HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - December 19,1995CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
'k PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
December 19, 1995 - 7:OO p.m.
~ Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 336
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
IL ROLL CALL
Chuclr Piland -Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber, Candy N3ish, Randy Graves, Karolyne
Johnson, and Valerie Rapp
III. CORRESPONDENCE'
IV. MINUTES
i - s A. Review and approval of November 21, 1995 Planning,Commission Minutes
~~
' V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
a
VI. BUSINESS.
e - ;19 A. Public Hearing.-;Review anddetermination regarding Tentative Plan'(Mnor
Partition) £or property located on south side of Hopkins Road (37 2W 11AC Tax
Lot 11203) (Applicant: Herb-Farber for Anne McKibben)
20 - 33 B. Public Hearing -Review 9nd determination regarding Tentative Plan (Minor
Partition) for property located on Briarwood and Columbine (37 2W 11 Tax Lot
4800 and 37 2W ilAC Tax'Lots 10800'& 10900) (Applicant L.J. Friar for
Robert Fellows)
3a - 39 C. Review and determination regarding Final Plat Application for Forest Glen
Subdivision, Phase. VIII (37 2W 11DA Tax Lots 100 & 202 and 37 2W 12C Tax
Lot 3300) (Applicant: Gary Whittle)
ao - 55 D. Review and rewmmendation regarding Annexation of property located on-North
Pacific Hwy (37 2W 3B TL 500 & :600) (Applicant: $offbuhr & Associates for
Marian G. Miller and 13i11y Rogue)
- VII. .MISCELLANEOUS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT .
is
,A
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
November 21, 1995
I. THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER at 7:03 p.m.
11. ROLL CALL -Those present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber,
Candy Fish, Karolyne Johnson.
Valerie Rapp notified the Commission that she would not be able to attend.
III. CORRESPONDENCE
Chairman Piland read a letter from Randy Graves dated October 23, 1995
addressed to the Planning Commission. Due to illness in his family he
resigned his position on the Planning Commission effective October 31,
~~ 1995.
IV. MINUTES
There was one change on the minutes, Herb Farber abstained on the
approval of the October 3, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes.
Commissioner Farber moved to approve the November 7, 1995 Planning
Commission Minutes with the change. Commissioner Johnson seconded
the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Farber, yes; Johnson, yes,
Fish, abstained. The minutes were approved as amended.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Mark Servatius introduced Steve Johnson from Boy Scout Troop 747.
VI. BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing -Review and determination regarding Tentative Plan
Bpnlication for Unit No 7 of Jackson Greek Estates Subdivision
lo~at' d on Beall Lane east of where Hanley Road int rc Beall
I ane 137 2W 10C Tax Lot 30001 IAnnlicant• Tom Malot Construction
Chairman Piland opened the public hearing.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
November 21, 1995 -Page Two
Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planner, reviewed the Planning Department
Notice of Public Hearing.
Commission Plland asked if there were any conflicts of interest to
declare or ex-pane communication. There were none from the
commissioners.
Nancy stated that in the packet and accepted into the record as
exhibits were:
a.. Public Works Staff Report dated November 13, 1995.
b. Building Department Staff Report dated November 16, 1995
c. Notice of Public Hearing dated October 31, 1995
d. List of Owners of Record mailed notice of hearing (by
reference)
e. Small vicinity Map
f. Tentative Subdivision Plan
Mike Thornton, Thornton Engineering, 670 Superior Court, Suite 210,
Medford, Oregon, stated that he wrote the Staff Report on behalf of
the Public Works Department and reviewed the report with the
Commission.
Condition.#8 on Page 17 is changed to read; "The proposed cul-de-
sac configuration does i74t conform..."
Nancy Kincaid reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report.
Commissioner Piland entered the "Agreement Pertaining to Dedication
of a 10-foot Strip of Land on South End of Unit No. 5, Jackson Creek
Estates Subdivision, Central Point, Oregon" as Exhibit G.
Mark Servatius, Fire Chief/Building Official, reviewed the Building
Department Staff Report .
Nancy Kincaid asked if the square footage on lots 223, 227 and
possibly 226 would be to code if there was a 10 foot widening of
_ Beail Lane.
~- 2
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
November 21, 1995 -Page Three
Mike Thornton stated-that the square footage -were calculated based
on the 10 foot dedication.
The applicarit, Tom Malot, 612 E. Pine Street, Central Point, Oregon,
came forward and gave the commission a historical account of this
application. When submitted there was a difference in interpretation
of an intersection and cul-de-sacs. At that time, Mr. Rubaloff
requested that this phase be redesigned and resubmitted.
Nancy Kincaid stated that the application was received on September
20, 1995.
Mr. Douglas McMahan agent for Hoffbuhr & Associates, an
engineering firm, 1061 E. Jackson Street, Medford, Oregon, spoke
on behalf of the application.
Commissioner Piland said that the Commission will not approve the
application as it stands; it does not meet code.
Commissioner Farber moved that the commission continue this item
of Public Hearing of Tentative Plan Application Unit #7, Jackson
Creek Estates Subdivision (37 2W 10C Tax Lot 3000) to the first
meeting in January. Jan Dunlap seconded the motion. ROLL CALL
VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Farber, yes; Fish, yes; Johnson, yes.
B. Review and determination regarding Site Plan Apolication far gropertv
loc^ted in the general vicinit~.sonth of Pin S r t b tw .n 6th and
7th Streets (Aoplicant• Tom Malot Construction)
Nancy Kincaid reviewed the Public Hearing Notice sent on November
17, 1995.
Chairman Piland opened the public hearing.
Chairman Piland asked if there were any conflicts of interest to
declare or ex-parte communication. Commissioner Johnson declared
that Mr. Malot was the cohtractor for her office building but there
_ ~ was no other contact. Commissioner Fish stated that her property
was across the street from the proposed building. There was no ex-
pane communication.
3
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
November 21, 1995 -Page Four
Nancy Kincaid stated that the. following exhibits are included in the
record:
a. Public Works Staff Report dated November 7, 1995
b. Public Safety Staff. Report dated November 6, 1995
c. Notice of Public Hearing dated .November 17,.1995
d. List of Owners of: Record mailed notice of hearing (by
reference)
e. Assessor Map
f. Proposed, Site Plan
Paul Worth, Public Works Technician, reviewed the Public Works
Staff Report and reported four changes:
1. Page 38, Paragraph B, 1,a, should read: Mainlines: The existing
6" mainline in E. Pine Street shall provide for fire protection.
The existing 6" mainline in E. Pine Street or the 8" line in So.
7th Street can provide for domestic use for this project.
2. On Page 38 under Sanitary-Sewer Improvements, Existing
Conditions add: #2. There is a 24" sewer line located at So.
7th Street
~ 3. Page 41, Paragraph 5(b): Per the applicant, the driveway cuts
are no longer needed. We would require that it be replaced
with a sidewalk and a regular curb and gutter through those
sections.
4. Paragraph #7 on page 41, last sentence should read "...and
South 6th Street.
Chairman Piland questioned the parking standards. Paul Worth
explained that he vision triangle standards requires a clear sight
across the corner. The City recommended that the parking spaces in
that triangle be limited. to compact vehicles.
Mark Servatius reviewed the Public Safety Staff Report.
Nancy Kincaid recommended approval. of Site Plan Application based
on the recommendations.
L~
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
November 21, 1995 -Page Five
Mr. Malot indicated there was a possibility they would cut down the
trees currently in the right of way because of possible disease. Paul
Worth stated that any replacement trees in the right of way could not
be over 42 inches high.
Chairman Piland closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Fish made a motion that the Commission approve the
sight plan for the proposed building located on 612 East Pine Street
between 6th and 7th Streets, and include staff reports as amended,
Resolution Number 335. Commissioner Farber seconded the motion.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Farber, yes; Fish, yes; Johnson, yes.
Motion passed.
,. VII MISCELLANEOUS
Chairman Piland stated that the next Planning Commission Meeting would
be on December 19, 1995.
VIII ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Dunlap made a motion for adjournment. Commissioner
Johnson seconded the motion. All said "aye" and the meeting was
adjourned at 9:Y5 p.m.
Staff Report
to: Central Point Planning Commission Dn^e'cember 15; 1995
from: Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planning Administrator I""~
subject: Review of a Tentative Plan for a Minor Partition
Background
Under the authority of CPMC 1.24, the Planning Commission can make decisions on
Partition Tentative Plan Applications. A Tentative Plan can be approved if the
proposed lots meet the size and configuration standards for the applicable zoning
district, and all other requirements of the municipal code are met, subject to any
conditions of approval necessary for such compliance.
This proposal is for the creation of two single family lots from one existing parcel in
the R L-8 zoning district. Each of the resulting lots will be 8016 square feet in area and
60(+) feet wide. The subject parent parcel,. which includes anexisting- single-family
home, is located south of Hopkins Road, about 260 feet east of Burrell Road. There is
an existing accessory structure on the property that is proposed to be removed, and it
appears that removal of this structure will be necessary to avoid a conflict with the
required setback from the proposed new property line. Applicant is Anne McKibben
with Herb Farber acting as agent.
Planning, Public Works and Public Safety Departments have reviewed the proposal and
have concluded that the proposed plan is substantially consistent with the requirements
of the Central Point Municipal Code. Public Works has submitted a memorandum
including a list of five recommended conditions of approval (see Exhibit A). Staff
recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the Public Works Staff Report,
and the requirement that the existing garage be removed unless the survey verifies that it
Central Point Planning Commission
Page 2
December 15, 1995
can remain in place consistent with the minimum 5 foot side yard setback in the R-1-8
zone.
Exhibits
A - Public Works Department Staff Report
B - Tentative Plan
C - Notice to Affected Property Owners Mailed December 7, 1995
D - List of Affected Properly Owners (by reference)
1
~:xixYSZT _,~.
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
TENTAT/VE PLAN REV/EW
Date:.
