Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - January 16, 1996;} J.~. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 16, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 339 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber, Candy Fish, Karolyne Johnson, and Valerie Rapp III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES i - 6 A. Review and approval of December 19, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS ~ - 4~. Public Hearing -Continued Public Hearing regarding Tentative Plan Application for Unit No. 7 of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision located on Beall Lane east of where Hanley Road intersects Beall Lane (37 2W lOC TL 3000) (Applicant: Tom Malot Construction) 48 - 63 B. Public Hearing -Review and determination regarding Tentative Plan (Minor Partition) for property located within Briarwood Village on corner of Hopkins Road and Briarwood (37 2W 11AC Tax Lot 10500) (Applicant: Terry Buntin) 64 - 82 C. Public Hearing -Review and determination regarding Tentative Plan (Minor Partition) for property located near Beall and Bursell Roads (37 2W 11D Tax Lot 2202) (Applicant: Herb Farber for Michael E. Sullivan) a3 - i 1o D. Public Hearing -Review and determination regarding Conditional Use Permit Application for OSP Property to allow the State Police Headquarters Office Building in the R-2 Zone(Applicant: State of Oregon) E. Review and determination regarding Site Plan Application for property located in the general vicinity of North Pacific Hwy, north of Crater High Schooi (372W3B Tax Lot 1504-N) (Applicant: State of Oregon, Oregon State Police) F. Review and determination regarding Final Plat Application for Valley Point III Subdivision (37 2W 11DA Tax Lot 300) (Applicant: Herb Farber, Surveyor for W.L. Moore Construction) VII. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT .., .> ., ~;_~ DRAFT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 19, 1995 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:05 P.M. II. ROLL CALL -Those present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber, Candy Fish, Karolyn Johnson and Valerie Rapp III. CORRESPONDENCE Chairman Piland read a card from the former Public works Secretary, Cecilia Gordon, thanking the commission members for their card and gift. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the November 21, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes as written. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Farber, yes, Johnson, yes; Fish, yes; Rapp, abstain. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances VI. BUSINESS A. Public Hearing -Review and determination regarding Tentative Plan (Minor Partition) for ~oerty located on south side of Hopkins Road 137 2W 11AC Tax Lot 112031 (Applicant: Herb Farber for Anne McKibbenl Chairman ,Piland opened the Public Hearing. Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planner, reviewed the Notice of Public Hearing which was mailed on December 7, 1995. She also reviewed the Planning Department Staff .Report and accepted into record the exhibits as follows: .l , , CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes December 19, 1995 -Page Two a. Public Works Department Staff Report b. Tentative Plan c. Notice to Affected Property Owners Mailed December 7, 1995 d. List of Affected Property Owners (by reference) There was no ex-parte communication Commissioner Farber declared a conflict of interest and took his seat in the audience. Nancy Kincaid stated that the proposed lots comply. with the configuration standards of the zoning ordinances. Mike Thornton, Mike Thornton Engineering, 670 Superior Court, Ste 210, Medford Oregon, stated that he wrote the Staff Report on behalf of the Public Works Department and reviewed the report with the Commission. Herfi Farber, 908 E. Jackson, Medford, OR, agent for the applicant Anne McKibben, came forward to speak on behalf of the partition. Mr. Farber stated that they had no problem with the staff report. He also stated that the real estate agent is working with PP&L to put the utilities underground which would include service to the existing house. Chairman Piland closed the Public Hearing. Commission Fish made a motion that the Commission, approve Resolution No. 336, regarding the Tentative Plan (Minor Partition) for property located on south side of Hopkins Road (37 2W 11 AC Tax Lot 11203) (Applicant: Herb Farber for Anne McKibben) subject to the Staff Reports. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Farber, abstain; Fish, yes; Johnson, yes; Rapp, yes. B. Chairman Piland opened the Public Hearing `~,, 4 nY CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes December 19, 1995 -Page Three Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planner, reviewed the Planning Department Staff-Report and accepted into record the exhibits as follows: a. Public Works Department Staff Report b. Tentative Plan a . Notice to Affected Property Owners Mailed December 7, 1995. d. List of Affected Property Owners (by reference) Nancy Kincaid stated that this )s two minor partitions handled as a single application resulting in 5 lots. Nancy Kincaid reviewed the Notice of Public Hearing which was mailed on December 7, 1995. There were no conflicts of interest or ex-parte communication. Nancy Kincaid .stated that there is a moratorium for utility hook-ups and one of the lots does not currently have utilities. There also may be a problem in that the corner lot may not hold the building in that position. However, there is enough square footage. on the lots for some flexibility. Nancy stated that the Planning Department recommends approval subject to the Public Works conditions and requirements. James' Hibbs, of L.J. Friar & Associates, P.C., 304 S. Holly, Medford, Oregon, agent for the applicant, and 'Robert Fellows, 2750 Heritage Road, Central Point, Oregon, applicant, came forward on behalf of the application. They had two questions: (1) Set back problems and 12) driveway location. Mike Thornton recommended the applicant provide to the Public Works Director proposed locations of the driveway and provide evidence that those locations will satisfy National Traffic Standards requirements in terms of site distance required based on the conditions for this street, the speed and the radius of the curve. Commissioner Farber stated that the Commission is only approving the land use plan for that property. The applicant will have to come in at another time with the site plan for approval. The lot meets the standard criteria for the City of Central Point. ,t , CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes December 19, 1995 -Page Four Mr. Hibbs stated that they are aware that-they will not be able to build on lot 4 until the moratorium is lifted on the utilities. Chairman Piland closed the public hearing. .:Commissioner Farber moved that the Commission approve Resolution Number 337,- review and determination regarding Tentative Plan (Minor Partition) for property located on Briarwood and Columbine (37 2W 71 Tax Lot 4800 and 37 2W 11 AC Tax Lots 10800 and 10900) (Applicant L.J. Friar for Robert Fellows) subject to the. staff reports presented. The motion was seconded by Candy Fish. ROLL CALL .VOTE: Jan Dunlap, yes; Herb Farber, yes, Candy Fish, yes; Karolyne Johnson, yes; Valerie Rapp, yes. Motion passed. G. ,. Review and Determination regarding Final Plat ARolication for Forest Glen Subdivision. Phase VIII 137 2W 11 DA Tax Lots 100 and 202 and 37 2W 12C Tax_Lot 300E (Applicant:. Gary Whittle) .Commissioner Farber declared a conflict of interest as Surveyor of the ..project. There were no ex-parte communications. Nancy Kincaid reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report. The Final Plat submitted is essentially. consistent. with theapproved preliminary plat and most conditions of approval have been met. The Division of State Lands was notified of the possible existence of wetlands and the property owner has:been apprised of that fact. The staff suggests approval of this Final Plat subject to the Public Works conditions and requirements. Paul Worth, Public Works Department, reviewed the staff report from the Public Works Department. The Final Plat is essentially the same as it appeared on the approved tentative plan, .however, the developer has not completed all of the conditions of the Tentative Plan . Herb Farber, 908 E. Jackson, Medford, Oregon, agent for the applicant appeared on behalf of the application. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes December 19, 1995 -Page Five Mr. Farber stated that in conjunction with the City Attorney, Doug Engle, and the City Administrator, Dave Kucera, some verbiage was added to the Subdivision Agreement which will be accepted for the Letter of Credit and to allow the City to issue Certificates of Occupancy for that part of the subdivision that is complete and accepted by the City. The purpose of the bond is to assure the City that the rest of the improvements will be completed. Mr. Farber stated that the final plat is being reinked with the right type of monumentatioh and that some of the point symbols are changing. Nancy Kincaid stated that we need a copyof this Subdivision Agreement on file. Commission Johnson moved that the Commission approve Resolution 338, Review and Determination regarding Final Plat Application for Forest Glen Subdivision, Phase VIII (37 2W 11 DA Tax Lots 100 and 202 and 37 2W 12C Tax Lot 3300) (Applicant: Gary Whittle) subject to the Staff Reports. Commissioner Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Jan Dunlap, yes; Herb Farber, abstain; Candy Fish, yes; Karolyne Johnson, yes; Valerie Rapp, yes. Motion passed. Chairman Piland declared a recess at 8:05 p.m. The commission reconvened at 8:15 p.m. Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planner, stated that this was her last week and introduced her replacement, Sue Riegel. D. Review and Recommendation regarding Annexation of fLnerty located on North Pacific Highway 137 2W 36 TL 500 & 600) IAoolicant• Hoffbuhr & Associates for Marian G. Miller and Billy 1-Ioguel Nancy Kincaid reviewed the Planning Department's Staff Report and included in the record the following exhibits: a. Planning Department Staff Report b. Public Works Staff Report c. Annexation Petition d. Annexation Preliminary Plat e. Assessor's Map/Vicinity Map f. Topographic Map - CJ ~t CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes December 19, 1995 -Page Six Nancy stated that no Public Notice was required because all property owners and all electors residing in the property to be annexed signed in favor. of .the annexation. Paul Worth, Public Works Department, reviewed the Public Works Staff Report. Chairman Piland stated that the action required was just a recommendation to the City Council. All annexations are on hold at the present time. Billy Hogue, 137 Thomas Court, Central Point, applicant, and Douglas McMahan, Hoffbuhr & Associates, agent for the applicant, appeared in favor of the application. Commissioner. Fish moved that the Commission recommend the Annexation of property located on North Pacific Hwy (37 2W 36 TL 500 & 600) (Applicant:. Hoffbuhr & Associates for Marian G. Miller and Billy Hogue) Jan. Dunlap seconded the motion.. ROLL CALL VOTE: Jan Dunlap, yes; Herb Farber, yes; Candy Fish, yes; Karolyne Johnson, yes, Valerie Rapp, yes. Motion passed.. Commission Fish made a motion to adjourn. Jan Dunlap seconded the motion. All said "aye".and the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Staff Report to: Central Point Planning Commission November 17,1995 from: Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planning Administrator 'V'\~ subject: public Hearing -Review and Determination for a Tentative Plan for Jackson Creek Estates Unit #7 located north of Beall Lane and south and west of the Jackson Creek 6 (Applicant: Tom Malot) Under the authority of CPMC 1.24, the Planning Commission can make decisions on Subdivision Tentative Plan Applications. Exhibit C of this report describes the application, decision criteria and procedure. Public hearing notices were mailed on October 31, 1995. At the date of this writing, city staff has not received any written or oral comments from the public regarding the proposed Tentative Plan. Planning, Public Works and Public Safety Departments have reviewed the proposal and fmd that density and lot configuration requirements are met and that public services can be provided in an orderly manner, subject to wnditions of approval. However, the design of the project is not V consistent with city standards, and requires modification to be approved within existing city, standards. It is my understanding that the original proposal for Jackson Creek 6 included this proposal, but that this part of the project was withdrawn because of staff concerns that the proposed access roads . were designed in a way that does not comply with city standards for cul-de-sacs. The proposed roads have not been re-configured in this submission, and are consequently inwnsistent with city standards, as follows: CPMC 16.20.080 Cul-de-sac. A cul-de-sac shall be as short as possible and hs allt~t.p4 event be more than four hundred feet long nor serve more than twelve single family . dwellings or seventy-five dwelling units. All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a circular turnaround. (Emphasis added) The proposal includes two cul-de-sacs with only one outlet to the city street grid. Because there is only one outlet, the length of the cul-de-sac is measured from that outlet. This is the interpretation was documented in the file by George Rubaloff, and is also the rule of thumb used in all of the other jurisdictions where I have worked. Using this standard interpretation, the proposed cul-de- „ ~.. Central Point Planning Commission Page 2 November 17, 1995 sacs are about 450 feet long, measured to the center of the cul-de-sac turnaround. The limit on cul-de-sac length is based upon fire safety concerns mainly,. but the. need to loop water service is another pertinent issue. Staff recommends extending the southerly cut-de-sac east to connect with the outlet of Madison r Court. This adaptation would reduce the length of the north cul-de-sac because a secondary outlet would be available, so the cul-de-sac could be measured from the intersection internal to this Phase of the subdivision. Without this or other appropriate design modification, staff cannot find that this proposal is consistent with the CPMC. ~~ •-- In addition to the above concerns, it has been brought to my attention that special arrangements maybe necessary regarding masonry fencing along Beali Lane. It is my understanding that ten feet of right-of--way for future widening of Beall Lane has been agreed to between the city and the developer in the course of approval of Jackson Creek 6, but uniess and until such widening takes place, the city has allowed construction of a block wall along the existing property line, with the understanding that the wall will be removed when necessary to accommodate road improvements. If that arrangement is repeated here, L t~2 7;1s too small to accommodate future improv~ eft of ~„-~~ Beall Lane. If approved, conditions of approval need to include re-configuration of Lot~fo lJ provide enough excess area to accommodate the possible future loss of 10 feet of width on the lot's south side to the public right-of--way. The Planning Commission may choose to 1) approve the proposal subject to the above- recommended design changes, 2) continue the public hearing and deliberations to consider an improved design, or 3) .deny this application for noncompliance with city road design standards. A - Public Works Staff Report dated November 13, 1995 B - Building Department Staff Report dated November 16, 1995 C - .Notice of Public Hearing dated October 31, 1995 D - List of Owners of Record mailed notice of hearing (by reference) E - Assessor Map F - Tentative Subdivision Plan ,. ~~HIBIT~ PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTAT/VE PLAN REV/EW ~`~/°~G G~ G°3C~G°~~~3~I Date: November 13, 1995 Project: Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 Zone: R - 1 - 8 # of Lots: 34 No. of Structures 34 Applicant: Tom Malot Construction Co. P.O. Box 3847 Central Point, Oregon 97502 (541) 664-1258 Agent: Dennis Hoffbuhr Hoffbuhr & Associates 1062 E. Jackson Street (541) 779-4641 Engineer: Location: Type of Land Use Action: Tentative Plan Name of Development Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 Applicable Codes: Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) 8.24, 28.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.04, 12.08, 12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64 Reviewed By: Michael Thornton -Thornton Engineering Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No, 7 November 13, 1995 -Page Two 1. TENTATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (16.10, 16.24) T'irle Dwa;rrinfinn Statux~ .Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.10.010 Filing Fee MS 16.10.020 Scale MS 16.10.030 General Conditions a. Name of Subdivision MS b. Date North Arrow Scale MS c. Legal location of subdivision MS d. Names/Address of Owner/Surveyor MS 16.10.040 Existing Conditions a. Location of street (See Exh. "A" No. 9 widths & easements, etc. IN (Provide Exist Street Names b. Topographic Info MS c. Benchmark established MS d. Location and direction of all water courses MS e. Natural features rock outcroppings, marshes, wooded areas MS f. Existing uses of the land Pasture g. Location of all existing streets and utilities MS h. Zoning on and adjacent to tract is compatible MS 16.10.050 Proposed Plan (Provide additional radius information a. Street Location, and the lanes, (See Exh. "A" No. 9 grades, radius of curves, relationship to other existing or proposed streets, and other utilities. IN (Provide easement widths b. Easements-Widths/Purpose IN (See Exh. "A" No. 9 & No. 12 c. Lot Dimension MS d. Other Uses MS e. Lot square footage MS iFCT ATI IC 1 C2 GAIr1. MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR- TENTATIVE PuN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEOEO ~~ "<- ,,Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 November 13, 1995 -Page Three Tentative Plan Requirements (16.10, 16.24 - Continued) 'rule no~~.:.,r:,,,, Status" Cnnditinns/Comments\Infn Neadad 16.10.060 Partial Development Is other property adjacent to this property being considered inYhe NA design? This property can be owned by the subdivider. 16.10.070 Explanatory Information a. Vicinity maps to explain relationship to existing streets, can require correction to existing streets. MS b. Proposed Deed restrictions NA c. Center Lane profile of streets to show grade (100" beyond street) CPP d. Approximate location and proposed size of utilities. MS 16.24.010 Block length MS Width MS Shape MS Not greater than 1200' MS 16.24.020 Block size MS 16.24.030 Blocks Easements a. Utilities MS b. Water Courses IN (Provide easement for Jackson Ck. c. Pedestrian Ways NA [See Exh."A" No. 9 16.24.040 Lots Shapes and Sizes MS 16.24.050 Lots-Size & Determination MS Lot length greater than 2.5 times width prohibited MS 16.24.060 Through Lots MS 16.24.070 . .Lot Sidelines M S 16.24.080 Lar a Lot Subdivision NA 'STATUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PtnN REVISION FP - FINAL PwT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED 1 t ~, , Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 November 13, 1995 -Page Four 11. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineating. improvements, curbs/gutters, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck access, traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bikeways. A. Existing Conditions 1. Street Name -Beall Lane Jurisdiction -County [lescdation -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways B. Street Standards Existina Conditions 60 ' Property to Property 24' Curb to Curb 2 0 7 VT/D none none none rno nos~.t„rl„~ Eftture Requirements 80' Property to Property 24' to 34` Cutb to Curb 2 - 4 moving lanes 0 - 2 parking lanes 5,000-10,000 VT/D Required Required Required Required Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.20.020 Street Generally a. Location See 16.20.080 b. Width MS See Exh. "A" No. 10 a. Grade CPP d. Relationship to existing street MS e. Topography as it relates to drainage CPP f. Provide for Street Construction CPP g. Follows a Master Plan CPP h. Traffic Volume CPP I. Safety Features CPP j. Accesses CPP Comp Plans. Street R.O.W. & Widths LS ROW " MS 50' LS Width " MS 36' curb to curb SA ROW " IN 80' See Exh. "A" No. 9 SA Width " IN See Exh. "A" No. 10 STATUS LEGEND: MS-MEETS STANOARO DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP -FINAL PLAT IN -INFORMATION NEEDED 1 ~' ,> Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 November 13, 1995 -Page Five Street Standards -Continued. Title Description Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.20.030 Street Reserve Strip NA 16.20.050 Street EMension NA PWS,VII,G Street Intersection Angles 90° NA 16.20.060 Existing Streets additional width CPP See Exh. "A" No. 10 16.20.070 Half Street NA 16.20.080 Cul-de-Sac and/or dead-end streets a. Shall not serve more than 12 lots DMS See Exhibit "A" No. 8 b. Shall not be greater than 400' DMS See Exhibit "A" No. 8 c. Turn-around MS 16.20.090 Street Names MS 15.40 Street Grades and Curves Public Works -MA SA CS not greater than 6% CPP Standards -Not greater than 12°~ on LS MS -Cannot be less than 1 /2°k CPP Curve Radius -LS - 100' MS -CS - 100' NA -SA - 200' NA -MS - 300' NA Stationin CPP Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flow Protection. A. Existing Conditions 1. One existing 12" water main lies in Beall Lane, and one 8" water main lies in the proposed improvement of Annalee Drive. 