Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 1, 2007,,~ ~_ i~~~~~' ~, ~~~$1'1 -• Io~~eg ~~u&~~a ~.'~t 1SlIli1I"1i11t~, {'f?ITl)1~I:ti~;1Oil Cola_tlie vlt~cr~~~ernl!;~ C.an,~_~.~ [~i~-I~- l.}art~i~_i:.i;li<arc. Cl)tach 1'il~Itic[, l'rl,l [?iYc:l:, ~~lil<t: t)1i~~c:)'4 iltli~ .)tiptill ~ iUl'it'~ A. Rc;~, ic1~ arltl ~al~l~l•c>v~ll c)[~,~~171 it .^i~ '{)()"I, 1'3~11~1)iai,~: C`t)l~lllliS`~it)l~ ~,-1i)~tat:~s VI. s~'~~.~d~'~~~ Pis. ] - 1 ~. ~`i~~ ~lt~ (3 /~~:~. !1 17ta171ic hc~~Il-Il~`>>, (c) cc))ttiilcl' ~t t'c°clu~°st r<~l-,l.t~l~t~~tiv~~ f'l~:aa) ~a~71)l'c:)~~a1 fo) the r)tall~o~c~ of c.l'c°atir~g f-c)ur {~f) sil~~rlc~ l-archly resiclc;l~ti~a1 li~tc it3 ~a17 l~_.1--f~, `h"a`zl l'~lll~ll~',l.(?1"12I1L? tlltitt'll.lcll")Cl lil4't]"t1ls~Cl l)1~ 1[)t' ,1~aCl~~c)la ~ (?lailtV -~ i..l°titi{)I'~5 111c a' ~a`: 1~rl~j "?l~,% lOlll3, '1 a~ l,c~t {) ~{){). "l he acicll'csb i~ ~"?7;~ °~~ax>tiv~ 13tatt~ I;~jl~c arld is lc>c~ltccl zx)rth c~l~ 13ta~11 L,at1c~. ~~,~c:~~t c~i~ :~l~t~~~'v 13tttt% l:,a)t~. ~a1d .~~uth o,, 'l~ilnothv ~tre~t. :'~pl~licrallt: ~~3~I,ttht~~n Q~ .['~ttl7~ la Ch~al~cellc)a'; :~~~r~)~t: 'l crr~? ~tla'~'I~. iztc. Pis. I - 3t~ B. ~~~~; ~~~o "~1''7 ~ ~~:~. !1 1~t1171ic last:z'iz~~ io cc})~5ic_lc.z' <t rcc[u~:si [ol- ~! (`,a5~ C` ~'<~;~i~~l3c:~ tc~ tl,~ l~uai~t7er c>' alla~~,ccl ~jcjl't,c~l~ to t<lk~; ~tcGtss #i°c)r1~ ~± :_'() ioo~ llat%l;~c~1c~ e~< „ rt7~iat ili j?i'i'7)Gll'<.tllililrttlCl 1'('~'lerSi' Ol` ~l 1 l't1t<l~aVf ['1<lil f1(71)~1C~ltli))1. l he (7111 ~!tll', 1`t)t' ihiti ~11)~hc:atlc7l~ )~ tc7 ~a.t:cc)it~117oca~It~ accc_~,~ )c>1' ~~ ihl)°cl loc'rt't)17~ ti1c~ a~~lt~l~olc° iasclnc:l~t. [_he ~~11t71CC;1 ln'c?17a~lly iti loctlc~cl it7 ~al~ [Z ••1--Cj. 1~L~ic:.icllti~al ~il7~slt~ 1~<al7lily Ic7a~it7~T cll~'it;t al~c is icic~a~tifi,cl oa7 ill' J~:iclt~oal ~ ~aitrliy Esc°SSOt'~~, ~~I~i[~ tai, -? 7`~ ? l~% ~ {)13{',1'a~ 1c3t J ()t?; ~ic~c3);ss i~ 1 !72 13G~a11 .[_,~in<:. th~;~al r ~.'`~1)l~lic;G~)Ii: 1'~lul {_)'c~tlt ~~$. 3 ~ - ~~ C. File No. 07103. A public hearing to consider a request far a Tentative Plat, Minor Land Partition, Flag Lat application to create three (3}residential parcels. A Class C Variance applicatian has been filed in preparation of this proposal, The subject property is located in an R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 3'7S 2W 1 ODC, Tax Lat 10{ly address is 17'72 Beall Lane. Qwner/Applicant: Pa~zl Crraut Pis. ~t8 - 84 D. File Na. 71.06. A public hearing to consider a request for Conditional 1Jse Permit for the proposed fitness center and second floor professional offices in conjunction with a Site Plan applicatian to develop a three (3) story mixed commercial and residential building in the TC}l~-HMR, High Mix Residential zoning district. The subject property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1188, Tax Lots 500, 600 and '700; address is 312 C?ak Street. Applicant: The Grassing at Center Paint, LLC, Agent: Tammy Malot VII. MISCELLANEfJUS A, Tree Removal Application -- Lane Redwood Grave (Par~menter), File No, 01109 B, Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Update C. Regional Problem Solving Update VIII. ADJGlUR1tiIMENT City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 200"7 I. MEETING CALLED TC} (7RDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL; Commissioners Connie Moczygcmba, Chuck Piland, Pat Beck, Damian Idiart, Mike C~livcr, and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Dcvelopznent Directoz; Connie Clone, Community Planner; Lisa Morgan, Planni~ag Technician, a~ad Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. III. C{~RRESPC}NDENCE There was one item of correspondence pertinent to item A on the agenda that was distributed to Commissioners. IV. MINUTES Wayne Riggs made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 6, 200'7 Planning Commission meeting with corrections reflecting that Mike Qliver voted "no" on Resolutions 7I9 and '720. Pat Beck seconded the motion. R£}LL CALL: Idiart, abstained; Qliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VL BI~SINESS A, File No. 7038. A public hearing to consider a request for Site Plan approval for the eoznmercial development of office and retail buildings. The subject property is located in a C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district, consists of approximately 4.87 acres, and is identified on the Jackson Cozznty Assessor's map as 37S 2W OIC, Tax Lot 802. The proposed project area is located on East Pine Street {Biddle Road} east of Hanzz•ick Road. Applicant: Excelsior Investment Co,; Agent: Jim Maize, Maize and Associates Pkrnnitzg Conznzission ~llitzutes ~~t~it 3, 2(107 Page 2 There were no conflicts or ex parte coznmunicatioc3s to disclose. Commissioners Wayne Riggs and Pat Beck stated they had made site visits. Connie Clone, Community Planner, presented the staff report and explained that the applicant had submitted six different concepts for development of their project which reflected their desire to maintain some flexibility with the project. Ms. Chine assured that there are minimal differences between the concepts presented, and the analysis in her staff report reflected site plans with the greatest and least number of potential uses. All elements of the master plan would rernaiz~ the saznc throughout and access in and out of the development would remain the same as well. Landscaping plans for the project would resemble those of Les Schwab's property to the east to ensure consistency. Reciprocal panting and cross-access easements will be executed for the benefit of all property owners, and parking requirements will accommodate each property owners' needs. Architectural design of the buildings will be consistent with variations in color and textures to create a look of separateness. Ms. Chine directed Commissioners' attention to the memorandum from Matt Samitore of the Public Works Department, which was distributed prior to the meeting, addressing traffic conce~-~~s. Public Works has requested that the applicant provide a traffic impact analysis based on full build out of the site. With the exception of the possible inclusion of a car wash in conjunction with a lobe and oil center, all other proposed businesses are permitted uses in the C-4 zoning district. Community Development Director Tom Humphrey added that any one of the six concepts presented by the applicant could work with a previously approved suMivision. Mr. Humphrey confirmed that shared parking and cross access easements would be in place prior to final plat approval, and landscaping of the development would be compatible with that of neighboring parcels to maintain uniformity. Mr. Humphrey further added that recommended conditions of approval would include a traffic impact analysis. Jim Maize, agent for Excelsior Investment Co., came forward and advised commissioners that tentative plan approval for the creation of five (5} parcels had already been granted, and applicant was in the process of creating a master plan for the properties with a consistent architectural design. The ability to provide continued maintenance of shared parking and landscaping would be provided by CC&T~s to be recorded at time of final plat, Mr. Maize stated further that while trying to anticipate what the commercial market will do in the future, applicant is asking for flexibility with the design of the development. Although variations between concepts are minor, any major modifications would come back to the Planning Commission for approval. Mr. Maize presented that the applicant is in general agreement with conditions of approval as proposed. PlEinning Conrrnission l~irr¢rtc>s tiFril3, 2~it7 Page 3 Tom I-luznphrey indicated the City would be completing its Transportation Systczn Plan in June of .2(}0'7 and would make every effort to coordinate with applicants to facilitate their developznez-zt and get the City's improvements done at tl~e same tune if possible. Bruce Abeloe, architect for the applicant, came forward and presented a palette of colors to be offered for the different propez-ties in the development. lvlr. Abeloe described variations proposed izz height and color of the buildings and indicated that the buildings to the back of the property would be two-story with single story buildings iza front. He anticipated the height would range between l9 - 24 feet with an arts and crafts style of exterior design. The general idea is to maintain consistency in theme, color azad materials. In adclztion, all mechanical components and garbage receptacles will be screened froze view. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Jinn Maize, applicant's agent, came forward and requested that the project lac approved as presented. The public portion ofthe hearing was then closed. Damian Idiart made a motion to approve Resolution No. '723 granting conditional approval of the Site Plan for the mixed use commercial planned shopping facility development on five {5} lots known as the North Valley Center submitted by Excelsior Investment Company in a C-4, Tourist and ©ffice Professional ;zoning district {Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W O1C, Tax Lot 802} based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Cheek Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Idiart, yes; t~liver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. 1Vlotzon passed. B. File No, 0'092. A public hearing to consider a request for the demolition of a residential building of undocumented historic interest located at the corner of ©ak and Third Streets {3I2 Qak Street} in the T4D-HMR zoning district. The subject property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W I I BB, Tax Lot '700. Applicant. Malot Enterprises There were no conflicts or ex pane communications to disclose. Wayne Riggs and Pat Beck advised they had made site visits. Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician, presc:ntc:d tlzc staff report and stated the house in tluestion is located across from Gity I-lall at the corner of Cak and Third Streets. Ms. Morgan said the applicant wishes to demolish the existing building and redevelop the property to the standards of the TOD-HMR zoning district by creating a commercial development with residential units included as part of the development. The existing structure is old and is not consistent with the other homes located in the same general Planning Conzrni.ssican l~~inrates ~~Jr~i13, 211117 Page 4 vicinity. In addition to the issues set forth in the staff report, applicant advises that the property cannot be insured. The applicant is asking the Planning Commission to forward a favorable reeommerzclation to the City Council for dcnaolition of the structure located at 312 Oak Street. Tom Malot carne forward and informed Commissioners they would like to tear the residence down because it is cost prohibitive to rcnov4zte or move it. A potential buyer would not be able to secure a loan on it either. Tom 1-~uznphrey, Con~n~unity Development Director, advised Comznissioncrs the reason this matter is before them for consideration is clue to the fact that a picture of this house shows up in the City's coznprchensive plan. although it is not on any sort of historical register with the State. No one of any historical significance or importance has ever lived there. Third Street has been identifzed as a civic corridor in the Dowz~.town Revitalization flan which is why City Ball is oriented the way it is. Although the plan was never adopted, it is supported by zoning and the development ofproperty. Tom Malot added they would like to help improve the downtown area. The public portion of the hearing was opened, and as no one came forward to speak either for or against the issue, the public hearing was then closed. Chuck PiIa~td made a motion to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Couucil for demolition of the house located at 312 Oak Street {Jackson County Assessor's map 3'7S 2W 11BS, Tax Lot ']04} based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: ldiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, yes. Motion passed. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Removal of White flak Tree located at 312 Oak Street Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician, presented tha staff report requesting consideration of a tree removal permit for a large white oak tree located at 312 Oak Street in preparation for amixed-use redevelopment project. The subject tree's root system would be compromised by any development on or near the property. Since it is inventoried on the City's significant tree list, the Planning Commission needs to approve removal of the tree. Connie Moczygemba asked staff if anything could be done to ensure that some of the City's lost tree canopy could be recouped, Lisa Morgan responded that 15°l~ of the project was required to be landscaped. Community Development Director Tozxz Humphrey added that every effort has been made to incorporate the planting of street PlUnning C'o~arrrrissic~~i Mf3~utes ~tx-i13, 2t1t77 Page S trees with new development, and more trees are laeitag planted thaca are being removed. Discussion followed concerning the size of trees that are customarily planted when development occurs, and Mr. Humphrey explaizaed that power lines and parking lots make it difficult to plant larger trees. Mr. ~-Iuznphrey further suggested that perhaps the focus should lac on planting larger trees in City parks. Wayne Riggs made a motion #o recommend approval of a tree removal permit far the white oak tree located at 31.2 flak Stree# based on the recommendations of Seaver Tree Service and contingent upon approval of the Site Plan application for the redevelopment of the carne property. Cheek Piland seconded the motion. Rf~LL CALL: Zdiart, yes; {diver, na; Beek, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, Yes. Motion passed. Tree Removal irr Lorre Redwood Grove Planning Technician Lisa Morgan presented the staff report for the removal of the tree located on Lot 1 of Lozxe Redwood Grave subdivision. At the tiz~e of tentative plan approval, applicant designated the subject tree to be added to the City's list of significant trees, thereby necessitating Planning Commission approval for its re~~ovai. Construction activity has damaged the tree's root system, and applicant Failed to follow the recommendations of the certified arborist that he hired to assess the damage to the tree to preserve the health of the tree. Commissioners discussed what could have been done to prevent this situation frazn. happening, and Ms. Morgan suggested that the tree could have been marked and fenced prior to excavation, By doing so, there was a chance the tree could have been preserved. Ms. Morgan stated it would be in the best interest of potential future homeowners that the tree tae removed at this time, prior to any additional development in the subdivision. Ray Paz~nenter, applicant and property owner, said any fences constructed within the subdivision would be right next to the tree, neighbors are scared of the tree, and added he would be agreeable to planting other trees in the subdivision. Chuck Piland made a motion to table further discussion of this issue until the May Planning Commission meeting irr order to provide staff with an opportunity to consult with the City's arborist #o form a recommendation of what could be required of the applicant for the replacement of the injured tree. Wayne Riggs seconded the motion. RC)LL CALL: Idiart, no; fJliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Riggs, no. Motion passed. Urban Growth Soundar /Re Tonal Problem Solving U date Tom Humphrey distributed two possible proposals for an Urban Growth Boundary amendment which will be presented to the Citizen's Advisory Cornrnittec on April 10, 207 for their consideration. lJf the two, proposal `B" looks like it would be more Plrtnazitzg Coratratisricarr 11~Iiaautes rl~a•i13, 2CJCJ~ Page 6 acceptable as tl~ze State has contested a prapasal to expazzd into marginal agricultural laz~.cls west of Granfi load. The City is attempting to get appraxiznately .~00 acres of land included in an expansion and ante there is an agrceznent an a directzan, infarznation will be brought back to fine Planning Cazx~znissian. Mr. ~-Iuznpi~rcy suggested a joint zneetzza~; of the Planning Coznznission and City Council to discuss properties currently within our Uzbaz~ Growth Bauzadary that are as yet unannexed. IX. ADJOURNMENT Chuck Pi~and made a motion to adjourn the meeting. L}aznian ldiart secazaded the znatian. Meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the April 3, 2007 Planning Caznznission meeting were approved by the Planning Caznmission at its meeting on May 1, 2007. Planning Caznmission Chair C:~A~~~~~o~ T~I~TATI~''~''~ PL~A~ ~~t~~.i tl-tl I1~; ~.~,.1.,~~2i~ is 1 ,t- 1 i;„ _ w~,. _ ~~~"- l :gin ui;,.~,i -~?i~~, 4.Q11 iii 11 ili ~ ~~; ('I i- I ~ :. 1:,)I~f ~.~ .ill; (_.t~yJ l~'~II ~.~„!' ,~. 1't~t?lii~ hctrl-i~~s,? its cc~l?sitltl~ <r l~talt~r[ivc 1'1<rta <!r?plic.<liit?n 1<~1~ ilr: l~rll•17t~sc t~f-c~r< <tliz~z~, i~t~llr' (~'~) lt~sidc:l~tia~~ tl`15 -- il'1C't'l` ~ ~ ~ ili~,~~' 1l)t> ;111(1 (~llt' ~tilih ctrl ~X1Stl(1~~ l~it)?1rC 1OJ,lti'i~ i1t >.~ i ~ ,`~i3lf>lt~l' lil:ti{° I,<IIIC;. ! 11L `~lli,je:CY ljt'crllc~t-ty is locatc~l it? .~r~ 1Z--1-(~. I~csitl~t;ti<tl `~ir~`tl~~ ! ~llttil~ i,t~rrin~~ c1i5lrici ~lljci i~ itlcltiili~::( c>1~ il3~ i~t~l~.~ut~. ivt?U111~' :1~~tii'ti>()I• S lil~ill <'3~ ;~/~; '~~t" 11~U1~, ~ <tX I,()~ ~~,J~~. ,`~j?17~i1.:ll3t; i`'1<t1111~~~ c~_ 1>' t LrSGt ~~'~C)(~~?c~11_ ~~l~illll,,'fl~ ~ ~,,. ~ ;_;;!.tl ~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~a _...~ ~___._ ~_ m~ mm_~~..._._ ~~_.m .... w .. ~~-_..M~ ._µ...__..a~_..~_ ~[ hi' ,ti~ll)~('C11~i YLI~i 1?~~t~Cl Ct7I~1St~ C1~ iC1OC(?517~1~11C'!`;' .~)t) Ut X31) ~C1_'C. ~ lli.'IL' I5 i1I1 ('.~11t171~ 110[3?.` {7~1 hrt~posed l,c?i 1 ~~f~ tlr~ "1~e.11t<ttivi~ 1'1<ali tlr~t ~~,~iil rerl~~lir1. It ti~'~ls ~'t?IlSiltlt;ietl i11 l t~9<~. 'l~herc is a si1~d lcrct~ied ~~ithir~ ills l~rol7i:»c:tl a:t~e,~s tt~ l:c~t ; ztr~cl 1 tlt<li ~~il! lie x~t,t1';i~tiLi1. 'l'l~e e~i~ti11~~ hc~tr~i' can 11raj,c~str~1 List 1, rrtect tltc st'it~tlcl, rr;cltail•~rne.z~is fur i11e otlin~ c13str~ict. Lc?t~ 1 ~tttd ? ~~iruldt<tl~c ir~iii~ icltt~rl tlil•eet accc:~ tart{~ titlr~~~,v [3ttite I,~lr,e, ~~ith I.~3i~ ~ <rr~t~ 4 t'al:in;_ at~ccss 9t~c~~71 ~~ :1~1~t`,11o1e sr~t~~l»erlt ~,nci il~e~~ tyre t;c>tisiclcred 7a~ lt~is. 1`l~c }>rc~pi>seci "~`~r~t,tt~te;1'F,11~ ahplic:~~tit?n t~lccts ~tll ,'ec~ui~etne~~ls. ast~tltliricdil~ci;~t~ti1 in t1tL ~~1~r1~~ti11~~ Ihp~tru~~ct?i lita~iii~~`~. ([~~3t`~r° t4~ ~~'11~~~I~~~~o r_ _ _ ___ '~o isstriv; I~z~ ~, ,_ lJw,~n ncrtes~ ~ltrri~~~; the review csf this ai?pli~~rti~~~~. 1. f~11~Iicar~t ,11x11 rl~eci the reclllit•cz~lcnfs ol"t11e 1'1<trll~irl~ Del?izl~ti}3ctat, 1'u1>1ic ~,~;';:~rs 1)~har?.~~et1t, I3uil~lil2~, T~ep~rt11ie1St and c>~ltsid~ a~.~~.t~ciws. ~%1~} T:~stztt~Terltative l'1~1r1 Page 1 ofd ATTACHMENTSIE~:I~IBZ'fS: Attachment "A" -- Tentative Plan Attachment "B" -~-Planning Department Findings Attachment "C" ~-Public Vdorl~s Staff Report Attachment "D" -- Building Department Staff Report Attachment "E" -Rogue bailey Sewer Services Comments Attachment "l~" -Proposed Resolution AC.TIC}lY. Consider approval for a Tentative Plan application to create four {4} single family lots. RF;C(IMMENDA'I"11C11tiT: Approve the Tentative Plan application per Staff Report dated May 1, 201x7 including alt attacnmen~s and exhibits to create four {4} single family lots, known as Riley Estates Subdivision, Riley EstatesTentative Plan Page 2 of 2 Mx ,i Wn nxr. ~ni rY+ satr ++r rr 'N+Yt SkUlB .w0+0 P<.C AY RTY4W A (^ tt !~: ` emery} ra iTtOx ,ft iCIC ;Cyx 3ut tiJ 1t1xnNYd 1G #M.rITr 'dYl! iljrYlfUt Y .P, rtdt r {1 I .. n~i !33!'VB:+.'0?Y3t R7.U`1'7txdY?31T tT~MJYAA ~ML YJ tM1ttlduirYl t3?,t)dip.Y. ~T3: -.'#1Iirc~YJG7E .t vhs n+n?tv7~v ;p-Pt^CU ~~tYa Of^,~ ~3tY.75 ~Y } n r aror rtr !y ~~.. ({ 55369dTSM~iJ~~ I Y3, 1 1Wi~ztfti ~ (~ aa~cti•<c tai~oxta ,_ _ (33 O[ ~t(xkC ( t~ \ ~ .°. s ~ 1 '' r 3 { .. ' { 3 'r ~ { ~ ~ "y~~~ QTt~f7lp5 K9? ~~ 1 I t i { ~ { .~~- t t97~~ a ~ ~# ~ t Y. t ~~ . t l ~ _~. °' . ,w~I.an~t Yrik- : { }~ ,. f ~ .... {.CP'}S .......:.::, ~:.:_... _e , r PP I r5..PtTJ I.r'J$ 91.'0f ~ ~~' t"zxerzfos >xca _.