Project:
Zone:
# of Lots
No. of
Structures
Applicant:
Agent:
Engineer:
Type of Land
Use Action:
Name of
Development
Applicable
Codes:
Reviewed
ay:
December 15, 1995
McKibben Minor Partition, PW 95034
R-1-8
2
One per lot, 2 total
Anne J. McKibben
c/o Private Property Management
112 Genesse
Medford, OR 97504
772-2127
Herbert A. Farber, Farber Surveying
908 East Jackson
Medford, OR 97504
None specified
Tentative Plan -Land Division
Not Specified
Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) 8.24, 28.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.04, 12.08,
12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64
Mike Thornton -Thornton Engineering
8
McKibben Minor Partition, PW 95034
December 15, 1995- Page Two
1. TENTATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (16.10, 16.24)
T'iflw nasnrinfinn Sfafus» Conditions/Comments/Info Needed
16.10.010 Filing Fee MS
16.10.020 Scale MS
16.10.030 General Conditions
a. Name of Subdivision Not Specified
b. Date North Arrow Scale MS
o, Legal location of
subdivision MS
d. Names/Address of
Owner/Surveyor MS
16.10.040 Existing Conditions
a. Location of street
widths & easements, etc. MS
b. Topographic Info MS
c. Benchmark established MS
d. Location and direction of all
water courses MS
e. Natural features rock
outcroppings, marshes,
wooded areas MS
f: Existing uses of the land MS
g. Location of all existing
streets and utilities IN See Exhibit "B" No. 3
h. Zoning an and adjacent to
tractis compatible IN Not specified
16.10.050 Proposed Plan
a. Street Location, and the lanes,
grades, radius of curves,
relationship to other existing
or proposed streets, and other
utilities. N/A
b. Easements-Widths/F'urpose TPR See Exhibit "B" No. 2
c. Lot Dimension MS
d. Other Uses MS
e. Lot square footage MS
ST ATUS LEG END:
MS - MEETS STANDARD
DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA - Nor APPLICneLE
BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
_ FP - FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
McKibben Minor Partition
December 15, 1995 -Page Three
Tentative Plan Requirements (16.10, 16.24 -Continued)
r..:., new...:...:,... Srarus• Conditions/Comments\Info Needed
16.10.060 Partial Development
Is other property adjacent to this
property being considered in the MS
design? This property can be
owned by the subdivider.
16.10.070 Explanatory Information
a. Vicinity maps to explain
relationship to existing
streets, can require correction
to existing streets. MS
b. Proposed Deed restrictions MS
c. Center Lane profile of streets
to show grade (100" beyond
street) N/A
d. Approximate location and
proposed size of utilities. N/A
16.24.010 Black length N/A
Width N/A
Shape N/A
Not greater than 1200' N/A
16.24.020 Block size N!A
16.24.030 Blocks Easements
a. Utilities MS
b. Water Courses N/A
c. Pedestrian Ways N/A
16.24.040 Lots Shapes and Sizes MS
16.24.050 Lots-Size & Determination
Lot length greater than
2.5 times width prohibited MS
16.24.060 Through Lots MS
16.24.070 Lot Sidelines MS
16.24.080 Lar a lot Subdivision N/A
• STATUS LEGEND:
MS - MEETS STANDARO
DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
' CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP - FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
1 V
McKibben Minor Partition, PW 95034
December 15, 1995 -Page Four
II. STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineating improvements,
cuPos/gutters, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck
access, traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bi keways.
A. Existing Conditions
L Street Name -Hopkins Road Jurisdiction -City of Central Point
De crintion Exist/na Conditions
-Right of Way 60' Property to Property future Reauiiements
60' Property to Property
-Street Width 40' Curb to Curb 40' Cyrb to Curb
-Moving Lanes 2 2
-Parking Lanes 0-2 0-2
-Traffic Volume unknown 2500-5000 VT/D
-Sidewalks yes Required
-Curb & Gutter yes Required
-Street Lights yes Required
-Bikeways None Required
B. Street Standards - No new street construction required
Title Desnriotion Status" Conditions/Cnmmentsllnfn Needed
T6.20.020 Street Generally
a. Location N/A
b. Width N/A
c. Grade N/A
d. Relationship to existing street N/A
e. Topography as it relates to
drainage N/A
f. Provide for Street Constmction N/A
g. Follows a Master Plan N/A
h. Traffic Volume N/A
I. Safety Features N/A
j. Accesses N/A
Comp Plans. Street R.O.W. & Widths
LS ROW'"' N/A
LS Width "' N/A
SA ROW "' N/A
SA Width "' N/A
STATUS LEGEND:
MS-MEETS STANDARD
DMS -DOES NOT MEET $TANDARD
NA -Nor APPLICABLE
BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
_" TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP -FINAL PLAT
IN -INFORMATION NEEDED
i
McKibben Minor Partition, PW 95034
December 15, 1995 -Page Five
Street Standards -Continued. - No new street construction required
TiHn flncnAn~inn CfwfuCN
CnndFHnns/Cnmmwntx/Info Nwwdwd
16.20.030 Street Reserve.Strip N/A
16.20.050 Street Extension N/A
PWS,VII,G Street Intersection Angles 90~ N/A
16.20.060 Existing Streets additional width N/A
16.20.070 Half Street/Flag Lot Access N/A
16.20.080 Cul-de-Sac and/or dead-end N/A "
streets
a. Shall not serve more than 12
lots N/A
b. Shall not be greater than 400' N/A
c. Turn-around N/A
16.20.090 Street Names N/A
15.40 Street Grades and Curves N/A
Public Works -MA SA CS not greater than 6% N/A
Standards -Not greater than 12% on LS N/A
-Cannot be less than 1 /2% N/A
Curve Radius
-LS - 100' N/A
-CS - 100' N/A
-SA - 200' N/A
-MS - 300' N/A
Stationin N/A
11. WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flow Protection.
A. Existing Conditions
1. One existing MWC 16" line lies in Hopkins Road
2. One existing fire hydrant lies across Hopkins - as shown on Plan
• STA TUS LEGEND:
M$ - MEETS STANDARD
DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP - FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
n
McKibben Minor Partition, PW 95034
December 15, 1995 -Page Six
B. Water Standards:
Title Description
Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed.
15.40 Water System provided mains N/A
Public Works
Standards Service Laterals, 1 ea. lot CPP
Fire Hydrants not greater than 300'
apart N/A
Fire Flow 1000 g.p.m, provide
minimum pressure 40 psi N/A
73.20 Backflow Prevention CPP
IV. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local Systems Development
Charge.
A. Existing Conditions:
1. A 42" BCVSA trunk line is located in Hopkins Road
2. An 8" City line is located in Hopkins Road
B. Sanitary Sewer Standards: No new Main Lines required
Tirlw Dwsrrintinn Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed
15.40 Adequate sizing,Mainline services N/A
Public Works
Standards Regional Systems Development
Charge N/A
Local Systems Development
Charge N/A
"STATUS LEGEND
MS -MEETS STANDARDS
DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA -NOT APPLICABLE
BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP -FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
- 13
McKibben Minor Partition - PW 95034
December 15, 1995 -Page Seven
IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catch
basins, and erosion protection.
A. Existing Conditions:
1. Existing curb and gutter carries runoff to storm drain system.
B. Storm Drain Conditions:
n____:_.: _.- c~s~..~« Cnndifinns/Cnmmante/Info Naadnd
15.40 Surface Drainage and storm sewer CPP
Public Works system See Exhibit "B" No. 1
Standards
Provide drainage through the
subdivision CPP
Are there adverse effects placed
on downstream structures? MS
No catchbasin located greater than
350 feet apart for any curb and
gutter section N/A
Discharge Basin
ORS 196.800 Wetlands Disturbance MS
ORS 468.740 Erosion Control Plan
Roof Drainage, Area Drains, CravJl
Spaces CPP
ORS 8.28 Flaod Mana ement MS
• STA TUS LEGEND:
MS - MEETS STANDARD
DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP - FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
1~
EXHIBIT "A"
PUBLIC WORKS pEPARTMENT
TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS
McKibben Land Partition
A. This review for the Tentative' Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in
accordance'with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this
review. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission
approval, could require resubmittai of an application, and approval by the City Planning
Commission based on'the recommendation of staff responsible for this review.
B. All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this
Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner,
C. No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and
specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and
other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued for each
portion of the project requiring a permit.
D. The Final Plat of this Subdivision shall not be approved by the Planning Commission
until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by
construction and acceptance thereof or bonding for construction.
E. The developer shall submit an AutoCAD compatible digital drawing of the Final Plat at
the time of Final Plat Approval.
j. rJ
EXHIBIT "B"
Public Works. Department
Tentative Plan Conditions
McKibben Land Partition
SPECIFIC
1. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive
drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an
approved storm sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary storm :drainage
improvements and lot grading to assure that ail streets, lots, and,all properties will
drain properly.
2. Parcels 1 and 2 shall include a 10' P.U,E. along the frontage with the exception of the
footprint of the existing house.
3. Developer shall coordinate with utility company to relocate existing power service to
existing house, so as not to cross adjacent parcel outside of P.U.E.
1G
N y,
~ W
Q J
a ,.
W
W
W ill
~
j {1 f
~ c o ~ it
J W
e R 4 '~
w
~ ~
°
~
Ea
° 0 f
N
Q mo~~~
~O y ~
v a ni £' V
~
'3
~ a
u
w 1 i
C
O
t .
.
- O °~°Y OU° I
ll '`
~"~ ea~rc
YNe
°?ru~
Q
Q.
~CCu
eY
~=
T
41 J
J
W r°mJU p
Y2
N J i
i--, Y
` ? ~ .
f' ~Y,~i1U '~
iu
YGU 6Q iW
w
F- oS75-
°
FU ~
s
°^ ~ 1
6 r... f
I
Y°O 5
J ^L
S°
° N
N F.vx
9~ ~
r C
„I S
?
~ ~
~ ~
Q ~ j
7 .~ w
N
W~~
V
~ ...._
.. l
° , .
J W /: y _ i
a ~.~.~ , //, .. ....1)u~YrH33i1l ...
a ~ a
, ~HIBIT ~ .
W ~j
z ~ w', ~ RO
fi ~ ~,
z '; ~ o ~,,
Q U \~ ~ ,.
