HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - September 16, 1997
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT .
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
September 16, 1997 - 7:00 p.m.
Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 401
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Chuck Piland, Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Bob Gilkey, and Karolyne
Johnson.
III. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. MINiJTES
A. Review and approval of September 2, 1997, Planning Commission Minutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VI. BUSINESS
Pgs 1-18 A. Review and determination regarding a Site Plan Review to allow the
construction of an office building, (C-5 zone) (37 2W 03BB Tax Lots 1500
& 1503) (Applicant: Medford Labor Temple Association).
19-27 B. Review and determination regarding a Variance to a side yard setback (R-
3 zone) (37 2W 03DD Tax Lot 700) (Applicant: Henry G. McCullough,)
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 2, 1997
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Angela Curtis, Bob Gilkey, Karolyne Johnson. Candy Fish
came in at 8:05 p.m. Jan Dunlap was absent. Also present were Jim Bennett, Planning
Director, Ken Gerschler, Planning Technician, Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, and
Arlene LaRosa, Public Works Secretary.
III. CORRESPONDENCE
There was no correspondence. Jim Bennett stated that Valerie Rapp resigned from the
Planning Commission.
IV. MINUTES
A. Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to accept the Minutes for August 19, 1997
as written. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Curtis. ROLL CALL: Curtis,
yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
There were no public appearances
VI. BUSINESS
A, Ro.,~o.., fln~ ~p+e~,~n~+~~n rpg~jpg a Site Plan Review for Genesis Recovery
ent r (C~2.(p~ zone~(37 2W 11 BC Tax Lot 5200~(G~y Glenn aonlicantl
Ken Gerschler reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report. He stated that
the city received atwo-page recommendation from Fire District 3 which was
passed out to the commission and entered into the record.
Commissioner Johnson made a motion to adopt Resolution 399 approving
a Site Plan Review forGenesis Recovery Center (C-2(M) zone) (37 2W 11BC
Tax Lot 5200) (Gary Glenn, applicant), including conditions in the Staff
Report and recommendations by Fire District 3. Commissioner Gilkey
seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes.
C[TY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
September 2, 1997
Page 2
B. Public Hearing -Review and decision regarding a Tentative Plan for Rosewood
Estates a 20-lot single-family residential subdivision (R-1-8 zone) (372W 10 Tax
)_ot 5900)..(Dallas Page a~ 1in cant)
There were no ex-parte communications or conflict of interest.
Chairman Piland opened the public hearing.
Jim Bennett reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report. He stated that the
city received a letter from Fire District 3 which was passed out to the commission
members and entered into the record.
Lee Brennan reviewed the Public Works Staff Report. He stated that he has
discussed cost sharing on the water line to Beall Lane with Country Meadows
and Quaii Meadows Subdivisions. He stated he wanted to change a word in
Condition 10 on Page 21: Change "prevent" to "minimize".
Dallas Page, 900 Windemar, Ashland, Or, applicant, stated that he is asking for
a variance from the Public Works condition 10 in the Public Works Staff Report.
The design calls for a private road with. a hammerhead turn-a-around. continuing
as an easement across Lots 7, 8 and. If the hammerhead is any further in, it will
decrease the size of Lots 8 and 9 significantly. He stated that the pool lot is also
designed as a detention area for storm water, along with one other detention
area at the north end of the property. He stated that the street lights will be
specially designed street lights, and there will be trees along the streets, one or
two per lot. He stated they have water rights from the creek and they may have
a system so each house can irrigate from the creek. He stated that they want
only the Hanley side of the subdivision to bear the cost of the deferred
improvement agreement for improvements on Hanley Road.
Ruby Reed, 310 Brandon Street, Central Point, OR., was concerned about the
turn-around area for a car at the closed gate.
Christy deVilleneuve, 209 Donna Way, Central Point, OR., had a question about
the floodway and HGL study.
David Sills, 262 Brandon Street, Central Point, OR., had a request that the fence
be put in before the buildings are begun.
