HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - October 21, 1997r
,K - `~~"
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
October 21, 1997 - 7:00 p.m.
Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 403
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Chuck Piland -Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Bob Gilkey, and
Karolyne Johnson
III. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. MINUTES
A. Review and approval of October 7, 1997, Planning Commission Minutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VL BUSINESS
Page 1-2 A. Review and recommendation regarding amendment of CPMC Chapter 5.32
pertaining to Mobile Home Parks.
3 - 6 B. Review and recommendation regarding a Withdrawal of Annexation Territory
from Jackson County Rural Fire Protection District #3 (R-1-8 zone) (37 2W
l OBA Tax Lots 6100, 6200 & 6300) (Burkhart/Fisher Annexation)
7 - 28 C. Continued review and determination regarding a Tentative Plan for New Haven
Estates, a 206-lot single-family residential subdivision. (R-1-8 zone) (36 2W 36C
Tax Lots 2500, 2501 & 2600; 37 2W O1B Tax Lot 3800) (Van Wey Homes, Inc.,
applicant)
29 - 40 D. Review and determination regarding a Tentative Plan for Lindsey Meadows, a 21-
lotsingle-family residential subdivision. (R-1-6 zone) (37 2W IODA Tax Lot 500,
600 & 700) (Richard Voigtman, applicant)
~~~;
41 - 52 E. Review and determination regarding a Tentative Plan for Shelterwood, a 26-lot
single-family residential subdivision. (R-2 zone) (37 2W 11D Tax Lot 1600)
(Michael Sullivan, applicant)
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
(~ of
, ~ .
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
OCTOBER 7, 1997
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Bob Gilkey, Don Foster were
present. Angela Curtis and Karolyne Johnson were absent. Also present were: Jim
Bennett, Planning Director, Ken Gerschler, Planning Technician, Lee Brennan, Public
Works Director, Arlene LaRosa, Public Works Secretary
III. CORRESPONDENCE
Jim Bennett stated that the Commission received a letter from Michael LaNier of The
Richard Stevens Co., agent for Van Wey Homes, Inc. concerning Item B on the
agenda.
IV. MINUTES
A. Jim Bennett provided Commissioner Gilkey with a copy of his verbatim motion
from the tape of the September 2, 1997 Planning Commission Meeting. Jim
read the motion into the record. This will be put into the file so that the
fences to be constructed as part of the subdivision will be built in accordance
with the motion.
Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to approve the Minutes of September 2,
1997 with the change as discussed. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the
motion. ROLL CALL: Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes; Foster, abstain.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the Minutes of September 16,
1997, as written. Commissioner Gilkey seconded the motion. ROLL CALL:
Dunlap, yes; Fish; yes; Gilkey, yes; Foster, abstain.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
There were no public appearances
VI. BUSINESS
A. Reviews and recommendation regarding amendment of CPMC Chanter 16 12
pertaining. to Final Plats
"'1 ' `.li
4,
Jim Bennett reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report. The proposed
amendment would allow the phasing of tentative plans at one year intervals,
not to exceed five years total.
Commissioner Dunlap made a motion to recommend approval regarding the
amendment of CPMC Chapter 16.12 pertaining to Final Plats, including the
Planning Department Staff Report. Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Fish. ROLL CALL: Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes; Foster, yes.
B. Reviaw~ ~nd determination regardi ng a Tentative Plan for Ne ws Haven Estates
il
id
i
l
f IR-1-8 zone
bdi
isi
l ) 1362W36C Tax
a 210-l y res
ent
ot sing
e-
am su
v
on
a
I nts X50 0 2501 & 2600. 372 W01 B Tax Lot 38001 IVan Wey Homes. Inc.
Aoolica ntl
Chairman Piland opened the public hearing.
Jim Bennett stated that a letter was received from The Richard Stevens Co.,
agent for Van Wey Homes, Inc., applicant, requesting the Planning
Commission postpone the hearing until October 21, 1997.
Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to continue the application regarding a
Tentative Plan for New Haven Estates, a 206-lot single-family residential
subdivision (R-1-8) (362W36C Tax Lots 2500, 2501, & 2600; 372W01B Tax
Lot 3800) (Van Wey Homes, Inc. Applicant) to October 21, 1997. Motion
was seconded by Commissioner Foster. ROLL CALL: Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes;
Gilkey, yes; Foster, yes.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
Jim Bennett reviewed future projects and agendas for the commission. He also
discussed the options available to correct the address problems on Pittview Avenue.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to adjourn. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Dunlap. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 7:39 p.m.
~,.i ~,
< <,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
Date: October 21, 1997
To: Central Point Planning Commission
From: Jim Bennett, City Administrator
Subject: - Review and recommendation regarding amendment of CPMC Section 5.32
pertaining to mobile home parks.
Summary
During the last legislative session, the State Legislature approved House Bi112641 which became
effective on October 4, 1997. This bill prohibits local governments from adopting a minimum lot
size for mobile home parks in residential zones that is greater than one (1) acre: The current City
ordinance that addresses mobile home park lot size is CPMC 5.32.300, Size and Density. This
ordinance states that the minimum size for any new mobile home park shall be eight (8) acres. The
proposed ordinance amendment modifies the existing ordinance to bring it into compliance with
House Bi112641.
Attachments
A. Draft Ordinance
f
~>
„~
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CPMC 5.32.300 PERTAINING TO
MOBILE HOME PARK SIZE AND DENSITY
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, DO ORDAIN, AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.: Central Point Municipal Code Section 5.32.300 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
5.32.300 Size and density. The minimum size for any new mobile home park shall be eigl}b
asr$s one acre. All mobile home parks shall be developed at a density equal to or less than six
mobile home spaces per acre..
Section 2. An emergency is hereby;declared to. exist, and this ordinance shall take effect
immediately. upon passage.
~ti~ 'zi
t ~ ~~,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 21, 1997
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Jim Bennett, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Withdrawal of Annexation Territory from Jackson County Rural Fire
Protection District #3 (Burkhart/Fisher Annexation)
Summary
On August 21, 1997, the City Council adopted Resolution No: 800'ordering the annexation
of 0.90 acres located on the south side of Taylor Road. The subject territory consists of
three single-family residential lots, two of which are developed with homes: To finalize this
annexation, it is necessary to withdraw the annexation territory from Jackson County Rural
Fire Protection District #3.
Authori
CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to review and make
recommendations to the City Council on withdrawals from special districts.
Discussion
Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council will hold a public
hearing on the proposed withdrawal and may adopt an ordinance declaring that the territory
within the annexation area is withdrawn from Jackson County Rural Fire Protection District
No. 3. However, Fire District No. 3 would still have responsibility for providing fire
protection to the annexed territory under its current contract for services with the city.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the; City Council
withdraw the annexation area from Jackson County Rural Fire Protection District No. 3.
Exhibits
A. City Council Resolution No. 800 and Annexation Territory Map
3
~n
~~
~~
21677yylorRob Z
~
d
~~
3
'
t~BA7T.~
~6300 ~
0
t
m
21677'tylor Rob N
Ceotnl Poim.OR97502 ~
~
-372W IUBA 7L 620U'. .,, N
~+
1toM1en lrwKr ~ -.
2165 Tay{orRob
~
~B
37
2{y IO
A iL6~W
Z
a
T
~.
rt ~
S ~
W ~
Z~. ~.
O .~ to
3~0
~ rt 'Z-1
fJl Q
~~
~o
Cn
m
0
y
rt
D
i!
D
b
P
0
t
r
z
a
0
~.
A
'cY
4
~ O
~' r
b
~~
O
H
ut fA ~J L,
4 ~.1
'.! Vii. .r
RESOLUTION NO. 800
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF
.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF TAYLOR ROAD
AND WEST OF BRAD WAY INTO THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON
(Applicants: Leroy Burkhart and Robert Fisher)
(37.2W 10BA Tax Lots 6100, 6200 and 6300)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Application has been made by the owners of
certain real property for annexation into the City of Central
Point, Oregon. The property consists of land. located south of
Taylor Road and West of Brad Way, consisting of a total of .9
acres. The property. to be annexed is more particularly described
as follows:
Couunencing at the Northwest corner of Donation Land Claim No. 53,'Cownship 37 South,
Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon, thence North 89 degrees, 45' East
on the North line of said claim, a distance of 939.84 feet to the true point of beginning, thence
South 170 feel, thence South 89 degrees, 45 tnimrtes West 280.24, thence North 170 feet, thence
North 89 delrrees, 45 minutes east 280.24 feet to the true point of beginning.
The above-described property is not within the City of
Central Point's current corporate boundaries, but is contiguous
to the City's existing corporate boundary and is within the
Central Point Urban Growth Boundary.
Section 2. The owners of the property proposed for
annexation are Leroy Burkhart and Robert Fisher, who have
submitted written consents to the annexation. In addition, a
majority of the electors residing within the above-described
property have also consented in writing to the annexation. Such
written consents are on file at Central Point City Hall, 155 S.
Second Street, Central Point, Oregon.
1 - RESOLUTION NO. 800 (082597)
5
,~
Section 3. ORS 222.125 provides that when all of the owners
of land in the territory proposed for annexation and not less
than 50% of the electors residing in such territory have
consented in writing to the annexation of the land in the
territory and'file such written consent with .the City Council,
the property may be annexed without the requirement for an
election or a public hearing.
Section 4. Annexation of the described-property is
consistent with the City~s ability to provide facilities and
services to the-real property, as required by the City~s
Comprehensive Plan.
Section 5. Pursuant to ORS 222..125,. the property described
in Section l above, shall be and hereby is, annexed to and made a
part of the City of Central.POint, Oregon.
`' Section 6. The City Administrator, or his designee, shall
transmit a copy of this resolution to the Oregon Secretary of
State, and this annexation shall be effective when filed with the
Oregon Secretary of State pursuant to ORS 222.180.
.Passed by the.Council and
its passage this ?~`a day. of
r
ATTEST:
City Representative
by me in authentication of
y
Approved by me this c7.`~ day of s`.ep M~~ , 1997.
Mayor .Rusty McGrath
2 - RESOLUTION NO. 800 (082597)
~,
6
,, , ,
,,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING
DATE: October 21, 1997
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator
SUBJECT: 'Continued Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for New Haven Estates
At the request of the applicant, the public hearing and Planning Commission review of the
Tentative Plan for New Haven Estates was continued to the regular meeting of Tuesday,
October 21, 1997. The applicant needed additional time to address the,Public Works
Departrnent staff report and conditions. A revised Public Works Staff Report has been
prepared and will be provided to the Planning Commission prior to the meeting.
~ ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING
DATE: October 7, 1997
TO: Central Point Planning Conunission
FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator
SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative. Plan for New Haven Estates. Subdivision
Ap"]p.~icant: Van Wey Homes, Ina
1762 East McAndrews Road, Suite J
Medford, OR 97504:
en • Farber& Sons, Inc. dba Farber Surveying
120 Mistletoe Street
Medford, OR 97501
Owners of Floriene E. Higinbotham Ruby D. LaFon
Record: 4993 Hamrick Road 236 Vilas Road
Centra! Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502
36 2W 36C TL 2501 36 2W 36C TL 2600
Wayne & Ginger Van Wey
Clayton R. & Yvonne Johnson
1762 E. McAndrews Road, Suite J
Medford, OR 97504
36 2W 36C TL 2500
ro e
description/
Van Wey Homes, Inc.
Key West Properties
1762 E. McAndrews Road, Suite J
Medford, OR 97504
37 2W OIB TL 3800
36 2W 36C TL 2500 - 32.42 acres
R-1-8, Residential Single Family (8,000 s.f.)
36 2W 36C TL 2501 - 7.60 acres (portion)
R-1-8, Residential Single Family (8,000 s.f.)
36 2W 36C TL 2600 - 9.98 acres (portion)
R-1-8, Residential Single Family (8,000 s.f.)
37 2W O1B TL 3800 - 6.63 acres
R-1-8, Residential Single Family (8,000 s.f.)
8
,;
~,;
Summary
The applicant, Van Wey Homes, is proposing a tentative plan for the subdivision of
approximately 55.2 acres located west of Hamrick Road and north of W. Vilas Road (Exhibit
A). The site is presently zoned R-1-8, Residential Single-Family (8,000 s.f.). The site will be
developed as asingle-family residential. subdivision, New Haven Estates. The total number
of lots proposed for the subdivision is two hundred ten (210). The average density for the
subdivision is 3.80 unitsJacre. The maximum density permitted for the site is 6 unitsJacre. The
maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted under the proposed zoning. is
approximately three hundred (300) dwelling units.
