Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 6, 1997~_ Cl~ia~_l1.r~ _ ~-i~. y .CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 6, 1997 - 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 383 L _MEETING CALLED TO ORDER ~' II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Bob Gilkey, Karolyne Johnson, and Valerie Rapp III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES.. ° ; A. Review and approval of April 15, 1997 Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS. Pss . i- z b A. Continued Public"Hearing -Review and decision: regarding a Tentative Plan for the Beall Estates Subdivision, Phase III, R-2 zoning'district. (37 2W 12C Tax Lot 3404) (Noel A. Moore.&.Bret A. Moore, applicants) Pg, z7 B. Continued Public Hearing- Review and decision regarding a Tentative Plan for the Central Point East Subdivision, R-1-6, R-1-8, R-2 & R-3 zoning districts. (37 2W;O1C Tax Lots 100. & 200;.37 2W O1B Tax Lots 2500, 2700 & 2900) (Partners Trust Company, applicant) VII. MISCELLANEOUS, VIII. ADJOURNMENT: ~' CITY OF CENTRAL POINT. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 15, 1997` I. MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. il. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Angela Curtis, Candy Fish, Bob Gilkey,' Karolyne . Johnson, Valerie Rapp. Absent: Jan Dunlap III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence IV. MINUTES A. Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the Planning,. Commission Minutes for April 1, 1997, as written. Motion was seconded. by Commissioner Rapp. -.ROLL CALL: Curtis,: yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes; Rapp, yes. V. BUSINESS A. Public He~rina Review and derision regarding a Tentative Plan for the Beall Estates Subdivision Phase III. R-2 zonjng district 137 2W Chairman Piland opened the public hearing. There were no conflicts of interest or ex-parte communications. Jim Sennett, Planning Director, stated that the applicant requests that the' pubtlc' hearing be continued to the next Planking- Commission meeting. Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to continue the Public Hearing on the Tentative Plan for the Beall Estates Subdivision, Phase III, to May 6, 1997. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Fish. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes; Rapp,: yes. ; B. PP ~bli~arina R view and recommendation regarding on ~ngQ from R-1-10. Residential Single Family (10.000 s.f.l to R-1-8. Residential Sipgl . F~ 18 000 s f 1 (37 2lM 10 Tax Lot 59001 (Dallas P~ge• ,a~pli an 1 C. Page, aR li an 1 Jim Bennett stated that Item B and Item C on the agenda vvilLbe combined for this meeting. Commissioner Rapp declared a conflict of interest and withdrew. Jim Bennett stated that the letters that haye .been received regarding this development are in the packets. Ken Gerschler, Planning Technician,, tated that due to an error in the Notice for Public Hearing, staff is requesting that the Planning Commission postpone the hearing so that a corrected Notice of Public Hearing can be mailed. Dallas Page, 900 Windemar Dr., Ashland; the<applicant, came forward. Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, stated that the Public Works Staff Report would be revised and provided to the commissioners. Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to postpone the Public Hearing regarding a Zone Change from R-1-10, Residential Single-Family (10;000 s.f.)`to R-1'~8; Residential Single Family (8,000 sf:) (3Z 2W 10 Tax lot 5900) (Dallas Page, applicant) ahd the Public Hearing regarding a Planned Unit Development, Rosewood Estates. ; (37 2W 10 Tax Lot 5900) (Dallas Page, applicant) -to May 20, 1997. Motion vvas seconded by Commissioher Fish. ROLL'CALL: Curtis, yes; fish, yes; Gilkey, ye§ Johnson, yes; Rapp, yes: VII. MISCELLANEOUS There were no miscellaneous items. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Johnson made a motion to adjourn. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Fish. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. r' nr'errnr1lU DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: May 6, 1997 TO: Central Poinf Planning Commission '`FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP City Administrator SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Beall Estates, Phase III 37 2W 12C Tax Lot 3404 ' li t/ Noel A. Moore & Bret A. Moore Owner: 1461 E. McAndrews Rd. Medford, OR 97504 agent: Herbert A. Farber dba Farber Surveying 120 Mistletoe St. Medford, OR 97502 Sum The applicants, Noel A. Moore & Bret A. Moore; are proposing & tentative plan for the subdivision of 9.90 acres located north of Beall Lane between the Beall Estates, Phase I and ` Green Park Village, Phase V subdivisions; (Exhibit A). The site is designated as R-2, Residential Two-Family, but will be developed as asingle-family residential subdivision, Beall Estates Phase IIL The total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is thirty (30). The average density for the subdivision is 3.03 units/acre, The maximum density permitted in the R-2 district is 12 units/acre which would allow up to 118 dwelling units on the site. uthority CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Exhibit $). Applicable Law, _ Central Point Comprehensive Plan -Urbanization Element & Comprehensive Plan Map ` CPMC 16.10A10 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.24.010 et seq. - R-2, Residential Two-Family District .- .. 1 Discussion The proposed subdivision is located on 9:90 acres north of Beall Ln. The. applicants are proposing to construct asingle-family residential subdivision, Beall Estates, Phase III on the site. It will consist of 30 single-family homes. Access to the subdivision will be from Beall Ln: and; with development of Green Park Village, Phase V, from the extension of Woodridge Dr. and Gatepark Dr. Surrounding uses include Beall Estates, Phase I to the. west; Forest Glen; Phase VIII to the north; Green Park Village, Phase V to the east, and City of Medford to the south across Beall Ln. The Planning' Department has reviewed the tentative plan for. compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. No zone changes are proposed as a part of this development. Accordingly, the subdivision complies with the City Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element which identifies this area (Subarea D) for future low- and medium- density residential development and with the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map. Each lot meets the minimum requirements for lots in the R-2 zoning district. The Parks & Recreation Element of the Comprehensive Plan identifies a neighborhood park for the southeast quadrant of the city. The subdivision site is one of the last remaining areas in the southeast available for park development:. The Parks Commission had previously discussed including a park site in the design of this subdivision with the applicants. ~As a result of negotiations between the City and the applicants, the tentative plan for Beall Estates, Phase III, includes atwo-acre neighborhood park site comparable to Van Horn Park. The applicants will develop the park to City standards and provide a turn key facility for residents of the area. The City will then purchase the developed park from the applicants. The City will also