HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - August 15, 1995r~,,
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
August 15, 1995- 7:00 p.m.
Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 326
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Chuck Piland -Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber, Candy Fish, Randy Graves, Karolyne
Johnson, and Valerie Rapp
III. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. MINUTES
~_ ~ A. Review and approval of August 3, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VI. BUSINESS
j'~ ~~ A. Review and determination for Tentative Plan of Unit No. 6 of Jackson
Creek Estates Subdivision located on a southerly extension of Jackson
Creek Drive
y,2 - b 6 B. Review and determination for Site Plan of Addition to the Valley Family
Practice Medical Facility located at 615 South 2nd Street, adjacent to the
Serenity Lane Treatment Center
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
~~~
i
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT I
Planning Commission Minutes
August 1, 1995 - Page One
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER at 7:02 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL -Those present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber,
Candy Fish, Karolyne Johnson and Valerie Rapp. Randy Graves called in to say
he would not be able to attend.
III. CORRESPONDENCE -George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator, distributed a
letter, .dated July 25, 1.995, from John Hastings, asking for an 18 month
extension to the condition in the C.U.P. for Hastings Furniture, requiring
Hastings to pave the parking lot and alley. George stated that extending the
timing on this condition would require a Planning Commission hearing, which
will be scheduled in the near future. George also distributed a "draft" of the
Planning Departments "Notice to Customers" outlining customer and City
responsibilities concerning to land use process.
IV. MINUTES
I
Commission Fish moved to approve the July 11, 1995 Planning Commission ;
Minutes. Commissioner Johnson seconded the Motion. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Dunlap, abstain: Farber, yes; Fish, yes; Johnson, yes, and Rapp yes, and the
Minutes were approved.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES -NONE
VI. BUSINESS
A. Review and recommendation of Annexation at 3436 Hanley Road generally
located on the east side of Hanley Road and directly west of Phase I of
Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision on Brandon Street. (Applicants: Beard and
Kula).
George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator, reviewed his Memorandum dated July
28, 1995 including definition of Annexation, Action Requested,. Description of
Annexation Proposal, (including the unknown factor concerning Bear Creek
Valley Sanitary Authority-BCVSA), Review Discussion, Related Issue,
Conclusion, Follow-up and incorporated the attachments: Annexation
Application, Maps, and the June 22, 1995 Public Works Report into the record
by reference.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
~:,
- ~ ,
~, Planning Commission Minutes
August 1, 1995 -Page Two
George stated that for clarification Item III, A. 1 in the Public Works Report,
dated June 20, 1995, -where it states that there was no sanitary sewer line
existing in Hanley Road along Applicant's Property Frontage, should be
modified to read there is no C/TY sanitary sewer existing in Hanley Road, but
a BCVSA mainline exists on the west side of Hanley Road, and the residence
is served by BCVSA.
George stated that the Planning Commission would process ail annexation
requests in the order they are received,. and then when the City Council wants
to decide upon annexation requests, the Planning .Commission part of the
process will have been already been completed.
W. G. (Cap) Beard, 1570 Angeicrest Drive, Medford, Agent, (.brother to Mrs.
Kula, and brother-in-law to Mr. Kula) came forward in support of the
application. He stated that at this time, he and the Kulas had no plans to
develop the property, but were requesting annexing into the City so that the
property could be connected to Central Point City water. No one else came
forward.
Commissioner Fish moved to recommend the Proposed Annexation at 3436
'Hanley Road to the City Council. Commissioner Johnson seconded the Motion,
ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Farber, yes; Fish, yes; Johnson,. yes, and
Rapp, yes, and the Motion carried unahimously.
B. Review and Recommendation of a draft Ordinance amending Title 17 of the
Central Point Municipal Code to establish Padlot Developments as a permitted
use.
George Rubaloff reviewed his Memorandum of July 28, 1995, including
General, Local Experience with padlots, Comprehensive Plan (padlots do not
conflict with. the City's comprehensive plan), Staff Review (Public Works,
Planning/Zoning, Public Safety/Building and City Attorney, have met 3 or 4
times to study the conceptl, and .Follow up. He then incorporated the
attachments, The Draft Ordinance Amending Title 17, Establishing Padlot
Development, and Proposed Resolution of Intent to Amend Title 17 into the
record by reference.
George distributed a'revised' edition of the Ordinance with changes added by
the City Attorney. This revised Ordinance would be the one to be voted on by
the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission would declare their intent
by adopting Resolution 325.
' CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
- 2
Planning Commission Minutes
August 1, 1995 -Page Three
Commissioner Farber stated that the padlot concept is somewhat like a planned
-unit development.
George stated that although similar to a P.U.D., padlots .are usually smaller
than the 5 acre minimum of a P.U.D:
Mark Servatius, Building Official stated that in reference to fire walls, separator
walls, separate foundations, etc, that he would need to confer with the City
Attorney to get a legal opinion.. Mark stated that he would need .some time to
do research on fire Code and: Building Code, as Padlot codes differ from
Condominium codes.
Commissioner Dunlap asked if she could have some addresses of padlots in the
Medford area. Bhe also stated that she would like to do some research before
voting on the Padlot ordinance.
George stated that staff would provide some addresses of existing padlots to
her tomorrow.
Mike Lanier, agent for Gary Whittle , 918 E. Jackson, Medford, Oregon came
forward to'draw a diagram on the blackboard illustrating .how padlots can be
formed. He showed how different footprints could be placed on lots under the
flexibility of the Padlot concept, such as moving structures closer together
when there is a problem with the lots, such as wetlands, a creek, odd shaped
lots, etc.
-George stated that padlots would not change the density. He stated that the
proposed ordinance is written so that density requirements would be
preserved.
Mike Lanier stated. the padlot concept makes it easier #or first time home
buyers and gave some examples of the high cost of lots in Medford, and the
average price of a new single family residence. No one else came forward.
There were no further questions.
Commissioner Fish moved that they approve Planning Commission Resolution
325, showing intent of recommending to Council amending Title 17 of the
Central Point Municipal Code to establish Padlots Developments as a permitted
use. Commissioner
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
3
~, Planning Commission Minutes
August 1, 1995 -Page Four
Johnson seconded the Motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, abstain; Farber, yes; Fish,
yes; Johnson, yes, and Rapp, yes and the Motion passed.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS -Next Planning Commission Meeting scheduled for August
15, 1995.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT -Commissioner Farber moved that. the meeting adjourn,
Commissioner Rapp seconded the Motion, and all said Aye, and the meeting
was adjourned at 8:13 p.m.
~(
' _:,,
[.~
REPORT
F R O M S T A F F
to: Central Point Planning Commiss}on
from: George Rubalo~ Planning Administrator
subject: Tentative Plan for Unit No. 6 of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision
date: August 11, 1995
Description of Application
Exhibit A, Notice of Public Hearing, describes the proposed tentative plan.
Background Information
Effective May 12, 1995, the land upon which Unit No. 6 is proposed was annexed to the City
of Central Point. In June 1994, the City notified the subdivider and the Division of State
Lands that the site may include a classification of wetlands known as Palustrine Forested
Wetland (seasonally flooded). In August 1994, the Division of State Lands informed the
subdivider that impact to the wetland corridor along the western edge of this property needs to
be avoided as much as possible. Moreover, DSL informed the subdivider that permits and
information would likely be required prior to site plan design in along the western edge of the
property.
The applicant dedicated land for park development throughout the course of subdividing Units
1 through 3 of Jackson Creek Estates. Those park dedications earned the developer an
exemption from required System Development Charges. City records indicate that those
previous land dedications satisfy park system development charges for Units 1 through 5 of
Jackson Creek Estates.
A Master Utility Plan was prepared for Jackson Creek Estates on March 11, 1988 and received
by the city on May 6, 1988. This plan provides for Units 1 through 5 of the development.
The Jackson Creek Neighborhood Development Plan which is currently on file in City Offices
illustrates a different layout of streets, blocks and lots than has been developed throughout the
subdivision and than has been proposed for Unit No. 6. Past reviews of Jackson Creek Estates
have been guided primarily by the Master Utility Plan. To assist the Planning Commission
with deciding upon the Tentative Plan for Unit No. 6, the subdivider has furnished the city
with a conceptual plan for how Unit No. 7 may be configured.
5
Central Point Planning Commission
Page 2
August 11, 1995
The area proposed for Unit No. 6 is designated within the Comprehensive Plan as Low
Density Residential. Zoning designation is Residential Single Family with minimum lot sizes
of 8000 square feet. The 25 lots proposed in Unit No. 6 of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision
meet or exceed the following zoning and subdivision standards:
lot area (interior)
lot area (corner)
lot width (interior)
lot width (comer)
lot depth
8000 square feet
8000
60 feet
70 feet
Average depth = 2.5 times width
Exhibits A and B of the Public Works Department Review include conditions relating to
positive drainage, street design, street lighting, traffic control plan, access control strip, fire
hydrants, sewer system design, storm drainage system along with a variety of public works
construction requirements.
Conclusion
By technical review, staff concludes that the proposed Tentative Plan for Unit No. 6 of
Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision could meet the applicable development requirements
outlined in CPMC Chapters 16 and 17 and the Public Works Standards provided that the
applicant can meet the conditions and requirements listed in Exhibits A and B of the Public
Works Staff Report.
Exhibit A -Notice of Public Hearing dated July 21, 1995
Exhibit B -Mailing List for Notice 100 ft radius (by reference)
Exhibit C -Maps and Plans
Exhibit D -Application (folded plan in commission envelope)
Exhibit E -Public Works Department Staff Report dated August 11, 1995
Exhibit F -Background Materials:
1. Letter from Secretary of State re: Annexation
2. Sanitary Sewer Service Area Agreement
3. Wetland Notification Form
6
Central Point Planning Commission ,i
Page 3
August 11, 1995
4. Jackson Creek Neighborhood Development Plan-
5. Chronology of Process
6. Letter to Tom Malot Construction Company dated July 18, 1995
..
.:. n
155 South Second Street
Central Point, OR 97502
(5031 664.3324
.PLANNING DEPARTMENT
George Rubaloff
Planning Administrator
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date of Notice: July 21,.1995
Hearing Date: Tuesday, August 15, 1994
Time: 7:00 PM (approximate)
Place: Central Point City Council Chambers
155 South Second Street, Central Point,
Oregon
NATURE OF HEARINGS
sandy Lommel
Administrative-
Planning Secretary
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will
conduct a public hearing to review a Tentative P(an Application for Unit No. 6 of
Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision. The proposed division is located in the Single
Family Residential District (R-1-8 Zone) located on the north side Beall Lane, west of
Brandon Street and adjacent to Units i, 2, 3 and 5 of Jackson Creek Estates.: Unit No.
6 is located on a 6.31 acre site further described as a portion of Tax Lot 3000 of Tax
Assessor Map 37 2W IOC. This phase of the development features 25 lots ranging in
size between 8007 and 10632 square feet. The proposed :development features a
westerly extension of Annalee Drive and a southerly extension of Jackson Creek Drive.
The properly owner of record is Clifford B. Gordy, Jr. The wntract purchaser is Tom
Malot Construction Company. The authorized agent in the application process is Dennis
N. Hoffbuhr of Hoffbuhr and Associates, Inc.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for approval of subdivisions and tentative plans are set forth in CPMC
Chapter 16, relating to street, water system, storm drainage and sanitary sewer and
CPMC Chapter 17 having to do with lot dimensions.. The Tentative Plan is also
reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use
decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing
scheduled for August 15, 1995.
2. Written comments should be sent to Central Point City Hall, 155 South
Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502, attention, George Rubaloff.
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be
A:+•
raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any -
testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will :/
need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the
Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for
public review in Room 214, City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central
Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at IS cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact George Rubaloff in
the Planning Department at (503) 664-3324.
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and
technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents
and hear any arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must
be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review hearing, the
Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan for Unit No. 6 of
Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision. City regulations provide that the Central Point City
Council be informed aboutall Planning Commission decisions at the regularly scheduled
Council meeting following the decision date. The Councit may, on its own motion, call
for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party aggrieved by the action
of the Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council
by filing a• written appeal to the city-no more than-seven days-after the date the city
mailsae notice of the: decision. _ _ _ . _ _ _
~E~
~NE ~ #
4 Q
g
Q
NOT TO SCALE
a Vlrxwri Avg
Gwdc
01d~Ln JACK001i CREEK EOTATEO
~
IQ Uhi1T NO. 6
u
K
( JACKSON CREEK EOTATEO
WIT N0. 4
~ ~aotc7
ttte
7
6EALL LANE
r
9
.~`"
r ~ ~ '
_ 1 ~,
~~.
.. i ~-
TAx LoT 3oa~
37 ~w ioc
N
sc~+c£
1"= 600
~~~~~
City of Central Point Zonine Map
1989 (Resolufion No. 1615)
rch 16
M
Adopted by .
a
C.P. City Council on
R=L -RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAbQLY 6,000 sq• i
R-1-6 -
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 8,000 sq. i
R-1-8
R-1-10 -
-RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMII'Y .10,000 sq.
R_2 -RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL MUL`T'IPLE-FAMILY
R-3 -
- NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCE SHOPPING
C-1 CO~RC~_pROFESSIONAL
C--2
C-2(M) -
_ Cp~vIERCTAL-MEDICAL DISTRICT
T
C-3 ~ - DOWN`rOWN BUSINESS DISTRIC
OFFICE-PROFESSIONAL
C-4 _ TOURIST AND .
_ THOROOUGHFARE COMMERCIAL
C-5
M-1 _ INDUSTRIAL
_ GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
n,.2~U -REAR GREEK G12EEN'NAY
.. _~
~ -~ ~'
001 MZ GE roN ~a,ys iu,mipy.
8
0
N
Z
0
W
Z
Q .:
\~
G '
f
~~
1
I
1
'~ ~ 12
~6
I~~ t!~ ~
~
~
oo Y-~
~ I 1'
d
Y~ ~
j
3
N~ ---.
P r
~~ ; -_ ,r~
M y
O~ ~ --~L~i
3w
I
;
~ ~ I~I
i _~_ ;m
I I)
; ___ .~
~_
1 I
S I 1
I
N
__
i
i ; ; I
_L ~ /
I
~~ I
F
~JGg
?~?!! }gee
$ ~ .~ir<~ i ~ _
r " ~~.t~l:.pp: ~
~~~~ 0
~ ~~~
i
TENTATIVE PLAN AP. _ICATION
LAND DIVISIONS
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
OWN ~~
1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name: ToIN ~ALOT GoNSTIZGCCTloN CD.
Address: r"" `'
CITY: ~rh ~/-a ~
Telephone: Business:
on Zip Cods: 97SOZ
. Residence:
2. AGENT
City: - - - i?1ed./ra-e/ Stale: A~ Zip Code: 9750 ¢--
Telephone: Businessi (SO3~ ?74-4641 Residence:
3. OWNER OF RECORD (Allacir Separate Slreel 11 More Tiran One)
Name: ~-rr"r-*°ru ~, wr~w 1 JK•
Address: 2134 S~1}LL. Lie-n~F
Clly: /'~°n~taa.l ~owt~ Slate: D~°"r ZlpCode: 97SO2
Telephone: Business: Residence: -~SO3~ G(o¢-(90S
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (~F?GIGS On/ C2EBk',~ST~T.~S SNv3 p,1 yNlT IVO. ~i,
Type of land Division: - Sulxlivlslon ^ Partition ^ -
Township:37 S Range• ~v'-1 Seclbni (dGTax Lol(s): ~OOO ~por~ien
Township: Range• Secllon:-Tax LOI(s)i
Township: Range• Seclon :.Tax Lol(s):
Townsldp: Ranger-Secllon:-Tax LOI(s):
Zoning DlstrlcL• R'"~ •-8
Total Acreage: ~ ~~ ~ ( pcv~s
5. REQUIR_E~D/SUBMITTALS
U3 This Application Form [>~One copy of 0 1l2.x 17 reduced plan
~ppllcalion Fee ($200.00) Title re,Ppan on subdivision ggueranlee
Written Aullrorlly lrom Properly Owner ll Ageril ~F°rTh eomin~•F~roM A~pL•ieanf"
uhf Application Process Q
Lq' Ten copies of tentative plan
6. I HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND TFIE PLANS AND
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO TFIE BEST OP MY
KNOWLEDGE.
I cenily Thal I am lira: ^ Propeny Owner or ^ Aulirodzed Agent of Ilre Owner
of fire propos~eyd~rproJecl site. v//y//~ ,, ,,L/ G~
Signature ~~ .'.~~~~ ~ ' `~`~' Dale.. ~S//s
If any wetlands exist on the site, It is the applicant's responsibility to apply (or a permit to ~
Division of State Lands before any site work begins. __
y},+ ~~'s'~p`~'r°4~q~~q~ 11~OHP[$A~fNiN~iaDEfsARTMENTUS~bNLVT~~k~~, x"
fi + 1 Ys 9~yPi I i 8a 3 s1 ~a w.~ .,,~ 2 ~ s 3 ~ `
I I ~z~ri.~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~z ,~ I~ ~js~4~ {r I (d~l~tahd ~~t > ~ , •
~.t~ ®y~ ~' ~L + 14~ 111 /~~~Ex
~ fit ~tl(~~ Y (,..~ ~ ~ ~l 191 °I ~~ .a r , hAt~ 9 P Stl~GG,u :~
a ~ ~ x . _ _ 3 _' S 1 O ~!~ ~4 Ai
1PON FORMALLY ACCEPTING YOUR APPLICATION, THE PLANNING-DEPARTMENT Ill MAID A COPY O_F TLIIS FORM TO YOU.J
-- - - -_- - --- ---- `_ --c~oocd be c,Pp Lr=a6/c
-l-o UN. r` No. 7
13 ~~ ay
~~ ~~
M1.
~.
~i
NOTICE' OF AUTFfORIZATSON
LET 'IT BE KNOWN THAT ~ou'1`u~ ~ /Y!i/f2c~.rh i"'~BUh'~~AS'TOC.,~
HAS BEEN RETAINED TO A AS'AGENT TOE PERFORM ALL .ACTS 'IN
CONJUNCTION WITH FILING APPLICATIONS AND/OR OTHER .REQUIRED
DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO ALL ZONING APPLICATIONS FOR' MY
PROPERTY LOCATED AT:
(Address or Road)
AND DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY AS;
TOWNSHIP 37 ,RANGE 2W , SECTION OG ,TAX LOT(S) 3oop
TOWNSHIP. ,RANGE ,SECTION ,TAX LOT(S)
TOWNSHIP.: , RANGE , SECTION ,, TAX LOT(S)
APPLICANTS ~ ~J ,~
SIGNATURE:~« ~ i~C~l~G.u.~ ~. DATE:
PRINTED NAME: Tom /nu~a7 e'en ss~/~uc-~iOh
ADDRESS: AOi BoX 384`1 •
CITY/STATE/ZIP: Cew~v«.l Po.1~3-. (w °I7S02
PHONE: ~03~ ~n /y~' " I Z 58
PROPERTY OWNER:
SIGNATURE: ~~~ Q.f' Y.• DATE: 9,1~,.~ Qy
PRINTED NAME: G ~i ~or'cl S. Go ra,.. + 3'R.
ADDRESS: 2134 Beal\ Lave, •
CITY/STATE/ZIP:. C'P.yl~'Y~0.~. ~Oitn~ ~ Ov 97SOZ,
PHONE:~~03~ ~~4'"' IgOS
AGENT:
SIGNATURE: ~ C. WU-~n-~. DATE: ~, / f~
PRINTED NAME: ~ t,a,y Cl3 C . {'~(.~/•~~~ /~O.ty./j(,c~jr ~f}330C.~ /~VL.
ADDRESS: /D(oZ ~a3/f/ y,/C(F-.(,'son ~~!-~/• -__
CITY/STATE/ZIP: /I/cgfar~ OY 91.SD¢
PHONE:~503~ 774 -¢~¢/
(annxauth.caf)
A
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Donation Land Claim No.
66 in Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian,
Jackson County, Oregon; thenoe.NORTH 30..00 feet to a point on the
Northerly right-of-way line of Beall .Lane (County. Road);, thence
South 89° 53' 11" East along said Northerly right-of-way line,
316.10 feet to the Southeast-corner of tract described in Volume
190, page 39 of the Deed Records of said Jackson County for the
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00° O1` il" West (Record North 0°
02' West)-along the Easterly line of said tract and its Northerly
projection 874.31 feet (Record 874.2 feet); thence South 89° 50'
38" East 40.07 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 10 of JACKSON
CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION, UNIT NO. 1, according to the Official
Plat thereof., now of record in said Jackson County; thence South
89° 50' 38" East along the Southerly .boundary of said Subdivision
and the Southerly boundary of .JACKSON"CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION,
UNIT NO. 2, according t 792 23o feet to the Northwest corner ofcLot
in said Jackson County,
112 of JACKSON CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION, UNIT NO. 3, PHASE II,
according the Official Plat thereof, now_of record in said Jackson
County; thence South 00° oi' 11" East along the Westerly boundary
of said Subdivision and the Westerly boundary of JACKSON CREEK
ESTATES SUBDIVISION, UNIT NO. 5, according to the Official Plat
thereof, now of record in said Jackson County, 873.69 feet to a
point o the aforementioned Northerly right-of-way line of Beall
Lane; thence continue South 00° OS' li" East 30.00 feet to the
centerline of said Beall Lane; thence. North 89° 53' 11" West, along
said centerline, 832.30 feet to a point which beathence North 00°
11" East 30.00 feet from-the Point of Beginning;
01' 11" West 30.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing
17.27 acres, more or less.
~~REGiSTEREU l
~PROFESS(ONAL 1
LAND SURVEYOR
EG-0N
rr te, weo
ODUGIAS C. MdAANAN
No. 1913
Douglas C. McMahan
L.S. 1913 - Oregon
Expires 12/31/94
Hoffbuhr & Associates,
Malot-Gordy Annexation
June ]., 1994
(88-064E)
(mltcrdnx.dcm)
Inc.
15 20
So
m
~ 3 ~ s~ ~ Qo~
m ~ m a > m
r ~a~~ a~5
~~~~~~
~
• ~
~
e ~q f
¢
s
~
a ~
~
pp
L 9
'
~ ~ ~
~~~~,~~
ww~iiwn
~4.®- S~
\
/
.; ~, j Cif. ~~ig~~ Y'~ ~,
O [ Y ~. i / ~` .[ i
i ~ / ~ Q' / /~ t \ i
--- ~ r ; ---~ ~-
-- ° E
I I Y-- i!- ~ w n
~- ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ c8 ~
H ~ J I ~ 1~1 ~ ~u _ ._ - _
IIIRRR-- a ~.----~--"~nl'--wi~nx a ~-.r- wu #
V m ~i i ~ iii i/~ - -- - - _ '
----~--j ' i ~!~~
~!~
'T . i ~ A <~/ ~~
~ ~ ~~~ ~_
t id it
' ` i~~ ' -
-~
El 1 JACKSON C`R6
~'~ i A~~ 1 aR~
~/~ ~ ~/~
V
1
i .
/ ~~
i /
~~/ ~i
;( Fd¢B
"ik~
,~--
~i
~~
3. ~~
1 ~ ~ ~~
s ~g`~~~a
~ 4~i~~
~~~~~~
qg> !.~ i
H
k~~~~
;s~
i
if
.;<~
z~~
c
I
_T_' ; I
% ~
~ / 1 I I
1 I
1
I
_ .--i I I
~ I
q~k~ i I
~. I I I
`'~I
~~ ~~ ~ ,
_ „~
III
.I
~~
~~I
I
I
I
~t
I
11 ml `~~
~I
i ~I
I
~I
I
~~
III
I
~I
I
I ~
i (
~ ~
k
TOM MALOT CONSTRUCTION INC.
P.0. BOX 3847 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502
(503) 664-1258 FAX (503) 664-4673
' August 10, 1995
City of Central Point
Planning Commission
155 Second Street
Central Point, Ore"
97502
Planning Commission:
Ref: Jackson Creek Estatesll7
Enclosed you will-find a Red Lined Plot Plasm of possible
tenative Plat of Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 7 located
in the City o£ Central Point, Oregon.
Respectfully yours,
Tom Malot Construction Co.Inc.
Thomas Eric Malot
encl
d
g o~
~ QQ
~~ pp~
Fj ~' ~ Ju W~ ~W~ S~U`Q LL'~~
r ~ ~ ~aF~ZV~ pup~m
QO ~r,~N S~N~ T~N UU
u ~ ~ ~~ ~- V
~~ m ~ d s_~W G o~~ ~o
m ~t .n bj 0
}pg~ G pp QG11~
~QaUx
i \
r
Q
Q
Z~ ~ ~
~,
~4 2-
~ ~ 61~
Q'~`^~wi
~~Wo
w>,-xo~.
4 Y J ~ u
f- F- ~ ~ =
Ill- W ~ ~ a
~ }' m ~i
z
O
~~
;s~ ~ oF
l€I ,
_ - °~e d gg
;I
n;
¢~2 B
i aS t
6
i !~
~
4 t
; :~
~
ii ~~
ij~ :t~
4 ~ •
l
p
Y
~ C~
l
~
~~
/ ~ / ) p
~ ~ £
i : A .< ,r-
%^ \
\ ~ . Vie. : i ~~
i
" `Y%,; ~',a~l3 \ i 41~~ %~ a~$~ ~~` "~~~ ~ 01~~ „. , lit~i ~";~~ / "s~
~~----~
t k ki 1 1 I N~ ~ ~ n~. +~ ~
n. i
~ ---
4 _
i
~ 1 = =
~~~
--
-
Ti
N k - m
~~ /~ 1 ~ / '
.' /~ I 1
~ `~~ ~ '~~
i
~ ~
~ € ~ I
i
~ 8 _ ;~
,; _
~
~
~ ~y
••
g~
~
~y.
Q ~ 6~
~
N
U ~
~ ~
s i
_ tl ...-•.. 1 ~C
gQ 1 AT1IM
m~
N ry-~
"j~~~'
~/ _
Rx~
e
~~
I n~
,I
I
I
~ ~ i
i
III
i ~ I
~ I I
I ~ (
i I
I
~ I I
~ I
~I ~ f
,~ ~ ,
I
'i ~ I
I! I I
~,_I
,I I
I' , I
i I
I
~;a t I
rI~ I
y1~11 R~{~{
QI
I I SCI F$I
~ ' ~I
~I I
WI
~'JI
I
~', ml
I
II
I
I
~ I
I
III
,~ ~ I
II
' I S
~ I
e.
i ~ i
K
3
~ ~ ~.
~~~~ ~~Y~
~~
~X
r
0
Q
O~ ~
~d ~
zJ ~mro
~~~~~e
~~~F~a
~zJ~o='
e
w
ww ~~a
f- ~
w.
~' .
O
Q'
--,
"-' b u
~ F
J~~~ N I~
~~~~ ~~~~
u~~~ a~~
~ ~ ~
------~.
~;_.
0. ~~
9a
[j~~~~
0
~>! „~e°
~~~ ~
goo
ova ~~
a~ ~~
~~~~~
\
'
.
^ ~
i _~
i
^,
` `
~ ~
~ Y.
v 0
~ r~ ~
~ ~
~
0. E
$
~
~ ~ I
~ ~~ ~
~...~
-' = J
°Z° ~
t
'~'Ula ~ °~~FIL
w ~ d nsxi
~---- : LL o
;~_ ~ ~
a~ L
~~ ~_ 1 ~ !~
~- r. ~~
~~ " ~"~ ~ s ~ ~~
*-~-f
i a
-r--
i
i
~ (
i
I
. I
i
~ I
i
I
~ I
I
I
I
I
' ~ I
I
1
~I~~
~I I
~ I
' ~~1
'~
I
~I I
i~~
I
,,
~~'
I
~ ~I
Q~
W,
ml ,
II
'I
I
~~ i
~ 1
~ I
{ I I
'~ ~ I
;~ I
I
~~
~ e
~ ~ ~ ~
1' `
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
• TENTAT/VE PLAN -STAFF REPORT
DATE.• August 8, 1995
PROJECT.• Jackson Creek Estates, Unit No. 6
ZONE•• R-1-8 fProposedl
NO. OF LOTS: 25
NO. OF
DWELL/NGS: 25
OWNER: C/ifford B. Cordy, Jr.
2134 Bea//Lane
Cents/ Point, Oregon 97502
AGENT.• Dennis N. Hoffbuhr
Hoffbuhr & Associates
1062 E. Jackson Street
Medford, Oregon 97504
(5031 779-4641
APPL/CANT.• Tom Ma/ot Construction
' PO Box 3847
Cents/ Point, OR 97502
(5031 664-1258
SURVEYOR: Doug/as C. McMahan
Same as Agent
LOCAT/ON.• T37S R2W WM Section 10C, TL 3000
TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT.• Residential Subdivision
TYPE OF LAND
USE ACT/ON.• Tentative P/an
APPL/CABLE
CODES: Centro/PointMunicipa/Code (CPMC18.24, 8.28, 10.04, 10.16, 12.02, 12.04,
12.08, 12.12, 12.20, 13.04, 13.20, 14, 15.12, 15.40, 16, 17.20, 17.64.
REV/EWED BY.• Michael Thornton -Thornton Engineering
20
August 8, 1995 -Page Two
/. TENTAT/VE PLAN REQU/REMENTS (16.10, 16.241
Meets Not Construction
Title Description Standard Aoolieable Plan Process
16.10.010 Filing Fee X
18.10.020 Scale X
16.10.030 General Conditions
a. Name of Subdivision X
b. Date North Arrow Scale X
c. Legal looetlon of
Subdivision X
d. Names/Addresses of Owner
Engineer or Surveyor X
16.10.040 Existing Conditions
a. Location of street
widths end easements,
etc. X
b. Topographio Info X
c. Benohmerk eatabllshed X
d. Epperson and direotion
of all water courses X
e. Natural features rock
outcroppings, marshes,
wooded areas. X
f. ExfsNng uses of the land X
g. Location of ell existing
streets and utilities X
h. Zoning on end adjacent to
tract is compatible X
16.10.060 Proposed Plan
e. Street Location, and the
lanes, grades, radius of
curves, relationship to
other existing or proposed
streets, end other utilities X
b. Easements-Widths/Purposes
c. Lot Dimension X
d. Other uses X
e. Lot square footage X
18.10.080 Partial Development
la other property adjacent to
this property being oonsidered
in the designs This property can
be owned by the subdivider.
18.10.070 Explanatory Information
e. Vicinity maps to explain
relationship to existing
streets, can require
correction to existing
streets. X
b. Proposed Deed Restrictions
c. Center Lane profile of streets
to show grade (100' beyon d street)
d. Approximate location and p roposed
size of utilities. X
Does Not Tentative Plen
Meet Standard Revision
X
X et time of Pinal Plet
X
IN(1)
~ 6fHCA
21
August 8, 9995 -Page Three
/. TENTAT/VE PLAN REQU/REMENTS (96.90, 96.241 con't
Meets Not Construction Does Not Tentative Plan
Title Descriotlon Standard Aocliceble Plan Process Meet Standard Revision CarcFGom
18.24.010 Block Length X
Width X
Shape X
Not Greater then 1200' X
18.24.020 Blocks Sizes X
18.24.030 Blocks Easements
a. Utilities X
b. Water Courses X
o. Pedestrian Ways X
16.24.040 LotaShapes & Sizes X
16.24.050 Lots•Size & Determination X
Lot length greater than
2.5 times width prohibited X
18.24.080 Through Lota X -
16.24.070 lot Sidelines X
18.24.080 Large Lot SubdiWsion X
//. STREET /MPROVEMENTS:
Includes: Street Subgrade, Street Base, Street Paving, Street Lighting, Traffic
Control/Delineation Improvements, Curbs/Gutters, Safety Improvements, Ingress/Egress
Improvement, On-Street Parking and Off-Street Parking, Delivery Truck Access, Other
Transportation Requirements, Sidewalk, and Bikeways.
1. Existing Streets Within Tentative Plan Boundary:
2. Existing Streets Adjacent to Tentative Plan Boundary:
a) Annalee Drive, local street, Jurisdiction -City
Descriation Existing Conditions
-Right of Way
-Street Width
-Moving Lanes
-Parking Lanes
-Traffic Volume
-Sidewalks
-Curb & Gutter
-Street Lights
-Bikeways
50' Property to Property
36' curb to curb
2
2
1000 VT/D -Design
yes
yes
yes
part of travel lane
b) Jackson Creek Drive, local street, Jurisdiction -City
Existing Conditions -Same as Annalee Drive
None
Future Requirements
None Scheduled
22
August 8, 9995 -Page Four
3. STREET STANDARDS
Meets
Title Description Standards
18.20.020 Street Generally
e. Location X
b. Width X
c. Grade
d. Relationship to
existing street X
e. Topography es It
relates to drainage.
f. Provide for street
construotlon
g. Follows a Master Plen
h. Traffic Volume X
I. Safety Features
j. Accesses
Comp.Plans Street R.O.W. & Widths
LS ROW 50' X
LS width 36'
SA ROW 80"
SA Width 48'
16.20.030 Street Reserve Strip
18.20.040 Street Alignment X
16.20.050 Street Extension X
PWS Street Intersection
Angles 90° X
18.20.060 Existing Streets
Addltlonal Width X
Not Daes Not Construction
Applicable Meet Standard Plan Prooesa Conditions
X
X
X
18.20.070 Half Street X
18.20.080 Cul-de-Sac end/or
dead-end streets
a. Shell not serve
more then 12 lots X
b. Shell not be greater
then 400' X
c. Turn-around
16.20.090 Street Names X
Publio Works Street Gradeaend Curves
Standards -MA SA CS not greater
then a°k
-Not greeter then 12°k
on LS X
-Cannot be less then 'k °k
Curve Radius
-LS-100' X
•CS-100'
-SA-200'
-MS300'
Stationing
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
(11 Exhibit "A"
(21.Exhiblt "A"
(S) Exhibit "A"
(2) Exhibit "A"
(31 Exhibit "A"
(41 Exhibit "A"
IN (2)
X
X
X
X
X
X
(SlExhibit"B"
eJ
August 8, 1995 -Page Five
///. WATER /MPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service, and Backflow Protection.
1. Existing Conditions .within Tentative Plan Boundary: None
2. Existing Conditions adjacent to the Tentative Plan boundary:
8-inch waterlines exist at the ends of the existing Annalee Drive and
Jackson Creek Drive.
3. Water Standards:
Meets Not Does Not Construction
Title Description Standards Anplicable Meet Standard Plan Process Conditions
15.40
13.20
///.
Title
15.40
Water.System
Provided Mains X (5) Exhibit "A"
Servioe Laterals
1 ee. lot X
Firs Hydrants -
not greeter then - -
300' apart X 151 Exhibit "A"
Fire Flow 1000 gpm
provide minimum
pressure, 40 psi X (3) Exhibit "B"
Becktlow Prevention X
SAN/TARP SEWER /MPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge,
Local SDC, Industrial Wastewater Permit.
1. Existing Conditions within Tentative Plan Boundary: None
2. Existing Conditions adjacent to Tentative Plan Boundary:
8-inch sewer lines exist at the ends of the existing Annalee Dr. & Jackson Creek Dr.
3. Sanitary Sewer Standards .
Meets Not Does Not Construction
Description Standards Applicable Meet Standards Plan Process Conditions
Adequate Sizing
Mainline Services
Regional SDC t
Local SDC ~
Waste Water Permit X
Easements X
(21 Exhibit "B"
X (S) Exhibit "A"
- 2~
(61 Exhibit "A"
August 8. 1995 -Page Six
/V STORM DRA/NAGS /MPROVEMENTSS
Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, TMDL Requirements.
1. Existing Conditions within the Tentative Plan Boundary:
a) Portions of the project lie within the 100-year flood boundary of
Jackson Creek.
b) The project site currently drains northerly towards Jackson
Creek Estates No. 1.
2. Existing Conditions adjacent to the Tentative Plan Boundary:
The existing portions of Annalee Drive and Jackson Creek Drive
drain to curb inlets located on Brandon Street and Daffney Lane respectively.
3. Storm Drainage Conditions:
Meets Not Does Not Conatruotion
Tlile Deaoriotion Standard Aoolioable Meet Standards Plan Prooese Conditions
15.40 Surtece Drainage
and storm sewer system X (1) Exhibit "A"
-Provide drainage through
tha subdivision X (7) Exhibit "A"
-Are there adverse effects
placed on downstream
structuresi X
-No catchbasin looated
greater then 350 ft. for
any curb and gutter section. X
-Disoharge Baeln X
ORS 196.800 -Wetlands Disturbance X
ORS 468.740 -Erosion Control Plan X (1) Ezhlbit "B"
-Roof Drainage ,Area
Drains, Crawl Spaces X l11 Exhibit "A"
ORS 8.28 -Flood Management X l81 Exhibit "A"
25
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
PUBLlC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TENTAT/VE PLAN
/NFORMAT/ON NEEDED
/N 7. The proposed City maintained uti/ity /ines between /ots 212 and 213, and the
offsite storm drain /ines, fa// outside the pub/ic right-of--way. /f approved
by the P/arming Commission, they sha// inc/ude a minimum 15' easement /n favor
of the City. The staff recommends that city maintained uti/ity /ines remain
within the pub/ic right-of--way where at a// possib/e.
/N 2. The City standard for a cu/-de-sac right-of-way radius equa/s 52 feet; the
Tentative P/an sha// inc/ude a 52' radius for Mal/ory Court.
26
EXH/B/T "A"
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT - TENTAT/VE PLAN COND/T/ONS
JACKSON CREEK ESTATES, UN/T NO. 6
1. All structures shall have roof drains,. area drains, and crawl spaces with positive
drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an
approved storm sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage
improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets and lots will drain properly. The
developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings; and perform
such grading and drainage improvements which satisfies this drainage condition,
leaving only minor grading required for each lot during. house construction.
2. The City's Engineer shall, at the cost of the developer, evaluate the strength of the
native soils and determine the street section design in accordance with the Public
Works Department Design Standards. The streets shall use the following design
criteria:
Street Name Average Daily Traffic % Trucks
Jackson Creek Drive 1,500 VT/D 5%
All other Streets 1,000 VT/D 2%
3. The construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan
and a Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City of Central
Point Public Works Department. The construction drawings shall include clear vision
areas designed to meet the City's Public Works Standards. The developer shall pay
for all costs associated with the design and installation of the improvements specified
on these plans.
4. The Final Plat shall include a one foot access control strip at the ends of Annalee Drive
and Jackson Creek Drive.
5. The construction drawings shall indicate type, size and location of water mains and
fire hydrants in accordance with the City's Public Works Standards and the
recommendation of the City's Fire Chief. The construction of the water line shall
provide for a looped system in Unit 7.
6. The developer's engineer shall design the sewer system to serve the development of
this tract and all future development tributary to this system.
7. The developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide
for runoff onto the subdivision property and from each lot. Prior to construction plan
approval for the improvements for this Tentative Plan, the developer's engineer shall
provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system.
The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the Public Works
Department for hydrology calculations.
8. The developer's engineer shall prepare and provide the City's Public Works
Department with a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of Jackson Creek. The analysis
shall determine the 100 year flood elevations in conformance with FEMA's
"Engineering Methods for Estimating Base Flood Elevations in Unnumbered A Zones
(Approximate Study Areas)."Thedevelope2r engineer shall determine and provide the
City's Public Works Department with the limits of the floodway in conformance with
FEMA requirements. The Final Plat shall show the 100-year flood boundary, floodway
and elevations.
9. The previous version of the Tentative Plan for this project viewed by the staff included
the proposed development of the property to the west.(Unit 7). The street layout did
not appear to conform to the City's code. The applicant withdrew Unit 7 from this
application. Therefore, the staff prepared this report with .the assumption that the
development to the west of this project will conform to City code and the layout of
this Tentative Plan..
28
EXH/B/T ,,B„
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT -CONSTRUCT/ON COND/T/ONS
1. ORS •Chapter 468.740 requires that all developments which will disturb 5 ACRES OR
MORE of land adjacent to a stream vvhich discharges to surface waters of the State
of Oregon shall as apart of the construction permitting process submit an "Erosion
.Control Plan."
The "Erosion Control Plan" shall require a PERMIT from DEQ, No construction on any
Tentative Plan storm drainage system can occur until authorization to do so has been
granted by DEO.
2. All sewerage system design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards
and guidelines of the Oregon DEO, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, and City
of Central Point Standards. The developer shall provide the City with evidence of DEO
sewer system design approval prior to issuance of a construction permit. The
Developer's engineer shall provide DEO and the City with test reports and certification
of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance by the City.
3. The developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum flow
of 1000 gpm at each fire hydrant.
4. The developer shall construct all utilities, streets, and other structures discussed
herein, within Rights-of-way owned, or dedicated to the City of Central Point, in
accordance with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable
requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of this development.
5. This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in
accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of
this review. Any modifications by the Developer of this project after City Planning
Commission approval, could require re-submittal of an application, and approval by the
City Planning Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible for this
review.
6. All costs associated with this development and the conditions placed on this
development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner.
7. The Public Works Department and other applicable divisions of the City shall approve
the plans and specifications and issue a Construction Permit prior to any construction
on this project.
8. The Planning Commission will not approve the Final Plat of this Subdivision until the
development satisfies all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this
Subdivision.
29
9. The City Public Work's Department shall approve the proposed street stationing prior
to the developer's engineer designing the improvements for this Tentative Plan.
10. In accordance with City of Central Point Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard
Details for Public Works Construction; at least 10 days prior to the incorporation of
asphaltic concrete (AC) into the construction work, the developer's contractor shall
submit the proposed AC mix design to the Public Works Department for approval. The
AC mix design shall be prepared by an approved laboratory.
11. Prior to final approval of the project, the developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide
the Public Works Department with a digital drawing of the Final Plat property
boundaries in an AutoCAD compatible format.
30
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ~'~
PHIL KEISLING
SECRETARYOF STATE
MICHAEL. GREENFIELD -
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE
May 15,1995
City of Central Point
Attn: George Rubaloff
155 South 2nd Street
Central Point, OR 97502
~~
ARCHIVES DIVISION
ROY il1RNBAUGH
_ DIRECTOR
900 Summer Street NE
Salem, Oregon 97370
.(503) 373-0701
Facsimile (503) 373-0953
Dear Planning Administrator:
Please be advised that we have received and filed, as of May 12,1995,
Resolution Number(s) 722 annexing territory to the City of Central Point.
It appears that the Resolution(s) will be effective May 12, 1995.
Please verify this date through the application of ORS 222.040 and/or 222.180.
Our filing number is AN 1995-0070.
Sincerely, /
~~~o--e
Carol Royle
Official Public Documents
~:
Jackson County Clerk
ODOT/Highway Dept.
Population Research Ctr./PSU
~1
~?
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA AGREEMENT ~.
FOR JACKSQN CREEK ESTATES, UNIT NO.S 6 AND 7
The purpose of this agreement is to reach a compromise regarding the
providing of sewer service to Unit Nos. 6 and 7 of Jackson Creek Estates and to
show g6od faith that both BCVSA and the City are interested in reaching a more
all-encompassing agreement. Such agreement would provide for the partial release
of customers from the existing territory of BCVSA to the City of Central Point for
the benefit of all customers. It is hoped that such an all-encompassing agreement
can be entered into in the near future for the balance of the property within the
Central Point Urban Growth Boundary.
WHEREAS, the City and BCVSA has entered into two different agreements in
1993 that have allowed the City to withdraw territory from BCVSA;
WHEREAS, both BCVSA and the City are interested in providing efficient
service at the least cost to the area;
WHEREAS, such sanitary sewer service is necessary to protect the health of
valley residents;
WHEREAS, the state law allows for the provision of such service by BCVSA
unless specific determinations are made;
WHEREAS, both parties believe that it is more efficient and in the public's
best interest for the City to provide service to a portion of this development.
It is hereby agreed between the City of Central Point, Oregon, and Bear Creek
Valley Sanitary Authority as follows:
1. All of Phase I of the Jackson Creek Estates, Units 6 and 7 will be served by
the City of Central Point. This is a total of 25 lots, numbers 192 through
216.
2. An additional five lots in Phase II, numbers 217 through 221, vvill also be
served by the City for a total of 301ots.
3. The remainder of Phase II, a total of 29 lots, numbers 222 through 250, will
be served by BCVSA. See attached map.
1 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement
32
4.' The City will approve, inspect, and own the contractor built lines in Jackson
Creek Drive, Mallory Court, Madison Court, and the portion of Annalee Drive
east of Jackson Creek Drive.
5. BCVSA will approve, inspect, and own the contractor built lines in Lynn Lane
and the portion of Annalee Drive west of Jackson Creek Drive. In addition,
BCVSA will pay to the City S.77 per month per house for each of BCVSA's
29 lots for joint use of City lines. (The formula for. inflation increases, pay-
ment schedules, etc: can be found in the November 7, 1988 agreement.)
6. Each agency will levy and collect its own fees and charges. In addition,
BCVSA agrees to collect and transfer to the. City, the city sewer fund's share
of the water reservoir obligation per house, as provided by the City of Central
Point, until that obligation has been paid in full. That amount is S n z~ per /~-~ r
home that is connected to the sewerservice. \~
7. Both parties agree to execute appropriate documents in regards to
ORS 450.987, as was done for properties on Chicory Lane 372W10DA Tax
Lot 100 and Freeman Road 372W11A Tax Lot 300.
8. Without unnecessary expense, BCVSA is .unable to provide service to a
portion of the area.
9. In consenting to such withdrawal and pursuant to ORS 450.987, BCVSA and
the City. of Central Point stipulate to the following:
a) Withdrawal of these 30 lots will have no substantial adverse impact on
the ability of BCVSA to provide service to its remaining territories;
b) The withdrawal is not solely for the tax advantage of the affected
property owner(s);
c) The withdrawal will not result in non-contiguous parcels being served by
BCVSA;
d) BCVSA cannot provide adequate. service to the subject territory within a
reasonable time; and
e1 It is in the best interest of the public .that this agreement be approved.
2 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement
33
~~
AGREED to as of '~~~, 1995.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT BEAR CREEK VALLEY
SANITARY AUTHORITY
' Mayor Rustyu M ~ th
ATTESTED:
ADMN34-5
~GU~LCc, `~f- ~.e-G~c.~r~
Chairman Walter W. Wassum
COUNTERSIGNED:
Charles L. Root, Manager
3 -Jackson Creek Estates Sewer Service Agreement
3~
^'e:
r
i
_-: I ' i~
J,1C./i ~p:ti C'P.FEk' EST.ATF, 1::\`/TJ .4'O.C ~.• :\`O. i ,
' LOCATL'D /:ti 3i2Yi'10C T.L. 3000 JACIfSO:\' COL`,\'T)'. OP,.
' i
~
.
-- ';
--~ _
,'I
..-_ -_
is cue
~~ ..
1
-~
~..
• ~ .. 1
i _
. 1
.. _ r
. ` -
. ~
';
l ,
//~\
'^J
I
~.
.`
~._ i
`^. _ _.
E ~:.7Y.i~ 'W
?.,C
DP.I ['E ,
.-. ~ .cam ..- ~ '
_.._ •\
I _..
- ~ -
_ . _.....
~~
:~- HETLANO LAND USE NOTIFICATION FOB l00
"- -VISION OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS `GRAM ~ A~ ~ ~
~' - 7t~ Summer Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310 ~~
m ? 503/378-3805 -~c.,,~
..
~~ u.
1. County: `" T:.~`-~~~
CityC ('a ntral P i r
2. APPLICANT: Tom Malot
name
P.O. Box 3897
street
Central Point. OR 97502
city state zip
(503) 664-1258
phone
Local Case File No.:
DSL File No.: '
LANDOWNER: Clifford B. Cordv. Jr.
name
2134 Beall Lane
street
Central Point. OR 97502
city state zip
(503)__ 664-1905
phone
3. LOCATION:
T 37 R 2W S lOC 1/4 Tax Lot(s) 3000
i(WI yua,i map ~ia~r d'kLSt .u,.tac,~ copy w~~h site .n ,.,.,,,,.2d.
Attached: X NWI map _. Parcel map _ Site plan X Other
4. SITE INFORMATION: '
NWI Wetland Classification COdeCs) PEY1C (Palustrial Forested Wetland Seasonally
Soil Series Name (optional) Flooded)
Adjacent Waterway <if any) Jackson creek In Floodplain? Y R N _
Current Land Use Residential & Field Croo Zoning Single Family Residential
(Planned)
5. PROPOSED ACTIVITY:
- site plan approval _ subdivision
_ grading .permit _ planned unit development
_ conditional use permit public-works (<„aeifvl
. _ building permit - X other Proposed Annexation
_ Zone Change to:
Project Description: Future Subdivision
Completed by/Contact: G. Rubaloff -Planning Date June 20, 1994
Address. Administrator Phone (503) 664-3324
(Thla form la to be completed only by plmniag department staff for mapped uetlandaJ
DSL RESPONSE
^ A removal-fill permit is required from the Division of State Lands.
^ A removal-fill permit will be required when the development project proceeds.
`EGA removal-fill permit may be required.
Information needed includes:
A wetland determination/del(i~neation.0rep~t.''~ •6~-~~~~`SI~r~
^ ~ ~-12(YYVl~2- ~JC~-{-C{~~~T I`IAS=(sd~~ V~/G-~a ,
^ State permit ^ was issued ^ has been applied for.
^ No removal-fill permit is required for the described project if/because: *
^ A permit may be required by the Corps ~
Engineers <
:-f o
Comments: s
a~fuf~tedcv~.st"Q,lrlho~-1x,creak~~AK.P~7`,P
Response completed by:
* If the project is changed to involve fill
state removal-fill permit will be required.
~-c''G`"v Date '~• ('`~~
or removal from the wetlands area, a
~~
e
f"^
d O
V CC p~.,
~~o
~~_>
wA
z
K~
\/
-;,.,
. ,
~' 4
a ~ ~ ~ -_.
