HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Resolution 655RESOLUTION NO. /a56
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A WATER SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE, INCLUDING A REIMBURSEMENT FEE
AND METHODOLOGY THEREFORE
Recitals
1. Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 223 and Central Point
Municipal Code Chapter 11.12 authorize enactment of systems
development charges. In October of 1979, Central Point received
a Water System Plan prepared by the engineering firm CH2MHi11,
which plan analyzed the City's water system as it existed at that
time, together with Central Point's future needs for water system
improvements.
2. The CH2MHi11 report found that Central Point's water
system, after certain improvements were made, had the capacity to
serve a population of 22,651. The system therefore presently has
excess capacity.
3. New development in the City will benefit from
previously-constructed water system improvements and should
therefore pay a proportionate share of the cost of those
improvements, such share to be determined through the methodology
set forth herein.
Now, therefore,
BE TT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Improvement Plan. The City of Central Point
hereby adopts the Water System Improvement Plan contained on
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by reference incorporated
herein.. The capital improvements shown on Exhibit "A" are those
the City Council determines are associated with the systems for
which the reimbursement fees will be assessed and determined
further to be eligible for expenditure of reimbursement fees.
Capital improvements that may be funded with the reimbursement
fee revenues collected hereunder shall include, but not be
limited to, the following costs:
Land or right-of-way acquisition, site preparation,
construction of appurtenant facilities and equipment,
contingencies, engineering, interest charges,
administration and construction inspection.
1 - RESOLUTION N0. ID5 5 (042293)
The improvement plan adopted herein may be modified from
time to time by resolution of the Council, following an analysis,
receipt of recommendations for modifications, and presentation to
the Council.
Section 2. Methodoloov. The methodology for the fees
described herein is defined in detail on Exhibit "S", attached
hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. This
methodology considers the cost of existing facilities, prior
contributions by existing users, the value of unused capacity,
rate making principals employed to finance publically-owned
capital improvements, including the time value of money, and
other relevant factors identified by the City Council. The
methodology promotes the objectives that future system users
shall contribute no more than an equitable share of the cost of
existing facilities.
In general, the methodology for the determination of the
water system reimbursement fee consists of the following:
1. Determine the Maximum Daily Demand in million gallons
per day remaining in the present system that is available for the
benefit of future users, and convert that to Equivalent Meter
Units (EMU).
2. Determine the value of the capital improvements that
have resulted in capacity remaining in the system available for
the benefit of future users. Convert that value into units of
cost per Equivalement Meter Units (EMUS).
Section 3. Reimbursement Fee and Collection. Effective
July 1, 1993, a water system development charge reimbursement fee
for any development subject to CPMC Chapter 11.12 in the amount
of $311 per Equivalent Meter Unit (EMU) shall be collected by the
Public Works Director upon connection to the City's water system
or upon issuance of a permit to expand Equivalent Meter Units in
cases where connection has already been made. The Public Works
Director shall not issue the applicable permit until such charges
have been paid in full.
The following conversions between meter size and Equivalent
Meter Units shall be applicable:
Size of Connection Equivalent Meter Units
3/4" Meter 1.00 EMU
1" Meter 1.67 EMU
1-1/2" Meter 3.33 EMU
2" Compound Meter 5.33 EMU
3" Compound Meter 10.67 EMU
2 - RESOLUTION N0. 55 (042293)
4" Compound Meter
6" Compound Meter
8" Compound Meter
10" Compound Meter
12" Class 1 Turbine
Passed by the. Council and
its passage this ~ day of
ATTEST:
City Rep entat~ve ~
16.67 EMU
33.33 EMU
53.33 EMU
76..67 EMU
104.75 EMU
signed by me in authentication of
1993..
ti° ~~,~
Mayor ger Westensee
Approved by me this ~?/ day of 1993.
Mayor ger Westensee
3 - RESOLUTION NO. la.a S (042293)
EACH/B/T ".4 "
VV.4TER SYS7"EIVI /ll/IPR0VEll9ENTS PLAN
Project Name
Hazel St. Ext.
