Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - September 4, 2007~~ CEfti[TRAL PdIt~J`C' CITY t3F CENTRAL PC3INT PLANNING COMMI55I#JN AGENDA September 4, 2007 - 7:00 p.n~. Next Planning Commission Resolutio:~ No. 734 L MEETING CALLED TQ URDER II. ROLL CALL Connie Moczygeznba, Candy Fish, Damian ldiart, Chuck Piland, Pat Beck, Mike Qliver, and Justin Hurley IIL C4RRESPQNDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of August 7, 20}7, Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS i'gs. i - i8 A. File No. 08138. A public hearing to consider a request for Conditional Use Perzxzit for a proposed City of Central Point police substation within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center building located in the TCID-HMR, High Mix Residential zoning district and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03CB, Tax Lot 73001. The proposed project area is located at 888 Twin Creeps Crossing. Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, t7regon Limited Partnership; Agent: Ronald Grimes, Architect 1'gs. 19 - 32 B. File No. 08139. A public hearing to consider a request for a Class B ~lariance to the TC3D off-street parking standard of the CI'MC Section i7.6S.OSC}; the number of required parking and covered parking spaces. The subject property is located in the T4D-HMR, High Mix Residential zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03CB, Tax Lot 7300. The proposed project area is located at 888 Twin Creeks Crossing. Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, tJregon Limited Partnership; Agent: Ronald Grimes, Architect Pgs. 33 - 35 C. File Nos. 06082 az~d 6095. A public nacetin~; to cansicle:r a request for an extension of Home Brothers' Site Plan and Tentative Plan far five (5} attached single fa~~~ily residences an .18 acres lacatcd at 124 North Third Street, in a TC}L}-~IMR, Higlx Mix Residential zoning district. Tl~c subject pz•operty is identified an the Jackson County Assessor's neap as 37 2W 03DD, Tax Lat 7700. Applicant; Name i3rathers, LLC; Agent: Shane Elsclon Pis. ~~ ' ~$ D. File Na. 07032. A pudic meeting to consider a request far an extension of a 53 lot Planned Unit Develop;net~t located in the R-2, Two-Family zoning district located an the south side of Vitas Road approximately 50(7 feet west of Table Rock Road and identified an the Jackson County Assessor's :nap as 372W O1 BA, Tax Lots 500 and 700. Applicant: Heritage Development, Znc.; Agent; ,~ixzx Clark VII. MISCELLANE©US Vlil. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Faint Planlli~ig Commission l~'Iinutes August 7, 2007 ~. MEETING CALLED T4 ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. RC?LL CALL: Coanmissioners Connie Moczyge~nba, Chug Piland, Candy Fish, Pat Beck, and Justin l"Iurley were present. Damian Idiart and Mike {3liver were absent. Also in attendance were: Toxn Huanphrey, Conan~unity Development Director; Don Burt, Planning Manager; Connie Clune, Co~nn~unity Planner; Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. III. CC?RRESP4NDENCE There was no con-espondence. IV. MINUTES Justin Hurley pointed out a typographical error on page 2 of the minutes as presented in the packet. Justin Hurley made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 3, 2007 Planning Commission meeting as corrected. Candy Fish seconded the motion. RC?LL CALL: Fish, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; I-Iurley, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. File No. 0'7132. A public hearing to consider a request for Tentative Plan approval to further subdivide Lots 65, 66, 67, 82, 8S, 86 and 88 of Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase II. The subject properties are located in the TC-D- MMR, Medium Mix Residential zoning district and are located within the Twin Creeks Master Plan area north of Taylor Road, west of Highway 99, and south of Scenic Avenue. Applicant: Twin Creeks Development, Ca., Agent: Herbert Farber, Farber Surveying Planning C"onzmission r'1~finastes ~t acgtrst ~ ?t~~7 Page 2 There were no conflicts or ex paste cozaamunications to disclose. Justin 1"lurley advised that he lives in the area uzader discussioza, azad Cazady Fish said that slae drives through the area frequezatly. Planning Technician Lisa Movgaza pz-esezatetl the staff report for dais tezatative plaza application, indicating that 3d attached single fazaaily lots would be created which is cozasistent with the Master Plaza and the `1"DD-MMR zoning designation for dais development. If this application is approved, approximately 9.h7 net acres remain in the T(JD-MMR zoning district for future dcvelopznezat and iza order to remain compliant with the Master Plan, will need to be developed at a density of 18.8 units per acre. Applicant has agreed to record a deed restriction on Lot 1 of Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase 1, azad Parcel 3 created under a partition {P-116-20~~} statizag that each of these parcels will achieve a minimum net density of 18.8 acres per net acz•e. Recorded copies of the deed restz•ictiozas must accompany the Final Plat applzcatioz2 as a eozadition of approval. The public portion of the hearing was opened. 1"lerb Farber, agent for the applicant, came forward and stated that he and the applicant were in full concurrence with the staff report. Mr. Farber added that any deficiencies in zoning densities could be zaaade up for in other areas, and the overall development is still within target range of established densities in the master plan. The public portion of the heaving was then closed. Chuck Piland made a motion to adopt Resolution '733 granting Tentative Plan approval to create athirty-four (34) attached single family residential lot subdivision known as Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase III, by further subdividing Lots 65, 66, 6'7, 82, 85, 86 and SS of Twin Creeks Crossing, Phase II, based an the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Candy Fish seconded the motioza. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Hurley, Yes. Motioza passed. VII, MISCELLANE©CJS Gray Cvur•t Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician, then presented a staff report to Commissioners, requesting approval of an extensiona for Gray Court Planned Unit Development (File No. 46U60}. Previous approval for an extension was granted on January 2, 2C}07 and expired on July 2, 2~0~. Ms. Morgan indicated that the extension was just a forrrzality to keep the application alive. Applicant is very close to completing required infrastructure improvements, and the extension will allow additiozaal time far filing a fznal development plan which will be brought to the Planning Commission for approval. I'krnning C'otartnissian r'i~rr2rrtes ~ugtrst 7, 2(1117 Page 3 Chairperson Conzxae Moczygeznba expressed cozxeerzx over the lapse izx tune sizxce July 2, 2047. Ms. Morgan stated that the applicant's letter of extension was dated June 28, 2407 but that the Planning Departzxxe;zxt slid not receive rt until after the July 7, 2407 Plazxzxizxg Conxznissaozx meeting. Candy Fish made a motion to graxxt an ex#exxsioxx of #inxe #o Gray Cour# PUD for submittal of a final developxxxen# plaza. The xxew expiration date will be February 7, ZU08. Pat Beek seconded the znotiozx, RC7LL CALL: Fish, yes; Beck, yes; Pilazxd, yes; Hurley, Yes, Motiozx passed. Railt•yad Ct~ossitt~ itt 2~'xvirt Ct•eeks Tom I-Jun-zphrey, Coznz~zunity Development Director, reported that azx agreement has been reached with Rail America on a pz•ice for the railroad erossizxg azx Twin Creeks Development, azxd developers are in the process of coznplctizxg a set of cozxstzzzction drawings. The Oregon Department of Transportataozx has indicated that a condition of approval would include the closure of another crossing. Central Point will enter izita an agreement with Jackson County to make iznprovezxxents to the crossing at Scenic Avezxue with the possible closure of the crossing at Seven C}aks. Planriin~ Depat~tmerrt lTtrdate Mr. Humphrey informed Commissioners that changes to code have allowed for planning staff to approve certain types of land use actions without referring them to the Planning Commission if nondiseretionary code requirements can be znet. As a result, a mizxor land partition has been approved along with two lot line adjustments and site plans for People's Bank. and Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom t-Iall in Snowy Butte Station. Don Burt, Planning Manager, added that one of the conditions of approval for the Kingdom Hall requires that there be no access onto Mac Court as it is a very nazrow street. Mr. Humphrey offered to include copies of staff reports for these administrative actions izx the Planning Commission packets in the future for informational purposes, and commissioners were receptive, ~'r•anspvt{tati©n Svstena Plun Planning Manager Don Burt distributed a draft of a memo directed to the Citizens Advisory Committee pertaining to the goals and policies of the Transportation System Plan. Mr, Buz-t stated that his intent was to keep the Planning Commission up-to-date and asked if commissioners would review and. comment on the memo. Mr. Humphrey added that we need to get our transportation issues ironed out with regard to the current urban growth boundary prior to expanding it. We cazx do a I.1GB expansion without updating the TSP, however, we would not be able to change the zonizxg. C}ncc we complete the TSP, we can adjust it again with changes to the UGB. Pltinning Cotnrnission ~~inutes Aacgacst 7, 207 Page 4 VIII. ADJQURNIYIENT Chuck Piiancl rt3acle a n~ati€~t~ to adjourzi the meeti~tg. Candy Fish seconclecl the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 5:00 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the August 7, 200" Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its z~aeetizag on September 4, 2007. Planning Commission Chair +JI'~~}~TIC~~AL C1~E4 P'~F~~VIT ADEN A ITE File l~lt7r. ~ c ;,~ ... , . +g: . . F .. .... ' ~ {E 's{ ~ is ~ ,. f ~ `,~.