Au h rit
CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing
and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of
the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC L24.060 (Exhibit.B).
Aonlicable Law
Central Point Comprehensive Plan & Comprehensive Plan Map
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans
CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. - R-1, Residential Single-Family District
Discussion
The proposed subdivision is located on approximately 55.2 acres west of Hamrick Road and
north of W. Vilas Road. It consists of two hundred ten (210) single-family homes and would
be developed as the New Haven Estates subdivision. Access to the subdivision is proposed
from Hamrick Road and from W. Vilas Road. Three interior streets, St. James Way, Jeremy
Street and Rabun Way, are stubbed for future access to undeveloped areas to the west and
east of the subdivision. New Haven Road will provide future access to Hamrick Road for the
Walnut Grove Village Mobile Home Park also to the west of the subdivision.
The Planning Department has reviewed the tentative plan for. compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. The area is .designated for low density
residential development by the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned R-1-8, Residential Single-
Family (8,000 s.f.). Surroµnding uses consist of rural residential uses tq the east;. coral
residential uses and the Walnut Grove Village Mobile Home Park to the west; rural residential
uses, a cemetery and the Central Point East subdivision to the south; and coral residential uses
outside of the Urban Growth Boundary to the north.
The subdivision is located at the juncture of Hamrick Road and W. Vilas Road. These are
County roads that are scheduled for improvement by Jacksom County by 1999. Jackson
County has requested a traffic study of the area.
9
The Public Works Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the City's
water, sewer, storm drain and transportation standards. The Public Works staff report is
attachedas Exhibit D. Written comments were also received from. affected public agencies
and utilities regarding their requirements for the development of the proposed subdivision,
as well as from. residents of the area expressing their concerns about. the proposed
development (Exhibit E).
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the
project and necessary for its approval:
1. The project site is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single-Family District.
The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map which designates
the project site as Low Density Residential The project site is located. in the R-1-8
residential district. These caning designations are both consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan Map.
2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of
approximately 55.2 acres for the purpose ofdeveloping asingle-family residential subdivision,
New Haven Estates.. The total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is 210. The
average density for the subdivision is 3.80 units/acre.
The proposed single-family subdivision meets the density requirement for the
R 1-8 residential zone which is a maaimum of 6 units/acre. Each lot within the
subdivision meets the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance requirements for
residential lots as well as the specific requirements for the R 1-8 zone. The tentative
plan includes ail information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et seq.
3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the
proposed subdivision, the findings of fact, and the conclusions of law and determined that the
project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions of
the Planning Department (Exhibit C) and the Public Works Department (Exhibit D).
Exhibits
A. Tentative Plan -New Haven Estates
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions
I). Public Works Staff Report & Recommended Conditions
E. Written Comments
~~
',.
t
t
t
i
~~
Tentative PLn
NEW MAVEN ESTATES
for
Yanwey Homes, Inc.,
N"~i~
.'~'.«
C
~K ~~
M /1'~ ~~
..
W ti
~ ~, ~
w YM. NN.
Ij Q~~~S..ww.~
i
11
r
l
t
~~;;
f}~
`I
~•~
~~
"r ~w
IYY~,
~~w
IMnM,IXI WIMP
~I ~i1M~M
y~Zi ti/~
City of Cent~ar Point .
,,. ,,
PLANNXNG DEPARTMENT ,
James H. Bennett, AICP
City Adcninisvator/Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technidan
Deanna Gregory
Adminisvative/Plamting Secretary
CIty of Ct`SCtr31 Foist
:Notice of Meeting ~+XH_ISTT tt tr
Date of Notice: September 22,1997. P1anningDenarnnent
Meeting Date: October 7, 1997..
Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Place; Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
~r n mr iRF OF MEETING
Beginning at the above-place and-time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a Tentative Subdivision located in the Residential Single-Family District (R=1-8 and
R 1-10), near the intersection of West Vilas and Hamrick Roads: The proposed New Haven Estates
Phases 1 through 10 would create 200 lots on Tax Lots 2500, 2501, 2600 of Jackson County
Assessment Map 36 2W 36C, and Tax Lot 3800 of Map 37 2W O1B.
The requirements for Tentative Land are set forth in Chapter 17 of the.Central Point Municipal
Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Constr~ttction
Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Woxks Standards.
rI rBLIC coMMEN~s
1 Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 7, 1997.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
3. 'Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Cotmission. ~ .
12
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at
15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Platnlillg Department at (541) 664-
3321 ext. 231. .
S3TMIVIARy OF )*RO DTm'ta
At the meeting, the Planning Conunission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any
Le~timony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of
the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan. City regulations
provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions.
J .-
155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541)664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384
13
. , ~, ..
~, ~_
EXHIBIT C
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMbIENDED CONDITIONS
1. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit- to the City a copy of the
proposed covenants, conditions and. restrictions` (CCRs) .for .the New Haven Estates
subdivision.
2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of Jackson County Roads
Department and a!( other affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the
development. of the New Haven Estates subdivision.. Evidence of such compliance shall be
submitted to the City prior to final plat approval.
3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and
requirements applicAble to the development and construction of the New Haven Estates
Subdivision.
,,
Date;
Applicant:
Project:
Location:
Legal`
Zoning:
Lots:
Units:
Plans:
Report By:
Purpose
10/15/97
VanWey Homes, Inc.
1762 East McAndrews Road, Medford, Oregon 97504
(541)772-7782
Subdivision
North of Vilas/Hamrick Road curve.
T37S, R2W, Section 01 B, Tax Lot 3800, and
T36S, R2W, Section 36C, Tax Lots 2500, 2501, and 2600
R-1-8 (with conditions)
207 total (11 phases proposed, but not illustrated)
207 Residential
Tentative Plan for New Haven Estates, Sheet 1 of 2, dated
Lee Brennan, Public Works Director
EXHISTI' ~ ~~~~
10/2/97. Sheet 2 not received.
Provide Information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinaftet referred to as "Developer") regarding
City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to tie included in the design and
development of the proposed subdivision. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed
development.
Special Requirements
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
REVISED STAFF REPORT
for
NEW HAVEN ESTATES
PW#97031
Blocks -- Sizes CPMC 16.24.020: The tentative plan illustrates block lengths along Rabun Way, Jeremy
Street, and Devonshire Place of approximately 1,397 feet. CPMC 16.24.20 states that "Blocks shall not
exceed twelve hundred feet In length except blocks adjacent to arterial streets or unless the previous
adjacent layout or topographical conditions justify a variation". The City's PWD review of the tentative plan
indicates that the proposed blocks are not adjacent to arterial streets, and the surrounding topographical
conditions or adjacent development does not warrant a variation. The City's PWD would therefore
recommend that the streets be reconfigured to meet the requirements of 16.24.020. A suggested correction
would be to extend Savanah Drive(?) north to an intersection with Rabun Way.
2. Blocks -- Easements CPMC' 16.24.030 C Pedestrian Wavs: In accordance with CPMC 16.24.030 C, we
are recommending that a minimum 6-foot-wide paved pedestrian public way be provided which is aligned
between Rabun Way and the property to the north;somewhere between lots 196 and 202 (to be determined
during the design phase), to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian traffic between Vilas/Hamrick Road and future
development to the north: This bicycle right-of-way can be aligned in conjunction with the recommended
City/BCVSA, or other public utility easements to be provided toallow for connection of future development
to utility infrastructure, as discussed in Item 6 below. -
3. Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure
(i.e: street; water, sahitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere
with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure
facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the
flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed
development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate
1
New Naven Estates, Tentative Plan
PWD StaJj'Report
October 1, 1997
Page 2
the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the
affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner
involved.
4. Master Ptans: Thornton Engineering (Thornton) has submitted to the City preliminary master plans (dated
July 9, 1997, and hereinafter referred to as the "Northeast Central Point Master Plans") for the proposed .
development and neighboring properties. These. preliminary master plans include a storm drain master
plan (mapping of storm drainage basins and proposed primary off-site conveyance facilities), sanitary
sewer master plan (mapping service areas and proposed alignments of main trunk conveyance lines), and
a water master plan (identifying a proposed layout of main [12-inch-diameter and larger] water distribution
lines). The City PWD is currently working with Thornton on the refinement and adjustment of the noted
items; and will continue to work with Thorntomand the affected Developers on the design refinement and
implementation of the master plans through the development in the noted service areas. The Developer
shalfprovide plans for City approval of storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance facilities, the
sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system, and the water distribution system which address the
items noted in the master plans and which Include allowancesfior the flows or demands of the proposed
development, any existing demands or flows, and any future development on neighboring properties; as
noted on the Northeast Central Point Master Plans and/or on other master plans prepared by the affected
utilities or other regulatory agencies.
5. Water Distrlbutlon System and New Water Master Meter. The Developer shall design and. construct, at
the Developer's expense, the large diameter (12-inch-diameter and larger) waterlines that will be aligned
through, the proposed subdivision, in accordance with the Northeast Central Point Water Master Plan being
developed. The City will reimburse the Developer (in the form of credits against water SDCs) for the
material's price difference (as bid to the City), for pipe and appurtenances with diameters larger than fl-
inches-diameter that are required by the City to be installed as part of the proposed development.
The proposed development and surrounding development will require the installation of a new water master
meter (including a suitable connection to the Medford Water Commission's water main line, and other
associated appurtenances) to be installed on the north side of the corner intersection of Hamrick and Vilas
Roads. The Developer shall work with the City DPW and the Medford Water Commission on the
..development and installation of this meter. It is the City's intent to have this master meter installed as part
of this and other currently approved development, and to be installed at the expense of the Developer and
.surrounding land owners, determined on a per acre of development basis as established by the City.
6. Rlahts-of--Way and Easements: Provide dedication for expansion of the right-of-way along HamrickNilas
Roads<to 100-feet in width (50-feet each side of centerline). Provide suitable and acceptable easements
.for any publia works infrastructure located outside the public rights-of-way. A separate 10-foot minimum
.width. public utilities easement (P.U.EJ should also be required outside the HamrickNilas Road right-of-way
for utility: installation. The City PWD is also recommending hat a minimum 20-foot-wide City/BCVSA utility
-easement (with an all weather surface) be aligned between Rabun Way and the property to the north,
somewhere between lots 196 and 202, to facilitate City/BCVSA utilities connection (in possible combination
with bicycle and pedestrian access) with future development to the north.
Landscape Buffers: As part of the proposed development, to provide for noise attenuation and a visual
buffer along.the secondary arterial roads that borderthe proposed development, it is the City PWD's
recommendation that the Developer provide designs for and be required to implement a City and JC Roads
approved landscape plan, which, at a.minimum, includes a landscaped buffer consisting of irrigated
landscaping and sidewalks along the applicable portions of the HamriekNilas Road rights-of-way that
.border the proposed development fromlhe southwesterly corner of Lot No.7 to the easterly property
r,
New Haven Estates, Tentative Plan
PWD Staff Report
October 1, 1997
Page 3
extension of Lot No. 8, and from the westerly end of improvements at the intersection of Naples pCiye and
Vitas/Hamrick Road to the easterly end of Lot No. 53. It is recommended by he City PWD that a Suitable
sound wall be required to be cgnstructed by the Developer on the proposed development's property along
the applicable portions. of HamrickNilas Road, for sound attenuation purposes.
8. Traffic StudX: A study entitled "Traffic Impact Study for Walnut Grove Village New Haven Estates" dated
August 5, 1997, prepared by Hardey Engineering and Associates, Inc (hereinafter referred to as "Traffic
Study") was received by the City on October 2, 1997. City PWD staff have not had adequate time to
thoroughly review The Traffic Study; nor has the City received any comments from JC Roads staff
regarding the Traffic Study. Cursory review of the traffic study by City PWD. staff indicated that the Traffic
Study did hot include the additional traffic impacts for future development to he east and west of the.
proposed development that will have access to the proposed development's streets; or for any impacts as
..the result of "cut-through" traffic from Gebhard Road. to Vitas/Hamrick Road, through the proposed
subdivision. The Traffic Study shall be revised to include these additional impacts. The developer shall
implement and construct, as applicable, any associated infrastructure as recommended in the Traffic
Impact Study and/or as determined by JC Roads and the City -
9. CollecforStreetDeslgnafion It is the City's PWD recommendation that New Haven Road (the portion
between the intersections with Vitas/Hamrick Road and Hawthorne Way) and Naples Drive (the portion
between the intersections with Vitas/Hamrick Road and Rabun Way), be designated as "collector' streets
as described in the City's comprehensive plan, which shall be provided with a minimum of two travel lanes,
,traffic turning lanes as required, and bicycle lanes. It is also the City's PWD recommendation that street
;parking would not be permitted on these collector streets, with the exception of allowing parking on the
.eastern side of Naples Drive. It is also the City PWD's recommendation that no parking restrictions and
.bicycle lanes should be provided on Hawthorne Way between New Haven Road and Savanah Drive..