} ~ f .' ta~ctrrFZ3m ra t ~ , i F ~ r tvt 1t ,rri tyC5 aicP ,yr ^Y . 4' 3n'> ~~ vac4cst {+A i i 107 ~ 1 ~ (Y ,~, ~ ' i , 1 I {t ~[ ~~''"QQ t 5 ii-Mt (+d'r4 yr i ~ ~1 ~ /'~ I K I1I ! I tN,KTt f:}6il Y 1~1 ~ ~(E 8Q?NC<C Q~tA4'LC '" yx tt xfx t t LU ;NREh'SP ,t t m. t ~k ~i r1>GY r _.. pWiu22f I` „~ iMa ~ !} ~~ E W Nt ~ r s ~ i {` lrMitS .9C c2 ~~ ~ w~t} a an~e .n >mtxev i ~ s i'" ~_ tM ~ ! 4 t 1at?~ t ~^i +~~ t r ',L, n»>ts ,r Y:fk4 ,P FMi 1 iI4A rx ~ tN?4' Kr {rt%t) YCYJY !iJ'Qb 0 xwsrtr:n aiM75 xlrrzP+Ys Ss~} ~x:nn rNroo moats d :+'Nn NYV.n .i~ 1xrtQtN ,iNu NTtLT tfifN4 YrN{] ;vti3Gb1 SM]e133T# i4 )"{'d 'JNRt dlQ ttA rN.7y FTO u7t7n ;va tco xw t~zmam' 3~xcasti ~ g~- Ax; c'drJ U: wt xavu 7~'d flat v.laN jr :+Wt}S J ..ntlm ,xarn:rcNkP ~.. ......... ~,• fist r. YM yr t+'~7+'Y.14i50cc`W -•~' SY+T tai GT9?.:Jtlu ~-' "" 6+1'7M1fU'SUC aSiSr xtf}t+t WTI 1:9 .rq,~.. .xxrr xrou.vY:u ara»m ipPrw --s^ri._ y,+T a'+6 aii3 Gw'Md7Y?%ext ......A+-- Yui ntYA ---)x- T+~x Pv. ..._.p~ tru: NrxQ ns»ts --~--t5 ^-° Qti~'3" L»•t uaw+aY zkrrmt~v asku r~ioostto ~' ~, r`'.~.r aKZ;37VU'13 G'f+Td't '1Y Na}ert• S~toiluk3d };iyLH tW 4'slti h'D'?.'it~TAYY'/SY J~IJ Ntbt]N }.C' SNO.i9.iN~iS'2tik"E "{Yt V t4~.~".rEN :ar~I 'x:~n~~ns~Hxr.~.r. LUS`Lt5 (3f}'Y:1 txJ'.kN[!Jd "EY;I.I.N?i3 .9N"Y"f h.1.kCYII a1.4YdH3 4I.Ln ~Cr.: £P Nf)7+`litfi',E.K {C'~k!'1 YM.I.4iY7 ;a,NY? A.f_GtT11 AntON> Y:GC tT0"t"i~7NYHJ -V yryg7.~V.fi pun ~v M7F~t.L_L.t+i'V cnavn v:NY.;:i].'xJMi TY kGxt'l.r ix s.,s,c rr-v m}.xx .k~ic*t ~+u,~~ s. vav«vsm+iAe+cn~ot~M a#ic:+,r QE ,Ytitl.l2:.IV U.Vttlx1lU SLV;lrt4MM Vlt.w, <v»tv ~r> ;SC1ISfAiC18i1S t' wa aN 1~{~~~~(~c~stiso :~~~_i£~l.C:r~a~~tttllp~~~~ ,_- I~;_~F~:i;r, )Il t1~1{' 717£1tCC "[' o~ i'E?7lSlif£')"tl(lol? of) "c'1 ~~ C',Y)t~}tf~'C ~~{t111 f~{!(7~1i'i)~1t311 tO C1'C`il)('10'tl' ~'a~ Sll~1~~~{' aY~nll~- d'E'sicfei)ii<aJ 1{ifs, it~l£~altifieil on ~dC key{.)Y~l {'olar)t.,~ lOss£ ssO~'s ta)s f) il~, 37 ~~'~' ~.[Oi:7)3, 'C ~:ax f'f':rvlC~ "1Ei.1~'.{)P`t)-"lEi.lf).f)z~f1.~ ~~c~lydt`irts~r in .~rTlrtrtt'~~;ic~tr r~~c~~tlrlir:~rdficrtt ctttrt~'ilitt~~; fc3c~; ~41J~7~tCldtltrt7 CdFttl ~(?Z'tf'Zd?~ :ti('~tlf'~ ~~f'tl€>t`tdl tYt)r()r`ittldt 1o3t; €';lT:il`tldc4' ~'ortl~tt tfr31'?~ Edt~il7ttottttl Ytt~Eri`3tltd$tt7Yt; 171XYtttil t~E:G~BIoIdDJt{?tIL; €?:~;~11(tFtidtop'I~ 1tt~oi`d1PCdtdOtt,t`t'PlfdT$"1"L-'d?~')lfd"s1 Cl~?~tY(IZ'1?l~~ c~~til rotatliiiortro r;,a ~`E°tttcdti2>c ~rl~dtt tdlrlir~oz?cTl. ~~~1"ic~~al~;~s. `lu'lu' a})pla{.aa~t f7~15 s{a1~r~iitt{~d VIII ~1e rY~_,~~,~:~,,iY~~~ 1P1t`{)Y an{~kiox:~..Y'E~i(~vant [:~ T{.'~!1C'L1'1:i15~ zi ({3Yl{:cl{:1V£' 1?{~iT! tit){){3Ccl'f.t1:)7l. C'~rn~3~YSic)t~t< ! (~{~ ~tj)1,1£:at.ioY) ~~ ~l~s ~fc~cltl{~cP cc)Y)t})~{~t£~ Via) :~{r~i1. "~, 7.i)0'. C'~~~v3(:' "1fi.3fi.{P~f~ -T'lyd<y 1,ot~~ --. fir? ltcdt°tifcrtt sltcdll fje t€F,lrt`o~~c~c~ in cf?ltic:lt td j1E~~ Xot; its clc jAirtc>ll in tftis tit1~>, is t'r~{'iatt'tl tdttlc~s<,: ~~) 7'dtE: ~~rt~c:rtt~ rxrtcl flydt~ lot., c~:€clttrlitTt~7 ih~ {lrt~~aolc>, zT.>lT~t~lt~.a• %c~ tt~tle or• Edtt E~r~sErrtti?,at; ;ltcdll cot,t~jlzl zc~rlt tltEt dttirtiTttdttt lot ~i~,;}, lr:rt rlitttEZ~tszorr:~~ cd~tEl s~tlrtar-k i'r~{~tdir•c'trtc~itf:~ fcr,` tl~e :ccrT~titt~~y cli:~ir•ir,f in ct~dticl2 tdt€~ lot~~ c~~'€~ 7crc~t~ecl; ~'IYi d71~~i; 1{' l~i1T"C'Tl`t: ~7~ITC'l'f. CC)31 +ists C)( cl]l{~1'oAltll~tt'Cl\' .~>~~ c1i:1'C' ~. ~~7C' ~1~IiY'.llt }~aY'CC`l is It~c'~lit~~~ ~vi'tllin the I;--l-~, R('siciC~r~lfi~ll `~iY~ls;lc~ )=~~Y)tily o)iitlf; cfisiiic:t Lvit(l ~a a7i1~iY-ltarn lot til/,ti' t'('l~Ul7'l'1:11C')lt O{ J,f~()i~ ~ii.~ll~il'C' {f'_('t. 1 {I(' SIJI~~t'C't: 1~t1I't_'I.l.t l)ill'Cl'l 35 . ~{1:~{_) { ~iC~llcl`I'f,' IC'.£'~:. { {l ti.' c~xistia)f>, tunas{~ L~,~llich is icfc~YZtifi(~cl t{~ z'el)~aiY) oat l)x'o~~os~cl l.,c)t 1 it~as col~stl'taC~fc~cl ia) f(j9~. 1 IZC= c~xisili7.t lu)us{~ is corrll)l i~lnt ~ti iih tl){~ s{>t'o~a~ .i~ a,-l~l to C o~~et-ll;<~ Y~t~{,~lir{~a?~c~l)ts of ilu~ C~-~ _ ~ ..., ~. "/.oilitTL~ C115t1'1Ct. l lll' foLa2' }7P'(?l.~{1q('{;{ lots 1't~T.l~~(' aT'! Sl%E? II'OIII (),9{}Q - t`,i ~=?i 1lE't sClllcla'C' {E'E'I J"'tot 1P1(:lL1C11774~ tl1E_' t1~1};170){? t'~ls£'allC'?lt ti1(lt l.otS ~ ~11'iCl ~ L~'()1TICf t~1lCl'c1C{'('ss ?)'Ol7l. l,Ot`? -5 flY1C~. '~ ~)~'(~ col~si~lc~rt~c~ fl~al~ lofs. f :ots 7 aal~i ~? ~voul.s_i l1RVt' tl~ciY' o~vn ia)clivrdaa~~l t~tcr(~ss fY~c)1~) `~rrc)~,h~~ Butte I_:aale; aY1(i <jY.{~ 7~c~t cc?a~sider{~Cl. ~ltt~; lots. '1`llc~ vti'ic~tli t)f t17e }~t~o}7{ ~: ~.:1 lots a'~~a'Ele fa'oYrl E~"1.90 0t7 l)ro~)ost~~i f ,0t 3t0 €f;~.?'~ ,~{'t on l~l'0~)0 ,c~ri 1..ot 1. 'l l ae sc~tl~~lcl retl~a.i~el~r7{~11ts for Lots; ?, 3, zll~c~4~~~i11 tic' ~,~~~1'itic>c~ f<?~' cor,~ ~~,,ii1c(' ~It~a'il~~, tie ~~c~alclin~; -. . , ~...~?a.~i` E#~;1()Iflo 111ois ll~eet ~~ r~c~t~~r~~rtt. i^~~ d It T~~lE~Lf~; {.j~/1~~:'9lt tZ ll l~{~ TF Et !-~~Gh ~q Lrt E~~L tC~~l~Obt.l/.I ~L~E: lt.~t~d ~~ raft EC ~34d ~~E~E~ ~Ci l.~~LE/L~t-~) C.j t~d ~1.4Z Edr1.3 ~i ~~. ~>r~tl:{rJJJJJJf'ilt iltzrltt~ W~tci~tclrTr•El!~ljc~ctj'i~rrtiErtt~> ~d~tct {.lttifPtt~ttt ~.1~:t~dl~o, {'iltf crj ~"'~~ttlt°cdl~'c~iiti ~At€tiltE^ t~'c~r'li:y .P~,=llEdp°tdttE=ttf I '; ~ ~; , l C31~ Findings: The applicant has provided a 21' wide easement for access to proposed Lots 3 and 4, as well as a turn axound between same mentioned Tots. Conclusion: The proposed Tentative Plan meets this requirement (C) No fence, structure, or any other physical obstacle shall be placed within the flagpole; and Findings: T'he Tentative Plan reflects an existing shed located within the flagpole easement. The shed is going to be xemoved. Conclusion: The Tentative Plan meets this xequirement, and conditions of the lire District ensure that compliance is maintained. {D) A maximum of two tots are allowed access from a flagpole. Findings: Lots 3 and 4 are the only Lots that will be taking access from the flagpole easement. Lot 1 will retain its existing access and Lot 2 will have its own. access directly onto Snowy Butte Lane. Conclusion: The Tentative Plan meets this requirement. CPMC 17.2f?.U1tt -- Purpose -The purpose of the R-1 district is to stabilize and protect the urban low densit:,~ residential characteristics ofthe district 7vhile promoting and encouraging suitable en~ironnrents for faatnily life. Findings: The applicant has met the purpose of the R-1 zoning district by proposing four {`l) single family residential lots. The design and lot size requirements in the IZ-1-b zoning district are consistent with the development that has occurred and will. occur in this neighborhood. Conclusion. The applicant has satisfied the purpose of the R-1, Residential Single Family zoning district. CPMC 17 24.U40 -Height Regulations - ItTo building or structure shall exceed thirty- fire feet in Tzeight in an R_I district. Findings: This is a tentative plan application and would not be addressed through the tentative plan criteria. Conclusion: This will be reviewed during the building permit review process. Page 2 of 3 CP1VEC Z7.2f1.{?51t -Density, LotArea, Lot Width, dimension, building height, Iot coverage, arrd yard requirements - The folIort~ing requirements slurp be observed fn the R-1-6 district: Findings: Density: In the R-1-6 zoning dtstxict the minimum density allowed is ~ units pex acxe, and the maximum density allowed is 6 units per acre. Based apart the size of the paxent parcel {.90 of an acre} the rnit~ni.um density allowed would be three {3} fats and the maximum density allowed would be five (5} units. However, in order to maintain the xztinium/maximum lot size requirements and access requirements far this parcel, the applicant can yield a maximum of four (4} Tats. Conclusion: The applicant has met the density requirements of the zoning district. MinimutsrjMaximum Lot Area: The minzmum lot area permitted in the R-1-6 zone is 5,000 square feet and the maximum allowed is 9,000 square feet. The proposed lots (excluding the flagpole) xange in size from 6,909 - 8,878 square feet. Conclusion: The apphcant has proposed lots that are wit]tin the square footage range allowed in this zoning district. Minimum Lot Width and Lot Depth: The m;r~~munt lot width within this zoning district is 50 feet. There is not a minimum lot depth requixement. The applicant has proposed lots ranging in width from 61.90 to 85,22. Conclusion: The lots proposed meet this requirement. Minimum setbacks, building height and maximum Iot coverage: The minimum franc yard set back is 20 feet, the maximum bui.Iding height is 35 feet, maximum lot coverage is 50°l~, and the side yaxd setbacks for new const~ractian will be determined by calculations during the building permit review process. Conclusion: Review of the building permits will ensure compliance with these requirements. Page 3 of 3 I ~~t ` ,~ h ~_. C,/ B~.~i~.. YY V ~ ~w3~ rJT ~r~ ~:t ' 1 k i ", ~ }l.l ! \ 1 ~ ~,~1"~1~ ;~'i]rr71?r)~( l~E'V. ~?CI'!uC; `_ Cat,7Ol'~. } Ou' I cI[ its})cll~,~l~li~n li)1 , ~ ,'~~ ' (!(_)}3_ ~I~~l); L(~t ~);UU Ap~?':ii:~llli: air}ttt}?(:ti', all~l 1' :ll(_l~t {'l~;ul~~cll(?z', 32`l~ ~l~i)~vti T~u~t~. T:i,~~~. C~'czltl~l? I'c,illf, {)i~ (I'SCi?: Zt~niil~~ ~i-1-ta, iZc;Sii}cilil al ~; ,~,il` 1 ;11r;ly . ~'t•a~[~t-~: ~}lI`;l'i} 1)11 111 t; ~il``t?~llt~: ()? ~iilSiti}~i?Ij<illil7'1 ~ 1~`!llll'C';"~ ~} [ }j } I'lj) ~r['isi?;lllf~l ~'1<'.Ili!;~!~, ~ }()Ul~ }(?l ~L,})C}1\ 15!(`111 '~t'I}} ~'i,'1?i',111t :1})})li!:ti,:i':7ate}y ~;~.ti-} l):..~ }7(>lli ',1~1})~ f ~~K~ }. l Ili; { i~;'ti' (1i ~ llil~ l}%!)Il;'~t}}`' 1('i111I1~ti IILI,~:1 ;~iiil}1~; C~l'il[iil} } ( ~ ~ fer ;"ttiti~ ~};:ve}(~prrlez7tthat ~~;cl]c~l~.~t~s a:(~1c th~ln 5 F'~T. Utz %~•;~f'~ic ~tltciti' i~ ~~•~><•t•<illf~c[•fc~t~ t}>i~'q ~lc-s'elr~[)z";~e~zt. ~../_,w _ ~ _ ~ .. __.~. ~'t'(lfia': ; },CI~C IS at1 l9l'1St1Il<< iS-II:~,~l ~,'r`Ll[CI~iIIl:; L'1 } }~:'}}L'b" ~~~'i1V :1?1C} it ~ ~ -II1C}7 Iil ~Ili)At ~ }~litC }(111(,'. ~ii?]'ill })1"III]: } }]C'il' 1~ LlI] ii.Yltillll~_' }:~-Ii1~f1 ti`li.);111 t}I~(t'll }illy Ill } lt~~~t°~ ~t,,l~' <.illli ~t':c)1`_ti' }Jl.il;C': ~.(3T1~. ~~1COt ~i;i:hi?[l: ~11t~\'v"~' }~L1t1C ?_;lilC IS (1 { It'v' ~'}lili)I' }Zi'5i(3i,i,Ci(li ~`.lCi.'L, I?rr~i-iees•il;~ atrlcf [)c°~'clo[~r7~c~~lt ['I~~1i~ ~~l c[ i~~t~~2~it~: '~'}7e f.Ci'.i121} }~()ltlt }ELI}Ill `~'t?l}~ti I}i;j?<liillli";li (~ ~}1<li'~'il} ~'vlf}I Il1'I?~l`'tilli'lli {)f t}l(; ~ItV':~ 11711"11 i111111:L11'C~y ,. _ .. ,ili;}Lalili~_' :itCCCIti, \b(iti;I~tLO;~~S. (1!1Cj StUi"ill ti'+~ittC;l~ C}I',lll?(I4!C 1L1(;?~tllliS, ~?; i'c1.Ci11}, L}"1~ }~Cj~(iI~~I?lC']115 ~tzlllt~al~+~ })l'Cll.~.citli)l? 2111(} 1 lllf<)il?l ~i9 ili}aCC} }_)C1tt115 t(.)I~ }ail});li: ~,`tt?I'}:> { C)11St1!iCll(?I]" ti}1(t}~ f!{)til!Il }li)',~' });i})}li i~aCl}lI1C'S ~.. z'(-' t(? })t_'. l:(lil~j-1'11Ci1'i}. ..}..}l is i~L\"L}(.)}:)C'i~ (~ 1; I7:(:fJUi'<.i`'l'C} tt) ()})1:1111 i.}ll, '1;iiC`t. \'l;?'~1(?!7 C!1~ 1}l t;til: >}~C::; 1.11 C; <i1T{?IlC ii~(.)1ll 11th. t'u};li;; ~~ <lli~~ L)c}~<trtrlcl,t. In ~~tncr~l}_ ~t}?c p}till snhlriitt~ll sha}1 ~Ilc?tlc?e }hall allci h>~c)i}e ±i~Ir streets, ~~atcc. sto.`1n L?l~~Iil~ lac <l;ic1 >"17i1ar,v. ~(?1V'C1~S, Srt7I~l?~ C}I'Il?1 ii~~'i; Ch}~Li}aUtll?ti. StOitll (}1 'lll 1~C }lllSlll ]llcl}~, C'.I'US1(ll1 ~(l~ti~Oi h}(111. L1TI~itV Illllj OL1IS1l;C L147,Ci?(~~ n~±titi~~at;c)n`; ,l,lc? alp})r()~11~. I7lL }?i~Il ln~,~ al;o iilC~ilc}ii a})})li~~l)}~ tI<tffi~ ,tt1c}i~ti, lG~~al t}C~til:li}~iic?ns a17c1 trtli~ic coui,~O1 j)itln. .~ }~Ui?i1t ~~ ()?}« }~Cf"llllt \'.'I;? (71]?y ~~e 1SSii:C? (111~I' ~}1C' })~;?tilllllL'1ii: ~11"i.:c;lUti :,})}~t`11~,'CS i}]t' }ill<ll ~()l,~lTLiillilll t}I'il~.\;1~?;a. =~CtLI' a}]})I'()\'1t1, t?1e ~t'G~ a~tii?C1:11i:C} ltltil t}i (}C\i'~<)j)1lCllt t'v'1}~ ?)t' Cti~l:li}11t1:C} 1111(} <tL~1L}li",i?. tip tl~, }]uLlic wt)cl })cn?]il. All i(~cs aT(~ 1~e~lclirl'.(1 tti [ae paid 111 t~111 ~..1 t}~~, ti;-1':e t17e t'iablic 1~;'uik.~ t'i;lt]]iG i~ i~~u~c~. Conditions czf :~.[~[~r•o"<~~~° 1. 17+~t~jj ~3utte i,arla; Mc~r~ltvrttln -- '~17ere is twc~-year zz777C)T~tUl-iurrl ,~.~ a1} stl°eet cuts. en ncr~vy butte 1~f~ S~tat`,'1 71~i'J Sftri;t Ce~~lr~~l,~'vr~t, C~I~ 17:.~(?2 ~ "~~~_Gf>~"~.~ ~~1 >~~ax >~t1,ti~:;~.ta.:~~3<f Lane. The Street eras paved in October of 24(}6 and cannot be cut a~,ain until October of 248. AZI in~rastrtzcture associated with the development of liiley Estates must come from Holley Way or wait until October of 2448. 94C? South 7"hird Street ,,, Cents! Point, CSR 9542 ~ 549.664.3327 - t''ax 541.664.6384 .: _~..rt..>~. r ~~ 1RC I ! I ~~` i JJtJ3LtJl'+#i.1 1~~;(~l~l\ 1 ;~'!L.'~"(ry &3 (",'~1.~. 1\1'~fD~~l~,.(. LJ1`l 1 ~l I to ~'(~. ~~~{;~ii11111~? ~ }ti()ill Hilt;ill 7B.~~T'. `lil)cli~~~~~~71 (I~i1cy F~;t~ltes) ~clt~rt?~5. 7.? i ~+ `°)17c)w~ t,ifCi; I:n C: ify: t ei)tr z~l ~c~iiri ~~~.J~~~~~~ ~~~a `T'3~e s~~i4~i`re~~~7ri 7s tt) ~~"t~l%ic~t~ )lfi~l~rl")a4ion i~? tl~t' 1'1~iniliris~ C4?rrlir)issi<))l Elilc~ t~ t~,~~~~1~~~lr~i l~t',{',~11~C~))lar {_~(f~'' ~~11)~t~il)~? (~i,'i)~li'(I"ltt'11~ ('(~t~llil~t/li);;il~s <)[lt~ Ct)r1C~!11t)il`3 ft~ ~.]'' lllt~tl(~1'_t~ "ill jll c3~•si~~rl zli~ti ~it;vt?loi)l~rt~~r)t u~~i~~;:>rc~~>t)se~i ~t~cr~t,'t;f. 'I'i~ti ~s ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~°~~~~rt°~.~~~ ~~l~is -i-t;~»)~t is ~)r~;li)rlinar~~ and ct~~~~)lt;tl st>lel~~ 1~~r Ilse ~~, 11it; ~~111's.~~ ~~~?llll ~~~21i1~1.111~ ~lll)111Ss1_C)1?, '1~ILi l11~ I EIE~ ~d '. ~: ~~ ti. lt'~~,iU _...i~ I. ~})}~Ii~;;t~l)t, ~l~~.ti,l~~ i~ ~<~ ~,{~l~ir~~)ctt~7-s lrnl~~t i.i>11)})1~~ ~~,~i}11 X11[ (:lil~ii~llt `'1~1i~ ~)1't~r~l~,{)-~r adapted i;o~~i~~_ ~111C1 ~~~})})l~~ 1't)i all })i.rl)lit;~ ~ti~ll'i>us~11 tlli; t `i~rl~l~~11 1'i)iili }~llilclirl~~ 17~})<lrilrlel~tt. ~, ~~'~:l 1)l~iv~lic; ~tc)rll) ~1r~lill ~v~,}i;lrl is 1)r{>1){),i;t1 i~ lrltit 1)i; lcvi.r~~i~t1 ~llltl ,l 1)i~l~rllii i~;~tted b~ the ~'`~rltl~al 1'i)islt 1'1t11111)31~~~ i)t~l)~lr~l~r~{~ 11~. ~. i,11~ 1.)ri~at~ .,i1~C°i,i 1i;ylrtill~> t~ltl~t ~~~ tivii~~~~:c1 ~lr~d pet`txlttt;tl ~)}' i1lt; (:'i;ll(r<l1 1?c~nt Flicf 1~I~{~1 1 ~i'1)~11~1111i;11t. 4. 1'l~i)~;'ici1~ }llc° 1)llililir)s~ l~~'j)rlTlrllellt. ~~;ii1l <l C; i:.c>ti~4~lrlc~l~ 1i?k)i)z:i; ~)ti ~i~c~t,lirccl h~~ {~~"'7C .r'~p~>i:l)di~ ,1 ~1~t1 1~a})~~, 1 t~ c}l, i11{~ C) ~~t' ,~ ti~ l itt~~ll ri;pt)l~i c)(~ E1i(' illy E 51 i~~:~ltiot~ ~l)~lll inclu~~, ~tlt a11/c~1 l~c)i 1)~, 1il~~iti;cl i{)~ t11i; 1~i)I}{)~.~irlr~ illf~{)rl~l~ltii?11: a, ~. 1)li)} 1)lali ti130tt lilr? ~lli: [()~a~i(?11 c)1'~111 IG`~f 'l~)i~ir14,';ti ~lll ~;IC?1~ i"i(;<l~''~illi)[~`>" ~, },,.)'~~('t~lx)~l()115 ~l[1C1 C1ilS`i111C'.{lllt)115 01 }1"1~', rllrl}i'-I~1~i1~ {'.lli~;f)11I1}4'.1~C'Cl. ~. J~;1~v~ltii)1)s <)I~"~1~c. ~~~~ltc.~ f<1b1~_, i}'C~11GOt1171~1~e<1. , . C~. ~tE'C O113r11(',11(~~_i~li)11S I`l)I~ lC)t1I1C~~1~1{)Il ~~;'~)t)rall(~ Cll'.`~;1~,`~ i;;l~I~~;C~l~'l; 11Tt.~'ttl~lll~,'<3(:t31~1i1 C~-111)ac~',ify. ~71~()'t'l~;li)ll ~C) Illl~ls?c1i.C' l~)l' ~;~`li'(.'t~ i)~,t,X~?slil~iVC; ~t?la~,, ~)l~i)ViSii)ll5 li> 1111"11~'.Q:l2; j11~' ~:f`i'i;i;ts c)•1ic111t',Sa~:lil)11 <~l)cl ~c)il ~ia~;rl~rtll. ~rlltl lli; tr1'ii;{.iti c)1'aclj~l{;i;rl} lt)ac~~. ~. ~'~`13e11 ~;~})all~ivi~ ~,c)i1~ ~lri~ 1)1~~~~~..nl :>})~~{~ia[ })ravi~"ii>rls ~;11~:111 big l)l~c)vic~~c1 in the E)1rlt1i:lLl~li)ll {1+W'ti1?11 ~117C1 {;()11;~tl~llt;tl()11 1() ~i:1lt'l~;llill'C1 ~l4_';i1117SI C1~11'tlflt'(' (1t1C; °({.) C'.X~)<111,`+1~'114;`i`~. r , aa~d tlt,'~1~_>ri ~l~al1 1)~ 1)~l.>~c1 c)rl tfC'{)1uG:111114;~11 t'4 C;C?11]tTl{'-r1C111~1{)315. ~, t ~l~vclil)~~~~;~cavf:3lic>n 1)i~l rl~ii~ ~lr~e t~i;c}~lit~{~.il ill aet;~~'citlrlc~ ~'` iill (~~~~; A}~)})~'l~t1i~ ~ and ch~i})t~.t_ 1 ~ alltl r~~;~ll-c1i11~~ ~lrla~ fill rrla~~ria1 })ltlci'c1 t)~ tll~; yti~. ~, i115 dc) b~~ t15cc1 tc) Sul)p<)1•f tlli~. 1-c)tlll{l~~tii)l~ c>l'~117 bllililil)t> c~~ ~"tl~l~{;itlri, sll~lll l:~c, pl~~+~ecl i~~ ~,~;~c)~cl~lnc-~ ti~'ii"l~ ~l{:c;ipt~c~ i'n~7i1)i;i~l rrl`3 1)1tlc:}itr~~. .f~ ~<)ii ii~vestl~,~a~it)l~ l~~l)c~rt, ~tllcl a l~i.}){)1-i {)f's~ltis(~l~;ii)1~~~ })141{:ir11~111 oi~ f'i11 (il>~;lir~an ~})i;~i411 ill~;pi:{.•ti~)rls f)1`1)1,11(.'lllt,'..il~ {~i~1•il1 ~lll(1 {;olll})~l{tii)rl) l~{.,{l)i~:ll)1i, 1o i11c I31.1i1c1il~t.} ~~f'1`icial, s1~~~11 ~)~ Stil)lni}tc~1 pl~i+`)l~ t~) fi11~~1 i)f` ~1)~~ i!l~ai1111~/~~.~;a~t~ltic~l~ })C`~hl~zit. 1311i1di; ~erllliis l~-ill 31{:li. ~)w i~5tltwi~ {llliil ~~~~1~111#_'%i;~i;a~~aiic)npe;l,~~~~.~t is a}~}~lc)~'~c1 tll}i~ Iill~llle~. 1, "111i; u~})~r ~,` Fcli)1; {)f` 1~i11 p1~c~~~ {)~~t~ic~4; t~~`~)tll)lic x ~Ili~;-t,1~_~~<ly. ~. 1 11~ lr1)1)~3' ~ .~~ li)U[ i)1~ ~~111 111{l~ {~();L.`; 3){)1, ~,111i1i;T~11t' l)CtJ1c11r~s"~. 5t~11C~tli~t'S~ C7I° vcllc;l11~11- ~l{;i:~~s tiv,:l~ ~ ul:~ }'?~lz"~.iri~ ~lr~~!5. [.~i~,<i ~~,~1~~r:<<n ~li~ t~i ~ C'II I;~ 3i;?1=i!. lii)i~~lll7!? i )C'~);ll.l1]~'I?1 ~ai_ ~~€€4:'~" ~,ytaats' ~tFSSt145's.v~ke€Fy a aa~ i~p! ~t~ rli" L;ftia, Thy ~ x~::,~if~„ ho~ls~ i ul"r~utly }~;rv~ by c~~ueciic°~n o Ile sewer m.~n n ncawy ~I.lili~ `~i~;i(~I"1. Ti~l(, l)r~ ):':?Cl C#~ Vel~amertt WIII tl~}'[ 11(C)C( lf~l`> ;;(?i"VICE. ~t~;'t+'~ SCrVICE"'tC~ l~lE=' Y`iC'i:':' IOi~~ 1,~:'i~i ('i?(::]uIl"E c"~ '"1'le''ill`l ~Illu ,XIC'f;;~lOf"i. 'Tfs r`"l~lll'? C[I~lc'. m1v1~~ e CI~SIC~Ci(;C:! ~l~C~ COiiS'ltLl~;t(C~ iu <'1C~(;()Il~c3.I1(:C' ~11.~i[I"1 ~1,t~~> .~~cl"1(,l,i~Cl~ ~;.}il(Jr~C1 i~1(? !i~~ll~ll"'~("E? O~ r.hc, ~)r;~eC;i !s V~,~i~~.il'1 ~.~,~ 1'f~ase ~ atcarrr!." a.rLa r~~ ~ req~,lired ~e meet relevl°ft ,~: etc>rmvt~~~:l° clu~3.;r~y I~^gl~irer7~~l)ts. c~Jl~le; 1/G~JIcy ~c~ ~~(r ~elvicc~; r~:qus~ t~t~i ~ti~r~~r~~1~.1 4f the pr~;i~osc: (leve:!(~pmnt b {;LIE~j{:mot it> .~)e ~t>il~;j~5,~ir;c~ :<~I)cli"iit7n:~; ~. ~('ilE.' cli ~')IICc?Ili tTll.l ~[ Sl,lf~u"1!t ^ .`~tGr"11'r,/cllr,l' I~~;"! ~C) ~~v~, ~~"1t? ~~c'll~ '1"1115 {7f?~ %)~(:)t"r?bc(a X~?~i ~iU~i ~~1'1C7 [U i~"1(> '~(i-1tl ~( C;t.)i1`~t'u;t1011. ~. ~ f~li cif)~~Ili;c;I1~ rt"tuSl {:j C:>IGI`1 ~1C3Ci Gc~r1 ~rUCt ~~"li~ Sdrlt';~~d1~! ;aewer C:Y.iC;I"1:_)IOC1 II1 ii,C:~ C71~(lcltl^(; '~'JI~~"1 ~ ~~i3 S[cillL~c~,t(:15. i~ee! il"ec~ i~ call me if Yep have arty c~l.at~s~icans rcr_I~~rclil~r this ~rc~~ect. ~ini'~~r;:l~, .. ...~ . f_ _M K:I~Ah:~`,;~GI:~~C'3I_..`~~yt ~ til,l''I'~'L,1~.I'~C4LTB])~I~~l~>fC??~~`;_'.ti(,Tr.~~'l{} ~~;[,1_,1' ~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~v~~ PLANNING COMMISSI©N RESC}LUTION NC3, A RESCJ-LUTIQN GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPRfJVAL TO CREATE FOUR {4} SINGLE FAMILY LCJTS {Applicant: Matthew and Pamela Chancellor} {37 2W 10r8, Tax Lot 93(10, APN # 102(12375} Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted an application to create four (4} single family residential lots on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 10tH, Tax Lot 9300, APN No. 10202375, consisting of approximately .90 acres in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May ~., 2007, the Central Point Planning Comranission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOZN'S: Section 1. Criteria A Iicable to recision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 16.10, Tentative Plan B. Chapter 16.36, Flag Lots C, Chapter 17.20, Residential Single Family Zoning {R-1-6} Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in City staff reports, and concludes that {City File No. 07'102} the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 16.10, relating to tentative plans B. Chapter 16.36, relating to flag lots Planning Camnussion Resolution No. {050107} ~. Chapter 17.2(3, relating to minimum/maximum densities, minimum Iat dimensions, minimum lot size & maximum lot size Secfiion 3. Conditional Approval. The City of Central Point Planning Commission hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on I xhibit "A", the Planning T.~epartrnent Staff Report dated May 2, 2007, which includes attachments, and which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 1st day of May, 2007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 1st day of May, 2007. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution I'wTo. {050107} ~RG-L~T C.L~A~ ~ ~LAF~AN~ _ ~ ~ ! clt V /'~(~1111 ~ .l iift~; s~,C~~a~~i~. ~'~,~':~'~e ~~~~~ i~t3„ ~"11th; ~.;arr_~ldr~t~taicor) (rt Ott) ~t}~1)Iii;a~tccrc~ t'(;~lu~stir~~, <l C1atis (' ~v ~lrtarr~.~ t(~ Ot)(.:,~tc)~lar({ c~i-tll(~ t ]'M(, t]rc:; ctutlll7~r t)f lots t}~at Lllt' a}1Ov,'c~r YO ta.kc zlc(;~S~r li~Otrc the 2O Jt. l~ tkylaOI ~; c~tsc~rr)c~rlt tits t~econ~rrnt'.nc}t;d h}~ Jac]csot~ C'ot.r~iti l~oacls. "h]Zis ~;~tlr~itltl(~<; al~>l~~licatiot) is iT~ hr(,~}:rariltioc~ o]~t~.'f~ctltatir°c ]'lar) a]))7]icati(») ll i]i' '~o. U;'1 t)~rl. ~l lt(; stti~J(;ct l~t'tit}~cT-i~ is I.(3ctit(;tl its t]r(;. I~.] .C,, t~t:~;it+;;Ttti~tl 4~itr~t]c.~ }'arr)il~' rcrtiin~_7 (}i5trict aclc3 i. ?d~;cttilie;] t)t) llt~ ~la{'k5(>rt ('(>unt~;' .~su~ssc)t~'s Taal) a~; ,~~7.`~~,`v~,' l t)l.)(.', '] a~ ,()t lt)0. }! l2 13(;al] ].«rt(;. {~.~s~~l~~.a~~; -~a~a9 ~~t°~r~~~. {;oTi.t~ic Cluck;, C (~Trlmur~it~~ ]'1<t~ ~r~~; r 'f~he stt17.1(°ci l-?r~()p;rt~ i~ al)l~co~in~atcl~ l.()~ acrc5 al)(i i5l'tlr~~;t'I. t.~l)L ol~r•ec;ot•(]ec1 lj~<Tt 1>.4--]{)()6, 'l lre sul~jc(;t l7rc)]?(:l'ty T°ecei~ec] (:r~ittti~,tr a1717t~o~%a] 1nT- a sip ((~) 1()t c]i~,isi(Tr~ (}~il~ (i)~t):7t):) ()r~ `~~]~ii;rrrl;cr- (i '()0;:]. 1Lc~tatavc; al)l~T•o~ a1 1or t}ic; l~t'()ic;ct~ CT'wcksicl(; ~;'rlla~~(:, ltt}~Ld c?ltt' tc) t])l~ tic~le it~ti c>]~-cc] iTl lrc, cli's`~it ara( t'T1~ir)ee.z•ir~g ol'(7t'if~lit~ C't't;~h ]7~tr)1~ sta}~iliratiot-t. .1.}~~ a~}~}icartt _ . _ ,. ._ ._ suh~ec]uer)tlti r(;clesigtae(:1 <c. l~,'()l~~osal t)c- a tl)r(;e ic~t lr<lr-tii(>T~. ,'`1c ....,~ c;xr,ttrl~ ~~sr~er)tral stt•c.tctltt~t; zs t(~ 1~~ reti~lo~ed as p;tTa O'r~ ih~ _ - ~ 7 hrOpo~ecl clt;~~~lo~ln~z)t. ~ ~ . ~T~~~~~~~a~~ `°9ir~cc° ]3(.rtl] ~ ~~~ ~ rt C()tttit~,' r't)all, t]~ tt~)],lictrrrt c11i;f ~~lth Jacks(Ttt Cc)lcl)tti R.oacis iTr l)rcl~aric)~~ a l~ar'titi()l~ al~l)licati()Tl. lhtrir~~> tl)4 T'~~ie~~ ()fi~ih~: Cc;tttaivt; pl~t.r) ii ~,as cletet~r~)it)cd, il)at 1~'f'kl}] 1_,a1~C's tlesl~',clttti)r1 <15 a C1)itIll~' f;I'1t)I'la] stT-CC't, 1~'Ottl(~ prol)i17it ~lircct tlccessif)r C'<Trc;(;] {_)t)i;. lrT tt lett;r dai(;cl r'~pril 1, {)();r l~:ric ~ie.rne~;'(;t', ,la(1<sot~ C(~uTtt~' I~t)acls 'l rai~fic c.~. T)evelopt~~t;t~t ItT~iTaecr~q rnac]c: tl~e t•ec()rrrln(~l?t}atiol) that T7a (~irc clri~-c~~'a~ ac(:cs.~; t(~ l3et~1} l.at~ lie (I~si~7neti (.F~'tacl)tner)t `°~.;"). 'T-Irc C;%f` F'ul~lc ~,~ at'l;.s I}c;l7aT~tt~1(:tli is in sul~l~TOrt oi~ ]~t; :Cac~~s~n C()tlratti 1°i;~(~tl)tttlrr)clai()T) trTat al] t]it-~(; (3j l~al~c;;ls al.(~ c1iT-ecf acc(,ss fr'()l~z tl)~: ?_{) 1't. ilaL?,]1()lc ~a~>tr~~(:la. Ci'~'1C' 1Ci.:~~.()=,lt? t`~) • ;, t }'la`', l,Ot~~ .`i~.aL(;:i tl'li3:l a TI)a~ltlll),ril ()1 t4~'() 1()tS itl't"' al]()~~"{'Ci i tlcc~ss i•or~) a 1~a~l~occ. 1'lai.~ a~~~l)licaton r(;clttcsis a vari~Tr)c(; t(~ access t1tT-~;e (,a} lttt~ I~rc>l5z t~ f~~.~~}j(rl~ ,~,, ;~~t)z(~rtt. a .,, .w ; 'y ~, ', . ,, ~~. IN INGS: AttaC ent 4i~79 is,7~ 1..1 43s lone C?ne X I I ITCH NS: A4ba~ f..r~t 44 A 99 1 ~v~tatlv~i Pan Attar ent 44B'" -Applicant Findings Attachment 44P'~99~ Jackson County Roads Comments Attachment 44.+99 _ Fmd~ngs Attar ent 44E99_ Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of a variance to CPMC 16.36.040 (U), the number of allowed lots that can take access from the 20 fl. flagpole easement +~ E ATI N: Approve Resolution _~, approving the Class ~ Vari ce granting three parcels access from a 20 ft. flagpole easement. Pale ~ of SUFYrY i'pR: 7~IVF~i~YG f`HF1L~~ItIIV ~tJi3 0£ 9URYEY ~~ a~pppp CROUT A ASSOCL1tE5. ECC p []t'+ I t,~ft ~-5 i-~-t'k-t- r-t~ ~ F-~ -f- !~ f~ C C ~~ p PAUL GR6ilf, REGISTENEQ AGENF t- AI\l.+~i... lYtt. ~ ~ f`~!1 f i t ~VIV F` ~A I ~ll. f- ""'J~"-' ~ 9~ V ~ V ~ei'f~ P.O. $6K 3575 ! SYf~7JCAXi' ug7FOR6, OREGON 47561 K, Ioaa#ad in the anrc~ ..ov,~ zo. zw> ~ .- ~~;,:.~ SOUTHEAST 7 j4 SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 37 SOU7t~, RANGE 2 WEST, Po6eoz ~astuw L.s. xxrl ``~- W€LLAMETTE MEREDIAN, CITY OF CENTRAL PQlNl', JACKSON COLFNTY, QREGON cENranl. PafNf, OREGON 4zaox (S#1}66a-7510 Cftt: 3aa-6642 +~ '~L •d` `Cjl {` ~' ItktTl.r:w b~;rxl!f.IA ~4tkfia:LEi GS. .: N e ' •- ' f ti. U` . , .:;. ..~;....M ... .. ,.,...,;. . ~~ssaTsn'e~~v, 1 s6~•s3'll'E lar.6s' •_ .... s~,a _" _ ". ~ sC } L } 3:: ni oNl1Y #SAF' 5• ~ ` .. t ~,f PROPOfiFx'3 PARCEI, 3 37-.'.V:-1C~C Tl 2G0 ~ GRbSSa 1SD$7 $Q, FT. T <t nA:r ctr•Erk NET= 8000 SO. FT.: ~ ~ ~ z a~.LLlLt~tt~~r ±U.O:' S't-w-~t0il"' TL IU'; ~ # ~ ~ .... ....T._...1,,~ m o.afre,Et, xsLNF,iF.i ° I ~pa i , ` ^•' a, ...... ... ~ ..- .. ,.~ ~ _. ~.GV .. _....... ._ ... .... .. .. ... ... ( LL SANE ~ - ~3 ~n .. . : ..:.. ....... w. ~I{ ~7 .3 .. .,,j 37-~+w_:Ct-~ it `. ;.' °^.1 ~v 7 '^~1 Lti' •: r.,rr c. cep^.^nt ro.xl ~'x "~ j PR4P0.Sf.4 PARCp. 2 y! i ~ 8t51S 6F BF,AS2ItiG5 ~§§ ~-k.~?;~ JI-~:',?-1jCif; Tt Iii i. ~' ~~ F• x ,. \ CROSSa 14720 Sp. ff. ,~ sKU I~ A LP=:i umL € - ~ CENTERLINE (?F B£RLL LANE SHAWN ON FiLEO SURVEY ho. '; ~ : ~~ '~ T~Erw soao so. FT. ~ ....~~ ; ., . °:, ~ ....~. -_ .o ~j j~l. `~ „ i I t~ 15x11 As spvTH 89•s3'11` EAST. , 23 C NQ ~y` " Aft.: $: Y - ' ~ I ~ LUTttit t.} ,, '~ \ - ; ~ FpvND BFeASS also IN THE spuTHEASr coRN£RQ~ ' s; `w..~ ~ ;~ . ~.,.,'1 ( :::Extin:>+:.a:,~tt.._=.:,ti"~.e.~;:,iirra;7. t ~; '2' l.r as. ~ .~.#tU.:,., ~"'~ O HEADWALL CP CpUNTY BRIDGE {(6i1 ON BEAtL L$[[1Lw'AT ~' ~:%\ o ., f j -~~ ~ ~.. .' ~ ~ GREfF€N CR££K. ELEVATION (299.1$'. SCAt£: 1 ` .. 30' \ `~~ sr ~ • , ~ ~ Ill'--I;b'S: 1 n cp~lTbvR rNTERVAL = 1' •- r "~ ~ ~ ~ 2aF-'~:t......._ ~_.: ~ ' ~::::_ ._ ~ 1 ~ M '~~ ,.`',.'~•. -1107.63' -- w ~~>. r ,, :~ ,~~ ~,, . 1 t `,:;;<';'. , s 37-2W-lilac rax LOT lax i - ; S ~ ~t, ~ .{._t, ~ GROSS AREA: i.i9 ACRES ` ~'~l .1`,. 1 ~ L 'f~2oPtrSEt} PARCEL[ t i ~ ZONED: R-1-$ E '.T_ ~- t CENTRAL POINT SCHppL 0}5TRICT Ha. & '~~t ~'.: ~ ,' GrtpSSa 43841 SO. FT, f 1'Ll fIRE DISTRICT 3 ti I . S' ~+-E. v' ~' . { 4•.;. '.••} 1 NET.. 9000 SQ. FT. ~ r.+.4.::.-:.a:.rn iS3a'tf<. J4.- r.n t ( •" ~~.'\ }1 c' u1 Unl., I ( ( t 3 t } ~~~~~ N4TE 3 "' ~ t ~ ~ ~ i ; ~ '~ " ~ -` 'GEC: 1L 'a' '4 ~ ~ ENVIRQNM£HTAL SPACE 7D $£ DEDICAT£Ct TO Tt3E ~ ~ >llt4ni» ,RUgi TH£ £LECTRlCiTY REGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT GRANT£p ?Eft ,'`~` ~+ ^ E~-•~^-`~ `- ~ „, J _.. .... CITY OF' C£N TRAL POINT FOR PARK PLRPOSES. INSTRJhi£N7 NO. 9&-.30072 MAY AFFECT THIS PRpP£RTY, 1 ;; '~.' ~:, r''~" ~-~' ~ Bu? !s NpT LpCATABS.E. A : ,~•~~~'. - 1$ 1...__ `: ~ `s : « ' t~„ h ~~ i .-..........; PARKWAY TO BE CIEDICAT£D TO THE CITY q' ~ F <S'-- -1 f D>SCLN4ER ~ ( ~}. ~., i• ~ S ~ ..._. __._~.3 OF CENTRAL POINT FOR PARK PURPOSES. ~ { ~ ro rHE rOPOGRANIC iNFpRMAT10N, SHOWN HEREON, tS FRpk! a! I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ PROPpS£D ACCESS EASEMENT. MAY 2005.lMPROVEMENTS TO BEALL LANE ANO 5NpWY @I I _.C. .~ ~ ~I I 6LirTE LANE SINCE FLAY 2005 6iAY RENDER SpM£ pF THE `` I .. _:~_ ~ i .. .... ( 3NFORMATEpN, SHOWN HEREON, Tp B£ iNACCC3RA?E. `f I i ~~ ~., ~ ~ i _ I11 ~1 I ~ ~ ., 4"n „' ,,:..... _I .:a:... ,::':.. - I ~' .,. .s ~ _..._'. _.V - PRpPbSED PROPERTY LINE. .c' ~ ;;~.;lr, ,~,~ I .. ,i. _~ 1~ 11[noi~`a ~ ~ ~ , i REc3ISrERED 85`1:Ha_s-.s~':2:.5`1xe.. ~.. ~- ~--•- .. ~'- •..... - PRp#"ESS1ONAt I .- _ i LAND SllRVEYO ., .. .-. ... - _ i ~ ... .rr.'.. .,... .. ..: ._. ,- .... _ CfL BEAl.i. LAIISE OREGON ~. _ ~ _ .... ~589'S3`#i"E 5pp.p4` (500,03`, FS 19043} {$ASiS OF BEq'RINGS} _ ~.. KERRY K. BRAQStiAW CENTERLINE BRAS5 RISC ~ 2x71 _ ~ N£ CORNER DLC ,88 Exr. lz-ss-o7 ~kti~~;£ t'cFhGtt'a~l,®~'"'BR,SS DISC BENCH AWiK CtJuN11' BFi:rvL ~[tf EEEVA126N + 1x94,16' A55ESSOR'S MAP No.: 37--2W-ipDC ?L 104 SHEET 1 QF 1 20O5tp5-p$0 Grou4 Beoll•revised•.4-20-^O7.dwg date: March l G, 2(}(77 To: City of Central Point l40 South Third Street Central Point, Clre~on 975{72 Re: Variance Application, 1772 l~eall Lane, 372W1OC, TT., 104 Applicant Paul Grout P.C}. Box 3575 Central Point, flR 975f72 I. Nafure c-f the Application The applicant is seeking approval of a variance consisting of accessing three lots off a Flag Pole. Background: The parcel is long and narrow with riff n Creek running through the parcels' southwestern boundary. ~t is proposed that the tract of land be partitioned into three {3} parcels. There is an existing home on the southwestern pax•t ofthe property nearest to Beall Lane, The applicant is seeking the flexibility of a variance while maintaining the purpose and intent of the flag pole lot. Specifically, the applicant is requesting relief from the City of Central Point Municipal Code {CCPM~ 16.36.040, paragraph D stating a ~naxirnum of two lots are allowed access from a flag pole. The applicant is requesting to access three parcels from a flag pole to satisfy Jackson County Roads and Parks' recommendation that "nr~ pa~c~l directly access Bull .bane ". In order to meet this access requirment the applicant must redirect the parcel's exising home driveway from Beall Lane to the flag pole. The applicant investigated City of Central Point 1Vlunicipal Codes (CCPM) Chapters 16 and 17 and found no other alternatives as discussed in this application othez• than a Class C variance. Jackson County's Roads recommendation establishes an unintented effect not caused by the applicant of preventing reasonable development of this tract of land in conformance with a Fiag Lot Land Paz•tition Central Point Municial Code {CCPM) Chapter 16.6. ~. ~ ~. CQMPLIANCE WITH CITY t)F CENTRAL PAINT MUNICIPAL CovE CHAPTER 1'7; Applicability. Mass C variance requests are th©se that do not canfgrm to the provisions of Sections 17.13.300 and 17.1.3.400 {Class A and Class B}, and that meet the criteria of Section 1.7.13.500, subsections {A}{1} thr©ugh {4}. A.} Section 17,13.30fl Class A and 17.13.404 Class B variances. a. This property does not conform to all five approval criteria of a Gass A variance nor does it conform to the Class 13 variance requirements loth of which are required for application of a Class C variance: i. Approval requirements for Section 1'7,13,300 Class A variance, subsection 13; l . The variance requested is required due to the lot configuration, or other conditions of tl~e site. Finding: See Exhibit "A". The requested variance is due to requirements set by Jackson county Roads and. Parks a-amail dated March 13, 200'7, requiring na direct parcel access to Beall Lane. 2. Tl~e variance does not result in the removal of trees, or it is proposed in order to preserve trees, if trees are present in the development area, Finding: The requested variance has no effect on removal of trees. 3. The variance will not result in violations} of any other adopted ordinance or code standard. Each code standard to be modified shall require a separate variance request. Finding: The requested variance would result in violation of 16.3G.040, subsection D; Flag Lots, a maximum of hvo lots are allowed access from a flag pole. The proposed application due to requirements by the Jackson County Roads department would require three lots access from. a flag pole. 2 4. An application for a Class A variance is li~~ited to one lot per application. Finding: The requested variance would aFfeet three lots. 5. No more than three Class A variances may be approved for one lot or parcel in twelve months. Finding; loo variances have been requested for Phis property. ii. Approval requirements for a Section 17.13.4110 Class 13 variance, subsection {A}(~) through (3}: 1. The Class B variance standards apply to individual platted. and recorded lets only. Finding: The requested variance is for three yet to be platted lots, 2. The Class B variance procedure shall not be used to modify a standard for lots yet to be crcatcd through a partition or subdivision process, such requests shall utilize the Class C variance procedure. Finding: The requested variance is for three yet to be platted lots, 3. A variance shall not be approved that would vary the "permitted uses" or "prohibited uses" of any zoning; district. Finding: The requested variance would vary the permitted use of a flag lot land partition. B.~ Section 1.7.13.5f~0 Gass C'Variance; subsection {A~ (1) through ~4} criteria. l . The Class C variance standards apply to individual platted and recorded lots only. i{`inding: 'The requested variance is for a platted and recorded lot. ~~ ~, 2. The Class C variance procedure cuay be used to ncodify a standard for three or fewer lots, including lots yet to be created through a partition process. Finding: See Exhibit "13": '1'he requested variance requested is for Three fio be created lots through a i~zinor parfiition application. 3. An applicant who proposes to vary a standard for lots yet to be created through a subdivision process znay not utilize the Class C variance procedure. Approval of a planned unit development shall be required to vary a standard for lots yet to be created tl~c-ough a subdivision process Where a specific code section does not otherW~se pcrnc~t exceptions. Finding: See Exhibit r~P": The requested variance requested is for three to be created lots through a minor parition application, The attached plat is a gross acreage of 1.19 acres and a five acre minium is required for a planned unit development per Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 1'~.G8.20. 4. A variance shall not be approved that would vary the "permitted uses" or "prohibited uses" of a zoning district. Finding: The applicant is creating three single fancily dervellings permtted under Central Poi~ifi Municipal Code Chapter 1'x,20.20, subparagraph A. APPftQ~AL ~'RflCLSS. Class C variances shall be processed using a Type ICI procedure, as governed by Section 17,05.400, using the approval criteria in subsection C ofi this section. In addition to the application requirements contained in Section 17.05.400, the applicant shall provide a written narrative or letter describing hislher reasozaing for the variance, why it is required, alternatives considered, and compliance with the criteria in subsection C of this section. Section. 17.05.40fl subsection C: Approval Criteria, Tlce city shall approve, approve with. conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on ail of tl~e following criteria: 1. The proposed variance will not be zx~aterially detrimental to the purposes of this code, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the sane zoning district or vicinity; Finding: See Exhibit "Ii", This odd shaped parcel is a result use prior to our present day planning standards. C/irrpte~~ 17,.2Q,41CI-"The purpose of the R-1 districfi is fo stabilize and protect the urban low densifiy residential characteristics ofthe district while promoting and ~~ encouraging suitable envirolllnents for falxlily Iife". TIIe proposetl develol~Inent is consistent tivith other development in this Ileigllol•Ilood in recent tilnes. it is an inflll lot and as stated iII the background discussion is the best that can be done ~crritl~in the limitations of the parcnf parcel o4vned by the applicants. 2. A hardship to development exists which is peculiar to tl~e lot size or shape, topography, or other sil~~ilar circumstances related to the property over which the applicant 11as no col~trol, and which are I~ot applicable to other properties iI~ the VIClnlty {e,g,, the Sa1T3e zonxl~g dlstr~ct}; Finding; See Exhibit "B": The applicant purchased the parcel in this conditions and had no control over the recommendation Jackson County Roads that nor ~trrcel rlrrec~ly access .S~rrlt Lrrn~. Additonally, tlxis parcel has no other direct access Other than Beall Lane. 3. The use proposed will be the salve as permitted under this title, and city standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; Finding: The applicant is asking he be allo~~ved to develop the parcel denisty as code requires and could not do so jvithout the approval of this application. The applicant's intent is to build three single family residences. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, natural resources, a~ad parks, will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development occurred as specified by the subject code standard; Finding: See Exhibit "B"; As as requested by Jackson County Parks and demonstrated oIi the attaced plat, the variance actually improves traffic conditions off Beall Lane, and fhe drainage, natural resources and parks on or around the parcel are not affected by the variance request, 5, 'l`hc hardship is not self imposed; and Finding: See Exhibit "A": The attached e-mail dated March 13, 200'7 from Jacksons County Roads department recommends "no direct parcel access to Beall Lane, which is the basis for the applicant requesting the variance. 5 6. The vaz•iaz~ce z•eclizested is the nainiz~zzzz~a variance than. wozzld alleviate the hardship. {ord. 1874 ~S{dart), 200~~. Tindingt fee 1/xhil~it "13": Per tl~e attached Plat as a condition for tl-c flag lot Partition, tl~e flag Pole access is the only other driveway access for the existing l~orx~e. Should you have any fizz~ther questions oz~ would like to meet, I can be reached at 601-000. Respect ly submitted this 16z~z day of March 20(17. .~~~ ~~~ Paul Grout Attachments Exhibit ~: Jackson. Cczuz~ty Reads F;-zxzail Exl~zibit B: Tentative Partition Plat 6 Txhibit "A" Paul Grout n~wnioorrrr~w~au~rrwrrrww~iriuwrr-~uunnnmi i~~owwrrw~ww~t From: Traffic Traffic [Traffic a~jacksancQUnty.org~ Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:21 PM To; Paul Groui Subject: Beak Irar~e f~evelopment ~'aul., we recommend no direct parcel. access to Bea11 bane for your three-lot residential. partition located west of Snowy Butte 7.,ane. Regards, Eric Niemeyer, ~'TE ~`ac#~son County Traffic Engineer 541--779-623Q 2~ ,a. ~ ~;,r w~ ~v~l ~ ~_: C~ i ~: ? ii'v ' 1 r =J~~;~~~ ~SOC'~~ f~OU€'~~CT'~' P0~`~3~:t~ ~, r:.:, IBC ~:... ~ _ i r` :~ ; ~ ~ E € ~~ ' ~ ` ~! ~ ~r `W='~ JACKSON COUNTY roads April ~ 2f 2007 Attention; Connie C[une City of Central Point Planning 115 South Secont Street Central Paint, C7R. 97502 RE: Subdivision cff E3eall Lane - a catsnty-maintained raad. Planning File: 07103 & 07104, A residential partition. Dear Connie; ~,oads ~'z•~t: ~t~m~}~~x, ~~ Tra~c c~.I7euetoprrt~tu.l;7rgitt~r zncJ Antefap9 hoed White Clfy, qR $78113 Phone:{541}774-8234 1'9x: {6b c } 774-82f35 n{9nteye€ c(~i Jeoksoncaunfy.a€g WK^N.J ea €t8 Q nCOI3 E'if}~.9tg Ti~anl€ you far the appartunlty fie carnment an this application far a residential partltio}~ and variance. The applicant is proposing athree-parcel partition located wesfi of Snowy Butte Lane. Raids has the following comments; 1. Ti-~e applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and oi<itain county permits if required. 2. The applicant shall obtain a raad approach permit from Roads far the new raad al3praach to Beall Lane. We recommend no throat. triveway access to Beak Lane. 3. Please note that Beall Lane (County Arterial) has a variable rigl~it-of-way wifh an Average Daily Traffic count of 6780 as of August 2006 seventy-five yards west of F-{ighway 99. 4. Wc~ recot~nment preserving and enhancing riparian zone with native plants. Sincerely, 1=ric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Develapmer~t Engineer I:tEn~ila-€e~rEl7glClev~Ic~prnentiC[T[E51CNTrt~r'T1471 E}3.wpd Attaehzx~ent "D" FINDINGS OF FACT AND CUNCLUSIUNS QF LAW File No: 0X03 INTRQDUCTICIN In the Matter of a Class C variance to Section 16.36A~4 {D} of the CPMC: A maximum of two ~2} lets are allowed access from a flagpole. The variance request is in support of a Minor Land Partition, Flag lots (File No. X7144} in the R-1-6 zone district fora 1.012 acre lot located north of Beall Lane. (Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37 2W 14DC, Tax Lot 144} 1772 Beall Lane. Applicant: Paul Grout Section 17.13.I17t? Variances -Purpr~se. This chapter provides standards and procedures for variances, which are modifications to land use or development standards that are not otherwise permitted elsewhere in this title as exceptions to code standards. This chapter cannot provide standards to fit every potential development situation. The city's varied geography, and complexities of land development, require flexibility. This chapter provides that flexibility, while maintaining the purposes and intent of the cads. The variance procedures provide relief from specific code provisions when they have the unintended effect of preventing reasonable development in conformance with all other codes. The variance procedures are intended to provide flexibility while ensuring that the purpose of each development standard is met. SECTION 17.13.St14 Class C variances. A, Applicability. Class C variance requests are those that do not conform to the provisions of Sections 17.13.31IQ and 17.13.4!14 {Class A and Glass .i3}, and that meet tlae criteria in subsections {A){I) through {4) of this section, Glass C variances shall be reviewed using a Type III procedure, in accordance with Chapter .11.