Commissioner Fish came in at 8:05 p.m.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
September 2, 1997
Page 3
_ Dallas Page, applicant, stated that the Brandon Street entrance should be large
enough for aturn-around. It is also possible to provide aturn-around area at the
entrance from Hanley Road. The right-of--way will be 10 feet wider which will help.
He stated that he is aware they have to do an HGL report for Jackson Creek.
Chairman Piland closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to adopt Resolution 400 approving a
Tentative Plan for Rosewood Estates, a 20-lot single-family residential
subdivision (R-1-8 zone) (37 2W 10 Tax Lot 5900) (Dallas Page, applicant)
including all conditions in the staff reports, staff comments and the
following additional conditions: 1) that there be no parking, except visitors,
on the private lanes; 2) that tree planting will be in concert with the
Planning Department's list of acceptable trees; 3) that a fence along the
east property line will be constructed in Phase I before the homes are built;
4) that, if possible, the barn will be renovated as asingle-family dwelling;
5)that the improvements to Hanley Road will be assessed under a deferred
improvement agreement to only those lots in Phase II of the project; and 6)
that the developer will negotiate with Mr. Brennan, the Public Works
Director, and staff on the design of the hammerhead and with Fire District
3 on the spacing of the fire hydrants. Commissioner Curtis seconded the
motion. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
Jim Bennett reviewed future Planning Commission agendas.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Johnson seconded the
motion. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING
DATE: September 16, 1997
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Jim Bennett, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Review and Determination Regarding a Site Plan Review Application to Allow
the Construction of a Labor Temple
Applicant/ Medford Labor Temple Association
Owner: 24 '/z South Grape Street
'Medford, OR 97501
A en : Fred Phillips Engineering
345 North Bartlett Street, Suite#203
Medford, OR 97501
Propertk 37 2W 03B TL 1500 - 3.14 acres
Zonine 37 2W 03B TL 1503 - b.58 acres
Description : C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial
Summary: The project consists of a' Site Plan Review to allow he construction of a
9,600 square foot, single-story labor temple to house the administrative
offrces of several local labor unions, including landscaping, irrigation, and
• paved off-street panting:
Applicable City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan.
Law: CPMC Chapter' 1.24 Public Hearings Procedures
CPMC Chapter 17.46 C-S, Thoroughfare Commercial District...
CPIvIC Chapter 17.72 Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan
Approval
Authority
CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commissiomwith the authority. to render a degision on
any Site Plan Review application.
1
Background
The Medford Labor Temple Association is proposing to construct a 9,600 square foot labor
temple adjacent to the new Oregon State Police (OSP) facility on North Pacific Highway. The
labor temple would serve as the administrative offices for several local labor unions.. The
project site is approximately 3.7 acres and lies directly south of the. OSP site in a G5,
Thoroughfare Commercial zoning district. Access to North Pacific Highway would be via a
common driveway shared with OSP. Across-access easement for this purpose has been
agreed to between the State and the Labor Temple Association and was recorded on
December 26, 1996.
Site Plan Standards
CPMC 17.72.040 sets out the standards that are to be used as the basis for any decision on
a Site Plan application:
A. Landscaping and fencing must be consistent with the neighborhood and used to screen
activities and uses that may impact existing neighboring uses.
The site plan shows new landscaping adjacent to North Pacific Highway, at the four
corners of the labor temple, and at the southeast corner of the site. A chain link fence
will separate the labor temple from the OSP facility to the north.
B. Ingress and egress points must be designed and located to maintain and improve traffic
flows on public streets.
Access to the site will be from North Pacific Highway using a common driveway shared
with OSP.
C. Off-street parking and interior circulation must be adequate to serve the site and maintain
good pedestrian and vehicle traffic flows.
The project proposes 126 off-street parking spaces, including three (3) handicapped
parking spaces. This meets or exceeds the off-street parking requirements for this
project.
D. Signs for the project must be designed and located to be compatible with the use and not
interfere with traffic control devices or traffic flows.
Any identificaEion'sign for the proposed uses on the site will require a sign permit and
will be subject to local sign regulations.
2
E. The site must be designed to be accessible to fire apparatus and have adequate fire fighting
facilities.
