Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - December 17, 1996 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA December 17, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 373 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Bob Gilkey, Karolyne Johnson, and Valerie Rapp III. :CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of December 3, 1996 Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS. i P A. Public Hearin -Review and decision re ardin Tentat ve lan for Minor g _g g Land Partition of 37 2W 03C Tax Lot 4400_ (Noel Moore, applicant) B. Public Hearing -Review and decision regarding Tentative Plan for Minor Land Partition of 37 2W 11D Tax Lots 3000, 3100 & 3200 (Noel Moore, applicant) C. Public Hearing -Review and decision regarding Tentative Plan for Beall Estates, Phase II, 37 2W 11D Tax Lots 3000, 3100 & 3200 (Noel Moore, applicant) D. Review and determination regarding Similar and Compatible Use request relating to massage therapy iu the C-3, Downtown Business District VH. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 19, 1996 IV V. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:03 P.M. ROLL CALL: Those present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Angela Curtis, Bob Gilkey, Candy Fish, Karolyne Johnson. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the November 5, 1996 :Planning Commission Minutes as written. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Curtis, abstain; Dunlap, yes; Gilkey, abstain; Fish, yes; Johnson, yes. BUSINESS A, a d aetermin tion reg rdi ° Site Plan Anolication for the addition to °'f°--- ° Fitness located at 155 North First Street 1372W10AA Tax Lot 46001 (Anplic°nt• Milton & Kathl~Gorden) Ken Gerschler reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report. Ken stated that some ~ _~ of the parking spaces encroach on.the right of way.. Tom Sharp, 1105 Gherry Street;' Central Point, applicant,-came forward in favor of the, _ application. He asked that the council to consider granting the parking as submitted. He stated he agreed with all-the- conditions except he also asked. that Council allow them to occupy the building .before the landscaping is completed if it can't be done because of bad weather. Administrator Bennett stated that the code does not permit parking in the right of way between the. property line and the street. Commissioner Gilkey made a motion to adopt Resolution #371 approving the site plan application for the addition to Lifestyles Fitness located at 155 North First Street (372W 10AA Tax Lot 4600)(Applicant: Milton & Kathleen Gorden) subject to all cohditions'oh the Staff Report and to amend the variance from twenty-three (23) to twenty (20) parking spaces. The applicant shall landscape-the right-of-way along First Street and shall bond for the landscaping with a limit of 120 days to complete the landscaping. Because of the deletion of parking spaces, it is recommended that applicant put up a bicycle rack for eight (8) bicycles. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Dunlap. ROLL CALL: Dunlap, yes; Curtis, yes; ,Gilkey, yes; Fish., yes; Johnson, yes. B ,, a s r' raa'rdjna Site Plan Application for the remodel of Central. p9• ~ ---- ° °•= to ated °t 255 South Front Street (372W10AA Tax Lot 4600) (Applicant: Grange Go-Operative Synoly Associat~onl Ken Gerschler, Planning Technician, reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report. ~~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1996 -Page Two Mr. Bruce Richey, 1391 Westerlund Drive, Medford, agent for the applicant, came forward on behalf of the application. Commissioner Johnson moved to adopt Resolution #372 approving the Site Plan Application for the remodel of Central PlwanGrGrangeoCo-Operati etSupplyouth Front Street (372W10AA Tax Lot 4600) (App' Association) subject to all conditions on the Staff Reports. Motion Sa F SIC Ses d by Commissioner Fish. ROLL CALL: Dunlap, yes; Curtis, Yes; Gilkey, y Johnson, yes. C. Ken Gerschler, Planning Technician, stated that the applicant has requested that the public hearing be postponed until a future'date. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Administrator Bennett reviewed a recommendation regarding withdrawal of territories from Jackson County Fire Protective Services District #3 (Lathrop Annexation and Hamrick Road Annexation) and requested the Planning Commission recommend withdrawal from the Fire District. Commissionir Fish moved to recommend withdrawal of. territory from Jackson County Fire. Protective Services District # 3 (Lathrop Annexation and Hamrick Road Annexation). Commissioner Curtis seconded the motion. All said "aye" and the motion passed. Administrator Bennett reviewed the Gloria Dei Lutheran project. Chairman Piland canceled the December 3, 1996 Planning Commission meeting due to lack of agenda items. VIII. 'ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Johnson made a motion to adjourn. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Fish. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 8:14 p.m. ~2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE:. December 17, 1996 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP City Administrator SUBJECT:.. Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Minor Land Partition. of 37 2W 03C Tax Lot 4400 Applicant: Noel Moore, d.b.a. W. L. Moore Construction 3600 Westover Dr. Central Point, OR 97502 .Owner of Dennis Bateman 37 2W 03C TL 4400 - 2.8 acres e rd• 2030 Taylor Rd. R-2, Residential Two-Family Central Point, OR 97502 ~~ The applicant, Noel'Moore, d.b.a. W. L. Moore Construction; is proposing the minor - -- -- partition of a 18.87 acre parcel into two parcels of 1.15 acres (Parcel No. 1) and 17.72 acres (Parcel No. 2) respectively. The property is located at 2030 Taylor Rd. in an R-2, Residential Two-Family zoning district. Both parcels would be accessed from Taylor Rd. h rit CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Exhibit C). ~pnlicable Law Central Point Comprehensive Plan -Urbanization Element & Comprehensive Plan Map CPMC 16:10:010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 16.36.010 et seq. -Major and Minor Land Partitions CPMC 17.24.010 et seq. - R-2, Residential Two-Family District ~~ Discussion The minor land participation would divide Tax Lot 4400 into two parcels of 1.15 acres and I 17.72 acres respectively (Exhibit A). The smaller parcel will contain an existing homesite and outbuildings. The larger parcel contains irrigated fields and is proposed for future urban development. The property is presently zoned R-2, Residential Two-Family. 'n ings of Fact 8c Conclusions of Law L The project site is located in an R-2, Residential Two-Family. The project site is consistent with Subarea "G" of the Urbanization Element of the Comprehensive Plan which calls for low density and medium density residential development in the area and with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site as Medium Density Residential. Tire project site: is located in an R-2, Residential Two-Family District. This zoning designation is also consistent with the referenced portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. "The project consists of a tentative plan application for the minor partition of an 18.187 acre parcel into two parcels of 1.15 acres and 17. 72 acres respectively. The project-divides the property into two parcels which meets the requirements for a minor partition. The project creates two parcels of 1.15 acres and 17.72 acres respectively and frontages of more than 60 feet which meets the. requirements. for lots in'the R-2 zone. The tentative plan- includes all .information required by CPMC ; 16.10.010 et seq. The Planning and .Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative .plan for the proposed minor land partition and the findings of fact and conclusions of law and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions of approval included in the Public Works Staff Report (Exhibit B). ii A. Tentative Plan -Minor Land Partition of Tax Lot 4400 B. Public Works Staff Report C. Notice of Public Hearing ~~ ~"04 City 'Cimits w - Y / Contour Interval ~ 2 Foot Scenic cP~\Or~~ , 4'!\~p O,~ y, Ngo\p'S ~ ~b N7O\ 1 O , pj ; V. JC. N_. ¢° Q~e`~ 9y, 1 q QC `~n °do , n Taylor ~J• VICINITY MAP nq scale ~~ O~ L~ OC ~y G Eziating Fence ~a z1.' 37-2N-03C, 'IT Tax Lot 4401 Not A fart a/ n 7 ParUaan ^ ~! 90~} sy~ / Sou[n L1ne or Section 3 Ana ;~ ~ '--- TAYI::OR.IROAO' f ~ L-Centerline Oi Taylor Roatl ~f0 T ; ~ ~~0 6q'-Riahf`nf Mav City of Cezltr;al Point EXHIBI'T' ttAtt . Piannug Deparhnent .ti -. 2656.3 ' PRVf0. hrlgai ton OSLCh _~_ \ ~ r ~ ~ t ~ , t r r t ---~ Parcel 2 ~f I 771794 aq f t ~ ~~ ` Irrigated :Fie ltls f ~ ~.. ~ I ~ { u 1 1. ~ ~ 4r s ~' d z U N C f i Y q _ ~ q 1 ~ u ' 9 LL ~1~` 1 / I-\.. I2$8 ~~ Y N .~ ~ u \ t . n ~'1°"w Y / W ~ u 1 ~ 0 i6M 117 \ x1r ~~ /~ ar 0 0s \ u / 1 ~ ; N \ ~ Parcel 1 ~°., 50137 sq f t O 6' Gas Line ` ; 24' BCVSA San. Seuer~ ` ~~ ~ ~- , ;' ; '21 ~' - 2\ 260.5 •SOUtnuest Corner ______ Of Sec tSon .3_ \L~~_~ _ ~_~ ------_----~ ~_^-._ll ~__-__._.._._._ __ __ ~6~_~ _ ~_. -~_~- CITY OF CENTRAL POINT' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT -TENTATIVE PARTITION CYty of Centrai'}?.oit E~HIEIT t'B't Pianning Department Date: 12/10/96 Applicant: Noel Moore, dba W.L. Moore Construction Co. Tom Malot Construction Co., Inc. Project: Land Partition Location: Taylor Road Legal: 37S 2W Section BC, Tax Lot 4400 Zoning: R-2 Lots: 2 Proposed Units: Not Specified Pians: Tentative Partition, 11/15/96, Farber Surveying Report By: Michael Thornton, Thomton Engineering General: 1. The applicant shall submit to the City's Public Works Department plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modification within the City's rights-of--ways or easements. All construction shall conform to the City's Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction and such other special specifications herein. No construction shall commence until the Public Works Department has reviewed, approved, and issued a permit for the proposed improvements. The developer shall pay for all costs associated with the design and installation of the improvements specified on these plans. 2. Prior to final approval of the project, the developer's engineer or surveyor shaft provide the Public Works Department with a digital drawing of the Final Plat property boundaries in an AutoCadd compatible format. 