(15: .l. The Glass C variance standards apply to individual platted and recorded lots only. Finding 17..t3,S44{A){1): The subject property is Parcel 1 of recorded plat P-54-1996, Conclusion 1 T.13.544{I): Complies. 2. The Class C variance procedure may be used to mod fy a standard for three or fewer Ivts, including lots yet to be created through a partition process. Finding .1713.544{A}{2~: The variance application is to safely create access for the proposed three parcels through the Minor Land Partitioning, Flag Lots {Section 16.36.444 CPMC}. Conclusion 1713.544{A}{2}: Complies. Page 1 of 3 3. An applicant who proposes to vary a standard far lass yet to be created through a subdivision process may not util%ze the Class C variance procedure. Approval ©f a planned unit development shall be required to vary a standard far lots yet to be created through a subdivision process where a spec fc code section does not otherwise permit exceptions. Finding 1713.5(?tI{A}{3}: The variance application is proposed for a partition application for the three parcels through the Minor Land Partitioning, flag Lots process, not the subdivision process. Conclusion 17.13.Sflq{A}{3}: Not applicable. 4. A variance shall not be approved that would vary the "permitted uses" ar "prohibiter) uses" of a zoning district. Finding 17:13.SlIfl{A}{4}: The variance is fc~r the purpose of providing ingress arzd egress for a permitted use, the creation of residential lots in the R-1-6 zone district. The proposed variance does not vary permitted use, nt~r allow prohibited uses in the R-1-6 zone. Conclusion 17.13,S11t1{}A}(d}: Complies. SECTfQN 11.13. Sod {C}. Approval Criteria. Tlie city shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on all of the following criteria: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this code, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; Finding 17:13.54tI(C} (1}: The proposed variance is to provide three parcels access via the flagpole. Beall Lane is designated as an arterial street and for the purpose of safety to the public, Jackson County Roads is restricting direct access on to Beall Lane. The current driveway is located on the eastside of the property resulting in any future residential development to be located closer to the identified floodplain of Griffin Creek. The need for this variance is due to Jackson County Roads recommendation that no direct access onto Beall Lane be designed Conclusion 1 ?.13.SQ11{C}{I}}; The prc~pc~sed variance would not he materially detrimental to the purpose of this code. 2. A hardship to development exists which is peculiar to the lot size ar shape, topography, ar other similar circumstances related to the property over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the vicinity {eg., the same zoning district}; Finding l ~:l3.Stlfl{C}{2}: The recommendation for the third parcel to access from the flagpole was made by Jackson County Roads, Attachment "C" of staff report dated May ~~ Page 2 of 3 1, 2fl07. The City Public Works concurs with this recommendation that Parcel C}ne take access from the flagpole, rather than maintaining a separate access onto Beall Lane. The variance is due to the classification of Beall Lane as an arterial street. Canclusicrn 17.13.500{C}{2}: The applicant has submitted an application in conformance with recommendations made by Jackson County Roads. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under tl:is title and city standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; Finding 17.13.500{C} {3}: The use proposed is residential lots that are a permitted use in the R-1-6 zone. All future structural development must meet setback, structure height and building code requirements. Code compliance of future development can be monitored during the building permit review process. Conclusion 17.13.500{C}{3}: The intended use of the land is for residential use as permitted in the zone. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffrc, drainage, natural resources, and parks, will not be adversely affected any mare than w©uld occur the development occurred as specified by the subject code standard; Finding 17.T3.500{C} (4}: The variance is due to the classification of Beall Lane as an arterial street limiting ingress/egress points for traffic safety. Conclusion: Variance is found to be consistent with the criteria set forth in 17.13.Sfl0{C} {4}. S. Tlie hardship is oat se f imposed; and Finding 17.13.500{C} {5}}: The variance is due to the recommendation by Jackson County Roads that the third parcel, Parcel doe, access from the flagpole. The recommendation is founded in the classification of Beall Lane as an arterial street. Conclusion 17.13.500{C} {5}: The variance is in conformance with recommendation made by Jackson County Roads. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship. (©rr~ 1874 ,~5(part}, ZQl1h). Finding 17.13.500{C} {6}: The variance request to the nut~nber of parcels that take access from a flagpole is the minimum variance to be considered to meet the recommendations by Jackson County Roads and the City Public Works concurs with this recommendation. Conclusion 17.13.500(0 ){G}: Complies Page 3 of 3 ~~~ ~~ PLANNING COMM~SSTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CLASS C VARIANCE TO THE NUMBER OF LOTS THAT ARE ALLOWED TO TAKE ACCESS FROM THE TWENTY (20) FOOT FLAGPOLE EASEIVIENT FILE N0.07I03 Applicant, Paul Grout 37S 2W l4DC, Tax Lat 140, 1772 Beall Lane. WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted an application far a Class C Variance to the number of lots that are allowed to take access from tl~e 20 ft. flagpole easement as recommended by Jackson. County Roads in preparation far a three lot partition on property identified on Jackson County Assessor's as map 3'15 2Viz 14DC, Tax Lot 140, 1772 Beall Lane in the City of Central Paint, t)regon; and WHEREAS, the property is currently in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and the vaz-iance application as requested is consistent with the criteria of Section 17.13,500; and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Caznmission considered the Applicant's request for a Class C Variance; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the Application does comply with the applicable standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report Exhibit "A"} dated May 1, 204'7; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission for the City of Central Point, Oregon, by this Resolution No, hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conditions of approval as stated in Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated May 1, 2047, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of May, 2007. Planning Camznission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No, {5/112007} ATTEST: City Representative Approved by zne this day of N1ay, 200'7 -- Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No, {511/2007 C~RC~UT T~~T.AT`~~''~ PL~A~+I ~, P ~ '®,a 4 May 1, 2007 I~riir~ r~.mr~ Tcart~~ Hrtrttt~rey, AIC~', C~~rrtrtarsnity ~7c~velo{an7~nt t7ire~tt~r~/ A~sist~~r~t C[ty ~c9n~inistratrar STAFF S~}URC: Connie Chine, Co unity pl er AC G Ul'~ The subject property is approximately 1.02 acres and is Parcel C}ne of recorded plat ??-54-1996. The subject property received. tentative approval far a six (6) lot division (File 05070) September 6, 2005. y,. ~ ~ac~~1 l~ :~`~~~~~ Tentative a ravel far the ro ct Creekside Villa e, ~' , pp p J ~ ~ ~ c r~~~ lapsed due to the time invalved in the design and ~.,. " ~ , ~,~~,~.~ engineering of Griffin Creek. bank stabili tiara, The ~ ~' °~` „. ~~ .~~ a~= ~ '~ applicant subsequently redesigned a proposal far a ".: , ~$"~+ ~~~~~~ ~,- ~: ~ ~~°~ ,,~,..; -, fir, yti,~~j~ `~ f,,,Yt„¢ ;`'"as +`~~ ;.~t9a .~ ~' three lot partzt~an. An ex~st~n res~dent~al structure is " ~~ ~~ a, .~~'..~~ ~ ~~,:~ °° . ~ Vim. ~~~ .,~ r~ ", to be removed as part of the proposed development. ~' ~~ '~ ~-~~~, ~-' ~:~'f~ , ~~~~, ~ ~,` ~" ~% yr .._, y r~ 9 p~ } r' ~ 6A 1 cw ~ 9` us I ce ~,. i A I µl '. t I ... .. ~' i . a and. , 1r s, ., The adjacent area is comprised oflats that are developed with single-family residences fronting Brandon Street and Snowy Butte Lane. The subject property and neighborhood have urban services. Figure 2 ~ r -t:tlta tz}~>l7 ae~zali i?rc~l~oses ~? in~~~e (;~) lcli l~>~Iri,itic~%a. I'zrc~.ir }Sr.ttc('.} i~; ahl~a'{:)xi,l?tlaelti' ~~,t:')O0 ~;q. fi rls.t }o't ~aa~ea, c~e~llrclirr~~. t(I( t~,recil~~~~~zv a)lcl ~ics:c~s etrs:~rl~rerlt, t}nz~; rrleetirlls t}zia illaxil~rl?aal? 1{,t ~;ir.c Of~tlle (~- }.,C). ~ , ,..,.~ ~1'arc;~~} (~n~; }3as Deal} f.allc li'c?~t~~,c~: ht~~~~c,wc:a~. ~t~{a~zli I,ar?c~ i~~; clc~i~i~atc,cl a~ a eozaalty ,rl~telral ;3tr4~t tltlci r<?I' ti?{° pilr}~(?~re {)i >•((t}~ ~cr tyre }~tLhlrc, Jacl.~<?il C {rzzllis' l~i)at?5 a~ rec~~ri?I11(~~a(}iII~~_ r aL'll }{~( ~a~~c('< ~ ~ ir'()i1 a Slrls?}i` 1c CC'~;`> et)tietlleilt. It Iti tll{' a~71711t'{?1114 1I1tt,l'It it) t'f'!'t! 1ill(,'C l)arCt.;lS li",ll7r? ~}le ~'la~ }.,Ot }llt)1i57O)1~ 01 ~3~'Cl(Oi' }t). 5~) })'~~i (I~aea,re ?). ,~'~~; I1{>iec} Irl i}1e variance a}~}~li~;at~i(Sra (}'i}e'ti{). (1,r1:?.l, `~~ ~eetioa~ 1b.~~Ci.~)~~t) ([)) szaies i}l~t ~z I~1~rxil~l(Ir11 0~ t~~-o 1<rts <trc ~errrlitie(1 z:rc(~css i~rc?In tt ~la~ }1olc: arlc3 t}?erel~>ri: ill{: ~,~tlri<anc;c }a<?:; } . ca~:~, I~e~II re sis{, '~ ,,,. ._.. ~. ,. i~;a~I~J'r1r7 Cl'c:~-1.. ~~ ' . ~ ~}li'OUg}, i}~IC~ tit?Lif}1uta~i ca(?r-I~i;z- c~i~rhe rSr{)r?ert~,~. tile. }Src~~r(.rt~;~ i }~)~acec} iIl illL `~l~eca~I} I'3acrd } I~Iz,I`tl i~r~ea (7r' the 1(}C?- 1, , ,. Fear" }}t)(~l}}i}<iln {)j ~tI~al~~all ~. reel: a11C1 ati SLIC'}l~ t},e fi~711}lC;illl lla~i 1~•t~}~)c?~ec} a ~I~c~:I?L~t;r' i(? be c}eclieatc{1 t(? il?e t iii t>i~('c^rltr~Il 1?(Sint. _- ',' 1 '1~}lc hr(S}~{r~;ed ~~r'ccal~~~a~° ~~,-ill corlllc°ct to l~}arra~~ill }'ark. <Ia1 c ~iS;~iill~ ~ - ~ ~ l ~_-1tti' 1~i:11'}~ i}lat lla5cI CICe}i SaCi{; tall ti~'Sll;lll. ~ }1(' }?rti;el?~,~'a~,' ~~'IIl 11}S{7 ~ollrieci l.o an c~pell space e>tizhliylle(1 as hart cif ~I~cS~,~~ }:~utic ' ~' ~~' k~. ~~-~r ~ ,~ . ;zalx}avisioll i~ t}~e rrC~Lt}1 i> i}?e slzb}('et }~It)l)eI°ti. .~1s a c(3,1c}iti(~rl o}_ . ~IC~l1J~ ,~ acne}~tlr1~ the. c?i~erl lr?ee. t}?{; Cris r~, reclurrrllt~ [Ilat. t}?e ar(°rz be larklsea}1ec3 an(1 tllaintainecl l?~ t}le }~I•o}1c-rte` c?~~;I1c:'rs ~ul~ tti;o (?) ~c~t`s (~c~Ilcliiolr c?i~a}?J.>r'o~~Il 7~i). '1 lle ~'ity }lily revieti~scl the <~reerl~~z~ }ar(llx>s<zl arrcl }ia1'~}s t}lc }~ot(;rltial iI?clztsivn c?(•tl)is <r}retl ,~}:Sacs. is iIl ~rJi1~U1`t13ai1Ci' ~5'Itll }gar}~ i1]t111t1~,('I1lc'tlt ~;()<IIS. "h~' ac}jaeer?t l?rc5ller~' io the rlorth cSl~thi~ }rr'{~jLc:i is rec{rlcstil?`~ 1'e~ ic-~~~ fna' ~?. ~~ro4l(~scc} c}i~ isi()rl. l )~~€~ tc'k iii. ~,roxiat;il~ of-}le t~~o l~r(Sllerties, <'it~ siaff'},a~; r'e~ic`'<ec} t'Ile e,<?nlleei~'ity c1f~t}le tr~c5 llr{lix>yccl ~~ ~~ +'rt°rlt~; iin(.d ha:~ c?cterallrtled tl?at c{~I?rlect`;n51 c>i-tllc easetllel?ts rs r1(St ~;rtizl aa1 i}lati tII'(:a. }Ile t'v~a lSCar~ce}s }lay ~ }7lI}7}ic~ r(Sirc1 a~t;(.s: arlc} t}lc; eil~~eall~ala; ~t° c{esi~nec} t(1 s~:rvice. r?rl}~ t`'~c~ inzel~ior }c)i~ ~acl~.. ~~E~()~a~~~sa ~~tiire}lrllent ~~1:;,;; 1. _1_llis "I~~rltative }'IaI1 I~r :a 1}lr{e l~al-ccl }7izrtiion i:~ t1r•ec}icaiec} {gin it}~}SI-~)z al {1f Lz i"las<; C' Var~~tlc:c r>ralliin`~ thl~ce llar~cels a(;ec~ss }:rc>rll ii ~?~ 9't. 7a~~ l~~alr~ c<tsenlerrt. 7 , ~'I'ial' icr illa} l7}at a}~)?r(1ti~al 1}lt; a}aplic~ztlt ~ll<z} I }it~c°}~~zr•e 1'{Sr~ tl~c (_ iiv's a~>~r~c~rv~zl C:o~ eyltzrlis, C"i~r~diti~t~s, arlcl [~esll°ieti<lrls (``(:Cc~:lisj rc9-el'cSrlcil.~ the }zzrlc5c~i}~ilz~. r(~ciuir-erlr~;rlis ~zrr(1 ir'rit~atic~Ir 171~1I1 lrr i}t illaialterl~rrlcr: {>i:~ille o}lctl. sl?acc area that shall l7e rrlailltairrec? L~ ilac: 1~r'c?l~(Sr't~ <_>~~,lc~r(s) i~?r° tz [~~,o year l~cr`iocllsersil?Irill~, at the iitnc c>}^insta}}aiiclrl. "I"Ilc; C-~"~:Rs ~}lal}. l7i_~ reecrl'clc~l ti~;iih the IillallSlat. ~, City Pzi}lie ~~,'~r1s Igo?lc}iti(lals of~al~}~rc)~al (~'~ttaclt?11ent 13) ns ,'>l}{~~-~'4y: :~. ,~~s Saa-t c>~ #}le irlal }?I~i a #c:a~vfoclt ~ti`icle ~iiiliiy eiiti~rr?c~ni sll~rll lle Il}a{:ec} Illlallicliate}~~ l~el?iztd I've ~f 4 the existing and proposed right-ofway. 2B. Beall Lane is classified as a Collector Street in the City, Developer will be responsible for constructing additional asphalt pavement, sidewalk and landscape row, with street trees, far the Beall Lane frontage. The City will be using a curb side sidewalk and a five foot landscape strip located directly behind the sidewalk for the design of Beall Lane. Developer is responsible for half street improvements. Civil improvement drawings must be approved for construction prior to Final Plat approval. 2C, Applicant will be eligible for SDC credit for the up-sized portion of the street, A standard city street has a half street improvement responsibility of asphalt paving of eighteen feet, plus a five foot sidewalk and five foot landscape row. A collector standard has a paved width of twenty f ve feet with a flue foot sidewalk and landscape row. The developer is eligible for SDC credit for the upsized portion of the asphalt paving. 2D. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the Building Department prior to any construction occurring. 2E. Prier to issuance of the f nal plat, the applicant shall submit far approval by the Public Virorks Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated far landscape raves. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet an center around the perimeter of the property, The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifications for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Cade Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 '1z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape raw will be of the property owners who awn the property directly adjacent to the landscape raw, 2F. The applicant shall provide for a minimum 2S-feat setback from the top of creek bank, as required in Section 1 `~.60.090(E} of the CPMC. The new three (3}let tentative partition map provides a 2S-foot setback. The 25-foot setback shall be shown an the f nal plat map. 2G. The City agrees to accept the proposed open space dedication; however, the area must be landscaped by the applicant, in accordance with a landscaping and irrigation plan that is approved by the Public Works and Parks Department. Maintenance of the open space area shall be managed and maintained by the adjacent property owners for a two year period beginning at the time of installation. At the end of the said two year period, the City will assume all maintenance responsibility for the dedicated open space area. 3. Fire District Three conditions of approval (Attachment C} as fellows: 3A. Add one fire hydrant at the entrance of the develaprrzent to serve residential fire flaw needs. Minimum fire flaw 100(} gallon per minute. If an existing hydrant is within '75 feet of this project entrance, none will be required. 38. Install "Na Parking Fire Lane: signs bath sides of the 20 foot access lane. Signage must be spaced to clearly inform occupants and users. 3C. Past "No Parking Any Tune" to the designated turn around area. Post clearly Page 3 of 4 4. Conditions as listed lay the Jackson County Roads Attachment D} and the Building Department (Attachment E}. 5. Tentative approval to create a three (3} lot flagpole partition shall be valid for one year from the date of approval. An application for Final Plat, Partition shall be filled with the City prior to building permit approvals. EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A>' -- Tentative Plan Attachment "B" -Public Works Staff Report Attachment "C" -Fire District No. 3 Comments Attachment "D"- Jackson County Roads Comments Attachment "E"- Building Department Staff Report Attachment "F" - Findings Attachment "G" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of a Tentative Plat, Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot application to create three residential parcels. REC(3MMEl'~DATICIN. Approve Resolution ,approving the Tentative Plat, Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot application to create three residential parcels. Page 4 of 4 TENT'AT'IVE PARTfT~ON Pi.AI" SUmEr FOR: Oi SURVEY BY: GROUT Fs ASSpGL~T'E5. Lip ~~- ' PAVE cRpVr, REGt57EREp AcENr PARCEL ~!C?. 1, PARTITI{7N E'LAT NU. P-54-1996 ~ PA. 6p% 3575 LtM1l~ StfP~lf7,64t': iAEOFpRp, pBECpN 87501 y, loca#ad in #ha ~~ .OIY.Y,.~#;iB/T£D oAtC: APRy, 28. 2807 .'. u ry Y„~ SOUTHEAST 1 J4 SECT€ON 1 d, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTN, RANGE 2 WEST, HERRY I{. BRApsK+w e.s. zz~t .~ Q:~ VJILlAME17E MERIdIAN, CITY OF CENTRAL. POINT, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGdN ce°irw80.Lxs~•+. oreecaN s7sar ', ~`~, (a+t)sB+-alto cEU: s++-sse2 ~~ i =4 ,'Yr t ss..he,..lrcr; tL ~>o:; `''t ~ u.~rrr;Ew ,4 .-AV,ft~ ~,utJCfli4ti AG' ' °.,k ~ ., µ _ -t,, , g'`588'5P agNt i $88'~t't t`E i+7.83' 1.~. R«. .,, ,,.. }-.,, m' MO CAtE `k r.4 `~ PROPOSE'U PARCEI. ~ - . _ ' s7-2'x-t0aC xL 2ad 1 GROSS- ?60$7 50. Ff., [II ti ~ k UALC Cl>"RK i E ~ t, ~ N£7=" 900D SO. FT. ~' k .. r--?U.O,M ro 3?- 2vr- SC,a: Tl f o3 I } ~i¢ S ` ~ t .: ; .-T"" : ~ V tctC+kEL 4.tCNEffE $, ' ~ ab~ I m 1 III °L' s !~J ~"~ ~: ~' ~s t 'ma'r ,....7p•._ .: t =~ .t t.G4i gq-wry -~ t Ni y„ ~ ~. .a .r- ...-..........Y .,,.f . fff .. . Six?..,,......,.. - BEALL LANE $~ z~' 's-, ,`,V / .i .,.•~-.........25:P0~• 531'_ E ' at ' '~ ~ a ~;1 [ .g; o~ 1 >: ',~ ' 1. ° ~~% I i }. .s rot:. , ~.;,:,,; i ,"s u-xw..eoaC Ts st2 °sl . '~ t.oo' i 1 cln cF cEt.~RnL noun~''~ ~ PROPDS£0 PARCEL. R vi ~ i BASYS QF BEARINGS 1 ~_:. u-29' 3?•~2w-tACC TL LOX E ~y , ~. GROSS ?4724 S0. F7, ~ ' I' ,:° ~a ~"':`.+-.R-?F,` ~ ~ ~ Bcwt~ & 1oRt ea+'t J CENTERLINE 4F SEAtL ERNE SHGWN ON FILED SttRVEY No. Ey ~¢"~ ~ J,i£7= 9D00 S4. FT. i 1 ,. ..,.L oau;; p=:r: f.....,. _ , ~`o ~ s~ ;:.'~~ ~' r ".,t o ~ ~ C? k5D17 A5 SOUTN $9'53'57" FAST. .. ,^rr ~ iUiif '. ~«. 1 ~h ~'wl 'y, ~. :,{ ~.25 . ~. ; ~ ~' ~.{ .. ' '; i EEZ FOUND BRASS DISC IN TH£ SOUTNEAST COE~c pF ~1 ~,` j,,; ~y-^. ~t, `'.a~ -.,, ~5?Irs4.,e~ttG£.5[sY..i<. sr~,stuE.vi:..~_ r. a HEADWA{.L OF COUNTY BRIDGE 611 pN 8 i.ANE AT ,: .~ a. sa.~ ....... ... . .. ~{ 1''us ~\o '~. ~ ]~ - 'S , ;r ... -.. i ~ ~ ~[~ GRIFFIN CREEK. ELEVATION >= 1299.18'. SCALE: 5' ,~ 3p' ~'r n rs1 ~,.'~,;yi~ ~~, .. r,,,^R._. _ _:.a~.. .. ._gs.2,' ~ ( ? S CONTOUR INTERVAL 7' 1 * x ~ SIT 20 ~""..=•. '"•: ~ .. + Iito7 as .. ..- - - ~ E i '4- ~I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ E 37-2w-kopG TAx LGT k6p '"' t ~ It; ~ i' GROSS AREA; 7,59 ACRES ~ ~J"3>~1 ~' ~ POS~[7 PARCEL' 1 1 <';~'::;.~' ! -~ ~ ~ 2OHED; R-?--6 I 1 ~, 1 .~1, ~ ,i E I G£NTRAi, FD3N ~ SCHOOL DISTREC7 No. 6 1t i~ OSS~ 13807 5O. FT. I tsi FIRE DISTRICT 3 .JhenSCN C'REEk C5TATCS 'JH~i kc t 1 ~ • t ~` Ji.~~ ~~ ~ , rn ~pf y,t;+~, ~'IET~ ~C}QD. $Q. FT, ~ "' N1 I ~ 1 .t} ~ .. 1;, ~ i ENCU148RAti0E NOTE v '€ ~~'. t d' .. m ~-„«~-. 1 x7_zw-tu0:, Tc Loa ' 1 I - ,~ ',,.,j .:4 ~ € ~ vi `*"~... ,`,"~ ENNRONMENTAL SPACE TO DE DEDICATED 7p THE THE ELECTREC17Y RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT GRANTED PER ':,:$`~~W;(a^.;~. '.~ti ~ .. '-.~+~.-~~'~ {... sxfwr.a; tRUSr c I ~ ~ . ~,,p ,i„ -~ - ~ ~ ~ ;". ~_'..;. :_.-:::~.. CSTY OF CENTRAL PbINT FOR PARK PURPOSES. INSFRUM£NT N0, 96-30072 EiAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY, 1 n7 ~ r ~1 i~ ~ fro ~ f I I } 8UT IS NOT LOCATABLE. I ,, nl~ I~ ~ u -',-.s~,': ~ ~ E _ ...- '` i t ~ ~ ~~ ~ "'~") PARKWAY TQ $E DEDICATED TO TH£ Ci7Y ~~~~ 1 I ~ ~ Ton- I ~ 5' ~ ~-E. ~ ( 4 t E .., ~.a OF CENTRAL POINT FOR PARK PURPOSES. TH£ TOP6GRAHIC tNFORF tA71ON, SiiOWN HEREON, I5 FROA3 ~I I ti'~; : ~ ~ ~''~` - ~~-: I . },fAX 2009. ltAPROVEM£N7S TO $EALL LANE AHD SNOWY HI ! ;j.:^,: ~',.7...;ti~ ':.,.# t *, , I I'"'-.. ~..'.`.:..;I PROPOSED ACG£SS EASEh{EN7. BUTTE LAhI£ S3NCE MSAY 2p05 MAY RENDER SOkt£ OF THE ,°2 1 ,,<" m t;I_::,'.;t,~~ ~, ..}__,z:.,;_, ~ C ...J y ~ 3 INFORMATION, SHOWN HEREON, TO $£ 3NACCURAT£. ` I ~ ' ' ' I ~€ g ~ j i"n # 2a_,;' ~- ,~2p, ..~ u~Er< €~ ;'. ; i -..--..--...... - PftOPOS£0 PROPERTY Eif~E. ,. , ~, 1 ,, x }. '"} ., ~ ~r _ ~ ... ... .... ._. iN -~~, -~_. a ..,,. - F£NC£LIN£ 3 ~2G .: .~; 2a ~. .? t0'~ ~ b+5e'~, ,,.t i RU Ou µ5,i ... ... -~~, may. J c SO.a0 .