HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - April 16, 1996
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 2, 1996
THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL -Those present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber,
Candy Fish, Valerie Rapp, Karolyne Johnson, Bob Gilkey
III. CORRESPONDENCE
There was no correspondence.
IV. MINUTES
Commissioner Fish moved to approve the March 19, 1996 Planning
Commission Minutes as written. Commissioner Rapp seconded the motion.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Johnson, yes; Rapp, yes; Gilkey,
yes. Motion passed.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
There were no public appearances.
VI. BUSINESS
Chairman Piland moved Items B and C forward on the agenda and combined
the two items.
B. Revie~^~ ^nd determin^tion regarding omorehensive Plan2one Text
Amendment to_~nerty on North 10th Street, commonly known as
Glori~ Dei Luth r~n •h it h (Qpoli ant' loria D i L rth .ran by Agen
AI x Forr t r & Arco iat c1
C. Revie~ ~ and determination regarding~ite Plan Application to {Zropertv
on North 10th Street commonly known ac Gloria Dei Lutheran
h it h tAoolicant• Cloria Dei Lutheran by Agent Alex Forrester &
Acsociate~
Chairman Piland opened the Public Hearing.
Alex Forrester, 303 N.E. "E" Street, Grants Pass, Oregon, agent for
the applicant came forward and asked the Commission to continue
•- Z
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
April 1, 1996 -Page Two
the Hearing for at least 30 days. He stated that they had become
aware of opposition from the community to the proposal. They would
like to meet directly with the community prior to coming back to the
Commission.
Chairman Piland continued the Hearing until May 7, 1996.
A. Public Hearing Review and d t rmination regarding Te^r~r• ,p ai
Aoolication for propQrty in th vi inity north of B ~II an ~st of
Brandon Street and adjacent to Snowy B tt an (Applicants Bri n
& Lori Lowel
There was no ex-parte communication or conflict of interest.
Chairman Piland opened the Public Hearing.
Sue Riegel, Interim Planner, reviewed the Planning Department Staff
Report. Sue stated that the Planning Department recommends
approval.
Paul Worth, Public Works Technician, reviewed the Public Works
Staff Report.
Commissioner Fish stated that the Lowe's needed to be aware of the
regulation concerning the site angle on the property corner.
Brian and Lori Lowe, 708 Malabar, Central Point, applicants, came
forward in support of the application. The Lowes stated that they
have taken into consideration the site angle but wanted an
explanation of Condition 1 (bl, the Local Improvement District, and
Condition 8, Wetlands.
Paul Worth explained the requirement for the L.I.O. He stated that
the letter of consent to inclusion in a Local Improvement District
encurribers the property for those that currently own the property or
will purchase it for any future street improvement.
Paul also stated that the creek is on the wetlands inventory and the
City has to make notification to the State. The State will determine
whether there is a wetlands on the property.
2
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
April 2, 1996 -Page Three
Rosanne Wagner, 772 Beall Lane, Central Point, owner of the
property, came forward on behalf of the application.
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve Resolution No. 348, the
Tentative Plan Application for property in the vicinity north of Beall
Lane, east of Brandon Street and adjacent to Snowy Butte Lane
(Applicants: Brian & Lori Lowe} with a variance as to lot dimensions
and subject to all the conditions on the Public Works Staff Report.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Fish. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Johnson, yes; Rapp, yes; Gilkey, yes. Motion
passed.
D. Revie~ro and recommendation regardina orooosed Zone Text
Amendment to CPMC 17 72 020 Pertaining to Site Plan Applications
and CPMC 17 40 080 Pertaininq~o Parking Regs,iirements in the C-3
Zone.
Sue Riegel reviewed the proposed change with the Commission.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to recommend approval of the
proposed Zone Text Amendment to CPMC 17.72.020 Pertaining to
Site Plan Applications and CPMC 17.40.080 Pertaining to Parking
Requirements in the C-3 Zone. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the
motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Johnson, yes;
Rapp, yes, Gilkey, yes. Motion passed.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
Sue Riegel informed the Commission that the new Planning Director would
be starting on April 15, 1996 and she would stay until the end of April.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Dunlap made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Rapp
seconded the motion.. Ail said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 7:48 p.m.
3
STAFF REPORT
Date: April 8, 1996 (revised)
To: City of Central Point
From~•s L. Reynolds, AICP, Consultant to City of Central Point
Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment proposed on tax lots 1800, 1901,
2300, 2400 T375, R2W, section 2D and tax lots 101, T37S, R2W,
section 11D in the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary
(including the Pilot Corporation project and other land).
I have reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions for a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment proposed for the subject property.
The application materials provided by the applicant were accepted
as complete for review on January 16, 1996. The applicant's
proposed findings and conclusions on statewide planning goals are
generally acceptable. For goals 8, 11 and 12, however, the
proposed minor amendment findings need some refinement. The
following sections state some additional facts, note policy issues,
describe potential consequences, and note that the City of Central
Point now has before it a development application for a portion of
the subject property that will require a new street in the City of
Central Point in order to be adequately served.
What the Eaisting Comprehensive Plaa says About this type of
Property and the adjoining area within the Urban Growth Boundary.
The Comprehensive Plan for Central Point, Oregon discusses on
page III-29 and 30 the reasons to designate the area for commercial
use as:
"to serve regional needs related to the freeway, Exposition
Park and the airport. The Tourist-Commercial/Office-
ProfessYonal category is intended primarily to serve these
regional needs while benefitting the community economically."
The Urban Growth Boundary findings also noted the attractiveness of
the subject property for commercial uses.
Summary of Why Subject Property was designated Commercial
From the text of the Comprehensive Plan we know that the
subject property is designated commercial to possibly diversify
Central Point's economy. The area of the site was selected due to
its closeness to I-5, Expo Park and the airport. None of these
factors have changed since the subject property was designated for
future commercial use in the Central Point Comprehensive Plan. The
plan also notes the importance of the Bear Creek Greenway to
Central Point's future attractiveness as a community.
This action results in part from the concurrent annexation
application and also from a land exchange with the Jackson County
4
Staff Report to Central Point 2
Bear Creek Greenway program since the Comprehensive Plan's
adoption. The policies remain valid guidance for the long-range
betterment of the community, but the particulars of property
ownership need to be matched to the policies. The applicant
requests this plan amendment in essence to place the private land
between Interstate 5, Pine Street (the former Head Road), and the
current ownership o£ the Bear Creek Greenway in one block o£
commercially zoned land consistent with the overall Central Point
Comprehensive Plan designations.
Comments on Proposed Findings and Conclusions for Plan Amendment
Goal 8. Recreational Needs
It should be noted that development plans for the subject
property should include connections to the Bear Creek Greenway.
11. Public Facilities
The City does not yet have an SDC for streets. Appropriate
connections to public facilities will need to be required o£
developments within the subject property including necessary
easements. This also may include oversizing so that land to the
east within the Urban Growth Boundary can be adequately served.
