements specified on these plans. 1~ Snowy Mountain View Subdivision June 6, 9996 Exhibit `A "- page Two 4. The construction drawings will indicate type, size and location of water service, water mains and fire hydrants in accordance with the City's Public Works Standards and the recommendation of the City's Fire Chief. All water systems shall be loop constructed where feasible. 5(a). Separate water service laterals shall be properly sized and configured for each dwelling unit. Include easement on Final Plat for any water laterals crossing adjacent property/padlot parcels. 5(b). Applicant shall install OSHA approved, testable backflow assemblies behind the City water meter for any system which connects to applicants irrigation system or another water system which may be a potential cross connection or backflow hazard. 61a). Developer's engineer shall design the sewer system to serve the development of this tract and all coordinate with the development East of this tract (Crown West Properties) which these improvements will serve. The sanitary sewer design shall be approved by DEO prior to approval of construction plans by the Public Works Director. 61b). Separate sanitary sewer serving each parcel shall be connected to the City sanitary sewers located in Village Drive, Mountain View and Colombine Way. The service lateral shall be sized in accordance with the Oregon Plumbing Code. In the event parcels are partitioned for padlots, each dwelling shall be served by a separate sewer. 7(a1. Developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for runoff onto the subdivision property and from each lot. As a part of the construction of the improvements for this Tentative Plan, Developer's engineer shall provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system for this development. Developer shall submit this information to the Public Works Department at the time construction drawings for the subdivision are submitted to the Public Works Department for permits. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the Public Works Department for hydrology calculations. 7(b). Developer shall execute a development plan with the Planning Department which includes a street protection plan and storm drainage/sedimentation protection during construction and building activities. Developer shall warrantee all improvements for a period of two years after acceptance. 8. The construction drawings shall include the locations of the driveways for lots 8, 16, 17, 12, 24, 30 confirming with the Public Works Standards. Accesses shall be located the farthest distance away from intersection. A 55' sight triangle is required at the intersections of Village Drive and Mountain View Drive with Hopkins Road. 9. The Developer shall provide the City's Public Works Department with an aerial photograph or topographic map which delineates the boundaries of the project and any 1~ Snowy Mountain View Subdivision June 6, 9996 Exhibit `.4"- Page Three wetlands in the immediate vicinity. The developer shall be responsible for all conditions and comply with all permits required by DEQ or DSL for construction of this subdivision. 10. The Developer shall coordinate with the 'developer' to the East (Colombine Way) for the design of the utilities and streets for this subdivision. Included with the construction drawing will be a separate drawing which details required coordination. 11. Shown on Final Plata (1') one foot access control strip at the East end of Colombine Way. 12. Prior to acceptance of street improvements including all water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and utilities. Developer shall provide "as constructed" drawings on Mylar. "As constructed" drawings shall include all field revisions including final invert elevations of sewer and storm systems, street grades and curb elevations. Additionally, Developer shall provide an AutoCad compatible digitized copy of the "as constructed" drawings and Final Plat. Digitized copy shall be presented in DWG or DXF format. 13. Developer shall be required to pay all previous City incurred costs for the Castle Court Condominium project IPW #92018) in addition to costs incurred for the Snowy Mountain View Subdivision. EXHIBIT ~ - interoffice M E M O R A N D U M to: Jim Bennett Planning Director from: Mark A. Servatius Fire Chief/Building Official "'~ sub)ect: Tentative Plan Snowy Mountain View Subdivision (Redha Corporation, Larry Friar Agent) (Project no. 96017TP) date: June 12, 1996 I have reviewed the Tentative Plan, for Snowy Mountain View Subdivision, further described as follows: AMP 37-2W-I IA, Tax Lot 1700. The following are my findings: 1. All fire protection requirements; including ,hydrant locations & water supply have not been satisfied for this development. Developer will supply the Fire Department with plans indicating fire hydrant spacing not to exceed 300'. Fire Chief will approve final location(s) of all hydrants. In addition water system will be tested by the developer and approved by the City of Central Point. 