~i - 9).8'J' ~ I, t HEAGWniE ~~~„"' ' E ... ., ,.z.t E*!Sr:n~.r.5O;~2r-Sli?R A.. ':..... i ,,.. ... r _; °, ,~.,:, ~. y}, PROF£S5kVEY W 4, ;, b .. - E ~ r, t, LANI} SUR {?R o ._.. y - .,. Ec~:c ,,r. ~ .:..n .,.... ,,,~.., r _. ' -- ~ _ _ ~L~BEALi. l.A~IE ~ osECON 22.15 Jt1LY i+, vit - -. - - - ~S$9'S3'k 5`E 500A4' {5pp.O3', FS 15654) {BASIS OFDF BEI{RENGS} - .._ t KERRY K~2¢RADSHAW '...... CENTERLINE BRASS DISC <. ''.... _ __ _ NE C6RN£R DLG $6 c>a'. s2-af-oz BRkM:E MPFOwnt~^mEa`-'-BRASS BISC BENCH FAARH COaN1Y BRt`S^.~E F8t t ELEVATION - 12$8.18' ` ASSESSOR'S #,7AP No.; 37^-2W-SpDC TL 7p0 ~~ SHEET 1 OF 7 24D5~b5-R8O GrouL$aoli\raviaad_4-20-O7,dvrg i"~~~~1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~3 Public Works department Bola Pierce, Director Stephanie Woolen, Ergineering Tech II PUBLIC i~YC?RKS S7'.4FI' I~LPt9RT' April 11, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Three Lot Paz-tition for 37-ZW-lODC, Tax Lot 100 Applicant: Paul .t-`,rout, P.4. Box 3575, Central Point, 4R 975{127539 Zoning: R-1-6, Residential Single Family Traffic: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers {ITE} Trip Generation iVlanual, a three lot paz-tition will generate approximately 3,(13 peak hour trips {PHT}. The City of Central Point typically z•equires traffic studies for any development that generates more than 25 Pf1T, No traffic study is warranted for this development. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is an existing 12-inch. waterline in Beall Lane. Storm Drain: There is no existing storm drainage in this section of Beall Lane. There is an existing county ditch in front of the subject parcel. Street Section: Beall Lane is county road, currently paved. to a width of twenty-four feet. Issues: In accordance with the flood Insurance Rate Map {FIRM}, the subject property is located in the Special Flood Hazard Area {SERA}, which is also refez-z-ed to as the 100-year floodplain of Griffin Creek. Flood hazards that are known to be associated with the area include: periodic inundation by flood waters, changing channel dynamics, and creek bank erosion. As shown on the tentative plat site plan, the applicant is proposing to designate 10,664 square feet {(1.245 acres} of open space area adjacent to Griffin Creek that would be dedicated to the City of Central Paint. In accordance with Section 17.60.090{E} of the Central Point Municipal Code {CPMC}, there is a zxzinimum 25-foot setback requirement from the top of creek, hank. The Tentative Plat site plan provides fora 20-foot setback between the top of creek bank and the proposed access drive, which is not consistent with the code requirement. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infz•astructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniforzrz Standard Details fox Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest vez•sion of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan zrzay also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. 94Q South Third Street t° Central Point, 975D2 •54~.664.332~ > Fax 54.664.6384 A Public Works Permit will ozxly be issued after the Department Director approves the fznal construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the tune tl~e Public Woz•ks Permit is issued. Conditions of Approval: 1. Public Utility Easement - As part of the Final Plat aten-feet wide utility easement shall be placed immediately behind the existing and proposed right-of way. 2. Beall Lane Frontage Iznproveznents: Beall Lane is classifzed as a Collector Street. Developer will be responsible for constructing additional asphalt pavement, sidewalk and landscape row, with street trees, for the Beall Lane frontage. The City will be using a curb side sidewalk and a five foot landscape strip located directly behind the sidewalk for the design of Beall Lane. Developer is responsible for half-street improvements. Civil iznpz•ovement drawings must be approved far construction prior to Final Plat approval. 3. System Development Charges Credit (SDC~: Applicant will be eligible for SDC credit the up-sized portion of the street. A standard city street has a half street improvement responsibility of asphalt paving of eighteen feet, plus a five foot sidewalk and fzve foot landscape row. A collector standard has a paved width of twenty five feet with a five foot sidewalk and landscape row. The developer is eligible for SDC credit for the upsized portion of the asphalt paving. 4. Gradin.,g, Permit: Applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the Building Department prior to any construction occuzring. S, Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final plat, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape rows. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifzcations for the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a I 'lz" trunk diameter at the time of installation, All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. 6. Top of Creek Bank Setback: The applicant shall provide for a minimum 25-foot setback froze the top of creek bazzk, as required in Section I'].60.09{}(E) of the CPMC. The existing tentative plat plan provides for a 20-foot setback from the top-of--creek bank to the edge of the private drive. To be consistent with the code requirement, the setback must be increased an additional five feet. 7. C}pen Space Dedication & Maintenance Responsibility: The City agrees to accept the proposed open space dedication; however, the area must be landscaped by the applicant, in accordance with a landscaping and iz-xigation plan that is approved by the Public Works and Parks Department. Maintenance of the open space area shall be maintained by the adjacent property owners for a two year pez•iad beginning at the time of installation. At the end of the said two year period, the City will assume all maintenance responsibility for the dedicated open space area. 14CJ Soufh Third Sfreef r. Cenfral Poir~f, fJR ~ ~5D2 * 541.664.3321 r Fax 541, 864.6384 ~. ~ ~`f~= March 28, 2007 Connie Clume Planner City of Central Point ~ackso County Fire District No. 3 833 Agate Read White City oR 97503-1075 {541} 526-7].t7C} {voiice) {541) 526-4566 {fax) In~arnatr"ovally Accredited -~ 2(1C?5-21111? Grout & Associates Tentative Partition Plat Rile # Q71 fl3 +& Q7104 • Add one fire hydrant at the entrance of the development to serve residential fire flow needs. Minimum fire flow 90170 gallon per minute. Ifi an existing hydrant is within 75 feet of this project entrance none will be required. • Install "No Parking Fire Lane: signs both sides of the 20 foot access lane. Signage must be spaced to clearly inform occupants and users. • Post "No Parking Any Time" to the designated turn around area. Post clearly Mark Moran Deputy Fire Marshal ., ~ ~~: r'u~€lu _~~~ f,%~ ~ i f;F-J ~ ~ r .~1~r,~1~soC~~.~ ~:~a~~~~~~m~~~' ~,>>~~~ ~ .n.:~ ~~~~ ~ f , ~~ t~ ~ -= ~=~~ JACKSON COUNTY xoQas Apr}I 12, 2007 Attention: Connie Clune Gity of Central Point Planning ~ 1 ~ South Second Streef GenfraI Poinf, CC:}R 97502 RE: Subdivision of€ Beall Lane w a county maintained road. Plannfng File: 07103 & 07104; A residential partition. Roar Connie: >~~~~~ Tt'lc #'tEsrne}'ei's ~'~ Tragic cfcl7e~loprtreret_~r~zx~rr zaa Anta#ope #ia©c3 White City, CiFt H7SD3 Phane: (531 } 774-820 t'rsx: (541} T74~24#6 ntsmeyek~}saSee oncounty.arg µrnv.}acksancouniy.atg Thank you for the opportunity fio commer#f on this application for a residential partltio}~ and variance, The applicant is proposing athree-parcel partition locafied west of Snowy Butte Lane. Reads has the following comments: 1. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to ,Jackson County Roads and obtain cc~unfy permits if required. 2, The applicant shall obtain a road approach permit f}~om Roads for the new road approach fo Bead Lane. We recommend no direcf driveway access to Beall Lane, 3. Please note fhaf Beall Lane {Gounty Arterial} has a variable right-of-way with an Average Dally Traffic count of 8780 as of August 2008 seventy-five yards west of F-tlghv~ray 99. 4. We recommend preserving and enhancing riparian zone wlfh naflve plants. Sincerely, Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & C7evelc~p~nenf Engineer €:~Er~gli~teerlr7gtC3evelpprrsentiClT(~StCNTRlPT107'€ 03.wpci '~' t r I~~`I~1..: 415147 T{~: ~I~r,rrrir~? L)~~t°1rrl~~,°rr~ ~''#.?I~1: 1~~rilclirr~~ 1~~}~~tr~fmn CTB,~CT: t'r~1~~ei'~'~trfifi<~i~ t'~cF~ir~ti;: l'.t7. l~c>~ X575 TI~~; -;i,~f~f~r~}:~ori ~s t« I~r~c:~~~~f~: ini-c~r~r~7~fic7rr t~ flt~; f'i~r~r~irz`> ~'c~r7rr7~i:~sior~ ~ir~cl tl~e 1~p~~:~li~~ri~t .. r~c~~~rr~c~rrir> t.;rf~:~ l~~rrl~~irl~~ I~~I~ar~fr~~~rr1 t~~~c~~rrr~~.~n~r~tti ~~t1cl ~:t~r~cir~~~~r~s 1o Inc: raa~l~t~a4 ~, rrr fl~,~ c$~.~i`~r~ ~~rlc~ L3~~~c1~~I~r2rc~rjf ~j(~fl~c~ k~r~t>}~~~s~ti ~~rc~j~cf. Thai ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~a~~~ ~°~°~ ~~~~~,0 1'l~i~, ri~I?ori ~:~ ~~~~~~litrri~a{rr~; ~~ircl ~~~rnl:~il~,ci sc~lel~~ f<?~~ ~r:;c~ y tl~e ~:zlf~~~1 I~~irri I'ltrrrrrirr (,.~ot~~r~ris~~it~rt. ' ~ . i ~ 1 1~' I ~, ~ ''~:';il~t r,. T i ~i ~IIr::ij ~. ~7~.1:ii..C:..,.„, ~~~~~f~l~f~l~iY ~~g n ~ ~~tee,;'~~' 1~!: i~rlt~l~lfr 1_. ~}~})1ic~)ili, ~lf>ct~it~ and ~c)IItT~)cic)r~ rr1ll~t 4;C)iJJI)l~~ ti~ itll ~)~1 tli'1(~il~ `>l~Tic~ c)l~t`~T-~n±~(~il ~o})t~cl c,(3ci~~,~ ~iJ~JCI r3})hly f`e?T' ~:Tl} f)~~T~iJJiiS iITJ~{)lll.~ll ilT~: C_'~:iliJ'~il Pc)ini 13LJilcliTl~r. l~(~l)~I(~i111L'1)t: ~. ~~ ~) })C1~'~liC_'- SLOCCII clC~TlJI ~,~%.'ili~iTl l~~ })CC?})(?~C;(1 ll 1"i1l~~;'t 1)C~ CC;~,it;~YC){~rlilC{ ~l })t''-C'iill( lt~SltC,C~ b t~~~~~CTlit~tl }'Oiiii }'[cJJ))1~irT~~ [)~.;1_)~t-iI1~I~;t~i~ ~. ,t~'l~' })I~1~'cliC; tiil~'(:'i 11~~:11iIC1*? lillCtii" ~?~'. !C.'~'I(;~,1 CC~ 'r1Ci(~ 1)(',1~11I1}tiJ,'C~ t71' }11 (; ~..~(.',lliJ~l~ ~{)lJll Etc(:iiic:~t11:)~~}~~TJiil)(~11t ~, l'J~t)~ i(:lc ilJ~ bllil(liitr~. ci(l)rll~li~'JC~tI~ ~,ti ii11 ~! CiC~c)i~(;jiili~:il rc~1)()ii ~1.; I~cltliic~tl b~ ~~`~`~~~; .'~.}~})~Jlcli~ .} ~tJlci ~:lltJ})tLr l ~ of`til~ ~7.`'~`~t_'. .~'1 ~~~ritcJJ r,l)c)ri of~illc ail~c~~1i4~~~ii()r) ~~li~rll ~rlclt~.c;~;, t?u~ Jl~~;ci JJOi 1)~ liT~)ii~(l ~o, tll~ }ol}<)~~~irT~ ii~t-{>~i'i~l~,~ti~~-: ~. .~, l)lc)i })ltiJl sl~c)E~;iil~ ill(; ]c3c.;~liic)il c)f~~Jll i~st 1)()i-iil~s ~IJxI'()1' (~(~~1~{)ii()11~;. b. }(;s(;ril)tic)n~ ~111('t ~~l~J~;~if~i(;~Tii<)ilti c)i~ill(; 111{Ti(~ri~Tls (:Jlcc)JJJat(~C(;(l. [~.l(~~{tii(~1T~ (>I~tlre ~~{Ti(~r i~Tl)1~. if~c~Jl(,cxlni~.r(.cl. ~~, ~2cco1~TTaT~tTt~~~ii(~11;; (t~i~ iotrt~ci~~iO11 t~~}3~, ~l~~cl tj~;sif,~~ ez'ifi~t'i~~, ii1~:~lclclin~, })~~Lt~i)~1<~' ~:a})~1(;iiti, prc)vi~ic)rJS it) illiti~~:~:tiL ill(.: (~f'l~;c[~ ()i~e~})arl~iti(' ~()il~, !?i'o~;i:-jic)Jls i() ~tTi1i~>~)f(° t(1~; (;'C~cis (3(~li(l~icl<lc;iic_~11 ~Jirtl ;~)il 5i1'~rl`~tll_ ~1TICl i1T~~ ~fl~(:t~ c)f~~T(l~~l~:~~Jli {c)~Ids. 1~'lT(iT ~~}~6ti1->ivc' ~c)i( ~~1~~.~;~r(~;t:iTt, s3c;~:i{Ti })r'c~~,iyic)t~s Il~ali ()~~ {)it)~,ici~:~t1 in ~r }(3JIi1C~i)~1()11 C1(:'iC~'ll ~I11(l (;()i151Tt1C;i1011 il) ~~Il~;~',iJ<T1~Cl ~I?~11115i Cl~lJll~i+,'C'. (ltJc.' i(3 C`4}3~1C151Z C;CIC'.~ti. ~>t1ICl Cl~1„_,i1 y}bill ()(r })~1:~(Ll i311 `,?L)i;C{111Ct;i1~ T~(_',C;()IT1JIlC%Jli~(irli?11ti.` ~. ~rJ~tl(liil~~ c~x(.<T~;~1Ti~~JT }3~r~il~ii5 ~ri~e:~ i~~~}~iir(~C} iJ~ ~i(:C:c)r~~:1~trT(:(~ ~~-ii}i ()`~`~~.' ;~'~}3f7(~i~li .} ~~n~~t (:}r<1})i(r ] ~ flJlCl r(~~;1T~(liJ~{~ ~In~ fill Jnai(;T~i<Jl })I~,(:~cl ()11 illc~ ~;iic. l~ill~, ic) 1;c~ Ii~,ec.l i(3 ~(1})})c)J~t il~(~ i)urJ(laii()11 c)f <~Jlri b~iil(liJl`, c>r ~~111(;itiri; ~;lJ~ill ~~, p[~~~<l iJl ~TCC;nrcl~TTlc(~ l~ iilJ ~TC~:(})i(~,tl eJl~iiT(;(~rirl~~ }~~acti(:(~s. 11 ~;c)i1 iJl~(~~tizttti()11 r~c}~<~ri, arJtl ~j t'ep()Ji ~)f's~t~i~~<T~i(>T~ti' })l~:~ceJll(~.111 of fill (irzc~uciin y})~~i<Tl irl~pi~:C;iic~11~ <_>-~})l~T(;(;Jn(~Jli i)l~Jl~Ji <111<~ C'C)111}?~1~'tiorl) ~TC~(~~:})t~Tl)le ic) ill( l3Jiil(1ir!`, ~)~~l~ic;i~ll~ ~ll~lll 1)~ Ll)Tlliti~(l }n~ic)r t<) [it~~I c~~' illy ~r~lclJJl~f'~, ;c~1r~~TiiOn }~~i'Jnit. 1~tJil~ii~t [)erJ)lii~ ~~~ill 11()~ lx~ issci~cl ~iJtiil <~r~lc~in~;lex~~lv~riiol> ~>erJllit is ~~~1)t-c)ti~(~cl ~TJlcl. f~ilTa~l(~c1. ~Lll~, ti})l~~t` 1. ft~()t c)1` Cil1 }>1;)<;~°d c)l~f_~~iclc~ ;~~`[)i.Jl)~rc~ ~i~'~li:>--c~f ~~ti ~)~ , ~. Tll~ Tl[~pr 1, fr~t~i ()f' fill tll~Ji (l(~L~ ~~~~t (i11cIcT~~i~ buildinns, sir(1~iliT'~s, t~~° v(;31i~ulr aces ~-, ~I~ ~ car }>arlbii~t~ ~~1`c~Tti. ,iihii~, ~~1 ii, I,t; io~o~rc ~~r c1~r>>c~li~>ir ~~~zti ;v:~i~tili~>. ~i~i~~.;itirc;, ~t)C~1~~ii r~t~t ~~~i/ E:~rt~j~c~t~ ~~zili i~~~ ~l~td~i~s.~ l_:)~;~~~iri~~~~,~~i fi>~ ~~~~~i~~~t r~~~~~ui~~it~~,ii~s. l~ ~it~tif~y flit, t'it~~ )a~iil~(ii<<~ 1)~°~~~~i(~racj~( ~~l'tii~y ~,ri~i>>~>_ ~~,~;ii~;, c~~ ~c;~ati~ ~,:.>(c:i~~~; 8, ~~~~v c3~;v~,l~~p1>>~d~~t (t~~~~}~ 111dz7-~~~~3~~~: ~~l~z~r~f~,~) ~tt~ i~a~~~~~c~~~cl ~~r l~~a~rr~}>rov~.:cl rW<~l ~;st~~~ 1o~~~t~cl t~'i~l~li[~t '~1~~ l~{>~~c3 l~z~~z~~rci ~~~~;~~ ol'th~~ (_'i1v ~~~i~{.'~~r~1t~~~1 1'~~i~~( sl~~~ll ~~~~gt~ir~- ~i i.~cr~4~lc~1~7~~~~~t ;}~:~~«~i( <~s s~i ~t~~~ti~ i» tll~~; C;~.~~tr~~l ['~~i~~( ~%1>,li~i~;i}~~~1 ~"u<l~ t~ ;} -.1~;~(~. c~# l)t~~l c;{~r~i~~~l, ~~~~~~io~~ t~~~i~t~~~>i, ~~~~~1 ii~~~~~1~ t>t~~ ~,li~ta~t<~i;~c.>tt~ ~~t~~~~~~c3ur~~s rr~~~~,t ~.~.~ ik1~~~1i;[t~er-i~;c1'. J C?. f~~~,31ir~.•~~tic>r~ fc~~. l~~iilcli~~~, ~~~.~r~1~~s ~~ i!l r~;c]i~iri, tl~i~~:°f.~ tiv(~ ~~f'c~~~~l~~li'.f~; l~lt~~i~; ii~~li~~~tii~~; ~;«~~ll~li~~i~c~ ~~ i11~ c:)~-~~>_c~ii (ti~si~lc~~ti<~i `~}~~ c~i~:~l(y~ C'c~cl~ ~~?t)()~ ). l~~iriv ~i~t~~i~~t ;~ tivill c~~,~<<~~~~~~inc; f~i~~~ hyc3~~~ii~filc~~;~~~c~ir-, ~~~ ~~~~il ~a~ ~~~;~;c~~~ t~ b>~ilciir~~js, <_; ~~n~ ~;~~t~t~~~~:s ~~r~~~t~~cc! ~il~l~ '~ ~; s~~{~ii~itt~~~i iii Syr iii~a~ [~~~ t~~~; ~~~~~li~<~t~i, ter ;~~?~~lic:z~jit'~; ~;~~i`~t~~~~~~~~c~~ t~c~ ~I~~ ~>iiC~_~i~~tr ?~€~~~~~~r1i~~~~11( 1~~~~~~~~~>~-ov~al p~°ic~~° tt~ ~~~~r~(, ~~i'ti~~~~~~1~. ~Lti~~e~11'ulltr~. I~~~lcl ~~I~:~IClot- .~1.ttachment "F" FINDINGS OF FACT AND C4NCLUSIIfJNS t)F LAW File No: 07104 INTRC3DUCTI€~N In the matter of an application requesting Tentative Plan approval for a Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot to create three parcels. A Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot request is a Type 11 application review; however this proposal necessitates variances to the number of lots that are allowed to take access from the 20 ft. flag pole easement as recommended by Jackson County Roads. A Class C Variance application (File No. 07103} has been filed in preparation of this proposal, The subject property is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zonia~g district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W lOL7C, Tax Lot 100, 1772 Beall Lane. Applicant: Paul Grout. CPMC .15.36. t74tJ ~Vo par'titir~~t slircll be crppt•©vetl in ~vliiclz rc f rc~,~ Ir~t, as defrnerl in this clruptet•, is crercterl unless: CPMC 15.36. ~4ta {~}. The parent and flag last, excluding the flag pule, ~vhethet' fee title ar• rzn er~se~rient, skull c~xttzply with the nainirtrtrtn lat size, lit ditttetrsion, and setback r•e~lcrif'etnents for• the z~rnirtg district in wliicli tl:e Ir~ts ~Ne locatert; Finding: The parent parcel is approximately 1.02 acres. The minimum lot area in the R-1-~ zone is 5,000 square ft., the znaxi~num lot area is 9,000 sq. ft with a minimum lot width of 50 ft. Parcel One's proposed net area is 9,0100 sq. ft. with a lot width of 65.66 ft. excluding the flag pole access as required by Section 16.36.040{A}. Parcel Two is 9,{}00 sq. ft. with a net lot width of $4.79 ft. Parcel Three is 9,000 sq. ft. in lot area with a net lot width of 52.47 ft. Finding: Parcel One fronts Beall Lane; however Beall Lane is designated as an arterial street and for the purpose of safety to the public Jackson County Roads is recommending that the access to the property be from a single access point utilizing the flagpole easement. Finding: The existing dwelling located on proposed Parcel One will be removed as part of this development. Finding: The proposed parcels are suff dent in size and design that a structure can placed in conformance to the setback requirements of the R-1-6 zone district. Cvnclusian: The proposed Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot as submitted meets the minimumlmaximum lot area and width dimension ofthe R-1-6 zone. Front and side yard setback requirements can also be met by this proposal. ~~ Page 1 of 3 CPMC 15.35. t14tI {B} The flag pole shall be tro Tess tliara twenty feet wide and paved to private standards as set for'tli in the Standard Specifieatiotas arrrl fJrrifor•rtr Retails, City r~ f Central Poirat Prrblie N~©rks 1~epat•tirrent; Finding: This partition application proposes a twenty {20} fl wide flag pole access to provide ingress/egress for three residential parcels. To accommodate the top of creek hank setback, the easement is designed to he twenty-five {25} ff. from the bank for Griffin Creek as required by Section 17.60.090 (E}. Finding: A turn around between Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 is designed in tl~e flag pole easement. Conclusion: The proposed Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot partition application as submitted meets section {16,36.040(B}, requiring no less than twenty {20} ft. wide flag pole easement access. CPMC 15.36. t1~ll {C} No fence, structure, or gray otl:erp/rysical t~bstacle shall 6epl'aeerl rvitliin the flag pale; Finding: The existing structures will be removed leaving the flag pole easement free of any physical obstacle. The proposed easement is parallel to an existing structure that is to be removed. Conciersion: Existing structures will be removed and no other physical obstacles arc proposed within the flag pole easement. CPMC 15.36. a4d {p) A nraxitraurra of true {2} lets are allowed access frotrr a flag pale; Finding: Three parcels are requesting access from a twenty {20} ft access easement.. Parcel C7ne has Beall Lane frontage; however Beall Lane is designated as arterial street and for the purpose of safety to the public, Jackson County Roads is recoz~.mending the access to the property be from. a single access point or the flagpole easement. Finding: This proposal necessitates a variance to CPMC Section 16.36.040 {D}, the number of allowed lots that can access from the 20 ft. flag pole easement as recommended by Jackson County Roads. A Class C Variance application {File No. 07103} has been filed in preparation of this proposal Conclusion: The proposed division is for the creation of three lots utilizing the one easement requires A Class C Variance to CPIVIC 16.36.040 {fit} and such application has been submitted and approved. CPMC I7,2(I fl2(? Permitted uses plie following uses and their accessory uses are pernrr`tted in an R~-I district: A. Single- f am ily d welling; ~~ Page 2 of 3 Finding: The proposed partition is foz• the creation of three resiclentiai parcels. Proposed Parcel One and a portion of Parcel Two have an existing structures that are to be removed. Parcel Three is vacant of structures. Finding: Griffin Creek passes through the southwest corner of tl~e propcz-ty. The propez-ty is identifzed on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as located in the Special Flood Hazard Area and as such the applicant proposed a greenway to be dedicated to the City of Central Poizat. The proposed greenway will connect to Flanagan Park, an existing City park that has a creek side tail system. The greenway will also connect to an open space established as part ofi Snowy Butte subdivision to the north of the subject prapez-ty. The City Parks Department has reviewed the greenway proposal and finds the potential expansion meets the Park managezrzent goals. Findz`ng: The applicant proposes a greenway parallel to Griffin Creek be dedicated as open space and to be incorporated in the existing City creek side park, Flanagan Park. Conclusion: The residential and park use proposed by this partition is a permitted use in the R- I-6 zone district. CPMC .17.2U 1154 Ilensity, lat area, lot width, dittzensirrn, but'Zding Izeigl:t, Irtt cr~verage, and yawl requirettzents. Tlie density attd Ivt rerZuiretnents of the R-I zoning rlistt•ict are grtverned by the subcategories ttfR-I-6, R-1-8 and R-1-14 districts, as delitzeaterl ertz the rtfficial zttnitzg ttza~ of Central Point. Tlie density, lot area, lot dimensions, building lteiglzt, lnt cr~verage and yawl t•erlttitettzents I?evela~ttnent Reriuit•enzents R-.1-6: Minittzuttr Ittt area {interior) 5,441) stl. ft, Muxittzuttt let area ~interiot) 9,444 srl. ft, Minitttuttr lat area {'corner) 7,444sr1. f~ Maxittzuttz lcrt area (corner} Nl,~ Minittzuttz Ictt }vdth {interior) 511 ft. Minitnunt Zvt width (corner,} b4f~ Minittrum front yard 24 ft, Minittzuttz side yard 'interior) 5 ft. Minitnunz side yard {street side) X4 f~ Mitzittzuttt side yard (street side) 14 ft: Maxintuttz buzlding height 35 f~ Maxitttutrr I~t cavet•age 511( Finding: The Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot application proposes the creation of three parcels meeting the maximum interior lot area and width requirement of 50 ft.. Finding: Tine parcel size and shape provide that structural development can met the setback requirements. Finding: The three proposed parcels have a net lot area not in excess of 9,Of~0 sq ft. Conclusion: Each parcel of the proposed Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot application meets the 50 ft. lot width requirement and maximum net lot area of the R-1-6 zone. Page 3 of ~~-~~~a ~ ~ ~~ 6659 PLANNING CUMMISSI(7-N RES4LUTIClN Nfl. A REStJLUTI4N Tfl APFRflVE A TENTATIVE FLAN FflR A MINOR LAND PARTITION, FLAG LOT TO CREATE TkIREE PARCELS FILE NO.O?104 Applicant, Paul Grout 375 2W IODC, Tax Lot 100, 1772 Beall Lane. WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted an application for a Tentative Plan for a Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot Section 16.36.040 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code on approximately 1.02 acres for a three lot partition on property identified on 3ackson County Assessor's as map 37S 2W I ODC, Tax Lot 100, 1772 Beall Lane in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the property is currently in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning district and the partition application as requested is consistent with the criteria of Section 16,36.040; and WHEREAS, on May 1, 20(37, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for Tentative Plan approval for a Minor Land Partition, Flag Lot; anal WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the Application does comply with the applicable standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set foa~th in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A"} dated May 1, 2007; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission for the City of Central Point, Oregon, by this Resolution No. hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conditions of approval as stated in Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated May 1, 2007 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of May, 200?. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (SI112007) ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of May, 2007 Planning; Cornrr~ission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. {511/2007) ~~AI.,C~T C: ~L'~TC}~IAL.E ~,J~~ P~F~N~I'T` AI~LI ~~T~ F~L~A~`~i ~l.GI~N !~ ~'~" 1IE' 110. 0"T106 ~~---, b' May 1, 2d~7 ~C'~arr~ Ntrrtit~ttrey,F~I~F; C:or~trnuc~ity C:7~vc~t~tsrrrettt t.)irc~ctart l~ssist~~+r~t C:tty Acir~air7istr~it~r ~TAFI~'' ~~UR~E: Tam Humphrey, Catnunity Develapment Directar ACKGRUUN a~.s~ut;ui~c ila~ t111VL11AGi,1 ~tclti Cilia i1G Wct~ dtJi~; I.U ~GC:UTC }, ~ ~. c<. new lacatians far the twa existing dwellings an tax ~' fats 600 and 700. ~ ,~,,,,~ `~ The structure's fatal grass Haar area is 26,030 square feet. Retail co ercial and a member's fitness center are prapased far the graund Haar. An ele~ratar will pravide access to the ascend Haar affices with a security card central far the third fleet to safeguard access far the residents, r CPM~ sectian 17.65.OS0, Table 1 "' The residential units will be two-bedroom apartments, each one with a balcony. The project's design includes landscaped areas and twenty-three (23} offstreet parking spaces. Eight of the off street parking spaces will be covered and assigned to the unit residents. Diagonal parking ~ 19 spaces} have been incorporated into the design along both Oak and Third Streets. Utilities are available and adequate to service the proposed development. Designated landscaped areas also along Oak and Third streets will provide street trees and pedestrian travel ways. Oak and Third Streets, along with an existing alley provide public access to the project. Ingress and egress to the interior parking area will utilize the existing twenty foot wide alley. The alley, located along the southern property line, will be paved as part of the project development. Conditional Use: The intent of this project is to support the City's ongoing efforts to promote `mixed- use' development where people live and work at a single location that combines personal service, commercial, professional office space and residential uses. Because the project proposes a fitness center and the second floor professional off ces~, a conditional use review is required. The TOD District encourages multifamily and senior housing along with complementary commercial use within the HMR district. The Tt~D-HMR designation and this site are located in the center of the Downtown TC?D District. Cxiven the higher densities, support activities, such as retail sales and services, and professional offices are permitted in addition to multiple family residences. Second story professional offices are permitted in areas adjacent to Employment Commercial (EC} districts. As the name implies, the EC designation supports employment and is generally located along Pine Street where there are existing EC uses. City Hall is adjacent to the subject property and is considered its awn employment center with offices located on the first and second floors. Although the zone designation for City Hall is Civic, the function and location of its offices are similar to those being proposed in `The Crossing'. City Hall and this proposed development are bath positioned along Third Street which is intended to be a `civic corridor'. The Central Point Downtown Revitalization Plan supports the TC}D-District in recognizing the location of Third and C~ak Streets as an important cross-axis to Pine Street. The Plan Hates that Third Street can play a significant role in the revitalization of Downtown and the area has already been enhanced by the siting of City Hall and the County Library. The addition of The Crossing is expected to contribute further to vibrant redevelopment an teak and Third Streets. The Downtown Plan states that the City should continue to encourage new upper-story office space to house community serving businesses as well as new retailers. When considering a Conditional Use in the TC7D District, key criteria in the CPIVIC include: l . That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and to meet all other development and lot requirements for the zoning district; and 2. That the site has adequate access to a public street that the street can effectively accommodate traffic that may be generated by the proposed uses; and a CPMC section 17.65,05£ Table I 3 Central Point Downtown Revitalization Plan, pages 1$ 8c42. Page 2 of 5 3. That the proposed uses {fitness center and the professional offices} will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted uses thereof; and 4. That second story off ces may be permitted in the I IMR zone when adjacent to Employment Commercial areas; and whether employment centers within the Civic designation (the Library and. City Mali} have the same or a similar intent as the EC zone, a and, 5. That the conditions required for approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health safety and general welfare. In reviewing the project, it has been determined that as presented, the project is in general compliance with the above key criteria {see Attachment "G" for detailed Endings}. Density and Coverage: For the property, the minimum allowed density is 16 units per net acres. The project proposes 18 units, which is consistent with the HMR density requirements. The minimum lot area for multifamily or senior housing is 1,000 sq. ft. The project proposes eight (8} residential units, which fall within the HMR lot area requirements. The maximum allowed coverage is 85°l0. This figure is based on a gross acreage calculation. After taking into consideration, the gross acreage of the project the proposed coverage is 83.3°l0, which is in compliance with the CPMC. Table 1 Setbacks: The property is located at the corner of ©ak and Third Streets. The site plan {Attachment B, sheet 1 }provides a twenty-one X21 }foot rear setback, a six {6) foot west side yard and a fifteen {15} foot east side yard setback, each of which is within the requirements of the CPMC. Parking: Section 17.65.050, Table 3 identifies the minimum parking requirements for the project. Parking standards may be reduced 25°lo when Pari?cing: Required The Crossing Residential 8 Units 1,5 {50°l0 12 Covered = 6} dr Senior Housing 9 {50% Covered =4} 8 Professional Qf~ce 1 sp per 400 sq ft 20 =20 Retail SaleslService 1 sp per 500 sq ft 16 =1$ To#al Parking 48 25°lo ReducedtTransit = 12 36 44 transit service zs provzded in the TC)D district. Shared parking is also encouraged in the TC}D and requirements may be further reduced when reciprocal agreements for shared parking are recorded. In this case, there are opportunities for shared parking in the immediate area. The project site is within the Rogue Valley Transportation District. Based on the project's specific uses, a minimum of 36 parking spaces are needed, 44 are proposed. Eight to twelve parking spaces are required for the residential use. Per the T4D regulation, 50°l0 of these parking spaces must be covered {six spaces}. As designed, the project provides for eight covered parking spaces. The above table, Table 1, illustrates that the project complies with the City's minimum parking requirements. Architectural 17-esign: The T4D District encourages multifamily housing along with complementary commercial use within the HMR district. ¢ CPMC 17.65.04{}{B}{1}and {C} s CPMC Section 17.65.(}50 Table 2 Page 3 of 5 The Site Plan application includes architectural elevations, parking and landscape plan {Attachment B}. The building design is similar to new construction in the area and the earth tone material colors are found to compliment the adjacent City Hall, The developer is proposing to use construction techniques that will give the new building an °aged' appearance. Lar-dscaping and Open Space: The project includes 3,{125 square feet of landscaped open space accounting for 13°le of the total property area. The minimum landscape requirement is 15°l0~ . The applicant has agreed to provide additional landscaped areas. The addition of a rooftop garden and patio- scapes on the individual balconies are two suggestions presented by the applicant. A review of the planting diagram Ends that additional street trees are required on Third Street in order to meet provisions of Section 12.36. The additional landscaped areas} and street trees will be included in the landscape and irrigation plan submitted to the Public Works Department for review prior to issuing a building permit. This is recommended as a condition of approval. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "G" ISSUES: 1. The Conditional Use Permit requires the interpretation and finding that the intent and current uses in the Civic zoning district are similar to the Employment Commercial {EC} designation which would subsequently allow second story professional offices in the HMR. zone when adjacent to either EC or Civic zones. 2. Additional landscaped areas and street trees are necessary to meet the code requirements. C€)NDITIUNS CIF APFRUVAL: l . The consolidation of tax lots 500, 6(3(1 and 700 will be done prior to approval of any building permits. 2. The additional landscaped areas} and street trees will be included in the landscape and irrigation plan submitted for review to the City Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall submit lighting and signage plans prior to building permit approval. Said plans shall be consistent with the provisions of CPMC Sections 15.24, 1'7.60.11(} and 1 ~'.6'7.O50~M}. 4, Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide plans that illustrate a required minimum number of covered parking as part of the project, 5. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Public Works Department (Attachment C} 6 CPMC Section 1'7.65.050 Table 2 Page 4 of 5 Sa. Prior to the building permits being finaled, an irrigation plan is required. Additionally, all perimeter and interior landscaping and street trees must be installed per the applicants Landscape and Irrigation Plan. 5b, A Street Tree Plan for Third Street is required. A minimum of four trees is needed. Sc. The Alley between South Third and Fourth Streets is required to be paved as part of the application. 6. Conditions as listed by Fire District No. 3 {Attachment D}, Central Point Building Department (Attachment E} and Rogue Valley Sewer Services {Attachment F}. ~. The approved conditional uses will comply with local, state, and federal health and safety regulations. 8. The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approvals shall lapse and become void one year following the date on which it becomes effective. EXHIBIT5IATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A -Applicant's Statement Attach3ent "B" -Proposed Project & Landscaping Plans Attachment "C" - Public Works Staff Report Attachment "D" -Fire District No. 3 Comments Attachment "E" - $uilding Department Staff Report Attachment "F" -Rogue Valley Sewer Services Attachment "G" -Planning Department Findings Attachment "H" -Proposed Resolution ACTIQN. Consideration of Resolution No. , approving the Site Plan Application and Conditional Use Permit. RECt7MMENDATIUN: Approval of Resolution No. ~, granting Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit approval. 52 Page 5 of 5 ~YIa.~Qt ~~3ilt~'1`~?1`~.SE',St ~~~ 650 ~. Pin+a street, 104 Central Point, C?R 97502 (541 } 864-12x8 Fax: X541 } 664-2554 e-mail: tamr~y~rnaiotconstructior~.cc~m City of Central Point Planning Department 3.40 S 'T'hird Street Central Point, QR 975{12 RE: File No. CI7146 'The proposed project will include a three story structure of high mix residential/commercial use in the TOD district. This structure will include a fitness club and retail space on the first floor, professional office space an the second floor and month to month residential rental. space on the third floor. ft is our intention to provide business and residential units witl~h7 the structure so ownersjemployees would have the option to live above their places of employment, thereby reducing excess traffic in the district. The structure will utilize complimentary materials that will flow with and enhance neighboring businesses and structures such as City Hall, The structure will be approximately 24,[}70 square feet. The first floor being 7,83.0 sq.ft., the second floor being 8,180 sq.ft. and the third floor being 8,130 sq.ft. There will be a three stop elevator with secured access to the tl~.ird floor residences. ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j: ;, r I ,~ ~ ~~ f 4 k k 1 I I j I I I ~, I ~~~~ J I N Q ~- ~ ~ d ~~ ~- ~ ~~ {~ ~~ 8 SCE} ~ ~ ~ ~~¢ ~I11~~~_{c41- O WXn~ ~ES pp ~«p EU~ ~f ga~a3 t.L1 Xsy~~i~~ ~~~~~~~~ F 'n iai 0 uF ~'?" ~~ ~ Z ~ Q ~ ~ d~~ ~_ ~' ? r _~ '~ F- Q 4 ~. [1.1 ~ 1 ~~ LLI SE! EY Z q (} .a F- ~ Q ~~ Iil iii ~ ur iit EiI ~ €4J ~}r s sn 1~ ~~ ~.. ~<0~~l4 ~ ~ m i ~.,~~g j a~ .~( ~~ ~ ~ '~ ems.. I1I .q..t. ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~~ '- ~ ~ ~ ~ fry sfl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ A ~ ~ ~ \l " ~ tlt ~~ !~+c 4 .« SS p ~ . { ~ `i, ~ 0 E 3€ ~_ ^6 t~ ---~X-~ r~-- .~~_~~ 6 ~~j __.~........_....__.__...__-__...__._... _._.-----~-~------ -___.. ..,...... f"'~~1 , ~C.~ak. ~ -~i c#} ~~,(~r V~ ~ ~ yy'' ~ ~ ~~ u; M ~ ~ d 9 Y rvCY iz ~ ~z~~ 3~~-~f ' ~ '~4 ~ ~ ~ ~e~ ~ ~J d pC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _, ~{ y ( } f N }'" ~..~ ~~,~ ~ ill 1'" ,o~ { ~ ~,. ~j ~~~~ § ~~n ~~ i a ~ F~~ ~ ~T 1~ ~(} ~jjl~~.. ¢ ~ ~ ~°ry ~~, 9 Kr~~~a,s' EZO `~ ~ffR ~s~ ~' ~ ~ N ~ ~- i~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~- Q- ~ r ~t a ~~~ a ~ ` ~ tijp~tl.l `~ a £ti_ ~3 ~~ ~ ~~ ~i~,'~ ~~ ~`nz~} ~iu ~ ~~w ~ z .~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 ~ ° d~ $ _~.____----........--G --- i 'o'~"k^ £a~tt atz712~o~ Imagel_edited.tiff ~iz7f2oa~ I~ge~_edited.tiff Public Wcarks L7epartment ~°` ~`{.~ ~ ~T a~~~ ~ [ ~f ~ ~ ~~ i~ ~ 99 Bob Pierce, director Matt Samitore, flev. Servr`ces Coord. P ~TBL~.~~' ~~.?R~S STA F.F R.~"P~R T April ~~, 200'7 AGENDA ITEM: 1Vlixed Use Buildings Site Plan far 37-2W-1 l BB, Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700. Applicant; Toznzny Malat, P.O. Box 3847, Cci~tral Point, OR 97502 Zoning; TOD-I~MR, I-iigh Mix Residential Traffic: The City of Central Point has studied the impacts of new development in the downtown several tunes through the Downtown Revitalization Study, East Pine Street Corridor Study and now the newest rendition of the City's Transpoz-tatian System Plan {TSP}. There are several intersections in the downtown that are currently failing. Any new development will not further deteriorate the system, Overall system development along Pine Street is needed to allow for the overall system to perform greater than a Level of Service "D" Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is an existing 8-inch waterline in Oak Street. Storm Drain: There is a 24-inch storm drain line in Oak Street. Street Section: Oak, 3"~ and 4`}' Streets are all defined as standard local streets and are paved accordingly. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Paint Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details far Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be canstz-acted. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm. drainage basin map, erasion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued. Conditions of Approval: ~14f~ South Third Street ~~~ Central Point, OR~ 5C12 ~ 541.6fi4.3321 -~ Fax 541.6fi4.6884 1. Irrigation Plans and Improvements -Prior to the building permits being finaled, an irrigation plan is required. Additiongally, all perimeter and interior laz7dscaping and street trees must be installed per the applicants Landscape and Irrigation Plan. 2. Third Street Tree's - A Street Tree Plan for Third Street is required. A z~-zinimuzn of four trees is needed. 3. Alley Improvement - The Alley between South Third and Fouz-th Stz•ects is required to be paved as part of tl~e application. 144 South Third Street €~ Central Paint, C.~R 97542 ¢ 541.664,3321 ~ Fax 541.44.6384 ~~ March 28, 2447 Connie Chime Planner City of Central Point Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road ~ .M White City OR 9750310?5 {541} 826-?1(}a {voice} {541} 826-4566 {fax} Internatr`ona/IyAccredited - 2Qp5-2t11Q FD#3 Preliminary Comments Malot Enterprises Mixed use Building Fite # 07'l Ofi 312 Oak Street Central Point, 97542 + Provide full set of construction plans for review and additional comments will be provided. + Potentially this type of development will require an approved NFPA 13 type Sprinkler Systems, + The Fire Department Connection AFDC}and Vault location will need to be pre approved by Fire Department. All NFPA 13 standards shall apply. + Alley Access width will need to be a minimum of 24 feet, There is a moderate fire threat to vehicle parking lots and primary building entrance for occupant accessibility. It appears the main entrance to the occupants will be through the parking loft entrance. With additional detailed construction plans and information, it may change the 24 ft requirement to a lesser width standard. + Ailey shall be clearly Posted `°No Parking Any Time" + All Building and Fire codes shall apply in the review process. Mark Moran DFM s~ City of Central Point, CJregon i4{~ 50, t'hirc# St., Cer€t€al €'c~ir~t,Ur <315Q2 541.66.3321 fax 5~#1.6G4.6384 v~rww.ci.centr~l-pc~ir€t.crr.us :.;;::~- ;:.~~. ,~~- ~F~~^~T~T~,L ~~~~ 1 Building Department Lois DeBc#tedctti, Bui[t~ing O€ficiai SCJ1LD11~G DEPARTMENT STAFF REP(~l~.T DATE: 04/24107 TC~: Plan~~ing Departm Planning ~~~ ~'~ 10~ FRAM: Building- Department St1BJl CT: 3- S~oz-y Com~nerczal BId. (Mixed Used APPLICANT: Tommy Malot P.C~. Lox 3847 Central Point, {Jr. ~750~ Property Description: 3'7S--~W-11 LL-5(30/d00I700 PURPOSE: '~"he staff` report is to provide informatiota to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Bui]ding Department requirements and conditions to be incl~~ded in the design and development of the proposed pr©ject. This is not a ptan review. `t'his report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Paint Planning Commission. 