Goal 12. Transportation
The original justification for having this land in the Urban
Growth Boundary included using the designated commercial land for
its proximity to Interstate 5. The traffic generation from new
commercial uses will be significant, but it is expected can be
mitigated by appropriate improvements on and adjoining the site. It
is expected that development will follow closely upon annexation
and the plan and zone change. Development plans .for the first such
proposal are now before the City of Central Point.
A pre-application conference has occurred with agents for the
owners of the subject property and an adjoining property. Plans for
a local street to intersect at the existing traffic signals at Pine
and Peninger are being developed and traffic studies are have been
completed for one proposed development and are underway for
another. Proper design and construction of a new street aligned
with the existing signal at Peninger and Pine will address most
short and medium range concerns about traffic impacts. Setbacks
sufficient to allow for the future construction of and additional
travel lane on Pine Street will be needed from any proposed
developments on the Pine Street frontage. Conditions for
appropriate street connections should be required both as a part of
this action with improvements specified in subsequent conditional
use permits or site plan review to assure continuity and
consistency for the orderly growth development of this part of the
City o£ Central Point.
5
Staff Report to Central Point
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITION OF APPROVAL
Access to the subject property shall be provided by the
creation of a new street aligned with the existing traffic signal
at Pine and Peninger. Development of this new street may be phased,
but street improvements on the new frontage to be developed,
changes to the traffic signal and all striping to accommodate
specific developments must be completed prior to occupancy of
developments on the subject property. The new street (including
extensions, driveways and intersecting easements needs to provide
access for all properties south of Pine Street, east of I-5, and
west Bear Creek so traffic can gain access to Pine Street via the
signalized intersection at Peninger Road.
6
Staff Report to Central Point 5
ATTACHMENTS
The following items are attached for entry into the official record
by reference and for the Commission's review of these concurrent
land use actions:
Item A - Vicinity Map
Item B - Notice of Public Hearing, Mailing List, and Tax Assessor
Map.
Item C - Application Materials including Findings.
Item D - Planning Department Condition of Approval
Item E - Proposed Resolution approving Plan Amendment and Zone
Change.
`"
T1'EM
C-4
1V1-
N
R
APPLICATION ~~C~{10~®
FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING TEXT/ ZONING MAP UCI. I S 1995'
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
APPLICANTINFORMATION ITEM ~~„fE -_
Name: Batter & Batter r....e~..___~_ _
Address• c/o Pulver & Leever, 1060 Crater Lake Ave
Medford . Suite C
CHy: State:
Telephone: eusfness: 773-7553 C-------_2lpCode: 975- 0-=
Residence:
2. AGENTINFORMA7TON
Namae J. Michael r.avi.... ,.__ _.
Address: 747 Ri bland, suite 19
CHy: Medford ate:
Telephone: Business: 773-2646 0--~'-ZIPCodo: 975- ~4-___
Residence: 779-2509
3. OWNER OF RECORD (AHach Separate Sheet If More Than One)
Name: Same as Applicant: See Findings
Address:
CHy: State:
Telephone: Business: ~-- Zip Coda: ----_
Residence:
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Townshi 37 g 2W Section:
P' Ran e~ 2- ~ _TaxLol(s): 1800, f 1901_
TownshlP~37 Range:_ZW Secton: 2D 230D. 2yDg
37 ---- Tax Lot(s):
P Ranges Sedbn: 11D Tax Lot(s): 10-- ~ -__
Exislfng2oningDlslAd: Greenway• IC F-5 and AR (County)
ProposedZoningDistrbl: C-4 (Tourist and Professional)
General Descrlptbn of proposed amendment to the zoni text
See Attached Findings ~ (Htdudealloodesedbns)orzoningmap;
Oescrk:e purpose lorproposed zoning ameMmenl:
Bring into compliance with ln.,n_s....,. _, __ ,.
5. REQUIRED SUBMfTTALS
!'r7 This appibatbn lortn. '
k7 Applbatlon Fee (a 325, )
&I WAtten auttaAty from Property Owner H Agent In applbatbn process.
ls7 Legal description of affected propertes [M applbabie).
L7 Map showing aii properties alleged and a8 properties within a 200 toot radius of exteAor boundary (H
appikabfe).
k7 FlrWings of lag addressing the cAteda fisted in CPMC 1288
El Proposed zoning text (H appHCable).
8. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE A80VE APPLICATION ANO THE PLANS AND
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
1 certHy that 1 am the: ~ Property Owner or ~ Azed Agem of the Owner
of the proposadvrmiectsttr. --,
Date/s ~95~
APPLICATION 6~~C~pif~6~
FOR AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE LAND-USE PLAN
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMEN1tl. 15 )995•
1. APPLICANTINFORMATION CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Name: Batzer & Batzer Investments, et al TIME
Address: c/o Pulver & Leever, 1060 Crater Lake Ave, Suite C
CRy;- Medford Slate: OR 2ipCode: 97504
Telephone: business: 773-7553 Residence:
2. AGENT INFORMATION
Name: J• Michael LaNier, Consultant
Address: 747 Highland, Suite 19
Cryy; Medford c OR
late: Zip Code: 97504
Telephone:8usiness: 773-2646 Residence: 779-2509
3. OWNER OF RECORD (Aaach Separate Sheet II More Than One)
Name:- Same as Aoolicant
Address:
Chy: Slate: Zip Code:
Telephone: business: Residence:
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TownshlP' 37 Range• 2w Segion: 2D TazLOf(s): 1800; 1901
Township, 37 Range• 2W Sedbn: 2D Tax Lot(s): 2300; 2400
Township, 37 Range• 2W Sedbn: 11D Tax Lot(s): 101
Exisdngcompptanmapdeslgna(bn Hear Creek Greenwav• IC, F-5 and AR
Proposed comp planrrlapdesignatbn Commercial
General Oestxlptbn of proposed amendment to the comprehensive land use plan:
Proooaed amendment to chanae areas of Pine Street to C 4
Tourist Commercial, consistent with annexation findings.
OescdbepugloselarproposedamendmeM: Bring site into compliance with
long-range plan for community
5. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
Gf This appAcatbn lone. ,
Cpl Applbadon Fea ($ 0 j; AppIIceM b required to pay IoraB adndnlstrattve and legal stall lime.
Q Wdtten aulhorky from Property Owner H Agent In applk~tbn process,
(3 Legal desaiplion and. map of aflected properties and ail properties whhln a 3001oot radius of exterior
bcundaryolproposedamendmem.
® Flndings of IaIX addressing the cdteda fisted In CPMC 1798
^ Proposed comp plan tent pl applbahle).
C$ Map Aluslrating any proposed amendment to disldd bcundades or UGb.
6. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS AND
DOCUMENTS SUDMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
IcerlHythatlamthe:^PropertyOwner or C~-AagodzedAgeMOttheOwner
of the orooosed-omien saw
Date~~%ff /4 S~
L....~~~.~~~.-..-~~_-....~~-.~~~.~ }~._.~~^~_... •.n-mcn~ _i^v=iLAOOPY OFiHIS FORMTO YOU.
,.