2. One existing fire hydrant lies in the proposed improvement of Annalee Drive • STA T S ND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - Nor APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED u Jackson Creek Estates, Units No. 7 November 13, 1995 -Page Six B. Water Standards: T'ifla nwerrintinn Status• Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Water System provided mains CPP See Exh. "A" No. 4 Public Works Standards Service laterals, 1 ea. lot CPP Fire Hydrants not greater than 300' apart CPP Fire Flow 1000 g.p.m. provide minimum pressure 40 psi CPP See Exh. "A" No. 4 13.20 Backflow Prevention IV. SANITARY SENJER IM1"PROVEN"ENTS Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional .System Development Charge, Local Systems Development Charge. A. Existing Conditions: 1. 8" sanitary sewer line lies between lots 212 and 213 in the proposed Jackson Creek Estates Unit J16. 2. One 8" sanitary sewer line lies in the proposed Jackson Creek Drive. 8. Sanitary Sewer Standards: r.•~,, ne~..a.,•t,... Stah,s• Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Adequate sizing,Mai~line services CPP See Exh. "A" No. 7 Public Works Standards Regional Systems Development Charge Local Systems Development Char e "STATUS LEGEND M$ -MEETS STANDARDS DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP -FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED 1 Y ,. Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 November 13, 1995 -Page Seven IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catch basins, and erosion protection. A. Existing Conditions: L Jackson Creek lies along the westerly property boundary. 8. .Storm Drain Conditions: Titles Dwsrrintinn Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Surface Drainage and storm sewer See Exh. "A" No. 5 Public Works .system CPP Standards Provide drainage through the subdivision CPP Are there adverse effects placed on downstream structures) No catchbasin located greater than 350 feet apart for any curb and gutter section CPP Discharge Basin ORS 196.800 Wetlands Disturbance See Exh. "A" No. 13 ORS 468.740 Erosion Control Plan Roof Drainage, Area Drains, Crawl See Exh.."A" No. 1 Spaces CPP ORS 8.28 Flood Mana ement CPP See Exh. "A" No. 6 • STA TUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - Nor APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP- CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS -.TPR- TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS A. ORS Chapter 468.740 requires that all developments which will disturb 5 ACRES OR MORE of land adjacent to a stream which discharges to surface waters of the State of ..Oregon shall as a part of the construction permitting process .submit an "Erosion Control Plan." The "Erosion Control Plan" shall require a PERMIT from OEO. No construction on any Tentative Plan storm drainage system can occur until authorization to do so has been granted by DEO. B. Developer shall provide and install ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department for each sanitary sewer manhole with a depth greater than 4.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. C. Developer's engineer shall design the. water system to provide the minimum fire flow per the Fire Chief's Staff Report. D. Developer shall construct all utilities, streets, and other structures discussed herein, within rights-of-way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central Point, in accordance with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of this development. E. This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission approval, could require'~esubmittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible for this review. F. All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner. G. No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued for each portion of the project requiring a permit. H. The Final Plat of this Subdivision shall not be approved by the Planning Commission until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by approved construction, bonding or a combination thereof. I. The City shall approve street stationing prior to Developer's engineer designing the improvements for this Tentative Plan. J. The developer shall submit an AutoCAD compatible digital drawing of the Final Plat at the time of Final Plat Approval. 16 EXHIBIT "A" Public Works Department -Tentative Plan Conditions JACKSON CREEK ESTATES,UNIT NO. 6 1. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets, lots, and all properties will drain properly.. The developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings and perform such grading and drainage improvements vvhich satisfies this drainage condition leaving only minor grading required for each lot during construction. 2. The City's Engineer shall at the cost of the developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine street section design in accordance with the Public Works Department Design Standards. The streets shall use the following design criteria: Street Name Average Dajjy Traffic % Trucks Beall Lane 10,000 VT/D 5% Jackson Creek Drive 1,500 VT/D 2% All other Streets 1,000 VT1D 5% 3. .The construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and a Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the. City of Central Point Public Works Department. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City of Central Point Public Works Standards. Developer shall pay for all costs associated with the design and installation of the improvements specified on these plans. 4. The construction drawings will indicate type, size and location of water mains and fire hydrants in .accordance with the City's Public Works .Standards and the recommendation of the City's Fire Chief. The developer's. engineer shall provide calculations showing that the proposed water system shall be adequate to meet the required fire flows. 5. Developer shall. construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for runoff onto the subdivision property and from each lot. Prior to construction plan approval for the improvements.. for this Tentative Plan, the developer's engineer shall .:provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the Public Works Department for hydrology calculations. 6. The developer's engineer shall prepare and provide the City's Public Works Department with a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of Jackson Creek. The analysis shall determine the 100 year flood elevations in conformance with FEMA's "Engineering Methods for Estimating Base Flood Elevations in Unnumbered A Zones (Approximate f` Exhibit "A" Specific Conditions-Continued „, , Study Areas)." The developer's engineer shall determine and provide the City's Public Works Department with the limits of the floodway in conformance with FEMA requirements. The Final Plat shall show the 100-year flood boundary, floodway and elevations. 7. An agreement exists between the City of Central Paint and the Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority for Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No.'s 6 & 7. The applicant shall obtain and become familiar with the conditions of this agreement, including the stipulation that portions of the sanitary sewer construction for Unit No. 7 will be approved, inspected and owned by the City of Central Point, and portions by BCVSA. 8. The proposed cul-de-sac configuration does to conform to the City's Municipal Code Section 16.02.080. The applicant shall submit to the staff for approval by the City, a revised Tentative Plan which provides a street configuration which conforms with the City's code. 9. The following information shall be included on the revised Tentative Plan and/or Final Plat: a. Radius information at ail right-of-way and centerline curves (16.10.050). b. The widths of all easements shall be shown (16.10.050). c. Street names shall be shown for all streets, new, existing and proposed extensions (16.10.040) d. An easement in favor of the City for access to Jackson Creek (16.24.030). e. Delineate the proposed right-of-way dedication for Beall Lane, 40' centerline to R.O.W. 10. The developer's construction drawings and improvements shall include the widening and improvements of Beall Lane to conform with the City's Public Works Standards. The improvements shall include the widened street section, curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, and 10.1 pavement transitions beyond the frontage of the project. The construction shall include a minimum 100' long right turn lane on to Jackson Creek Drive. 11. If the developer proposes to construct a wall or fence along Beall Lane, the wall shall be constructed outside of the City's right-of-way and in conformance with the City's codes and standards. The Planning Commission and Developer are directed to the 10- foot dedication agreement for Unit No. 5 as a reference as to how this condition was accomplished previously. 12. The developer shall re-align the proposed storm drain easements through lots 240 and 244 to lie adjacent to, and parallel with, the proposed lot line boundaries. 13. The Oregon Division of State Lands has prepared a response to the Wetland Land Use Notification for this project. The developer shall become familiar and comply with the comments of that response. 18 "„ SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA AGREEMENT ~~~~ FOR JACKSON CREEK ESTATES, UNIT NO.S 6 ANA 7 , The purpose of this agreement is to reach a compromise regarding the providing of sewer service to Unit Nos. 6 and 7 of Jackson Creek Estates and to show g6od faith that both BCVSA and the City are interested in reaching a more all-encompassing agreement. Such agreement would provide for the partial release of customers from the existing territory of BCVSA to the City of Central Point for the benefit of all customers. It is hoped that such an all-encompassing agreement can be entered into in the near future for the balance of the property within the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary. WHEREAS, the City and BCVSA has entered into iwo different agreements in 1993 that have allowed the City to withdraw territory from BCVSA; WHEREAS, both BCVSA and the City are interested in providing efficient service at the least cost to the area; WHEREAS, such sanitary sewer service is necessary to protect the health of valley residents; WHEREAS, the state law allows for the provision of such setvice by BCVSA unless specific determinations are made; WHEREAS, both parties believe that it is more efficient and in the public's best interest for the City to provide service to a portion of this development. It is hereby agreed between the City of Central Point, Oregon, and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority as follows: i. All of Phase I of the Jackson Creek Estates, Units 6 and 7 will be served by the City of Central Point. This is a total of 25 lots, numbers 192 through 216. 2. An additional five lots in Phase 11, numbers 217 through 221, will also be served by the City for a total of 30 lots. 3. The remainder of Phase 11, a total of 29 lots, numbers 222 through 250, will be served by BCVSA. See attached map. 1 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement 3~ i9 AGREED to as of '~ 1995. ~~ ^ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITA~~R,YLAUTHORI~TY Mayor Rusty Mc "' th Chairman Walter W. Wassum ATTESTED: COUNTERSIGNED: ~~. ~ ~ , Charles L. Root, Manager _. AOMN34-5 3 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement ~~ ~~.',~ ~ ~ ni r I J,[C1iSO:ti CP.F.L•h' EST.1TE G•`:\`/T~ A'0.G f: :\'0.7 LOCATL'D !ti 3:21f'fOC T.L. 3000 J:~C/fSOA' COL~.1'T3: OP.. i ~.-r. n~~ _ ~ .. _.. -- i ----~ ?~5 i ,~ _._ ~ • :~ ! _._ _ `'~ `;; _ ~ i 1 ^~; X55 PiC ,. ..'>_ ~.. __. 1 .. ---. - 1 - 1 •~ _ .7 - ._ ~. ~_ _. ..-L _.} ~ - ~_ .. ~ ~. • \ l . 1 ` ` ` • '~ '.A.'~ r. N 1 • .• _ 7i3 Summer Street nt ~a~em, vre on yiaiv ~1, •^'~ ~ p~ ~i~ m - 503/378-3805 111 ~~~'-~J`JJI ~~ c 1. County: `" rarl.' Local Case File No.: City: (•nntral n + DSL File No.[ 2 2. APPLICANT: Tom Malot name P.O. Box 3847 street Central Point. OR 97502 _ city state zip (503) 664-1258 phone LANDOWKER: Clifford B. Cordv. Jr. name 2134 Bea11 Lane street Central Point. OR 97502 city state zip (503)._ 664-1905 phone 3. LOCATION: T 37 R zw S loc 1/4 lax lot(s) 3oo0 ICIYA l'Yall lila}l nanlc :J~^~.'i1 Grl•I ~.GSi •.1llG~u t~py n~tU ~~e .n~,b4lcui Attached: X WWI map ,_ Parcel- map _ Site plan X Other 4. SITE INFORMATION: NWI Wetland Classification COde(s) PEC7C (Palustrial Forested Wetland Seasonally Soil Series Name (optional) Flooded) Adjacent WaterHay (if any) Jackson Creek In floodplain? Y x N _ Residential & Field Current Land Use Cron ZOning Sinr(le Family Residential , .(Planned) 5. PROPOSED ACTIVITY: _ site plan approval - subdivision grading permit _ planned unit development conditional use permit _ public'xorks ~(<ane; (V1 _ "building permit 7~ other Proposed Annexation _ Zone Change to- Project Description: Future Subdivision Completed by/COntdCt: G. Rubaloff -Planning Date June 20, 1994 AddreSS Administrator PhOne(503) 664-3324 (this form la to be eo,~leted only by plmnlag deparGaeat staff for mappedvetlmd:) DSL RESPONSE ^ A removal-fill permit is required from the Division of State lands. ^ A removal-fill permit Hill be required Hhen the development project proceeds. ~GA removal-fill permit may be required. ,Information needed includes: ,p _ L ~la~.~sS~r ~l~ A Hetland determinationldelineation re ort. 6 ° ~ ^ ~ °-~e<md~ Px.-Feh-1-~f' i u tcS~r~{~a<vJc-(~wlc ^ State permit ^ Has issued ^ has been applied for. ^ No removal-fill permit is required for the described project if/because: ^ A permit may be required b,yy the Corps < Comments: ` ~tu(~1td. ~- slro~~L~-~o~-lz,crrak~AG~-LCtic.r~ Response completed by: ~ If the project is changed to involve fill state removal-fill permit will be required. Engineers (326-6995) ., LnS- ~,~~ ~1-~- ~ GC~~c~ ~ ~~ ~ Date ~• (: `l~ or removal from the Hetlands area, a ~~ ~~ ;~ 4. The City will approve, inspect, and own the contractor built lines in Jackson Creek Drive, Mallory Court, Madison Court, and the portion of Annalee Drive east of Jackson Creek Drive. 5. BCVSA will approve, inspect, and own the contractor built lines in Lynn Lane . and the portion of Annalee Drive west of Jackson Creek Drive. In addition, BCVSA will pay to the City 5.77 per month per house for each of BCVSA's 29 lots for joint use of City lines. (The formula for inflation increases, pay- ment schedules, etc. can be found in the November 7, 1988 agreement.) 6. Each agency will levy and collect its own fees and charges. In addition, BCVSA agrees to collect and transfer to the City, the city sewer fund's share of the water reservoir obligation per house, as provided by the City of Central Point, until that obligation has been paid in full. That amount is S n z7 per /~-~ r home that is connected to the sewer service. \'~ 7. -Both parties agree to execute appropriate documents in regards to ORS 450.987, as was done for properties on Chicory. Lane 372W10DA Tax Lot 100 and Freeman Road 372W11A Tax Lot 300. 8. Without unnecessary expense, BCVSA is unable to provide service to a portion of the area. 9. In consenting to such withdrawal and. pursuant to ORS 450.987, BCVSA and the City of Central Point stipulate to the following: a) Withdrawal of these 30 lots will have no substantial adverse impact on the ability of BCVSA to provide service to its remaining territories; b) The withdrawal is not solely for the tax advantage of the affected property owner(s); c) .The withdrawal will not result in non-contiguous parcels being served by BCVSA; d) BCVSA cannot provide adequate service to the subject territory withiri a reasonable time; and e) It is in the best interest of the .public that this agreement be approved. 2 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement 33 c3 ti v EXHIBIT ~~ STAFF REPORT Date: 11/16/95 Project: Jackson Creek Estates Unit # 7 Tentative Plat Developer /Applicant: Tom Malot Surveyor :Douglas McMahan Agent: Dennis Hoflbuhr This Staff Report Review covers the Fire Protection aspects of the proposed Tentative Plat. The requirements outlined herein are based on the 1991 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code with 1992 State of Oregon Amendments. This review assesses the Fire Protection needs related to Water Supply, Fire Department Access, Required Fire Flow. THE FOLLOWING ARE MY FINDINGS: The required fire flow for this project is established at 1000 g.p.m. ,based on Appendix A-III 5. for One & Two Family Dwellings when the largest structure within this development does not exceed a fire area of 3600 sq. ft. If there is planned for a structure to be built within the development that would exceed a fire area of 3600 sq. ft. the required fire flow will be established using Table No. A-III-A-1 of the of the Uniform Fire Code. Fire Area is defined as the total square footage of all floors, 3. Water supply is to be calculated and designed by applicants engineer and submitted to the City for their review to substantiate proposed design as shown on Tentative Plat submitted. Hydrant locations shall be established by the Fire Chief , but as a minimum will not exceed a spacing between hydrants of 300'. 4. The proposed cul-de-sac design configuration submitted does not meetthe Central Point Municipal Code Section 16.20.080. The applicant shall submit to staff for the City's approval a revised Tentative Plat which provides a street configuration design that meets CPMC 16.20.080. Cul-de-sac design criteria is established not only to move traffic for the motoring public safely but also, and most importantly provides for appropriate Fire Deparment Access to facilitate operational logistics in the event of a Fire Emereency. (cont'd) ~~ Page 2 5. Timing of the installation of the water system for required fire flow and Fire Department access shall be completed, tested, and approved by the City prior to the issuance of any Building permits. Approval of the submitted Tentative Plat is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office; or ofnon-compliance with any applicable regulations of this jurisdiction. Note* COPIES OF THE CODE SECTIONS PREFACED IN THIS REPORT WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE DEVELOPERS OF THIS PROJECT FOR THEIR REFERENCE. Reviewed By: Mark A. Servatius Fire Chief/Building Official N c3 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE APPENDIXiII-A Division III FIRE PROTECTION APPENDIX III-A FIRE-FLOW REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS 1. SCOPE The procedure determining fire-flow requirements for buildings or portions of :. ~.~:. b~ildingshereafterconstmetedshallbeinaccordancewiththisappendix.Thisap- _ -~ ~ ~ ~- : _..:. - ~ - pendixdcesnotapplytostmctures other than buildings. The chief may be guided ~I by NFPA 1231 in areas that are unable to comply with this appendix. 2. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this appendix, certain terms are defined as follows: FIRE AREA is the Floorarea, in square feet, used todetertnine the required fire flow. N FIRE FLOW is the flow rate of a water supply, measured at 20 psi residual pressure, that is available for firefighting. 3. MODIFICATIONS (a) Decreases. Fire-flow requirements may be modified downward by the chief for isolated buildings or a group of buildings in coral areas or small commu- nities where the development of full fire~flow requirements is impractical. (b) Increases. Fire flow may be modified upward by the chief where condi- tions indicateanunusual susceptibility to group fires orconflagrations. An upward modification shall not be more than twice that required for the building under consideration. 4. FIRE AREA (a) General. The fire area shall be the total Floor area ofallfloorlevelswithin the exterior walls, and under the horizontal projections of the roof of a building, except as modified in this section. (b) Area Separation. Portionsofbuildingswhichareseparatedbyoneormore r• four-hourareaseparationwallsconswctedinaccordancewiththeBuildingCode, ~~~~ without openings and provided with a 30-inch parapet, are allowed to be consid- ered as separate fire areas. (c) Type I and Type II-F.R. Construction. The fire area of buildings con- structed ofType land Type II-RR. construction shall be the area of the three largest successive floors. 5. FIRE-FLOW REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS (a) One- and 1Wo-Family Dwellings. The minimum fire flow and Flow dura- tion requirements forone-and two-family dwellings having a fire area which does not exceed 3,600 square feet shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. Fire flow and Flow 495 ~~ ,,, APPENDIX III-A, A-III-A-0 1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE € durationfordwellingshavingafireareainexcessof3,6lXlsquarefeetshallnotbe __ less than that specified in Table No. A-III-A-L. EXCEPTION: A reduction in required fire flow of 50 percent as approved by the chief, is allowed when the building is provided wilh an approved automalic sprinkler system. a (b) Buildings other than One- and Two-Family Dwellings. The minimum fire flow andilowdurationforbuildingsotherthanone-and two-family dwellings s shall be as specified in Table No. A-IB-A-1. EXCEPTION: Areductioninrequired fire0owofup to75 percent,asapproved by the chief,is allowed when the building is provided with an approved automalic ' sprinklersystem. The resulting fireflow shall not be less than 1,500 gallons permin- we. N - TABLE NO. A-III-A-1 - MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW AND FLOW DURATION FOR BUILDINGS FlRE AflFA (square feeq FlRE T~yp~e 4F:R IIO ~H Type IV H T ~yp~ a }~ FLOW ll a ns (ps OUflATION . 14fiflJ R. Ill One-HR! • . . V-One-HR.' . IIFN~ Type V•H~ p e r inlnule) (hours) 22,700 12,700 8,200 5,900 3,600 - 1;500 30,200 17,000 10,900 7,900 4;800 1,750 38,700 21,800. 12,900 9,800 6,200 2,000 2 48,300 24,200 17,400 12,600 7,700. 