Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet - March 4, 2008
i'~INT C~'~'~' ~~~' Qr"~~;1~'1~}~~~.t, C~Q~tla'~'1' P`LAI~rNMI~'~.~ ~:;~~1~~i~~~~~~Nt_p~ ~+.~m~~;;'~1-~,. I~l~~~~e.ii~ =~, 26)0 ~. ~t00 t~,~~i. 1~1ext P1,ttning Commissioaa ie.,olutiuaa. No. 74i I, l~~l~~t~"I'II~IG CALLED fit) ORDER C N. ROLL CALL Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fislz, Damian. diart, Cl~auc i'iland, Pat Beck, Mile Oliver, and Justin Hurley III. CORRF'SFONDENCE IV. II~t1'I~1~'.S~ A. Review and approval ofFel~ru<u~~ , 2U08 Planning Commissioaa M:it~ltt~s V. 1~Li~~~,IC APPEt~I~:'~NCES V~. BCJSINES S Pgs. 1 - 22 A, Consideration of amendxanents to Section 17.4 Off Street Pa~'1~i~ti~ and Loading, Section 17.8 R-~ Residential Multiple Family Distri~;t. and Section 17.4 R-2 Residential Two-Family I)istrici of the City of Central Point Municipal Code. Applicants City of Cent~~al laoint Pgs. 23 - 62 File No, 0841. A public hearing to coaisi~-I~:a~ approval ofa Site Plan application for Pgs. 63 - 73 C. A public hearing to consider a legislative Comprehensive 1'lati Text 1lmend~~~ent providing i"or a revised population and demographic element of the City of Central Point's Comprehensive flan and fai~nulate a recommendation to the City Council l'or review on April 24, 2008. Applicant: City cif Central Paint VII. DISCUSSION VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS IX. MISCELLANEOUS X. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes February 5, 2008 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Mike Oliver, Pat Beclc, Chuck Piland, and Justin Hurley were present. Also in attendance were: Tom I-Iumphrey, Community Development Director; Don Burt, Planning Manager; Connie Clune, Community Planner; Dave Jacob, Community Planner; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Candy Fish made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 15, 2008 Planning Commission meeting. Damian Idiart seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Hurley, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VL BUSINESS A. File No. 5061. A public meeting to consider a request far extension of approval for Final PUD Development Plan and Tentative Plan for Gebhard Village, a Planned Unit Development, Iocated at 4020 Gebhard Raad in an R-2 Residential Two-Family zoning District. The project site is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 02AA, Tax Lot 2800, APN #10195726. Applicant: Eric Artner Construction There were no conflicts ar ex pane communications to disclose. Connie Moczygemba made a site visit. Planning Commission Minutes Febj•uary 5, 2008 Page 2 Chairman Maczygemba asked for clarification of the property address and was advised that there were indeed two addresses Hated in the Assessor's records for the subject property - 4020 and 4922 Gebhard Road Connie Clune presented the staff report for this request for extension stating that the Planning Commission originally approved the Final PUD Development Flan and Tentative Plan applications far this development in December of 2006. Applicant is now requesting a one (I} year extension of this approval and has submitted a phasing plan to develop this project in three phases. As the City's street standards have changed since original approval was granted, staff has recommended that the original conditions of approval be modified to increase the width of Johnson Lake Drive to 36 feet while maintaining the current right-of--way width of 52 feet; that a comprehensive grading plan be prepared for each lot prior to final plat approval indicating drainage away from adjoining Iots and to the storm drainage system; authorizing a three (3) year schedule for the development of all three phases with the final plat for the first phase recorded on or before December 1, 2008, as set forth in the staff report dated February 5, 2008. All other original conditions of approval remain in effect for the PUD as set out in the Planning Commission Report dated December 5, 2006 and for the Tentative Plan as set for in Staff Report dated July 5, 2005. In addition, it has been brought to Ms. Chine's attention that the walkway shown on approved plans be eliminated and an additional condition be imposed as follows: "The four (4) foot pedestrian easement located at the northern end of the property is not approved as an element of the extended final development plan for the Gebhard Village PUD. The pedestrian easement shall not be shown on the final plat or referenced in the CC&Rs." Ms. Chine stated that she has discussed the revised conditions of approval with the applicant, Eric Artner, who has agreed to all conditions imposed. Community Development Director Tom Himphrey then responded to questions raised by Commissioners with regard to changes in street standards, piles of trash on the property that were removed by the City, drug activity which had previously taken place on the site, and access to garage locations. In response to a question raised, Ms. Chine added that there were no landscaping plans for the alley located along the east boundary of the project. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Applicant Eric Artner came forward and thanked staff for all of their hard work and said that the property would be cleaned up again. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Planning Connnzission tt~inutes February 5, ZooB Page 3 Chuck Piland made a motion to approve the request for a one (1) year extension of approval of the Final PUD Plan and Tentative flan map far Gebhard Village, a Planned Unit Development, in an R-2 Residential Two- Family zoning district. The project site is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 02AA, Tax Lot 2800, APN 14195726, based on the standards, Endings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the Revised Staff Report dated February 5, 2008. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: p'ish, yes; Idiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; I~urley, yes. Motion passed. VII. DISCUSSION Com reliensive Plan _ Element 1: Pa elation cfc Demo ra laics Don Burt, Planning Manager, conducted a brief study session with Commissioners on the Population & Demographics Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The numbers contained in the element will be used as a basis for the City's land use, housing, economic and transportation elements. The population forecasts include projections for each of the cities in Jackson County and will be adjusted from time-to-time in the future based upon figures from the Portland State University and the U.S. Census. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS Downtow~t Revitalization Tom Humphrey advised that the downtown revitalization group had met and would be discussing how to dress up the downtown area. They will be reviewing goals, developing a theme and generally reviewing the process at their next meeting. Transpor#a#ion Utility Fees Mr. Humphrey stated that there would be a City Council meeting on February 14, 2008 to discuss the establishment of a transportation utility fee to be used for street maintenance. He added that the County will no longer be paying for improvements to streets located within the City. IX. ADJOURNMENT Mike Oliver made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Chuck Piland seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes Febr•zrar~~ S, 2008 Page 4 The foregoing minutes of the February S, 2008 ilanning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting oz~ March 4, 2008. Planning Carnmission Chair A~ENDM~IrITS TO G~~ITF~AL POiI~iT 1VIUHICIPAL CODS ~'T~TLE '~ 7 14n tv. ~ hi<r. 5; .I ~'oii t i): x!!'542 54' ~' ~ ;"'1 ,~ _ ,r, ;. Wu ~.,.t.i.U~,~~.~t. }~taiul t~C.4.m ~ ~. ~ k ', %~,~ ~`" ~ ~~; ^ ~,r MarCl1 ~, ~{~~~ ',~l~l~llli~ i ~E,;~i~~il~'~;+_ f1~ ~_;,~tl;t„a~a t;t1~~u isi3<~:ci~' IT~:~t Considut~atiozi {>t'~~i~Xenc1~17cnts to Section 17.4, C7ffStrccl l'sirl:in anil 1,otidinti, Section 1'7.2$, ~~.-~ Resicici~tial Multi~+le l~aa~ilti llistriut, and Section 17.24, R-~'' Rc.,itlc~tiial I ~,~~>>-t~an~ily I)i~;tricl ~>i~tltc City of Central Point ~1uniE%1~a1 C'c>c~~, Ct} of Central 1?oit~tt, A~plict~~~t. STAFF C-U+CE; Donald lZ, hurt, ~lCl', EDP BAC~If~~R~>r]'~lD: Periodically, ittconsisteneies a~~d ot'7cr ev~c~~ts warrant ci~n~idcration of mi~ilifii:<~ti~~ns t<~ the zoning. ordinance, At this time there are threc* sections of the porting ordinance tfiat the 1'ian~~in;~ C)cpartrn~;nt is recommending be amended to either reflect '°best practices- or star~dar~lvatii,rt. ~~he 1~oli~~«'in;; addres~c , eaci~ rf the proposed code modifications: Section 1.7.G~ Cott-Ste°eet hair°lci~et; and Laadint;. The Planning DeparCn~ent's re~~icti~ ,~fdcvelupenc~~t prc~pc»als r~(-t;in finds conflicts between ~~ht~t is sztlr»itt~cE and what flee code reflects. enerall~~, thc~c conflicts are not nccess<iri ly ~nz issue unless tlu~ ap~~li: anti ci>r~~piaii~ that tltc t.`ity's standards are outdated. or unret~sonably irtflexibh , ~a Inc City's parking standard- as hrescntcd in (~r-dinance Flo, 1512, are dimen~iona) lr' very conservative aria sh~nild be updated to reflect best ~~racticcs in parking design. The charxge pr°esenied in Attaclxmerxt "A" presc~ris a rsvised schedule for parhi~~~~ slaxce dimensions. The proposed amendment only addresses parl:irrg space dimensions not the required number of parking spaces. The other change proposed is the acknowledgement Heat when the curb is used as a bumper-stop that tfie length of the parking space can be reduced by two (2) feet. This is common pra~otice,'but is cur~~e~atly ~~ot ack~~~7~v1~ decd ill flee parking regulations, Section 1'7.28 R-3 ResidentiRl Multiple Farnity D%strict. The proposed. R-3 amendment addresses three changes as follows: Minimum Densiity. Section 17,28.f-8t1 does not contain provisions ft~r minimum densities, Tlxis section has bee~~ elirxXinate~~ and restated under Section 1.7.2$.t150(A~(9) ~cttin~~ firth minimum density regt~rerncnts. In nrder to attain the objective ofthe R-3 district... it i~ ~~ec;cssary that a minimum density.. startciard tic applie.~1, thus assi~u-ing that the intent ofthe district is met., ~~'ithout a minimum dcn~ity it is possible for ~-3 lands to be developed ~~ ith single-ia:mily lots (6,U~3fl sq, i~. min,). The p,•ima~'y purpose of the minimum density standard is to assure that the City's supply of high density residential ltuids is properly deg elo~red in accordance with the land use and housing objecti~~irs as set Earth in the Comlarehcnsive T'lan. T1~w use of minimum densities is present in all residential zoning districts and the TC)D r'c:~idential ciist~-icts, C?nly the ~12-2 and R-~ districts are without minimum density restrictions. Table 1 provides a comparison. between the TC7l~ MMR, the existing R-3, and the proposed Ft,-3 densities, 2. Maximum Density. Section 17.28.0$0{A-C) addresses maximum density requirements, with conditions, and minimum Iot sizes, which obtusely define maximum density. Section 17.28A$0(A-C} has been eliminated and restated under Section 17.28.OS0(A}(9) as maximum. density requirements. Tl~e Comprehensive Plan establishes the maximum density allowed within the R-3 district at 25 units per acre. All lands currently zoned R-3 are identified in the Cornprehe-rsive I'larr as 1-Iigh Density Residential property. There is no conflict between R-3 zoned lands designated MediErm Density on the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the Section 17.28.80(C} is not needed, and has been eliminated. Table 1 provides a comparison between the TOD MMR, the existing R-3, artd the proposed R-3 densities. 3. Development Standards. The purpose and density of the R-3 district is very similar to the TOD MMR district, which is to provide residential development at higher densities. As part of tl~e update it is proposed that the design standards in the R-3 district include an option to allow development under the MMR standards. The premise for this recommendation is based on the realization that the City currently has two sets of standards for development of high density reside~~tial lands. When it comes to the physical design and development of high density residential development the MMR standards provide greater flexibility in achieving a preferred design. The TOD designation has no relevance with respect to the physical outcome of a high density residential development, regardless of locatio~~. Table 1 provides a comparison between the TOD MMR, tl~e existing R-3, and the proposed R-3 development standards, Table ~. Zoning Standards Comparison LMR Existing R-2 Proposed R- MMR Existing R-3 Proposed R- Medium 2 High Density 3 Density _ _.. Minimum 6 N.A_ b h4 N.A. 14 DensitylAere - Maximum I2 12 12 32 25 25 Density/Acre _. Cront Yard: 1.0'11 ... 20' 1'0'Il.,~;" ~0`, 10'/I5' 5>rtback : ,.. Side Yard 5'10' S' per story 5'10' S' per story 5'10' Setback ,. ,` 5:5/il)' I4~ _ 5'11.0' 10". 5'/]0' ' ; Rear Yard 15' 10' 15' 10' 15' Setback L?istance - 5`/p? 12 -?p'+ .. ', 5'10'.. ° 0'- 12'-24'+< 5'!0' betweexr buildings orr _ , , ,.. sbe Lot Coverage 80% 50% 80% 50% Section 17.28.050 has been redefined as "Development Standards" and includes all standards for density, lot, coverage, height, and setback standards applicable to the R-3 district. These standards are identified as "Conventional Zoning" development standards. This section has also been revised to include a "Performance Standards" option, which allows far the use of TOD MMR development standards. It should be noted that use of the MMR standards exclude use of the higher MMR density. A developer in the R-3 district has the option to develop under one or the other set of development standards. Section: 1.7.24 R-2 Residential Two-Family District. Far the same reasons noted in the above R-3 amendments for density, it is appropriate to modify the R-2 zone to include minimum density requirements. At this time it is not recommended that TOD LMR standards be made available to the R-2 district. This recommendation is based on the predominant existing single-family character of most of R-2 property, and tl~e impact of LMR standards on the single-family character of the R-2 zoned lands. 1. Minimum Density: Presently, Section 17.24 does r~ati specifically dune a rnaximutn density. Only through minimum lot size is density defined. On each minimum lot asingle-family residence or a duplex can be constructed. The absence ofa minimum density requirement compromises the City's ability to assure that the housing heeds of the City, as stated in the Comprehensive Plan are met. Section 17.24.055 Density, Itas been added to the R-2 district, This new section addresses both minimum and maximum density requirements. 2. Maximum Density: T'ar purposes of consistency betwee~~ all residential dis#ric#s a maximum density has been defined for the R-2 district. The maximum density for the R-2 district (Medium Density Residential} is defined by the Comprehensive flan as 12 units per acre, which is consistent with the current R-2 district. ISSUES: The only issue is the application of the MMR standards to the R-3 as a development option. EXHIBITS: Attachmen# "A" -Proposed Amendments Attachment "B" -Resolution of Intent ACTION: Consider Resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution and forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council. ~~~al° A~ Section. ~'~ ` ~ Purpose. 1, ~ ' ~ C7ff street loading. 1; .~ ~ ~ t7fi'-street parking--Regtaired. ~ 7 ~, , ., , :.. Ofi-street parking-~~4utni~er of sp~~,,,<; ~; ;)'iii iVlixed lasGS. ~ ' ~> > t)'ii! Camman parking or Cc~ading ~arc~~:;, 1 ~ t,,~ ~ ~;', Compact car adjustment. 1 ~ .t ~)~ i~) Change to another use, 1 i f ~~)r~ Fractional regrairement, { ~' ~,` ~ : ~t= Parking design requirements. 17.