work with adjacent property owners to provide access to the new park for city residents on the other side of Elk Creek. The Public Works Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the City's water, sewer, storm drain and transportation standards. The Public Works staff report is attached as Exhibit D. Written comments were also received from Fire District #3, Rogue River Valley Irrigation District and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority which discuss each agency's requirements for the development of the proposed subdivision (Exhibit E). i~~of Fact & Conclusion The project site is located in an R-2, Residential Two-Family. The project site is consistent with Subarea "D" of the Urbanization Element of the Comprehensive Plan which calls for low density and medium density residential development in the area and with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site as Medium Density Residential. The project site is located in an R-2, Residential Two-Family District. This zoning designation is also consistent with the referenced portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2 2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of 9:90 acres for the purpose of deveioping asingle-family residential subdivision, Beall Estates Phase III. The total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is thirty. The average density for the subdivision is-3.03 units/acre. The proposed single-family subdivision meets the density requirements for the R-2 zone which is a maximum of 12 units/acre. Each lot within the subdivision meets the minimum lot size and lot frontage requirements for the R 2 zone. The tentative plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. 3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision for compliance with municipal rules, regulations and standards. The project meets all City standards and requirements subject to .the recommended conditions `of the Planning Department (Exhibit C) .and the Public WorksDepartmenf(ExhibitD). - Exhibits A. " Tentative Plan -Beall Estates Phase III B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions D. Public Works Staff Report & Recommended Conditions E. Written Comments 3 CYty of Central Point. ' EXHIBIT f~, Planning!Departmeltt ' .ILN '-M.N..;..~ . Tentative Nan .•. • • - ••- -•••^•° _ _ IwtuN n aN .«nN«I ra.• q Iwu« u...«+w 1. • : } ~ \ a.nw MN. a wI N ~n~Iwu. M.N..+ av • x twlr•1 MIN. :r (w.la. rv•Nn Beall Estates. Phase III •~i~'. .•NaNrvw•••.111 ~++~~+~,• tone n-Y6r.: ,~~: ~ • .. ~ 8 '"""' ~ :. PROPOSED PARK vsv ..::a.::...; ~. .... S 1.96 Acres ~.; •`N Nw 5 sCY •1 ~e• S •Nti•Naia •{ • • u wi :v•:i• w : is o` .I riwNU •.: Y: ~ t ~ k M1: p. h ': a r ~ • INrM 1...• N/.q •.S• •: nor .j .-~.w .I~.s---~r•r.•Y: YJ ;:^ ~~ 1••• ~ 3 ~ M • M la7 ~.• r •+, 4 •W• I gilµia wlr Mnaaa~i•A .n.a~7N Ii Ma.ryxM1 W I I "i i :¢A •~ •. ••• ~ •: • M"Sli.• ~ i NM .w t•M •N N.41• • • i Af N • • • N.N I l • .• •• •./t•1^ 1 NaM i 4t N, .~,; . _ .I L•unit«N ~=gw.wNn; awlMNUs •: . I wM Mn, • INAt ~ wWy Nll + .1.. .'r.% J a.:4 I ~ Circ boa! r ~ ti M N it:e~ wlw 4 ... :I •'• f' 1 G era°N M:tF ' w.« INr • I ~._ ur ~ .: aeolleaw4• S•usNw Ii~ _ uii•. l~wa : ~ ? « ~fbel A. Haor! ,•1 •.olwi• iS. `w,w,fl„•~ .N ' Byrelt A1~vH~oware <a. awl ~N ... ~ • r «~..waMN\irl~il .[w 1b~s i.. N ~I ~ ut M; a~.N f1.N• £:r ~. •M • MM.wNn ' .. w '• <•wll ~vwNNN~.klo-s+•NCwu1 Ma ~ ~ •~apHNN R=Nw uNN r~r _ .. ~• a N~Na 1•N11N•MMYNt N11MMWlM<MM • l pg ~~ N ~fN~yNnl{{IN,MN [Y •' M.M. • ~ •q.N NlatNl. aly~~g ~Ne • W WM~~KYYMNM N1W~M~ ~ ~~{~ a r d e ~i^~ • «i ~ jai II M~i•w~~a~1 MN N~•yNN1tM.~N•11•w NN • a' a MtNt•NIM IMIM .µr `v IM NI MI a~i+w{MwMMMw NNwI • rY~ •' ~~~~~~+!~11 a _ :t! wMM1 ~~•"'lil ~.ll• 1 +: :w: M.: w i" - ~ eauNliV4TOi '0'G'f't~ia w .~"1~.'~~iiq{~~" }. ~.1 Q11 wto / ~w µ•~•NMIII• atM •M•IN - •ap MIaL MN`_ Nl4 %~ Ji _ •N W I}' 1y IwMI i ~Ir MYaMwMIM tWI MM <{M N ~ 11lIIfM40L1 •f1a<f s•wlwl ..hilt«w ~:. _ ael~i liwM w~Na44 • • 4 •. ~ •11X1 fM.rM' . • 'R••::w :`rte MTICC tr4itgc w11UK /a011ET[ an 1•u~ .p,l:::i:~ MleaMtlll '~ <. •. <ta qw ~! .elms aww mx eawelM«I. ar4w qw kql bM ,1 hwW MW a•••`w M ar' w« uw. ""' ee.mm ev Ir wlnw. <a- MwNtM~ ROn <y1L. 11WIgNN MY. g1Fq «.IN1l NM• N•a a14.w Mll laa µ wM~~/ NL. CIKH YIaO MIN • ~ W4a Mf.MI < NM.1M < 4 City of Central Point PLANNING DEPARTMENT James Bennett Planning Director Ken Gerschler Planning Technician NOTICE OP MEETING Date of Noflceo March 27,1997 Meeting Date: Tuesday, April 15th 1997 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hail , 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATLIRE OF MEETING Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an application fora 381ot Tentative Subdivision Plat to be named Beali Estates, Phase 3. The parcel is located in the the Residential Two-Single-Family (R:1-6) and Residential Two-Family (R-2)zones on Tax Lot 3404 of Jackson County Assessor Map Page 37 2W 12C. ERIA. FOR DECISIO The requirements for approval of Terita ive Plats are set forth in Chapter I7 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street Parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan {s also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS L Anyperson interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit '.written comments up untiLthe date of the meeting schedgled for Tuesday, April 15th, 1997. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Seeond Street, Central Point, OJt 97502: 155 South Second Street • Central Point OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 5 ~~ w ~--, ~~ 3. Tssues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about :.the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly do the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City 1Tall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 (ext. 231) 4UMMARY OR PROCEDURE At the meeting, Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. P EXI-IIBIT C, PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. The applicants shall comply with all requirements of BCVSA, Fire District #3, Jackson County Roads Department, Rogue River Valley Irrigation District and any other affected agencies as they pertain to the development of the subdivision. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 2. The applicants shall submit a park developmentplan to the Planning Department indicating the manner and schedule by which the neighborhood park within the subdivision will be developed. This shall include any proposed landscaping, irrigation, natural areas, architectural features and play equipment. 3. The applicants shall submit a copy of the recorded:: covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) for the subdivision to the Planning Department. 4. The applicants shall comply'with alt requirements of the Division of State Lands for the project as indicated by its response to the Wetland Land Use Notification Form. S. The approval !of the tentative plan shall become void one year following the date of~such ' 'approval unless as application £or a final plat has. been submitted to the Plamung Department. 6. The subdivision shall be developed in accordance with the tentative plan as approved by the Planning Commission. Modifications to the tentative plan shall be subject to further review and approval by the Planning Commission. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT. DEPARTMENT OF PUBL/C WORKS STAFF REPORT for BEALL ESTATES PHASE 3 PW#97015 Date: ,:. :04/30/97 Applicant: Noel Moore and Bret Moore 1461 E. McAndrews Road, Medford, OR 97504 Project: Subdivision Location: Bealt Lane and Circlewood Drive Legal: T37S, R2W, Section 12C, Tax lot 3404 , ' Zoning: . R-1-6 Lots: 30 Units: ; ` '30 Residential Plans: Beali Estates, Phase 3, 04/28/97 Report By: Paul W. Worth, Public Works Technician Lee Brennan, Public Works Director Purpose, Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding Public Works standards and proposed new standards to be included in the design. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed development. Special Requirements 1. In accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, Section VII, Proposed Parks and Recreation Facilities, a ten (10) acre park is shown for the area which is also the location of the proposed subdivision. ,The. Developer. has proposed to develop an approximate two (2) acre park within the proposed development, and develop a cost sharing or purchase agreement with the City; so that the City will own and maintain the park after its completion. The park vvill serve several purposes providing land for wetland mitigation measures for the development and additional flood storage for Elk Creek during major. storm events.' The Developer-shall work with. Public,: Works staff in the development and layout of the park so that the park, wetland, and flood storage uses of the park will be functional and maintainable. The Developer shall also make every effort to preserve and potentially enhance the "stand" Beall Estates Phase Ill PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat - ~- April30, 1997 Page 2 of oak trees located on the northwest portion of the proposed park site. 2. The Developer shall work with the City to obtain an easement through the existing subdivision to the North of the proposed subdivision to obtain pedestrian/bicycle access from Forest Glen Drive to the. proposed park location. General 1. Developer shall submit to the City's Public Works Department (City's PWD) for review and approval, plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of- ways and easements. 2. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and gutters); storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and including fire protection); street' lighting; and traffic control devices,. street signs and delineation. 3. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's Public Works Standard Specifications and Details (City PWD Standards) and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City's Public Works Director. 4. During construction, changes proposed by the peveloper shall be ubmitted in writing by the Developer's engineerao the City PWD for approval prior to installation: 5: No constructioh shall commence until the City PWD has reviewed; approved, and issued a Public Works permit for-the proposed improvements. 4 9 Beall Estates Phase Ill PWO Staff Report on Tentative Plat Apfil 30, 9997 Page 3 6. The Developer shall pay for all costs associated with the design and ' installation of the improvements specified on the:approved;plans. 7.' Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and cohditions' as may be required_by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-IACQE);.affected irrigation districts, and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads). 8. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department. with a digital drawing of the construction "as-builts" in an. AutoCAD: compatible format. - As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items; including„but not limited to, invert, inlet; and rim>elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade; utility line locations and depths; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar) of construction drawings, and an acceptable AutoCAD compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction. 9. The Developer's engineer or surveyorahall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat-map, reproduced on Mylar and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD format. The. Final-Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State. Plane Coordinate.System. 10. All elevations used oh'the construction .plans, orr temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent ,benchmark shall be-tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent 'Benchmark' shall be provided.for the proposed development, :the location of vvhich shalF be as jointly determined by he City PWD and the;Developer's surveyor. 10 (• Beall Estates Phase 111 PWD Staff Report on TentativePlai April 30, 1997 - Page 4 1 1. All fill placed in the development shall be "engineered fill", and compacted to City standards. All existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from'the sife'and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the Oregon Department of, Environmental Quality. 12. Identify easement dedications and widths on the Plot-Plan. 13. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain] must be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements fior storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E: Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. 14. All design, construction plans and specifications, and as-built drawings must be prepared to acceptable professional: standards. 15. All street and water improvement plans must be approved in :writing, by Fire District 3 prior fo review by the City's PWD. - 16. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year floodzone, how does the placement of these structures modify the floodzone.'What affect will it have on the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary, and what affects-will'the modification: of the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary have on the existing facilities and properties surrounding the proposed development. 17. Prior ~o the City.PWD-fina4 approval.of the construction; plans#or,the `proposed improvements; the following must be submitted:,, '^ A copy of written approval from Fire. District 3 of the final street and "water system improvement plans for the. proposed development. 11 Beall Estates Phase pl PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 5 ^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers must be approved. in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks must be completed on the plans. ^ Copies of written approvals and/or permits from the various agencies involved: DSL, DFW, DEQ,: and/or ALOE. 18. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb `elevations; street elevations, etc.l, to which the proposed subdivision vVill connect into existing improvements, prioC to final 'construction plan design. 19. The Developer's engineer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. street; water, sanitary;sevver, Storm drain, systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not intgrfere with the effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities. have. adequate capaci#ies to, accommodate the'flovvs and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of-the connection of the proposed developmenf's infrastructure. 