2,2j0 59,000 33,200 21,300 15,400 9,400 2,500 70,900 39,700 25,500 18,400 11,300 2,750 83,700 47,100 30,100 21,800 13,400 3,000 97,700 54,900 35,200 25,900 15,600 3,250 3 112,700 63,400 40,600 29,300 :18,000 3.500 128,700 72,400 46,400 33,500 20,60(1 3.750 145,900 82,100' S2S00 37,900 23,300 4,000 164,200 92,400 59,100 42,700 26,300 4,250 183,400 103,100 66,000 47,700 29,300 4,500 203,700 .114,600 73,300 $3,000 32,600 4,750 225,200 126,700 81,100 58,600 ~ 36,000 5,000 247,700 139,400 89,200 65,400 39,600 5,250 271,200 152,600 97,700 70,600 43.400 5,500 295,900 166,500 .106,500. 77,000 47,400 5,750 Greater Greater 115,800 83,7110 51,500 6,000 4 " 125,500 90,600 55,700 6,250 " 135,500 97,900 60,200 6,500 " 145,800 106,800 64,800 6,750 " 156,700 113,200 69,600 7,000 " 167,900 121,300 74,600 7,250 " 179,400 129,600 79,800 7,500 " 191,400 138,3IX1 85,100 7,750 " Greater Greater Greater 8,000 J Fr Y~ ~'Iypes of conslmclion are based upon the Building Code. 496 to.VO.UlU it Chapter 16.08 DEFINITIONS Sections: 16.08.010 Definitions. 16.08.010 Definitions. As used in this title the mas- culine gender includes the feminine and neuter gender and the singular includes the plural. The following words and phrases, unless the context otherwise requires, shall have the mean- ings assigned to them. 1. "Alley" means a narrow street through a block pri- marily for vehicular service access to the back or side of properties otherwise abutting on another street. _ 2. "Applicant" means the owner or contract purchaser of the property sought to be subdivided, partioned or developed, or the person duly authorized in writing by`such person or persons to act as agent to seek subdivision, partion or de-' velopment, and in connection therewith, to bind. the property... to any conditions thereof. 3. "Building line" means a line on a plat indicating the limit beyond which buildings or structures may .not be erected. 4. "City" means any representative of the city of Cen- tral Point authorized to make the decision in question, in- cluding but not limited to, the .public works director, the city administrator, the planning. commission or the city council. 5. "Cul-de-sac" (dead-end street) means a short street having one end open to traffic and being terminated by a ve- hicle turn-around. 6. "Development plan"'means any plan as defined in Cen- tral Point Municipal Code Section 15.16.010. 7. "Easement" means a grant of the right to use a strip of land for specific purposes. 8. "Final plat" means the final map and other writing containing all the descriptions, locations, specifications, provisions and information concerning a subdivision, and where applicable, includes a partition plat prepared by a registered professional land surveyor. , 9. "Flag lot" means a lot or parcel surrounded by other parcels on all sides and connected to the public.,right-of-way by a privately owned driveway or easement for ingress-and egress. 10. "Half street" means a portion of the width of ,a' street, usually along the edge of a subdivision where the remaining portion of the street has been or could later be provided in another subdivision. 197 (Central Point .4/.91) ~~ 16.20.080--16.20.130 be subdivided, the other half of the street shall be plat- ted within such tract. Reserve strips and street plugs may be required to preserve the objectives of half streets. (Ord. 1650 (part), 1990). 16.20.080 Cul-de-sac. A cul-de-sac shall be as short as possible and s all in no event be more than four hundred feet long nor serve more than twelve single-family dwell- ings or seventy-five dwelling units. All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a circular turn-around. (Ord. 1684 §11, 1993: Ord. 1650 (part), 1990). 16.20.090 Streets--Names. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the city and the surrounding area and shall be _. subject to the approval of the city. (Ord. 1650-(part), 1990). 16.20.100 Streets--Adjacent to railroad right-of-way. Wherever the proposed subdivision contains or is adjacent to a railroad right-of-way, provisions shall be made for a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance to be determined by city. Such ..distance shall be determined with due consideration at - cross streets of the minimum distance required for approach grades to a future grade separation. (Ord. 1650 (part), .1990).. 16.20.110. Planting easements. Where physical condi- tions require approva ~of streets less than fifty feet in right-of-way width, additional easements for planting of street trees or shrubs may be required. (Ord. 1650 (part), 1990). 16.20.120 Alleys. A. Location. Alleys may be pro- videdin~commercial and industrial districts, unless other permanent provisions for access to off-street. parking and loading facilities are made as approved by the city. B. Intersections. Alley intersections and sharp changes in alignment shall be avoided. The corners of necessary alley intersections shall have a radius of .not less than twenty feet. (Ord. 1650 (part), 1990). 16.20.130 Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with such standards as are adopted by the city. Sidewalk construction shall be completed on each individual lot prior to the city building inspector grant- ing a certificate of occupancy for any construction upon 210 (Central Point 8/93) u I - ~ ~:xxlalT . THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date of Notice: October 31, 1995 Hearing Date: Tuesday, November 21, 1995 Time: 7:00'PM (approximate) Ptace: CentraLPoint City Council Chambers 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon ~ 55 South Seco'hd Street Central Point, OR 97502 (503) 664-33'24° George Rubaloff Planning Administrator Sandy Lommel Administrative- Planning Secretary Beginning at the above place and 6me, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision Phase VII. The proposed division is located in the Residential Single-Family District (R-1-8 Zone) and located immediately east of Jackson Creek, south of Jackson Creek Estates Unit I. The subject property is a 10.18 acre parcel further described as Tax Lot 3000 of Tax Assessor Map 37 2W IOC. This .phase of the development features 341ots ranging in size from 8006 to 14406 square feet. Access to the subdivision is from the junction of Analce Drive and Jackson Creek Drive to the east. The property owner of record is Tom Malot Construction Company.. The authorized agent in the application process is Dennis Hoffbuhr of Hoffbuhr and Associates, Inc. The requirements for approval of a tentative plan for a subdivision are set forth in CPMC Chapter 16, relating to street, water system, storm drainage and. sanitary sewer and CPMC Chapter 17 having to do with caning district requirements and lot dimensions. Tentative Plans and Site Plans are also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for November 21, 1995. ~~ 0 2. Written comments should be sent to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502, attention, Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planning Administrator. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written wmments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review in Room 214, City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (503) 664-3324. At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear any arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review hearing, the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan for Phase VII of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision. City regulations provide that the Central Poini City Council. be informed about all Planning Commission decisions at the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date. The Council may, on its own motion, call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party aggrieved by the action of the Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing a written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the decision. ~~ o a U J W; OO, JJ ~NO pp. V ~4KFF ~ 'r" ~~4 ~ go~`oo mm > U ~ ~ ~ v JFWO a~~ 33 a WWS a'~o~ Wu~ N y SIKU ~LL'tt 0: ~ ~~ `` m O ~a.Qbs ~ a#m~5y~ ~`~3a xVqN~ Q~a G~aa I' m 0. ' a~$~~ if O o ~~~ E ~ ' 3 U. A " W ~ N N W o~~ 40 ~oae ' ~ g ~~wa i ~ g ~ :~~a ^ _ W as ~~~ ~ '-~. U . . ~xAL ° OxQL 1 , l~ ))~aZ=Za11a11YyyY Z-uZuN JI~N4NW~ ~1 ~' 8\ 5 7 S £~ i -qy~ S ~ 3 ~F y¢ ~~ ~;FYr t~~~~? ~~ '7 n Y' I r O E- 'I(n~ rr m V/ ~ 3 ~ II-I ~ 0 ~ .~ ,. ~ x~ 6 Q ~ VI Z ~ v I > W~~ w a _ 11~ F a e ` Y O C I , 11 I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ W '____w __ ~ 6 \d.~~ . ~/W Bm ' '4 : U F. m .V ~i____~^_jC~ _ ___. _i ~ ____ ___ N a ~ T ; ~ 1 1 INI ~ ! 1 r____~__l~I l i c+ 777 ` U ~ 1 ~ro i _ ~_a;_ H~ ~ N' ~ -, ------~ " - c _ - T` _Y~ ~xr~ I l~Yl ..i ``~~` ._~ `~\ I I I .. ~ ~t~ I I ~\`~~~_.1 .t I 1 •~~ /~~\ ~3 I I I --------- '.:d II _____ A~ ~ r'3 ~Nl I III I ~ ~i ~ _ } X ' (V~ .~ 4+ :~ Y I ~~ N E I; ~ i ____ __ h I ___ II ___ I __ _~~- I I 1 I I j~3i .. I I Ir~ .,, _ I T - !! iITP-_ n1 ~ rv~ ~ rv~ ~ !iiry~~~ rvi ~ n~ x~} i zii~ ~ z~~ p°} i ° i I I I ~ I ~ 32 1 I CJ : I II I I ]' I }}~~ N3 , II I ~If 4 I ~~. L.I I I li1t~ ~ II' i, N r! I~ +I brv~ Zvi i IY I I r { g _... ._ _ ""r-s_ - I "1 H r ; Iijl}Zi f ~~ , ~~ ~~ I I I Z i Q I I I JI 3 ~ ~I;I I J ' mi ~~ ~t9i i I~ g b: e~j m~ I I i I I s~ =-° a~S I I . w +aKdel ~~ ~~ ~ I I i I~ w ~~ w'1~~1 jI _ _ I' ~~£~ I I II I I I Yg I~ I I '.~~ig it 6 ~~ I ~ ~ n ~ I 3 PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTAT/VE PLAN REVIEW G3L~MO~C~D ~~Q~~ 63C~pOo G°3~ Date: January 9, .1996 Project: Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 Zone: R - 1 - 8 # of Lots: 34 No. of ', Structures 34 ,Applicant: Tom Malot Construction Co. P.O. Box 3847 Central Point, Oregon 97502 (541) 664-1258 Agent: Dennis Hoffbuhr Hoffbuhr & Associates 1062 E. Jackson Street Medford, Oregon 97504 (541)779-4641 Engineer: Location: Type of Land Use Action: Tentative Plan Name of Development Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 Applicable Codes: Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) 8.24, 8.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.04, 12.08, 12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64 Reviewed By: Michael Thornton -Thornton Engineering ~~ Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 January 9, 1996 -Page Two TENTATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (16.10, 16.24) Tirln nwsrtrin}inn Stahls~ Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.10.010 Filing Fee MS 16.10.020 Scale MS 16.10.030 General Conditions a. Name of Subdivision MS b. Date North Arrow Scale MS c. Legal location of subdivision MS d. Names/Address of Owner/Surveyor MS 16.10.040 Existing Conditions a. Location of street (See Exh. "A" No.9 widths & easements, etc. IN (Provide Exist Street Names b. Topographic Info MS c. Benchmark established MS d. Location and direction of all water courses MS e. Natural features rock outcroppings, marshes, wooded areas MS f. Existing uses of the land Pasture g. Location of all existing streets and utilities MS h. Zoning on and adjacent to MS tract is compatible 16.10.050 Proposed Plan a. Street Location, and the lanes, (Provide additional radius information grades, radius of curves, (See Exh. "A" No. 9 relationship to other existing or proposed streets, and other utilities. IN (Provide easement widths b. Easements-Widths/Purpose IN (See Exh. "A" No.,9 & No. 17 c. Lot Dimension MS d. Other Uses MS e. Lot square footage MS NCTATI IC I C(_`CrJ A. M$ - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - Nor ArPUCaeLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED 3 Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 ' January 9, 1996 -Page Three Tentative Plan Requirements (16.10, 16.24 -Continued) Title 'r]nscrintinn StwtuaM Cnndifinns/Cnmmwnfw\Infn Nwwdwd 16.10.060 Partial Development Is other property adjacent to this property being considered in the design? This property can be owned by the subdivider. NA 16.10.070 Explanatory Information a. Vicinity maps to explain relationship to existing streets, can require correction to existing streets. MS b. Proposed Deed restrictions NA c. Center Lane profile of streets to show grade (100" beyond street) CPP d. Approximate location and proposed size of utilities. MS 1.6.24.010 Block length MS Width MS Shape MS Not greater than 1200' MS 16.24.020 Block size MS 16.24.030 Blocks Easements a. Utilities MS b. Water Courses IN (Provide easement for Jackson Ck. c. Pedestrian Ways NA {See Exh. "A" No. 9 16.24.040 Lots Shapes and Sizes MS 16.24.050 Lots-Size & Determination MS Lot length greater than 2.5 times width prohibited MS 16.24.060 Through Lots MS 16.24.070 Lot Sidelines MS 16.24.080 Lar a Lot Subdivision NA * STATUS LEGEND: M$ - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED J e~ Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 January 9, 1996 -Page Four 11. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineating improvements, curbs/gutters, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck access, traffic requirements, sidewalk; and bikeways. A. Existing Conditions 1. Street Name -Beall Lane Descryion -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways B. Street Standards Fxi tin o ondition 60 ' Property to Property 24 ' Curb to Curb 2 0 1 VT/D none none none T.rle no~„a„rl„n Jurisdiction -County 80' Property to Property 24' to 34' Curb to Curb 2 - 4 moving lanes 0 - 2 parking lanes 5,000-10,000 VT/D Required Required Required Required Statns• Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.20.020 Street Generally a. Location See 16.20.080 b. Width MS See Exh. "A" No. 10 c. Grade CPP d. Relationship to existing street MS e. Topography as it relates to drainage CPP f. Provide for Street Construction CPP Exhibit "A" No. 14 g. Follows a Master Plan CPP Exhibit "A" No. 8 h. Traffic Volume CPP I. Safety Features CPP j. Accesses CPP Comp Plans. Street R.O.W. & Widths tS ROW "' MS 50' LS Width "' MS 36' curb to 'curb SA ROW "' IN 80' See Exh."A" Na. 9 SA Width " IN See Exh. "A" No. 10 STATUS LEGEND: M$-MEETS STANDARD DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP -FINAL PLAT IN -INFORMATION NEEDED ;, 36 r• Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 January 9, 1996 -Page Five Street Standards -Continued. Title Desrrintinn Status• Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.20.030 Street Reserve Strip NA 16.20.050 Street Extension NA PWS,VII,G Street Intersection Angles 90~ NA 16.20.060 Existing Streets additional width CPP See Exh. "A" No. 10 16.20.070 Half Street NA 16.20.080 Cul-de-Sac and/or dead-end streets a. Shall not serve more than 12 lots IN See Exhibit "A" No. 8 b. Shall not be greater than 400' IN See Exhibit "A" No. 8 c. Turn-around MS 16.20.090 Street Names MS 15.40 Street Grades and Curves Public Works -MA SA CS not greater than 6% CPP Standards -Not greater than 12% on LS MS -Cannot be less than 1 /2% CPP Curve Radius -LS - 100' MS -CS - 100' NA -SA - 200' NA -MS - 300' NA Stationing CPP Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flow Protection. A. Existing Conditions 1. One existing 12" water main lies in Beall Lane, and one 8" water main lies in the proposed improvement of Annalee Drive. 2. One existing fire hydrant lies in the proposed improvement of Annalee Drive '.STA TUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED I~ Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 January 9, 1996 -Page Six B. Water Standards: rrlo nnse.inrinn Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Water System provided mains CPP See Exh:'A" No. 4 Public Works Standards Service Laterals, 1 ea. lot CPP Fire Hydrants not greater than 300' apart CPP Fire Flow 1000 g.p.m. provide minimum pressure 40 psi CPP See Exh. "A" No. 4 13.20 Backflow Prevention IV. SANITARY SEWER Ih"PROVER"ENTS Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local Systems Development Charge. A. Existing Conditions: 1. One 8" sanitary sewer line lies between lots 212 and 213 in the proposed Jackson Creek Estates Unit #6. 2. One 8" sanitary sewer line lies in the proposed Jackson Creek Drive. 8. Sanitary Sewer Standards: rno nnso.iorioo .Status" .Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Adequate sizing,Mainline services CPP See Exh. "A" No. 7 Public Works Standards Regional Systems Development Charge Local Systems Development Charge "STATUS LEGEND MS -MEETS STANDARDS DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS ~ A TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION *~ FP -FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 January 9, 1996 -Page Seven IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catch basins, and erosion protection. A. Existing Conditions: 1.. Jackson Creek lies along the westerly property boundary. Title B. Storm Drain Conditions: ' nasrrin}inn Statue Conditions/Cnmmwnts/Info Nawdwd 15.40 Surface Drainage and storm sewer See Exh. "A" No. 5 Public Works system CPP Standards Provide drainage through the subdivision CPP Are there adverse effects placed on downstream structures? No catchbasin located greater than 350 feet apart for any curb and gutter section CPP Discharge Basin ORS 196.800 Wetlands Disturbance See Exh. "A" No. 13 ORS 468.740 Erosion Control Plan Roof Drainage, Area Drains, Crawl Spaces CPP See Exh. "A" No. 1 ORS 8.28 Flood Management CPP See Exh. "A" No. 6 • STA TUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED ~~ EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS A. ORS Chapter 468.740 requires that all developments which will disturb 5 ACRES OR MORE of land adjacent to a stream which discharges to surface waters of the State of Oregon shall as a part of the construction permitting process submit an "Erosion Control Plan." The "Erosion Control Plan" shall require a PERMIT from DEO. No construction on any Tentative Plan storm drainage system can occur until authorization to do so has been granted by DEO. B. Developer shall provide and install ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department for each sanitary sewer manhole with a depth greater than 4.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. C. Developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide the minimum fire flow per the Fire Chief's Staff Report. D. Developer shall construct all utilities, streets, and other structures discussed herein, within rights-of-way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central Point, in accordance with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of his development. E. This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications. by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission approval, could require resubmittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible .for this .review. F. All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this Development shalt be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner. G. No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been' issued for each portion of the project requiring a permit. H. The Final Plat of this Subdivision shall not be approved by the Planning Commission until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by approved construction, bonding or a combination thereof. The City shall approve street stationing prior to Developer's engineer designing the improvements for this Tentative Plan. J. The developer shall submit an AutoCAD compatible digital drawing of the Final Plat at the time of Final Plat Approval. 0 EXHIBIT "A" Public Works Department -Tentative Plan Conditions JACKSON CREEK ESTATES, UNIT NO. 7 1. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and cravvl spaces. with positive drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets, lots, and all properties will drain properly. The developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings and perform such grading and drainage improvements which satisfies this .drainage condition leaving only minor grading required for each lot during construction. 2. The City's Engineer shall at the cost of the developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine street section design in accordance with the Public Works Department Design Standards. The streets shall use the following design criteria: .Street Name Average Dgjly Traffic % Trucks Beall Lane 10,000 VT/D 5% Jackson Creek Drive 1,500 VT/D 2% All other Streets 1,000 VT/D 5% 3. .The construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and a Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City of Central Point Public Works Department.. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City of Central Point Public. Works Standards. Developer .shall pay for all costs associated with the design and installation of the street and lighting improvements specified on these plans. 4. The construction drawings will indicate type, size and location of water mains and fire hydrants in accordance with the City's Public.. Works Standards and the recommendation of the. City's Fire Chief. The developer's engineer shall.. provide calculations showing that the proposed water system shall be adequate to meet the required fire flows. 5. Developer shall construct an adequately. sized storm drainage system to provide for runoff onto the subdivision .property and from each lot. Prior to construction plan approval for the improvements for this Tentative Plan, the developer's engineer shall provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage. system. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the Public Works Department for hydrology calculations. 6. The developer's engineer shall prepare and provide the City's,Public Works Department with a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of Jackson Creek. The analysis shall determine the 100 year flood elevations in conformance with FEMA's "Engineering Methods of Estimating Base Flood Elevations in Unnumbered A Zones .