10. Erosion Control Plan: A suitable erosion control plan must be prepared and implemented for the
construction of any improvements associated with this development.
11. Off-Site Sform Drainage Infrastructure: For any storm drainage infrastructure constructed or improved
outside the City's rights-of-way or easements, the Developer shall provide a suitable document or
documents which contain.approvalstor the implementation of such connection and/orrimprovementsgnd
which describe:
^ Who is responsible for the operation, maintenance, and repair of the infrastructure facilities to
maintain the original design parameters associated with the infrastructure. If the City is to operate
and maintain the infrastructure, the applicable funding mechanism that will be created (i.e local
improvement district) for the associated City expenditures;
^ How will access be afforded and maintained indefinitely to maintain and repair the infrastructure
facilities;
^ That an easement or other suitable conveyance document has been granted, as necessary, to
provide suitable access on private property for the inspection, maintenance, and repair work to be
pertormed on the infrastructure facilities.. The easement shall include a statement which allows
access by City personnel for inspection and maintenance purposes; and
12. Traffic Control Device at Intersection of New Haven Road or Naples Drive and Hamrlck/Vi1as Road:
A park site has been desighated for development in an area to the southeast of the proposed development.
Pedestrian or bicycle access to these facilities will require crossing of Hamrick/Vilas Road. The City. shall
1'7
New Haven Estates, Tentative Plan
PWD Staff Report
October 1, 1997
Page 4
develop an'appropriate "special project systems development charge" to be assessed on building permits
issued as part of the proposed subdivision and adjoining subdivisions, which provides applicable funding
for the' design and implementation of a suitable and approved traffic control device to afford safe pedestrian
and bicycle traffic across HamrickNilas Road, at either or both of the intersections of New Haven Road and
Naples Drive with HamrickNilas Road.
13. Rolled Curb'Gutterand S/dewalk Section: The Developer has requested to use the City's standard curb,
gutter,`and sidewalk section in lieu of the 8-foot-wide rolled curb, gutter, and sidewalk section planned for
the Central Point East development, and the private road rolled curb and getter section planned for the
Walnut Grove manufactured home park. If the Developer is permitted to/use the City's standard curb,
gutter; and sidewalk section, it is the City PWD's recommendation than a developer be required to
construct a continuous curb and gutter section (without deviation in the line and grade of the curb section
focdriJeway aprons), and that the curb section is sawkut, removed, and replaced in accordance with City
PWD Standards wheh the driveway apron is installed.
14. (trprovements to HamrickNllas Road: All "half-street" improvements to HamrickNilas Road including,
but not limited to, street section, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bikeways, landscape buffer, storm drainage, and
traffic Control and delineation; shall be coordinated and approved by the JGRoadsand the City PWD, and
designed and constructed at the expense of the Developer as part of the development of the proposed
subdivision.
As approved by the City Administrator and/or JC Road§, as applicable, the Developer may request or be
required to defer any or all of the required improvements along HamrickNilas Road until a later date. If any
or all of the improvements are to be deferred to a later date, then the Developer will be required to enter into
a suitable deferred improvement: agreement with the-City and/or Jackson County for the "half-street"
improvements.
General
1. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions
approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards,
and/orupgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or h1s designee prior to the approval of the
construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the
Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to
installation.
2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by
other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFWj, Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of
Ehgineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and JC Roads.
3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the
Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should
provide the drawings inboth a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar®) and in a "digital"format compatible
with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved
construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed Items,
including, but not Iimlted to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings;
road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modificatiohs to
Ls
New Haven Estates, Tentative Plan
PWD Stafj'Report
October 1, 1997
Page 5
street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations
and depths; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar®), or an approved alternative format, of
construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD®compatible drawing electronic file to the
City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of qublic'infrastructure facilities completed as
part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee.
4. '` All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark
shall be tied into ari established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least seven
permanent BenchrYrarks shall be provldetl for' the proposed development; the locatigns of which shall be as
jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer
5. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures;`:clearond grub materials, and other
deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and eitherrecycletl.or properly disposed of in
accordance with the requirements of the DEQ.
6. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]) should be a
minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary
sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried
infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City
owned utilities are located wlthin an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required.
Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that
easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure
facilities, es determined by the City PWD.
7. 'Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following
should be submitted:
^ A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and water system improvement
plans for the proposed development.
^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved ih'writing by BCVSA, end the
appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans.
8. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i:e; pipe inverts curb elevations, top of
banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations; etc.), to which the proposed subdivision will connecYinto
existing improvements, prior to final construdtion plan design and submittal for final approval.
9. Overhead power lines. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, US West, and TCI
Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed
development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements
associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of
these facilities from overiead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the
Developer.
10. The accurate locations of any existing underground and' above ground public infrastructure, and the location
of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and
vertically) on the construction plans and as-built drawings.
J ./ w ~v
New Haven Estates, Tentative Plan
PWD Staff Report
October 1, 1997
Page 6
Streets/Traffic ,
i f
Existing Improvements - HamricklVilas Road -Major Arterial. Current ROW 60' wide, varying street width.
Right-of Way required: 100-foot width; 50- foot on eitherside of centerline. .
Jurisdiction -.Jackson County.
1. Construction drawings for.this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and Traffic Control Plan in
accordance with the requirements of the City PWD. Street lights shall be placed in a "zig-zag" pattern
along the streets and at maximum 200-foot spacing (as measured from light post to light post) to afford
better lighting of the public rights-of-way.
2. Ttie.City PWD shall„at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine
the treet section designs in accordance with the City PWD. Standards. The City's engineering staff or
selected engineering consultant (at Developer's expense), shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and
determine the street section designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. Minimum street section
.shall be as follows:
3-inches Class "B" A.C.
6-inches of 1"-0"crushed rock
- 8-inches of 4"•0" crushed rock (City of Medford specifications),
- Woven geotextile fabric over compacted subgrade.
Street section (excluding the asphalt concrete portion) shall be extended underneath and one foot beyond
the rolled curb, gutter, and sidewalk portion of the street section to provide better structural support for the
curb, gutter, and. sidewalk section.
3. Stop signs and traffic delineation (i.e. "stop bars") shall be required and installed by the City PWD (at the
Developer's expense) at the. proposed development's intersection with HamricklVilas Road and at the
following ihtersections:
^ Hawthorne Way, and New Haven Road (4-way);.
^ Hawthorre Way and Savaneh Drive (northbound only);
^ Naples Drive and St. James Way (4-way);
^.;, ; Naples Drive and Devonshire Place (eastbound only);
^ Naples Drive and Jeremy Street (eastbound only); and
^ Naples Drive and Rabun Way (northbound only)
Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements
Existing Improvements - The Upton Lateral of the Rogue River Valley Irrigation System traverses the
proposed development from south to north. Rogue River Valley Irrigation District
controls Irrigation rights within the project area including conveyance of water in
Upton Lateral
1. During the design ofthe storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance systerh (SD System) which
provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or
culvert or creeWditoh conveyance), the Developer shall demonstrate that the storm water flows from the
completed development of the proposed development (at any time prior to completion of development) do
not exceed predevelopment flows; or that allowances or provisions have been made (and approval of the
applicable properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained, which accommodate any
additional flow which exceed predevelopment flows. The Developer and the City PWD shall agree on the
applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations.
~~ 20
'~ 1
New Haven Estates, Tentative Plan
PWD Staff Report
October 1, 1997
Page 7
2. Any discharge points storm water retention facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing,
useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100
year storm event.
3. During construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of
hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall Incorporate the
use of the City PWD's rainfalllintensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers,
retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations.
4. Materials shall be PVC (ASTM D 3034 with gaskets), HDPE (meeting ODOT requirements for corrugated
polyethylene storm sewer pipe, including a provision for premium water-tight coupling .bands), or approved
equal: Provide concrete encasementwhere required in areas ofminimum cover.
5. If inlets/catch basins are to exceed 4.5 feeYin depth fromthe lip of the inlet, then the inlets and catch basins
shall be designed to afford suitable "man" entry into the inlets/catch basin for maintenance/cleaning
purposes.
6. Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and'flow1ine plots for private and
public storm drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGL on the
profile: Pipes should maintain cleaning velocity (minimum 2.0 feet per second) and have adequate
- capacities without surcharging during the design storm.
- - 7. The Developer may wish to incorporate the use of a perforated SD system. If so, then the perforated storm
- drain system shall be designed to have adequate capacities to:
^ Convey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum cleaning velocities and
without surcharging the collection and conveyance piping; and
^ Minimize silts, sands, gravels, and fines migration from the native soils into the SD system.
The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltratioh, and the storm water run-off and run-on
inflows into the SD system.
8. Construction of private storm drains is discouraged by the City. However, if a private storm drain is to be
constructed, the following is required:
- Provide to the City acceptable documentation as to how the private storm drains will be
maintained, repaired, eta '
- All lot drainage should be drained by surface flow to the curb and gutter section of the
street or to a private storm drain line located either at the rear/sides of the lots or in the
PUE or other suitable easement outside the public rights of way.
- Private storm drain likes shall only be connected to the'public storm drain system at curb
inlets or manholes.
- Provide suitable clean-outs (type and spacing with maximum 200 foot spacing):
- Provide invert elevations and lateral stationing for construction of private storm drain
system.
- Provide plan and profile views and elevations for any private storms drain system that may
be proposed.
- Designed to facilitate minimum cleaning velocity of 2.0 feet per second.
9. Provide 0.2-foot drop through all manholes and curb inlets.
24
New Naven Estates, Tentative Plan
PWD Staff Report
October !, 1997
Page 8
10. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to a public storm drain tine. The roof drains
(that'do not drain to splash blocks) and underdrain discharge lines that discharge at the curb face in
accordance with City PWD Standards.
11. Developer shall be required to coordinate with Rogue River Valley Irrigation District to resolve any irrigation
rights or use of water from the Upton Lateral.
Sanitary Sewer
1. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall
conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEO, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter,
Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority. (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable..
2. The. construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer
latgrals.
3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans
to BCVSA for completion of the. review process.. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of
final revisions to4he plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on
the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form.
4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA
requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports,
TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance.
Water System
1. The water system shall be designed to provide the required demand capacities with a minimum fire flow
demand of 1,000 gpm (at a minimum. pressure of 20 psi), and shall conform to Fire District 3 requirements.
Maximum spacing of fire hydrants shall be 300 feet. The water system shall be of reinforced flow ("looped")
design. Lateral /connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built
drawings.
Stte work, Grading and Design, and Utility Plans
1. Developer shall provide the necessary "rough" lot grading to assure that all lots will drain properly to the
curb and gutter, or to a drainage system that drains to the curb and gutter or public storm drain system, as
approved by the City PWD and the City Building Department.
2. .Grading plans should have original/existing. grades and fnal grades plotted on the. plan. Typically, existing
grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the
existing grades and are in a heavier line width and sdlid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations.
3. Indicate location of street lights on plans, with table indicating stationing and offsets.
Rights of Ways/Easements
1. If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any
affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the
State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the
proposed development.
22
' s rl
New Haven Estates, Tentative Plan
PWD Sta,/J`'Report - ~ -
October /, 1997
Page 9
2. Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements regarding any proposed
development that may overlap any existing easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or alters
an existing easement should be approved by the easement's owner in writing, and a copy of that written
approval should be submitted to the City PWD prior to submission of construction plans for City PWD
review and approval. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development shall be
shown on the final plat with reference to the recordation number and Grantee.
23
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY IRRIGATION
7179 MLRRIMAN ROAO d MEOFORO.OR[OON 9'1601.1277 d .
July 28, 1997
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician.
