HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Resolution 589RESOLUTION NO. 589
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE,
INCLUDING IMPROVEMENT FEE AND METHODOLOGY THEREFOR
WHEREAS, Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 223 and Central Point
Municipal Code Chapter 11.12 authorize collection of system
development charges for parks. and recreation, and the City has
heretofore retained McDonald Environmental Planning (MEP) to study the
Central Point park system and make recommendations regarding a park
system development charge; and
WHEREAS, MEP has issued. its Park Facilities System Development
Charge Report dated June 20, 1991, analyzing the City's park system
and recommending certain capital improvements and the imposition of a
certain park system development charge; and
fdHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said MEP report and
determined! that new development within the City will benefit from such
capital impfovements and should pay a proportionate share of the cost
thereof, as determined by the methodology incorporated herein; now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. IMPROVEMENT PLAN. The City Council hereby adopts, as
its park improvement plan required by ORS 223.309, the improvement
plan contained in the MEP Park Facilities System Development Charge
Report dated June 20, 1991. Said report defines the cost of projected
capital improvements needed to increase the capacity of the park
system to which the improvement fee is related, and lists capital
improvements that may be funded with improvement fee revenue and the
estimated cost and timing thereof. The capital improvements that may
be funded with the improvement fee revenues collected: hereunder shall
include the following:
A. Land acquisition;
B. Site preparation;
C. Construction of active and passive park and recreation
improvements contained in the MEP improvement plan;
D. All appurtenant facilities and equipment, including but
not limited to, tables, landscaping, swings and
benches;
E. Contingency construction costs;
F. Engineering, planning consultant and administrative
costs for park capital improvements, appurtenant
facilities and. equipment;
G. Interest charges, administrative costs and construction
inspection costs related to such capital improvements;
and
H. Planning consultant costs for developing future park
SDC plans.
1 - RESOLUTION N0. 589 (062491)
The improvement plan adopted herein may be modified from time to
time by resolution of the Council, following an analysis, receipt of
recommendations for modifications, and presentation to the Council.
Section 2. IMPROVEMENT FEE. Effective July 1, 1991, an
improvement fee for any development subject to Chapter 11.12 of the
Central Point Municipal Code shall 6e required in the amount of $515
per dwelling unit for a single family, two family, multiple family,
mobile home, manufactured home or trailer home, as provided in Central
Point Municipal Code Chapter 11.12. In the case of mobile home par{<s
or trailer parks, the improvement fee shall apply to each improved
mobile home or trailer site.
Section 3. METHODOLOGY. The methodology for the park systems
development charge is set forth in the MEP report, and such
methodology is hereby adopted.. The methodology is to examine the
present and future population of the City of Central Point, the
benefits of the present and future park facilities to present and
future residents, and then to divide the total future costs of
necessary facilities by the expected future population, to arrive at a
park SDC on a per single-family residential unit basis.
Section 4. COLLECTION OF CHARGE, Effective July 1, 1991, the
park systems development charge is payable to the City of Central
Point upon application. for a building permit, a site permit for mobile
or manufactured homes, or a development permit for trailer site.
developments. The City Building Official' or the Public works
Director, in case of trailer site permits, shall collect such charges
pursuant to Chapter 11.12 of the Central Point Municipal Code and
shall not issue the applicable permit until such charge has been paid
in full, or arrangements have been made for payment pursuant to CPMC
11.12.09D.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its
passage th i s ~3~`'day of 199/1 . /~ ~
~:~, n ~~1~~-vi~~z9-Ch.~J
C9~C8C ~ CpIINCIL PRESIDENT
ATTEST:
OC/ry ~/_ o~ } //L ~,P 1
City Rep entative
Approved by me this a~~'day of ~-~/ 1991.
Q97Ei1~}970{~~d{@fX f COUNCIL PRESIDENT
2 - RESOLUTION NO. 589 (062491)
EXHIBIT "A"
PARK FACILITIES
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE REPORT
I. IIVI'RODUCTIOIV
The City of Central Point adopted a Land Dedication Ordinance through Ordinance 723
in 1963. As a part of this Ordinance, a fee in lieu of dedication was established so
that if the City of Central Point could not utilize property, they could collect funds.
The funds were to be expended for the purpose of acquiring and developing new or
existing park sites or recreational facilities within the City of Central Point Urban
Growth Boundary.
By adoption of ORS 223.297 through 223.314, the State of Oregon established
procedures for the collection and use of Systems Development Charge (SDGI
revenues. Among other things, these provisions require adoption of an fmprovement
Plan which includes a list of capital improvements to be funded with the SDC
revenues, together with the estimated cost. and timing of each project. Also required
is the adoption by ordinance or resolution of methodology which considers the cost
of the projected capital improvements needed to increase the capacity of the systems
to which the fee is related. This Report will provide the project list and the
methodology for establishing a Park SDC in the City of Central Point.
Summarizing the results of the calculation of the Parks SDC on a per residential unit
basis, this Report determined the total cost of land and facilities necessary to
accommodate future growth (based upon a 2.4% per year population growth) to be
S1,023,300. That sum was divided by the total number of additional households
served, which is 1,683, arriving at a Parks SDC of S550 per unit. This level of SDC
charge and the development funded therewith is projected. to continue the existing
community standard of parks into the next twenty years.
Cost of park improvements are projected to increase at approximately 5% per year,
therefore the Park Reimbursement Fee will be recalculated each year. Recalculation
of the Park Reimbursement Fee will include the increase in cost of improvements and
the amount of improvements which have been completed.
11. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES
Recreational opportunities in the Central Point community occur at both passive and'
active facilities. This study shall take both types of recreation into consideration and
make comparisons to the standards established by the National Recreation and Park
Association.
1
A. PASSIVE RECREATION:
The passive recreational opportunities occur predominantly at the Bear Creek
Greenway (42.3 acres) managed by Jackson County Parks, and is currently in the
development phase of different segments. This open space is comprised of a trail
system with both walking/jogging pathways and horse riding trails. It is planned to
have one access point located near the Central Point community and planned for
development in the near future. The recreational opportunities offered here include
walking, jogging, horseback riding, and nature interpretation. Also, the existing parks
in the City of Central Point offer passive recreation opportunities including picnics and.
walking.
B. ACTIVE RECREATION:
The active recreation. facilities in the Central Point Park System occur at the three (3)
developed parks, and a City Patk adjacent to a school. Other facilities are planned to
be located at two 12- undeveloped properties.
Although the existing parks provide basic recreation opportunities, the City Council is
currently planning to continue to develop existing and future parks at the same level
as past park development to meet future demands.
Table 1 identifies both the passive and active recreational acreage in the Central Point
Park System. This system is comprised of the developed City property, Bear Creek
Greenway, 5.5 acres of undeveloped park, and properties adjacent to Richardson
School.
TABLE 1
RECREATION OPEN SPACE
EXISTING OPfN SPACE:
Central Park 1.8& Acres
Van Horn Park 2..00 Acres
Liberty Park .50 Acres
Griffin Creek -Undeveloped 5.53 Acres
Bear Creek Greenway 42.30 Acres
School District #6 -Developed'
- Undeveloped
TOTAL ACREAGE 3.62 Acres
5.00 Acres
60.81
2
C. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY REPLACEMENT VALUE
The Central Point Park system was evaluated to inventory the existing community
facilities. These activities and their land area requirements have been summarized in
the Recreation Facilities Replacement Value Table (Table 2~.
TABLE 2
RECREATION FACILITY REPLACEMENT VALUE
Activity/Facility Existing
Facility Replacement
Value
Softball 2 S 110,250
Baseball Field 2 110,250
Multi-Purpose Court 1 16,500
Tennis Court 2 88,000
Basketball Court 1 16,500
Restroom Facilities 1 60,600
Picnic Shelters 1 25,400
Playground Areas 2 37,500
Bear Creek Greenway 42.3 840,000
Undeveloped Acreage 5.5 110,000
Developed Acreage 7.98 159.000
TOTAL 51, 574,000
Table 2 indicates the total replacement value of the existing park system is
51,574,000. This existing park system benefits a population that is estimated to be
7735 on July 1, 1991. Therefore, the per capita. value of park facilities is 5203.00.
3
TABLE 3
RECREATION. FACILITY STANDARDS
Activity/Facility NRPA Std. City Std_ Existing
Facility Space for
Activity
Softball Field 1/5,000 1/3,750 2 1.5-2 Acres
Baseball Field 1 /5,000 1 /3,750 2 3-3.5 Acres
Multi-Purpose Court 1 /1.0,000 1 /3,750 2 .25 Acre
Tennis Court 1/2,000 1/3,750 2 7,200 s.f.
Basketball Court 1 /5,000 1 /3,750 1 5 to 8,000
s.f.
