Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - September 2, 2008,f=NTItAL i't~INT ~c~tc~t~hc~ ?9 Z00~ - 7000 ~~,~at, ;h'~c~t Pl~annin~ Co~~~naissit~~~ Rcso[i~tiora I~lo. "TS? i, ;~1~;1:'~`IIl~~ ('.i1~1~,1~-:l) T~ ~)lZl)1a~1~ II. R®~::~ CAL la C~iinni: hl~acrv~:emba, I)aa~~ia.n Idar~, Chuck. 1?ilanti, Yat 13ec1:. ,1like ~)lir car, and ,Tustin T lrtrle~~~ IIT. Ct~T~I~T~;~l'~'.~aTl)l~:i~~'I~:. '~. h~I~hd~.T~T~;~ - Rcviel~ and approval of 1~ca~,ust S, 2(10; T'lannin~ Conin~issitm ~~lirautcs anc~ tilinutcs caf ~t~rtly `session datc;d ;1~~gust ~~). ''008 V. l~~!13I.IC .~~1'Ie~i;;~ld.-~i'~Cli. VI. 11 C1~s1'~li~S ~'~s, 1 -3'7 A. 1~ilc Igo, 0~1~2a _1 public lrearira>? ua consider a Rexaltaiion recornrnca~dia~a~ appror~rl ol~a a•ight-of=ti~ay ~ acalion of a portion of ~~sh `~trcet located bctr~;cc~a i i•ccinan Ruad and Sotztt~ 7{~` `~trcct. /~hhlic~iflt~. ~'1~> of t,cr~Q~~aaN ~~oint Pis. 3~ - 65 g,« 1~'ilc ~o0 09603 .~~ public hearirl~ t~ consider a ~I cntati~~e flan t~pplication for the p~u•posc of crcatin`~ a 20 lot Industrial Business 1'aa•k sttbdivisic~n kr,caun as ~I~ah(c ,Ruck Business Park. The I x,03 aca•e project site is irl art ~-1-1, Industrial zor~in~,~ district and is identified on tlae .Iackson t'ount~~ ~~ssessors map as .j?S 2~V 128, Z~a~ Lots 800. 9U0 and 9U2. 'l~he proposed proicct area is located south t~f Ilarnrlck Road and ti~~est of ~I~ablc Rocl: Road. Ah~licant: Tai~le Dock. ~tr~inr~ss 1'ar•1c, ~,L.C; ~.~cnt. C~alpi~~ ~ Associates. ~'~~.'~~' C. l~,ilc '~o0 0900~< Consideration t~Cd mural application.. A~plican~. Hc-v-rard ~Iur~t U. File ~u. 81 G0(03~. ,-'~ public hearing to consider a Resolratioa~ recommending Pgs.67-69 appro~,~al of, an anzeaulrraent to the Central I'oia~ Coa~~prehea~sive Pl<<n updating the "I-ranspoa-tatioii ~k°stcm Tian t~llich is aa~ ~~lenrcn ol~ tiac ('its ~~i' Cerltr<iI l'caini's Coraxhrehensiti~c flan. f~~plic~x~t: ~;it~- 41' Cer~trE'~l Ji~oint Pgs. 70 - 77 E. File No. 09004. Consideration of a Resolution to Initiate an A~ne~ldineni to Section 17.48.040 to allow Membership Warehouse Retail as a Conditional Use within the M-1 Industrial district. Applicant: City of Central Paint VII. DISCUSSION VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS IX. MISCELLANEOUS X. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2008 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Mike Oliver, Pat Beck, Chuck Piland and Justin Hurley were present. Commissioner Damian ldiart was absent. Also in attendance were: Torn Humphrey, Community Development Director; Don Burt, Planning Manager; Connie Clune, Community Planner; Dave Jacob, Community Planner; Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. III. CORRESPONDENCE -None IV. MINUTES Justin Hurley made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 1, 2008 Planning Commission meeting. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Hurley, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. File No. 08183. A public hearing to consider a Site Plan application for the purpose of constructing a 59,135 square foot building for a package distribution and delivery center for Federal Express Ground. The project site is in the M-1 Industrial zoning district, Lot 9 of tentatively approved Federal Way Business Park, and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 12B, part of Tax Lot 200. Applicant: Bob Gude, dba Jones Medford, LLC; Agent: Neathamer Surveying, Inc. There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Justin Hurley, Mike Oliver and Connie Moczygemba said that they had made site visits. Community Planner Connie Clune presented the staff report for this site plan application. By way of introduction, Ms. Clune pointed out that the proposed name for the Airway Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2008 Page 2 Business Park Subdivision has changed to Federal Way Business Park and site plan approval will be conditioned upon the filing of a recorded final plat with the City. The applicant understands and agrees to this condition. At the present time, road improvements to Hamrick Road and construction of Federal Way are in process. Ms. Chine stated that a traffic izxzpact analysis was not being required for this project and Tom Humphrey interjected that when consultants prepared a traffic impact analysis for Central Point as part of the comprehensive plan, industrial, commercial and residential uses were included. Provided there has not been a departure from traditional land uses, the impacts on full build-out have already been evaluated in the Transportation System Plan. Mike Oliver expressed concerns about the impact of truck traff c on the intersection of E. Pine Street and Hamrick Raad. Mr. Humphrey explained that a 20-year analysis on all of that land, as well as the impact on the intersections, has already been performed. Don Burt, Planning Manager, mentioned that over the next ten {10) years, we shouldn't have any trouble with Hamrick Road. Trip calculations have already been performed based on full build-out and this should not be an issue. The public hearing was then opened. Bob Neathamer, agent for the applicant, came forward and stated that the application meets all of the criteria in code. Mike Oliver questioned whether triple trailers would be used by Federal Express. Mr. Neathamer said that streets are being improved and should be able to handle the truck traffzc. Bob Gude of Jones Development, applicant in this proceeding, came forward and stated that whatever was legally allowed in Oregon on the lnterstate should be able to drive to the proposed facility and then out again. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Justin Hurley made a motion to approve Resolution No. 751., a resolution gran#ing site plan approval for the construction of a 59,135 square foot building for a package distribution and delivery center for Federal Express Ground to be located on Lot 9 of tentatively approved Federal Way Business Park in the M-1, Industrial zoning district (Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W 12B, part of Tax Lot 200) based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Chuck Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. B. File No. 0$185. A public hearing #o consider a Conditional Use Permit application for the purpose of occupying and operating aYoga/Tai Chi center to be located within the Mountain View Plaza shopping center. The subject property is located in the C-4, Tourist & Office Professional zoning Planning Cornrnissiorr Minutes ,4ugust 5, 2008 Page 3 district, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 42D, Tax Lot 1202. The address is 1205 Plaza Boulevard, Suite F, and is located east of Freeman Road, and south of East Pine Street. Applicant: Adam Holtey There were no conflicts or ex pane communications io disclose. Mike Oliver said that he had made a site visit. Planning Technician Lisa Morgan presented a staff report for this conditional use permit application proceeding, indicating that the proposed use would be compatible within the Mountain View Plaza, and applicant has met all requirements. In addition, proposed signage will be similar to other businesses within the Plaza. The public hearing was opened. Applicant and business owner Adam Holtey came forward and expressed his appreciation for all of the assistance he has received from staff. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Chuck Piland made a motion to approve Resolution No. 752, a resolution granting a conditional use permit for the purpose of occupying and operating a Yoga/Tai Chi center within the Mountain View Plaza shopping center which is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district (Jackson County Assessor's Map 37S 2W 42D, Tax Lot 1242) based an the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. C. File No, 471.19. A public meeting to consider an Extension request for White Hawk Estates, a Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Duncan Development, Inc. There were no conflicts or ex pane communications to disclose. Community Planner Connie Clune presented the staff report, stating that the request for an extension had been received in a timely manner. Applicant is requesting this extension based upon prevailing real estate market conditions. Justin Hurley questioned how many times an applicant could expect to have an extension granted for an application. Planning Manager Don Burt explained that staff verifies that there have been no changes made to the City's municipal code that would adversely affect the granting of an extension prior to bringing the matter to the Planning Commission. Planning ConTmission Minutes August 5, 2008 Page 4 Mike Duncan came forward az~d informed Commissioners that he was not happy about requesting repeated extensions. Mr. Duncan said further that his company has expended a lot of creativity on this project and they are hoping to start construction within the next 12 months. Mr. Duncan added that he understood the Planning Commission's concerns about granting numerous extensions, however, he also pointed out that it was very cost3y io sit on a piece of property and not develop it. Don Burt suggested that perhaps the Planning Commission might want to discuss extensions further at a study session. Mike Oliver made a motion to grant approval of a six {6} month extension of time to White Hawk Estates, a Planned Unit Development, until January 1, 2009, within which to file a final development plan. Chuck Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. D. File No. 8160(02). A public hearing to consider a Resolution recommending approval of an amendment to the Central Point Comprehensive Plan updating the Buildable Lands Inventory section of the Land Use Element. Applicant: City of Central Point Planning Manager Don Burt presented an update of the Buildable Land Inventory which will become a part of the Land Use Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Burt stressed that this document is only an inventory whose purpose it is to provide a record of the availability of lands far residential, commercial, and industrial development. State law requires that cities maintain an inventory of buildable lands sufficient to provide a twenty (20) year supply to accommodate projected growth needs. The buildable lands inventory maintains an accounting of buildable lands by land use classification and zoning. Justin Hurley made a motion to approve Resolution No, 753, a resolution recommending approval of an amendment to the Central Point Comprehensive Plan updating the Buildable Land Inventory section of the Land Use Element. Mike Oliver seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. E. File No. 8160(03). Consideration of a Resolution Declaring the Planning Commission's Intention of Amending the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan to Update the Transportation System Plan. Applicant: City of Central Point Planning Manager Dan Burt presented Commissioners with a staff repoz•t concerning the amendment of the Transportation System Plan (TSP} element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Burt suggested that two study sessions be scheduled to review the TSP and then schedule a public hearing prior to forwarding a Planning Commission Minutes ~4ugust 5, 200& Page 5 recommendation to City Council. There are two tiers of projects that constitute the essence of the TSP. Tt will be important to achieve a balance where improvements are concerned and every five {5} years, the list of improvements will need to be maintained and adjusted. Mr. Burt stated that it is importa~it that Commissioners be comfortable with having and maintaining the transportation facilities that will serve current and future needs. Commissioners agreed to schedule a study session on Tuesday, August 19, 200$, at 5:30 p.m. Chuck Piland made a motion to approve Resolution No. 754, a resolution declaring the Planning Commission's intention to amend the Central Point Transportation System Plan section of the Comprehensive Plan. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. F. File No. 09004. Consideration of a Resolution to Initiate an Amendment #o Section 17.48.040 to allow Membership Warehouse retail as a Conditional Use within the M-1 Industrial zoning district. Applicant: City of Central Point Don Burt, Planning Manager, reviewed a staff report for consideration of a resolution to initiate an amendment to Section 17.48.040 to allow membership warehouse retail as a conditional use within the M-1, Industrial zoning district. If there is sufficient interest on the part of the Planning Commission, staff will pursue this matter and will create findings for review. Mr. Burt advised Commissioners that the Citizens Advisory Committee was agreeable to allowing membership warehouses as a conditional use in the M-1, Industrial zoning district with emphasis on traffic impacts. Tom Humphrey added that there is interest in making Table Rock Road five (5} lanes. Mike Oliver was concerned about the traffic impact on the City of Central Point. Mr. Burt stated that as a conditional use, there can be certain requirements imposed upon the applicant. Pat Beck made a motion to continue discussion of this item to a study session scheduled for August 19, 2008 at 5:30 p.m. at which time staff will bring back a definition of "membership warehouses" and present examples of where this type of development has occurred. Chuck Piland seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; and Hurley, yes. Motion passed. Planning Commission Minutes tlugust S, 2008 Page 6 VII. DISCUSSION Road Vacation - Asli Street Tom Humphrey advised that the vacation of a portion of Ash Street had been sent back to the Planning Commission by City Council to determine whether or not it should be approved. Commissioners agreed to schedule the matter for a public hearing to bear issues and answer questions. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS Tom Humphrey complimented his staff far doing a great job during his absence, announced that Planning Technician Lisa Morgan had accepted the position of City Recorder with the City of Prineville, Oregon, and informed further that the City was advertising for the Planning Gammission position left vacant by Candy Fish. Mr. Humphrey added that if we can work out the details, we should have a mural application for review in September. Regional Problem Solving Tom Humphrey advised there is now a proposed schedule for prospective completion of the process. LCDC review will take place in October of this year with joint meetings of the City Council and Planning Commission to follow to review a Participants' Agreement. In order for LCDC to have the flexibility to deal with us under Regional Problem Solving, we will all need to sign the agreement, and Mr. Humphrey said he will be taking the agreement to City Council far a resolution of support. Railroad Crossing Mr. Humphrey stated that he has a meeting scheduled with Bab Dunn later this month to discuss the closing of a railroad crossing. IX. ADJOURNMENT Pat Beck made a m©tion to adj©urn the meeting. Justin Hurley seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the August 5, 200$ Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on September 2, 2008. Planning Commission Chair City of Central Paint Planning Carnmissian Minutes Study Session August 19, 200$ I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 5:~5 P.M. II. ATTENDEES: Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Mike Oliver, Pat Beck, Damian ldiart, Chuck Piland and Justin Hurley were present. Also present were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director; Don Burt, Planning Manager; Connie Clune, Community Planner; Dave Jacob, Community Planner; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary III. DISCUSSION A. Membership Warehouses in M-I, Industrial Zoning District Tom Humphrey advised commissioners that there had been an inquiry from a party interested in allowing membership warehouses in the M-1 zoning district. Mr. Humphrey shared a memo written by Planning Manger, Don Burt, which provided several definitions of what a discount store/membership warehouse might be. Mr. Humphrey then presented possible concerns for consideration and discussion with commissioners to include: ~ provisions allowing discount clubs that might already exist in the City's municipal code; • typical size and acreage requirements; • the existence of buildable land in the C-5 commercial zone to accommodate the use; discount clubs in other cities; s the impact on traffic; whether or not a discount club is consistent with the intent of the M-1 district; • what purpose would a code amendment allowing discount clubs as a conditional use serve. Planning Comnai.ssion Minutes August 19, 2(?O8 Page 2 Don Burt said that if commissioners are ag~•eeable, staff would bring the matter back at the next regularly scheduled meeting for consideration of a recommendation to Council for a modification to code that would aIlaw membership warehouses as a conditional use in the M-l zoning district. Mr. Humphrey added that the increase in traffic would provide the biggest impact. Currently, Central Point is working with Medford and Jackson County to make improvements to Table Rock Road to accommodate tl~e increase in traffic due to growth of commercial activity in the area. B. Transportation System Plan Community Planner Dave Jacob and Planning Manager Don Burt reviewed several chapters of the draft Transportation System Plan {TSP) with commissioners. Chapters not discussed will be reviewed at another study session scheduled for September 2, 2008 at 5:30 p.m., prior to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. Cliapter l - Introduction The City's TSP is a requirement of the State of Oregon's Transportation Planning Rule. It coordinates land use planning and transportation planning and forecasts where growth is going to occur. The TSP is also a funding tool far capital improvements. Base documents utilized in preparation of the TSP include the Regional Transportation Plan (prepared by the Rogue Valley Council of Governments} and the City's Vision 2020 Strategic Plan. Clxat~ter 2 -Plan Compliance The purpose of this chapter is to verify coordination, and where appropriate, compliance with applicable transportation plans and programs and to address the consistency of this TSP with affected state, federal and local transportation plans and programs. Chapter 4 -Existing Transportation Conditions This is where we are now. Chapter 4 presents an inventory of existing conditions for streets, pedestrian systems, bicycle systems, transit systems and rail and fxeight provisions. Road classifications, jurisdictional responsibility, traffic safety, level of service, potential traffic calming designs for Highway 99, and the critical function of railroad crossings were reviewed in this chapter. Clio ter 5 -- Trans ortation S scent Elements Transportation Management utilizes best practices to achieve the most efficiency out of existing systems while maintaining the character and livability of neighborhoods, business districts and the general environment as a whole. Components include transportation system management which aims to make use of existing infrastructure and reduce costly roadway capacity expansions; access Planning Corrrrraission Minuses August 19, 2008 Page 3 management which limits access to land developments, preserving traffic flow an the road systems in terms of safety, capacity and speed; and transportation demand management which focuses on alternative means of mobility. Chanter 6 - Parkin: Management Parking strategies to reduce dependence an the automobile and encourage use of alternative modes of transportation are identified in this chapter. Chanter 7 -Street Svstem. 2008-.2030 There are sixty (60} miles afraad and thirty-five {35) intersections located within Central Point. The City has completed four major traffic studies and has prepared forecasts of future demands on arterials and collectors for the years 2010, 2020, and 203x. Staff reviewed deficiencies and priorities for these years along with recommended street improvements through the year 2030. The order of projects is random and will be driven by receipt of funds and/or development. The City has the flexibility to determine priorities of improvements. Granter 12 - Transnortatinn Svstem Financing Program_ This chapter presents the City's financing program for its transportation system and project prioritization criteria, Improvement projects are divided into two tiers, the first of which {Tier 1 } is reasonably funded with Tier 2 projects identified but for which funding is unavailable. Funding sources have been listed in the chapter and it is recommended that project costs be re-evaluated annually and modif ed as necessary. IV. ADJOURNMENT at 8:15 p.m. ASH STR~~T RAC HT~OF~~YAY YACATIOItii (;;it_y rz ~_:c~rt:r <t9 I't~i~zt, t_:~~ ',<.':r, 1,~ '~o ~Iiirtl `,t,{~i-r3lr~3i Pt?in ~-)r ~?iSU~ L^J!'V ~ <I.CC!111 '.~ ~}(i;!'t ,(V f. 1.35 f f l ~ ~ ,`~ti T: ~~.,~ ~~ .J I /'~ ~` ~~ 1~1~.w~'~121 ~~`I~~rt~~~~it~~ L~c..p~<~~i~r~~~~e3i~. rr~~ ~O'~t liun~~3ln~ y ~1I(_I? t,,..~M~IIIIIUl1 ~~~ ~ 1(.~~('~i)~)I11 t't 11 (~li"(rOf~ i1•>si5lant C~i;y f~rln;in ti',ratr.r ~'I"]C.i~r~e As}~ `~ireetVacation - Fllc ;pro. 0~ 1 ~~"_ (~r>nsidct~aiir~n vl~a T~esolution Rccoinrzzc~ndins~. ,'lphruval of a IZi~~ht-of=~%ati~ Vacation of~l'or-tiuns o1~.1sh ~trcct. " ~~1~~~lii~~fite ~:it~~ ~~~' ~~,~,~at~°~1 l~oant `~T,~T'h ~®[JiZC:6~:o- ~l)a~•.ad ~ia~tzl>, ('o»>nrrrniiv ~'I~ir~rze~r ~~.=~(.'t~~I~C)~i`1[)< On June ~. ~'{.)(~1~. I3rvan and Lisa I lcrr~zz~frzzi EII~rg~~°l~t l~~zr~er. r1`7~rztl stzhnzitted an aphlicatiorz to the city rcquestin~ a partial fZi~7lat-cz1=l~~ai~ (IZ(.)~') Vacation tihc "~-vacation") of'a section cif ,ash Street. "I he ~'~lcatic>n al~lects that section of -'1sh Street f'ronz 1'rectzzan Road to `~ouih `~, `~ireet. On the C'ite's Street {.'lassitication l~1ai~ .ash Str~:ct is a cl~si~~natcd r~si~iential titrect with arz aistin~t Rt)~~ c~i~;~U lit. i h~ ('itti "~ ~~isting rnirrirntrn~ stantiar~d lzr ~r residential strcel is ~{i 1t. 1'hc area ti> he ~ acated ~~ c>irlcl be I ? 1't. ern both siiics of the street w3lich would result in a i2U~'~~ ~,~~icith of 5G i~t. 1~rorn T'rccznau Road to So~rth ?`~' `~tr~cct. OR5 provides t~~~o methods for vaeatin~; public- ri;~~ht-of-wav. l~lzese t~~~o rnetho~ls are described in DRS 271.080 irnd C)RS 211,130, each of ~~,iziclz is h~er;eralla described a~ follo~~'s: 1, ~~~~ 271,U~tl pr~ot ides f~rr ~ RtJ~~' varttion tlzrou`~h a I~ci;itio~z I~roccss. 12cquiremcnis I~~r approval ofthe vacation petition include the consent of the oti~~ncrs oi~~1i1_ahuttirz« -- p~~~rti~s and of not less than two-thirds in the area of the real property allccted thcr~eb~~. l~otiiicatizrz and a 17ub1ic he•arin`,~ are req~aircd in accordance with C)12S 27 l.] I{) lrt revicwin~ the F}er-rz~~rnn's vacation applicatior7. Planning I~epartn~ent Stai~i~ f~zrmd that the applicant had noC met the muzinzurn consent re~luirement ftn~ abtzttin~, and af(ivcteci pxoperty o~~-Hers. Since; the ~%acation application did not meet the basic requirements oi' ORS 271.010(2}, the Plannin<~ Department Seat a letter to the applicants suy„`~cstin~ that the application be with dra~~n based on noncompliance ti~ith the; Ic~~al regt.rirements of C)RS 27l .O](i(2?. Subsequent to the sta-l~ lr.ttt,r, the applicants' representative provided an additional consent #-orm but the. applicant still did not meet the abuttin~,~ property consent rcquirerrzcnt, and v,-as thcrc9-ore unable to compl}~ ~~;~ith the vacation criteria ref ORS 27] .(J8(?. 2. ~IZ~S 271,130 prr~rvides for arz alternative method of a RO~~' ~~acation ~~,~lzich is initiated' by a city {~ovi:rnin~, bode. Proecdur~ally, the. City can initiate a vacation. settin~~ ~z date fir public hearing rind decision. Unlike ORS 271.O8O. only the approval oi~the <zbl.lttin~.~ ~,z~op~r"t~~ ot~-ners is required to initiate, hr_rt onlti il'the cite can find that the ~~actltiozz a-i11 not substantially af~icct the rnarkei value of the property. Once the. City has initiated the vacation. the notification requirerz~ents of ()P.S 2'71.110 apply. Y Ash Street Right-of-~,~;'av Vacation - I'lannin~,~ 17eparttncnf Staff Report Pa;e 1 At the July 10, 2008 Central Point City Council meeting (Public Appearances), the applicants' representative requested that the City initiate the Vacation per ORS 271.130. Mr. Gene Skelton, a resident of Ash Street, was at the meeting and spoke in apposition to initiating the vacation. After hearing both parties, the City Council requested that staff prepare a report far consideration at the July 24, 200$ City Council meeting. The report would be acco~npa~~ied by a resolution to initiate the vacation process. At the July 24, 200$ City Council meeting, the City Council reviewed a staff report and received testimony concerning the Ash Street vacation. After consideration, the City Council approved Resolution #11$6 initiating proceedings to vacate. The Council requested that the Planning Commission review the Vacation and provide a recommendation to tl~e Council prior to the Public Hearing. The Resolution was amended to reflect this request. A Public Hearing before the City Council was set far September 25, 2008. ISSUES: In consideration of this item there are twp basic issues to be considered. The first is related to required findings for a city initiated vacation, and the other relates to the impact of the vacation on the non-conforming status of the abutting properties. X. In accordance with ORS 271.134, the City must make a determination whether or not the vacation will result in a substantial affect on property values. If it is determined that the vacation will have a substantial affect on property market value, then all of the abutting property owners must consent to the vacation. If it is determined that the vacation will not substantially affect the market value of property, then consents from abutting property owners are not required. In Attachment "B", findings have been prepared supporting a determination of no substantial affect on property market values. It should be noted that a majority of the abutting properties have consented to the Vacation (11 of 15 properties}. 2. Although not a product of the proposed vacation the issue of non-conformity and the relationship of existing non-conformities and the vacation need to be noted. Under current conditions most of the residential units along the proposed vacation are non- conforming relative to the front yard setback. Central Point Municipal Code defines "legal nonconforming uses and structures" as those which do not conform to provisions or requirements of the zoning ordinance or of the zoning districts in which they are located, but were lawfully established prior to the effective date of the codified ordinance (CPMC 17.56.020). In the R-1-6 zoning district, the minimum front yard setback is 20 feet (CPMC 17.20.050}. With the existing $0 ft. right-of--way, eleven (11 } of the fifteen (15} structures abutting the proposed vacation are legally nonconforming for the required front yard setback (See Attachment "C" -Ash Street Vacation - SO Ft. Right-o1=Way}. Additionally, the minimum lot size in the R-1-6 zoning district is 5,000 sq. ft. Tax lot 802 is 4,650 sq. ft. which is legally nonconforming for the required minimum lot size. In Attachment "B", findings have been prepared supporting a determination that aright-of way vacation from SO ft. to 56 ft. will allow all residential properties to meet front yard setback (See Attachment "D" -Ash Street Vacation - 56 ft. Right-of--Way} and minimum lot size requirements, thus effectively eliminating the properties nonconforming status. Ash Street Right-of--Way Vacation ~ Planning Department Staff Report Page 2 The nonconforming condition of the properties is essentially an encumbrance on the property requiring that it comply with the Section 17.5b. 060. Essentially, the structures are allowed to expand/modify provided that any expansion/modification does not aggravate the nonconforming condition, and if a nonconforming structure is destroyed, it may not be reconstructed unless it meets required setbacks, etc. It should be noted that, aside from the vacation, there are other means for eliminating the nonconforming status of these properties including individual variance requests, and classification {with conditions) as a Class "A" nonco~~forming use per Section 17.SG. Approval of the resolution does not constitute approval of the Vacation. It only declares the Planning Commission's support of the vacation. The final determination on the Vacation will be made by the Central Point City Council after conducting a duly noticed public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution No. Recommending Approval of aRight-of--Way Vacation of Portions of Ash Street B. Planning Department Findings C. Ash Street Vacation - 80 ft. Right-af--Way D. Ash Street Vacation - S6 ft. Right-of=Way E. Vacation Application _ Written Consent of Owner Signed Forms F. Public Works Staff Report G. Farber Surveying Findings H. Rogue Valley Sewer Services Letter 1. Jackson County Fire District No. 3 Letter ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. Recommending Approval of a Right-of Way Vacation of Portions of Ash Street. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. ,for the partial Right-of--Way Vacation of Ash Street. Ash Street Right-of--Way Vacation -Planning Department Staff Report Page 3 n~ e,~ ATTACHMENT "A" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION OF PORTIONS OF ASH STREET WHEREAS, the Central Point City Council is authorized under ORS 271.130 to initiate vacation proceedings for any public street and make such vacation without a petition or consent of property owners; and WHEREAS, on July 24, 2008 the Central Point City Council by Resolution No. 1186 set September 25, 2008 as the date to consider the partial vacation of Ash Street; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 118E the City Council further directed that the proposed vacation be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their consideration and recommendation; and WHEREAS, on September 2, 2008, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly- noticed public hearing at which tune it reviewed the Staff Report anal heard testimony and comments on Ash Street Right-of--Way Vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, after considering all testimony, does hereby forward a favorable recommendation to the Central Point City Council io approve the partial right-of way vacation of Ash Street as described in the Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated September 2, 2008 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 2008 Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2008. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (0910212008) ATTACHMENT "S" Planning Department Findings Applicant: City ©f Central Point Purpose: Ash Street Right of Way Vacation File No. 08182 INTRODUCTION In the matter of providing the Central Point City Council with a recommendation to approve a right-af way {ROW} vacation of a portion of Ash Street. The right-of-way vacation in located in an R-1-6, Residential, Single Family zoning district, and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11BA, Tax Lats 703, 725, 735, 765, 300, 806, 802, 812, 813, 814, 300, 1000, anal 1100. All tax lots are Iocated on Ash Street and abut the proposed ROW vacation, Consideration of a vacation is subject to the criteria set forth in Oregon Revised Statute 271.130{1) as follows: 1. ORS 271.130(1). No street area will be vacated without the conse~~t of the owners of the abutting property if the vacation will substantially affect the market value of such property, unless the city governing body provides for paying damages. Finding: When determining whether or not abutting property owner consents are required, it is necessary to first determine whether or not the proposed vacation will have a substantial affect on the market value of abutting properties. A determination of substantial affect of market value is based an the following: - Use: Does the vacation adversely affect the type of use on the property? All properties are currently used for single-family detached residential purposes. The proposed vacation will not cause, ar otherwise affect, the use of the property as permitted by the City of Central Point's zoning ordinance. - Access: Does the vacation adversely affect the abutting property owner's ability to access their property? All affected properties will retain legal frontage and access to Ash Street. The vacated portion along each abutting property will be deeded to that property (ORS 271.140). - Utilities: Does the vacation adversely affect the abutting property owner's ability to extend and maintain utility services? Utility service and access will not be disrupted as a result of the proposed vacation. A ten (10) foot utility easement will be retained as part of the vacated area. - Property Area and Dimensions: Will the vacation result in a reduction of the abutting properties minimum required area and dimension requirements? The proposed vacation will not reduce, or otherwise adversely affect the area and dimension of the abutting properties. ~.:. Ash Street Right of Way Initiation of Vacation -Findings The vacation will not affect access to the property or the use of the abutting property as permitted by the City of Central Point Municipal Cade. In all cases property values of all abutting properties will increase in value as a result of the vacation from a minimum of $S,S24 to a maximum of $18,936. This increase in value is the result of the added square footage to each property. The Jackson County Assessor's Office has stated that there will be little to no impact on property taxes. Conclusion: Based an the above f ndings that the proposed vacation will not substantially affect the market values of the abutting property, it is determined that the proposed vacation is in compliance with ORS Section 271.130(1}, and that consent from all abutting property owners is not necessary. 2. ORS 271.130{1}. No street area will be vacated if the owners of a majority of the area affected, computed on the basis provided in ORS 271.080, abject in writing. Finding: The property proposed to be vacated represents 675 ft. of Ash Street from Freeman Road to South 7`h Street. There are fifteen {15) properties abutting the proposed ROW vacation. Of these fifteen properties, owners of eleven (11 } of the properties have signed consent forms supporting the vacation application (see Attachment " E"). Conclusion: Based on the finding, a majority of the abutting property owners have signed consent forms supporting the ROW vacation application. Notice will be sent to abutting and affected property owners as per ORS 271.110 prior to public hearings before the Central Point City Council. It is determined that the proposed vacation is in compliance with Section 271.130(1). 3. CPMC 17.56.020. "Legal nonconforming uses and structures" are those which do not conform to provisions or requirements of the zoning ordinance or of the zoning districts in which they are located, but were lawfully established prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title. Findings: Of the f fteen (15) residential structures abutting the proposed street vacation, eleven {11}are legally nonconforming for the twenty foot front yard setback, and one residential structure is legally nonconforming far the required minimum lot area (interior) of 5000 sq. ft. required in the R-1-6 Zoning District (CPMC 17.20.050}. A twelve (12) ft. right-of--way vacation on both sides of Ash Street would provide the 20 ft. setback required for all eleven { 11 }properties to meet the setback requirements. The additional square footage provided would also allow the single tax lot to meet minimum lot area requirements. It is hereby determined that properties which are legally nonconforming for front yard setback and minimum lot size would conform to current R-1-6 requirements .-~ Ash Street Right of Way Initiation of Vacation -Findings as a result of the right-of--way vacation from the existing 80 ft. right-of--way to SG ft. right-of--way. Conclusion: Relative to the nonconforming status of the abutting properties the proposed vacation would result in the removal of their nonconforming status. 4. City of Central Point Transportation System Plan. Findings: Based on the City's current Transportation System Plan (TSP} Ash Street is designated as a Residential Street. The City's pending TSP retains the Residential Street designation for Ash Street. Conclusion: The proposed vacation does not alter, or otherwise affect, the street classification of Ash Street and is therefore consistent with the City's TSP. 5. City of Central Point Public Works Standards. Findings: As a designated Residential Street the City's Public Works Standards require a minimum right-of way width of fifty-six (56} feet, with a four (4} foot parkway adjacent to the curb and a fve (S} foot sidewalk. The proposed vacation will retain a minimum 56 ft. right-of--way width. Ash Streets curb-to-curb section is consistent with the City's standard for a Residential Street. However, sidewalks in the general area have been constructed adjacent to the curb. It is proposed that in the future any sidewalks along the vacation be constructed adjacent to the curb consistent with the remainder of the neighborhood sidewalks. Conclusion: The proposed vacation results in aright-of--way width consistent with the City's Public Works Standard for Residential Streets. ~,;~ Ash Street Right of Way Initiation of Vacation - pindings g ~; ~:. ~~ Righk ~~ VUay 11Vidth so i'~~1~11'~lI"lll;1~~ __ 1.1i ~'~tt~ect ~~ic~~tir~-~ .. w0 l~Y. ~2i~,„ht „9~~'~'~~~ ~p~~lia~~at: E~~~ti~an aui~! t,is;~ I~crrniann ~i ~~ ~,~ ", c e aJ~ sir ~ ~ ~y ~' ~.. f ~~ ° t ~ ~ ~` ~, ,.~ t„ "'~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ t ,fir ~,N~ 1 1 ,~..~i~l ~(f~:.'i ,.~~ a.,m wewn[ 'i' ly ~ r~.o ~` Hai °2uon~~ ~v~i trg. ~ ~ ~ ~` ~~ ~ ~,~ ~~° ~q~. ,...~ " ~ y < ~„ ,,~. 4~ 4 `~ ~, y ~ ` ~M,a '~~ a% ~~~, - Oyu ~ LAG ~~~ ,~~1] S1t'uCt ~~, a <. f o:2 r ~t ~r ~w .~~ r' S~lia' ~ q ~1.. ~. ,u ~, r - sw ~ S~'.~.~Y' ~ dr , ~ r nev; ~ ~ . ~ ~"' 19 ~ ~; .~,, ~, a r a a ~ n ~~ ~ ~' ~~ .u ~ >, ~,,. ~ a i 1 ~~ , ~ ~ ~...~v~+' sus s ~ ~t ,. ,. d ~ 'i.E ~ . ~;a ~ r P`6' uii ~, ,• ~~ ~,., ~~~~ w ~a~aaxm~+w.. u~,~ .,.~ »'r ~' a /n ~s ~,.,~x tFS ~1 m i .x ~. ~.~ _,u ,.n i~r~~.~ t. _ t ' . •e. ~~~i I_Cgend Ri~h4 of Way Width ;: ; , ~ett;ack :'~si~ ~ia~t~c~ 1'ac<~tioi~ ~ ~(a }'t. Ri~;hY of" 11"a~~ .Applicant: 13rti~an and (,isa kle-~r~nann ATTACHMENT "E" Vacation Application Written Consent of Owners Signed Forms ~... VACATION APPLICATION WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER File Number Q ~{ ~ 8 ~ I, Sharon K Morgan ,the property owner of Tax Lot on Jackson County Assessor's Map '~72W~ i RA 1100 ,hereby consent to the filing of an application for Right-Of Way Vacation on said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. ~~~~ ~ Signcd: Dated: ~ l~ ~l a ~ VACATION APPLICATION WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER File Number Q_8 j~~ I, i ~j ~~'3' StcLC~5..5a2 "f'~Q.u57~,~ the ~~ of Tax Lot 701 hereby consent to the on 3ackson County Assessor's Map 372W11 RA filing of an application for Right-Of--Way Vacation on said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent one before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. Signed: ..~C'~~~ Dated: ~'~ ~ ` ~ ,~ _ ,s VACATION APPLICATION WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER File Number ~ g (~ Z I, Evelyn R. Hull ,the property owner of Tax Lot 1 Oa0 on 7ackson County Assessor's Map 372W1 1 RA ,hereby consent to the filing of an application for Right-Of--Way Vacation on said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. Signed: ~ ~`~ - ~ V`''`~'~ Dated: ~ 3 ~' ° ~ ~ VACATION APPLICATION WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER File Number d ~ ~ ~ Z. ~~ Virginia Brown ,the property owner of Tax Lot 300,900 on Jackson County Assessor's Map 372W1 lRA hereby consent to the filing of an application for Right-Of Way Vacation on said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. i , Signed: Dated: .~..,~_._. ~~ { VACATION APPLICATION WRi'I TEN CONSENT OF OWNER File Nurr~ber D g` ~ ~ 2-- I, Bryan Herrmann ,the property owner of Tax Los 600 on Jackson County Assessor's Map ~ ~~~ ~ 1 R A ,hereby consent to the filing of an application for Right-Of-Way Vacation on said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. Signed: ~'~ Dated: ~.~~- ~`- ~ VACATION APPLICATION WItTTI~N CONSENT OF OWNER File Number b ~ (g 2-- 1, Thamas E. Malot on Jackson County Assessor's Map the property owner of Tax Loi 372W1 1RA 802 hereby consent to the filing of an application far Right-O~ Way Vacation an said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. F t .-...-1 ~..... Signed: ~~`~'~1-,,!.~:,~._ ,,{ ,~~~~ ~..3 ~`c=1~' Dated: `~~ ~; VACAT'~ON APPLYCATION WRI IfiEN CONSENT OF OWNER File Number (~ ~ (~ 2.._. 1, Leslie K Pierce the property owner of Tax Lot 702 on Jackson County Assessor's Map 3 72 W i ~ RA ,hereby consent to the filing of an application for Right-Of--Way Vacation on said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. Signed: c !~ ~"`'~'' Dated: y` ~ ~- ~ ~~~ VACATION APPLICATION WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER File Number t7 ~ 1 g Z- I, Lori L Larson on Jackson County Assessor's Map 703 372W1 1 RA ,hereby consent to the filing of an application for Right-Qf~-Way Vacation on said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. Signed: ~ ~-_. Dated: `-''~~n ~ , the property owner of Tax Lot VACATION APPLICATION WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER File Number ~ ~ ~ ~ 2`-' I, Nelda Turman ,the property owner of Tax Loi 200 on Jackson County Assessor's Map ~72W1 tRA ,hereby consent to the filing of an application for Right-Of-Way Vacation on said property, and will allow Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. ~~ Y Signed: Dated: `T' " ~7- a ".% '~A~`~T~4~ A~"PL~G,ATION .~ :. VAN' C~~7'SEI~1T ~I'+ :U'VVNER. ~~~,~~r D ~ ~ 8 ~ can Tacksan County t~ssessi~~'s dap, . ~~"2~t I:RA ,,~reby-cvt~sent`to#he ;,, :~1`ictgofan:a~?pl~cation~gr fight C3#'''W~~aca~ott ~n~s~iil.~rape~lyy~i~',ll` _. ~~~~, ~'azb~rSurvey,~g _ >tareprescrn~meti~fcire~Ciy'ufCci~tral Pasri~:A.~ra±in~ Atitht~ty Sgn~s3 .. '~" ~ __ __. _ ............... _. __ ~ __ _._ _ _ p ~~~~~~ ~~pc~l~r~ ~ s~.~~~~ nr ~'c~t'~ ~ ~~€i~~sgt ~fi~ ZOQf3 1301 f're:r~E~ Uirr {'r~r Mz tt S,a»;rtoir; l~ev :~f~rvn;~s `~;~~itcet tt:_ Vacalrott oft k~ortton of Ar511 `~trcct 1t'tlnl youth ~ 1 Ic::rll~nl Load. >llii~it>!e•r~ P~1' condTrcti;cl ;:tn opt•ti holls~ or1 the potential vacation in April. ?i)C)~, .,t the nice#in~~ ~;c~ ~r~ti it~~rns ~~crc discTisscd incluclir)t~, rrtrrr-cc:>rli~trr'n1irT~~ use. sid~`~aiks. t~r~e~ anti cxtcrli oi•tlr~° ~ac~atie~n recirti°st. 1'~~' tlicd ic) <i~l~]re5s the T1Tajority oi'the issues. '•,-lost of the nci~hborhooci inelutiin`~ the. applie~rnts. their a~~en1 anti nlt~si of'the prc>pertti' t)ti~~rrers ~~cre its attendatl~;e. .ash `~trett r de}fined as a cilti Tcsidcntial street. Residential `~trects call helve a width oi' S? to l~() 1'ect de})enc.}1z1~...,... on their design. l'l~% ~tatldard anti ~pcci}icatic)rls t'etluires a lnillirllunl ~~~ ~',ide street for all rctrofii at~c~is. P1'!r cle}rtes retri)1it areas as established rlci~711i~orhoc>iis shat ]lave c~istin`z paved streets tend inicrnlittcnt side~~~,lks. 'This Si'~tlon t~l~l~S11 ~tr'Lc1 rnL"t't~ I'`v4' cie]lnltlOlls. }'tiU C;otllur's 11'1111111Lr i'1Tin(lln`? l~cpartnlcltl~ aSSlssnii'ilt IOt' a T~tinirllunl fib' ~>s~it}e street. The larger street would allo~~,~ for all ~~~atcr nletcrs to be located ~~,ithin the rid}tt-c>f-wav as ~,vcll as curb side sit]eti~~~aiks. Both sidew'a}ks and tivatermctcrs are I-eytziret] to he within a right-ol~-sway or a dcsi~~naicd cascnlcnt. ~s~t~es. ~~r c+v~ ~~ idth: F'V4' concur's ~~~ith file Plannitt~ llcparintents its>e.ssment fr,r ~ mininlunl 5C' tivii]e sweet. The street would allow 1br all ~watcr rnetcxs to be located ~s~'ithirt the right-oi~-~'~av as ti~e11 as curb side sidewalks. l3atll side~~alks and ~~+ater meters ire required to be 'vvlthitl a riL~ht-of-ti~~a~ car a dei~nattd caserrttttt. V~e~tio~i l~re~: P ccsrtcurw ~~ith the lirxaits ofthe a)aplicant's vacation request. `~c~cral other streets, irtci.uding - - - -_-_ Chcstnui ~trld ()al4 5trcet bettiveerl ?"' arid) reerllan Koad have already had. stz~eet vacations on th~;l~t arld this retluest for avacation oft1s11 Street would nlakc this scctiorl similar. ~4© South 3r" Street central Pouf, 0/~ 97542 .~~ 1. ~6~F..3;~21 Fax 54 ~ . 6~4. ~~84r • FARBER & SONS, INC. • POST OFFICE BOX 5286 • CENTRAL POINT, OR 975D2 • • OFFICE • 431 OAK STREET • CENTRAL POINT • August 25, 2008 Planning Commission City of Central Paint 140 South Third Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Findings for right of way vacation of Ash Street reducing the right of way by 10 feet on each side, between Freeman Road and 7~' Street. Findings of Fact Far the City Council to approve a vacation, they must find that certain requirements and criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the Council with a statement of facts that will lead them to conclude that these requirements and criteria are met. Such a statement is called the Findings of Fact. In order to approve a vacation, the City Council must determine the following: 1. That the vacation complies with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: This request is to vacate 10 feet, each side of the present right of way which is 80 feet wide. This right of way was created by Constant Tract Addition recorded on January 26, 1889, and named Constant Avenue. Subsequent to the Constant plat the name was changed to Ash Street to conform with the name of the street, previously created, with the Plat of Central Point. The street improvements at this time consist of a 36 foot street section from face of curb to face of curb which allows for two 8 foot parking bays and two 10 foot travel lanes. The street presently does not have fully developed sidewalks or planter strips. The public improvements all lie within the proposed right of way with the exception of four water meters {shown on the attached Exhibit "B" and "C"} which would fall on the new right of way line. The proposed vacation will result in a 60 foot wide local residential street conforming to the pending Transportation System Plan (TSP) for local street standards. The Circulation/Transportation Section Eleven of the adopted Comprehensive Plan dated May 1983, does not have any specifications. The proposed right of way will be in conformance with ~ HERBERT A. FARBER PRESIDENT/SURVEYOR • SUSAN M. FARBER BUSINESS MANAGER• PHONE: 541-fi64-5599 • FAx.' 541-664-5fi03 Page 1 of 3 ::~ ~~ the proposed comprehensive plan, TSP and present city code and public works standards. The traffic circulation, as it has existed since l $$9, will not be compromised or diminished in any way therefore conforming to the coxprehensive plan. 2. If initiated by petition under DRS 271.080 per ORS 271,120, the City Council must determine the following: a. For a plat vacation or part therea, f that two thirds of the affected property owners consent in writing. Affected property owners are all owners of property embraced within the plat ar part thereof. For a street or alley vacation: that 100 percent of the abutting property owners and two-thirds of the affected property owners consent in writing. Affected property owners are owners of all land lying on either side of the street or alley proposed to be vacated and extending laterally to the next street that serves as a parallel street but not to exceed 200 feet, and all property within 400 feet of the terminus of the part of the street or alley to be vacated. b. That the required notice has Been given. Finding: This section is not applicable. 