~ }` I ~ ~ 1'LJ L ~_L
~'I~N
j _.~..i~_~ :.~ .r.t L '_
rT f.Y~ L
37
f•
CHRONOLOGY
Jackson Creek Estates Tentative Plan Application
V
June 1994 Accepted Annexation request
No work was accomplished on any annexation proposals because council was not making
annexation decisions until issues relating to sanitary service had been resolved
March 7, 1995 PC recommended approval of annexation
March 20, 1995 Applicant filed Application for T.P. for Units 6 and 7
March 20, 1995 City told Applicant orally and in letter that city
could not accept application until annexation perfected
May 1995 City and BCVSA execute Sanitary Service Area Agreement
for Units 6 and 7 of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision
May 4, 1995 Council approved Annexation
May 12, 1995 Annexation Perfected by Appropriate Filing with
Secretary of State
May 24, 1995 City served applicant/agent written notice that twelve (12)
individual items of information were missing from
Tentative Plan Application, and,
City informed applicant /agent that the two proposed cul
de sacs in Unit No. 7 did not conform with city subdivision
standards
June 5, 1995 Applicant/agent refiled an application for Tentative Plan
for (only) Unit No. 6 of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision
June 6, 1995 City Accepted application as complete (applicant/agent
promised swift delivery of required title report)
June 6, 1995 -Present Staff working and processing this application
August 15, 1995 Public Hearing is set for this date -Anticipated date for
Planning Commission decision
38
August 17, 1995
Unlrnown
Anticipated date Council will accept the Planning
Commission decision regarding proposed tentative plan
Issuance of Public Works Permit for construction
of subdivision improvements
39
;:
155 South Second Street
Central Point, OR 97502
(5031 664-3324
George Rubaloff
Planning Administrator
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
Tom Malot
Tom Malot Construction Company
P.O. Box 3847
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Re: Unit No. 6 of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision
Dear Mr. Malot:
sandy l.ommel
Administrative-
Planning Secretary
July 18,1995
The Planning Department is anticipating Tuesday, August 15, 1995 as the date upon
which the Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review your Tentative
Plan Application for Unit No. 6 of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision.
As you have experienced previously on your subdivision projects, once tentative plan
approval has been granted, an applicant then has twelve (12) months in which to
construct the subdivision improvements or bond for those improvements and submit a
final plat to the city.
The review and determination of a Tentative Plan Application is one step in the overall
review process. Subdividers are required to submit detailed engineering and
construction plans for their projects. Those plans are also reviewed and then discussed
in apre-construction conference with the developer, engineers and Public Works Staff.
Upon satisfactory review by the City, the subdivider is issued a Public Works Permit
to construct the public improvements.
As a courtesy to you, the city received your construction plans on May 22, 1995.
Acceptance of those construction plans does not constitute approval of those plans.
In the normal sequencing of review steps, engineering and construction plans for
subdivisions are reviewed after the Tentative Plan has been approved. This is because
tentative plans can change during the process, and, conditions may be attached to the
Tentative Plan that would not be known until Tentative Plan Approval has been granted.
Speaking of changes, the construction plans which you submitted would, at this point
in time, need to be revised in Unit No. 7 so that they conform to the regulations
pertaining to cul-de-sac length. Such a reconfiguration of streets and lots may even
cause you to reconfigure Unit No. 6.
40
_~ f
The purpose of this letter is to clarify that the Tentative. Plan Application and Public
Works Construction Permit are two separate processes. However, before you can begin ~,
construction on a subdivision, you are required to have both the Tentative Plan
Approval from the Planning Commission and the Public Works Construction Permit
from the Department of Public Works.
If you have questions about this matter, please contact me at city offices.
Sincerely,
rge ubalo
Planning Administrator
cc: Susan Wilson Broadus, Public Works Duector
r
~~
~.
r e p o r t
FRO M S T A F F
to: Central Point Planning Commission
from: George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator
subject: Site Plan for Addition to Valley Family Practice Medical Facility
date: August 11, 1995
Description of Application
The application and decision criteria is described within Exhibit A of this report: Notice of
Public Hearing.
Land Use History
The Comprehensive Plan shows an eventual westerly extension of Hopkins. Road to provide
another link to Highway 99. The Hopkins Road extension would run west along the north end of
the medical park. A primary issue during the 1983 review of the site plan for the existing medical
building was the location of the property line in relationship to the proposed Hopkins Road
extension. Moreover, there was discussion at that time as to how much land would need to be
dedicated for a particular street design of the Hopkins Road extension. The applicant, at that time
Dr. Alan Bates, was agreeable to dedicating land for future street but wanted some assurance that
the placement of that street would not consume open space surrounding the building.
On June 7,1983, the Central Point Planning Commission approved the site plan application for the
4586 squaze foot Medical Office Building which currently exists on the property site. The record
shows that Planning Commission decision did not include any resolution of the street design and
exact location of any future extension of Hopkins Road. The record also indicates that on June
16,1983, the City Council reviewed the Planning Commission Report of June 7;1983 and agreed
that no parking be allowed on any future extensions of Hopkins Road should the road be designed
to a 30-foot width.
nin
The City of Central Point has provided for hospital, health and medical facilities within its
Comprehensive Plan by encouraging the development of a medical office park or campus in
the vicinity of South Second Street. In keeping with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
this area has been designated as the Commercial-Medical District (C-2 M Zone). The C-2(M)
Zoning District is intended to assure that adequate medical care will be available to the
residents of Central Point and enhance the City's amactiveness as a location for medical
practices and other health facilities. The proposed addition is a permitted use within the C-2
(M) Zone.
42
Central Point Planning Commission
Page 2
August 11, 1995
Through the Planning Department review, it was determined that the proposed site plan
conformed with all applicable zoning standards in Title 17 of the Central Point Municipal
Code. CPMC 17.72.040 (G) provides broad authority to the Planning Commission to include
other development requirements to ensure land use compatibility, health, safety and welfare.
The Public Safety Department reviewed the application from a Fire Protection perspective.
The report outlines specific requirements including parking restrictions along the north
driveway to ensure accessibility of fire and emergency response vehicles.
The Public Works Department review the proposal in accordance with required public
facilities. A list of conditions is incorporated within the report. General Conditions include
requirements for obtaining construction permits, sizing water service, backflow device and
positive drainage,
Subject to meeting requirements outlined in the staff reports and any other conditions placed
by the Planning Commission, the proposed site plan would conforms to city standards.
xhi '
Exhibit A - Notice of Public Hearing
Exhibit B - Mailing List for Notice 100 ft radius (by reference)
Exhibit C - Maps
Exhibit D - Application
Exhibit E - Public Works Department Review dated August 8, 1995
Exhibit F - Public Safety Department Review dated July 5, 1995
~~
155 south second street
Central Point, OR 97502
(503) 664-3324
PLANN~NC DEPARTMENT
George Rubaloff
Planning Administrator
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date of Notice: July 21, 1995
Hearing Date: Tuesday, August 15, 1995
Time: 7:00 PM (approximate)
Place: Central Point City Council Chambers
155 South Second Street, Central Point,
Oregon
Sandy Lommel
Administrative-
Planning secretary
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will
conduct a public hearing to review' a Site Plan Application for construction of an
addition and remodel to the existing Valley Family Medical Practice located within the
City's C-2 (M) Zone (Commercial-Medical District).
The proposed addition is planned fora .76 acre site, located at 615 Second Street,
directly east of Rogue Valley Serenity Lane Treatment Center, in the general vicinity
of where Fourth Street turns east into Hopkins Road. The site is also know as Tax Lots
5301 and 5302 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 37 2W i1BC.
The proposed project features an 18001 square foot, single-story building addition .
On-site improvements provide for paved parking spaces and aisles including accessible
parking for disabled persons, landscaped grounds and pedestrian walkways.
The applicant and owner of record the Rogue .Valley Medical Center. The Agent of
record is Architect Douglas S. Snider.
The requirements for approval of Site Plan Applications are set forth in Chapter 17 of
the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to Commercial Medical District, General
Zoning Regulations, Off-street Parking and Loading, Site Plan, Landscaping and
Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's
Public Works Standards and regulations in the Central Point Municipal Code which
relate to public improvements.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the proposed land use may
~~
submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for
Tuesday, August 15, 1995.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the hearing to the Central
Point Planning Department, Room 214, 155 South Second Street, Central
Point, Oregon 97502; attention, George Rubaloff.
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal of the decision shall be
raised prior to the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday; August
15, 1995 or prior to a specific. date to which the hearing may be
continued.:
4. Testimony and written comments about the proposed land use should be
stated clearly to the Planning Commission. Any testimony and written
comments about the land use proposal must be related to the criteria set
forth above.
5. Copies of alt evidence relied upon by the applicant are .available for.
. public: review at the Central Point Planning. Department, Room 214,
155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are
available at 15 cents per page.
6. For additional information, the public may contact:.George.Rubatoff in
-the Planning Department at(503).664-3324:......_ -
At the public .hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and
technical .staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents
and hear arguments on the. application. At the conclusion of the review hearing, the
Planning Commission may approve or deny the Site Plan for the proposed Addition to
Valley Family Practice Medical Facility.
City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all
Planning Commission decisions. The Council may, on its own motion, no later than
the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date, call for a review
of the Planning Commission decision. Any pally aggrieved .by the action of the
Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing.
a written. appeal to the city no more. than seven days after the date the city mails the
notice of the. decision.
ATTENTION MORTGAGEE LIENHOLDER VENDOR OR SELLER
If you receive this notice, please promptly forward it to the purchaser of the property.
located in the vicinity of this land use proposal.
45
~~
-~`
M-1
~y ~ v~~ J~ .~,~` vim, ,' i T~ \i \\~\\
~~ a _ _
"s ~
'~ \
A
,e~~
,, ~.
~. ~-,
~~ ~ ~
1 ' ~ ..
.,
,. ~ ;
r .
.. ~ ~ ,. .. .... 1
~, ~-
•~ -- i ~- ---, ~ r^~
-- - ('/j -
i \" N`'`~
1 j y 1_' f _ ~ J Y _ \ ~` !
Z ~~ ~l
n
~ 1 ~ -- ~ r-~r --, ter' _ ~_ ~o ~C~No ~~`~.~. ~,^\~`~~~1~..
~ -'~~
1
. ~, ~ ...
v 1 ~e '' ".
T
S ~••' G ~
.;
ry
/ 19,.,`' 200 '~`; ~~
Izoo ?7 s
~, ~ ~ •,, • 3 0 G
1300° • o
s.w. coR
~~ ~ y. Y.3Q4 P.I58 "''~ p
5 •' ~ 1400 °° ~ G~~~1(;J 4 p
4500 ° .~. 8 I "+, 400'
51600'° (P~434 2 e 1100`' .-,, ;+~ 1190 (~~Q o
10 ~°, ~q~ 3 1000 S. .: s
.° N. LINE 500 <
NO ' , V.421 P,346 5 .
4 ~"
V ` 4`t ~O w
5 900 ~
y '''~5 LK28 x ,,, 60.0 ~~ ~
(P -1264) (p'I~ ', ~
1SH SUB.
