HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - March 18, 1997,~ . ~~~
R..
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
March 18, 1997 - 7:00 p.m.
Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 380
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Chuck Piland -Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Bob Gilkey, Karolyne
Johnson, and Valerie Rapp
III. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. MINUTES
A. Review and. approval of February 18, 1997 Planning Commission Minutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VI. BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing -Review and decision regarding a Tentative Plan for the Central
Point East Subdivision, R-1-6, R-1-8, R-2 & R-3 zoning districts.
(37 2W O1C Tax Lots 100 & 200; 37 2W O1B Tax Lots 2500, 2700 & 2900)
(Partners Trust Company, applicant)
B. Public Hearing -Review and decision regarding an amended Tentative Plan for
the Bluebird Heights Subdivision, R-3 zoning district.
(37 2W 02BC Tax Lots 1101 & 1500) (C. David Freel, applicant)
C. Public Hearing -Review and decision regarding a Variance of the side yard
setback requirement for asingle-family dwelling located at 251 S. Fifth St. in
an R-3 zoning district. (37 2W 11BB Tax Lot 5600) (L. Wayne Fair, applicant)
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 18, 1997
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:03 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Bob Gilkey,
Karolyn Johnson, Valerie Rapp. Also present were: Jim Bennett, Planning
Director, Ken Gerschler, Planning Technician; and Arlene LaRosa, Secretary.
III. CORRESPONDENCE
There was no correspondence
IV. MINUTES
A. Commissioner Curtis made a motion to approve the Planning Commission
Minutes for February 4, 1997, as written. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Rapp. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes; Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes;
Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes; Rapp, yes.
V. BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing -Review and decision regarding a Site Plan Review for
exoansion and remodel of a historic building. 445 Manzanita St.. C-2 zoning
district 137 2W 03DD Tax Lot 82001 (David and Sera Gilmour a~plicantsl
Chairman Piland opened the public hearing.
Commissioner Johnson stated that her office has insurance for the
Gilmours, but that it is not a conflict of interest.
Commissioner Fish stated that Dr. Gilmour is in the same office as her
doctor, but that it is not a conflict of interest.
There were no ex-parte communications.
Jim Bennett reviewed the basis for testimony and the appeal process.
Jim Bennett reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report.
The applicant, Dave Gilmour, 445 Manzanita, Central Point, came forward
on behalf of the application. Mr. Gilmour stated that there are guidelines for
making changes on historic houses and described how they will meet those
guidelines. ~
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 18, 1997 -PAGE TWO
Chairman Piland closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 379, to approve the
Site Plan Review for expansion and remodel of a historic building, 445
Manzanita St., C-2 zoning district, based on the findings of fact in the
record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval in Exhibit G.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Johnson. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes;
Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes; Rapp, yes.
B. Review and recommendation regarding a Zone Text Amendment to amend
CPMC Chapter 17 56 ac it relates to nonconforming i and historic
buildings.
Jim Bennett reviewed the Planning Department Memorandum concerning
the rationale for this zone text amendment.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to recommend approval of the Zone Text
Amendment to amend CPMC Chapter 17.56 as it relates to nonconforming
uses and historic buildings. Commissioner Curtis seconded the motion.
ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes; Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes; Johnson, yes;
Rapp, yes.
C. Revie~~~ and recommendation regarding a Zone Text Amendment to amend
CPMC 17 60 10 a i r la to nadlot developments.
Jim Bennett review the Planning Department Memorandum concerning the
motivation behind the request for this zone text amendment.
Commissioner Johnson made a motion to recommend approval of the Zone
Text Amendment to amend CPMC 17.60.210 as it relates to Padlot
Developments. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes; Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Gilkey, yes;
Johnson, yes; Rapp, yes.
VIII. MISCELLANEOUS
Jim Bennett outlined future agendas.
Ken Gerschler reviewed possible future commercial properties in Central Point.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Johnson made a motion to adjourn. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Rapp. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Aonlicant:
rs o
Recor
March 18, 1997
Central Point Planning Commission
James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator
Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Central Point East
37 2W O1C Tax Lots 100 & 200; 37 2W O1B Tax Lots 2500, 2700 & 2900
Partners Trust Company
P.O. Box 4707
Medford, OR 97501
Partners Trust Company
P.O. Box 4707
Medford, OR 97501
De Carlow Homes Inc.
814 Jackson St.
Medford, OR 97504
37 2W O1B TL 2500 (portion) - 1.14 acres
R-2, Residential Two-Family
37 2W OIB TL 2700 - 21.44 acres
R-1-8, Residential Single Family
37 2W O1C TL 200 - 20.45 acres
R-3, Residential Multiple-Family
Charles F. Larson 37 2W O1B TL 2900 (portion) - 19.77 acres
Rex Roberts R-1-8, Residential Single-Family
P.O. Box 10667 37 2W OIC TL 100 - 6.48 acres
Eugene, OR 974407 R-1-6, Single Family Residential
The applicant, Partners Trust Company, is proposing a tentative plan for the subdivision of
approximately 69 acres located north of E. Pine St.Biddle Rd. and east of Hamrick Rd.
(Exhibit A). The site is comprised of a combination of single-family, two-family and multiple-
family residential zones, but wili be developed as asingle-family residential subdivision,
Central Point East. The total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is two hundred
thirty nine (239) which will be developed in seven (7) phases. The average density for the
subdivision is 3.47 units/acre. The maximum density permitted for the site ranges from 4
units/acre for the R-1-8 zone to 6 units/acre for the R-1-6 zone, 12 units/acre for R-2 and
25/units per acre for R-3. The maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted
under the current zoning is approximately 47 units of R-1-6, 224 units of R-1-8, 13 units of
R-2 and 511 units of R-3 for a total of 795 dwelling units.
.~..
Authority
CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing
and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of
the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Exhibit B).
Aonlicable Law
Central Point Comprehensive Plan & Comprehensive Plan Map
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans
CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. - R-1, Residential Single-Family District
CPMC 17.24.010 et seq. - R-2, Residential Two-Family District
CPMC 17.28.010 et seq. - R-3, Residential Multiple-Family District
Discussion
The proposed subdivision is located on approximately 76 acres north of E. Pine St. and east
of Hamrick Rd. It is part of an area that was annexed by the City in September of last year.
It is also the first new development proposed for this area. The applicant, Partners Trust
Company, is proposing to construct asingle-family residential subdivision, Central Point East,
on the site. It will consist of 239 single-family homes and will be developed in 7 phases.
Access to the subdivision will be provided from Hamrick Rd., E. Pine St./Biddle Rd. and
Table Rock Rd. The applicant will prepare a neighborhood circulation plan for this area to
ensure that transportation services (pedestrian, bicycle, auto, and public transportation) can
be provided to the area. This will be processed as a Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
The Planning Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. No zone changes are proposed as a part of
this development. Accordingly, the subdivision complies with the City Comprehensive Plan
Urbanization Element which identifies this area (Subarea H) for future urban development and
with the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map. Each lot meets the minimum
requirements for lot size in its respective zoning district. Some lots will have to be adjusted
to meet the minimum requirements for lot width for their zoning district.
Surrounding uses consist of the Bear Creek Orchards to the south which are designated for
future light industrial development; rural residential and small farming uses to the west and
north which are designated for future urban residential and commercial development; and light
industrial uses to the east along Table Rock Rd. A buffer will be required for all subdivision
lots adjacent to this light industrial area to mitigate the impacts of industrial development on
future single-family dwellings developed on these lots.
The Parks & Recreation Element of the Comprehensive Plan identifies an area within the
proposed subdivision as the site of a future special purpose park about ten acres in size. The
park would have a linear configuration taking advantage of the steep topography of the ridge
that transverses the site and existing trees and vegetation. It was proposed to provide a buffer
between future residential uses and the adjacent industrial uses along Table Rock Rd. It could
possibly be used for specialized recreational purposes, such as hiking or nature study.
The applicant is proposing to eliminate this park and replace it with a more usable park on
level terrain that would provide additional recreational opportunities for residents of the area.
The new park would be located in the vicinity of Gebhard Rd. to the west. The original park
site would be incorporated into the design of the subdivision. The ridge line, existing trees
and vegetation would be preserved and protected from development by subdivision
covenants. Homes constructed on lots adjacent to the light industrial area along Table Rock
Rd. would
be buffered through additional setback, landscaping and/or fencing requirements. In order
to accomplish this proposal, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment would be required.
The Public Works Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the City's
water, sewer, storm drain and transportation standards. The Public Works staff report is
attached as Exhibit D.
Findinss of Fait & Conclusions of L
I. The project site is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single-Family District; R-1-6,
Residential Single-Family District; R-2, Residential Two-Family District; and R-3, Residential
Multiple-Family District.
The project is consistent with Subarea "H" of the Urbanization Element of the
Comprehensive Plan which calls for low, medium and high density residential
development in the area and with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the
project site as Low, Medium and High Density Residential. The project site is located
in the R-1-8, R-i-6, R-2 and R-3 residential districts. These zoning designations are
also consistent with the referenced portions of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of
approximately 69 acres for the purpose ofdeveloping asingle-family residential subdivision,
Central Point East. The total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is 239. The average
density for the subdivision is 3.47 units/acre.
The proposed single-family subdivision meets the density requirements for the
applicable residential zones which range from 4 units/acre to 25 units/acre. Each lot
within the subdivision will meet the minimum lot size and lot frontage requirements for
the applicable residential zone. The tentative plan includes all information required by
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq.
3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the
proposed subdivision, the findings of fact and the conclusions of law and determined that the
project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions of
the Planning Department (Exhibit C) and the Public Works Department (Exhibit D).
r~
Exhibi
A. Tentative Plan -Central Foint East
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions
D. Public Works Staff Report & Recommended Conditions
E. Written Comments
~:
~~ i
i ~ i n
v
r ~ (, ~
~;~ I I~ p ~ x o A r
6
i 'y ~ -p~ p' ~ 9n.b to Z -i
6~ k d y l ~„p Er-i .A
rI' ~ ~ j _~ ° e a ~pp ~QSSRRT -i
-7i' ' _~_ I ~ M ~p 8 a • iip ^, VO o m D A'~
_ K ~ ~c O CP CIl
Iii '~' 1= k y 4 ~. ~ a y p \' p y v y~ p 0 bg' ,~ ~ Itt D
9 1= (_ \' I° 6\' Y ~'\ .ice b ~ u ~`•` J m -1
a
(f 1~ ~ (~ K R/ r E 3
t
ii If i ;; ~• ti ~ 1 r by~'~ ~~~G~""k at p ~ z
6 it ~ li (s li IS k !. P .~,` h . /~ k R
~~ ( ~ I~ t p
l MIcInIn(.Rh ~k h\ i .y~ a.y1 p
M
fi ji }1 1~ (~ I= t 1= 1= n \ a y to s .. ~
p ~~ ~ ~i ('• ~ '~ a it
y ~ tar 1' ' q ~\ epa ~ ~ _ _
~1 p 5C ~ 1• ,e~ •e ayr ~
~ ~ [• , p P
J • R Q
h N t~ e I
h ~F h~ i= a' p~~
i eG(eNh i
i ~•-----.,J ti
~ ~ '' '` ~
~i a 1-
-- ---- --
:,.a. i __
s
s~F~~~ ~ ~~~ x F~ ~ R'o'lX S~~ ~~a0p~~
!r _ ddd o _
S~
T
t
O
,_~
,.
City of Central Point
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
James Bennett
Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
NOTICE OF MEETING
Date of Notice: February 28,1997
Tuesday, March 18th 1997
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a Tentative Subdivision. The proposed 2391ot subdivision is located in the
Residential Single-Family District (R-1-6 & R-1-8) and the Residential Multi-Family District (R-
3)near the intersection of East Pine Street and Hamrick Road on Tax Lots 2500, 2700 and 2900 of
Jackson County Assessor Map Page 37 2W O1B and Tax Lots 100 and 200 of Map Page 37 2W O1C
100, 200.
('RITERiA FOR DECISION
The requirements for Tentative Land Divisions are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street Parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and
Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works
Standards.
PiJBLI COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the date of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 18th, 1997.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
155 South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 664-6384
~~
VICINITY MAP
d
O
U
O
fx
W
a
H
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall,
155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents
per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 (ext. 231)
SUMMARY OF PROCEDLIRF
At the meeting, Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application.
Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion
of the review the Planning Commission may approve, modify or deny the Tentative Plan. City
regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission
decisions.
~~~
EXHIBI'T' C
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
I. Prior to submittal of a final plat application, the applicant shall prepare a
neighborhood circulation plan for the area bounded by Biddle Rd., Hamrick Rd., West Vilas
Rd. and Table Rock Rd. including the Naumes Orchard property north of Biddle Rd. and
west of Hamrick Rd.
2. Prior to the submittal of a final plat application, the applicant shah also prepare a plan
for dedication and development of a city park in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision to
replace the special purpose park identified in the City Comprehensive Plan.
3. The applicant shall submit an application to the City for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to adopt the neighborhood circulation plan and park development plan. If the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved, the tentative plan shall be acknowledged and
the final plat may be submitted for approval.. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is not
approved, the tentative plan approval shall become null and void.
4. Prior to submittal of a final plat application, the applicant shalt submit to the City a
copy ofthe proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (GCBs) for the Central Point East
Subdivision. The CCRs shall include language that preserves and protects the ridge line area,
including existing trees and vegetation, that transverses the project site. The CCRs shall also
include language that mitigates impacts on all residential lots from adjacent existing industrial
uses and areas zoned for future industrial development. This may include, but is not limited
to, increased setbacks, landscaping, berming, fencing and masonry walls. Mitigation measures
incorporated into the CCRs shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department.
5. A disclosure shall be provided to every purchaser of a subdivision lot which is adjacent
to an existing industrial use or an area zoned for future industrial development acknowledging
such use or development. A copy of this disclosure shall accompany each building permit
application submitted to the City for development of those subdivision lots affected.
6. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Rogue River Valley Irrigation
District as set forth in their letter of February 21, 1997 and with the requirements of Jackson
County Fire District #3 as set forth in their letter received on March 10, 1997 (Exhibit E).
08
interoffice
M E M O RAN D U M
to: Lee Brennen, Jim Bennett, Lois De Benedetti
from: Paul W. Worth
subject: Central Point East Development
date: Mazch 10,1997
Attached for your review is the preliminary Public Works staff report for the Central Point East
Development Tentative Plan, PW# 97010, located on Hamrick and Biddle roads.
The report is intended to be presented infonnally at a meeting with the developer(s) and others
including the Medford Water Commission and Jackson County Road Department as a method of
gathering input and assuring the project implications are fully understood before proceeding with
the final report.
It is requested the Planning Department arrange a meeting convenient to the interested parties as
follows:
Developer/Applicant(s), Kevin Nering
Developers Engineer
Developers Surveyor/Planner, Hoffburh and Assoc.
Medford Water Commission, Ed Olsen
Jackson County Road Department, Dale Petrasek
City of Central Point; Public Works, Planning, Building departments.
~~
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT
CENTRAL POINT EAST DEVELOPMENT
PW #97010
Date:
Applicant:
Project:
Location:
Legal:
Zoning:
Lots:
Units:
Plans:
Report By:
Purpose
03/04/97
Kevin Nering/Partners Trust Company
Subdivision, Phased
Biddle Road and Hamrick Road
T37S, R2W, Section 01 B, Tax lot(s) 2500, 2700,2900
T37S, R2W, Section 01 C, Tax lot(s) 100,200
R-1-6, R-1-8, R-2, R-3
239 (seven phases)
#??? Residential
Central Point East Tentative Plan, 02/10/97, Hoffbuhr & Assoc.
Paul W. Worth, Public Works Technician
Provide preliminary information to the Developer regarding Public Works standards
and proposed new standards to be included in the staff report. Gather information
from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed development.
General
1. Applicant shall submit to the City's Public Works Department, plans and
specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or
modifications within the City or Public rights-of-ways and easements.
All construction shall conform to the City's Standard Specifications and
Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction and other special
specifications or standards as may be approved by the Public Works Director
and noted herein. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer
shall be submitted in writing by the developers engineer to the Public Works
Department for approval prior to installation.
No construction shall commence until the Public Works Department has
reviewed, approved, and issued a Public Works permit for the proposed
improvements.
The Developer shall pay for all costs associated with the design and
installation of the improvements specified on the approved plans.
1
~~
2. Asa minimum, the developer shall provide "as constructed" drawings
showing the elevations of sanitary and storm system inverts, manhole rims,
and street centerline control points (monuments).
At least one TBM shall be provided for each project and shall be referenced
to the established FEMA elevation datum benchmark noted as RM 74,
located near the I-5 interchange at Pine Street. All adjustments to alignment
or gradient shall be noted on the "as constructed" drawings.
3. The developers engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works
Department a digital drawing of the Final Plat property boundaries in
AutoCad format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner
and the State Plane Coordinate System.
Streets/Traffic
Discussion/Concerns: - "Cut Through" traffic from Table Rock to Hamrick and
Biddle roads.
- Left turn traffic from Meadow brook across Biddle Road.
- May require Developer to provide a traffic study to
determine impact to adjoining streets.
- Traffic speeds on Biddle, Table Rock and Hamrick
exceed 45 mph. Effect on safe ingress/egress to and
from the subdivision.
- Street width and ROW's.
- Technology may not be available locally to construct
Mountable curb, sidewalk and gutter sections in
monolithic pour?
- Visual aesthetics. Meander sidewalk and landscape
along Biddle and Hamrick roads.
1. Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting
Plan and Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the
Public Works Department. The construction drawings shall included clear
vision areas designed to meet the City's Public Works standards.
25' unobstructed sight triangle areas shall be required at all uncontrolled
intersections. 55' shall be required at arterial intersections.
2. The Public Works Department shall, at the cost of the developer, evaluate
the strength of the native soils and determine the street section designs in
accordance with the Public Works Design Standards. Minimum street
2
~~
section is 8" 4"- 0, 4" 3/4 -0, and 3" class B AC.
3. Acceleration and deceleration lanes meeting Jackson County Road
• Department standards shall be provided at all intersections with Biddle Road,
Hamrick Road and Table Rock Road. Suggest 10'X325' tapered sections,
however, the lane along Hamrick Road may be continuous to enhance traffic
flow continuity.
Stop signs shall be required at Stone ridge Ave./Ridge way, Brookdale
Ave./Meadow brook Dr., Beebe Lane/ Meadow brook, and North Mountain
Ave./Meadow brook Dr. in addition to the above arterial intersections.