3. Additional public improvements, which are not recommended as a part of this staff report, will be requested at the time an appGca6on for further development of parcel 2 is considered. Streets/Traffic: 1. The city has identified Taylor Road as a secondary arterial. The owner of record is requested to dedicate 10 feet of additional feet right-of-way along the Taylor Road frontage to the public for acceptance by the county. Jackson County has jurisdiction over Taylor Road along the frontage of the proposed parcels 1 & 2. 2. The owner of record shall enter into a deferred improvement agreement with the. city/county for the design and construction of the proposed street widening, curb and gutter, sidewalk, lighting, and storm drainage improvements along the frontage with Taylor Road. Sanitary Sewer: 1. The applicant shall refer to the report from BCVSA regarding additional conditions for this development. Q~ Public Work's Staff Report 12/10/96 2. Any existing sanitary sewer fixtures not already connected to the public sewer system shall be connected. Water System: 1. Any existing water supply fixtures not already connected to the public water system shall be connected. The construction shall comply with Oregon Health Division requirements for Backflow prevention. Rights-of-ways/Easements: 1. See note 1 under streets/traffic for right-of--way dedication. 2. The construction drawings and Final Plat shall show all right-of--way and easement boundaries associated with the project. 0''l 2 Cz~y of Cent~ar Poznt PL.ANNXNG DEPART.NIENT C4ty of Central Foint E~HIB~T ttCtf Planning Department James Bennett, AICP Planning Director Ken Gezsc]Ser Planning Technidan Sandy Lommel Planning Secretary NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date of Notice: November 21, 1996 Hearing Date: Time: Place: Tuesday, December 17; 1996 7:00 p.m.(Approximate) Central Point City Council Chamber 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon' NATURE OF HEARINGS Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for property located in the Residential Two Family Zone (R-2) located at Tax Lot 4400 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 372W03C. The applicants are W.L. Moore Construction and Tom Malot Construction. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for approval of tentative plans are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to tentative plans, land partitions,. street, water system, storm drainage and sanitary sewer and CPMC Chapter 17 relating to lot dimensions. The Tentative Plan is also reviewed for compliance with the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday, December 17, 1996. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the hearing to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 7GS O Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point; Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5: For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3324 (extension 231). SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant,. proponents,. and opponents and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review hearing,-.the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan for the proposed land partition. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. The Council may, on its own motion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date, call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any party aggrieved by the action ofthe Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing a written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the decision, 0~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: December'171996 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP City Administrator SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Minor Land. Partition of 37 2W 11D Tax Lots 3000, 3100 & 3200 1' nt: Noel Moore, d.b.a: W: L: Moore Construction_ 3600 Westover Dr. Central Point, OR 97502 Owners of Harold L: Thies 37 2W 11D TL 3000 - 2.48 acres Record: 606 Beall Ln: R-2, Residential. Two-Family Central Point, O)3 97502 Jerome Maehren 586 Beall Ln: - CentratPoint, OR 97502 John & Marjorie Metz 566 Beall Ln. Central Point, OR 97502 37 2W 11D TL 3100 - 3.00 acres R-2, Residential Two-Family.. 37 2W 11D TL 3200 - 1.49 acres R-2, Residential,Two-Family The applicant, Noel Moore, d.b.a. W. L. Moore Construction, is proposing the minor partition of a 6:01 acre parcel into two parcels of 5.20 acres (Parcel No. l) and 0.81 acres (Pazcel No. 2) respectively. The property islocated at 606 Beall Lane in an R-2, Residential Two-Family zoning district. Parcel No. l would be accessed from Westrop Drive and Parcel No: 2'from Beall Lane. hori CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Exhibit D). ~~ Annlicable Law Central Point Comprehensive Plan -Urbanization Element & Comprehensive Plan Map CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 16.36.010 et seq. -Major and Minor Land Partitions CPMC 17.24.010 et seq. - R-2, Residential Two-Family District Discussion The minor land partition involves three tax lots and three property owners. Prior to the submission ofthe minor land partition application, a property line adjustment was completed which changed the configuration of the three tax lots (Exhibit A). The new lot corners resulting from this property line adjustment were required to be surveyed, monumented and recorded with the County Surveyor. The effect of the property line adjustment was to seduce the size of Tax Lots 3100 and 3200 and to consolidate the remainder of these two tax lots with