2. Fire Department access is approved as submitted 3. No Building Permits will be issued for this development until all City of Central Point conditions including installation of Fre hydrants have been met and final plat approval is given. CONCLUSIONS: The Aforementioned Tentative Plan meets all Fire & Building Department requirements & is approved pending all conditions outlined herein are complied with. Approval of submitted Tentative Plan Application(s) is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office; or ofnon-compliance with any applicable regulations of this jurisdiction except as noted. Reviewed By: cc: Public Works Department Public Safety Project File C:\OFFICE\WI'WQJIWPDOCS\Tf'SNOMIN. WPD A. Servatius Fire Chief/Building Official 18 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 18, 1996 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: James H. Bennett, AIC~ Planning Director SUBJECT: Tentative Plan for Green Park Village Subdivision, Phase V Summary The applicant, Louis F. Mahar, is proposing a tentative plan for Phase V of the Green Park Village Subdivision consisting of thirty-seven single-family lots. This subdivision was originally approved by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1994. However, the applicant failed to get final plat approval within one year of this approval and the tentative plan subsequently expired. It is being resubmitted at this time with no substantial changes. The subdivision is generally located west of Interstate 5, north of Green Park Village #1 and east of Forest Glen #1. Authority CPC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a subdivision tentative plan. Notice of the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPC 1.24.060. Discussion The Planning, Public Safety and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for Phase V of the Green Park Village Subdivision and have concluded that it is in compliance with all city requirements if all conditions of approval are met. The recommended conditions of approval included in the Public Works Staff Report dated May 22, 1996 are incorporated herein by reference. Exhi i A. Tentative Plan -Green Park Village Subdivision, Phase V B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Public Safety Staff Report -May 20, 1996 D. Public Works Staff Report -May 22, 1996 i9 <O n 1/go1q/~m~Ir~' 2PU~Y ~~Oq ~:is~ j~~M O a J~Sv I~~Y FWh s~T ~ZZ N~Y uui`oY ~~ 1 N ~WQ~ nap =0=~ ~3~HIBI'P 4`.&~ ~~. x s J x(!o C o[~~iv nN~ C. ut.,=~'= _ W ^~ „LLO `~k .o= ~`-=-a a a I~ // / / / / / ~ / / / O / z ,/ ~ /' ~ / Zo / z ~ a ~ /, o # € \~ // ~ / E-I ~ o , / / ,~;~ ~ '' Z ~! \ / / / / \ \ I'. a / / \ \ :\ W F~'i .~.I y ~ E ~\~ /// ~1~c //// / \ W\ \ \\ ~~~ (z] \ a it /E/!/ 7 \ _7r L° - I v.s ~ sea I. t (~si~ ao ~~ \\'~~~,,~~ yo~~6~5'\\,.g~y~' 9T,~y~~ & •jzvr,N~- t ,g~~\I ' 'K °~gg dt' ~'%6 /~\'t `~ `~F r i 00:$ a'K fv ~ s . ''w. ^& ~ o% / ~t`~'4@e 4 ~$~. T~ ~$f~J' er g I ~ ~9a ~~ ~ ~~. d +aJYll- _ ~' / ^~ ~ a; ) (Fn...Ta~- _'p~ '~nzo(-_-~ _~zY ~'~-zvm~_ _vom•_ _.n.z :.?4J~: ,,~W''~~: ti'7: '-~rsr.-ten ~--~-~:~~"'~-.tsF ~- -. ~ It-__-..,~-._-_. ./ .,'~C~ I~k.^v CA 35e~,d jy319 a~f&a ~PSz~k ~~$ ~ ~ ~cP °°w ^~Rp° 8 rv<§ .oo~av <I•vv " R8y ~gla -«3. n~ c ~_ .u'vv .n'ac .uro. .. ~ 8 Jtp ~~Ri ~PJn ~~ ~EJI~ ~ Iy~d{~~C ay ~ (APIA 35vHd 'NY@319 15'y~ J ' 19 q ~ xi;. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~, m ~ Z R ~ §> l m ~, u 4 tl tl ` a ~. fiQ~ W k E ~ ~ < ~ ~ \ o yq 04 a~ ' ~~ s •p ^~. ~~ y ~ H ~ V ~~ N q ~ N C p~ 1 ~ I ~~ 3 ., ' _ NE I ~ Ir` ` __ ~7 0 N $ ~ \ \ f~ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ l \ a. \ ¢_ ~ _y , !S~ ~i" \ Y~i U E9 ~.~Y ~z s g \~~' \''~^ $ w\ „ gi~4N ~ lla.m' ,; s ^ d5 $ $~~g ~. ~ r g €'~,~ w ~ ~.._~-[E8 ~ '\ii ~ "Eqi~~~ o~ / ~~~~ ~~~~ b~ Sa ~~ - / ~~ ~i y vJ ~c:rc~r~c ~ vo.o~ EXHIBIT PL~INNIlVG DE,I',A.~TN,tENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date of Notice: June 3, 1996 Hearing Date: Tuesday, June 18, 1996 Time: 7:00 p.m.(Approximate) Place: Central Point City Council Chamber 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF HEARINGS lames $enzte Planning Din;ct Sandy I.omm Adzninis[zati~ Planning Sceceta Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for a land partition located in the Single Family Residential Zone (R-1-6) on property north of Green Park Subdivision, east of Interstate 5, and south of Forest Glen Subdivision. The site is located on Tax Lot 3400 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 3'12W 12C. The agent of record Douglas McMahan of Hoffbuhr and Associates. ,CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for approval of tentative plans are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to tentative plans, land partitions, street, water system, storm drainage and sanitary sewer and CPMC Chapter 17 relating to lot dimensions. The Tentative Plan is alsc reviewed for compliance with the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday, June 18, 1996. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the hearing to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502. ,,i NOPIig~~nd Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) G64-3321 • Fax (541) 664-6384 2~ 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at IS cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3324 (extension 231). SUMMARX OF PROCFDIIRE At the public hearing, the Planning Commission wilt review the application, and technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review hearing, the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan for the proposed land partition. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. The Council may, on its own motion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date, call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party aggrieved by the action of the Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing a written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the decision. 4 N NOPHTGNT/ADMIN 22 >-~=~ M E M O R A N D U M to: Jim Bennett Planning Director from: Mark A. Servatius Fite ChiefBui(ding Official subject: Tentative Plan Green Park Village Subdivision Unit #5, Louis MahadPactrend, Inc. applicant) date: May 20, 1996 I have reviewed the Tentative Plan, for Green Park Village Subdivision Unit #5, further described as follows: AMP 37-2W-12C, Tax Lot 3460. The following are my findings: 1. Al( fire protection requirements; including fire department access, hydrant locations & water supply have been satisfied for this development. 2. No Building Permits will be issued for this development phase until all City of Central Point conditions have been met and final plat approval is given. CONCLUSIONS: The Aforementioned Tentative Plan meets all Fire & Building Department requirements & is approved as submitted. Approval of submitted Tentative Plan Application(s) is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office; or ofnon-compliance with any applicable regulations of this jurisdiction except as noted. Reviewed By: A. Servatius Fire ChiefBuilding Official c:~orFice~wPwrt~weoocs~catm>xsm>. wao 23 EXHIBIT ~ PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTAT/VE PLAN REV/EW ~~a~~ G°3Cp0~~ Date: May 22, 1996 Project: Green Park Subdivision Unit 5 PW 95020 Zone: R - 1-6 # of Lots: 37 No. of Structures 37 Applicant: Louis F. Mahar 1014 orth Riverside Avenue Medford, OR 97501 Agent: Douglas C. McMahan Hoffbuhr & Associates, Inc. 1062 East Jackson Street Medford, OR 97504 (541) 779-4641 Type of Land Use Action: Subdivision, T37S R2W, Section 12C, Taxlot 3460 Name of Development Green Park, Unit 5 Applicable Codes: Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) 8.24, 8.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.04, 12.08, 12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64 Prepared By: Paul W. Worth -Public Works Technician 24 1 ~; Green Park Subdivision Unit 5 May 22, 1996 -Page Two I. TENTATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (16.10, 16.24) Title Desr•.rintinn Statuc+ r:,,.,,ttr~...,<rc,.,.,..,on~an..r.. nh„a..a 16.10.010 Filing Fee MS 16.10.020 Scale MS 16.10.030 General Conditions a. Name of Subdivision MS b. Date North Arrow Scale MS c. Legal location of subdivision MS d. Names/Address of Owner/Surveyor MS 16.10.040 Existing Conditions a. Location of street widths & easements, etc. MS b. Topographic Info MS c. Benchmark established MS d. Location and direction of all MS/CPP Show top of bank for both sides of Elk water courses Creek Channel on construction plans e. Natural features rock outcroppings, marshes, wooded areas MS f. Existing uses of the land MS g. Location of all existing streets and utilities MS/CPP Show all existing utilities h. Zoning on and adjacent to tract is compatible MS 16.10.050 Proposed Plan MS, CPP Show street grades for individual a. Street Location, and the lanes, streets. grades, radius of curves, relationship to other existing or proposed streets, and other utilities. b. Easements-Widths/Purpose MS/CPP c. Lot Dimension d. Other Uses N/A e. Lot square footage MS *ST ATUS LEGEND: ' M$ - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - Nor APPLICABLE BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP- CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN flEVI$ION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED 25 Green Park Subdivision, Unit 5 " May 22, 1996 -Page Three Tentative Plan Requirements (16.10, 16.24 -Continued) TitIR nRSr:I1rIfIRR Sf nfnc• Cnnrl7fln nc /Cnmmn MC\Inin ~Inn.lnd 16.10.060 Partial Development CPP, IN See information needed IN.(2) Is other property adjacent to this property being considered in the designs This property can be owned by the subdivider. 