Maple St. Ext.
E. Pine St. Ext
Oak St. Ext.
Hiway 99 Ext.
Taylor Rd. Ext.
Mae Richardson Ext.
Snowy Butte Ext.
Crown Comet Ext.
From To Area Location
N. 3rd St. N. YOth St. N.E. 1870'@
Node 27 Node 33 Phase 2
Hiway 99 N. 10th St. N.E. 2740'@
Node 12 Node 35 Phase 2
2nd. St. 10th St. N.E./S.E. 2200'@
Node 98 Node 261 Phase 2
5. 7th St. Freeman Rd.S.E. 1070'@ S60/Ft.
Node 255 Node 258 Phase 2
Laurel St. Hazel St. N.E. 1210`@
Node 7 Node 32 Phase 2
Hiway 99 W. City Limits N.W. 2190'@
Node 7 Node 604 Phase 2
Taylor Rd. W. Pine St. N.W. 1050'@
Node 114 Node 429 Phase 2
W. Pine St. Snowy 12" S.W. 1840'@
Node 428 Node 161 Phase 2
Crown@ Scenic Ave. N.E. 3900'@
Kings
Node 46 Node 78 Phase 2
Hopkins Rd. Ext. E.End
Hopkins Glen Grove Ave. S.E.
Node 1.01 Node 102 Phase 2
Glen Grove Ave. Hopkins Rd. Pittview Ext. 5.E.
Node 102 Node 105 Phase 2
New St. Ext. Bursell Rd. Glen Grove Ave.S.E.
Node 107 Node 105 Phase 2
I-5 Crossing Hopkins/
Glen Grove Hamrick Ext. S.E..
Node 102 Node 1121. Phase 2
1000'@
2200'@
2340'@
1000' @
Cost
S60/Ft.
S 112,000.00
S 60/Ft.
S 164,400.00
S60/Ft.
S 132,000.00
5 64,200.00
S60/Ft.
S 72,600.00
S60/Ft.
S 131,400.00
S 60/Ft.
S 63,000.00
S60/Ft.
S 110,400.00
S60/Ft.
S 234,000.00
560/Ft.
S 60,000.00
S60/Ft.
S 132,000.00
S60/Ft.
S 140,000.00
S60/Ft.
S 60.000.00
Exhibit A -Page Two
Project Name From To Area Location Cost
Beall Ln. Ext. Snowy Butte Hanley Rd. S.W. 2650'@ 560/Ft.
Node 1.62 Node 164 Phase 3 S 159,000.00
Beall Ln. Ext. Hanley Rd'. Grant Rd. S.W. 380'@ S60/Ft.
Node 164 Node 165 Phase 3 5 22,800.00
Hanley Rd. Ext. W. Pine St. Beall Ln. S,W. 2000'@ 560/Ft.
Node 156 Node 164 Phase 3 S 120,000.00
Grant Rd. Ext. Beall Ln. Scenic Ave. NW/SE 8620'@ S60/Ft.
Node 165 Node 142 A Phase 3 S 517,200.00
Taylor Rd. Ext. WA.C/L Grant Road N.W. 1550'@ 560/Ft.
Node 604 Node 153 Phase 3 5 93,000.00
New Rd. Ext. Hiway 99 Grant Rd. N.W. 3000'@ S60/Ft.
Node 32 Node 151 Phase 3 S 180,000.00
Griffin Crk.Ext. Taylor Rd. New Rd. Ext. N.W. 1370'@ S60/Ft.
Node 153 Node 149 Phase 3 S 82,200.00
Hiway 99 Ext. N C/L Scenic Rd'. N.W. 2800'@ 560/Ft.
Node 32B Node 142 Phase 3 S 168,000.00
Scenic Rd. Ext. W.Scenic Ext Hiway 99 N.W. 2300'@ S60/Ft.
Node 78 Node 142 Phase 3 S 138,000.00
Scenic Rd. Ext. Hiway 99 Grant Road N.W. 800'@ S60/Ft.