1 City of Central Point, C3regan top So.Tl~ird SL, Central Point, (?r ~75U2 5~11.G64.3321 l=ax 541.664.63f3~+ E~rwv~r.ti.c~r~tral-point.or.us _ - r,:~- ~E~~F"'"' ~.. 1 Building Department Crois €~eE3eneclctti, Building Clffi~ial S~[1XLT.~~NG D~PARTM~NT COMIV~ENT'S: ~ . Applicant, agent and contractors must caznply with all current State of C}regozz adopted codes, and apply far all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. if a pz-ivate starrn dram system is l~ropased it: must be reviewed arzd a permi€: issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. .Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by tl~e Cezztral Paint l~lectrical Department. 4. Provide tl~e building department with a Geoteclani.cal report as required by (~SSC Appendix .l and chaptez- l 8 of tl~ie C)SSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the Following information: a_ A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andlar excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications afthe znatcrials encottntercd. c. P.levatzoz~s of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bear-ing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil stren~~th, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. ~Nhen expansive soils arc present, special provisions shall be provided in tl~e foundation design az~d c;ansh-uctiaz~ to safeglizaz-d against damage due to expar~sivezzess. Said design shall be based an geotechnical z-ecomznendations. 5. ~radingJexcavation permits are required in accordance with ~SSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any X11 material placed on floe site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private storm drain work must be permitted and inspected by City 13ui1dmg .Dept ~pz-ior to back~ll). A soil invcstigat:ian report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill including special inspections of placement of fill and compactions acceptable to tl~e Building ~Jfficial, shall be submitted prior to final of tl-ze gradingJcxcavation permit. 13uildiz~lg permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finaled_ l~xceptian: l , T'he upper l .S foot of fill placed outside of public rights~o~ way. 2. Tl~e upper l .5 foot offill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways ar parking areas. 2 C~?r1Cil~ ~i1l,Pi~f:', FAQ ~mm~~~ iiy of Cei'rtl~al Pnl+i~ f'I~~~~nint~ C~epartment 155 S,~iatl~ S~'~(;r~~i ~>~rc Central ~-'dint, Crc--u)~-~ ~+r">~+~? [=3c: Site Flan r~Yi ~r Malc~t Mixed USe Building, File X10 Tkli-', Stf~`)je(!t "Y~I ~'1`tiC.S :'lI"w C1i"i~~°~lf~~/ ~c?I~Vc?i{ ~1~/ ~l(i)"P G' cE1ti/'I^C? ti;Crl~lC'~.;~`liC`I~iS ~O TF~1(: ., z ~., ~~ ~~•,~ ..._ ~C.1''Ji',( t11c]_Irl C)rl )(1 ~,"~I"~;E' i.. ~ flt ,,t, S~?iViG~..:~ I~1Ll;i l.)e RUC d~et.i ;if"i~ S~-;cJ~C'~ ci[ tl1F:' ~Cl,~e("1~` i~f"ii? ~;'u'llt~rl lh~ e~,iS~ll"1C~ h;_I~C:1111~S ctre ren~~,ved. ~ hey n'~ay I~~tC~~ ~v xte;lCl~;Ci'ke Serve 111~~ l:~,t>!:)"7C?C1 C~euLlo~rn~r~i.. The rt~perty is 1n.+;(I~in tr. I~!1-'ILL=S I='h~zse S~orr~v~~alnl" C~~,~~liry rn~[r"~~~gement area and rC1S CQI'7~:?!y v~l 11 C"i>iE1,'cl'f !t StGrll'~ r'c3:i?r cta~;lliy C~11.l1C1~.'~il"?F:;.i, 1-'i.)C~l.ac V<ti~ey >Es''~'~'t?,I' ~(~I"VICe~ I"eCllleS~S tl`lat a~31~i"GV~11 of 'Che ilrv(~OSt";i.{ clc,v~'eprrtE;i-l I>[~ ~>~Ik~i=c tc~ clie olic)~r~.inC~ conditic~nS: 1. J;~~pii(:,<<n r~lrgst ft~c~~t cxi5~ii-ICS service l~:tter~tls tired Seel them at the ~~;c}~~=;r,~ lint; ~~~ hen he cxisiinc~ k;~r.ailciir~~is are derY~c~vt;ca. . A~x~licar~t i"ril1SC C,hi~~in << sc,~~l~er ~)elrrii; ~trtd pay all +C'I~i[(;C, cicvc,lo~l~tent C:flc~l"~je f~f"iiJ~ T:) CC)ilrl2(~tll`':C; .ii k?t"., `i;~'ti~E;r. ~. fa~~kJ~iCcll"tl 1111.i~f :~likJri'ITc1 S'Orrr';1,1 elect ~~'n t0 ~ ~Ci i~ef°I"1C)r1511 cilC;' GC)('11~~Ic1nGc" V"l'Ith ~.^,`cll:'i` C{C.iil~lt~l ~i{111Cac1rC~S. r ': free tc~ c~~11 ride if yc~u have any ~~~aes~ions rc, ;~arc±ir~c~ ihic +~rc~jt, v „_ ,. ~„...m........e~......,,, ...........~ .. .,..,. Dl:~ta-~et ~nC~InF:c?;. I~:~T,7A`~`~1~1~x.~n:~ , ~,~,r ~ i„_111'LAi~;,~.r ~ ~ t, i'i i~u.~_~~~':)~r\~(}(1'7tt;)71~C~ tii,.1i>~ ~:: _.~~i ;~ :i;;;_ A~~~Cl1ITl~ilt ccG» FINDINGS C)F FACT AND CQNCLUSIC7-NS C3F LAW File Ncr: 071.06 INTR4DUCTIQN In the Matter of a Conditional Use Permit and Site plan Review for the cozzstz~ction of a 24,{}7{1 square foot, three-story mixed use building located in the TC~D-I-1MR, 1-ligh Mix Residential zoning district and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's znap as 37S 2W 1188, Tax Lots 500, 600 az~d 700. The proposed project area is located at 312 Clak Street. (Applicant, The Crossing at Centre Point, LLC, Agent: Tommy Malot} CPNIC' ~~ 65.(15(1 Zvxaittg regrrlativns~~TC1l} district rl. Per~aaitted Uses. Permitted uses in Table 1 are shown with a „P.,, These zrses are allowed if they comply with the applicable previsions of this title. They are subject t© the same applicatio~z and rei1iew process as other permitted uses identified in this title. Finding: The subject property is located within the TC}D-HMR, Kigh Mix Residential zoning district. Mixed commercial, senior housing and Multi-plex apartments are designated as a permitted use, Section 17.65.050 TQD Table 1. Finding: The proposed project is a three-story structure with retail commercial and a fitness center oi~. the first floors, professional offices on the second floor and eight residential units designed on the third floor. Finding: The second floor professional office space will require a Conditional Use permit review. A Conditional Use permit application has been submitted and is a part of the Site plan review application, Finding: The fitness center is considered a personal service oriented use and requires a Conditional Use Permit review. A Conditional Use Perixiit application has been submitted and is part of tkie Site plan review application. Conclusion: The retail and residential uses are permitted in the TC}D-~-IMR zoning district. A Conditional Use Permit application has been submitted for the fitness center on the first floor and professional office spaces proposed on the second floor. CPMC I ~ 65. (15(1(.5). Limited Uses. Limited uses in Table 1 are shown with an "L. " These uses are allowed if they comply with the specific limitations described in this chapter and the applicable previsions of this title. They are subject to the same application and review process as other pernitted uses identified in this title. Finding: The second floor professional office may be permitted in areas adjacent to Employinent Commercial zoned districts and is reviewed as a Conditional Use. A Sage 1 ©f 15 ~'PMC 17. SS. f 511, Table 3 - TC~D I)r`stt•ict and Corrirlar Parkrn~; .Statrrlarcls Findings: Section 17.65.050, Table 3 identifies the minimum parking requircznents for the Project. The total z~uznber of parking spaces required is 48. Finding: Parking standards may be reduced 25°/a when transit service is proved in the TQD district {Sec. 17.65.050{3}. The project is within the Rogue Valley Transportation District {RVTD}. Based on the Project's specific uses, a mizliznuzrz of 36 parking spaces are needed and 44 are proposed. Reciprocal agreezxzents for shared parking may also be pursued and the total number of required spaces further reduced. Finding: Twelve parking spaces are required far the residential use. Per the T4D regulation, 50°l0 of these; parking spaces must be covered {six spaces}. As designed, the Project provides for eight covered parking spaces. The Project complies with the City's minimum parking requirements. Conclusion: The Project complies with the City's minimum parking requirements. CPMC .1 ~ 66, 43f1 {~). Conditional Use. Conditional uses shall be reviewed as provided ita Chapter 1 ~. 76, Conditional Use Permits. Finding: A Conditional Use application was submitted for Planning Commission review of the proposed ground floor member's fztness center az~d the second floor professional offices. The project review utilizing CPMC Sec#ion 17.76 and the TC~D District criteria is found elsewhere in this document, Attachment "G" of the staff repoz~t dated May 1, 2(307. Conclusion: An application has been submitted for public hearing azZd review. CPMC l7.66. flS(1 Application approval criteria. B. Site Plan, landscaping and Construction Plan approval. tl site plan, landscaping and construction plan application shall be approved when the approval authority~nds that the following criteria are satisfied or can be shown to be inapplicable: 1. The provisions of Chapter 77.72, Site Platt, landscaping and Construction Plan approval, shall be satisfied,- and 2. The proposed improvements comply with the approved TC7.~? district or corridor master plan for the property; and 3. Chapter .17.67, L3esign Standards-TC?L3 district and 2`'C?I~ corridor. Finding: A site plan and building elevation. have been submitted as part of this application. Land area and dimensions, parking spaces, and proposed uses have been evaluated utilizing the site plan and TfJD district criteria of CPMC Section 17.65.050 and 17.67. findings addressing Sections 17.72 and 17.67 are included elsewhere in this document, Attachment "G" of the staff report dated May 1, 2007. Finding: Conditions of approval that must be met prior to issuance of a constr~zction building perzrzit are listed and found within the staff report dated May 1, 2207. Page 3 of ~5 Additional conditions nay be ix~~posecl by the Punning Co~nnxission anti will become pax-t of the record. The applicant will receive written zaotiee of the condztions of any approval. +Canclusion: The application included a site plan and landscape planting plan. CPrYfC 17.6d. tl5(1(D). Conditional Use. I. ~ conditional use application shall be approved when the approval authority,~nds that the following criteria are satisfied or can be shown to be irxapplicable.~ a, The prRovisions of Chapter 17.7, Corxditinnal Llse l'errnits; and b. The proposed conditional use complies with the approved TC~I? district or corridor masterplan,for the property; and c. Chapter 1 x.67, T.~esign Standards~~TC?1~ district and TC~1~ corridor. 2. ~ conditional use application shall riot be required for a conditional use which was approved as part o, f'a valid master plan approval as provided in Section 1 T. 6~'. USt?(~I) Finding: A Conditional Use application was submitted for Planning Conxnxission review of the proposed ground floor member's fitness center and the second floor professional offices. The project review utilizing CPMC Section 17.'16 and the TC:}U District criteria is found elsewhere in this document, Attachment "G" of the staff report dated May 1, 2C?07. Findi~~g: The subject property is located out of the Twin Creeks Master Plan land area and is therefore not a part of that plan, The parcel size of (}.53 acre does not require a master pun as provided. in Section 17.66.050(A}. Conclusion: An application has been subrrxittcd for public hearing and review. CP.lt1''C .1 T 67 (1~4 Circulation and access standards ~1. Public Street Standards. 1. B'xcept for specific transportation facilities identified in a TC~I? district or corridor master plan, the street dimensional standards shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 shall apply for all development located within the Tt2p district and for development within the TJ~7 corridor which is approved according to the provisions in Section 17.6S.Q2f1 and Chapter .17.66. 2. Block perimeters shall not exceed one thousand six hundred feet measured along the public street right-of=way. 3..8lock lengths for public streets shall not exceed~ve hundred feet between through streets, measured along street tight-of way. 4. .Public alleys or major off-street bikelpedestrian pathways, designed as provided in this chapter, may be used to meet the block length or perimeter standards of this section. 5. The standards for block perimeters and lengths shall be modified to the minimum extent necessary .based nn~ndings that strict compliance with the standards is not reasonably practicable nr appropriate due to: a. Topographic constraints; Wage 4 of 15 b..~"xisting development patterns on abutting property which preclude the logical cotanection of stt~eets or aecessways; c. Railroads; . d. Traffic safety cotzcerns; e, functional and operational needs to create a large building,- or f. Protection of significant natural resources. Finding: The subject property is located at the corner of C}ak and Third Streets. Both are improved City of Central Point standard residential streets. The existing twenty {20} foot wide alley will be iznprovcd as part of the project. No new streets are proposed. Conclusion: The proposal coznplics. CPMC .17.67. CI4t1(6~ _ {9} -Relating to utility litzes, pedestriatzlbike accessways, sidewalks, off street trails, etc... Finding: Utilities are available and adequate to service the proposed developrent. Finding: These items are reviewed by the Public Works Department during the civil drawings approval process for compliance with City code. Conclusion: Approval of the on-site civil irr~provements shall be determined by the City Public Works Department. CPMC I7 67.4(1{.8). Parking Lot .Driveways. 1. Parking lot driveways that link public streets andlor private streets with parking stalls shall be designed as private streets, unless one of the following is nzet. a. The parking lot driveway is less than otze hundred feet long; b. the parking lot driveway serves one or two residential units; or e. The parking lot driveway provides direct access to angled parking stalls. 2. The number and width of driveways and curb cuts should be minimized and consolidated when passible. 3. l~~here possible, parking lots for new development shall be designed to provide vehicular and pedestrian connections to adjacent sites. 4. Large driveways should use distinctive paving patterns. C. Dn-~`ite Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation. attractive access routes for pedestrian travel should be provided by: 1. Reducing distances between destinations or activity areas such as public sidewalks and building entrances. YT'here appropriate, develop pedestrian routes through sites and buildings to supplement the public right-of-way,- .2. Providing an attractive, convenient pedestrian accessway to building entrances; 3. ,Bridging across barriers and obstacles such as fragmented pathway systems, wide streets, heavy vehicular trafjxc, and changes in level by connecting pedestrian pathways with clearly marked crossings and inviting sidewalk design; 4. Integrating signage and lighting system which offers interest and safety, for pedestrians,- - Page ~ of 25 .5. Connectitag parking areas and destinations with pedestrian paths identified through use of distinctive paving materials, pavement stripings, grade separations, or landscaping, (~?rd. 1c41S~~1(part}, Ex1i. C(pccrt~, 2t?t7Z1). * Editor's Note: Talale 1, L?esign Standards, and .Figure I, Street Cross Sections, are on f le in the planning department. Finding: Ingress and egress to the interior parking area will utilize the existing twenty (20} foot wide alley. The alley, located along the southern property line, will be paved as part of the project design. A covered walkway has been designed to connect the C}ak Street building entrance with the internal parking area, thus providing vehicular and pedestrian connections. Finding; The project design provides diagonal street parking along Oak and Third Streets. No additional access curb cuts are necessary for the project as designed. Finding.: The site plan provides a twelve foot wide sidewalk alozag the Qak Street entrance to the building (Applicant submission sheet 1 }reducing the distance between the entrance and public sidewalks. Finding: The site plan provides connecting parking areas and pedestrian paths through the use ofplanting areas and hard surface walkways. Variation of material is recommended to distinguish the walkway and parking areas. Conclusion: The project can meet requirements ofthis section. CPMC 1 ~ 67.(15(? Site design standat•ds. A. Respect for Existing p'acilities and Qn-Site r`eatures. 1. .Adjustments should 1 e made during land division and site design to improve the overall relationship of a development or an individual building to the surrounding context. Finding: The applicant's architect has designed a building that will be compatible with the design of City Hall and Pour Oaks Centre. The applicant has oriented the Third Street view in order to enhance visual civic corridor established by City Hall and leading to Central Paint Elementary. Finding: The landscaped parking area provides physical space acrd a buffer between the existing residential neighborhood to the south and the proposed project. Conclusion; The proposal complies. 2. .Buildings should be clustered to preserve natural areas. Finding: No identified natural areas are located on or near the subject site. Conclusion: The proposal complies. 73 .page b of 15 CPMCI7.67,Q511 {B}. NatacralFeatures. 1. ~3uildings should be sited to preserve significant trees. Finding: April 3, 2007, the City of Central Planning Coznznissioza (File No. 0711(}) reviewed an application for removal ofan existing Oak tree located on the project site. It was deterzrzined that based on the root system the tree would not survive any type of disturbance, such as sidewalk improvements or other on site construction. Conclusion: Review was completed April 3, 200`]. CPMC I ~:6~ (151I(C). Topography. Finding: The proposed project site is level with zoo unusual topographic features to consider. Concl~~sion: NlA 2. New buildings proposed for existing neighborhoods with awell-defined and desirable character should be compatible with or complement the arclzitectzrral character and siting pattern of neighboring buildings. Fzticling: The proposed design ofthe building is complementary to the adjacent City Hall and Library buildings in architectural style. The building orientation reflects the applicant's concerza for the existing neighborhood to the southeast. The improved alley surface will provide access to these properties and to the project site. Conclusion: The application complies. CPMC I ~ 6T (15(1{F). New Prominent Structures. I. Key public or civic buildings, such as community centers, churches, schools, libraries, post offices, and museums, should be placed in prominent locations, such as fronting on public squares or where pedestrian street vistas terminate, in order to serge as landmarl~s and to symbolically reinforce their importance. Findings: Although the proposed building is not considered a civic building, the architectural design does compliment the adjacent City Hall. The applicant has proposed an architectural design that is compatible the adjacent civic use while maintaining a prominence at the public intersection. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC I7:6T.45(1 {G}, Yiews. The massing of individual buildings should be adjusted to preserve important views while benefzting new and existing occupants and surrounding neighborhoods. Findings: The proposed project site is level with no remarkable views. Page 7 of 15 Conclusion; The proposal con-~plies. CPMC` 17 67. f)54 {F.I). adjoining uses and adjacent Services. 1. YTJhen more intensive uses, such as tzeighborhaod eot~amercial or multifamily dwellings, are within or adjacent to existing single family neighborizaads, care should be taken to minimize the impact of noise, lighting, and traffic on adjacent dwellings. 2. Activity or equipment areas should be strategically located to avoid disturbing adjacent residents. 3. all ota-site service areas, loading zones and outdoor storage areas, waste storage, disposal facilities, trans, former and utility va:dts, and similar activities shall be located irz azz area not visible from a street or urban space. 