_ Fire apparatus will have access to the site from North Pacific Highway.. Fire hydrants
will be installed in accordance with Fire District #3 and city standards:'
F. The project must comply with all applicable city ordinances and regulations and must be .
aesthetically acceptable in relation to the neighborhood and the City of Central Point.
The project is in compliance with all city ordinances and regulations. Most of the
surrounding properties in the area are zoned for or developed with. commercial,
industrial or public uses. Crater High School is located across Griffin Creek in a
residential zone.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions:
1. Approve the Site Plan Review application for Medford Labor Temple:Association, based
on the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record and; subject to the
recommended conditions of approval; or ,
2. Deny the Site Plan Review application; or
3. Continue review of the Site Plan Review application at the discretion of the Commission.
Exhibits '
A. Site. Plan, Building Elevations, Landscaping Plan for Labor Temple
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Recommended Planning Conditions of Approval
D. Public Works Staff Report & Requirements
E. Written Comments
3
~ zve . ~ foot iiEPES,u 6ro1
3: \E {09L8 uoeaa0 PtoIpeW Wtwu. ~ wwlnad rl TM~c~xTT TT.~1
t' COL'^N'IEW181nInaB'N POp Ewawav Wl nN lwlNU4nE Vx Wawa 1 JL>LL~~L
GulHlul u8 Gtl11114d Pn! t68 LLLL
1 ~ Ba6it..a~ ualPwoEEr Ntlw4 aotlE7 P+o1MW
. ~.... _ ..t >Planning D
I~ ~ ~
qq gEg s
1 _ 1g~ aE 9V~ ~ Y
4 9 xt$¢ a
N JS~ ~ y
G [ $g ~pp n
N Y 6 'rin
,,~
~ ~.\
~ \\~ e~ aR
t~ ~~•~ `4~~~
ht \~\ ~ \ `\~•~...
~`
\.'y,
c
.. .
" \ ~ ,\ ~ W
~ t• ~\
3$y \a" ~ \
j i .,~ \ '.~, ~.
~~ .,. ~ a',a~
~f
to ~ ~a'a
1
i
' 1 _ ~ ~ \
3 ; - - - - - -
8 ~~~hl.J ~ ~,
t ; ((}S
~~
P
e~'° ; x c
i ~ a a
k.
9~io'~aOiy ~_J ~N
H
1 V
1 a~I
d i o~~~~4~.y~
t a a S ~i "'s
,'~ ~ L._.
~C~ Div P)
bb 2138 AtlMH91H '8'!1
4
nt
~~t
/xC uf6,v ~N° RfH
W
~~~
yg
C ` 4
~21.
~~
~\
fGkN /~i/vj~ ¢p
id AwWii// ~ `'
~a1 e7 P~4fPow ! 1 ~ ~ ~ @ s
"
~ A ~
I] 1
f
5
a~ ~`
~~~ ~
~4
~~~
yle r ~
I1 4
S
Q
` ~ ~ ~ Z
• Q
L
' :d
~ ~~z 5 ~~® ~ W
~~" ~ 3 !
a ~ ~
b~~2~~ ~ ~~~ W
~ ~~g~J~'bz °°~ i IvRI
~ 3 "'9~W~=: ~
.O0. ~ ~
.s~ ~ m
• L
t
t 1 2~_ p J o l a
. , Jc.~ T n
t, ~ ~~~~4 s ~ "~
,. ' ~ ~ ..
~~~~
,.
f£~~~ ~~
' ;1
1
~, '~ ~1 ~
-~~ ~ ~ ,~~
,.
~ ~
,;:.:
j5 P .. , • 1 ~ ~ -tom
1 .S
x; - ~ ~.
o
:~
.,
~~ s
fyy ,
s „ }ti' _
a
G`ity of ~ C`en~~al Point
PLANNXIVG DEPARTMENT
James H. Bennett, A1CP
City Administrator/Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
Deanna Gregory
Administrative/Planning Secretary
~~
City of Central Foint
Notice of Meeting E~.HI~r:I' t,~tt
Date of Notice: September 2,1997. Planning Department
Meeting Date:. September 16, 1997
Time:.. 7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Place: Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
NATURE OF MEETING
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Site
Plan Review application for the construction of anoffice building to be located at 4480 North Pacific
Highway. The parcel is located in the (C-5) Thoroughfare-commercial district on Jackson County
Assessment Plat 37 2W 03B, Tax Lots 1500.
('RTTFRIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for Site Plan Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal
Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-slireet parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction
Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENT
1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 16,
1997.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
• South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
7
street
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence. relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same aze available at
15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 ext. 23'1.
Sl'7MNLAItY OF PROCED[TI2E
At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and heaz arguments on the application. Any
testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of
the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan. City regulations
provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions.
SUBJECT Pl
8
EXHIBIT. C
RECOMMENDED PLANNING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan to the Planning Department for approval.
Landscaping for the project shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping
plan. All landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy, growing condition. An
automatic irrigation system shall be installed to service all landscaping subject to approval by
the Building Department.
2. The applicant shall install a slatted chain link fence, where appropriate, to enclose the labor
temple site in accordance with the approved site plan. A fencing plan shall be :submitted to the
Planning Department for approval> No barbed wire fencing shall be permitted.
3. Off-street parking shall be provided as shown on the approved site plan and subject to the
requirements of CPMC Chapter 17:64..
4. All signage proposed for the project shall require a separate application to the Building
Department and issuance of a building permit.
5. Access to and from the project site shall be provided as shown on the approved site plan.
All buildings on the premises shall be accessible to fire fighting apparatus.
6. A1I outdoor lighting and illuminated signage shall be designed and installed so that it will.
not impact adjacent properties or interfere with any traffic control device.
7. The site plan approval shall expire on September 16, 1998, unless a building permit is
issued by the Building Department and construction is commenced and diligently pursued
toward completion.
8. The applicant shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations and the
requirements of all affected agencies.
9. The project shall be constructed in accordance with the approved site plan and. subject to
the issuance of a building permit. Any modifications proposed to the approved site plan shall
be subject to review by the Planning Commission. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued
for the use or occupancy of the buildings approved on the site plan until alt requirements and
'conditions approved by the Planning Commission have been completed.
E
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT
for
LABOR TEMPLE
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL FACILITY SITE PLAN
PW#9(~O t5
Date: September 11, 1997
Applicant: Medford Labor Temple Association
24 %z South Grape Street
Medford, Oregon'97501 Agent: Fred E. Phillips Engineering
Project: Labor Halt Construction
Location: Highway 99 (Just South of New OSP Facilities)
Legal: T37S, R2W, Section 3B, Tax Lots 1500 and 1503
Zoning:' C=5
Units: 1 - 9,600 square foot building and parking (126 spaces)
Plans: 4 pages (1 of 4 [Site Plan] and 2 of 4 [Elevations]: Fred E. Phillips [5/5/87]; 1 of 1
Topographic Map: Neathamer Surveying [6/6/97]; and 1 of 1 Landscape Plan:
Natural Systems [7/17/97]
Report By: Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director
Purpose
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as
"Developer") regarding Publio Works standards and additional standards and raquirementsto be
included in the design. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding .proposed
development.
Special Requirements
1. Landscape P/an: Developer has prepared and submitted a preliminary landscape plan for
the project. A final plan, meeting'the requirements of the Oregon' Department of
Transportation (if applicable) and the City Public Works Department (PWDf, shall be
prepared and implemented by and at the expense of the Developer. At a minimum, the
landscape plan shall provide fior a landscape buffer adjacent to the public right-of-way
along Highway 99, while affording proper sight triangles at the driveway entrance with
the highway.
2. Hiahw~; rrn JronrovPments All improvements on and connections to Highway 99 shall be
coordinated and approved by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the City
PWD, and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the Developer. Tie-ins to
the newly installed s±orm drainage system along Highway 99 must be permitted and approved
by ODOT.