~4.U~iQ l~~urpc~~e. The following regulations are established to provide for the cuff-strut parking of automobiles, trucks and other vehicles in connection v~~ith tine rJSes of land permitted by this zoning ordinance. far-iQrrs land arses generate vehicular traffic; according to their specific characteristics and req~aCre differing ac~~aunts of off- street parking and Goading area.. TC7ese requirements will help to relieve ors-street parking derliand and ><raffic congestion by ensuring adequate off-street. parking and Caading facilities where they are needed most. (ord. 146 §2t.part), 1981). IreMV ti~an ~y~VVJ 0 Less than 30,000 0 3o,00a to 100,000 ~ 100,001 and over ~ B. A loading berth shall not be less than ten feet wide, thirty-five feet long and have a height clearance of twelve feet. Where the vehicles generally used for loading and unloading exceed these dimensions, the required length of these berths shall be increased. C. If loading space has been provided in connection with an existing use or is added to an existing use, the loading space shall not be eliminated if elimination would result in less space than is required to adequately meet the needs of the use. D. Off-street parking areas used to fulfill the requirements of this title shall not be counted as required loading spaces and shall not be used for loading and unloading operations, except during periods of the day when not required to meet parking needs. E. In no case shall any portion of a street or alley be counted as a part of the required parking or loading space, and such spaces shall be designed and located as to avoid undue interference with the public use of streets or alleys. (Ord. 1436 §2(part}, 1981). 1T,64A30 Off-street parking--Required, In all districts, except those specifically excepted and noted, in connection with any use whatsoever, there shall be provided, at the time any building or structure is erected or is enlarged or increased in capacity or the use is changed or increased in intensity, off-street parking spaces for automobiles for the enlarged or increased portion in the case of an addition ar for the building, structure or use in other cases, in accordance with the requirements herein. (Ord. 1436 §2(part), 198'1 }. 17.fi4A40 Off-street parking--Number ofi spaces. The number of off-street parking spaces required for specific land uses shall be as set forth in the foll owing schedule: USE STANDARD A. Residential 1. One- and two-family A private garage or carport accommodating not less than two dwellings. parking spaces for each dwelling unit. 2. Multiple family dwellings. Not less than two spaces per dwelling unit, at least one of which shall be a garage or carport; plus one guest parking space for each four dwelling units or fraction thereof. 3. Mobile home parks. Two spaces on the same lot or pad as the mobile home (may be in tandem}; plus one guest space for each four mobile homes or fraction thereof. ~. Rooming ar boarding One space for each accommodation; plus one space per each houses; residential hotels ar two employees. motels. B. Commercial lodging 1. Notes or motel. Not less than one space per guest unit; plus one space per each two employees. Units having kitchen facilities shall provide two spaces each. 2. Club, lodge. Spaces to meet the combined requirements of the uses being conducted within. C. Institutions 1. Welfare or correctional Nat Tess than one space per five beds for patients or inmates. institution. 2. Convalescen# hospital, Not less than one space per each twn beds for pa#ien#s or nursing home, rest home, residents. sanitarium. 3. Hospital, Not less #han three spaces per each two beds, determined by the maximum designed capacity of the facility. D. Places of Public Assembly 1. Churches, chapels, Not less than one space per each four seats or eight square mortuaries, public feet plus one space for every fifty square feet of area available for por#able seating, secondary assembly or classroom purposes. 2. Library, reading room, Nat less than one space per four hundred square feet of net museum, art gallery. floor area; plus one space per each two employees. E. Schools 1. Child care center, day Not less than one space per employee; plus one space per five nursery, preschool. children the facili#y is designed or intended to accommodate. Na requirements for facilities caring far five or fewer children 51mUltaneOLfsly. 2. Elementary and junior high Not less than three spaces per classroom, or, one space per schools. four seats in the main auditorium, gymnasium, or other place available for public assembly, whichever is greater. 3. High schools and colleges. Not less than one space per each five students, based on the designed capacity of the facility, ar, one space per four seats in the main auditorium, whichever is greater. 4. Private and parochial Same as (E)(3} above, if in accordance with Section 17.64.050. schools, including vocational schools. F. Commercial Amusement and Entertainment 1. Theaters, amphitheaters, Not less than one space per each four fixed seats or eigh# feet stadiums. of bench length. 2. Bowling alley. Five spaces per lane; plus one space per each two employees. Other uses in the building shall be calculated separately, per Section 17.64.050. 3. Dancehall, skating rink. Not less than one space per each one hundred square feet of net floor (or ice) area or fraction thereof; plus one space per each two employees. ~. Swimming pool (for public Not less than one space per each one hundred square feet of use). pool surface area. G. General Commercial 1. Retaii stares, personal Not less than one space per each two hundred square feet of services and uses other than net float area (excluding storage and other nonsaies or those listed in subsections nondisplay areas). {G}(2) through {G)(7) below. 2. Furniture, appliances, Not less than one space per each five hundred square feet of wholesale outlets. gross fionr area. 3. Automobile, boat, Not less than one space for each employee on the major shift; manufactured home and plus two spaces for each service bay; plus one space per each mobile home, and recreational three hundred square feet of showroom area; plus one space vehicle sales, service and per each two thousand square feet of used ar new vehicle sales rental. area, or other ou#door sales area. 4. Nurseries, gardening Same as (G)(3) above, materials, building materials, and similar businesses requiring large sales buildings or yards. ~. Service or repair shop. Not less than one space per each three hundred square feet of gross floor area. 6. Eating and drinking Not less than one space per each three seats, or, per each one establishments. hundred square feet of grass floor area, whichever is greater; plus one space per each two employees on the major shift. 7. Drive-in, walk-up, or walk- Not less than ten spaces for the first five hundred square feet or through establishments #or the less of gross floor area, and one space for each additional fifty sale of food or beverages. square feet; plus one space per each two employees an the major shift. NOTE: Same nr all of these requirements may be waived in the C-3 district, pravided the establishment is smaller than five hundred square feet and is intended to cater primarily to downtown pedestrian traffic during normal business hours. H. Office-Professional 1. Banks, other financial Not less than one space per each three hundred square feet of institutions, general and gross floor area or fraction thereof. In no case shall there be professional offices, fewer than three spaces pravided. governmental offices. 2. Medical and dental offices; Nat less than three spaces per practitioner; plus one space per clinics. each two employees, or, one space per each two hundred square feet of hoar area, whichever is greater. I. industrial and Manufacturing 1. Assembling and Nat less than two spaces per each three employees on the two manufacturing businesses. largest shifts*, ar one space per each five hundred square feet of grass floor area, whichever is greatest. (*One space per employoee if the business has only one shift). 2. Warehousing and other Not less than two spaces per each three employees on the two storage facilities. largest adjacent shifts*, or one space per each one thousand square feet of grass floor area, whichever is greater, {*One space per employoee if the business has only one shift). 3. Industrial vehicles. One space for each vehicle kept or operated in connection with the use. (Ord. 1684 §60, 1993; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981). 17.64.050 Mixed uses. In the case of mixed uses in a building or on a lot, the total requirements for off-street parking facilities shall be the sum of the requirements for each of the various uses, computed separately. Off-street parking facilities provided for one use shall not be considered as providing required parking space for any ather use, except as specified in Section 17.64.06. (Ord. 1436 §2(part}, 1981). 17,64.060 Common parking or loading areas. Parking area requirements applicable to two or more separate building sites or uses in any commercial (C) or manufacturing (M) district may be satisfied by the establishment and maintenance ofi common parking areas. Such areas shall be subject to approval by the planning commission as to size, shape, location and other factors. Such facilities shall be improved and maintained in the manner provided in this chapter. If the common parking area and the buildings or building sites to be served are subject to more than one ownership, permanent improvement and maintenance of such parking facilities must be provided for and such facilities shall not be used for any other purpose, unless approved substitute parking areas are provided. (ord. 1436 §2(part}, 1981 }. 17,64.070 Compact car adjustment. A. Any parking Io# or otherwise required public parking area containing ten or more parking spaces shall be eligible for a compact car adjustment, provided ail requirements of this chapter are adequately met. B. Up to, but not exceeding, twenty-five percent of the total number of required parking spaces may be designed and provided for the parking of compact cars. C. Compact car parking spaces shall be not _.~ _~... ll less than eight feet in width and not less than fifteen feet in length. All maneuvering and ~~ driveway areas shall remain standard size, as provided in Section 17.64.100. ~' r: D. All compact car parking spaces shall be clearly marked as such, with such marking to be of the type found to be most appropriate by the planning commission. (Ord. 1436 §2(part}, 1981). 17.64.0$0 Change to another use. Areas needed to meet the parking requirements of a particular building or use shall not be transformed or changed to ano#her type of use, nor transferred to meet the parking requiremen#s of another building or use until the original user of said parking area has adequately met the parking requirements of his use or has adequately provided his needed parking at another location approved by the planning commission. (Ord. 1436 §2(part}, 1981). A ~ Parking angle (; = Stall width C =Stall [n curb 17 =Aisle width r =Curb €cngth gxr vchidc 1=' = A4aximuint ccntcr•tn-center width of 2-rn~e bin F== Tves[cdecntcr•to-center ~4idth of 2-rntit bin •~, ~. .. ~0 ~ 14 00:; 11 ~+~0 : 23:x{'1 , < 39 04.` ' ~ l,~t~. ` ' $: ~ S ~ ~i%f J~ ~~ ~. ~ (] ~/]]nn„ 7;il.V , . yu ~ann_, ', ~.~- 1J ~V'~.; . ynyn ~~- ~..: ~ ~ ~V, ~_, .~:~ ~ ~~'yy ~~[[ fin .- 613x30 a ., y }~~{ .~,~~ 41 00.:.~. ~ ?~+~ ray ~'~,7L 5{)-. ,_..~~ yy., V _ ~ ~y ~ S }~ 1a +h ~ //~1 ~ ~ .. UYC ~ .d3a 8 ,00 ;,~.. 1G SU,, ~'_, ~ 1.1,00. ~';' - l,f.{1(1 ~~ - ~.~44 fl0 '~ ~'Fl3'7 lt#-. ~,-, , ~ss ~ , , x ~~ ~ ~ , ~~ `~ F' ~ .. '. '~ A . _ 5 ~.\a_• v . vi Pik - {r:Li. Y` 9.00 17.3U; ' 1.1':b(? . 1~.(~t3 . 4S>6b ~~.~~ . '~{~~~iq',, ~ 5;00 18 311; ~ 1 ~ ~0 :. 12;413 - 49.C~t~: ~ 43 50 ..: x:00 19 .IO :.: X2;40 . .: i~.)~tl X0,20° `;.43.3€1,:. . {{ ~:0~ .: ;19 10~`* ° : ~ 14:ci00 ~ I.130 52:2:. ; :4.50. ;. `~:` 900 x`19 ~U** 13.00=_ 1~;'~fl :~~ ~~ ,, , , n4~ 20.. . $:00 a'.~.'~~## . ~~ ~ ~ „ 14 0U t 0.54 ~ 53 44 , ' 4$ 30 .G. . ~ff IF. l~~ P ,~ ~4 d ~ ~ to ~ .ve - .Tk' ~oe ~ ~o~.* 1.04 ~ i,:~o sa.s~, -:~~ ~a :.:. . .. s.~~ .: `2a ~o~~ ' . .. . t~o~ x.20 ..~~$~ :, ° . ss s~ ~ ~ ~ Y . ~ vJ.' r r ~ » .3 ~~ qq 56C?~~ x ~~ ~~ 9<C?{1 21.0U~`* : 1$ ~0 ~ 10~t! ~0 U0 55 Sfl, 900 ~(LflO** , 19 `{)0' ; '.: 9G~1 bl {)0:: 5~.9!} `; °.;.. ,6~V --'Gil ~V~~ ~'. /r~.Vl7* ~ ~c O. ~~i,} - ~-~ ~~~~~~~ ~V..~.. . , .;~J Oil_~;,~,- 5~ 9:40 ` 20 34~~` .: 24:U0*. ' ,.: 9.14 ` d4.31~ 62.'~f) ':; s44 - '..~~ ~0*:* -:,26.4U* 8.44. ,54 Oq.::: `' ~ a r ' ~QO 19.00'~'~ ,.24a~Q* 9 4~?: ; °<C2 0.0.: : ;.'.:: .~. . 9 1?.~.t?C3 l~~~ot`rc~na~i regr~ire ant. Any t~uilding or ease thai, upon computation of the rcgr_rired nr~rn~hcr t~f parking spaces, is'fo~rr7d to require a fractional p4~r~t of a parking spa~;e, any iractic~n shall be construed ~~ one compiote space. (Ord. 136 ~~tpart~, 191). "iT.64.`ii7(~ Paw~fir~g design t~~aei~xire~rt~r~ts. ~ _ W.. :~ A compact car parking s;~~~c~~ shall b~ ~ ~:~igh~i f~ r:~i in widish ka~rfi`r~e,cr~ feel in f~~ngi!~, as provided ire Secfiion ~ ~ ~ %t;. ~. Parking Lot Aisles. The width of parking lot aisles shall be as illustrated in the diagrams entitled "Parking Standards" contained in Ordinance 1512, and adapted by reference. C. Recess. There shall be adequate provision for ingress and agrees to all parking spaces. C?. Driveways. Driveway width shall be measured at the driveway's narrowest paint, including the curb out, The design and construction of driveways shall be as set Earth in the Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard.. Details for Public Works Construction Manual. E. Improvement of Parking Spaces. 1. All areas utilized far off-street parking, access and' rrraneuverincd of vehicles shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use ar3d shall be adequately drained, including prevention of the flaw of runoff water acres sidewalks or other pedestrian areas. 2. Required parking areas shall be designed with painted striping or other approved method of delineating the individual spaces, with the exception of lots containing single- ortwo-family dwellings. 3. Parking spaces for uses other than one- and two-family dwellings shall be designed so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way shell be necessary. 4. Any lighting used'. to illuminate off-street parking or loading areas shall be so arranged as to reflect the light away from adjacent streets or properties. 5. Service drives shall have a minimum vision clearance area.. formed by the intersection of the driveway centerline, the street right-of-way line, and a straight line joining the lines through points twenty feet from their intersection. 6. Parking spaces lava#ed along the outer boundaries of a parking lot shall be contained by a curb or a bumper rail so placed to prevent a motor vehicle from extending aver an adjacent property line, a public street, public sidewalk, or a required landscaping area. 7. Parking, loading, or vehicle maneuvering areas shall not be coca#ed within the front yard area or side yard area of a corner lot abutting a street in any residential {R) district, nor within any portion of a street setback area that is required to be landscaped in any commercial (C) or industrial {M) district. F. Limitation on Use of Parking Areas. Required parking areas shall be used exclusively for vehicle parking in conjunction with a permitted use and shall not be reduced or encroached upon in any manner. The parking facilities shat( be so designed and maintained as not to constitute a nuisance at any time, and steal( be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons or property, or unreasonable impediment to traffic, will result. {Ord. 1684 §61, 1993; Ord. 1512 ~ 1, 1984; Ord. 1436 §2{part}, 1981). ~, Sections; ~-' ';f' ` 1'Ur"pose. '' ~'"" f'ermittect rays. ~;onciitional uses. i -~< i~ei~lht regulations. 1 =', ' ;`,~) Area, ti~vidth and yard requirements. `l ~ . ;_)~:_ 1"Ol coverage. ~I ~ ~_ special yards and distances i~etween buildings. 1 '~ ) Density. 