Tax Lot 3000. The new Tax Lot 3000 is approximately 6.01 acres in size and the subject of the minor land partition application. The minor land participation would divide Tax Lot 3000 into two parcels of 5.20 acres and 0.81 acres respectively (Exhibit B). The smaller parcel would take access off of Beall Lane. The larger parceYwould take accessfrom Westrop Drive. The applicant wishes to develop the larger parcel as a residential subdivision which would become Beall Estates, Phase 2. The question arises as to why the applicant did not try to accomplish the property line " adjustment and the minorland partition by including them as part of a tentative,plam for the, proposed subdivi§ion. The reason appears to involve he three existing home sites that take access from Beall Lane. The applicant wanted to separate these three home sites from the remainder of the property in away that would not trigger any requirements for the immediate improvement of Bea11 Lane. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law 1. The project site is located in an R-2, Residential Two-Family. The project site is consistent with Subarea: "D" of the Urbanizatioq Element of the Comprehensive Plan which calls for low density and medium. density residential development in the area and with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site as Medium Density Residential. The project-site'is located in an: R 2, Residential Two-Family District. This zoning designation is also consistent with the referenced portions of the Comprehensive Plan. ~~ 2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the minor partition of a 6.01 acre parcel into two parcels of 5:20 acres and 0.81 acres respectively. The project divides the property into two parcels which meets the requirements for a minor partition. The project creates two parcels of 5.20 acres and 0.81 acres respectively and frontages of more than 60 feet which meets the requirements for lots in the R-2 zone. The tentative plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed minor land partition and the findings of fact and conclusions of law and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions of approval included in the Public Works Staff Report (Exhibit C). Exhibits A. Property Line Adjustment -Tax Lots 3000, 3100 & 3200 B. Tentative Plan -Minor Land Partition of Tax Lot 3000 C. Public Works StaffReport D. Notice of Public Hearing 12 _ V.. K~ _ ~r.4~~ ~ - c . fY ~ .~~.~ ~[oak..va liSC PC ~j],` l~slaaPw ~ ~; ~ - ab CYty of Central i'oint EXH I~IT ttA't Planning Department Eor•est Gl en;Phase VIII vo1.21: Plats Pg.4 S/N 14806 Property Line /~d~ use me n't' 4POltcant: Noel Moore W.L.Moore Cons Zonetl M-.1-6 - .. ' 1.0i 98 Lot 2~>2 lot 273 lot 27~1ob 275 lot 2761 1~_l..__.__J_~...r1 _ _ - - - - za2t wtn mq scorn LOT T LOt 67 1 r (cram atuo /2' , \ t , Euatanq soot urY ]Y , aewll~at Vb e~ ..~ ~+ lot fib ~ f r ~~ LOi 2 ~ '-' 1'~ _____. t0 ... a _ _ _____~ / -~ I ~~~ LOT 3 3 m _ a+ a a Lat 65 ,~ 1 I ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ W x 1- , \ , ~ a N .. ¢ W _____ _ _t t 1 ~ LOT 4 '-t N ¢ N ° W t T.0 w al ¢ t ' 1 V D 6 e F Lot 64 213663.00 f0 fl ~ _ - - _ - - ~ w c ^1 In t t o __ __ __ _ { ~{.UT 5 ~ w r' ~ W lot 63 " - ` \ 1 e ~ -~ -- O m tJ-r - ~' ' i /~ LOT 6 J m r--; ~ t a ------ J , J I , OI~LO/ .Y~ 1 _____ t Gi)[S / T- - ~ 1'street t WESTRDP ORI_VE _ ~ _ ~~ ~` ,~ 1 ~ _ LoT 6 _ _ _ Ewa i q water atub/-~~, T6M OC C/L G _-_ ul bvb~tc utlf rtles ~ Elev. 1290.45 atubbea tb both enOf of fO W.U.E. M<s b0 Orty< t aolu0~-~ ^ _ - ~ - _ ~ ~ , ~ it I ` _ _ WESTRDP DRIVE 0 J i J ~~ t PrbbertY Ltne ad lustaent 1 1 ~ ILOT 9 _ _ _ J _ _ ~~ r 1 Owners 01 JOnn antl Marjene 566 Beal I L.Y1• Central Polnt, antl Jerome MRC~h 566 Beall l.n, Central Potnt. an0 Maroltl 'r{sie 606 Beall Ln~ Central Po lot. 'I 1 -__.__ av.a9~~ - .. 'y 1 1 e 1210_ o `« o .la tl° c~ e N e i Iy~O r---- e to ° le m mt n`os o° I n (^'r~~n ~ w J ~ ~~ O'er rv ~ ^t ~ fir} v'i ~~ m ~------ 1"-1 i ~ i 372N110 _ - _ _ 1]6.65 I - 69.99 139.98 -6-6-4-o_G-G- - wa7ir-~L+.v. - vl- W - N W - W___.... _ _ __ _ __ _ - _ - r- s y_ _~ -5 ~^sy_yw,s_Be_a~ll.Lane _ ______ ///___ Marilee Street Cannlll avenue City of Medford Boundary 4~ -.~~:~ ~taokwa /.sf IfAAG ~~ ~ klcsli pLL. ~. , ~ ae F ~ ~ ~~ Zonetl R-1-6 Tentative Partition flan AppllCdn't: Noel Moore W . L .Moore Cons-I•. LOT 99 lot 2)2 Lot 2)3 Lot Pa Lat 2)5 tot 2)6I 95 7P9 ' LOC 67 . lEwut mB fstore. et ' 4rafn ltwb 12• LOT 1 ~ \ - - - - - _ - - - - - _ Exf atan0 aam tart' ]! I sewet~stub 6' J \ ` LOT 2 ti lot 66 ~ J >, f1 1 . 0(~ ~ .• ~ 3 Y n _ - _, - - - - 11 ~i ---1 _ t~~ 'LOT 3 ~ _ ~ i - -•f a c W ----_-- 4 LO . W . ui w v a n o ~ ~ LOt'64 I 2f 3663.00 n4 It _ -- - _ - ~ w c N ------- Parcel No. 1 _LOTS C .~ ~ w W . _ _ _ - _ _ Y "'L Lot 63 W ~ e h' ` /u ` LOT 6 ~ J ~ m t ,f . a r-- \1 ~ ~ N I e ~ ` ?~ ~ ----- - ' ~ I . ~ LOT 7 Y I Y. O O J i J ~ ~ - - - - - - WESTROP DR f - - - IVE ='sv4eA ,.. Plw9 Qg _ 1 ~, LOT 6 - ------ _ ` J .. Eafae t~p water n[ub ~• J.~ ---•--••--•- - - - - - - T6M fiC C/L r =-= ` All Pua1 Pc utf ntlaa Flew. 1290.45 10W.U.E. etwbbe4 eo bsen ends of weatroP Orf•< f pjygjt-~ - _ ~ - - WES TROP OR I VE 1 y I~• f0'P. U.E. .. O I O J I J .. LOT 9: - - - •1 - - _R _-----~ Owners of Jenn dntl Mdr nr{e 566 Beal {.ry- Centrdl POlnt. antl 11 JerpmC MO,C tfr Ct ' 566 Beall 4n• Central Pplnt. antl Maroltl Th~ss 606 Beall 4n. General Porot. 