~.r0
Labor Temple Site Plan
PWD Staff Report
Septemberll, 1997
Page 2
3. Site Draina„qe/Storm Drain P/an: The developer shall design and implement a site
drainage/storm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage for the entire
area noted on the site plan. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the
public rights-of-way, into Griffin Creek, or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable.
The storm drainage infrastructure will be privately operated and maintained. A suitable system
will need to be designed for a minimum 10-year storm event, designed to the City's PWD
.Standard Specifications and Details. (PWD Standards), or as otherwise approved by the City
Administrator or his designee. The discharge point and potential retention of storm water run-
off shall be coordinated with aspects of the proposed development to provide an aesthetically
.,pleasing, efficient, and low maintenance facility. The storm water retention facilities shall be
suitably landscaped; designed to mitigate erosion' and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition;
and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. The
.developer shall also secure written'permission to connect/discharge into adjoining storm water
conveyance facilities managed by other jurisdictional agencies.
4. Erosion Control Plan: A suitable erosion control plan must be implemented prior to and
during he construction of any improvements associated with this development.
5. Existing Infrastructure: The Developer's engineer shall provide suitable engiheering
certification and justification (i.e: calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,pthat all corinections to
existing ihfrastructure (i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage
systems; etc.,) will not ihterferewith or provide for the significaht degoadation (in the'opinion of
the Public Works Director) of the existing effective level of service or operation of the
infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate
capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure
as the result of the connection of the proposed development's'infrastructure; or the existing
facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the
additional flows. and/or demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of
service of the affected facility.
General
1. Developer shall submit to the City's Public Works Department (City's PWD) for review and
approval, plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or
modifications within the City or public rights-of-way and easements.
2.. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and
gutters and landscape buffers); storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance
systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and including fire protection); street
lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation.
3. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's I~WD Standards, the
conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special
specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City
V-d r 3,1
Labor Temple Site Plan
PWD Staff Report
September 11, 1997
Page 3
Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed
development. During. construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in
writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation.
4. As applicable, .Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and
conditions as may be.required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEO),
Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps df Engineers (ACOE), affected
.irrigation districts, and JC Roads.
5. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall
provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's
engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on
Mylar'®) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAO~, or other form as approved by the
City PWD.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to filial
approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of
actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot
elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lilies, valves, and fire hydrants; water
and sewer lateral statioriing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations;
street light locations; other below grade utility line locations and depths; etc. Provide a "red-
line" hard copy (on Mylat~), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if
feasible, an -acceptable AutoCAD'~ compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion
of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of
the proposed .development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his
designee.
6. All elevations used oh the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the
permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so
noted on the plans. At least one permanent Benchmark shall be provided for each phase of
the proposed development, the locations of which shall be as jointly determined by the City
PWD and the Developer's surveyor.
All existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other
deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed
of in accordance with the requirements of the DEO.
8. All improvement plans should be approved in writing by Fire District 3 prior to approval by the
.City's PWD.
9. If the proposed development places structures or other improvements within the 100-year
.floodzone, the Developer's engineer will be required to explain and provide detail as to what
affects will the placement of these structures have on the floodzone; what affect will it have on
the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary; and what affects will the modification of the
12
Labor Temple Site Plan
PWD Staff Report
September l!, 1997
Page 4
floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary have on the existing and proposed facilities, and
properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable„fhe Developer's engineer
shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and illustrate the existing
boundaries of the Floodplain and filoodway fora 100-year storm event (commonly referred to
as the "Base Flood Event") associated with Griffin Creek, on the construction plans submitted
for the development.. The drawings shall also indicate the revised Base Flood Elevation
contours and boundaries of the Floodplain and Floodway expected to occur following the
completion of any development within the identified floodzone (also referred to as the 'Area of
Special Flood Hazard"):
10. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the'construction plans for the proposed improvements,
the following should be submitted:
^ A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and water system
improvement plans for the proposed development
^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and
the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans.
^ As applicable, copies of written approvals and/or permits including conditions from the
various agencies involved: DSL, DFW, DEQ, and/or ACOE.
11. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations,
street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed subdivision will connect into existing
improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The
accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the
location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both
horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans.
Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements
Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and
conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto
the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance), any
existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface
water flow (i.e. Griffin Creek), and, if applicable, any areas deemed by the City that will need to
connect-into the proposed development's SD System.
2. Developer's engineer shall determine how SD system will work during 10-year and 100 year
flood events associated with Griffin Creek. Identify the HGL in Griffin Creek during 10- and
100-year storm event, and what affect will it have on the proposed outlets and storm drain
system: System should be designed to.adequately drain 10-year storm without surcharging or
should be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to prevent
backflow of water from Griffin Creek up into SD system during storm events.
13
Labor Temple Site Plan ,
PWD Staff Report
September l1, /997
Page 5
3. During the design of the SD system, the Developer's engineer shall consider the effect of the
proposed improvements and structures with regard to the 100-year base flood event floodway
and floodplain of Griffin Creek and the stormwater drainage system associated with Highway
99. 'The allowable flow rates into Griffin Creek and the ditches along Hanley Road from the
proposed development shall not be greater than the run-off flow rates experienced from the
property in its current status, unless otherwise approved by the City PWD or ODOT, as
applicable. The developer's engineer shall provide suitable hydrological calculations and storm
hydrog~aphs to depict the existing predevelopment, and projected post development conditions
of the development area on Griffin Creek and the storm drainage system along Highway 99.
The Developer's engineer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off coefficients,
curve numbers, retardance; etc:, to be used in the Developer engineer's calculations.
4. Plans which propose to include the discharge to Griffin Creek or the existing storm drainage
" system orrHighway99, any construction or modification within the floodway of Griffin Creek or
the right-of-way of Highway 99, shall be in compliance with DSL, ODOT, ACOE, ODFW, DEQ,
JC Roads, and/or City PWD (as applicable) guidelines and requirements and any applicable
cohtlltiohs and or approvals, of these regulatory agencies.
Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this Tentative Plan, the Developer's
engineer shall prdvide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic
calculations and profile plots forsizing the SD system. The engineer shall use the
rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrologic calculations, and the
negotiated run-off parameters.
Sanitary Sewer
All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and
testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA
Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD
Standards, where applicable.
2. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction
of sewer laterals.
Water System '
Existing Improvements - A 12-inch-diameter D.I. water line is aligned along the Highway
99 frontage of the subject tax lot.
1. Developer's engineer shall design the watersystem to provide a minimum flow of 1,000 g.p.m.
and conform to Fire District 3 requirements. Construction plans shall be reviewed and
approved by Fire District 3 prior to submitting to DPW.
f4
Labor Temple Site Plan
PWD Staff Report
September J/, 1997
Page 6
2 'Lateral/connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built
drawings.
3. Construction drawings shall includethe size, type; and location of allwater mains, hydrants, air
valves, service connection, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD
Standards and as required by the City PWD.
4. The design and all connections to the water supply system should comply with OHD and City
requirements, including backflow prevention. Water will not be "turned on" by the City until
such requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated inspector
(currently the Jackson County plumbing inspector).
Site work, Grading and Design, and Utility Plans
All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage
away from the building. If applicable, drain lines shall be connected to the curb and gutter and
discharge from the curb face or other approved discharge point or system.
- 2. Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan.
Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour
lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid.
Contour lines should be labeled with elevations.
3. Indicate location of parking area lights on plans.
4. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company which reflects all utility
crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. Utility locations should be accurately depicted on
the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings.
Rights of Ways/Easements
All easements for improvements dedicated to the City shall have a minimum 15 foot width and
shall be located (whenever possible) contiguously along the exterior boundaries of properties
and shall not split lot lines. Public utility easements shall have a minimum width of 10 feet.
2. If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form),
for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will
coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no
longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development.
3. Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements regarding any proposed
development that may overlap any existing easement. Any development proposed which
overlaps or alters an existing easement should be approved by the easement's owner in
l5
Labor Temple Site Plan
PWDStaJfReport -
September l1, 1997
Page 7
writing, and a copy of that written approval should be submitted to the City PWD prior to
submission of construction plans for City PWD review and approval
4. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development shall be shown on
the final plat with reference to the recordation number and Grantee.