4. Speed limit signs will be required on Meadow brook Drive.
5. Developer shall construct mountable curb, sidewalk and gutter section prior
to issuance of building permit. Ref. AASHTO, 1984, Type G curb section.
Storm Drainage
Discussion/Concerns -Catch basin inlet types. In gutter grate/drain
- Mountable curb and gutter section
- Discharge capacity/storm drain maintenance
1. The Developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to
provide for runoff onto the subdivision and from each lot including future
development.
Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this Tentative
Plan, the developers engineer shall provide the Public Works Department with
a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm system. The
engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the Public Works
Department for hydrologic calculations.
Design system to carry runoff for 10 year storm if Q<100cfs. Use runoff
for 50 year storm if Q> 100 or < 200 cfs. Use 100 storm runoff if Q is
> 200 cfs.
2. Maximum distance between catch basin or curb inlet shall be 350 feet.
3. Minimum storm drain diameter shall be 15 inches.
3
4. Materials shall be PVC, ASTM D 3034 with gaskets or HDPE, ASTM.........
with premium bands. Provide concrete encasement where required to
prevent pipe deformation in areas of minimum cover.
5. Storm system shall discharge to the main storm drain in Biddle Road unless
an alternate point is approved by the City and DEQ. Developers engineer
shall assure adequate capacity of the existing storm drain.
6. Construct grated inlets/catch basins in gutter section. Ref. APWA, California
Section, drawing #303-1
Sanitary Sewer
D iscussion/Concerns:. -Coordination of the design review process
- Design must meet or exceed City standards as well as
BCVSA and DEQ standards.
1. All sewerage system design, construction and testing shall conform to the
standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards,
Oregon Chapter, BCVSA and City of Central Point Standards.
The City upon completion of plan review and preliminary approval, will
forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process with DEQ.
Upon completion of the review by DEO and BCVSA and final revisions, the
Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form.
The Developers engineer shall provide DEQ, BCVSA and the City with test
reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior
to final acceptance.
2. Sewer system capacity shall be designed to accommodate future
development on adjacent property as may be annexed in addition to this
subdivision.
5
~~
Water System
Discussion/Concerns: -Coordination of design with Medford Water Commission
- Coordination with Fire District 3 requirements.
- Backflow prevention
- Design life
- Flow demands for future development. Consider a
consortium of developers to share costs, or increased
SDC's to pay for larger pipe size.
1. The master water meter shall be located on the North side of Hamrick Road
at the location shown on the Water System Plan, 1979 in accordance with
designs approved by the Public Works Department and the Medford Water
Commission. Installation shall include backflow prevention as noted below.
2. Developers engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum
flow of 1000 gpm and conform to Fire District 3 requirements. Maximum
spacing of fire hydrants shall be 300 feet.
Design of the flow requirements shall consider current usage demands and
future development demand within the system area as shown in the Water
System Plan, 1979.
Any proposals requesting the City to share in costs due to the increased size
of pipe for future flow requirements shall include the engineers calculations
and complete cost analysis.
Anticipate increases requiring a 14 inch dia. in Hamrick Road and 18 inch
dia. for the future line west of the master water meter location
3. City will require Class 50 wall thickness, PVC lined ductile iron, AWWA....../
ASTNI ........... for all pipe runs.
4. Developers engineer shall provide a "looped" water system to lines within the
development as well as the line required in Hamrick Road between Beebe
Lane and Meadow brook Drive.
6
e9
5. Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division and City requirements
for backflow prevention.
A OSHD approved Double Check Valve Assembly (DCVA) shall be installed at
the tie in point with the MWC 36 inch dia. transmission line.
A OSHD approved backflow prevention assembly shall be installed
immediately downstream of the water meter serving each dwelling unit.
6. Construction drawings shall include the size, type and location of all water
mains, hydrants, air valves and service connection details in accordance with
City Public Works Standards.
Site work, Grading and Design
Discussion/Concerns: -Park areas and landscaping
- Lot drainage, roof drainage
- Wetlands disturbance and soil erosion
1. Developer shall provide agrading/paving plan with the construction drawing
submittal to the Public Works Department. Drawing shall show the location
and elevation of the 100 year flood plain, curb elevations, finish grade and
bottom floor elevations.
All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with
positive drainage away from the building and drain lines connected to the
curb and gutter, or if necessary to an approved City storm sewer.
Developer shall provide the necessary "rough" lot grading to assure that all
lots will drain properly.
2. Set aside by title to the City, park area within reasonable proximity to
accommodate this and future development. Would not necessarily have to
be located in within this project area.
3. Meander sidewalks with landscaped buffer along Biddle and Hamrick Roads.
4. Provide the City with copies of the DSL, DEQ and COE permits including any
mitigating requirements.
y ~~
Rights of Ways/Easements
Discussion/Concerns: -Easement and Rights of Way Widths
- Access for maintenance of Public Works improvements
1. All easements for improvements dedicated to the City shall have a minimum
15 foot width and shall be located contiguously along the exterior boundaries
of properties. Public utility easements shall have a minimum width of 10
feet.
2. Private easements shall be located contiguously along the exterior boundaries
of single properties. Where the purpose of the easement is for maintenance
of a storm drain, etc., the developer shall require covenants which require
the property owner to perform maintenance at least annually of such
improvements to assure their function.
3. The City will require a 52 foot ROW width on local streets and 60 foot ROW
on collector streets (Meadow brook, Beebe).
8 ~.~r
ROGUE RIVER VA~~EY IRRIGATION DISTRICT
3139 MCR RIM AN RDAD Q~ MEDFORD. OREDON 97501-1277 4 15031773-6127
February 21, 1997
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
City of Central Point
155 South 2nd
Central Point, OR 97502
Dear Ken:
Thank you for allowing us to comment on your tentative plat
for the City of Central Point East Development.
As per our phone conversation of 2/20/97 I see three
possible problems with the development. The first being in the
Northeast corner. It is here that Rogue River Valley Irrigation
District enjoys a 25' right of way for it's Upton Lateral. This
section of canal is open and will need to be placed underground
according to District specifications at the developers` cost.
Also, the right of way needs to be left open with no gates or
other obstructions in order to allow District vehicles and
maintenance trucks access to the canal and pipeline. This looks
likes it could impact lots 136, 137, 138, 218, 219, 210, 211,
212, 213, 214 and 215.
The second area of concern is on the south end of the
project where the District owns a 12" pipe line for its Peck
Lateral. This pipeline runs just inside the project boundary.