3. If initiated by the City Council under ORS 271.130, the City Council must determine the following: Finding: The city initiated the vacation process on July 24, 200$, forwarding it to the Planning Commission for recozxzmendation to the City Council for approval or denial. The criterion is limited to the following: a. That more than 50 percent of the affected property owners do not object in writing; and Finding: At the time of preparing this report we have 20 of the 3 $ affected owners who have in writing demonstrated their support for the right of way vacation. One of the 13 is Nelda Turman who signed a consent form earlier but was not abutting so 1 did not include it with the original application. I include Nelda's consent with this report. Of the original nine consents submitted Virginia Brown has three properties which make the total of 13 signed consent forms. 1 also include with this report seven statements of support froze additional owners of affected property. As of this writing no one has objected to this vacation in writing. The hearing scheduled for September 2, 200$, will allow other affected owners to demonstrate their support or opposition to the vacation in writing. b. That the vacation will not substantially affect the property value of any abutting property, or, if the vacation will substantially affect the market value of any abutting property where the owner objects, the City will provide for paying the damages. Page 2 of 3 Finding: The letter from Dan Ross, Jackson County Assessor demonstrates the effect to the abutting properties as a result of the vacation of the requested 10 foot of right of way on each side of the street. Most properties will not have any increase of property tax as a result of this action. This does not mean that taxes will not go up as we have na control over the actions of government, but again, it will not be as a result of this vacation. This meets the criteria of not substantially affecting the value of any abutting property. Dan's letter is attached as Exhibit «A» Comments: Previous testimony at the July 24, 2008, City Council meeting indicated that the Herrmann's who initiated this action is for the sole benefit of the Hemnann's. The Herrmann's did initiate this action but they have the support of other abutting property owners as demonstrated by the fact that eight additional abutting property owners have signed consents in support of this application. They have this support because in make sense to vacate this extra right of way. The primary reason it makes sense is that few if any of the properties would comply with current set back standards. While they are all grandfathered in as preexisting conditions, if they are substantially damaged by fire, wind or other calamity they would be required to be rebuilt to today's standards including a 20 foot front yard and 15 foot rear yard setbacks as shown in Exhibit "B". The addition of 10 feet of frontage would enable most of these homes to be rebuilt more closely to the present locations. Precise measurements were not made to locate all of the houses. In review of the photo Exhibit "C", also included in this application, it can be clearly seen that many lots would be much closer to conformance with the vacation than without the vacation. Although not a part of the criteria for this application there is a clear and net benefit to all abutting properties involved with this application. It is expected that the City reserve a 10 foot public utility easement along the new right of way in keeping with today's standards for development. Respectfully submitted, Prepared by: Herbert A Farber Farber & Sons Inc Farber Surveying 431 Oak Street Central Paint, Oregon 97502 541-664-5599 Page 3 of 3 3 ~ ! * !r •~, t t ~` ~ ~ ~ , ~~~~:L. <C~a ~C~~: ; ~~~11~~~r~ ~e~~~a~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~.~ ~a~tF~ ~~~~~~~e ~~~ ~~~~ :~r~~~r~~~~'~ir~~ ~~~~iie~ ~e~~Q~~~~ ~~{~~~~~rt ~~~ ~~ m~~'~-~6~1~~ ~~~.-~~~~~~i7~~. July 2, 20CI~ To whom it rr~ay concern, Herb Father has asked rye to discuss and give r~iy opinion on the proposed vacation and consolidation Of part of the right-a-wa}~ on a portion of >~sh St. in Central Point, Central Point was last appraised in 1991. At that time the stardard lot size was .1~d to .30 of an sere. Vt~e use size adjustments for undersized and rural tract value for oversized lots. "here are only two tax lots, 900 and 1000, that had already exceeded the standard lot size and with the addition, the tax consequences are very srY)all. ~SF_E BEI_.UWj. remember this is only an estimated and depending how budgets do this year the outcome could change, but it wouldn't be much.. ta% IoT r0Y 5C~ ': OTC ft acre edd S(r ft neL4' acre exceed t0~23 ~. SCI ahDV~. acre previous '-~_~~~ atio Nty PR V ; T,~)r R.kTF esr 1°AX tl@W C~S4 7C3 7016 I 0.16 1015 O.G2 O.1S I 0.00 702 6300 0.14 911 0.02 0.17 0.00 701 6310 0 14 913 0.02 1 0.17 0 00 60.7 9747 022 705 u.02 0.24 0.00 500 ~ 10228 Q.23 74C 0.02 0.25- 0.00 300 ~ 10071 023 1998 0 OS 0.28 ~ 0.00 ~ r -- -- . _ t - - -- -~------_ ~ 806 5496 ' (1.13 403 0.01 __. 0.14 ! O.OC1 802 4 4650 0.12 609 0.01 ___. 0.12 O.Ot7 i-- __ __ - 804 5025 0.12 662 ....__....-_ 0.02 -- 0.13 ', 0.00 ', S12 ! 7575 0.17 :r003 G~.02 0.20 0.00 ._., ~ ......._._.~,_.._ ._.... ,._ 813 ~ SC39 -- 0.12 __ __ 545 __ 0.01 t 0.13 0.00 --- _ ~ ~ ..._._........~ ~._ r 814 5039 ~ r 53.x. ADO 1361 ' ,- v.12' 3r~ 0 31 545 0 IG~ ~> 0.01 .02 C.J.' J.13 0 00 i_.-__.. ~ ~~ C 3~ 0 0 0 3, ~ ~ ~ ~ 57(. OO~.Ot _ )0.0[~ .. 4~ ~~, ~ ~ i II 1=~ I ,1,2 ~ ~ 50 48 r ,~ ~ $6] ~ 17 c ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 0959 1J.xcG ° 510.48 cn ~5 - __~.' j 5098 ' 0.12 7R4 ~' 0.02 0.14 I ~ I nape this answers your questions. Dan Ross ~r r « ~ ~. ~ 1l" !`` ~ f ~ E I ~ I ~..._._....~.,..~.._~,........_.._..., ! ~__.~. 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ _.__,.~_.__._.I E M { ~ - 1 1_ ~.. _ ___..._...,._._...._ , -- --.....e.....,...,.._.,,.~ -.,. m ~... " ~ S I N it l `~ I Tt F F: I water r~ieter ~ t- ., ~ i f = PROpbS~D 7D' VACATI(7N S~~rVeyed ~y.{ E~RBER & SDIVS, 1/VC, dba FARBER SURVEYING (541) 664-5599 AO L30X 5286 431 O~1K STREET CENTRl~L I~OlN7; OREGON 97502 SCALD: 1" = 100' L~A~f~E: IaUGUST 22, 2008 J{7B NO. '1529-07 p 60 120 24U ,~ F~~t ~~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~~ & f t r~ ~ ____, _ __ _-- °- ,~.. __ ~.. ° t ~ ~ a ~ ~ f ~° ~ t : ~; .,. H \ `~ ~ Omar ~r ~ ...• s ~ ~~ ~ ~ Sr,..: w-P ,a ~ M ~ ~ t x a ;, ~M n '~ ~ ~ r , ~~ ~. K ! a r` v . ° o ~ - n a ,; ~ ~ , ~~v - ~, _ s ~ a: ~ b~~ ~ ~Pk a a ~ ~. ~ a~ ,:. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r•, ~ ~ ~, ,ts ~;`~, ,;1 : ~. w1 tom' 1 S < ~~ I, ~ (:; k ' x a i~ r ~~ n v~"; I t . Yn ~.. S c,~rv~r~ee~i jn~ .~s+~ s~r~~~3" ~_. ,~, s. ~~ ~ ~.,~,:.. f ~Y~ ~ ab ~ ~n (pp 1 8~ .. w. `y 1 ~ ~ w 1 ~ . 4 ~ h ~' ~ 5 x ~ ~~ ~ r i, ~ i ~( Ltt K~ ~ 4 w~.. j ,~c" c~+ ~d ~ -: F E ~•.~ ,+~~~ ~ '~.. ~tg ., h ~ ~"~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ '.. au ~ i ~~,°,~} ~ ~z -wart,<;~~ ~ P7. '~+~.` ~ ~ ~ o ~ t ~ . 2' ~ _ '' ~ ` ~ ~ ` ' 1 ~ 1 g t.., ~" ~"~ tt ~~^ 9~.'.- V'~,.'^^" »,r.~~«* ~1.._.~ ~~~ °-^e ,~ 1,u.:..4:; r%ti~ ~ ..ay"',~s,,.~~ : „ ~ '~~ a ~ r : < ~ r S v ~ .....,.~. ~ ' ~ ~ .r • ,,, _ T .,s #ti~~ o-scsn s ~T` ~ ~ n ,. ..y -tl~ W, r .. ~ ~ to t F a: £ m "° ~ " ~ w ia•y a ~. .}gyp '+t=~ ~,.ao's ~a { ~t-C. ~~;;~ 7U ~l!vATf~~I f R ~`"~ r.~, ;x ~t ._ 'S+r, ~AII ~~~F Nr'fTN iC' ~`r; ~`~'l~`A~~" ~„ ~ r Id~C~' 3CT q~`, 4r~ C 60 120 240 ~~ _~ _ _ Feet ~. - ~l w ~-_ ~ J ' '~ ! ~. tJ R ~" _~__w ___ ~_____._____. ~~ . _ -34_p; VACATION APPLICATION WRI'I'~~N CONSENT OF OWNER File Number 1, the property owner of Tax Log 2aD Nelda Turman on 3ackson County Assessor's Map 372W 1 1 RA ,hereby consent to the fling of an application for Right-Of Way Vacation on said property, and will alloys, Farber Surveying to represent me before the City of Central Point Approving Authority. _Y Signed: ~`~ Dated: ..~....~ ~7_ d 6~ ~„~ ~~ (,~ August 22, 2008 Central Point City Hall Attn: Planning Commission 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Re: Ash Street Vacation between Freeman Road and South 7~' Street Dear Madam or Sir: I am a property owner that has received notice of the proposed Ash Street Vacation. I am signing this lettex in support of the Ash Street Vacation. Sincerely, Signed: Printed name: (~5.. Address: ~_ Bigham Drive Central Point, 4R 97502 Dated: ~ ~i D ~~ ~~ August 22, 2008 Central Point City Hall Attn: Planning Corxamission 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Re: Ash Street Vacation between Freeman Road and South 7~` Street Dear Madam or Sir: I am a property owner that has received notice of the proposed Ash Street Vacation. I am signing this letter in support of the Ash Street Vacation. Sincerely, Signed: ~ODo ~~~ Printed name: 5-~., Address: ~ Bigham Drive Central Point, OR 97502 Dated: ~ q~ ~- August 22, 2008 Centrai Point City Hall Attn: Planning Commission 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Re: Ash Street Vacation between Freeman Road and South 7`~ Street Dear Madam or Sir: ~ am a property owner that has received notice of the proposed Ash Street Vacation. I am signing this letter in support of the Ash Street Vacation. Sincerely, ;~~ Printed name: ~~r~v.e_.- ~~ .~-~ Address: ~ Chestnut Street Central Point, 4R 97502 Dated: ~ ~~ ~, jl August 22, 200$ Central Point City Hall Attn: Planning Commission 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Re: Ash Street Vacation between Freeman Road and South 7`~ Street Dear Madam or Sir: Z am a property owner that has received notice of the proposed Ash Street Vacation. I am signing this letter in support of the Ash Street Vacation. Sincerely, Signed: ~~ Printed name: ~ ~ c e Address: ~,~] Chestnut Street Central Point, OR 97502 Dated: August 22, 2008 Central Point City Hall Attn: Planning Commission 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 . ~ Re: Ash Street Vacation between Freeman Road and South 7~ Street Dear Madam or Sir: I am a property owner that has received notice of the proposed Ash Street Vacation. I am signing this letter in support of the Ash Street Vacation. Sincerely, Signed: .~---~ Printed name: Address: ~~3C7 Chestnut Street Central Point, OR 97502 Dated: ~ 2j ~d~ ~~ ~~ August 22, Laos Central. Point City Hall Attn: Planning Commission 14Q South Third Street Central Point, 4R 97502 Re: Ash Street Vacation between Freeman Road and South 7'~ Street Dear Madam or Sir: I am a property owner that has received notice of the proposed Ash Street Vacation. I am signing this letter in support of the Ash Street Vacation. Sincerely, t Signed: GU~~ Printed name: ~ '"~ S ~~ 4 ~ ~ ~ Address: ~ ~hestnut Street Central Point, QR 97502 Dated: ~ 2 3 ~~ ° ~ ~,~ f August 22, 2008 Central Point City Hall Attn: Planning Commission 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Re: Ash Street Vacation between Freeman Road and South 7~ Street Dear Madam or Sir: I am a property owner that has received notice of the proposed Ash Street Vacation. I am signing this letter in support of the Ash Street Vacation. Sincerely, r Signed: Printed name: .. ~1 ~ ~~ ~ j/~~~, ~~ Address: ~~ Chestnut Street Central Point, OR 97502 Dated: ~"~3`" ©~ ~, ;: ~,~ ~w,~, June 16, 20Q8 David Jacob ROGUE VALLEY SEINER SERVICES Location: 13$ West Vitas Road, Central Point, OR -Mailing Address: P.O. Bnx 3130, Central Point, OR 7502-(}Q45 Tel. (541) 664-G30t?, Fax (541) Gfi4-7171 www.RVSS.us City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Ash Street Vacation, File #08182 Dear David, There is an 8 inch sewer main which crosses Tax Lot 1004 to serve property to the South. The portion of this sewer main is located in the area of the proposed street vacation, Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that the street vacation include a provision to allow tike continued use of public sewers within the vacated area. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, ar appert, District Engineer K:IDATAIAGENCIESICENTPTIPLANNGIST 2EETVACATION108182_ASH.DOC ~; A~~`m0'E~9~~ ~ ~ 9r ~` ~~~~ s~ June 16, 2008 Mr. David Jacob Planning Dept. City of Central Point 140 So. Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road y White City 4R 97503-io75 (541) 8267100 (voice) (541) 82fi-456fi (fax International'l'y Aac~dited - ZO05-2010 Subject: Ash Street Right o€ Way Vacation File #08182, Fire District #3 Comments Dear Dave, Per our conversation today our only comment is that should the water system be upgraded hydrants should be spaced so that no building is in excess of 600 €eet of a fire hydrant (Oregon Fire Code Section 508.5.1 Exception: 1.). Curbs and sidewalks need to be designed and installed so that fre equipment can navigate turns without need of backing up. Thank you, Hugh Holden Fire Marshal ~_>~ ,=-i 'T'ABLE ROOK BUSII~~SS PAF~K ~TENTATI~IE PLAI`I ,a;r t j ~ ~ t r>; ~ inttini i)~ I )~,;-=•I~~~>rni~ni ! ):<~c t~>r,~ ~1~,~,i~,r<u~a +, iiv i~rl n .~(~tl;~l),1 IT~:11~o Ii'il~ ~da-o X190€9:~ Cot~sideratiotl c-fa ~l~ct?tati~'c I'1an al?piietttivtl }<?r a t~~~cnt}` f::{)) lol inihtstriai sukxiivi>iot? knor~~~n a5 Table Rock 13usincss I'arl~. l he subjt:ct propcrtti is located in an Iti•q- 1, lnd~t~trial ionic?<~ i}istric~t and consists cif appro~im~ticly l ~.(), acres <ttld is idcntilicd can it?c Jacl:sot? C:o~tnt~ ,lsscs~c~r~s n?ap a~ ~~7S :?1;~;' }?13, T<t Lois 8{)(~. il0{) and ~>{)?. 1 h~ propc:~scd project arch is loc~ticd south oI• I }~tnu•ic}: 1:oad and l ~dirrai ~~'~t.~ . <zt?d ~•sest of"1 al~lc 1Zock Road. .-~pplic~nt: 1ah1c~ 1~ock l3usincss Park.. I:I.C'; -1~~~ct?i; (ris t;~?lpit? ~`~ .'~ssociaics. Conniff C•Iuttc. ~•' ommut?ity Planner •` '1 he l 8.{)3 ~:tcrc project site: is south of the tct?tati~~cl~ appri~vcd I cdcral '~~- a~ subdivisii~n. The prop;rt~ is rot?cd for light industrial u~i°. is cttrrcntl~~ undo eloped. and utilities ari; available. 1 he d:ticla:~pnlent a~f each lot w%11 he subject tc} `site Plan rzL~ i~~~'. mm_..,~ _ ~, ,~ ~r, ~,._~_: _ ~~t~ ~ ~,~ , t~e><a~x~~l .I'rc~jacf 13~~e~°i~ti~n The Ap1?l icani propox s a t~~ enty ,: (?U i lot iladustria} subdi~, ision tt~ tie hi;.~ure 1 '~ delcloped in tti~,o pltascs as itlustratcd its l~ipttre, l {Phase I in '~~~ ,, ..-;; ~ ~ v=~: ~rcen, P~?asc 2 in orangej. ti~'ithit~ Phase ] of the projec[. Feiiet'al ~?~?ay will be c)stctldCtl and unproved to City industrial street st,?nd<tt•ds to the southerly lit?pits of T.et I l~~here it will inicrsect ~~, ith '~}avi~~atc~rs ~~%al . Phase ? ti~-ill e~ti tad I~etleral ~~%a~ sout}a b~:cotx~it~,~_ Airpot-i Road <tt?ti ir~.tet~sectin~~ tj ith .I_~~?}~: X:ock Road a> illustt~stted in l ibttre 1 and ot~ the tentati~ c plat. ' ~t'11C ~4tiot7 17.`72.02(1 Pa<~;' 1 c>fd P1'(~pc:1"1~'T101-[h O the SU~}~cCt1~r0~CC=t al"1d 3d(:ntIIIC'd Ott the It'lll<111~~1' 17liln a~ ~'('I~('i'(11 11"lll~ ~311.~'111N.1.4 ~'tll'l*, has k7cen shots"n ou tl1c tclltati~"c p1a1~1 Iin- hurpc~scs ol~illu~,itaiir~_ ~ pct cc~n~lcctivit~.~ ui' l~cckcrak •l~~a~~- ~~n<l is not suI?,lcct lc~ rct ic~~~ at tlliS t1117t'-. y ~O~'~'l ~4~0 _c]"iS..TcICI~SOI7 ~Ot~iltV ~`Ul-~Cl"f?t~. ~li1S 1-CC~ItCStCCi that (1~C' ~1111Ck1~,'7~70[l 11i11~~C 1~C clldat~C'C~ (.~IIC 1t)ri71 isxisting cle~~eiopn~elrf i~"hk1 ~ siruilar nan~c (~lltacllrncnt C; j. ids <1 1-csult. the 1'i,rtl hla~ :'gill nc suhl~iittcad ~a~ith a1~ ttpprov~d t~au~c such ~~~ Central Pc>int Ir1d~~tstrial P~tr. .:"~c~c•~~~: {~}id~sc~ T is designed tc~ }~ro~idc cac:ll I{1t ~~ith access 1•rc>tr1 l~eder~ll ~','a~' and Na~i~,~ct<~rs ~?~%<t{. I~deral ~~a~. under construction is ~1 dcsi~,~rlated cc~llectc>t- street. ~ulcl is currcl~tl~ ~hcillt~ ccrosidet•cd I-or rcclassiiicatic~ll as an industrial ;trees. ;~~; such. the in<lltstri<11 street ilcsisrn cI lssilication t~-ill be used inr 1'cdcral ~','a~ oral tial i~~alc>rs ~1'av <1t this titt~c, ;~s a cclttilitic>n cif approvak for k~cdcr~~l ~,~;'a~,~ Business Pt1ti; subdi~~iio1~.~I Ianirich Read is bc:in~ improti"cd tc~ City of (i'e.ntt~al Poittt collecto~~ street standards {hakf~~-street). 'Chc intetsectic~n c~~hNavit~aiors Wav at~d "I'ablc Rock. Road ~~ il1 be a 1-i~:.hi in%ri~tl~t c:>ut c,1~1~ lccess. ~~ l ral~sportclticln Jt~~i~~1ct ~tttdv i l'1`~} l~~iJl be redrtil-ed ifthc applicant rc~lucsts lck~t turn nlc~vc~mcnts i:~lttach~~~ent (`). Direct lot access fic~ Cable Rock Road is prohibited. 