(Approximate ~- Exhibit "A"- Specific Conditions-Continued Study Areasl." The developer's engineer shall determine and provide the City's Public Works Department with the limits of the floodway in conformance with FEMA requirements. The Final Plat shall show the 100-year flood boundary, floodway and elevations. 7. Ah agreement exists between the City of Central Point and the Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority for Jackson Creek Estates,-Unit No.'s 6 & 7. The applicant shall obtain and become familiar with the conditions of this agreement, including the stipulation that portions of the sanitary sewer construction for Unit No. 7 will be approved, inspected and owned by the City of Central Point, and portions by BCVSA. 8. The Developer shall submit to the Public Works Department for approval a street circulatioin and property development plan for the extension of Annalee Drive to Hanley Road. 9. The following information shall be included on the revised Tentative Plan and/or Final Plat: a. Radius information at all right-of-way and centerline curves (16.10.050). b. The widths of all easements shall be shown (16.10.0501. a Street names shall be 'shown for all streets, new, existing and proposed extensions (16.10.040) d. An easement in favor of the City for access to Jackson Creek (16.24.030). e. Delineate the proposed right-of-vvay dedication for Beall Lane, 40' centerline to R.O.W. 10. The developer's construction drawings and improvements shall include the widening and improvements of Beall Lane to conform with the City's Public Works Standards. The improvements shall include the widened street section, curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, and 10.1 pavement transitions beyond the frontage of the project. The construction shall include a minimum 100`long right turn lahe on to Jackson Creek Drive. 11. If the developer proposes to construct a wall or fence along Beall Lane, the wall shall be constructed outside of the City's right-of-way and in conformance with the City's codes and standards. The Planning Commission and Developer are directed to the 10- foot dedication agreement for Unit No. 5 as a reference as to how this condition was accomplished previously. 12. The developer shall re-align the proposed 15 foot storm drain easements through lots 244 and 245 to lie adjacent to, and parallel with, the proposed lotline boundaries. The storm drain proposed through lot 241 shall be relocated to Annalee Drive. 13. The Oregon Division of State Lands has prepared a Yespohse to the Wetland Land Use Notification for this project. The developer shall become familiar and comply with the comments of that response. /, ~. Y r/ Exhibit "A" - Specific Conditions -continued 14. The developer shall provide for the design and construction of the proposed creek crossing at Annalee Drive and Jackson Creek. A concrete barricade shall be placed on Annalee Drive until the street construction to the west is complete. 15. The developer shall secure and provide the City with a 50' street right of way with additional 10' Public Utility Easements on each side from Annalee Drive to Hanley Road. ~: ai SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA AGREEMENT ~®~. FOR JACKSON CREEK ESTATES, UNIT NO.S 6 AND 7 The purpose of this agreement is to reach a compromise regarding the providing of sewer service to Unit Nos. 6 and 7 of Jackson Cree-c Estates and to show gb'od faith that both BCVSA and the City are interested in reaching a more all-encompassing agreement.. Such agreement would provide for the partial release of customers from the existing territory of BCVSA to the City of Central Point for the benefit of all customers. It is hoped that such an all-encompassing agreement can be entered into in the near future for the balance of the property within the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary. WHEREAS, the City and BCVSA has entered into two different agreements in 1993 that have allowed the City to withdraw territory from BCVSA; WHEREAS, both BCVSA and the City are interested in providing efficient service at the least cost to the area; WHEREAS, such sanitary sewer service is necessary to protect the health of valley residents; WHEREAS, the state law allows for the provision of such service by BCVSA unless specific determinations are made; WHEREAS, both parties believe that it is more efficient and in the public's best interest for the City to provide service to a portion of this development. `" It is hereby agreed between the City of Central Point, Oregon, and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority as follows: 1. All of Phase I of the Jackson Creek Estates, Units 6 and 7 will be serveii by the City of Central Point. This is a total of 25 lots, numbers 192 through 216. 2. An additional five lots in Phase 11, numbers 217 through 221, will also be served by the City for a total of 30 lots. 3. The remainder of Phase 11, a total of 29 lots, numbers 222 through 250, will be served by BCVSA. See attached map. 1 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement 4. The City will approve, inspect, and own the contractor built lines in Jackson Creek Drive, Mallory Court, Madison Court, and the portion of Annalee Drive east of Jackson Creek Drive. 5. BCVSA will approve, inspect, and own the contractor built lines in Lynn lane and the portion of Annalee Drive west of Jackson Creek Drive. In addition, BCVSA will pay to the City S.77 per month per house for each of BCVSA's 29 lots for joint use of City lines. (The formula for inflation increases, pay- ment schedules, etc. can be found in the November 7, 1988 agreement.) 6. Each agency will levy arid collect its own fees and charges. In addition, BCVSA agrees to collect and transfer to the City, the city sewer fund's share of the water reservoir obligation per house, as provided by the City of Central Point, until that obligation has been paid in full. That amount is S n z~ per ~~ r home that is connected to the sewer service. 7. Both parties agree to execute appropriate documents in regards to ORS 450.987, as was done for properties on Chicory Lane 372W10DA Tax Lot 100 and Freeman Road 372W11A Tax Lot 300. 8. Without unnecessary expense, BCVSA is unable to provide service to a portion of the area. 9. In consenting to such withdrawal and pursuant to ORS 450.987, BCVSA and the City of Central Point stipulate to the following: -- a) Withdrawal of these 30 lots will have no substantial adverse impact on the ability of BCVSA to provide service to its remaining territories; b) The withdrawal is not solely for the tax advantage of the affected property owner(s); c) The withdrawal will not result in non-contiguous parcels being served by BCVSA; d) BCVSA cannot provide adequate service to the subject territory within a reasonable time; and e) It is in the best interest of the public that this agreement be approved. 2 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement i( F~ .AGREED to as of `~~~- 1995. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY Mayor Rusty Mc" th Chairman Walter W. Wassum ATTESTED: ~ :~, ADMN34-5 COUNTERSIGNED: C ~ ~ ~,>~- Charles L. Root, Manager 3 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement ~~ ~_ o J,iC1i~0:V L'P.F_L•h' EST.gTE~ 1:\`/T~ A'O.G f.- :\~0,7 J LOCATL'D /ti 3:2N'fOC 7:L. 3000 JqC/fSO~\' COL',1•'T?'. OP.. _---_ --, :~\, -l .. 7 ~~~ 1 .. ~-? / ~ ~i~ ~ __ ' 'I _,_ '.! J -1j ~s:. ,.~ I i s .;~'- -. -- --~ ----- - '- i --- - ~- .. - - __ :\ • .., _„ _ ~: ' --- - ~i_..f.r ._...-_.._'j -t1,:Di<~.\' iii ;R7 ~ , ~,. 1 .. .. =.~ ~_ __~ ~ . .. ~_ .. 1 .. - _ \ ` , •' ~. ~~:~ f. ~~ Staff Report to: Central Point Planning Commission December 22, 1995 from: Nancy Kincaid, Interitn Planning Administrator ~~~ subject: Review of Tentative Plans for a Minor Partition Background Under the authority of CPMC 1.24, the Planning Commission can make decisions on Partition Tentative Plan Applications. A Tentative Plan can be approved if the proposed lots meet the size and configuration standards for the applicable zoning district, and all other requirements of the municipal code are met, subject to any conditions of approval necessary for such compliance. This proposal is for partition of one lot into two at the comer of Hopkins Road and Briarwood Drive. The parent lot is further described as 37-2W-11AC-10500. Terry Buntin is the applicant. The proposal is for a corner lot of 7000 square feet and a lot fronting on Hopkins Road of 6176 square feet. The subject property is zoned R-3, Residential Multi-Family. Minimum lot area in the zone is 6000 square feet (comer lots 7000). The minimum lot width is sixty feet for interior lots and seventy feet for corner lots. Both lots have . widths in excess of the minimum requirement. Planning, Public Works and Public Safety Departments have reviewed the proposal and have concluded that the proposed plan is substantially consistent with the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code. Public Works has submitted a memorandum including a list of recommended conditions of approval (see Exhibit A). Staff recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the Public Works Staff Report. ~~ Central Point Planning Commission Page 2 December 22, 1995 Exhibtts A - Public Works Department Staff Report B - Tentative Plan C - Notice to Affected Property Owners Mailed December 26, 1995 D - List of Affected Properly Owners (by reference) [c:\current\sr-buntn] ~~ PC/BL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT. TEN~rTAT2/V2E PnLA2N~REVn/EW U~°- I~I~ °U~LSIf'~r14°~ Date: Project: Zone: R - 3 # of Lots: No. of Structures Applicant: Agent: 1~%HIBTT ._~ ^, January 11, 1996 Briarwood Village Partition, Countryside II Subdivision, PW 95037 Current (1) Partitioned (2) 2 Terry Buntin 2811 Leonard Avenue Medford, OR 97504 Not indicated Engineer/Surveyor: James E. Hibbs, PLS Location: Type of Land Use Action: Land Partition Name of Briarwood Village Partition Development T37S, R2W, Section 22 AC, Tax Lot 10500 Applicable Codes: Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) 8.24, 8.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.04, 12.08, 12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64 Reviewed By: Paul W. Worth -Public Works Technician ~~ Briarwood Village Partition, Countryside II Subdivision December 28, 1995 -Page Two I. TENTATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (16.10, 16.24) Title Description Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.10.010 Filing Fee MS 16.10.020 Scale MS 16.10.030 General Conditions a. Name of Subdivision MS b. Date North Arrow Scale MS o, Legal location of subdivision MS d. Names/Address of Owner/Surveyor MS . 16.10.040 Existing Conditions a. Location of street ' widths & easements, eta MS Previously established under b. Topographic Info N/A Countryside II Subdivision c. Benchmark established N/A d. Location and direction of all water courses NJA e. Natural features: rock Previously established under outcroppings, marshes, Countryside II Subdivision wooded areas N/A f. Existing uses of the land N/A Previously established under g. Location of all existing Countryside II Subdivision streets and utilities IN Show sanitary sewer location in h. Zoning on and adlacent to Briarwood Ave. tract is compatible MS 1 i 6.10.050 Proposed Plan Previously established under a. Street Location, and the lanes, Countryside II Subdivision grades, radius of curves, N/A relationship to other existing or proposed streets, and other utilities. b. Easements-Widths/Purpose DMS See Exhibit A, Conditions ~V2,3 & 4 c. Lot Dimension MS d. Other Uses N/A e. Lot square footage MS WCTATI IC 1 C!`_CNIr1. MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - Nor APPLICABLE FP - FINAL PLAT BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION IN - INFORMATION NEEDED ~. Briarwood Village Partition, Countryside II Subdivision December 28, 1995 -Page Three Tentative Plan Requirements (16.10, 16.24 -Continued) Title Description -Status" Conditions/CommentsUnfo Needed 16.10.060 Partial Development MS Is other property adjacent to this property being considered in the design? This property can be owned by the subdivider. 16.10.070 Explanatory Information a. Vicinity maps to explain relationship to existing streets, can require correction to existing streets. MS b. Proposed Deed restrictions N/A c. Center Lane profile of streets to show grade (100" beyond street) d. Approximate location and DMS See Exhibit A, Condition #3,4 proposed size of utilities. 16.24.010 Block length N/A Width Shape Not greater than 1200' 16.24.020 Block size N/A 16.24.030 Blocks Easements N/A a. Utilities b. Water Courses c. Pedestrian Ways 16.24.040 Lots Shapes and Sizes MS 16.24.050 Lots-Size & Determination MS Lot length greater than 2.5 times width prohibited 16.24.060 Through Lots N/A 16.24.070 Lot Sidelines N/A 16.24.080 large Lot ( ro'ect) N/A STAT S ND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED V /J fjnarwood Village Partition, t;ountryside II Subdivision January 11, 1996 -Page Four IL STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineating improvements, curbs/gutters, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck access, traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bikeways. A. Existing Conditions 1. Street Name - eriarwood, LS 161 Descd t -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Existina Conditions 50 ' Property to Property 36 ' Curb to Curb 2 2 VT/D unknown none yes yes none 2. Street Name -Hopkins Road, CS 19 Descdotian -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Existina Conditions 60 ' Property to Property 40' Curb to Curb 2 2 300 VT/D (1993) none along frontage yes yes no B. SpeciatFlndings Jurisdiction -City of Central Point Future Requirements 50 ' Property to Property 36' Curb to Curb 2 2 VT/D <2500 Required Required Required None Required Jurisdiction -City of Central Point Future Requirements 60-66' 40' 2 0-2 VT/D 2500 - 5000 Required Required Required Required Constriction was commenced prior to approval of tentative plan or issuance of a building permit. Approval must be made in accordance with CPMC 16.10.090, 16.10.090. Permits must be issued in accordance with CPMC 15.04, 15.12 and 15.40 prior to resuming construction. 1 Briarwoad Village Partition, Countryside II Subdivision December 28, 1995 -Page Five C. Street Standards Title Description Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.20.020 Street Generally Briarwood Drive and Hopkins Road a. Location N/A previously constructed to required b. Width N/A .standards.. c. Grade N/A d. Relationship to existing street N/A e. Topography as it relates to drainage N/A f. Provide for Street Construction N/A , g. Follows a Master Plan N/A h. Traffic Volume N!A I. Safety Features N/A j. Accesses CPP See Exhibit A, Condition /J2 Comp Plans. Street R.O.W. & Widths Previously established under LS ROW •' N/A Countryside II Subdivision LS Width "' N/A SA ROW •' N/A SA Width •' N/A 16.20.030 Street Reserve Strip N/A 16.20.050 Street Extension N/A PWS,VI6G Street Intersection An91es 90° N/A 76.20.060 Existing Streets additional width N!A 16.20.070 Half Street/Flag Lot Access N/A 16.20.080 Cul-de-Sac and/or dead-end streets N/A a. Shall not serve more than 12 lots N/A b. Shall not be greater than 400' N/A c. Turn-around N/A 16.20.090 Street Names N/A 15.40 Street Grades and Curves. N/A Public Works -MA SA CS not greater than 6% Standards -Not greater than 12% on LS -Cannot be less than 1/2°k Curve Radius -LS - 100' -CS - 100' -SA - 200' -MS - 300' Stationin STATUS LEGEND: MS-MEETS STANDARD DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP-BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS FP -FINAL PLAT TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION '3: nnarwooe Village Partition, Countryside II Subdivision December 28, 1995 - Paga Six ~, II. WATER IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flow Protection. A. Existing Conditions L One existing 8" ductile iron waterline lies in the west lane of Briarwood Drive. 2. One existing 12" waterline and one existing 16" waterline lie in the north lane of Hopkins Road. 3. One existing fire hydrant is located in the right of way, fironting lot 10500 on Hopkins Road. 4. One existing 1 Yz" angle meter valve is located at the N.E. property corner of Lot 10500 (Parcel #1) to serve the existing lot. See Exhibit A, Condition #3. B. Water Standards: rrl„ nnecrlnrlnn Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Water System provided mains N/A Public Works Standards Service Laterals, 1 ea. lot DMS, FP See Exhibit A, Condition #3 (Easement Required) Fire Hydrants not greater than 300' apart N/A Previously established Fire Flow 1000 g.p.m. provide minimum pressure 40 psi N/A Previously established 13.20 Backflow Prevention LPP Show location/type IV. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local Systems Development Charge. A. Existing Conditions: 1. An 8" sanitary sewer exists in Briarwood Drive with 4" TAP located near the N.E. property corner of Tax Lot 10500. 2. An 8" sanitary sewer (City) and a 42" (BCVSA) sewer is located in the south lane of Hopkins Road. "STATUS LEGEND MS -MEETS STANDARDS DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP -FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED ~' v' tsnarwooa vwage rarutlon, countrysla December 28, 1995 -Page Seven 8. Sanitary Sewer Standards: Title Description Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Adequate sizing,Mainline services N/A Previously established under Public Works Countryside II Subdivision. See Exhibit .Standards Regional Systems Development A, Condition #4 Charge CPP Local Systems Development Charge CPP IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catch basins, and erosion protection. A. Existing Conditions: 1. Curbs and gutters exist along. Briarwood Drive and Hopkins Road frontages. B. Storm Drain Conditions: 'i"irln Ilccc~tntinn Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Surface Drainage and storm sewer N/A Previously established under Public Works system Countryside II Subdivision Standards Provide drainage through the CPP subdivision Are-there adverse effects placed on downstream stnictures7 N/A No catchbasin located greater than 350 feet apart far any curb and gutter section N/A Discharge Basin N/A ORS 196.800 Wetlands Disturbance N/A ORS 468.740 Erosion Control Plan Roof Drainage, Area Drains, Crawl CPP See Exhibit A, Condition #5a and #6 Spaces ORS 8.28 Flood Management N/A " STATUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD MS -MEETS STANDARDS DMS -DOES NOT MEET $TANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION 5~ .EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIOWORKS DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS BRIARWOOD VILLAGE PARTITION, COUNTRYSIDE II SUBDIVISION o ORS Chapter 468.740 requires that all developments which will disturb 5 ACRES OR MORE of land adjacent to a stream which discharges to surface. waters of the State of Oregon shall as a part of the construction permitting process submit an "Erosion Control Plan." The. "Erosion Control Plan" shall require a PERMIT from.DEQ. No construction.on any Tentative Plan storm drainage system can occur until authorization to do so has been granted by DEO. o Developer shall install ladder rungs approved by the .Central Point Public Works Department for each sanitary sewer manhole with a depth greater than 3.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. o Developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum flow of 1000 g.p.m. at each fire hydrant. o Developer shall construct all utilities, streets, and other. structures discussed herein, within rights-of-way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central Point, in accordance with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of this development. o This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review.. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission approval, could require resubmittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning Commission based on the recommendation. of staff responsible for this review. o All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner. o No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and other required divisions of the City and a Construction. Permit has been issued for each portion of the project requiring a permit. o The Final Plat of this Subdivision shall not be approved by the Planning Commission until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by construction and acceptance thereof, or bonding for construction. o The City shall approve street stationing prior to Developer's engineer designing the improvements for this Tentative Plan. C ~7 .Jt ~ SPECIFIC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS BRIARWOOD VILLAGE PARTITION, COUNTRYSIDE it SUBDIVISION Specific: 1(a) The construction of this development shall include the street subgrade, base rock, paving, lighting, traffic control and delineation improvements, storm drain improvements, curb/gutter, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvements, sidewalks, and utility crossings to that portion of Briarwood Drive and Hopkins Road adjacent to the partition project. 1(b) Developer shall be required to construct sidewalks in accordance vvith Public Works Standards and Specifications. 