City.:of Central Point
155 South 2nd St.
Central Point, OR 97502
RE:
Dear Ken:
DISTRICT
15071 •1'17•b 1 37
C7ity of C~itrai Pointi
E.XH~13T'T t~E tt
Planning Department
Subdivision Tentative Plats
The Rogue River Valley irrigation District does not have any
responsibilities on the proposed Lindsey Meadows Subdivision
(97038-TP). The only requirement that we have on the Summerfield
Estates Subdivision (97039-TP) would be a Right To Transfer
document, so we could move the water that was on the property.
On the New Haven Estates Subdivision (97031-TP), the
District operates and maintains several District owned and
private laterals that will need to be considered.
The Districts Upon Lateral traverses the project through
the north-easterly side of the property and runs roughly in a
north-westerly direction. This is an open canal that will have
to be placed in a pipeline to District specifications, at the
developers expense, with a 25 foot easement and road for
operation and maintenance over the pipeline facility. No fences,
gates, or permanent structures-can be built within the right-of-
way. .The District would be open to discussion on relocating the
placement of the pipeline to more effectively coincide with
streets, but would need to have an agreement with the City of
Central Point for joint maintenance.
The District also owns and operates the Harvey Lateral that
comes into the project from the south just west of Tax Lot 3700.
This lateral has served all the properties in the proposed
development and Tax Lot 3700. The District will need an easement
and free and easy access to the control boxes and the pipeline,
together with a pipeline and recorded 15 foot maintenance
easement for the lateral that serves Tax Lot 3700. As long as
Tax Lot 3700 continues to irrigate, .arrangements will have to be
made for tailwater or return flow to get to a storm drain with a
drainage easement and pipeline to keep the water out of the lots
between Hawthorne Way and New Haven Road.
z4
~ 1
Ken Gersahler
Page 2
July 28, 1997
There is also a private lateral with an easement that
diverts from the Upton Lateral approximately between St. James
Way and Jeremy Streets, to serve the properties to the east. that
will have to be replaced since the existing pipeline is shallow
and leaks severely.
The property will have to have the water removed by the
District exclusion process. The current-exclusion cost ie $76.89
per acre. This rate will change on 1/1/98. -The current
irrigation charges on the property must be paid in full, the
exclusion fee must be paid and the District needs a photocopy of
the written surveyors description for. the land being excluded.
No drainage water can be accepted into the District's
laterals without prior approval and an approved drainage.
contract. As always, construction times and schedules must be
accomplished so as not to interfere with the Districts normal
water deliveries.
If you have any questions, please contact me at the District
office at 773-6127.
Sincerely,
ROGUE R R VALLEY
IRRIGAT N ISTRICT
..(.k, .~ESt~~
im Pendleton
pager
iG a7
r.
City of Central Point
Planning Department
122 South 2nd St. Room 214
Central Point, OR 97502
To Whom It May Concern:
September 26, 1997
I own County tax lot H3700 in map #37-2W-01C,
located on Hamrick Road. My property is now bordered
on three sides by the proposed New Haven Subdivision.
i am concerned that the irrigation and drainage
water from my property .may be blocked off by the
development of this subdivision. I have marked the
enclosed map with the flow direction of the irrigation
and drainage water. I am also concerned with problems
caused when housing is not separated from E.F.U. land
by some kind of buffer zone.
I would appreciate your looking into these issues
as you continue with the planning phase of this
project. A written response regarding my concerns
would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
SEP 26 1997'
Glenn Higinbotham,
4957 Hamrick Road
Central Point, OR
Jr.
97502
CITY OF CI=A!"fHq~. faGlNl"
TIM[ _..._._..__
26
a 6~ \~
v~ ~~
~? T ,6 c,
,~
r~' ?,VdO ~.i
O
vd
112.6
~.---~ , --.-16.9
~ -~ .~ :1
^- ~ m •
nr m ^ ~,
~ a ~ ~
.Vi ~ .{.7 CU .~.-1 r y///~
v ~11 rn .~C'/,
• ~ 3(3-y``ft O i~
~ ~..
~~nl 110.6 E9~
~ '31 ~ 72606m N I H ~ F6~
1 m CC., N
~7 m
'~ ~O 1 ~ ~ .l.lm ,n/.V
56.7 01;, ~,v^; `~'~~'
-.... -- - ,Jm ; ~ o.
104.0 h
----- 0p.~00 \ /Oo
59.3_b0 •~y L`~~v0`~o
z} b, eele _ AI`~
,\ ~v~ 9~
ZZ m '~,
0 1~O (7 l
ui a• , ~ ~ ~
.I u' 11U . 7 ~ ~' ~,
u i X N., ~~ N O N i
4°j ~ Oy
n a, Q, n a fy ,~, /
,:1 iS0_0 ~ ...~ ~1 pt
\ !
` t
\ \
\ O
\'~ ~~. Glenn- Higinbotham, Jr.
~ ~o ~ ~ 495'1 Hamriok Road
Oq ~;
pti~ Central Point, OR 97502
u ~\ ~
~ \ \ \
V
~ \O NSF \ \
^ \ \ /
_- ~, d ~ ~
6 \~/~~
~ ~,
,o~
S ::!,~
~ ~0,<•
O •U~.
3
'~ 1 ~` ^' ~ `^7 ~ ~/ L ~ a/ ~Y~ \ p•~ /~ OFF
~,~ ni ~~ I ~ ti,Lti~~h~ h~ bk
1 110.6 _ m ,v ,~ti~' ~fO~~C+,~ e
1 n ~J„ ~ ~. ~., .
- 7:7.'9 -:.•1:5010,
n 't ,.
IH 100.8 ~`
I ~; bs OTOB:~
Q
Ip ~ 9 z ~;
I~ O
1 ~O~ h
n
~Id Soo.e
(z 31 bs QI09
IQ ~ ~~ N
j~Q O1 ~ O, ~
1 `~.
100.6 C
(~
+ i{ _
6s Ot08
`
fl N 07 ~
OC ~m
I
~ ,
O~ F~ ~
~
^ nNi I
1 100.0 m :r - -y.
' ...
~} - ---'-
bs nLOB
- N
n chin °•
as ~ 1
(I
1 IfI I(1 I
Q1' i wed
p. c :Il
1 rn
~., ~ I ~ m . ,,
i c:
i
,
w,~,
n.l
a} bs n109
1 !in of ,n ~ ~ '
m
~,a,
~ L
-,
.~ o,
> ('
_)
wq
> w
o ,~
L
~~ 01
y 11
~ C
c 1O
"~
ro~
's ~
v
~ :; ~
lK'~~n: h0>~ 9
/~ bs
~~ S
0
Ql, s o 2
~1p~~01
°o
y
~ +'
Q
rn
0 m
J
.,
1 1
~ 1 I
1 1
Q I ,
.-, 1 I
• I
I
~`
°s
~ ~.. ~
,~F .` e F \
0 0 ,_
", 6` ~
~ :.
h
/~ oo s
~ is • O
~ N O
11~9d rn ~~ n
l'~,r d9~~K`Q~GI~ ~
X O~FO~
0
~ 26.0 150.0
~t''c... J.75.
~d~d aao~xo
p0
9•\
~. Uj ~~, y9
K~ o
Ooom
~A°j 96 6`
.--~`~~
a} bs 9L58
9
~.o~
115.1
• T T T a
.-+ D n N c +, _ ~ c
ro A~ a (O v a t7 a r-+ a U ~V
rl
C Na ro•-, N T +I Oro L roCL 2 (11 v/-
L ~,•~ Z a L a Q N ,--, N C ~.+ r, Q Z Q > T a +, L
a a, L a a 7 •" ..+ CT a a s CC Q N 4 a v a O •N t
aU`I-OL ND~a O'aL ZCCJa»CDJ Z>••+ a O F
C a 0 ~- 1, a C •U N a L N •rl U a C7 d G L> L 1[7 L
..~ .~~ U m O a L .N C 3 •I.- C D r+ CL O +~ O O N CV ~,
010 Nom, L••+ OL LroroOa ~-,OWO CU1L N ~"~
C L L C O> T N +, N C O ~'+ L LI r-l a, l-- J O] a Q J 3
a O. ro O ~,- L •--~ ro •~ w Ct'O T•N ro Z I-I E U r'+ F- 1
ON~N NNat-O C NCLC•"a+, a<_QO N~a~ ro U N1
L..', ro a G~ ro••,O a0U C LNF-ri 7a m ~
m r. ++ u u •.- ~ ~ - -• .~ .~ o a r ~- z •~w v c m
1-c~•~c N.~acv.,cnw+, vo o Z ~-
a E OLD- E 1a•,NN 7Y a C7 ro D lA 9
•aaa~ 27 L •~aLwln•+ w .v ai m N
••-, lP a m N C a •~ T. L a' H •-+ ICl •--, C U Ul ''
••.~ li 1 t. > L N 17 a v, w S: ro ~~ ro a m ro ~
1
I
1
1
fi
JacKSO,o (oo~r Fl~ DisTaicr No 3
8333 agate Rd
WhRe Gty, Oregon, 97503.
541-826-7100
Fax:541-826-4566
September 3, 1997
City Of Central Point
155 South Second Street
Ceritxal Point, OR97502
Ken Gerschler:
RE:-New Haven Estates
The Revised plat plan from 8/28/97 looks just fine, we request a meeting with the developer to discuss
hydrant placement.
Thank you,
Lou A. Gugliotta
Division Chief~re Marshal
~~CEIVE®
SFP ~ 1997.
CITY ~F C~NTRAI I~O1NT
TIME ....,..-.K_....... __ ... .
,,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORTP
HEARING
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 21, 1997
Central Point Planning Commission
James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator
Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Lindsey Meadows Subdivision
Applicant: Richard Voigtman
4294 East Barnett Road
Medford, OR 97501
Agent: Darrell Cooper
1500 Spring Street
Medford, OR 97504
Owner of Matthew & Leah Perna
Record: 3473 Chicory Lane
Central Point, OR 97502
37 2W 11D TL 500, 600 & 700
Property 37 2W 11D TL 500 - 4.03 acres
Description/ R-1-6, Residential Single- Family (6,000 s.£)
Zoning:
37 2W 11D TL 600 - 0.23 acres
R-1-6, Residential Single- Family (6,000 s.£)
Summary
37 2W l lb TL 700 - 0.22 acres
R-1-6, Residential Single- Family (6,000 s.f.)
The applicant, Richard Voigtman, is proposing a tentative plan for the subdivision of
approximately 4.48 acres located west of Chicory Lane and east of Daisy Creek (Exhibit A).
The site is presently zoned R-1-6, Residential Single-Family (6,000 s.£) and will be
developed as asingle-family residential subdivision, Lindsey Meadows. The total number
of lots proposed for the subdivision is twenty-one (21). The average density for the
subdivision is 4.69 units/acre. The maximum density permitted for the site is 6 units/acre.
The maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted under the proposed zoning
is approximately twenty-eight (28) dwelling units.
29
•,
Authority
CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing
and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of
the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Exhibit B).
Applicable Law
Central Point Comprehensive Plan & Comprehensive Plan Map
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans
CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. - R-1, Residential Single-Family District
Discussion
The proposed subdivision is located on approximately 4.48 acres west of Chicory Lane and
east of Daisy Creek. It consists of twenty-one (21) single-family homes and would be
developed as the Lindsey Meadows subdivision. Access to the subdivision is proposed from
Chicory Lane via Lindsey Court, a new local street. A residential lane, as yet unnamed, is
also proposed to serve some lots within the subdivision. The City does not presently have
a standard for residential lanes which are local streets with reduced rights-of--way, limited
on-street parking, and designed to serve a limited number of dwellings. Staff is working
with the applicant on establishing standards for this type of street in the city.
The Planning Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance.. The area is designated for low density
residential development by the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned R-1-6, Residential Single-
Family (6,000 s.f.).
The Public Works Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the City's
water, sewer, storm drain and transportation standards. The Public Works staff report will
be presented at the Planning Commission meeting. Written comments were also received
from affected public agencies and utilities regarding their requirements for the development
of the proposed subdivision, as well as from residents of the area expressing their concerns
about the proposed development (Exhibit D).
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the
project and necessary for its approval:
1. The project site is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family (6,000 s.£)
District.
30
r '~io
1
The project is a permitted use in the R-1-6 residential district. This zoning
classification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the
project site as Low Density Residential.
2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of
approximately 4.48 acres for the purpose of developing asingle-family residential
subdivision, Lindsey Meadows. The total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is 21.
The average density for the subdivision is 4.69 units/acre.
The proposed single-family subdivision meets the density requirement for the
R-1-6 residential zone which is a maximum of 6 units/acre. Each lot within the
subdivision meets the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance requirements for
residential lots as well as the specific requirements forthe R-1-6=zone. The tentative
plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.10A10 et seq...