'I _ ` "~: lies"frictions on additional dw~;lling units on ~ Singh lot. 'I,~, ,'?('~ C)fi~f--street parking. 17.28.G'J~ ~~rp~sc~9 The R-~ district is irrter~dec~ to provide opportunities for thc~ development of attrao~ti~re living environments tit densities greater thin. perm"rated ire other residential districts. This district encourages '~ developnien~~ of .~ horsing nor l)Oii~ o~FV~~~er ~~rirl renter occupar~its. 1 :~ distric;ts should fie (coated to r~~l~xliYli~~ direct access to shoppincg and employment opportunities, public facilities, and major streets and highways in order to minimise through traffic in lower density residentia4 neighborhoods. (Urd. 1~~ a(part); ~ ~51~, 17.2~.Cl~t~ C~~rmittocf uses, The following uses anc~ their accessory uses are permitked in fihc ~~-~ district: A. Single-family dwellings; B. Single-~`amily manufactured home, as defined in Section < .~ ~ , ~~rrd subject try the following conditions: The manufactured home shall be multisectional and enclose a space of not less than one thousand square feet, 2. The manufactured home shall be placed on an excavated and back-filled foundation and enclosed at the perimeter such that the manufactured home is located not more than twelve inches above grade, . The manufactured home shall have a pitched roof, with a minimum slope o~fi three feet in height for each twelve feet in width, 4. The manufactured home shall have exterior siding and roofing which in color, material and appearance is similar to the exterior siding and roofing material commonly used on residential dwellings within Central Point or which. is comparable to the predominant materials used an surrounding dwellings as determined by the city, 5. The manufactured home shall be certified by the manufacturer to have an exterior thermal envelope meetings performance standards which reduce levels equivalent to the performance standards required afsingle-family dwellings constructed under the state building code as defined in ORS 455.0'10, 6. The manufactured home shall have a garage or carport constructed of like material. The city may require an attached or detached garage in lieu of a carport where such is consistent with the predominant construction of dwellings in the immediately surrounding area, 7. In addition to the foregoing, a manufactured home and the !ot upon which it is sited shall comply with any and all development standards, architectural requirements and minimum size requirements with which conventional single-family residential dwellings on the same lot would be required to comply; C. Duplex and single-family attached dwellings; D. Multiple-family dwellings and dwelling groups; E. Boardinghouses and rooming houses; F. Public schools, parochial schools, kindergartens, but not including business, dance, music, art, trade, technical or similar schools; G. Public parks and recreational facili#ies; H. Churches and similar religious ins#itutions; I. Developer's project office and sales office including mobile homes and trailers adapted to that purpose during construction of the project only; J. Residential facilities, as that term is defined in Oregon Realised Statutes '197.660{1 ); provided that the city may require an applicant proposing to site a residential facility to supply the city with a copy of the entire application and supporting documentation for state licensing of the facility, except for information which is exempt from public disclosure under ORS 192.496 to 192.530; K. Residential homes; and L. C7ther uses not specified in this ear any other district, if the planning commission finds therm to tae si~~~il~~r to tl~~osc~~ listed ak~ove ar~d cor7~patible with other p~ ~;t~itted uses and with the ini:er~t of the F~-~ dish ict as 1~rovic_~ec in Section " ~C7rd, 1691 2, 1993; Card. 1' ~~3~ ~3E7; 199:3; «rd. 1615 §8, 109; Ord. 1~'3~ ~2(pa~rt}, 1981). 17'.~B.~C~ ~c~nclition~~l uses. The following rises and their accessory arses ~rre: permitted in the ~t~ district when authr~rized key the planning cammissior~ in accordance with Chapter ~ ~' _~~;: A. Rest fumes, nursing homes and co-~valcscer~t homes; B. Private recreatianaf uses and facilities that are compatible with the residential neighborhood, but not including such large intensive comn~7ercial uses as gaff courses and driving... ranges, race tracks, amusement parks, bawling alleys, roller and ice rinks, and similar facilities; C. Public and public r,~tifity buildings, strr.rctures and related uses., but not including carporatior~, storage ar repair yards, warehouses and similar uses; d. fVlobile home and manufactured home developments; ~. fVlabile hams parks; . C)ff-street parking fats to serve the residents of multiple-family developments, mobile hams development, group quarters facilities ar~d similar uses; G. Planned unit developments in accordance with Chapter ~ , f-fi. The ternpora~y placement of mobile homes on single lots for the purpose of prc~vcling full-time care far the infirm subject to the provisions of Section ~~ - - , I. Public and parochial early chHdhaod development preschools, nursery schools ar day care centers. (ord. 1684 §37, 1983; C?rd. 1615 §3, 1989; Ord. 1551 §4, 1935; Ord. 1530 §2, 1984; (Jrd, 1436 §2(part), 1981 }. 17.28.AC1 l®lcfght regulatic-ns. No building or structure shall exceed thirty-five feet in height in an f~-3 district.. (C7rd. 1436 §2(part), 1981 ~. 9 "~.28.a5Q _ t r, fly ~ ~, ~_~ rI'" Ilir~! !I! ~~ I' ,__ _... ' I I `~` -, arty ,~ i' (_''.111.. ,~ r~~t-i ', iii I'-. j)r" f~i'c~twith~fianding the yard r~quiran~er~ts ab~v~a and d~ertdinc~ ran the It~c~~~I:iC~r~ «i the It~t, spa~i~l sei~ac~ r~cluirements may apply gas s~~ci~iF~d i-~ ~ectit~n _ > ' ~ ~~ ~~. (C)rd..1738 4, 196, fJrd. 1723 ~4, 1~9; CC:)rd. 1615 ~~5, 1 $~; C~r~1 : X36 2(r~7rt), 1 X81). i~ : ~ ~ ~ .. ,_ ~ ~.: 1T.28.©$5 Restrictions on additional dwelling units on a single lot. No additions! dwelling units, as defined in this title, shall be constructed on a single lot upon which there is an existing dwelling unit or units, unless all of the requirements of this chapter are met and: A. Unoccupied and unobstructed access not less than eighteen feet wide shall be provided from the street fronting the Iot to the rear dwelling or dwellings on the lot; B. Primary access to each dwelling unit is not gained through an alley for either pedestrians or vehicles. (Ord. 1684 §39, '1993; Ord. 1615 §40, 1989; Ord. 1436 ~2(part), 1981). 97.28A90 Off-street parking. All uses shall provide off_street parking and loading facilities as required in Chapter 17.64. {Ord. 1436 ~2{part), 1981). ;~ ~~~~~~~~i~t~~° n ~ectiora ~~,: "'~ ~ ~'ur~pase. "° ~ , ' f'ermittec~ uses. Condifiional uses. 1 _~. I~eight reg~rlatic~ns. ~~ ;'area, tnldtta and yard requirements. i__ot coverage . ~ ~ Special yards ar~d distances between buildings. _ i Restrictions on additional dwelling units on a single lot. 1~.~~•.ti;~`ici ~L~rpa~c. The purpose of fibs R- district is to promote ar~d encourage a suitable environment t4r tamiiy life at a slightly higher density than that permitted ire the F~- 1 district, and also fia provide cppcrrtunities for the developr7~ent of lower cost duplex and attached dwellings. Where this district is applied to areas of existing single-family homes, the intent is to preserve fihe low density neighborhood character, promote continued home maintenance acid rehabilitation, ar~d allow replacement housing at slightly higher densities that is corrtpatibie with the overall character of the neighborhood. {Ord. 1436 {part), 19131). . ~ carport where such is consistent with the predominant construction of dwellings in the immediately surrounding area, 7. In addition to the foregoing, a manufactured home and the lot upon which it is sited shall comply with any and all development standards, architectural requirements and minimum size requirements with which conventional single-family residential dwellings on the same lot would be required to comply; C. One two-family dwelling; D. Public schools, parochial schools, kindergartens, but not including business, dance, music, art, trade, technical or similar schools; E. Churches and similar religious institutions; F. Public parks and recreational facilities; G. Developer's project office and sales office including mobile homes and trailers adapted to that purpose during construction of the project only; H. Residential facilities, as that term is defined in Oregon Revised Statutes 197.660(1); provided, however, the city may require an applicant proposed to site a residential facility to supply the city with a copy of the entire application and supporting documentation for state licensing of the facility, except for information which is exempt from public disclosure under ORS 192.496 to '192.530; I. Residential homes; and J. Other uses not specified in this ar any other district, if the planning commission finds them to be similar to those listed above and compatible with other permitted uses and with the intent of the R-2 district as provided in Section 17.60.140. (Ord. 1691 § 1, 1993; Ord. 1684 §33, 1993; Ord. 1615 §31, 1989; Ord. 1436 §2(part}, 1981). 97.24.©30 Conditional uses. The fiollowing uses and their accessory uses are permitted in the R-2 district when authorized by the planning commission in accordance with Chapter 17.76: A. Rest homes, nursing homes and convalescent homes; B. Private recreational uses and facilities that are compatible with the residential neighborhood, but not including such intensive commercial uses as golf courses and driving ranges, race tracks, amusement parks and similar activities; C. Public and pubic utility buildings, s#ructures and uses, but not including corporation, storage or repair yards, warehouses and similar uses; D. Service, fraternal and lodge organizations; E. Dwelling groups composed of single-family and/or duplex dwellings; provided, that there shall be at least three thousand square feet of lot area for each single-family detached dwelling and at least five thousand square feet for each duplex or attached dwelling; F'. Mobile and manufactured home subdivisions; G. Planned unit developments in accordance with Chapter 17.68; H. Public and parochial early childhood development preschools, nursery schools or day care centers; f. The temporary placement of mobile homes on single lots for the purpose of providing full-time care for the infirm, subject to the provisions of Section ~. 1~ C~i.~l,>>r. (C}rd. 1684 X34, 1993„ (ord. 1015 ~3~, 1989, C}rd. ~~~"t , 1985; Card. 1530 §1, 1984; (ord. 1436 2{party, 1 ~ ~ ~. 17.~.O~C? ~°l~i€,P~~ r~~~l~~ien~~, o building car structure shall exceed thirty-five ~fee~ ir, heic~Pit in an -~ district. {C)rd, 1436 §2(part), 1981>. . ~ -~ ~ ,O~(, ~.. ,~_ i ~ ~ _ ~1~11~, ,: I~ LI f"i 17.24,06Q lm.®~ CC~Ver~~e. The maximr,m permitted aggregate building coverage in an R-~ district shall be fifty percent cif the Ic~t area. (ord. 1436 ~2(part), 1981). 17.24.®T0 Special ya~°ds artd di~t~nc~s l~ct~~cn ~uildirac~s. A. The distance bettiveen any principal b~,ilding and detached accessary building shall be a minimum of ten feet. ~: B. An inner court providing access to double-row dwelling group units shall be a minimum of twenty feet. C. The distance between principal buildings on the same lot shall be a minimum of one-half the sum of the height of both buildings, and in np case shall the dis#ance be less than twelve feet. (Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981). 17.24.080 Restrictions on additional dwelling units on a single lot, No additional dwelling units, as defined in this title, shall be constructed on a single lot upon which there is an existing dwelling unit or units, unless all of the requirements of this chapter are met, and A. Unoccupied and unobstructed access, designed and constructed in accordance with the Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details far Public Works Construction Manual, shall be provided from the street fronting the lot to the rear dwelling or dwellings on the lot; and B. Primary access to each dwelling unit is not gained through an alley for either pedestrians or vehicles. (Ord. 1684 §35, 1993; Ord. 1615 §39, 1989; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981). ~T~~~~M~N~ `~ ~ 9g PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S INTENTION TO AMEND THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE ZONING TITLE 17.24 R-2, RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY DISTRICT, 17.28, R-3, RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE-FAMILY DISTRICT AND 17.54 0FF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS WHEREAS, the amendment of the Central Point Municipal Code may be initiated by adoption of a resolution of intention by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Paint deems that the public necessity and convenience and the general welfare of the public will benefit by the proposed amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point, Oregon that it is the intention of the Planning Commission to amend the City of Central Point Municipal Code Zoning, Title 17, in order to update the R-2, Residential Two-Family District, R-3, Residential Multiple-Family District and 17.64 Off Street Parking and Loading Standards. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 2008. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2008. Planning Commission Chair ~~ HOUSII~IC AUTHORITY OF ~ACKSOI`I GOUI~ITY ~-- SITI~ PLAIN REYIE~Y ~~ ~ •~- I ~ I' ' f ~~ ~ I I~1ar•c1~t Q. ~OOt~ ~~l;~l!"rlltl~> ~~~t ~~~;it~i?~`!li 1t!;n I iut~i~;iu~"~ fi11Y1t"M~,~;~,,i~vl~t~,i,~l~a{>~nf~~~i I;n /,, ~ ~ ~ ify/~<1~iuni~~,,,, AGE~I-A ITE T'IL,E PTO. ~~ ~ -~ 1 Consiciecation ofa Site l~la~l ~"eview i~~~~~, the constructic~~7. ofa fi~rt~-~'.ir>llt (48) brut 13111~t1-larnil~r corrtpie~ to inc;lud~; townhomesg a~~ activity buildi~~,~ ~tnd pia}~ tll~ea in ,~~~ i`~ ~. IZcsi{~cniial ~lulti~~~c J~~aily zoning; district. The projcet is kn~;~v~1 as~cenic Ilei,i~ts a~~d is luCatc~j at 15ti 1 ti~~rtl~ "l hi~"ci ar~~:i ib47 scenic Avenue. The pi~ojcct is ide~~lired on the Jacl~son Co~uity :luscss~>3~~s n1~~~ as 37`~ 2Vd 03 A13, "1'a~ Lets 480 and 49010, APN 1!~2~365~ and 1C120~661. Applieaiit: 1lousin`,~ Autiiurit~ ui'Jackson County> Project Developer: Jason Eizy. STAFF St~UR+CE: Connie Chine, Community Plaz7n~"r BACl[GT2t~UND s ~y Ordinance 1852 d;~t~ed Nove~ ber 2~~2004, a Caxn~n~~~hci~sive flan <1n~cndnicl~ a~ d Zo .e Chan e t.. n g o R-3, Residential Multi le Famil zonin district ~~ 4ts a ~ raved for the 2.49 acre ro cct site. The construction and realignment of Scenic Avcn~YClTcntl~ St~~eet and Third street was co~r~~~lcted in 200'7. ~ _ ~ , ;~ _ , ' ~ ~ ~., ,, .- .,, ti, Pale l of 5 exterior building elevations are designed in the craftsman az•chitectural style with varying rooflines, alternating gabled and semi-hipped roofs. The majority of off street parking is located to the rear of the complex out of street view. As previously noted, construction is complete on the Scenic Avenue/Tenth Street and Noz-th Third Street realignment project, which included the re-design of the North "1"bird Street and Scenic Avenue intersection. A portion of the old North Third Street roadbed is no longer needed and it is the City's intent to vacate that portion of the right-ofway, File 08155. The old roadbed, located in the southeast corner of the project site, is highlighted in Figure 1. Access: The project has two ingress and egress points: The primary access is a three lane driveway at Scenic Avenue that aligns with the new realigned Upton Road. The second ingress/egress access point is at the southeast corner of the property at the realigned North Third Street. Due to the proximity to the intersection of North Third Street and Scenie Avenue ingresslegress will be right in/right out only. Currently this access point is part of the abandoned North Third Street roadbed and until the right-of--way vacation is complete, the City of Central Paint Public Works Department has agreed to grant the applicant an access easement across the roadbed as evidenced by the interoffce memo dated February 21, 2008 (Attachment D). The site plan identifies a twelve {12) foot wide strip within the private drive along the south property line as a reciprocal access easement. The applicant is prepared to record a reciprocal cross access easement for that portion of the private drive. Landscaping: The project includes the following landscaping characteristics as submitted (Attachment C, Sheet L1}: Frontage Landscaping: A frontage landscape row of trees, shrubs and lawn along Scenic Avenue; Interior Landscaping: The interior Iandscape is designed to enhance each building and unit entrance to include a planting area designed around the play area and community building. The Iandscape areas separate the parking areas and pedestrian walkway. Landscaped planting and grass areas are designed to be compatible with the residential neighborhood. Parking: Review of the parking is based on the pending amendment to Section 17.64.100 relative to the design dimensions for parking. The project provides 108 parking spaces of which 48 are covered carport spaces thus meeting the number of required spaces of 17.64.040 (A){2}. The proposed amendment to Section 17.64.100 is a modification to the design standards for a parking space. The amended dimension standards provide for a parking space nine (9) feet in width and nineteen {19) feet in length, and be designed with a minimum back-up space of 24 feet The amendment provides for a maximum deduction of two {2) feet far overhang when the curb serves as a wheel stop. The parking spaces as submitted are seventeen (17) feet in length. The back-up aisle width along the private drive is designed to be 22 to 23 % feet. Compliance with the pending dimensional schedule is required and can be achieved by minor modification to the site plan. Page2of5 ~~ FINDINGS: See Attachment I ISSUES: The applicant's preferred site plan is designed utilizing the pending perfon~~ance zoning standards of the TOD MMR zoning district. The applicant has also provided a modified site plan (Attachment A-1 to be distributed} illustrating development of the property under current R_3 development standards. In addition, the City has proposed an amendment to Section 17.64 Off-Street Parking and Loading, updating the parking dimension standards. In the context of the proposed CPMC amendments, the following listed issues are noted and discussed: 1. Arterial Street Setbacks: Scenic Avenue, along the east property line, has recently been upgraded to urban standards as a collector street, and is proposed in the revised Transportation System Plan to function as a collector street. However, currently Scenic Avenue is a designated secondary arterial street. According to CPMC Section 17.60.090 Special Setback Requirements, Subsection A, projects within any residential district must set back a minimum of 60 feet from the centerline of the secondary arterial street. The purpose of the setback is to allow for the future expansion of the street for its intended purpose. Based on recent construction the intended purpose of Scenic Avenue is to serve as a collector street. The City has not requested any additional right-of--way from the project, for either collector or arterial purposes. Based on the recent construction to collector standards and the pending re-designation of Scenic Avenue from a secondary arterial to a collector street, the review of the project did not take into consideration application of Section 17.60.090{A). Z. Distance Between Principal Buildings: The applicant has elected to use the pending performance standards of the TOD-MMR district. Within the TOD- MMR district, the setback distance between principal buildings is five {5) feet for detached buildings. Currently Section 17.28.070{C) R-3, Residential Multiple Family requires a setback distance between principal buildings based on the height of the buildings, with a minimum distance of 12 feet. Based on the height of the proposed buildings, the required setback distance would be 20 feet between each building. To comply with this requirement it would be necessary for the applicant to modify the site plan by joining the principle buildings as illustrated in Attachment A-1 {to be distributed}. It is the appl'icant's preference to use the pending design standards of the TOD-MMR district to achieve a superior site plan, with the understanding that approval of the site plan per Attachment A is conditional, and subject to adoption of the proposed amendment to Section 17.28. 3. Parking Space Length and Aisle Width: The modification to CPMC Section 17.64.100 provides design standards for aff street parking spaces, including a maximum deduction of two {2) feet for overhang when a curb serves as a wheel stop. Such an amendment would still require minor modifications to the site plan, which can be easily accommodated by the applicant. 4. Third Street Road Right-off Way Vacation: The applicant is aware that the abandoned portion of North Third Street that resulted from the realignment of Third Street must be vacated and the applicant has agreed to participate in the vacation process. The City is processing the road right- Page 3 of S ~ ~ of--way vacation, File 08155. It is anticipated that the applicant will acquire ownership of that portion of the vacated right-of way as shown in Attachment B. 5. Front Yard Setback: As currently conf gored, the project site is classified as a corner lat. In the case of a corner lot, the property line having the shortest street frontage is defined as the front lot liner Although the subject property is triangular, approximately 80 ft. of the project site is located along North Third Street and is recognized as the front lot line. As noted above, the applicant elected to use the pending performance standards of the TOD-MMR district. The front yard setback in the TOD-MMR is a minimum of ten (10} feet, with a maximum of fifteen (15). The project provides approximately a fifteen {15) foot front yard setback. It was determined that at the time of this application that the property had legal frontage on North Third Street and that the front yard setback would be measured from the sidewalk of the realigned North Third Street. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Setbacks: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall meet the minimum setback distance between buildings or connect the buildings as illustrated in Attachment A-1. The applicant also has the option, as described in Attachment A, to develop the property in accordance with the proposed CPMC amendments, and subject to adoption of those amendments. 2. Parking. The applicant shall either: a. Modify the site plan as necessary to comply with the parking standards as set forth in the existing Section 17.64; or b. If adopted, modify the site plan as necessary to comply with the parking standards as set forth in the pending modifications to Section 17.64. 3. Third Street Vacation. The applicant shall continue to participate in the right-of way vacation application, File 08155 for the abandoned portion ofNorth Third Street that resulted from the realignment of North Third Street. 4. Access. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall prepare and record reciprocal crass-access easements for that portion of the private drive located along the southern property line, 5. Misc. Conditions. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Public Works Department {Attachment E}, Central Point Building Department (Attachment F}, Fire District 3 (Attachment G} and Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment H}. 6. Signage. The applicant shall submit a signage plan prior to building permit approval. Said plan shall be consistent with the provisions of CPMC Section 15.24 and Section 17.67.050. ~ CPMC Section 17.©8.010 Lot Line, Frpnt Page4of5 ~~ General Note: Site Plan Approval shall Iapse and become void one { I }year folInwing the date on which it becomes effective unless construction has commenced. ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS: Attachment "A"- Site Plan, Attachment "A~ I Attachment "B"- Attachment "C"- Attachment "D"- Attachment "E"- Attachment "F"- Attachment "G"- "-Site Plan, to be distributed Vacated Right-off way Acquisition Map Applicant Submittal Public Worlts Interaf~ce Memo Public Works Staff Report Building Department Staff Report Fire District 3 Attachment "H"- Rogue Valley Sewer Services Attachment "I"- Findings Attachment "J"- Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Site Plan Approval for the construction of a forty-eight {~8} unit multi-family complex by the Housing Authority of Jackson County, to be known as Scenic Heights, subject to the conditions as set forth in this Staff Report dated March ~, 2008. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. ,granting Site Plan approval far the multi-family complex by Housing Authority of Jackson County with an expiration date of March I, 2009. Page 5 of 5 ~~ urltn ~n, ~~`- L 1 ~~ I ~ `~ - x. x<x err, _ _ J. .2... ~ .1.. - . = --. I ~, (~ ~ 7HaS3...GtICI.1~" R: r~s ~.:.a TtpSN E~.CL.p'~':jG ~_`'y.[41.1 ri4!3E S~E~ ,,..a ~aa i.~.o ~ ~..... _~_" I '6 g ~ ~ AG~~~~le;}1.ln FTYNl51?A~E,~~ETY nOTE: I ~ C> 11 ` \ rwar~cc.:. ax,r.~x ra caesr xriu ruu.:anae..,c, now rew "^^cn,:ei~rr er,.~9.~e'n cRreu. tu~L rSWGn'4 CWC. I1t LO1tR V.ocR \ \ \ '415 /sue ~CGESSbIG. P J ~i6 AO~wIAaF OR wv~ctf•. Ji (++M~^.:+K W16 A+L wCCCY.N[.G .coo v',:Sw6'..G. a ~nHSApLC L ~3M'[+K~A>~.IRO~i5:5 n?p~pCG R, T6 CGCT1i.SIY Pr~9pG. I . ~O I "'"""' ~ ~ ,\ ~~~ SfTF Tq_FyUf~A710Ns I ~ DO:rrt: rroR wa+s::r ~R!? . cr ymla PHO^O4[9 . y utt9 I `\ \ WlILGRYi rG3:PR. w, ISC I: >k'lN. N"i VT'Cgtb PI¢wi ~ `\ 6:S[ Co~TCI.GC~ R06l:IYM.IC j:. tai Awb~C: >GMVr .: PCrz3 Wrtf. Nfv~iS ` I a\ I / / ~~ , \ ~•tl0 x107, Ke 1`r M9GP /!KG) ~o srwcf.. upcrs cwvrorsie r\LI~. \ wvPR,A': i /.• ~ \ / \ \ 1 t1i w rfR %tJUa•n/.CG q~g rtwis ~ I ~ ~ ` 6 SOSN. IY C~ aY ~~ \ ~ a. K » 60 11//~~ a ` / ~; nay r`~'~' /\ n ' I ~ +, I __ . ~.. .. ~O ti~ "J l ~ y . ,l , ~\ ~ _ ~~:: e.clE 4 ~ ~ Ya \ #~ e, ~~ ~r'•. , ,L b ~ 4a Y' , t~ \ ~~ _'' E I 4 LI x, row ~ ti .. ~ .,.~. ~ G~'tiW:. _ M -~' ~ ._ ~l I~""~" V ~ ' w .. ~ F- ~ a ~ r ac., - >s - _> r~rs I n € >~ E ~ fl`» f ra ~ ~Y [ ~o ~ r, a< ~ xi n ~i I I n w I u i~ is a n a+ ~ a z ~ ~ i,row~.o .. IE 1111 !l >o n m ~ I w9AGts~rwm,. trx .._ CARPORT ~'y~-~I-c'-I-s'-I I >rw' RIVATc D I e' --_..._._..~ _~__~_ ~ ~ C_Y~ ~'--- - - ~--~-i~ Ei~c~ROCa acce~'oaau^iErr= - - - - - - - _ -- _ _ i hG2IH I `~ 3 ~-2W-Q3AB T.L. 4200 i d°mp I .\ ~\ ~} \\ ~I `\ ,\ ,~ ~TACHMENT " ~~ " SG~hl1C ~EIGF~TS SGE.~'IG Ate. t 3rd ST. CEtiTRAI i'OIh:T, OK Aid a rORE7ABLE HOU51[\G DE~LOFh1Er;T rpR ~lousllac Aur~nrairr J_~K`~..~\ Cc7UNTY 775! TABLEROGK EriJ. M~P>=CJRA. OR PROJLCi hAF'16[R: fll•13u f ; aa+-inGa 5sa~r1 1 '" ~wteu . R«e a.~ser~s `. I i 3 , /~ ~~ G // I /~ / \ I 6ANfiCL Ri1~RICN aiL1uYECr laae EAGLE PoM, dR 5i:1<S 9..~ ,.wK~i«~.,.a~,,.~or..~,. ww ..N...p..<e w. P.n~ / ~Ywoy ra aw :Yr. ~v iyu b W 9es.-ter... ~ I _F7 ~ %;/ Y~JaVM`Y lGdei .~`/ /~ I dF 9 A 1~(~I iMI:~::~11" l to~~l~l ~-~l1T~CJ~~I~~~~l~ ~~~~~~:~`Ilf ~~Ct.~l~f~'IC~~ ~ `° ~ , ,, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~„ f y ~,~\ ' ~y,. " vim`( \ q k. ~ i v ~, "~. ~ ~~ 4 k ~. .. 1 i , `v ~ 'w ~_ ~ ~_ ~ 4 " ti ~~ ~^ ~, ~ M _; ~l ;j . i, Ali ~.f .''J.., ..., _ ( a ~ ~ ~ ~ia~ _ f ~ _ +.. i ~ ~ . ~ ~ _ 1, k _ . i ~ >"~ ~ ~~, ~ s a ~ ~ ~ ",. ~ ~ .. 1 . i 'y ~ j ~~, I ~ ~ .. Via, r_ .. - .. ,~ "~ ,, _ , ~. _ ... r .._. ., .mil . , ~ f. ,.. ., 4E3r3w e ~99C~~? l ~~' ~~ d.e' Y fi HOUSING AUTHORITY OF JACKSON COUNTY %/ 2259 TABU ROCK ROAp MEDFORD OR 9769 ~~ ~~~ ~ PHlT'DD (541 j 779-5785 FAX (541) 857-1 1 9 8 1 FAX 779-4656 ~ f~ Scenic Heights Site Plan Application 1801 N. 3~° Street & 184? Scenic Avenue, Central Point, OR December 27, 2007 Written Findings of Fact _ Municipal Code Compliance Chapters 17.65 TOD DISTRICTS AND CORRIDORS: Not Applicable, site is not located within Central Point's TOD District and/or corridor. 17.66 APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE TOD DISTRICT AND CORRIDOR Not Applicable, site is not located within Central Point's TOD District and/or corridor. 17.67 DESIGN STANDARDS - TOD DISTRICT AND TOD CORRIDOR Not Applicable, site is not located within Central Point's TOD District and/or corridor. 17.72 SITE PLAN. LANDSCAPING AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL 97.72.040 Standards A. The landscaping is designed to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, incorpora#ing subs#antial lawn areas and uses of trees and shrubs typically used in this region. Tree species will be selected from the City's approved tree [ist. Trees will be planted at the site's street frontage per 42.36.090. Street tree species will be chosen with the Cities approved species list and wil! be a minimum of 1.5"diameter per 12.36.1 OD. Lawns, shrubs, and trees will be irrigated via an automatic irrigation system utilizing sprayer sprinkler heads in lawns and drip irrigation in planter beds. Irrigation backflow device(s) will be installed per building code. B. The site plans allows for two ingress and egress points to public streets. Primary ingress and egress is accommodated at the NW corner of the site. A three lane driveway at Scenic Ave., with left only lane, aligns with the newly realigned Upton Road per consultation with Public Works. The second ingresslegress point is at the SE corner of the site at the newly realigned 3~° Street. Due to proximity to the 3s° St.IScenic Ave intersection, ingresslegress will be right in/right out only. The interior, two lane drives, will be privately owned but will be constructed per city street standards per the request of Public Works. C. In compliance with 17.64.040, the site plan meets minimum off-street parking with 1D8 parking spaces. Code requires not less than two spaces per dwelling unit with one additional visitor parking space for every four dwelling units. The site plans calls for forty-eight (48) covered parking spaces via carports, also in compliance with 17.64.04D. Driveway and parking areas shall be paved and sufficiently drained. Parking spaces shall be delineated with painted striping. Compact parking spaces shall not exceed 25% (27 spaces) of total parking spaces. Driveway and parking areas shall be suffciently illuminated and reflected away from adjacent streets and neighboring properties. Perimeter parking will include curbing to prohibit vehicle encroachment to surrounding properties andlor landscape areas. O~Onf VM3 ~1 D. Twa project signs are included an-site. One at the south corner of the driveway on Scenic Ave. and one on the north corner of the driveway on 3R° Street. Project signs will be limited in size, not to exceed 6'W X ~'H. Project signs will be set back a minimum of 10' fram street frontage to avoid sight limitations at driveway street frontage. E. In Dec. 'O7 the Project Architect, Dan Horton, met with Mark Moran of f=ire Dis#rict 3 to review the site plan for sufficiency and accessibility of fire fighting facilities. Fire District 3 approved the si#e plan as designed. The Fire District dictated the placement of #hree {3} hydrants on site located at the three perimeter corners as marked on the accompanying site plan. F. Dwelling Units on Cul-de-sac streets -Not Applicable. G. The site resides in a neighborhood consisting primarily of single family homes. The site is positioned at a four-way, newly redesigned, controlled intersection. It is fronted fay Scenic Ave wrapping nearly all of the eastern and northern property edges. North 3RD Street #ronts the southeast corner of the property. Across Scenic Ave., to the east, is a moderately sized single-family subdivision built in 2000. Across 3RD street to the southeast is a corner neighborhood market. Currently the market is vacant and for sale. Directly west of the site is a one-acre parcel of land with a renovated farm house. Southwest of the site is Scenic Middle School. To the south is an undeveloped parcel of land wi#h R2 zoning anticipated for condo development in two to three years. Site characteristics are highly suitable for residential construction. The topography of the site has a slight slope rising ten feet from front to back. The site plan is engineered to take advantage of this slope by integrating asplit- face retainer wall about 30" in height set back approximately 15' from the curb face on Scenic Ave. The retainer wall will allow the site to be slightly flattened at its highest points while elevating buildings above street lever thereby creating street separation from dwelling units with both safety and curb appeal in mind. Two primary objectives influenced project design. First, was to design a project that would integrate nicely into the predominant single-family neighborhood, producing an attractive complex with great curb appeal. The majority ofoff-street parking is located to the rear of the complex and out of street view. Townhouses, versus apartment flats, are located at street frontage, emulating single-family, attached row houses along Scenic Ave. Sixteen, two bedroom townhomes will be contained in four buildings, with four units each. Exterior building elevations are designed with acraftsman-like architectural flair with varying rooflines alternating gabled and semi-hipped roofs. Each unit floor plan is offset from the next, to create architectural interest. Each townhouse will have a small front porch connected by a path to the city sidewalk on Scenic Ave. The townhouses wil! be separated from street frontage by the retention wall discussed above. The street side of the retention wall will be heavily planted with a combination of fawn, attractive shrubs and street trees. The back or parking lot side of the townhouses will each include a second small patio with exterior storage providing a place to store barbecues and bicycles. The second objective while designing the project was to maximize the density of the site while limiting design to two story buildings. All interior buildings are designed as apartment flats versus split level {townhouse}floor plans. A total of four apartment buildings including a 6-plex, 10-plex, and two 8- plexes will contain thirty-two {32} apartments with one, two and three bedroom units intermingled throughout the buildings. The craftsman styled architecture is carried fram the townhouse (split level} design to the apartment buildings with styling queues including: both shingle-sided and board & batten gables, full-light patio doors with aesthetic grids to match single-hung windows, off-set exterior elevations, and varied roof lines. fOVAi IroV5f16 O?•IOR1VMIfY r ` ~.e ~'~ ~ n n ~ r c_ f t t i ~ .~-- r ~ z ' ~ -.- t x f _ I Y Y !~ I t K i ~ ~ ~~ r ~ r ~ . ,~ _ ~~ I , s y i { i 1 I ~'"' I 1 ~ N ^'~ ^ Q H ... ti e x O { b -~y R N t ,' r y'~ ~ I ~ ~~ ` ~ .t t ~~ ~`~, `~ a /r ~~~~ ;/ d ~~~ G... E s c o z~ l 1 J'_ 6 F ~ t ~/ LI S ~1 f~ ,~ ,~ ,~ f`a~ ' I I f~ ~f ~/ 1 f r r , ° d d `l f a ( r r ~ ' r l ~ ~ f 7 j» ~ i(J ,, ~, 1 r i /j r ! r t f `ti, fr r r r rf r r r rJ ///i 1 II ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~` ~ s~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~k ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ „-~ ~ ° ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ $~ ~~- ~~~~ ~r wn~ ~~~ ~~ ~F~ ~ o i ~~~~ ~a ~~~~, ~~~ ~~# . ~ ~~~~~ z~ 4 ~ ~ 4-,¢~~~ ~c1Z. ~ ~~ ~~_ Y ~~~~~m o~~~ „_ ~~ i i "€]p ~~ ~~ ~~, ~a. ~`~~~~~~ ~!~s~ ~~ ~ ~ ll v~Av~$ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ w ~. y ~~ - ~ ~~~m ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ F L e t~~~r ~~ ~"- µ~g ~~~~~g~~~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~€~~~ ~ ~ ~Z ~n- a~= ~~- f 4 +• e ~ ~~}~ ~~ ~~n_~~ 7F i m ~r = ~ ~ ~n ~~z 8~~ ~~~ ~~tt3 a a ~ ~~ ~€~ pF€_pF~~~; ~~~`7 i; ~f~ ~~ c_ m~D-~~ D~ ~~ °~ °~ m ~ 0~ ~~~ Y Ay yMm D j-i~ r~ n~ ~~~ D S: ~ 7j .any-~ ~~ ~~ ~~l~i a ~ ~E~,~ ~*~ a~~-fig ~z n v ~~~s~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ p~ 4`J y,,,,, 5c~n~ic u~~~uTs SCEkiG GvE. < 3RD. $T. CENTRAL POW7, 07C Aid AF~pi®ADLiw tdGSSBNJG AEVELOPI'~NT ROIC ~~ icir.i ~ ei~TNORf TY QF ~,ArIC4tY.l crx,!{J,TY 2251 TAbLE.IK7CIG }~F7. h1Ei'~FOI~. QfFl:C}Ghl ww~ Tp,i>!GT llo. Ol-ISY r•.i~ __ p pY1lL ~[ YOwipi ~ J74~~~T TOV~ 1[TiLLfW~PO.iW~117 ~~ ~{T, OIS 1'Ai~ ~w18~~i~AI~~ Mww W wW ~'aywr~.YV N}y~~T~ r~r.~ ~M'r~ 'wp~~KY w~ W rw v~ ww+~ ~! z-I I NT 9GETJIC AVE. a 3Rp. 9T, CENTRAL }°OA4T. OR H.E. ELEVATIGhI 9G op ~f~ S.tu_ ELI=VATIQhi %',I,_m. ~~~ I' 1 ~~ 5. L VATIOhi I' N.Ui. E!_EVATION AN AFFORpApLE aUlglfifG f7'ctiELOFSIEkT FOR upuarly~ A~ruor~r7~ ar; JAGICSQI`I GOUNTY 7PS! TA~EROQ4 Rp, h1Ei7FOKm, OR ~7.tCT Nq O'1.19Y 0 owum a ~+aape -r~ncr wor K~+.~c ro, sa+.a aeu ~r.aa e~uc ,~.r .~. N _ +1I~ ~ n~a~i ~rn W. r~~ w ~~+~y~~~ V w AM~~a ~rrycY~/L 7O 3Lt' YeEI 90~ E ~FLaosz >~I_ara-corlrn~wT,~ ~IiLlal~ ~+ Tu LIVFtY,~i lfA2dY !'iC34r= t~L.4~i ~'.i'-0' a: n ~~- y ~s 0 .- ~~ _{ ,~ ~~ W rw ~ TI Gl ~ ~~• . 3 it ~~_~. 3'~4 n o ~ ~~ _~ `~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -;,: ~ ~ ~Y ~< e `m ~ ~ ~ - ~~~~p ~ N ~ ° ~ ~ r ~ i~3~ ~A ~ m~~n~ D~ z ~~ ~ ~} m g~~s~ ~ ~~~~m ~N~ '7~ FF -~ ~' ~~ ~ ~,^ F,. .......... _..___ ._.... c.~_-, W _r .tt ~ ~I i; ~ `1?'- ~ Ifs ~ - Q _ n ~n ~- `~o ~ a ! . w O L N ~~~~ j~ ~ O ~~p' ~ _ €~ m~~~'- n n ~ ~ ' ~~ni p~~~~~ nZ ~~ ~ T~ ~ ~- ((~~ m ~Ti ~~~~~~ $~~~ ~ ~ ~r~~tr~i ~ b. ~ ~.~~~~~~~ ooh ~ zw~ ~A _~~ ~~ G Tlat M YMG tlY aRSYtaGt, RGIiHPM Ylaa m Tau i• caLa"A a E• .Lnov7 YK ~ OR~OL Cad7tlIR'V7 TI*R TO a' ZD b K ~ 7dL _ 1 TIPS TM Oi 6YYtt1i C~A~AA L~ORAT LIF1{i~'D NATV6 iOP. ,w.wa~ ro...vwr pAnAns ro r.ac ~eLar wra,L Ryan eemlreLr ~ \ s. auettlasL Trae aa~ee TI[7 .+r~euw. io~+ cf a rw• ~r+LgL srAgl ac r.al f' IRT olaai ~~ ~ ` Lam RaIL w+Ema o waor a~LL rrtc rIE L10t ILOrw m EAr'a ° aa' T ErAlare r•ae nm M+ani on aarAc ~`!l` RRpif R?Ot CApill l•Yhp~rWyH p~~ +~ ~ \ ,~ kMYMKO PRAOtl W ••1lIMTILm I.kRGitLGM l rLOOr TlALi. ~ \ ~~ .i'l: I.S,, ~ ' i ~ Ira 1'PORf® SOA`1 Ta'EOIL l:iY`.Rs r~r+.,;;\>:,:v,ti^; ~ ~a arw.la,Lr omedrto waor aa.•sm• * \ ~•• LLAILMLWtk VT.LWPru [aLlaf~0i T7eC1 r. woyanem ruraK aaa • \ L~ IcTtlC1C7W rcw In•semn awoLu - ~~ _ ~ \\ TR ANTIk ll!/ R T ARF21 R ~TRE~ PLA~ITIN~~,S7Rl]G7URAL FILL ~ IIIY~ -___..,. `\ t~w,srwar'ec.ararune:r AhfT i"'IAT I t•! ~.~ T~nH~.I..L,w~.,L nL~r•~yd....,.anr~r>wraz~ -~.V~~' 1 • \`\`\ \ A. iNYwO ORR~Y RMif RfI~IJMt~4r'ELk.C) a. MYfY 6~v~A7~['IPP'AI~LACIN L70![ 4 T ORAn 1•LWT t/l1JR7 \ 7ON...1 • GLL•R Il• aOr1Y G mJraVA SETA WI/ LtAL ~UOO/A' \ R RJUr iY.L fyi pLW1 i' AaO•f LLIY716 dIUO[! O. ACJI! RMIR1a bGiVCROLtR!' NML[ y> wA ~ ~M~a~aLli~ ar'aw nL.ratun Et•~EI w. r+awb L4YrAkLCa it > W1.~ ` 51•IRUF3 f'LAnlTINCs Dc'-TAIL aeweweaeewLr~luerw+e K wASr rpvstwra' wol~ w/i nay. ratty .cALa.l+n x r+pra IsW~m nLaLluv maraud Ena4a[ rtl~r. ra.u L • \ .Le><R.. r. faftqura vwn eELCir ~ P)rAHTi ~ KIOPtlIJaltaltlAl'.MOTgfATIC~LU'LLLM00.G/RANTIV[ \ L 1RX'~ lpr 7PIL Tub TEN 1Ft Q`~~ Mfl~ I GIL. • s' OA:IYAM_ LMY47 L, b110 Glrt~f itlLYM LaLIa1L Q R:Of EMLL Mm 1" Cflir lY 1!4 Mlarr, ALr~ GTTItlN IgLArl!% raatorlnarralLpaer S wpNp[4"p7aw 7fX~foQ AT GIR7IIO [OrR K~kdr:A>~V,7ga~~~ Aryp TlR. AIT~ AGNRiW M0.LM wtaw wiKM i~ L MR'~'C`/c A' PKr' LryprrLID RLCaI AT .LI.L K W Wri'41 /.'M1.Ya~IQC VYgLt~ N1piTSVa ' \ RNnLp !Y!N IIOT MtllYAfU CPL'R ALT GgIfYA TeRLaTa Y7nnere QRq#0a' l.Ir!!MA ptlY7~IM1T tlq!!ip 1VOf O. YCTa7TYYrlOE OiM~A 1tlYY1C MpIML' MIW.aArf 6A~D! Af N1. TIRE LyN,iTm QIJOfK ALT ISMO7IL DGM{rfCA'paAFMGfA' SsI7H a'Tp eYVN)PL:ea+asv.aa wralL® w.tNLla ppp=wrYla'svMLD'rroMVrraL a•T. ypyn A w1R]vll7E STRIGTUraL tldL6 Vnu AU.MI~/T Itr~ c:wmwa'uu nal(~•0' LtAC a „mlwu'I TLVIE'R+~IRr • ooafAUC Alm r•Alaoeu ET.w.- sw nllr.~ ® .Ln LYIIMrRM aArLp.'Lti7L lLawr7lEl! 1~1av[r 1 \ 4i~K EIYAT~ pN rLarLb R L'Npifaa rRNrrll'~WT L\D \ ALr~ [7CILOiALAM-tlI.LIaTr Y7a1YPL' I 1 ATI ht T RaL~LrlnoLt~orsr~iam~ \ I. Wi(MCJI't ccmlcACron ll~ rwP//Da 7MOw T.1taG/ttQEA 6 aaya•Gltr oULlar \ Q Iwe'aaTTa+ aYenn LAYp,IT ab ALTr FrtrrbinRl'1 TLOYfa ^Lltln.~ta L74t41N rr.v~Llm.EyLLp7q LNrAL1.LILpN O[TAYJI, IL MTl%aLALrLKA YilEiOL1A' OMdaaF NIyNC{5/A 7. Alt TIRp Tp O[ OIUr NaaGaTm W 7 tlYT1O16 Alh tllEdk K Jarf,MYj tl•R•L aaAUm \ T KL SAiM TO tlQ l]liw EL1fEArW W 7lFITRA \ 4 ALL ftl! TO ar >run~ LY 4naisrAaLS v. 1t9! . wnaLnaL RrrL peya QJO. Yuuw7r PA'•Ek•MLRLiQ~IIiAp6. iLA~TOETA*4YLQ WA.I7W T1aaTlppLl'IWITApT4 4• wOra 17' PC ~I \ ALT. fiAALU A117T1ULN CdyLp7tTy \ \ BGENIG 4VE. ~ 3rd. ST. GENT!¢d1. pOMT, OR \ lW .44.ORDLLBLE HOU91hl;a i71:V~LPF'1'tENr FOR \\ l:~JS~NCa AutuagTY c~ ,,JAG1C50N GPUNTY zzbl r~E~c Imo. \ r'i€r~ole~, ac 1 lLROJEGT NIti~El4 D'7-t36 >t I ~ ~ 1 / 1 i ` ._.....___ __.._.._______.... _.. ~L7NLpY.RFlpRpt A11CLIiSEGT 70D9 __. __ ~ wLIpiCR~A1[ b<Ii70.L01~ ..~.... r...~ . ~ .~....~ .....~ ~ ...~~ ~......`~ . , ....T... "","n"h„w ~.. ~ .. err..,. ~. ~ .......r...,,. ... ~ ~ .. I ` ti O'~w'~.wLrnAnLr'AarNarlr o~.w~L ~ \ P~r/wwM LL~liirw w'wy.Y bY~ wawb I Lea ~~ I {gyp I 1/ PI[C~~{R xppl '°1a 3~-2Ut-4J3AB T1,.. 48O(~ 1 4~3m0 ~ s ~ r Bob Pierce, Director _,. Public Works De artment CEN ,u' p ~e w ~ Matt Samitore, Development Services ~. ------ IV~1 Po i NT ._$1 ~ f : . Public LY~orks Departmerl t INTEROFFICE MEMORItNDUM TO: CONNIE CLUNE FROM: MATT SAMITORE SUBJECT: ACCESS TO HOUSING AUTHORITY DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2008 Connie, A question has been proposed about access to the Housing Authority property if the North Third Street Vacation does not occur. The City shall grant access to the Housing Authority at their desired location through the old right-of--way of North Third Street. The staff report regarding the conditions of approval for the development are unchanged. ~~ 140 South Third Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 g Fax 541.664. fi384 Public Works Department `=`~~ ~=~ ~_____ _~__~.______~--.---___._.~~.___~__ CENTRAL PO [ NT PUBLIC Wo,r~xs sTA~F R~PoBT January 23, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: ~T 6 ~~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ T c~„~.....~-„!S9 Bob Pierce, Director Maft Samitore, Dev. Coordinator 48 Unit Apartment Complex for 37-2W-03AB, Tax Lots 4800 and 4900 Applicant: Housing Authority of Jackson County, 2251 Table Rock Road, Medford, QR 97501 Zoning: R-3, Residential Multiple-gamily Traffic: No traffic study is warranted for this deveIopznent. A Traffic Study was completed for the 3 /lot /Scenie/Upton realigz~.znent and incorporated this use into its Endings. The new intersection is designed to incorporate this additional traffic into its configuration. Existin fufrastructure: Water: There are two 8-inch water main extensions on the proposed private streets. Storm Drain: There are two 18-inch storm drain extensions on the proposed private streets. Street Section: Existing right-oF ways for UptonlScenic/10ih13T~ vary adjacent to the subject site. Issues: Issue A: 3; Street Right-of/way dedication. Issue B: Future limited access. Engineering and Developznen# Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and stone water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm. drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also izaclude applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffrc control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction e~ 140 South 3r~ Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 ~~ Fax 541.664.6384 drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the dcve(opznent will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid i3z full at t11e tune the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works lnspection fees. After project completion during the hnal plat application process, the Public Works lnspectar will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection tizxze to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspectio~zs fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as deterrzzined by the Public Works Director}. Conditions of Approval: 1. 3rd Street right-of`way vacation: Prior to construction of any building the right-of--way of North 3rd Street must be vacated. 2. Future Limited Access: The traft`ic study conducted for the intersection re-alignment determined at some point izz the future the proposed access onto North Third Street from the development will be iizrzited to right-in and right- out movements. The Public Works Department does intersection studies every five years. The next update will occur in 2010. The city anticipates at that time striping, sigzzage and/or concrete znediazzs will have to be installed at the intersection. Full access to the development will be from the Upton Road alignment. 3. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated far landscape rows. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet an center around the perimeter of the property. The plan shall include constz~uction plans, irrigation plans, details and specifzcatians far the trees to be planted within the landscape rows. Plantings shall eoznply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 '/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigatiazt system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be the responsibility of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. ~~ X40 Soufh 3rd Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3327 _~ Fax 541.664.6384 City of Central Point, Oregon 140 S ~'hird Street, Central Polnt, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.161 www.ci.central-point.or us :~;<:~ CENTRAL Po~NT !"~~ I f'i~F II~I~NT ~d9S Building Department Todd Meador, Building Offi~ial BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPQRT DATE: 112910& TO: Planning Department Planning file: FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Housing Authority Project APPLICANT: Housing Authority of Jackson County Propez•ty Description: 37-2W-03-AB 4800.4900 PURPOSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. ~~ 940 S Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 ~ 549.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.1611 Building Dept. Staff Report, Page 2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT C4MMENT5 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report ofthe investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following infoz-znation: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classif cations of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations far foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive sails, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/excavationpermlts are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapte~- 1 Sand z•egarding any f ll material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private storm drain work must be permitted and inspected by City Building Department (prior to back .fill}. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of f 11 (including special inspections of placement of f ll and compaction) acceptable to the Building Off cial, shall be submitted prior to f nal of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is f paled. Exception: 1. The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of f ll that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 140 S Third Street Central Point, OR 97542 ~ 541.664.3321 = Fax 541.664.1611 Building Department Staff Report, page 3 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.2.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. A comprehensive erosion control plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Department prior to start of work. 10. Application for building permits will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Cade (2007), The International Fire Code {with the State of Oregon Amendments-2007), NFPA 13, Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code (2007, Uniform Plumbing Code (with Oregon Blue Pages-amendments). Plan check may take from 3 to 8 weeks, depending on completeness when submitted.....ifrcquested, plan check my be initiated simultaneously with Planning Dept. evaluation (Plan Check Fee must be paid prior to start of plan check). A complete code analysis should be a part of the submitted plans. 