Restroom Facilities 1 .25 Acre
Picnic Shelters 1 .25 Acre
Play Ground Areas 2 .25 Acre
Table 3 also indicates the actual area. required. for each activity and enables calculation
of acreage minimums for meeting these average demands. Some activities identified
here can not be accommodated on the existing park sites. Softball and baseball fields.
require substantial areas and therefore, to meet this future demand, the City will have
to acquire additional. land located within the community to serve the growing
neighborhoods.
4
In Table 4, the following specific park lands have been identified for development of
these activities and facilities. The improvements listed below include the amenities
necessary to provide a functional facility such as, but not exclusively, to power,
lighting, parking, site furnishings, landscaping and irrigation.
TABLE 4
RECREATION NEEDS
Development Timing/Acreage
Activity 1995 2000 2005 2011 Acres
1 Softball Field 0 0 ' SE Park 0 2
1 Baseball Field 0 0 SE Park 0 3.5
1 Multi-Purpose Court 0 Griffin 0 0 .25
2 Tennis Courts 0 Griffin SE Park 0 .50
1 Basketball Court 0 SE Park 0 .25
3 Restroom Facilities 0 Griffin SE Park SE Park .75
4 Picnic Shelters Van Horn Griffin SE Park SE Park 1.0
3 Play Ground Areas 0 Griffin SE Park SE Park .75
The acreage needed without parking and general open space for transition between
activities totals approximately 9.0 acres. When adding the connecting spaces,
minimum size of lots available, and the parking needed to provide the ball fields and.
park development, the total area would add up to 19.5 acres.
IV. II~iPROVEn/IENT PLANS
Those facilities identified in Table 4 as being needed in the years 1995 through 2011
have been proposed for the park properties. In the case of Griffin Creek Park, it is
likely that the demand for this facility will correspond to the development of the
residential neighborhood surrounding the park property and the proposed
improvements for Griffin Creek Park, serve to provide the City standard. The following
listing of proposed improvements is comprised of items which serve to meet the City
recreation standards as the population grows. The park improvements for each park
are itemized below with their location, estimated timing, and. representative cost.
5
TABLE 5
FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PARK ITEM COST TOTAL
Van Horn S 34,500
Picnic Shelter 5 34,500
Griffin Creek S 238,600
IViulti-Purpose Area S 18,000
Play Equipment S 37,500
Restroom/Storage S 60,600
Picnic Shelter S 34,500
Tennis Court S 88,000
SE Park S 360,200
Picnic Shelter (2) 5 69,000
Restroom/Storage (2) S 116,000
Playground Area (2) 5 40,000
Softbaii Field S 50,000
Baseball. Field S 50,000
Basketball Court S 18,000
COST OF IMPROVEMENTS S 633,300
i nese ngures mcwoe Design piannmg ana tacnrcy costs.
V. ACQUISITION OF PARK LANDS
To meet the community recreation and park standard in the year 2005, Central Point
will need to acquire additional land and develop facilities by 2011. Central Point needs
to acquire approximately 19.5 acres to meet the standard that community leaders
have established. (See Table 1 -Recreation Facilities. Open Space Needed). These
acquisitions shall require substantial capital expenditures by the City. In fact, based
on the average cost of undeveloped land of 520,000 per acre in 1993, a 5390,000
dollar investment into property would need to be made. The park lands under
consideration here are located adjacent to Griffin Creek. (5.53 acresl, in the Southeast
quadrant of the City on Tax Lot 3300, 3301, and 3404, T37S, R2W, Section 11, and
Tax Lot 3404 T37S R2W Section 12C, (4.5 acres) see the vicinity map for the park
locations and in the northeast quadrant of the City adjacent to Griffin Creek and I-5
and Highway 99.
6
Therefore, when combining the acquisition costs identified with the proposed
development costs of the park land, the City of Central Point is looking at a minimum
development cost of 51,023,300 to bring Griffin Creek Park and the Southeast Park
into recreational use.
TABLE 6
TOTAL COST FOR PARK & RECREATION
SYSTEM DEVELOPMEfVT
Definition Cost of Items
Expansion of Existing Park Facilities S 34,500
Acquisition of Park Properties (19.5 Acres) S 390,000
Development of New Acquisitions S 598.800
TOTAL COST FOR RECREATION 51,023,300
VI. METHODOLOGY
A. Explanation of Population Statistics and Projected Population.
On Page 4 of this Report, Item III-A, 1, 2, 3, discussed future projections. In order to
establish a future growth statistic, a 2.4% growth rate was used as a conservative
Tong-term prediction. However, programs such as this are reviewed every year.