3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the
proposed subdivision, the findings of fact, and the conclusions of law and determined that
the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions
of the Planning Department (Exhibit C) and the Public Works Department.
Exhibits
A. Tentative Plan -Lindsey Meadows
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions
D. Written Comments
3i
q
/ +~
y"
r
I~x
i a•
n
r
.~
5
A ~
§ ~9
tlv
~ + $~
w :aw,cv ~
a ~I '°,~
w ~ ~_ I-
$I
v
H~~ f ~ t
[~7y ~~ i
z
0
d
aryv~
ro ~
cz~~
~:"3 °o a
~y
•d~°'~
~~o~
zo~
zo
0
3
c
a
t
~~
_ -~
__ ,___i
A
I $v'
8
pq~$~ ~Rn€~ ~8~~~
a
~~61~~~Ipa
_%
n=
.~
•~ ~
.,
City of C'ent~al Point
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GYty of Centr~I Faint-
EXHI~I3' t><~ tt
Planning Department
James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator/Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
Deanna Gregory
Administrative/Planning Secretary
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: October 8, 1997
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
October 21, 1997
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a Tentative Subdivision to be located in a Residential Single-Family District (R-1-6)
near the intersection of Chicory Lane and Timothy Street. -The proposed Lindsey Meadows
Subdivision would create 21 parcels on Tax Lots 500, 600, and 700 of Jackson County Assessor
Map page 37 2W IODA.
('RTTERT_A FOR DECISION
The requirements for Tentative Plans and Zoning are set forth in Chapter 16 and 17 of the Central
Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping
and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public
Works Standards.
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 21, 1997.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission. e3 e3
155 South Second Street ~ ^entral Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3''' 1 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384
~
~A 1
D
I
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, .155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same areavailable at
15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 ext. 231.
Y OF PR2C_FD
At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any
testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of
the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan. City regulations
provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions.
34
155 South Second Street ~' Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-?z21 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384
J
` i
- /?
EXHIBIT C
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
1. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy of the
proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CCRs) for the Lindsey Meadows
subdivision.
2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and
utilities as they pertain to the development of the Lindsey Meadows subdivisipn. Evidence
of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to finale plat.approvaL
3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and
requirements applicable to the development and construction of the Lindsey Meadows
subdivision.
35
t" ,~
~_ •
JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON
mo ~II~ y 200 ANTELOPE ROAD WHITE CITY, OREGON 97b03
4 PARKS SEP
July 25, 1997
Attention: Jim Bennett
City of Central Point Planning
115 South Second Street
Central Point, OR 97502
RE: Planning File 97038; 19-lot residential subdivision
Dear Mr. Bennett:
°~ a , u
ROADS 6 PARKS SERVICES
JOSEPH L. STRAHL, DIRECTOR
(603) 826.3122 or (603) 776-7266
FAX: (603) 630.6407
City of Central Faint.
E,XHISIT t'D't
Planning Department
Thank you for the opportunity to commenton this request for Lindsey Meadows
Subdivision, a 19-lot residential subdivision, located on the west side. of Chicory Lane north of
Timothy Street. Roads and Parks Services recommends the following conditions of approval:
1. Chicory Lane is a local access road that has a twenty (20) foot right-of-way and is
substandard. The applicant should be required to improve Chicory Lane along his
frontage to the same standard as Chicory Street to handle the addition traffic.
2. If additional right-of-way is required for the improvements, dedication should be required.
If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at 830-6400 ext. #230.
Sincere) ,
Eric Niemeyer
Traffic & Development Section
~~
e
"g~,~~ D
I:\DEVELOP\CITIES\CNTRLPT\97038.DSB
BEAR CREEK OREENWAY / ENOINEER7N0 / FLEETMANAOEMEM / MOTORPOOL / PARKS / ROAD MAINTENANCE / VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
776.7188 828-3122 8263122 776.7338 776-7001 818.3122 8283122
1?OG'iJE RIVED VALLEY IRR16~I'ION DISTRICT
7119 M[RRIMAN ROAD 'O~ MEOFORO.OREGON 9'1501-1277 b 15031777-6127
July 28, 1997
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
City of Central Point
155 South 2nd St.
Central Point, OR 97502
RE: Subdivision Tentative Plats
Dear Ken:
The Rogue River Valley Irrigation District does not-have any
responsibilities on-the proposed Lindsey Meadows;::;Subdivision.
(97038-TP). The only requirement that we have on the Summerfield
Estates Subdivision (97039-TP) would be a Right To Transfer
document, so we could move the water that was on the property.
On the New Haven Estates Subdivision (97031-TP), the
District operates and maintains several Distriot owned and
private laterals that will need to be considered.
The Districts Upton Lateral traverses the project through
the north-easterly side of the property and runs roughly in a
north-westerly direction. This is an open canal that will have
to be placed in a pipeline to District specifications, at the
developers expense, with a 25 foot easement and road for
operation and maintenance over the pipeline facility. No fences,
gates, or permanent structures can be built within the right-of-
way. The District would be open to discussion on relocating the
placement of the pipeline to ,more effectively coincide with
streets, but would need to have an agreement with the City of
Central Point for joint maintenance.
The District also owns and operates the Harvey Lateral that
comes into the project from the south just west of Tax Lot 3700.
This lateral has served all the properties in the proposed
development and Tax Lot 3700. The District will need an easement
and free and easy access to the control boxes and the pipeline,
together with a pipeline and recorded 15 foot maintenance
easement for the lateral that serves Tax Lot 3700. As .long as
Tax Lot 3700 continues to irrigate, arrangements will have to be
made for tailwater or return flow to get to a storm drain with a
drainage easement and pipeline to keep the water out of the lots
between Hawthorne Way and New Haven Road.
37
4.
~ ?
Ken Gerschler
Page 2
July 28, 1997
There is also a private lateral with an easement that
diverts from the Upton Lateral approximately between St. James
Way and Jeremy Streets, to serve the properties to the east that
will have to be replaced since the.existing pipeline is shallow
and leaks severely.
The property will have to have the water removed by the
District exclusion-process. The current exclusion cost is $76.89
per acre. This rate will change on 1/1/96.. The current
irrigation-charges on the property must be paid in full, the
exclusion fee must be paid and the District needs a photocopy of
the written surveyors description for the_land being excluded. ,
No drainage water can be accepted into the District's
laterals without prior approval and an approved drainage
contract. As always, constructon:times and schedules must be
accomplished so as not to interfere with the Districts normal
water deliveries.
If you have any questions, please contact me at the District
office at 773-6127.
Sincerely,
ROGfJE R R VALLEY
IRRIGAT N ISTRICT
im Pendleton
Manager
38
~~
JA(K~Otf (OUN1Y Fig D~rnia No;
8333 Agate Rd
White City, Oregon, 97503
541-826-7100
Fax 541-826-4566
Jury 29. 1997
City of Central Point
155 South Second Street
Central Point, OR 97502
Attn..: Ken Gerschler
RE: 9703 I -TP 97039-TP 97038-TP:
I. 97039-TP Summerfield Estates subdivision
97038-TP Lindsey Meadows
.The site plan address the required Fre Code issues for cul<Je-sacs, and street width. Thee
plans'do not address fine hydrarm. The fire District request a meeting with the devebper(s) to diswss
the placement of fire hydrants. Fre Hydrants shall be placed every 300' thrnughoutthesubdivision.
The minimum fire fbw requirementis 1000 galbns per minute.
2. 9703 I -TP New Haven Estates subdivision
This site plan is the same as stated above, The District request a meeting to disam fire hydrant
placement, etc..
Oxford Patio will require a turnaround forfire department apparatus.
3`9
^
JUL-GS-177'! 11:5'! W Y NH I UFiHL UHS
541 858 4'!714 h".1911171
~l ~ 4 '
7-25-97
MEMO
TO' -Central Point planning Department
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
.6694-3321 Fax 664-6384
FROM WP Natural Oas
David McFadden
858-0740 Fax 858.4790 -
RE: Comments on Planning Action Applications
97-071-TP !Yew Haven Estates Subdivision
WP Natural Gas recomtnstds that a 10-foot Public Utility Easements be created alarg all
street frartages. If these streets are not to be public, we recommend that the street aeeas also be
classified as a P.U.E. W e also recommend that the developer use common 4-Foot utility trenches
in the PUE for power, gas, telephone, and cable use. Apre-construction utility meeting should
also be held to coordinate services. ~~
Natural gas service can be made available to this development The developer should
contact Steve Wood, 858737 or 821-2952, at WP Naturel~Gas to make arrangements. WP
Natural Gas asks that the developer provide a larger plat map of the development (see carunent
below). Plat traps can be E-mailed to WP Natural Gas at DFORII@W WPCO.COM
A suggestion for traffic safety; The easterly access onto Vt2as Road•would be better
located if it were not~ce.tlle carve of Vilas Rd.
97-034-TP Snmmelfield Estates Subdivision
WP Natural Gas recommends that a 10-foot Public Utility Easements be created along all
street frontages. If these streets are not to be public, we recontmsld that the street aeeas also be
classified as a P.U.E. We also rewmmend that the developer use btimmon 4-foot utility wenches
in the PUE for power, gas, telephone, and cable use. A pr'aconstruction utility meeting should
also be held to coordinate services. '
Natural gas service can be made available to this development. The developer should
contact Steve Wood, 858-4737 or 821-2952, at WP Naturat Gasio•ritake arrangements. WP
Natural Gas asks that the developer provide a larger plat map ofthe development (ace comment
below). Plat traps can be E-mailed to WP Natural Gas at. DFORD@W WPCO.COM
97-038-TP Lindsey Meadows ~ ~~ `'
WP Natural Gas rewmtnends that a 10-foot Public Utility Easements be created alarg all
street frontages, as shown on the plat. If these streets are not to be public, we recaanrnend that the
street areas also be claesified as a P.U:E. We also recommend that dte develops' use coxtrrnar 4-
foot utility trenches in the PUE for power, gas. telephone,'and calilq;rase. A pre~onstruction
utility meeting should also be held to coordinate services:. '
Nattral gas service can be made available to this development. The developer should
contact Steve Wood, 8581t737 or 821-2952, at WP Natural Gas tat~fake arrangements. WP
Nattual Gas asks that the developer provide a larger plat map of thedavelopment (see comment
below). Plat maps can be E-mailed to WP Natural Gas at DFORD@W WPCO.COM
I recommnend that the city ask the developers to provide enough plat.maps bf at least 18"X24" in size that
the Planning department can distribute adequate size maps with the notification of Planning Action
Application. Of the 3 traps received, only the Lindsey Meadows map was cleaz eacugh to show any
details, and even it had no street dames shown. ,
I was unable to attend the last meeting that considered the Mobile•Iiottte Park located to the west of the
New haven Estates property. It also did not show PUSS along the street• frontages. Without these areas
being set aside for utilities, power transformers, telephone connection boxes, and orbs' utility facilities can
not be placed or planned. .• .
40~...
Tf1TfX P Al
'. ,
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT
for
LINDSEY MEADOWS
PW#97038
Date: 10/15/97
Applicant: Richard Voightman
4294 East Barnett Road, Medford, Oregon 97501
Agent: Darrell Cooper, 1500 Spring Street, Medford, Oregon 97501
Project: Subdivision
Location: Northwest of Timothy Street and Chicory Lane.
Legal: T37S, R2W, Section 10DA, Tax Lot 500
Zoning: R-1-6
Lots: 21 total (no phases proposed)
Units: 20 New, one existing
Plans: Lindsey Meadows, Hammond Engineering, revision 3 dated 8-13-97.
Report By: Lee Brennan, Public Works Director
Purpose
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding
City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and
development of the proposed subdivision. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed
development.
Special Requirements
Residential Lanes: The tentative plan illustrates one street which does not meet the City PWD's current
minimum width requirements and which the City PWD understands is to be a public street (in lieu of a
private road). The tentative plan illustrates a 20-foot wide right-of-way. In consideration of this plan and the
"infill" conditions of this subdivision, the City PWD is recommending the utilization of a new Residential
Lane standard which consists of the following:
^ A 25-foot-wide traveled section, with a 2 percent crown
^ Standard curb and gutters
^ A 2-foot-wide strip located behind the curb for installation of water meter service box
^ Requires a 30-foot-wide right-of-way.
^ Street parking not allowed on residential lanes.