2. Developer shall construct driveway accesses to Parcels 1 and 2 in accordance with the Public Works Standards and Design Guidelines. Fire access to parcel 1 and 2 shall be located as .stipulated by the Public Safety Department. Developer shall construct a 40' driveway (throat width) for parcel #2 with turnarounds adjacent to both sides of the driveway sufficient to allow vehicles access to Hopkins Road without backing into the street. Permanent signs shall be installed on property prohibiting backing out. 3. Developer shall connect separate water service laterals for Parcels 1 and 2 to the' existing angle meter valve on Briarwood Drive with valuing and backflow prevention in accordance with Public Works Standards. Service laterals shall be sized in accordance with the Oregon Plumbing Code. Applicant shall provide and show easements on Final Plat and Plot Plan for water lines crossing the adjacent parcel (#1) 4. Separate sanitary sewer services serving each parcel shall be connected to the 8" sanitary sewers located in Briarwood Drive or Hopkins Road. The service lateral shall be sized in accordance with the Oregon Plumbing Code and Public Works Standards. Applicant shall provide and show easements on Final Plat and Plot Plan for any sewer service lines crossing adjacent parcels. 5.(a) Developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for runoff onto the subject. property .and from each lot. As a part of the construction of the improvements for this Tentative Plan, Developer's engineer shall provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system for this development. Developer shall submit this information to the Public Works Department at the time construction drawings for the project are submitted to the Public Works Department for permits for construction of the storm drainage improvements. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the Public Works Department#or hydrology calculations. 6. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm sewer. Developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets, lots, and all properties will drain properly. Developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings and perform such grading and drainage [J Briarwood Village Partition, Countryside II Subdivision ' Page Two - Tehtative Plan Conditions improvements which satisfies this drainage condition leaving only minor grading required for each lot during house construction. 7. Applicant shall install a 9500 lumen Street Light on the existing PP & L Power Pole 1/810663 located on the Southwest corner of Parcel #2 and Hopkins Road. Applicant shall coordinate the installation with Pacific Power. and Light Company. Typically, there is no charge for installation on existing poles. However, applicant will be required to pay any additional costs. ~~ 10000 0 24 Ac p .ro,ea 41 10100 r O 24 AC R ~r0, 1'O I O v 10200 A ~~ 0 24 4c n .re.lo 43 _ / 10300 L 024 Ac F /ra. ra l 44 . / 10400 V O 24 4C e i/o 10 •' ,y y~sQq;,(~; IyI+T R PD ~ O~~ f ~' dl ~~~b~~ J ~ FN 4` S.S.E. CDR. ~° + ~~ 41 as as a ...................... .w..v.~.r.....„.w,.. .......... .. '~ /2 /i /.Ji7f/L 2 (P-2270) '1lC 54 U Q. i s I 37 2W IIA80 I I 10800 0.26 QC O I I PLC'S S 10900 1 uv.a roVd ~/ ( 1 ~ o a A 9400 9300 I ~ ~ C\ z o .~ I M o.16ac o.16Ac G V - t,, ,ur.,, 6 i 49 G 52 ~ '~ 9500 `° ~" 1 1000 ~ 5 10700 0.28 Ac /,r.YY r~Y.++ 1 s w 0 28AC is I as 9600 9100 j 0.16AC ~~, 't '6Ac t~ Q h (CS 143141 ~ ~ i 0 I 4 /OY. Y6 1 L~ /M,.~ l o~ :~ 1 48 ~ 53 W Q 9700 0 16 A 9800 / > dz . ~ c ~ O 16At, ~f v 11100 ~ - 3 mr•9 Y ~ 10600 0 28 4 0.28 AC 2 J- 9800 0 16 A ~ / .~ 00 _ c ~ ~ . CC w, e a 0 E I ' E I C r J :~ ~ .Or dl 2 /OV i~ 1 ~ ~f~ I I ~ U « 9900 ~0.16Ac ~ 8800 C 6AC +, ti G 47 fi 54 I ~ . • ^ Y t..- / /! tl _ „ A'YB I M atH 1 faJ as Mai HatlHH 1-X~f "fY/ 1r BB mrrla rtl rn lTtf~tltrf~ .. n - .1.1Jw • I "•t'MYfYTYTI •i_01 (1200 11202 11 -~'~ '• •' 203 • v4c sBAC ~37AC 7200 7100 I !CO(: i - _ ' - :Yd agar 1 , . aoq 1~~' ;1 ,a2~a1~ a.s-.. ~_ •.r_.. ' • :..Nara; .,..< 7'~'~ .: r 69J' ^-- ~ 600 ~ 75~J0 a~ ~'~ "~ .. I X300 6800 1 v ~~~1'7 l"~ ~` • 'f s print is made solely for the purpose o~ ~ 6 'r' ~°`°_1 '; $trn~YtY{pCd id3Pn~np tin 'S f ' g d ~t~j!'--J rit Imes no liability for information printed on ! t ~~ aIUANITA - ;- IIn~~Qncluding zoning, variations, if any ~ ~; , 7 fimensions,and locations, ascertained by ial ;!~'., °• °~ ~~- "'° surve . Y ~ I _ JACKSON COUNTY TITLE DIVISION ;~ ' -7700 ' ' 7800 7900 • 8 ;~ :~ CONTINENTAL LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY 1 ;~ I •; ' W. MAIN PH. 719-2811 MEDFORD, OJ2EGOf~ ` _ • 9 _ __ I +'J II 12 ar az ., .e I 7f•. K 40Q 4 `I n 100 ,... 3n~aa 3mseatxno~ I I EXHIBIT ~ I : 1 . e' _ -___.___. 1 .~. _ k ~ ~ ena .o~ ~, _ - _ ~ I ec I x e n+ t © I I I I I I ~ I i i ~: ® I I I I 4 I i l I iCo o ,~:~ a . I ~ ~w~ ,r-~ 1 o~ a ~ P 6 <~ ` , . , ~ ~ , , ~ =~ :, g e.: ~;s ~~~ -~ ~I = I , I ~ I i I 1 I . , a , ~ I I I i I I ~ .; ~ .,; ; ~ j I ~ I ~ r,~ I O .. I I I< 1 i i I ~•~ i~ J i) --- ------ ~a .o, - - ~ - I! ~I l ; ; li ~. w I j ; ~; ~ i _ I i I I .t.sv n. u.aoax ~I I I I ~ i , l ~I I Gin aarww Y I it •y 1: ~ I •I _ 60 _ ' a I Z I ~~~ _ ~ '~ _ i 6 i ~ :: .... .... ~~ ~~ ! lal a'oI 3. K.e0GM I ~ I I I O ~Il ~~ ~ iy I~~~a~y I I ~. . I O O I w ~ I II I y ~ ~ ~n W I a i i i . I ' _ . I I • o ~ o .o ~ ~o ~° I .....' II I L~ ' V: o ~ I 1 1 ~_ 1 _..__________________._..._. _. _._.._. oo vv n. ia.eoox I OVOa 1136x06 V .155 South SCCt7nd'Str2et E}a~ii$IT ~ central Point, oR s~soz (503) 664332$ PLAI1iiVING DEPARTMIENT George Rubaloff Planning Administrator THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date of Notice: December 26, 1995 Hearing Date: Tuesday, January 16, 1996 Time: 7:00 p.m.(Approximate) Place: Central Point City Council Chamber 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF HEARINGS Sandy Lommel Administrative- Planning Secretary Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for a land paztition located in the Multiple Family (R-3) Zone on property north of Hopkins Road between Briarwood Drive and Bursell Road. The site is located on Tax Lot 10500 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 37 2W 11AC. If approved, the land partition would create one 6,176 square foot parcel and one 7,000 squaze foot parcel on Hopkins Road. The owner of record is Briarwood Village Partnership and the Applicant is Terry Buntin. CRITERIA.FOR DECISION The requirements for approval of tentative plans are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to tentative plans, land partitions, street, water system, storm drainage and sanitary sewer'and CPMC Chapter 17 relating to lot dimensions. The Tentative Plan is also reviewed for compliance with the City's Public Works Standazds. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday, January 16, 1996 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the hearing to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502. NOPHTENT/ADMIN [a w 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comment: about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same aze available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3324 (extension 231). SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the public heazing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review. hearing, the Planning Commission may. approve or deny-the Tentative Plan for the proposed land. partition. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. The Council may, on its own motion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date, call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party aggrieved by the action of the. Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council. by filing a written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the decision. ~~ Staff Report tO° Central Point Planning Commission December 22, 1995 from: Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planning Administrator ~~ subject: Review of Tentative Plans for a Miaor Partition Under fire authority of CPMC 1.24, the Planning Commission can make decisions on Partition Tentative Plan Applications. A Tentative Plan can be approved if the proposed lots meet the. size and configuration .standards, for the applicable caning district, and all other requirements of the municipal code are met; subject to any conditions of approval necessary for such compliance. This proposal is for partition of one lot into two at the comer of Beall Lane and Bursell Road. The garent lot is an "L" shaped parcel with frontage on each road, but is not a corner lot. The property is fiutheT described as 37-2W-11D-2202 {It is not entirely clear that this is the current tax map identification number because of a recent lot line adjustment). Michael E. Sullivan is the applicant with Iietb Farber acting as agent/surveyor. The subject property is zoned R-2, Residential Two-Family. Minimum lot area in the zone is 6000 square feet {comer lots 7000). The minimum lot width is sixty feet for interior lots and seventy feet for comer lots. Both tots have areas and widths in excess of the minimum requirements. The proposed Parcel 2 may be large enough to be divided again. As noted above, the parent property was the subject of a recent lot line adjustment. It is my understanding that this property and some adjacent property have been the subject of several reconfigurations in recem years. It is suggested that a County Assessment ~. Central Polnt Planning Commission Page 2 December 22, 1995 snap demonstrating the actual current property boundaries be submitted to the file for Commission review, This office does not currently have an Assessor's map on file that shows the parcel as represented in the application. Planning, Public Works and Public Safety Departments have reviewed the proposal and have concluded that the proposed plan is substantially consistent with the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code. Public Works has submitted a memorandum including a list of recommended conditions of approval (see Exhibit A). Staff recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the Public Works Staff' Report and a clear demonstration that the Assessor has accepted the property description of the parent parcel that is proposed to be divided here. ~~~ A - Public Works Deparnnent Staff Report B - Tentative Plan C - Notice to Affected Property Owners Mailed December 26,1995 D - List of Affected Property Owners (by reference) [c:\current\sr-sulvn] ~T J Exxrarr ~ Date: Project: Zone: R - 2 No. of Lots: No. of Structures Applicant: Agent: Engineer: Type of Land Use Action: Name of Development Applicable Codes: Reviewed By: PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTAT/VE PLAN REV/EW ~~G°aI~G G°3L pOo G°3`~ January 11, 1996 Sullivan Land Partition, Beall/Bursell Roads, PW #95038 2 Not indicated Michael E. Sullivan 305 Harvard Place Medford, OR 97504 (541) 773-3630 (Res.) Herbert A. Farber, DBA/Farber Surveying 908 E. Jackson Medford, OR 97504 (541) 776-0846 Not Indicated Land Partition T 37S, R2W, Section 11 D Tax Lot 2202 Sullivan Land Partition (Parcels 1 and 2) Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) 8.24, 8.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.04, 12.08, 12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64 Paul W. Worth -Public Works Technician 6u Sullivan Land Partition, Beall/Bursell Roads January 11, 1996 -Page Two I. TENTATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (16.10, 16.24) Title Descriotion Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 16.10.010 Filing Fee 16.10.020 Scale 16.10.030 General Conditions a. Name of Subdivision MS b. Date North Arrow Scale MS o. Legal location of subdivision MS d. Names/Address of Owner/Surveyor MS 16.10.040 Existing Conditions a. Location of street widths & easements, etc. MS b. Topographic Info MS c. Benchmark established MS d. Location and direction of all water courses N/A e. Natural features rock outcroppings, marshes, wooded areas N/A f. Existing uses of the land IN Field Check -Residential g. Location of all existing streets and utilities MS h. Zoning on and adjacent to tract is compatible MS 16.10.050 Proposed Plan a. Street Location, and the lanes, IN, CPP See Exhibit A, Condition #1, 2 grades, radius of curves, and Information Needed #1 relationship to other existing or proposed streets, and other _ utilities. b. Easements-Widths/Purpose IN, FP See Exhibit A, Condition #2, 4 c. Lot Dimension MS and Information Needed #1 d. Other Uses MS e. Lot square footage MS "ST ATUS LEGEND: M$ - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED f "I Sullivan Land Partition, Beall/Bursell Roads January 11, 1996 -Page Three Tentative Plan Requirements 116.10, 16.24 -Continued) rno nnccrlnunn Srarus• Conditions/Comments\Info Needed 16.10.060 Partial Development IN See Information Needed #1 Isother property adjacent to this property being considered in the designl This property can be owned by the subdivider. 16.10.070 Explanatory Information a. Vicinity maps to explain relationship to existing streets, can require correction to existing streets. MS See Exhibit A, Condition #1 b. Proposed Deed restrictions MS c. Center Lane profile of streets to show grade 1100' beyond street) N/A d. Approximate location and proposed size of utilities. N/A 16.24.010 Block length N/A Width N/A Shape N/A Not greater than 1200' N/A 76.24.020 Block size N/A 16.24.030 Blocks Easements N/A a. Utilities b. Water Courses c. Pedestrian Ways 16.24.040 Lots Shapes and Sizes MS 16.24.050 Lots-Size & Determination MS Lot length greater than 2.5 times width prohibited 16.24.060 Through Lots N/A 16.24.070 Lot Sidelines N/A 16.24.080 Lar a Lot Subdivision N/A * STATUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD DMS - DOES NOT MEET $TANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP - FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED ~ L"; js Sullivan Land Partition, Beall/Bursell Roads - January 11, 1996 -Page Four 11. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineating improvements, curbs/gutters, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck access, traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bikeways. A. Existing Conditions 1. Street Name - Beall Lane - SA 15 De~i/~tion -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Existina Conditions 60 ' Property to Property 30 ' Curb to Curb 2 0 (gravel shoulder) 2520 VT/D11993) none none none none *Comprehensive Plan Accepted Standards 2. Street Name - Bursell Road -CS05 Descdotion -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lanes -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalks -Curb & Gutter -Street Lights -Bikeways Existina Conditions 60 ' Property to Property 32 ' pavementlwith tapers) 2 none 1452 VT/D11992) none none 1 none Jurisdiction -Jackson County Future Requirements 80-88' Property to Property 60-64' Curb to Curb * 2-4 * 0-2 * 5000-10,000 VT/D Required Required Required Required Jurisdiction -Jackson County Future Requirerrrents 60-66' Property to Property 40' Curb to Curb 2 0-2 2500-5000 VT/D Required Required 200' spacing required Required Note: A Deferred Improvement Agreement (REC.. *87-16563) was executed for 375 2W 1 1 D, Tax lot 2200 on 7/31 /87 prior to the first subsequent property transaction dated 1989. Instrument #74-05946 describes the property owned by Richardson in 1974 as including Tax Lot 2202. (Farber Fax Memo, 12/27/951 C? i/ Sullivan Land Partition, Beall/ Bursell Roads January 11, 1996 -Page Five B. Street Standards nrio nasn.iorinn Status» Conditions/Commentsllnfo Needed 16.20.020 Street Generally a. Location MS b. Width MS c. Grade MS d. Relationship to existing street N/A e. Topography as it relates to drainage MS f. Provide for Street Construction FP See Exhibit A, Condition #1 g. Follows a Master Plan N/A h. Traffic Volume MS I. Safety Features CPP j. Accesses CPP See Exhibit A, Condition #2 Comp Plans. Street R.O.W. & Widths LS ROW 50-60' LS Width 36-40' CS ROW 60 - 66" CS Width 40' SA ROW " 80-88' SA Width " 60-64' 16.20.030 Street Reserve Strip N/A 16.20.040 Street Alignment MS 16.20.050 Street Extension N/A PWS,VII,G Street Intersection Angles 90~ N/A 16.20.060 Existing Streets additional width See Exhibit A, Condition #1 16.20.070 Half Street/Flag Lot Access IN See Exhibit A, Condition #2 16.20.080 Cul-de-Sac and/or dead-end N/A streets a. Shall not serve more than 12 lots b. Shall not be greater than 400' c. Turn-around 16.20.090 Street Names N/A 15.40 StreetGrades and Curves CPP/IN See Exhibit A, Condition #2 Public Works -MA SA CS not greater than 6°h Standards -Nofgreater than 12% on LS -Cannot be less than 1/2% Curve Radius -LS - 100' -CS - 100' -SA - 200' -MS - 300' Stationing STATUS LEGEND: MS-Meets Standard DMS -Does Not Meet Standard NA -Not Applicable TPR -Tentative Plan Revision FP -Final Plat IN -Information Needed BPP -Building Process Plan CPP -Construction Plan Process ~~ h Sullivan Land Partition, Beall/Bursell Roads ' January 11, 1996 -Page Six II. WATER IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flow Protection. A. Existing Conditions 1. One existing 8" CI waterline lies in the East side of Bursell Road fronting Parcel J/1. 2. One existing 12" CI water line lies in the north side of Beall Lane fronting applicant's Parcel lt2 3. One existing City of Medford fire hydrant lies an the south side of Beall Lane at Bursell Road. B. Water Standards: Title Description Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Water System provided mains MS Public Works Standards Service Laterals, 1 ea. lot CPP See Exhibit A, Condition Jf3 Fire Hydrants not greater than 300' apart DMS See Exhibit A, Condition #3 Fire Flow 1000 g.p.m. provide minimum pressure 40 psi MS See Exhibit A, General Conditions 13.20 Backflow Prevention CPP Show location/type IV. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local Systems Development Charge. A. Existing Conditions: 1. A 42" BCVSA Regional Sewer lies in the West Side of Bursell Road. 2. No Sanitary Sewer exists in Beall Lane along Tax Lot 2202 frontage. "STATUS LEGEND M$ -MEETS STANDARDS DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA -NOT APPLICABLE BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION FP -FINAL PLAT IN - INFORMATION NEEDED F'q Sullivan Land Partition, Beall/Bursell Roads January 11, 1996 -Page Seven 8. Sanitary Sewer Standards: Title Description Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed 15.40 Adequate sizing,Mainline services MS See Exhibit A, Condition Jl4 Public Works Standards Regional Systems Development Charge CPP Local. Systems Development Char a CPP IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catch basins, and erosion protection. A. Existin_a Conditions: 1. Open drainage ditches exist along both sides of Bursell Road and Beall Lane at property frontage. B. Storm Drain Conditions: r..,.. n..e...:...:,... Srnh,c• (:nndifinna/Cnmmwntu/Info NaeAad 15.40 Surface Drainage and storm sewer CPP See Exhibit A, Conditions 1, 5, 6 Public Works system Standards Provide drainage through the subdivision CPP See Exhibit A, Conditions 1, 5, 6 Are there adverse effects placed on downstream structures) N/A No catchbasin located greater than 350 feet apart for any curb and gutter section CPP Discharge Basin N!A ORS 196.800 Wetlands Disturbance IN ORS 468.740 Erosion Control Plan CPP Roof Drainage, Area Drains, Crawl Spaces ORS 8.28 Flood Management N/A Not located in identified flood lain " STA TUS LEGEND: MS - MEETS STANDARD IN - INFORMATION NEEDED DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD NA - NOT APPLICABLE BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS FP - FINAL PLAT TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION !' Sullivan Land Partition, Beall/Bursell Roads January 11, 1996 -Page Eight V. Additional Information Needed 7. Provide information regarding possible future division of Parcel #1. Show access)ocatlons of Parcel 1 and 2 from Bursell Road and Beall Lane. ~~ EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS SULLIVAN LAND PARTITION GENERAL o ORS Chapter 468.740 requires that all developments which will disturb 5 ACRES OR MORE of land adjacent to a stream which discharges to surface waters of the State of Oregon shall as a part of the construction permitting process submit an "Erosion Control Plan." The "Erosion Control Plan" shall require a PERMIT from DEQ. No construction on any Tentative Plan storm drainage system can occur until authorization to do so has been granted by DEQ. o Developer shall install ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department for each sanitary sewer manhole with a depth greater than 3.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. o Developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum flow of 1000 g.p.m. at each fire hydrant. Maximum spacing of Fire Hydrants is 300'. o Developer shall construct all utilities, streets, and other structures discussed herein, within rights-of-way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central Point, in accordance with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of this development. o This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission approval, could require resubmittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible for this review. o All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner. o No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued for each portion of the project requiring a permit. o The Final Plat of this Subdivision shall not be approved by the Planning Commission until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by construction and acceptance thereof or bonding for construction. o The City shall approve street stationing prior to Developer's engineer designing the improvements for this Tentative Plan. =% SPECIFIC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS SULLIVAN LAND PARTITION. Specific: 1(a) The construction of this development shall include the street subgrade, base rock, paving, lighting, traffic control and delineation improvements, storm drain improvements, curb/gutter, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvements, sidewalks, and utility crossings to that portion of Beall Lane and Bursell Road adjacent to Tax Lot 2202 of the partition project. A Deferred Improvement Agreement (REC #87-16563) was executed for 37S 2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200, 7/31/87. Fax Memo dated 12/27/95 from Farber Surveying indicates the Deferred Improvement Agreement would include Parcels #1 and 2, Tax Lot 2202. 