800 .,,.- ; ~
,u' 700
5~ ~ e~
~ SOUTH CORPORATE
,~1 •SOUNDA Y OP C.P. S.E. COR. OF
~,~~, ORI81N L TOWM
CENTR~i~ POIMi
.1
5 2 00 3!07 ~~~ '~ ,.~'
53~
~:.
-2 3 ~y
I} ,..
1 µ~~
( P-12931
':=~~:
- I ~ 1 ~
6 15~,^
~~
HOMESTEAD PARK UNIT N0.2
39 a ~`~Y ~ ~c a° -` ~~.~
:.. ~ `~ q
,G ! ~ \
\l` l~~ F`PJ?'
i
1
I
i
1
i
~,~
.~
~~
r.
In
1
GRAND AVE.
i
1
S~ \
~O
~S~
~~~
~~
0
x
H
[•]
H
Medical
Office
Approx. Right-of-way
to be acquired.
Co unity
ospital
SBREr~~~
'f R$~"rf CNr
FpciV~ y
M@v~ckL-
~UIL-D/NG-
-Site--
Prap~saD
Add it%on
HOPKINS ROAD
EXTENSION
Approximate alignment of
50 ft. right-of-way .
~} H
Large
House
HaPKTNS
RoAn
~I I'= PLAN REVIEW APPL' CATION
~rIY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEH7•RTMENT
~~~I;I~~I~
1. APPLICANT INFORMATION "
Name: JU~J )21995'
Address: ~ 2 25 ernet oad '
CITY OF CENTR POINT
: CHy: - INnAford
Stater Oregon TIEE /D;4
'
Telephone: Business:- 770-41x1 pCOGB^
Residence:
?• AQENTINFORMATION
Name: Dou las S. Sntder
Address: 45 Hawthorne
CHy; Medford. tate:_ Oregon
Telephone: Business: 772-5203 ~"
-ZlpCode: 97504
Residence: 779-8630
8. OWNER OF RECORD (Attach Separate Sheet If Mare Than One)
Name: Ro ue Valle Medical Center
Address: 2825 Barnett Road
- City: - Medford State: -- Ore on
----- =-
_ 21p Code: 97504
Telephone: Suslneas: 770-4151.
Residence:
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Typeof Development: - addition to Bxtstinn Medical offi
ce
Township; a7 Range`2.N[_Sectbn:LiscTaxLot(s): X391
5302
.
Address: o d tree[
2oning Dlslrbl:- C-2M
Protect Acreage: .79 Acres
Number of Dwelling Units: None.
Gross Floor Area: x.333 sa ft
Numberoi Palt<Ing Spaces: a2_ -!ingsd_es 26 existinet
5. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
® This Appibatlon Fonn
® She Plan Drawn to Scale (10 copies) ®~ga Dtescdptlon (EZOO )
® Landscape and IMgatlon Plan (3 copies) ® Written Authority from Property Owner H Agent
® Reduced Copies (81/2" x 11") of the SHe In Application Process
Plan, Building Elevations and Landscape Plans
(1 Copy Each)
6. I HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS AND
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDQE.
I ceriHy that I am the: Propedy ner or ®Authodzed Agent of the Owner
of the proposed pr sit
Signature Date_SeLL/ 7~
If eny wetlands exist on the site, It is the applicant's responsibility to apply for a permit to ~
Division of State Lends before any s)te work begins.
49
.._..._
.F~~' ...
-------------- . ~
a~~a
~ ~~
~.,a.~t - a
May 24, 1995
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is to'authorize Douglas Snider, AIA, 45 Hawthorme,
Medford, Oregon- act as Rogue Valley Medical Centers agent for
the purpose of filing for Site Plan Review and approval. This
authorization is for the Valley Family Practice, 615 S. Second ST.,
Central Point, Oregon, addition and remodel.
~~
Craig Hartl
Mgr. Facilities/Construction
Rogue Valley Medical Center
ROGUE VALLEY
MEDICAL 50
CENTER
2825 6nrnen Rwu/. AleAjmx/. Organ )7504-9389 503"3-4900
L-50865 -
. EXFiSBZT A
Commencing at the intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of the
relocated Pacific Highway, as described in Volume 197, Page 18, of the
Deed Records o£ Jackson County, Oregon, with the south boundary line of
the City of Central Point, Oregon; thence North 89°57'i0" East, along
said south corporate boundary, a distance of 867.82 feet to a 3/4" iron
pipe at the intersection of the west line of tract described in Volume
421, Page 346, said Deed Records; thence South 0°37'30" West along said
west line, 12.00 Peet to a 3/4" iron pipe; .thence North 89°57'10" East,
along the south line of said tract described in Volume 421, Page 346,
said Dead Records, a distance of 94.08 feet to'a 3/4^ iron pipe; thence
continue North 89°57'10" East, along said south line 59.00 feet; thence
' continue North 89°57'10" East 124.98 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe from which
the 3/4" iron pipe monument at the southeast corner of the original Town
of Central Point, Oregon, bears North 0'02'50" West 12.00 feet; thence
89u57'~002East 41S021feet toga 3/4" iron pipetpthence South Or02'S0" East
17.00 feet to the east-southeast corner of tract described in Document
~ true8point6of beginningfithence~contisue Southo0°OZ 50 ~East~173.00rfeet
to the northeast corner of tract'desoribed in Document No. 84-00260, said
Official Records; thence continua South 0.02'50" East 27.00 feet to the
southeast corner thereof; thence South 89'S7'10^ West, along the south
line of said tract, 166.00 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner
thereof, being South 0.02'50" Sast of the southwest corner of tract
described j.n Document No. 82-15739, said Official Records of Jackson
County, Oregon; thence North 0°02'50" West, to and along the west line of
said tract, 200 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of tract
described in Document No. 84-00261, said Official Records; thence North
89.57'10" East, along the south Line of said tract, 166.00 feet, more or
lass, to the true point of beginning.
(Code 6~2, Account #i-070545-7, Map #372W11BC, Tax Lot #5301)
(Code 6-2, Account #1-091407-7, Map #372W11HC, Tax Lot #5302)
5 ~_
,.
:I O
gnO
t
~ L
4.. f~ ~j
1
J
a ~ ~ ~f3 t" ~ R F ~ ®A®:®oace~as s~a~ ~ QD~~1P0®nM ~ RC~f~I®~l~d ~®G~
o s S
d c ~
~ ~ ~ ~
tl iao® i su" ~w °uorv~ ~Qd~,~r ~f ~Q l~A ~d~ ~ r~~° ~~ll ~~I
'~
OIYfI ^FACIlilEO WMNMOEiY®fi o
MEMBER NAERIGW WSIINIE OF ARQMlEC15 610 btl ~iRQT C®ffPAL FOIIAf~ ORlOON
52 ._._.L.-.
t=====__
Al
,oao suaF aaawo
ec a mama euntu
B1 V
C1
nWEST ELEVAAON
iii ~ONJC~dG^Q~ ~bODC~G~, Qoa e, DD0~1'~ 001 o G°3C f~tlOO DD C~(~ GOO G°~
..... . ~~~~~~~~ MQL~~C ~I G QG~nI~L~I pG~QC~~'~C~C~
^~~® ^ ~fya~a~s® n n ° ° n
^~^ ^ FdC0~.0411~8 R62.~OddO~4~Tk4
MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS ~ ~ ~9~ end ~V~~4 CC~R741~Q6 ~®Ob4', ®RCs®~G'+I
z eo z :,,~
,l
.ot /,.t
u
~~>n.~
end :~ „~,,,~
u eor
Gs/ot/so ,,,„
~ w~
A
~
r
r ~
~ -1
'~7
D
~_
r
n
1
n
rn
N
2
m
m
r N
n
D ~
!: Z .o
N z
C1
D
'I ~
rn
', ")
~e ~ae
~ti~
~
~~inmxrF+~
~ me~x~nm
i
u
wk
mwvn
~r ^~r ww
M1T~Ne[
=Ira
~ wsa.
a~v.
TREE PLAHfNO
TREE/SHRUB LEGEND
600 TREE ACER RURRUTA "RED SUNSET" IS GALLON
ORNAIAENTAL PEAR
PYRUS "betulilolia" IS GALLON
TREE
~`02
~•/ SHRUB ESCAIIONIA "compokla" 1 GALLON
' SHRUB COTONEASTER "Cammer~ • 1 GALLON
~'
GROUND COVER JUNIPER "willonii' 1 GALLON
5~
502
PLACED ON 2' CENTER
z dot ;~„~
,o~ /„~
,~m~~
ana ~~,„„
v.a
ss os 5~ro
- o
r
r m
mG '~
D
r
U
A
D
n
n
m
N
.~ 2
A mm
~ ~
-Di l~~1
O N
Z A
0
~ ~
O
~ Z
Z '
O
D
N
N
N
O
N
Z
O
Y f%ATNG Pfa1G1MN UNE
J 5'" '.Y~
i. •+:
~j
•~~ ~~~.:'••'~~~ I IRRIGATION SLEEVING
.pk ~
~_ •.'E~••f'
1
,
q
55
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
S/TE PLAN REV/EW
~~Q~~ G~C~pOo ~~
Date: August 8, 1995
Project: Site Plan .Review
Project # PW 95018
Zone:
# of Lots: 3 lots as noted below
No. of
Structures Addition onto Existing Office Building
Applicant: Rogue Valley Medical Center
2825 Barnett Road
,. , Medford OR 97504
Phone: 773-4900
Agent: Craig Hartl, Manager
Facilities/Construction
Plans Prepa red
By
Architect Douglas Snider
45 Hawthorne
Medford, OR 97504
Location: T37S, R2W, WM Section 11BC, TL 5301, 5302, 5303
Type of Land
Use Action: Site Plan Review
Reviewed
By: Dan L. Latusick
Public Works Department
., 56
RVMC Addition
Site Plan Review
July 18, 1995 -Page Two
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
Includes: Street sub-grade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic
control/delineating improvements, curbs/gutters, safety improvements,
ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, .delivery truck access,
traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bikeways.
