Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - October 5, 1999 ~' ~ ~ ,. ~ ~, ':' .. Vll. MISCELLANEOUS VI11. ADJOURNN[ENT CCI"Y OF CENTRAL POIN"I' PLANNING COMMISSION MINU'I~IS September 21, 1999 MEETING CALLED "f0 ORDER A"1' 7:00 P.M. [I ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Candy Pish..Iohn LeGros, and Paul Lunte were present. Commissioners Johnson, Foster and Riggs were absent Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Planning Director; Matt Samitore, Planning Technician; and Lee Brennan, Public Works Director. III CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a tnotiai to approve the Planning Commission Minutes for the September 7, 1999 meeting as presented. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; LeGros, yes; Lunte, yes. V BUSINESS A. Continuation of a public hearine to consider a site plan introduced by Dr. Curtis L. 'fverman P.C. to construct a 2250 square foot dental office buildin~> at 348 Oak Street. The subject property is located in the C-2 Commercial Professional zoning district. Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, presented the Planning Department Staff Report. Mr Humphrey explained to the Commission the problems that have been associated with this project. In order for the Tyerman's to construct the dental office the way they want, they will have to apply for a variance. The variance will be off-street parking requirements and using the alley way as part of a vehicle maneuvering area. Mr. Fumphrey recommended to the Commission that they continue the review until a variance has been submitted to the city and proper noticing has been done. Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, presented the Public Works Staff Report. Mr. Brennan recommended to the Commission that when this project is finally passed the City come into agreement with the Tyerman's for a deferred improvement agreement on the sidewalks, until the City has established a Side Walk Master Plan. Mr. Brennan also recommended that the alley be improved for the width of the project and a bit longer for turning movements and for drainage. "The Public Works Department would also recommend that the driveway be 20 feet instead of the l6 feet depicted on the site plan. Marilyn Wilbur, 3l2 Oak Street, asked the Commission how this would aflect the library expansion project. Mr. Fhunphrey told the Wilbur's he would contact the Library for them to see if this eliminates that site or not. Planning Commission September 21, 1999 Page 2 Commissioner Fish made a motion to continue the review of the Site Plan submitted by llr. Cw•tis L. Tyerman to build a 2250 square foot dental office building in the C- 2 Cmnmercial Professional zoning district, until a further date. This date will coincide with the submission and noticing the variance if the aQplicants with to proceed. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. B. Public I-Iearing to consider a site plan introduced by Tom and John Hamlin to add about 840 square feet to an existing restaurant building at 507 Front Street. The subject is located in the C-5 Thoroughfare Commercial zoning district. Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, Presented the Planning Deparhnent Staff Report. The Applicants are requesting a Site Plan Review for a commercial addition at the EI Albinil Restaurant. The facility is located at 507 South Front Street and shares a common tax lot with the 98 Cent Store and other businesses. The addition would add seating and expand the kitchen area. The Planning Deparhnent calculated that 32 spaces are required for this project and the applicant has provided 35. Access is proposed from common shared driveway access within the shopping complex from Bush and Front Streets. The City would like to come to agreement with the owners to acquire additional right of way for future Bush Sheet expansion. Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, presented the Public Works Staff Report. The Public Works Department recommends that the City and the owner come into an agreement to purchase 12 feet of land on Bush street to be dedicated as a public right of way for future Bush Street expansion. The City would also like to have a deferred improvement agreement and a 10 Foot Public Utility Easement on Highway 99. The city would also recommend the applicant building a storm drain system to adequately transfer storm water off the site. Tom Hamlin, applicant, stated that he did not feel he should have to pay for the additional recommendations from the City. Mr. Hamlin agreed, after talking to the commission, to wait on his decision to withdraw his application until after he met with the business owner and talked with the Planning and Public Works Departments. Commissioner Fish made a motion to continue the site plan review submitted by Tom and John Hamlin to add 840 square feet to an existing building in a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District, to the next regular meeting. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously VI Adjournment ~~ , ~ , PLANNING DEPAR'rMGNT sTArr REPORT HEARING DATE: September 21, 1999 TO: Central Pint Planning Conunission PROM:.. Tom 1-lumphrey AICP, Planning Director. SU6JGCT: Publicl-searing-Site Plan Reviewof372W IIBC,TaxLot4700-EIAlbinilRestaurant Addition Owner/ Tom and John Hamlin Apalicant: P.O. Box 43 Medford, Oregon 97501 Agent: Vitus Construction Inc. P.O. Box 1097 Gold Hill, Oregon 97525 Property Description/ 37 2W 11BC, Tax Lot 4700 - 2.26 acres Zonine: C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare District Summary The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review for a commercial addition at the El Albinil Restaurant. "rhe facility is located at 507 South Front Street and shares a common tax lotwith the 98 cent store and other businesses. Applicable Law - CPMC 17.46.010 et seq. - C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District CPMC 17.64.010 et seq. -Off Street Parking and Loading CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site P(ah, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Discussion The restaurant and subsequent 840 square Coot addition are pennilted in the GS zoning district and meet the area, width and yard requirements ofthe municipal code. The new single story construction would add rnore kitchen and guest seating area. T- I 1 I siding will be appl ied as shown on the applicant's elevations. An addition to the EI Albinil restaurant will increase themeed for off-street parking spaces. CPMC 17.64.040(G-6)rcquireseatingand drinking establishments provide "not less thanonespacepereach three seats, or per nne 1TUndredsquare feet gfgro.rs,/loor area; whichever i.r greater; plus one space ~1 i t lav~ r~ii •l~ nru rml~lu rr~~e ou ilir ~ii~ijnr,chi%!.. City staff calculated (hat 3? spaces arc ruluircd for this project and the applicant has provided 35. Regardingon and oFl'sitc improventcnts; the Public Wcii'ks Dcpartnienthas'stated concent with the existing width of Bush Strcct and it's ability to solve additional tral7ic demand. Although the restaw ~tnt addition may not directly influence a large increase in vehicular unFl ic, the City may wish to address the issue ofobtaining a wider right of way at this time. Public Works is preparing a recommendation (or on and offsite improvements whichare believed to be reasonably related to the proposed development (see Attachment D). 'T'hese include, but are not limited to; driveway aprons, sidewalk improvements; site grading and drainage; on-site lighting; paving and utility (water, sewer and storm drain) connections. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority, Jackson County Fire District Number 3, and US West Conununications have submitted comments that relate to the project (Attachment "C" ). Findings of Pact & Conclusions of Law In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from Section (7.72.040: A. Landscaping and fencing and the constnlction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme ofthe neighborhood, and in such a mannerto use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may re<luire the niainteitance ofexisting plants or the installation ofnew ones forpurposes of screening adjoining property. ^ The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for consideration by the Commission. The plan shows a mix ofexisting/proposed shrubs and trees. [3. Design, numberand location ofingress and egress points so astio improve'and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ Access is proposed from common shared driveway access within the shopping complex from Bush and Pront Streets. C. "I~i> provide ofl~-sU ebl parking rind loading faci I hies aixl pcdesU~ian and vehicle Ilow I~ici I itics in such a manner as is conipatiblc with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable ofuse, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interfcrencc with the traffic Flow on public streets; ^ The 35 parking spaces provided by the applicant meet the off-strcetparking requirements ofthc municipal code. O c~ ~;~. , . ;~ ~ ,. D. Signs and other outdoor'advertising sh'uctures to ensure that they do nut conflict with or deter Irom traffic control signs iir devices and that they are compatible with the design oftheir buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ No signage I~as been proposed at this time however the applicant will be required to apply for a sign permit and submit his plans to the City prior to any sign installation. E. Accessibility and sufficiencyoffirefightingfacilitiestosuchastandardastoprovideforthereasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; ^ The project, if approved, would need to meet any requirements ofJackson County Fire District 3. F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction will meet the minimum setback requirements for the C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare Districf. G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ The proposed structure is similar in architectm•e to other structures located within the C- 5, Commercial Thoroughfare District. Recommendation Staff recommend that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. AdoptResolution No._, approving the Site Pian subject to the recommended conditions ofapproval (Attachment D); or 2. Deny the proposed Site Plan; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A. Application and Exhibits f3. Notice of Public Hearing ; C. Correspondence D. Planning and Public Works nepartment Recommended Conditions of Approval 03 d • q (qty of Central P- ~ _... 1', , ~~:r-rrBr~r ~tA ~r Planning DePlrtmenl _gU_Sry- S7R~ T ~~ =s«~~ - I~ ~~~~F -... \~oS7, ~ ~ ~ • ~. •~ _~.~ 'r~ r I i ~ ~} %4'-SPA c5 s_ LSILFCG' ~ - J :~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ IC_ ~ I ~i ~ ~er II ~{ ~ 1~' q ~- .i~; tl ~Iddd n ~ y ~ ~p~. - _ __ r° ~ ? ~ `4 7 : d ~ ~ \ ~~ T\, ~ C~IR ~ ACS .:~~ -' , l tA\ ~ Ir p'' ~ w.lL K r ~ ~ ,o u G .... ,~ ~ F ~ ~ ~; , ~ : . ~ ~ ~:z~ _ ~ ~ _~ ~~, r L _._. A -T6o M ~,J oa ~ i ~N 7 °. ~' b ~ ~A ~ ~ ~r i q ,~ I ~ -~~ '~ ~_ --..28•_0„ ..... ~ OA 1 ~ M ~ r 1. I41 ~ u ~ S I C n J Ij ~~ ~~ ~ ~I l Y ~ 4u ,~ ~ 8, (~ ~~ 1. 1 ~`ryljy~ ~'~ ~~ N'~ M . ~~ r a /~ ,i ~ ~_.~ ` _... 4F1 M ~ ~ ~', N o _._- I'. 0. M ~~ ~~ 1"+. A~. '. ~. ~, M ~ ~ ~ ~, r ~~ r_ - -, __ z _ -- .~ - ~~ ~ _ r~ - r 0 1 ~ i ~, ~ / Z ~ i i _ O n~ i"~ ~• ~fi ' ~, ~~` 1 ~S ~ _..1 .M ~~,~ u. I , ° ' p r 1.,/ xC11'?t~!`7~cT~ Tb.P...clioaD ~ CpTITI N1 • ~ ,r ~ I I M1."~' H EXI 3ZIK4 7C R¢':N T _ eka ,I ,.~..,r \ ~~ "' ', I. L ~-' , ,~ _ F ~ r t : ~ itsS~N ,. ~ - ~ « ~I,•-.I r,~.,~.~ a ,. ~ F ~ ti~R`+N44't5 ~~= ,. -toxto .-C1~t57-l~D I 3yyyy^CCSKSN .. J 1 1 ~~~ -. -S~~RC~s¢~~ 1 p '~"tAtiCR~cI~ u . d/3P1b:.0 ~C._BaTN:. AY5 I .. . r 1 r ~ l _ .. _~ i}°'lCPGI(-w _ .\S ,~ .IOFc, 4p `rY' z.-tf'4 0_ 4 ~•~GM\L S..,•_ ~Q"~~GO~API:CS ."_. -~ ~ /GU'CpM PA CT E- S~~1PLG4( ~ GO C~ ~~mhN¢EKS-- ~ 1, n M\ 11w101 STI~.R6~D SOC[~ - J~` Ld µny~ -~ 06 ~: City of Ccrtt~•rtl Point PI:ANNXNG DEPARTMENT TonrEiuntphrcy, AICP Planning Director Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: June 15, 1999 CYty of central Point ICen Gerschler EXHI~~IT fiB tt Community Planner Planning Department Mact Samttorc Meeting Date: Time: ' Place: NATURE OP MEETING September 21, 1'999 ' 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point Cfy Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an application for a Site Plan that would allow a commercial addition to the El Albinil Restaurant at 507 Front Street. The proposed addition would allow additional seating for restaurant patrons. The parcel is located in a C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372W11BC, Tax Lot 4700. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Site Plan Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance with the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMEN"fS 1 . Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 21, 1999. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. Planning Technician O ly 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 ~. - , ,,, ,~ ., . 3. lssucs which may provide the basis for an appeal shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period' noted above. Any testimony or written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related directly to the proposal and should be stated cleazly to the Planning Commission. 4.., Gopies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, I SS South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 231. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents,.and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Site Plan. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. y~R O ~~~ O Z~~ QP~/ GF"/~ ~~) ~~ \O~T P~' c~~4~~~ooy ~,y~'SG`~` src.~ SUBJECT AREA 08 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 OO BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY 4916 SOUTH PACIFIC NWY, • MEOFOg0. OgEGON 97601• 9099 • (6f 1)779-1111 • FAX (611) 6JS.fty7g August 25, 1999 City of Cent;a-~_ ~~- Ken Gersehler ~+~S.~~X~tI`~•' ccC» ( City of Centre! Point 1'lannin De Pla~t[tg ~~at'tinent I55 South Second Street g partrnent Central point, Oregon 97502 Subject: 99060 SP - EI Albinal Addition Dear Ken; We have reviewed the proposal with regard to providing sanitary sewer service. Our records indicate there is an existing 8 inch sanitary sewer in First Street and an 8-inch PVC sewer in the property on the North side of Bush Street. The service line records in this area aze not complete, we therefore can not accurately identify where and how the existing structure is connected. Have the applicant contact BCVSA for connection and permitting information. If you need additional information, please call me at 779-4144. Since , Jam@s May, Jr. P. . District Engineer 4g v ` ~ REVISEll ..CITY OF CENTRAL POINT BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT APPLICANT: Name; EL ALBINID (VITUS CONSTRUCTION) ` Address:... P.O. BOX 1097 97525 GOLD HILL State: OR Zip code: City: - AGENT: Name: SAME City: Zip code: OWNER OF RECORD: Name; TOM & JOHN HAMLIN Address: P.O. Box 43' 97501 City: MEDFORD State; OR Zip code: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RESTAURANT ADDITION (840 SQ. FT.) BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: * 1. APPLICANT MUST VERIFY REMOVAL OF, OR PROPER ABANDONMENT OF UNDERGROUND TANKS LOCATED ON SITE (PREVIOUS GAS STATION SITE)z * 2.. DECOMMISSION HEATING OIL TANK IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ ' AS PER (UBC CH. 29 4. BATHROOMS AS PER (UBC CH. 11) $. PROVIDE 3 SETS OF BUILDING PLANS. * CONTACT ERIC CLOUGH, DEQ 776-6010 EXT. 249 CENTRAL POINT BUILDING DEPARTMENT Dated: By. DE BENEDETTI 6-20-99 STAFF RL•PORT.wpdC:\Corel\SuileB\TcmplatclCusWm WP Templates\Dusiness FonnsISTAFF REPORT.wpd O ~k7 tiF 31/,1991 09: :. ~ G2Ga`S6G JL.f D3 BUS Of`C FIRE DISTRICT" No. 3 ,JACKSON COt1NTY 8333 AGATE ROAt7, WRITE CITY, OREGON 97503-1075 (s4i) az~-7ioo Fnx (sav aze-ases August 31, 1999 ,, Ken Gerschler City bf Central Point lte: 99060-SP FF1GE kl2/~l2 Fire Dist 3 reviewed a set of plans from the city building department on 7-28-99. This review was sent to the building department. if you need any other review from use please let me know. Neil Shaw Deputy Fire Marshal ~1 ATTACHMENT D RECOMMENDED PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. "the approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on September 21, 2000 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . 3. .The project must meet the off-street parking requirements for professional offices, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials focali-weather use and approved by the Public Works Department. 12 . a' PLANNING UEI'AR"1'~4EN"TSTA1~1~ REP012"I' MEETING DATE: October 5,.1999 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing - "po consider a Tentative Plan for a l6 lot commercial subdivision known as the Naumes Pear Blossom Center located north of Gast ..Pine Street and west of Hamrick Road in the C-4 zoning district (372W02D Tax.Lot l-00). _ - A~ulicant/ Owner: Naumes, Inc. 2 Barnett Street Medford, Oregon 97501 Agent: Burrill Real Estate, LLC 300 Crater Lake Avenue #2A Medford, Oregon 97504 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 21.6 acres of land into 16 commercial lots. The tentative plan depicts property divisions that would allow for individual lot development or the consolidation of lots,to accommodate larger anchor tenants. A preliminary master plan is included in Attachment A to illustrate the building layout the applicant has in mind. The Naumes' would like to subdivide and improve the property as part of their - marketing strategy. They do have some tenant commitments and the Commission can expect to review site plans fOr subsequent development in the near future. At this time the applicant is only seeking tentative approval for subdivision. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission .with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. Applicable Law_ CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. - "tentative Plans CPMC 17.44.010 et seq. - C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District - i Discussion: I'hrrr arr a liw issurs that will hr adchrssed ^s part of this staff report includin~~ lh~ approjiriatcncss of this site Ibr rununcrcial development, the impact ofsilc dcvelopntcnl upon adjoining properties, the u'allir impact analysis pcrfornud by a pricatc consultant and the inn'udurtion ofnrw inirastructurc to This area of the Cily. C•mm~rrrriul Urrelupnrcnt As the Conunission is aware; Central Point has largely functioned as abedroom community and lagged behind othcejurisdictions when it comcsto conunerciabdevelohntent. The Tourist Commercin! nncl Office'Prgfessional designations applied tb Pine Street (Rend Road) east ofNre Jreetvuv were intended Io nln•act tourist related motels, holels•, restaurants, enter•tairvnenl facilities and other rrses• that iron/d meet the needs of tourists generated btu the anport nnc( Exposition Park (Comprehensive Plan, 1V-23). As a result of substantial residential growth these past few years, the City of Central Point is being targeted for more commercial and industt•ial development. Annexations and the extension of inliastruchu'e on the east side of Interstate 5 have made the land in this part of the urban growth boundary (UG[3) ntorc desirable. The subject property was annexed to the City in 1997 at the time other land was being brought into the City. The Naumes corporation removed the pear orchard that was on this site in 1998 and an environmental site assessment was performed to determine whether any clean up was necessary. Limitcdamountsofcontaminated soil were found in thevicinity oftheold wind machines. This soil will be excavated as part ofredevelopment. "fhc subdivision of this property-will also involve making improvements to City sU'eets, water, sewer andstornt drainage. Adjoining Lund Uses Properties to the north of that owned by the applicant are in the UGQ but not within the City limits. Residents, from adjoining parcels have expressed concern about this subdivision proposal and subsequent development that will occur on site. Of primary concern is the effect that the installation of new infrastructure will have on area wells. The Public Works Department is recommending that a hydrogeological investigation be performed to determine what, if any effect the development of the site will have upon graundwatcr and the shallow wells along [3eebc Road (refer to Attachment D). - Eight and nbisc generated-h'om a.futurc shopping center is also a concern to adjoining property owners who heliuve that a berm and/or wall can mitigate. ~fhis has been addcil as a Planning Department condition of approval (Attachment 6). "hral~lic Impact Analysis A copy ofa ~fIA prepared by KiUClson and Associulcs was given to Planning Commissioners last week for their review and consideration. ~~ .~~ ~ ' l here arc a number of rrrumnrcndatiun> pruposcd he thr u;rllir cunwltant with which the C'itc concurs. .lackson County Roads has a.kcd ti,r additiainrl analysis lirior to tcntalicr plan approval and ' this ,will he up to the Commission's discretion. "I"hc I'uhlic Works Dcparuncnt is reconuncnding spccilic improvcnunts that arc consistrnt ,with those in thc'IlA and ,which arc intaxled to mili~~atr u•allic impacts created by development on this site (rcl'cr lu Attachment I)). ,lackson County iZoads, Bear C'rcek Valley Sanitary Authi,rity, ODO"f and I irr District El, have each submitted comments and rcconunendatiims pertaining to their facilities and ,Mould like these considered by the Planning Commission as part of their review (sec Attachment C). The Planning Department has reviewed the tentative plan tin' compliance with the City's zoning code and Comprehensive Plan. The area is designated ii~r tourist and professional-ol'tice development and is zoned C-4. The Public Works Department has provided their continents, recommendations and requirements for this application which can be found in Attachment D. findings of fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. 1. The project site is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional Zoning Dish•ict and is consistent with the intent of this zone and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed tentative plan will facilitate the dcvclopmcnt of a ,-aricty of commercial uses permitted in this -r-oning district. The purpose of the C-4 zoning disu'ict is to provide for Nye cfevelopznenl q/ concentrated tourist uses and entertainment facilities that serve both local residents and the rr•crveling public. Compatible major professional office facilities are part of this mix. C-4 zoning is intended to occur at locations that maximize ease of dccess from I-5 and mcrjo'r m•teria(streets and are convenient to users of Expo Park, the airport and Downtown. This proposal involves subdividing property that falls into the C-4 locational criteria and allows the iridependent development of uses permitted in the C-4 zone. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the creation of an economically strong and balanced commercial sector of the Community that is easily accessible, atU'active, and meets the commercial needs of the local market area (Comprehensive Plan, page XII-13). The development of this site has been contcmplatod Ibr almost 20 years and the commercial uses that arc anticipated will serve new residents in the immediate area, the ttavcling public and visitors to the ,lackson County I_.xpo. 2. T"he project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 21.G acres for the purpose of developing a commercial subdivision. The total number of lots proposed for what the applicants have identified as the f rst and only phase of their subdivisions is 16. All of the parcels in the tentative plan meet the area, width and access requirements for the C-4, Tourist and office-Professional zoning district. J ,i ~ ~~ ' ~~ ~~ , I?acb lot ~~ ilhin the suhdi~ ision mccls the requiremcnls of the C'ity's subdivision and zonin~~ codes for conuncrcial lots as well as the sp~cilic requirements ofthe C-~t zone. "I he lcnlative plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.IQ.010 cl. seq. 3. "['he Planning and Public Works Dcparhnents have reviewed both the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project mcetsall City standards and. requirements subject to the reconuuended conditions found in Attachments D and G. Recommendation: Staff reconunends that the Planning Conunission take the following action: I. Adopt Resolution No. ,approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Attachments D & E); or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the disa'etion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Copy of Project Application, Tentative Plat and Preliminary Site. Plan B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Correspondence Received from Affected Agencies D. Public Works Staff Report dated May 28, 1999 E. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval ,~.~,~~ose.who ~~ F F~N7q \ttacluncnt A r ~ t: , "o rr ,:Ft i~~ Y t- '~ '~' o LAND DIVISIONS D i' l'~ fit; ~~ u ~% fr ~ C~ =' "-Zi .City of Central Point Planning Department IUI AUG 1 2 1999 '~ ~.., ,e ARE GoN 13 -gqr: c~rnntr I . APPLIC ~W"f [NFORMA"PION itrrice usr: ~ N ante>_N a um~,~--------- Address: 2 Barnett Street City: Medford Statc:_ OR __7_ip Code: 97501 Tclcphone~ Business: 541-608-1727 _ Residence: _ 2. ADEN"I' [NFORMA"PION Name: Burrill Real Estate. LLC Address: "tnn (`rator T aka Avanna 1I2A -__ Ci[y: Medford State: oR Zip Code: 97504 Telephone.: Business: 541-776-1311 Residence: 3. OWNER OF RECORD (Attach Separate Sheet If More Than One) . NatttC: Naumes Inc. __ Address: 2 Barnett Street City: Medford __ State: OR_ _ZipCode: 97501 __ "I"elephone: Business: 541-608-1727 _ Residence: 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Type of Land Division: Subdivision ~ Partition ^ Pad Lot ^ Township: 3L____ Range:_~___ Section: ~2~ Tax Lot(s): 100 Township:- Range: Section: Tax ~.ot(s): __ 'township:, Range: Section: "Tax Lot(s): Township; Range: Section: Tax Lot(s): Zoning District:: C-4 Total Acreage:. 21.6 a. Type of Structure proposed: Single Family ^ Duplex ^ Multiplex ^ b. Number of Dwelling Units: N A 5. REQUIR,//ED SUBMITTALS ~1/ "this Application Form ©/Application Fee $500.00 plus $25.00 per lot 10 copies of tentative plan Written Authority from Property Owner if Agent in Application Process ~~ One copy of plan reduced to 8 %x x l O Title report on subdivision guarantee 6. [hIEREBYS'tA"fETHATTHEC'AC'CS[tELA'fED'[NTHEABOVEAPPL[CA"fIONANDTHEPLANS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FIERE W ITH AI2E'1'RUE, CO[tRL;C"f, AND. ACCURATE "fO "CI fE BL'S'f Of MY KNOWLEDCiC:. I certify that t am the : ~ Property Owner or ~ Authorized Agent of the Uwncr oCthe proposed project site. ~~ ,, I I ~..._... 6;ap _._. _.____ -- ~. - _ -- _ ,. .- ~ ~ I,~I ~a ~ I I -~ o ° .n Y o m ~~ ~ '~ 1 a° t~~ aim ' _ 1 I ' ;,_ ~ n. IOW ~ I ~~ i ~ 9 Ire I I 1 ..N O._ .., I 77r _. 'I I I n_I ________,J I . --- ~~. € E I I __ - ~ I .. _.. I 41 I 1 I I _ 1 ~ ._ I I ~ I I /z i i N uo i -I I ' ::I / 1 1 NO ' D~j I 1 I I .' I ~ 1 : A W IA 9y I I -.1 I ,_..._u~ -_.. - I I- m I I ~B I I I / no i i ~1 m 1 i, i I I I r ^' I _....... I ,. I GG 1~ ILA ~ - I ~ ___ "/ _ ______ __ I I 1 ff gg 1 I q~l I~ { t _. I y' ~ ~ ~ 1 I I C ~g Y~~ a~ I I ()W 1 1 ^'o I 1 I ~~ I`<Z I '. is vl I ~~ I i I :~ I ~ml I .K ' ~ ~ ; ; I A ^ I I F---------- ___T /F-NI I ifP i ~ - i 1 kr jj,I 6A ~ l: ~ I 1 g e~^ I V~ il~ 1 N~ I 1 I I ~ tl9_ I I I ~ I' D~ ~ I f n I i I I --i { p.n I I 1 1 a yy $P !I:I I- UI j i 1 i !~~^ 'p yy 'P 1 I I ,I' aC~^ i I[I 1 I 1_ W I I I I - I G ~ I I jg4 yy 9 I I ~ I I 4 I j/~ Dpr I I n~ I 11 Tf.9 tll I AO~O I I _._ Lll'10 I 1 gg r I I I yNN 1 II VI I ~^ _. -., 1 I I " -----~ ~ ,_ ---- -- ---- ------c I 1 I I ~ I .. umir ~ ~~ Nr mr ~ :. ~ i i t B^ I J i or I I I I a Fp a -1 a -I I I _ __._ ~~ ~ ~__'1 1 Ili _ -) __ _______ __ __ ____ __ ~______l~ l IL` _ ~ .-. _ i R ~zi~`T. Y L _ -_-.., _ _r r .. C OF HAAIRICK RoAO \' r _ _ _ T _ _ ~ _ r _ (BI~lT„pF_Wt~vyA91F51 _Q- - - - ~-I - - _ Gr i 9Y ~ ~~N I Yf j.9 Ff 1 I:Yy ~ I I 1 I I z m D Z pg a ~ ~s~g Y a ~ ~~ e~F`~~,~ ~4:tnA< ~A.. ~ ; ~ ~6 ~~ ~ ~~r~ ~~~' [mom ci ~ ~ 6 ~ ~~~ ~a~ ~~ ~ ~ v r- E Ga ~,k 9 ~' I ~Y~~~I~ ~~~ ~ F n " ~ ~ ~ ' „ ., i c: , , i c~ ~~~ ~ 1u1 P .P~, ~ r ~ a 1 r~ ~ ~ .t n- ,-_,,, iP,. _~ P el ~_' . I - -' ~ Q _ ~`. ~~ - ~ r ~ ~ ifd'~ I I_ ~ "°- ~ l.: ~ it ;~, z~; ' ~ r ~~T.nl i _ -r. i~ .: - ~--- ~ = r - ~ s. y ° ~" ? ~ -. Y i,.2}P ~ ~.~(' c°!I I ~ Asa. ° i :~ _ P -J -~.. ~,~,... ~ ~.u~ , ,~ (=1 I IJ \I r~ I a -~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~~ ~' _ 9ti d ~. l l . ; r-~ I IP ~ o `I a 2;; ~: ~{- ~ of ~Ir ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~.I ~ ~, ti ~ ; ~ ;~~~~ ~l j,~Ti jj d ,~' ,, e ~ ,, _ ~;. ,L,' air - "~ --, o ~; xb s:. i, ` JK! ' ~^ d o ~~ ~ u P dam-. ~ i ~ - a - J ,,tt °f C li - ~~ P - -IWj~P~--. ., ~~_ ~ ; i 0. I , d - o o a`'- - fix' '. ~~ b ~ ~_ ~~ d F ~ r <~< r- _ ~ ~~,,~ ~ \ _ `II~\ i \~r ~ ~~ S ~ I ~°:~~ n .. _,~~, o ~ ¢y ' ~h ~ :~-. ~ it a ~. d p (t I I t~G{ t-- ~ ~ _ ~ -1 R f e. uY 1 C ~'~ u ~ 1l' 1 ~ ~ ~ , i. P ~ n~ }4 Xw~ ~ ~ ~ ', ~~~ ri ,`~ ~;-~1" ~ , 1 d r~ --~-`cam `~~ ~ .J C ~y ~• d v = _.P -.~ 9 u ~f F ~ d d d ~ p. a'~ >p' "dr mF e yf , -~ d - - ......-_. -t .. , r _ ~ _ i i I ? d _ ~ 2y, "U'" n~~n ~ " ~ n nl' HAMP,ICf< ROAD i _f City of Ceri~r•al ~~oi~tt :~ttachntcii(13~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Planning Technician Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: September 13, 1999 Meeting Date: October 5, 1999 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Subdivision application for a parcel of property located adjacent to the northwest corner of Hamrick Road and East PineStreet. The subject parcel is located in a C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372W02D, Tax Lot 100. The Central Point Planning Commission will initially review the application of Tentative Subdivision to determine if the proposed subdivision of the existing 21.60 acre tax lot meets the requirements oflaw. If approved, the subdivision would create a total ofsixteen commercially zoned parcels. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Tentative Partitions are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up untilthe close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 5, 1999. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Flall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. i. Issues which may provide the basis Ibr an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly. to the Planning Commission... 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 Soutlt Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Please refer to file 99059-TP. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. I'or additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext: 23t. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Subdivision Plan and Site Plan Review. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ] 55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 _ N i Attachment C _~_ ', -- JACKS Roads ON COUNTY Ja~cph L. Strahl~~ D~rcemr 200 Antelope Road White City, Oregon 97503 (s4 t) Bzs-3 t zz or (sa t) ns-7zse Fax: (541) 830-6407 apt, l6, ~ t eet~; r~9$ Attention: Tom Humphrey City of Central Point Planning 115 South Second Street Central-Point, OR 97502 RE: Revised Comments for Naumes Subdivision off Hamrick-.Road Planning File 99059; T37-2W-Sec. 02D, Tax Lot 100, Dear Mr. Humphrey: ~[~C~~~I~~!il~` gip 2 3 1999 Thank you forthe opportunity to comment on the application fora 16-lot commercial subdivision located on the west side o£ Hamrick Road. Jackson County has received and reviewed the traffic'study by Kittelson for the said project. We recommend that he following comments be addressed prior to tentative plat approval. We concur that the proposed south access on Hamrick be restricted to right in only. As stated in the study this creates a level of service problem for the north access. The LOS concern with the north approach must be adequately mitigated prior to plat approval as the facility is not adequate. This may be:accomplished by providing access directly to Beebe Road or other such appropriate treatment. 2. The traffic study notes five access points and the plat shows only 4. Access must be analyied according to theproposed plat. 3. Results of the analysis for Hamrick & Pine Street on page 30 show capacity available. We recommend a revised study be submitted, prior to plat approval, which analyzes the main center drive on Pine StreeC restricted Co right in/right out/left in movements only, and the southbound left turns from the site be accommodated at the Hamrick/Pine Street intersection. This may eliminate the need for a signal and prevent problems encountered along the ORE 62 corridor near the Fred Meyer and Target store. 4. As stated on page 33 a raised median along Pine Street is more effective in restricting access points to right in/right out movements. If the raised. median is not possible due to access along the south side of the road we will require an adequate "pork chop" design prior to plat approval. To be effective; pork chop islands require a substantial amount of area and the plat should reserve the necessary right of way for proper construction. . _ 22 BEAR CREEK OREENWAY / ENGINEERING / FLEET MANAGEMENT / MOTOR POOL / PARKS / ROAD MAINTENANCE '/ VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 776.7288 8264122 828-3121 776-7739 776-7001 826-3122 816-3122 5. A complete site plan with lane widths and access points on both sides of Pine Street and Hamrick should be submitted. The plan should extend 500 feet beyond property boundaries, showing all access points. The recent application by Valley of the Rogue Bank should also be included. Relocation of the proposed access points may be necessary. These comments may require substantial changes to the tentative plat and should be addressed prior to approval If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at 774-6230. Sincerely, ` v Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer cc; Lee Rodegerdts, Kittelson & Associates 610 SW Alder, Suite 7Q0 Portland, OR,97205 Page 2 September l6, 1999 C\DB V ELOP\CIT[F.S\CNT'2LP"I199059a.wpd 23 - JACKSON COUNTY Ronc~s September 1, 1999 Joseph L, tih'ahl Du'ector 200 Antelope Road V\4117e City, Ofegon 97503 (541)826-3122 or (547)776-7268 Fax: (54t) 630-6407 Attention: Tom Humphrey City of Central Point Planning 115 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Naumes Subdivision off Hamrick Road - a county maintained road. Planning File 99059; 737-2W-Sec. 02D, Tax Lot 100. Dear Mr. Humphrey: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the application fora 16-lot commercial subdivision located on the west side of Hamrick Road, north of East Pine Street. Roads and Parks Services has the following comment:' 1. We need to review a Traffic Study before making comments. The study should include access points, turning movements, traffic impacts, etc. for existing and future full build-out conditions for the peak hour during an average weekday. We recommend denial until we receive and approve a Traffic Study. If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at 774-6230. Sincere Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer L~„"~M~ ~ ~ t/al /~c4I -~ -_ I:\DEVELOP\CITIES\CNTRLPT\99059.wpd 2, `i BEAR CREEK OREENWAY / ENGINEERING / FLEET MANAGEMENT / MOTOR POOL / PARKS / ROAD MAINTENANCE / VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 776.7168 838-3172 816-31YY 776-7339 776-7007 826-3172 826-3122 DLPAR'C\dGN"l' OI+ '1'RANSYOR'CA'1'[ON August 31, 1999 Ken Gerschler, Planner City of Central Point 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: File 99059-TP Dear Ken: We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this application, which is a proposal to subdivide a parcel described as 37-2W-02D; Tax Lof 100. This parcel contains'21.6 acres and is located northwest of the intersection of East Pine Street and Hamrick Road. ODOT has no concerns with this proposal atthis time. Please contact Alex Georgevitch, ODOT Traffic Engineer at 774-6354 or myself at 774-6399, if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Shirley Roberts, Planner Cc: Monte Grove, Area Manager [CP99059-TP.sr] .., `~ :~ ilkG.:l 14'1'1 il'1; 1.1'i !-:?h4!rt~~' .qa D_I 111;; III IYIi-i{+~ MI"'~p;:~ FIRE DISTRICT No. 3 ,JACKSON COUNTY 8333 AGATE ROAp, WHITE CI'tl; OREGON 97503-1075 (541) 826-7100 FAX (541) 826.4566 August 31, 1999 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Re' 99059-TP Fire Dist 3 will need to review the 1Vaumes Partition for the following L Street width and layout. Fire Dist 3 will review far-fire department access. 2. Fire hydrants will be squired. Contact Fire Dist 3 for locations and flow. 3. Fire Dist 3 will review each building, for additional. requirements. lfyou have any question please give mea call. ~~e~~~~ Neil Shaw Deputy Fire Marshal ~~ BEAR CREEK VALLEY.., SANITARY AUTHORITY 7915 SOUTH PACIFIC NWV. •. MEDFOgD,OREGON 97501-9099 • (541) 779-4744 • FA%(541) 595.5270 August 25, 1999 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Subject: 99057 TP - Naumes Partition 37 2W 2D tl 100 Dear Ken, p~C~G~LId[s AUG 2 7 1999 D We have reviewed the proposal with regard to providing sanitary sewer service. The sanitary sewerage system for the subject development would require that Easements be granted for Ingress and egress, operation, and maintenance of all sewer mainline: The property slopes Westerly toward Bear Creek, and the Upper Bear Creek Interceptor Sewer is on the West side of Bear Creek crossing under Bear Creek at the Beebe Road / Gebhard Road intersection. A recommended connection for this development would be to the existing Beebe Road sewer through the Picollo Property. This would require the least amount of line replacement and upsize by the applicant in Beebe Road due to a capacity moratorium on that line. The sanitary sewer line indicated on the tentative plat in East Pine Street does not exist. The sewer in Hamrick Road according to recent project development is directly under a 36 inch water transmission main, no additional connections will be made to this sewer line. If you need additional information; please call. me at 779-4144. Sincerel James Ma Jr. f' Y. District F,ngineer ti. I (~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ' STAFF REPORT for NAUMES PEAR BLOSSOM CENTER PW#99059 Atuuhmciu f) Date: September 27, 1999 Applicant/ Naumes;lnc;, 2 W. Barnett Rd., Medford, Oregon 97501, 772-6268, Owner: Contact: Gregg Anderson, Chief Financial Officer Agent: Burrill Real Estate/Hoffbuhr & Associates Project: Pear Blossom Center: Commercial Retail, Professional Office, Restaurant; Motel, Gas Station, Bank (w\drive-up) Location: Northwest Corner of Hamrick Road and East Pine Street Intersection Legal: T37S, R2W, Section 02D Tax Lot 100 Zoning: C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District Area: 21.6 Acres. Units: 16 Parcels: Parcel l: Motel Parcels 2-11: Retail, Restaurant, Gas Station; with 1 to 2 Anchor Tenants, with parking. Parcels 12-18: Professional Office, Banking Plans: 1 "Master Plan" illustrating tentative road, building, and parking layout for development; prepared by Hoffbuhr & Assoc., dated July 29; 1999; and "Tentative Plat" for Naumes Inc.", dated August 12, 1999 prepared by Hoffbuhr & Assoc. Report By: Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Purpose Provide informatioh to-the Planning Commissioh and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as''Developer'") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed commercial/professional office facility. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. Special Requirements Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner involved. 2. Master Plans: In association with City PWD staff, the Developer shall prepare master plans for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system, the sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system, the water distribution system, and the street/driveway system for the subject tax lot and the areas to the north and. south of the proposed development. The master plans should take into account the flows or demands of the proposed development, any future development on neighboring portions of the subject tax lot, on neighboring properties, and any other areas deemed by the City that will need to connect into the proposed development's or ~- . 28 /'ll7r ~l, rl/Kn•~~~'I /'tl ~',' _ existing neighboring infrastructure. The prepared master plans should take into account any previous master plans that have been prepared and approved by the City and Jackson County. 3, Easements: The Developer shall provide suitable and acceptable 15-foot-wide minimum easements for. any City public works infrastructure located outside the public rights-of-way. These easements shall. be dedicated for sole use by the City, and shall not overlap (crossings are acceptable, as long as required infrastructure separation is maintained) other utility or infrastructure easements. A separate 10-foot minimum width public utilities easement (P.U.E.) should also be required for utility installation outside the Freeman Road right-of-way along the property's exterior frontage with Hamrick Road and E. Pine Street. Vehicular and Pedestrian Access to All Proposed Development: Access agreements or similar documents will need to be granted on the proposed Development's-property to allow for public and private vehicular and pedestrian access (ingress and egress). on and/or across the proposed Development's property to afford access to the various parcels of the development (cross-access easement agreements). All construction plans and as-built drawings shall accurately portray (both horizontally and vertically) utility line and appurtenance locations and the locations of any existing and new easements on the proposed development. All final plats shall accurately portray the horizontal location of all easements and right-of-ways dedicated as part of the development of this project. All right-of-way and easement dedication shall be completed prior to final construction plan approval. Traffic Circulafion Plan: The developer shall prepare and submit for City PWD approval a suitable site traffic circulation plan for the proposed development. The traffic circulation plan shall illustrate that all driveways and connections to streets shall accommodate the turning and access .movements of all expected truck, bus, emergency vehicle (i.e fire truck) and all other applicable vehicles including but not limited tb a WB-67 truck (long-haul delivery truck); a motor home in combinationwith a boattrailer; a single unit bus (RVTD); and fire-fighting equipment. It is further recommend that the development include bus "turn-outs".internal to th.e development that will provide for rider shelters and bus loading facility for RVTD buses. All vehicular movements shall be designed to avoid infringing into opposing or adjoining travel lanes when the traffic movements are made by the studied vehicle. 5: Clear Vision Areas/Triangles. All driveway approaches of the proposed Development connecting to public roads shall maintain a minimum 55-foot sight vision triangle as measured from the edge of the right-of-way to the center of the driveway. This requirement may be adjusted by the City RWD, depending oh final orientation and lane layout of the adjoining roads, in accordance with AASHTO clear sight-vision requirements. Adequate clear vison area/triangles shall also be maintained at all internal driveway intersections. 6. Traffic Sfudy• Improvements to Hamrick Road and E. Pine Street• and Riphf-of-WaV Dedication: A traffic impact study forethe proposed development, prepared by Kittelson & Associates;'Inc., dated June 1999, has been submitted to the City. The traffic study analyzed the year 2003 (anticipated year of build-out of the center) projected traffic'flows and intersection levels of service at the major'street intersections most likely to be impacted from this develepment; and the Development's driveway connections to Hamrick Road and East Pine Street. The traffic study included the residential development already approved to the north and east of the site (Walnut Grove; New Haven, Cehtral Point East, and Parkwood Terrace); :~ (! x. ~_ .,_ _ ~~, ,.v i r. fir: ~ :, ^. ~ ~ :~n~~ /', r~~ , the USF Reddaway site, and the potential retail/professional office facilities on land owned by USF Reddaway on the southeast corner of the intersection of Hamrick Road and fast Pine Street. However, the traffic impact study, does not include "build-out" (i.e full development within the current UGB) traffic flow conditions for the northeast portion of the City which greatly- . influences the "build-out" design and right-of-way requirements and needs'for two of the City's main arterial roads: Hamrick Road and East Pine Street. The scope of the traffic impadt study was determined jointly by Jackson County, ODOT, the Developers, and the City. It was jointly decided that the Development only look at what impacts it will have on the projected traffic flows at'the time ofcompletion of the Development; year 2003. The City is currently updating the City's Transportation System Master Plan (TSP) which will classify certain streets and project. "build-out".traffic flows forthis northeast portion of the City. :. Unfortunately the overall road classification and lane determination needs for Hamrick Road, East Pine Street, and Table Rock Road to accommodate "build-out"conditions have. hot been determined by the City, nor by Jackson County. Thus, additional master planning will be warranted once the TSP is completed. However, it is projected that this additional master planning work will probably not be completed prior to the end of year 2001. Another issue not addressed by the traffic impact study, is how abcess to East Pine Street will be afforded/limited for the properties located to the south of East Pine Street in the area immediately to the South of the proposed Development. This area is largely undeveloped, and due to the arterial nature of East Pine street, willneed to be master planned to facilitate a limited ingress and egress to East Pine Street. To allow for development of the proposed project prior to the completion of the traffic master planning needed for the area, the City PWD recommends the following: A. The Developer be required to constructall improvements noted in the Traffic Impact Analysis that adjoin the subjecttax lot, including the signal at the intersection of the Central Driveway and East Pine Street. B. The Developer be required to construct street widening, bike lane, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalk (including driveway aprons and wheel .chair ramps), planting strip with landscaping, traffic delineation (including median traffic islands on E. Pine Street), and street lighting (with maximum 200 foot spacing) improvements for the portions of Hamrick Road and. E. Pine Street that adjoin the proposed development. The portions of Hamrick Road and East Pine Street that adjointhe subject development are developed as "rural" roads that do not meet current City or County urban standards. The roads will need to be improved, as a minimum; to meet City standards, as reviewed and approved by Jackson County Roads, and the City PWD: C. The Developer be required to sign a deferred improvement agreement with a 15-year "sunset" (executed at the time of publicworks construction permit issuance) to participate in a local improvement district {for a portion up to 50% of -the total cost) for he intersectionimprovements and traffic signal installation at the proposed Development's northeast driveway connection onto Hamrick,Road. D- Regarding the road right-of-ways adjoining the proposed Development; the Developer be required to dedicate additional land for street and. City utility i.7 ~~ l'.', u' Rln.c..om (~rurrr /'al'i J purposes a minimum of 62 feet from the centerline of E.-Pine Street Additional land dedication for street and City utility purposes shall also be dedicated a .minimum of 44 to 56 feet (wider as it approaches the intersection) from the centerline of Hamrick Road. After completion of build-out master planning/construction, any dedicated property that was not necessary, would be "vacated" and returned to the adjoining parcels of the proposed Development. E. That additional "acceleration" westbound tapers on E. Pine Street and southbound tapers on Hamrick Road, be constructed at the exits to the proposed :development, as jointly determined by the Developer's traffic engineer, the City PWD, and Jackson County. That the "Eastern" and "Western" driveway entrances to E. Pine Street and the "Southern''. entrance to Hamrick Road be constructed as "right-in/right-out" entrances, with suitable concrete island "pork-chops" constructed for traffic delineation. Landscape Buffers, Meandering Sidewalks, and Cify Utility Sfrip : In keeping with the landscape buffers and meandering sidewalks .established with the Central Point East Development, the City PWD is recommending that the Development be required to develop an approved landscaped buffer (including suitable irrigated landscaping and meandering sidewalks) located in the strip of land between 12.5 feet to 2.5 feet from the back edge of the Hamrick Road and E. Pine Street right-of-way to be established for-the Development. The remaining 2.5 feet of right-of-way is to be reserved for City utility location (i.e street lights, fire hydrants; air relief vents, etc.); but should be landscaped as appropriate. Erosion Control Plan: A suitable erosion control plan must be prepared and submitted to the Oregon.Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for the construction of any improvements associated with this development. The construction plans associated, with this development Will not be approved by the City PWD until the. City PWD receives a copy of the written approval of the erosion control plan by the DEQ. - Storm Drainage System: The storm drain system shall be designed to accommodate the storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek ditch conveyance); any future development on adjacent properties; conveyed storm drainage or surface water flow, and any flows from areas deemed liy the Citythat will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. Depending on topography, this may include. surface water flows from the properties north of the subject tax lot that drain across the subject tax lot. However, if applicable, the City PWD is further recommending that the Developer be required to design the storm drain conveyance system to accommodate projected post-development flows from these adjoining properties.. City would propose reimbursement to the Developer for up-sizing the applicable up-sized portion(s) of the storm water conveyance system to accommodate the future development on these neighboring properties, as applicable. The City fs currently developing a schedule for the cost differences forup-sizing storm drain pipe and manholes. Once the cost table is developed, the cost differences will be multiplied against the lineal feet of storm drain pipe for the various pipe up-sizing, and the number of manholes up-sized, to determine the total reimbursement that would be due the Developer. 'Once the amount of the reimbursement is determined, it is proposed that the City would enter into. an agreement with the Developer that calls for payment of the determined reimbursement amount (which would likely be designated as the "Pear Blossom Center storm drainage project --- 31 Pr,rr )1luasarn ('nr6v' 1' II D .C/n//72r/ rorl .Cr)rlrmhrr ". /9V,C Page fee") as it is collected from the developers of the affected properties. 10. Off-Site Storm Drainage Infrastructure: For any storm drainage infrastructure constructed or improved outside the City's rights-of-way or easements for drainage of surface waters from the subject development, the Developer shall provide a suitable document or documents which contain approvals for the implementation of such connection and/or improvements and which describe: ^ Who is responsible for the operation, maintenance; and repair of the infrastructure facilities to maintain the original design parameters associated with the infrastructure. If the City is to operate and maintain the infrastructure, the applicable funding mechanism that will be created (i.e local improvement district) for the associated City expenditures; ^ How will all-weather driveable access be afforded and maintained indefinitely to maintain and repair the infrastructure facilities; ^ That an easement or other suitable conveyance document has been granted, as necessary, to provide suitable access on private propertyfor the. inspection; maintenance, and repair work to be performed on the infrastructure facilities. The easement-shall include a statement which allows access by City personnel for inspection, maintenance, and repairpurposes. 11. -Water Distribution Sysfem and Fire Protection: It is recommended that the water system for the development and neighboring properties to the north and west shall be master planned, to not only accommodate the needs of the proposed Development, but to provide for mainline valves and stub-outs for future main distribution networks and "reinforced looping" of the adjoining propertieato the north and west. The water distribution far the proposed Development hall be of "reinforced loop" design; a minimum of two connections will need to be made to the City's distribution system: one connection to the planned 12-inch line along E. fine Street (to be constructed in the winter of 2000), and a second connection to the 16-inch- diameter line currently being constructed along Hamrick Road. The-water lines shall be sized to accommodate all fire demand flows of the development. Fire hydrant or service vault locations .and needs shall be determined by Fire District No, 3. 12. Flood Study of Bear Creek: The proposed development places improvements and structures within or alters the 100-year floodzbne associated with Bear Creek. It is recommended that the Developer be required to have a 100-year flood study analysis performed. The flood study must provide findings which indicate what affects does the placement of the proposed improvements and structures have on the base flood elevation and floodzone boundary; and what affectswill the modification of the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary have on the existing facilities and properties surrounding the proposed development. The Developer's engineer shall determine the existing base flood flow rates and the base flood elevation contours; and illustrate the existing boundaries of the floodplain and floodway fora 100-year "base flood" storm event associated with Bear CreeK through the affected properties. The construction drawings shall indicate the revised base flood elevation contours and. boundaries of the floodplain and floodway expected to occur following the completion of any development within the identified floodzone (also referred to as the "Area of Special Flood Hazard's), including any affected upgradient areas. The information determined in this study will also be used to determine minimum finished floor elevations for any structures that will be placed within the area of special flood hazard. ~~ /'1171 Cn ilr Krrnrr \,'/~h'mhrr' ~ iV~l\' l',rCr h 13. Aboveground Utilities: If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power, US West, and Falcon (TCI) Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development.: All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 14. ..Shallow Groundwater..-Because of the groundwater level and quality degradation concerns .raised on the neighboring properties to the proposed development, the PWD is recommending that the Developer conduct a hydrogeological investigation of the shallow groundwater underlying the proposed Development to determine what affects the proposed development ...and. associated improyements may have on groundwater levels and quality, and expected affects to downgradient properties. General 1. Public Improvements: All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and. stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to - implementation. 2. Permits and Approvals: Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required bypther agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and Jackson County Roads and Parks Services (JC Roads), Fire District No. 3, and,Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA). The.. Developer shall submit written approvals of the final construction plans from Fire District No. 3 (fire.. hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), and JC Roads, (E. Pine Street and Hamrick Road improvements and driveway/access road connections) prior to final construction plan review and approval by City PWD. 3. As-Builts: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy"form (produced on Mylar®) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD: As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide ':'red-line" changes to final. approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations; other below grade utility lines; etc. Provide. a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar®), or an approved alternative format, 33 l'r, u' IJ/ups nn (~rnl~ r /'1171 b'l, rl)Rr/,arl Sr/~Irrnhir,~~. /9V,e l',rgt of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development; or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 4. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on'temporary benchmarks; and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans: At least two permanent benchmarks shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of the benchmarks shall be as joihtly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's surveyor. 5. Exisfihp Infrastructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations,'etc.), to which the proposed development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans. 6. Fill Placement: All fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building Department standards, except for the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of publicrights-of-way and that does not underlie building, structures, ortraveled vehicular access ways or parking areas. 7. Road/Driveway/Parking Areas: The Developer shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs to handle the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and parking areas. Need to provide designed road sectiorrfor review. The road/street/driveway sections withih the public rights-of-way shall be constructed per the design of the City PWD. 8. Utility Plans: The utility plans shall be-drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility lines and appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.). Utility ihfrastructure location-must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. 9. Area Lighting Plan: Need to provide and implement an adequate area lighting plan for parking and public access areas, including the driveway entrances. 10. Easements: Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]) should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines shall be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U:E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable; driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 11. Street Lights Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas ~~ /' 1171,V r!lj~ Rrpnr! .C,~armhir _' I99S l'alC ,\ designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 12. Storm Drainage Svstem: Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collectioh, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water run- off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-ori or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance), any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. DevelopePS engineer shall determine how the SD system will work during'10-year and 100 year flood events associated with Bear Creek. Identify the HGL in Bear Creek during 1D-and 100- yearstorm event, and what affect it will have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system and building elevations: System should be designed to adequately drain a 10-year storm event without surcharging or shall provide adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to prevent backflow of water from Bear Creek up into SD system during storm events. During the design of the SD system, the Developer's engineer shall consider the effect of the proposed improvements and structures with regard to the 100-year base flood event floodway and floodplain of Bear Creek. The design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system (SD System) should provide for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-oh or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance); the Developer shall demonstrate that the storm water flows from the completion of the proposed development (and at any time prior to completion of development) do not exceed predevelopment flows into Bear Creek; or that allowances or provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained), which accommodate any additional flow which exceed predevelopment flows. The Developer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations. Developer's engineer'shall provide a site drainage plan designed, ata minimum, to accommodate a 10 year storm event. Thi= SD system must be desighed to adequately drain, the 10-year storm event without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing public storm drainage facilities. Catch basins and area drains shall be designed for on-site sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon 7etention. Thi: private storm drain system shall be designed to directly connect to the public storm drain system; 2nd shall notbe desighed to discharge to the. street surfaces. Surface drainage from any fuel storage and dispensing facilities shall not be directly connected to the storm drainage system without prior approval by the DEQ and City PWD. Public storm drain pipe materials shall be PVC, FiDPE, or reinforced concrete, with water-tight joints. Provide concrete or sand-cement slurry encasement where required In areas of minimum cover. Roof drains and underdrains shall not bo directly connected to public-storm drain lines, and shall 'drain to the on-site private storm drain system. `As applicable, any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall'be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designedto mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100 year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities. ,_~ 3 . ,,, , , , r n i ~ c~, ~~; r;., •, ,,, r,.,• ~~ Prior to City PWD constriction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfall/intensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughnesscoefficients, etc., that. are used in the engineering calculations.., Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. Plans which propose to include the discharge to Bear Creek and,any construction or modification within the floodway,of Bear Creek or in the road ditches, shall be in compliance with DSL, ACOE, ODFW, DEO, JC Roads, and/or City PWD (as applicable) guidelines and requirements and any applicable conditions and or approvals,: of these regulatory agencies. 13. Fire Hydrants Prowde locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fire Hydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger lines, with the supply lines being "looped" as feasible. If applicable, steamer ports at hydrants located near the building shall face the :.buildings. Fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and ncroachment. 14. Wafer System Cross Connection Control: Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for cross connection control. If a pressurized irrigation system and/or domestic water wells exist on the property, the Developer will be required to install, the required backflow prevention assemblies directly behind the City's water meters. 15. WaterSystem: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 16. Roof/Area Drains: All structures shall have roof drains; area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. Roof drains shall not be directly connected to the public storm drain system:.. 17. Gradinp Plans: Grading plans shall have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 18. Sanitary Sewer: All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEO, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 19. Water_Ric~ If applicable; Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. ~? C Discussion l'hcinu'uduetian ufa nesvhank branch anct data renter svi I I add Ici C'rntral Point"s (Icceloped commercial land inrentorv and bring new (not relocated) family stages jobs into the C'ily and the rc~aion. As the Commission is asvarc, property anne.~otions on the cast side ol'thc Irecssay hacc all occurred in the pass Icsv years and the necessary inli'astructure (water sewer; storm drainage, new roads, etc.) is still being developed. "1 herefore; the property owners and developers alongf:as(Pinc should czpect some delays in aeccssing infrastructure or he prep~ired to bear the cost of extending that infrasu'uchu~e and be reimbursed as other property develops. ManyofthePlanningandPuhlicWorksreconuncndationsrellcct thecurt'cntstatusofinlrastructuredclicienciesonthcsouthsideofGastPineSu'cet. Citystal•fistryingto coordinate the independent development ofthis area so that a uni fled and successful overall plan results. Tr•nnsporlatiar lmTrovcnrerols As is mentioned above artd again in the Pubic-Works staff report (Attachment D) a traffic signal is proposed as part ofthe improvements Ibr tlic Naumes Pear [;lossom Center which is due north ofthe applicant's property. AtthercquestofJacksonCountyRoad's,theapplicaut'sa~enthaspreparedavery rough draft ofotherapproaches in the immediate area and has also depicted the new signal location and crosslott~cecssthatmaybeconsidered(sccAttach'mentA). Pursuingtliistrafliccirculationapproachon the south side of Gast Pine Street would minimize the number ofaccess points on an arterial street and-' benelit both property owners and the traveling public. The Public Works Department has suggested how the bank might proceed on an interim basisuntil a signal is installed and adjoining property is developed. Nlunicipnl Code ancl~I~fecled ~Igewcv 1Zequiremerrls The proposed use ispermitted inthe C-4 zoning district and meets the area, width and yard requirements ofthe municipal code. The Public Works Department has prepared a recommendation for on and offsite improvements which are believed to be reasonably related to the proposed development. These include, but are not I invited to; driveway aprons, sidewalk improvements; site grading anddrainage; on-site lighting; paving and utility (water, sewer and storm drain) connections. The alignment ofa new entrance to this and an adjoining properly for a U'al•1 is signal will necessitille the reconfiguration o(bn-site parking and a revised parking plan should be submitted to the City as a condition of approval. Responses from tiffcctcd agencies can be found in AttachmcriCC. Water for (irclighting will berequired by Pire DisU~ict H3 and-they will expectlhe applicant to submitplans fortliathavc City [3uilding Deparunent approval. "I~he [3car Cl cek Val Icy Sanitary Authority (RCVSA) has stated shat aii cs fisting scrvicelnay be usal loroncofthc proposed buildingsandthat lhesecondoncwillrequire itsown individual service line which should lit into the Bank's construction schedule. 'hhe recommendations of.lackson County Roads have bceir inan'poralcd intd Uic CilyPublic Works Staff Report (Atlaehnicnt D). 7 (l ~ .. I~indin«ti of I~~irl ~G Conclusions of L.aw Inappru~ing;conditionallyappnwingurdcnyingtheplanssubmilled,theCilybascsiCsdccisiononlhc li~llo~eingslandgrds Isom Suction 17.7?.0-t0: A. Latuisr,~pingandlencingand_thccpnstructionofwallsoitthcsileinsuchamannerastocausethesame to nqt substantially interfere with the landscapingschemepfthe neighborhood,and insuch amanner to use the saint lo,urccn such acli~~itics and sights as might be heterogeneGxis to existing neighborhood uses. Chc Commission Inay reduirc the maintenance ofexisting plants or the installation olhew onesfor purposes of screening adjoining property. ^ The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for consideration by the Commission. The plan will change [fthe site plan [s amended to reflect transportation related improvements (signalized entrance, meandering sidewalks, etc.). The Planning Department is recommending that.plans fa• signage, lighting and, landscaping Ue submitted by the ,applicant for review and approval by staff prior to,installation. These plans would be expected to reflect any changes made to,the site plan. l3. pesign,numberandlocalionofingressandegresspointssoastoimproveandtoavojd interference w~ilh the tral•tic liow on public streets; ^ ~ Access is initially recommended frrom one driveway on Gast Pine Street. As a new signal is installed on Pine betvvicen Hanu•ick and Peninger Roads, this would become the primary access to the applicants property and the driveway would be eliminated and replaced by cross lot access to and from adjoining properties to the Gast and West Right in/rightout drive ways would Ue permitted and Public Works is recommending these at intervals no closer than 350 feet.. C. "fo provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle (low facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable ofuse, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the h'affic Ilow on public streets; ^ Since CPMC 17.64.040 (H-1) requires thatbanks and other financial institutions provide not less than. one space per each three hundred square feet. of gross floor area, this project would need to demgnstrate the availability of 66 spaces. Valley of the Rogue bank has proposed a total of 88 parking spaces(2 handicapped, 71 standard and 15 compacq. U. Signs and olhcroutdooradvertisingsU'ucturestoensurethattheydonotcon[lictwithordeterfrom Uaflic conU'ol signsordeviccsand lhatlhcyarccompatihlcwilh lhcdcsign ofthcirbuildingsoruscsand will not interfere with or detract Il~om the appearance or visibility ol~ncarby signs; L] L~ ^ No signagehas been proposed at this time however the applicantwill be required t6 apply for :~ sign permit and submit his plans to the City prior to any sign installation. G Accessibility and sut~icicncy of fire lighting titcilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety oflife, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and tire;lanes so [hat all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; ^ Theproject, if approved, would need to meet any requirements ofJackson County fire Dish•ict 3. F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction will meet the minimum setback requirements for the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District. G. Compliance with such architecture and desigl standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs: ^ The proposed structw'e is similar iu architechu'e to other stwchu•es located within the C- 4,Tourist and Office Professional District. Building elevatimts have been provided for the Planning Commission's consideration. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No. ,approving the Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2: Deny the proposed Site Plan; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A. Application and Exhibits t3. Notice of Public Hearing C. Correspondence D. Public Works Staff Report E. Planning Department Conditions of Approval 41 Sl"I'L r'LAN IZF,VILW APYLII,A`I'I(~"' City of Central Point Planning Department APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: I~LGv~"Y ~f Address: /Z~ ~'//~! City: ~GYUG /v,~~ Telephone: Business: ~~/- 77 2. 3. 4. AGENT INFORM~AJTION ~/ Name: i7~f000r~ ~~SSGL - f`~`~ /-'~ TES < Zip Code: ~7~ Address: City: State: Zip Code: Telephone: Business: Residence: Address: ~'Z / >{C~~K C(CE~~ ~~Nt City: ~!(~~(~T~ State: O~ Telephone: Business: --7~~f"~~}~- Residence:_ OWNER OP RECORD (Attach Separate Sheet If More Than'One) Name: <EPPG/C~~-'7 /G Tax Lot(s): Non-Sale Area Sq. Footage Sale Area Sq. Footage NumberofParkingSpaces: ~~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Type of Development: 6~tic/~ ~AN~ Township:' Range: 2Y/ Section: Address: E~{ST T~irs/Gz ~T2E6 T Zoning District: C'- ProjectAcreage: f, 8 AG Number of Dwelling Units: 5. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 2700 =Gross Floor Area ~2/~'g.o. f~ This Application Form. ~LegaCDescription. ^ Application Fee ($255.00). L~Letter of Project Description. Site Plan Drawn to Scale (10 copies). ^ Written Authority from Property Owner if Agent in Application Process. ~ Reduced Copies (8 %x 11) ofthe Site Plan, Building Elevations and Landscape Plans (I copy Ea.). r~Landscape and Irrigation Plan (3 copies). 6. I HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARETRUE,CORRECT, AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE-:. [ certify that [ am the : 0 Property Owner or ,~ Authorized Agent of the Owner of the proposed project site. "~„/~ 4.ti 1 ~ CSty of Cerurii Faint E~:HI)3T`T t'A't Planning Department ~-T ,g,~LF~ 0,~~ ire, Zip Code:: 97r" 7 'O Residence: O~J T.4 C'. E ti.~~2 p ~~fl iP ~ ~d g r±dea e ~ ~~S$~ii~ Y~~ qq {d gs8~i ® e d'dd~ ~R ~ "4 °~ ~~~~gE~ ~~g ~ ~a~x~~dg ~~`L~~~ r3~ ~I~gtE~ O ~$ e ~ ~$d€~ °P~t~H ~ N ~ s ~ R { g~p ~' rt 7 4 N ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ a 6 - ~ ~ ~_ ~ - o ~ ~~ ~@ ~ ~x~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~j~~r ~~~¢~~~~~ H m amwx ~pp ~ ~'6~d~~ ~'~~~d~t~~ y _ _ _ _ _ _ -1f~w~yE_. _ 'I E 9 fl g g y 9 Y ~r ;r I gl ` 11~~ E~~k8 a8< ~Ct¢d.g ~,tl x x ~~,~ e H x ~R~B~ vap ~ ~i ~ ~ S ~ I m~amsrx ~; - wrv ~3^ ~ N iN P N 1I M N H IN H N N i ~ f Y ~ .: n -~ j - wcae°w~v'ara i~ a - ~ I m L._.._._ _._. ._._._._.-.-.-. - _ _.-.- -._._._._._._.J = ca ~amfax i 9~ ~~~ ~ I I I I' ~'~t ~~ SIE/ LLV~loprt»nE Study CiR ( ~ ~tltl991p1i3a9a~ VaII o1 w Ea~k O 9I it ~ a ~ I I I I I sl!ISIfI" ~ I ._o.wn eo,x a.,a~y c.ns q li ~ ®~ ~~ 4 9 ~~ 40~ Z ~~ a v tl a f p ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ 'i~ ~ ~~ SIG D~v~ I opm~nt Study T~ 9 1 e j ~i { Erarwh Conk wW Date Lwik«~ V ~. ~ovQ'H G~~GU-~A-'Ro-.l Ply-t~l, .___ _ _ ~J I ~ ~ of t ~,~ ~ {~ kys~ ~ . 'Plrl~ BK ~ r-~wcy ~_-_ ------r------ z -------- - ~ _~ _ -- 4~H'i -fM ~ i_ ~ ~ I I_ ~ '~ ~ ~ ' `X/ ~ _ , ~ ~ 11~ _ - j ~ ~~ ~ _ - ~~ A \_ L' L'~is i ' AflM-N _ ~ ~~'EiC ,~-----~ gx5{.y ' --- .~ i ~ _,~' __ ~, ; - ~ - J 9~ ~zty of~ CentY•al P~ '~~tt PIANNXNG DEPARTMENT Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Planning Technician Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: September 13, 1999 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OP MEETING October 5, 1999 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Ceritral Point, Oregon City of 7CentTrra{i~Point ~1 1~F11 ~tB tt Planning Department Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an application for a Site Plan Review that would allow the construction of two commercial buildings totaling 18, 215 square feet near the intersection of Hamrick Road and East Pine Street. The parcels proposed for development aze located in; a C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372WO1C, Tax Lots 2600 and 2700. Tlie Central Point Planning Commission vvill review the Site Plan application to determine that all applicable provisions of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Site Plan'Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in comrnenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 5, 1999. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 ~- 46 ~. Issues which m;tp provide the basis litr an appeal un the ntattrrs shall hr raised prior to the expiration of the conuncnt period noted above. Any testimony and t~'ritten conunents about the decisions desa'ibed above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review al City Hall, l55 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Please refer to file 99061-SPR. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541)' 664- 3321 ex[. 291. SUMMARY OF PROCRDURU At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the and Site Plan.`` City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all,Planning Commission decisions. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point OR 97502 ~ (54.1) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384. n~ - JACKSON Roads Sgptember 24, 1999 Attention: Tom Humphrey City of Central Point Planning 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 COUNTY aescpn i.. Slrald rnn•ca~r 200 Antelope Road While City, Oregon 97503 (541) 826-3122 or (541) 776-72fi6 Faz: (541) 830-6407 CYty of Central P!ofIIC E X~HII~IT «C» Planning De{~attment RE: Development off East Pine Street - a county maintained road. Planning-File 99061-SPR; Valley of the Rogue Bank and Data Center. Deaf Mr. Humphrey: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application for the Valley of the Rogue Bank and Data Center, located on the south side of East Pine Street, .25 miles east of the I-5 Interchange. Roads and Parks Services has the following comments: 1. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and Parks Services and obtain county permits if required. 2. We recommend that half-street frontage improvements to East Pine Street be required to urban standards. Improvements shall include road widening, curb, gutter, drainage facilities, sidewalk and bike lane. 3. If additional right-of-way is required for the improvements, dedication should be required before permits are issued. City of Central Point standards may be utilized for road improvement if the City agrees, in writing, to future maintenance of the urban improvements. 4. The applicant shall obtain road approach permits from Roads and Parks Services for road approaches to East Pine Street. The paved approaches shall have 30' approach radii and a 30' minimum width. 5. Please submit a revised site plan showing approaches within 500' of the subject property, including the proposed Naumes Commercial Center. The interior cross property access shall be moved farther away from East Pine Street. 6. Jackson County Roads and Parks Services would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report including the calculations and drainage plan. Capacity improvements or on site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. 7. We recommend a Traffic Study for this project. If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at 774-6230 Si/ncerely, '"CJ Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer `i ~ ~~~ D I:\DEVELOP\CITIES\CNTRLPT\99061-SPR.wpd ~' BEAR CREEKGREENWAY / ENGINEERING / FLEET MANAGEMENT / MOTOR POOL / PARKS / ROAD MAINTENANCE / VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 776.7168 E26.7/21 6T&7122 7767779 7767001 616-JiT2 8263121 BEAR CREEK VALLEY. SANITARY AUTHORITY J915 SOUTH PACIFIC NV/Y. • MEDFOfl0. OREGON 97601.9099 • (641)779.4114 • FAX (541) 6J5.6779 September I5, 1999 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Subject: 99061 SPR -Valley of the Rogue Dear Ken, We have reviewed the proposal with regard to providing sanitary sewer service. There is an existing 8 inch PVC sanitary sewer at the Southerly properly line as shown on the site plan. A 4' inch service line is stubbed neaz the Westerly property line also as shown on the site plan. The existing service will need to be used for one of the proposed buildings. The second building will require it's own individual service line from the 8 inch main at the Southerly property line. Have the applicant contact BCVSA for connection and permithing information. If you need additional information, please call me at 779-4144. Si ~' y, ~ ~ ~~ .r ~ James May, J . .E. District Engineer 1 ~ ~r I~ IJ U LS °~{I SEP 1 6 1999 D ~- 4~ JCI=U3 BlI`n OF is FIRE DISTRICT No. 3 ,JACKSON COUNTY 8333 AGA1E ROAD, WHITE QTY, OREGON 97505-1075 (541) 826-7100 FAX (54v 826-4366 9/15/99 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point RE: 99061-SPR I':1i;t ,~ N?;I i-,~ Fire District 3 has reviewed the site plan for Valley of the Rogue Bank & Data ,Center. Water for firefighting will be required for this project: The amount and location will be deterauned when a set of blue prints are submitted. These plans . must have the building departments approval for Building classification and Occupancy class. Atthat time,fire district 3 will apply the fire code requirements; ~~~ s~ Neil Shaw Deputy Fire Marshal - )U r\uachment U CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT for Valley of The Rogue Branch Bank and. Data Center PW#99061 Date: Applicant/ Owner: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Area: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose September 28, 1999 Valley of the Rogue. Bank, 110 Pine Street, Rogue River, Oregon 97537, 770-5500, Contact: Felice Belifore Agent: Abeloe & Associates: Attn Peter Gutting, 734-3853 Phase 1: 3,215 sf (additional 2,400 SF future expansion) Branch Bank with Drive-up window (2 lanes) Phase 2: 2 Story 15,000 SF Data Center South of E. Pine Street, South of Proposed Pear Blossom Center T37S, R2W, Section 01C tax Lots 2600 and 2700 C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District 1.81 Acres. 2 Parcels: either to be combined, or lot lines realigned.. 1 "Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Utility Plan" illustrating tentative driveway, road, building, and parking layout for development; prepared by Abeloe& Assoc., dated August 20, 1999; and faxed drawings illustrating, cross lot access and drainage easemehf, dated September 23, 1999 Lee N. Brennan, public Works Director Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer') regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed commercial/professional office facility. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. The proposed Development is a redevelopment of a former retail store at this location and vacant land to the South..The surrounding parcels are currently rural residential from Bear Creek to Hamrick. Road, that are in the process of redevelopment as a commercial distridL It appears that f elver and Leever may have control or at least indirect influence regarding future development of the surrounding properties.. It isthe public works department's recommendation that only limited ingress and egress access be allowed to the southern side of E. Pine Street, similar to what is being considered for the Pear Blossom Center, which is located across E. Pine Street from the proposed Development. This would include a "main driveway" entrance (affording westbound, northbound, and. eastbound traffic . movements) aligned across from the "central driveway" of the Pear Blossom Center.(signalized intersection). Other right-in/right-out driveway connections could also be afforded along the south E. Pine Street frontage at minimum 350-foot spacings. It is further recommended that prior to construction plan and final plat approval (and possibly before tentative approval) of the proposed development, that approved master plans of connections to Pine Street, internal street/driveway layout, water, storm drain, and sanitary sewer, and other utilities be, prepared for the subject tax lots and all the parcels between Bear Creek and Hamrick Road that adjoin to Pine Street. Special Requirements Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage .~ J~ I _, i ~. .... ~, .....r IL,. v, l:,rn ~~ ', ~~o~L'rn h,~r ~\ IV~1\ /~,i C~' systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate tfie additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service oY the affected facility, as approved by (as'applicable) the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner irivblved. Master Plans: As discussed above, in associatioh with City PWD staff and property owners and representatives or agents of Pulver and'Leever and the Pear Blossom Center, it is recommended that the Developer (and others)'prepare master plans that include the limited' connections to Pine Street; the internal street/driveway system; water, storm drain, and sanitary sewer distribution/collection/conveyance systems, and other utilities (natural gas, power, telephone, etc.) for the subject tax lots and all the. parcels between Bear Creek and Hamrick' Road that adjoin to Pirie Street. The master plans would also include "stub-outs" for connections to the surrounding parcels. The master plans should take into account the flows or demands of the proposed development, any future development on neighboring portions of the subject tax lots, on neighboring properties, and any other areas deemed bythe City that will need to connect into the proposed development's or existing heighboririg infrastructure. The prepared master plans should take into account any previous master plans that have been prepared and approved by the City and Jackson County. Easements: The Developer shall prdvide suitable and acceptable 15-foot-wide minimum easements for any City public works infrastructure located outside the public rights-of-way. These easements shall be dedicated for sole use by the City, and shall not overlap (crossings are acceptable, aslong as required infrastructure separation is maintained) other utility dr ..infrastructure easements. A separate 10-foot minimum width public utilities easement (P.U.E.) should also be required for utility installation outside the E. Pirie Street right-of-way along the property's exterior frontage with E: Pine Street. Vehicular and Pedestrian Access to All Proposed Development: Access agreements orsimilar documents will need to be granted on the proposed Development's property to allow for public and private vehicular and pedestrian access (ingress and egress) on and/or across the ' proposed Development's property to afford access to the various adjoining parcels (cross- access easement agreements). All construction plans and as-built drawings shall accurately portray (both horizontally and vertically) utility line and appurtenance locations and thelocations bf any existing and new easements on the proposed development. All final plats shall accurately portray the horizontal location of all easements and right-of-ways dedicated as part of the development of this project. All right-of-way and easement dedication shall be completed priorto'final construction plan approval Site Layout/Traffic Circulation Plan: The developer shall prepare and submit for City PWD approval a suitable site traffic circulation plan for the proposed development and neighboring parcels identified for the master planning work required. The traffic circulation plan shall illustrate that all driveways and connections to streets shall accommodate the turning and access movements of all expected truck, bus, emergency vehicle (i.e fire truck) and all other applicable Vehicles including but not limited to a WB-67 truck (long-haul delivery truck); a motor r ~~ I ~r:,n ..,' R.'r:., ,~ .... ...~ .. ,. , .. r.~ l'. m,~~ /'1171 ?I,tll F,'/a`r: /S!\f home in combination with a boat trailer; a single unit bus (RVTD); and fire-fighting equipment. It is further recommended that the development of the subject parcels and or adjoining parcels include bus "turn-outs" either internal to the development of this area south of Pine Street, or that adjoin Pine Street,. that will provide for rider shelters and bus loading facilities for RVTD buses. All vehicular movements shall be designed to avoid infringing into opposing or adjoining travel lanes when the traffic movements are made by the studied vehicle. The: realignment of the "main driveway" will also likely necessitate relocation of the parking spaces indicated along the western border of the subject development. This will require reconfiguration of the planned improvements to provide for the required parking. 5. .Clear Vision Areas/Triangles. All :driveway approaches of the proposed Development connecting to public roads shall maintain a minimum 55-foot sight vision triangle as measured from the edge of the right-of-way to the center of the driveway. This requirement may be .adjusted by the City PWD, depending on final orientation and lane layout of the adjoining roads, in accordance with AASHTO clear sight-vision requirements. _Adequate clear vison area/triangles shall also be maintained at all internal driveway intersections. 6. Traffic Study: Improvements to Hamrick Road and E. Pine Street; and Right-of-WaV Dedication: A traffic impact study for the Pear Blossom Center development, prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated June 1999, has. been submitted to the City. The traffic study analyzed the year 2003 (anticipated year of build-out of the center) projected traffic flows and intersection levels of service at the major street intersections most likely to be impacted from the Bear Blossom Center development. The traffic study included the residential development .already approved to the north and east of the site (Walnut Grove, New Haven, Central Point East, and Parkwood Terrace); the USF Reddaway site, and the potential retail/professional office facilities on land owned by USF Reddaway on the southeast corner of the intersection of Hamrick Road and. East Pine Street. However, the traffic impact study, does not include any new development along the southern frontage of E. Pine Street. or "build-out" (i.e full development. within the current UGB) traffic flow conditions for the northeast portion of the City which greatly influences the."build-out" design and right-of-way requirements and needs for two of the City's main arterial roads: Hamrick Road and East Pine Street. The City is currently updating the City's Transportation System Master Plan (TSP) which will classify certain streets and project "build-out" traffic flows for this northeast portion of the City. Unfortunately the overall road classification and lane determination needs for East Pine Street to accommodate "build-out" conditions have not been determined by the City, nor by Jackson County. Thus, additional master planning will be warranted once the TSP is completed. However, it is projected that this additional master planning work will probably not be completed prior to the end. of year 2001. Another issue not addressed by the traffic impact study; is how access to East Pine Street will be afforded/limited for the properties located to the south of East Pine Street in the area immediately to the South of the proposed Development; and what affects will development of the parcels to4he south of E. Pine Street have on the identified streets and intersections in the Pear Blossom Center Traffic Impact Study. It is recommended that the Developer and the owners/agents of the adjoining parcels on the South side of E. Pine Street (from Bear Creek to Hamrick Road) either prepare a separate traffic impact study, or prepare an amendment to the Pear Blossom Center Traffic Impact Study, that evaluates the impacts to the identified intersections and the connections to E. Pine street as the result of the development of the ~~ 'i ~ •_ r , I nlltr n/7hr Kn~ur ltr~,urrh Rank ,inJ ll,tla l'rnltr I'll'U J7nQ Xrpor! Sepnvnher ?3, /993 1'nge J identified parcels located to the south of E. Pine Street. ' Td allow for develdpment bf fhe proposed project prior to the completion of the traffic master plarining needed for the area, the City PWD recommends the following: A. The Developer be required to pay an equitable share of the signal development and installation costs (and associated improvements) to the signal at the intersection of-the Pear Blossom Center's Central Driveway and East Pine Street: B. The Developer be required to construct street widening, bike lane, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalk (including driveway aprons and wheel chair ramps), planting strip with landscaping, traffic delineation (including median traffic islands on E~ Pine Street), and street I(ghting~(with maximum 200 foot ' "spacing) improvements for the portion of E. Pine Street that adjoin the proposed development. The portion of E. Pine Street that adjoin the subject development is developed as a "rural" road that does not meet current City or County urban standards. The road will need to be improved, as a minimum, to meet City standards; as reviewed and approved by Jackson County Roads, and the City PWD, This could be deferred (as executed in a deferred improvement agreement by and between the beveloper and the City/County) until other development is implemented on the adjoining parcels south of E. Pine Street. C. The Site plan be revised to reflect a permanent "main entrance" that is located directly across from the signalized "Central Driveway' of the Pear Blossom Center. No other permanent access to E. Pine Street on the subject parcels would be allowed. A temporary access to E. Pine Street could be permitted that is located near the northeast corner of the subject property. This temporary access would function only until the "main driveway"'is completed; and then the temporary'driveway would be removed. Again, only one access would be afforded either temporarily or permanently. Additional right-in/right-out accesses to E. Pine Street could be afforded, that are located at a minimum spacing of 350 feet from the "main driveway". D. Regarding the road right''-of-way adjoining the proposed Development: the Developer be required to dedicate additional land for street and City utility ' purposes a minimum of 62 feet from the right-of-way centerline of E. Pine Street. Currently the right-of-way width on the'''southern half' of E. Pine street along the subject property's frohtage is 50 feet. This would require dedication of an additional 12 feet for road and City road and utility improvement purposes. After completion of build-out master planning/construction, any dedicated property that was not necessary, would be "vacated" and returned to the adjoining parcels of the proposed Development. E. That. appropriate "deceleration" and "acceleration" tapers (both temporary and permanent) on E. Pine Street be constructed at the driveway entrance/exit to the proposed development, as jointly determined by the Developer's traffic engineer, the City PWD, and Jackson County. . J !~ I:..:n , ! li,r Ri ;l'ur lt~:r,e'6 lt,;,,l .ni,l /Sa.: t ~, ,:n ~, I'll ll ~h UI~Rr(vn'l 11~~i Landscape Buffers, Meandering Sidewalks and City Utility Strip : In keeping with the landscape buffers and meandering sidewalks established with the Central Point East Development and. proposed for the Pear Blossom Center Development; the City PWD is recommending that the Development be required to develop an approved landscaped buffer (including suitable irrigated landscaping and meandering sidewalks) located in the strip of land between 12.5 feet to 2.5 feet from the back edge of the E. Pine Street right-of-way to be established for the Development. The remaining 2.5 feet of right-of-way is to be reserved for City utility location (i.e street lights, fire hydrants, air relief vents; etc.), but should be landscaped as appropriate. 8. Erosion Control Plan: > A suitable erosion control plan must be prepared and submitted to the _Oregon Department,of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and City PWD for the construction of any improvements associated with this development. The construction. plans associated with this development will not be approved by the City PWD until the City PWD receives a copy of the written approval of the erosion control plan_by the DEQ. 9. Storm.Drainape System: The storm drain. system shall be designed to accommodate the storm water run-off from and run-on onto the. proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek ditch conveyance); any future development on adjacent properties; conveyed storm drainage or surface water flow, and any flows from areas deemed by the City that will need to cgnnect-into the proposed. development's SD System. Depending on topography, this may include surface water flows from the properties east, south, and west of the subject tax lots that drain across the subject tax lots. However, if applicable, the City PWD is further recommending that the Developer be required to design-the storm drain conveyance system to accommodate projected post-development flows from these adjoining properties. CityPWD would propose reimbursement to the Developer for up-sizing the applicable up-sized portion(s) of the storm water conveyance system to accommodate the future development on these neighboring properties, as applicable. The City is currently developing: a schedule for the cost differences for up-sizing storm drain pipe and manholes. Once the cost table is developed, the _cost,differences will be multiplied against the lineal feet of storm drainpipe for the various pipe up-sizing, and the number of manholes up-sized, to determine the total reimbursement that would be due the Developer. Once the amount of the reimbursement is determined, it is proposed that the City would enter into an agreement with the Developer that calls for payment of the determined reimbursement amount (which would likely be designated as the "E. Pine Street South Commercial Center storm drainage project fee") as it is collected from the developers of the affected properties. _ 10. Off--Site Storm Drainage Infrastructure: For any storm drainage infrastructure constructed or improved outside the City's rights-of-way or easements for drainage of surface waters from the subject development, the Developer shall provide a suitable .document or documents which contain approvals for the implementation of such connection and/or improvements and which describe: C7 .Who is responsible. for the operation, maintenance,, and repair of the infrastructure facilities. to maintain the original design parameters associated with {he infrastructure. If the City is to operate and maintain the infrastructure, the applicable funding mechanism that will be created (i.e local improvement district) for the associated City expenditures; IJ How. will all-weather,driveable access be afforded and maintained indefinitely to maintain and repair the infrastructure facilities; ;. ~,dlrr ,q (Gr K„~ur Hr,inrh 1L rnA ,w,l l~, n,i (~r,u~r r n I i .~t, X11 2,~1,0~ i I'agr 6 O That an easement or other suitable conveyance document has been granted, as necessary,'to provide suitable access on private property for the inspection, maintenance, and repairwork to be performed oh the infrastructure facilities. The easement shall include a statement which allows access by City personnel for inspection, maintenance, and repair purposes. 11. Water Distribution System and Fire Protection; it is recommended that the water system for the development and neighboring properties to the east, south, and west shall be master planned, to not only accommodate the needs of the proposed Development; but to provide for mainline valves and stub-outs for future main distribution networks and "reinforced looping" of the adjoining properties to the east south and west'. The water distribution system for the proposed Development shall' be of "reinforced Idbp" design; a minimum of two connections will need to be made to'the City's distribution system (as master planned). The waterlines shall be sized to accommodate alf fire demand-flows of the development: Fire hydrant or service vault locations and needs shall be determined by.Fire District No: 3. The 12-inch-diameter water line along the northern portion of E. Pine Street will be constructed in late 1999 or early 2000. Unless fireprotection needs can be made from the on-site domestic well, itisrecdmmended that development not proceed until the waterline along E. Pine Street is in full operation. 12. Aboveground Utilifies: If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power, US West; and Falcon (TCI) Cable; to'convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities; prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion bf these facilities from overhead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 13. Shallow Groundwater. Because of the groundwater level and quality degradation concerns raised omthe neighboring propertiesto the proposed development, the PWD is recommending that the Developer conduct a hydrogeological investigation of the shallow groundwater underlying the proposed Development to determine what affects the proposed development and associated improvements may have on groundwater levels and quality, and expected affects to surrounding properties. General Public Improvements: All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/dr upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development: During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be 'submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to implementation. Permits and Approvals: Developer shall provide copies of'any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including,'bul not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEO), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL); U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and Jackson County Roads and Parks Services (JC Roads), Fire District No. 3, and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), as applicable. The Developer shall submit written approvals of the final construction plans from Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant f, I ,uin nl de' Rn~.irr 1;~,ui.'4 l~,uiA anJ /I, u,i 14'mr, !' II / 1 ,Ira/)7~r (h n'I ,,\r/grrnh,'r ,',C, /V4,C !'tl~i placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), and JC Roads, (E. Pine Street improvements and driveway/access road connections) prior to final construction plan review and approval by City PWD. 3. As-Builts: Prior to approval and .acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the .Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide. the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar®) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to: the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations; other below grade utility lines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar'~), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his, designee. Elevations: All elevations used on the. construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of the benchmark shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's surveyor. Existing Infrastructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittaCforfinal approval. The acdurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans. 6. Fill Placement: All fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building,Departmentstandards, except for the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and that dyes not underlie building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas. 7. Road/Driveway/Parkinp Areas: The Developer shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the access road; parking, and driveway section designs to handle the expected loads (including fire equipmerit) to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and parking areas. Need to provide designed road section for review. The road/street driveway sections within the public rights-of-way shall be constructed per the design of the City PWD. 8. Utility Plans: The utility plans shall be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility lines and appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.). Utility infrastructure location must be accurately included on the'as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. C, ~'1 ~+ ~ ~uller of lhr Kngue lJrancL NanA acid Uola ('enrt•r PII'D SYyQ~Repor! Se•plember 18, / 99S l'nge 3 Area Lighting Plan: Need to provide and implement an adequate area lighting plan for parking and public access areas, including the driveway entrances. 10. Easements: Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if -applicable]) should be a minimum of 15-feetwide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines shall be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E: CenteYline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements musC be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular acdess to City public infrastructure facilities; as determined by .the City PWD. - 11. Street Lights: Construction drawings foP this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee (with maximum 200 foot spacing). The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 12. Storm Drainage Svstem: Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water run- e off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek ditch conveyance), any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed 'storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. As applicable, Developer's engineer shall determine how the SD system will work during 10- yearand 100 year flood events associated with Bear Creek. Identify the HGL in Bear Creek during 10- and 100-year storm event, and what affect it will have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system and building elevations. System should be designed to adequately drain a 10-year storm event without surcharging or shall provide adequate storage to prevent. surcharging; and be designed to prevent backflow of water from Bear Creek up into SD system during storm events. The design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system (SD System) should provide for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposeddevelopment (either surface run-on orcuWert or creek/ditch conveyance); the Developer shall demonstrate that the storm water flows from the completion of the proposed development (and at any time prior to completion of development) do not exceed predevelopment flows into Bear Creek; or that allowances or provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained), which accommodate any. additional flow which exceed predevelopment flows. The Developer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers; retardance, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations.. Developer's engineer shall provide a site drainage plan designed, at a minimum, to accommodate a 10 year storm event: The SD system must be designed to adequately drain the 10-year storm event without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing public storm drainage facilities. Catch basins and area drains shall be designed for on-site sediment and petroleum 58 r.., /',!r~ ~~ hydrocarbon retention. The private stone drain system shall be designed to directly connect to the public stone drain system, and shall not be designed to discharge to the street surfaces. Public gtorm drain pipe materials shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced cohcrete, with- water-tight joints. Provide concrete or sand-cement slurry encasement where required ih areas of: minimum cover. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines and shall drain to the on-site private storm drain system. As applicable, any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100 year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfall/intensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. Plans which propose to include the discharge to Bear Greek and any construction or modification within the floodway of Bear Creek or in the road ditches, shall be in compliance with DSL, ACOE, ODFW, DEO, JC Roads, and/or City PWD (as applicable) guidelines and requirements and any applicable conditions and or approvals, of these regulatory agencies. 13. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fire Hydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger lines, with the supply lines being "looped" as feasible. If applicable, steamer ports at hydrants located near the building shall face the buildings. Fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 14. Water System Cross Connecfion Control: Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for cross connection control. If a pressurized irrigation system and/or domestic water wells exist on the property, the Developer will be required to install the required backflow prevention assemblies directly behind the City's water meters. 15. Water S sy tem: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 16. Roof/Area Drains: All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. 17. Grading Plans Grading plans shall have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. ~: ( r . .- 1'nller of die Hu~ue lJranrL HanA ,inJ l)am ('r Ner l'll'U SInJj KeparJ Seplembrr 1S. /99,Y Pnge I r) .Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. Sanitary Sewer. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to the stahdards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA' Standards; Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority(BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. Water Riphts: If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermastertkere-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. 18. 19. ~~ n~r~rACFIMrNa~ ~ I2~COMMGNDGD PLANNING DGPAI2TMF.NT CONDITIONS Of APPROVAL I . The approval ofthe Site Plan shall expire in one year on October 5 2000 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The appl icant shat I submit a revised site plan depicting aiiychanges discussed aiid approved at the public hearing within 60 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations 3. The project must meet the off-street parking requirements for professional offices, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable. materials for all-weather. use and approved by the Public Works Department. 4. The applicanUproperty owner shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the Planning, Public Works and BuildingDepat•tments forapproval priorto obtaininganybuilding permits.. .L PLANNING DF,PAR"I'Mr,N"C MrMOKANUUM I IL;AIZING DATE: October 5, 1999 TO: ;, Central Point Planning Commission., FROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Modification to Site Plan Review and Variance from Side Yard Setback Requirements for 37 2W 11BB Tax L,ot 8200-Central Point Public Works Yard. Applica--t/ City of Central Point Owner: 399 South 5th Street Central Point, OR 97502 Pro er Description/ 37 2W 11BB Tax Lot 8200- 3.34 acres Zonine: R-1-6, Residential Single-Family Summary Last year, the Public Works Department requested and received approval to construct an additional building at the City's utility yard and have since identified the need for a second story. A modification of the original approval requires a review by the Planning Commission. Authority CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Site Plan Review. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Attachment B). Annlicable Law CPMC 17.20.010 et seq.- R-1-6, Residential Single Family District CPMC 17.60.010 et seq.- General Regulations CPMC 17.64.010 ct seq.-Off Street Parking CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval - ~ 62 . . Discussion In Septemherof 199$, the applicants proposed the construction of a 1520 square foot office building at the public works yard and shop complcs. 1~hc new ol~licc area was to be located in a paved portion of the yard and would replace two existing buildings (sec f\ttachment A). "fhe Public Works Department, citing limited space, has requested a modification of the .Site Plan and Variance and is requesting the addition ofa second story. The additional story would be positioned directly above the first and would increase the total square footage to 3040. A variance from the side yard setback was,granted with the previous approval "fhe additional building mass created by the second story will not likely affect neighboring properties since the variance was granted for the side lot lice adjacent to Cedar Street. ThePlanning Department did not receive. any writtencomments either for or against the proposed modifications... Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Site Plnt~ 2eview In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, Clre City bases it's decision on the Following standards from Section L7.72.040: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantiallyinterfere with the landscaping scheme ofthe neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities Ind sights as_tnight be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commissiati may require. the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property. e The applicant's site plan/landscaping plan depicts numerous planters with trees and shrubs as they presently exist along Cedar and South 5th Streets. The landscaping is already irrigated and drip frrigation will be extended to new wine barrel planters. B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ There arc presently two driveways one on South Fifth Street and the other on Cedar Street. The Cedar Sheet access will be used more often than it is now once the new building is constructed. "traffic volmne counts on Cedar arc low. ~~ J ~ 1J C: ~fo provide of7-su~cct parking and loading laciliticti and pedcslrian and vehicle lluw facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the silt is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a mannei as to improve and avoid interference with the Uaftic flow on public streets; ^ The City's new parking plan depictsa totalof 7 parking spaces (one handicapped) in addition to those that now exist in the yard and in front of the shop buildings. Under CPMC 17.64.040(D) building square footage necessitates' S spaces. llesign requirements in CPMC 17.64.100 call for paved, adequately drained parking areas for all-weather use; painted striping; lighting and the placement of bumper tails along property lines, sidewalks and landscaping areas. D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ The City presently has a sign and does not expect to add any others. However, should this change, the specific locatimr will be identified as part of a sign permit application with the building department. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fre fighting facilities~tosuch a~standardas to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, includiiig,but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; ^ Jackson County Fire District Number 3'~and the City'sBuilding Dcparhnent will enforce State Firc and Building codes: The Fire District has determined that Yirc hydrants are currently available on street frontage and no new hydrants will be required. F': Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction fails to meet the minimum setback requirements for the R-1 District. A variance from these requirements is also being considered with this site plan application. 1Jnginebring Standards and Specifications also call for adequate parking lot illumination which the applicant will provide. There are currently street lights along South 5th and Cedar Streets. G: Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relaliou to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ The new office building is generally compatible with the surrounding structures and presents an attractive appearance. The Public Works Department has submitted building elevations as part of the application package. Site landscaping, parking improvements and new construction by the applicants would enhance the aesthetic value of the site. ~_ 62 ., I ~~, r~,~~~ ~~ A variance may be granted if findings are made as follows: 1. "fhe Variance will provide added advantlges 4o the neigltbot'hood or the Cily such as. beautification or safety. ^ The proposed modifications will improve the overall efticiency of the public works yard; upgrade the site aesthetically and provide ADA access to a public building. 2. The Variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood. ^ The requested Variance and proposed modifications will not have any anticipated adverse impacts to adjoining uses located along Fifth or Cedar Streets. If anything, the improvements could provide added incentive for other businesses and homes to make similar improvements. 3. The Variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district. ^ The property will continue to be used as a Public Works yard and will be more accessible useful to customers and employees. The building remodel will introduce new landscaping, access and parking where it currently is not well defined. 4. Circumstances affect the property that do not apply to other property in the same zoning district. ^ The existing structures on site (water tower and shop buildings) make it difficult to work around and meet the zoning requirements. 5. The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-unposed through the applicants' own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family member's. ^ The records of the Jackson County Assessor indicate that the water tower and shop buildings date back to the 1950s. Recommendation ~" Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the proposed modifications to the Site Plan-and Variance subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Attachment C ); or 2. Deny the modifications to the proposed Site Plan and Variance; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan and Variance modifications at the discretion of the Commission. 6:~ nUachmcnts A. Planning and Public Works Staff Reports dated September 1, 1998 I3. Notice of Public [-leaning Gi Revised Elevations of Piiblic Works Duildiiig' ~~ ;, ' ,. HEARING DATE: TO: PLANNING UF.I'AR'fMl?N"I' S'fAFP Rl?1'OR"l' September I, 1998 Central Point Planning Conunission City of Central Paint IJ~iIIIBIT t'A tt Planning DeBarimmt I+I20M: Tom Humphrey, AICP Placuring Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Site Plan Review and Variance from Side Yard Setback Requirements for 37 2W 11BB Tax Lot 8200-Central Point Public Works Yard. Applicant% City of Central Point Owner: 399 South 5th Sheet Central Point, OR 97502 Pro er Description/ 37 2W 11BB Tax Lot 8200- 3.34 acres Zonin R-I, Residential Single-Family Summary The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review for the additionof a new City shop building and the relocation remodel of existing buildings that are part of the City's public works yard on South 5th Street. The Public Works Department would like to improve their existing office arrangement by creating space for training, plan review and personnel management (refer to Attachment A). The construction of the new facility would allow existing and inadequate office space to be reclaimed for use as a garage bay and partial conversion to a water. system telemetry. control room. The proposed placement of the new building requires a variance from the City's side yard setback. Authority CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Site Plan Review. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Attachment B). Annlicahlc Law CPMC 17.20.010 et seq.- R-1 Residential Single Family District CPMC 17.60.010 et sey.-General Regulations CPMC 17.64.0.10 et seq.-Off Street Parking CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval e ~~~ CPMC 17.64.010 et seq.-Off Street Parking CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Discussion The applicants are proposing the addition of a l 520 square foot office building to the existing public works yard and shop complex. The new office area would be constructed in a paved portion of the yard and would replace two existing buildings (see Attachment A). The placement ofthe new building is intended to make the best use of yard space and access to the property from Cedar Street. Requirements for on- site pazking (stall length) and the importance ofmaintaining specific distances between older buildings, a water tank and the new building have necessitated an application to vary from the side yard setback ofthis corner lot. The City Public Works Department maintenance crew currently operates from a converted garage bay in a building that is approximately 40 years old. The proposed office building would include a mud room, plans office, supervisor's office, training/lunch room and ADA accessible bathrooms with corresponding locker areas (Attachment A). Existing training, locker and office azeas will be reclaimed for use as shop and parking bays, and a telemetry room used to control water reservoirs, master meters, and master flow meters. The property surrounding the public works yard is occupied by single and multi-family dwellings and a school recreation field. Curb, gutter and sidewalk currently exists along the applicant's frontage, there is established landscaping along portions of the site and the entire perimeter of the property is fenced. Findings of Tact & Conclusions of Law Site P[an Review In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City-bases it's decision on the following standards from Section-17.72.040: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme ofthe neighborhood, and in such amanner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission mayrequire the maintenance ofexisting plants orthe installation ofnew ones forpurposes of sgreening adjoining property. The applicant's site plan/landscaping plan depicts numerous planters with trees and shrubs as they presently exist along Cedar and South 5th Streets. The landscaping is. already irrigated and drip irrigation will ~c extended to new wine barrel planters., B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; 68 ~' ~ ~ ^ 'There arc presently hvo driveways one on South rifth Street and the other on Cedar Street. The Cedar Street access will be used more often than it is now once the new building is constructed. Traffic volume counts on Cedar arc low. C: To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle tlow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; The City's new parking plan depicts a total of 7 parking spaces (one handicapped) in addition to those that now exist in the yard and in front of the shop buildings. Under CPMC 17.64.040(I) building square footage necessitates 5 spaces. Design requirements in CPMC 17.64.100 call for paved, adequately drained parking areas for all-weather use; painted striping; lighting and the placement of bumper rails along property lines, sidewalks and landscaping areas. D. Signsandotheroutdooradvertisingstructurestoensurethattheydonotconflictwithordeterfrom traffic control signs or devices and that they aze compatible with the design oftheir buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ The City presently has aaign and doesmot expect to add any others. However, should this change, the specific location will be identified as part of a sign permit application with the building department. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; Jackson County Fire District Number 3 and-the City's Building Department will enforce State Fire and Building codes. The Fire District has determined that fire hydrants'are currently available on streQt frontage and no new hydrants willbe required. P: Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction fails to meet fhe minimum setback requirements for the R-1 District. A variance from these requirements is also being considered with this site plan application. Engineering Standards and Specifications also callforadequateparkinglot illumination which the applicantwill provide. There are currently street lights along Soutlr 5th and Cedar Streets. G: Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ The new office building is generally compatible with the surrounding structures and pt•esents an attractive appearance. The Public Works Department has submitted building 69 1 \. elevations as part of the application package. Sitelandscaping; parking improvements and new construction by the applicants would enhance the iiesthetic value of the site. Variance A variance maybe granted if findings are made as follows: 1. The Variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the City such as beautification or safety. ^ The proposed modifications will improve the overall efficiency ofthe public works yard; upgrade the site aesthetically and provide ADA access to a public building. 2. The Variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood. ^ The requested Variance and proposed modifications will not have any anticipated adverse impacts to adjoining uses located along Fifth or Cedar Streets. If anything, the improvements could provide added incentive for other businesses and homes to make similar improvements. 3. The Variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district. ^ The property will continue to be usedas a Public Works yard and will be more accessible useful to customers and employees. The building remodelwill introduce new landscaping, access and parking where it currently is not well defined. 4. Circumstances affect the property that do not apply to other property in the same zoning district. ^ The existing structures on site (water tower and shop buildings) make it difficult to work around and meet the zoning requirements. 5. The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicants' own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family members: ^ The records of the Jackson County Assessor indicate that the water tower and- shop buildings date back to the 1950s. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No.~ approving the Site Plan and Variance subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Attachment C ); or 2. Deny the proposed Site Plan and Variance; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan and Valiance at the discretion of the Commission. ~~ ti ..>,~,~ ' t~° c raf. . til'l~l°: I'1.:~\ Rl~;~'ll°:~V' :V'PLI(':~~1'ION City of Central Point Planning Department APPLICAN"t INFORMA"PION None: Public Works Department City of Central Point City: ('Antral Point State: pg Zip Code: 87502 Telephone: Business: 664-7602 Residence: 2. AGENT INFORMATION Name: Lee Brennan, Public Works Director Address: City: State: Zip Code: Telephone: Business: Residence: 3. OWNER OF RECORD (Attach Separate Sheet If More Than One) Name: City of Central Point City: Telephone: Business: State: Residence: Zip Code: 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Type of Development: Shop Building for Public Works Dept Township: 37 _ Range: 2W _ Section: 11BB Tax Lot(s): 8200 Address: Zoning District: R-1-6 Project Acreage: Number of Dwelling Units: none _ Non-Sale Area Sq. Footage Sale Area Sq: Footage =Gross Floor Area 15 2 0 Number of Parking Spaces: ~ 5. REQUIRES SUBMITTALS p' This Application Form. ~ Legat Description. A lication Fee WAVED DY . . ^ Letter of Project Description. PP pENEVOLENCE Site Plan Drawn to Scale (10 copies). /Written Authority from Property Owner iC Agent in Application Process. C3" educed Copies (8 %z x 11) ofthe Site Plan, Building Elevations and Landscape Plans (1 copy Ea.). Ca' Landscape and Irrigation Plan (3 copies). 6 ~ [HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT, AND ACCURATETO'I'IIE BEST OP MY KNOWLEDGE.-,. [ certify that [ am the : ~ Property Owner or Authorized Agent oC the Owner of the proposed project site. ..,~ '71 , ~ ~~1 /~ WATER TANK ./i ~,~~ /~ ~~ ,. ,~ ~,n, ® ~.~~~, _ `K`~ uMrtxre ~T' bear~v.~ ~Q_ ~~~ l-X` MI ~,~,K \. / N ww v,ma/. ~ , ® ruwlc xovxs snw ~~~ ~~~~ ,~' \ ~ ' Jt .;~~ „~ '7 3 ^, ~.. N~` 0.~ n y~_\ AR ~ ~~ v~R ~~~ ~ `~~ N ~~, _- ~ A I o.e~e~ 4~4AN N ~, q~oyA n~~~ ~n r or \~r w Y', ~ I .,.I.II:I~III I, :. i,.. ~ i LI III. UI ~ ~I!:~~' Ifilll i _~ _._ ~ ~ I .I ...__._...__.. .I~~,li... i,.i~l: --- _ i I ~I,~.i~~ ~~ II ~~ ill d,l~l i. ,I,i, i' i,! I~ ~. i .i I .~ ~ ' ~~ O ^ I ~ 1 o~ Ny o ~~ ~ ! Y I )~ H~ ~ \ ~" ,C N0 r ~~ i r~ C N N, V I ~=1 ~ ~~~ ~~j ~~~~~~ ~ . 1 ~~,~~ Notice of Hearing Date of Notice: August 11, 199E 'tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director ICen Gerschler Planning Technician Deanna Gregory Administrative/Planninq Secretary/ PLANNING DEPARTML'NT Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING September 1, 1998 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review applications for a Variance and Site Plan Reviewthat would facilitate the construction of anew building atthe City Public Works Yard. The parcel islocated in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district on Assessment Plat 37 2W 11BB, Tax Lot 8200. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Vaziances and Site Plan Reviews aze set forth in Chapter 17 ofthe Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street paiking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is alsoreeiewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday, September 1, 1998. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Ha11,155 South Second Street; Central Point, OR 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration ofthe comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the 155 South Second Street O CentralPoint OR 97502 • (541) G64-3321 O Fax: (541) 664-6384 ~~ ~1v. / 1, decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated cleazl~ to ° , " ; ~ ~, the Planning Commission. 4. Copies ofall evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, l55 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies may be purchased for I S cents per page. 5. Tor additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3321 ext. 231. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commissionwill review the applications, and technical staffreports; heaz testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents; and discuss issues relative to the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Variance or Site Plan. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~ ~ _~ VV ~ ~ ~y ~ a ~,ft CNESTNUT STR T Z~ o o OFD . P~' 5~~~~~ ~ ~ ~\~/ ~ ~ w y P~' ~ ,.. ~~ ~. ~ GF,OPP STR w~ P~' ~~ C~~'~o~R PAY Q~F, QpV F~'SG0 A ~^ t y~~` , \> t~~~ V pP Z~`\~~~\~ OJy~ AN N G~ C(/ \ _ 155 South Second StreetO Central Point OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 ~~ .:, ",~' RIsCOMM1,NUPll PLANNING DCPARTM~N"t CONllITION5 OF APPROVAL L The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on September I, 1999 unless an application for a building permit or an application foe extension has been received. "I~he applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed acid approved at the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. :The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations including, but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Fire Code and Structural Specialty Code. 3. The applicant shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the Planning, Public Works and Building Departments for approval prior to obtaining any building permits. ry rl City of Gentr°ar Point `~ ~ ~~` ', PLANNING DEPARTMENT Notice of Meting Date of Notice: September 13, 1999 Meeting Date: October 5, 1999 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Planning Technician: City of Centx;al Paint EXHI~I`i' ttg ~t Planning Department Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review arequest to modify the previously approved variance and site plan for the proposed utility building at the City's Public Works Yard. The Public Works Department would like to modify the original site plan by adding a second story to the proposed unit. Modifications to approved plans generally require an additional review by the Planning Commission to ensure that the minimum setback and off street parking requirements of the municipal code can be met. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Variances and Site Plan Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 5, 1999. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. ~~ Y A',~ ~ .~ ;. Issurs ~~~hich map provide the basis Ibr an appeal on the maucrs shall he raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and ~~~ritten comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at Cily I-tall, I55 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Please refer to lile 98036. Copies of the same are available at l5 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 291. SUMMARY OF PROC);DURF At the meeting, the Plamring Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the and Site Plan. City regulations provide that the Ceritral Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ? pP~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~/\` / OF'~ V \^\)~ P~ J n ~~~ ~~ V Stf ~ OPP t G~ m I55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 i (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 664-6384 r ~ ~ ~~~~ J EXHIBIT "C" WILL BE PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AT THE MEETING o so