B. Benefits to Existing Population.
On Page 3 of this Report, it was determined that the replacement value for existing
land and park facilities development is 51,579,000. The improvements benefit a
population of 7735 for a cost per person of approximately 5203.
C. Benefits to Future Population.
The proposed new facilities acquisition and development defined above, will serve a
total population of 12,430 and will cost 51,023,300, benefitting an additional City
population of 5041 people.
D. SDC Calculation -Total Cost divided by Future Population Benefit.
The total cost of S 1,023,300, divided by number of benefitted persons, 5041, equals
5203 per person. The City has an average of 2.71 persons per residential unit, so
that the Parks Systems Development Charge is 5203 multiplied by 2.71 or 5550.00
per dwelling unit.
7
RESOLUTION NO. 589
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE,
INCLUDING IMPROVEMENT FEE AND METHODOLOGY THEREFOR
WHEREAS, Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 223 and Central Point
Municipal Code Chapter 11.12 authorize collection of system
development charges for parks and recreation,. and the City has
heretofore retained McDonald Environmental Planning (MEP) to study the
Central Point park system and make recommendations regarding a park
system development charge; and
WHEREAS, MEP has issued its Park Facilities System Development
Charge Report dated June 20, 1991, analyzing the City's park system
and recommending certain capital improvements and the imposition of a
certain. park system development charge; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said MEP report and
determined that new development within the City will benefit from such
capital improvements and should pay a proportionate share of the cost
thereof, as determined by the methodology incorporated herein; now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. IMPROVEMENT PLAN. The City Council hereby adopts, as
(((( ~ its park improvement plan required by ORS 223.309 ,. the improvement
l__,,~ plan contained in the MEP Park Facilities System Development Charge
Report dated June 20, 1991. Said. report defines the cost of projected:
capital improvements needed to increase the capacity of the park
system to which the improvement fee is related., and lists capital
improvements that may be funded with improvement fee revenue and the
estimated cost and timing thereof. The capital improvements that may
be funded with the improvement fee revenues collected hereunder shall
include the following:
A. Land acquisition;
B. Site preparation;
C. Construction of active and passive park and recreation
improvements contained in the MEP improvement plan;
D. All appurtenant facilities and equipment, including but
not limited to, tables, landscaping, swings and
benches;
E. Contingency construction costs;
F. Engineering, planning consultant and administrative
costs for park capital improvements, appurtenant
facilities and equipment;
G. Interest charges, administrative costs and construction.
inspection costs related to such capital improvements;
and
H. Planning consultant costs for developing future park
SDC plans.
1 - RESOLUTION N0. 589 (062491)
The improvement plan adopted herein may be modified from time to
time by resolution of the Council, following an analysis, receipt of
~. recommendations for modifications, and presentation to the Council.
,erection 2. IMPROVEMENT FEE. Effective July 1, 1991, an
improvement fee for any development subject to Chapter 11.12 of the
Central Point Municipal Code shall be required in the amount of $515
per dwelling unit for a single family, two family, multiple family,
mobile home, manufactured home or trailer home, as provided in Central
Point Municipal Code Chapter 11.12. In the case of mobile home parks
or tra filer parks, the improvement fee shall apply to each improved
mobile home or trailer site.
Section 3. METHODOLOGY. The meth d 1 ~~ Q~- the park systems
development charge is set forth in the t, and such
methodology is hereby adopted. The methodology is to examine the
present and future population of the City of Central Point, the
benefits of the present and future park facilities to present and
future residents, and then to divide the total future costs of
necessary facilities by the expected. future population, to arrive at a
park SDC on a per single-family residential unit basis.
Section 4. COLLECTION OF CHARGE. Effective July 1, 1991, the
park systems development charge is payable to the City of Central
Point upon application for a building permit, a site permit for mobile
or manufactured homes, or a development permit for trailer site
developments. The City Building Official or the Public Works
~• Director, in case of trailer site permits, shall collect such charges
~,~~ pursuant to Chapter 11.12 of the Central Point Municipal Code and
shall not issue the applicable permit until such charge has been paid
in full, or arrangements have been made for payment pursuant to CPMC
1.1.12.090.
Passed by th~Council and~A 51gf10Ci by me in authentication of its
City Rep entative
Approved by me this a~_~"day of
1991 .
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
passage this ~5 day of 199/-1._ Q,, •
COIINCZL PRESIDENT
ATTEST:
2 - RESOLUTION N0.
589 (062491 )