1'ablc Rota< Road ti3~i1k be imllr,_,v=~d tc~ major arterial stecct standards b~ the County at a later d<1te. L'trs~st ~ design redcai~~es acc~llisiliot~. of Tax Lot 9t:71 to connect 1=cdcral 'til a~" ~Lirt~ort hood ~~tiith l chic Rock l~clad. 'I k1e ;~pplicatat is aware th~;t this propcrt,r is nccc5sttr~` for cc>mplc~tiotl i1i' ulc Phase ?design ~1nd has stated that. ~ I ,.~fi_~. e ~.lrchase. c1J~ this property is into ndc:d, hcri~ti"CVCI'. 111e tt[lnsactlan 1~~as nOt c,~mplticd at the tin~ic of this =-~ ~ ~ ~' ~ _ °~ '""~ application. Prio1- to Phase ? Iin~11 plat ~~,~~ ,~ cam, ~.~°r~ z~et"iel~ 1'01• lots in Phase ?. the it~turs;:ctiot~ oh I~ cdcral War i_'~irpc~rt '~ . - - .m:~.__ _. _. -_: Road c~,-ill need to ne constructed. a;~ ~ ,`~t ~ - illtzstratcd anti built to meet. C'it~" t '. .W.. industrial street standards. - , ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~_ ,. s ]C~c;'~ic~ Ri~>i~t-of-v~~~~' a~c~ Try~p~'o~~e-x~e~~ts; Tahlc Rock Rc1ad is curl-el~tly a Jackson C`ountti~ ~'•, Read desi~.~tiated ~1s a majol• arterial st1•eet fCit~~ ~ ~ ~ `." `} ofCea~tral Point 1'ranspc»°tation ~±ystexn flan). ~, ~ .~ This section of ~I~ablc Rock Read currently '~; ~' chan~~es i'ror71 a sixty (6{~j Knot z•igiat-cif=~~"ay to a ~'i~~u:~-c 2 ~~~~ ! sc~ cnty (7Ol knot r1~ht-of-ti~~~ay appro~tti~atel}~' ~, ,. ,~ .~. _, . _ ,; '` ru~d~~~a}~ along 1.,ot 9. :~~s a rn~~lo~- arterial. art _ . additional tight--oi=way dedicatiola of~tti~°e,nty . (?(f 1 sect is requirc<k Ins- Lot ~ and the north poi~tion of Lot 9 ~~ it}1 ix ten (1 p) I•clat dedication necessary far 1~te southern portion oI' Lot 9. 'phis section ok'"I al~lc Rock Rawl is identified iii the Jackson. Colintti rl `~P a Project No. ?3 attck iii the Rc~~iort~tl I~tarlspc>rtation Plt1n as Project Nc~. li? 1. tct:tatiyelti scheduled 9~ot. construction «,ithiil tl~enext fire years. ;1s a pkatlt~ed Gotlnty l~ro,Jcct~ no italproyements arc 1•equircd a~~~ith this apt~licatioiz. Page 2 of 6 Floodplain/Floodway: The floodplain and the floodway of Bear Creek are identified along the west side of the project site encompassing Lots 1, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17. Construction Engineering Consultants (CEC) conducted a preliminary study in preparation for this application. The CEC study finds topographic conflicts between what appears as the actual floodplain/floodway versus that shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map {FIRM), Community Panel No. 4155890402 B. The CEC flaodplain/floodway is illustrated by the yellow highlighted line in figure 2 (Attachment A-1). As a result of the study, the Applicant has filed a Letter of Map Amendment {COMA) with the Federal Emergency Management Agency {FEMA}. The submitted tentative plat map illustrates the current FIRM map identified flood hazard and the location of the proposed amended floodplain/floodway (see Attachment A}. The flood hazard determination is critical to the project as FEMA regulations prohibit development within an identified floodway. To proceed with the current submitted design, the Applicant is aware that a FEMA approved COMA will be a condition of any final plat review for Phase 2. ISSUES: Airport Road Extension: The property located at 3705 Table Rock Road (Tax Lot 901) is not part of this application. This property acquisition is necessary for the completion of Federal Way/Airport Raad and its intersection with Table Rock Road as designed in Phase 2. As such, the Applicant is aware that property acquisition shall be a condition of any final plat review for Phase 2. Flood Hazard: Lot development and the southerly extension of Federal Way warrants some concern relative to the location of the floodplain, and possibly the floodway, both of which may impose design restrictions on development. As a result of the potential impact of the floodplain/floodway on the future land development and Federal Way extension, the Applicant is required to get written authority from FEMA approving any hazard map amendment. This issue has been addressed in Condition numbers 1, 2, 4{f) and 4{g}. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "I" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1) Prior to issuance of any building permits for Lat 1 and prior to final plat approval for Phase 2, the Applicant shall meet or exceed all flood hazard requirements of CPMC Sections 8.24, 17.60.090 and FEMA and as specified in Conditions 4(f} and 4(g) below. 2) Prior to final plat approval for Phase 2, the Applicant shall provide the City with written authorization from FEMA that an approved COMA has been duly processed. Said FEMA approval shall be accompanied by a map prepared by an Oregon certified engineer or surveyor. In the event that said COMA is not approved by FEMA, the proposed Lots 14 and 15 of Phase 2 shall be consolidated with Lot 1 to form one lat. 3) Prior to final plat approval of Phase 2, Federal Way/Airport Road intersection shall be constructed to meet City industrial street standards. Page 3 of 6 4) Conditions as listed by the City of Central Point Public Works Staff Report dated August 1, 200$ {Attachment B}. a) Table Rock Road is a major arterial; as such, the developer shall dedicate an additional right-of way of twenty {20) feet for Lot 8 and the north portion of Lot 9 and dedicate ten (10) feet along the southern portion of Lot 9. b) The developer is eligible for SDC Credits based upon the value of tl~e industrial right-ol=way that is being dedicated and upon the slated improvements. The developer shall provide the City with the cost of the Right-of way by a certified appraiser or use the City's default 2008 number per square feet of $6.75 per square foot. In any case, the SDC credit can only be a maximum of 40% of what is collected based upon the City's System Development Charge Ordinance and Oregon State Law. Forty percent is the city's maximum default allocation for development based upon the City's current Capital Improvement (CIP) plan. c} AlI streets proposed shall be built to City Industrial Street Standards. d) Developer shall `loop' the waterline from the Federal Way to Airport Road and back up to Navigators Way. Looping of the system shall occur with construction of Phase 2 of the proposed development. e) Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 '/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Plans for all public improvements shall include a street tree landscape plan identifying tree type, location, and irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be by the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. f) Lots 1 and 13-17, of the proposed subdivision are located in the Special Flood Hazard Area {SFHA), commonly referred to as the 100-year floodplain. The Final Plat for these lots shall note that Lots 1 and 13 - 17 are within the Bear Creek SFHA and to contact the City of Central Point for development restrictions. Engineer shall illustrate the extent of the 100-year floodplain, including the mapped floodway on the Civil Improvement drawings. All proposed development within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with the flood damage prevention and hazard mitigation provisions established in Section 8.24, as well as the special creek setback requirements established in Section 17.60.090{E) of the Central Point Municipal Code. g} The Bear Creek Floodway impacts the proposed use of three (3) lots as follows: i) Lot I is partially located within the floodway of Bear Creek {see Tentative Plat}. No development is allowed within mapped floodways2, which limits the buildable area of Lot l . The Final PIat for Lot 1 shall note that Lot 1 is within the Bear Creek Floodway and to contact the City of Central Paint for development restrictions. ii} Lots 14 and 15 are predominantly Iocated within the floodway of Bear Creek, and as such z CPMC 8.24 Page 4 of 6 cannot be developed. No development is allowed within mapped floodways~. Prior to 1`inal Plat approval of Lots 14 and 15, the applicant must either: {1) Remove Lots 14 and 15 from the Final Plat by consolidating with Lot 1, or (2) Demonstrate that Lots 14 and 15 are buildable lots by submitting an approved FEMA Letter of Map Change (LONG) to the Public Works Department for review. h) Section 17.60.090{E) {4) of the City Municipal Code requires easements for access as needed by the Public Works Department. This Section is hereby waived because the proposed lots are not adjacent to the Stream Channel and because the adjacent property is part of the Bear Creek Greenway which already has access provisions for the city of Central Point. 5) All grading, excavation and building permits required for the Storm Water Detention Water Quality facility located on Lot 1 shall comply with flood damage prevention and hazard mitigation provisions established in Section 8.24, as well as the special creek setback requirements established in Section 17.60.090(E} of the Central Point Municipal Code. 6) Conditions as listed by Jackson County Roads comments dated August 14, 200$ (Attachment C}. 7) Rogue Valley International-Medford Airport (Attachment D) requests an avigation, noise and hazard easement for the project site as required by Jackson County LUDQ Section 7.2(E). Said easement shall be recorded and submitted with the Phase 1 Final Plat application. 8) Conditions as listed by Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment E) a) Applicant shall construct a new public sewer main in accordance with RVS standards. This main line shall be accepted by RVS prior to final plat approval. b) Applicant must obtain a NPDES 1200-C permit. The permit application shall be submitted to Rogue Valley Sewer Services. c} Applicant must submit a storm water plan to RVS to demonstrate compliance with the storm water quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES permit. 9) Conditions as listed by Fire District 3 (Attachment F), the County Surveyor (Attachment G), and the Building Department (Attachment H}. 10}Tentative approval to create a twenty (20) lot subdivision shall be valid for one year from the date of approval. An application for Phase 1 final subdivision plat map shall be submitted within the one year period. An application for Phase 2 final subdivision plat map shall be submitted in accordance with CPMC 16.12.060{B} and said submittal shall not exceed five years from this date of tentative approval. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A"- Tentative Plan map Attachment "A-1 "- Flood Hazard with Letter of Map Change Highlighted map Attachment "A-2"- Applicant Findings s CPMC 8.24 '' Page 5 of 6 ~ ~ Attachment "B"- Public Works Staff Report Attachment "C"- Jackson County Roads Attachmenfi "D"- Rogue Valley International-Medford Attachment "E"- Rogue Valley Sevaer Service Attachment "F"- Jackson County Fire District No. 3 Attachment "G"- County Surveyor Attachment "H"- Building Department Staff Report Attachment "I"- Findings of Fact Attachment "J"- Resolution ACTION: Consideration of a Tentative Plan to create a twenty (20} lot industrial subdivision (File No. 09003}. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. ,granting approval of the Tentative Plan application to create a twenty {20) lot industrial business park (File No. 09003}. Page 6 of 6 ~ z 0 T - ~ '~ ~ ..4..r i y a 1 ~ i x~ -- m i ~,ta ? F,I i I ,. J .. E~ ''~. I 1 /. ..1 15': 1 ~ i~N ~t - ~ Y 1 ,: ~.7 r i, 1; ._ . Ii/ ~"~.~ ~~ f rr' ~ 1 1,.., I ~~~ i iP ~-' ' 33 ~ x ~ ~ .i ° ~` ~~ F .~, ~_ ~~ ~ta} -I ~. _.~ J I -.-' fir' :: 1#~f A ~.3 D ~ _ ' ' ~ ~YY ~]>6 ] } ~~ ~4 d* 31 I 1^..--....-~+1..~.a.„,.... .:, 1_n....,.x _ .Cm• /;~' 3 3 /~ /'S' ~~ ma. ~1 ~~.~'J ~Q/i~~~ > .y, i- -/~. ~ ~t-:-1 ~~ ~~ Lea i II, I I -- ---- ;1 ~ % I' / " /~ oo a~ , -' ~, / -y S' ~ , J'l 1 - _.- _... 3. ... Vim", /r I ~ d r S >~~ fl rJ a ' S k i t 1 1 i I ~ .~~4' ~ PHASE I' ~ 1 ~ s ~ I E-~ li' I ~' ~ >; I 'S b la ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ i ~v>y s iii a _~ .,.,,_____.1 . (4 `+ I ~ ,,,~ ~ ~ 9O \,- i _ half g ,' .~ ~ Vim.,. Vo ~/ i ~ x ^ 1 .. ..... ~ `~. ' - nr; E r ~'s x ~ ~ ~ ,o ~~ ~ i ~ ~~ fr ~ o H ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ a ' ~I~I ~ ~ v ~ ~~ SiI i ^N '' i =' ~ ~oc I ~ 1 E~.'i I -~ '~^• - '~ I e ~~ ~ I r 'i ~,~s E si ~, ~ ~ xo ~ci it n3 ~A5 ~ I / ~ 1~,~~ g l`I v Ida „! ~S a s~ s -~~ a F.a R V 1 I f l 3 ~ ~ ~ L \ - - 1 ~i li. t ~ 7ASLE' ROCK ROAD ~ - - ~~~va; ~-~ -~ +~~" -~~~--~ { ~ ~ ..m ~ i r r>~=€ .],..~, ,,. ~ ,. ~~' ~ ~ y ,'1 $li 8 E m ', ~Y ~ D m i w ~ V r Q W ~ =~ ~4 `i ~ rzi~O?.9~ 7~7 z ~ L ~ ~ '"'~ y l -~ ~ ~ `I ~zo~A "~ ~,~ " 2y~ ~ ~ {7 "O a ~~ ~ ~ z ~o~ z ~ ~ Z ~~` ~ z -I _ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ M1 a° m O x `z ', - c ~ j z p I oEE''s' ' c.~e. o:w ..._" n ~ .-gT RL'CT 'g z ~= K ~ ~~ ~ ~ l/~~ ~ ~ "`° ____Y_.... _......_.__. c,: e I CoE\'G7 R ~G .1- II ~T~,~ l~^~, ~~ '< 8 - 2~ zz~ ~> = ~~ '~ ~ ~ -~---~--~-- P.O. 6C\ I)24 •IIEPMRD. OA.fGOti' 9>SPF ~ `~ p 0~ ~ ~~~~~ '~~ PH. f5i 11 >%9-5266 ~ PAi ISii1 %'9_3139 ..... .. .. .E, ...___.. ...... ... ;< J_ ~ ~ € ~ a~~ r ,ir s~ __ _ ~ ~, :: ~~ . ___.. ~ ~ -- r `', _ I: ~ ~, ,'/ ~ ~ ~: ;: !, J~- , „ ' ;: it - z ~ i'l 7 F ~ J r ] 1` ~ f~. ~E ] r. ~~/ v ~ ~.. tel: ~/ ~ j FED E4A1 WAY FEOEftAl ~"/hY I lam.: 1 " ~' ~ I r jj - `r , /~ r ` PHASE # ~ f ''. ~~ '. :> t I o ~ ~ ~ .~ 1 ~ ' S ~~ i ~ _ ! o ~ _.. vv ~_~ E ~ ~..~...,...P........~ / i O A, - E i + o m c ~ ~_ - _ - T. ... .--_. .. . I -~~ ?~. '~'i! F:A3 _ m ~'} ~ - .. _ _ . _.i .~ SS _ _.._ _.... ,,, I ~ D. ~~....f.. - ', DA _ ~ 3 ~ f I ". _ O e ~ ~ a ~ a ~ a n JI ~ ~ ~k~3 0 o nn~~ - ~6 ~ Z r t ~~ ~~ 9 ~ r ~ ~ n ~ y~~o oa - ~ ~ '~~ 4 4s ~ z ~~R e x z ~ C ZO~Ot~r- ~ Z m ~ ~ ~~ € ~ o _ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~0~~2 ~ Z s _ ~ °~~' Z ozN~ 7C E M1x~ z~ C o i~ ~ - ~ f-Y ~ 3 n 2 ~ i 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ b E z . O z x c '' ~ z ° °o 5~ ; R Z ~~', f - `~~ b Ip u~/ fG P Oe f ]/:~E ~ST R F: C f '~' ''~ ~ ~.. ~s-n=~_ {~`----a°F°. p~~ -- _. _._.._.._.a.~....W i C~~JR CGS ~ C' - i ~ _` `~~ ] ~ ~~, """"' --- i ~ P.O. FO% !]21 ~16~FOR-. 6REGD\ M.501 ~ ' 6', ~~ E CAC i PH. {}It) »8-5268 ~ FN( (}sij ]>9-]139 1 '' A ld.Jl t~~~~ 6E~~ 93 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISION CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION } FOR A TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL ON 17.40 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF TABLE ROCK ROAD AND AIRPORT ROAD IN THE M-1 ZONING DISTRICT RECITALS Property Owners/ Applicant: FINDING OF FACT` AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Table Rock Business Park LLC PO Box 43 Medford, OR 97501 Agent- Cris Galpin & Associates 744 Cardley Ave., Suite 100 Medford, OR 97504 Property Description- Area- Zoning- INTRODUCTION: 37-2W-12B-tax lots 800, 900 and 902 18.03 M-1 Table Rock Business Park is centrally located among several hundred acres of industrial zoned land in both the City of Central Point and the City of Medford, the last half of the remaining Iand of the already approved Federal Way Business Park. The applicant is making application for a Subdivision Tentative Plan approval. A. Criteria to grant or deny. Chapter 6 of the Comprehensive Plan contains specific criteria pertaining to industrial land within the City of Central Point. The proposed project complies with all criteria. B. The proposed project will have minimal adverse impact if any on surrounding properties. E-~ C. The applicant and owners of the proposed project are well known in the community, experienced with property development and have the financial capability to carry out the proposed plan. They fully intend to begin constntetion as soon as all necessary approvals are gained from the City of Central Point. D. The proposed project incorporates important street connections that will in the future provide improved connectivity to the entire area. The extension of Airport Road will be an important link to Hamrick Road to provide and alternate North- South route. The location on a major arterial and in close proximity to the Medford/ Jackson County airport further justifies the need for the proposed traffic circulation. The circulation plans will not only serve this project but will improve connectivity for the surrounding area and is the recommended circulation plan of Central Point JRH traffic study. E. 1f any jurisdictional wetlands are found to exist they will be preserved in accordance with state and federal regulations. F. The proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. G. The proposed plat will decrease vehicle miles traveled by providing services for people working in the surrounding industrial area. 17.68.050 Preliminary development plan. See attached tentative plat ~~ c Public Works Department c~n~~ CENTRAL POINT Oregon PUBLIC WORKS ST.