16
r
9-4-97
MEMO
TO Central Point Planning DeQattv-ent
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
664-3321. Fax 664-6384
FROM WP Natural Gas
David McFadden
R58-4740 Fax 858-4790
CYty of Central Point
E.~IIBI'~ ttE tr
Planning Department
RE: Comments an Planning Action Applications
1 may not be able to attend the Planning Commission Meeting that deals with this project.
Please enter the following comments into the project records.
Thank You
46-015-SP Labor Temple Site Plan Review
4480 Rogue Valley Hwy
WP Natural Gas recommends that 15-foot Public Utility Easementsbe
created along all street frontages in commercial zones. ,
Natural gas service can be made available to this. development from the
gas lines already installed to serve the new Oregon State Police Office. The plat
map does not show these lines. Tlie developer or general contractor should
contact David McFadden, 858-4740, to make arrangements for natural gas service
to this new building.
PS--I want to thank the planning depar[ment for sending me an adequate sized plat map to review.
Be Safe
Call Before You Dig!
1-500-332-2344
TOTAL P. 01
09/10/97 08:46• FAX 5418264566
September 10, 1997
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
155 South Second St.
Central Point, Or 97502
File # 97015-SPR
FIRE DISTRICT 4f3
FIRE DISTRICT N0.3
8333AcaTE ROAD
WHITE CITY OR 97503 • .
(641)826-7100
Fax: (541)826-4566 •
~.
~io2
r
The Building Department will request a set of blue prints firom the applicant for
submittal to Fire District #3 to review. The plans shall uiclude a plot plan showing
placement of buildings, main access roads and driveways. The Fire District wili
apply Uniform Fire Code requirements which may also include hydrants for fire
protection, and road access prior to construction.' '
~eil E. Shaw
Deputy Fire Marshal
18
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING DATE: September 16, 1997
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator
SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Variance to the side yard setback at 320/322 North First
Street (37 2W 03DI) Tax Lot 700)
licant
wner•
Agent:
Henry G. McCullough
320 N. First Street
Central Point, OR 97502
Same
Summary: The applicant Henry G. McCullough has applied for a Variance that would
allow the construction on an awning that extends toward First Street. The
subject parcel is zoned R-3, Residential Multiple-Family.
Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to
hold a public hearing and render a decision on any applicationfor a
Variance. Notice of the Public Hearing was effected in accordance with
CPMC x.24.060.
Annlicable Law: CPMC 17.28.010 et seq. - R-3, Residential Multi-Family District
CPMC 17.80.010 et seq. -Variances
is
discussion:
Mr. Mc Cullough is requesting a Variance to the side yard setback at 320 First Street to allow the
construction of an awning that would provide shade from the afternoon sunshine and heat.
The proposed pole supported awning would be attached for a distance of 47 feet along the front
of the existing residence and extend 10 feet towazd First Street.
CPMC 17.28.050 (E,3) requires that any structure served by a driveway located on the side yard
have a minimum 20 foot setback.
If the Vaziance were approved, the applicant could construct the awning within 6 feet of the
property line.
Findings of Fact
CPMC 17.80.010 stipulates that the Planning Commission may grant a Variance if findings are
made that the following considerations will either result from the granting of the Vaziance or do
not apply to the requested application:
1. The Variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the city such as
beautification or safety;
2. The Vaziance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood;
^ There are currently no other homes along First Street that have awnings.
3. The Variance will utilize property within the intent and the purpose of the zoning district:
^ The proposed residential addition (awning) is located within an appropriately zoned
(R-3) district.
4. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to the property in the same
zoning district; and
^ There are no apparent special circumstances that apply to this particular parcel
5. The conditions for which the Variance is requested were not self-imposed through the
applicant's own actions, not the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family
members.
The applicant has submitted finding of fact for consideration by the Commission.