Node 142 Node 142A Phase 3 S 48,000.00
Upton Rd. Ext. Raymond Wy Wilson Rd. N.E. 3490'@ S60/Ft.
Node 134 Node 131 Phase 3 S 209,400.00
Wilson Rd. Ext. Upton Rd. Table Rk.Rd. N.E. 6280'@ S60/Ft.
Node 131 Node 125A Phase 3 S 3766,800
New Rd. Ext. Upton. Rd. Table Rk.Rd. N.E. 6280'@ S60/Ft.
Node 132 Node 122A Phase 3 S 376,800
Expo. Ext. Expo Hamrick Rd. N.E. 4540'@ S75/Ft.
Node 36 Node 116 Phase 3' S 340,500
Exhibit A -Page Three
Project Name. From To Area Location Cost
Beebe Rd. Ext. Wilson Rd. 1450' S. N.E. 1450'@ S60/Ft.
Node 123 Node 120 Phase 3 S 87,000.00
Beebe Rd. Ext. 1450' S. 3870' S. N.E. 2420'@ S75/Ft.
Node 120 Node 139 Phase 3 S 181,500.00
Vitas Rd. E. Table Rk.Rd. 1200' W N.E. 1200'@ S60/Ft.
Node 117A Node 117 Phase 3 S 72,000.00
Hamrick Rd. Ext. 1200' S. Biddle Rd. N.E. 3910'@ S60/Ft.
Node 117 Node 117 Phase 3 S 234,000.00
E. Pine St. Ext. Bear Crk. Hamrick Rd. N.E./S.E. 1950"@ S60/Ft.
Node 622 Node 114 Phase 3 S 117,000.00
Biddae Rd. Ext. Hamrick Rd. Table RI<.Rd. N.E./S.E. 2100@ S60/Ft.
Node 114 Node 114A Phase 3 S 126,000.00
Table Rock Ext. Wilson Rd. I-5 Overpass N.E./S.E. 11800'@ S60/Ft.
Node 125A Node 1108 Phase 3 S 708,000.00
Hamrick Rd. Ext. Biddle Rd. 2400' S. S.E. 2400'@ S60/Ft.
Node 114 Node 112 Phase 3 S 144,000.00
Hamrick R. Ext. 1200' S. Table Rk.Rd. S.E. 1200'@ S60/Ft.
Node 1 13 Node 110A Phase 3 S 72,000.00
Hamrick R. Ext. Vitas Rd. Gibbon Rd. N.E. 5630'@ S60/Ft.
Node 117 Node 128 Phase 3 S 337,800.00
Beall Ln. Ext. Hiway 99 1450' W. N.W./S.W. 1450'@ S60/Ft.
Node 110 Node 402 Phase 3 S 87,000.00
WIfl5Y5.E%A
EXH/B/T "B"
WATER SYSTEM /MPROVEMENTS SDC A/IETHODOLOGY
RE/MBURSEMENT FEE
GENERAL /NFORMAT/OIU.•
1. The cost of water system improvements constructed since the 1979 CHZM Hill
Report (CHzM) were funded by revenues from the City Utility Fund which is
supported by rates paid by users, and provided benefit to both existing and
future system users.
2. The 1979 CHzM Hill Report defines water improvements necessary to provide
for a population of 22,651.
3. The CHZM Hill Report (In Table II-1) estimates the population on July 1, 1977
of 5930 with a maximum daily demand (MDD) of 384 gallons per capita per
day (GPCD) Table II-5, at 22,651 with an 8.70 MGD MDD from Table II-6
revised.
4. Current estimated City population growth is calculated at 2.4% per year.
5. The July 1, 1992 Portland State University Bureau of Governmental Research.
population estimate for the City of Central Point is 8,195.
FUTURE POPULATLON
6. Population estimated on 7/01/93 is 8392 (population estimate on 7/01/92 in
6 above plus a 2.4% increase per year from 7/01/92. to 7/017931•
7. Future population benefitted by water system improvements is 14,259, the
difference between the future population in #2 above, and the estimated
population on 7/01 /93 from #6 above.