%,
3
H
O
O
J h! ~. ..-
~b ~ O
»1 _.. pep Q
o p" ~ b J ~° 2
h _` ~' f ~ N
z r ' . ~ oY.
~ ~ o
u _
.~
J
w
,~ //r
J
' ? T
\ rE'E[I N
`
OW
~~ y~4 ~
~0> mYl ydj
O
a ~ j
Y
~
2W N o
o
2 n ,
a
N Wv,
..
m
.. fy
° ~~
uu. ~
rD~ °
1, ...:.... .. ~~._..._... ~ ` n>
...... ....
i ~. _ _ _
\ m
_ nWm
1 __
' 1
O
~ m
fj
. M
J ~ 7
In ~~
W'i
' ~ i
1 1
i
~~:
P
N
o ,
:'
r
Y
P
Z Y
n
z ~
2
2 '
JO
r
O
a
c
f
~ ;
C
1/
.. ~
i rt
°c
a°
t
i
M/d ' 1.~ 09 Otl0a ll3St
~~
yN
a N -
~ J
u t`
0
£ ~ V N
T J '
---i7
y`,n111UL1
155 South Secontl Street
Central Paint, OR 97502
Y5031 664-3324
THE HEART OF THE
ROCUE RIVER VALLEY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date of Notice: December 7, 1995
Hearing Date: Tuesday, December 19, 1995
Time: 7:00 p.m.(Approximate)
Place: Central Point City Council Chamber
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
NATURE OF HEARINGS
Ceorge Rubaloff
Planning Administrator
Sandy Lommei
Administratlve-
Planning secretary
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point. Planning Commission will conduct a
public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for a land partition located in the
Residential Single Family (R-1-8) Zone on property south of Hopkins Road and east of Burrell
Road. The site is located on Tax Lot 11203 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 37 2W
11AC. If approved, the land partition would create two parcels; one.8016 square foot parcel and
one 8016 square foot parcel. The applicant and owner of record is Anne J. McKibben. The
agent. of record is Herbert A. Farber, Surveyor.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for approval of tentative plans are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to tentative plans, land partitions, strcet, water system, storm drainage
and sanitary sewer and CPMC Chapter 17 relating to lot dimensions. The Tentative Plan is also
reviewed for compliance with the City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may
submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday,
December 19, 1995.
2. Written comments-maybe sent in advance of the heazing to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Strcet, Central Point, Oregon 97502.
NOPHTENT/ADMIN
i8
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to
the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments
about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be
stated clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant aze available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same aze available
at 15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at
(541) 664-3324 (extension 231).
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and technical staff
reports, heaz testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the
application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above.
At the conclusion of the review hearing, the Planning Commission may approve or deny the
Tentative Plan for the proposed land partition.. City regulations provide that the Central Point
City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. The Council may, on its
own mofion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date,
call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party aggrieved by the action of the
Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing a
written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the
decision.
s~ ' (~ ~ a Na~~ GS-u~~y I ~..
R ~/}4 O
A, k ~ ~ ~ '' 67 O 0.168
q `sat-as-sr-~s Q e~malr 'Q. Fes- °~`
,~n ~- - ~osoo~ ~• ~ F, z sR;
$ti o.7ok
. tG 0 8 ~~' m~ P S ~~-~~ v sip
M ~ M.
~. ~.
es
iiza iizoo ~ nzoz r ~~
~o a>k g~/(e alek sue .~
~~ ~1
.A. . P66~ T F ~ $~ t.
aue
(r-ur01 _ Q ~ ~
... 600 ~ 77i(f0 t t
•„ T
2100 ~(olyD PRPARTITION ~
10 e ~s
a ._.. ,,
~'~ u .~ µ.,~ ~
NOPHTENT/ADMIN
1(-f
Staff Report
to: Central Point Planning Commission December 15, 1995
from: Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planning Administrator ~~
subject: Review of Tentative Plans for Two Minor Partitions on Adjoining Parcels
Under the authority of CFMC 1.24, the Planning Commission can make decisions on
Partition Tentative Plan Applications. A Tentative Plan can be approved if the
proposed tots meet the size and configuration standards for the applicable zoning
district, and all other requirements of the municipat code are met, subject to any
conditions of approval necessary for such compliance.
This proposal is for two partitions not involving creation of a road and occurring on
adjacent properties. Staff accepted the two partitions under one application because any
issues that apply to one will apply to the other, and, consequently, Staff review is not
significantly more complicated by consideration of the two partitions at the same time.
The subject properties are zoned R-3, Residential Multi-Family. Minimum lot area in
the zone is 6000 square feet and the minimum lot width is sixty feet for interior lots and
seventy feet for comer lots.
The first division proposed is creation of two single family :lots from one existing parcel
on Countryside Road, approximately 150 feet south of Columbine Way. The proposed
lots are 6064 square feet and are 73.9 feet wide.
The second division proposed is creation of three lots from an existing two lots on
Briarwood Drive, at the corner of Columbine Way. Two of these proposed lots are
20
Central Point Planning Commission
Page 2
December 15, 1995
7708 square feet and 94 feet wide. The third lot, the corner lot, is 7627 square feet and
107.79 feet along the back property line, with a curved front and side property line at
the intersection of the two streets. The existing lots are currently being developed with
duplexes, located in such a way that no conflict should be created with the proposed
new lot lines. However, placement of the proposed duplex on the northerly lot at the
intersection of Columbine and Briarwood has proven to be difficult because of
minimum setbacks on street frontages. Consequently, staff expects that there will be
minor revisions of the dimensions of these lots before a final plat can be reviewed. Also
note that utility hookups for the new central lot in this division will not be available
until mid-1996, at the earliest, and that the applicant understands that development of
that lot will not be possible until services are determined by the city to be available.
Bob Fellows is the applicant, with L.J. Friar and Associates acting as'agent.
Planning, Public Works and Public Safety Departments have reviewed the proposal and
have concluded that the proposed plan is substantially consistent with the requirements
of the Central Point Municipal Code. Public Works has submitted a memorandum
including a list of eight recommended conditions of approval (see Exhibit A). Staff
recommends approval subject to the condifions listed in the Public Works Staff Report,
and the requirement that a plot plan for the duplex to be built on the northerly lot be
submitted with the final plat to document that potential conflicts with the side yard
setbacks have been resolved in the location of the new property lines.
Exhibrts
A - Public Works Department Staff Report
B - Tentative Plan
C - Notice to Affected Property Owners Mailed December 7, 1995
D - List of Affected Property Owners (by reference)
F.
~; ~.
EXHIBIT . n
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
TENTAT/VE PLAN REV/EW
~~°,f~G~ G~Cp0G3~
Date: December 15, 1995
Project: Fellows Minor Partition, PW 95035
Zone: R - 3
# of Lots: 5 Total (2 in 1 partition, 3 in 1 partition)
No. of
Structures 5
Applicant: Robert Fellovvs Construction
2750 Heritage Road
Central Point, OR 97502
664-1689
Agent: L. J. Friar & Associates, P.C.
Engineer: Not specified
Type of Land
Use Action: Tentative Plan -Land Division
Name of
Development Not specified
Applicable
Codes: Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) 8.24, 28.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.04, 12.08,
12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64
Reviewed
By: Michael Thornton -Thornton Engineering
~z
Fellows Minor Partition - PW 95035
December 15, 1995 -Page Two
1. TENTATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (16.10, 16.24)
Title Description Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed
16.10.010 Filing Fee MS
16.10.020 Scale MS
76.10.030 General Conditions
a. Name of subdivision IN Not specified
b. Date North Arrow Scale MS
c. Legal location of
subdivision MS
d. Names/Address of
Owner/Surveyor MS
16.10.040 Existing Conditions
a. Location of street
widths & easements, etc. MS
b. Topographic Info IN Not shown on Plan
c. Benchmark established IN Not shown on Plan
d. Location and direction of all
water courses N/A
e. Natural features rock
outcroppings, marshes,
wooded areas N/A
f. Existing uses of the land N/A
g. Location of a16 existing
streets and utilities IN Storm Drainage not shown
h. Zoning on and adjacent to
tract is compatible MS
16.10.050 Proposed Plan
a. Street location, and the lanes,
grades, radius of curves,
relationship to other existing
or proposed streets, and other
utilities. N/A
b. Easements-Widths/Purpose MS
c. Lot Dimension MS
d. Other Uses N/A
e. Lot square footage MS
'ST ATUS LEG END:
MS - MEETS STANDARD
DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA- NorAraLlcaaLE
BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP- CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP - FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
23
Fellows Minor Partition, PW 95035
December 15, 1995 -Page Three
Tentative Plan Requirements (16.10, 16.24 -Continued)
r:.:., n.,~,..:..r:,... Crarus• Cnnditinne/Cnmmentxllnfe Needed
16.1.0.060 Partial Development
Is other property adjacent to this
property being considered in the
design? This property can be
owned by the subdivider. N/A
16.10.070 Explanatory Information
a. Vicinity maps to explain
relationship to existing
streets, can require correction
to existing streets. MS
b. Proposed Deed restrictions IN Not shown on Plan
c. Center Lane profile of streets
to show grade (100" beyond
street) N/A
d. Approximate location and
proposed size of utilities. N/A
16.24.010 Block length N/A
Width N/A
Shape N!A
Not greater than 1200' N/A
16.24.020 Block size N/A
16.24.030 Blocks Easements
a. Utilities MS
b. Water Courses N/A
c. Pedestrian Ways N/A
16.24.040 Lots Shapes and Sizes MS
16.24.050 Lots-Size & Determination
Lot length greater than
2.5 times width prohibited MS
16.24.060 Through Lots N/A
16.24.070 Lot Sidelines MS
16.24.080 Large Lot Subdivision N/A
• STATUS LEGEND:
MS - MEETS STANDARD
DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
_ NA - NOT APPLICABLE
" BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP - FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
. 2~
Fellows Minor Partition - PW 95035
December 15, 1995 -Page Four
II. STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineating improvements,
curbs/gutters, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck
access, traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bikeways.
A. Existing Conditions
1. Street Name -Countryside Dr., Briarwood Dr., Columbine Way Jurisdiction -City of Central Point
OBSC/% to ion
-Right of Way
-Street Width
-Moving Lanes
-Parking Lanes
-Traffic Volume
-Sidewalks
-Curb & Gutter
-Street Lights
-Bikeways
Fxistina Conditions
50' Property to Property
36' Curb to Curb
2
2
unknown
None
yes
yes
no
future Reauiiements
50' Property to Property
36' Curb to Curb
2
2
1500 VT/D
Required
Required
Required
Not Required
6. Street Standards - No new street improvements required
T.fln flocerinfinn
Status" Conditions/Comments/Info Needed
16.20.020 Street Generally
a. Location N/A
b. Width N/A
c. Grade N/A
d. Relationship to existing street N/A
e. Topography as it relates to
drainage N/A
f. Provide for Street Construction N/A
g. Follows a Master Plan N/A
h. Traffic Volume N/A
I. Safety Features N/A
j. Accesses CPP See Exhibit "B" No. 2
Comp Plans. Street R.O.W. & Widths
LS ROW •' N/A
LS Width "' N/A
SA ROW "' N/A
SA Width •' N/A
STATUSLEGEND•
M$-MEETS STANDARD
DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA -Nor APPLICABLE
BPP- BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP -FINAL PLAT
IN -INFORMATION NEEDED
/..~
Fellows Minor Partition, PW 95035
December 15, 1995 -Page Five
Street Standards -Continued - New Street constructiorrnotrequired
r..:., r1..~...:..t:,.., Srotuc• Conditions/Cnmmwnts/Info Nwwdwd ~~
16.20.030 Street Reserve Strip. N/A
16.20.050 Street Extension N/A
PWS,VII,G Street Intersection Angles 90° N/A
16.20.060 Existing Streets additional width N/A
16.20.070 Half Street/Flag Lot Access N/A
16.20.080 Cul-de-Sac and/or dead-end
streets N/A
a. Shall not serve more than 12
lots N/A
b. Shall not be greater than 400' N/A
c. Turn-around N!A
16.20.090 Street Names N/A
15.40 Street Grades and Curves
Public Works -MA SA CS not greater than 6% N/A
Standards -Not greater than 12% on LS N/A
-Cannot be less than 1 /2% N/A
Curve Radius
-LS - 100' N/A
-CS - 100' N/A
-SA - 200' N/A
-MS - 300' N/A
Stationin N/A
II. WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flow Protection..
A. Existing Conditions
1. Existing 8" water lines lies in each street.
2. F~cisting fire hydrants lie between lots 39 and 40 of the Subdivision and lot 52 and 53 of the
Subdivision.
" STA TUS LEGEND:
MS - MEETS STANDARD
DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA - Nor APPLICABLE
BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
.' TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP - FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
i~
Fellow Minor Partition, PW 95035
~~ December 15, 1995 -Page Six
B. Water Standards:
Tine nescrintinn
Status• Conditions/Comments/Info Needed
15.40 Water System provided mains N/A
Public Works
Standards Service Laterals, 1 ea. lot CPP See Exhibit "B" No. 3
Fire Hydrants not greater than 300'
apart MS
Fire Flow 1000 g.p.m. provide
minimum pressure 40 psi MS
13.20 Backflow Prevention CPP Show location/type
IV. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local Systems Development
Charge.
A. Existing Conditions:
1. Existing 8" Sanitary Sewers lie in each street.
8. Sanitary Sewer Standards:
Tithe husrrintinn StehlsN Conditions/Comments/Info Needed
15.40 Adequate sizing,Mainline services CPP See Exhibit "B" No. 3
Public Works
Standards Regional Systems Development
Charge N/A
Local Systems Development
Char a N/A
"STATUS LEGEND
MS -MEETS STANDARDS
DMS -DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA -Nor APaLICaeLE
BPP -BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP -CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR -TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP -FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
2'7
Fellows Minor Partition, PW 95035
December 15, 1995 -Page Seven
IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catch
basins, and erosion protection.
A. Existing Conditions:
i 1. Existing curb and gutter drains to storm drainage system.
B. Storm Drain Conditions:
r..,_ n.......:..~:,... Srs~uc• (:nnditinne/Cnmmwnts/Info Nnadad
15.40 Surface Drainage and storm sewer
Public Works system CPP See Exhibit "B" No. 1
Standards
Provide drainage through the
subdivision CPP
Are there adverse effects placed
on downstream structures) MS
No catchbasin located greater than
350 feet apart for any curb and
gutter section MS
Discharge Basin MS
ORS 196.800 Wetlands Disturbance MS
ORS 468.740 Erosion Control Plan
Roof Drainage, Area Drains, Crawl
Spaces CPP
ORS 8.28 Flood Mana ement MS
• STA TUS LEGEND:
MS - MEETS STANDARD
DMS - DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
NA - Nor AFrLICaeLE
BPP - BUILDING PLAN PROCESS
CPP - CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS
TPR - TENTATIVE PLAN REVISION
FP - FINAL PLAT
IN - INFORMATION NEEDED
,G O
EXHIBIT "A"
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS
Fellows Tentative Plan
GENERAL
A. This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in
accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this
review. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission
approval, could require resubmittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning
Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible for this review.
B. All costs associated with this Development and_the conditions placed on this
Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner.
C. No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and
specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and
other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued for each
portion of the project requiring a permit.
D. The Finai Plat of this Subdivision shall not be approved by the Planning Commission
until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by
construction and acceptance thereof or bonding for construction.
E. The developer shall submit an AutoCAD compatible digital drawing of the Final Plat at
the time of Final Plat Approval.
~~
EXHIBIT "B"
Public Works Department
Tentative Plan .Conditions
.Fellows Tentative Plan
1. All structures. shall have roof drains, area. drains, .and .crawl spaces with positive
drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an
approved storm sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage
improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets, lots, and all properties will
drain properly.
2. Access to Parcel No. 5 shall not be located within the street curve.
3. Some of the parcels may not have adequate existing sewer and water services. The
streets currently are under moratorium. No cutting of the pavement shall be allowed
until the moratorium is lifted.
a
~~
y<
~~
~ '
I
I
I a
I 7j
I zl
.I J'
I `1
I ,
~ ,
NI
I
.i
I
I
I
I~ I
I ,
'I
I I
COLUNBINE WAY
--- ----------Bra.--~~.~
,.-- - -
1 L
,~~
a ~ I -~ .~
;< I _ I 1
~ I I L_.~.~..J
m
I ' I o.n i I
I ^ t, a '
~ i a g~ 1~ 7 ~
I ~ li I
J I
j ..
i ,. i I
s !
..
i I I I~ i
-~ Jlnl'N'f Ja.00
__ I
1 _ ____
I ~:_ I .~.. .._..~ I
I `~ FI `a ! ~« I I
i zl ; , I .:~ ~, I
~ A «_:
` ' j Et i I i
!"
e nrN r .JO '~
I I I --~
I _~ ? I ~ ~ i
I I s ~
K ~
I ± ( F ~ -' „
~-
I i ( ~~` - i
I + ~ I
.J.r~
I ......... ............. wnl ~~ r
I ~~
I I ~ ~
«i I ;
~I I ~.,.
I I -~- r ,
i I
I ~ + 'tea ".w
1 = ~~
~c~
ul.oo
~; ~Ft
al. ~~
gr; i
'° ° I:
eaw a E_
' •:
=' `;o I e'
=f<: iY~~
~3sls ;l
~"s<~~~~ 3'd
-~ ~~
„ ,
+ i ~fChV $p
2 r' - Y
a"E
3 I K G
I ~ .; n~i
I =~~
e., o:~
I ''_
I i I ;.
„ I '„
i
!i I ~~ 1 .. .I ._.... .
I ~° I..
` i ;
3 I ,
o ~ I
1 i I ~ I
. _ ;
I I
Iii~il.
i i l~ ;
1 ~E i 1
I
} 1..
i I ~_~~~ ----...
I I i I
i I „
i ~~ I +
i~ I
i _;
i .i _...
I +
I I ,
I ~ ;
j ,
J
I o
sl
'I
r i
I"`
I
I
IJ
I
I
II
I
I i
FXKIBIT S~
155 Southsecond Street
Central Point, OR 97502
(5031 6643324
George Rubaloff
Planning Administrator~
THE HEART OF THE
Rocue Riven vauEV NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date of Notice: December 7, 1995
Hearing Date: Tuesday, December 19, 1995
Time: 7:00 p.m.(Approximate)
Place: Central Point City Council Chamber
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
NATURE OF HEARINGS
Sandy Lommei
Administrative-
Planning Secretary
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a
public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for a land partition located in the Multiple
Family (R-3) Zone on property north of Hopkins Road between Briarwood Drive and
Countryside Drive and south of Columbine Way. The site is located on Tax Lots 10800 &
10900 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 37 2W 11AC, and Tax Lot 4800 of Jackson
County Tax Assessor Map Page 37 2W 11AC: If approved, the land partition would create three
parcels on Briarwood Drive, two 7708 square. foot parcels, and one 7627 square foot. parcel. In
addition it would create two 6064 square-foot parcels on Countryside Drive. The applicant and
owner of record is Robert Fellows. The agent of record is L. J. Friar & Associates.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for approval of tentative plans are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to tentative plans, land partitions, street, water system, storm drainage
and sanitary sewer and CPMC Chapter 17 relating to lot dimensions. The Tentative Plan is also
reviewed for compliance with the City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may
submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday,
December 19, 1995.
2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the hearing to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502.
NOPHTENT/ADMIN
~~,
.V
Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to
the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments
about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be
stated clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available
at 15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at
(541) 664-3324 (extension 231).
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and technical staff
reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the
application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above.
At the conclusion of the review hearing, the. Planning Commission may approve or deny the.
Tentative Plan for the proposed land partition. ,City regulations provide that the Central Point
City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. The Council may, on its
own motion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date,
call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any parry aggrieved by the action of the
Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing a
written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the
decision.
NOPIiTENT/Al
33
Staff Report
to:
from:
Central Point Planning Commission December 11, 1995
Nancy Kincaid, Interim Planning Administrator N~
subject: Review of a Final Plat for Forest Glen Subdivision Phase VIII.