'I - f .68.99 - _ 4yot n ~ .. N 1 ~ _ O = . i t ~ ee r -.- - _ - n G o o' ory w ~l to `~ ~ o m oR VMT ~ f n ~1-Yr{ i i rv J n ~µ ~. J. N m I L~ m -, ,~ a 1' 1 I 372H7f0 _ - _ 116.65 I 139.96 '69.99 -4 -6 - 6 - o -4-6 - walG'wL«.c _ _. d - w.1 - M- - W - W .__.... _ -----------•- ~ = 5 - ~ ~-- Beall Lane ------ --- ~ - - s-s I-~---------------------- r - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ -----~ f 1 Marilee Street Cannel] Avenue / City of Medford Boundary/ city of Central Point EXHIEI'I' t'S,'t Planning Department Forest Glen, Pnese VIII vo1.23: Plats Pg.4. S/N 14606.- CYty of Central Point ~XI-IFIT ;ttC;tt Planning Department CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT -TENTATIVE PARTITION .Date: 12/10/96 Applicant: Noel Moore, dba W.L. Moore Construction Co. Project: Beall Estates Phase 2 -Land Partition Location: Beall Lane, Westrop Drive Legal: 37S 2W Section 11D, Tax Lots 3000, 3100, & 3200 Zoning: R-2 Lots: 4 Proposed Units: Not Specified Plans: Tentative Partition Plan, Property Line Adjustment, 1/15/96, Fazber Surveying Report By: Mrchael Thornton, Thornton Engineering General: 1. The applicant shall submit to the City's Public Works Department plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modification within the City's rights-of--ways or easements. All :construction shelf conform to the City's Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction and such-other special specifications herein. No construction shall commence until the Public Works Department has reviewed, approved, and issued a pernutfor the proposed improvements. The developer shall pay for all costs associated'wth titre design and installation ofthe improvements specified on these plans. 2. Priorlo final approval of the project, the developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with a digital drawing of the Final Plat property boundaries in an AutoCadd compatible format. 3. Additional public improvements, which are not recommended as a part of this staff report, will be requested at the tune an application for further development of pazcel 1 is considered. Streets/Traflic: i. The city has identified Beall Lane as a secondary arterial. The owners of record for tax lots 3000, 3100, & 3200 are requested to dedicate. l0 feet of additional feet right-of-way along the Beall bane frontage to the public for acceptance by the county. Jackson County has jurisdiction over Beall Lane along the frontage of said tax lots. 2. The owners of record fortax lots 3000, 3100, & 3200 shall enter into a deferred improvement agreement with the city/corutty for the design and construction of the proposed street widening, curb and gutter, sidewalk, lighting, and stomt drainage improvements along the frontage with Beall Lane. Sanitary Sewer: 1. The applicant shall refer to the report from BCVSA regazding additional conditions for this development. ~~ 1 Public Work's Staff Report 12/10/96 Water System: 1. Any existing water supply fixtures for parcel 2 not already connected to the public water system shall be connected. The construction shall comply with Oregon Health Division requirements for Backflow prevention. Rights-of-ways/Easements: 1. See note i under streets/trafiic for right-of--way dedication. 2. The construction drawings-and Final Plat shall show all right-of--way and easement boundaries associated with the project. i6 2 BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY PHONE (541)779.4144.3915 SOUTH PACIFIC HWY. • MEDFORD, OREGON 97501 December 5, 1996 Jim Bennett City of Central Point Planning Department 155 So. Second Central Point, Oregon 97502 Subject: Tentative Plan Application 95023-MP Dear Jim, We have reviewed the records in the subject area and determined that sewer facilities exist near the site. The West branch of the Lower Bear Creek Interceptor passes through the middle of the proposed lot. Further subdivision of this lot should recognize the location of the interceptor line by constructing streets over or plan for relocation of the line. Have the applicant contact BCVSA for additional 'information. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed action. Sincere, r~%` ~ / /` 7a•~ y Jr. P District Engineer xc: Mike Thornton I~~ Czty of Central' Poznt CYty of Central Point E~HIBI`T ttD'' Planning Department PLANNXNG DEPARTMENT James Bennett, AICP Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date of Notice: November 21, 1996 IIearing Date: Tuesday, December 17, 1996 Time: 7:00 p.m.(Approximate) Place: Central Point City Council Chamber 155 South Second Street ..Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF HEARINGS Ken Geescl~cr Planning Tedinician Sandy Lommel . Planning Secretary Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for a land partition located in the Residential Two Family Zone (R-2) on property located at Tax Lots 300, 3100 & 3200 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 372W 11D. The applicants Noel Moore,. dba W.L. Moore Construction. ('RITERTA FOR DECISION The requirements for approval of tentative plans are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to tentative plans, land partitions, street; water system, storm drainage and sanitary sewer and CPMC Chapter 17 relating to lot dimensions. The Tentative Plan is also reviewed for compliance with the City's Public Works Standards. PTTBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may ..submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday, December 17, 1996. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the heazing to Central Point City Hail, I55 South Second Street,. Central Point, Oregon 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for anappeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be, related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 155 South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax (541) 664-6384 18 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT .HEARING DATE: December 17, 1996 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: James H. Bennett; AICP City Administrator SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Tentative Plan for Beall Estates, Phase II 37 2W 11D Tax Lots 3000, 3100 & 3200 l~pn iTcant: Noel Moore, d.b.a. W. L. Moore Construction 3600 Westover Dr. Central Point, OR 97502 er Iiarold L. Thies c r : 606 Beall Ln. Central Point, OR 97502 Jerome Maehren '586 Beall Ln. Central Point, OR 97502 John & Marjorie Metz 566 Beall Ln. Central Point, OR 97502 37 2W 11D TL 3000 - 2.4$ acres R-2, Residential Two-Family 37 2W 11D TL 3100 - 3.00 acres R-2, Residential Two-Family 37 2W 11D TL 3200 - 1.49 acres R-2, Residential Two-Family Summary The applicant, Noel Moore, d.b.a. W. L. Moore Construction, is proposing a tentative plan for the subdivision of 5.20 acres located north of Beall Lane and adjacent to Westrop Drive (Exhibit A). The site is designated as R-2, Residential Two-Family, but will be developed as a single-family residential subdivision, Beall Estates Phase II. The totat number of lots proposed for the subdivision is twenty.. The average density for the subdivision is 3.85 units/acre.. The maximum density permitted in the R-2 district is 12 units/acre. Atari CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a tentative plan for a land partition. Notice of the public hearing was effected in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Exhibit C). ~~ Applicable Law Central Point Comprehensive Plan -Urbanization Element & Comprehensive Plan Map CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.24.010 et seq. - R-2, Residential Two-Family District Discussion The proposed subdivision is located between the Beall Estates Subdivision, Phase I to the east and the Valley Point Subdivision, Phase III to the west. The Forest Gten Subdivision, Phase VIII is immediately to the north. Access to the subdivision will be from Westrop Drive. and a new cul-de-sac street, Joshua Court. The subdivision will also allow the completion of Westrop Drive from Heather Lane to Looking Glass Way. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law 1. The project site is located in an R-2, Residential Two-Family. The project site is consistent with Subarea "D" of the Urbanization Element of the Comprehensive Plan which calls for low density and medium density residential development in the area and with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site as Medium Density Residential. The project site is located in an R 2, Residential Two-Family District. This honing designation'is also consistent with the referenced portions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of 5.20 acres for the purpose ofdeveloping asingle-family residential, subdivision, Beall Estates Phase II. The total number of lots proposed for the subdivision is twenty. The average density for the subdivision is 3.85 units/acre. The proposed single-family subdivision meets the density requirements for the R-2 zone which is a maximum of 12 units/acre. -Each lot within the subdivision meets the minimum lot size and lot frontage requirements for the R 2 zone. The tentative plan includes all information xequired by CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. The Planning and Public Works Departments. have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and conclusions of law and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions of approval included in the Public Works Staff Report (Exhibit B). Exhibits A. ' Tentative Plan -Beall Estates Phase II B. Public Works Staff Report C. Notice of Public Hearing ~~ '~ . ~~ ~-~l{~~ ~ ~ l~ 4_~ City of Central Foint . - - Zaneo R-1_6 ~ EX$ISIT t'A't~.~ . Forest-Glen. Phase IIIforest Glen. Phase VIII..:, Planning'Deparlment , ' - LOT 86. ~ LOt 272 ~ LOL 2]3 1 Lot. 274 ~ LOt i _.. 1 1 ~ 1 ~__i2b3 ~ - _/_ 130.00 Sa0.00 ° / 58.65 o t` o \ J Lot 29 ~~~~ Lot- 30 ~ "~ LOT 1 Lot 67` ~ ~ ,cd.. ~ a ~ '~ f03a7 a4 It .'ty: _ 13]6t s0 ft "' \t~~~t°/ LOt 28 L _ _ y0 w `.. t3a63 a9 It 7 - !o / \ <nfY m LOT 2 2 °°~ 0 ~ 1 2g~` .pB / s d9 <yO I. L O t 31 .......... , <tnl s J Lot 66 /~° .:'Ly.... p•25"'• ~'°° ~ . / / B3f6 a4 R ~~ •• t<q 60~ y/ o yS. I 'V _ _ ,u.21~~ !f "' 1 B~so ' i Lot 27 ~\ 8 LOT.3 ~~ ` t I I ! 'a w Lot 65~`~ ,~. 07s. ao It m Lot 32 ~`•,~,n ~~ sR "; ~ --- q }I ~;: o h ez92 a4 It '•,'~ ~ /~ _ t3e.as ce.. .r _ _ _ t ~': • y LOT 4 Lot 26 m - - 136.17. ' ~) .~ .. z '~ ~ ~ B6at a0 I[ $ 'q LOt 64 n... 3$ 23~. I m. p L u y ~ g 0036 s0. ft _ Ig 3 $ 1.0.~a~ rn u N . c ~ ~. i .I ~ I ~ LOT 5 p A u N N ~;.- ..~ 131.20 t H .~ LOt 2'S ~~'-/286 A C o ~. ~. Lot .34 ` .3 ° ~ 67acc4 it ¢ 1u- ` _ ~ N ~ ":d w X. ~. n. S A Loi _,63 _. u ~ 8.76 aa'it ~ ~~u ~ ~ :~ 1 .25:. / ~ ro 07 6 b0 00 71 4a ~ ~ ?, I \. Lot 24 ~ , .