Again, the District needs to be able to travel the length of the
pipeline for operation and maintenance purposes. This line will
impact lots 38, 1, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 66, 67 and 68. However,
as we discussed, it may be possible to move us further south into
the landscape buffer which would put us more out of the way.
The third concern would be that several tracts of land in
the southwest corner of the map are still under irrigation. The
run-off from irrigation and rain water tends to flow from south
to north through lots 47 to 51. Arrangements would need to be
made to pipe this water out.
1.8
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
February 21, 1997
Page 2
One last note: Any construction work done on the District's
facilities needs to be done so as not to interfere with the
delivery of frost protection or irrigation deliveries.
JP:nh
Sincerely,
ROGUE RIVER LEY
IRRIGATION I TRICT
im Pendleton
Manager
~~
FItZE DIvT1ZICT No. 3
JACKSON COUNTY
8333 AGATE ROAD. WHITE CITY. OREGON 87503.1022
(641) 826.7100 FA% (641) 826.4566
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
City of Central Point
,Jackson County Fire District #3 would like to address the following issues
regarding the Central Point East Development. File # 97010
1. Addressing on all buildings will be a minimum 3" numbers
visible from the street frontage.
2. The city standard of 36' street width is acceptable, provided
that parking does not reduce width to under 20' street width.
3.Hydrant spacing for this project will be at 300' intervals.
The hydrant layout plans shall be submitted to the fire district
for approval prior to installation. All hydrants and access roads
. will be installed prior to any construction.
µ. The city standard of 45' for cul-de-sacs will give fire
apparatus the minimum distance needed to turn apparatus
around.
5. The minimum fire flow for residential property is 1000 g.p.m.
Lou ugliotta
Fire Marshal
~, a ~:,
li a wFa ~'r, 5 ~7 L'M~ ~.i"
r~~~ 1 ~ 1997
ra-rv " :. , -.: ,, i~r,n~~i
~~ ~~isT .__....._ . _,.._...._---._--
~g ~t ~~ p ..7~2.~ ct~ 6 , 1 ~ y
~~-
c
~_ ,.. „n
_~ , __
~:
Pr_ _
~iL-J~
w,t`~h ~ti
,~a-~~--
-.
PLANN-ING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING
DATE: March 18, 1997
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP
City Administrator
StJS7ECT: Public Hearing -Amended Tentative Plan for Bluebird Heights Subdivision
37 2W 02BC Tax Lots 1101 & 1500
A i nt/ C. David Freel
er of P.O. Box 587.
Record: Shady Cove, OR 97539
37 2W OZBC TL 1101 & 1500
R-3, Residential Multiple-Family
Summary
The applicant, C. David Freel, is proposing an amended tentative plan for the Bluebird
Heights Subdivision located on North Tenth Street adjacent to the Willow Glen Apartments
(Exhibit A). The project site is zoned R-3, Residential Multiple-Family. The total number of
lots proposed is 16 with a potential for 71 dwelling units. The average density for the
subdivision is 14.64 units/acre. The maximum density permitted in the R-3 district is 25
units/acre.
Authori
CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing
and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of
the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Exhibit C).
A~olicable Law
Central Point Comprehensive Plan & Comprehensive Plan Map
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans
CPMC 17.28.010 et seq. - R-3, Residential Multiple-Family District
Discussion
In July of 1996, the Planning. Commission approved a tentative plan for the Bluebird Heights
Subdivision (Exhibit B). The tentative plan consisted of 171ots: 2single-family lots, 9 duplex
lots, 5 fourplex lots and one multiplex lot with a potential for 60 dwelling units. The average
density of this tentative plan was 12.37 units/acre. The maximum density for the R-3 district
is 25 units/acre.
~~
The amended tentative plan is substantially different in that the number of lots is reduced to
16: 2single-family lots, 11 duplex lots and 3 multiplex lots with a potential for 71 dwelling
units. The street layout is generally the same, although the new cul-de-sac street has been
shortened somewhat. The duplex lots wilt be developed as padlots. The multiplex lots will
be developed at a later date and will require site plan approval from the Planning Commission.
The Public Works Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the City's
water, sewer, storm drain and transportation standards. The Public Works staff report is
attached as Exhibit D.
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
The project site is located in an R-3, Residential Multiple-Family District.
The project site is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which calls for
medium and high density residential development in the area and with the
Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site as High Density
Residential. The project site is located in an R-3, Residential Multiple-Family District.
This zoning designation is also consistent with the referenced portions of the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of 4.85 acres
for the purpose of developing a multiple-family residential subdivision, Bluebird Heights. The
total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is 16 with a potential for 71 dwelling units.
The average density for the subdivision is 14.64 units/acre.
The proposed single-family subdivision meets the density requirements for the
R-3 zone which is a maximum of 25 units/acre. Each lot within the subdivision meets
the minimum lot size and lot frontage requirements for the R 3 zone. The tentative plan
includes all information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et seq.
3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the
proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and conclusions of law and determined that the
project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions of
approval included in the Public Works Staff Report (Exhibit D).
ii
A. Amended Tentative Plan -Bluebird Heights
B. Original Tentative Plan -Bluebird Heights
C. Notice of Public Hearing
D. .Public Works Staff Report
~~
. i
~~s
,.
~~~
~~
~s
~6
s~
.,
~~ \~5~
i
~~ i
T~ y
~~~ d
- k _ _
~pp~~~' YV_l= ___ Yve xwNl
L'i ~ I~i1 ~ F -L ~ ~
a ~ oz"1 i
,.
p~ g
g I
-'Y-
F7~~
I
I g.. ~~~~~E&
s e~ ~~°
~..