Background
Under the authority of CPMC 1.24, the Planning Commission can make decisions on
Subdivision Final Plan Applications. A Final Plat can be approved if the subdivision
design is substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat, all requirements of
the municipal code are met, and all conditions of approval have been met.
Planning, Public Works and Public Safety Departments have reviewed the proposal and
have concluded that the proposed final plat is substantially consistent with the approved
preliminary plat, and that most conditions of approval have been met. Public Works
has submitted a memorandum including a list of two conditions that have not yet been
met, and those conditions are incorporated here by reference (see Exhibit A). Staff'
recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the Public Works
memorandum, plus the requirement that the property owner/developer demonstrate that
the Oregon Division of State Lands has exempted them from permit requirements
regarding wetlands,. or, if a permit is required, that the developer has submitted a plan to
DSL that meets that agency's requirements for wetlands management..
A - Public Works Department Memo of Final Plat Determination
B - Final Plat
3~
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 8, 1995
PW#95020
TO: Susan Wilson Broadus, Nancy Kincaid, Mark Servatius
FROM: Paul W. Worth -Public Works Technician
SUBJECT: Forest Glen Phase 8, Final Plat Determination
I~~FI38IT A'
The Final Plat of the Forest Glen Subdivision, Phase 8, has been reviewed according
to CPMC 16.12.050, Staff Approval. The property is located T37S, R2W, Section
11 DA, Tax Lot(s) 100, 202, Section 12C, Tax Lot 3300. The following items have been
verified by the Public Works Department Staff:
The final •plat as shown is substantially the same as it appeared on the approved
Tentative Plan adopted by Planning Commission,. Resolution 330, September
27, 1995.
2. The developer has not completed all the conditions of the Tentative Plan. These
conditions are as follows:
Construction terns
estimated S,Q,,tis
Construction of all streets including utilities, curbs, gutters, paving &
lighting and as further described on the attached estimate provided
by Construction Engineering Consultants, Inc., dated 12/06/96 - $218,550.00
Submit as-built construction drawings for subdivision - 500.00
Manhole testing and certification - 240.00
Subtotal Construction $219,290.00
TV inspection 983.00
Re TV Sewer after 1 year (DEQ Req.) 1020.00
Water System (valve actuation, chlorination, testing) 90.00
Street Signs and Delineation 1210.00
Water usage 300.00
Soil Testing Laboratory Costs 2640.00
City Engineer Fees 2710.00
Pay Public Works fees for review and inspection for subdivision. 3170.00
City vehicle charges 340.00
Pay Planning Department services fees including legal vests 300.00
Subtotal Inspection Services $12,763.00
Overhead @ 17.1% 2,182.47
Total $234,235.47
3~
Forest Gien Phase 8, Final Plat-Determination
Page Two
December 8, 1995
3. Show storm drain easements as outlined in Public Works Staff Report condition #13.
4. It is unclear whether all Division of Statel:ands (DSL) Wetland requirements have
been met. Therefore, the applicant shall provide the City with written verification
from DSL that such requirements have been fulfilled. The Final Plat is incompliance
with all ordinances and other State laws provided, however, survey adequacy
required by other ORS 91.100 shall be approved by the Jackson County Surveyor.
Qptions for Consideration:
1: Approve the Final Plaf for the above subdivision, provided that the Subdivisiori
Improvement and Security for Performance Agreements are signed and the sum of
$234.235.47 is provided in a form acceptable to the City.
2. Deny the Final Plat based on findings to be developed by the City.
3. Approve the Final Plat, subject to written DSL verification that Wetland requirements
are met and modifications to the Final Piat being completed by signing.
Attachments: CEC Cost Estimate, 12/06/95
cc: File PW#95020
c:lwpwin60VhVg5final.dac, P W!l94027
3~
a~y5TItU TxQ .
~' ENGIN ING ~ -
° COA`SUL A~~S .
x+c
P.O. BOJ41644 • MEDFORD. OR 97501 PH (S03) 7795268 • FAX (503) 779-6314 -
FORE~FGLEN PHASEVw
c~nrlltAL PONJT~, OREGON .
._. 1
BONDIPIG REgtnt~uEKrs
uNir InrAL
uNrr PRICE PRICE
1 GRAaNG Ls 000.00 aoU.oo
2 U ENTAT10P1 1 8 53 600.00 •00
3 ICA[. 43 EA 400:t3ci 17 :00•-
4 43 EA 230.00 1 750.00
5 ~. ~,µTG 13 EA 1000.00 3000.00
8 VESTRUCTURE 2 EA 000.00 OOO.W
REAnOYE FOUNOAliON 1 E/1 1000.00 1000.00
8 12"SD 209 LF 20.00 080.00
.584 1E S3S.00 T 00
0 ,,~ gp 1 EA 1200.00 200.00
11 ~ MFI 1 EA 500.00 S 500:00
12 CURB 1 5 FJ~ .00 000.00
1g 8" 825 LF 15.00 375.00
1 s• 33s 1R oo a2aoo
15 8BiVICE WYE 10 EA 5.00 50.00
1 48"33' H 2 EA 200.00 .00
17 s• ss a LA .o0 400.00
1s ,~, ~ oo ~~ soo.oo
9 8" 335 00 370.0
0
~
~~yy
fw
~ ~
1 ~.`
T3A X
.W ry
~
a00
21 'T2'S~' C 1 ~ ~ ~
22 12" B.V. 3 EA 00 700.00
~ g.O.V; 2 pA 500.00 000.00
24 FH' Y 2 EA 400.00 800.00
Y PIpE g LF' .00 7825.00
28 WATER SERYK~ ?90 LF 00 .00
2t WA METT3tlk FTfG3~. 12
... F g500 gy 1.00 4500.00
20 CR' F~ 1000 CY .00 000.00
30 ASPHALT 7510 TON 32.00 320.00
81 CURB G 11: 6.00 1480.
f ..
. 'roral.soNaNG _ Szt$,sso.oo
NO A PORTION OF THE ROADS ARE CURRENTLY ROCKED AND GRADED. IF THEY ARE
- PAYED BEFORE THE FINAL PLAIT IS ACCEPTER, •MEN THE TOTAL BONDING SHOUT-D
BZr REDUCE[5 BY 57t,9~.00 (87.4 toa X 32 S)mn).
~~
f.
H
H
H
N
N
N
L
a
c
d
1"I
C7
it
N
rU
L
0
LL
,o
~ ~~i~1 I'f
~~
++
~Oa SS q ~ 7
$'
I ~ ~
S
@ ~ ;A ~~
s3~'
5~@~ ~z#
..
Z 133N5 33S $"s~
0
N.
mz
N; oa
J •~
~;
R
E
g I ~ E ..
/ J
/ 8 Y:~18
N
i Sly m wNYa
~
~~2
E• E 1 i, NR
.~
~ )! 7
: R .
o X
J'
,1 I
a ~ a 1 u
~ .J9 av .N
~ ~~ w.N 1 g N.M
/~
V J
AVN SStl"10
~ s
R. »~« Y N NY IG.« R
___.
~"•-__.___._.
- ---
- {S
S
Lt
-1' ONIHOOI a ~
R ~ 8 .5 S 6R:RRRARR.9884:87RR88AoN
RRIC~CA=
:
=
-
C E~~ 9 ~«.«
.
_-_ v RSERRRRRRR
BE
:.
=
e
N
8
..«~_...~
!
~ ~ a
! ..___
..
~...^ _._.
.
~
~
8 ..u.
E ......~....~.. r
i ~71SIRRRtinSlSl~f.}ISC.r^~!r.G:11CR~.7$R
Q
a
r 8
of M
~
~i N
B: `~ E
0 7
8
R E SdE99~5GeeBBill,AGBa.~.$+7
t
~ EB~Y~~SaSS3:i<$:.~3~3~$~s
. g _ ~ 1 1°
~ J 7i F 1 w N N~ n CC^-RR•Tj.RRiFR8R8tlYR,^q®q
'
'
~
~
.
q
K
IS _
B: N E 8
E R
j ~iRa
I91
'R0.11~.::FE9E8^-.
.:.
~......-
=
°~~
n' =
C K K
I~ E; ++;
^ ~8888778T
8o7:
E88A
o
•x8
^"
%3SW38Z~'d8,88S}
F Y
z
y
;a ~ I ~» J
w a Na ..
R .
:3
7
8
8 '~'="'itYtiYNP7NYAitiNCiR
i 1 ~ n ~
0 ~~
W
~ l 8
3 m ;8
~ iII .~i
1
Fu :
8i N E
911 8
i }' i s E88gg888888888888888888
i~ C %P.iRR9i/1RWiRKR1E91T1R
¢ 1 «
},
it 1~ N g
0
1 0 ~..$
$"
Y O
4' ;
~ `.
~ O
.. J
•
.
•J Fy• N
W i 97
61
. J Ye.w
' « N N
~'1 1'^~ i•
~
ylYl
,•
1
~
81 Z PIE
8 E
3
3AItl0
NYWNOY00
a
: x
`
i.
I
~._p .«.~1
a « Na
E1 R jf
Ye.«
~ 6
-
E T
/1 q
1 w«NL
R~
C ~
w:a... a ~1 ^-
~ N E
3
O
• „~~F is »T»
^- i °
E
1u
~
1 9^ IlO.K E
8
' N
~
8 YI
o ~
C
, » » N
1
it
c •al Psna ~
i
..
. ....~.
_
.......
.....
..-..
7
«
'
i »19prd .., .. .
.L«.w.wi
I Q,
Z
LZ
~ C / Y. . ~ E~
Fi
:
».w
~ M'N'YY '.11 ~ ».w w.»
~ »•N'YY i w'N'NY ~ ip t t x •F a
_.~ ! ~! E. }
8E
} . i ~ ~ Tt
8°
~..
' 1 a a 1
s ~ "
~ f~
98
8E~ ~ ~ I i i 1 0
~~ ~6 ~£ S8 S~ .k 3€.
~~ i~ E
~
~ A
1
1 8E ~.
f ~ E= R= ~
S ~i3.+
p
S $
5
.
g jE ~~ S' Sa
a ~
" :
~9
S S ~ i
F~ cc gRC R
'
.«.~ «,.
III 3SYNd 'N3'10 1S3tlOd s
~ E
x: a Fe Ea;
~ ii ° ° ` ' a ~= ~ ~
e
'J
A41
Forest Glen, Phase VIII
Locebtl In par<al tb. 2 me 3. Pert ltlon plat P-]]-f993 of lee racorev of
Oreeon Inefv VeluM ~. peea ]]. CcuntY SurvaYOrE flla
Jackeon CeuntY
e
No. .
f3fi53. aefe per<el 6alne In Me eauMeeet 4ufrter of Eectlan 11, m
a 2 Mot of
] Seute
Ren
el
tee eoute e
p
.
veet euerter e1 Eectien 12, Ye,me
fNeeon
Jeekeon Count
int
p
.
,
y,
o
tea k111aeette Nerfelen. City e/ Ce~rel
Crow n West Developments
EOB Eee! .MCkeon
Naefartl. OreoEn 9]50A
SeaSheet 3 for Curve Oitte and LeOend
f~ rlw a Ian , e m wares. rltww+Ar«w
\J-~ i
I _
j c °-""'-~-•-
!a :' FOREST GLEN. PHASE V ";
8 , P
61 _ tm teto
1 IAY taa fM 1«le LqY tm ~ ~
IAT i97 j ! ~ 8
j ~ ~ 8 -1
'ze•v Ex
ls
•
- -. -
^ j _
.
7 Hro
Y
~~
J
Iw.w xl.n wm
la.n
'
w
» 1
/
'
t I 8;
e: Lot 231 - LOt 222 ;q
1
I G Lot 232 ~
? I 81 LOt 292
F w».f It ;g
81
]wl w It
1 Iw.w 1'I'
I uzY Ix.« Ixz.e]
wip»E wEw»E 1 fNwy
i '
»pw»E ,
O
~ ~8 j Lot 291
s' Lot 230 s Lot 223. iR ~ HB
e LOt 233 ;g s' ww « n 8 row w It .8 m m..f n
g j $$ 1 ~ .}/
]tM w a [
1».p Iw.f]
@L»
Iw.w j F
wfw»f Yew lL
FFI ~ h2w11E
~ fwYIIIE -j Y
Lot224 ix ~.j_ Yi Lot 290
8' LOt 229 S F
'
z
8
Lot 234
j8
8~ ; ]rw w n
$ &
8; wn w n 8 ]]fo w n
o
.
8 8 ye« w n i8 Yj~ .
'IL - IiLb I
YL Y » F
J•
W eE 1~
L
Y 1w.w n ;
e ;
» E
wi w
E
~ tww»E I
~ • ~C g;
s! Lot 22B Lot 225 '8 lit $; Lot 269
£ A LOt 235 IG ¢ ~ 8, we « n 8 lefe Y a .8 j »Y w n
a $ ]we N It 18 O ~
ZI. IY.w Iw.« .~~.!11
110.10
w 'zw »E IY,+ fwe Y
ew Yw E
, f- I ,
G' •R ~ Z LOt 266
,
j • LOt 227 a LOt 226 ,B ! o R7 »x Y Ie
8
C lot .236 1e a »w w Ie ~ eeee w n I
I
LL
I d Ia.w
•_-----• --_- ••---•-•
w.w Iw.le
j M\ w Y Iz v
Iw.w j w
~
w » F
= a
a ---~
1~ E]I.n M
87
La
t
--------"5 °'r~'''---
----
~
C Lot 237 y
2
T
XHITE a
S ]Yt N Il
'h
; X
M
m Y 1
Y '
• L ~ ~ w.« w.w w.w ;
~ w•IK .~
A
w»M y
~
7Y ~ Lot 2e4 ar~
I Y
e Lot 23e
u to ! .Let 263 a .]RI w It . Q
Lest 2e6
t
t ]]w w a!
Y~ xwwla Y _
~
i
' r~
.~ ,w»w«
t 265
"L
Iw.w J. 6t a s o
c
M»Y
i ^.;~• 11000 NIt
R
j
a s
f s Lot 239
r j
Y $ ww N It » »
,
' xl.M lw.w
I
Ie• ruf I ; w.» w.w
Y
w • wl Y If Y 1N'w•T•f »t.w
. Y
m FppT aufll g1iyE a 1
R. e---------V~------+ Y
r Lot 2e2
W Me'w'»•R wv.w
a
11000 w n
M ;
-
, 11!
w Lot 279 Lot 2e0 ,o~wf i~' '
1
/0 s eNINw
Iw,w11 ~ E Lot 2e1
Y
If ~
le ,
Y lofve w
s8 m~a`
p.Y
`IIe.IE
bl'«'e,'E
w«,w : v« w. »mIw n IY. zvi tx n auo m.,t z of 1
C
A
Y
O
PROI'I:SSIOHAL
EANa SURVEYOR
xnuii~uwv
fsplee 17/]l/95
oavErY m rfww a Y,R, tkc. arflee
fYeHl svfiETlva ''"~
a
~
r
~
P.e. eel eXM1 ev
erY.
co
fa
v
CEMWL wIM. p'Eep1 wE00 pq[: Ne]j )MW«
O}NnO Er: fY.luf Wrerlet w•
fC,IG 1 lan : w (.« WIOHC e•fl.we v tt3>o.eee f
are x o:r la« .m «•.: exx-vl
39
Staff Report
to: Central Point Planning Commission December 11, 1995
from: Nancy Kincaid, Interim P1ar-ning Aduiittistrator ~`~
subject: Annexation Request for Marian Miller Property at 4732 N. Pacific Hwy.
Background
The proposal is for annexation of about 14 acres of land between South Pacific
Highway and Griffin Creek, just south of the Green Glen subdivision.. The proposal
has been reviewed by Gary Shall, Consulting Planner, on behalf of the city. Mr. Shall
concludes that the proposal appears to meet the requirements of the city annexation
code and the urbanization element of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. ShafPs full report
is attached.
Annexation at the request of a property owner does not require notice to surrounding
property owners if'the owners of all property to be annexed and alt electors residing in
the property to be annexed sign in favor of the annexation. That is the case in this
instance, so no property owner notice was mailed.
A - Planning Department Staff Report
B - Public Works Staff Report
C - Annexation Petition
D - Annexation Preliminary Plat
E - Assessor's MapNicinity Map
F - Topographic Map
4~
ExxlBrr -~_
Annexation Report
Miller - 375, R2W, 3B, TL500 & 600
November 20, 1995
Annexation
Annexation is the act of extending the boundaries of a city so that the property owners of a new
territory can benefit from municipal services and facilitate urban development.
Action Requested
CPMC 1.24 requires thePlanning Commission to review requests for annexation and make
recommendations to the City Council. The Commission's recommendation can be in the form of a
minute-motion. The City Council decides upon all annexation requests after conducting a public
hearing.
Description of Annexation Proposal
Marian G. Miller and'Billy W. Hogan, properly owner and applicant, respectively, have authorized
Douglas C. McMahan, Hofrbuhr & Associates, to submit an annexation request on their behalf.
The proposed annexation is located at 4732 Pacific Highway, on the east side OR99, generally
south of Unit No. 2 of the Green Gien Subdivision, and west of Scenic Junior High and Royal
Heights Subdivision. If approved, the annexation would add 13.99 acres of new territory to the
City of Central Point. As proposed, the annexation excludes any North Pacific Highway right-of-
way.
The property is located on North Pacific Highway which is classifiedas a major arterial. A single
family dwelling with accessory buildings is located on the westerly portion of the southerly tax lot;
37, 2W 3B TL600. The balance of the property including all of tax lot 500 is tilled for agricultural
production.: Tax lot 500 and 600 are currently county planned/zoned F-5 (Farm with five acre
minimum lot sizes), and SR-2.5 (Suburban Residential with 2.5 acre minimum lot size),
respectively. Griffin Creek's floodway and 100 yeaz floodplain span the easterly portion of the
property. The northeastern area, adjacenYto Griffin Creek, may also contain a wetland. Further
investigation by the Division of State Lands is warranted: No other significant physical features
exist on the property.
Existing access to property is from North Pacific Highway. This highway is subject to specific
access control policies which limit the frequency ofpublic roadway intersections and private
driveways. Future deveiopmerrt of the property should rely upon access from Green Glen
Subdivision (Nuys Way and Nancy Ave.) and a single street intersecting OR99. Every effort
should be made to avoid any private driveways off of OR99. The street network should also
provide for the future by providing for its extension to the north and south (i.e. TL 400 and 401)
to the north and TL 700 and •1001 to the south). Additionally, it-would be very desirable to include
pedestrian/bicycle access to Scenic Junior High. Future development utilizing OR99 as an access
(whether as a public road or driveway) will require an Oregon Department of Transportation road
access permit.
~~
Annexation Report
Miller - 37S, R2W, 3B, TL500 & 600
November 20, 1995
Paee 2
Tax lot 500 and 600 are designated on the Comprehensive Plan as low and medium density
residential, respectively. In keeping with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the City Zoning
Map classifies tax lot 500 (northly tax lot) as Residential Single Family (6,000 sq. $) and tax lot
600 as Residential Two-Family. After laying out streets with a portion of the acreage, the land
could be subdivided into roughly 701ots. However, access issues may result in a design of more or
less lots through some combination of subdividing and partitioning.
The lands surrounding the proposal have the following land uses and zoning designations:
Area Incorpoated/ Land Use Zoning
Unincorporated
North Incorporated Single family residential (Green Green R-1-6 (residential w/
Subdivision -Unit #1) 6,000 sq. ft minimum
lot size
Unincorporated Agricultural land /single family dwelling F-5 (Farm w/ 5 ac.
minimum lot size
West Incorporated none none
Unincorporated OR99, railroad w/ agriculture use beyond EFU (exclusive farm
.use)
South Incorporated none none
Unincorporated Single familyresidential on large SR - 2.5 (suburban .
suburban lots residential. w/ 2.S acre
minmum lot size
East Incorporated Single family residential (Royal Heights R-1-8 (residential w/
Subdivision) and Scenic Junior High 8,000 sq. ft minimum
lot size)
Unincorporated none none
Review Discussion
L , Written. Consents: In accordance with ORS 222, all owners of the land and not
_ less than 50 percent of the electors residing in the territory. must consent, in writing,
to the. proposed annexation,
~~
Annexation Report
Miller - 37S, R2W, 3B, TL500 & 600
November 20, 1995
The application for annexation includes a written consent from the property owner Marian
G. Miller. Ms. Miller also resides on the property which is the only residence within the
tract proposed for annexation.