20. The accurate locations of the MWC water line and the natural gas main (and any associated appurtenancesl, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities,'shal4 be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans and final plat. 21. Overhead power lines. Coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light to convert overhead electrical power facilities to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed `developments. Aii agreements and costs associated with the cdnversioh of the eleotrical power facilities from overhead to underground facilities; shall lie by' and between Pacific, Power and Light and the Developer. Z2 Beall Estates Phase 111 PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 6 Streets/Traffic Existing Improvements - Beall Lane -Secondary Arterial:, ROW. 60' wide, pavement 30' wide. Jurisdiction -Jackson County. - Woodridge Drive -.ROW 50' wide, street width 36' - Gatepark Drive -ROW 50' wide, street width 36' 1. Construction drawingsfior this Tentative Plan shall ,include a Street Lighting.. Plan and Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 25-foot unobstructed sight triangle areas shall be required at all uncontrolled intersections. 55 feet shall be required at arterial intersections. 2. The City'PWD shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the- native soils and determine the street section designs in accordance with 'the City PWD Standards. The City's engineering staff or selected `engineering consultant (at Developer's expense, shall. evaluate the strength of the native soils ahd determine the street section designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. Minimum street section shall be as follows: - 3-inches Class "B" A.C. 4-inches of 1 "-0" crushed rock '. - 8-inches of 4"-0" crushed rock;(City, of Medford specifications, woven geotextile fabric. over compacted. subgrade. Street section (excluding the asphalt concrete portion) shall be extended underneath the sidewalk portion of the street section to provide structural support for the sidewalk section. 3. All improvements to Beall Lane -.including, but not, limited to, street section, curbs, gutters, sidevvalks, and traffic control and delineation, shall be coordinated and' approved by the JC Roads and the City;PWD. Acceleration and deceleration lanes meeting JC Roads standards may need to be provided at the proposed development's intersection of Circlewood Drive with Beall Lane. 13 Beall Estates Phase 111 PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 7 4. Stop signs shall be required at the intersections with Beall: Lane. 5. Mihimum'curb to curb width of local. streets is 36 feet. Radius of cul-de-sacs ' and street knuckles shall be a minimum of 45-feet. , Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements Existing Improvements - Elk Creek adjacent to the west boundary of the proposed development.. - A drainage ditch beginning at the outlet of a 48" culvert under Beall Lane near lot 22, traversing in a northerly direction across the proposed Gatepark - Drive to a discharge point in Elk Creek to the north... of the proposed park location. Stream has wide splay areas which possibly afford flood storage - Rogue River Valley-:Irrigation. District indicates that .2:35 acres of irrigated land are included in the project area. 1. Developer's engineer shall develop a master plan for the stormdrain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm vvater run-off firom-and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance), any future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface weterflow (i.e. Elk Creek), and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's. SD System. 2. Developer's engineer shall determine how,SD ystem will work during 10- year and •100 year flood events associated with Elk Creek.. What is HGL in Elk Creek during 10- and 100-year event, and what affect will it have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system. System must be designed to 'adequately drain 10-year storm without 'surcharging. or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging;. and be designed to prevent, backflow of storm water from Elk-Creek up into SD,system. 14 Beall Estates Phase ll/ - PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 8 3. Need plan arid profile drawing of HGL in Elk Creek channel and indication of floodway and flood-zone boundary during the 100-year flood event. The City DPW does not have a complete copy of the flood study work performed on Elk Creek`in this area. Was the flood study done with the inclusion. of the proposed development? if the proposed development was not included, in the original study, then a revised study (with the inclusion of the proposed development and surrounding future developments (if applicable) will need to be performed. 4. Easements need to be 15-feet 'wide, and need clause in final property deeds or final CC&Rs to maintain driveable access to manholes for getting vactor/fetter to manholes. fVeed copy of either document prior to approval of construction plans 5. During the design of the SD System, the Developer's engineer shall consider the effect 'of finished lot elevations with regards to the floodway and 100 yearfloodplain for Elk Creek and-the drainage ditch on the east side of the proposed development. The allowable flow rates into Elk Creek or into the unnamed' ditch from the proposed development shall not be greater than the run-off flow'rates experienced from the property in its current status. The Developer's engineer must provide suitable hydrological calculations and storm hydrographs to depict the existing condition and the finished condition of the proposed development. The Developer's engineer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance etc'.; used in the Developer engineer's calculations... Provide analysis of the 'drainage ditch along the east side of the develcpment.as well as EIk Creek. 6. ` Plans which propose to include discharge to Elk Creek. or the existing ; drainage ditch and any construction thereof, shall be in compliance with DSL, ACOE, ODFW, and DEQ guidelines and requirements. Any modifications to the drainage ditch and Elk Creek shall be done in accordance with any, requiremehts and applicable conditions of the DSL, ACOE, and/or DEQ. 7. The discharge point and potential retention of storm water run-off shalt be coordinated with aspects of the .proposed park-to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and iow maintenance facility. 15 Y Beall Estates Phase ll1 PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 9 8i ` Prior to construction plan approval.of the improvements for this Tentative Plan, the Developer's engineer shallproyide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the City PWD forhydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters. 9. The SD system shall be designed to carry runoff from a 10 year storm event if Q< 100cfs. Use runoff for 50 year storm if O> 100 or < 200 cfs. Use 100 storm runoff if O is > 200 cfs. 10. Minimum storm drain diameter shall be,1.5 inches. 11. Materials shall be PVC (ASIM D 3034 with ;gaskets);. HDPE (meeting ODOT requirements for corrugated polyethylene storm sewer pipe, including a provision for premium water-tight coupling bands), or approved equal.. Provide concrete encasement where required to prevent pipe deformation in areas of minimum cover. 