IN THE MATTER OF A REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION
AND A CONCURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
ZONING DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 13.62
ACRES, LOCATED OFF PINE STREET AND I-5
IN CENTRAL POINT, OREGON: Batzer & Batzer
Investments, et_ al., Applicants
J. Michael LaNier, Consultant, Agent
AMENDED
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
DATE: June 31, 1995 (Amended Dec. 15, 1995)
PROPOSAL: An application for Annexation of
7.58 acres to the City of Central
Point, Oregon, and a Concurrent Plan
and Zoning Designation of C-4
(Tourist and Office Professional)
Batzer & Batzer Investments, Frank
J. Pulver III, William Leever, Helen
C. Hoffbuhr, Gregory T. Hornecker,
Russel Ray Heysell, Viking
Distributing Company, Robert ~'H.
Hutchins, Sr. and James M. Wright:
c/o 1060 Crater Lake Avenue, Suite C
Medford, OR 97504
AGENT: J. Michael LaNier, Consultant
747 Highland, Suite 19
Medford, OR 97504
(503) 779-2509
PROPERTY OWNER: Same as Applicants
11
II FINDINGS OF FACT PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1. Legal Description: The subject property to be annexed
consists of approximately 13.62 acres, consisting of five tax lots
that lie along Interstate 5 and south of Pine Street, and on the
East side of the freeway. The parcels are, specifically:
a) T37 R2W Section 2D, Tax Lots 2300 and 2400;
b) T37 R2W Section 2D, Tax Lots 1800 and 1901;
c) T37 R2W Section 11D, Tax Lot 101.
A complete metes and bounds description of the overall area to be
annexed has been provided. Consent to Annex Petitions have been
signed and authorized by all the property owners.
2. Location: The property in question is located generally east
of Interstate 5, and south of Pine Street. The City Limits abut
the property on a common boundary in the east-central quadrant of
the Central Point urban area. The property is currently not
developed, and is within the Urban Growth Boundary for the City of
Central Point.
3. Size: The annexation consists of 13.62 acres total. Site maps
of the area to be annexed are attached as Exhibit A.
4. Land Use: The subject property is generally vacant and
undeveloped land, abutting the freeway. Land use north of the site
are C-4, Pine Street and Bear Creek Greenway. Land uses south (and
across the freeway) are residential. The area~to be annexed is
consistent with projections for urban land needs within the City,
and lies within the Urban Growth Boundary.
5. Zoning: Zoning designation on TL 101 and 1800 is AR (Aggregate
Resource); TL 1901 is zoned F-5 and TL 2300 and 2400 are IC
(Interchange Commercial) as designated by the Jackson County
Zoning/Comprehensive Plan, 1982; however, the property is included
in the Urban Growth Boundary of the City of Central Point, Oregon,
and has been designated as BCG (Bear Creek Greenway) by the City of
Central Point. This application asks for a concurrent Plan Map
Amendment of Commercial and a zoning designation of C-4 for the
entire site (all 5 parcels).
12
6. Current Assessed Valuation: Based upon information received
from the assessor's office on August 2, 1995, the assessed
valuation of the subject property is estimated as follows:
Tax Lot 2400: Land & Improvements: $331,810.00
Tax Lot 2300: Land & improvements: $453,230.00
Tax Lot 1901: Land: $88,300.00
Tax Lot 1800: Land: $37,790.00
Tax Lot 101: Land: $62,730.00
TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE: $973,860.00
It should be noted that the subject property does not have any
special farm or forest assessment at this time.
7. Existinc Improvements: As noted
vacant, and improvements are limited
does abut the Bear Creek Greenway, a
will be in concert with the focus
orientation, open space, and other
impacts on the Greenway.
above, the sites are generally
to two homesites. The property
nd the development of the site
of the Greenway in terms of
factors that would mitigate
8. Urban Services: Urban services are generally available or can
be made available to the property at this time, including fire
protection, police protection, water-and sewer. Anticipated use
of the property for commercial uses will require facilities to be
extended to the site, and information pertinent to the annexation
of the property and public facilities is noted below:
A. Water Service: Water is provided by the Medford Water
Commission and the City of Central Point via~a 12-inch ductile
iron line in Pine Street. Additionally, water service may be
extended along proposed crossings of the freeway as noted in
the Central Point Water Master Plan.
Extensions of the water system to the site will be the
responsibility of the developer. Water service and water
capacity is adequate to serve the properties (Public
Works, City of Central Point, 8-28-95).
13
B. Sewer Service: Sewer service can be provided to the site
by extension of the existing sewer line located in Pine Street
on the East side of I-5 via BCVSA. Further, there is a 42"
line (East Branch interceptor) that is north of the site.
C. Storm Drain: The site is immediately abutting the
Bear Creek Greenway, which is a mayor storm drain
receptor for the entire drainage basin.
III COMPLIANCE WITH ANNEXATION CRITERIA, PER CHAPTER
1 20 CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE lCPMC1:
The provisions of the Central Point Municipal Code, Chapter 1.20,
provides for the Annexation Procedure for annexation of real
property into the City of Central Point. The following findings
are submitted to demonstrate compliance with these criteria:
Chapter 1.20.010: All proposals for annexatioa of real property to
the City under the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes 222.111 to
222.180, now in effect or as hereafter amended, shall be
accompanied by a preliminary plat, an exterior boundary legal
description and the annexation fee as in this chapter provided.
FINDING•
The City of Central Point can find that this application
is consistent with this standard, in that a preliminary
plat, an exterior boundary legal description and the
annexation fee have been submitted as required by Chapter
1.20.010 and Ordinance 1684, which changed the annexation
fee to two hundred dollars. Findings addressing ORS
222.111 to 222.180 are also attached, to demonstrate
compliance with the applicable State of Oregon criteria
as well.
14
F•
Chapter 1.20.011: Applications and review thereof shall conform to
the provisions of Chapter 1.24 (Public Hearing procedures) of the
Central Point Municipal Code and all applicable laws of the state.
Applications for annexation may be accompanied by other, concurrent
applications, for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Amendments
to the Zoning map and requests for withdrawals from special
districts, provided that such concurrent applications meet all
requirements.
FINDING•
This application is consistent with this section, in that
the City of Central Point has adopted a public hearing
process, and all land use issues are processed via that
process, consistent with•Chapter 1.24. This application
also contains concurrent findings to support an amendment
for a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designation to C-
4, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 1.24, and
Chapters 17.88.040, and Chapter 17.96.
Section 1.20.020: Preliminary Plat Requirements:
(This section provides for technical requirements for
submitting the preliminary plat for annexation, including
paper size, scale, title block requirements, and other
information to be contained on the plat).
FINDING•
The City of Central Point can find that the plat
submitted with this application is consistent with the
provisions of Section 1.20.020.
Section 1.20.030: Legal Description:
A narrative legal description of the exterior boundary of the area
to be annexed shall be submitted with each proposal for annexation.
15
FINDING•
The City of Central Point can find that this application
is consistent with the requirements of Section 1.20.030,
in that a complete metes and bounds prepared by a
licensed professional has been prepared and is
accompanying the application.