MDD REMAINING IN THE SYSTEM
8. Based on the 384 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) from #3 above and the
estimated. population on 7/01/93 of 8392 from #6 above, the estimated MDD
on 7/01/93 is 3.22 million. gallons: per day (M'GD) (384 GPCD times 8392
population}. Also, using the same 384 GPCD, the estimated MDD on July 1,
1977 with an estimated population at 5930 from. #3 above is 2.28 MGD (384
GPCD times 5930 populatonl.
Exhibit B -Water SDC
Page Two
9. Remaining MDD in the system, benefitting future users, is calculated by
subtracting the estimated 7/01 /93 MDD of 3,22 MGD from #8 above from the
Design MDD of 8.70 MGD in #3 above, which provides an MDD of 5..48 million
gallons per day (MGD).
EMU's REMAINING IN THE SYSTEM
10. The actual MDD from the City's records for the month of August, 1991, was
recorded at 3.21 million gallons per day (MGD1.
11. Based on the City's records for August 1992, there were 3330 Equivalent
Meter Units (EMU) based on multiplying the total number of each size meter by
the Equivalent Meter Unit (EMUI per meter size found in Table I.
12. To determine the MDD per EMU, divide the actual MDD in August 1991 of
3.21 MGD from #10 above by 3,330 EMU's from #11 above which equals 964
MDD/EMU.
13. The remaining MDD in the system is 5.48 MGD from #9 above, the amount of
MDD/EMU in the system is 964 from #12 above. To determine the remaining.
EMU's in the system, divide the 5.48 MGD-MDD by the 964 gallons MDD/EMU
which equals 5688 EMU's remaining in the system.
COST OF BENEFITTED EMU'S
14. The designed increase to MDD by improvements constructed since 1979 is
calculated by subtracting the estimated 2.28 MGD, MDD fora 5930 population:
on July 1, 1977 from #3 above from the Design MDD of 8..70 MGD for a
22,651 population from #3 above, which equals 6.42 MGD-MDD.
15. The amount of MDD remaining in the system after 7/01/93 is 5.48 MGD from
#9 above, divided by the increased design amount of 6.42 MGD-MDD from
#14 above, provides 85.36% of MDD remaining in the system, and therefore
available for future users.
16. To calculate the present day cost per benefitted EMU, the cost of each project
constructed since 1979 less the depreciation (60 Year Life) of each project
(Column 5 Table II is multiplied by the percentage of the improvements
benefitting a future population, 85.36% -from #15 above), then the result of
the above multiplication is divided by the benefitted 5686 EMU's from #13
above and the result is increased by the: time value of money (8%) to present
day. This calculation is shown in Table 61 and equals a cost per total benefitted
EMU of Sat 1.59 rounded down to the nearest dollar, OR 5311 per EMU.
Exhibit B -Water SDC
Page Three
DETERMINATION OF THE SDC REIMBURSEMENT FEE
17. Table t provides an equivalent Meter Unit (EMU) for each size meter.
18. After determining the EMU per meter size from Table I, then calculate the SDG
reimbursement fee by multiplying; the EMU per meter size from Table I by the
5311 per benefitted EMU in #16 above.
TABLE I
Equivalent Meter Units
Equiva/ent Meter Units
Siae GPD = 9000 Ga//ons (Per Meter Sizel
3/4" Meter 1296/1296 = 1.00
1" Meter 2160/1296 = 9.67
1 % " Meter 4320/1296 = 3.33
2" Compound Meter 6912/1296 = 5.33
3" Compound Meter 13,824/1296 = 10.67
4" Compound Meter 21,600/1296 = 16.67
6" Compound Meter 43,200/1296 = 33.33
8" Compound Meter 69,120/1296 = 53.33
10" Compound Meter 99,360/1296 = 76.67
12" C/ass /Turbine 135,760/1296 = 104.75
EXBSDC.WTR