P
NL
y
A~~
I
I
~~AN~~~
W ~
I
i _
o3SZ n~ `L`, b ~'
-1 -1 ~Y
11
I
~ D L
N
.'
i~
n SL's E
-I ~ r-
~
.,
„Q
~
~
N o
N
~
~0
i N ~
~
m c. -( p
~ (1 x
D
y ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
°' (~i -
a~ ~
ro ~ D
J -D1 ~ N -V
N ICI
~~ ~
~
1
Z 1 lS
CJ
w
3
CYty of Central Point'
y ~ EXHI$IT tt$ tt
~~ '' '\
r-~ `\ Planning Department
\ •
g .d~
S~ L• \ \• ~G Q ~ ~ M o r
g ~ ~/ O? i \ \h \\ k ~ o ~ H
/ 8 !!2
/~pD~`2•' / 4• \O. f Y s `• ~b.aF \ SA. `7,~ t~ ~ ~ C ~ 7 117'
i , jY ~ y` ~ / ~ ~4~~ ~~ 4$1` R' ~` _ ~~• ~ ~'\7~'N~\• ~' ~ y~ O~y • O
/ as I ~ \ -1
• ,y p T 1 tl
'B/ 1f° ~\Q ~' ~• 4'y~ s` 0~ 'ar e. Ny \ 6 $ ~'• -~~/ ~~yy
t ~/ 1~~ \` ,~N.ar ti ` 1l9 4`y~ ~~'t., ~Pyg 4 ~ \ `I m
FF)) ~ _ ~ c z ~,y
I•I3 ~ 'h 4~~ r 3 \\\ m \` O 0
q a
MOPl1'taM ~' y tl999~` ~4Y `\\ `\ ~a ~\\ 9~ ~9' F OY' R`n ~~ /' 1 LI
1` ____ ~{{ tta~gg \\~v ~\~ \\ w o ~4~ ~ V ® ~ 1
Y~ ~~~ ° `.,ro ~ ~ A Yi¢ a ~'~~'> 6~ ~y\~`~.~~' ye'te 7. , 4~ % $~ W
N ffff ~e / (p~~~ fr P s
q ~e ~~ ' ~~p~a p i ~h 1 rya &y4
~~~~~ a~y
E E ob
~ °`~ Y ` / %
•[•y y1 i
Y • \ ~ /•
\ ~1 N a:y e ¢ ~, \ ;~ /per
y ~-~ ~
e~y ~ 9 ` V
a.o-:su-sg ~ ~~ l ~ aa~ ~ > ak
g /
e' n / •".'
~ / g3Q ~
~ . . ~ . ~ ~ 8~.. SC 22
S /
pp8§ ~, A /
d C C C ARE ~ ~ tl / ~, o y
~ ~
r i ~" ~I ~ ~
E! rS fi / n ~~6ac
~~ ~ ~ ~
~ g
~ e
~ • ~ ~
~ ~, ~3
City of Central Point
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
City of Central Foint
EXHIBIT ~t~"
Planning Department
James Bennett
Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Planning Technician
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
NOTICE OF MEETING
Date of Notice: February 19,1997
Tuesday, March 18th 1997
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
amended Tentative Plan Application for a land partition located in the Residential Multi Family
Zone (R 3) on property located east of Tenth Street and south of Cherry Street. The site is located
on Tax Lots 1101 and 1500 of Jackson County Assessor Map Page 37 2W 2BC. The agent of record
is Douglas McMahon of Hoffbuhr &Associates.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for approval of Site Plans are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to Commercial Zoning, General Regulations, Off-street Parking, Site Plan,
Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's
Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
wdtten comments up until the date of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 18th, 1997.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
155 South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 664-6384
rw
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall,
155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents
per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 (ext. 231)
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
At the meeting, Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application.
Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion
of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the tentative plan. City regulations
provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions.
c~ ~~
r
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT -TENTATIVE PLAN REVIEW
Date:
Applicant:
Project:
Location:
Legal:
Zoning:
Lots:
Plans:
Project#:
Findings:
GSity of Central Foint
EXHIEIT tt~tt
Pla nnin g' 1) ep artm ent
02/20/97
Freel and Associates
Single Family/Padlot Subdivision
North 10th Street, Cherry Street
T37S, R2W, Section 26C, Tax Lots 1100 and 1500 (Free) and Assoc.)
R3
16 (includes 22 padlots)
Bluebird Heights Tentative Plan, Amended 02/13/97
PW#96027
1. The amended plat is substantially changed from the application for final plat
dated 10/24/96 in terms of lot configuration
2. The location of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, street and water improvements in
Sunrise Way to the connection in tax lot 1100 differ from the originally submitted
final plat and approved construction drawings.
3. The length of Sunrise•Way appears reduced from the final plat previously
applied for.
4. The Public Works staff report prepared by Thornton Engineering, dated
06/27/96 is valid for the re-submittal of the amended tentative plan. Attached
hereto.
Requirements:
1. Applicant shall submit revised construction plans and specifications to the
Department of Public Works for review.
2. Revised plans shall be submitted in accordance with the Public Works staff
report prepared by Thornton Engineering dated 06/27/96;
3. Separate water meters and sewer laterals will be required for each padlot unit;
4. Existing residences on lots 2 and 3 will be required to connect to City water and
sewer.
w J
5. Show connections to City water, sewer and storm systems for lots 5,6 and 7.
on construction drawings. If this is to be a future development requiring additional
Public Works improvements, indicate the required stub out locations to avoid street
cutting.
5. Applicant shall show all existing and proposed easements and Rights of Ways
on the Final Plat and Construction Drawings;
6. Show revised 55' sight distance triangles at intersection of Sunrise Way and
North 10th Street;
`'
a:w
,~:~
E~isIIBIT 1
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT -TENTATIVE PLAN REVIEW
BLUEBIRD HEIGHTS
Date: 6127/96
Applicant: Freel & Associates
Project: Multi-Family Residential Subdivision
Location: North Tenth Street, Cherry Street
Legal: 37S 2W Section 2BC, Tax Lots 1101, and 1500
Zoning: R-3
Lots: 17 Proposed
Units: 60
Plans: Bluebird Heights Tentative Plat, Revised 4/29/96, Hoilbuhr & Associates
Report By: Michael Thornton, Thomton Engineering
General:
1. The applicant shall submit to the City's Public Works Department plans and specifications for
all improvements proposed for construction or modification within the City's rights-of--ways
or easements. All construction shall conform to the City's Standard Specifications and
Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction and such other special specifications
herein. No construction shall commence until the Public Works Department has reviewed,
approved, and issued a pemut for the proposed improvements. The developer shall pay for all
costs associated with the design and installation of the improvements specified on these plans.
2. Prior to final approval of the project, the developers engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public
Works Department with a digital drawing of the Final Plat property boundaries in an AutoCadd
compatible format.