The "hammerhead" design of the turnaround at the southern end of this street needs to be as approved by
the City PWD and Fire District No. 3. The City PWD is also recommending that a 5-foot wide sidewalk
section (with a suitable public ingress and egress easement requirement) would be provided overlying the
public-utility-easement to facilitate pedestrian traffic. The sidewalk would be installed as part of the
development and will be maintained by the property owner, similar to the City's current ordinance
requirement. The City PWD is further recommending that a concrete drive approach (constructed
somewhat similar to a driveway apron) would be required at the intersection with Shanthi Drive; the design
of which would be jointly determined by the Developer and the City PWD.
2. Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure
(i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not intertere
with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure
, ~ li
.~ i ~l
Lindsey Meadows
PWD Staff Report
October I5, 1997
Page 2
facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the
flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed
development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate
the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the
affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner
involved.
3. Storm Water Drainage Problems: The Developer is being asked to assist in alleviating the storm and
surtace water drainage problems associated with tax lots 37 2W 11 C, lot 8300 (Walt and Leora Frohreich)
and 37 2W 10DA lot 100 (Virginia Brown ), by providing for connections to the proposed development's
storm drainage collection, retention, and conveyance facilities to facilitate proper drainage in the area of
these two tax lots.
4. Daisy Creek Setback and Flood Hazard Prevention: The Developer should address the requirements of
CPMC Chapter 17.60 pertaining to setbacks from floodways and creek banks, and CPMC Chapter 8.24
pertaining to flood damage prevention and hazard mitigation associated with Daisy Creek. The Developer
shall also work with the City's PWD in improving the flow capacity of Daisy Creek to mitigate any current or
future flood hazards associated with the floodway of Daisy Creek. The City PWD would request, for flood
emergency puposes, that the proposed development would provide the City with either right-of-way or
easment for suitable driveable access to Daisy Creek from the proposed development.
5. Chicory Lane Improvements and Rights-of--Way: As a minimum, complete half-street improvements (i.e.
street section, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage) and provide dedication for expansion of the right-
of-way along Chicory Lane to 35-feet in width (25-feet west of centerline), to a point approximately 70 feet
to the north of the existing end of improvements on Chicory Lane. Developer to work with the City on
obtaining right-of-way dedication and completing half-street improvements on the eastern side of the
centerline of Chicory Lane adjacent to the section to be improved, to obtain the full 50-foot right-of-way
dedication, and completion of road improvements.
6. Shanthi Lane: As discussed above, the City PWD is developing a residential lane standard and
designation. To identify these types of streets, and to avoid confusion, the City PWD would request that the
Developer rename Shanthi Lane to Shanthi Drive or other suitable street identifier. A suitable City
approved semi-permanent traffic barricade shall be designed and implemented at the northern end of
Shanthi Drive.
General
1. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions
approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards,
and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the
construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the
Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to
installation.
2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by
other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and JC Roads.
3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the
Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should
' , ''~.,
,., r
Lindsey Meadows
PWD Stajj'Repw•t
October I5, 1997
Page 3
provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar®) and in a "digital" format compatible
with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved
construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items,
including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings;
road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to
street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations
and depths; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar®), or an approved alternative format, of
construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD®compatible drawing electronic file to the
City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as
part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee.
4. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark
shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least two
permanent benchmarks shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as
jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer.
5. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other
deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in
accordance with the requirements of the DEQ.
6. Easements for Ciry infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]) should be a
minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary
sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried
infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City
owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required.
Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that
easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure
facilities, as determined by the City PWD.
Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following
should be submitted:
^ A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and water system improvement
plans for the proposed development.
^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the
appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans.
8. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of
banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed subdivision will connect into
existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval.
9. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year floodzone, the Developer will be required
to explain and provide detail as to what affects will the placement of these structures have on the floodzone;
what affect will the development have on the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary; and what affects
will the modification of the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary have on the existing and proposed
facilities, and properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer
shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and illustrate the existing boundaries of the
floodplain and floodway fora 100-year storm event (commonly referred to as the "Base Flood Event")
',
Lindsey Meadows
PWD Staff Report
October I5, 1997
Page 4
associated with Daisy Creek, on the construction plans submitted far the development. The
drawings shall also indicate the revised Base Flood Elevation contours and boundaries of the
Floodplain and Floodway expected to occur following the completion of any development within the
identified floodzone (also referred to as the 'Area of Special Flood Hazard"l.
10. Overhead power lines. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, US West, and TCI
Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed
development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements
associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of
these facilities from overhead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the
Developer.
11. .The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location
of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and
vertically) on the construction plans and as-built drawings.
StreetslTraffic
Existing Improvements - Chicory Lane (improved section from Timothy) -Residential Street Current ROW
50' wide, 36 feet street width. Jurisdiction -City
Chicory Lane (unimproved section) -Residential Street Current ROW 20' wide, 20
feet wide gravel road. Jurisdiction -City
1. Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and Traffic Control Plan in
accordance with the requirements of the City PWD. Street lights shall be placed in a "zig-zag" pattern
along the streets and at maximum 200-foot spacing (as measured from light post to light post) to afford
better lighting of the public rights-of-way. The Street Lighting Plan shall include placing street lights on the
residential lanes, of a design and at locations as approved by the City PWD and Pacific Power. Street
lights will also need to be installed or possibly modified along Chicory Lane to afford proper lighting of the
intersection.
2. The City PWD shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine
the street section designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. The City's engineering staff or
selected engineering consultant (at Developer's expense), shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and
determine the street section designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. Minimum street section
shall be as follows:
- 3-inches Class "B" A.C.
- 6-inches of 1"-0" crushed rock
- 8-inches of 4"-0" crushed rock (City of Medford specifications),
- Woven geotextile fabric over compacted subgrade.
Street section (excluding the asphalt concrete portion) shall be extended underneath and two feet beyond
the curb and gutter section.
3. As applicable, stop signs and traffic delineation (i.e. "stop bars") shall be required and installed by the City
PWD (at the Developer's expense) at the proposed development's intersection with Chicory Lane.
4. Current PWD standard minimum curb to curb widths of local streets are currently 36 feet with a minimum
right-of-way width of 50 feet. Minimum pavement radii of cul-de-sacs are currently 43 feet, with a minimum
right-of-way radius of 50-feet. Streets shall be modified accordingly.
~i, ~;,.
' ~ ~ it
Lindsey Meadows
PWD Staff Report
October /5, 1997
Page 5
Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements
Existing Improvements - Shallow irrigation ditches (running west to east) along southern and northern
boundaries of proposed development. Daisy Creek is along western border of
proposed development.
The design of the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) shall provide for
storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surtace run-on or culvert or
creek/ditch conveyance).
2. During construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of
hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the
use of the City PWD's rainfalllintensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers,
retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations.
3. Developer shall demonstrate how SD system will work during 10-year and 100 year flood events associated
with Daisy Creek. Identify the HGL in Daisy Creek during 10-and 100-year storm event, and what affect
will it have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system. System should be designed to adequately
drain 10-year storm without surcharging or should be provided with adequate storage to prevent
surcharging; and be designed to prevent backflow of water from Daisy Creek up into SD system during
storm events. The allowable storm water discharge rates into Daisy Creek from the proposed development
shall not be greater than the run-off flow rates experienced from the property in its current status, unless the
downgradient facilities have adequate capacities or will be modified to handle the additional flows.
4. Materials shall be PVC (ASTM D 3034 with gaskets), HDPE (meeting ODOT requirements for corrugated
polyethylene storm sewer pipe, including a provision for premium water-tight coupling bands), or approved
equal. Provide concrete encasement where required in areas of minimum cover.
5. If inlets/catch basins are to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip of the inlet, then the inlets and catch basins
shall be designed to afford suitable "man" entry into the inlets/catch basin for maintenance/cleaning
purposes.
6. Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flow line plots for private and
public storm drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGL on the
profile. Pipes should maintain cleaning velocity (minimum 2.0 feet per second) and have adequate
capacities without surcharging during the design storm.
7. The Developer may wish to incorporate the use of a perforated SD system. If so, then the perforated storm
drain system shall be designed to have adequate capacities to:
^ Convey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum cleaning velocities and
without surcharging the collection and conveyance piping; and
^ Minimize silts, sands, gravels, and fines migration from the native soils into the SD system.
The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the storm water run-off and run-on
inflows into the SD system.
~,,,
,.,, ,
Lindsey Meadows
PWD Staff Report
October /5, 1997
Page 6
8. Construction of private storm drains is discouraged by the City. However, if a private storm drain is to be
constructed, the following is required:
- Provide to the City acceptable documentation as to how the private storm drains will be
maintained, repaired, etc.
- All lot drainage should be drained by surface flow to the curb and gutter section of the
street or to a private storm drain line located either at the rear/sides of the lots or in the
PUE or other suitable easement outside the public rights of way.
- Private storm drain lines shall only be connected to the public storm drain system at curb
inlets or manholes.
- Provide suitable clean-outs (type and spacing with maximum 200 foot spacing).
- Provide invert elevations and lateral stationing for construction of private storm drain
system.
- Provide plan and profile views and elevations for any private storms drain system that may
be proposed.
- Designed to facilitate minimum cleaning velocity of 2.0 feet per second.
9. Provide 0.2-foot drop through all manholes and curb inlets.
10. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to a public storm drain line. The roof drains
(that do not drain to splash blocks) and underdrain lines that discharge at the curb face in accordance with
City PWD Standards.
11. Developer should be required to coordinate with affected irrigation district(s) to resolve any irrigation rights
with the subject property or for use of water from Daisy Creek.
Sanitary Sewer
1. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction, and testing shall
conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter,
Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable.
2. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer
laterals.
3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans
to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of
final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on
the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form.
4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA
requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports,
TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance.
Water System
1. The water system shall be designed to provide the required demand capacities with a minimum fire flow
demand of 1,000 gpm (at a minimum pressure of 20 psi), and shall conform to Fire District 3 and City PWD
requirements. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants shall be 300 feet. The water system shall be of reinforced
flow ("looped") design, with connections to the existing 8-inch water line in Chicory Lane. Lateral/connection
stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built drawings.
~,
.r~, ,
Lindsey Meadows
PWD Staff Report
October 15, 1997
Page 7
Site work, Grading and Design, and Utility Plans
Developer shall provide the necessary "rough" lot grading to assure that all lots will drain properly to the
curb and gutter, or to a drainage system that drains to the curb and gutter or public storm drain system, as
approved by the City PWD and the City Building Department.
2. Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing
grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the
existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations.
3. Indicate location of street lights on plans, with table indicating stationing and offsets.
Rights of WayslEasements
1. Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements regarding any proposed
development that may overlap any existing easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or alters
an existing easement should be approved by the easement's owner in writing, and a copy of that written
approval should be submitted to the City PWD prior to submission of construction plans for City PWD
review and approval. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development shall be
shown on the final plat with reference to the recordation number and Grantee.
2. If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any
affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the
State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the
proposed development.
~ i~~
,,, ~,,, 1
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING
DATE: October 21, 1997
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator
SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Shelterwood Subdivision
A licant: Michael E. Sullivan
3784. Coleman~Creek°Road
Medford, OR 97501
Agent: Farber & Sons, Inc. dba Farber Surveying
120 Mistletoe Street
Medford, OR 97501
Robert L. & Bernadine K. Cartwright
3316 Bursell Road
Central Point, OR 97502
37 2W 11D TL 1800
Michael E. & Sandra M. Sullivan
3~784.Coleman~Creek~Road °'~N `~ ~ ~ ~~, ,, 4.-`Q ~ ~
Medford, OR 9750°1° ~`
37 2W I1D TL 2201 & 2~0
37 2W I1DTL 1800-1.01 acres
R-2, Residential Two-Family
Owners of Jack M. & Betty J. Beale
Record: 3344 Bursell Road
37 2W 11D TL 2201 - 0.50 acres
R-2; Residential Two-Family
Central Point, OR 97502
37 2W 11D TL 1700
Ernest L. & Betty A. Brewer
~2,~6<Bur~sell-Road, ~ `~~y r`~~~~
Central Point, OR 97502
37 2W 11D TL 1901
~,.