12. Construct grated inlets/catch basins in gutter section. Ref. APWA, California Section, drawing #303-1. If inlets/catch basins are to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip of the. inlet, then the. inlets and catch basins shall be desighed to afford suitable "man" entry into the inlets/catch basin for maintenance/cleaning !purposes. 13. Developer's engineer. shall: provide. hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flow line plots for private and public storm drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGL on the profile. Pipes must maintain. cleaning velocity and have adequate capacities without surcharging. 14. 'Due to he high IeveF of groundwater. in the area, the Developer may wish to incorporate the use:of a perforated SD system,,: If so, then the perforated storm drain system shall be designed to have adequate capacities to: 1.6 Beall Estates Phase Ul PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat Apri130, 1997 Page 10 ^ Convey the collected groundwater and storm water with. the minimum. 'cleaning velocities and without surcharging the collection and 'conveyance piping; and ^ Minimize silts, sands, gravels,'-and fines migration from the native soils into the SD system. The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the storm water run-off and run-on inflows into the SD system.,, 15. All storm drain easements must be 15-feet wide, and include a clause to maintain driveable access to manholes for getting a suitable truck mounted vactor/fetter machine to manholes, clean-outs; or inlets::. 16. ' As illustrated on the tentative' plat, a 30-foot wide storm drainage easement 'shall be located on the northern portion of lots 49, 50,-and 5.1 to afford access to the Elk Creek channel. 17. Construction of private storm drains is discouraged by the City. However, if a private storm drain is to be constructed, the following information must be provided'to the Cityt - How will the private storm drains be maintained, repaired, etc. - All`roof and iot drainage must be'drained to the curbline: - Provide invert elevations and lateral stationing for construction of private storm drain system. - Provide plan and profile views and elevations for any private storms drain systemxhat may be proposed. _ 18.' Provide 0.2-foot drop through all manholes and curb inlets. 19. "Roof drains and'uhderdrains shall not be directly connected to public-storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street at the curbline, whenever possible. Lots should be raised if necessary. Building #oundation under drains. (and these type of facilities only) may drain to private storm drain lines that 1~ tl Beall Estates Phase 111 PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 77 discharge. onto the streets, or into a storm drain curb inlet or manhole only; must tie approved 4efore construction by the'City PWD; and musf be identified: and accurately. portrayed on as-built drawings. 20. Curb.and gutter sections shall not exceed. 350 feet before entering a catch basin or curb inlet. 21. Developer shall be required,to,coordinate with Rogue. River Valley Irrigation District to resolve. any irrigation rights or use of water from Elk"Creek. Sanitary Sewer Existing: Facilities - 8-inch ACP stubbed to approimate Sta. 1 +Z0 in Woodridge Dr. (Green Pa~kl• Other - 8-inch sewer is proposed for installation to the end of -Gate Park Drive as illustrated in he unapproved construction plans for the Green Park V subdivision. 1. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations` :and, flow line. plots for existing and proposed sanitary sewers to both BCVSA and,the, Cjty. Calculations and flow line plots should include allowances for existing flows and projected future or existing development that will be connected to the, system. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separatepi•ofile drawing that indicates the HGL on the profile. All pipes must maintain cleaning velocity and have adequate capacities without surcharging. 3. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. is Beall Estates Phase l1l PWD Staff RepoK on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 12 4. The-City upon. completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completioh of the review process with DEQ. Upon completion bf the review by DEQ and'BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in firal form. 5. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. Thee Developer shall provide bEQ; BCVSA, and the City with-test reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. 6. 7. The SS System shall be designed in accordance' with any master planning prepared by Bear Creek Valley Sanifary Authority (BCVSA) and/or the City to provide adequate. capacity for the proposed development area, any future development on adjacent properties, and any existing sanitary sewer collection systems thaf may need to cohnect-into the proposed development's SS System. If a master plan for the proposed development .area is,unavailable, then a master plan shall be prepared for the proposed development which acCOmniodates the capacity needs for the proposed development as well as the' capacity needs for the adjoihing properties, and any additional flows as determined by BCVSA and the City PWD: Any. proposals .requesting the City or BCVSA to share in costs for development of the sanitary sewer collection system to accommodate the upgrade of lihe sizing to handle the additional capacity requirements for surrounding development, shall include detailed engineering calculations and costs analyses. The Developer'will be respohsible to coordinate and develop any cost sharing agreements with any identified adjacent property "- owners/developers. 19 Beall Estates Phase ll1 PWD Sfaff Report on Tentative Plaf April 30, 1997 Page 73 Water System Existing Improvements - A 12 inch. D.I. line ends approximately. at the intersection of Hulse Lane (proposed Circlewood Dr.) with a reduction to a 8 inch D.I. line. - A 2 inch line ends at the.last service on Circlewood Drive. - A 8 inch D.I. line ends at the west end of Woodridge prive. A 8 inch line is to be installed at the end of Gatepark,Dr. as-illustrated in the unapproved construction plans for the Green Park V subdivision. - A 36 inch MWC main transmission line traverses the proposed development along. Elk Creek to lot 55 then south, along the proposed Circlewood Drive ~; ROW to Beall Lane 1. A=water distribution system shall be designed in accordance with the .1979 Water System Master Plan which accommodates the proposed development, any future development on adjacent property, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's water distribution system. 2. Developer's engiheer shall ascertain the configuration of the existing 12 inch by 8 inch reduction irr BeaIF Lane: at.Hulse>Lane and provide connection of the proposed 8 inch line in Circlewood Drive to the existing 12 inch line in Beall Lane with valuing adequate to isolate the systems. 3. Developer shall provide abandonment of the 2 inch line in Hulse Lane and 'reconnect existing servicerlines (2) to the proposed $ :inch main... `4. ' •'` Developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum flow of 1,000 gpm and conform to Fire District 3 requirements. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants shall be 300 feet. Construction plans shall be reviewed by Fire District 3. ~~ Beall Estates Phase 111 PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 14 5. Specifications for the design and construction of the water system shall be in accordance with City PWD Standards. 6. Lateral /connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built drawings. 7. Developer's engineer shall provide a reinforced flow ("looped") water system with connections at Woodridge'Drive; Gatepark Drive and the existing 12 inch City water line in Beall Lane. ' 8. Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for backflovv prevention: An OHD approved backflow prevention assembly shall be installed immediately downstream of the water meter serving eaoh dvvelling'unit. 9. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connection, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as`required by the City'PWD. 10. All connections to the water supply system must comply with OHD requirements. Water will not be "turned on" by the City until such requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated inspector (currently the Jackson County plumbing inspectorl. 11'. V1/atersystem shall be tested in accordance with City-PWD Standards and. requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City. 21 Beall Estates Phase 111 PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 15 Site work, Grading and'Design, and Utility Plans Existing Improvements - Drainage ditch, Elk Creek Wetlands - 2 areas classified as,PEMC and PUBHx on the Wetlands nventory Map-are located in close proximity to the proposed development. 1. Developer shall provide a. grading/paving plan(s) with the construction drawing submittal to the City PWD. Plants) shall illustrate the location and elevations of the base flood event flood zone and floodway of streams in proximity to the development (if applicable); curb elevations; finish grades; and building pad and lowest floor elevations. 2. '' All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or cravvl spaces with positive drainage away from the building: Drain lines shall be connected to the curb and gutter and discharge from the curb face. 3. Developer shall provide the necessary "rough" lot grading to assure that all lots will drain properly to the curb and gutter, or to a drainage system that drains to the curb and gutter. 4." Provide the City with copies of any required permits and approvals lincluding any mitigating'requirements or cohditions) from DSL, DEQ and ALOE lincluding any mitigating requirements), for any required wetland or flood hazard mitigation work to be performed as part of the proposed development. 5. Grading plans must have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. 'Typidally; existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back; and final grade contourlihes are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line vJidth and solid. Contour lines must,be;iabeled with elevations. 22 Beall Estates Phase 111 PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 1997 Page 16 6. Need to place street lights on plans, with table indicatingstationing and offsets. 7. Provide City with a utility plan-approved by each utility company which reflects all utility crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 8. Utility locations must be accurately depicted on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built. drawings: , Rights of'Ways/Easements 1. All easements for improvements dedicated to the City shall have a minimum 15 foot width and shall be located (whenever possible) contiguously along `the exterior boundaries of properties and shall not split lot lines.. Public utility easements shall have a minimum width of 10 feet.: 2. The City will require a 50 foot ROW width on local streets and 60 foot ROW on collector streets. 3. Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved forml, for the affected property (Tax lot 3404). For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster, the re-allocation ofi any waters attached to lands no onger irrigable as a result of the proposed development. 4. Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements regarding any proposed development that may overlap any existing easement: Any deyelopment proposed which overlaps or alters an existing easement must be approved by the easement's owner in writing, and a copy of that written approval must be submitted to the City PWD prior to; submission of construction plans for City PWD review and approval.. 5. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development ~~ 'I n. Beall Estates Phase llf PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat April 30, 9997 Page 17 shall be shown on the final plat with reference to the recordation number and Grantee. ~~} Steven R. & Debbie M. Childs 484 Beall Lane Central Point, OR 97502 (541) 6648604 City of Central Point 155 S. 2nd Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Beall Estates Proposal To Whom it May Concern; :~i~ fiPR 1 ~ i9~7' I have a few concerns regarding the proposed development. Our fast concern involves environmental issues. The area proposed for development was a dairy farm for many years and all the barns and outbuildings were on this properly. This allows for the•° ' possibility of contaminadon of soil and ground water from fertilizers, fuels and chemicals used in a dairy operation. In addition, a number of old barns and buildings have been tom down recently which suggests a possibility of asbestos contamination. Have these issues been addressed? The property is also surrounded on three sides by small creeks which provide a habitat for wildlife. How will this be maintained? There are two tax lots bordering the Beall Estates development fronting on Hulse Lane (current name on local maps). We want to be assured that access wt71 not be changed by the proposed streets. We understand that development is part of the growth of the community, however we want to be sure existing habitats are protected and the area is emrirotlmentallyssfe for fatni7'tea. Sin Steve and Debbie Chdda 25 I M1{ ~j i ~ `~ ~~~~~~~® CITY OF CENTRAL POINT APR Z B ~99~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 10, 1997 CITY OF GEN'I'RA~ FaOtNT TIME _~:.~..._..,.. Dear Mr. James Bennett, SUBJECT: Subdivision Plat to be named Beall Estates, Phase 3. I live on Bea11 Lane directly across from the new subdivision and have since!1984. There are"three concerns I have. First .the epnstruction dust: With the previous development d' suffered the` lose of several established plants including `a Rhododendron that was 8- feet across. Seoond Traffic: _ I worry about being hit while waiting to enter my driveway. Now am L going to have trouble leaving the driveway? Third noise: The increased traffic, from the pervious subdivision, has greatly amplified the noise and partly because the 6 foot wooden fence across the road has no~sound absorbing qualities. There must be studies about what could be planted along such fences to delete noise and be very low maintenance. Si erely, ~/ . ` , ~/~is2~~~ Virginis.L. Kimball 40.5 Beall Lane Central Point, Or 97502 772-2534 26 PLELNNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: Apri130, 1997 TO: Central Point Planning Conunission FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP City Administrator SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Central Point East; 37 2W O1C Tax Lots 100 & 200; 37 2W'O1B Tax Lots'250Q, 2700 & 2900; Partners Trust Company, applicant. At the regular meeting of March d8, 1997, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and received public testimony regarding the proposed Central Point East Subdivision. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing to its regular meeting of April 1, 1997, and left the hearing open to receive additional public testimony and to receive -additional information from the applicant regarding t~-e buffering of residential lots ,adjacent to the Table Rock Rd. industrial area and the proposal,of a new park site to'serve the area; among other issues. The applicant subsequently requested that the public hearing be further continued to the regular meeting of May 6, 1997, to allow them additional time to prepare a response. Staff has met with t e applicant recently and expects them to make a complete presentation to the Planning Comr~'ssion at the meeting. To date, however, no additional application materials or exhibits have been submitted to the city. 27 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT for HOPE CHRISTIAN CHURCH NEW (ADDITIONAL) DAY CARE FACILITY SITE PLAN PW#97019 Date: Applicant: Project: Location: Legal:' Zoning: Lots: Units: Plans: Report By Purpose May 30, 1997 Hope Christian Church, 325 Oak St., CP, Darold L. Hutsell, Agent Day Care Facility Expansion 325 Oak Street T37S, R2W, Section 2CC, Tax Lot 9800 C-2 1 1 New Day Care Facility 1 Page, By GM Building Design Paul W. Worth, Public Works Technician Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant regarding Public Works standards and additional standards to be included in the design. Gather information from the Applicant/Engineer regarding proposed development. Special Requirements 1. Applicant shall prepare and submit, for City Public Works Department (PWD) review and approval, a suitable landscape plan for the western and northwestern portions of the project. The plan shall be prepared and implemented by and at the expense of the Applicant. At a minimum, the landscape plan shall provide for a landscape buffer adjacent to the public right-of-way along Third Street. 2. The sidewalk,-gutter, and curb section along Third Street will need to 6e replaced, and a new driveway apron will need to be installed at the Third Street entrance to the alley. All broken cracked, or raised (lowered) curb and sidewalk sections along Oak Street will need to be replaced, as directed by the City PWD. Need to remove and replace two existing driveway aprons on Oak Street,. in accordance with City standards. Need to remove and replace corner radius panels on the northeast corner of Third and Oak Streets, and the northwest corner of Fourth and Oak Streets, to access ramps which. meet ADA/City Standards. 3. Coordinate with PP&L to relocate the street light pole (pole no. 64830) to the Hope Christian Church Day Care Facility Site Plan PWD Staff Report Page 2 back of the Third street right-of-way; and to install a proper extension arm/fixture to move light further out onto Third .Street. Also coordinate with PP&L on the installation of an appropriate street light on the existing power pole (813962) near the northwest corner of the subject property. 4. The current proposed location of the new day care facility building apparently affords the necessary current minimum 15-foot sight triangle City PWD standard for the connection of the alley to Third Street. However, the City PWD is going to revise the standard to require a minimum 25-foot sight triangle. We would therefore request the Applicant to relocate the proposed building 10 feet to the South, which would afford the more desirable sight triangle. The relocation of the building also preserves the limited number of parking spaces for the existing facilities and the new day care facility. 5. Need a site drainage/storm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage for the entire tax lot. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public right-of-way is generally unacceptable, unless the Applicant implements City PWD approved improvements to the existing alley surfacing (and potentially base rock) materials and drainage facilities. 6. In lieu of the requirements for designing and constructing the sidewalk, curb, and/or gutter improvements on Oak and Third Street, and the drainage and surfacing improvements on the alley, the Applicant can enter into a City PWD approved deferred improvement agreement for the future development of these facilities. However, the Applicant will still be required to replace and reconstruct the driveway approaches and ADA access ramps at the noted street intersection radii; as discussed above, as part of the development of this project. Genera/ 1. Applicant shall submit to the City's Public Works Department (City's PWD) for review and approval, plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City rights-of-ways and easements. 2. Public improvements, where applicable, include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and gutters); storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and including fire protection); street lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs and delineation. 3. All construction of public improvements within the City shall conform to the Nope Christian Church Day Care Facility Site Plan PWD StaJj'Repor! Page 3 City's Public Works Standard Specifications and Details (City PWD Standards) and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City's Public Works Director. 4. During construction, changes proposed by the Applicant shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation. 5. No construction shall commence until the City PWD has reviewed and approved a professionally prepared set of engineered construction plans and specifications for the public improvements or connection to the public improvements, and the City PWD has issued a Public Works permit for the proposed improvements. 6. The Applicant shall pay for all costs associated with the design, specification and installation of the improvements specified on the approved plans. 7. The applicant shall pay all fees and system development charges, as applicable, prior to obtaining a City building or public works permit. 8. As applicable, the Applicant shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but. not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFWI, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEO.), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads). 9. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Applicant's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "red-line" as-built drawings. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations and depths; etc. Provide a 'red-line' hard copy (on Mylar) of construction drawings. 10. As applicable, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. Hope Christian Church Day Care Facility Site Plan PWD Staff Report Page 4 1 1. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on any permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established benchmark designated and approved by the City's PWD. All elevations used on the construction plans shall reflect true elevations based on the said City PWD approved benchmark and vertical datum. An equation station will not be acceptable. The nearest City PWD approved Benchmark is a brass disk on the North curb of County Bridge #116 on W. Pine Street: elevation 1274.83. 12. All fill materials placed in the development shall be "engineered fill", placed and compacted in accordance with City standards. All existing concrete, pipe, building materials, removed structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. 13. As applicable, identify easement dedications and widths on the Final Plat and Construction Drawings. 14. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm . . drain) must be a minimum of 1 5-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a public utilities easement (PUE). Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. PUEs must have a minimum 10-foot width. Easement dedications in final deeds or in CC&Rs need a statement which clearly states that easements must be maintained for suitable, driveable access, as determined and approved by the City PWD. 15. All design, construction plans and specifications, and as-built drawings must be prepared to acceptable professional standards. 16. All street and water improvement plans must be approved in writing by Fire District 3 prior to review by the City's PWD. 17. All work shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City's Municipal Code; in particular, the recently revised chapter pertaining to Flood Damage Prevention and Hazard Mitigation (Chapter 8.241. 18. Public street lights and fire hydrants shall not be placed within PUEs. 19. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following must be submitted: Hope Christian Church Day Care Facility Site Plan PWD Staff Report Page S • A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the water system and fire equipment access on the improvement plans for the proposed development. • The plans relating to the sanitary sewers must be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks must be completed on the plans. • As applicable, copies of written approvals and/or permits from the various agencies involved: DSL, DFW, DEQ, and/or ACOE. 20. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design. 21. The Applicant's engineer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with the effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the .result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure. Streets/Traffic Existing Improvements - Poor condition of sidewalk, curb, and gutter along Third Street. Fair condition of sidewalk and curb section (no Gutter section) along Oak. 1. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas (i.e. sight triangles) designed to meet the City's PWD requirements. 2. The Applicant's engineer shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the road and parking section designs to handle the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these private driveways and parking areas. Hope Christian Church Day Care Facility Site Plan PWD Staff Report Page 6 Storm Drainage Existing Improvements - Surface Run-off from Existing Property onto the public rights-of-way. 1. Applicant's engineer shall provide a site drainage plan with the facilities being designed, at a minimum, to accommodate a 10 year storm event. System must be designed to adequately drain the 10-year storm event without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing public storm drainage facilities. 2. The discharge point(s) for the site shall be designed to mitigate erosion, and to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility. Any storm water retention facilities shall be suitably landscaped and designed to mitigate erosion, and sediment deposition onto the neighboring streets, and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. 3. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street at the curbline, whenever possible.. Lots should be raised if necessary. Building foundation under drains (and these type of facilities only) may drain to private storm drain lines that discharge onto the streets, or into a storm drain curb inlet or manhole only; must be approved before construction by the City PWD; and must be identified and accurately portrayed on as-built drawings. Sanitary Sewer 1 All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEO, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), the City PWD Standards, and Oregon Plumbing Specialty code, where applicable. 2. Applicant shall make application for any sewer service and construction with BCVSA. A Public Works Permit will be required to construct sewer within the public rights-of-way or easements. 3. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. Hope Christian Church Day Care Facility Site Plan PWD Staff Report Page 7 Water System Existing Improvements - Tax Lot 9800 is currently served by a 5/8-inch-diameter water meter facing Oak Street.. 1. Applicant shall provide properly sized service lines to the buildings in accordance with the Oregon. State Plumbing Specialty Code. Applicant shall pay any associated costs and system development charges required as the result of up- sizing the meter or additional tap and lateral required to serve the new development. 2. Provide construction drawings for the location of any fire hydrants required.. If applicable, steamer ports at hydrants located on the building shall face the buildings. Fire hydrants shall be protected from vehicle damage and encroachment. 3. Specifications for the design and construction of the water system shall be in accordance with City PWD standards and requirements. 4. Lateral/connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built drawings. 5. Applicant shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for backflow prevention. An OHD approved backflow prevention assembly shall be installed immediately downstream of each installed water meter. 6. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connection, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 7. All connections to the water supply system must comply with OHD requirements. Water will not be 'turned on' by the City until such requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated inspector (currently the Jackson County plumbing inspector-. Site work, Grading and Utility P/ans M1 ~ f n Hope Christian Church Day Care Facility Site Plan PWD Staff Report Page 8 1. Applicant shall provide agrading/paving plan(s) with the construction drawing submittal to the City PWD. Plan(s) shall illustrate the location and elevations of curb elevations; finish grades and contours; and building pad and lowest floor elevations. 2. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. 3. Applicant shall provide the necessary 'rough" lot grading to assure that the property will drain properly. 5. Grading plans must have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines must be labeled with elevations. 6. Provide for a landscaped buffer along building frontage with Third Street. 7. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company which reflects all utility crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 8. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings.