HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - June 16, 1998;. ,
`,
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
June 16, 1998 - 7:00 p.m.
Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 426
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Chuck Piland -Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Bob Gilkey, and
Karolyne Johnson
III. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. MINUTES
A. Review and Approval of June 2, 1998, Planning Commission Minutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Page 1- 14 A. ~ Public Hearing to review a Site Plan submitted by the Central Point
Assembly of God Church to construct a new sanctuary on property located
eastlof the intersection of North 10th and Maple Streets.
15 - 20 B. 1, Withdrawal of Batzer Property (9.4 acres) from Jackson County Fire
Protection District No. 3 following its Annexation to the City of Central
Point.
VI. BUSINESS ~
~~~`
21 - 25 C. ~ Presentation of Horn Creek Flood Study and Drainage Plan for Country
Meadows Subdivision (Public Works Director).
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
1
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
JUNE 2, 1998
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Bob Gilkey,
Karolyn Johnson. Angela Curtis came in at 8:35 p.m. Also present were:
Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, Jim Bennett, City Administrator, Lee
Brennan, Public Works Director, Kevin Chrisman, Public Works Technician,
and Arlene LaRosa, Public Works Secretary.
III. CORRESPONDENCE
There was no correspondence.
IV. MINUTES
Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the Minutes of May 19, 1998,
as written. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Gilkey. ROLL CALL:
Dunlap, abstain, Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
There were to public appearances.
VI. BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing to consider a request by USF Reddawav for a
Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to establish a truck
terminal on 20 acres in the vicinity of East Pine Street and Hamrick
Road.
Chairman Piland opened the public hearing. There were no conflicts
of interest or ex-parte communications.
Tom Humphrey reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report. Tom
stated that the Public Works Director has asked for more right-of-
way, afull 72 foot right-of-way, which will require an additional 6
feet from each side of Hamrick where there is only 60 feet now. He
is also requesting curb, gutter and sidewalk on Hamrick, on the west
side of the property and along the south side of the property.
Craig Stone, 708 Cardley Ave., Medford, agent for USF Reddaway,
stated they will be moving the shop building north approximately 20
feet and removing one row of parking in front of the office for better
The City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
June 2, 1998 -Page 2
circulation and additional landscaping. He stated they would like to
add to the wording in Public Works Department Staff Report. On
page 50 of the packet, paragraph 1, second sentence under Water
System, add the wording: "or as approved by Fire District 3". Fire
District 3 has stated they do not intend to enforce the 300 foot
requirement to the interior of the facility.
Mr. Stone stated that the applicant has a major concern on the
requirement for construction of 6 foot sidewalks along Hamrick on the
south side of the property; they have no objection to sidewalks along
the west side of the property. The applicants feel there will be no
need for that improvement in the near future. Mr. Stone referred to
two land use cases: Dolan vs Tigard and Nolen vs. California Coastal
Commission. These cases indicated there has to be some correlation
between the impact of the development and the exaction taken. Mr.
Stone stated that this development will generate no pedestrian traffic.
If and when there is a development of a motel to the north and
industrial land to the south and this generates pedestrian traffic then
the City needs to determine whether sidewalks should be required.
John Hesson, Attorney for the applicant, agreed that a quantifiable
social problem should exist.
Jim Bennett, City Administrator, argued that the Public Work's
requirement is justified based upon both state and local goals and
anticipated developments in this area.
Mr. Stone stated that the applicants would withdraw their objection
provided the City will include the Deferred Improvement Agreement
the condition that sidewalks be required only if there is a
demonstrated need.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 423 approving
the request by USF Reddaway for a Conditional Use Permit and Site
Plan to establish a truck terminal on 20 acres in the vicinity of East
Pine Street and Hamrick Road, including conditions in the Staff
Reports, and adding to second sentence, first paragraph under Water
Systems on page 50 of the packet in the Public Works Staff Report
the wording "or as approved by Fire District 3", that a Deferred
Improvement Agreement be entered into by the applicant for the
sidewalks on the South side of the property along Hamrick Road with
the wording added "tb be done only if determined to be needed jointly
by City and Developer". Motion seconded by Commissioner Dunlap.
The City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
June 2, 1998 -Page 3
ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes; Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Gilkey,
yes; Johnson, yes.
B. Public Hearing to consider a request by James and Sharon Mock to
partition a 1.25 acre parcel at 527 Freeman Road into three parcels.
Chairman Piland opened the Public Hearing.
There were no conflicts of interest or ex-parte communications.
Tom Humphrey reviewed the Planning Department's Staff Report.
Lee Brennan stated the City has four concerns: 111 pedestrian traffic
on the private lane where there will be no space for pedestrians
except in the lane itself; 121 the mound of dirt, shrubs and a tree are
in the vision triangle; (31 the 20 foot residential lane being proposed,
after the curbs and gutters, will be reduced to18 feet; (41 there
needs to be room for emergency vehicles to get through and there
should be no parking allowed in the streets.
Dallas Page, 900 Win~demar Drive, Ashland, OR, agent for the
applicant, stated that rather than put a fence along the street next to
or in front of the existing houses on the north side of the private lane,
he wanted to enhance their property with landscaping. He stated
that they will bring the sewer to the front 2 lots, improve the sewer
to the back lot and bring all the utilities to the properties. They will
also bring an 8" water line into the property for fire hydrants and stub
out for future development. The three lots will drain to Mingus Creek.
Anything that drains on the structures and driveways will drain to the
street. He will adjust the boundary of parcel 3 to meet the street
bulb.
Lee Brennan stated that the City would like the power pole to be
placed underground if feasible.
Earl Mix, 685 Cedar Street, Central Point, OR, stated that his concern
was the traffic on Freeman going past Shadow Way. The traffic
count he conducted showed an average of 475 cars an hour going
past that point and 17 cars came out of Shadow Way. He also stated
that school children would have to cross Freeman to catch the school
bus.
Ron Musmecher, 411 Freeman, Central Point, OR., stated that the
driveways dip down off Freeman and it is dangerous to back out.
The City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
June 2, 1998 -Page 4
Dallas Page stated that he agreed it is important that he try to obtain
a 25 foot right-of-way for the entrance portion of Shadow Way. It
would be acceptable to make that a condition of approval.
Chairman Piland closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to adopt Resolution 424
approving the request by James and Sharon Mock to partition a 1.25
acre parcel at 527 Freeman Road into three parcels, with the
condition that the access to Freeman Road be a 25 foot wide access
including sidewalk, and to include all the conditions and of the Staff
Reports and staff comments on the power pole. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Johnson. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes;
Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes.
C. Public Hearing to consider a request by W G Beard for a Conditional
UsP Permit and Tentative Plan for the Cedar Shadows 26 Unit
Planned Unit Development IPUD) on 2 3 acres off of Freeman Road
Chairman Piland opened the public hearing.
There were no conflicts of interest or ex-parte communication.
Tom Humphrey reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report.
Lee Brennan reviewed the Public Works Department Staff Report. Lee
stated that Item 4 on page 3 of the packet is not applicable to this
application. Lee stated that the commission could vary from the
creek set-backs because this is a P.U.D. He also expressed concern
that the water line is a dead-end line. The City would like the
applicant to explore the possibility of running the water line out to
Freeman through an easement so that it is looped.
Dallas Page, 900 Windemar, Ashland, OR, agent for the applicant,
stated that if they can obtain access through an easement to run the
water line to Freeman they would do so. He stated they are
proposing flood storage in the middle of the development, also
designated for parking, and it will drain to Mingus Creek. Mr. Page
discussed perimeter fencing. The house currently on the property will
remain on the property and will be renovated on the outside. The
public areas will be maintained by a homeowners' association. There
will be a fence on the west side of the property and either a chain link
or cedar fence on the east side along the creek for safety purposes.
Mr. Page stated that if there are no trees to act as barriers the
The City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
June 2, 1998 -Page 5
decking on the second story houses would be on the street side
rather than in back of those homes. There will be a restriction in the
CC&R's that the trees cannot be cut down except if they are dead or
diseased.
Roger Smith, 555 Freeman, #27, Central Point, OR., stated that he
would like a fence installed between the subdivision and The
Meadows and would like all the houses to be one-story.
Ron Musmecher, 411 Freeman, Central Point, OR., stated that if 2-
story homes go behind his house, his view will be totally obstructed.
Mr. Earl Mix, 685 Cedar, Central Point, OR, stated that the only way
out of the subdivision will be the private road, Shadow Way, and will
add 52 cars coming out onto Freeman. It is a dangerous spot unless
the entrance from Shadow Way onto Freeman can be leveled off and
widened.
Mark Haynes, Central Point, OR stated the reason the partition had
not been recorded before was because of the access problem related
to the piece of property on the southeast corner of Freeman and
Shadow Way.
Dallas Page, agent for the applicant, stated that a person should be
able to buy a piece of property and build one or two stories on it. He
is not against working with the neighbors in that area, if possible. Mr.
Page stated that he will try to get the owner of the piece of property
on the southeast corner of Freeman and Shadow Way to move the
dirt, enlarge the vision triangle and also grant an easement to widen
the Shadow Way.
Chairman Piland closed the public hearing.
Tom Humphrey informed the Commission that two traffic studies are
being done on Freeman because of the new shopping center and a
local street network plan to analyze and improve city-wide circulation.
Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to extend the meeting past
10:00 p.m. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Fish. All said
"aye" and the motion passed.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 425 approving
the request by W.G. Beard for aConditional-Use Permit and Tentative
Plan for the Cedar Shadows 26 Unit Planned Unit Development (PUD)
The City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
June 2, 1998 -Page 6
on 2.3 acres off Freeman Road including all Staff Conditions and
recommendations; the building style is to be approximately the same
as the pictures presented in the application; the fence along the creek
is to be a chain link fence for safety; the water line is to be looped
into Freeman if possible; all the trees are to be left except where
located in the streets, or where dead or diseased; the builder is to
take into consideration the neighbors privacy and views when building
homes. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the motion. ROLL CALL:
Curtis, yes; Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson,
yes.
D. Consideration of Central Point Municipal Code revisions to eliminate
references to Ian nning fees and adopt a planning fee schedule.
Tom Humphrey reminded the commission about previous discussions
to remove specific references to fees from the municipal code and
create a schedule of fees..Tom passed out a proposed planning fee
schedule and corresponding municipal code revisions.
Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to recommend to the City
Council approval for the removal of references to fees from the
Municipal Code and the adoption a planning fee schedule. Motion
was seconded by Commissioner Curtis. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes;
Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
There were no miscellaneous items.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Dunlap made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Curtis
seconded the motion. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 10:20
p.m.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING
DATE: June 16, 1998
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Tom Humphrey, AICP
Planning Director
SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Site Plan Review for 37 2W 02CB Tax Lots 7200, 7300 & 7302-
Central Point Assembly of God Church.
licant/ Central Point Assembly of God Church
er• 310 No. 10th Street
Central Point, OR 97502
en • Rev. Jeffrey Anderson
ro e
Description/ 37 2W 02CB Tax Lots 7200, 7300 & 7302- 3.34 acres
o in R-3, Residential Multiple-Family
umm
The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review for the addition of a new sanctuary, classrooms and
the remodel of existing buildings that aze part of a local church complex on North 10th Street. The
church contemplated these changes several yeazs ago when it prepazed a site master plan for three
separate tax lots under its ownership (refer to Attachment A). The plan before you is a variation of
the original design which was never submitted to or reviewed by the City.
Authority
CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and
render a decision on any application for a Site Plan Review. Notice of the public hearing was given
in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Attachment B).
CPMC 17.28.010 et seq.- R-3 Multiple Residential District
CPMC 17.60.010 et seq: General Regulations
CPMC 17.64.010 et seq.- Off Street Pazking
CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval
1
Discussion
The applicants are proposing the addition of approximately 8400 square feet to an existing church
which primarily occupies two of the three tax lots in their ownership. The new sanctuary would be
constructed in the existing parking area and consequently some, but not all, of the parking and
vehicle circulation has been redefined in the new site plan. Reverend Anderson has stated that
additional church parking will resemble that of the original site master plan.. There were 178 parking
spaces (including 2-3 handicapped) proposed in the church's original site master plan. Although the
capacity of the new sanctuary is less than that proposed for the original building, it appears that the.
total square footage for classrooms and administrative offices has been maintained. The church
submitted an Occupant Load Summary with its application (see Attachment A).
The property surrounding the church is occupied by higher density single and multi-family
dwellings, a public school and low density single family homes. The Willow Glen apartments take
their access along the east side of the church's property. The largest of the applicant's tax lots (1.89
acres) is vacant and about 3-4 feet lower topographically than the other two lots occupied by church
buildings. All three tax lots front on North 10th Street which is classified a secondary arterial. City
Public Works has determined that an additional 9 feet ofright-of--way is needed from both sides of
North 10th to handle future traffic volumes. Curb, gutter and sidewalk currently exists along the
applicant's frontage and the entire perimeter of the church property is fenced.
The Commission will notice that there are some pieces missing from this site plan application
however, at the applicant's request city staff scheduled the public hearing with the expectation that
additional information would arrive. At this point it appears that parking and landscaping plans will
be presented at the meeting. This may or may not afford the Public Works Department ample time
to respond to issues such as surface drainage, parking, driveway access and lighting improvements.
The applicants would initially. like to make minimal improvements to the parking areas due to the
cost of such improvements. Reverend Anderson envisions repaving the existing parking area, and
grading the remaining parking area in phases with crushed rock. These phases and the number of
new parking spaces have not yet been defined. Given the essential completion of the.. church's
(building) master plan, the City would prefer full improvements, including paved parking, storm
drain improvements, landscaping, lighting and additional right-of--way dedication along North 10th
Street (which could be deferred).
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision
on the following standards from Section 17.72.040:
A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause
the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such
a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing
neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the. maintenance. of existing plants or the
installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property:
2
^ The applicant has been working on a landscaping plan for the site and hopes to have
something for the Commission at the public hearing. The original master plan depicts
numerous planters and trees in the parking lots and around the new sanctuary. As
stated earlier, the perimeter of the property is fenced with chain link.
B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid
interference with the traffic flow on public streets;
^ There are presently two driveways onto North Tenth Street and a third is proposed
from the Willow Glen access drive. Service drives are required to have a minimum
vision clearance of 20 feet from the intersection of driveway centerlines and the
intersecting street right-of--way line. It appears that the church can design its driveway
accesses to satisfy this requirement. Traffic generated by churches typically occurs at
off-peak periods.
C: To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in
such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable
of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public
streets;
^ The City. has received no new parking plan and the original site master plan depicts a
'-~+ total of 178 parking spaces. Under CPMC 17.64.040(D) seating capacity for the
- •-- sanctuary itself (378 people) would necessitate 95 spaces and as many as 113 spaces
- ' ~' could be required to accommodate classrooms and secondary assembly areas. Design
- - requirements in CPMC 17.64.100 call for paved, adequately drained parking areas for
all-weather use; painted striping; lighting and the placement of bumper rails along
property lines, sidewalks and landscaping areas. Additionally, parking areas should
not be erected or maintained in special setback areas which in this case would be 60 feet
from the centerline of North 10th Street. The applicant has not submitted any
independent off-street parking calculations. The project would be eligible for compact
car adjustment of up to 25% of the total
D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter
from traffic control signs or devices and that they aze compatible with the design of their buildings
or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appeazance or visibility of nearby signs;
^ The applicants presently have a sign and expect to replace it. The specific location will
be identified on a revised site plan and/or landscaping plan. The submission of sign
plans typically occurs subsequent to the Commission's approval and in response to
conditions imposed at the time of approval
E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the
reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads
and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire appazatus;
3
^ Jackson County Fire District Number 3 and the City's Building Department will
.enforce State Fire and Building codes.
F: Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations;
^ The proposed construction meets the minimum setback requirements for the
R-3 District. There are general regulations governing special setbacks and landscaping
(17.60.090 and 17.60.135 respectively). Special setbacks on secondary arterials like
North. 10th are. intended, among other things, to permit eventual widening. The
application of this. standard to the subject property would potentially eliminate a row
of parking within 60 feet of the street centerline. As an alternative, this setback area
may be used for landscaping which the planning commission may, at their discretion,
attach as a condition to approval. The applicants are proposing only one light standard
in the lower parking lot. City Public Works Standards and Specifications call for more
to adequately and safely illuminate this area. There are street tights along the Willow
Glen access road.
G: Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in
relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs.
^ ,The pitched metal roof proposed for-the sanctuary. is generally compatible, with the
urrounding structuresand the building itself presents an attractive appearance. The
applicants have submitted building elevations as part of their application package.
Site landscaping, full parking.improvements and newsigns proposed by the applicants
would enhance the aestheticvalue of the project.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions:
1. Adopt Resolution No._, approving the Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of
approval (Attachment C ); or
2.. Deny the proposed Site Plan; or
3. Continue the review of the Site Plan at the discretion of the Commission.
Attachments
A. Application and Exhibits submitted by Assembly of God Church
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C: Planning Department Conditions
D. Public Works Staff Report (delayed due to lack of complete site information)
4
SITE r LAN REVIEW APPLICATION
City of Central Point Planning Department
Attachment A
MAY 121998'
~~~ ~~~~
APPLICANT IT
Name: ~
Address:
Telephone: Business:
2. AGENT
City: '~ ~'
Telephone:
State: (.~ Zip Code:. -j'~f~
a~(-1, (o~y, 3~5 ~ Residence:
(Zev~JeKe~ ~..Rr~aQrsov,~ ~qS~o<~-~9(9~-f-YZ4',~
~c , -Qc J~C t"S ~ Cl
Zip Code: cl'ZSGc~
Residence: CO(9'-~'~ ll ~
3. OWNER OF RECORD (Attach Separate Sheet If More Than One)
Name: Ce•rfraf Porhf,4sse~.r//y of l70~ clip/~ti
Address: 3~o N, /o'`" sfreaf
City: Ca~fr.,( Qoiefd nR State: ok Zip Code: q~so2
Telephone: Business: 5Yr•66y3353 Residence:
'~A.-s PROJECT DESCRIPTION
''~ '~'~' TypeofDevelopment: ~cfcl~ t:on
Township: 37 Ranger Section: D2 ~$ Tax Lot(s): 73~o r/3~.2 ?.~•~
Address: 3/o N. /o+'F st~~eef Cea~~a( ~oi~l'` 9>ro2
Zoning District: R 3 . R.ed.sle~~F.d/ /Y1~/><;die ~a.n,%/
Number of Dwelling Units: No+~n.,
Non-Sale Area Sq. Footage Sale Area Sq. Footage =Gross Floor Area
NumberofParking Spaces:
5. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
This Application Form. ~ Legal Description.
Application Fee ($200.00). ^ Letter of Project Description.
Site Plan Drawn to Scale (10 copies).
~ Written Authority from Property Owner if Agent in Application Process.
~ Reduced Copies (8'/z x 11) of the Site Plan, Building Elevations and Landscape Plans (1 copy Ea.).
~ Landscape and Irrigation Plan (3 copies). Co~L,.~a w~fn s;fie P(,k.
6. I HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED 1N THE ABO VE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS
AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT, AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I certify that I am the : ^ Property Owner or Authorized Agent of the Owner
of a proposedGproject sGit~e. Q~
Si nahr ` ~.~......_..~ - -- 5Date ~- O r ~ I ~ t~
v
,~
,
~ ;
; ;
'
.
l
6-'
Z
,Q
04/04/lyy! 18:16 5108463102 CORNERSTONE (}1URCH PAGE 02
J p I
I I I
I~W00 Y!O?f'R9lUa~
E~~
I ,~I:
`. I
i
f
i
~ v MMrrMM<<~~II I~ I
0~~. ,~\sv~Mn R+
~~ ~~
f~ I _ i° I ~ I I ;.
i ~. c~ I~ I I ~ ,
j? I
v i I
I .t I
I
_ _ _ _ _ ._..r..~. .._
:~ i~~
I /~/ ~ ~~I ;'V1
.,I ~~\
~.~ ~ ~,
~, ~
`~! '.
`'~, , ~ g
~ \f
.;
f, ~ t
~`,,\
'~,`
'`
,\
``
``
~~
e 4
a
S~~' ~
~• ~ /
,/ , ; , ~.
I ~
/,
/z ~,
~ ;'
/ / //
!, !
I ~!
I
i I~
ii
i!:
!. .._.. ._4..y ~ ~ ~
.~- I I
1J1J ~ ~ I I
i I
I ~:
I ~ II' N
I ~ I
s
.~
I
'! I
1~'
~j~
I
. ~ ~,
t ~'
/ / /
/ / /.
/ /,/ % / ~
~'
~' / ~1
•~
a
~.
~_
'.
^~
~ i
"I
I
VYI UYI IJ./: lU.1V .:a •+~rY V.+a •+..
CORNERSTONE CHURCH DEVELOPMENT, INC.
.'
y i:.,IZ, (l;Gf~~~E~t rid,, .~l~i~b,~~ ~~ ~~:~'. ' }' ~ > v' x ~ `ls''1 .:.
:.
•.
~.~.~,• .•.~;1 jR~~aY cc.l ~ ys r~ Irl-~(: xt; i'`~'N +1"t<
< ~.::
>t.., .
;.
!fir ~j1• ~ .~ ~ ''•::~~. .,E'.Ic~::.:,•I.::..::ea.:
pp' • . ~ '. .:' .
~~~ .r f!r, t , -
Occupant Load Summary
•~ J• r4 t
Projected Maximum
Attend Yeer Attend In 2 Attend
Ago Attend Now Yeare Projected
v• Y~•1,
t
~
Morning 70 180 300 500
Evening 40
Sub-totals 110 180 300 500
Pro)edad Maximum
Attend Year A11end In 2 Attend
Class Ago Attend Now Years Projected
..-.v.~:....Y:.., ...
.i:~.1. }.//~f ~%~. ..,i: v
':,!~•li'' ..•
eSS':T
.
IY'
:'
~ ...:.
:e .::':\'..:
.:.'. •• ..:
..
.. ..
~
.. ..
uJ~'tn'~.:':l'l.•~'•:
l.:'.~.1T:.1~"
'.l
. :. -.
i~l.. i.. %~`t"'.i. -4(`.' -u~Z.:.,ii•3Y..~~t1':Iy
e~%V~:.~ ~(
. Ty `~.~'~I'~:1•.a .. ~j
14 ~P
•1
`
~
~~
~
..
. /I
<
:
~. .. ~..~ .
. ..
. .....
..
,.:
:~
:'
.i.
. Yi
,
,
i.-..b
..
Newborn 4 8 8
Nursery 10 20 20
-:_.:. .: Creepers (1 yr. old) 3 8 8
Toddlers (2 yr. old) 3 8 8
3 yr. old 3 8 8
' Ayr, old 3 8 ' 8
IOndergarten 3 8 8
Grade 1 3 8 8
Grade 2 3 8 8
Grade 3 3 B B
Grade 4 3 8 8
Grade 6 4 10 t 0
Grade 8 3 8 8
Jr. High 30 80
High School 15 30
CollegelCaraer 3 25
Adult 50 100
Additional 50 100
Subtotals 0 186 118 433
"` 9
~ ;'
~~
~~
~c
q
i
i ~
€~ ~~
io
i
$~
~~~ ~ :"
~_~~~.
~ g ~gg
S ~A
T
~~
~~
..~
g~ ~ 3
6~ ~~ ~~
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW
~a wurx secoxo ar
cExttu~ roixr, on n~ox
N~~Oli
OWNER: CENTRAL POINT ASSEMBLY of GOD CHURCH
ADDRESS: NORTH TENTH STKEET
OCCUPANCY: A-2.1 SANCTUARY AREA:3,872 S.F. ALLOWABLE AREA: 10,500 S.F.
OCCUPANCY: A-3 CLASSROOMS & EXIST. AREA: 8,608 S.F. ALLOWABLE AREA: 6,100 S.F.
TYPE of CONSTRUCTION: SANCTUARY ; V-1HR CLASSROOMS & EXISTING ; V-N
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:
A TWO HOUR FIRE SEPARATION WALL IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SANCTUARY AND THE
CLASSROOMS WITH ALL OPENINGS REQUIRED TO BE ONE AND ONE HALF HOUR RATED. ALL
PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS OF THE FII2EWALL ARE TO BE METAL AND LIMITED IN
NUMBER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 709.6 AND 709.7. THE SANCTUARY IS TO BE ONE HOUR
CONSTRUCTION THROUGHOUT AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 6-A.
THE EXISTING TOILET ROOM FACILITIES EXCEED THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES REQUII2ED BY TABLE
A-29-A.
EXIT ILLUMINATION AND EXIT SIGNS TO BE PROVIDED AS REQUII2ED BY SECTION 1012 AND 1013.
PROVIDE DOOR HARDWARE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 1016.4.
PROVIDE LIGHT AND VENTII,ATION AS REQUIItED BY SECTION 1202 AND TABLE 12-A.
HEATING PLANS ARE REQUIRED; PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SCHEMATICS ARE
REQUII2ED TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.
ii
City of Central Point AttaehmentB
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
Deanna Gregory
Administrative/Planning Secretary
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: May 27,1998
Meeting Date: June 16, 1998
Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Place: Central Point City Hall
15$ South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
NATURE OF MEETING
Beginning at the above time and place, the Central' Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a Site Plan Review-that would allow the construction of a building addition at the
Central Point Assembly of God Church.. The subject parcel, is located in a R-3, Residential Single
Family district on Assessment Plat 37 2W 2CB, Tax Lot 7300.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for Site Plan Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal
Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction
Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 16, 1998.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission. 12
155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384
ATTACHMENT C
RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on June 16, 1999 unless an application
for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The
applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at
the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval.
2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations including,
but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Fire Code and Structural Specialty Code.
3. The applicant shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the
Planning, Public Works and Building Departments for approval prior to obtaining any
building permits.
4. The applicant shall enter into a deferred improvement agreement with the City for
improvements along the North 10th Street frontage including, but not limited to, right of way
dedication and the relocation curb, gutter and sidewalks.
13
Attachment D
Pa~G~ic
I~Uvr~s STAFF
R¢ pert
To be submitted
at the meeitng
1.4
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
MEETING
DATE: June 16, 1998
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Withdrawal of Annexation Territory from Jackson County Rural Fire
Protection District #3 (Batzer Annexation).
i mm r ,
On June 4, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 825 ordering the annexation of
9.4 acres located on the southwest corner of Biddle and Table Rock Roads. Although this
area is presently being used for agricultural purposes, it is designated by the Comprehensive
Plan for Light Industrial uses. The subject property is one of several currently being
considered for Comprehensive Plan amendments and zone changes and Batzer Construction
would like to develop the site in commercialuses.
h ri
The Central Point Municipal Code (Section 1.24.020) vests the Planning Commission with
the authority to review and make recommendations to the City Council on withdrawals from
special districts.