Property 37 2W 11D TL 1700 -1.01 acres
Description/ R-2, Residential Two-Family
Zoning:
37 2W I ID TL 1901-1.53 acres
R-2, Residential Two-Family
37 2W 11D TL 2300 - 2.07 acres'
R-2, Residential Two-Family
4i
S~
The applicant, Michael Sullivan, is proposing a tentative plan for the subdivision of
approximately 6.12 acres located north of Beall Lane and east of Burrell Road (Exhibit A).
The site is presently zoned R-2, Residential Two-Family. The site will be developed as a
single-family residential subdivision, Shelterwood. The total number of lots proposed for the
subdivision is twenty-six (26). The average density for the subdivision is 4.25 units/acre.
The maximum density permitted for the site. is 12 units/acre. The maximum number of
dwelling units that would be permitted under the proposed zoning is approximately seventy-
three (73) dwelling units.
Authority
CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing
.and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of
the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Exhibit B).
Applicable Law
Central Point Comprehensive Plan & Comprehensive Plan Map
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans
CPMC 17.24.010 et seq. - R-2, Residential Single-Family District
Discussion
The proposed subdivision is located on approximately 6.12 acres north of Beall Lane and
east of Burrell Road. It consists of twenty-six (26) single-family homes and would be
developed as the Shelterwood subdivision. Access to the subdivision is proposed from Beall
Lane via Shelterwood Drive, a new local street, and from Burrell Road via Greenleaf Lane,
a.residential lane.. A second residential lane, Arborwood Lane,, is also proposed to serve
some lots within the subdivision; The City does not presently have a standard for residential
lanes which are local streets with reduced rights-of--way, limited on-street parking, and
designed to serve a limited number of dwellings. Staff is working with the applicant on
establishing standards for this type of street in the city.
The Planning Department has reviewed the tentative plan for .compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning,Ordinance. The area is designated for medium density
residential development by the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned R-2, Residential Two-
Family. Single-family dwellings are permitted usesin the R-2 zoning district. This is an ini"ill
development. The surrounding area is entirely comprised of single-family dwellings.
~~ ~
42
f l7r.i ~ .
The Public Works Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the City's
water, sewer, storm drain and transportation standards. The Public Works staff report will
be presented at the Planning Commission meeting. Written comments were also received
from affected public agencies and utilities regarding their requirements for the development
of the proposed subdivision, as well as from residents of the area expressing their concerns
about the proposed development (Exhibit D).
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the
project and necessary for its approval:
1. The project site is located in the R-2, Residential Single-Family District.
The project is a permitted use irr the R-2 residential district. This zoning
classification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the
project site as Medium Density Residential.
2. 'The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of
approximately ' 6.12 acres for the purpose of developing asingle-family residential
subdivision, Shelterwood. The total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is 26. The
average density for the subdivision is 4.25 units/acre.
The proposed single-family subdivision meets the density requirement for the
R-2 residential zone which is a maximum of 12 units/acre. Each lot within the
subdivision meets the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance requirements for
residential lots as well as the specific requirements for the R-2 zone. The tentative plan
includes all information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et seq.
3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the
proposed subdivision, the findings of fact, and he_conclusions ofiaw and determined-that
the project meets all City standards and requirements subject.to the recommended conditions
of the Planning Department (Exhibit C) and the Publio Works Department.
Exhibits
A. Tentative Plan - Shelterwood
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions
D. Written Comments
43
al X110
Applicank: a~-re~~~o
Miohul E. Sul llvan
M~ElaN'a8ra8on 9>SOlatl
L1WOBf 6: >^'x ~
Mlehael E. aryl Sandra k. Sul llvan
3184 Celoan Cruk Bud
Xedlard..,BCeBan 91501
hek M: 'itl8r6akly J. Beale: 6A201D
334 8vae11'-. ROatl
Canlral Pe Mt, 8r.~pon 9>50R
Ernuk L. and Betty A. erexv
3498 &IreelLEOatl
Central P91nk, Dre90n 9]503 ..
Bebert L. and 8arnatllne K. CarMrlpht
C~nkr~l Po tnkN,aO^egen 9 ~n ply
I m49-
dwan ~ nsa
p.~l~ N+n~~.~e16~
Cxxnl N•1••.
~1•w••v'a My Wa^ w IAII, gpiTU~4 IJOf. 1a W. _...r..
xav-IID n•. 1>m,leuD,rom.re col
imlauw •UKKVI•Im .m Er~x'h un• •d3wleml
Shelterwood
un~lwr m m• s ~ i : gg~~ viu.l gi 11alfii:e°~y el"
o~nma~ao.m~; "Pdrjr•n danry"'G+9•n.
Michael E. Sullivan
d'~f,~!'~oa°~, 3r~"9'"
I
i
I
I------------------------
I
I
~ PiL~Y6S5° .
1 _
1 s.
I __________ N.:9
Oity of Cex-tral Fof3ntr ~'
~TI~T'I' ttAt
Planning Department
Zara RQ
bt K
La1 'L
n<~
_._........ ~~at3
3'y8
lal SI ~yt
bl S2
I.1x
9lnYEYEO BY:
FAI®EN 8 9JN9. INC.
ba FNBfA 6BL1EYW0
(Skl) )]40816
OFFICE LOCATION: KAILI NB ABDPE99:
M]%tl1~0. dTYt.19/SOi [E11f1VL ~WLB~ OIFSli1119]SM
DBPInm Br: wF,FAS kmxna: m•
sxE- I Ira : 5D I»I ,aB w. am5
DATE: 9 RP 19y>
BU9W: WN.O]0N IMB1.000E
UI
Gity of Central Point
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
City of Central Fait
~XHIHIT t*B~.tt
Planning Department
James H. Bennett; AICP
City Administrator/Planning Director
I<en Gerschler
Planning Technician
Deanna Gregory
Administrative/Planning Secretary
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
~gTiJ1iF nF MEETING
Notice of Public Hearing
Date of Notice: October 6, 1997
Tuesday, October 21, 1997
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an application
for a Tentative Subdivision to be located in a Residential Two-Family District (R-2) near the intersection
of Beall Lane and Hopkins Road. The proposed Shelterwood Subdivision would create 25 parcels on Tax
Lots 1700; 1800, 2201, and 2300 of Jackson County Assessor map page 37 2W 11D.
~RTTFRiA FOR DECISION
The requirements for Tentative Plans and Zoning are set forth in Chapters 16 and 17 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street Parking, Site, Plan,. Landscaping and
Conshuction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to'the City's Public Works Standards.
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written
comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 21, 1997.
2, Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 135 South
Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration
of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions
described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning
Commission.
Street
45
,s'~ , , „
,,' ,.,,
~BY j
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall; 155
South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) b64-3321 ext.
231,
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant,. proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any
testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the
review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan. City regulations provide that the
Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions.
155 South Second Street • .Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 664-63254
46
n~ ,j. ~ 1~
/.r
EXHIBIT C
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
1. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy of the
proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CCRs) for the Shelterwood subdivision.
2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and
utilities as they pertain to the development of the Shelterwood subdivision. Evidence of such
compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval.
3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and
requirements applicable to the development and construction of the Shelterwood subdivision.
47
C5ty of CentralP~*aihtE~, ,
City ~f Cen~Y~r l~rrnt _ EXHIBIT tYDtt
Planning Department
PL~NNIlVG ,1sEPARTMENT
~~ ~ ' ~ 1997'
Building Department
~_ Fire District #3
_ City Attorney
_ BCVSA
_ Public Works Department
Police Department
_ City Administrator
State Highway Division
CITY ~j~. ,
_.
_ Jackson County_L~oads
& Parks
Jackson Co. Admin.
Officer
Jackson Co. Planning
_ Jackson Co. Health Dept.
_ Jackson Co. Surveyor
U.S. Post Office
James H. nennett, AICP
City AdministratorJPlanning DLcector
Ken Gerechler
Planning Technician
Airport
_ Pacific Power & Light
_ WP Natural Gas
_ U.S. West
_ TCI Cablevision
Rogue River Valley
Irrig. Dist.
Rogue Valley Transit
_ Central Point School
Dist. #6
FileNo.: Y7oS~ -Tl~ Project Name: Stielterwmo9 5.,6d~ivd~on
File No.: Project Name:
File No.: Project Name:
File No.: Project Name:
Attached is a Planning action application. Please investigate and submit to the Planning Department,
within ten (10) working days, a written report setting forth any necessary wnditions as required of your
department/agency for approval of the above project(s). If no comments are received within the ten day
review period, it will be assumed that there are no comments.
A Planning Conuuission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, O~-Fe6o r 21 ~ I q97 at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. /D~~j
Sincerely,
Ken Gerschler ~ ~~~~ lam- ~/'~'~ ~~~5 '7~ZlKN 7i=~
Planning Technician /~~ ~~,~p1Gcc9~9~J( ~~ ,
48 ~-~--
155 South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 664-6384
3rt.y Sine ealkltip!a?+t '• ..-:
~_ "-
~.
: t `~ ~l. ~t4 ~4
R
r Y n 7,
~atia~t x1 rttiwtMh~P ~Y ti:. ~_` . x
~
'
asp~ir NerS f ;~1ksE off'
e
H
~
~ s ~
;.
~; t
uun
gn
n ;
t
. ~~f~y~~ ~ ~ +
.
r~8t~ fiQSd + '~ ~~ ;
,
+
~dtse R=2• AY'td?sf¢ „gtPr~ "` ~
"' +dY`+lSn„tf
~"tad~t ~ t
€~a
~ • x ,
x$.29 .
Bi..'*7 , fOp.6o • 8sS tk
s~
+ . ,,.
6~'1Q 9G ~ C 84tlo aq ft 8ftb~3 sq ft, ~ , •
'~ '
SO PP6podpd ~' ~. ~. ~ ~ •. _~
_ LVA. \
72.89
`~..~
,~ 1
y
, ..~
~
` pry
+l "X 11 lat 43.
~
,;
,
V
..
:
used +7ater line':' ; ; . `.
i01 rli
r h
-- - -
~ ~ ~
Lt~t 9
M' _ _ _
~-. -~
.`
;
~
e 69®9 s0 ft
hi
nl
'
Sq l-t R~ 1~F - ` v; hot 44'~ - -
14' .P[`ISfiospd ; , ' .9.2.78
P,Ct.E. i• ` orlghiial PCoRerty ~
~
1.4t $~ r.. t
/1'Sne Yl: 3610
_ ___
d
Q
Yg66 9Q f t ~ : ~ i LO~ ~ ~ ~ N
W
~ . - ~M,
a
;~ ~ .`
~;
6389 s.4 ft
~.
~~n_
T
:.
-
v ..
Lot ~.
.~4,~
.
~ . ~wr..
~.' • 92.7Q , + ~ t~+R
~ . +
1
~
~'
Lot 17 ~$
rw+ ,
+
g, saki 84 +t ,~ rr
~ +
"~'~%' Ur', ~li389 s4 Et ~:' LOt d6
~ ,
' Sc~:7Q; ~ ' ,
-
- ,
~» ~.
:+
~ .. ~
-
_
~'
92.19.
i
~ ~
w l.Dt' 2.Ci
'
~}
. ~:,.
W
~ t iy,
<<,,Y
~~
~, r
603
1-sa f4 o. '3:- ~.. '
Ori4yinal Prp~~P~pprty ~~'
th,.:'
.';
.~.
LOt~ (`1' ~,
4ot 47;
3.1nB iC 19D~ ~ ~: ~: ~ 8389 sa+:.~
.'92.:7.8: ~ t(3.°• +
s . *
,®
J •$9151 Sq 4t _. _iR
$ N. Lpt 5.
Lot. 48
t
'~Q
~ ~~
°
~ ~... ~ a~.~a
;
++
t
~
+ f ~
~•~ae~ a4r r c ;
cot 49
~,.
~ -
-' ~i"a
Lt-t 4 ~.
Bi 19 ~ ~ 6fi50 sQ Ft ~ : --
..
. r ,
-
. .
.
' -
+~ , fi
t ,
.
sQ 3~
'~ 7000 ; ,~ ~ ~ X786 sp f t, ~ ~~
. „
,
; L}1t J~
ShefQ. _
! ~ . /~~y p 01 ~
.-
j
e!t~
9G .~7~
1
1
.. 1
..~
DC .7y :. p
~~
1
~W..
~.
.
~
~. ,.
y`1O; proPQ4ea -
-
A ~ , ~
~,
c~,Q
l.Ot
' ~ , ~
~. ,
~
N ~
~~ g
~QtR I j _
t.t ~ '
6786 s
. ~
. 6403 spy fk ~
is ~ N, q
N, . -
t
`4
, , 1
' -~' ~ a ~ .SOni tary sewer.