2. Developer shall construct driveway access to Parcels 1 and 2 in accordance with the Public Works Standards and Design Guidelines and Jackson County Road Department. Fire access to both parcels and required turn arounds shall be located as stipulated by the Public Safety Department. Should future division of these parcels occur, the city will require a 20' easement and street meeting standards for flag lot access. Developer shall be required to grant the City a 10' easement on the Final Plat centered over any fire hydrants, mains or water meters, located on the property. 3. Developer shall connect the service laterals to the existing water line along Beall Lane and Bursell -Road with valuing and backflow prevention as determined by the Public Works Department. The sizing and spacing of fire hydrants and of service lateral for Parcels #1 and 2 shall be determined - based on the requirement for the fire protection as is stipulated by the Public Safety Department and the Oregon Plumbing Code. 4. The sanitary sevver serving all parcels shall be connected to the BCVSA sanitary sewer located in Bursell Road. The service lateral shall be sized in accordance with the Oregon Plumbing Code and Public Works Standards. Show easement on Final Plat for any sewer laterals crossing adjacent property parcels. 5. Developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for runoff onto the subject property and from each lot. As a part of the construction of the improvements for this Tentative Plan, Developer's engineer shall provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system for this development. Developer shall submit this information to the Public Works Department at the time construction drawings for the project are submitted to the Public Works Department for permits for construction of the storm drainage improvements. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the Public Works Department for hydrology calculations. 6. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm sewer. Developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets, lots, and all properties will drain properly. Developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings and perform such grading and drainage 7. Developer shall install a 22,000 Lumen HPS Light on the PP & L Power Pole located at the Northwest property corner of Parcel #1. Developer shall coordinate the installation with Pacific Power and Light Company. r~ - f v ,' Farber 8L Sans, Ina FARSER SURVEYING ~ v FORESTRY CONSULTANT- LAND SURVEYING -WATER RIGHTS EXAMINEfl G.P.S. SURVEYS PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXPERTS • PLANNING REPORTS -CONSTRUCTION STAKING FAX GOVSR SgF.EYL FR~i FAX NDI4Bffit (503) ?76-2056 To: Paul Worth Company: City of .Central Point Fax Number: 541-664-6384 ,Date: .December Z7, 1995 Number of pages including cover: 1 Subject: Michael Sullivan Partition Message: My research indicates that Assessors map no. 372W11D TL 2200 in 1987 includes all of the property with. in the boundary of the proposed partition. Instrument No. 74-05946 (1974) describes the property owned by 12irhardson with the next transaction being in 1989. Differed improvement agreement executed in 19s7. If you have any questions please contact me. Herb ~~ P.O. BOX 5286 -CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 - {547)776-0848 (oNxe) (541)778-2056 (FAJq ,. + A___-_ ' .< ;. DEFERREDIMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Property Identification:. D - o easto er a 1 ane , ` and BursalY Road, Central Po ins, OR, Legal desciipe[[ached) THIS ,AGREEMENT between the CITY OF CENTRAL POINT; herein- ` after referred to as "City,° and Roger Rioherdeon and Elizebeeh Aieherdson .. '~" , hereinafter referred'to w as "Owner." ~;' wREREAS, owner desired to develop the property described ~' in Exhibit."A" but ~rishes to defer~COnatruction of permanent ` improvements beyond the time limits~motherwise required, and Cify ~ ? € agrees to such deferment provided O:iner agrees to .construct ~' improvements as herein•'provided; tt~~~TtIEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS~~ ~' ~~ w FOLLO47S: t' i - I. AGREEMENT BItiDING~:ON SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST - ~• ~~ ~ s '' This agreement is an instrument affecting the title and f possession of the real property_ described "ia Exhibit ' ~ "A". All the terms and conditions herein imposed shell,.,„ .; i run with the len8 and shall be binding upon and inure d to the benefit of the successors in intorest.of.Owner. Upon any sale~pp~r division of the property described in ~ x Exhibit."A";.the terms of this agreement shall apply • separately to,:•~each parcel and the owner of each parcel~~ shall succeed to the obligntions imposed on Owner by - this agreement. '• '~`~ ~ ~+ SI. NATURE OF~OBLIGATION ~ -.'.~'.y7 A. City and Owner agree that the improvements set ' forth in this section may be. deferred .because immediate ~ installation of such improvements is riot deemed practical; at this time. •s~~~-. ' B. Owner agrees to Construct the following improve- r ments in the manner set forth'~in this agreements i d'~ .., )_ Water; sanitary sewer, storm sever, street, curb, gutter, sidewalk, or /= ~ ocher improvemea is determined Co benefit •nid property. ~i i f } / -: ,. i 3 f • ~ -:.. e~-lcsca •: ~ .. ,_j ^ ,~ - .. .. .. ~. C. When the City Ad~ilelstrator determinea..that the ~V reasort(sl.for the'deferment no.Songe.Y;.exiat(a), he ~ • shall notify Owner,. in writing,. nf;terms;for perform- ance of the work. •The notice shall .be mailed to the• current owner oz dwners a£. land as shown on the latest,• adopted coun£y'assessment roll. All or any portion of'. said improvement may be'~required at a specified time.. " Each Owner shall participate on'a prb rata basis of thee, s cost of installation of the<improvements. - - ~ • III. PERFORMANCE•OF THE WORK.BY ONNER Owner agrees to the performance of ahe work deferred: ... hereby,by conformance with one of,the following ~ .~~ ~ '. options: ~ ~ '" -" ~" A. WORK PERFORMED HY OWNER Owner Ss responsible for performance of the work and obtaining contractors' therefor. Owner shall cause satisfactory plans and specifications for-the improvements tb be prepared and to submit said-plans and specifigstion;:tq the City Administratorlfor approval prfoY'to commencement of the•~.. work to be done, ... SUCh.work :.shall be done: in accordance _ with City stAndards in`.~'ffeet at~.the tips fhe, improve-: . " meat plans are.submittetl for`approYal. 'Owner agregs.to •~.~~ make payments required by the Ci.iy?incld8ing,:but"not • " ~ limited to engineering;deposits, permit ,fees hnd.: inspection fees. Owner shall notify the CiCy Admi'nis - j trator at least forty-eight (4B) flours prior to-the ~i , start gf work. V;~;' ~ ~• -.. j ~ ~ Prior to approval of improvemenb•pipn9 by the City, owner may ue required to execute .and deliver to the City, a performance bond in.an amount an8 form accepta- ~ `"j ble to the City, to•be released by'<the"City .in whole or' i in part upon th'e City's final aoceptance of the work { performed. ~, ~. • . _ -.. . if owner disagrees with the requirements set forth for ~! installation of improvements as provided in this section, he shall, within. thirty (30) days of. the date " the notice from the City Administrator was mailed, a request a review of the requirements by the City Counci L The decision of this Council shall be binding upon both theCity and the ;Owner. B. CONSTRUCTION AS LOCAL IMPROVEMENT TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST PROPERTY -. Owner's signature hereon shallbe t~ :,+G. ~ O'er £ . . ~ . ... r .^.EFERR°D IMPRO\'E*SENT AGREEIhENT -2 ~~ 6 ; , L ~; I /,:: E. r .,~ e I 'r 1 1 i • ..< , :, . .,:: . equivalent to a petltion`iequired'~n-Section 11.04.020 of the~Centra~l~POYnt~,MUnlclpel.Cdde: If Owner does not completethe improgemepts.hinselfudder provisions of~~• paragraph III,•,A,,,aboye; •ttie City'taa}• do the .work as a local Smprovenenb~,prtSject follpwing the .procedures established by ofHinence for such projects and assess the cost against the property specially benefited. Permission to enter onto the property of the owner Ss granted to theCity or~~its contsaetor~as may be • necessary to construct such improvements. Owner hereby waives any right of remonstrance~to;'said improvements. IV. MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ~ - Owner agrees to provide any necessary temporary facilities, access road or•other'~eguired improvements, to assume responsibility for the,pzoper functioning thereof,-to submit plans to the appropriate City agency for review if required, and to maintain saidimprove- ments and facilities in`a manner•:wh;ch will preclude any hazard to life oY,health or Qamt~ge to adjoining property. ~.. :,;.*'~R,C,i,_; ~_ >,~,... Citq agrees to acceptfo; maintenance ,those improve- - - ments specified in Section II, excepting sidewalks, which are constructed-in accordahee.with City stan- . Bards, which are constructed in accordance with City standards, which are installed within right-of-ways or easements dedicated and accepted ;by :the City, and which' have received final acceptance by:thA Clty. lihere the required work is performed by Owner puisunnt to the . above Section III, H, the City Administrator will provide adequate and timely. progresS•inspection of said work and upon completion of any said improvements in accordance herewith, will issue to the Owner his final certificate of inspection and acceptance thereof.; -- provided, however, the Owner sha1T quarentee all improvements to be constructed in 'a workmanlike manner and to be free of defects for a period of two (21 years from the date of issuance of the final certificate and acceptance. If, in the opinion of the City Administra='. tor, it shall be necessary to repair or replace all or part of such improvement within said.two-year period, the City Administrator shall so notify the Owner and it shall be the,.responslbility of said: Owner to construct the necessary repair or. replacement:.: If such construc- tion is not accomplished in a timely fashion, the City .~ y ;.,. 3' DEFERRED 1.;?ROVEI•fENT AGREE74ENT -3 • i t ~.°r•" , ;; %. 1` i .. :~ ¢ `e d a .~ ~'. ... i 4 -. - r 4 ~ ~ . I - j may construct or contract far Such construction, and j . the 0~^•ner shall be•respor'sCb~e-.for all hosts :Hearted. - ~ Assessment f'oY sU'ch construction sha11'be as provided .~'I .Sa Part IY. _ - DATED this ;3y'Sh day of ~~G~ V .. ~ 19~ •, _T . .< OWNER ;:~ CITYOF CENTRA'L' PbINS ~ - ~ ~ B Hy: /r ~~~ c~~~ , i ~ rs ai ac' .. „~. ~ Daity ~ rt e[o~ ~ ~ - sy izaberh Richardson ;.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ~ SUBSCRIBEDAND SWORN 0 b efore methis .~~~ day of ~ S ., : ~' ~a .y~ ~ _' ~ F~/Z./,/,nl/,- l~~Lj2i/ . ~:-~ 9.4L.. by _ ~Sn ~ ~'~ c: - . and gbid ~C.i~.~r ~ ~. ~ ~' .. ^'~p ,,,,,,.~,"<: ~ 'Notary Public or•Oregon .~ ~ ~~ . - ~~ :' ~ ' Ny commission expires: ' % /~f-~/ :~ iN'/J oaf": - f c~'••. :: ' . ~~ ~ 0'c a • OfiE ' .... .. ~~ ` ` . a ~, ~- n Al ~ I i , .L J'i . !,: t IIII ~. } [ '. ,~ ~~ .. _ - '! ,. ..=F£RR°D ?!•:PROVE!;$ST AGREE!•1ENT --0 `' .. ~ ~• c. ~ y ti .il } ~~~~ ruRRCa ~R a Haau~ rax ~ 5u: a ,,.. ~ . .. ,z ' .Q H _._.~ c ~ ~ ~ N u ~ N r J `t H a~ g S ~ ~ •~ w E3 QO ~ N Y /~~i Ai ~ a a '~Y N u ~~g a ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ J s ~ ~ §~~ ~ Q J ~ u m Z gg i 25 n g f fjj g 3 3 o a n ~ I W a } ~ r W ~ ~ ~ W r^ •Q ~ aa a s a~~ ~ u h--i ~ ~ ~ u ~ I r~ ~ ~~ ~~ '~"~ W U7 J . °a cws oa~~ •• Q N aa- 8 ~"" R . N Q a 15:28 EXHIBIT 1 oo•oc ;U Y I~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i l ~,° ~ ! ; u :~ ~~ ;u ~~ • g ia.a •itm» w. _~ a r Z N U .~ n ;~ ~~ 8 4~ r oo ~ . &~ 9~ I ~~~ ao•oc w z a J q J > r.t ~ Q u W m. u ~aj8~ 1 a~ ' ~~ i ~ ~ ^E ~a~ e O~ PP i` a6 cej,' o~ o~~cse s~ m 0 7100 7(01 ~/ ~ws~ 10500 -26 1400 'S6~" ~ 1600) ' E lr~~ H0 Fp2 5T I Q ooe ~. ~` 4'/~.;,: 1700 a7a,6' !GOlJ ~ ei h^.9 ._ _.es: 18~Q 47l 6' • i i'. 1911 E a74 6~ 1 ,.~ Js.. !.P , _~.,,< 1900 000 2 300 1so' 2,to17 !100 m rl 2~ f , "~A 3 ~~, ', ~,~.~ 25oi~' R 1 ~~ ~CY ~. IG:U1 Itl1. a. '(~ 2 :s~7 7aA9~ °9r " ,. ,. 9 s / o'r~q 26 1 I ~ I ~~ .. t 1 I . , Po' I 49-4~-. la ~ I .~~ v m , J ~` ti i ~1 ~ ~ I ^ ~~ 1 ;Ill 2s ~H~ ~1!) :) 1 FI ! I H 1 ~_ S< +O 0300 6200 6100 6000 5 00 q d I= ^ ~ „ o d I d ,ri +S o ~ O I n O O - _ ~ C4~{~ - 1 ~ - . i2 T J:7400 7500 1600 7700 ' ~~ S~R~~ _ Ccs ~3 3 1J fit!) ~!'.~ Sri ri 9 2 - m.zs-, .,7~.z~ ~ _ ~ ^ :h(:.4q AVENUE I ~ F,I,.LEN ~ ~'~' AVENUE ~1 9720 /~~1 ; +~+ 9719 96 9e0G N uN.1,8LK1R ~a H BLK.2 n~ ~h print is made snlrly for. t!te pu~pnse _qf `~ 0 97Yn' ~ :,_ 'sting in locatir s~:ie nre(ri:'ns ;"1 t"~. an o ~l 9718a 9717 a•d~ U(nHS nC 11'x: 11 ii t(:( :il~f;! ~~.;'!:::: (?~j~:rl 4 - °( UNIT2 9716 ~970~1 @1~1 Inciu:il;l~ s"''i ~. V. ;1+1!~iS, any. 97z ' ~ OH ° eLlc.~ ih diaiensious an'' !uca!i,ns, asp. .. etl by H p~ Su - - - .... - - -- - - - ss g,x. B~. ~-fiEf2~y~. 97za " .- .~ ~ ~ NiL~RSOfN COUf~TY TITHE OIVISIONAVENUE e NJ' °• .~• "~~ s7O ~ 502 W.~MA(IV PN. 7L 79 811 MEDfORO~OR GOH - - a 972 9724 ~ W 9721. BLK.I 9728M ~W I ~f' 372W//D > , Fi 8Z;Si ZT Uef SS68-9zb-TbS ~ Xe~ ~ JOSSH B ?J31S3?J?J0~ X3lti STAFF REPORT T0: Central Point Blanning Commission FROM: Wes L. Reynolds, AICP, Consultant to City DATE: January 10, 1996 (xevised draft) SUBJECT: Oregon State. Police District 3 Headquarters (37S 2W Section 3, Tax lot 1504N) Application for .Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Site Plan Review and Variance. SUMMARY The State of Oregon is applying to the City of Central Point for approval to construct a new Oregon State Police District 3 Headquarters. This facility will. replace the existing State Police offices approximately two miles to the south in Medford. The new facility will also allow the .consolidation of some State Police functions in a modern and efficient facility.. FORMER LAND USE ACTION AND ISSUES FOR THIS PROPOSAL A previous CUP application for a State Police facility on this site was approved in 1990, but for reasons unrelated to land use requirements that CUP lapsed in 1992. This new application is for substantially the same use as the city previously approved, although it is for a smaller, redesigned facility. Based on the experience of the previous application and testimony at the 1990 hearings, the applicant and its design team was advised in pre-application conference. The applicant was told that the issue of compatibility with the Deighboring properties in the R-2 zone, especially to the north, would be a concern. Other issues discussed are those that are addressed by CUP and site, plan criteria. Applicant and applicant's agents have been responsive to these code concerns, and have submitted some findings for a variance for the radio tower, which is an integral part of the communications and dispatch aspects of the proposed use. STANDARDS AND DECISION CRITERIA The applications involve these .land use actions: a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). and a Site Plan Review with a variance, which are being handled concurrently by the City .of Central Point. The Conditional UsG Permit Standards entail these aspects of development on the site and the relationship to the surrounding area, including.: adequacy bf lot in size and shape; adequate access to a public street; no significant adverse effect on abutting property or uses thereof; compliance with local, state and federal health and safety regulations; and conditions required are to protect public health, safety and general welfare. The Conditional use Permit Standards are contained in Section 17.7b.040 of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC). The Applications Issues Response provided by Berry Architects addresses project compliance with .each CUP Standard. The Planning Commission can find the proposal consistent with the Conditional Use chapter of CPMC provided the new facilities ~~ Staff Report to Central Point Planning Commission OSP CUP & SPR 2 are constructed as proposed and with appropriate conditions to assure conformance with city standards. The Site Plan Review Standards entail several aspects of development on the site including: landscaping and fencing; ingress 'and egress; off-street parking,loading and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities; signs; access for fire safety; compliance with city ordinances; and compatibility of architecture and design with the surrounding area. The Site Plan Standards are contained in Section 17.72.040 of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC). The Applications issues Response provided by Berry Architects addresses project compliance with each Site Plan Standard (see pages 11 to 14). By constructing the new facilities as proposed and with appropriate conditions the Planning Commission can find the proposal consistent with the Site Plan chapter of CPMC. The Variance criteria in Section 17.80 of the CPMC also need to be addressed for one unique aspect of the proposal. The variance required is due to the dispatch center integral to the 'proposed facility,. which requires a radio tower. This radio tower is not a building, but it has been determined by the city attorney to be a structure that is subject to the height limits in the R-2 zone. As a structure over 35 feet in height, it requires a variance to the height limit in the R-2 zone. Any height over 38.5 feet is beyond what city staff can 'approve as a minor variance. The five variance criteria of the City of Central Point are met as follows (and other findings are on the attached excerpt submitted with the applicant's initial November 28, 1996 application). The code language is in quotation marks and findings concerning each criterion follow. 17.80.010(D){1) "The variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the city, such as beautification or safety." The safety of the city and the neighborhood will be enhanced by the presence of a new State Police Regional Headquarters in Central Point including the 24-Hour Dispatch Center and radio tower higher than 35 feet due to the greater responsiveness of police agencies that will make possible in Central Point. 17.80.010(D)(2) "The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood." Anew State Police Regional Headquarters in Central- Point including the 24-Hour Dispatch Center and radio tower higher than 35 feet will have no more than a minimal impact upon the neighborhood due to the landscaping proposed to buffer the site from neighbors. Noise levels will be no greater than now occur with existing uses in the area and on the site. 17.80.010(D)(3) "The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zoning district." The proposed use is allowed as a conditional use which includes public buildings and uses in the R-2 zone. 17.80.010(D)(4) "Circumstances-affect the property that generally do not apply to other property in the same zoning district." The. radio tower above 35 feet which requires the variance to the height regulations of the R-2 zone needs to be a part of the State Police Regional Headquarters including the 24-Hour Dispatch Center. This circumstance does not and will not apply to any other property in'the R-2 zoning district. O Staff Report to Central Point Planning Commission OSP CUP & SPR 3 17.80.010(D)(5) The consideration for which the variance is requested are not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family members." The dispatch and communications needs of a properly functioning State Police Regional Headquarters in Central Point including the 24-Hour Dispatch Center are the circumstances requiring a radio tower higher than 35 feet due to technical requirments of communications systems rather than any self-imposed action. FINDINGS OF FACT. The- application- materials provided by the applicant's agent, Berry Architects were accepted as complete on December 11, 1996, An Application Issues Response has been submitted by Berry Architects in addition to the application forms and required drawings and maps. The Application Issues Response for this project addresses relevant CPMC sections, and should be included as part of findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision. With the revisions of December 6, 1995 requested by the City's, contract planning staff, the Application Issues Response constitutes adequate findings of fact for both the CUP and Site Plan criteria. This staff report provides some additional findings concerning the variance for the height of the radio tower, and this report should also be included in the record as findings in .support of the decision. CONCLUSIONS The application materials show the proposed use to be within the various size, setback and other minimum requirements of the R-2 zone. .Generally, the proposal is well within the code requirements and .standards with the sole exception of the radio tower being above the 35 foot height limit. in some cases, such as with parking spaces, more. than enough spaces are proposed on the site plan, sa a future building:. addition can be accomodated. Even including impoundment spaces a special type of parking demand, a future building. addition could be accommodated without adding any more parking spaces. The applicant has not requested any such addition at this time, but the Planning Commission should know that the proposal under review is in terms of the city code less than full buildout of the site {in other words there is some room for growth of the facility on this site over the years). The city's planning consultant recommends approval of the proposal with conditions. 