A. Existing Conditions
1. Street Name - S. 2nd St.
Descri tp ion
-Right of Way
-Street Width
-Moving Lanes
-Parking Lanes
-Traffic Volume
-Sidewalks
-Curb and Gutter
-Street Lights
-Bikeways
Jurisdiction-City of Central Point
F_xisting Conditions
60'
40'
2
2
?? VT/D
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
2. Street Name -Hopkins Road
Description
-Right of Way
-Street Width
-Moving Lanes
-Parking Lanes
-Traffic Volume
-Sidewalks
-Curb and Gutter
-Street Lights
-Bikeways
xi ting Conditions
60'
22'
2
2
2959 VT/D(6/92)
No
No
Yes
No
FutureReouirements
60'
40'
2
2
< 2500
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Jurisdiction- Jackson County
FutureReouirements
60'
44'
2
2
> 3000
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
3. Street Name - S. 4th Street Jurisdiction -City of Central Point
-Right of Way 60' 60'
-Street Width 44' 44' -
-Moving Lanes 2 2
-Parking Lanes 2 2
5'7 ,1
o\
RVMC -Addition
July 18, 1995 -Page Three
-Traffic Volume 2959 VT/D(6/92) >3000
-Sidewalks Yes Yes
-Curb and Gutter Yes Yes
-Street Lights Yes Yes
-Bikeways No Yes
B. App/icant's Required Conditions -See Exhibit "A" Conditions.
1. CPMC 12.02, 17.72 -Street Improvements:
a. Standard 12.02.010 Reouired: The City finds and
determines that the construction of buildings or other
development of property within the .City directly results in the
increased use of the City's streets and street-related
infrastructure, such as sidewalks and storm drainage. The City
further finds that in order to mitigate the negative impacts of new
development on the City's streets and street-related
infrastructure, it is necessary and just that those persons engaged
in new development within the City be required to improve streets
and street-related infrastructure adjacent to the property being
developed, if the same is below the City's current standards for
such improvements at the time of the development.. See (8)
Exhibit "A" Conditions
b. Any person constructing a building or otherwise developing
property within the City which is adjacent to a public street,
highway or alley shall, as a condition of issuance of a certificate
of occupancy for said construction or development, cause
improvement of the street, highway or alley in accordance with
the same standards and requirements as are in effect for the
creation and improvemenf of streets within subdivisions,
including, but not limited to, the design standards set forth in
Chapter 16.20 of this code. The City Building Official is
authorized to withhold issuance of a certificate of occupancy until
such improvements are completed. See (8) Exhibit "A"
Conditions.
2. CPMC 12.02, 17.72 -Street Lighting Improvements: Not Required
58
RVMC Addition
July 18, 1995 -Page Four
3. CPMC 12.02, 15.40, 17.72 -Traffic Control and Delineation
Improvements: None required.
4. CPMC 12.02, 15.40, 17.72 -Curb /Gutter Improvements: See
(8) Exhibit "A" Conditions.
5. CPMC 12.02 and 17.72 -Safety Improvements. (See report from
Central Point Department of Public Safety.) Standards -CPMC
17.72.040 G. Other development conditions can be implemented
to ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point
residents. Various timing factors-may apply.
6. CPMC 17.64 -Parking:. See Planning Department Report.
7. CPMC 12.04 and 15.40.- Sidewalk Improvements:
Standards -CPMC 12.04 -See (8) Exhibit "A" Conditions.
Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Back-flow Protection.
A. Existing Conditions
1. One existing 8" diameter water line lies to the west of the
existing building.
2. One existing 12" diameter water .line lies to the north of the
existing building.
B. Discussion
1. Mainlines: The existing 8" water line to the west of the building
shall provide fire protection and domestic use for this project.
V
5~
RVMC-Addition
July 18, 1995 -Page Five
2. Property Service: A water meter exists for the existing building.
See (9) Exhibit "A" Conditions.
3. Fire Service: See Central Point Department of Public Safety
Report.
4. Back-flow: Standards -OAR Chapter 333. See 191 Exhibit "A"
Conditions.
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge,
Local SDC.
A. Existing Conditions
1. An 12" sewer line is located off S. 1st Street.
2. A 10" sewer line is located off S. 4th Street.
B. Discussion
1. A Sanitary Sewer service already exists. An increase of number
of fixtures will result in SDC charges.
2. Main Line: Mainline construction is not required for this project.
See 15) Exhibit "A" Conditions.
IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements,
mainlines, services, catch basins, and erosion protection.
A. Existing Conditions - A 15" storm drain lies in the east side of S. 1st
Street with a 12" storm drain running to the existing building
60
RVMC -Addition
July 18,1995 -Page Six
B. Discussion:
1. Pretreatment Requirements: None required for this project.
2. Mainlines: Provide storm drainage improvements in conformance
with the City's design criteria and standards. None Required for
this project.
3. Property Service: According to CPMC 15.12, the plumbing plan
for this project must include connection for all roof drains, crawl
spaces and areas drains to an approved storm drainage system.
See (6) and (71 Exhibit "A" Conditions.
4. Flood Management, CPMC 8.24: This property is not located in
the flood way of the 100-year flood plain.
e ~.
~,
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS
RVMC Addition -Site Plan
APPLICANT SHALL COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TIMING
FACTORS AS NOTED.
TF - 1 To be submitted as a part of construction plans and specifications for
YevieW by the City prior to issuing permits.
TF - 2 To be completed prior to issuance of any Construction or Building
Permits.
TF - 3 To be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
TF - 4 To be completed prior to Approval of the Final Plat.
TF - 5 To be a continuous condition, to be set at the time of future land use
action decisions.
1. Applicant shall construct all utilities, streets, and other structures discussed
herein, within rights-of-way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central
Point, in accordance with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions,
standards and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for the
construction of this development.
2. This review for the SITE PLAN submitted by Applicant was done so in
accordance with all the rules, regulations, ordinances and standards in effect
as of the date of this review. Any modificatiohs by Applicant of this project
after City Planning Commission approval, could require re-submittal of an
application, and approval by the City Planning Commission based on the
recommendation of staff responsible for this review.
3. Applicant shall pay all costs associated with this development and the
conditions placed on this development.
4. No construction will begin on this project until the Public Works Department
and other pertinent departments or divisions of the City have reviewed the
project plans and specifications and have issued a construction permit.
5.
TF-1 Applicant shall provide a complete set of construction drawings for all new
construction of the sanitary sewer system for review and approval by the City
prior to issuance of a building permit. The property service line shall be located
and sized in accordance with the Oregon State Plumbing Code.
~~
RVMC-Addition
Exhibit "A" -Page Two +r'
6.
TF-7 Applicant shall provide the City with a complete set of construction drawings
for the storm drainage system to serve this property, including connection to
the City system. All roof drains, area drains, crawl spaces, and parking lot
drains shall have positive drainage away from the structures.
7.
TF-1 Applicant shall provide the City with a grading and drainage plan for the entire
project. Runoff and pipe sizing calculations prepared by Applicant's engineer
shall accompany. this submittal. The engineer shall use the intensity-duration
curve obtained from the Public Works Department for determining the runoff
for this project. The grading and drainage plan shall indicate topography and
show elevations sufficient to evaluate the plan.
8.
TF 3 Remove existing curb cut and driveway located on S 4th Street and replace
with curb, gutter and sidewalk per City of Central Point Standards.
9.
TF 1 Applicant shall provide the City with the sizing requirements for the water
service for this development. Applicant shall anticipate a minimum of one
water meter for this development. Applicant may utilize the existing meter,
provided. the service. meets sizing requirements for the. project.
Applicant shall install an OSHD approved testable backflow. device behind the
City water meter for any system which connects to Applicant's irrigation
system or any other water system which may be a potential cross-connection.
Location, typels) and size(s) of backflow prevention devices shall be shown on
the construction drawings.
Appiicant shall provide the City with sizing requirements and flow calculations
for the fire systems including any mains and hydrants.
~~ ~ ;
~.
STAFF REPORT
Date: 7-5-95
Project: Valley Family Practice Addition
Address: 615 South 2nd St. Central Point, Or. 97502
Owner: Rogue Valley Medical Center
Architect: Douglas S. Snider A.LA
Engineer: None Specified
Surveyor: None Specified
This is a Site Plan Review covering the Fire Protection aspects of a proposed 1879.8 Sq.
Ft. addition to an existing Medical Facility Project. The requirements outlined herein are
based on the 1991 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code with 1992 State of Oregon
` , Amendments. This review assesses the Fire Protection needs related to Water Supply,
_. Fire Department Access, Required Fire Flow, and General Precautions against Fire during
' construction. This review does not cover the Structural nor Fire & life Safety
requirements relating to the proposed structures. Those requirements will be discussed in
detail at the time of submittal of detailed plans.
THE FOLLOWING ARE MY FINDINGS:
1. The required fire flow for this project is based on the largest structure within this
development. That structure has been determined to have an approximate fire area
of 6333 sq. ft. Using Table No. A-III-A-1 of the of the Uniform Fire Code and
assuming that the structure will be constructed of Type V-N. construction the
minimum required fire flow shall be established at 2250 g.p.m.
2. General precautions against fire shall be in accordance with Section 87.103 UFC
relating to Fire Safety during construction. This existing facility has on site an
adequate number of fire hydrants and other fire protection devices in existence and
will not require any additional during construction. In addition fire department
access, hydrants and any other fire protection device shall not be blocked by
construction material during construction.
Confd
~~
3. Water supply and hydrant locations shall be in accordance with Sections
10.401;10.402; 10.403; and 10.105 UFC. As previously stated water supply and
hydrant location although not ideally located are adequate for this project and will
not require any additional water supply.
4. Timing of the installation and maintenance of all Fire Protection and Life Safety
Systems shall be in accordance with Sections 10.501 and 10.502 UFC
(See attached).
5. Fire Department access shalt be in accordance with Sections 10.203: 10.204; and
10.205 UFC (See attached). The existing north driveway access to the rear
parking lot is only paved approximately 12' 4" wide. Although this does not meet
the required 20' width for new accesses, it meets the general intent of the fire code
and as such is approved. However the dirt and graveled area immediately adjacent
to the north of the aforementioned paved driveway access must kepi free of
vehicular parking at all times. This will afford fire apparatus the needed vehicular
swing to negotiate turning into the east parking lot.
Approval of the submitted Site Plan is not an approval of omissiogs or oversights.. by
this office; or of non-compliance with any applicable regulations of this jurisdiction.
Note* COPIES OF THE CODE SECTIONS PREFACED IN-THIS REPORT
WILL BE DISTRHiUTED TO THE DEVELOPERS OF THIS PROJECT FOR
THEHLREFERENCE.
~~%`,_ _.
Reviewed By: Mark A. Servatius Fire Chief/Building OfScial
~ '` ;