SUMMATION AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
The City of Central Point can find that the submissions and
procedure are consistent with the requirements as defined in
Chapter 1.20 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code.
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH ORS 222.111 THROUGH 222.180:
The provisions of the Oregon Revised Statutes, ORS 222.111 through
ORS 222.180, outline the various procedures that can be utilized by
municipal corporations in annexation of property into the city
.limits. ORS 222.11i.outlines~aiithority and procedure, generally;
ORS 222.115 provides for annexation contracts. ORS 222.120 notes
that, unless expressly required by a city charter, the legislative
body of a city is not required to submit a proposal for annexation
to the electors of the city.
ORS 222.125 provides for the procedure of annexation by consent of
all owners of land in a territory to be annexed, and is germane to
this application. This section notes that
"The legislative body of a city need not call or hold an
election in the city or in any contiguous territory
proposed to be annexed, or hold the hearing otherwise
reauired under ORS 222.120, when all of the owners of
land in that territory, and not less than 50 percent of
the electors, if any, residing in the territory, consent
in writing to the annexation of the land in the territory
and file a statement of their consent with the
legislative body. Upon receiving written consent to
annexation by owners and electors under this section, the
legislative body of the city, by resolution or ordinance,
may set the final boundaries of the area to be annexed by
a legal description, and proclaim the annexation."
~, 6
ORS 222.130 through ORS 222.160 discusses annexations where
elections are required, and as such, these statutes are not
generally considered applicable to this situation.
ORS 222.170 governs the effect of consent to annexation of land by
territory, with or without a city election. This section is
generally discussed as the "Triple Majority" statute, and notes
that
"...The legislative body of the city need not call or
hold an election in any contiguous territory proposed to
be annexed if mare than half of the owners of land in the
territory, who also own more than half of the land in the
contiguous territory and of real property therein,
representing more than half of the assessed value of all
real property within the contiguous territory consent in
writing to the annexation of their land in the territory,
and file a statement of their consent with the
legislative body..."
The balance of the statutes (ORS 222.173 through ORS 222.180)
discuss time limitations, public records, and filing of the
applications with the Secretary of State, and are procedural in
nature.
FINDING'
In this case, the property owners, who own all of the
property within the territory to be annexed, and, who
represent 100 of the electors within the territory to be
annexed, have consented, in writing, to the annexation of
this property and that consent is submitted as an exhibit
to these findings.
With this in mind, the City of Central Point can accept
the petition to annex, and may set the final boundaries
to be annexed by resolution or ordinance, :and hold a
public hearing consistent with Chapter 1.24:020(D)(1)(2)
and (3) of the Municipal Code, and demonstrate, by these
findings, that the application is consistent with ORS
222.125.
SUMMATION AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
Based upon the information contained in this application and these
findings, the City of Central Point can find that this application
for annexation is consistent with the applicable sections of the
Oregon Revised Statutes, and specifically with ORS 222.125, in that
the owners have consented in writing to the annexation, and they
represents both 100 ownership and electors, and the city may
proclaim the annexation after the locally required hearing.
V. AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE:
The application before the City of Central Point is to annex
approximately 13.62 acres of land to the City, and amend the
Comprehensive Plan Designation on the property from BCG (Bear Creek
Greenway) to Commercial, and adopt the C-4 Zoning Designation £or
the property as well.
Section 17.96.050 0£ the Central Point Municipal Code requires that
the City of Central Point, in processing a proposed amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Ordinance,
" ..shall address the pulilic need, and justification for
the proposed change, and shall make specific findings,
reciting the evidence in support thereof, for each of the
state-wide planning goals as the same apply to the
proposed change....
This section further notes that
^ ..findings adopted by the planning commission following
the public hearing shall be forwarded to the city council
prior to the public hearing at the council level...^
The information contained herein includes findings of fact to
demonstrate compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals, and the
applicable provisions of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Ordinance as well:
ig
A Compliance with Statewide Goals:
The purpose of reviewing general comprehensive plan map amendments
against the Statewide Planning Goals is to assure that changes made
in the acknowledged Plan are also acknowledgeable. A finding of
consistency with the plan policies and mapping criteria can be
generally construed to mean consistency with the Goals, other than
when an exception is being taken via Goal 2 and when the applicable
administrative rules (OAR's) are mandated.
As the subject property does .lie within the Urban Growth Boundary
of the City of Central Point, it has been found to be committed to
Urban use. Therefore, no exception is required under OAR
660.04.022-028.
The sole question before the city is to acknowledge the character
and orientation of the property and the neighborhood, and apply
that appropriate land use designation to the site consistent with
the proposed Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial.
The measure of Statewide Goal compliance is the combined evaluation
of the existing exception taken for land within the Urban Growth
Boundary, and the explicit criteria and policies contained in the
statewide goals themselves, as noted below:
GOAL 1: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
The purpose of the goal is to insure that a citizen involvement
program exists that insures the opportunity for citizens to be
involved in all phases of the planning process.
FINDING•
The City of Central Point can find that the City Council
has adopted appropriate policies and procedures to insure
compliance with this goal, specifically Chapter 1.24,
which establishes the public hearing process and a
uniform procedure for planning, zoning and land use
decisions. If the application is deemed to be
consistent with Chapter 1.24, it follows that the
application is consistent with this Goal.
19
GOAL 2: LAND USE PLANNING
The purpose of this goal is to establish a land use planning
process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and
actions related to use of land, and to assure an adequate factual
base for such decisions.
FINDING'
As noted above, the City of Central Point can find that
the City Council has adopted a Comprehensive Plan and an
implementing Land Development (Zoning) Ordinance for a
uniform framework for processing land use decisions. The
information contained in these findings demonstrate
compliance with the implementing ordinances, and as such
the applications are in compliance with this goal.
The property in question is currently identified on the
General Land Use Plan Map as Urban land. The proposed
change to C-4 (Tourist and~Office/Professional) is based
upon information indicating that there is a public need
for this use as demonstrated in the Plan, and that the
use is consistent with the land uses in the vicinity.
GOAL 3: AGRICULTURAL LANDS
Not Applicable; Land is inside the Urban Growth Boundary and
proposed for inclusion in the City Limits, and as such is committed
to urban uses consistent with Goal 2 and Goal 14.
GOAL 4: FOREST .LANDS:
Not Applicable; land is inside the Urban Growth Boundary and
proposed for inclusion within the City Limits; and as such is
committed to urban uses.
GOAL 5• OPEN SPACE SCENIC AND HISTORICAL AREAS: NATURAL
RESOURCES-
The purpose of this goal is to conserve open spaces and protect
natural and scenic resources. Programs shall be provided that
protect scenic and historic areas and natural resources....The
location, quality and quantity of the (resources) shall be
inventoried.
