Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - December 2, 1997~: - C, ~ _ _. -. ~ _ ,~ ' _3,. _ _ - ~ _. ~ ~ CITX OF CE-NTR~1L POINT - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA . , -December-2, 1992 - '~iOQ p.m. ~ ~ ~ .y~•.-~ , ~' ~ ~ Npxt P~anning,CAmmiss~on Resolution No::-E406 I, ' ' MEETTiVC~ CALLED T6 0RDE1~ ,._ F ~, _ ~. , , II,- ~ R¢LL CALL ~ ~ . ~. ~ _ ,. f ~, Chuck Plano - Attgel~ Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Bob Gilkey,, and ~; Karo yne Johnson ~ ~ _ ~. ~ ~~ _ ~ r '-I'I'I: CO-RRESPOI~FDENCE ~. ~_ ~ - _ , IV: IvI~IVUTES i ~; ~A. Review and approval of N6vember 4, 1997 Planning Cpmmissiou Minutes V. ` 'PUBLIC taPPEARANCES, _ -: - ~ ~ ~, ~- V~: BUSINESS. ;Page 1 $ ~A,~ ~ Review aiid d"ecison regarding a'fen~ative Plan-for a lYlino~Partitio~, (37 2W 1OD$-Tax Lot 8402) (fit-1-6 wn~) (Dean & 1Gleridee Fancher, applicants) - 9-23 ~B. Review-and decision regarding a Site Plan Review/Conditional Use Peirnit for New Holland P;quipmerit, (37 2~,11C Tax Lot"13Q'Q) (C-5 zone-) (Les _ ~ Gutcfies, a~P3eant), ~~ _. t,.. - - ll~rr i/II~ _ MIS~£LLAN$OU~~ ~ f_ ~ ., - 'L ~ y / v rte. '> l- ~- - '-~' VIII, ~ADJOURNMEN'I' ,- ,' `- i - ~ - = _ - r S ~, i ~ -. r -, ~ _ - ., ~ ~ >_ _,~ ~ ~ "- : i r 1 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 4, 1997 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Bob Gilkey, Karolyne Johnson. Angela Curtis and Jan Dunlap were absent. Also present were Jim Bennett, Planning Director, Ken Gerschler, Planning Technician, and Arlene LaRosa, Public Works Secretary. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve the Minutes of October 21, 1997, as written. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Foster. ROLL CALL: Fish, abstain; Foster, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Revia~v and recommendation regarding a street name change for a portion of Pittview Avenue. Jim Bennett stated that, although this was not a public hearing, notices were sent to the community to provide comment to the commission. He reviewed the memorandum which included background and several optional changes to rectify the street addressing problem on Pittview Avenue. Barbara Ritter, 794 Pittview, Central Point stated that she would like to have option #1: renaming of the portion of Pittview Avenue west of Bursell Road to Pittview Court. Royce Holmes, 683 Pittview, Central Point, stated that he would like to have option #1. it would effect the fewest number of people. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commissioner Minutes November 4, 1997 -Page 2 Mike Gamble, 747 Pittview, Central Point, stated he wanted the option that would impact the fewest number of people. Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to recommend adoption of Option #1: renaming of the portion of Pittview Avenue west of Bursell Road to Pittview Court. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Fish. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Jim Bennett stated that Herb Farber came to present a revised Tentative Plan for New Haven Estates. The developers agreed to, and the plans reflect, that they widened the rights-of-way, put bicycle lanes on both sides, and have on-street parking on one side. They were able to keep everything the commission wanted plus improve the street to allow parking on one side. Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to approve the changes on the revised Tentative Plan for New Haven Estates, a 207-lot single family residential subdivision (R-1-8 zone) (36 2W 36C Tax Lots 2500, 2501, & 2600; 37 2W 01B Tax Lots 3800) (Van Wey Homes, Inc., applicant) Motion was seconded by Commissioner Johnson. ROLL CALL: Fish, abstain; Foster, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes. Jim Bennett stated that the City had been contacted by one of the churches concerning permission to sell Christmas trees on church property as a fund raiser. Ken Gerschler stated that they would be issued a temporary business permit to sell the trees. The commission agreed that this could be considered a normal, seasonal fund raising activity of the church. Jim Bennett stated that there will be no meeting on November 18, 1997. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Johnson made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: December 2, 1997 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP City Administrator . SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Minor Land Partitiorrof 37 2W IODB Tax Lot 8402 -Dean and Meridee Fancher Applicant/ Dean and Meridee. Fancher Owner:. 3425 Snowy Butte Lane Central Point, OR 97502 Agent: Eagle-Eye Surveying 23 N. Ivy Street Medford, OR 97501 Pro e Description/ 37 2W IODB TL 8402.- O.SS acres Zoning: R-1-6, Residential Single- Family (6,000 s.f.) Summary The applicants, Dean & Meridee Fancher, are proposing the minor partition of a 0.55 acre parcel into two parcels of 12,-031.5 sq. ft. each (Exhibit A). The properly is located at 3425 Snowy Butte Lane in an R-1-6, Residential Single-Family (6,000 sq. ft.) zoning district. The parcels resulting from the proposed partition would be accessed from a private road off of Snowy Butte Lane. Authori CPC 1.24:020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPC 1.24.060 (Exhibit B). Applicable Law ' Central Point Comprehensive Plan & Comprehensive Plan Map CPMC 16.08.010 et seq. -Definitions CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 16.36.010 et seq. -Major and Minor Land Partitions CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. - R-1, Residential Single-Family District Discussion The project site presently consists of three lots of record that were created by the minor partition of Tax Lot 8400. The final plat for this partition was approved in September 1997. The applicants, Dean and Ivleridee Faucher, have