Discussion
Upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council will hold a public
hearing on the proposed withdrawal and consider adopting an ordinance declaring that the
territory within the annexation area be withdrawn from Jackson County Rural Fire Protection
District No. 3. Coincidentally, Fire District No. 3 is now providing fire protection to the
annexed territory under its current contract for services with the City.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council withdraw
the subject annexation area from Jackson County Rural Fire Protection District No. 3.
Attachments
A. City Council Resolution No. 825, Zoning and Annexation Area Maps
15
Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO. $~S
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF
A 9.4-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED
BETWEEN BIDDLE AND HAMRICK ROADS
INTO THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON
(Applicant: Batzer Construction)
(37 2W O1C Tax Lot 700)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
ecti n Application has been made by the agent of the owner of certain real
property for annexation into the City of Central Point, Oregon. The property consists of 9.4
acres located east of the City limits, between Biddle and Hamrick Roads. The property to
be annexed is more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference
incorporated herein.
The property to be annexed is not within the City of Central Point's current corporate
boundaries, but is contiguous to the City's existing corporate boundary on its western
boundary and is within the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary.
Section 2. The ..owner of the .property proposed for annexation is Batzer
Construction, which-has submitted a written,consent to the annexation by way of his agent,
The Richard Stevens Company; LLC so designated in writing by the owner. There are no
electors residing on the property. The written consent is on file at Central Point City Hall,
155 S. Second Street, Central Point, Oregon.
tion 3 ORS 222.125 provides that when al( of the owners of land. in the
territory proposed for annexation and not less than 50% of the electors residing in such
territory have consented in writing to the annexation of the land in the territory and file such
written consent with the City Council, the property may be annexed without the requirement
for an election or a public hearing.
e ti Annexation of the described property is consistent with the City's
ability to provide facilities and services to the real property, as required by the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Applicant's written "Proposed Findings of Fact:and Conclusions of
Law" insofar as they address annexation and not a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
zone change are hereby adopted and incorporated herein.
ecti n Pursuant to ORS 222.125, the property described in Section 1 above,
shall be and hereby. is, annexed to and made a part of the City of Central Point, Oregon.
16
Section 6. The City Administrator, or his designee, shall transmit a copy of this
resolution to the Oregon Secretary of State, and this annexation shall be effective when filed
with the Oregon Secretary of State pursuant to ORS 222,180.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
day of :S, ~.•Q., , 1998.'
Mayor Rusty McGrath
ATTE T:
v
City Representative
Approved by me this 4 day of ~U hie. , 1998.
Mayor Rusty McGrath
1~
Planning Department
Exhibit A
Commencing at the Northeast cornerofDonation Land ClaimNo. 56 iu Township 37 South, Range
2 West of the Willamette Meridian in Jackson County, Oregon; thence South 00° 01' 44" West
(Record Soutlt 00° 01' 30" West) along the Easterly boundary of said Claim, a distance of 104.22 feet
to a point on the centerline of Biddle Road, said point being on the current boundary of the City of
Central Point, said point also being the POINT OP' BEGINNING; thence continue South 00° 01'
44" West, along said City boundary, 60.16 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of--way line of said
Biddle Road, said point being the Northwest corner of tract as described as Tract "A" in Instrument
No. 98-19989 of the Deed. Records.ofJaekson County, Oregon; thence continue South 00° 01' 44"
West (Record South 00° 01' 30" West) along the Westerly boundary of said tract and along said City
boundary, a distance of 723.32 feet to the Southwest corner of tract described as Tract "B" in said
Instrument No. 98-19989; thence, leaving said City boundary, South 89° 59' 06" East along the
Southerly boundary of said tract, 588.47 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of--way line of Table
Rock Road; thence continue South 89° 59' 06" East 30.00 feet to a point on the centerline of said
Table Rock Road; thence North 00° 02' 34" East along the centerline of said Table Rock Road,
731.52 feet to the point of intersection with the aforementioned centerline of Biddle Road; thence
Northwesterly along the centerline of said Biddle Road along a spiral curve to the left (tlie long chord
to which bears North 84° 19' 26" West 256.31 feet); thence continue along said centerline, North 85 °
47' 17" West 364.55 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 10.78 acres, more or less.
_„~. ~ ws ~c, nn s n ~ ~xt ~c Sri ,.. .
t~t~C)FI~SSiON/4L j
!_AIJb sutxveYat~
~ C, r~ ~G~
EGON ~~~
J lY I0, 1900
~OUGGIAS C. hkMAHAN
~~,- N°. 1913
Douglas C. McMahan
L.S. 1913 -Oregon
Expires 12/31/98
Hollbuhr & Associates, Inc.
Batzer -Annexation
(37SiWO1C TL 700)
June 1, 1998
(98-106)
(btzrannx.dcm)
~. g
Z
X
W
Z
3=
$
.
~O ..
o
.