8 Staff Report to Central Point Planning Commission OSP CUP & SPR ADDITIONAL FINDINGS 17.80 Variances ___ 17:80.010 Variances A. General. A.1 A vanaace may tic granted. as provided is this chapter. whero the strict application of the provisions of ibis title would result in unnecessary hardship. Strict appGcatioa of Tiue 17 would prohibit the development of a facility that provides distinct advantages b the neighborhood end location. A.2 This chapter may not be used to allow a use that is not is confomtity with Ure uses specified by this title for the district is which the land is located In granting a variance, the city ions similar to those provided for conditiooa! uses to protect the best interests of the sutroundia$ property, the neighborhood, or the city as a whole. ~ B. ~+PPlicatioa and Review. ~~ Applications and review of a variance shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 1.24 and all applicable laws of the state. The applicafionshall be accompanied by a fee of two hundred dollars C. Information Required. Not typed heroic WiLL be developed as necessazy in prosecution of desired conditional use. D. Consideration for Grmting Variance. ' A variance may be granted if findings, aze made that the following coasidetatioos will either result Crom a granting of the variance or the (ollowing considerations do not apply to the requested application: D.1 The variance will provide added advantages w the neighborhood or the city, such as beautification or ~A well designed, landscaped, and maintained State Facility will not be detrimental but improve the development of the highway properties frontage in contrast to the agricultural use and improvements that exist and are foreseeable. ' • The added presence of a State Police facility will increase safety along the highway and in the neighborhood byvisual and physical presence to moderate. citizens' behavior. D.2 -The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood. • The presence of a public safety office building wtll generally tend to minimize disruptive behavior and future developments in this area of the District. D3 The variancewill utilize property within the intenrand purptue of thczone district • The State Police facility will muntain more open space than a fully developed R-2 usage: Planting screens on the perimeter and interior will be provided and maintained. Noise levels will be no higher than normally occur in the existing agricultural context or neighborhoods were automotive and yard maintenance noise is recognized. The development of the State Police facility will upgrade the roadside drainage and reduce litter and maintenance needs through the required gutters, storm drainage collection, and installation of a culvert instead of borrow-pit ditch that also serves as a drainageway. D.4 Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to other property is Ure same zoning district. • Frontage on the highway with high speeds and attendant noise from truck traffic are not typical in R-2 residential neighborhoods or their low volume sad velocity streets. Few uses are compatible with highway frontage or can take advantage of it in the manner that the State Police facility can. Highway frontage generally discourages development for rues other than commercial, industrial, or agricultural ttsas. Normally the only residences abutting highways aze those related to agricultural use and tend to discourage upgrading and developments of the frontage itself. D.5 The considerations for which the variance is requested ate not self-imposed through the applican['s own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employers or family members The findings concerning variance criteria on this page were submitted by Berry Architects on November 28, 1996. They are included as part of the staff report of Wes L. Reynolds, AICP as part of the staff report to the Central Point Planning Commission (revised January 10, 1996). O~ Staff Report to Central Point Planning Commission OSP CUP & SPR 5 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONS FOR TH6 SITE PLAN 1. Landscaping will be planted as shown on the planting plan submitted and planting will be complete at the time of occupancy. 2. A plan for the irrigation system for the landscaping shall be submitted with the building permit application for City approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Fencing shall be installed,as shown on the site plan by the time of building occupancy. 4. Access shall be provided as shown on the site plan. Applicant shall obtain an approach road permit (or equivalent permission) from the Oregon Department of Transportation prior to occupancy. 5. Off-street parking and loading shall 6e provided as shown on the site plan, except that [some spaces may be deleted or deferred in development. 6. A drawing(s)-for the signage shall be, submitted with the building permit application for City approval prior to issuance of building permits. 7. For compatibility of architecture and design with the surrounding area construct the building as shown on the site plan and consistent with the building elevations submitted with the applications. It is expected by the City that minor .design variations such as a change in the height or placement of a wall of two feet or so may result in final design. ' CONDITIONS FOR THE CUP IN ADDITION TO THE SITS PLAN 1. Recognize the need for at least lb parking spaces for impounded vehicles,.and require an oil/water separator in drainage. system of parking areas. 2. Operation of a 24-hour Dispatch Center is allowed including the radio tower at a height not to exceed 110 feet aboveground level. ihfrequeht use of the offices outside of regular business hours is also allowed for emergency response and law enforcement activities. 3. The approval of this CUP is valid for a period of 24 months. ~~ 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 9TSQ8 (5031 6643324 THE HEART OF THE ROCUE RIVER VALLEY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date of Notice: December 26, 1995 Hearing Date: Tuesday, January 16, 1996 Time: 7:00 p.m.(Approximate) Place: Central Point City Council Chamber 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF HEARINGS George Rubaloff Planning Administrator Sandy Lommel Administrative- Planntng Secretary Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review an application for Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan for the project known as the Oregon State Police District 3 Headquarters located in the Two-Family (R-2) Zone. The proposed building is planned upon 3.59± acres along Highway 99 at 4500 North Rogue Valley Highway 99. The specific site is located on Tax Lot 1504-N of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 37 2W 3B The proposed project features a 20,784 square foot building for the Oregon State Police District 3 Headquarters. On-site improvements would include landscaping, parking and utility connections. The applicant is Facilities Division, Department of Administrative Services and owner of Record is the State of Oregon. Agent is Richard G. Maxis of Berry Architects. __ CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for approval of Site Plans are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to Two-family Zone, General Regulations, Off-street Parking and Loading, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. The requirements for approval of conditional use permits are set forth in Section 17.76.040 of the Central Point Municipal Code which relates to size and shape of the site, access and significant adverse affects to abutting property. NOPHTENT/ADMIN ~~ PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday, January 16, 1996 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the hearing to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per-page: 5. ;For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3324 (extension 231). SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review hearing, the Planning Commission may approve or deny. the Tentative Plan for the proposed land partition. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. The Council may, on its own motion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date, call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party aggrieved by the actionof the Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing a written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the decision. NOPHTENT/ADIvIIN ~~ C.~. R-1~6 \~ N M-2 ~,°~ PROPOSED PROJECT SITE ~~ ~1 l~, c is M-1. R-1-8~ R-2~, M-1 li ~ i! i ~~~~ €~ ~ 4a vi ___ ~~~ wT x i ~~ ~6~~` ~E ~~p~ ~~a~ ~I9 ~ T7 .q i ~~~ _~~ ~a .. . ~ . ': ' ' .g! „~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ,_, ~ ~ ~ i tg ri ,I ~ .) ~ IFF #C t. -eoucp onTNCT w iu v//.~utr nGMVAT ~~ 8^ R R Y A R C N I T[= T 8 IT, dYGON OT602 0! ORL60N ~ vn wu~~~. ~~.~~ wr ,~+rw ,a EPLW --1 ~~ 1 Staff Report to Central-Point Planning Commission OSP CUP & SPR 6 ATTACHMENTS The following items are attached for. entry into the official record by reference and for the Commission's review of these concurrent land use actions: Item A - Vicinity Map Item B - Notice of Public. Hearing, Mailing. List, and Tax Assessor Map. Item C - Aerial Map [Floodplain Map] Item D - Application Materials including Site Plan, Planting Plan, Floor Plane and Building Elevations. Item E - Public Works Staff Report Item F - Fire bepartment Staff Report . Item G - Planning Department Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan. Item H - Proposed Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan. eT W PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT S/TE PLAN REV/EW ~~Q~~ ~~~0~~ Date: January 12, .1996 Project: Oregon State Police District III Revised Staff Report -Site Plan Review Zone: R-2 Subarea A Owner: State of Oregon .Agent: Richard G. Maris, A.I.A. Berry Architects Location: 37 2W 3 TL 1504N 4500 North Rogue Valley Highway 99 Reviewed By: Michael P. Thornton, P.E. Thornton Engineering ~~ Oregon Sta#e Police District III January 12, 1996 -Page Two The Public Works Department and its consulting engineer have reviewed the above site plan for conformance with City of Central Point's Municipal Code and Standard Specifications as it relates to public works improvements. Following are our findings on this site plan: Oregon Department of Transportation's Highway 99 is the only street adjacent to this project. The city has not yet received comments oc conditions from O.D.O.T. regarding this project. The applicant shall conform to O.D.O.T's requirements set forth for this development. The City shall receive and review O.D.O.T.'s comments prior to site plan approval. The comprehensive plan calls for the right-of-way width to be 100' to 110' for major arterials. The existing right of way is 85 feet, with Southern Pacific Railroad right of way on the westerly edge. The project shall dedicate for public right of way, as necessary, to accommodate the improvements required by O.D.O.T. and a 4.5 foot wide sidewalk section to City Standards, and an additional two feet beyond the back of the sidewalk, for a total of seven feet beyond the face of curb. An additional 10' wide P.UIE. shall be granted along the entire frontage. We anticipate that the Highway 99 improvements will include storm drainage improvements. Street lighting, sight triangles, sidewalks, and all other improvements shall conform to the City's Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. The project shall include a minimum 24 foot wide cross access easement to, and in favor of, Parcel No. 2 as shown on the site plan. An existing 12" public water main runs along the entire frontage. The project shall acquire water service from this existing mainline., The developer shall size the meter and the service to assure it has adequate capacity for the development. Backflow requirements shall conform to Oregon Health Division and City of Central Point's standards. Fire service shall be in conformance with Central Point's Public Safety Report. Any onsite fire hydrants shall be served by an 8-inch public water line conforming to the City's Standard Specifications. The onsite public water line shall be centered within a 15 foot wide public easement for the purpose of access and maintenance. ~. `e Oregon State Police District III January 12, 1996 -Page Three Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority's Regional Lower Bear Creek Interceptor Sewer (36") is located within an existing 30 foot wide sanitary sewer easement, 50 feet from the project's easterly boundary. The project shall include a public 8-inch sanitary sewer main to serve this project and parcel no. 2. The onsite public sewer line shall be centered. within a 15 foot wide public easement for the purpose of access and maintenance. The easement shall extend all the way to an existing City right-of-way or easement. Equipment wash down areas shall conform to DEO requirements and shall be covered and connected to the sanitary sewer. All storm drainage shall be collected onsite and discharged through. a pipe into Griffin Creek within the 15 foot wide easement for storm drainage per OR 94- 04480. The developer shall submit a complete. set of design calculations prepared by an Oregon licensed Engineer, for both roof drainage and lot drainage to assure proper size to Griffin Creek. This project -lies within the 100 year flood plain, and shall be designed in accordance with the City's Flood Plain Ordinance and FEMA's guidelines for development within the -100 year flood plain. ~~ J FIRE & LIFE SAFETY PLANS REVIEW Date: 1/8/96 Project: Oregon State Police District Offices Address: 4500 North Rogue Valley Highway Owner: State of Oregon (Dept. of Administrative Services) (Tom Haeg Project Mgr.) Architect: Berry Architects (Richard Maris) Engineer: Marquess & Associates (Randy Cleveland) Surveyor: Marquess & Associates (Charles Strom) This is a Site Plan Review covering the Fire Protection aspects of a proposed 20,849 Sq. Ft. (Main office bldg.) , 5,13'7 sq.ft.( Srv. bldg.) Project. The requirements outlined herein are based on the 1991 Edition of the Uniform Fira Code with 1992 State of Oregon Amendments. This review assesses the Fire Protection needs related to Water Supply, FireDepartmenf Access, Required Fire Flow, and General Precautions against Fire during construction. This review does aut cover the Structural nor Fire & life Safety requirements relating to the proposed structures Those requirements witl be discussed in detail at the time of submittal of detailed Structural & Fire & Life Safety plans. THE FOLLOWING ARE MY FINDINGS: Water supply & hydrant locations shall be in accordance with Sections 10.401; 10.402; 10.403; and 10.105 UFC. The required fire flow for this project is based on the largest structure within this development. That structure has been determined to have an approximate fire area of 20,849 sq. ft. Using Table No. A-III-A-1 of the of the Uniform Fire Code and assuming that the structure will be constructed of Type V-lhr. construction the minimum required fire flow shall be established at 2500 g.p.m. 'The required fire flow shall be met by a minimum of three (3) fire hydrants located on site. There is in existence one (1) fire hydrant on the south side of the proposed driveway entrance to the project. To facilitate the Fire Departments tactical & operational needs this existing hydrant will need to be relocated to the north side of the proposed driveway entrance. (confd) v1 ~~ •> Page 2 In addition the remaining two (2) fire hydrants will be strategically located on the south side of the parking lot aisle that nuns east &, west on the south side of the Property All hydrants will be placed on parking islands located adjacent to the proposed parking stalls which will afford a minimum clearance around the hydrant of three (3) feet. In addition and in accordance with UFC Section 10.105 all fire hydrants shall be protected, in a manner approved by the fire chief, from vehicular damage. 2. General precautions against fire shall be in accordance with Section 87.103 UFC relating to Fire Safety during construction. Fire Department access, hydrants and any other fire protection device shall not be blocked by construction material during construction. Timing of the installation and maintenance of all Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems shall be in accordance with Sections 10.501 and 10.502 UFC. Fire protection including fire apparatus access roads & water supply shall be made and serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. 4. Fire Department access shall be in accordance with Sections 10.106; 10.203; 10.204; 10.205; 10.206; 10.301; 10.302; 10.304 & 10.305 UFC. Approval of the submitted Site Plan is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office; or ofnon-compliance with any applicable regulations of this jurisdiction. Note* COPIES OF THE CODE SECTIONS PREFACED IN THIS REPORT WILL BE DISTRHiITTED TO THE DEVELOPERS OF THIS PROJECT FOR THEIR REFERENCE. Reviewed By: Mark A. Servatius Fire ChiefBuilding Official ~q r( 1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 10.101-10.104 PART III „ , GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR FIRE SAFETY ARTICLE 10 FIRE PROTECTION Division 1 ~~ GENERAL = ~t07E4TN s a Scope € Sec. 10.101. Fire protection shall be in accordance with this article. Definitions Sec. 10:102. For definitions of AUTOMATIC FIRE-EXTINGUISHING __ FACILITY, F1RE DEPARTMENT INLET CONNECTION and "__ SYSTEM , STANDPIPE SYSTEM, see Article 9. s Permits Sec.10.103. A permit is required to use or operate fire hydrants or valves intended for fire-suppression purposes which are installed on water systems and accessible to public highways, alleys orprivate ways open to or generally used by ~ the public. See Section 4.108. € EXCEPTION: A permit is not required for persons employed and authorized by the water company which supplies the system to use or operate fue hydrants or valves. Tampering with Fire-protection Equipment and Site Barriers Sec. 10.104. (a) Fire Department Property. Apparatus, equipment and ~ ~,,, appurtenances belonging to or under the supervision and control of the fire deparanentshallnotbemolested,tamperedwith,damagedorotherwisedistttrbed unless authorized by the chief. (b) Fire Hydrants 'and Fire Appliances. Fire hydrants and fire appliances required by this code to be installed or maintained shall not be removed, tampered _ __, _ with or otherwise disturbed except for the purpose of extinguishing fire, training, . recharging or making necessary repairs, or when allowed by the fire deparunent. When a fire appliance is removed as herein allowed, it shall be replaced or rein- stalled as soon as the pttrpose for which it was removed has been accomplished. (c) Site Barriers. Locks, gates, doors, barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags or seals which have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with or otherwise molested in any manner. - 59 ~~ ---- 1o.1oa-1o.10~ 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE ~' EXCEPTION: When authorized by the chief or performed by public officers € acting within their scope of duty. € Obstruction, Identification and Protection of Fire Hydrants and Fire-protection Equipment Sec. 10.105. (a)Obstruction.Posts,fences,vehicles, growth, trash,storageand other materials or things shall not be placed or kept neaz fire hydrants, fire department inletconnections orfire-protection system control valves in a manner € that would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately discernible. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining ,; _ =immediate access to fire-protection equipment or hydrants: e A 3-foot cleaz space shall be maintained azound the circumference of fire hydrants except as otherwise required or approved by the chief. (b) Identification. Fire-protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in a manner approved by the chief to prevent obstructionby parking and other obstructions> (c)FireHydrantMarkers.Whenrequirrdbythechief,hydmntlocationsshall e be identified by the.instailadon of reflective mazkers.' (d) Protection of Fire Iiydr•ants. When exposed to vehiculaz damage, fire hydrants shall be suitably protected. Closure. of Accessways Sea'10.106. (a) General. The chief is authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads, trails or other accessways, not including public streets, alleys or highways. When required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. When required to be secured, roads, trails and other accessways shall not be used :.unless authorized by the owner and the chief, (b) Trespassing. Trespassing upon roads, trails and other accessways which '__ havebeenclosedandobstructedinthemannerprescribedbythissectionisprohib- -`_ ited. EXCEPTION: Petsonsauthorizedbythechiefandpublicotficersactingwithin their scope of duty. (c) Obstruction. Vehicles shall not be parked in a manner which obstructs the entrance to roads, trails or other accessways which have been closed and"' obstructed in the manner prescribed by this section. Fire Protection in Mobile Home and Recreational Vehicle Parks Sec. 10.107. Mobile home and recreational vehicle parks shall provide and maintain fire hydrants and access roads in accordance with Divisions II and IV. `- EXCEPTION: Recreational vehicle parks located in remote areas shall be provided with protec[ion and access roadways as required by the chief. 60 9:3 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 70.201-10.204 Division II FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS General Sec. 10.201. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with this division. Plans Sec. 10.202. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire departmenrfor review and approval prior to construction. Required Access Sec 10.203. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building orportion of a building hereafter consweted ormoved into or within the jurisdiction when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by anapproved route around the exterior of the building or facility. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the provisions of this section may be modified by the chief. 2. When access roads cannot be installed due to topography, waterways, nonne- gotiablegrades ar other similar conditions, the chief is authoriuA to require addi- tional fire protection.as specified in Section IOSOI (b): 3. When. there are not mote than two Group R, Division 3, or Group M Occupancies, the requirements of this section may be modified, provided, in the opinion of the chief, firefighting or rescue operations would not be impaired. More'than onefireapparatusroad shall be provided when it is determined by the ch ief that access by a single road may be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could-limit access.. For high-piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109 (a). For open yazd storage, see Section 30.102. For hazardous materials, see Article 80. For fire safety during construction, alteration or demolition of a building, see Section 87.103 (b). _:, _ Specifications Sec. 10.204. (a) Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unob- structed width and a uniform surface of not less than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than t3 fee[ 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Upon approval by the chief, vertical clearance may be reduced, provided such reduction does not impairaccess by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance. 67 ~, f l1 tl 10.204-10.301 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE ~, ., Vertical clearances orwidths shall be increased when, in theopinion of thechief, vertical clearances or widths aze not adequate to provide fire apparatus access. (b) Surface. Fire apparatus access roads. shall be designed and maintained to suppon the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be provided with asurface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. (c) "ILrning Radius. The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be as approved by the chief. (d) Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning azound of fire apparatus. (e)Bridges. W hen a bridge is required to be used as access under this section, i[ shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable sections of the Building Code and shall use designed live loading sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire appazatus. (f) Grade. The gradient fora $re apparatus access road shall not exceed the maximum approved by the chief. Obstruction Sec. 10.205. The required width of a fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. Marking Sec. 10.206. When required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fine apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. Division III FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS TO BUILDINGS Premises Identification Sec. 10.301. (a) General. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such aposition as tobe plainly visibleand legible from thestreet orroatl fronting theproperty. Said numbers shall contrast with their - ' background.. jb) Street or• Road Signs. When required by the chief, streets and roads shall be identified with approved signs that comply with the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 1988 Edition. 1. Fire lane curbs or road surface shall be painted bright red with white letters. The stroke shall be l inch with letters 6 inches high toread"No Pazking Firelane." Spacing for signage shall be every 25 feet. 62 l lf' 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 10.301-10 305 2. Vertical signs shall be mounted no lowerthan4 fee[ and no higherthan 8 feet. ~ - 3. Vertical signs shall be 12 inches wide by 1$ inches high. Signs shall have red letters and borderoma'white background, The word NO shall be presented in a re- versed colora~rangement in the upper left-hand comer. Spacing shall not exceed every 25 feet. Key Boxes Sec. 10.302. When access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary forlife- saving or firefighting purposes, the chief is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an accessible location. The key box shall be a type approved by the chief and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required by the chief. Shaftway Marking Sec. 10.303. Exterior windows in buildings used for manufacturing or for storage purposes which open directly on shaftways or other vertical means of communication between two ormore floors shall be plainly marked with the word. SHAFTWAY in red letters at least 6 inches high on a white background. Warning signs shall beeasily discernible from theoutside ofthebuilding. Doorand window openings on such shaftways fromthe interior of the building shall be similarly marked with the Ovoid SHAFTWAY in a manner which is easily visible to anyone approaching theshaftway from the interiorof thebuilding, unless thewnstruction of the partition surrounding the Shaftway is of such distinctive nature as to make its purpose evident at a glance. Exterior Doors and Openings Sec. 10.304. (a) Obstruction and Elimination. Exteriordoors or their function shall not be eliminated without prior approval by the chief Exterior doors which have been rendered nonfunctional and which retain a functiona! door exterior appearance shall have a sign affixed to the exterior side of such door stating THIS DOOR BLOCKED. The sign shall consistof letters having principal strokeof not less than 3/4 inch wide and at least 6 inches high on a contrasting background. Required fire department access doors shall notbe obstructed or eliminated. See Article 12 for exit doors. (b) Access Doors and Openings. For firefighting purposes, access doors, openings and exitdoots shall be provided and readily accessible in occupancies as required by the Building Code. For access doors for high-piled combustible storage, see Section 81:109 (b). - Floor Openings See.10.305. Flooiopenings shall be surrounded by guardrails as set forth in the Building Code or shall'have covers which are automatic closing or maintained in a closed position at all times. 63 t~~ ' 10:407-10.403 9991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE v , ~'' _ Division IV WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION General Sec. 10.401. An approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities, buildingsorportionsofbuildingsarehereafterconstruc[edormovedintoorwithin Ihejurisdiction. When any portionofthefacilityorbuildingprotec[edisinexcess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved _'_ i•outearoundtheexteriorofthefacilityorbuilding,on-sitefire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shallbe provided when required by the chief. _ Water supply required forcertain public buildings as per ORS 479.200. (l) Any public building, as defined in paragraph (i) of:Subsection {1) of ORS 479.010, erected after July 1, 1967, that exceeds 5,000 square feet in usable or occupied floor area or is more than two stories in height and exceeds 2,000 square feet. in usable or occupied ground floor area shall have a readily available water supply within 500 feet of such building of sufficientcapacity to allow firefighting appara- tustd pump500gallonsperminuteforaperiodof 10minutesforeach5,000square feetof occupied or usable floorarcaor fraction thereof, up to 500 gallons per min- ute for 30 minutes. (2) Required watersupplies may be provided by underground cisterns orsurface ponds, lakes or streams when approved and readily accessible standpipes of not less than 4-inch inside diameter with not less than two 2t/z-inch outlets orequiva- lent are provided. Type of Water Supply Sec. 10.402. Water supply may consist of reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, water mains or other fixed systems capable of providing the required fire `" =flow. In setting the requirements for fire flow, the chief may be guided by the ~i provision in Appendices III-A and III-B, or NFPA 1231. Fire Hydrants _ -- Sec. 10.403. The location, numberand type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on the public street or on the site of the premises or both to be protected as required and approved by the chief. Fire hydrants shall be accessible to the fire department apparatus by roads meeting the requirements of Division II. For fire safety during construction, alteration or demolition of a building, see Section 87.103 (c). 64 J~ ~ e~ g I~ Division V INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FIRE-PROTECTION AND LIFE-SAFETY SYSTEMS General Sec. 10.501. (a) Type Required. The chief is authorized to designate the type and number of fire appliances to be installed and maintained in and upon all buildings and premises in the jurisdiction other than private. dwellings.. This designation shall be based upon the relative severity of probable tire, including the rapidity with which it may spread. Such appliances shall be oC a type suitable for the probable class of fire associated with such building or premises and shall have approval of the chief. (b) Special Hazards. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or whereaccess forfiteapparatusis undulydifficult, thechief is authorized to require additional safeguards consisting of additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. Such devices orappliances may consist of automatic fire alarm systems, automatic sprinkletor water spray systems, standpipe and hose, fixed or portable fire extinguishers, suitable fire blankets, breathing apparatus; manual orautomatic covers, carbon dioxide, foam,. halogenated or dry chemical or other. special fire-extinguishing systems. Where such systems. are provided, they .shall be designed and installed in accordance with the applicable Uniform Fire Code Standards. (T'ext continues on page 65.) ia~: l`J`Jl UNIt'UHM fIHE (:UUt tU.SUI-1 U.9U4 r~ '', ' (c) Buildings under Construction. Fire-protection equipment and systems shall be installed and maintained in buildings under construction in accordance with Article 87. Timing of installation Sec. 10.502. When fire protection, including fire apparatus access roads and water supplies for fire protection, is required to be installed, such protection shalt be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of conswetion. EXCEPTION: Whenaltematemethodsofproteclion,asapproyedbythechief, aze provided, the above may be modified or waived. Approval and Testing Sec. 10.503. Fire alamt systems; fire hydrant systems; fire-extinguishing sys- terns, including automatic sprinklers and wet and dry standpipes; halon systems and other special types of automatic fire-extinguishing systems; basement pipe in- lets; andotherfire-protection systemsandappurtenancestheretoshal-meettheap- proval ofthe fire department as to installation andiocation and shall be subject to such periodic tests as required by the chief. Plans and specifications shall be sub- mitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. Condition of approval of halon systems shalCbe satisfactory passage of a test conducted in accordance with nationally recognized standards prior to final acceptance of the system. Maintenance Sec. 10.504. (a) General. Sprinkler systems, fire hydrant systems, standpipe systems, fire alarm systems, portable fire extinguishers, smoke and heat ventilators, smoke-removal systems and other fire-protective or extinguishing systems or appliances shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times and shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Fire-protection or extinguishing systems coverage, spacing and specifications shall be maintained in accordance with recognized standards at all times. Such systems shall be extended, altered or augmented as necessary to maintain and continue protection whenever any build- ing so equipped is altered, remodeled or added to. Additions, repairs, alterations' and servicing shall be in accordance with recognized standards. (b) Systems in High-rise Buildings. Theownerof ahigh-risebuilding shall be responsible for assuring that the fine- and life-safety systems requ'ved by the Building Code are maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved persons. A written record shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. See U.B.C. Sections 1807 and 1907. (c)Smoke-control Systems. Mechanical smoke-control systems, such as those in high-rise buildings, buildings containing atrfar covered mall buildings and mechanical ventilation systems utilized in smokeproof enclosures and for smoke-removal systems utilized in high-piled combustible storage occupancies, shall be maintained in an operable condition atall times. Unless otherwise required 65 is i. ~ l by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved ~ ,, persons. A written record shall be maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority. Portable Fire Extinguishers Sec. 10.505. (a) General. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in occupancies andlocations as set forth in this code and as required by the chief. Portable fire extinguishers shall be in accordance with U.F.C. Standard No. 10-L (b) Prohibited Types. Vaporizing liquid extinguishers containing cazbon tetrachlotideorchlorobromomethane shall notbe installed or used in any location for fire-protection use. Soda-acid, foam, loaded stream, antifreeze and water fire extinguishers of the inverting types shall not be rechazged or placed ih service for fue-protection use. (c) Sale of Defective Fire Extinguishers. Forms, types or kinds of fire extnguishets which are not approved or which are not in proper wonting order; or the contents of which do not meet the requirements of this code, shall not be sold or traded.: EXCEPT'ION: '[hesaleortradeoffireexdnguisherstoapetsonengagedinthe business of selling or handling such extinguishers, and the sale or exchange of obsolete or damaged equipmenCfor junk. l~r 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 87:101-87.~us ' ARTICLE 87 FIRE SAFETY DURING .CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION OR DEMOLITION OF A BUILDING Scope Sec. 87.101. Buildings undergoing construction, alteration or demolition shall be in accordance with this article. Approvals Sec. 87:102. Approval of the safety precautions required for buildings being consweted, altered or demolished may be required by the chief in addition to other approvals required for specific operations orprocesses associated with such construction; alteration or demolition. EXCEPTION: Group R; Division 3 and Group M, Divisions I and 20ccupan- cies. Fire Safety during Construction Sec. 87.103. (a) General. Buildings under construction shall be in accordance with this.section. (b) Access itoads. Fire department access roads shall be established and main- tained in accordance with Article 10, Divisioh IL EXCEPTION: When approved bythechief,temporaryaccessroadsofawidth, vertical clearance and surface which provide access for fire department apparatus can be used until permanent roads are installed. (c) Water Supply. Water mains and hydrants shall be installed and operational. in accordance with Article 10, Division IV, and Sections 10.502 and 10.503. EXCEPTION: When approved by the chief, a temporary water supply for fire protection can be used until permanent fire-protection systems are installed. (d)FireProtectian.l.General.Duringtheconstructionofabuildinganduntil the permanent fire-extinguishing system has been installed and is in service, fire protection shalt be provided in accordance with this section. r d ildin d f b id gs un e or u e 2. Fire extinguishers. Fire extinguishers shall be prov i h i; s ers consttuction when required by the chief. The number and type of extingu ll be suitable for sh i i h f ,,; ~ nae ¢~ a ngu s er ext shall be as required by the chief, and the type o ~ the type of fve associated with the hazards present. g 3. Standpipes: A.General.Buildingssixstoriesormoroinheightshallbepro- videdwithnotlessthanonestandpipeforuseduringwnstntcdon.Suchstandpipes s shall be installed when the progress of constmctiori is not more than 50 feet in B height above grade. Such standpipes shall be provided. with fire department hose connections at accessiblelocationsadjacenttousablestairs,andthestandpipeout- E lets shall be located adjacent to such usable stairs. Such standpipe systems shall be extendedasconstructionprogressestowithinonefloorofthehighestpointofcon- t3 s[ruction having secured decking or flooring. 435 ~~rF - - -- B Oneachfloorthereshallbeprovideda2~/Z-inchvafveoutletforfiredepartment ",'~ use. Where construction height requires installation of a Class III standpipe, fire s pumps and water main connections shall be provided to serve the standpipe. $. Temporary standpipes. Temporary standpipes are allowed to be provided s in place of permanentsystems if they aze designed to famish 75 gallons of water per minute at 50 pounds per square inch pressure with a standpipe size of not less t3 than 4 inches. Outlets shall not be less than 2~/Z inches. Pumping equipment suffi- cient to provide this pressure and volume shall be available at all times when a - Class III standpipe system is required. 6 C. Detailed requirements. Standpipe systems for buildings under construc- ~ tion shall be installed as required for permanent standpipe systems. (e) Combustible Debris. Combustible debris shall not be accumulated within buildings.Eombustibledebris, mbbishand waste material shall be removed from buildings as often as practical. Combustible debris, waste material and trash shall not be burned on the site unless approved. (f) Motor Equipment. Internal-combustion-powered construction equipment shall be used in accordance with the following: 1. Equipment shall be located so that exhausts do not discharge against com- bustible material. 2. When possible, exhausts shall be piped to the outside of the building. 3. Equipment shall not be refueled while in operation. 4. Fuel for equipment shall be stored in an approved area outside ofthe build- ing. (g) Heating Devices. Temporary heating devices shall be of a type approved by the chief, located away from combustible materials, and attended and maintained by competent personnel. (h) Smoking. Smoking shall be prohibited, except in those areas approved by the chief. When required by the chief, a suitable number and type of NO SMOK- ING signs shall be posted. (i) Cutting and Welding. Cutting and welding operations shall be in accor- dance with Article 49. (j)Flame-producing Equipment. The use of torches orflame-producing de- vices for the sweating of pipe joints shall be in accordance with Section 11.405. .+:r' .~ I (k) Flammable Liquids. The storage, use and handling of flammable liquids `~~ shallbeinaccordancewithArticle79.Ventilationshallbeprovidedforoperations_ ._^_ utilizing the application of materials containing flammable solvents. (I) Open-Flame Devices. Open-flame devices and other sources of ignition shall not be located in areas where flammable materials are being used.. (m) Asphalt and Tar Kettles. Asphalt and tar kettles shall be located and oper- ated in accordance with Section 11.402. (n) Temporary Electrical Wiring. Temporary electrical wiring shall be in ac- cordance with Article 8S. 436 ~~~ 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 87.103-87.105 a ~~ ,~`, .~ ~ . (o) Building Access. When required by the chief, access to buildings for the purpose of fitdfighting shall be provided. Construction material shall not block access to buildings, hydrants or fire appliances. (p) Emergency Telephone. When required by the chief, telephone facilities shall be provided at the construction site for the purpose of emergency notification of the fire department. The street address of the construction site shall be posted adjacent to the telephone together with the fire department telephone number. (q) Fire-protection Plan. When required by the chief, afire-protection plan shall be established. Alterations of Buildings Sec. 87.104. (a) General. Alterations of buildings shall be in accordance with the Building Code, applicable provisions of Section 87.103, and this section. (b)Fire-protection Systems. When the building is protected by fire-protection systems, such systems shall be maintained operational at all times during al[er- ation. When alteration requires modification of aportion of afire-protection system, the remainder of the system shall be kept in service. When it is necessary to shut down the entire system, a fire watch shall be kept on site until the system is re- sumed to service. (c) Exits. Required exit components shall be maintained in accordance with Article 12. EXCEPTION: Approved temporary exiting system or facilities. (d) Fire-resistive Assemblies and Construction. Fire-msistive assemblies and construction shall be maintained in accordance with Sections 10.601 and 10.602. Firesafety during Demolition Sea 87.105. (a) General. Demolition of buildings shall be in accordance with this section and, where applicable, Sections 87.103 and 87.104. .,,, (b) Automatic SprinklerSystem.When abuildingtobedemolishedcontains a sprinkler system, such system shall not be rendered inoperative without approval of the chief. (c) Fire Hose. Suitable fire hose, as required by the chief, shall be maintained at the demolition site. Such hose shall be connected to an approved source of water -°~ and shall not impede fire department use of hydrants. (d) Cutting and Welding. Demolition operations involving cutting and weld- ing shall be in accordance with Section 49.107. (e) Burning of Combustible Waste. Combustible waste material, trash and rubbish shall not be burned at the demolition site, unless approved. Accumulations of such material shall be removed from the site as often as necessary to minimize the hazards therefrom. 437 ~, ~. 87.105 lyyl UNIFUHM tlHt cvvc / .~. (f) btire Watch. When required by the chief for building demolition which is ~ ~~ ~ ~' hazardousin nature, qualified personnel shall be provided to serve as anon-site fire watch. The sole duty of fue-watch personnel shall be to watch for the occur- rence of fire. 438 4 ~' _