~~
FINDING•
The City of Central Point can find that the subject
property, while shown on the Zoning Map as Bear Creek
Greenway, is a border of land outside the official
Greenway Boundary, which lies east of the subject
properties. The sites in question are available for
development with limited impact on the greenway, are
committed to urban uses, and are not needed or desirable
for open space, mineral or aggregate resources, energy
sources, fish and wildlife habitat, wilderness areas,
historic areas, sites or structures, cultural areas,
recreation, scenic views or any other ecologically or
scientifically significant area, based upon the location,
orientation, and character of the property and the
surrounding area. The property will provide for a unique
opportunity to utilize design strategies to buffer the
Greenway from the Freeway.
The property is currently near urban level development,
both commercial -and residential, and is affected by
major transportation features such as I-5 -and Pine
Street, as well as the Greenway and Greenway Bikepath.
The proposed change in zoning requested is, however,
consistent with the land uses and topography in the area,
and with the urban form in the vicinity; parks SDCs as
part of the development costs provide for additional
parks and improvements consistent with City policies.
GOAL 6• AIR WATER AND LAND RESOURCE QUALITY:
The purpose of this goal is to maiataia and improve the quality of
the air, water and land resources of the state.,.
FINDING•
The City of Central Point can find that this property is
served by BCVSA for sewer service and is also served by
the City, via the Medford Water Commission for potable
water.
11
21
A review of the wetlands inventory indicates that there
is a potential mitigation necessary, as the drainage that
serves the site (Bear Creek) is also a greenway that will
require the developer to work with the Greenway and the
Division of State Lands regarding the site. The proposed
zone is consistent with the existing and proposed uses of
the site in conformance with the amendment to the General
Land Use Plan Map and should not impact the ability of
the City to provide service. The City of Central Point
can find the application is consistent with the goal.
GOAL 7• AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS:
This goal is to protect life and property from natural disasters
and hazards.
FINDING'
The subfect property is not located in any area mapped as
a significant hazard area for erosion, landslides or
other natural hazards. The FEMA mapping for Bear Creek
will be complied with in terms of flood hazard from that
waterway, is consistent with Goal 7.
GOAL 8: RECREATIONAL NEEDS:
This goal is to satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens and
visitors in the state.
FINDING'
Again, while the site is identified as an area that is
mapped or inventoried for open space use, the actual
Greenway area lies easterly of the properties, and
adequate provision has been made to ensure that adequate
land was conveyed to the Greenway to mitigate any impacts
from development of this site; parks and recreation are
paid for by Parks SDCs via the development permit
process, and the development of this property; consistent
with the Greenway plan, will provide added monetary
incentives for the Parks and Recreation program for the
City of Central Point.
12
22
GOAL 9: ECONOMY OF THE STATE:
This goal is to diversify and improve the economy of the state, and
particularly to encourage development and activity in areas that
have underutilized human and natural resource capability.
FINDING'
The subject properties are located in an area (Southern
Oregon) that has been dramatically affected by the loss
of jobs in a key industry...timber. In order to
diversify and improve the economy of the state, provide
encouragement for private enterprise and enhancing
productivity, the City of Central Point can find that
designating the area in question as Commercial will
provide for a wide range of uses that recognizes the
current level of development in the vicinity, emphasizes
the changing conditions in the area and provides for
adequate management programs that can help the private
sector expand and increase productivity, thus
demonstrating compliance with this element. The
Commercial character of the area provides for greater
flexibility and uses on the subject parcel while
preserving the general overall character of the
neighborhood.
GOAL 10: HOUSING:
This goal is to provide for the housing seeds of the state. The
goal requires that buildable lands be inventoried, and plans
encourage the availability of adequate numbers of housing units at
prices and rent levels which are affordable.
FINDING'
Not Applicable; Area is not designated for any
housing use, and is not consistent with housing
characteristics for the area.
GOAL 11: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND..SERVICES:
This goal is to plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient
arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a
framework for urban and rural development.
13
23
FINDING:
A review of the subject property indicates that the
parcels, consisting of 13.62 acres, are located in an
area currently able to be served by City public
facilities, including water, sewer, storm drains,
streets, police and fire protection, and other related
services. Since the City of Central Point will receive
increased tax revenues from the annexation of this site,
and since the City has implemented Systems Development
Charges for all new development to pay for extensions to
public facilities, including water, sewer, parks and
streets, the applicant submits that any new businesses
developed on site will ultimately assist in paying for
his fair share of the development costs for public
facilities and services necessary to serve a property of
this type. Since facilities exist in the immediate area,
the cost of extension of these services to the taxpayers
is minimal. The City of Central Point can find that the
site is in conformance with Goal 11.
GOAL 12: TRANSPORTATION:
This goal is to provide and encourage a safe, convenient and
economic transportation system.
FINDING'
As noted above, the subject property takes access from
Pine Street, which connects directly with existing
streets within the city system, and the I-5 interchange.
Any intensification of use as envisioned by the proposed
zone change will be consistent with other uses in the
vicinity; the level and intensity of commercial uses
proposed for the site, for example, will be fudged when
the annexation and zone change are complete, and a
development plan submitted for the property: Annexation
and zoning, oer se, will not affect the traffic off this
site.
GOAL 13: ENERGY CONSERVATION:
This goal is to conserve energy, to manage and control land uses to
maximize conservation of energy based upon sound economic
principles.
14
24
FINDING•
The City of Central Point can find that the land use plan
generally adopted by the City, and the building codes
that have been adopted are in place primarily to conserve
and manage energy. The proposed modification as
expressed in this application will, by virtue of urban-
centered growth, and a design which will provide adequate
circulation and access, has addressed the appropriate
criteria for energy conservation as outlined in the goal.
GOAL 14: URBANIZATION:
This goal is to provide for an orderly and efficient transition
from rural to urban land use; requires Urban Growth Boundaries, and
planning techniques.
FINDING'
The subject property is located within the Urban Growth
Boundary of and is proposed for inclusion into the City
Limits for the City of Central Point, and has for some
time been committed to urban levels of development by
virtue of that inclusion.
The site has access to primary public facilities, and
thus is consistent with Goal 14. The property is within
a fire protection area (Central Point). The applicable
category of land use was requested to recognize the wide
variety of commercial activities that can take place
within the city, and more effectively responds to the
uses on site and on abutting parcels with an eventual
Planned Development concept, while providing adequate
mitigations for the Greenway.
SUMMATION AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
Based upon the information contained herein, the City of Central
Point can find that the Annexation request, the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and Zone Change Request for the subject parcels are
consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals.
15
25
B Public Need and Justification (Section 17 88.030 and Section
17.96.050, CPMC):
As noted above, the concept of public need must be addressed to
justify the change in the Comprehensive Plan map for the City. In
addition, Chapter 1.24, which outlines the requirements for
findings. These findings must include
" ..a comprehensive statement of factual information that
the applicant intends to establish and upon which he
intends to rely and proposed conclusions setting forth
the manner in which the applicant believes that the facts
meet all criteria, and support an allowance of the
application."
FINDING'
The information contained in these findings addresses the
compliance of the various sections of the Central Point
Municipal Code that apply, and as such meets this
standard.