applied for a minor partition to divide the middle lot, Tax Lot 8402, into two parcels: This is the same manner in which the property immediately to the north, Dixie One Subdivision, was partitioned in 1993 and 1994. CPMC 16.08.O101imits the partition of land to one division into two or three pazcels in any calendar year. If the proposed partition is approved by the. Planning Commission, the fmal plat could not be approved and recorded until calendar year 1998. The proposed partition would result in four parcels in total, all of which would take access from a private road that comes off of Snowy Butte Lane. Tax: Lot-8401 is the site of the original residence on the project site. Tax Lot 8400, at the end of the private road, has been purchased by the property owner immediately to the north and will be preserved as an open space lot with access to Griffin Creek. Tax Lot 8402, if partitioned, would create two additional residential lots. The total number of lots available for residential development. would, therefore, remain at three. The owner of Tax Lot 8400 has granted the City a pedestrian easement to Griffm Creek across the property. Staff recommends that a condition of approval of the proposed minor partition be to grant a similar pedestrian easement to the City across the two parcels created by the partition preferably within the existing private road easement. The City will then. pursue access across Tax Lot .8401 to complete the pedestrian easement to Snowy Butte Lane.. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed minor land partition and have concluded that it is in compliance with all city requirements if all conditions of approval are met. The recommended conditions of approval are included in the Public Works Staff Report and are incorporated herein by reference. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval: 1. The project site is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family (6,000 s.£) District. The project is a permitted use in the R-1-6 residential district. This zoning classification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site as Low Density Residential. 2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the minor partition of approximately 0.55 acres into two single-family residential lots. The average density for the minor partition is 3.64 units/acre. The proposed minor partition meets the density requirement for-the R-1-6 residential zone which is a maximum of 6 ixnits/acre. Each lot meets the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance requirements for residential lots as well as the specific requirements for the R-1-6 zone. The tentative plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. 3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed minor partition, the findings of fact, arid the conclusions of law and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions of the Planning Department and the Public Works Department (Exhibit C). Exhibits A. Tentative Plan -Minor Land Partition for Dean & Meridee Fancher B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Public Works Staff Report 3 --~ r h aav' i N ,s ~ ~ I~ \~ ~~ I~ b ~ ~ ~i" N a ~ ;~ ~ isz. zrr• V~ k ~ ~J ~ A I ~ r~ ~a is ~mm ~, ~~.. ~~ _ _ i, i ier.rr' ^ L ~ i G ~~ I ~, ~j FFG pP s i 9n 3~ snwwv SurrE UNe a ~ ~ 0 0 ~ U` ~ m ~ ~ i ~ y 6a d ° ~ N ~' 1R` r ~ ° ~ i ~ ~ p s .. a ~ 6 ~ o ~ q a o yu ~ ~ ~ ~, u g .. L .:. :. :. ~I N .:: ga 2 V _'~ ~ ~ O T ~1 O r " N t 4 ' ,, Y ~ t8 a ~;~ p ~ ~ ~ ~L ~ L~ ~ -may br s ~ / n ~ pp ~ ~~ 7 L D Z ~ d6 c ~n ~ ra `~ c Q ~ !' ] ~ ~£ ~,+ 3 N ~~ ~E a ~ ~ s~~ ~ I I m to G ~ ~ Z ~ ~ O mm u ~~"`m 3 ~ ~ N ~ A ~ u ^~ i ~ z ~ ~ $ y cu c [ ~` F G ~' i.y~ S .fin .~ ~ - y Z i N ~po ~ V fi ~ ~ S p r^ D Z D ~~ O Z n 1 m b i V 4 C~~ of Central Poir ~: PLANNING .DEPA;RTMENT James H. Bennett, AICP City Administrator/Planning Director Ken Gerschler Planning Technidan Deanna Gregory Administrative/Planning Secretary Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: November 18, 1997 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURF OF MEETING December 2, 1997 7:00 p.m: (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155'-South Second Street Central Point, Oregon GYty of central L?oint EXIiI~IT t, tf Planning Department Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an application for a Tentative Land Partition to be located in a Residential Single-Family District (R-1- 6) on Snowy Butte Lane. The proposed partition would create an additional parcel on Tax Lot 8402 of Jackson County Assessor Map Page 37 2W IODB. The requirements for Tentative Plans and Zoning are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 2, 1997. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 5 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point'OR 97302 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City, Hall, 1 SS-South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 23.1. ~iTMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponerits, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may_approve or deny. the Tentative Plan. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. s 155 South Sewnd Street !Central Point, OR 97502 (541).664-3321 ~ Fax:. (541) 664-6384; EXHIBIT G ~- CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT for FANCHER LAND PARTITION Date: Applicant: Project: Location: Legal: zoning: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose PW#97055 :November 18, 1997 - Dearrand-Meridee Faucher Agent: Eagle-Eye Surveying Corp, Russell Braughton Land Partition (1 lot into 2 lots) Between Snowy Butte Lane and Griffin T37S, R2W, Section 10DB, Tax Lot 8402 R-1,5 2 single family dwellings, 12,000..square foot lots 1 page Land Partition (Tentative): Eagle-Eye Corporation, dated 1 1 /3/97. Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Bob Pierce, Public Works Technician Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"1 regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the design. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed development. Requirements Pub/ic /ngrrs -'grass on Private Access Wav: Anon-vehicular access way between the east side of Flanagan Park and Snowy Butte Lane has been requested by several of the residents living in the area of the proposed land partition. The City Public Works Department (PWD) would suggest requiring the applicant to place a deed restriction on the noted parcels of land to allow for public non-vehicular ingress-egress along the 20- foot private access way for access to the east side of Flanagan Park. The access way should also be illustrated on the final plat. It is suggested that the final plat for this land partition not be issued until the recorded dead restriction is received by the City. 2. Private Water Line Easements: If applicable, Developer needs to provide for private water line easements (with a minimum of 5-feet in width) for neighboring properties across the northern edge of the property to allow for installation of private water lines outside the public utility easements. 3. Water Service: As per the Agreement dated September 9, 1997, by and between the City and the Fanchers, water service will not be provided to any of the lots in either this tenative partition or the Meridee Estates partition, until the terms and conditions of the Agreement have been completed to the satisfaction of the City. Panther LandPartition Tenantive Plan PWO Sfaff Report November 18, 1997 - ~. Page 2 4. 100-year Flood Zone: If the proposed partition places additional structures or other improvements within the 100-year floodzone, the Developer's engineer will be required to explain and provide detail as to what affects will the placement of these structures have on the floodzone; what affect will it have on the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary; and what affects will the modification of the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary have on the existing and proposed facilities, and properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and illustrate the existing boundaries of the Floodplain and floodway fora 100-year storm event (commonly referred to as the "Base-Flood Event") associated with Griffin Creek, on the construction plans submitted for the development. The drawings shall also indicate the revised Base Flood Elevation contours and boundaries of the Floodplain and Floodway expected to occur following the completion of any development within the identified floodzone (also referred to as the 'Area of Special Flood Hazard"). PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: December 2, 1997 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP City Administrator SUBJECT: Site Plan Review and Public Hearing to Consider a Conditional Use Permit Application for New Holland Equipment Applicant/ Les Gutches Agent:... 4099 Tami Lane Central Point, OR 97502 Pro a Dwight Buss Owner: 625 Foots Creek Road Gold Hill; OR 97525 Pro e Description/ 37 2W 11CD TL 1300-1,82 acres Zoning: C-5; Thoroughfare Commercial Summary The applicant, Les Gutches; has applied to the City of Central Point for approval of a Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Pernut to allow the constiuetion'of a-7,200 sq. ft. commercial building to be used for tractor and farm equipment. sales and repair by New Holland Equipment (Exhibit A). The projecrsite is located on the east side of Front St. just north of Beall Lane in a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District: Authorl CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to render a decision on any Site Plan or Conditional Use Permit application. A public hearing is required for consideration of any' Conditional Use Permit application. Notice of the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC"1.24.060 (Exhibit B). 9 Applicable Code Sections CPMC Chapter 17.46.010 et seq. - C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District CPMC Chapter 17.72.010 et seq. -Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval CPMC Chapter 17.76.010 et seq. -Conditional Use Permits Discussion The proposed use falls within the category of heavy equipment sales and service. This type of use is peinutted in the C-5 district subject to the approval of a Site Plan and a Conditional Use Permit application by the Planning Commission. The use must also comply with the height, area, width, yard, signs and lighting, off-street parking and general requirements of the C-5 district. Site Plan Standards CPMC 17.72.040 sets out the standards that the Planning Commission must consider in basing its decision on a Site Plan application: A. Landscaping and fencing must be consistent with the neighborhood and used to screen activities and uses that may impact existing neighboring uses. A 5' buffer and landscape area is proposed along Front St. A planter is also proposed at the northwest corner of the building. The site plan does not indicate if any fencing is proposed. B. Ingress and egress points must be designed and located to maintain and improve traffic. flows on public streets. Access for the project will be via.Front Street. One driveway entrance is proposed. C. Off-street pazking and interior circulation must be adequate to-serve the site and maintain good pedestrian and vehicle traffic flows.: The project will provide ten off-street parking. spaces including one handicapped paxking space. Nine off street parking spades. are. required for the building plus one space for each employee. In addition,. one off- treet truck loading space. is required. It appears there is adequate area to provide. the additional off-street parking required for employees and the truck loading apace. D. Signs for the project must be designed and located to be compatible with the use and not interfere with traffic control devices or traffic flows. The applicant will be required to submit a sign permit application for all signage proposed for the projeot. E. The site must be designed to be accessible to fire apparatus and-have adequate fire fighting facilities. Fire apparatus will have access to the,site from FrontSt. Fire hydrants will: be installed in accordance with City and Fire District #3 standards as necessary. 