Streets/T'raffic:
L The public works improvementsfor the development shall include the widening of the east side of
North Tenth Street to a 22 foo[ halfsecNon from centerline to the east face of curb. The widening
shall extendfrom the existing 22 foot halfstreetsection approximately 3Sfeet north of the projec[
to the southerly project boundary. From the southerly project boundary the improvemenfsshall
transition to the existing curb line 100 feet south of the project boundary (25:1 transition).
2. The construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and a Traffic
Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City of Central Point Public Works
Department. The constnrction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the Cit}rs
Public Works Standards.
3. The City's Engineer shall, at the cost of the developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and
determine the street section designs in accordance with the Public Works Department Design
Standazds
4. See recommendations provided in the June 17, 1996, memorandum: by John Replinger, DEA,
City's Traffrc Engineer.
o
Public Work's Staif'D°port , ~ 6/27/1996
Storm Drainage:
1. The developer shall constnrct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for nrno(fonto
the subdivision property and from each lot. Prior to construction plan approval of the
improvements for this Tentative Plan, the developer's engineer shall provide a complete set of
drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system. The engineer shall use the
rainfalUintensitycutve obtained from the Public Works Department for hydrology calculations.
2. Curb card gutter sec[iorrs shall trot exceed 350 feet before entering a ca[ch basin or cub inlet.
Sanitary Sewer:
1. All sewerage system design, construction and tesfmg shall conform to the standards and guidelines of
the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chap[i;r, and City of Central Point Standards. The
C[[y w[Il, upon completion ojplan revietiv curd approval, subm[[ the plaits to the Oregon DEQ for
sewer system design approval prior to issuance oJa carsb7rc[ion permit. The Developers engineer
shall provide DEQ and the City with test reports and certification of the sewer system construction
prior to final acceptance by the City.
Water System:
1. The construction shall comply with Oregon health Division requirements for Backflow
prevention.
2. The developers engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum fire flow in
conformance with the requirements of City's Fire Chief.
3. The constnuction drawings shall indicate type, size and location of water mains and fire hydrants in
accordance with the City's Public Works Standards and the recommendation of the City's Fire
Chief.
Site Wark:
1. Provide agrading/paving plan with the construction drawing submittal to the Public Works
Department. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive
drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm
sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary "rough" lot grading to assure that all lots will
drain properly. The developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings; and
perform such grading and dramage improvements which satisfies this drainage condition, leaving
only minorgrading required for each lot during house construction.
Rights-of-ways/Easements:
1. The construction drawings and Final Plat shall show all right-of--way and easement boundaries
associated with the project.
c3.~ 2
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
Date of Hearing: March 18, 1997
To: Central Point Planning Commission
From: James H. Bennett, AICP
Planning Director
Subject: Variance Application for 251 South 5th Street (372W11BB-5600, Zoned R-3)
u r:
The applicant, L.Wayne Fair, has applied for a Variance at 251 South 5th Street. The Variance
would allow a proposed carport to encroach within the minimum 20 foot side yard setback. The
property is located in an R-3 Residential Multiple-Family zoning district.
rit
CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and
render a decision on any application for a variance. Notice of the public hearing was effected in
accordance with CPMC 1.24.060.
Backgr~c und:
The applicant, L. Wayne Fair, currently operates a "residential home" in asingle-family dwelling
located at 251 S. 5th Street. It functions as an adult foster home licensed by the State of Oregon
for the residential care of five or fewer individuals. ORS 197.665 allows residential homes in any
residential zone and prohibits any city or county from imposing any requirements on their
establishment more restrictive than those placed on asingle-family dwelling in the same zone.
Mr. Fair converted the garage of the dwelling into an additional living area in order to provide
living accommodations for the maximum five individuals permitted by the statute. The State
required him to provide evidence of local government approval for the garage conversion. Upon
review of the project, the City determined that Mr. Fair would have to provide additional covered
off-street parking on the site to replace the converted garage. A building inspection of the
converted garage would also be required to ensure compliance with all applicable building codes.
Mr. Fair has an existing fenced storage area on the side of the dwelling adjacent to the alley. He
wants to construct a carport in this area to provide the required off= street pazking. To do this,
J
Rd
however, would require a variance from the side yard setback requirement of twenty feet for
structures taking access from a street. An alley is considered a street.
Discussion:
CPMC 17.64.080 requires that areas needed to meet the parking requirements of a particular
building or use shall not be transformed or changed to another type of use, nor transferred to
meet the parking requirements of another building or use until the original user of said parking
area has adequately met the parking requirements of his use or has adequately provided his
needed parking at another location approved by the planning commission.
To meet the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code, the applicant has requested a
variance to the minimum 20 foot side yard setback. If approved, the Variance would allow a
metal two vehicle carport to be constructed on the side property line with alley access provided to
5th Street.
Staff conducted a site visit and determined that the owners of several houses, duplexes and
apartment buildings had positioned covered parking facilities along the alleyways between 4th
and 6th Streets.
'ndin
CPMC 17.80.010 requires that the Planning Commission may grant a Variance if findings are
made that the following considerations will either result from the granting of the variance or do
not apply to the requested application:
1. The variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the city such as
beautification or safety;
2. The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood;
3. The variance will utilize property within the intent and the purpose of the zoning
district:
4. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to other property in the same
zoning district; and
5. The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the
applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family
members.
The applicant has submitted findings of fact (Exhibit "C") for consideration by the Commission.
3~
Recommendation•
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions:
1. Adopt Resolution No._ and approve the Variance for 251 South 5th Street based on the
findings of fact and staff conclusions contained in the record and subject to the recommended
conditions of approval; or
2. Deny the proposed variance; or
3. Continue the public hearing for the variance application at the discretion of the Commission.
Exhibits:
A: Application for Zoning Variance.
B: Site Plan for 251 South 5th Street.
C: Applicant's Justification for Required Findings.
D: Notice of Public Hearing.
E: Recommended Conditions of Approval.
3~
APPLICATION FOR ZONING VARIAN~E`•~°h~twls GYtyotCeniral-Point
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Irt p!~i ~~.~,~ E~IIEIT~ttAtt
r;n"/ t, .•,~„ I..~ Planning Department
1. APPLICANT INFORMATION- , `"
~ ~A1R i'ir.6F _..
Name: L . /// i c .... _.