~. __ s
~
~
~
n ~~~
~ boo
~
2 N
W
C
a
s 6
~ ~ ~ ~~
rLry~N~~
38
F" p~
~N ~(Sy
~~°ya~
~
~~~~ tl
~G~^ i @ n
~~W ~1~ w
~
08+
ad,~ 08^
~„x ^
s hex ~
~~ ~'
I -
~ LS'I CL
3.Yt,Z0.00N 8
/ / \\
avoa Nooa aievll, ~ - -
I
n Sgg ~m~i° Lez o
K n ~_~
/ °f.d a Z
QO
° u v~ °
n ~I n
9~v~W a
6666 F- co °~a r I
J
~ o v ~F
g o
° ~ s°
/^n
a ~
_
W
m ~
.
f
z° $
Yt' I ~ - .6Y'OLfI MJg10.006 I 1' ~ I
' .OL'tLl / 1 ' s
1 V 1
~1\ 'F
~ g r
°f $ V
~ GV
>w O C
CN yQ
NVI
,' ~~
/
~ ~, ood
`~~ o
ff9 nd
3
o
F I
~ T
'~ Io
-d6oa NolawvH
„i
4„
S
V
p/ m~ .-u K
O I
° U
J
° I
I
m n$ 2
.o
F ~ w
.m~ ~
\
~
~I &~50
I V
i 7„ I
I
}~ ~~
`
, 1
I
% 7 I
1 -----
-
J
-
,-
---
.
,
-
\
/ ~
'
N00'S0'O6 W 65L.fi0 ~
~ 1\Y/
vp dry,
~ ~
~
! YO rya:
~ "w
.
" ge~a ~
~ ~ t
I _
~
3
19
i~
F~
€~
~' a
CJ
X N
~i
F
ZONING MAP
City of Central Point, Oregon
Exhibit 3
98042-ANX
'Subject Property
1V11L
HAMRICK ~". ROAD
e ~ o
20
C~1
0
a
0
~ I
Y
U
O
K
W
J
Q1
Q
t-
pf ANNiNG DFPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
MEETING
DATE: June 16, 1998
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Public Works Presentation of Horn Creek Flood Study
Background
The Commission may recall that a condition to their approval of the Country Meadows Estates
development(s) involved the preparation of a master plan for storm drain collection (refer to
pages$ through 11 of the attached PWD Staff Report dated July 9, 1997).
Hammond Engineering has been preparing the Flood Study. referenced in the above referenced
PWD Staff Report and the City Public Works Director will present the results of this study and
proposed subdivision drainage plans on Tuesday night.
Discussion
There will be an opportunity for Commission members to ask questions about the Flood Study
and matters associated with the storm drainage and irrigation improvements for Country
Meadows Estates. This is intended to be an informational matter only and the Commission is not
expected to make any decisions regarding this subject on Tuesday evening.
Attachments
A. Country Meadows Estates, Phase 1,2,3 PWD Staff Report dated July 9, 1997
21
Country Meadows Cutatec, Pfau !, Z,3,
PWD Smf/'Re an
u , 1 flfl7
PageB
nu~,on~„c,i n
5. At the developer's option, the Developer may propose the use of a rolled curb,
gutter, and sidewalk section (as developed and approved by the City PWD) in
lieu of the curcent City PWD curb, gutter, and sidewalk standards.
6. It is suggested that a dedicated easement or piece of property be afforded on
lots assodated with the Country Meadow Estates subdivisions andlor the Quail
Meadows subdivision, that afford pedestrian and bicycle traffic from Mendolia
Way (Bachand Avenue)' to Donna Way. The location of bike/pedestrian ways
shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and Master Transportation
Plan as currently written or as being curcently revised. It is suggested that these
.easements could be combined with utilityeasements that will be required for
utility interconnections or discharge points.
7. Due to the relative doseness of the two proposed intersections to Grant Road of
Blue Hearon Dcive (of the proposed Country Meadow Estates subdivisions) and
Quail Lane, (of the proposed Quail Meadows Subdivision), it is suggested that a
suitable, City approved semi-permanent bamcade be installed across the
wesfem end of Blue Hearon Drive that affords pedestrian and bicycle traffic only,
but prohibits normal vehicular traffic. The barricade could be constructed in
such a manner that provides for lockable modification to allow the passage of
emergencyservice vehicles, as required. The barricade would be appropriately
landscaped 'and irrigated, ad provide for adequfe AOA passage requirements.
Storm Drainage, irrigation improvements
F,dsting Improvements - Hom Creek traverses the proposed development
from south to north.
- Rogue River Valley irrigation District controls
irrigation tights within the project area inducting
conveyance of water in Ham Creek.
1. Developer's engineer shall develop a master plan for the storm drain collection,
retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water
run-off from and nan-on onto the.proposed development (either surface run-on or
culvert or creeWditch conveyance), any future development on adjacent
properties, conveyed sform'drainage; or surface water` flow (i.e. Hom Creek),
and any areas deemed by the Gity that will need to connect-into the proposed
development's SD System.
2. Developer's engineer shall determine how SD system will work during 10-year
and 100 year flood events assodated with Hom Creek. Identify the HGL in Hom
Creek during 10-and 100 year event, and what affect will it have on the
proposed outlets and storm drain system. System should be designed to
22
CounayMeadowsErtales, Platt 1,7,3.
PWD SG{Q'Repor!
July O9, 1 fl97
Page 9
adequately drain 10-year storm without surcharging'or should be provided with
adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to prevent baddlow
of water from Hom Creek up into SD system during storm events.
3. During the design of the SD system, the Developer's engineer shall consider the
effect of the proposed improvements and structures with regard to the 100-year
base flood event floodway and floodplain of Hom Creek and the drainage
ditches associated with Grant and Hanley Roads. The allowable flow rates into
Hom Creek and the ditches along Grant and Hanley Roads from the proposed
development shall not be greater than the run-off flow rates experienced from
the property in its current status. The developer's engineer shall•provide suitable
hydrological calculations and storm hydrographs to depict the existing
predevelopment, and projeded post development conditions of the development
area on Hom Creek and the ditches along Hanley and Grant Roads. The
Developer's engineer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off
coeffldents, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the.peveloper
engineer's calculations.