2. Within UGBi Pursuant to Policy No. 3 (City-County Urban Growth Boundary and
Policy Agreement; September 1984), territory annexed into the City is required to
be within the Central Point Urban Growth Area.
The land of the proposed annexation is within the Central Point UGB.
3: COnt18u1tV: ORS 222 Yequires that annexed territory be contiguous to the city or
separated from the city only by a public right of way, or a stream, lake or other
body of water.
As shown on the proposed annexation plat, the territory is contiguous to the
existing city limits on a portion of its northern and all of the eastern boundary.
;,,, 4. Order v Provision of Public Facili ;PC: OAR 660-01-310 states that annexation of
lands is subject to the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan.
The Central Point Comprehensive Plan was formally acknowledged by the Land
Conservation and Development Commission on December 13,1984. The
comprehensive plan specifies that the phasing of development and annexations shall
be consistent with the City's ability to provide facilities and services.
The Public Works StatfReport (Item C) provides an inventory of existing public
facilities (streets, water, sanitary and storm sewer). The report concludes
1uc. "Ywbl`n,c, Woy1Gs Ss~IaXY P~re~t1
Future enhancements and additions to the existing public facilities necessary for future
development would be required of the developer as those land use applications are
processed by the City. The City follows a regulated process for land use decisions. It is
anticipated that implementation of the City's decisions would result in an orderly provision
of public facilities to the territory proposed for annexation.
Related Issue
A statute (ORS 450.987) adopted in 1989 changed how the cities withdraw territory from special
districts. The City may annex territory situated within the boundary of a special district, however,
the City shall not remove any service provision capability from that special district unless specific
findings are made by the County Board of Commissioners. One of the more significant of the
4~
Annexation Report
Miller - 375, R2W, 3B, TL500 & 600
Novemher2l, 1995
requied findings to:withdraw territory from a special district is that the district cannot provide
adequate service to an annexed territory within areasonable time.
The City's acknowledged comprehensive plan is the controlling document for land use within the
Urban Growth Area covered by the plan. The Plan and Statewide Goals require an orderly,
economic provision for public facilities and services for lands within the UGB which are converted
from rural to urban uses. The coordination of public facilities and services, including their
extension and operation, is crucial to the future development of the City. Under state law, specific
special district agreements are required in order to ensure coordination.
The City Council, as of this date, has postponed any final decisions on annexation propo~ais until
this issue has been resolved.
Conclusion
This application meets the fundamental requirements for annexing territory into the City.
However, until such time that the policy question relating to the coordination of key public
facilities is resolved, the City is not in a position to conclude that there would be an orderly
provisionof public facilities with respect to the proposed annexation;
Folh
The Planning Commission's recommendation regarding the proposed annexation will be included
in the public record at the time the City Council conducts a review and hearing on this proposal.
Prior to any public hearings, the City will send notifications to agencies which could be affected by
the proposed annexation. The agencies on the mailing list include Jackson County, Bear Creek
Valley Sanitary Authority, utility companies, School District No. 6, Central Point Police
Department and Central Point Fire Department. The Oregon Department of Transportation should
also be notified. Agencies receiving notification will have an opportunity to submit comments
about the annexation prior to any future public hearings.
Attachments
Item A -Annexation Application
Item B -Maps (Zoning, Assessor, Topographical, Wetlands)
Item C -Report from Public Works Department
~•
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
~I~~LOMOI~ sT~~ ~E~®~T
~~ MILLER ANNEXATION
DATE:
PROJECT:
Name of Project:
Project#
CURRENT ZONING:
APPLICANT:
December 8, 1995
Proposed Annexations
rsxxlanr _~
Marian G. Miller Property/North Pacific Highway (99)
PW95033
R-1-6 (Tax Lot 500) R-2 (Tax Lot 600)
Billy Hogue
P. O. Box 4521
Medford, OR 97501
(541) 772-3529
g.
SUBDIVIDER/
OWNER
AGENT/
SURVEYOR
ENGINEER:
LOCATION:
PLANNED
ZONING:
TYPE OF LAND
USE ACTION:
~~
Marian G. Miller
P. O. Box 3713
Central Point, OR 97502
Douglas McMahan/Hoffbuhr & Associates, Inc.
1062 East Jackson Street
Medford, OR 97504
(541) 779-4641
Douglas. C. McMahan/Hoffbuhr & Associates, Inc.
1062 E. Jackson Street
Medford, OR 97504
(541) 779-4641
T37S R2W WM Section 036 Tax Lots 500, 600
North Pacific Highway U.S. 99 at mile post 2.3
Same as current
Annexation
REVIEWED BY: Paul W. Worth -Public Works Technician
4
Miller Property Annexation
December 7, 1995 -Page Two
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Street Subgrade, Street Base, Street Paving, Street Lighting, Traffic
Control/Delineation Improvements, Curbs,/Gutters, Safety Improvements,
Ingress/Egress Improvements, On-Street Parking and Off-Street Parking,
Delivery Truck Access, Other Transportation Requirements, Sidewalk, and
bikeways.
A. Existing Conditions:
-Right of Way
-Street Width
-Moving Lane
-Parking Lanes
-Traffic Volume
-Sidewalk
-Curb/Gutter
-Street Lights
1. Street No. MA03, Street Name -North Pacific Highway (US
99), Classification-Major Arterial, Jurisdiction-Oregon Dept
of Transportation.
55' right, 35' left of centerline
property to property
52' pavement to pavement"
4 (undivided)
None (gravel shoulder -both sides)
VT/D 13,400 (1994)
none
None
None
None
1 residential, 1 field
None
100'-110' property
to property'
84' curb to curb"
4to6"
0-2
10,000-40,000 VT/D
Required
Required
22,000 Lumen-200'
Spacing
Required'
Controlled Access
Controlled Access
-Bike Way
-Drive Way
-Street Access
-Right of Way
-Street Width
-Moving Lane
-Parking Lanes
-Traffic Volume
-Sidewalk
-Curb/Gutter
-Street Lights
-Bike Way
-Drive Way
2. Street Names(s) Nancy Ave. LS 043 and Marys Way,
LS 045. Jurisdiction -City of Central Point
50' property to property
36' curb to-curb
2
None (gravel shoulder -both sides)
VT/D (unknown)
yes
-yes
yes
No
Yes ~ 6
50' property to
property
36' curb to curb's
2
none
<2500 VT/D
Required
Required
Required
None Required
Required
Miller Property-Annexation
December 7, 1995 -Page Three
*City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan
** with 4' gravel shoulder
B. Discussion
1. The City of Central Point will require coordination with Oregon
State Department of Transportation (ODOT) to determine
requirements for improvements or access on North Pacific
Highway (U.S. 99).
ODOT may require a traffic study be performed if street access to
U.S. 99 is anticipated.
2. The City may require developer to submit a street development
plan which encompasses adjacent properties and future street
locations to ensure satisfying the goals of the Comprehensive
Plan. A traffic study may also be required to support the street
development plan with regards to Scenic Avenue (Jackson
County Road Department).
3. Subdivision of this property will require the construction of local
streets within the development and conformance with City's
Comprehensive Plan and standards and specifications for Public
Works Construction.
11. WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service, and Backflow Protection.
A. Existing Conditions:
1. 8" waterlines are located in the East sides of Marys Way and
Nancy Avenue located in the Green Glen Subdivision adjacent to
applicants property.
2. 12" ductile iron water main located in the East right of way of
Highvvay 99 terminates at the NW property corner of Tax Lot
1504 N (proposed Oregon State Police complex).
B. Discussion
1. Subdivision of this property vvill require the construction of
waterlines within the development in conformance with the City's
Water System Pian, the Comprehensive Plan, and Standards for
Public Works Construction.
,r
The City may require the developer to construct off-site
47
Miller Property-Annexation
December 7, 1995 -Page Four
improvements to provide water to the .development and to provide
for adequate flow.
2. Applicant is responsible for verifying actual locations size and
types prior to design and construction.
111. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge,
Local SDC, Industrial Wastewater Permit.
A. Existing Conditions
1. 8".City Sanitary Sewer lines are located in the South lanes of
Marys Way and Nancy Avenue of the Green Gien Subdivision.
2. A 36" BCVSA Regional, Sewer Line is located in a right of way
near the east boundaries of applicants property (Tax Lots 500 and
600). `
B. Discussion:
1. Subdivision of this property will require construction of Sanitary
Sewer Lines in conformance with the City Sanitary Sewer Master
Plan and Standards of Public Works construction.
The City and/or Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority may require
offsite improvements to provide sewer facilities to the
development.
2. Applicant is responsible for verlfying actual locations, sizes and
types prior to design and construction.
IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS:
Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, TMDL Requirements.
A. Existing Conditions:
1. Griffin Creek traverses the East side of Tax Lot 500 and 600 in a
northerly. direction..
2. A 3' (D) x 5'(W) drainage ditch fronts the applicants property
along highway 99.
3. The Division of State Lands Wetlands inventory has identified the
~~
Miller -Annexation
December 7, 1995 -Page Five
site as PSSC land adjacent to Griffin Creek.
4. The eastern third of the Applicant's property is located in the 100
year flood zone adjacent to Griffin Creek.
B. Discussion:
1. Subdivision of this. property will require the construction of storm
drains adjacent to and within the development in conformance
with the City's Standards for Public Works Construction.
The City may require the developer to construct off-site
improvements to provide adequate drainage for the development.
2. Developer may be required to perform additional measures with
regard to Wetland Improvement/Preservation.
Application must be made to the Division of State Lands and
certified copies of permit requirements delivered to the City prior
to any site work.