0. F. The project must comply with all applicable city ordinances and regulations and must be aesthetically acceptable in relation to the neighborhood and the City of Central Point. The project is in compliance with all city ordinances and regulations. The use of the property for heavy equipment sales and service is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding commercial neighborhood. Required Findings for Conditional Use Permit CPMC 17.76.040 requires that the Planning Commission make the following findings in granting a conditional use permit: A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to"accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code. B. That the site has adequate access'to a public strcet or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate'the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use. C. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the ,_ ... proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal .,. circulation; setbacks; height of buildings; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs. D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section. E. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. If the Commission fmds in favor of the proposed applications, staff recommends that the conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibits C and D be incorporated into any such approval: 11 Recommendation. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the Site Plan and adopt Resolution No. ,approving. the Conditional Use Permit, based on the findings of fact contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the. proposed. Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit applications; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan application and the public hearing for the Conditional Use Permit application at the discretion of the Commission. Exhibits A. Site Plan, Floor Plan, Elevations, Landscaping Plan B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Recommended Planning Department Conditions of Approval D. Public Works Staff Report 12 ~-.,-« O -r-, -ti ~' co C7 0 'n D p ~a ~tEfEitt~ p~a~.~r~ f ~4 t~ a -c; s r^ ~. ~ C ~-- n ~ ~ r s a f F I N ~ i -b #,. 0 c 7 b _.. T? ~. ~~ ~~ t c F C'~J' of Central Po ;~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT James H. Bennett, A[Cp City Administrator/Planning Director Ken Gerschler Planning Technician Deanna Gregory Administxative/Planning Secretary Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: November 18,1997 Meeting Date: Time: Place: December 2, 1997 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City. Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon City of Centrai`E?Qipf ~xx1~rT tt tt Planning Department NATURE OF MEETING $eginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review applications fora 7100 square foot commercial building to be constructed near the intersection of Beall Lane and Highway 99. The proposed building would be located in a C-5 ('Thoroughfare Commercial District) on Tax Lot 1300 of Jackson County Assessor Map Page 37 2W 11CD. The requirements for Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, •Off street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 2, 1997. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 16 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 '3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at I S cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public. may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 231. SUMMARY~OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications;.. technical staff reports, hear testimony fiom the applicant, proponents; opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above.. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative. Plan. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ,: r . 17 W~ L19BY a a J J ~' W W G 2 Z ~i W 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point,, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 EXHIBIT'C RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The project shall be developed in substantial compliance with the approved site plan. 2. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping'plan prior to final occupancy. Landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy growing condition. An automatic irrigation system shall be installed for all landscaping subject to the approval of the Building Department. 3: Off-street parking shall be provided for the project in accordance with the approved`site plan and CPMC 17.64. This'shall include required off-street parking and loading, handicapped pazking, parking stall design and aisle width. Any revisions to the parking layout shall be approved. by the Planning beparfinent prior to the' issuance of building permits. 4. Access to the project site shall enter and exit from Front Street. 5. Changes to or improvement of the public streets adjoining the project site, including all channelization, striping and signage, shall be constructed in accordance with city, Jackson County and ODOT standards, as applicable. 6. Each sign proposed for the project shall require a sign permit application to be subnutted with the building permit application for the project. 