~FF REPORT Augast 1, 2008 Bob Pierce, Director Matf Samitore, Dev. Services ~~~T ~~ ~~ AGENDA ITEM: 20-lot Industrial Subdivision for 3 7-2 W-Ol C, Tax Lots 500, 900 and 902 Applicant: Table Rook Business Park, LLC Zoning: M-1, Industrial Zoning Traff c: As a result of the recent updated TSP based on land use, no traffic study is warranted for this development; however, at anytime the land use changes additional Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) may be needed. The updated TSP and corresponding subdivision planned for this growth, to include eventual widening of Table Rock Road and improvements to the intersection of Table Rock and Biddle Road. Existin Infrastructure: Streets: Table Rock Road is a designated Major Arterial Street currently under County Jurisdiction. Federal Way, under construction, is a designated collector street, currently being considered for reclassification as an industrial street Water: An existing 12-inch. waterline is currently being constructed in Federal Way to the northern limits of the property. Storm Water: Anew storm drain system and detention will be built for this development. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Paint Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and prof le for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued. 940 South 3"r' Street • Central Point, OR 97502 •549.664.3329 • Fax 541.664.6384 Conditions of Approval: 1. Table Rock Road Dedications: Table Rack Road is a major arterial; as such, the developer shall dedicate an additional right-of--way of twenty (20} feet for Lot 8 and the north portion of Lot 9 and dedicate ten (10} feet along the southern portion of Lat 9. 2. SDC Credits: The developer is eligible for SDC Credits based upon the value of the industrial right-of-way that is being dedicated and upon the slated improvements. The developer shah provide the City with the cast of the Right-of--way by a certif ed appraiser or use the City's default 200$ number per square feet of $b.75 per square foot. In any case, the SDC credit can only be a maximum of 40% of what is collected based upon the City's System Development Charge Ordinance and Oregon State Law. Forty percent is the city's maximum default allocation for development based upon the City's current Capital .improvement (CIP} plan. 3. Industrial Street -All streets proposed shall be built to City Industrial Street Standards. 4. Water Looping -Developer shall `loop' the waterline from the Federal Way to Airport Raad and back up to Navigator's Way. Looping of the system shall occur with construction of Phase 2 of the proposed development. 5. Street Tree Plan: Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 ~/2" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Plans for all public improvements shall include a street tree landscape plan identifying tree type, location, and irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape row will be by the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. b. S ecial Flood Hazard Area -Lots 1 and 13-17, of the proposed subdivision are located in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA}, commonly referred to as the 100-year floodplain. The Final Plat far these lots shall note that Lots 1 and 13 - I7 are within the Bear Creek SFHA and to contact the City of Central Point for development restrictions. Engineer shall illustrate the extent of the 100-year floodplain, including the mapped floodway on the Civil Improvement drawings. All proposed development within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with the flood damage prevention and hazard mitigation provisions established in Section $.24, as well as the special creek setback requirements established in Section 17.60.090(E) of the Central Point Municipal Code. 7. Bear Creek Floadwav -The Bear Creek Flaodway impacts the proposed use of three Tats as follows: a. Lot 1 is partially located within the floodway of Bear Creek (see Tentative Plat}. No 740 South 3'~ Street • Central Poinf, OR 97502 •547.664.3329 • Fax 549.664.6384 development is allowed within mapped flaodwaysl, which limits the buildable area of Lot 1. The Final Plat for Lot 1 shall note that Lot 1 is within the Bear Creek Floodway and to contact the City of Central Point for development restrictions. b. Lots 14 and l5 are predominantly located within the floadway of Bear Creek, and as such cannot be developed. No development is allowed within mapped floodways2. Prior to Final Plat approval of Lots 14 and 15, the applicant must either: i. Remove Lots 14 and 15 from the Final Plat by consolidating with Lot 1, or ii. Demonstrate that Lots 14 and 15 are buildable lots by submitting an approved FEMA Letter of Map Change {LOMC) to the Public Works Department for review. b. Section 17.60.090{E) {4) of the City Mwnicipal Code requires easements for access as needed by the Public Works Department. This Section is hereby waived because the proposed lots are not adjacent to the Stream Channel and because the adjacent property is part of the Bear Creek Greenway which already has access provisions for the city of Central Point. ~ CPMC 8.24 2 CPMC 8.24 140 South 3ro Streef • Cenfral Point, OR 97502 •54 7.664.3321 • Fax 541.664.6384 ~' Reads damn !6ltp, ~E T}r~'fc ~ Dsvsfo~emr B~ytxwer Y4~h~OR F~~~ A K N C~ N~T~" ~~.~ SCJ U Rows August 14, 2008 Attention: Connie Ciune City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Table Rock Business Park Subdivision off Table Rack Road - a county-maintained road. Punning i"iie: 09003; An indusMal zoned subdivision. Dear Connie: Thank you for the opporhmtty to comment on this applicatEon for the tentative plan for Table Rock Business Park Subdivision, a 20-lot subdivision located south of Hamrick Road and west of Table Rock Road. Roads has the following comments: . .`.. ... ...~.. 1 """ ""Th'e'~pplicant~shali~nhmitconstruatlorr~fn~wings-to-Jadcson~Eounty~ Roads-and abtairrcaunty- -- permits i# required. 2. Please note that~Table Rock Road {Coonty Arterial) has a sbcty foot nigh#-o€-way with an Average Dally Traffic count of 14,739 as of July 20f~3 two-hundred yards north of AI ort Road. We recommend no direct parcel access ttt Table Rock Road. Roads concur with Central Point on a rlgh#-ofi way dedication aloeg the Table Rock Road frontage for future road widening. Our preference for any new road would be having one [ine up with Airport Road. This is because Table Rack Road is an arterial and the Jackson County Access anagemsnt Guidelines has set guidelines far access. Nevi store Way was allowed as a right in and right out only with a raised center median in Table Ra~ Road. A TiS wi[i be required if left tum movements are desired. The,app[fcant shall ab#ain a road approach permit from Reads for Navigators Way. The approach shaii have 30' approach radii. 3. Jackson County Roads wouid Ifke to review end comment on the hydraulic re ort including the calcuiafions and drainage plan. Capacity improvements or on site detention, if necessary, shall be Installed at the expense of the a plfcant. Upon completion of the pro act, the developer's engineer shaii certtfy that construction of the drainage system was cons~cied per plan and a copy of the certification shall be sent to Jackson County Reads. 4. Roads recommend the removal of any exisfing driveways an Table Rock Raad. Sin rely, ~. ' P.~ p J s Philp, PE Traffk: & Development Engineer wad .~. 1 8 f~'~~~IVI~~~ ss 79 Connie Ciune From: Marcy Black [BlackMAr~jacksoncounty.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 9:36 AM To: Connie Clune Subject: File # 09003 Table Rock Business Park The airport requests an avigation~ noise & hazard easement be required as part of the permit process. Thanks far the opportunity to continent. ~` ,. 2~` ~/ ~ August 5, 2008 Connie Clune ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point, DR - NEailing Address: P.O. liox 3134, Central Aoin€. OR 7502-04(}5 Tel. {54I) 6(i4-G30(}, Fax (54E) 6G4-7I7f www.RVSS.us City of Central Point Planning Department 1.55 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Table Rock Basirtess Park, File #4903 (Ref: File #06049) Dear Connie, The proposed developnnent will be served by extending the sewer main from the adjacent Federal Way Business Park, which is currently under construction. Final acceptance of the Table Rock Business Park will be contingent upon completion of the Federal Way Business Park. The proposed development must cornply with the water quality requirements of the Phase 2 NFDES permit which are currently being developed. We request that the following conditions be met prior to final plat approval: 1. Applicant txzust construct a new public sewer main in accordance with RVS standards. This main line must be accepted by RVS prior to final plat. 2. Applicant must obtain an NPDES 1200-C permit. The permit application should be submitted to Rogue Valley Sewer Services. 3. Applicant must submit a stormwater plan to RVS to demonstrate compliance with the stormwater quality requirements of the Phase 2 NPDES permit. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding sewer service for this project. Sincerely, Car Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:IDATAIAGENCIESICENTPTIPLANNGISUBDIVISION12009109003-TABLE ROCK BUSINESS FARK.DOC ~' e CIear Day Connie Clune From: Don Hickman (Donh(,mjcfd3.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 2:22 PM Ta: Connie Ciune Subjec#; TABLE ROCK Bt1SiNESS PARK Sl1BDIVfS1ON bonnie, Page ~ of 1 I have reviewed the tentative plan for the Table Rock Business Park Subdivision with the following comments. We will accept the fire hydrant locations as represented on the plan. As this subdivision develops, additional f re hydrant may be required to meet f re flow requirements based on construction type, square footage of the building and the occupancy classif cation. If you have any questions, Please call Don Hickman Deputy Fire Marshal s~s~2oa$ Connie Clune From: Roger Roberts [RobertRR~jacksoncounty.org] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 9:37 AM To: Connie Clune Subject: 09003 Table Rock Rd Bus. Prk Connie, I received the Request for Comments on August 4, 2008, and have briefly reviewed the tentative plan for Table Rock Business Park Subdivision. Y do have a comment concerning the proposed subdivision name. Oregon Revised Statute Chapter 92 says the following: 92.090 Approval of subdivision plat names; requisites for approval of tentative subdivision or partition plan or plat. (1} Subdivision plat names shall be subject to the approval of the county surveyor or, in the case where there is no county surveyor, the county assessor. No tentative subdivision plan or subdivision plat of a subdivision shall be approved which bears a name similar to or pronounced the saute as the name of any other subdivision in the same county, unless the land platted is contiguous to and platted by the same party that platted the subdivision bearing that name or unless the party files and records the consent of the party that platted the contiguous subdivision bearing that name. We have a recorded subdivision by the name of TABLE ROCK INDUSTRIAL PARK, and which is located a little over a mile away at Table Rock Road and Bateman Drive. In a possible emergency situation, there could be confusion with the similar names. Therefore, in the interest of public safety, I request that the developer chose a name that will not create a possible conflict with that of an existing subdivision plat. Most local developers, surveyors and private planning agencies will contact this office in advance to clear proposed names for use. 1f a proposed name is found to be acceptable, it is placed in reserve for that development. The reserved names list currently has over 200 entries. Roger Roberts Jackson County Surveyor 10 So. Oakdale Rm 318a Medford, Or 97501 Tel 541-774-6192 Fax 541-779-6193 RobertRR@jacksoncounty.org ~1~~~ C_ ity of Central Point, Oregon !40 S Third Street, Central point, OR 97502 54 f .664.332 i Fax 541.Sb4. l 61 1 www.ci.central-point.or us f. i;~~o' CENTRAL .-.-------- - -__ - ---- - Building _Department POINT Todd Meador, Building Official nre~~c~r~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: 0$I2S/08 TO: Planning Department Planning f le: FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Table Rock Business Park (File# 09003) APPLICANT: Cris Galpin and Associates Property Description: 37 2W 12B TL 800/900/902 PURPOSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. X40 S Third Sfreet ®Cenfrai Poinf, OR 97502 •549.fifi4.3321 • Fax 54~.664.16~1 Building Dept. Staff Report, Page 2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classif cations of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness, Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. S. Grading/excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private storm drain work must be permitted and inspected by City Building Department (prior to backfill~. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement off 11 and compaction) acceptable to the Building Off cial, shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finaled. Exception: l . The upper 1.5 foot of f ll placed outside of public rights-of way, 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 740 S Thirid Street • Central Poinf, QR 97502 •547.664.3327 ~ Fax 541.664.1fi11 A... ~, ~: Building Department Staff Report, page 3 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. S. Any development {any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. A comprehensive erosion control plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Department prior to start of work. 10. Application for building permits will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code (2007}, The International Fire Code (with the State of Oregon Amendments-2007), NFPA 13, Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code (2007}, Uniform Plumbing Code {with Oregon Blue Pages-amendments}. Plan check may take from 3 to $ weeks, depending on completeness when submitted.....ifreguested, plan check my be initiated simultaneously with Planning Dept. evaluation (Plan Check Fee must be paid prior to start of plan check}. A complete code analysis should be a part of the submitted plans. 11. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. 12. Property lines must be established and pinned by a Licensed Oregon Surveyor prior to any building inspections. I3. No work is to start until Grading and Erosion Control Plans are approved and permit issued. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. If questions, please call Todd Meador..,..664-6325, ext. 228. 