20'
xhibits:
_ A. Site Plan
B. Notice of Public Hearing
J C. Applicant's Findings
D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions
G:~PLANN[NG~Ivi000LL. VAR
1
• ~o~s ~,.z+ou
l_
'f1
r
S.
ti'.
c'
j
~~
`~
R , Z`
~ J SAD n ~ _
E
I~ ,~
a ~
y >_
,L: ~ 3 ~ o
'' --~ cr; ~ ~ ~
~9 ~ t ~ ~
~ a
f~
\~`./
t1
S' __ ~ ~
._.._.._12.•..... ,__~
E--__^ .. ... -3
~~~
~,
E~
is
D
O
r
„=•a
22
Czty of Central Pozn
PLANNXNG DEPARTMENT
CYty of Central Fdutt
EXHI~r`~ tT~ tt
James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator/Planning Director
1<en Gerschler
Planning Technician
Deanna Gregory
Administrative/Planning Secretary
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: August 28,1997
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
September 16, 1997
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a variance to a side yard set back to facilitate the construction of an awning. The
parcel at 320/322 North First Street is located in aResidential-Multiple Family (R-3) zoning district
on Jackson County Assessment Plat 37 2W 3DD Tax Lot 700.
('RTTFRIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for Variances are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code,
relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans.
The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 16,
1997.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
24
155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: {541) 664-6384
E
3.
4.
5.
SUB~ECC PROPERTY
\\ / ~ • ~ / R\/ n V Y r\` \ / \ Y
Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shah be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall,
155 South Second Street. Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents
Per Page•
Por additional information, the pulilirmay contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 (ext. 231)
SCJMMAR'Y OP P120 I;DLmF
At the meeting, Planning Commission will review the applications, tedutical staff reportsihear
testimony from. the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application.
Any testimony or written comments must be related to the ixiteria set forth above At the condusion
of the review the Planning Commission may approve, modify or deny the ~'entatrve Plan. City
regulations provide that the Central Point City Counal be informed about all Planning Commission
decisions.
25
(;Yty Af Central Fom
EXII~~T ft~tt
. ~ Planning Department
:. -..
i.
`#~ _ ,6LSFIU ~/;~jC.4~Y%Di/ ~ .S' NN'/~ 9Nr ; .S iOi~
4~' j/Gl/.fcT Fizaw/ v~ r ter: ,7~ a~ svti ~/-~cSi'r) }
-CdiGl .~JLSO /mil///icy c'UOGGnt ~"i,CCcs" ~O :s~~
/rr GS1fL~l?i/G'S
p-
Z, , '' rii/6-" u~/,~/Y2~r C c'~ G~ iGi. !?DT ~/AU ~C rrl Y
CIO/i.C~3Ey /a.~'~c~"c3S ah :NLS" y,~oi'erz.YS
} Zp ~^td' o'L /f. / s7 S i oLL i-f/L~ /1.c7.30.C.~/Ud.7
.. .,~ ~ ~NLr l1~2/9gc c'r WiGL. G/TIL /L.Gr i~~ .o/LOPcs~i U
.'a' ~ ..300 /~00. /~. / '~ ~ s F;
,~_ c/iZcur//sT.~rnts~ ~Fr"G~riS O~i 1'' ~i20~'~/<<i
,q~ .~~'D 7-300 /9. /' ~ s ~. ~ X20/9 M/a!'l(~" 5 r
TO .'AlLf /~GLLrY ~ ~/i!/i L v G-`LF~`C~ F19 (.~ .~.ZO ~3L 2.
~. ~ s r SS
::> ~~d;
- G Ile G U/`!<T7'~/I G GsS ~GJNI Tc ~q/ ~,r/Cr d.~1.e/.orft~
~SdUG Ol,~J/9G°oE' .~J ~' ~~d f"a~O /% ` 'r S
R
i
~.
26
EXHIBIT "D"
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The project shall be constructed in accordance with the approved site plan.
2. A building permit shall be obtained for the construction.
3. The site plan approval shall expire in one year, September 16, 1998 unless a building
permit has been issued and construction has commenced and diligently pursued toward
completion.
,~ ~ 27