7. An oil/water separator shall be required for the drainage system of the pazking area. 8. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit is valid for a period of twelve months. The proposed use must commence. within this period or a new Conditional Use Permit must be applied for. s: e R7CIIIBIT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT for New Holland -Ford Tractor Sales and Service Commercial/Industrial Facility Site Plan PW#9705.5 Date: Applicant: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Units: Plans:- Report By: Purpose November 2l, 1997 Les Gutches 4099 Tami Lane, Central Point, Oregon 97502 New Holland -Ford Tractor Sales and Service East Side of Highway 99 (Just North of Beall Lane) T37S, R2W, Section 11CD, Tax Lot 1300 C-5 1 - 7,200 square foot building and parking (11 spaces) 1 page (no title) Designation as Lot # 1, with date of 10/30/97 Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant Qhereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the design. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed development. Special Requirements Landscape Plan: A final, more detailed (i.e. identify shrub types add trees, irrigation, etc.), landscape plan, meeting the requirements of the Oregon Department of Transportation (if applicable) and the City Public Works Department. (PWD), shall be prepared and implemented by and at the expense of the Developer. At a minimum, the landscape plan shall provide for a landscape buffer adjacent to the public right-of-way along Highway 99, while affording proper sight triangles at the driveway entrance with the highway. 2. tLighway 99 Improvements: All improvements on and connections to Highway 99 shall be coordinated-and approved by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the City PWD, and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the Developer. Tie-ins to the existing installed storm drainage system along Highway 99 must be permitted and approved by ODOT. The driveways into the proposed development should be designed and positioned in a manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of a WB-67 truck; without crossing into-an opposing lane or additional travel lane of traffic 3. Slte Dralnage/Storm Drain Plan: The developer shall design and implement a site drainage/storm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage for the entire area noted on the site plan. Sheet flow surtace drainage from the property onto the public rights-of- way, or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. The storm drainage infrastructure will be privately operated and maintained. A suitable system will need to be designed for a minimum 10-year storm event. The discharge point and potential retention of storm water run-off shall ~9 New Hoiiand -Ford Tractor Sales and Service Siie Pian PWD Staff Report November 2l, 1997 Page 2 be coordinated with aspects of the proposed development to provide anaesthetically pleasing, efficient, and low maintenance facility. The storm water retention facilities shall be suitably landscaped; designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition; and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. The developer shall also secure written permission to connect/discharge into adjoining storm water conveyance facilities managed by other jurisdictional agencies. Catch basins, curb inlets, and area drains shall be designed for sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retention. 4. existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation (in the opinion of the Public Works Director) of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility... General Development Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and approval, plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-way and easements or for connections to City infrastructure. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks; curbs and gutters and landscape buffers); storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and including fire protection); street .lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior 4o the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the. Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's-engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation.- 2. Aaarovals: Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access),. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), City of Medford Regional Water Reclamation Facility (commercial/industrial wastewater discharge permit) and Oregon Department of Transportation (storm water discharge into Highway 99 storm drainage facilities and driveway/access road connections) written approval of construction plans shall be submitted to the City PWD prior to final construction plan review -ahd approval by City PWD. 20 New Hoffand -Ford 7Yactor Sales and Service Slte Plan PWD StaffReport November 21, 1997 Page 3 3. ~s-Builts: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings.. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy"..form (produced on Mylat~) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD~, or other form as approved by the City PWD, As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including; but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim oxlip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water lines,. valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations; other below.grade utility lines; etc. Provide a °red-line" hard copy (on Mylah), or an approved .alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 4. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied. into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans.- The closest City reference elevation is located on the brass disk in the southeast corner of County Bridge No. 611 on Beall Lane. at Griffin Creek in Central. At least one permanent Benchmark shall be provided for the: proposed. development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's surveyor. 5. Existing Infrastructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.); to which the proposed development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall. be accurately portrayed {both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans. 6. Fill Placement Ali fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building Department standards, except for the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie building;.structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas. 7. Road/Driveway/Parking Areas: The Developer shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs to handle the expected loads (including fire. equipment) to be traveled on.these private driveways, access-.roads, and parking areas. Need to provide section for review. The driveways, access roads, and truck parking and turning areas orrthe proposed developmentmust be designed and positioned in a manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of a WB-67 truck, without crossing into an opposing lane or additional travel lane of traffic. 2Z New Halfand -Ford 7Yactor Safes and Service Site Plan PWD StaJJ Report November 2!, 1997 Page 4 8. Utility Plans: We did not receive any utility plans for the proposed development. The utility .plans shall be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility lines and appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.). 9. Area Lighting Plan: Need to provide and implement an adequate area lighting plan for parking and public access areas, including the driveway entrance from Highway 99, and if applicable, Highway 99 (as may be required by the State or City PWD). 10; Clty Utilityfasements: Easements must be provided for existing City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain) and any of the City's infrastructure that is to be installed as part of this development. The easements must be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split loYlines. Easements for storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a public utilities easement (PUE). Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feetfirom the edge of the easement. PUEs must have a minimum 10-footwidth. Easement dedications in final deeds need statement which clearly states that easements must be maintainedfior suitable,-.driveable access, as determined and approved by the City PWD: 11. Public. Utility Easements: A mihimum 10-foot wide public utilities easement (PUE) shall be dedicated on the proposed development for the installation of public utilities and should. be located outside the public rights-of-way. At a minimum, The PUE should.be aligned along the exterior boundaries of the property that border Highway 99, if a PUE.is not currently present in this area. 12. Clear Vision Areas: The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas (i.e. sight triangles) at driveway entrances designed to meet the City's PWD requirements. 13. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fire Hydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger lines. If applicable, steamer ports at hydrants located near the building shall face the buildings. Fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 14. Water System Cross Connection Control: Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for cross connection control. Need to know projected .activities and water uses for commercial building to determine requirements for cross connection controF and fire protection. Water will not be "turned on" by the. City until such requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated inspector (currently the Jackson County plumbing ihspector). 15: Water System: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordarice with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. There are -two waterlihes in the Utility corridor of Highway 99. ~. 22 New Holland -Ford Tractor Sales and Service Site Plan PWD Staff Report November 21, 1997 Page 5 16. Sanitar~Sewerlndustrial Discharge Permit If applicable, obtain industrial discharge permit from City of Medford Regional Water Reclamation Facility (Medford RWRF). Obtain Medford RWRF's written approval to connect to the sanitary sewer system. Copy of application can be obtained from City PWD. 17. Sform Drain Sysfem Desiqn: Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this development plan, the Developer's engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the site storm drain system. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters. 18. Roof/Area Drains: All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or-crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. Roof drains shall not be directly connected to the public storm drain system. 19. Grading Plans: Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. i 'R 20. Water Rights: If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City '` approved form), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the-State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. 21. Existing Easements: If applicable, Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements regarding any proposed development that may overlap any existing easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or alters an existing easement should be approved by the easement's owner in writing, and a copy of that written approval should be submitted to the City PWD prior to submission of construction plans for City PWD review and,approval. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development shall be shown on the final plat with reference to the recordation number and Grantee. 23