~ . ~ i ;'t a ,. ~ .. ~. ~alic~-SiaBsftion .. . ~, r ... i .I c ~, eptt~l~?t' 4, ~~~ Consideration of a Conditional Use Pe it far the proposed Gity of Central Point police substation within the Twin Creeps Retirement Center building located in the TOD-I-IR,1-ligh Mix Residential zoning district and identified an the ,Tackson County Assessor's map as 3'~S 2W 03 C13, Tax Lot '730. The proposed project area is located at $$ Twin Greeks Grassing. (Applicant: Twin Creeks etirement, regon Li iced Partnrktip, Agent: anald Grimes, Architect). STA. F S+C-U C~; Connie Clone, Go unity Planner A G N {fin March 6, 200'7, the PI ing Commission approved the Site Plan for the Twin Greeks Retirement Center by Resolution 722. Review afthe project date fined the need for a Conditional Use Pe it for the police su . bstat~on, a cxvzc use wxtlun the ro Deed building. _~ ~ ~==~--`_ ~ __~.__._.. ,~, ~, ~~ ~ io This application is in response ~ ~ ~~°~='~.~ ~~ ~~ ~- ~;;~~~ .;,,~ ~ ~` to the Site Plan Cond~t~ons of _::' "`~'' µ~'W,:;~",``~ ~''~ :„se.. Approval number 2. ~-;iz . ~.~_~~_ .. , . ~~~`. ~ ~ ~~_...~~~:~~., ar~'~` ,~~ .,,~ r~ - " Ir~nir~ prr~r~ Tora~ t~i a~rmr~k~rey, AICP, C"~ar~~r7~r~r~ity [7v~glo~~rr~er~t C~irectc~rl Assist~~nt ~ ity Ac.~r~~inistr~~iar ~;r, ~' ', ~q p ~- 6w, A.;. f „rv ~~ ~~. ~ ~ ~' c--f~ C eCnpSA ? ".Y"_m ,.: _....m ~. &n ~m .ww \ ~ ~- ~r~a ,/,f,,/ /, P/' ' ~~ I ~, Y Canitina- Use Criteria: When considering a Conditional Use in the TOD District, key criteria in the CPC include: ,. l . That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and to meet all other development and lot requirements for the zoning district; and 2. That the site has adequate access to a public street that the street can effectively accommodate traffic that may be generated by the propased uses; and 3. That the proposed uses {police substation} will have no signif cant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted uses thereof; and 4. That the conditions required for approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health safety and general welfare. In reviewing the request, it has been determined that as presented, the police substation is in general compliance with the above key criteria {see Attachment "C" for detailed findings}. Parking: Section 1'7.65.OS0, Table 3 allows the parking requirements for a community service civic use to be the number determined as necessary. The City Police Department requires on-street parking, and therefore the designated parking will not consume the retirement center's off-street parking spaces. This proposal provides two {2} on-street parking spaces along Twin Creeks Crossing, adjacent to the retirement center {see Figure 1}for use by police vehicles. The police parking area will be posted and the curb painted to specify police vehicle parking only. . FINDINGS; See attached Attachment "C" ISSUES: 1. No issues identified CONDITIONS flF APPRQVAL: l . Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Twin Creek Retirement Center the applicant shall designate, and mark, two on-street police vehicle parking spaces along Twin Creeks Grassing as illustrated in Figure l . EXHIBITSIATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" - Project map Attachment ``B" - Applicant Statement and site plan Attachment ``C" - Planning Depai~ent Findings Attachment "D" - Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. ,approving the Conditional Use Permit far a police substation located within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center, RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. ,granting Conditional Use Permit approval. Page 2 of 2 :1~.~- ~ m~ ~ T c ~ ~ ~/~ ~f~ ~ °r~ .~, mow. w.~s. ~~ ~ c~ra°~~r ~~~ ~t~~rr - .. ly"' '~ FA6ly ~ YJA PG Y~fl ~s ~i _ V ~~ .aJC~d sl a. aRs,m p ., S~Op~,k ~ ~"~~~., &t~ A .: - ' ~ .., -~ ~ ~~~ "„ aa~ t4~fr! ka ~A r< ~ 4 i j. 0Q0! k1)m ~ ,42+9 t7. ,. C 4n " >~ 010'1 ' 42Gq_ t , yi,. 8a a { i q704 ~ '' ^, 6. . Fa', /M ~ ~~ kta ~ z.. r° e ` ~ .v,'d m' a dAr v' SDOtl ~~~~ ,', 4,, '~; F~" t~ 190 ~ ~e ~u ~~' ~ . ~ tr c f' !!8 _ m7''~ ' ~ f -~.~ 547 n ca k ~ .' ~`~*' ' ~ ~ , . ~ y;, ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~'„ .,3, 6 ~ ~~, S7t~ n nib k ' xax! o , $ L W1, k a ,N= " Naf ,, _ a. fu ue d; 35j~ F:,~ w:,- - .'- ~.b .~.~yy <- „ $. B} C9 '#a w 5 l.Yt 64/i,Ja„l~ / ~ F11 k.1~.x °'r i :... " S e {'.A A: ~ WI a ! ° „~ 2340 ; ~. 224 (~f 4tx-' ~ --~ ~':, - ''__. i` ' C~'f 9: I ( 4 r i~,"'l h'd::k S00J C m; ~.e„ p7 a1~iC4 W!W '9 d! '.. :15 f9k ~~r~ r' er. i ~~ _ _ . - ,~. ., i ~' .. 7, ! ' 4 v .~ l °ti¢ .~. 4 x!{{I ~ - ! A .I r T .~. am ._.. rr~Af 7 >rbk , .~~ ~,. ~`°~`S gar? !~ ~" ~ ~..~ ~ ~ '. ~ , a.wo k ~~ d ' 'E, '.,. f. ~ ra d i ... ._ a ~+ *rr,' ~' a F ,~-H w !41 , i ,' - $sa~ ~ ~ ' zee ^, r,> t a t ,~ ~ -~z.:...~-. i ,~ ,, ~ . 1 /rr _: i i. ,., C~~~d e. a k s. .F ~1" 6.<tk 'n '~~ :6 ttk+b }ayJ ~lbJ ,° !(X."5 '•$1%1a7 4,sS1 il'V5.7 ~• , ,/ ~ . ,, _ f `~, w ?! d° X744' Sr ~ B ~ ~~ r . ., ! w, I t u a: 910'3 ,"~+ e tf~'ex j ~ i ;:% ,1 7 5500' -~.~ ~s. a.+~ +.s S~'am ~': 9f ,; fix, ~ aac~ , :.~ a.~r ~ -... -, ~. 3 ( f~55 ~ C I~m~~ . C~ I" 0408 , a. ~, sd ...,. ', '" . 50~ " 5!64: ' j !X>'J TiA .. ex o ab .. „ b~Y~:,}r;(rQj ! .. t.ry b: ~ ' "d6 $Sk ., r h, 6~ -3 Y ~~ YeYy i,' af,~~ x.7a •1$$1~~ .. .S ivy. .i ~ f.d~~ ~~ Y mirk - 51~,.-u fsr m9000 ~~, 159.0 ~~, lEQ9 ~.f7C~7 ~~~ '~~ c9^. ,. ee~, taal~ ~~~:~ aa~an c9c6 ~.s.a. ~ ~Y r "4 fab:z i ~ ~ a (,~,~ C 9 td~tt ~ I S2u~ vv ~ ^s ~fsas j c a. '~ .7 it do ~it.+;..~ LA'~-.., dS; '~ yw. ~ if., `~~7'~ i.i i~~~~4~,,. , rr'' ~j ~" ___ ~ 1 4y.~}gg(;;~~ AAgg T( {q'~yyi~py ~~¢p+~'~ A C1lALa S'lliiq ! Twin Creeks (retirement Center Conditional ~1se Permit: A City of Central Point Police substation ,: 1 w ~, ~....... _,.._..n, .s.......,.., .. C ~,~ s ._.,__w,.....~..` ..~` a, ~, r . ~ .. ~.~.~. ..,..~ ., ... ~ .. I ~ ~ ' 'er'r." ~~" ~.~'* ~'.~ c~r~yP iFt~'~-%'C`.~..~ u k-._ . ...+~x iL. na>n ," ~,~-# .i , 1~_.•~ r • a ~ ~• z •, a a za $ z.i~.., .~~ ~... via: *:~; ~~ ~ <~~.>;~> ~., .: r eFT ...z a .s .a, ~ . :- e 'm. ' `M~ ,, z ~, r e• { ~ vR=Y ^•~ / a p3~ ~ws 11 \\ . ~, z Y a .: 1 i.,~ ~ .t~~~ ~ ~~~ Y^~ n .: ` ,t s' w m `S t . ,; ~~, p' .. F. .. ~,_ ~ ~'r.n s`E'a'a' l R'm~4aew .q, .> ~ ,P'~.-ems .,. _..... . _,. _ ,.. ,}F`~ `'~ .~ . ~~ . .~ ~ _ ~.e a~ ._ ~~._..~ :~;.~~ .. . .w.t } `" w a ,. s, to ~ /~.~~yy11 ~~++~^+.~~ Yya~ y~ry ~w¢e'}4p j~}~yy~ ~~ ~e .~ ~ r~. /f ~~"f ~~. ~ ~ ~^ ~ J 3 r ` f ~•l~Vil4~'TJ +U LdMJ{G ~A 40I € l„ rs~, k "~+~/~ ~ r~"yam /.~ ~ ~/ ~~ rfe 4 i p t ../ ' f 3 ~ / s ~ ., { ., ~• .. w r s ~ ... c~» ax „r ICI , x ,,.::y`i. °.K'mt'; ~'a" ~+~' r _ ><,~ ,,.~ .•., ,l ~~,/ _, ~:.~,_ ._.,...__._ - _ v..,.~_ ~~~.~:w cR?e~a c~ossc~ac .._.~ti.: ; _ .~' _ ._., ~~ ,.. ~~µ ' fi Y / ,.,~c, ~., f _, ., .:~., ..,.<. .~. 1 ,,= a,k , .~....__....e___.__.,_.____....~. .a t I ~ r-..~.... .~......______..~____.___..,. ~...m_,..., .~. -----, m F;~J08S105L~6 CP RETIREMENT C.TR~C~RRENTIRe~e W~issl06-12-Q7~05Df~-5-EE1-~.dwgREV.dwg, EXTERIC}R EI.EVATIC}N~, 7/27J~C .~ oc~c~oo .ryo,8~ >R~~~~ ~ ~~~a~ `€ YY; X ~"~~~ +R~~o ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ d ->R n 2 ~ ~w ~'~~`~€ .. 3". ~ ~ °s, s ~ - TWIN CfCB t2~TIREt~NT GEN'f~t2 ~ ~ Rowan ~. cRE~ES PC V~ ~- g a °uJ.~SB T#NIN G12E~K5 GR058I N6 a R C H i 7 E C r ,~ ~ x ~ a ~ ~ ~ G~NTRfkt.. t3PINT, C~t2~60N 'x"1502 em~~ ~~a ~ ~'~`i~=rn=' July R©NA~.C7 ~.. ~R€M~S A R C N€ T C T S, P. C. City of Central Paint Planning Department 140 South Third Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Attention: Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician RE: Twin Creeks Retirement, File No. 07fl36 Dear Ms, Morgan: Please accept this letter and attachments as an application for a conditional use permit as per chapter 17.76, "City of Central Point Zoning Ordinance of 1981". And revised staff report 3.6.07, 1=findings of fact, item C, pg2. 17,76.020 Information required. A. Twin Creeks Retirement, Oregon Limited Partnership 1118 Spring Street, Medford, Oregon 97504 B. Twin Creeks Retirement, O.L.P., is the owner of the property and Ron Grimes, a member of the "Partnership" is authorized to represent the owner. C. 888 Twin Creek Crossing Assessor's map number T37R2W03C, tax lot #1 fl0, lot 32 D. Drawings describing the site and improvements are attached. E. Included in the design is a police substation. The purpose of this use is to provide an enforcement presence in the Iocal neighborhood. A sign, police car and substation space in the building would provide the desired presence. The substation is classified as a civic use and civic uses in the NMR district require a conditional use permit for the police substation prior to the occupancy of such space as a police substation. 17.76.040 Findings and Conditions A. °`That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and Iot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code;" The proposed police substation area contains an open office area and restroom facility totaling 338 square feet. This office is located with-in the main building of 184,258 square feet. The site 4.23 acres can accommodate the substation. The office will require one parking space, as shown on the site plan during the day and that space is street parking or off site. The building has been previously approved for alI lot 7 3 i ~© STATE ST~3EET • MEt3FORC}. C3r2EG0t~1 975p4 0 {84`kl 772-300© o FAX E5493 779-€3483 o w~rrw.GwEarch.com requirements of the zoning. District and others provisions of the zoning cads. Therefore, since the police substation is proposed as part of the approved building it complies. B. "That the site has adequate access to a public, street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use". The site has direct access to Twin Creeks Crossing and Rustler Peek Street, Twin Creeks Crossing has a 46' wide paved section with two way traffic. Rustler Peak Street has a 36' wide paved section with two way traffic. The proposed traffic would be volunteers staffing the station 3 times a week for approximately 4 hour periods. Officers would stop by 3-4 times daily at the rate of 3-~ times a week. The streets have adequate capacity to handle this additional load. C. "That the proposed use will have na significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thru of. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on fhe site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; se# back; height of building s and structures; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs". The abutting use of the property is currently being used as a large open grassy area used for football practice by high school, soccer games and generally an open space. The Fong term use of the space is zoned for civic use like a grade school. The proposed location of improvements on the site will be located on the south side of the retirement center, on the first floor and approximately 60' from the south-east corner of the building fronting on Twin Creeks Crossing. The proposed facility is an office where all activity takes place in side the building and the only activity would be the traffic generated by fhe police cars. The physical presence of law enforcement located directly across the street from a playground {current use} and a grade school {future usej, would provide a secure influence on these activities. Vehicular ingress/egress will only occur in the public street and at their curb side parking space which will be painted red far identification. Again the presence of a police car will not adversely affect the local neighborhood. The maximum number of trips on any given day would be approx. 2Ct. This is iow traffic movement to have a significant adverse effect. There would not be any internal circulation. The setback for this side of the building is from 0 feet to ~ 5 feet. The project has a 1 g foot setback which is acceptable. The maximum building height in this zone is fig'. The actual building height in this portion of the building is 38'-fl". The 78'-t}" wide public R.4.W. helps in reducing the 3 story effect of the proposed building an the abutting use. There are no walls or fences. The building is setback 10' from the sidewalk and will contain landscaping and trees. The sidewalk also has street trees and the two working together will sa#ten the effect the building has on the use across the street {Twin Creeks Crossing}. 2 Cutdaor lighting is located in the soffits of the covered walkway on the Southside of the building. This source of lighting will produce more down light that fight aim off the property. There will be {1 }one sign located near the sidewalk. The sign will be a 3'X2'X8' above grade with a single ground light to provide visibility at night. This size of sign has little to no effect on the area across the street. D. "That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or Injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section". The building structure the proposed use will be part of and has received complete and approved building permits from the city of Cents( Point and sanitation permits from the Bear Creek Va[[ey Sanitary Authority. These permits and inspection processes assure us that the structure will be appropriately built to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of persons residing andlor working in the area. The proposed use is a police substation. What other use could be better to promote the public health, safety and general welfare of persons residing and/or working in the area. "We plan on staffing the substation with volunteers. They will be there ~3}three times a week. They would be there for approximately 4 hour periods. C}ur officers would use the station for "soft interviews". Soft interviews are interviews with victims vs. "Hard„ interviews with suspects. We would not interview or arrest suspects at the Twin Creeks substation. ~n occasions an office might stop by to make phone calls or write reports. I would think 3-4 times daily, 3-5 times a week. This Information was received from kt. Chuck Newell, Central Point police department. The proposed used would become a positive effect in the community just by having the presence of the Central point Police Department in the neighborhood. Avery goad deterrent to crime, As the use across the street develops into a public grade school, the safety of the children would be enhanced. ~. "That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include: items 1 thru `l2". We believe our project can be approved as meeting all the requirements of the Central Point zoning code. We look forward to discussing these issues at your conversance. Please contact our office should you require additional information. Re ctfu[l~y Submitted, Ronald.~~fi ~ e~~s~chitect P C Rig/klh 3 ~ L ~ ~.m.~.wv~ ~-4 E ` ..__.. - 6 _~_ __.e~ _ _ _ _ 's~ Y ~~~ d~ ,tom i ~ ~ 1 -i° ~ ~' ~y ~ y e -~ --. i ~ 3 ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 m_ ~.s. °--- - - a 3 F - ~_~• _ x3 ... - : I`~N _ i~ ~ E ~ '~-~ ~_ ~ _ _ _ v ~ a~ 6 _. ~ ~.s.~ _-~ e g.- ..~. ---~ ___..~~ .. _ _ _ , e ,- ~~.. .w. '~_ Y ._-~ ___ .... a ,: m _ 3 _ __ ,.. .~ __ n f ~. _ t . ~ . y _ ~,_ ~_ ~ _.- ___ - ~ ... _ LL ~ """^"4 F _ ~ _ i ~,. __ ~, . ~q, ~. V' & ~ r ~ ~ ~, `.s ~~~ ~ r ~\~~, tx~.6.'e"4m~^ ~a ~ ~~ts1 '' iP~D~V~LKIPED~ ~~H3aA t T372 W03C-1~0 1a\~ \\ .' f {6 \ ~ ~~ m' i Al r~~35 ! ., , 5 P1'~ `~ r t V s~~~ 't l t ~ ~ rz6~ :.. _ COV ` .j1,» m 6 3 ~ i ~ 1 # ~= _e 3 ~ -~~`. - ,. . tp„+u+ t `~ ~~ - ~ -4 °€ , 1~ ~~,4 ~ "~ 'azs ^`T~ e _ i t4Y e 6 _ ~ ~L - - ys~ +we,s^.lt`'"ki r. E i 1 d' ~ f1 .. ,_ _ ,. ~;.. ¢(( `, ~~ ~ , ~ :mss u ~ ~. },~ r a,. r __e_.._____.~______ --_.e_~ .mm~_~~~- g__.e 3 F {i Le 9 I + _~ > 3.»'. ~ ~A,C~.SOt~ C~UNTv SCHC>CtL ? t?ISTRiC7 & L'i j ~~r~s:~v ~:~~ c - - -._~~ C}VIC S \ ~ 5, ~, },~ \i 1 i~ t ```~ A ~ ~ ~~ a ~. ,\ t .~% r ~ ~ `~ ~'~'.. _.~ m~. 0 I i ~_. n ~it ~~ w gE. n tY t' .q p{ t £c [ (3 c~`~ € ~~ ~ 1 ~: ~ ~~ ~,~,' I 1f ~mf `~~ ~ ~: I ~ ~~t i ~ ~ E ~ ~~ { I 1 ~ ~'': gq €ry`€ 9 ~ ~ ti ~ B ~/`QsR p~~U ! rJjidif~' ~~ i ~}$LC~~` ~~~u~a ~;tu~~ /fit- ~'C}~ ~~{i~iftF~E- ~Q1~U'E~ 4.. L( 41d ~(_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~c}~ I 1 f'. Lt i ~ t- t`, F __ ova- ~-------~-- _.. _____~'=~=~__ is ~1 M ~;~ " '-{' D'xes ~0".'3.c__ac_r~- (}/ tf `t. '`, ~ i aE. P ~r-ma ~ 3 0 ~ . .~: ~~.:~~ 1 rs KZ t r t F wa ua': y jf y 1 4 •`~ Attachment <`C" FINDINGS flF FACT AND CflNCLUSIflNS flF LA'4V File No: 08138 INTR4DUCTIflN In the Matter of a Conditional Use Permmit for the proposed City of Central Point police substation within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center building. The Planning Cozmmission approved the Site Plan for the center on March 6, 2t~07 by Resolution 722. The center is located in the TOD-1"1MR, High Mix Residential zoning district and identified on the 3ackson County Assessor's zmap as 375 2W 03 CB, Tax Lot 73fl{~. The proposed project area is located at 888 Twin Creeks Crossing. {Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, Oregon Limited Partnership; Agent: Roz-zald Griz~~es, Architect). CPMC .17. bS. (15U Zvnirtg ~•e~arlrctirrns--T4I1 rlistt•ict. CPIYfC .17.65,QSf1 (C}, C"onditiaTxrzl Uses. Conditional asses in Fable l are sha~~n vuitli a "C. " ;l'hese arses are allowed if they comply with the applicable provisions of this title. They are subject to the same application and reviezvprocess as other conditional uses identified in this title. Findinb: The proposed police substation on the first floor is classified as a Civic, community service use and zmay be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. Conclusion: The applicant has zmet the procedural requirements with the ding of a Conditional Use Permit application. CPMC I7. SS. dS(I, Table 3 - Tt713 I-3istrict and Crrr•rirlor Parking Statrrlards Findings; Section 17.b5.C}50, Table 3 states that the number ofparking spaces is to be determined as part of the conditional use review, Finding: On-street parking, designated for a police vehicle by the use of a sign and curb paint, is illustrated on the site plan. Twin Creeks Crossing, a public road, has an on- street parking strip and is built to sufficient width standards to accommodate the police vehicles. Finding.: Utilizing on-street parking will eliminate the need for off-street parking within the retirezment center, thus no additional off street spaces are required. Conclusion: The Project eozmplies with the City's civic use parking requiremments. CP11~C .T 7.66. f134 {`4}. Conditional Use. ~`onditional uses shall lie t-e~?ietived as provided in Chapter 17. ~6, Conditional Use Perrt2its. ~~ Page 1 of 6 Finding: A Conditional Use Pez-mit application. as provided by CPMC Section 1'].76 has been submitted for Planning Commission review ofthe proposed police substation. Conclusion: An application has been submitted for public heari~~g and review. CPM"C 17.66. (1511 Applrcatiftrt rcpprttvcrl criteria. B. Site Plan, .Landscaping and Cotzstructif~n .flan .Approval. ~ site plan, landscapitzg and construction plan application shall lac approved 1~lhen the approval autlzfarity,~tzds that the ffallfawing criteria are satisfied or can lac shfawtx to be inapplicable: .1. The previsions of Chapter 1 x.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Cotzstruction Plan ~lpprf~val, shall be satisfied; and 2. The proposed inzprfavemetxts cfanxply nTitlz the approved Tf?l7 district far- cfarridfar master platx for the property; and 3. Chapter .l 1.67, L)esigtx Standards--TC)LT.~ district and TC1l? corridor. Finding: A site plan and building elevation have been submitted as part of this application. Land area and diznez~sions, parking spaces, and proposed uses have been evaluated utilizing the site plan and TC}D district criteria of CPMC Section 17.65.OS0 and 1'7.67. Finding: Conditions of approval that must be met prior to issuance of a construction building permit are listed and found within the staff report dated March. 6, 22(}'7 as part of the Twin Creeks Retirement Center Site Plan review, File 0'703(}. Additional conditions maybe imposed by the Planning Coznrr~ission and will become part of the record. The applicant will receive written notice ofthe conditions of any approval. Conclusion: The application included a site plan anti landscape planting plan. CPMC' 17,66:d5t1 {D). Conditional Use. 1. ~ conditional use application shall be approved when the approval authority fznds that the, f `fallowing criteria are satisfied or can lac spawn tea lac inapplicable: a. The provisions of Chapter .17.76, Cfanditifanal Use Permits; and b. The proposed conditional use complies with the approved TQL~ district car c©rridor master plan fear the property; and c. Chapter .17.67, L7esign Standards--TC~1~ district and TUL~ corridor. 2. A efanditiflnal use application shall not be required ffar a cfanditifanal use which was approved as part caf a valid master plan approval as prfavided in Section 17.66. l?SQ(A} Finding: A Conditional Use application was submitted for Planning Commission review of the proposed ground floor City of Central Point police substation project review utilizing CPMC Section 17.7& and the TC}D District criteria. Finding: The substation site is located within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center for which a Site Plan was reviewed and approved March. 6, 2007 by Resolution 722. Conclusion: An application has been submitted for public hearing and review. Page 2 cif 6 Finding: The City Polzcc Dcpartmet~t requires ozx-street parking, and therefore the designated parking will not consume the center-'s off-street l~arlcinl; siaaces. CoEEC1EESlOi1: The application con-~plies. CPMC T 7.67.S1~{K :~,) Sr'te design st~cnrlarrls Finding: Site design standards of CPMC 17.7.50 were discussed during the Site Plan review as evidenced in the findings exhibit "C" of the Staff Report dated March 6, 2007. An application for a Conditional tlsc Permit was made a condition of approval. This application does not request z~odifications to the approved site plan referenced in above findings. Conclusion: Application complies CPMC` Z~ 6~ l?Sl1 {M). Signs. 1. The pz°ovisions of this section are to be used in cotzjunction with the city sign regulations itz the Central Point Sign Code, CTzapter IS.24. The sign requirements in Chapter IS.24 shall goverzz in the T©.t~ district and Graz°r°idor; Finding: Signagc specifying the on-street parking; spaces are dedicated for police vehicles will be installed. Conclusion: The project can meet this criterion. CF1V~C 17.76.(14(1 C~rtlditicznal Ise Pet'tlritr Finrlillgs atttl cranrlitirltas The planning commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows: ~. That the site for tl2e proposed use is adequate in size and shape to aceotntnodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all oilier provisions of this code; Finding: A first floor office within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center will be used for the police substation. Finding: The office space is 338 sq. ft with a restroom and is sufficient in size for the proposed police substation activities. Conclusion: The project can rrteet this criterion. CPtFIC .17.76, (14f1 {B). That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic t]zat is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Finding: Twin Creeks Crossing is adjacent to the first floor office and is a public road adequate in width and surface to accommodate the police vehicle parking, ingress and egress. ~~ Page 4 of 6 Conclusion: The project can z~~ect this critez-iot~. CF.t2"C.t ~ ~6.11~11 ~C}. 1'Ziczt the proposed use will have zzo significeznt adverse effect ara abuttingpropet-ty or the permitted zzse tlzea°eof. Ito aazal~ing dais determination, llie commission shall consider the proposed location of ijaaprovetnents on floe site; vehiczdar ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings arzd structzzres; }Falls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; Finding: T'olice presence in the Twin Creeks area can provide an increased level of public safety and welfare. The police substation is zlot expected to interfere with. the activities custoznaz•ily associated with the retirement center. Conclusio~z: The proposed use is consistent with the TC}D-1-1MR zoning and City's intent for this area. Cl'M'C .17.76.44 (l1}. What the establishnaetzt, nzaitztetrance or operation of the use applied for ~~Fill eonaply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detr°inaentaZ to file health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods aaad will aaot be detrimental or injuf-ious to file property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C crf this section; Finding: The substation. will be within a newly constructed building that has inet or exceeded structural requirements. The substation will be operated by the City of Central 1'oiz~t Police Department. Conclusion: The proposed use is consistent with the TC}D-HMR zoning and City's intent for this area. CPIYIC 1176.444 (E}. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general we~are and may include: 1. adjustments to tat size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use; provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions for the subject zoning district, unless a variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter 17.13, 2. Increasing street widths, modifications in street designs or addition of street signs or traffic signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use, 3. rldjustnaents to off-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics of the proposed use, ~. .Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress, S. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance progranx, tr. Regulation of signs and their locations, Pale 5 0£ 6 7, l~egzriring fences, berms, walls, lanclrecr~aing ar other del?ices tlf orgatzie ar artificial eatnpasitian to eliminate ar reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, ndot°s, viszral incompatibility or other undesirable effects on surrautzding properties, 8. Regulatiotz of time of aperations,far certain types nf'uses if their open-crtiat2s nzay adversely affect privacy of sleep of persons residitag nearby ot- atlzct•u~ise rata flirt with atlzcr comtnzrnity or neighborhood fitnctiotzs, . 9. Establish a tinge period within ~~Tzicli the sulajeet land zrse nzzcst be de~1eloped, 1t1. Regzrirenzent of a band ar other adequate asszrratace ~aritliita a specified period cf. time, .l 1. Such other catxditions that are fotand to lie necessat:y to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, 12. ~n considering atz appeal of an applicatiatz for a conditional use permitfar a home occupatr'ota, the planning commission shall review the criteria listed in Section .l T. 6~.19(~. Finding: No adjustzx~.ents to off street parking recluirezx~ezits is necessary with this proposal, Police vehicle parking will be provided as on-stz-eet parking. Finding: The on-strut parking will be posted with a sign designating police vehicle parking. Conclusion: The proposal is consistent with the TOD-HMS zoning and City's intent for this area. Page 6 0~ b PLANNING CQI~~iMISSIQN RESC7LLITICJ-N NCJ. A RESOLC.ITI(~N GRANTING APPRiDVAL {)~< A CONDITIONAL IJSE PERIVIIT FOR A CITY flF CENTRAL POINT POLICE SUI3STAT[CIN Applicant: Tc~in Creeks Retirement Cez~fier; Agent: Ronald L. Grinxes, Architect (37S 2 W 03 CB, Tax Lot 7301} S$$ Twin Creeks Crossing} File No. 08138 WHEREAS, the applicant submitted an application for a Conditional Llse Permit far a police substation within the retirement center building located within a T4D- I-1MR, 1-liglz Mix Residential zoning district. The office consists of approximately 338 sq. ft. first floor office space within. the Twin. Creeks Retirement Center and is identified an the 3acksan County Assessor's Hoop as 37S 2W 03 CB, Tax Lat 7300, located at 888 Twin Creeks Crossing, in the City of Central Point, C7regan; and WHEREAS, oz~z September ~-, 2007, the Central Point Planning Camznissian caz~ducted a duly-noticed public hearing an the applica#ion, at which tiz~-ze it reviewed the City s#aff report azzd heard testimony az~.d comments an the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Cazxzmission's consideration of the application is based an the standards and criteria applicable to the TflD-11MR, High Mix Residential section 17.65, Applicatiaz~z Review Process section 17.64 and Conditional Use Permit section 17.76 of the Central Paint 1Vlunicipal Cade; and WHEREAS, the Planning Corrzmissian, as part of the Conditional Use Permit application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated September 4, 2007, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the conditianai use permit is consistent with the intent of the TC}D-HMR District, now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Cammissiaz~, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth az~ Exhibit "A'>, the Staff Report dated September d, 2007, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Caznmissian and signed by me in authentication of its passage this d~" day of September, 2007, Planning Coznmissian Chair Plaz-zning Caaxzrnissicrn Resolution No. {09040} ATTEST: City Representative Approved by n~~ this Ott, day of Septezr~ber, 2007. Planning Con~n~ission Chair Planning CornYnission Resolution No. {~90~Oy} CLA~~ ~ ~IARIA~I~~ ,~ r 4c~taica~~a, ,r Ala 2t10"7 ____ ~.r~ ___ ~ _.~ _ ____ __._ ___ ~_. , . _ ~_ . ~ ~ .~ .. ~ . __.. ~: ~,,.~_ t~:ot;~,ad~r~lttc~s~ of ~~zr ~~pl~Jrcatac~ar r•i;cltac,~tia~~~ r ('1. :> !' ~ ~~ iz~t~t,c ur i]ac 1 {3]) c~f~f=strcct ~<trkiall ~t~a~cl~rr~f uf~ t}re {'[>~{~, °~cctior3 ] 7.~i~~.t)~t); t}t~ araaartbca• of°rc;c~taia•c~c3 aa~aa•11ir~;~ ~taac} ecr~'cre~} i~aa' ~~il :-lr.cc;;. '1:-lac; ~aa]rjec:t: }~c`oix^r~tr~ is ]ocatc:<l iai ihe~ '1 t)1a--1]~,-71Z, } lit}~ :~~li:~ I~c:~>iclcrlti~al ~craaiaa~ clasta°ict at~~i rcaca~tilicc] oar tlri; J~t~l, ;can C;cztarlt~ r1»c5sor-~ ara~al7 a~ >'7 :? 1,~;' t3~j {'13. lax },cat %3t)t), (,'~X~~aYa~~;~~:~e "~'~~s~~ ~;r~~~~~E~~ 1~.~,$ic,F ~af,~a7{ ~.~ ' `'~ x __d___r_ _ _-__ _~ _~- __._...,- _, ,. _ . _ C`Qa,a~ar~ C]ua~c, (.;~~tr~a~~tta~i'ty 1']~araa~c.r ~~~1~'ll~~.~C~~%~ ~: {Jai :'~f.aa•c~la Vii, ~Ot)i tl~~~ I'1<aaaalat~~7 C'oa~aa~~is5ac>al a17~rc~~cc1 tl~c gate, l:']~aa~ loa ~tla~ 1~C~-uaai l~ria~. C rcc:1;5 ]~etir°ca~~i;r~t. C'eaatc~~~ (l~t~scaltatic>a~ ,~:?). l }lc: 1~ciirava~lerrt <'calier clt~~;i~j,i~ iracltulc;d tc:cestic~a ~ ~asc~5 ~~~sc~c;i<aicc ~vtl~ t}~c~ ccaatcr. t_'1'il~'IC `~~,t.'ii{~rY 17.6:x.() ~tl, ""~ai~l; ~, `~ctaioa~ Flotssira~; rec~tair•es i~rr~ (1) }~tar•kitlt~ s}..a~ac~~, ljer zliti~irIlira`,~ taaiit. -1s ir~a]71icc1 tir tllc l~r~o,jec.t the z~~iali,ratatt~ ~a~ra~kia~~~ i~e~~caia•crnerrt irac:ltaciccl ~accc.ssc>ry c,sc;s. pt~rs~, icltarl Said acca/ssc~r~;~ usca, ~er~. ~. cl ort}~~ tk~c3 seslic~r~ hcatasin,~ }~a-c~jcut. .fit t}~e iraa~ ol~`~itc 1'}aa1 }Z~.vie~ti ~.I;: taE~plic4rtlt t~c.att« tli~at, 1~~3~;d orr t}aa~ir ~u~:l7~riea~cco i]ie City,;?arkir3tr a•ec}tzit•t;ri7er~t Ior• a•ctircr~~c:r~t hcausira~ ~~;<is e~cussi~~e. lr~ r•c:s1~<at~se to thy; to}}1?]ic~~nt's ccra~c~;a~ar almut i}_,`. p~trkia~~ si~ar~ci~arcl ileac 1'lat~rlir~~ C'oa~~rx~ait~r1 i~rca~;iclLc:l, <cs to coricliti~a~ c~l~tl~e ~iie 1'l~aa~ a•evic~r~, that t°eclaacticraa~ ia7 tl~e l?<la•kiaa~ r<~tic~ ~~oulti be a~tlsiclca~~°ci 4~r•o~~ic}i~c} t}7~ {tl~}~lictant staE~rz~ittecl r~ta~ljc>t-tial,~' clc~~uxrlerlt~ttic3r~ and ~a171~1icd fc~r ~a vaa-ia[l~c. 1'ea• `~ec;iic~zt l I.? y.=~-()0(1;) t]IC. C:ii~~ tiaati~ ~j}?l~r~oti~ ~~~rri~ralces tc~ t:13c~ ra~ir~%rxi.tar~7 or° nza~imtanl staatcl~ra'd5 f~~r oi~9=-sta•e~.t ~arkizt{> k rtaliclec.] t}ra t}~~yfol}cr~~rir~~~ li:u]sa7~~ corn }7e r.a~~~ee a. Tllc it3c}ividt?~tl i;}star ~tct~c•ist~c:~ cif tlrL tvs~ at t.1ie ltacat~c~t~ re~<]iiira: aTroa-: i~r lcr~;s ~,ti,~l:irl~~, 3;I~:~t2 ~y~rlcr~all~° rcc~tairetl .ivr ~. taxi; a this t~g~~ trtrd iaat°rr,i~~~ as ~.c:°z~~oristr~atcd }~~ ~i }rar•1:ia1a> aaral~,~~.i5~ ~. T}~c atc-ec~ fir t~c~ciitiona} }7rarki~~;~, ~ ~rrr~t)'t t•c~~rsc±rta.b]y lie inc~ 1}a~'otaa~}t tt~c:; prta~~i5ioa~ o:~c~n- str~cet x~,trr•l~ir~~ car s~raa•ecl f7tta,l:it1~,~ r~it}~ tat~jac~nt c~r° n*w~jr}~~;- ta~~~s: t~r~c1 :~'<?<~~~ 1 af4 c, Ail other code standards are met, in conformance with this code. At this tune the applicant is z-equesting a variance from the City's parking requirements as follows: l . A reduction in the tninimuan number of arkin~; spaces required; and 2. A reduction in the number ofcovered parking spaces required by CPIvIC. 1. Reduction in Minimum Nuxrtbelr of Parking Spaces. CPMC Section 1'7,65.OS0, Table 3 identifies the minimum off street parking requirements for the Retirement Center as ane spade per unit. Based on the center's number of units, a minimum of 12{l parking spaces are required. The submitted revised project plan proposes 1C1Q parking spaces. The proposed 1flC} parking spaces are distributed as follows: TABLE 1. PRbPbSED Pt1RKING use Na. Spaces Tenant 56 Employee 2S CarNan Pool 2 Visitor ? Other l0 Tatal 100 The applicant has provided additional infannation regarding the parking demand for projects ofthis type {Senior Dousing} supporting a lower parking demand ratio. The applicant states that the average age of the tenants is 8{l years old and that for a variety of reasons, most do not have individual vehicles. Table 2 illustrates the information submitted by the applicant. This information is based on four existing retiretment centers operated by the applicant. The parking ratio per residential unit ranges between .b4 and .9{~, with an average of .'79 spaces per unit. The variance proposal provides a parking ratio of .83 spaces per unit vs. the l.Q required by CPMC. TABLE 2. EXISTING FACILITIES & ITE CbMPARISbNS Na. of Na. of Parking Parking Residezit Facility Name „ zzits , „ . Residezzfs . Spaces S paeeslUnit Cars CarslResidezzt Employees Te enzn Terrace rp g ~, . 4 .. .._. ._ 106 85 0.90 35 4.33 20 1-lorton Plaza 94 106 70 0.'74 46 0,43 23 Anna Maria 102 116 91 0.89 46 0.40 24 Fountain Plaza 132 149 84 0.64 41 0.28 25 Average 105.5 1.19.25 82.5 0.'79 42 0.40 23 1'1'l~;t 0.4$ T~vizz Creeks 120 135 100 0.83 56 0,41 25 Nate: ~ ~taxitnum occupied parking spaces per unit during weekday with a minimum of.l I spaces per unit. Average was .27. Weekend parking rates were higher, but data was insuCficicnt to prow€de a statistically vatid comparison. Page2of4 ~~ In addition to the applicant provided inforznatian, Staff canciucted a paz-king staz~daz-cis caz~~parisan utilizing The Institute of Transpartatian Engiz~cers {ITE} publica#ian Parking GcJtz~t°atiota, 2"`r L;ditiort, which is a comprehensive source of parking occupancy ra#es for uses and building types. Based oz~ the ITE data the zxzaxizrzuzrz was .48 spaces per uni# {Table 2}. Criteria I. Based on the applicant's data, azzd the information from ITE, it has been. adequa#ely demonstrated that the proposed nuzrzber afparking spaces is suffzeient to appropriately supply the off street parking needs ofthe project per Section 17.13,100{E}{1}. The overall z•equest represezats a 1'7°l~ reduction in the number of required parking spaces. As a result afthe projects location within a residential neighborhood and being bound on #hree sides by public streets, there is na reasonable opportunity to share parking. I-lawever, the project will have a carlvan services to transport residents to shopping, activities, etc., which suppoz-ts a reduction in parking dezxzand. There are provisions in the Code that allow far a 25°l~ reduction to the parking when. transit is available. blawever, at this time there are no transit services available to the project site, The nearest ~traz-zsit stag as at Second Street and Laurel Street. Therefore, #his provision can not be solely relzed upon as a solution to the variance, but the availability of car/vaz~ service further suppar#s the variance request. Criteria 2 & 3, Based on the project's location within the neighborhood it has been adequately demonstrated that use of shared parking is not a reasonable solution to the requested reduction. All other parkin ;requirements will be rrzet. 2, Reduction. ixz Number of Covered Parking Spaces - In addition to the number of overall parking spaces, the applicant is requesting a variance to the required number of covered parking spaces. CPMC Section 17.65.050{3}{a} states that: "Fifty percent of all residential off-street parking areas shall b~ cov~r~d. .tlcc~ssot y z~nit parking spaces are not required to be covered. " Based an Table 1 there will be a total of 56 tenant {residential} parking spaces. Per CPMC a minimum of 28 spaces zxzust be covered. The applicant is proposing that a total of 28 spaces be covered. If the variance to the number of parking spaces is granted, then the request to reduce the number of covered parking spaces will be consistent with Section 17.65.050{3}{a}, effectively eliminating the need far a variance to the covered parking requirement. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "C" ISSUES: 1. if the variance to the number afparking spaces is approved, then the minimum required number of parking spaces shall be as noted in Table 1. 2. if the variance to the number of parking spaces is approved, then the variance to the number of covered parking; spaces is na longer required. Page 3 of4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Igo conditions EX~IIBITSlATTACI-IMENTS; Attachment "A" -Project Site Plan Attachzxzent "B" -Applicant's Statement and site plan Attachment "C" -Planning Departz~aent Findings Attachment ``D" -Proposed Resolution ACTION; Consideration of Resolution No. , approviz~zg the Class B Variance to the minin~uzrz number of required offstreet parking within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center, urith a finding that no variance is required for the covered parking. RECOMMENDATION; Approval of Resolution No. ,approving the Class B Variance to the minimum nun-zber of required off street parking spaces to 10(}, with a finding that no variance is required for the covered parking. Page 4 of 4 Twin Creeks #~etirement Center Parking & Cavered Parking tt , ~ ,. ~ q4 .~ $ 0 ~, i,,.. /'tit Galden Peak anus ,>r~°~4~;y8,~`` ,*Yy „ ~~' ~ ,^ ..., ... ,air .,,, &.. ,, _ ._. a^w^- _. `,~t r~ i-°', _ ~ '+~~, P F oV@Yed1G«1Yc1~~BA1"kWhe ~ ~ 7 ~~ ~' ~`+~ 1 ' c ~ 4 <, '' .~.. ' ~~'~ r K , ... ., ~' .. ,. t° _, .. ., ,~~ 9 c ~ ~1.»iP3.F '~ mf~~.n .S .., a f;. .,1_. 1;. `al E w _;~.~,.~ ,~ - r ~ „lam 5 },,~;%~,; i. ... ) e ,,/' ' y !• may, i~ i ' 6, ~ a .., i. ~ sir ~ ./'`/ " ry ~~ „~ ' .. ~.: :„ x s`~*~e'.^~r°<`s'.m.,`,`~.,''...,'.:,~',:..»,..._......_ .,.y,--,-,.r ~aa,''Y Y r//OCjrS~FI"{Cld'1~ /~„ -ro> ~~ ' ;_ ., ~,-_ , »x,.;,~ QllStregJ tai tk~ityn e~_~/1rl~;.'-'s,=. _ ~,,,,~ ,' r, p~ ~;~~ w_. .. _ ., 1; .,,, J /' ..: , e ~o~ALn ~.. o~~nr~s A R G H[ T E CTS, P. C. ~.luly 26, 2007 City of Central Point Planning Department '140 South Third Street Central Point, C}regon 97502 Attn: Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician RE: Twin Creeks Retirement, Pile Number 07036 Dear Ms. Morgan: Please accept this letter and attachments as an application for an "Exception to Code Standards" Chapter ~ 7. ~ 3, Class B variances, Section 17.13.00, A. Applicability. Class 8 variance requests apply to the types of requests meeting the approval criteria in subsections {B} through {G} of this section, and that conform to subsection {A} {1 }through {3} of this section. Class :3 variances shall be reviewed using a Type I11 procedure, in accordance with Chapter 17.06 E. Variance to parking and loading standards. E,1. ,a,The individual characteristics of the use at that location require more or less parking than is generally required for a use of this type and intensity, or modified parking dimensions, as demonstrated by a parking analysis or other fact provided by the applicant; The individual characteristic of our facility that requires less parking than is generally required in our facility, senior housing, the average age is 80 years old. Many of the seniors at this age either can nat or choose not to drive. The facility will provide transportation with a small buss and a car for doctor appointments, trips to Grater Lake, to coast, to Seven I^eathers, banking, shopping, lunch out, dinners out and other pre- arranged trips. ~. 3110 STATE STREET • ~.t€EC3FC7F3f], OREGON 97504 s (549) 772-3000 • FAX 15491 779-C}Q83 o tour+rv.GwEareE3.ct~rn The table listed below is a comparison of other facilities owned and operated by this developer. Facility Name Units Residence {E} Parking Employees Tenant Cars Terpening Terrace 94 106 85 20 35 33 Horton Plaza 94 ~ 06 70 23 46 43 Anna C~rlaria 102 116 91 24 46 43 Fountain Plaza 132 149 84 25 41 28 Twin Creeks 120 135 100 25 56 47 Proposed use of 100 parking spaces 56 tenant parking {50°l0 of tenant parking = 28 garageslcovered parking} 25 employees 2 car and bus 7 visitors Qur basic line of thinking is a lot of seniors do not drive cars for physical reasons. Since we provide transportation for them, their dependence on their own vehicle is significantly reduced. UVe are proposing more parking spaces than any of our other facilities. This is also not counting any on street parking which exists on there side of our facility. ~.1.b. They need for additional parking cannot reasonably be met through provision of on-street parking or shared parking with adjacent or nearby uses; There are no existing facilities where shared parking is a possibility. There are on-street parking spaces that could provide the twenty spaces we are short. They would have to be shared between employees and visitors. C}ur tenants would park on site. P.1.C. All other code standard are met, in conformance with this code. All other parking standards are met as proposed. We respectfully request the city to grant the variance. We propose not to create an encumbrance on the city or the neighborhood with this variance. R ectfuliy Submitted, Ronald ~ ri~rchitect, PC RI..Glklh I~nclosures {4 pgs} ~. -- _____ 1 ! t m - - 4 p ~~ . ~ 1~ -,~ ~ ~ *§ ~ N - c °n~ a- a~ a~z fe 1,_ --- ~,~F ~`~ iii ..~ T~; ` ~--'-~ ~ .a~ ~ ~_ - - - - -. ~._ ` - _ -_, - ~ _ - ., _ _..e.._-_ cw..wsR .... . '\.. qv' a `372yY09G-'{7G - J _. >- - - _. #~ ems"-- p,a._ - : L Ss,,..~z ~,. H ~ $~tt44~. s<<,`iM1 tcc.^ce b 4 f x< - _ - _ ~ tt A -~ s _ } ^^ s r J \ l \ \ ~ a e~~ a ~~ \\\ ~ °~ ~ 4 ~- ~~ ,~ ~ € , its Z .r . { <_ ,. .. € ^o; ~ ~p a t ° ; „ ~ f ~ ` i , ` - ' _ ~ ~ _ 'war'' ~k%~ `~ -~'~ i i -mot <.~ _ a f :t ~~ ~ ~^+. 3 reu"_A-- ~ - ` .... ~._.~.~<.m..< . _>..__~ .e....>>_»... _..- G WtY _ _ Y Aw~f°"'$b°° 1 . wPek':F# nxLn ~ Pax - - > ~ /- t , =>E CR CRO ~ -----•-°°°-_ °vY i .~ - - _ ~~ - _ , _` i ~~ _ --~ - ~_ _". ~ _ -- _ _ _.d ...- .P _..m.~ ~ ~ ~ °A _-,,. _-- a 3 °"_i -_>--^ ) ail .< ~ _.-r -.~.. - -~_ --- :-..~.~ ,~..~-~~. _:~~.,.. - ' __._..__ .._ _____...~_.,_ ~.,..~., ~, i{I ~ .<e. T372N1cgGA_~DO~ - - - ~ . ~ # _. i c ~ F-.~ m_°_____ u:xa 4.av°.e~.~___ sr n -- - - _ - ~ as wn *c~,ma^ _ o~_ e~~ €i ~°"'-~~'^> - 3 € ~ .. A,.- v 4`v CO,s~f,-y ~Ut-,GC}C ~. ~~ r - '_'" '* ..' t.,, € E_ <. ~ r fff € ~ la.~.c r ~. -.~ 3 ` µte uur s, ~ S"'t- T -t c€ !~~ ~ ~" i t i x ~,.3 _ , -., _ ro !!! ~ `°-iFl , a ~2> € R.,F F t_F _ ~". 8" : ~r a~..e,. ~:, E" - ., .. - - °-°..,~`3^*~>~•~"c r #- ii `` ~ ~ E f ~S T <E'. ~ L .A ~ - ~'~ f ' ~~%te t ,G °°•,- I~,.m ~ r € ,~ i T ~ F i E AttZC~lII1CIlt ccC}~ F1NUINCS OF FACT AND CClNCLU~i£)NS ELF LAW File No; 08139 1NTRUDUCTIUN In the Matter of a Class $ Variance to the TDD aff street parking standards far the Twin Creeks Retirement Center. The Planning Comzx~ission appraved the Site Platx for the center an March 6, 2iJQ7 by Resalutian 722. The center is located in tlae TCJD-~-1MR,1-Iigh Mix Residential zoning district and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's ~xxap as 37S 2W 03 C$, Tax Lot 7300. The praposed project area is located at 888 Twin Creeks Crossing. {Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, ©regan Linxited Partnership; Agent: Ronald Grimes, Architect). CPt1fC 17.1.3.400 Class B variances. .~. .~#pplicability, Class B vas°iance regzests apply to the types of requests nzeeli~rg the approval criteria in subsections (B) through ~C~ of this section, and that cotaforna to subsections {A)(l) through ~3) of this section. Class B variances shall be reviewed using a Type III procedure, ira accordance with Chapter 17.(15. ~. The Class B variance standards apply to individual platted and recorded lots only. 2. The Class B variance procedure shall not lac used to modify a standard for lots yet to be ct°eated through a partition or subdivisiota process; suc12 requests shall utilize the Class C variance procedure. 3. ~ variance shall not be approved that xvould xJary the `permitted arses" or 'prohibited uses"of any zoning district. Finding. The variance applicatian is reviewed using a Type 111 pracedure in accordance with section. 17.05.3x0 and the public hearing before the City afCentral Paint Planning Commission September 4, 2(}07. Finding. The variance request is not a modification to the lot size. The project, Twin Creeps Retirement Center, senior housing is a permitted use in the zone. Cozzclusian; The applicant has met the procedural requirements with the filing of a Class B Variance application. CPMC 17.13.4Qt1 ~$), variance to Minin2un21'lousing Density Standard, {C~. Iariance to T~eZaicular ~(ccess and Circulation Standards, and (.~}). T~arianee to Street Tree Regzairenaents (Chapter 12,3d~. Finding; The variance request is not a modification to the minimum housing density standard, vehicular access and circulation standards or to the street tree requirements. Page 1 of 4 Conclusion: The apl~licatial~l complies. CPC ~ ~.13.4af~ L. Uat°iatzce to 1'at~lring and Loading ,Stctnclar-ds. 1. The city ttzay apps~ove ~Fat-iatzc~s to flee razini3aarrtrx or• rtzcrxitnzcrn stcztadat-ds,for off street par°king (c~ztatztities and dirrzetzsions of `parlcitag spaces,} itz thr.'s code irpotz ~nditzg all cif the follativing: a. The inclividiaal character~istics of the r,rse at that 1©catiotz rec~a><ire more or less parking than is generally required for a zcse of this type and intensity, or ttzodi~ed parlritzg dirnensit7tzs, as demonstrated lay a parking analysis or other. facts pros>ided fay the applicant,. Finding: Ci'MC Section I7.~S.050, Table 3 identifies the lx3inilxlulxl off street parking requirelnel~lts far the Rctirelnent Center as one space per unit. Based an the center's number of units, a minimum of 12{} parkilag spaces are required. The submitted revised project plan proposes 1 OQ parking spaces; tenant spaces S6, employee spaces ~S, car/van pool 2 spaces, visitor '7 and other 1(} spaces. Finding: The applicant states that the average age of the residents at the retirement center is eighty {80} years old. This is a characteristic unique to a retirement facility verses other multi-family apartment devcloplnerlts. The applicant states that the average age of the tenants is 80 years old and that for a variety of reasons, most do not have individual vehicles. Table 1 illustrates the inforlTlation submitted by the applicant. This information is bawd on four existing retirement centers operated by the applicant. The parking retie per residential unit ranges between .64 and .9~, with an average of .'79 spaces per unit. Table 1 illustrates the submitted comparable data. TA,BI.Is 1. EXISTING FAC1L1TlES & 1'rE CClZ4~PARISOIVS Facilif Name Units Nfl.41` Residents No. of Parking S aces Parking S aceslllnit Resident Cars CarstResiderit Em to ees Terpening Terrace Harlan Plaza Anna Maria Fountain Plana 94 94 102 132 1{36 106 116 149 85 70 91 84 0.90 0.74 0.89 0.64 35 4~i 46 41 0.33 0.43 0.40 0.2$ 20 23 24 25 Avera e 105.5 119.25 82.5 0.79 42 11.40 23 ITT' 0.38 Twin Creeks 120 135 100 0.83 56 fl,41 25 Note: ~ Maximum occupied parkins; spaccs per unit during weekday tivith a minimum of.l l spaces per unit. Average was .27. L'Jcekend parking rates wexc ltighcr, but data was insufficient is provide a statistically valid comparison. Finding: The variance prapasal provides a parking ratio of .83 spaccs per unit vs. the l .0 squired by CI'MC. The percentage oftenants with vehicles range from 28°lo to 43°l0 among those living at the existing retirement centers. Finding: The applicant has provided additional information regarding the parking demand for existing projects for this type ofuse {Senior Housing}; the submitted data is in support of a lower parking demand ratio as expressed in Table l . Page 2 of 4 Finding: A parking standards comparison utilizing The Institute of Transportation Engineers {lTE} publication Parking Generation, 2"`t edition finds that far a senior housizzg building the national paz•king ratio is lower, '73°lo to J2°lo than the TC~D standard. The proposed variance request to 140 parking spaces, a 17°l° reduction fi"otn the T£)D standard, exceeds the spaces the 1TE report lists as a maximum of 0.45 or 57.G spaces for 124 units . The data is compared by the I~uI~-Ibex- of aff-street parking spaces per I.zzzit. Tlzc following Table 2 illustrates cazxlparable conditions. 'I"able 2 I'rC ~ompara#ive Repork TaD Panting Proposed ITC Parkin Generation standard: Per IJni# Variance Avet:[ e c:• t~nik tvlaxim[an~ er unit Senior I-Ionsin I 4.83 {I.27 0.48 Finding: Based an the applicant's data, and the information from ITE, it has been adequately dezz-zonstrated that the proposed number ofparking spaces is sufficiezxt to appropriately supply the aff-street parking needs of the project per Section 17.13.400{E}{1}. The overall request represents a 17°l° reduction in the number of required parking spaces. Finding: The project will have a carlvan service to transport residents to shopping and activities. The provided transportation supports a reductian in parking demand. Conelasion: The application complies. CP.~C 17.13.4~JQ E ~. 7'he need for additional parking cannot reasonably be met through provision of an-street parking or s7iared parking with adjacetzt or nearby irses,• Finding: The project site is located within a partially developed residential neighborhood and is bound on three sides by public streets so there is na reasonable oppaz-tunity to share parking. Finding: On-street parking is available along Twin Creeks Crossing with appraxirzzately twenty-three {23} on-street spaces that can be utilized by guests. Finding: fart III, Community Design Features element of the Twin Creeks Master Plan states "residential parking is provided in a rear parking court with on-street parking supporting the street_fronting retail/commercial."I The project has provided covered residential parking in the rear of the facility in conformance with the plan policy. Conclusion: The application complies. In addz'tion to the number of overall parking spaces, the applicant is requesting a variance to the required number of covered parking spaces. Cl'MC Section 17,65.OS4{3}{a} states that: ~ Tufin Creeks Master Plan Mixed-Use Page 64 ~ng~ ~ Ct~ ~ "Fifty percent of all residet2tial off-street pcu°king areas slacrll lie covered. accessory unit parking spaces tct-e not required to lie covered. " Finding. Thorn will be a total of 56 tenant {resiclential} parking spaces. Per CPMC, a minimum of28 spaces rrzust be covered. The applicant is proposing that a total of28 spaces be covered. if the variance to the number of parkizag spaces is granted, then the request to reduce the number of covered. parl~ing spaces will be consistezzt with Section 17.~S.OSO{3}{a}, effectively elizxzinating tl~e need for a variance to the covered parking requirement. ~`PMC 17.13.4(1!1 E c. all other code standards are met, it2 conformance ~~>ith tl2is code. ~. ~'he city tnay reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces as required ley this code, if tl2e applicant can demonstrate that t12e proposed use by its natr.cre tiarould be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need far bicycle parking. 3. 1'he city n2ay allow a reduction in the amount of vel2icle stacking area required for dr°ive-througl2 facilities if suc12 a reduction is deemed appropriate after analysis of the sire and location of'the development, lin2ited services available and other pet•tinent. factors. 4.1'12e city n2ay modify tl2e loading area standards if such cc ~°eduction is deemed appropriate after analysis of the use, anticipated shipping or° delivery traffic generated by the use and alternatives for loadinglunloadi22g, such as arse of on- oroff-street parking areas during nonbusiness Iiours,• provided, that traffic is r2ot irnpeeled. Finding: Not applicable to this application Conclusion; The application complies. Q Page 4 of 4 ~~II ~"a~ ~-~I ~l ~ ~I YT " .~_~ ~3 PLANNING C4MMISSICJN RESCILUTI4N NCf. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPRt)VAL {~F A CLASS I3 VARIANCE TO THE PARKING STANDARDS OF THE TOD-HMR, HIG~I-MIXED RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement Center; Agent; Ronald L. Grimes, Architect {3'1S 2 W 03 CI3, Tax Lot '7300 $$$ Twin Creeks Crossing) File No. 0$13$ WHEREAS, the applicant submitted an application for a Class B Variance to the parking standards to reduce off street parking to 100 parking spaces, of which 28 are covered, for the Twin Creeks Retirement Center located within a TC)D- 1.1MR, High Mix Residential zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's snap as 37S 2W 03 CB, Tax Lot 7300, located at 888 Twin Creeks Crossing, iz~ the City of Central Point, tJregon; and WHEREAS, on September 4, 2{}07, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which tune it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the application, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the T~JD-I-IMR, High Mix Residential section 17.5, Application Review Process section 17.fib and Exceptions to Code Standards section 1'7.13.400 of the Central Point Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Class B ~`ariance application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated September 4, 2007, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the variance is consistent with the intent of the TOD-I-IMR District, now therefore 8E IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission., by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff Report dated September 4, 2007, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4`h day of Septez~~zber, 2{}0'7. ~. Planning Coinrriission Chair I'lanz~zing Commission Resolution No. {0904{l7} ATTEST: City Representative Approved iay me this 4`~' day of ~epten~t~er, 2007. i'lannin~ Coxnznission Chair 3 Planning Commission R~soiution Na. {0}040y} F~~T~~I~IC.~N F~CIF~ F'~.1~ ~~~<ti~l~lt~ ,y i. ~ ~,13~~.-l ill `~~ !;„ ,•~~ ~tn~D~,~~A"~~~~~'~' il'ii'1°;ed. ~+;i~,d~;T~~,~, I~T~):~~;~-g'~~~1°~~!~'et~~~~>i•:wtr~~ ~k~'>9 i,{)ClSltie?"<ltit?l7 t)Id ]~i'litlt°St !i):' t.'XLeI1S?t)i? C?I {,,,~E?!'iC 2112ti ~~<Ilil'1'SO17 i'~i3. :1l~t~lic~?11t: I lel~if<.t~c. Ue~~elc~~~lllen~:, Iuc. f~ ~~:?I: .1'i l t.. _. ~`~' -'~ ~~ ~~ ~JUF~~i« ___ __...~______. .w.__...... Li~<I ~1t)1 ~„?~1rty Planning Tecllill~:i~Tn i-LCD,' I`.~Iu~ii ~~_,i~;} _._ _ _ _ ..~ .._ _ .. ... _.ww_. ._.~ _ .. ,. _ -. __ Q~1 I~'3zTrcl? b. 2t,'Oi, l it:l1 t?~e i)c~~elt~h111cnt r~ceivcd zt,~ilrt',~~11 ~r~~111 tilt; ~'~Tnniu~z {.~t~l?~]Ii is`;it~n 1,~~ __ R~-St1i~Itic111 '~~~u?nl)et-s °?I ~l. %?.(1 ~Ln~i ~~'.l . 1 ilis dLveltrin;lent ~,Ell~si~tt°ci c?1'a (`n3cl lIc131~r1 l'-sc 1'f~rrili%, .~~ h,~;;i11ii:Ci i I11i I~l;bCil)J)Illeili, iTli(l 1e111dtIVC I~i211? tlilililClltll~i?ti, I )Ie SLll71<'Ci hl't)I?Ci'(1 ]:~ ~{icCltcci G1t i M~ e' and l(7~ ~,'t'c';-,I ~{ii?i> 1>;[}~Ci Rtilti 15 ?T:'11{lil? ~.}l~ I{ ~5, ill.~ICit',f':ilc"?l ~ ti'~t? I`<liilli`.' t',t?i]ill~' tll~ll'I`t~1., ~Li'"1 e1~_' ~7'~'.SC.'111~"iil)11 C)~l~l~' i3i;1I111111`` ~{I21st111ti~;1)li 1°Ci~t~I~t i'ti t13~' ~ 1tV r~lltllll:l~ iTli~l it?i`'. iill'. ~lt\` ~()lIl?(,'.1~ (.1~C`.1(ie Ci tt) ~'?i E'f ('t Si.; lil C_'.lY ttlltflt)P'1'l ~:' t(? ltl l''1 ~.-t' f['~'ll;l~' j.l?C i1I'i.)11(?5eia lti~(JilC.tt lt?I1. I Ill' ~,. IIV ~. t)111IC',11 ~'t illl~i;,'(l ~(; I~~VIe~L ti,e 51/t: i?l tilt° ii)Iti ~II1Ci t}le I?1't`j)t~etl ~ti'L'C'i t't)Ill?eiill 11\' tC? ~,~i(llilli21111 '~1'~;1Llt, till'VLt`?il ll ~()l)d"~1U21 t7~ ~ 011 .i t) t1 t:'.5 I ~ ~? 1'iL . . 'l~ht' ~C;1ty +t?L111L?i ililll it ``tllt~~' ~l'ti11C)l1 1711 ,I11'i~ i (~« ?i)l~l'7 ~t) i i7I1~Itiel' tllc i?I~l?ili;il!t~?lti i)I,'IUI~I' t;t)i1L~tlC:lz11~ i~ ~'itti' (_"~~ucil ~1t ~1ri11~7 zla dcteril1i11e ~~~Il~-tit~hi~~r I1c~t tt? zzi7}u?I,11.11t~ l'1~1nI?ink C't>I11nli~~sit~u:~ ~Ii~)i?rt~val, _,. I1 ~~ITV 91), ~.(I( /y lilt` 1, 3t~' ~.,(1tt11t?i i?l~tit'il l~eti?itlllt"~T1 Q. ~ l~~y <ll!ll~ttllll4? the i~i~Ii?11111 z' t)Illilil~~1~111 5 ~Ict isil>r] ih <Iili~rtlve iilc <ti~~j~]icsititlll5. ~ .~ 411 ,~L1Ite ~t~):~,. ~~)U~, till' ~i7tb' ~p'vii";CII ~?~SS~C{ i~C`>{)lLar1t721 ~If?, ,) ~ ti~. C~C~ICI4(,lll~r ~! ~1C71"t't~011 C))~i){1~ ~C)t"tCS ~~3t';t il,ti i)U}1ilC' lI`?,li-<;(- 11'<i~.' IOf' Iile i51'f)1)t)~c'ii ~l.li1(il~'iSlt?17 11t1~,~ it77()~til<i5 )'(7l.tj' ~ie~lSt~tl ~ ~yl,?i'til~'l~l(>I?, ll l'1~I1!lletl L11it I);a~el~;i~nlezli. "l~llis det3iclzt~c)n oCri~,~ht-t>~'- ~a~<T~~ el~zhlccl Ii~l'i?;as,t' Dhvt~it,hlrlelli it?c, ~_~~I111t~t~titm 13t°~decl tt? '~«I~tll ~1~1c?ll~i~lill f)1'ice. [ l~~ ti_~~zt~ I)e~, ~Io~~111~:1?iF t?e~tl~ ._i ~~j~;~,,,~ <fl I'tlr ti~ic ~it.~tiil•;ttit?r~. ,. _ ~, _ _. aCrls~l?t-t~I-~'~ati' IIl t?rtler i~ Inept the c~~IZ: itlt>ns c)1 zlllh]•o~~tal ~11111~35c~ o,l ~Ta,';:}1 b. ?!lG_ at iI1~, l'lannln~~. ~.,t)111i11]~,~Illil n1et:~iiis~~.. 111 l'it~l`~~,e l?e'<el~li~lY~ir~nt i-la5 ei~tcrecl Alit) an a`I,i"eenl~:llt l~ii)1 tic Cif n1 C_;entr~al 1't1ilTt it'! 11,I~. 1c3r t}?e 1't111 et7t?stI'uctit~tl t1I~i l.'~<I~~Lt~i-h~rl1 ~`«tll~i ~~,it}1il? [)tin .Tt~11cs ('~rrh in exclla,~lf~,t' i<)I~ ihc~ ]~i~~.ht-~r~`~~~~~a~, D?ie to tlli' ~Irllc)ullt t)1°tililc ih~lt 11acI i„l~tiec1 tc> <IC1;1rr=s~ c>the, t?1ea11t'lll~ lleLileci li~l the etll~?pl.ete °~z~?~?l~i)~`~.1 ~f' . . t 1G t1I't?~?OSCI~ ~Lli7iilti'ISIt)I~l, ti7C ~I~I1IlL~lI1t, ~~415 I'ec3i?cs~ti,.:ci Ci_?I1SIiIl;I`11110I1 (1,~, illl ~'\iUI7Sillil ~~ ti1C I~.lli1nC'C ~ 'J111 lle~'~1o~tT1e?lip ~Ii,iar~'~ al. l'laltzlecl [ llit D~'~cIt~~pz~tzczzt appro~;al is valid l:caz ~ pelit<~tl oz sip fib) z??t)Ilill~;.` ' ~'C 17.8.06~J Final i'lat extensian taff'Itepart fI9(I42Qtl? - E'age [ of 2 Typically, the six (6} months would he from the Planning Commission's approval for the Planned ~1nit Development application. Renee the early request for an extension. Since the City Council reviewed and approved these applications by Resolution No. 1137, the revised expiration date is six ~6) months Pram the City Council approval date of May 10, 2Q(37. 't'he current expiration. date is Monday, Navemher 12t~', 2C3fl7. However, the request for an extension. has been submitted in a timely manner. The Planning Departrraent is bringing this request for an extension to the Planning Commission for approval. The typical period for an extension of a PUI} is six (6} months. Granting approval of this extension will extend tl~e approval to Monday, May 12, 2(308. FINDINGS: Conditions affecting the original approval ofthe Site t'lan have not cl~an,ged. ISSUES: None. ATTACFIMENTSIE~;IEIIBITS: Attachment "A" -Request for extension letter dated August 22, 2(3(17 ACTIt1N. Consider request for an extension. RECQMMENDATI©N. Make a motion to grant a six ~6} month extension. I`inal Plat extension staff f2eport 09042007 -Page 2 of 2 ATTA~HME~`~ `~ aF august 22, 2007 City of Central Point 140 S. Third fit, Central Point, C}R 97502 Re: Lleritage l~evelopznent -Planned Unit l~cvclopz~nent Silas Road - l;ile No. 07025 ~y~ S k 1 r.." ~ ~ ~ 4 ~S">~ { ~ f ~ 4. ~~ t ~1#t:~ ~~~~ -___ Lay copy of this letter, 1 respectfully request a six ~~ontl~ extension of time within which to file for final PUD approval ofour 53 zero tot line single family subdivision which received tentative plan approval on March 6, 2007. Thank you far your consideration. Sincerely, t' ~~ r `''Jim Clark ~~~T~~~IC}~ F`C}F~ -IT~ PL,A~ 8~ "T~~TATV~ PfL.~A~ ! ~ w. +, ,~~a~~~.~~'~.~ll'~~'1 ~~~'~;:~~a ~~'~~:k;,'~~~„ ~~~~i~Pa<~ - ~~cz~~~~~ ~~[~s~~~~~^~"~~ ~~a~~~: ~e[a~~i ~~'w ~~~;,~~4,~a~ ~'~^~~~s~i~,~ ~Alz~t[ ~w_. _ ~O11S1(,1~'1i'iti(?11 {)~ 1 ?'i'~ll1C'tii iOt' i?VtCClSiilll t?1 l.~C)i17v: )3l~Utilia'~ `~lif' h1~117 ;:1~ C1 ~ i'11t~iU'Jl:~~~~il11 G[~?)l:~l)~'G115. ~`~;~~~lict-ant: I ii>nlc }3ri~tElc-rs_ T.T.C _._~~it: `~hatn:' i:1si11lII _.__ __ wr- _.... Lisa"~c~r~<[[~, i'i~[nnir~~ Tccl~n~ci~ .__._____ _ .__. _ .-..._.. _._........._...._.~ ...r _ _-___ ., .. .... _ ......__,_,_. i~~,~ I~eSilluiltltl_ ;~~cl, "i[?~ ci<~.ti.d `~c,~t~:[~11~{:) ~, <_'Ut3~q 411c 1'I<.,r)r~r[ t (;{,)~~)~~)s:,)t?1~ <[{~~~)~r~~,{~cl ~.,~[t~ I'1~=[1 il~}il~lC;i[Lll)[l i {)l`i1~9-I11~? ()l ~:I~)~11~U,`~illl~i,tf'1~' .~ } iil:ll;;>„ ~ lll' `illl)1~'t'~ ~?I't)~?t',i'i\' i:ti ~[1(;;Il~;<1 ;1 i. 1 .~.1. ~. ~ ill[Cl`?tl"~E'~ ;.llltl l~ ~,-4'iti113] t11C ~~ ~~~ l 1 x:11: zi~nir[±_t clistrit~t. ~l i~c~ ;i11i' ~~~~)Il <ll%1?t'i):'<!.1 1`a 1t'[' 4i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ l'C`-]11C11tI~31 Sll1""lCl~11~;[Uti „~.L '~" " ~'' ~ ~~ f,jtC't1U~~I11Ctlt Ct)[ll~l~!tiC~ f3'u ... ,. ~ _ .~ = ~ " '~ ~ _ ~. ~) ,11t~1C{Z~C1 Sltl~ ~~ ~ -.- :s ~ e ~1 - i ~ c }' 1C<[i1C'tl( C.S. r~ ~`~1~~ l~l)lll~ i ~, _ ~ ~ ~ ~ h~iin z117~)('C)~'Ell i5 iY?UOC~ i01" i~ _ e - . _ ~ ~~~ - ~1~~?rclti X11. _ __~._.______~.,. w. _ --_ W_.._._.~, '~hc ail}~lic:tty{ i4 at~~t~ r rec11!eslin~, an ext~[lsii~[i !ilk tl]CI[" ~ Cllt~allv~ 1~1~II? <11~1~)~1C[tltlll (~ ilV 1'11C' ~~C7r ~4«. OE~t)~?~~) l~l<IL 1~~'~1ti 111~'C~ . ~ `t ~ ' ~ __ c<l[~c{arr~:nil~~ ~~~it1I illc 'etc ,.~, ~.", .~ ~ ~' ~ Plan %1}~1~licatii»1 (('its I~'ile =~= licztic~I~ ~;t[ti lily° ci P 1 [2 3 ,`~1~p ~ ..'~ # t 5 { yp + 1Vi 4I~4 ~7 i.I [. ~~~~~L ~)[ \..I LCIl)i3 ~. ~. y ~ LV {`~~ lil3ll'1C111~:~ <{lt~ii 11c{~ ~]ilt?]l' i~ifilil\ 1'i'~ICI{:ili:i'S t1~11C~1 l~;~lti ~~?~["l"f~"~ {~ {J~' ~,;; St~~IliitlTi ~(~~, C~dttwC~~'C]~t~'[71~~C~T` y ~{~~}. F) t!~' il3 t1i` ['~.t~lll['irlll;'Ilt i?1 511~;i11i111.x1 a7 1 irlal 1'i<tt all?l~li~i[tic~n ~'`itl,in C)lIL "~i:z1r c~f~ez~ ~tj~C~~~~ved~, aret~uest lut ~ ~tetl~;ii~~t i~ al~cl l~~:in~ z~;c;u~~ti;cl .~>r illu l.~nt~[tiv~ L'Ia~~ as t~~i:l1. ° ~PMC 17.72.Q'7U - F~~pir[ti~=1[ CI'MC 16.12.btU- I ;rl~il 1":~t Subl;li~~ic~n F'rcaced[rare ~_ ~_. Final Pln~ tr~r-. siai: Sf ili KcE~o~[ a<i~J420,,, - 1 ~ 2 Section 17.72.070 contains provisians allowing the Planning Conzrxzission to extend, with gaad cause, the deadline for approval of a Site Plan for a period of ane { 1 }year. Can August 22, 2007 a request for an extension was received in a timely zzzanner. `l"he basis For the extension is to allow the applicant additional time to finalize civil drawings design and incaz•porate their portion of the alley way. As a Forrrzality, the Planning Department is bringing this request for an extension to the Planning Commission For approval. Tl~e typical period for an extensiaz~ afa site plan and tentative plan is one year. Cxranting approval of this extension will extend the approval of the Site Plan and Tentative Plan applications to Thursday, September 4, 2048. Fl<ND)1NGS: Conditions affecting the original approval of the Site Plan and Tentative Plan. have not changed. ISSUES: None. ATTACHMENTSIE~;HIBITS: Attachment "A" .... Request for extension letter dated. August 21, 2007 ACTIflN: Consider request far an extension. RECOMMENDATION: Make a motion to grant a ane {1}year extension Far the Site Plan and Tentative Plan. ~~ final Plat extension Staff Report 49442447 -Page 2 of 2 5121120t}7 To: City C?f Central Point f~ ~11(I~~V,~ ~~ ~~ f~ ,;~,; -~ We have a site plan File ~Io. fl6t182 and a Tentative Plat File No. (}605 for a property located at 124 Noz-th Third St. We have our engineer drawing plans and is also redrawing plans to include our portion of ally way. At this time we need to ask for an extension on both of these files. Thank you ~~~/ Shane Elsdon 541-776-7765 ~~~~~~A~ ~~~~