~ r - ~ o a 8701 a4 It 1 g Motes: • I `< _-_ 1 i ~' p~ serucWe :,'. J Lot 36 ,lspt 35~ k ~. L t~ ~~:., ¢ioaa .. i : a 3 ~ ' `,7i.oz ~00.: r"~','s"~o s1 1 _ - T9uT .., # _ ~~ ~~ 685. a4 !t 08233 sb':.~It w I 1 w ~»1 o ~ : ~ ~. ~ ':Lot 23 -.a~.,.ar~t 1 ~. ., 1 ~ Lot 22 _ - > ~ ''23' ~ + - o i' "'ss di ° ~ 6 ~ eiea'cs n a': 115o w n .S + y~ i se 3~K1Q ~ Dp~Y~ ~, _ ~i0p ~36J~i ( ~ LoT s tweaaa~~ro°o°to"r: P'=. _I"k~ - S!( ltl `L~.. ~. '8395x...... 65.00.: •~ - .. 73 9u ~ '•'~~"`c SS \ i strHr' >.HIeV ... ~ 16 i1 u;>< '~ ~;8. `~_.<0- ~-L~tu WESTRUP,• OFl i ~°~~ 'Ss\. t Lot' 37' ~~t 3B ~ .__. ...~ is. oo _ ..'7 e :W ~ .N. l L SQ~P.U.E. 7~ ~ ~ e110.aa Yt P7$Bi.sa n ' Lot 40 Lot 41 ~"-.1 ~~ 6838 sV It :-714 s'f,'4. R. ~. P -~ ~ ~ ~ g T03.-aO./t tr o ~'-.. ~ { ~~ -~ `' aqg ^ ~ T4.h ~ b9'00 ~ fN.oO -, o+' p f9 ~ 69'.99. ;~ /~ ~ N J ~ CSty of Central'Point. EXHIBIT ft~,t . Planning Department CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT -TENTATIVE PLAN REVIEW BEALL ESTATES -PHASE II Date: 12/10/96 Applicant: Noel Moore, dba W.L. Moore Construction Co. Project: Residential Subdivision Location: Westrop,Drive Legal: 37S 2W Section 11D, Tax Lots 3000, & proposed partition thereof Zoning: R-2 Lots: 20 Proposed Units:. Not Specified Plans:. Beall Estates, Phase,II, Tentative Subdivision Plan, Revised 11/4/96; Farber Surveying Report By: Michael Thornton, Thornton Engineering General:: 1. The applicant shall submit to the City's Public Works Department plans'and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modification within the City's rights-of--ways or easements: Albconstmctioq shall conform to the City's Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public-Works Construction and such-other special specifications herein: No construction-shall commence until the Public Works Department,has reviewed, approved,-and issued a permit for the proposed improvements. The developer shall pay for all costs associated with the design and installation of the improvements specified on these plans. 2. Prior to final approval of the project, the developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with a digital drawing of the Final Plat property boundaries in an AutoCadd compatible format. Streets/Traffic: 1. The construction drawings foc this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and a Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City of Central Point Public Works Department. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's Public Works Standazds. 2. The City's Engineer shall, at the cost of the developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the street section designs in accordance with the Public Works Department Design Standazds Storm Drainage: 1. Tha developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for offsite runoffonto the subdivision property and runofffrom the streets and from each lot. Prior to constnuction plan approval of the improvements for this Tentative Plan, the developer's engineer shall provide a wmplete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system. The ~2 Public Work's Staff Report 6/27/1996 engineer shall use the rainfalUntensity curve obtained from the Public Works Department for hydrology calculations. 2. Curb and gutter sections shall not exceed 350 feet before entering a catch basin or curb inlet. Sanitary Sewer: 1. The applicant shall refer to the report from BCVSA regazding additional conditions for this development. Water System: 1. The construction shall comply with Oregon Health Division requirements for Backflow prevention. 2. The developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum &re flow in conformance with the requirements of Jackson County Fire District No. 3. 3. The construction drawings shall indicate type, size and location of water mains and fire hydrants in accordance with the City's Public Works Standards and the recommendation of Jackson County Fire District No. 3. Site Work: 1. Provide a grading/paving plan with the construction drawing submittal to the Public Works Department, AU structures shall have roof drains, azea drains, and crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain; or an approved storm sewer. The developer shall provide the necessary "rough" lot grading'to assure thaball lots will drain properly. The developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings; and .perform. such grading and drainage improvements which satisfies this drainage condition, leaving only minor grading required for each lot during-house construction. Rights-of-ways/Easements: 1. The construction drawings and Final Plat shall show all right-of--way and easement boundaries associated with the project. `'~ N 2 i BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY PHONE (541)779-0144.3915 SOUTH PACIFIC HWY. • MEDFORD, OREGON 97501 December 5, 1996 Jim Bennett City of Central Point Planning Department 155 So. Second Central Point, Oregon 97502 Subject: Tentative Plan Application for Beall Estates Phase 2 95023-TP Dear Jim, We have reviewed the records in the subject area and determined that sewer facilities exist near the site. We are concerned with the fragmented nature of the sewer collection systems in this area. It appears that a Sewer System Master Plan was not prepared for this development area. The result is alignments that will present extreme difficulties to maintain and property Titles that are encumbered with unnecessary easements. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed action. Sincerer /"/l. ~~~~G~/ James May, Jr. P.E. District Engineer ~~ Czty of .Central' Poznt ,PLANNXNG DEPARTMENT CYty ofCentral Point EXHIPIT' t'C't Planning Department James Bennett, ATCP Planning IJirector NOTICE OF PUBLIC. HEARING Date of Notice: November 21, 1996 Hearing Date: Tuesday, December 17, 1996 Time: 7:00 p.m.(Approximate) Place: Central Point City Council Chamber 155 South Second Street: Central Point, Oregon Ken Gersclder Planning Technician Sandy Lommel Planning Secretary NATURE OF HEARINGS Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to review a Tentative Plan Application for Beall Estates, Phase II located in the Residential Two Family Zone (R 2) on property located at Tax Lots 300, 3100 & 3200 of Jackson County Tax Assessor Map Page 372W11D. The applicants Noel Moore, dba W.L. Moore Construction. (~'RTTF.RTA F(lR DF,C:ISION The requirements :for approval of tentative plans are setforth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to tentative plans, land partitions, street, water system, storm drainage and sanitary sewer and CPMC Chapter 17 relating to lot dimensions. -The Tentative Plan is also reviewed for compliance with the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the hearing scheduled for Tuesday, December 17, 1996. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the hearing to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 1 SS Cnnth SPrnnrl Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 66v:-bsus ~~ 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-3324 (extension 231). SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the public hearing, the Planning Commission will review the application, and technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, and. opponents and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the'review hearing, the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan for the proposed land partition. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. The Council,may, on its own motion, no later than the regularly scheduled Council meeting following the decision date, call for a review of the Planning Commission decision. Any parry aggrieved by the action of the Planning Commission may request a review of such action by the City Council by filing a written appeal to the city no more than seven days after the date the city mails the notice of the decision. 2b PLtLNNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: December 17, 1996 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: James H. Bennett, AICP Planning Director SUBJECT: Request for Determination of Similar and Compatible Use .Summary Staff has received a request for a determination of whether "massage therapy" is a similar and compatible use with those uses permitted in the C-3, Downtown Business District. Au hori CPMC 1.24.020 and CPMC 17.60.140 invest the Planning Commission with the authority to render a decision on authorizations for similar uses. in i CPMC 17.60.140 allows the Planning Commission to rule that a use, not specifically named in the examples of permitted uses within a zoning district, may be included among the permitted uses of the district if it is of the same general type and is similar to the permitted uses. The following findings must be made in order to authorize a similar use: 1. The use is closely related to listed uses and can be shown to exist compatibly with those uses; The C-3 district permits medical services, personal services including barber and beauty shops, and physical fitness/conditioning centers. 2. The use was not anticipated or known to exist on the effective date of the ordinance codified in Title 17 of the CPMC, either because it involves products, services or activities not available in the community at that time or the use involves new products, services or activities that are nonetheless similar to permitted uses in size, traffic impact, appearance and other attributes; t Medical services, personal services including barber and beauty shops, and physical fitness/conditioning centers were established as permitted uses in the C-3 district by Ordinance No. 1436, adopted in 1981 Staff has not identified any massage therapy services that were available in the community at that time. However, staff has received an undocumented report that massage therapy services have been provided in the past at a beauty shop in the C-3 district. 3. The use is treated under local, state or national codes or rules in the same manner as permitted uses, exclusive of land use or zoning regulations; Staff has not identified any local, state or national codes or rules, exclusive of land use or zoning regulations, that treat massage therapy services differently than other permitted uses in the C-3 district. 4. The use is consistent with the purpose of the district and the comprehensive plan map and policies. The purpose of the C-3 district is to improve the commercial characteristics of the t1d'~vntown business district, provide apedestrian-oriented commercial environment, and to encourage competition. The Comprehensive Plan map and policies support this purpose. ~~