When the owner of the property being considered for annexation submits a Tentative
Plan for a subdivision, additional requirements may be placed on this project.
~~
Ml. r - -u. .} i' ~ t f. ..
~W''.rr r)ir.kj-~ ty s •~~+, ~l~:a ;i./ r .4~+ C ~....d's" a -o- -t.j. t +l J + x r
,.s ~`3 tt rrY~S ( ~a ,f n < ,/''') t.' )Y + e :t'.
.,sp k y r l.,y Z' wjr5~f• •"~ t n! 4 `` `" ~ Jr r } ~ / ~') s s <.. r / t ...
~ r' I.V 'C;/ 1 {iT r.. "tit t {t ~+ c r 11..~'e r r
~a q ~~yv t ~v !t { -KS ,~, ,
,~,
/~~ 3 / _ 'mss ., 1 `c.. .` ~3',K t T
/ ~~~ ` a
ti t.
. .
.oZj - - .
y,:
. .. qr'
t 1'
r -.
yfj- A78 i lam'
« ,~. r. ~ ~
\ ~A ~'
_ _ ,ci a c~1'' ,h tti3
1 ~~~ 1
.. i~. ~ M s
.~
~ ~
,~~
. 1 ~ .';~ '. ~ ti . « ~ l
~ ~ ;. O
r G ~~ ~ is ~ i, H. ._ ^~ ^ N .
' ~ ) ~' ..~ ` . .. I f. .
t~. «.
1`{F1 ~,
V `
.~
~. a ~ F
.~i h V1 ~ ` /ti
~C o f
•-, :¢ a
f
Miller -Annexation
December 7, 1995 -Page Five
site as PSSC land adjacent to Griffin Creek:
4. The eastern third of the Applicant's property is located in the 100
year flood zone adjacent to Griffin Creek.
B. Discussion:
1. Subdivision of this property will require the construction of storm
drains adjacent to and within the development in conformance
with the City's Standards for Public Works Construction.
The City may require the developer to construct off-site
improvements to provide adequate drainage for the development.
2. Developer may be required to perform additional measures with
regard to Wetland Improvement/Preservation.
Application must be made to the Division of State Lands and
certified copies of permit requirements delivered to the City prior
to any site work:
`~ When the owner of the property being considered for annexation submits a Tentative
Plan for a subdivision, additional requirements may be placed on this project.
~~
YD`S`.-• rfJi ,1~. _-' +Y ~ F xG t~w~ pay a H r z 4..~a~Y" 4 ~.: -?,- - \~ ~' A } + ix .+. ,~
5` ~ ~" -e ~ j- ~}. ~` ku' : a + A '~ r it ,/. r~ a '+i x-
e. Ft ~ ti ~ vr-L 1 L ~ i f ` .~
.{p ` ~! Yt 32Y,."~„J~y Yp `•tk ~, ~' f{r 7 M ~i xa r d~c rx ,Rs
~ ~ ~'.
~ •- ''
y.
.l t 1
+ • --
' „M~ V.„
~.
,~
~ ,...
/ - - - ~ ~- - 41~' -~ -:
-.. ~ ~ ~ ,,
w „ •~
r'
h ~ t ~,~ '.
K' "' }
f , ~ •(~ 4
G Ci ' _ J
(~ <
4 ` O .h ' .. !'`~j;;.
~ ~. ~ a
` ~ b1~ ~* ~ E,%
r.:,:
^ ~. .°
~ '
M ~--- c yN.-. 3\\
i ~~
~ I ~ v w ~ g6~~: ~ ~
x~ ,. v 4
I - -~ a~
~,
>1
K
s
V
~~
Z
O
a
w ~
Z n
Q ~ U
~ N O
~ z~
;,: F: W sZ
~x~
:~~0_.. ~IOO
Ox
? 3<
N ~
W ~
a
.' ' -
r
~ M
=
o ~ N ~J~-
m ~
~
II _~
~g~8:
~_~ &
~
U
•
~
~~~oT
ny°v`NO
:~3~
d~ _
ie
Z
~~oe~
d ~
~a~ ls
~
H
ox-s^
a. C
o
}
X
W c
/
K
0
_ z
i'n ~
~" F; m
n '
:
1 +
L U
tr tD
.
:L Ir i+i Ct C7
z
1
r '- ~
J ~ _
1
I G ~i
1.
_:. -
w
I
SOP16•ST
:`T~
a
j ~ ~ \F~G
QP~'
i ~~~
~~°
;s
9°j da.~
~,a
5 ~. '~
(Q
It O
I~ ~ ~_ ~ w~~~~
tz 0 2 d Z
Qj Y
°~ A-
n1
bI
:I
„I
~_ ~ ~I
U 6 3I
E a
OI
w a o
'~ ~- v
II ~
W
o ~
X
w
z
z r ~i a-
Q ~ ~
J
y W =S„-„ a
3 O ~ v~~n Ir I ~
_ ~9>< e
~.00~0 ~ b N.• I }m
'1 J'{O ptl K ~n~~ F
~'! Q
a ~'"4u Q bi O
D
W
O ie p
I O
~ a
1' ,-"^.. fen,
EXHIBIT C'
ANNEXATION PETITION
TAE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation i~
to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property
contiguous thereto described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
by this reference made a part of the within petition.
By their signature hereto,.•the undersigned certify that they
are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be•
annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are "electors" registered
in the territory proposed. to be annexed as described in Exhibit
nAu
This petition, containing the request and consent to said
annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on
or before the date of the public hearing to be held upon the
proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120.
"Owner" is defined.by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner
of record or, where there is a recorded land contract which is in
force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership
in a parcel of land,'each consenting owner shall be counted as a
fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in 'the t,
land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners, and
the same 'fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass for
purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in ~>
a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be
considered to be the individual owner of that land.
"Elector" is defined in said statute as an individual
qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon
Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 16
years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and
registered to vote as required by applicable state law.
Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors .petitioning
for annexation be registered in the territory proposed to be
annexed.
Elector or Property owner:
(If Property Owner, insert
Name: property description) Siunature: Date:
ANNEXATION PETITION
(120887)
52
0
r
0
m
U
i W
0
- ~- ~ x33.]0' `~
W W 3 r 3°°.OY _._ _n.
'%~B> ~
i
~ ~BN I ~
I ~ .
I
1 ^' iY ~ s
W Y
I
~
I b ;
=~> aJ oi
^-
b I ~.W O =x J' M
~ I
N 1 2 I l~ ~ 6 //~I Tii
~ J ~ mil
Z (]
z ^ 1
WI
I ` '
~Q ir. :::
~:: m I
W
O
~~~
`?' JJ--
1~
~
Z
e
..: ...
t_.
U
I ~ I
a ~ ~ ~ 1-. €i; i;i
z
~ ~
~ c w iii ii .~ 1- e
'- Y I
m. -
O 0 0 _ I
... ~ I Ili !
i N s l ~ b l
l~ Z i. i [
i1i w I -
` C E
F
' u~
Q~z
%
I o U
Q
J m o p i
i i
.~ p1
~ '~ E ~ ~ I
~ F V I 1 I ; ~ (T .
Y- o m z I JJll tltlllll ~ b
b
o ______
_
-- _
_ -
-
~
Q O y. SOP16•SCC - L II
.'~ Z 3 a ° o
u ~ N -a X
..I M W
W
d
<
~
~
I ~
_~
m =e°°ibtl l c
c b
O" • ti~oM~j
b
O Z
~Obbb ~ b
~ b
6JN.b.O
. 4
B I ~
m
'°3mb ~ ~~n I
Z-
awe^O Q
p
g
W
b U
l
~rm
U Q O
b H
Q
p N
I O
m °• i
a a I O
a
• 1 l
~
y~P
~G~
~
14 G
Q
/
a
i R~
O
~ "~
°y5 s4° g9 ago
I s
s~ a0' .. . ~`Rd
t'
a~P~ 5~~
~`G
~S
~
~J
'M1 t -. j .:
~6 2W, 34 r '
s ~ •'~ ~ i Fti , S .bs.
a 4 V i:~ .~.,. .
• ,. ~
.1` i r
~ , i~':
:~ ,t..1.. , ~ "~'.
` ~ , ~ ,_; IA~p RT
I '~. '~ ~ rnxxnrroN ps~sSMEiv~
¢~' - t o~Re4s~:
~: ,
j - 1 SENORA LQtaJE ~ `^ -'.yi ~t~j. .:
•\ Si^
v~. G
• • . 500 • ~ .. r '..,'
'. y~ 7~
~,, i
.... ,., ,_ .._.. J v
S
•P.q RI! A f.
•~ .. • ! 1'.d f{.G1 ~I. iii>.
' T L ,~;t
•. •MtN 1 r .r•,; t ~ ,~
~ •~ 1` •., ~ ~ ~~ 1. ~' -lYY1t e~'e.'.~a
y. L
•^f 1 ,~•„L fi fbu
(200 u Y ar•
A•~f ~e.J w.ra Jwl ra/fa/r
W
~~'. /v.p. pfu
~. ~-
i aoo
~ ... . .r' _ ~ wm
i+oo tSOaN '~
ase
•~ A59Re
~, •' ~ ! a
~
~\ `af
(r-up)
~
v.p~\. ' .. I~
~_ 1 i.
37 2W 3C
.~ .~~
i SWM
1 ~~
i~ ~
~. i
•• ._
`'~ ` ... •~ J~ .
~.
'\ ~~
[I'~
~ ~ 1
u
a
n
3
= lV
~ M
• ~.
r!„A. - ~ 37 ZW 3DE
.9 ..~ •\ .
tRnl
Y d
fihfNa) ~ ~~. r..
~:r4 . .,.: ..y. ~ M
EXHIBIT E
<<
t,
Y
;1 ~
pV E. s
a'
i.
4
O
WAY ~ . ~g ~
a
rt
x
J "
~J
~ QQ O
Q OVA
Q
y
~ n v $s ~~ U
n a /n~
(~J~ ~
@ oO i~%
t
z^\
W r
\ \
_ e\\~ ,P~~ .~
~l ~ .` PG~~\C
P