FINDING'
Public Need is generally defined as a desire, or
requirement, of the public at large, which is generally
evidenced by a statement of policy. In the context of
land use, there must be a perception of the desirability
of a particular land use for the public benefit to
establish "public need".
When the Central Point Comprehensive Plan was originally
created, there was significant discussion involving the
commercial land base for the community.: With this
concept in mind, it made perfect sense to apply the
"commercial" land use designation to the properties
adjacent to the I-5 interchange, and to those areas
surrounding the interchange as well. The area along Bear
Creek was designated for BCG (Bear Creek Greenway) as a
corridor of open-space between the northeast quadrant of
the City and the Freeway. However, the Bear Greek
Greenway District does not include all of the land that
was noted as BCG on the City Plan.
16
26
The preliminary plat submitted with this plat indicates
that the properties were divided, with the easternmost
sections of the property that were within the Greenway
District donated to the District, and the balance of the
parcels remaining along the freeway. This parcelization
allows more intensified uses on the balance of the
property with the adoption of the amendment, supporting
additional office and tourist oriented uses for the City.
Since inventories show that Central Point has a limited
amount of C-4 that is able to be annexed to the City,
this property is a logical extension of the interchange
area for C-4 uses.
Further, over six years has passed since this particular
plan area has been evaluated, and as noted above, the
site has had no development plans, nor any attempt for
the site to be utilized for greenway or open space
purposes.
Discussion•
An evaluation of the available commercial zoning in the City of
Central Point would indicate that there is a significant public
need for additional tourist oriented commercial uses to serve the
public within the City, and the travelling public. Central Point
has lost ground due to interchange developments along the north and
south interchanges of Medford.
Based upon this information, the City of Central Point can find
that there is adequate Public Need and adequate justification to
annex the property to the City, and amend the Comprehensive Plan
and Zoning on the site from county zoning and BCG to Commercial, C-
4, consistent with the abutting land uses in the area.
VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS:
The applicant submits that the City of Central Point, after a
public hearing as required by Chapter 1.24 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, can make the following conclusionary findings:
17
27
FINDING #1•
The City of Central Point can find that this application
for annexation is consistent with the provisions of ORS
222:111 through 222.180, as noted herein, and
specifically is consistent with ORS 222.125, which
indicates that a property owner who represents 100 of
the ownership, and over 50~ of the electors within the
territory, who has agreed in writing to the annexation,
can be annexed without an election or a hearing as
provided for in ORS 222.120.
FINDING #2•
The City of Central Point can find that, with the
submittals attached to the application and findings, that
the application for annexation is consistent with the
requirements of Chapter 1.20 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, in that the Preliminary Plat meets the
requirements outlined therein, the legal description as
submitted meets the requirements of the Chapter, and the
annexation fee has been submitted with the application,
consistent with the requirements of this Chapter.
FINDING #3'
The City of Central Point can find that, with the
submittals attached to the application and findings, that
the application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Zone Change for the C-4 designation, is consistent with
the requirements contained in Chapter 17.88 (Zoning
Amendments) and Chapter 17.96 (Amendments to The
Comprehensive Land Use Plan) of the CPMC, in that the
concepts of public need and compliance with the Statewide
Planning Goals have been demonstrated. ~ ,
With this information, the applicant respectfully requests that the
City of Central Point
18
/.I 0
(1) annex the subject property, with a concurrent
Comprehensive Plan change for the entire acreage to
Commercial; and
(2) a Zone Change from the Jackson County designations of AR,
F-5 and IC, and Central Point Designation of BCG, to C-4,
Tourist and Professional Office, for the respective parcels.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
J. Michael LaNier
Consultant
19
. 29
STAFF REPORT
T0: City of Central Point
FROM: ~~~" Wes L. Reynolds, AICP, Consultant to City
i
DATE: April 8, 1996
SUBJECT: Pilot Corporation Application
(37S 2W Section 2D, Tax lot 2300 and part of 2400)
Application for Conditional Use Permit (CUP),
and Site Plan Review IN C-4 Zoning District.
SUMMARY
The Pilot Corporation is applying to the City of Central Point for approval
to construct a fast food restaurant and truck fueling facility. The new facility
will be the first to use a new street south of Pine Street. There are several
concurrent applications that have been filed for the subject property including
an annexation and a plan and zone change to the city designation from the Jackson
County zoning.
PURPOSE OF C-4 ZONE
The CUP and Site Plan are being reviewed under the~C-4, Tourist and Office-
Professional District which has been applied for concurrently. Contract planning
staff has separately recommended approval of the Plan and Zone Change to C-4
which is the Comprehensive Plan Map designation.
Section 17.44.010 states the purpose of the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional
District is:
"to provide for the development of concentrated tourist commercial and
entertainment facilities to serve both local residents and the traveling
public, and also for the development of compatible major professional
office facilities. C-4 development should occur at locations that will
maximize ease of access and visibility from the Interstate 5 freeway and
major arterial streets and to be convenient to users of Expo Park, the
airport, and downtown."
The proposed uses would be expected to serve the travelling public, and rely on
ease of access to I-5.
ISSUES FOR THIS PROPOSAL
The applicant has met with staff in apre-application conference. The main
issues discussed involve traffic impacts, traffic signal improvements, street
improvements, and connection to the Bear Creek Greenway. Other issues discussed
were the CUP and site plan criteria. Applicant and applicant's agents have been
responsive to these code concerns, although some specifics remain to be
addressed.
30
Staff Report to Central Point
STANDARDS AND DECISION CRITERIA
The applications involve these land use actions: a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) and a Site Plan Review, which are being handled concurrently by the City
of Central Point with a Plan and Zone Change application. The Conditional Use
Permit Standards entail these aspects of development on the site and the
relationship to the surrounding area, including: adequacy of lot in size and
shape; adequate access to a public street; no significant adverse effect on
abutting property or uses thereof; compliance with local, state and federal
health and safety regulations; and conditions required are to protect public
health, safety and general welfare. The Conditional use Permit Standards are
contained in Section 17.76.040 of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC). The
Applications addresses project compliance with each CUP Standard. The Planning
Commission can find the proposal consistent with the Conditional Use chapter of
CPMC provided the new facilities are constructed as proposed and with appropriate
conditions to assure conformance with city standards. Several conditions are
recommended.
31
Staff Report to Central Point 3
The Site Plan Review Standards entail several aspects of development on the
site including: landscaping and fencing; ingress and egress; off-street
parking,loading and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities; signs; access for
fire safety; compliance with city ordinances; and compatibility of architecture
and design with the surrounding area. The Site Plan Standards are contained in
Section 17.72.040 of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC). The Application
indicates the project will comply with the standards of the C-4 zone.
By constructing the new facilities as proposed and with appropriate conditions
the Planning Commission can find the proposal consistent with the Site Plan
chapter of CPMC.
FIAtDINGS OF FACT
The application materials provided by the applicant were accepted as
complete on March 15, 1996. In the application forms and required drawings and
maps for this project relevant CPMC sections are addressed, and should be
included as part of findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision.