3 940 S Third Street • Central Poinf, OR 97502 •549.664.3321 ~ Fax 549.664.9699 ~°" ~? ~~. Attachment I FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No: 09003 INTRODUCTION Consideration of a Tentative Plan application. for a twenty (20) lot industrial subdivision known as Table Rack Business Park to be developed in two phases. The subject property is located in an M-1, Industrial zoning district and consists of approximately 18.03 acres. The subject property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 12B, Tax Lots 800, 900 and 902. The proposed project area is located south of Hamrick Road and Federal Way, and west of Table Rack Road. Applicant: Table Rock Business Park, LLC; Agent: Cris Galpin & Associates. CPMC 16.10.010 _1.6.10.070 Tentative Plans. This section of code provides design standards and principles of acceptability, the information required to be included on a tentative plan map and other supplementary material that may be required for review of the application. Finding: The application and tentative plan map submitted contain the necessary and required information of Sections 16.10.010 through 16.10070 as evidenced by Applicant's exhibit, Tentative Plan map, Attachment A. Finding; Each of the twenty (20) proposed lots is designed with road access via Federal Way, Navigators Way and Airport Road. Lots $ and 9 are parallel Table Rock Road, however, the primary access to these lots is provided by Navigators Way. Direct lot access to Table Rock Road is prohibited. Finding: Federal Way extends north as part of the Federal Way Business Park (File No. 08169} and has been designed to continue south in this tentative plan providing road connectivity. This cooperative design is verif ed by the May 6, 2008 letter from the property owner and tentative plans for both Federal Way and Table Rock Business Parks. Finding: The subdivision is proposed to be developed in two (2) phases. Phase 1 is designed to provide each lot with access from Federal Way and Navigators Way. Federal Way, under construction is a designated collector street, currently being considered for reclassification as an industrial street and as such, the industrial street design classification will be used for Federal Way and Navigators Way at this time. As a condition of approval for Federal Way Business Park subdivision, Hamrick Road is being improved to City of Central Point collector street standards (half- street). The intersection of Navigators Way and Table Rock Road will be aright in/right out only access. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS} will [~; ~° be required if the applicant requests left turn movements (Attachment C}. Direct lot access to Table Rock Road is prohibited, Table Rock Road will be improved to major arterial street standards by the County at a later date. Phase 2 design requires acquisition of Tax Lot 901 to connect Federal Way/Airport Road with Table Rock Road. The Applicant is aware that this property is necessary for completion of the Phase 2 design and has stated that purchase of this property is intended; however, the transaction was not completed at the time of this application. Prior to Phase 2 final plat review far fats in Phase 2, the intersection of Federal Way/Airport Road will need to be constructed, as illustrated and built to meet City industrial street standards Conclusion: The tentative plan meets these requirements. 16.24.030 Blocks--Easements. ~. Utility Lines. Easements for electric lines ar other noncity owned public utilities may be required, and shall be a minimum of ten feet in width located on the exterior portion of a single property. Easements for city utilities (i. e., water, storm drain and sanitary sewer mains) shall be a minimum of f fteen feet in width located on the exterior portion of a single property. Tie-back easements six feet wide by twenty feet long shall be provided for utility poles along lot lines at change of direction points of easements. Finding: A fifteen {1S) foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) is located on each lot adjacent to the right-of--way and parallel to the street. Finding: The final engineered construction drawings require City of Central Point Public Works Department review for compliance with the Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Publie Works prior to the Public Works Permit being issued. Conclusion: The tentative plan meets this requirement. B. Watercourses. Where a subdivision is traversed by a watercourse, drainage way, channel or stream, there may be required a storm water easement or drainage right-of way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse, and such further width as will be adequate for the purpose. Streets, parkways or access roads parallel to major watercourses may be required. Finding: Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel No. 4155890402 B identifed the floodplain and the floodway of Bear Creek along the west side of the project site encompassing proposed Lots 1, 13, 14, 1S, 16 and 17. Finding: The submitted tentative plan map illustrates the current FIRM map identified flood hazard. Page 2 of 5 Finding: Construction Engineering Consultants (CEC) conducted a preliminary study in preparation far this application. The CEC preliminary study finds the floodplain/floodway is different from the FIRM map, and as a result, of the study, the Applicant is filing an application for a Letter of Map Amendment (COMA) with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The location of the proposed amended floodplain/floodway is labeled and shown on the tentative plan map. Finding: Storm water drain lines are provided for and labeled as such on the tentative plan to include a storm drain detention and water quality facility located on Lot 1. Conclusion: The tentative plan meets this requirement. C. Pedestrian Ways. In any block over seven hundred fifty feet in length a pedestrian way may be required. The minimum width of the pedestrian right-of--way must be at least six feet in width which shall be hard surfaced through the block and curb to curb in order to provide easy access to schools, parks, shopping centers, mass transportation stops or other community services. If conditions require blocks longer than twelve hundred feet, two pedestrian ways may be required for combination pedestrian way and utility easement. When essential for public convenience, such ways may be required to connect to cul-de-sacs. Long blocks parallel to arterial streets may be approved without pedestrian ways if desirable in the interests of traffic safety. Finding: The internal street systems of the subdivision wall be constructed to City of Central Point street standards to include sidewalks. Conclusion: The tentative plan meets this requirement. CPMC 16.24.040 Lots-Uses. A. The city may, in its discretion, deny approval for the creation of any lot by any manner if the effect of such creation of a lot would be to facilitate perpetuation of a nonconforming use. Finding: The proposed twenty (2~) lot subdivision is within an M-l Industrial zone district and is proposed to be developed with a variety of light industrial uses permitted and conditionally permitted in the M-1 zone. Finding: The subject site is currently vacant of structures. Conclusion: The tentative plan meets this requirement. B. No lot shall be created unless it is in compliance with all applicable provisions of this code. Page 3 of 5 Finding; The Table Rock Park Subdivision is within an M-1 Industrial zoning district and is proposed to be developed with a variety of light industrial uses permitted and conditionally permitted in the M-1 zone. Finding: The floodplain and the floodway of Bear Creek are identified along the west side of the project. The flood hazard determination is critical to the project as FEMA regulations prohibit development within an identified floodway. To proceed with the current submitted design the LOMA and approved FEMA decision will be a condition of any final plat review for Phase 2. If said LOMA is not approved, the proposed Lots 14 and 15 shall be consolidated with a conforming lot to form one lot. Finding: The property located at 3'145 Table Rack Road (Tax Lot 901 } is not part of this application. This property acquisition is necessary for the completion of Federal Way/Airport Road and its intersection with Table Rock Road as designed in Phase 2. As such, the Applicant is aware that property acquisition shall be a condition of any fnal plat review for Phase 2. Conclusion: The phase development of the tentative plan meets this requirement. CPMC 16.24A50 Lots- Sitze and determination. Lot sizes shall conform with the zoning ordinance and shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision and for the type of development and use contemplated. B. Where property is zoned and planned for business or industrial use, other widths and areas may be required, at the discretion of the city. Depth and width ofproperties reserved or laid out far commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for the off-street service and parking facilities required by the type of use and development contemplated. Finding: There are no minimum site area requirements in the M-1 Industrial zone except sufficient space for the required parking is .necessary. Each lot within the project is of a sufficient size that can accommodate a use and parking as described in Section 17.48.064 of the CPMC. Conclusion: The tentative plan meets this requirement. CPMC 17.48.010 Purpose. The purpose of the M-.l district is to provide areas suitable for the location of light industrial uses involved in service, manufacturing or assembly activities and having high standards of operation of such character as to permit their location and operation in close proximity to nonindustrial areas of the community. CPMC 17.48.050 Site area requirements. There are no minimum site area requirements in the M-I district, except as necessary to provide for required parking, loading and yard spaces. ~~ ~ ~Ge Page 4 of 5 Finding: As noted in the above finding, lot dimensions are not an established standard in the M-1 zone. Each lot within the project is of a s~zff dent size to accommodate a use and parking as required by this section. Conclusion: The tentative plan zxzeets this requirement. :~ 3 e Page ~ of ~ ~~~~1.~6 I~~~~ ss ~ 9~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE PLAN FOR A TWENTY (20) LOT INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS TABLE ROCK BUSINESS PARK FILE N0.49043 Applicant: Table Rock Business Park, LLC (37S 2W 12B, Tax Lots 800, 900 and 902) WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted an application for a Tentative Plan for a twenty (20} lot industrial subdivision an a 18.03 acre property identified on Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 12B, Tax Lots $00, 900 and 902 in the City of Central Paint, Oregon; anal WHEREAS, the property is in an M-1, Industrial zoning district and the application is consistent with the lot area and dimension standards set forth in Title 17, Section 17.48.470, and with tentative subdivision plan map criteria of Title 16, Section 16.10; and WHEREAS, on September 2, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Paint Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for Tentative Plan approval; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application does comply with the applicable standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A"} dated September 2, 2008; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission for the City of Central Point, Oregon, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the f ndings and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated September 2, 2008 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of September, 2008. Planning Commission Chair ~~ Planning Commission Resolution No. (9/2/2008) ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of September, 200$ Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. (91212008} NEURAL APPL,ICAT~ON ,, ~ ~ Ir~~il li~i~~3~a~iu~~}%. ill( I', ~ '~i~ !1111'y' ~)i'4'i'~G! i~l - '.-11 i i~.. P~~:,~,.~iniCfl~ ~.<<~.~__~,,.,.,~ .~~x~.l~)(~~ I~~~~'~ ~~ ~''fliie ~i43. ~6~)9619 ~'onsidertition <~l~~r Resol~rtion ahpro~~n~_ a n7ural at?~l I~~as1 Pine Strut. i~~;'t~li~a~tflt; I~o~~~~t~ci i~~fln~~9 Lion Rrrrt. ,'~iCi', IL:)FF ~l in~~ i~9ana~cr ~~~~'~~~~t~~)~liv~)~; C)rr ~'~u~~~rst i. 2U~)8 tic: C:.it~~ a•~ceived its ~rsi rntrr~rl ~ti1~l~l.icafiorr. Ire accvrd~rrrcc ~ti~ith ti°te C`lt~~'~ rreti~r~t~ triloptetl rr~ur~tl statt~l<<rds the application ~~as lor~tiarcictl i~r the ~Zrts Co~rru:il on :1rr`~rrst ~~, 2(ll)~ and scheduled the applicatiotl i-or cor~sicleratirrt~ ley the pl~rnnin`~ (`crrlar~~i~siot~ ~.t them ~epteri~het ~?, 21)t~8 meeting. At this time the al~l~lieati~rrt has rri?t been reti•ieti~,;d ~) the l~rts C;s~uni:il. Ia aecorciar~ce 1~ ith the procedural standards i~rr revie~~ rr~' applc~rti~?r7s, it is nec Lssarv that the ;~~r•cs Couzlcil for~~,~ar•c~ ~~ r•ccornrrrendation try the l'lannin~ Curnrnissit~n prior to action by the. 1'lannirl~ Cortlr7jission. since the ,arts C'iruncil hits ru>t ~'e~~ieti~~et`l the application fire I'lannint~ C;or7~rnissic-n eaur~ot tale action. 1;1'~I)I~'C~~o ~h}tcre arc do lindir~,~s ~t this time. Prior t« action by the Plannit~~ Gotllinissiozl, the arts C-ouncil must fQr~~~~ard a t•econ~m~;ndatiora. i» le C;or~tinue considerati~rt uniil the ()ctoher 7, 28()13 planning ~omnZission meetin~~. Continue consitleratic~xl until thU ~ct~ber 7, 20C)~ Ptannin~ C;crmn~iss%t~n tlleetit~t~. Pa<~c: 1 of 1 ~T"F~AI~iSPC~RTATiQH SYS'T'~1Vi PL,AH r 1~+ =~lar7r~ir~t~, (~r~~;~,~iii~~~~t ... _.... ....... i ._._....., . -,.__ .._._. _. .,-._,,...,,,® ..,.. .. _... __ ! ' ~~""` „, lolil ~ Ilfla lrJ~lr '~1L._P, ~'~S '~` C,c~nn~ai~nity I~c~vc~lo~n,irnt 1) ~~t~I;}'~'l~f~ 7"~,~+;~~`~~~: ~'il~ i'~~o, O~~t~O(()3) C:onsidcration of a Resolution Rec-~~lllr~~cr~din~~ l~pk~rcl~~aP oi~an ~lnlcncitllcnt to t11c (~'ctaT•~Tl 1'~int C'onlprchcnsiv~ Plan i_Jpd~-Ttinp the •hransportation ~ysteT11 ]'Ian, ~~p~711~~anto City of C`cntra} Point I)oxl Burt, Planning ~7ana~eT• ~, ~ ~; I~ CB I~(~ C;1~ 1- 1 he City o'CeTltral Point rcco~ni~es the in'tpT>rtance in having anc} rllaintairlin~~ a cixn•dinated ne:«~orh oftrallspo?•tation facilities that ~ervcs current <Tnd l~Tture State. T~egional and locale tl•ansportation needs. 1n response to t}lis ohjccti~~e, the City 11<TS prepared ibis "} ransportation ~vstcm Plan (I ~P j to assure That not only; arc the transport<Ition Tlecds omits citizens nlct in a tinkly and cf~ficicnt rlTarlncr. but that in doing so. the tl-ansportatioll system ~~-ill continue to be inlprovecl in a manner that supports projected l;roti~~•11~ ~Tnd enhances t~hc quality o}' life o1'tht~se ]i~ ing and ~~isitin~~ the C'itl• {,i' Ccntr~Tl P~~it1t, T~tis "i `~[' has l~ecTl prepared ~~ithin the contest cif an trrl~an area consisting of?,~8() acres, the state', Transportatiotl I'3~Tnrlin~~ IZulc (~l PR j. tltc Re~iona} Transpc~rtativrT Plan (R_~f•P), ~tnd other }t~c~il tT•~tnsportati_oll plans. "1'hc ~1'SP ~~~ill serve as the TraTlspot-ta-boll l;lenlent of the CitS-'~ £,.'~_~nlpre.}7cnsivc PPan rnectina the 1-ccl~Tirell~TCnts ~.~1'Si.~ltc-~~~iclc Planning Goal 12 -1~ransf?ortation. 1'lie 1«llo~vin`~ represents the principles that hal e guided the preparation.. and future irnplei7l~:nlation aln` this 1'~P: 1. To strike a b<1}ance between acccssibilit~ arld connccti~ it) r>f`pec>ple alld 17c,cicls, ~ti}rile kecpirly~ the syytel2l safe, attractrVe and l~Cl~-tllalntJlnlC}, '1 c~ advocate land use patterns. s~TCli as transit-cTrientec} deve}opmcTlt and in-~]1 strategics, that support the continued ~::nhanccnTCrTt clCrnuiti-mc~da} tr~tnsporiation. 3. To in::rcase street sy5te~r11 safety ~r.nd fiTUCtion throu~~h the atloptiiln anti irrTplcTrTCnfatiort of~access rnarTa~~enlent standards 1~~r tlzu purpose ol'nlaintainin~~==: and preserving the. cxistin~~ in~:a~trrTCnt l~ transportation f`acilitics. F':r~~~~ 1 ofd 4. To design streets in a manner that maximizes the utility of public right-of--way; is appropriate to their functional tale; and provides for multiple travel modes, while minimizing their impact on the character and livability of surrounding neighborhoods, business districts and the environment. ISSUES At the September 2° Planning Commission meeting, staff will identify and discuss specil"te issues in the current draft of the TSP. It is fully expected that amendments will be made to the draft TSP which was distributed to Planning Commissioners on August 5, 2008 and is available for public review on the City of Central Point website located at www.ci.central-paint.ar.us. The Resalution is worded to include all agreed upon modif cations to the TSP. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NA EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS Attachment "A" -Resolution ACTION Consideration of a Resolution No. forwarding a favorable recommendation to approve tl~.e Transportation System Plan. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. forwarding a favorable recommendation to approve the Transportation System Platt Dated September 2, 2008. Page2of2 ATTACHMENT "A" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATING THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN WHEREAS, on August 5, 200$ the City of Central Paint Planning Commission, in accordance Wlth SECtlon 17.OS.S00 of the City of Central Point Municipal Code, initiated a Type 1V Legislative change to the City's Comprehensive Plan to update the City's Transportation System Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment has been prepared in compliance with OAR 660- ] 2, the Oregon state adopted rules governing preparation and coordination of transportation system plans which are collectively referred to as the Transportation Planning Rule and with Qregon Statewide Planning Goal #12 -Transportation; and WHEREAS, on September 2, 2008, the Central Poirlt Planning Commission conducted aduly- noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the Transportation System Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by the Resolution No. does hereby accept, and forward to the City Council, the Transportation System Plan as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" for final consideration and adoption. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 2008 Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2008. Planning Commission Chair {~ ~~: ; Planning Commission Resolution No. (0910212008) N~1~NiBERSHIP YYAR>~HC]US1~SI DISCOUI`IT cLEUBS ~~~I!1211i'; i .?I !tilt i r it ~ ~~ ~ ~~iiil ilui?t1, r)r :~zc l~il i-'il;~ ~ ~-7 ~~~~ 9' f~A'.R~1~A@ Po~ Corasidcr~itiora o}-a Resolution ic? initi~atc ara an~iendn~cnt t<a'~cctiot~ I'7,~'I~.~I~10 to allo« 1Jiscottttf f lu~~~s as rt conditicinaal Lase ~~itlain the ~'1-1 lndu~tr'ial t~istrict. _~p}alicant: City u1 Central Yoint. Don Burt, ~~IC'P, EDl'P Plar7nia~rr it~'f~zaa~,er- t~/~C ~~~{~C,~[1I~t)a ,~'1 ri/clucst titias rcceivccl to corasidcr a]}o~~ira~~ I~isccaunt Clubs (raaembersl~ila ~~irrehcause rctai.l cl~rb) ~.~ a conditional use «it}ain the ~1-1 ~onin~ district:.. I)iscouni ('lobs are large li_,raaaai stand arlcrne a•etail ~tcrres su(;h as ~os1CO, ;~arlr's ~ lilb, etc. ~t tlacrr Jtanc aal~l ,Taald mcetin~s. the C'rtricns i"~ll~'ls(?)'t Cor~aanrttec c:or~srderecl a request tit per~ui. mcra~rbc r:>hil~, «archouse clubs era tlae J~1-l zc~rain~~ distr'icl. arld forwarded a fay oraLilc recoa~ar~~er~daalioa; subject to lir~~itin~ Discount Clubs as a conditional use. only. ~~f their %lucust ~. ~t)08 nlcctin`~. the I'Izatltlitasz Cc.,azaraaissi~rn contiiclcr-cd ti rc>~>lutican tea iaaitiatc ~rrl aalacndtnent to Section 17.=~H.t)4O allcati~~~in~ Disciaunt C~lu~~s. and ciir'ected stal'1•ti, a~escarcla the is;;a.ae f~rt'thi~r and present additional inlorrnation at a study scsion schedule~.l for r~u;dust 19. 2(It)~. r1t the ~'~>r~,ust ]9. ?Ot.l~ steady ~c5sioaa, thy: planning C'iamr~~ission received ~dditioraal ir~(~_,rmation (see rlttaehrncaat •~~\°'.) ~+_nd cliscusscd Discount C'habs as a conditianaa~l use in the M-l gone. It li as ruacierloocl that at the Septenlber• 2, ?OOS Planning C~on~rnission rnectin ,r ~~~c~lutiart to initiate sr~ arncndnlc.nt to~ Section l 7.~1;.0~10 would lae sc;hedulcd fc~'i' corasic}cratio>1. 1~'I~'I~l ~'(~`~: l~'orr~~al liru.Iin~s a-ill be prepared penc~lin initiation oi~thc ccaclc ~.rncr~clmcrat. Section 17.1C}.`'0() rc~~aalatcs the processing of text arncndmcnts to the: city code. "1 he proposed cl~an~c tvotilcl lac prerccs>cd Las to ~1 ~ p 1.~,'. I~e`,!islativc ,fiction (Section 17.~)~.~OO j. l~indin~~s «ill be prepared peradin;a initititicrrt o'thc prc,posed code. iarlacradrncnt ley the l~'1ann~uz~~ Commission. It is irnportar~t tta taotc that apprc»al c~l'l~c resolution as prevented in ~ttacllntent "R" onlti initiates pruceeciin,~s for consideration i,1 I~isec,unt (.'lobs. F3ti iaaitiatin<,~ coa~sideration ol'th: proposed amendment liar I'lanniaa~~ C`otTiiT~issicrra is not coznr~aittecl to <appros~ing tl~~c p>r'i:~posal. I~iraa! reconaaa~endaation «-ill iai/ based cn1 public tes(.imcmy and 1oraaaal ti~;~a'iiieal fit~dinps. T'a~c 1 cif 3 Attachment "A" addresses questions raised by the Planning Commission and the Citizens Advisory Committee. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" -Memo dated August 19, 2008 Attachment "B" --Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of a Resolution io initiate an amendment to Section 17.48.040 to allow Discount Clubs as a conditional use within the M-1 Industrial District. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. initiating an amendment to Section 17.48.040 to allow Discount Clubs as a conditional use within the M-1 Industrial District. ~: .~. Page 2 of 3 ~~` I ,.f ( ~~ u~,.. ~ "T k ^^^ z ~ 4 ~ - _.. ~ J ~ rf1 I ~ ., e d Y ~, '> ~ ~ 'i ~., ~ x~~ ... _. ~ _... ~ ~~ ~ UI: ~ ~ ~.~ .., o ' n~ ~~H r ~ I i , ~ l ~ _ _ „_... ..__,,~ s ~a , ti~ ~~ - ~ ,,. ~ ~ ~ '- )' I ~„ , . ~~ ~1 14 y ~i ~I _ s . 4- ~ - ~ ; ~ , - '~ ~~ i Ill ~'~ ,~ ~~ ~.:~~'~ r _. , ~ ~, 8 4 Y \ ~ i I ~~ 1 ~ I t ,'R "~ ~~ ~ _~ ~ ~ .,~ iE ji _ - I ~.~ 1 Y. is Jj 6.N eLil ~ D ~, ~~ Y ~ ' r ~ j ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~f ~ r ~, I ~~ ~ ~ ~; f ~ y~~ - ~ C ~ i ~ ~' ~I ' ~ .. _ '" l Q ~ s r. ,-~-'- ~ ~ l A ~ • ia' ~ ~ ,_ ._S~ ~ . ~ ~ c ~,. . .m ~ ~ ~) ~F T~fT.7 ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~~ -~ ,~ r ,~... , ; . {F lti 1I7 _ 7 ~ I 4 ` ~ IM I * i ~ k+~ ~ ~~ f ~ ~'~' ~ ~ ~; N. $U t rFr+~ F y i H~ _ ~ ~ ~°t ~ .~I~ r i ~ I ~ ~ J} .. '1I ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ i1 ,~_ ~ ~ I 3 ~ r r : ' z ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ', ~~ f I ~ i 7 ~ ?': I 1 ~, ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~~.- ~ II J:,. I it L C c..~, t '.~ l } ~ ~.t ~ i ~~~~- 'T~ yy~ 1 3 ~, ~:', I~.. : ! d F + ~. .~ lei' F ] '~f { fJ ' ' ~e ~ _ r . ~ '~' ¢l- - - . ,.: ! .J .. .SM,.,J ~.... . ~. ._..i' .._ ,... rw yo, l.~ .b n .. .. ...._ ..... K F .. h K Q.~ ` ~,~~ fTtl ..... r.. '.. . ] •o~r~ UGB h.S l ....,... ~~ 1 ~?,li T' H ~i..~ ~I-~ ~~~rex~tot~~c~ ~~~p ~_,Il".~ ~ ~i ' ~('T1~t~E1) ~°~t3113~ ~~1't' OI I i~~U `x~. I~ rri Si. (r~nLra!" f'r~i ~~ 9151)2 To: Tom. Tltunphrcr,~, C"orllmunity T~cvclohTllent T)il'cctol' ~`rom~ Dorn Burt, Plant~lin~ Iti~an~Tt~er `itlbjc(:t~ l)isccrulltClubs late: <<~tT`~u~t l9, t~08 ~t.._ i:~nua;;viiiy I:?r~,~~°Int~~~i~~n[ 1)irc~r [,:~r/ i,~siS1~u>i. ~._ity /lcli>iinis~ra,r_;r ~t 1'cgtTCst 1~as recei~ eel to (:onsider a]loti~ in`~ nlcallbcrship ~~archotlsc t~ctail clut~s (i~isc;(>ttnt Clubs) as a condilion~al usi: ~~ thin the 1v1- l aoll%Il,~~ distric. l~7iscount clubs are ~uencrally in cxccs of 1C)0.()OCI sq. ft of `,?loss ilo(>r area, ,tnd 1'equire ~t sits: area o}'appro~in;~i~~i~. 1{) acr(:s.~ l~h(~ f©1J(~ti~,~in~~ d:iirritit>n c1f~I)iscoutlt Cluhs: ~'1~'t~rP{r ,~srtc~y°[~~~r~i 1`~rr~td~•f~~rrrl C7assi~tc•r~Pio>=r Sy~s~P~~~~r - "T?isci>uni t'1t.tbs are lar~~e f~~rtllat st~tn<l alone retail slores such as C:(?sico. `~~tm's C'Itlb, e,±c. that require menlbelsllip for lntrchasin~, prig i.le~~es. (7nly nlcrizbrrs ar(r allo~~ ed to shop the sii]res» " ~~~ki~~~-rlird -;:,~~ ~tittri;hi~use (Vlub is a retail stole. usu~ill~ sellill awide l~triel; ofmcT'cllatldise. iil r~hich custotners ~a}~ annual lncl»belsllip fees ill order to shop, "1'ilc clubs ar'c able to I:ccp prices low dttc t(~ the no-frills f'olrzlat of the. stores. Ill addition. custon~lcrs aI'e required to huff lar~,~e. r~~holesale quantities ol'the siore's products. vti~llich Tllakc these. clubs attracli~~e to bath bargain hunters and shall business o~~~ncrs." ~f1.4'f1Pd4p(' UJ`~ ~~Yltil.S~iJDi'PflPlOfl Li1~li1BE'i'S', ?'i'lJ`) l~L'i1L~i'fl~lO,iP - ~`J~1 ChSCC)UI1t Store C31' ~ti'al'C;hoLlSe u'llel"e tiho}~pC'ls ~la~ a r11l;Tllbel'slllp 1Ce 111 Ordcl- L(, take aclvatlta`.~e of'chscinTnted l~rlces otl a ~~lde ~al'let~ of itellls such as food, clothing. tires alld appliances; rllatl~r items are, sold in lart.~e quantities of bulk." T'ol~ ease ofdiscussioll T have. I"ormaiirrd this tnenlo ill. tet'tn5 ofqucstiolis and ansv,crs. ~l llis alloti~s tar~ctin`~ c?f the c(_>nce1~T1~ azld accomTll(~clatin~t additional qucsions, (lts~~tir-~1 ~c~. 1: L)oes the City contain provisio~as that allow for Llisc~unt dubs in its zoning ordinaTlce:' Page 1 of S Answer No. 1: Yes. Although not memianed specifically Discount Clubs would be classified as large retail establishments, which when equal to, or less than 80,000 sq. ft. are allowed as a permitted use in the C_4 and C-5 district, and when in excess of $0,000 sq. ft. are allowed as conditional use in the C-5 district. Discount Clubs are prohibited in all other commercial zoning districts. Question No.2: What are the typical size and acreage requirements for a Discount Club? Answer N©. 2: The typical Discount Club's gross floor area is in excess of 120,000 sq. ft, and requires a minimum of 10 acres. The average Discount Club would only be allowed in the C-S district as a conditional use. Question No. 3: Is there sufficient buildable Iand within the C-S district to accommodate a Discount CIub? Answer No. 3: No. Based on current zoning and buildable lands the City does not have any G S lands adequate in area to accommodate such a use. The largest available C-5 parcel is less than 5 acres. If combined with abutting properties the acreage would not exceed ~' acres {see Map 1 }. Question No. 4: Have other cities allowed Discount Clubs in industrial zones? Answer No. 4: Yes, with qualification. Within Oregon there are a number of cities/counties that Dave allowed Discount Clubs within industrial zones, i.e. Clackamas County {I-2}, Portland (IG-2}, and Eugene (I-1}are some examples. Initially, Discount Clubs were allowed within industrial districts with the general understanding that they were considered a wholesale business. Since initially being allowed within industrial districts many cities have since refined the defnition of retail and wholesale activities to clearly state the difference between retail and wholesale operations. The following definition is representative of the general redefinition of Discount Clubs as wholesale operations: "A retail use would include any activity where merchandise is sold or rented to a person who is the end user and the merchandise is not intended for further sale or rent. All other forms of selling or renting merchandise would be considered wholesale." As a result of the above definition, or similar definitions, the allowance of Discount Clubs within industrial districts has been subject to further regulation varying from classification as a conditional use, additional site development restrictions, and outright prohibition. Question No. 5: How does the traffic generation of a Discount Club compare to other permitted uses in the M-1 district? Answer No. 5: The primary impact of a membership warehouse club in any location would be traffic. Table 1 illustrates the traffic generation of typical uses permitted in the M-1 zone, including membership warehouse clubs (Discount Club}. The data is derived from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and compares the average weekday and weekend ADT for each of the uses. ~;~ ~ `~ Page2ofS The average weekday and weekend ADT is based on the average gross floor area of each use as identified in the 1TE Manual. Because the uses are of different sizes (GFA) the ADT is also presented in the form of the average ADT per sq. ft. of GFA (see last column}. Although not permitted within the M-1 district Free-Standing Discou~~t Superstores have been included for comparison purposes. Table 1 ITE Trip Generation per 1,000 Square Feet Selected uses ADT/1,000 5f Average Average Average use weeKaay saturaay sunaay 1 Truck Terminal (03D)~ 81.90 17.28 10,78 2 General Light Industrial (110) 6.97 1.32 0.68 3 ]ndustrial Park (130) 6.96 2.49 0.73 4 Manufacturing {140) 3.82 1.49 D.62 5 Warehousing (150J 4.96 1.22 0.79 6 Car/Truck Sales/Repair {841) 33.34 21.03 1{3.48 7 Home Improvement Superstore (862J 29.80 45.67 - 8 Building Materials/Lumber {812) 45.16 51.60 24.50 9 Dlscour3t Ciub (851J 41.80 :53.75 33.fi7 1 10 Free-Standing Discount Superstore (813j 55.02 71.19 54,9011 ADT/Average Use ADT per Weekday Saturday Sunday Average Hui Ku i riu E aq. rt. 819 173 108 4.25 1,415 26$ 138 6.97 2,610 934 274 6.96 1,333 520 216 3.82 1,999 492 31$ 4.96 567 358 178 3334: 3,844 5,891 - 29.8D 406 464 221 45.16 -4,682 6,020< 3,771 41.8U _ _5,938_ 7,546 5,819 56.02 Using an industrial park as a benchmark for comparison purposes a Discount Club will generate approximately 1.$ times as much traffic on a weekday. On weekends the difference is substantial. When compared to a Home Improvement Superstore, which is allowed as a conditional use (large retail establishment), the difference is considerably less. Question No. 6: Is a Discount Club consistent with the intent of the M-1 district? Answer No. 6: The purpose of the M-1 District reads as follows: "The purpose of the M-1 District is to provide areas suitable far the location of light industrial uses involved in service, manufacturing ar assembly activities and having high standards of operation of such character as to permit their location and operation in close proximity to non-industrial areas of the community." The purpose statement of the M-1 district is rather clear about its intent as a zone for industrial purposes. However, when the listing of permitted uses is considered the industrial intent tends to evaporate with such retail uses as automobile/truck sales, boat sales, and retail lumber and building materials. Lacking a definition of retail vs. wholesale it could be argued that a Discount Club would also be allowed under "storage and wholesale of prepared or packaged goods". As a conditional use it could be argued that the Planning Commission could consider Discount Clubs as "commercial uses that are compatible with and closely related in their nature of business to permitted uses in the M-1 district (Section 17.48.040(A)." Question No. 7: What would the purpose of the code amendment to allow Discount Clubs as a conditional use serve? ~ g ~~ Page 3 of 5 ~'~;l~a~,~'€~-°'~i0a '7; As notecj iIT (7tzcstit~Il ~c~. l) tlT~:ec tlr~: sc)1Tic ~tnTi,i~~uitit;~ i13 tiTC I~1-l ~ii~tl~ici tiT~~t ct)uld he l.lset~ to ar~tuc fol' l7zscoul~T Clllbs 3~i al1<n~,~cc! ilT tlu ~'1. 1 ~iistl'ict. 1 ht~ currclTt Cj1tit,~l~S1()11. <1T1C~ ;'>tlssll)le t;t)t~t' ~1I11tI1CIJTli'tTt, l~'OU~ti l:i~lI'li~' 1`+'iTt~li1C1'~)1S~'t)11111 ~_~ill~)`~ ~ll'l: i)+::1'iTll(li;t,~ o~ltri~ht. ~~l~o)Til)it~c~, ns a11c;~ti~'~~i ~~y. a c~~nditiozTal u~;c. ,' ;. ~,~ ,, ~, .. `~-.. - .. lit; ,. c~, i _ ~, a ~' , ~~~.~~ C _. ~,~ ~- f Con~~t'ehe»si~'e Land Ilse Plan ----~_ 2{x08-2030 ~~~~ ~ p~J .~T~°A~HII~ENT " 3 " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S INTENT TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 17.48 - M-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, ALLOWING DISCOUNT CLUBS AS A CONDITIONAL USE WHEREAS, in accordance with the Central Point Municipal Code, Section 17.10 the City has established procedures for amendments to the City of Central Point Municipal Code and that amendments may be initiated by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point deems that the public necessity and convenience and general welfare of the public may benefit from such an amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, that it is the intention of Planning Commission to initiate an amendment to Section 17.48 allowing Discount Clubs as a conditional use within the M-1 Industrial district. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of September, 2008. Flanning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of , 2008. Planning Commission Chair ~"~ fa/'~ 7 Planning Commission Resolution No. (09/02/2008)