16.10.070 Explanatory Information MS a. Vicinity maps to explain relationship to existing streets, can require correction to existing streets. b. Proposed Deed restrictions CPP/FP At the time of Final Plat c. Center Lane profile of streets to show grade (100" beyond street) CPP d. Approximate location and proposed size of utilities. CPP Show location and size of utilities on construction plan. 16.24.010 Block length MS Width MS Shape MS Not greater than 1200' MS 16.24.020 Block size MS 16.24.030 Blocks Easements FP Show utility easements on Final Plat a. Utilities b. Water Courses FP Provide easements for Storm Drainage. CPP See Exhibit "A" Condition 11. Show on Final Plat. c. Pedestrian Ways N/A 16.24.040 Lots Shapes and Sizes MS 16.24.050 Lots-Size & Determination MS Lot length greater than 2.5 times width prohibited 16.24.060 Through Lots N/A 16.24.070 Lot Sidelines MS 16.24.080 Large Lot Subdivision N/A STATUS LEGEND• MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED ~~ Y Green Park Subdivision Unit 5 May 22, 1996 -Page Four II. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineating improvements, curbs/gutters, safety improvements, ingresslegress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck access, traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bikeways. A. Existing Conditions 1. Street Name - GatePark Drive, LS-157 pescri t -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Exisfina Conditions 50' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 2 7 VT/D Yes Yes Yes No Street Name - Glengrove Avenue - LS 143 pescri tR ion -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Exisfina Conditions 50' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 2 1 VT/D Yes Yes Yes No B. Street Standards Title Description Jurisdiction -City of Central Point Future Requirements 50' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 moving lanes 2 parking lanes 1000 - 2000 VT/D Required Required Required Part of travel lanes Jurisdiction -City of Central Point Future Reauirements 50' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 moving lanes 2 parking lanes 2500 VT/D Required Required Required Part of travel lanes Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.20.020 Street Generally a. Location MS b. Width MS c. Grade CPP d. Relationship to existing street CPP e. Topography as it relates to drainage CPP Exhibit A, Condition #1 f. Provide for Street Construction CPP Exhibit A, Condition #2 & #3 g. Follows a Master Plan CPP, IN See Info Needed Item #1 h. Traffic Volume CPP Exhibit A, Condition #2 I. Safety Features CPP Exhibit A, Condition #3 & #5 j. Accesses CPP Exhibit A, Condition #8 Comp Plans. Street R.O.W. & Widths LS ROW *50' MS 50' LS Width *36' CPP 36' curb to curb SA ROW *' N!A SA Width *' N/A STATUS LEGEND: MS-MEETS STANDARD BPP- BVILOING PLAN PROCESS FP -FINAL PLAT NA -NOT APPLICABLE CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD n R -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION IN -INFORMATION NEEDED /Gj Green Park Subdivision Unit 5 May 22, 1996 -Page Five ~~ Street Standards -Continued. 7irlc na~~.L,rt„~ Sraruc• Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.20.030 Street Reserve Strip CPP Exhibit "A" Condition #12 16.20.050 Street Extension CPP Exhibit "A" Condition #12 PWS,VII,G Street Intersection Angles 90~ CPP 16.20.060 Existing Streets additional width N/A 16.20.070 Half Street/Flag Lot Access NlA 16.20.080 Cul-de-Sac and/or dead-end streets a. Shall not serve more than 12 lots MS b. Shall not be greater than 400' MS c. Turn-around MS 16.20.090 Street Names MS 15.40 Street Grades and Curves Public Works -MA SA CS not greater than 6% CPP Standards -Not greater than 12% on LS CPP -Cannot be less than 1/2% CPP Curve Radius -LS - 100' CPP -CS - 100' N/A -SA - 200' N/A -MS - 300' N/A Stationing CPP 11. WATER IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flow Protection. A. Existing Conditions 1. An existing 8" ductile iron water main lies in the West lane of Glengrove Avenue (Forest Glen #5) and is stubbed to South side of Elk Creek. 2. An existing 8" ductile iron water main lies in the East lane of Glengrove Avenue (Green Park Unit 41 3 An existing 8" ductile iron water main exists in the South lane of Gate Park Drive (Green Park, Unit 4. * STATUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT " IN - INFORMATION NEEDED 28 n Green Park .Subdivision Unit 5 May 22, 1996 -Page Six B. Water Standards: Tlln fleecrinfinn sratus" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Water System provided mains CPP Exhibit "A" Condition #5 and General Public Works Conditions Standards Service Laterals, 1 ea. lot CPP Fire Hydrants not greater than 300' apart CPP Exhibit "A" Condition #5 Fire Flow 1000 g.p.m. provide minimum pressure 40 psi CPP Exhibit "A", General Conditions 13.20 Backflow Prevention BPP Building Permit Process. Required for all sprinkler systems. IV. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local Systems Development Charge. A. Existing Conditions: 1. An 8" sanitary sewer line is stubbed out at ends of Glengrove Avenue, STA. 22 + 76 (Forest Glen 5.) and Tax Lot 4000 (Green Park, Unit 4) B. Sanitary Sewer Standards: Title Description Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Adequate sizing,Mainline services CPP Exhibit "A", Condition 6 Public Works Standards Regional Systems Development BPP See Exhibit "A", General Conditions Charge Local Systems Development BPP See Exhibit "A", General Conditions Charge "STATUS LEGEND M$ -MEETS STANDARDS DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP -FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED 29 Green Park Subdivision Unit 5 May 22, 1996 -Page Seven IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catch basins, and erosion protection. A. Existing Conditions: 1. A 15" storm drain exits Glengrove Avenue at Sta. 1 +48 (Green Park, Unit 4) to open ditch along'Interstate 5. 2. A 12" storm drain ends at catch inlet, Sta. 3+40, Gatepark Drive (Greenpark Unit 4) 3. Elk Creek lies along the West boundary of the subdivision adjacent to Lots 194 through 204. B. Storm Drain Conditions: Title Descriotion Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Surface Drainage and storm sewer CPP Exhibit "A" Conditions #1, 7(a), 71b) Public Works system Standards Provide drainage through the subdivision CPP Exhibit "A", Condition #1 Are there adverse effects placed on downstream structures) CPP Exhibit "A", Condition #1, 7(a), 7(b) No catchbasin located greater than 350 feet apart for any curb and gutter section CPP Discharge Basin N/A ORS 196.800 Wetlands Disturbance CPP Elk Creek may be identified as a Westland site. See Exhibit "A", Condition #9 ORS 468.740 Erosion Control Plan CPP As required by DEO, Exhibit "A" Roof Drainage, Area Drains, Crawl 8PP Exhibit "A", Condition #1 Spaces ORS 8.28 Flood Management CPP Exhibit "A", Condition #4 " STA TUS LEGEND: M$ - MEETS STANDARD DM$ - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED v O GREEN PARK, UNIT 5 INFORMATION NEEDED ON THE TENTATIVE PLAN IN (1) Provide a Master Street Plan and information on how Gate Park Drive will serve properties or connect to other developments to the West and South of this development. IN (2) Provide information regarding development of the non-lotted property lying north of Lot 193. 31 t, EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS " GREEN PARK, UNIT 5 GENERAL o ORS Chapter 468.740 requires that all developments which will disturb 5 ACRES OR MORE of land adjacent to a stream which discharges to surface waters of the State of Oregon shall as a Bart of the construction permitting process submit an "Erosion Control Plan." The "Erosion Control Plan" shall require a PERMIT from DEQ. No construction activity on any Tentative Plan can occur until authorization to do so has been granted by DEO. Developer shall provide a copy of the DEQ permit to the City prior to beginning construction. o Developer shall provide and install ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department for each sanitary sewer manhole with a depth greater than 4.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. o Developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum flow of 1000 g.p.m. at each fire hydrant. o Developer shall construct all utilities, streets, and other structures discussed herein, within rights-of-way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central Point, in accordance with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of this development. o This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission approval, could require resubmittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible for this review. o All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner. o No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, DEO and other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued for each portion of the project requiring a permit. o The Final Plat of this Partition shall not be approved by the Planning Commission until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by construction and acceptance thereof, or bonding for construction. o The City shall approve street stationing prior to Developer's engineer designing the "' improvements for this Tentative Plan. ~~ PURL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTAT/VE PLAN COND/T/ONS GREEN PARK SUBD/V/S/ON, UN/T 5 1. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains and crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the structure to drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage improvements and stabilization materials lot grading to assure that all streets, lots, and all properties will drain properly and provide foundation support. The developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings and perform such grading , compaction, material stabilization and drainage improvements which satisfies the drainage and stabilization condition leaving only minor grading required for each lot during house construction. 