Adequate findings of fact for both the CUP and Site Plan criteria also
require addressing public facilities which is done in the staff report of the
Public Works Department. These reports should also be included in the record as
findings in support of the decision.
The application materials show the proposed use to be within the various
size, setback and other minimum requirements of the C-4 zone. Generally, the
proposal is well within the code requirements and standards with appropriate
conditions to assure compliance.
The Commission should know that the proposal under review is only the first
of several that can be expected in this area of the city'-code. We cannot know
precisely when full buildout of the area between I-5, Pine Street, and the Bear
Creek Greenway will occur and tend to think it may take 20 years. However, there
are already indications of a motel, a sitdown restaurant, and another fast food
restaurant may submit applications in 1996. It is possible that most, or even
all, of the growth that will use the new street at this site will occur in the
next five years. The city's planning consultant recommends approval of the
proposal with conditions that will allow for the current proposal and the future
growth.
32
Staff Report to Central Point 4
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE PLAN
1. Landscaping will be planted as shown on the planting plan submitted and
planting will be complete at the time of occupancy.
2. A plan for the irrigation system for the landscaping shall be submitted with
the building permit application for City approval prior to issuance of building
permits.
3. Access shall be provided as shown on the site plan. Applicant shall obtain an
approach road permit (or equivalent permission) from Jackson County prior to
occupancy for the direct access on Pine Street. Changes to the traffic signal and
improvement of the new street, including all striping, shall be completed for the
project frontage prior to occupancy.
4. Off-street parking and loading shall be provided as shown on the site plan,
as amended.
5. A drawing(s) for the signage shall be submitted with the building permit
application for City approval prior to issuance of building permits.
6. For compatibility of architecture and design with the surrounding area
construct the building as shown on the site plan and consistent with the building
elevations submitted with the applications. It is expected by the City that minor
design variations such as a change in the height or placement of a wall of two
feet or so may result in final design.
CONDITIONS FOR THB CUP IN ADDITION TO THE SITE PLAN
1. Require an oil/water separator in drainage system of. parking areas.
2. Operation for 24 hours per day is allowed.
3. The approval of this CUP is valid for a period of 12 months.
J~
Staff Report to Central Point
ATTACHMENTS
5
The following items are attached for entry into the official record by reference
and for the Commission's review of these concurrent land use actions:
Item A - Vicinity Map
Item B - Notice of Public Hearing, Mailing List, and Tax Assessor Map.
Item C - Aerial Map [Floodplain Map]
Item D - Application Materials including Site Plan, Planting Plan, Floor Plan
and Building Elevations.
Item E - Public Works Staff Report
Item F - Fire Department Staff Report
Item G - Planning Department Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit
and Site Plan.
Item H - Proposed Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan.
34
~-a
6
C-4
C-4
ITEM .~,_....
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date of Notice: March 27, 1996
Hearing Date: Tuesday, April 16, 1996
Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Place: Central Point City Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
Central Point, OR 95702
NATURE OF HEARINGS
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a
public hearing to review a proposed Conditional Use Permit Application.
Batzer & Batzer Investments, et al, has requested a Conditional Use Permit for property located
in the general vicinity south of East Pine Street and east of Interstate 5, to conditionally allow fast
food restaurants in the proposed Pilot Tmck Stop Project within the C-4 (Tourist and Professional
District) Zone. This property is described in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as 37 2W
02AD Tax Lots 2300 and 2400.
CRTI'ERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for conditional use permits are set forth in Chapter 17.76 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to access, size and shape of site, significant adverse impact upon abutting
properties, local, state and federal regulations and general health, safety and welfare.
Pi1BLIC PARTICIPATION
Any person interested in commenting on the proposed amendment to the conditional use
permit may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for
Tuesday, Apri116, 1996. Written comments may be also sent in advance of the hearing to
Central Point City Hall, 155 South 2nd, Central Point, Oregon, 97502, Attention: Planning
Department.
2. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised in writing
prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written
comments about the decision described above will need to be related to the specific
proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission.
Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review and City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies are available at 15 cents per
page.
36
i
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
4. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at
(541) 664-3321.
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the proposal and any technical staff
reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and heaz any azguments on
the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth
above. At the conclusion of the review hearing, the Planning Commission may approve or deny
the Conditional Use Permit Application for the Batzer and Batzer Investments. City regulations
provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions.
The Council may, on its own motion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting
following the decision date, calf for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party
aggrieved by the action of the Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the
City Council by filing a written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city
mails the notice of the decision.
1
x
3~72W02D TL 2500 John Batzer, et al
129 N. Oakdale
Rod Bell Medford, OR 97501
P O BOX 3909
CENTRAL POINT OR 97502
372W02D TL 2600 Wes Reynolds
William;Cornetius 1265 Munson Drive
P.O. Box 4220 Ashland, OR 97520
Sun River, OR 97707
372W02D TL 2900 Gary Shaff
Frank Pulver, III 47 Eastwood Drive
P.O. Box 4460 Medford, OR 97504
Medford, OR 97501
Gary Hall J. Michael LaNier
2385 Terri Dr. 747 Highland, Suite 19
Medford, OR 97504 Medford, OR 97504
372W 2D TL 2400
James Wright
P.O. Box 4460
Medford, OR 97501
...Jeffrey Leever Jackson County
:1060 Crater Lake Ave, Suite C Courthouse
.Medford, OR 97504 Medford,OR 97501
Dennis Hoffbuhr Melrose Orchard
IiOFFBUHR & ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 996
1062 E. Jackson Medford, OR 97501
Medford, OR 97504
Loretta Reeves 37 2W 02D TL 400
PILOT CORPORATION State of Oregon
5508 Lonas Road Division of State Lands
Knoxville, TN 37909 775 Sumner St., NE
Salem, OR 97310
38
l
_i // /%~/.1 ~ /
_`~
/ya~v
Y
n~ya
,~G
P
N
QO
~=~;-'~-
7,= ~t ~~;
~,~
N Z
v• ~ m
e
e
/ ~ I
4
My O N V
N I
4 P_
L J
0 (~~- ~.