11. Fire District 3 will determine f ~•e hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. 12. Property lines must be established and pinned by a Licensed Oregon Surveyor prior to any building inspections. 13. No work is to start until Grading and Bz•osion Control Plans are approved and permit issued. 1 ~. Appendix N of the ORSC will represent the code requirements far this project buildings. 1 S. Any grading on site shall not in, any way, adversely effect adjacent property. The developer must prove compliance with submitted building plans. Building nay not proceed until grading approval from Building Dept. (Retaining wall, area drains,etc. may be required. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. If questions, please call Todd Meador.....66~1-6325, ext. 228. 140 S Third Streef Central Point, OR 97502 ~ 541.664.3327 Fax 541.664.761 ~ ~~ ~. ...- st ~~ ~" ee Y7 ; ' ; 1. January 31 , 2008 ~ T~~C~IM~iV°f ~'~__ ~.~~ ~ ?:~ ~` ~ ` Z00~ Connie Clune ---._.._...... -.._.,....._- -.-....-.. ~. Community Planner Central Point RE: Update for Scenic Heights In conclusion from our meeting this morning we came up with the following solutions. Move the new hydrant to be placed on Scenic roughly 40 feet north to accommodate the existing water supply. Keep the suggested hydrant location in the north entry way near the trash location. I spoke with Dan Horton since the meeting and one change has been made. The handicap space cannot be moved due to the building code. The solution is to allow space 67 in combination with the handicap space to make up the fire apparatus turnaround. The total width will be 18 feet as agreed upon in the meeting this morning. If you have any questions, please feel free to calf. Michelle Fuss Fire & Life Safety Specialist JCFD No.3 541.826.7100 ~~ ~~~~~ s~w,~~,~~ January 25, 2008 Connie Clune City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 ~`.i~ ~` ~~ .~,~~~: ~ ~,. ~ao~ 1 Re: Housing Authority of .lacicson County, 37 2W 03AB - 4800, 4900, File # 0814'i Qear Connie, There is a 10 inch sewer main along Scenic Avenue and an $ inch sewer main on 3~d Street. Sewer service to the proposed development will require a main line extension from one of these locations. The project is within the Phase 2 Stormwater Quality Management Area and will be required to meet Stormwater quality standards adopted by Rogue Valley Sewer Services. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this project be subject to the fallowing conditions: 1. The sanitary sewer system must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards. 2. The sanitary sewer system must be accepted as a public sewer by RVS prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant must submit a Stormwater management plan demonstrating compliance with RVS standards. This plan must be approved by RVS prior to the start of construction. 4. The applicant must obtain an €~PDI=S 1200-C erosion fYontrol permit prior to the start of construction. This permit is administered by RVS. Feel free to call me if you need additional information. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, District Engineer K:IDATAIAGENCIF.,SICENTI'TIPLANNGISUBDNISION12D08108I41 3AC0 HOUSING AUTHORITY.DOC ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Lncalion: I t8 11`esl 1ri[tts Road- C'entr'al Point. OI2 - ~b9ailine Address: P.(}. 13~~x ;I 30- Cenls;al Poini. UR 750"?-!)(}ili -fi:l.lip}1}fiG~l-h~()0.]~ax{5~I1Gf,4-7171 www.I2VSS.trs ~~ Attachrr~ent ~`I" FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No: 08141 INTRODUCTION In the Matter of a Site Plan review for the construction of a forty-eight (48} unit multi- family complex to include townhomes, an activity building and play area in an R-3, Residential Multiple Family zoning district. The project is to be known as Scenic Heights and is located at 1801 North Third and 1847 Scenic Avenue. The project is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03 AB, Tax Lots 4800 and 4900. Applicant: Housing Authority of Jackson County; Project Developer: Jason Elzy. CPMC 17.28. Q20 Permitted uses. R-3, Residential Multiple Family District The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted in the R-3 district.• D. Multiple family dwellings and dwelling groups; Finding: The proposed project is amultiple-family dwelling complex. C©nclusion: The proposed use is a permitted use in the R-3 zoning district. The applicant's preferred site plan is designed utilizing the pending performance zoning standards of the TOD-MMR zoning district. The applicant has also provided a modified site plan (Attachment A-I to be distributed} illustrating development of the property under current R-3 development standards. For purposes of consistency, the City of Central Point has initiated amendments to CPMC Section 17.28 R-3, Residential Multiple Family District to be consistent with the TOD regulations by providing a development standard option. The complete text of the pending code amendment is found in File 08165. Specific to this application are the proposed amendments to Section 17.28.050 dealing with development standards, i.e. setbacks. Section 17.28.050 reads in part: 17.28.050 Development Standards. At the discretion of the applicant, a develapment application within the R-3 district shall be subject to either: A. Conventional Zoning B. Performance Zoning.• The develapment standards of the TOD-MMR district as set forth in Section 17.65 shall apply to the design and development of property within the R-3 district. The following table illustrates the development standards for subsection A, Conventional Zone and subsection B, Performance Zoning TOD-MMR. ;Gi Page 1 of 9 Table 1. CPMC Section 17.28.U50 ©evefopment Standards Standard R-3 Conventional Zonin Performance Zoning TOD- MMR Lot Area 6,000 s ft. 1,500 s . ft. Lot Width 60 ft. NA Lot De th NA 50 ft. Front Yard 20 ft. 10ftmin/15 ft. max Side Yard 5 ft. er s#o 5 ft. detached Corner 10 ft. 5 ft min110 ft. max Rear Yard 10 ft. 15 ft Lot Covers a 50% 80% Densit Minimum units per net acre 14 14 Maximum units per net acre 32 32 Distance between buiidin s: Accesso Buildin 10 ft. 5 ft. Inner Court 20 ft. NA Princi al Buildin 20 ft. 5 ft. CPMC 17.28.050 Area, widtlt artd yard requirements. D. Front Yard. R-3 Conventional Performance Site Plan Standard Zonin Zonin TOD-MMR Desi n Front Yard 20 ft. 10 ft min/15 ft. max 15 ft. Finding: As currently configured, the project site is classif ed as a corner lot. In the case of a corner lot, the property line having the shortest street frontage is defined as the front lot line, CPMC Section 17.08.010 Lot Line, Front. Finding: Ii was determined that at the time of this application that the property had legal frontage on North Third Street and that the front yard setback would be measured from the sidewalk of the realigned North Third Street. Finding: The subject property is triangular with approximately 80 ft. of the project site located along North Third Street and is recognized as the front lot line, The Site Plan provides approximately 15 ft. setback from the property line parallel to the Page 2 of 9 sidewalk. The section of North Third Street fronting the property is part of the road right-of way vacation application, File OS 155. Finding: It is the applicant's preference to use the pending design standards of the TOD-MMR district to achieve a superior site plan, with the understanding that approval of the site plan per Attachment A is conditional, and subject to adoption of the proposed amendment to Section 17.28. Conclusion: The project complies with the pending amended CPMC i 7.28 minimum front line setback. E. Side Yard. The side yard shall be a minimum offive feet per story. Side yards abutting a street shall be a minimum of ten_feet; provided that, side yards abutting streets shall comply with the following: I. Sight distance and clear vision area requirements set,forth in the public works standards; R-3 Conventional Performance Site Flan Standard Zonin Zonin TOD-MMR l~esi n Side Yard 5 ft. er sto 5 ft. detached 15 €t. (10 ft. Corner 10 ft. 5 ft min110 ft. max PU1= Finding: Scenic Avenue, along the east property line, is considered the side property line. A ten (10) foot Public Utility Easement (PUE), parallel to Scenic Avenue, is located on the subject site. To accommodate the PUE, the project design provides a minimum of fifteen {IS) foot setback from the side property line. Finding: The minimum clear vision area for the project at the corner of North Third Street and Scenic Avenue intersection is a 25 feet setback from North Third and Scenic Avenue, as per Table 300-7 Standard Specification and Uniform Standard Detail for Public Works Construction. Conclusion: The project complies. F. Rear Yard, The rear yard shall be a minimum of ten feet. R-3 Conventional Performance Site Plan Standard Zonin Zonin TOD-MMR Desi n Rear Yard 10 ft. 15 ft min. 22 ft. Finding: The private drive is a minimum of twenty two {22) feet in width along the west and south property lines, thus providing a rear yard setback in excess of the minimum rear yard setback requirement. 5 Page 3 of 9 Conclusion.: The project complies. CPMC I7.2$.070 Special yards and distances between buildings. A. The distance between any principal building and detached accessory building shall he a minimum often feet. B. An inner court providing access to double-row dwelling group units ar clustered units shall be minimum of twenty feet in width. C. The distance between principal buildings shall be at least one-half the .rum of the heights of both buildings; provided, that in no case shall the distance fie less than twelve feet. R-3 Conventional Performance Zoning Site Plan Standard Zonin TD©-MMR Desi n Distance between buildin s: Accessary Buildin 10 ft. 5 ft. 10 - 12 ft. Inner Court 20 ft. NA 25 ft. Princi al Buildin 20 ft. 5 ft. 8 - 12 ft. Finding: The project design provides a minimum often feet eleven inches (10' 11 ") between the closest principal building, the 10-plex, and the community building. Finding: The interior parking aisles, sidewalks and landscaping provides an area in excess of twenty (20) feet. Finding: Based on the height of the proposed buildings, the required setback distance would be twenty (20} feet between each building. Finding: The building units can be attached forming larger Alex units, such as a 16- plex.. In addition, the Uniform Building Code permits the use of an arbor/ canopy as a means to connect the buildings. Finding: To comply with this requirement it would be necessary for the applicant to modify the site plan by joining the principle buildings as illustrated in Attachment A~ I (to be distributed). It is the applicant's preference to use the pending design standards of the TOD-MMR district to achieve a superior site plan, with the understanding that approval of the site plan per Attachment A is conditional, and subject to adoption of the proposed amendment to Section 17.28. Finding: Within the TOD district, the setback distance between principal buildings is five (5} feet for detached buildings. The pending text amendment to Section 17.2$ Development Standards, File 08165 provides for five (5} feet between principal buildings. The applicants preferred site plan provides 8 to 12 feet between buildings. ~J Page ~ of 9 Conclusion: CPMC 17.28.070 {A) and (B} can be met as submitted. Subsection C can be met by connecting the buildings meeting all Building Code requirements or comply with the pending CPMC amendments when adopted. CPMC I7.50.090(A) Special Setback Requirements Finding: Scenic Avenue, along the east property line, has recently been upgraded to urban standards as a collector street, and is proposed in the revised Transportation System Plan to function as a collector street. However, currently Scenic Avenue is a designated secondary arterial street. According to CPMC Section 17.60.OR0 Special Set back Requirements, Subsection A, projects within any residential district must setback a minimum of 60 feet from the centerline of the secondary arterial street. The purpose of the setback is is allow for the future expansion of the street for its intended purpose. Based on recent construction, the intended purpose of Scenic Avenue is to serve as a collector street. The City has not requested any additional right-ol=way from the project, for eitlrer collector or arterial purposes. Finding; Construction is complete on the Scenic Avenue/Tenth Street and North Third Street realignment project to include the re-design of the North Third Street and Scenic Avenue intersection. A portion of the old North Third Street roadbed is no longer needed and it is the City's intent to vacate that portion of the right-of--way as evidenced by the road right-of way vacation application, File O81S5. Conclusion: Based on the recent construction to collector standards and the pending re-designation of Scenic Avenue from a secondary arterial to a collector street, the review of the project did not take into consideration application of Section 17.60.090(A). CPMC 17.72.010 (AJ Purpose. The purpose of site plan, landscaping and construction plan approval is to review the site and landscaping plans of the proposed use, structure or building to determine compliance with this title and the building code, and to promote the orderly and harmonious development of the city, the stability of land values and investments, and the general welfare, and to promote aesthetic considerations, and to help prevent impairment or depreciation of land values and development by the erection of structures or additions or alterations thereto without proper attention to site planning, landscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in relation to the development of neighboring properties. CPMC 17.72.020 Site plan approval required; {A) A site plan application conforming to the requirements of Section 17.72.030 shall be made: 1. For all construction requiring issuance of a building permit; or Z. Upon a change of use. Finding: The application and supporting documents provide the information necessary for review of the proposed Scenic Heights multiple-family dwelling complex. The proposed building will require issuance of a building permit. Page 5 of 9 Conclusion: A Site Plan Review for the proposed structure is necessary and the submitted application complies. CPMC 17.72.030 (A) _ (E) Information Required. This section of the code addresses all of the necessary information to make a decision for approval or denial of the site plan application. Finding: The applicant has provided all of the necessary information as outlined in the above referenced code. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17, 72.030 (F) In the discretion of the city, a traffic study performed by a licensed professional engineer; Finding: A traffic study was not required for this application. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72,040 Standards. 1'n approving, conditionally approving, or denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their decision on the_following standards: CPMC 17.72.040 (A). Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Planning Commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screening purposes and far sound and sight insulation from existing neighborhood use; Finding: The project includes a frontage landscape row of trees, shrubs and lawn along Scenic Avenue. The applicant states that the tree species will be selected from the City of Central Point's approved tree list and tree size per CPMC Section 12.36.090, thus meeting the street tree requirement. Finding: The interior landscape is designed to enhance each building and unit entrance to include a planting area designed around the play area and community building. The landscape areas separate the parking areas and pedestrian walkway. Landscaped planting and grass areas are designed to be compatible with the residential neighborhood, Finding: Site Plan, applicant submittal Sheet 1 of 9, specifics the replacement of the existing chain link fence along the west property line. Said fence is along the east property line of Scenic Middle School and the applicant will work with the school district for a proper replacement. Conclusion: The proposal complies. ~~ Page 6 of 9 CPMC 17.72.090 (B} Design, number and location of~ingre.ss and egress points .so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic.flor~= on public streets; Finding: The project has two ingress and egress points. The primaz•y access is a three lane driveway at Scenic Avenue that aligns with the new realigned Upton Raad. Finding: The second ingress/egress access paint is at the southeast corner of the property at the realigned North Third Street. Due to the proximity to the intersection of North Third Street and Scenic Avenue, ingress/egress will be right izz/right out only. Finding: Currently this access point is part of the abandoned North Third Street roadbed and until the right-of way vacation is complete, the City of Central Paint Public Works Department has agreed to grant the applicant an access easement across the roadbed as evidenced by the memo Attachment D dated February 21, 2008. Conclusion; The proposal complies. CPMC 17.7,2.040 (C) To provide off-street parking and loading facilities• and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference ~=ith the traffic flow on public streets; Finding: Review of the parking is based on the pending amendment to Section 17.64.100 relative to the design dimensions for parking, File 0$165. The proposed amendment to Section 17.64,100 is a modification to the design standards for a parking space. The amended dimension standards provide for a parking space nine {9) feet in widfih and nineteen (19) feet in length be designed with a minimum back- up space of 24 feet. The amendment provides for a maximum deduction of two (2) feet for overhang when the curb serves as a wheel stop. Finding: The project provides 108 parking spaces of which. 48 are covered carport spaces thus meeting the number of required spaces of 17.64.040 (A}(2). Finding; The project provides 8 compact parking spaces in compliance with CPMC Sections 16.64.060 and 17.64.070 and four (4) ADA spaces in compliance with the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. Finding: The parking spaces as illustrated on applicant submittal Sheet 1 of 9, are 17 feet in length. The backing movement aisle width along the private drive is designed to be 22 to 23 112 feet. Compliance with the pending dimensional schedule is required and can be achieved by minor modification io the site plan. Conclusion: The number of parking spaces and the number of covered spaces complies with CPMC Section 17.64.040 (A)(2). Compliance with the pending dimensional schedule is required and can be achieved by minor modification to the site plan. Page 7 of 9 CPMC .17.72.040 (D) Signs and othef• outdoor ad}~ertising structuf•es to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and thut they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract f •om the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: The applicant proposes the placement of a project identification sign at the Scenic Avenue entrance (tax Iot 4800) and a sign at the North Third Street entrance {tax lot 4900}. Finding: The location of the two proposed signs is in conformance with CPMC Section 15.24.600(A) as only one sign placement is proposed far each tax lot. Finding: The applicant states that the project name or identification signs are designed to be six feet wide and four feet in height (twenty four {24} square feet}, thus meeting the size requirement of Section 15.24.600{C} and TOD sign standards Section 17.67.050(M). Finding: A sign permit will be required. Sign standards and permit requirements are found in Section 15.24 and Section 17.67.050 (M) of the CPMC. Conclusion: Compliance with CPMC 15.24 Sign Code and 17.67.050 TOD Signs will be monitored during the sign or building permit process. CPMC 17.72, 040 (E) Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that alI buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; Finding: Fire District No. 3 has reviewed the site plan as evidenced by Attachment G dated January 31, 2008. District 3 will review the structural plans and comment during the building permit process. Finding: The project design has incorporated Fire District 3 recommendations. Conclusion: Fire District 3's requirements can be monitored in the building permit review process. CPMC 17.72.040 (F) Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section 1 b.20.080 pertaining to the maximum number of single family dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding: No single-family dwellings are proposed with this application. Conclusion: Not applicable Page 8 of 9 CPMC I7 X2.040 (G) Compliance with such architecture and design standards us to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation tv the neighborhood and the Central Point area and its environs. The architecture and design proposals may he rejected by the Planning Commission iffound to be incvmputihle with the existing architectural or design characteristics of adjacent properties or• uses. In addition, the Planning Commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, vr• vther• development requirements that may he necessary to ensure land use compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point residents. Finding: Applicant's site plan and building elevations (Attachment "A") illustrate the proposed design of the building. The Alex units are designed with apartment flats, single story living units, and tawnhomes. The project's exterior building elevations are designed in the craftsman architectural style with varying rooflines, alternating gabled and semi-hipped roofs. Finding: The project is engineered to integrate the slight topographic slope of the property to create a raised streetscape along Scenic Avenue by the use of a split-face retainer wall. The four 4-plex townhouses are positioned along Scenic Avenue and designed to resemble attached raw houses set slightly above street level. Each townhouse will have a front porch connected by a path to the city sidewalk on Scenic Avenue. Finding: The interior buildings, a 6-plex, 8-plex and 10-plex, are designed as apartment flats containing 32 apartments with one, two and three bedroom units intermingled throughout each plea. The majority of off street parking is located to the rear of the complex out of street view. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page 9 o£ 9 ~~r~r~~~nn~~°r «. J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FORTY-EIGHT (48} UNIT MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX KNOWN AS SCENIC HEIGHTS Applicants Housing Authority of Jackson County, Project Developer: Jason Elzy. {37S 2W 03 AB, Tax Lots 4800 and 4900 APN 10203653 and 102003661 1801 North Third Street and 1847 Scenic Avenue } File No. 08141 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for Site Plan approval for the construction of a forty-eight (48) unit multi-family complex located on the 2.49 acre site. The subject property is Iocated in an R-3, Residential Multiple-Family zoning district and is identified on the 3ackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03 AB, Tax Lots 4800 and 4900, APN 14203653 and 10203661. WHEREAS, on March 4, 2008, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the R-3, Residential Multiple-Family zoning district Section 17.28 or as amended, Off-Street Parking and Loading Section 17.64 or as amended and Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Section 17.72 of the Central Point Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Site Plan application, has considered and fords per the Staff Report dated March 4, 2008, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the site plan is consistent with the intent of the R-3, Residential Multiple-Family zoning district or as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff Report dated March 4, 2008, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. ~- .~„ Planning Commission Resolution No. {3/04/2008} PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 4~ day of March, 2008. Planning Commissian Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 4th day of March, 2008. Planning Commission Chair ~~ Planning Commission Resolution No. (3/04/200$} CC~IV~PREH~1`ISIVE~ PLAItii F~~Y~S~~I`I P4PULATI4~i 8c DENI~C t~APHICS ~ L~1VI ~ 1tiIT q_ f ~ I~ ~$~~~ ~'~~ is ~ i ~~_ ~ ~ 7,~ l~r~ali,~n~(~~ur~%,;AiCf~ ~ ` , 4 ~ ~ f ~ CC u--n~uait; ik vci~~~~nr~ni 1 ~u~~~. tt~rl ~i __ f\`,-i i<~ia (Ily 1\t~~n 1;iSli.ile~~` w~ 1 ~A' J' 1~,.i~~V'~~ March 4, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: I~ ite l~ o. ()8160 Consideration of a ~omprehansive P~~~1 Text ~~mct~clmcnt to the City ofC~l~~i~a'I T'oint ~oprahensi~v~e Plan -Element }: Population and Demo~r~~phics. ,~~,hp[ic~~a-t, City <>1~~'cnt1~~~1 }'Dint STAFF SCJI.}l~C't~,> Dan Burt, Pl4~nning Manager BACI~GROL~?~rD. The Planning Llepartment i be~.'inning to update the Comprehensive Plan and is st~artini~ with the Population and Demographic; P,ler~:~e~~t. This element provides the primary cl~ta ncec~~ar•y for preparation of the City`s L~lz~cl t.: se, Transportation, Housing, and .Economic ci e m en ls. The population. data in the Popu}anon and Uetr~ographic Element is based on Jackson County's recently e~7n~pleted population forecast, «hie}~ irlc}odes population projections for all cities within the County. The data is also derived from the U.~. Census and Portland State University's Papn,c~iic~n Research Center. In reviewing the element, it is important to realize that the forecast figures are not absolutes. They are intended for planning purposes only. Each year the forecast population will be compared against Portland State University's Population Research Center annual population estimates and by 2010 the U.S Census will be underway providing t~~u~ll~er opportunity for adjustment. ISSI.TE~; K.ey cc~n~iderations l'~Jit}lit~ she Population and Demographic Element are as follows: 1. Projected population to 2030; 2. Persons per household; 3. Household type; and 4. Percentage share of fatal population. C(JNDITIUNS OF APPRCIVAL: No conditions Page } of 2 EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS; Attachment "A" -City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan -Element I :Population and Demographics Attachment "B" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of the proposed City of Central Point Comprchensive Plan text amendment and recommendation to the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: Forward the proposed comprehensive plan text amendment to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. ~4 Page ~ of 2 ~~~~~Hn~~~~« ~ City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element l: Population & Demographics January 22, 2008 City of Central Point -Comprehensive Plan Element 1: Population and Demographics Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... l 2. Population Growth Forecast .........................................................................................................1 3. Population Growth Characteristics ..............................................................................................3 3.1 Growth Rate ............................................................................................................................3 3.2 Percentage Share of the County's Population .....................................................................3 3.3 Source of Growth ....................................................................................................................3 4. Population Age Characteristics ....................................................................................................3 5. Household Characteristics .............................................................................................................4 5.1 Average Household Size ......................................................................................................... 5 5.2 Household Type .......................................................................................................................5 5.2.1 Fa~uily Households ..................................................................................................5 5.2.2 Non-Fannily Households .........................................................................................6 5. Population Goals &Policies ...........................................................................................................6 .~ .. ~~ Citv of Central Point Comprehensi~~e PEan, 2008-2030 ELEMENT 1 -- POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS 1. Introduction Central Point was founded in 1889 and by ]900 had a population of 322', With the exception of the decade between 1910 and 1920 the City of Central Point has continued to steadily grow (Table 1 }, and today is the third largest city in Jackson County. Over the course ofthe next twenty years, the City's population is expected to continue to grow, requiring additional land for housing, recreation, ernployn~ent, and supporting infrastructure. In an effort to facilitate the City's planning process, it is the purpose of this Population Element to formally acknowledge a projected rate of population growth to the year 2030 and to identify the general population and household characteristics associated with the City's population. It is important to understand tlfat the population projections set forth in this Population Element are estimates. These estimates are based on the best available information. The information contained il] this Population Element will be used as the basis for maintaining and updating of the City's comprehensive plan in accordance with ORS 197.712 {urban growth boundaries) and ORS 197.295 - 197.296 (housing). The information presented in this Population Element is either historic data from the U.S. Census or population forecasts from the Jackson County Conrprehen.sive Plan, 2007 Population Element. Most of the information is to be used simply to describe the population's general characteristics, while other information is intended to be used in the determination of the amount of land and types of land uses needed to accommodate the projected population growtlf. It is the intent of the City to ]naintaill the population forecasts based on the 2010 U.S. Census and Portland State University Population Research Center population estimates. Throughout this Population Element reference will be made to AcknoN~ledged Inputs. Acknowledged liZputs represent data inputs to be used by the City in the maintenance and updating of such elemel~ts of the Comprehensive Plan that rely on population data to determine land use needs to the year 2030. Table 1. Popnlation and Growth: 19110 - 20U0 U.S. Census, 21}115 PSU Estimate City of Central Point, Jackson County, and State of Oregon k`ear City of Central Point Po ulation % Increase Jackson County Po ulaEian % Increase State of Qregon Po ulation % Increase 1900 322 _:, . 13,698 _ 413,536 1910 761 136.34% ; ' 25.756 88.03% 672,765 62.69% 1920 5$2 -23,52% 20,405 -20.78%': 783,389 16.44%',' 1930 821 41.07% 32.918 61.32% 453,786 21.75% 1940 906 10.35% 36.213 ]0.01% 1,089,684 14.25% ]450 1,667 84.00% 58.510 6L57%' 1,521,141 39.59%;; ]960 2,289 37.31%i 73,962 26.41% 1.75$,687 16.27%i 1970 4,004 74,92% 94,533 27.81% 2,091,385 18.25%'• 19$0 6,357 58.77%. 