4. Screening shall be pro~Jided for activities areas atad egzipment that -will create noise, such as loading and vehicle areas, air conditioning units, heat pumps, exhaust fans, arzd garbage compactors, to avoid distuf°bing adjacent residents. S. Group mailboxes are limited to the number of houses an any given black of development. Only those boxes serving the units may be located on the block. t~#ultiple units of mailboxes nzay be combined within a centrally located building offour ~~alls that meets the design guidelines for materials, entrance, roof form, windows, etc. ~'he straacture must have lighting both inside and out. Findings: The building orientation reflects the applicant's concern for the existing neighborhood to the southeast. The unproved alley surface will provide access to these properties and the project site. The landscaped parking area provides a physical space or buffer between the existing residential neighborhood and the proposed project. Conclusion; The proposal complies. CPMG I7.67 t?Sl1 {I). Transitions in Density. .1. l~.ligher density, attached dwelling developments shall minimize impact on adjacent existing lower density, single;family dwelling neighborhoods by adjusting height, massing and materials andlor by providing adequate buffer strips with vegetative screens. 2. Adequate buffer strips with vegetative screens shall be placed to mitigate the impact of higher density development on adjacent lower density development. 3. New residential buildings within~fty feet of existing lava density residential develapment shall be no higher than thirty eve feet and shall be limited to single family detached or attached units, duplexes, triplexes or four plexes. 4. New commercial buildings within fzfty feet of existing law density residetatial develapment shall be rza higher than forty eve feet. S. Dwellings types in a TC7D district or corridor shall be mixed to encourage interaction among people of varying backgrounds and income levels. 6. Zoning changes should occur mid-block, not at the street centerline to ensure that compatible building types face clang streets and within neighborhoods. when dissimilar building types face each other across the street because the zoning change is at the street Paga 8 cif 15 centerline ar mare infill hauling is desired (for instance, drrplexes across the streetfrarrz single dwellings, design shall ensure similarity in massing, setback, and character. 7. 17ensity should be increased incrementally, to buffer existing neighborhoods fratn incompatible building types or densities. Sequence density, generally, as follows: large lot single dwelling, small. lot single dwelling, duplex, townhames, courtyard multifamily apartments, large multi family apartments, and mixed use buildings, Finding: The applicant has provided a landscape plan and site plan. The applicant has provided more than the rewired percentage of landscaping for the proposed developzr~ent and moved the building as far to the north as setbacks allow in order to minimize impacts to adjacent residential properties. The service areas are located away from the existing R-3 zoned neighborhood. Finding: The adjoining properties to the south are zoned for higher density residential use. Although there are no immediate plans to change the current uses on these tax lots, the densities could be increased and they would become even n`rore compatible with the proposed mixed use. Canclusian: Steps have been taken to transition from the density being proposed in the new development. CPMC Z ~ 67, 45(1 {J). Parking. Finding: The applicant has provided parking options for the residents and employees of the proposed project. The applicant proposes 44 parking spaces, eight {8} will be covered and two spaces have provided to meet the ADA accessible requirements. Finding: Table below illustrates that the project complies with the City's minimum parking requirements. Parking: Required The Crossing Residential 8 Units l.S {5(}°l0 12 Covered = 6} 4r Senior Plousing 1 {5(}°fo Covered =4) $ Professional Offzce 1 sp per X00 sq 2fl ff =22 Retail Sales/Service 1 sp per SE}0 sq I6 ft =16 Total Parking 48 25% Reduced/Transit = 44 12 30 Ct~nclusian: The application complies. Pogo 9 of 1~ C'PMC 17, 67 4St1 {K). Landscaping. 1. Perittxeter Screening and Platxting. a. Landscaped buffers slxould be used to achieve sz.r~cient screening while still preserving views to allow areas to be watched and guarded lay neighbors. b. Landscaping should be used to screen and buffer unsightly uses atxd to separate such incompatible uses as parking areas and waste storage and pickup areas. 2. Parking Lot Landscaping and Screening. 3. Landscaping Near Buildings. Landscaping shall serve as a screen or buffer to soften the appearance of structures or uses sz.rch as parking lots or Zcrrge blatxk walls, or to increase the attractiveness t~f common open spaces. 4. Service treas. Service areas, loading zotxes, waste disposal or storage areas must be fully screened fronx public view. S. Street frees. Street trees shall be required along both sides of all pacblic streets with a spacing of'twenty feet to. forty feet on center depending on the mature width of'tlze tree crown, and planted a minimarnx of two feet from the bacl~ of curb. Trees in the right-oaf= way or sidewalk easements shall be approved accorditxg to size, quality, tree ufell desigtx, if applicable, and irrigation shall lac required. Free species slxall be chosen from the city of Central Point approved street tree list. Finding: The applicant has provided a landscape plan designed with l3°ln lot coverage. Additional landscaped areas are necessary to the zrzinimum landscaping requiren~zent of l 5% for this site. The addition of a rooftop garden and patio-stapes on the individual balconies are two suggestions presented by the applicant. Finding: The review of planting diagram finds that additional street trees are required on Third Street in order to meet provisiaz~s of Section 12.36 The additional landscaped areas} and street trees will be included in the landscape and irrigation plan subzrzitted for review lay the City Public Worlcs prior to issuance of a building pez•znit. Conclusion: The application complies. GPMC 17. X7.1151?{L), Lighting. I. Minimum Lighting Levels. Minimum lighting levels shall be provided for public safety in all urban spaces open to public circulation. a. A minimum average light level of one and two-tenths footcandles is required for urban spaces and sidewalks. 2. Fixture Design in Public Rights-of--Way. a. Pedestrian scale street lighting shall be provided including all pedestrian streets along arterials, major collectors, minor collectors and heal streets. b. Pedestrian street lights shall be no taller than twenty feet along arterials and collectors, and sixteen feet along local streets. 3. Qn-Site Lighting. Lighting shall be incorporated into the design of a project so that it reinforces the pedestrian environment, provides continuity to an area, and enhances the drama and presence o. f'architectural features. Street lighting should be provided along Page ~ Q of 15 sidewalks and in medians. Selected street light standards should be appropriately scaled to the pedest3°ian environment. ~degacate illumination should be provided,for° building entries, corners of buildings, corartyards, plazas and ~~ralk~fays. a. ~ccessuxays through surface parking lots shall be well lighted with, fixtures no taller than tujenty feet. Finding: A specific lighting plan will be presented and reviewed by the City Planning Departr~nent prior to issuance of a building permit to insure that standards of Section 17.67.050{L) are met. Conclusion: The project can meet the criterion. CPMC 1167 (1511 {M}. Signs. 1. The provisions of this section are to lac used in conjunction Lvit1~ the city sign regulations in the Central Point Sign Code, Chapter 15.24. The sign requirements itr Chapter 15.29 shall govern in the TC?.Z1 district acrd corridor; Finding: A specific sign plan will be presented and reviewed by the City Planning Department prior tQ issuance of a building permit to insure that standards of Section 17.67.050{M) are znet. Conclusion: The project can meet the criterion, CPMC 17, 76,1144 Ccrnrtitivnal Ilse Permit: Findings cxnd c©nditir~ns. The planning camnrission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows: ~. That the site far the proposed acre is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code; Finding: The project proposes 18 units, which is consistent with the HMR density requirements. The minimum lot area for multifamily or senior housing is 1,000 sq. ft. The project proposes eight {8) residential units, which fail within the I-IMR lot area requirements. The maximum allowed coverage is 85°fo. This figure is based an a gross acreage calculation. After taking into consideration, the gross acreage of the project the proposed coverage is 83.3°l0, which is in compliance with the CPMC. Conclusion: The project can meet the criterion. CPMC 1176. fI4(1(13j. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Finding: Oak and Third Streets, along with. an existing alley provide public access tc~ the project. Ingress and egress to the interior parking area will utilize the existing twenty foot wide alley. The alley, located along the southern property line, will be paved as part of the project development. Page ~1 of 15 Conclusion: The project can meet the cz-iteriozz. G,t'lt~~' .X ~ fib, (t44 {~). That the proposed use will leave no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof .ln making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circzslation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures,- walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; Fizzling: City Hall and. this proposed development are both positioned along Thirst Street which is intended to be a `civic corridor'. The Central Point Downtown. Revitalization Plan supports the TC)D-District in recognizing the location ofThird and {)ak Streets as an important cross-axis to Pine Street. The plan notes that Third Street caz~ play a signifzcazat role in the revitalization. of Downtown and the area has already been. enhanced by the sitizag of City Hall and the County Library. The addition of The Crossing is expected to contribute further to vibrant redevelopment on teak and Third Streets. The Downtown. Plan states that the City should continue to encourage new upper-story office space to house cozxzzxzunity serving businesses as well as new retailers. Conclusion: The proposed use is consistent with the TC}D-l lMR zoning azzd City's intent for this area. CP1V~C .17.76. (14(I {D). That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regzdations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C` of this sectio~z; Finling: Second story professional offices are permitted in areas adjacent to Employment Cozxzznercial {EC) districts. As the name implies, the EC designation supports employment and is generally located along Pine Street where there are existing EC uses. City Hall is adjacent to the subject property and is considered its awn employment center with offices located on the first and second floors. Although the zone designation for City Hall is Civic, the function and location of its offices are similar to those being proposed in `The Crossing' Conclusion: The proposed use is consistent with the T(~D-H1VIR zoning and City's intent for this area. CPMC .17.76.44Q {~). That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general we~are and may include: ~ Central Point Downtown Revitalization Plan, pages i8 &42. Page ~.~ O~ ~.J~ I..tldjzcstments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accamrnadate the proposed use, provided the lass or yard areas con farm to the stated taainitnum dimensions fot~ the szzbject zoning district, unless a variance is also granted as provided far in ~'lzapter .77.13, 2. increasing street widths, tnodificatians in street designs or addition of street signs or traffic signals to accotnnzodate the traffic generated by the proposed use, 3..tldjustnzetats to off-street pat~l~ing requirements ita accordance with any unigzre characteristics of floe prapased use, 4. Regulation of paints of vehicr.rlar ingress and egress, 5. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting atad a property n2aintenanee pragratn, S. Regulatian of signs and their locations, 7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other de~~ices a_f'arganic or artificial composition to elira2inate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility or other undesirable effects on surrounditag properties, 8. Regulatian of tithe of opeYatiotas for certain types of zrses if their operations may adversely affect privacy of sleep of persons residing nearby ar ather~vise conflict with other community ar neighborhood fitnctians, 9. Establish a tinge period witl2in -which the subject land use nzLrst be developed, 1f1. Regzciretaaent of a band or other adequate assurance within a specified period of tinge, l.l. Such other conditions that are foi.znd to be necessary to protect the public Health, safety and general we~are, 12. Utz considering an appeal of an application far a conditional use permit for a Honze occupation, the planning commission shall review the criteria listed in Section 7 7. b~.19i1. Finding: Eight conditions are recommended to satisfy the review criteria. Cc~nclc~sic~n: The proposal is consistent with the TOD-HMR caning and City's intent far this area. CFMC 1 T T2.112d Site plan appt•aval required: {t1~ r# site plan application canfaYming to the requirements of Section .17.72. ZJ3(1 shall be made: 1. FoY all construction requiring issuance of a building permit,- or (B) Except for the C-3 zoning district, the requirement for a site plan application upon a change of'use may be waived by city staff if staff determines that no nzadificatians are necessary to the existing access, parking, driveway, or any other facilities an the site. Finding: The application and supporting documents provide the information necessary far review of the prapased mixed caznercial and residential building. The prapased building will require issuance of a building permit and is a change of use. Page 1.3 of 1~ Finding: The proposal, a commercial, professional offices azzd residential bz.zilding~ to be loeatcd on the comer of CJak and Third Street. The project requires removal or demolition of existizxg structures located on the subject site. Conclusion: A Site Plan Review for the pz•oposed structure is necessary az~d the submitted application complies. CPMC.17.72.t13Q {,A) - {~) Infnrrnati©tr Required. This section of the code addresses all of the necessary information to make a decision for approval or denial of the site plan application. Finding: The applicant has provided all of the necessary information as outlined in the above refcrcnced code. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC` X 7.7.2.114(1 {Ian. Sigtas and other outdoor advertising stracctures to ensure that they do not conflict y~rith ar deter from traffic control signs ar devices and that they are compatible with tl2e design of their buildings or uses and xJill not interfere with ar detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: The site plan submitted for this proposal does not identify signs or sign locations. The accompanying Applicant's Response narrative states that "signage will be designed so that it does not conflict with traffic control signage or interfere or detract froze nearby signage". Finding: Sign standards and perzxzit requirements are found in Section 15.24 ofthe CPMC. The sign requirements in Chapter 15.24 shall govern in the TfJD district and corridor with exceptions listed in Chapter 17.67.050(M} ofthe CPMC. Conclusion: Compliance with CPMC 17.72.(}40 (D); CPMC 15.24 Sign Code and CPMC 17.67.050{M} will be monitored during the building permit process. CPMC .17 72. fI4f1(E), accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb andproperty, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access rands and j~re lanes sa that all buildings an the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; Finding. Fire District I~lo. 3 reviewed this proposal and provided written comments dated March 28, 2007. The review and comments of the Planning Department staff report dated N1ay 1, 2007, have been included in this report. Finding: The project site has public street access on two sides, (Jak Street to the north and Third Street to the west, and internal or on-site circulation, with the width necessary to accozxzniodate fire vehicles. Page ~4 of 15 Caz~cl~isic-n: Fire District 3's review and comments can be addressed by the applicant as specified by said hre authority. In addition, Fire District 3's requirements can be monitored its the 1?uilding permit review process. ~'PMC' 17.72. (14th {F}. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section 16.20.~18C1 pertaining to the maximum n~cmber ofsingle family dwellings or du>elling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding: ~o single family dwelli~ags are proposed with this application. Cflnclusion: loot applicable CPMC 17.72. t14~ {~). Compliance with such al°elzitecttsre and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the ~zeiglzborhood atzd the Central Point area and its environs. Tlie architecture and design proposals nzay be re~ jetted by the planning commission if found to be incompatible with the existing architectural or design characteristics of adjacent properties or uses. In addition, the planning commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, or other development requirements that may be necessary to ensure land use compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and privacy of'Central Point residents. Finding: The proposed structure is similar in design. to buildings recently constructed in the city and can provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood, the TOD District, Coz~~idor and the City of Central 1?oint. ColicIusion: The proposal complies. Page 15 of 2~ PLANNING C4MMISSiflN RESC3LUTI(JN Nth. A RES©LUTIC3N GRANTING APPRCJVAL C?F A C4NDITI©NAL USE PERMIT FQR A FITNESS CENTER AND SECCIND FLC3QR i'RCaFESSiQNAL C~FFiCES AND SITE PLAN APPRC7VAL FDR THE CtJNSTRUCTICJN C7F A MIXED USE CQMMERCIAL DEVELCIi'MENT Applicant: The Crossing at Center I'Qint, ZLC, Agent: Tc~~rnmy Malot (37S 2W 11B8, Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700} File No, 07106 "WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted applications for Conditional Use Permit and Site flan approval for the construction of a three-story mixed commercial and residential building located within a TC~D~ i-iMR, High Mix Residential coning district. The property consists of approximately 23,100 sq. ft. gross acreage and is identified on tl~e Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11BB, Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700, located at 321 flak Street, in the City of Central Point, ~7regon, and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2007, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed. public hearing on the applications, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the applications; and GVI:IEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the applications is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the TUD-i-iMR, i-figh Mix Residential section 17.65, Application Review Process section 1.7.66 and Design Standards - TC~D District section 17.67, Conditional Use Permit section 17.76 and Site Plan criteria section 1.7.'72 of the Central Point Municipal code; and "WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Site Plan application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the conditional use is consistent with the intent of the TDD-HMR District ,now therefore BE iT RESC7LVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the applications based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A -Revised", the Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, which includes attachments, is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Commission Resolution No. (050107 PASSED by fhe Planning Caznznissioz~ and. sigz-zed by zne izz aufhez~zficafiozl of ifs passage Phis 1St day of May, X007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Cify Represenfafive Approved by zne Phis 1St day o~ May, 2007. Planning Commission Chair Planning Coznznission Resolzzfion No. {050107}