4. Rlans which propose to include the discharge to Hom Creek ar the existing
t drainage ditches on Grant or Hanley Road, and any consfrradion or modification
within the floodway of Hom Creek or in the road ditches, shall be incompliance
with OSL, ACOE, ODFW, DEQ, JC Roads, and/or City PWD (as applicable)
guidelines and requirements and-any applicable conditions and or approvals, or
these regulatory agendes.
5. Need plan atxl profile drawing of HGL's in Hom Creek, with indication of
floodway and flood zone boundary during the 100-year flood event, taking into
cansidecafton potential developmens~ de e o ment in the d~inage.shed of
Hom Creek upgcadient of the propo P
6. Ali storm drain easements need to be 15{eet wide, and need clause in final
property deeds or final CC&Rs to maintain driveable access to manholes for
getting vactorretter to manholes and to discharge points in Hom Creek. Need
copy of either document prior to approval of construction plans.
7. designed t provide an ae~stheticallytpleasin9, useful and Irnv maintenlance
fadlity.
8. Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this Tentative Plan,
the Developer's engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set stem.
hydrologic and hydraulic calculatiens and profile plots for sizing the SD sy
The engineer shall use the rainfal~ntensity curve obtained from the City PWD
for hydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters.
23
CouatryMeadows$s(a(es, PGau 1,2,3,
PWD S4~'Report
Jafy 09, 1997
Page 10
9. The SD system shall be designed to cony runoff from a 10 year storm event if
Q<100cfs. Use runoff for 50 year stom7 if Q>100 or < 200 cfs. lJse 100 storm
runoff ff Q is >200 cfs.
10. Minimum storm drain diameter shall be 15 inches.
11. Materials shall be PVC (ASTM D 3034 with gaskets), HDPE (meeting ODOT
requirements for corrugated polyethylene storm sewer pipe, including a
provision forpremiumwater-tight coupling bands), or approved equal. Provide
concxete encasement or suitable reinforced cona'ete pipe where required o
prevent pipe deformation in areas of minimum cover.
12. Construct curb inlets with side inlet in curb section and grated inlet in the In
gutter section. If inlets/catch basins ace to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip
of the inlet,• then the inlets and catch'~basins shall be designed to,affocd suitable
"man" entry info the inlets/catdt basin for maintenanee/deaning purposes.
13. Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations. and
flowline plots for. private and public storm drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide
a separate profile.drawing that indicates the HGL on the profile.. Pipes should
maintain cleaning velocity and have adequate capadfies without suroharging.
14. Due to fhe high level. of groundwater in fhe area, the Developer may wish to
incorporate fhe use of a perforated SO system. If so, then the perforated storm
drain system shall be designed to have adequate capadties to:
Convey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum
cleaning velodfles and without suroharging the collection and
conveyance piping; and ~ . .
O~ Mntmize silts, sands, gravels, and fines migration from the nafive soils
into the SD system.
The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the storm
water run-off and run-on ir>fiows into the SD system.
15. A 30~oot virile storm-drain aooess easement shall tie located on fhe lots
adjoining•Hom Creek to afford access to the main channel of Hom Creek.
Gated aooess to accommodate a 15' wide access (beyond the tap of bank of the
Hom Creek channel) shall be provided through all fence crossings of;
easements.
i`
24
CounkyAfcadowsEslatar. Phase I.I.3.
PWD S(go'Rcpart
Ju(y09, 1997
Page II
16. Construction of private storm drains is discouraged by the City: However, if a
private storm drain is to be oonsfnlcted, the following-information should be
provided to the City:
- How will the private storm drains be maintained, repaired, etc.
_ All roof and lot drainage should be drained to the curbline when a
standard curb and gutter section is used.
_ Provide invert elevations and lateral stationing for constnlction of
private storm drain system.
Provide plan and profile views and elevations for any private
storms drain system that maybe proposed.
17. Provide 0.2~oot drop through all manholes and cacti inlets.
18. Roof drains and underclrains 'shall not be directly connected to a public storm
drain lines, and if a standanl curb and gutter section is to be used, the roof
drains and underdrains shall drain to the street at the alrbline, whenever
possible. if a rolled curb and gutter section is to be used, Then the roof drains
and underdrain dschar+ge lines shall either be connected to the rolled gutter
section utilizing a City PWO approved design, or they shall be connected to a
private storm dram system (with a suitable easement dedication for the private
P. .E., that discharges into alicurb ilnlet og marsh ale that is part of the publd/or
storm drain system.
1g, ~~ and gutter sections shall not exceed 350 feet before.entering a catch basin
or curb inlet.
20. Developer shall be cequit+ed to coor<iinoart use of water from Hom ey~lgatton
OtsG1ct to resolve any imgatton rights .
Sanitary Sewer
Existing Facilities - ' 15" =18" BCVSA Gravity Sewer is located in Grant Road.
21"•-24" BCVSsegwervis locatediin 0 t~iWayylor Road
• _ 8-inch sanitary
tKlS~~ ~-
All sanitary sewer collection and~oonveyance system (SS System) design,
construction and testing shall oorrform to the standards B guCrelek Valley e
Oregon DEQ,1990 ~SA)~ a d ~BSC WD Stadards, where applicable.
Sanitary Authority
25