132,456 40.12%' 2,533,156 25.90%,: 1990 7,509 18.12%; : ` 146,3$9 10.52% 2,847,000 $.12% 2000 12,493 66.37% - 181,273 23.$3% 3,421,399 20.1$% 2005 * 15.640 25.19% <.: '. 194,515 7.31 % 3,631.440 6.14% Source: L".5. Census and Portland Slate Univ°rsity Estimate, 2005+ 2. Population Grawtli Forecast On February 21, 2007 by Ordinance No. 2007-3, the County adopted an update to their Comprehensive ~ U.S. Census Bureau dement 1 -Population and Demographics (February 27, 2048) Page 1 r~ Cih~ of Centro! Point Comprehensive Pian, 2flfl8-2Q30 Plan, 2007 Population Element. This action by the County was u~tdertaken in accordance with State la~vz which requires that counties maintain and periodically update population forecasts for communities within their jurisdiction. The County's updated Population Elernent included individual annual population forecasts far each city within the County to the year 2040. The population forecasts were prepared in coordination with each municipality and in accordance with State law. The methodology used in preparing the forecasts is presented in the County's Population Element, which is incorporated herein by reference (Appendix A}. The population forecast for the City of Central Point is presented in Table 2. The data in Table 2 is based on the Jackson County Comprehensive Plan, 2007 Population EIement, and illustrates the projected population growth of the City to the year 2040. Although population has been projected to 2040 in Table 2, for purposes of this Population EIement, the 2030 population forecast is the basis for the City's land use planning as presented in the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, 2008. As illustrated in Table 2, by the year 2030 the City's population is forecast to increase by 10,240. It is expected that by the year 2022 the City of Central Point's population will exceed that of the City of Ashland, making Central Point the second largest city in the County3. Acknowledged Input 1-Population Forecast: The population data presented in Table 2 is acknowledged as the projected population to be used in City of Central Year Jackson County Paint % of county 2005 194,515 15,640 8.04% 2006 197,963 15,896 8.03% 2007 2az,ao2 16,3ss s.la°i° 2008 206, I24 16,793 8.3 5% 2009 210,329 17,239 8.20% 2U10 2I4,G21` .. 17,59fr . 8.25°0 2011 217,626 1$,050 8.29% 2012 220,672 1$,411 8.34% 2013 223,762 18,778 8.39% 2014 226,894 19,152 8.44% __ 2015 _ 230,1 b$:: 19,541 8.49°io 2016 233,257 19,918 $.54% 2017 236,387 20,301 $.59% 201$ 239,559 20,691 8.64% 2019 242,773 21,087 8.69% '' 2020. 246,031 21,4}1 $.74% , 2021 24$,049 21,877 $.78% 2022 252,145 22,269 8.83% 2023 255,197 22,667 8.88% 2024 258,328 23,072 8.93% 2025 26,1,497: -" 23,4$3 8.9$°0 2026 264,419 23,875 9.03% 2027 267,374 24,364 9.11 2028 270,361 24,861 9.20% 2029 273,382 25,367 9.28% .2€331} '' . ;. ~7d,4~7 <. 25;&SO 9.3~°l0 2031 279,3I8 26,3$2 9.45% 2032 2$2,230 26,$92 9.53% 2033 285,173 27,410 9.61 2034 288,I46 27,935 9.69% 20335. `- 291.154 ; .. ,.. 2":x,469 9.7$% ,, 2036 294,142 29,006 9.8b°/a 2037 297,165 29,552 9.94% 2038 300,219 30,105 10.03% 2039 303,304 30,667 I0.11% '' 204th 3.(!:6,421 ,: 31,737 ," I0,19~0 , ::'. maintaining and updating the City's Comprehensive Plarz. It shall be the responsibility of the City to periodically monitor and, if necessary, update the data presented in Table 2 as it relates to the City of Central Point through data provided by Portland State University and the U.~S. Census Bureau. z Oregon Revised Statute (ORS} 195A36 ' Population EIement, Jackson. County Comprehensive Plan, Table 7. Element 1 - Population and Demographics (February 27, 2008} Page 2 City of (:entrst Paint C'an~~rehensive Ptan, ^fui~-?p3t~ ~. ~p'optel<~tior~ Gro~~~th C1~a~'a~t~ris~ta~~:~ Jn additic>~~ tea tl~~: proji;cted population,~ro~~ th, tl~c f~711c~~vi~t~rt rcpres~arts an overview ~sf"the it~fc~rrr~atic~n presented in the,Tt~~~.rks~>il C'a~tnrt~~ C'nr~~~~rc'~i~r~Taii=~~ l'1<r~r, /'~i~nrlc~:ir;n Elerrz~rn~. ~~'~~~~~°~ 1. City ofCentr~tl l~~ti~ti 1"lisr~~K°ict ~~~ l~t~t4s~~t~,l ~~c~l~~tI~~ti~At~ p 35,OOU .... .. .....M ............ ~ 30,000 Y 20,000 ? _ _ . .. .... ... ....... ........_._. ~' ~~ 1 t 1 "?..493 10,000 ..... m__ _......_ 0 5,000 4,004 ~ "7,509 ,.,. ~b 4 ~ ,.CJ C~ r~ C5 r,~l c,~> ~~~ `~C> ,~C` ICJ C~ ~~` Census 1~'c<~ Y~ 3.1. Growth Rate: As illustrated i~~7 Figuz~e 1. since 1981). the population of the Jackson County has grown ~tstc~r than the Mate. ~ut~ing this same pea-iod, the (:itv ot~C.'cntral 1'oij~t has exceeded the rate ofgrrw~'th oFthc Co~rnty and has been one of the fastesi gro~~~int~ cities t~ itliin the Cout~~ty, with an average annual ~ro~~,~th rate of 3.67°~~~~`. 13v the yc<~j° :'03C), it is expec;tcd that the City will con'ii~~uc t~k grow but at a slower aver<~~e an~~ual rate of approximately ~.(i''/a. i~urin~ tlae same period, the County is expected to ~rr~1~~ at an avcracc annual rate ~~[~ l .68;x. 3.2. Pc~~~~E~r~i,~~,o 51~a~t•€' cif tic ~a~unt~° i~t~hbtiation: In l9 ~, Centt~~tl }~(7int°S population accounted .for 2,~`% of the Cotmtv's pol~~ulatio~~. T» 20105, the ~'it~~ m~tdr ul~ aproxit»~tte[~ $°/a cf the County population. t~ver the course o1~ the a~ext 35 years, this r~~.te is expected to continr~~e to increase, ~ti itlz a 2040 ix~pulatiola share of approximately l0ala. 3.3. Source of (grog the '1"l~erc are two basic sources to population growth:. natural increase births minus deaths) and net ~iirgration (in-migration minus out-migration). Growth occurring as a ~•csult t~i~ natural ir~c;rease is typii;ally a small. percentage of a community's population gri~~~~th, ?~~1ost i~~ct~s;ases in population are a result of net migration. used on the 20U0 U,S. Cea~s~ts, the predominant source of growth for Jackson County was the result of net mi~~rati~~~ with o~ er SO°la of the population growth resulting from net migration. 4. Populattom Age Char~ctet•isticv Since the 1990 Census, the age chnract~:ristics of the County population have remained relatively constant, In 2000, the single lamest a~;c cohort was the 25 -- 44 age cohort, which accounted far a Jackso>> County Population ~"1erl~ert. Tabte 5 ~ U.S. Ce.nsa ~~iureau, Census 2Ut70 Element 1 - P~pula?on ar,d l7cmoz <~t~lics (February 27, 2008} Page 3 r Ci#'v orCenEra[ PoinE Comprehensive Plan, 2008-2030 approxitnatcly 25% of the total population followed very closely by the 45 - G4 age cohort (Baby Boomers}. Figure 2 it lustrates the shift in the 2S - 44 age cohort between 1990 and 2000. Unlike the County, Cerrtral Poir;t's 45 - 64 age cohort only experienced a small gain in percentage of total population. Central Point's Under 5 age cohort did experience an increase in total population when compared to the County's Under 5 age cohort. Figure 3 illustrates the change in age calrorts between 1990 and 2000. Table 3. Jackson County Population by Aye Cohort. 1990 & 200[} Age Group 1990 Population % Change 2000 Population % Change Under 5 9,758 6.67% 10,886 6.00% S - 17 26,947 18.4I% 33,380 ] 8.41 18 - 24 12,375 8.45% 15,730 8.68% 25 - 44 43,897 29.99% < 46,260 2S.S2% 45 - 64 29,700 20.29% 46,028 25.39% 65 and over 23,712 16.20% 28,991 15.99% Total 14G,3$9 100.00% 1$1,269 100.0©% Table 4. City of Central Point Population by Aye Cohort.199U & 2000 Age Grou 1990 Po elation % Chan a 200(1 Po elation % Chan e Under 5 519 6.91.% 976 7.81% 5 - 17 1,623 21.619a `. - 2,S9fi 20.78% 18 - 24 589 7.8490 978 7.$3% 25 - 44 2,289 30.48% 3,651 29.22% 4S - 64 1,429 19.03% 2,521 20.18% SS and over 1,060 14.12% ' 1,771 14.18% Tota! 7,509 100.00% ':.. 12,493 100.00% 5. Household Characteristics A by-product of population growth is the formation ofhouseholds. Trends in household formation are an important consideration when discussing residential land needs necessary to accommodate forecasted population growth. Since the early 1900x, household characteristics have been gradually changing. For purposes of land use planning, it is irxtportant to understand the trends associated with household formation. For purposes of this Population Element, there are two characteristics worth noting: Average household size and household type. Figure 2. Jackson County Population by Age Cohort,1940 & 2000 P 50.000 -- ° 45.000 P 40.000 u 35.000 3a.00a a 25,aaa t 2o,aaa I s,aaa E 10.000 ° 5.000 Et ~ - UnderS 5-17 18-24 25-44 45-64 65 and over AgC C9110rt Element i -Population and Demographics (February 27, 2008} Page 4 CiE}~ of Contra[ Point Corrtprehensive Plan, 2008-2030 5.1. Average Household Size Since the 1370 Census, and before, the average housel--old size has been gradually declining. For the City of Central Point, the average household size has dropped from 3.46 in 1970 to 2.63 in 2000. It is expected that during the term of the planning period {2030} that tl~e average household size will continue to decrease but at a decreasing rate. Figure 3. City of Central PointPopulation by Age Cohort, 1990 & 2000 P 4,DOo n 3,500 `~ enst~s2OQ0 ~ ly i ~ ~ u 3,ODD ... ~ ~~~ ... I 2,SD0 ~. _ _._..~~~ . _ - _ -_... y _~~~ _.. _ ` f * a 2,Dfl0 I ~, ~~ .~.. ~ SD0 - - ~ t 1 ~`, ~ - _ `~ , i 1,OD0 Aif _ - ~~~~ _ _ _. - - 0 500 _ ... .......... .......... ....... ... Gensns-{ 944......... _............. ... n _ ..........~._~..-..~ ..........................._. ........--..........-...---.-.._._......--......._-....-............-.-................... -.... UnderS 5-E7 I$-24 25-44 45-64 65and over Age Cohort Acknowledged Input .2 -Average Houseftald Size. For purposes of calculating household fnt•~natinn, the City will use an average household size of 2.69. This frgure will be the basis for deterririning the nun7ber of households expected to be fof•med throughout the planning period. It shall be the responsibility of the City to periodically monitor and, if necessary, update the average household size through data provided by the U.S'. Census Bureau, 5.2. Household Type As previously noted, households are categorized as either family or non-family households. Past trends in the distribution of households by average size and type is worth noting, particularly as it relates to the demand for housing, residential land needs, and infrastructure necessary to support residential growth. Over the course of the past 40 years, average household size has been declining (Figure 4). In addition to the decline in average household size, the distribution of households by type has been gradually shifting to non_family households. Whether the average household size or mix ofhousehold types changes, there will be consequences on the demand for housing. H 3,5 0 u S e 3 h k~gure4. HistoricalAverageHouseholdSizefor Jackson Countyand CentralPoint 1950- 2004, Projected U.S. to 2(}10 3.42 CentraE Point 3.13 3.08 3.05 o Jackson County `~~ I `.~~2 ~62 d 2.5 ............._.._..__ -- -- -- -- ---- - ----- s i z e 1950 1950 1970 1980 CensnsYear Source: U S Census 2.71 2.63 ^i 1990 2000 5.2.1. Family Households; Family households are comprised of two or more people who are related by marriage, birth, or adoption. Most family households are most commonly represented by married-couples. Family households have and continue to dominate household types. However, although the formation of family households continues to increase, it is doing so at a decreasing rate. In 1990, family households in Central Point accounted for 77% of all households. By the 2000 Census, family households represented 75% of total households. Element 1 -Population and Demographics (February 27, 2008) Rage 5 .~ Cit}~ of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, 200$-2030 Based on the 2000 Census, the average number of persons per family household in Central Point was 3.06. In 1990, tl~e average number of persons per family household was 3.16. Figure 4 illustrates the history of average family household size in the U.S. and Central Point. Acknowledged Input 3 T Family Houseltolds. Fnr putpa,ses~ of calculating hnuseltnld formation, the City will use 75% as the percentage of households that crre.fatrtily households. This frgure shall be used in maintaining and updating the C'it}T',s Cnrrtprehen,sive Plurt. It shall be the responsibility of the City to periodically ntonitnr and, if necessary, update the percentage offantily households through data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. Acknowledged kaput 4 -Average Family Households Slze. For purl~nse,s of calculating household farntatiort, the City will use 3.06 as the average household size_for•_farnily households. This figure shall be used in rttaintaining and updating the City',s Cnrnprehensive Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the City to periodically trtanitor and, if necessary, update the average family household size through data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. 5,2.2. Non-Family Households: Nan-family households are comprised of si~~gle persons, or two ar more people who are not related. In 1990, nor-family households represented 23% of all households within the City. By 2000 non-family households represented 25% of all households. As the City's population grows older, the number of non-family households can be expected to increase. Based on the 1990 Census, the average number of persons per non-family households was 1.27. By the 2000 Census the average non-family household size increased slightly to 1.28 . Acknowledged Input S - Nott-Family Houseltolds Fnr purposes of calculating household formation, the City will use 25% as the percentage of households that are non family households. This frgure shall be used in maintaining and updating the City :s Comprehensive Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the City to periodically monitor and, if necessary, update the percentage offantily households through data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. Acknowledged Input 6-Average Non-Family Houseltolds Size. For purposes of calculating rton family household formation, the City will use 1.28 as the as the average household size for non family households. This figure shall be used in maintaining and updating the City's Comprehensive Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the City to periodically monitor and, if necessary, update the average rton family household size through data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, 6. Popalation Goals & Policies Goa!- To prepare and maintain population projections as the primary data source for developing and implemerrting plans and programs for management of the City's growth. Policy: Tlie population. forecasts presented in this element shall serve as t{:e basis fort{:e develapme-tt of land use policy and land use decisions. Element I -Population and l7emographics (February 27, 2008) Page 6 ~~ 1 I ~~~tYll..,..i V ! ~~µ ~ 73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATING THE POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHIC ELEMENT WHEREAS, the applicant has initiated a Type IV Legislative change to the City's Comprehensive Plan consistent with Section 17.05.500; and WHEREAS, the amendment is consistent with the following Statewide Planning Goals; #2 Land Use Planning; #9 Economic Development; #10 Housing; #11 Public Facilities and Services; #12 Transportation; and #14 Urbanization; and WHEREAS, the amendment is consistent with the Central Paint Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on March ~, 2008, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly- noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments an the application; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Paint Planning Commission by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on findings and conclusions of approval set faith on Exhibit "A", the Staff Report dated March 4, 2008, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 200$. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of 2008. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (0310412008)