Address: BSI ~. 5"rh ;"r
City: ~,'~,~r2v+~ ITT; p~~
Stale: ~~ ~ Zip Code: Y
Telephone: Buslness: Residence: -66`'~53~'^~
2. AGENT
Name: D/17J 1~ !_ ' ~K
Address:~~~r1~,~o'°' ~Yrprv ~r l5Y-COK VK1YrG -
Clly: -• t ~~ ~Z- ~lN'~ State: ~ 2ip Code: ~7~2-
Telephone: Buslness: ~P'°4• 5958 Resldence:~X 66~•~S°J°J°~
3. OWNER OF RECORD (Attach Separate Sheet If Mare Than One)
Name: - ~- • v~i,~.VV mfr rr~
Address:LS( S', 5th gy-; C /~.0, /~'x 9`f9Y~
Clly:-C E'vT/LW-L ~ State: D~ ' Zip Code: ~ ~2-
Telephone: Buslness: Resldence: ~'r° "'` ~S ~L ~'
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Townshlp:.~~Range: ~W Sectlon : <S.6 Tax Lot(s): ~'~
Zoning District:
5. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
C$ Thls Application Form !31' Written Authority from Property Owner it Agent
~ SltePlan and Elevations Drawn to Scale (10 In Application Process
sets) )idl Legal Description of the Property
f3 One Capy of a Reduced Site Plan and ~ Findings (Addressing Crileda In Sectlon 17.80
Elevations (81/2" x 1 tq of the Central Paint Municipal Code)
,L/1 Apptlcallon Fee ($200.00)
6. I HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS AND
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
I cerltly that I am the: ~ Property Owner or ^ Authorized Agent of the Owner
of the proposed pr) ct site.
Slgnalure~ "~~~~ Date.'-'1~'~~
~ If anyy wetlands exist on the site, it is the applicant's responsibility to apply for a permit to ~
Division of State Lands before any site work begins.
UPON FORMALLY ACCEPTING YOUR APPLICATION, THE
FORM
t~
Q"-. >
Total Acreage: rJJr K 140 tMr. IA'I' 512 17(7 Ate
CP
u
~_
0
-i
i_.
:~=
z
e
City of Central Point
EXHIBIT "~"
n I_ ~ ~ ~ .Planning Department
--e- --q -- -- --'~'~-~
I o ~~~~ I
I ~~ ~~i77~1 I
.._ I
I ~N ~l~I Ov I
I ~
I
I I 'x
I N I~
I ~~~ ~ ~ I
-n
D o I
r 7
I T trtl i n
I ~ rn
-~ x X
-~ N N Y
i o~ ~ z ~o
I ~ iz = i rn
~~ ~ I~
I r '~ 3 I -(
I rn rn ~r
z
I Irn
I j
I I
~ I
I I
I I
~ ~~~~~~~„ Eb s>~d
9 WAYNE FAII{ RESIDENCE oS•~g'4r n
xsi s. srx sr. `~' 6r ~~~~.'~F.
wnwx. wan ox. axsax ~° ~~ ~ p~ Y P K w O ~
tk r.
~~~mm k`
daniel park & ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS
6180 Shady Brook Dr.
Central Point, Oregon 97502
(541) 664-5858 Fax 664-5999
January 31, 1997
Subject: Variance Application for L. Wayne Fair
Property Description: 37 2W 11BB TL 5600
SCOPE
CYty of C'eriiaral I?oint
EIIP~T ttC tt
Planning Department
The attached proposed revisions to the residence at 251 S. 5th St., Central Point, Or 97502 will
provide a minimum of two (2) additional covered off street pazking spaces for this residence.
The property owner is providing the two (2) covered pazking spaces as required by current
ordinance. His original home built in the 70's was constructed with only a single car garage.
The proposed improvements will provide a roof over an existing fenced double pazking space.
The proposed construction will encroach upon the alley set back but will not encroach into the
alley right of way. The owner has paved a portion of the alley and will pave the alley to the
end of his proposed improvements. The proposed carport will not encroach beyond the present
fence line and will be constructed in a manner similar to the existing residence.
FINDINGS
1. The proposed addition will allow the property owner to fully comply with the current
covered pazking requirements and locate both of his vehicles off street. This will benefit the
neighborhood by having fewer vehicles pazked on the street, for a cleaner more open avenue.
2. The proposed improvements will not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood or the alley.
There are presently two fenced pazking spaces in the same location. This use is wmpatible with
other adjacent properties and will not adversely effect alley traffic or flow.
3. The use is in compliance with current caning and will allow the property to meet the current
ordinance for covered pazking off street.
4. The proposed improvements represent a minor change to the present physical facility and
present no negative impact to the neighborhood and will allow the owner to meet more
restrictive compliance issues.
5. The owner respectfully requests a variance to encroach into the alley setback.
J ~t
City of Central' Po nt ~
PL~l.1VNXNG .DEPA.RTMENT
James Bennet
Planning Directo
Ken Gerschle
Planning Technician
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NOTICE OF MEETING
Date of Notice: Pcb,vary 24,1997
Tuesday, March 18th 1997
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
City of Central Faint
EXHI~I'I' t'D tf
Planning Department
NATIJRE OF MEETING
Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a Variance at 251 South 5th Street. The parcel is located in the the Residential Multi
Family Zone (R 3)zone on Tax Lot 5600 of Jackson County Assessor Map Page 37 2W 11BB.
The applicant is requesting a Variance to the side yard setback so that a carport can be constructed
to meet the city's minimum ofE-street parking requirement.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for approval of Variances are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to Commercial Zoning, General Regulations, Off-street Parking, Site Plan,
Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's
Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
I. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written rnmments up until the date of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 18th,
1997.
2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
155 South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Pax: (541) 664-6384
C7
i
~~~~~
\ P~~/ \
~~
3.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
~. ~/,l~ \
v \~~~~ 5~~~~~ /~~
/~ ,c'~ n
Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Ball, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at
I5 cents per page.
5. Por additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 (ext. 231)
SUiMMARY OA PROCEDURE
At the meeting, Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, and opponents and hear arguments on the application.
Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the
conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Variance. City
regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission
decisions.
~~
,~
,:~
EXHIBIT ~°E"
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The proposed modifications to the facility shall comply with the approved site plan.
2. Permits must be obtained for the carport.
3. The garage conversion shall be inspected to ensure compliance with applicable building
codes.
4. A copy of the State permit for residential home operation shall be provided to the City.
~~ U