~
~' r~ r~
ro y~
Lflt 25 i srs+,
~ dot 1 ~,
'
4
YdDO sq .ft
~ ,
{ ~
-~, .
3010 s0 F'
~-;~ {pt ~~
s `
~' ~
• t = •'Y'Xt9'tYnyy
'
~ ~ d::sadewa'Lk,
Ch ~~, t,..
` ri~ ..e.~; .e
. ~r..p1+1 a.n~T'w
~ti
y. .LI:....S:ti-! e~riw«} •.• slip Y Y,r' ~ f .rT -
~~~~ d{
~~~~
~
~'''~. _. Rk~EiC~ 4C?G1~fiI~7N' f~AiLiA1~ AAGR$
,
~ ~1 ~
r ~
, ~`~
• ~ ~.
~
~
~
'
~~
~~~ _
_
!
LY1.1 (i ~ G Y
W
l ~. i~
i1 R1
~Te LL
fY.
i '
i
~•'~
j
~~'pp
~
Y5, rA~M i -.
~
~ ~~ ~ ~- ~_ . '
1 -
«u,- ' GOi~CfT~: 8Y'` filAf'r t~,fQ` '"
~A~~Utk
: ~ ..
• ~` ` t S~z14E + ~ ~(rtC~t . ~6" lecet~ .
Jio. ~
b
- ,
, ~ s'
~ ; 114fV rY.s
f ~ ~~~Mf ~ ~.~'Ar7 r
' +^
'
i
y 5
/
' X
i i
1 t f
. . .
. ~ .. . ,... S~, v,i
4 l /~ _ r ~X t r~ a
~1 ~q~ I
1 1 i, II i
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT
for
SHELTERWOOD
PW#97051
Date: 10/15/97
Applicant: Michael E. Sullivan
3784 Coleman Creek Road, Medford, Oregon 97501
Project: Subdivision
Location: Northeast of Intersection of Bursell Road and Beall Lane.
Legal: T37S, R2W, Section 11 D, Tax Lot 1700, 1800, 1901, 2201, 2300
Zoning: R-2
Lots: 26 total (no phases proposed)
Units: 26 Single Family Residential
Plans: Tentative Subdivision and Property Line Adjustment Shelterwood,
Farber and Sons, Inc., revised 10-15-970
Report By: Lee Brennan, Public Works Director
Purpose
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding
City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and
development of the proposed subdivision. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed
development.
Special Requirements
Residential Lanes: The tentative plan illustrates two streets (Arborwood Lane and Greenleaf Lane) which
the City PWD understands are to be public streets (in lieu of private lanes). The applicant is requesting the
consideration of these streets as "Residential Lanes", similar to the residential lane specified in the City of
Medford's Land Development Code. The Medford Land Development Code specifies that a residential lane
would consist of a 24-foot-wide traveled way with standard curb and gutter, located within a 30-foot-wide
right-of-way. Parking is generally permitted on one-side of the street. In consideration of this request and
the "infill" conditions of this subdivision, the City PWD is recommending the utilization of a new Residential
Lane standard which consists of the following:
^ A 25-foot-wide traveled section, with a 2 percent crown
^ Standard curb and gutters
O A 2-foot-wide strip located behind the curb for installation of water meter service box
^ Requires a 30-foot-wide right-of-way.
^ Street parking not allowed on residential lanes.
The City PWD is also recommending that a 5-foot wide sidewalk section (with a suitable public ingress and
egress easement requirement) would be provided overlying the public-utility-easement to facilitate
pedestrian traffic. The sidewalk would be installed as part of the development and will be maintained by the
property owner, similar to the City's current ordinance requirement. The City PWD is further recommending
that concrete drive approaches (constructed somewhat similar to driveway aprons) would be required at
the intersections of these Residential Lanes with Shelterwood Drive and Bursell Road, the design of which
would be jointly determined by the Developer and the City PWD.
2. Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure
(i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere
p ~~
~ u !e r., .~ ~ „
Shelterwaod
PWD StafJ'Report
October I5, 1997
Page 2
with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure
facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the
flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed
development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate
the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the
affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner
involved.
3. Rights-of--Way and Easements: Provide dedication for expansion of the right-of-way along Beall Lane to
80-feet in width (40-feet each side of centerline). Provide suitable and acceptable easements for any public
works infrastructure located outside the public rights-of-way. A separate 10-foot minimum width public
utilities easement (P.U.E.) should also be required along the southern boundary of Tax Lot 1700.
4. Arborwood Lane Traffic Barricade and Turnaround: A suitable City approved permanent traffic
barricade shall be designed and implemented at the western end of Arborwood Lane. A suitable "T"
shaped "hammerhead" turnaround shall be designed and implemented, as approved by the City PWD and
Fire District No. 3.
5. Connections and Improvements to Bursell Road and Beall Lane: All street connections and
improvements to Bursell Road and Beall Lane including, but not limited to, street section, curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, bikeways, storm drainage, and traffic control and delineation, shall be coordinated and approved
by the JC Roads and the City PWD, and designed and constructed at the expense of the Developer as part
of the development of the proposed subdivision.
As approved by the City Administrator and/or JC Roads, as applicable, the Developer may request or be
required to defer any or all of the required improvements along Bursell Road and Beall Lane until a later
date. If any or all of the improvements are to be deferred to a later date, then the Developer will be required
to enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement with the City and/or Jackson County for the
improvements.
General
All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions
approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards,
and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the
construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the
Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to
installation.
2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by
other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality (DEO), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and JC Roads.
3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the
Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should
provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar®) and in a "digital" format compatible
with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved
construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items,
~J. ,1,v1
' P F, `., n
Shelterwood
PWD Staff Report
October I5, 1997
Page 3
including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings;
road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to
street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations
and depths; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar®), or an approved alternative format, of
construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD®compatible drawing electronic file to the
City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as
part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee.
4. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark
shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one
permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as
jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer.
5. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other
deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in
accordance with the requirements of the DEO.
6. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]) should be a
minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary
sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and notjust a P.U.E. Centerline of buried
infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City
owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required.
Easement dedications in f nal deeds or CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that
easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure
facilities, as determined by the City PWD.
Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following
should be submitted:
^ A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street anc] water system improvement
plans for the proposed development.
^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the
appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans.
8. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of
banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed subdivision will connect into
existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval.
9. Overhead power lines. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, US West, and TCI
Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed
development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements
associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of
these facilities from overhead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the
Developer.
10. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location
of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and
vertically) on the construction plans and as-built drawings.
t. a
i i„'~1,
Shelterwood
PWD Staff Report
October l5, 1997
Page 4
Streetsfi'raffic
Existing Improvements - Beall Lane -Secondary Arterial. Current ROW 60' wide, varying street width.
Right-of-Way required: 80-foot width; 40-foot on either side of centerline.
Jurisdiction -Jackson County.
Bursell Road -Collector. Current ROW 60' wide, varying street width.
Right-of-Way required: 60-foot width; 30-foot on either side of centerline.
Jurisdiction -Jackson County.
Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and Traffic Control Plan in
accordance with the requirements of the City PWD. Street lights shall be placed in a "zig-zag" pattern
along the streets and at maximum 200-foot spacing (as measured from light post to light post) to afford
better lighting of the public rights-of-way. The Street Lighting Plan shall include placing street lights on the
residential lanes, of a design and at locations as approved by the City PWD and Pacific Power. Street
lights will also need to be installed or possibly modified along Bursell Road and Beall Lane at the street
intersections with Shelterwood Drive and Greenleaf Lane, to afford proper lighting of the intersections.
2. The City PWD shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine
the street section designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. The City's engineering staff or
selected engineering consultant (at Developer's expense), shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and
determine the street section designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. Minimum street section
shall be as follows:
- 3-inches Class "B" A.C.
- 6-inches of 1"-0" crushed rock
- 8-inches of 4"-0" crushed rock (City of Medford specifications),
- Woven geotextile fabric over compacted subgrade.
Street section (excluding the asphalt concrete portion) shall be extended underneath and two feet beyond
the curb and gutter section.
3. As applicable, stop signs and traffic delineation (i.e. "stop bars") shall be required and installed by the City
PWD (at the Developer's expense) at the proposed development's intersection with Beall Lane and Bursell
Road.
Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements
Existing Improvements - Shallow ditches along Beall and Bursell with no defined drainage pattern. Two 12-
inch-diameter and one 15-inch-diameter Storm Drain Stub Outs from Valley Point
subdivisions to eastern boundary of the proposed subdivision.
The design of the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) shall provide for
storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surtace run-on or culvert or
creek/ditch conveyance).
2. During construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of
hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the
use of the City PWD's rainfalllintensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers,
retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations. The Developer
shall field verify all connection inverts from the closest downstream catch inlet and the ends of the pipes at
the plugs or catch basins, to which the proposed subdivision's SD System will discharge. The calculations
,~, ;,
Shelterwaod
PWD Staff Report
October 1 S, 1997
Page S
and plots shall include these reaches of existing pipe.
3. Materials shall be PVC (ASTM D 3034 with gaskets), HDPE (meeting ODOT requirements for corrugated
polyethylene storm sewer pipe, including a provision for premium water-tight coupling bands), or approved
equal. Provide concrete encasement where required in areas of minimum cover.
4. If inlets/catch basins are to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip of the inlet, then the inlets and catch basins
shall be designed to afford suitable "man" entry into the inlets/catch basin for maintenance/cleaning
purposes.
5. Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flow line plots for private and
public storm drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGL on the
profile. Pipes should maintain cleaning velocity (minimum 2.0 feet per second) and have adequate
capacities without surcharging during the design storm.
6. The Developer may wish to incorporate the use of a pertorated SD system. If so, then the pertorated storm
drain system shall be designed to have adequate capacities to:
^ Convey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum cleaning velocities and
without surcharging the collection and conveyance piping; and
^ Minimize silts, sands, gravels, and fines migration from the native soils into the SD system.
The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the storm water run-off and run-on
inflows into the SD system.
Construction of private storm drains is discouraged by the City. However, if a private storm drain is to be
constructed, the following is required:
- Provide to the City acceptable documentation as to how the private storm drains will be
maintained, repaired, etc.
- All lot drainage should be drained by surface flow to the curb and gutter section of the
street or to a private storm drain line located either at the rear/sides of the lots or in the
PUE or other suitable easement outside the public rights of way.
- Private storm drain lines shall only be connected to the public storm drain system at curb
inlets or manholes.
- Provide suitable clean-outs (type and spacing with maximum 200 foot spacing).
- Provide invert elevations and lateral stationing for construction of private storm drain
system.
- Provide plan and profile views and elevations for any private storms drain system that may
be proposed.
- Designed to facilitate minimum cleaning velocity of 2.0 feet per second.
8. Provide 0.2-foot drop through all manholes and curb inlets.
9. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to a public storm drain line. The roof drains
(that do not drain to splash blocks) and underdrain lines that discharge at the curb face in accordance with
City PWD Standards.
7 ~
P , 1
p,
Shelterwood
PWD Staff Report
October I5, 1997
Page 6
Sanitary Sewer
1. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction, and testing shall
conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEO, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter,
Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable.
2. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer
laterals.
3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans
to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of
final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on
the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form.
4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA
requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports,
N reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance.
Water System
The water system shall be designed to provide the required demand capacities with a minimum fire flow
demand of 1,000 gpm (at a minimum pressure of 20 psi), and shall conform to City PWD and Fire
District No. 3 requirements. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants shall be 300 feet. The water system shall
be of reinforced flow ("looped") design, with connections to the existing 8-inch water lines in Bursell Road
and Beall Lane. Lateral/connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built
drawings.
Site work, Grading and Design, and Utility Plans
Developer shall provide the necessary "rough" lot grading to assure that all lots will drain properly to the
curb and gutter, or to a drainage system that drains to the curb and gutter or public storm drain system, as
approved by the City PWD and the City Building Department.
2. Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing
grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the
existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations.
3. Indicate location of street lights on plans, with table indicating stationing and offsets.
Rights of Ways/Easements
Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements regarding any proposed
development that may overlap any existing easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or alters
an existing easement should be approved by the easement's owner in writing, and a copy of that written
approval should be submitted to the City PWD prior to submission of construction plans for City PWD
review and approval. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development shall be
shown on the final plat with reference to the recordation number and Grantee.