_~
~~
V
J
I K
"s
P
4
f EB 161996'
1. APPLICANi1NFORMATION T
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATI~9~i~~
CITY OP CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~~~ OF CENTRAL PO1N
Name:-Pilot ('nrnnraN CITY
Address: 5508 Lonas Rd TI
OHy; Knoxville Stale: TN
ZlpCode: a~gng
Telephone: 8uslness: (4231 588-7487 Residence:
2. AGENT INFORMATION
L
Address;. ~~S N'.~ T2rni llr•
coy: /1.(e-~ ~o M1,C Mate: J9 r zip code: 7 ~
Telephone: 8uslness: ~~/ -'7~ 9'-g'SG, Z Residence:.'// ^ 779-// 3,G
3. OWNER OF RECORD (Aaach Separate Sheet If More Than One)
Name: rnh.. a-« ~, c!o G D Horn cker
Address: 17q N Oakri=le
Clry:-Medford Stale: __OR
Zip Code: 97501
Telephone: 8uslness: Residence:
4. .PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TypeolDeVelopment:-Pilot Travel Center
Township: Ranga' Sedbn:_TaxLOt(s): 2300 s a oortion of 1901 2400
AddfeSS:?S90 E. Pine St C ntral Point OR 2500
ZOningDistdet:- interrhanae Commercial
Project Acreage: a q7 arrn<
Number of DweHing UnHs: n
GrossFlOOrMea: to taa <~ ft
Number o1 Parking Spaces: 172 _ _
8. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
(~Thls Appibatbn Form ~S~ I ' 4>
L~SHe Plan Drawn to Scale (10 cBptes) ' "
O~Landscape and Irrtgatbn Plan (3 Copies)
L7~ Reduced Copies (81/2" x 11~ of the Ske
Plan, Building Eiewilbns and Landscape Plans
(1 COPY Each)
21~AppGpibnFee • (szoo)
0~~gal Desalptian '
Written Aulhodly from Property Owner H Agent
in AppHptbn Process
8. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS AND
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
I cenHy that I am the: ~ Property Owner or IB~Authodzed Agem of the Owner
of the proposed projre~C-/sitep/, ~ ~ /~
Signature- "!/l~,~t' Oate-~~ Gbh l9ffo
~ If any wetlands ex)st on the site, It is the applicant's responslbiltty to apply for a permit to ~
~ Dllrfs on of State Lands before any site work begins.
4~
l
a
~~ A%S 3
~ ~~ 6
$m ~ a
~~ ~~~ ~~4 ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q
~ ~~~ i~~ a~~~ ~ $~ ~~~;~
g~_ p
y ~.,¢ SnA
9I ~$~ ~I nff
pP~ E
'iAZ ~P~
~Ei ?ig ~
r
6 'cQ
~g7~ ~~~
t ~+ t
°1 ,~ ~ ,Sgt
~~~e ~'~~ t~°~!~° C
~~N ~Pg4 Eaa~ ~
t~~~i Q~sE'.:w:.
~~~j~~4
~C
~~ ~ ~ e
3~ ~t ~ a j
4~~ !
e ~
4S h'tp~~ iel
3v~ i~ [ Q
~~~~y~~~~ g'~
~b~~r~j~~a~o
,N, ~~o3ti~6
- mr«, On1
'
•
'
w<,ww
••u
W rroo36o lmoe lvtlul3o
133tl16 3NId 1• S 31V1Stl31W
~
~ ,
_
(IC
T
+auN
C••ur%1
MI"
6O6G[ •
Wq •uwl GOCC 1
M
M
OC6LC
Orlfll COO 'O'e ~~ -fl/1~110~ £ R
0211NOUY
1 W071VIEOd1A00 10116 c C ~~~
.
'
w+~vua
~ r
067190PAfl1Vd Y AfF01i1-dV
YlY NVId 311S 1tlVNiWil3tld ••^~ ~ ~'
.
s~`~t
~g
41
' --- -
f ~ ~ a ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PINE STREET
~ - ~
• I .~.~: ~ RRi .I ~: \\
~ 9 ,~ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~,
'iii '_, ~~, S
~.. .~ R.. _ ' .
`E ` ~
t i
-., ~,
I i ~~ ,'
,\\ p+ `1
4 , j ~:.
~:"
.~ ~ .~~
~~::~.__._ ~ om
_.. ~
.. d
~. ~
.1. ~ i t
" ' • ~
:,
:/
•
.®
Yd I
1~ ~~~~ ~
~E F#a
a !`a:
~! {~~ ~ I
~~ ~~~-~~' 42
d
,_
a'_r t c is a~ ~ a~~~s~ i~ ~ g~
~3~~° &~
r
c
M003Y0 •1MOd lYY1N30
<..<-..c uan
ww
•
n~YtY ~Yw w a uvuYUw
•°
uw
r°°a..° '
i
M
6061[ <ruw.a
ML
w
wwt YOtt Y,
Y
I
6C6[C
AIOi Y06 'OY ~3~ ~~~ 1.~~
p 1 ~
~'
1.O211K0l7V
' POOL1YtlOd140O lOlid ~ ~
'pJ ®
°~ ! ~ Q
OBi1SOPR(31Yd Y AkdOPUPdp
_ YIY '
SNOIIVA3~3 tlOItl31X3 ~ ••° ( r
' ,
O
JI
W
r
e
DEPARTIVIENT Q~F PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY
SITE PLAN REVIEW
Date: 4/8/96
Project: Pilot Travel Center
Address: East Pine Street
Owmer. Pilot Corporation Gary Hall Agent
Architect: Anthony J. Paternostro A.I.A.
Civil Engineer: Jenson & Associates
Surveyor: David M. Minneci Hoflbuhr & Associates
This is a Site Plan Review covering the Fire Protection aspects of a proposed 10,183 Sq.
Ft. Travel Center Project. The requirements outlined herein are based on the 1991
Edition of the Uniform Fire Code with 1992 State of Oregon Amendments. This review
assesses the Fire Protection needs related to Water Supply, Fire Department Access,
Required Fire Flow, and General Precautions against Fire during construction. This
review does not cover the Structural nor Fire & life Safety requirements relating to the
proposed structure(s). Those requirements will be discussed in detail at the time of
submittal of detailed plans.
THE FOLLOWING ARE MY FINDINGS:
The required fire flow for this project is based on the largest structure within this
development. That structure has been determined to have an approximate fire area
of 10,183 sq. ft. Using Table No. A-III-A-1 of the of the Uniform Fire Code and
assuming that the structure will be constructed of Type fI-N. construction the
minimum required fire flow shall be established at 2250 g.p.m.
2. General precautions against fire shall be in accordance with Section 87.103 UFC
relating to Fire Safety during construction. Fire Department access, hydrants and any
other fire protection device shall not be blocked by construction material during
constnzction. (cont'd)
ITEM F
44
Page 2
Water supply and hydrant locations shall be in accordance with Sections 10.40 (;
10.402; 10.403; and 10.105 UFC. Developer will provide the city ~+dth an approved
design for water supply that will meet the domestic & fire flow demands for this
project. The developer ~+~Il submit this design to the City for their approval. City
standards specify minimum size of water lines supplying fire hydrants to be 8".
The Fire Chief shall specify the number & location of fire hydrants.
4. Timing of the installation and maintenance of all Fire Protection and Life Safety
Systems shall be in accordance with Sections ]0.501 and (0.502 UFC.
5. Fire Department access shall be in accordance with Sections 10.106; 10.203; 10.204;
and 10.205 UFC.
Approval of the submitted Site Plan is not an approval of omissions or oversights by
this office; or ofnon-compliance with any applicable regulations of this jurisdiction.
Note* COPIES OF TIIE CODE SECTIOII`S PREFACED IN THIS REPORT
VF'ILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE DEVELOPERS OF THIS PROJECT FOR
THEIIi REFEREIITCE.
~~
Reviewed By: Mark A. Servatius Fire ChiefBuilding Official
4~