2. The City's engineer shall, at the cost of the developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the street section design in accordance with the Public Works Department Design Standards. The engineer shall use the following design criteria: ~ Street Name Age Daily Traffic % Trucks Wedgewood Drive 2,500 VT/D 2% Paisley Court 1,000 VT/D 2% Angela Court 1,000 VT/D 2% Glengrove Avenue 2,500 VT/D 5% Gatepark Drive 2,500 VT/D 2% 3. The construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and a Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City of Central Point Public Works Department. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's Public Works Standards. The developer shall pay for all costs associated with the design and installation of the improvements specified on these plans. 4. Developer shall jointly, with Crown West Properties (Forest Glen 5), construct a box culvert across Elk Creek at Glengrove Avenue, sized to carry a 100 year storm as stipulated in CPMC 8.24. Developer shall indicate the 100 year horizontal flood plain boundary on construction drawings and on Final Plat. Top of bank shall also be shown on construction drawings. 5. The construction drawings shall indicate type, size and location of water service, water mains and fire hydrants in accordance with the City's Public Works Standards and the recommendation of the City's Fire Chief. All water systems shall be designed for loop construction where feasible. 6. The developers engineer shall design the sewer system to serve the development of this tract and all future development west of this tract which these improvements will serve. The sanitary sewer design shall be approved by DEQ prior to approval of construction plans by the Public Works Director. 7.(a) The developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for runoff onto the subdivision property and from each lot. As a part of the ~.~ Green Park Subdivision, Unit 5 ~' May 22, 1996 `'1 Exhibit "A" -Page Two construction of the improvements for this Tentative Plan, the developer's engineer shall provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system for this development. The developer shall submit this information to the Public Works Department at the time storm drain construction drawings for the subdivision are submitted to the Public Works Department for construction permits. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the Public Works Department for hydrology calculations. 7.(b) Developer shall execute a development plan with the Planning Department which incudes a street protection plan and storm drainage/sedimentation protection during construction and building activities. Developer shall warrantee all improvements for a period of two years after acceptance. 8. The construction drawings shall include the locations of the driveways for lots 178, 180, 185, 186, 189, 194, & 208 conforming with the Public Works Standards. Accesses shall be located the farthest distance away from intersection. 9. Developer shall provide the City's Public Works Department with an aerial photograph or ' topographic map which delineates the boundaries of the project and any wetlands in the immediate vicinity. Developer shall be responsible for demonstrating compliance with all . permits required by DEQ or DSL for construction of this subdivision. . Developer shall provide the City with copies of permits and conditions required for this development. 10. The Developer shall coordinate with the developer to the north' (Glengrove Avenue), and to the developer to the west' (Gatepark Drive) for the design of the utilities and streets for this subdivision. Included with the construction drawing will be a separate drawing which details required coordination. 11. Developer shall provide a storm water easement for lots 193 through 204 adjacent to Elk Creek. The storm water easement shall be located from the centerline of the channel to a line 15' beyond the top of bank on each lot. 12. Shown on Final Plata (1') one foot access control strip at the end of Gatepark Drive. 13. Prior to acceptance of street improvements including all water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and utilities. Developer shall provide "As Constructed" drawings on Mylar. "As Constructed" drawings shall include all field revisions including final invert elevations of sewer and storm systems, street grades and curb elevations. Additionally, Developer shall provide an AutoCad compatible digitized copy of the "as ~; constructed" drawings and Final Plat. Digitized copy shall be presented in DWG or DXF format.